title: Complete FirebaseDynamicLink not tappable when shared on WhatsApp
body: <p>I am generating a FirebaseDynamicLink using below code:</p>
  
  <pre><code>DynamicLink baseDynamicLink = FirebaseDynamicLinks.getInstance().createDynamicLink()
                  .setLink(BASE_URI)
                  .setDynamicLinkDomain(DYNAMIC_LINK_DOMAIN)
                  .setAndroidParameters(new DynamicLink.AndroidParameters.Builder(BuildConfig.APPLICATION_ID).setMinimumVersion(MIN_VERSION).build())
                  .buildDynamicLink();
          baseDynamicLinkUri = baseDynamicLink.getUri();
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>I am using below code to share it to other apps such as WhatsApp, gmail, etc:</p>
  
  <pre><code>public void shareDeepLinkWithExtraText(String extraText) {
          Intent intent = new Intent(Intent.ACTION_SEND);
          intent.setType("text/plain");
          intent.putExtra(Intent.EXTRA_SUBJECT, "Firebase Deep Link");
  
          intent.putExtra(Intent.EXTRA_TEXT,extraText);
  
          startActivity(intent);
      }
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>The generated link looks like this:
  <em>Check this out at my app - <a href="https://tvh54.app.goo.gl?amv=10&amp;apn=mydomain.myapp&amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mydomain.co.in%2F" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://tvh54.app.goo.gl?amv=10&amp;apn=mydomain.myapp&amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mydomain.co.in%2F</a>.</em></p>
  
  <p>Now the problem is - when shared on gmail, the complete link is tappable, however when shared on WhatsApp the link is tappable in parts. So <a href="https://tvh54.app.goo.gl" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://tvh54.app.goo.gl</a> is tappable, 2Fwww.mydomain.co.in is tappable.</p>
  
  <p><strong>How can I make complete link tappable on WhatsApp?</strong> </p>
  
  <p>I can generate short link but problem is when there is no any Internet connection then short link cannot be obtained hence as a fallback mechanism I am allowing user to share the complete link.</p>
  
  <p><strong>In case if there is no any solution for the first query then is there any alternative solution to implement intended fallback mechanism?</strong></p>