title: Mercurial vs Subversion. Whose performance is better?
body: <p>There are a lot of articles about SVN vs. Hg in general.
  I would like to concentrate <strong>only</strong> on performance.</p>
  
  <p>Real-live experiences preferred.</p>
  
  <p>Here is my set-up:</p>
  
  <p>(future setup) Windows with IIS fro Hg</p>
  
  <p>(current setup) SVN 1.3.2 on top of apache under windows</p>
  
  <p>I would like to have <strong>statistics</strong> for most commons operations (commits, stats, local/remote pulls, pushes, etc...). I am not really sure what are the most common operations for Hg.</p>
  
  <p>Performance is NOT the only thing that matters to us but it is highly import and may be the crucial decision point in switching to Hg. </p>
  
  <p>However, I would like to see some statistics. How log did it take to clone repo of 5 gb? or  something like that.</p>