title: Android: Jumbo Mode vs Multidex
body: <p>I'm not totally sure what the difference is between setting dex option "jumbomode" to true vs adding multidex support.</p>
  
  <p>Setting jumbo mode to true or multidex to true seems to fix the problem below</p>
  
  <pre><code>AGPBI: {"kind":"SIMPLE","text":"UNEXPECTED TOP-LEVEL EXCEPTION:","position":{},"original":"UNEXPECTED TOP-LEVEL EXCEPTION:"}
  AGPBI: {"kind":"SIMPLE","text":"com.android.dex.DexIndexOverflowException: Cannot merge new index 65772 into a non-jumbo instruction!","position":{},"original":"com.android.dex.DexIndexOverflowException: Cannot merge new index 65772 into a non-jumbo instruction!"}
  AGPBI: {"kind":"SIMPLE","text":"\tat com.android.dx.merge.InstructionTransformer.jumboCheck(InstructionTransformer.java:109)","position":{},"original":"\tat com.android.dx.merge.InstructionTransformer.jumboCheck(InstructionTransformer.java:109)"}
  AGPBI: {"kind":"SIMPLE","text":"\tat com.android.dx.merge.InstructionTransformer.access$800(InstructionTransformer.java:26)","position":{},"original":"\tat com.android.dx.merge.InstructionTransformer.access$800(InstructionTransformer.java:26)"}
  AGPBI: {"kind":"SIMPLE","text":"\tat com.android.dx.merge.InstructionTransformer$StringVisitor.visit(InstructionTransformer.java:72)","position":{},"original":"\tat com.android.dx.merge.InstructionTransformer$StringVisitor.visit(InstructionTransformer.java:72)"}
  AGPBI: {"kind":"SIMPLE","text":"\tat com.android.dx.io.CodeReader.callVisit(CodeReader.java:114)","position":{},"original":"\tat com.android.dx.io.CodeReader.callVisit(CodeReader.java:114)"}
  AGPBI: {"kind":"SIMPLE","text":"\tat com.android.dx.io.CodeReader.visitAll(CodeReader.java:89)","position":{},"original":"\tat com.android.dx.io.CodeReader.visitAll(CodeReader.java:89)"}
  AGPBI: {"kind":"SIMPLE","text":"\tat com.android.dx.merge.InstructionTransformer.transform(InstructionTransformer.java:49)","position":{},"original":"\tat com.android.dx.merge.InstructionTransformer.transform(InstructionTransformer.java:49)"}
  ...
  </code></pre>