title: Terminology: What's the difference between a class and a component?
body: <p>Within the OO paradigm, we choose to use classes because they help us to break the system down, and provide nice side benefits such as encapsulation, separation of responsibilities, inheritance, modularity, etc.</p>
  
  <p>If we look at a software system at the component level, can we simply treat components in the same conceptual way, i.e. a component is simply a "Big Class"? Or is there more to it than that?</p>
  
  <p>What extra considerations must be given when designing components?</p>
  
  <p><strong>EDIT:</strong></p>
  
  <p>I know that a class and a component are different things. I also understand that a component may contain many many classes, each of which have their own roles and responsibilities.</p>
  
  <p>I'll see if I can explain myself better.</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Classes allow us to solve bigger problems because they allow us to think and design more abstractly.</li>
  <li>There are rules &amp; techniques to determine how to break down and assign data and functionality to classes.</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>This seems like a very similar situation to that of component design, just at a higher level of abstraction. Do the techniques used to determine what classes are needed scale up to components, and/or are there other things that affect a high-level system design that don't apply at the class abstraction level?</p>