title: TDD vs. Unit testing
body: <p>My company is fairly new to unit testing our code.  I've been reading about TDD and unit testing for some time and am convinced of their value.  I've attempted to convince our team that TDD is worth the effort of learning and changing our mindsets on how we program but it is a struggle.  Which brings me to my question(s).</p>
  
  <p>There are many in the TDD community who are very religious about writing the test and then the code (and I'm with them), but for a team that is struggling with TDD does a compromise still bring added benefits?  </p>
  
  <p>I can probably succeed in getting the team to write unit tests once the code is written (perhaps as a requirement for checking in code) and my assumption is that there is still value in writing those unit tests.  </p>
  
  <p>What's the best way to bring a struggling team into TDD?  And failing that is it still worth writing unit tests even if it is after the code is written?</p>
  
  <p><strong>EDIT</strong></p>
  
  <p>What I've taken away from this is that it is important for us to start unit testing, somewhere in the coding process.  For those in the team who pickup the concept, start to move more towards TDD and testing first.  Thanks for everyone's input.</p>
  
  <p><strong>FOLLOW UP</strong></p>
  
  <p>We recently started a new small project and a small portion of the team used TDD, the rest wrote unit tests after the code.  After we wrapped up the coding portion of the project, those writing unit tests after the code were surprised to see the TDD coders already done and with more solid code.  It was a good way to win over the skeptics.  We still have a lot of growing pains ahead, but the battle of wills appears to be over.  Thanks for everyone who offered advice!</p>