title: Redundant intercept-url pattern in this Spring Security example?
body: <p>Are the third- and fourth intercept-url patterns below, for ROLE_USER, redundant?  It seems to me that "/<em>" would also capture any request URL that matches "/account/</em>.do".</p>
  
  <pre><code>&lt;security:filter-security-metadata-source&gt;
  &lt;security:intercept-url pattern="/login.do" access="IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY"/&gt;
  &lt;security:intercept-url pattern="/home.do" access="IS_AUTHENTICATED_ANONYMOUSLY"/&gt;
  &lt;security:intercept-url pattern="/account/*.do" access="ROLE_USER"/&gt;
  &lt;security:intercept-url pattern="/*" access="ROLE_USER"/&gt;
  </code></pre>
  
  <p></p>