title: Converting an FFT to a spectogram
body: <p>I have an audio file and I am iterating through the file and taking 512 samples at each step and then passing them through an FFT.</p>
  
  <p>I have the data out as a block 514 floats long (Using IPP's ippsFFTFwd_RToCCS_32f_I) with real and imaginary components interleaved.</p>
  
  <p>My problem is what do I do with these complex numbers once i have them?  At the moment I'm doing for each value</p>
  
  <pre><code>const float realValue   = buffer[(y * 2) + 0];
  const float imagValue   = buffer[(y * 2) + 1];
  const float value       = sqrt( (realValue * realValue) + (imagValue * imagValue) );
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>This gives something slightly usable but I'd rather some way of getting the values out in the range 0 to 1.  The problem with he above is that the peaks end up coming back as around 9 or more.  This means things get viciously saturated and then there are other parts of the spectrogram that barely shows up despite the fact that they appear to be quite strong when I run the audio through audition's spectrogram.  I fully admit I'm not 100% sure what the data returned by the FFT is (Other than that it represents the frequency values of the 512 sample long block I'm passing in).  Especially my understanding is lacking on what exactly the compex number represents.  </p>
  
  <p>Any advice and help would be much appreciated!</p>
  
  <p>Edit:  Just to clarify.  My big problem is that the FFT values returned are meaningless without some idea of what the scale is.  Can someone point me towards working out that scale?</p>
  
  <p>Edit2: I get really nice looking results by doing the following:</p>
  
  <pre><code>size_t count2   = 0;
  size_t max2     = kFFTSize + 2;
  while( count2 &lt; max2 )
  {
      const float realValue   = buffer[(count2) + 0];
      const float imagValue   = buffer[(count2) + 1];
      const float value   = (log10f( sqrtf( (realValue * realValue) + (imagValue * imagValue) ) * rcpVerticalZoom ) + 1.0f) * 0.5f;
      buffer[count2 &gt;&gt; 1] = value;
      count2 += 2;
  }
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>To my eye this even looks better than most other spectrogram implementations I have looked at.</p>
  
  <p>Is there anything MAJORLY wrong with what I'm doing?</p>