title: Private Static Readonly Field Capitalization
body: <p>Pascal or camel case?</p>
  
  <p>I name private fields and private static fields using camel case. I name consts (as suggested by MS naming conventions) with pascal case (regardless of private vs. public)....</p>
  
  <p>So what about private static readonly? Logic says camel case...but a private static readonly is functionally like a const...right?</p>