title: Modernizr vs W3Schools recomendation for Video fallback
body: <p>We were looking for a solid fallback solution for video. We want to create an app in HTML5 for clients that will access the app on mobile devices, but we also know a significant amount of our Government clients will be using older desktop browsers and are not able to upgrade them.</p>
  
  <p>I've been looking at <strong>Modernizr</strong> and <strong>Video for Everybody</strong> solutions, and then I came across the W3Schools recommendation that simply has this:</p>
  
  <pre><code>&lt;video width="320" height="240" controls&gt;
    &lt;source src="movie.mp4" type="video/mp4"&gt;
    &lt;source src="movie.ogg" type="video/ogg"&gt;
    &lt;source src="movie.webm" type="video/webm"&gt;
      &lt;object data="movie.mp4" width="320" height="240"&gt;
        &lt;embed src="movie.swf" width="320" height="240"&gt;
      &lt;/object&gt; 
    &lt;/video&gt;
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Is there any advantage to using Modernizr or Video for Everybody over the simple W3Schools recommendation in regards to video fallback?</p>