The efficacy of ARI rate in the intervention and in the control after the intervention (n1=n2=82) Location ARI rate at T0 (n,%) ARI rate aT6 (n,%) ARI rate at T12 (n,%) Difference p Intervention 35 * 47.2 25 * * 30.5 8 * * * 9.8 Reduced ARI rate at (T0 - 6) (%) Reduced ARI rate at (T6 - 12) (%) Reduced ARI rate at (T0 - 12) (%) (0 - 6) =0.105 (6 - 12) =0.0009 (0 - 12) =0.0002 16, 71 20, 72 37, 43 Location ARI rate at T0 (n,%) ARI rate at T6 (n,%) ARI rate at T12 (n,%) p Control 29 * 35.4 24 * * 29.3 17 * * * 20.7 (0 - 6) =0.403 (6 - 12) =0.860 (0 - 12) =0.086 Reduced ARI rate at (T0 - 6) (%) Reduced ARI rate at (T6 - 12) (%) Reduced ARI rate at (T0 - 12) (%) 6.11 8.62 14.73 p * 0.337 * * 0.864 * * * 0.0206 Difference 6.11 12.12 22.73 Chi square was used to compare 2 percentages, there was the difference when p-value less than 0.05.