Mr X was a 50-year-old male who was first seen by the authors on 14 November 2012. He had been diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and HIV with severe PN in May 2011, 5.5 months previously. He was commenced on HAART - D4T, 3TC and EFV on 05 July 2011. He was admitted to Mahatma Ghandi Memorial Hospital on 12 November 2012 for extreme weakness and sensitivity of both lower limbs. The patient reported that he had not been walking for over a year and was dependent on a wheelchair for mobility as well as caregivers for transfers. He was referred to physiotherapy by the attending doctor to assist with mobilising the patient out of bed and pain management. He was receiving medication as listed in Table 1.
He had undergone lumbar spine X-rays to exclude TB spine and his vitamin B levels were within the normal range.
Mr X was married and unemployed and received a social grant. He felt very depressed and demotivated because of his limitations and the severe pain.
He lived in a five-room house, with an outside toilet which he was unable to access because of his disability. He had electricity but no running water in his home.
Mr X arrived at the Physiotherapy Department in a wheelchair. He was wearing his slippers with doubled up socks as he found it too painful to touch the normal lining of the slippers. He was unable to transfer independently from the chair to the examination plinth and required the assistance of two helpers.
He reported severe pain in the lower limbs and that he fatigued easily. He required assistance with grooming but was independent with regard to other self-care activities. He was unable to sleep because of the pain and was unable to cover his legs with a sheet or blanket for warmth because of the hypersensitivity of his feet. His desired outcome was that he would be pain free so that he could walk again and regain his independence, specifically in terms of getting to the toilet without assistance and attending church services.
He had intact biceps and triceps reflexes in the upper limb. It was not possible to test the knee and ankle jerks as a result of the presence of severe pain. He exhibited severe hypersensitivity and allodynia within the L4-S1 dermatomes. He was unable to tolerate any form of tactile stimulation, light touch, pin-prick or temperature testing and found even the touch of cotton wool unbearable. He also reported a sudden shooting pain on unexpected touch or movement. He rated his pain as 10/10 on the pain visual analogue scale (VAS).
He was generally weak (Grade 3-4 muscle strength on the Oxford Scale of muscle strength [Porter ]) which was likely a result of disuse of his arms and lower limbs. He had full range of movement in the upper limbs and at the hip and knee. His feet were discoloured and he had dry, scaling skin on his feet, evidence that he had not taken weight through his feet for a while. He had hammer toes which indicated paralysis of the intrinsic muscles of the foot. He was unable to do any active dorsi-flexion and could only plantar flex up to 10  as a result of pain and a degree of swelling around his ankles. The muscle strength of his ankle muscles was Grade 2 on the Oxford Scale, which by definition meant that he was unable to move his ankles through full range against gravity.
He had been receiving physiotherapy treatment, which consisted of light tactile stimulation (using cotton wool), for the previous two days in an attempt to desensitise the hyperalgesic areas. He had also received treatment to strengthen his upper limbs and to teach him how to manage his wheelchair.
A Vibromat clinical vibrator was utilised for intervention. This consists of a vibrating pad of approximately 10 cm x 12 cm, driven by a small motor. It is standard equipment in most physiotherapy departments as it is generally used to assist in dislodging chest secretions by vibrating over the chest wall.
We treated Mr X supported in supine. We covered the pad with a sterile glove and we requested Mr X to touch the Vibromat, which was set at a low frequency, in order to get used to the sensation. We started vibrating proximal and lateral to the hyperaesthetic area by placing the Vibromat next to his calf and asked him to move his calf against the pad. He was thus in control of the amount of stimulation he received. He found it painful and was hesitant to push against the pad at first. However, within a very short space of time he was able to push quite hard and was then willing to move his leg so that the pad approached his ankle and finally his foot. In the beginning he could tolerate only light touch but within approximately 60 seconds he was able to apply quite firm pressure against the pad with his ankle and ultimately the sole of his foot. The treatment lasted for approximately 5 minutes and was then repeated on the other leg.
He immediately reported a decrease in pain and he was also able to move his ankles more freely and with minimal pain. We then assisted him into standing, and for the first time in 6 or more months, he was able to walk with minimal support. He walked the length of the ward and his response was 'Thank God, thank God!'
The response was of such magnitude and so immediate we were concerned that there might be a severe exacerbation in pain and we counselled him in this regard and warned him against doing too much.
The patient reported no increase in pain; on the contrary, it was much improved to 7/10 on the VAS, but had increased since the cessation of treatment the previous day. His ward mates reported that he had been walking with the assistance of other patients. The swelling in his feet had subsided completely. He then applied considerably more pressure, paying attention to the area at the ball of his left foot, which was more painful than his right. He reported that the pain had decreased to 5/10 on the VAS. He reported that he had had pins and needles prior to treatment but this subsided completely after the vibration. Post-treatment he walked with more ease, at a faster pace and with minimal assistance and was able to walk to the bathroom on the ward.
Improvement continued and vibration treatment was given as before. He reported a 4-5/10 pain intensity on the VAS. He was discharged from hospital with medication (see Table 2) and was given mobility and strengthening exercises to continue at home.
Mr X arrived late for his appointment with the authors and was given regular physiotherapy without vibration, which included upper limb strengthening exercises, cycling for 10 minutes and stair climbing. He coped well and was issued with elbow crutches to aid his balance.
Mr X walked into the Physiotherapy Department with his crutches as he no longer felt the need to use his wheelchair and opted to rest if he was tired. On examination the active range of movement in his ankles had improved 10  in all directions (dorsi- and plantar-flexion and inversion and eversion) from 7 weeks before. The condition of his skin had also improved. The patient was able to climb the stairs with no walking aid. Therapy was continued as before, including the vibration. He was issued with a hand-held commercial massager for use at home. He left the Physiotherapy Department with his crutches under his left arm and smiled, saying: 'I might just need them if I get too tired'.
Mr X continues to receive vibration therapy, once a month, on an outpatient basis. He reports that he has maintained his level of mobility and independence. His quality of life in general has improved tremendously and he attributes this positive change directly to the physiotherapy intervention that he has received.