A 32-year-old male was admitted to clinic with abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea. The patient had been well until 5 years earlier when he began to experience recurrent diarrhea and abdominal pain. He had been seen at many centers for these complaints but no specific disease had been diagnosed. The abdominal pain had colicky character that aggravated with meals and was accompanied by nausea and vomiting. Ten days before admission, the abdominal pain had become more severe, radiating to his back and accompanied by severe nausea and vomiting, unlike previous periumbilical and epigastric pain. No drug abuse or alcohol consumption were noted.
Abdominal examination showed mild to moderate epigastric tenderness without guarding and rebound. Rectal examination was normal. Laboratory values included a white blood cell count of 10 200/mm3, hematocrit of 36.3%, hemoglobin of 11.9 g/dL, erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 38 mm/h, C-reactive protein of 29.8 mg/dL (0-8 mg/dL, normal limit), and serum amylase of 390 U/L (25-125 U/L normal limit). Ultrasonography and computed tomography of the abdomen showed edematous pancreatitis. Histology of biopsies obtained from the stomach, terminal ileum and colon revealed patchy acute inflammation, abscess formation, lymphoid aggregates, granulomas with multinuclear giant cells surrounded by a lymphocytic rim in the lamina propria. Neither caseification necrosis nor foreign material was noted in the granulomas.
Gastric and iliocolonic CD accompanied with acute edematous pancreatitis was diagnosed on the basis of clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and histopatologic findings. After admission to clinic, the patient was treated as a case of acute pancreatitis. Subsequent radiologic and laboratory examination showed resolution of the pancreatitis in 10 days. Fifteen days after admission, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography was performed and no pathology was detected in the pancreas and biliary tree. After resolution of pancreatitis, and after Entomoeba histolytica infection and tuberculosis were ruled out, high dose (1 mg/kg/d) methylprednisolone therapy combined with mesalamine was started because of persistent diarrhea. All clinical and laboratory parameters were normal after 1 month of therapy. Mesalamine was continued at the same dose. The patient had no complaints in the following 6 months and gained 8 kg.
An increase in reported cases of pancreatitis in patients with CD is highly suggestive of their association. Acute pancreatitis complicating CD may be idiopathic, related to biliary lithiasis, biliary tract involvement with CD, duodenal CD, sclerosing cholangitis associated with inflammatory bowel disease or drugs used in the treatment of these patients, such as azathioprine, mesalamine, 6-mercaptopurine, corticosteroids and lipid emulsions. In many cases, no etiologic factors were found except for CD itself, indicating pancreatitis as an extraintestinal complication of CD.
In our case, all etiologic factors, such as biliary tract disease, alcohol consumption, drug intake, metabolic causes and trauma, which may involved in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis, were ruled out. The patient was diagnosed with CD on the basis of clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and histopathologic findings at the follow up. Exclusion of biliary tract and duodenal involvement of CD and the other etiologic factors of acute pancreatitis suggested that acute pancreatitis developed in this case as an extraintestinal manifestation of CD. In the literature, it is emphasized that pancreatitis without Crohn's involvement of the duodenum, drugs, or other known etiological factors, suggests its role as an extraintestinal manifestation of CD. In conclusion, acute pancreatitis may complicate CD either secondary to other well known etiologies or as an extraintestinal manifestation. The treatment modality depends on the etiology. Therefore, it is very important to clarify the causative factor in these patients.