Give me a tl:dr on the response to the War on Terror. Use the article below:

The notion of a "war on terror" was contentious, with critics charging that it has been used to reduce civil liberties and infringe upon human rights,[49] such as controversial actions by the U.S. including surveillance, torture, and extraordinary rendition, and drone strikes that resulted in the deaths of alleged terrorists but also civilians.[50][51][52] Many of the U.S.' actions were supported by other countries, including the 54 countries that were involved with CIA black sites,[53] or those that assisted with drone strikes.[54]

Criticism of the war on terror has focused on its morality, efficiency, and cost. According to a 2021 study conducted by the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, the several post-9/11 wars participated in by the United States in its war against terror have caused the displacement, conservatively calculated, of 38 million people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Philippines and Pakistan; 11.3 million remain displaced.[55] The study estimated these wars caused the deaths of 897,000 to 929,000 people, including over 364,000 civilians, and cost $8 trillion.[56][57] Critics accuse participating governments of using the "war on terror" to repress minorities or sideline domestic opponents,[58][59] of mainstreaming Islamophobia,[60] and have criticized negative impacts to health and the environment resulting from it.[61][62][63] Critics assert that the term "war" is not appropriate in this context (much like the term "war on drugs") since terror is not an identifiable enemy and it is unlikely that international terrorism can be brought to an end by military means.[64] 
system
Give me a tl:dr on the response to the War on Terror. Use the article below:

The notion of a "war on terror" was contentious, with critics charging that it has been used to reduce civil liberties and infringe upon human rights,[49] such as controversial actions by the U.S. including surveillance, torture, and extraordinary rendition, and drone strikes that resulted in the deaths of alleged terrorists but also civilians.[50][51][52] Many of the U.S.' actions were supported by other countries, including the 54 countries that were involved with CIA black sites,[53] or those that assisted with drone strikes.[54]

Criticism of the war on terror has focused on its morality, efficiency, and cost. According to a 2021 study conducted by the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, the several post-9/11 wars participated in by the United States in its war against terror have caused the displacement, conservatively calculated, of 38 million people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Philippines and Pakistan; 11.3 million remain displaced.[55] The study estimated these wars caused the deaths of 897,000 to 929,000 people, including over 364,000 civilians, and cost $8 trillion.[56][57] Critics accuse participating governments of using the "war on terror" to repress minorities or sideline domestic opponents,[58][59] of mainstreaming Islamophobia,[60] and have criticized negative impacts to health and the environment resulting from it.[61][62][63] Critics assert that the term "war" is not appropriate in this context (much like the term "war on drugs") since terror is not an identifiable enemy and it is unlikely that international terrorism can be brought to an end by military means.[64] 
user
While many countries, including those that assisted with drone strikes or were involved in drone strikes, supported US action, some critics have alleged that the notion has been used to reduce civil liberties and infringe upon human rights. Criticism has mostly been focused on the morality, efficiency and cost of the War on Terror, with critics claiming a high civilian death toll and costs estimated to be over $8 trillion.
assistant
<|system|>
</s>
<|user|>
Give me a tl:dr on the response to the War on Terror. Use the article below:

The notion of a "war on terror" was contentious, with critics charging that it has been used to reduce civil liberties and infringe upon human rights,[49] such as controversial actions by the U.S. including surveillance, torture, and extraordinary rendition, and drone strikes that resulted in the deaths of alleged terrorists but also civilians.[50][51][52] Many of the U.S.' actions were supported by other countries, including the 54 countries that were involved with CIA black sites,[53] or those that assisted with drone strikes.[54]

Criticism of the war on terror has focused on its morality, efficiency, and cost. According to a 2021 study conducted by the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs, the several post-9/11 wars participated in by the United States in its war against terror have caused the displacement, conservatively calculated, of 38 million people in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Philippines and Pakistan; 11.3 million remain displaced.[55] The study estimated these wars caused the deaths of 897,000 to 929,000 people, including over 364,000 civilians, and cost $8 trillion.[56][57] Critics accuse participating governments of using the "war on terror" to repress minorities or sideline domestic opponents,[58][59] of mainstreaming Islamophobia,[60] and have criticized negative impacts to health and the environment resulting from it.[61][62][63] Critics assert that the term "war" is not appropriate in this context (much like the term "war on drugs") since terror is not an identifiable enemy and it is unlikely that international terrorism can be brought to an end by military means.[64] </s>
<|assistant|>
While many countries, including those that assisted with drone strikes or were involved in drone strikes, supported US action, some critics have alleged that the notion has been used to reduce civil liberties and infringe upon human rights. Criticism has mostly been focused on the morality, efficiency and cost of the War on Terror, with critics claiming a high civilian death toll and costs estimated to be over $8 trillion.</s>
