Rewrite this as if you're a teenage girl talking to her friends. Make it super pedestrian/colloquial.

Prior to the company I’m currently at, I was in the IT department at the previous place. My experience with our ERP and other in-house apps made me the next most knowledgeable when my former boss left the company after being there 10 years. I was there just over a year before moving on to a different company, in a different field. However, my previous IT experience made that line of “other duties as required” in my job description start being more and more broad in terms of helping with anything from basic help desk stuff such as swapping monitors and keyboards out, to sql database modifications, AD related tasks for users, etc.

Most recently, management has saw how a good portion of my current responsibilities hinge on being able to do a lot of the IT related things I’m technically not responsible for, but have been managing, so they want to replace me in my current role and move me into being more responsible for all things IT related. We currently do contract a third party IT consultant firm to manage network infrastructure, security and M365 related things, but management wants to phase them out and bring everything in-house.

How big of a mistake is it for me to have expressed interest in going along with this?
system
Rewrite this as if you're a teenage girl talking to her friends. Make it super pedestrian/colloquial.

Prior to the company I’m currently at, I was in the IT department at the previous place. My experience with our ERP and other in-house apps made me the next most knowledgeable when my former boss left the company after being there 10 years. I was there just over a year before moving on to a different company, in a different field. However, my previous IT experience made that line of “other duties as required” in my job description start being more and more broad in terms of helping with anything from basic help desk stuff such as swapping monitors and keyboards out, to sql database modifications, AD related tasks for users, etc.

Most recently, management has saw how a good portion of my current responsibilities hinge on being able to do a lot of the IT related things I’m technically not responsible for, but have been managing, so they want to replace me in my current role and move me into being more responsible for all things IT related. We currently do contract a third party IT consultant firm to manage network infrastructure, security and M365 related things, but management wants to phase them out and bring everything in-house.

How big of a mistake is it for me to have expressed interest in going along with this?
user
So like, at my old job right? I did computer stuff, and I knew almost as much as my boss did. And he was there for like, 10 years and I was there for about a year. You know? So at this new job, they're discovering that I can do all this, so like, they started making me do a bunch of extra work. Oh my god, I know, right! They make me swap out screens and keyboards and stuff, play around with the database, and a bunch of other things. 

Well now, I guess my bosses found out that this is most of my job but not really my job. So they basically decided to replace me at my actual job, and move me into a new job doing all this computer stuff they've been giving me to do. I mean, they have this whole other group that they hire to do all this stuff too, but like, I guess they don't want to use them anymore? And use just me instead? I mean, I don't know, is it dumb for me to go along with all of this?


assistant
<|system|>
</s>
<|user|>
Rewrite this as if you're a teenage girl talking to her friends. Make it super pedestrian/colloquial.

Prior to the company I’m currently at, I was in the IT department at the previous place. My experience with our ERP and other in-house apps made me the next most knowledgeable when my former boss left the company after being there 10 years. I was there just over a year before moving on to a different company, in a different field. However, my previous IT experience made that line of “other duties as required” in my job description start being more and more broad in terms of helping with anything from basic help desk stuff such as swapping monitors and keyboards out, to sql database modifications, AD related tasks for users, etc.

Most recently, management has saw how a good portion of my current responsibilities hinge on being able to do a lot of the IT related things I’m technically not responsible for, but have been managing, so they want to replace me in my current role and move me into being more responsible for all things IT related. We currently do contract a third party IT consultant firm to manage network infrastructure, security and M365 related things, but management wants to phase them out and bring everything in-house.

How big of a mistake is it for me to have expressed interest in going along with this?</s>
<|assistant|>
So like, at my old job right? I did computer stuff, and I knew almost as much as my boss did. And he was there for like, 10 years and I was there for about a year. You know? So at this new job, they're discovering that I can do all this, so like, they started making me do a bunch of extra work. Oh my god, I know, right! They make me swap out screens and keyboards and stuff, play around with the database, and a bunch of other things. 

Well now, I guess my bosses found out that this is most of my job but not really my job. So they basically decided to replace me at my actual job, and move me into a new job doing all this computer stuff they've been giving me to do. I mean, they have this whole other group that they hire to do all this stuff too, but like, I guess they don't want to use them anymore? And use just me instead? I mean, I don't know, is it dumb for me to go along with all of this?

</s>
