<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--  Copyright (C) 2006 The Android Open Source Project

     Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
     you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
     You may obtain a copy of the License at

          http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

     Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
     distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
     WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
     See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
     limitations under the License.
 -->

<resources xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
    xmlns:xliff="urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:1.2">
    <string name="app_label" msgid="5452708708398908131">"കലണ്ടർ"</string>
    <string name="what_label" msgid="1933578391985810049">"ഇവന്റ് പേര്"</string>
    <string name="where_label" msgid="3472482206065595118">"എവിടെ"</string>
    <string name="when_label" msgid="894636567327261599">"എപ്പോൾ"</string>
    <string name="timezone_label" msgid="3988530993300431650">"സമയ മേഖല"</string>
    <string name="attendees_label" msgid="2971281641565729725">"അതിഥികൾ"</string>
    <string name="today" msgid="8577375020252453006">"ഇന്ന്"</string>
    <string name="tomorrow" msgid="614434811813859237">"നാളെ"</string>
    <string name="today_at_time_fmt" msgid="1981279213130049736">"ഇന്ന് <xliff:g id="TIME_INTERVAL">%s</xliff:g> മണിയ്‌ക്ക്"</string>
    <string name="tomorrow_at_time_fmt" msgid="1330779112841767432">"നാളെ <xliff:g id="TIME_INTERVAL">%s</xliff:g> മണിയ്‌ക്ക്"</string>
    <string name="date_time_fmt" msgid="1642972650061946484">"<xliff:g id="DATE">%1$s</xliff:g>, <xliff:g id="TIME_INTERVAL">%2$s</xliff:g>"</string>
    <string name="repeats_label" msgid="7414023871434593196">"ആവർത്തിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="no_title_label" msgid="302177118061368042">"(ശീർഷകമൊന്നുമില്ല)"</string>
    <plurals name="Nminutes" formatted="false" msgid="7310648773807033278">
      <item quantity="other"><xliff:g id="COUNT">%d</xliff:g> മിനിറ്റ്</item>
      <item quantity="one">1 മിനിറ്റ്</item>
    </plurals>
    <!-- no translation found for Nmins (2710431271593652640) -->
    <plurals name="Nhours" formatted="false" msgid="8998738602639204540">
      <item quantity="other"><xliff:g id="COUNT">%d</xliff:g> മണിക്കൂർ</item>
      <item quantity="one">1 മണിക്കൂർ</item>
    </plurals>
    <plurals name="Ndays" formatted="false" msgid="2502834794639322464">
      <item quantity="other"><xliff:g id="COUNT">%d</xliff:g> ദിവസം</item>
      <item quantity="one">1 ദിവസം</item>
    </plurals>
    <!-- no translation found for weekN (6682545863072873513) -->
    <string name="calendar_refresh" msgid="6172731193680500025">"പുതുക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="show_day_view" msgid="5782512782605466016">"ദിവസം കാണിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="agenda_view" msgid="5566084759423843245">"അജൻഡ"</string>
    <string name="day_view" msgid="4467754504843584437">"ദിവസം"</string>
    <string name="week_view" msgid="6775043022159508060">"ആഴ്‌ച"</string>
    <string name="month_view" msgid="7287101431749285412">"മാസം"</string>
    <string name="event_view" msgid="7621353079385122317">"ഇവന്റ് കാണുക"</string>
    <string name="event_create" msgid="6941040556709110617">"പുതിയ ഇവന്റ്"</string>
    <string name="event_edit" msgid="4006961928830064662">"ഇവന്റ് എഡിറ്റുചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="event_delete" msgid="2386667193277770442">"ഇവന്റ് ഇല്ലാതാക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="goto_today" msgid="9162136434410891230">"ഇന്ന്"</string>
    <string name="menu_preferences" msgid="9120238479503233925">"ക്രമീകരണങ്ങൾ"</string>
    <string name="menu_select_visible_calendars" msgid="735670432781741817">"പ്രദർശിപ്പിക്കുന്നതിനുള്ള കലണ്ടറുകൾ"</string>
    <string name="search" msgid="550656004486017426">"തിരയൽ"</string>
    <string name="hide_controls" msgid="830320505938520882">"നിയന്ത്രണങ്ങള് മറയ്ക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="show_controls" msgid="715520586028062621">"നിയന്ത്രണങ്ങൾ കാണിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="select_visible_calendars_title" msgid="7944393060991949882">"പ്രദർശിപ്പിക്കുന്നതിനുള്ള കലണ്ടറുകൾ"</string>
    <string name="synced" msgid="7913940305983383493">"സമന്വയിപ്പിച്ചു"</string>
    <string name="not_synced" msgid="4275114941801829419">"സമന്വയിപ്പിച്ചിട്ടില്ല"</string>
    <string name="acct_not_synced" msgid="6126800985681230627">"ഈ അക്കൗണ്ട് സമന്വയിപ്പിച്ചിട്ടില്ല അതുകൊണ്ട് നിങ്ങളുടെ കലണ്ടർ കാലികമായിരിക്കാനിടയില്ല."</string>
    <string name="accounts" msgid="849401841083180306">"അക്കൗണ്ട് & സമന്വയം"</string>
    <string name="select_synced_calendars_title" msgid="7916084873075901448">"സമന്വയിപ്പിക്കുന്നതിനുള്ള കലണ്ടറുകൾ"</string>
    <string name="select_synced_calendars_button" msgid="8890542984949996251">"സമന്വയിപ്പിക്കുന്നതിനുള്ള കലണ്ടറുകൾ"</string>
    <string name="hint_what" msgid="709155115005044531">"ഇവന്റ് പേര്"</string>
    <string name="hint_where" msgid="4972598001033801974">"ലൊക്കേഷന്"</string>
    <string name="hint_description" msgid="1910143586169033232">"വിവരണം"</string>
    <string name="hint_attendees" msgid="1650488163176888480">"അതിഥികൾ"</string>
    <string name="creating_event" msgid="7516249252554059980">"ഇവന്റ് സൃഷ്ടിക്കുക."</string>
    <string name="saving_event" msgid="7694181017411177226">"ഇവന്റ് സംരക്ഷിച്ചു."</string>
    <string name="empty_event" msgid="9018699257414338634">"ശൂന്യമായ ഇവന്റ് സൃഷ്ടിക്കുക."</string>
    <string name="creating_event_with_guest" msgid="5758688413124191931">"ക്ഷണം അയയ്‌ക്കും."</string>
    <string name="saving_event_with_guest" msgid="9184584438475689577">"അപ്‌ഡേറ്റുകൾ അയയ്‌ക്കും."</string>
    <string name="rsvp_accepted" msgid="8146618862268962727">"അതെ എന്ന് പ്രതികരിക്കുക."</string>
    <string name="rsvp_tentative" msgid="6545510359501328718">"ചിലപ്പോൾ എന്ന് പ്രതികരിക്കുക."</string>
    <string name="rsvp_declined" msgid="8686330037802222895">"ഇല്ല എന്ന് പ്രതികരിക്കുക."</string>
    <string name="create_event_dialog_save" msgid="1080859798521717414">"സംരക്ഷിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="alert_title" msgid="7869592820853066853">"കലണ്ടർ അറിയിപ്പുകൾ"</string>
    <string name="event_info_title" msgid="56024222340421620">"ഇവന്റ് കാണുക"</string>
    <string name="event_info_title_invite" msgid="9160326363769403865">"മീറ്റിംഗ് ക്ഷണം"</string>
    <string name="edit_event_to_label" msgid="795012981218062421">"അവസാനിക്കുന്ന സമയം"</string>
    <string name="edit_event_from_label" msgid="174999102612666115">"ആരംഭിക്കുന്ന സമയം"</string>
    <string name="edit_event_all_day_label" msgid="6200181113992136073">"എല്ലാ ദിവസവും"</string>
    <string name="edit_event_calendar_label" msgid="4556498359505856900">"കലണ്ടർ"</string>
    <string name="edit_event_show_all" msgid="4558049350756058301">"എല്ലാം കാണിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="description_label" msgid="7193475046717505855">"വിവരണം"</string>
    <string name="presence_label" msgid="6169724148441175862">"എന്നെ ഇങ്ങനെ ദൃശ്യമാക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="privacy_label" msgid="9215031965259597335">"സ്വകാര്യത"</string>
    <string name="reminders_label" msgid="7292389181815525676">"ഓർമ്മപ്പെടുത്തൽ ചേർക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="no_syncable_calendars" msgid="7019488867045436129">"കലണ്ടറുകളൊന്നുമില്ല"</string>
    <string name="no_calendars_found" msgid="8968682716053492187">"നിങ്ങൾക്ക് ഒരു അക്കൗണ്ട് ചേർക്കാനാകുന്നതിന് മുമ്പ്, നിങ്ങളുടെ ഉപകരണത്തിൽ കുറഞ്ഞത് ഒരു കലണ്ടർ അക്കൗണ്ടെങ്കിലും ചേർത്ത്, കലണ്ടർ ദൃശ്യമാക്കിയിരിക്കണം. ഒരു അക്കൗണ്ട് ചേർക്കുന്നതിന് അക്കൗണ്ട് ചേർക്കുക എന്നതിൽ സ്‌പർശിക്കുക (നിങ്ങൾ ഇപ്പോഴാണ് ഒരു അക്കൗണ്ട് ചേർത്തതെങ്കിൽ, അത് സമന്വയിപ്പിക്കുന്നത് വരെ കാത്തിരുന്നശേഷം വീണ്ടും ശ്രമിക്കുക). അല്ലെങ്കിൽ റദ്ദാക്കുക എന്നത് സ്‌പർശിച്ച ശേഷം കുറഞ്ഞത് ഒരു കലണ്ടറെങ്കിലും ദൃശ്യമാണെന്ന് ഉറപ്പുവരുത്തുക."</string>
    <string name="create_an_account_desc" msgid="7249605109240576895">"ഒരു Google അക്കൗണ്ടിൽ കലണ്ടർ നന്നായി പ്രവർത്തിക്കുന്നു.\n\n. ഏതെങ്കിലും ഒരു വെബ് ബ്രൗസറിൽ നിന്ന് അത് ആക്സസ് ചെയ്യുക\n. നിങ്ങളുടെ ഇവന്റുകൾ സുരക്ഷിതമായി ബാക്കപ്പ് ചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="add_account" msgid="1669072099756774952">"അക്കൗണ്ട് ചേർക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="view_event_calendar_label" msgid="6126231656338241140">"കലണ്ടർ:"</string>
    <string name="view_event_organizer_label" msgid="2753151795647402277">"ഓർഗനൈസർ:"</string>
    <string name="choose_event_color_label" msgid="2192923501857428854">"ഇവന്റ് വർണ്ണം തിരഞ്ഞെടുക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="event_color_picker_dialog_title" msgid="4631938661655159511">"ഇവന്റ് വർണ്ണം"</string>
    <string name="event_color_set_to_default" msgid="3447218820785647967">"സ്ഥിരസ്ഥിതി കലണ്ടർ വർണ്ണത്തിലേക്ക് സജ്ജീകരിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="calendar_color_picker_dialog_title" msgid="3595509200561433667">"കലണ്ടറിന്റെ നിറം"</string>
    <string name="calendar_square_color_picker_description" msgid="7430468363525563483">"വർണ്ണ പിക്കർ"</string>
    <string name="view_event_response_label" msgid="8382281658458798329">"പങ്കെടുക്കുന്നുണ്ടോ?"</string>
    <string name="response_yes" msgid="2027484304899988350">"അതെ"</string>
    <string name="response_maybe" msgid="7791500973627841695">"ചിലപ്പോൾ"</string>
    <string name="response_no" msgid="561911691884148136">"ഇല്ല"</string>
    <string name="email_guests_label" msgid="8772030932155305903">"അതിഥികൾക്ക് ഇമെയിൽ അയയ്‌ക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="email_organizer_label" msgid="7178059542798074813">"ഇമെയിൽ ഓർഗനൈസർ"</string>
    <string name="email_picker_label" msgid="4808253965057791781">"ഇവർക്ക് ഇമെയിൽ അയയ്‌ക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="event_not_found" msgid="8356864185947582727">"ഇവന്റ് കണ്ടെത്തിയില്ല."</string>
    <string name="map_label" msgid="8795383535586556038">"മാപ്പ്"</string>
    <string name="call_label" msgid="2960328220008869083">"വിളിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="quick_response_settings" msgid="6776151690686068278">"അതിവേഗ പ്രതികരണം"</string>
    <string name="quick_response_settings_summary" msgid="7878304729027355604">"അതിഥികൾക്ക് ഇമെയിൽ അയയ്ക്കുമ്പോൾ സ്ഥിര പ്രതികരണങ്ങൾ എഡിറ്റുചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="quick_response_settings_title" msgid="8966517107774567031">"പ്രതികരണം എഡിറ്റുചെയ്യൂ"</string>
    <string name="quick_response_settings_edit_title" msgid="6260055523174081930">"ദ്രുത പ്രതികരണം"</string>
    <string name="quick_response_dialog_title" msgid="2681309456412199207">"ദ്രുത പ്രതികരണം തിരഞ്ഞെടുക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="quick_response_email_failed" msgid="5544066405231853245">"ഒരു ഇമെയിൽ പോഗ്രാം കണ്ടെത്തുന്നത് പരാജയപ്പെട്ടു"</string>
  <string-array name="quick_response_defaults">
    <item msgid="1524421198348168403">"ഏകദേശം രണ്ട് മിനിറ്റ് വൈകി പ്രവർത്തിക്കുന്നു."</item>
    <item msgid="6215158751728689832">"ഏകദേശം 10 മിനിട്ടിനുള്ളിൽ എത്തുക."</item>
    <item msgid="4485794001743679338">"മുന്നോട്ടു പോയി ഞാനില്ലാതെതന്നെ ആരംഭിക്കുക."</item>
    <item msgid="8036557974294987511">"ക്ഷമിക്കണം, എനിക്കത് ചെയ്യാൻ കഴിഞ്ഞില്ല. ഞങ്ങൾക്ക് റീഷെഡ്യൂൾ ചെയ്യണം."</item>
  </string-array>
    <string name="quick_response_custom_msg" msgid="8792374208224108798">"നിങ്ങളുടേതായത് എഴുതുക…"</string>
    <string name="event_info_organizer" msgid="9138683335394832629">"ഓർഗനൈസർ:"</string>
    <string name="event_info_reminders_label" msgid="8913097552956388972">"റിമൈൻഡറുകൾ"</string>
    <string name="agenda_today" msgid="5965841338467422191">"ഇന്ന്, <xliff:g id="DATE">%1$s</xliff:g>"</string>
    <string name="agenda_yesterday" msgid="4170964206728599693">"ഇന്നലെ, <xliff:g id="DATE">%1$s</xliff:g>"</string>
    <string name="agenda_tomorrow" msgid="3893625470780723605">"നാളെ, <xliff:g id="DATE">%1$s</xliff:g>"</string>
    <string name="loading" msgid="3772533493214331230">"ലോഡുചെയ്യുന്നു..."</string>
    <string name="show_older_events" msgid="5140647493681439926">"<xliff:g id="OLDEST_SEARCH_RANGE">%1$s</xliff:g> എന്നതിന് മുമ്പുള്ള ഇവന്റുകൾ കാണുന്നതിന് സ്പർശിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="show_newer_events" msgid="2604638815440163080">"<xliff:g id="NEWEST_SEARCH_RANGE">%1$s</xliff:g> എന്നതിന് ശേഷമുള്ള ഇവന്റുകൾ കാണുന്നതിന് സ്പർശിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="search_title" msgid="8898015280250716254">"എന്റെ കലണ്ടറുകൾ തിരയുക"</string>
    <string name="edit_event_label" msgid="7413222956349977161">"വിശദാംശങ്ങൾ"</string>
    <string name="edit_label" msgid="8934331258435656534">"എഡിറ്റുചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="delete_label" msgid="874742811918030739">"ഇല്ലാതാക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="save_label" msgid="2133599104834432589">"പൂർത്തിയാക്കി"</string>
    <string name="discard_label" msgid="2394623883289782541">"റദ്ദാക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="snooze_all_label" msgid="4994488813124409077">"എല്ലാം സ്നൂസ് ചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="dismiss_all_label" msgid="1834400025868091301">"എല്ലാം നിരസിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="snooze_label" msgid="1515893621063224666">"സ്നൂസ് ചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="does_not_repeat" msgid="1877681921029738999">"ഒറ്റത്തവണയുള്ള ഇവന്റ്"</string>
    <string name="endByDate" msgid="7654221304929538201">"; <xliff:g id="DATE">%s</xliff:g> വരെ"</string>
    <!-- no translation found for endByCount (8013128840623220306) -->
    <!-- no translation found for daily (8835347097162749985) -->
    <string name="every_weekday" msgid="5896574838353902978">"എല്ലാ പ്രവർത്തിദിനങ്ങളും (തിങ്കൾ–വെള്ളി)"</string>
    <!-- no translation found for weekly (6866376933378266880) -->
    <string name="monthly" msgid="4587116285383048586">"പ്രതിമാസം"</string>
    <string name="yearly_plain" msgid="3652692085322162449">"പ്രതിവർഷം"</string>
    <string name="monthly_on_day" msgid="5370155265278821156">"പ്രതിമാസം (ഈ ദിവസം <xliff:g id="DAY_OF_MONTH">%s</xliff:g>)"</string>
    <string name="yearly" msgid="8576208380302949002">"വർഷം തോറും (<xliff:g id="DATES">%s</xliff:g> തീയതിയിൽ)"</string>
    <string name="custom" product="tablet" msgid="3806817351377723249">"ഇഷ്‌ടാനുസൃതം (ടാബ്‌ലെറ്റിൽ ഇഷ്‌ടാനുസൃതമാക്കാൻ കഴിയില്ല)"</string>
    <string name="custom" product="default" msgid="4137468716966004993">"ഇഷ്‌ടാനുസൃതം (ഫോണിൽ ഇഷ്‌ടാനുസൃതമാക്കാൻ കഴിയില്ല)"</string>
    <string name="modify_event" msgid="5982876409997142690">"ഈ ഇവന്റ് മാത്രം മാറ്റുക"</string>
    <string name="modify_all" msgid="4421657265864209041">"ഈ ശ്രേണിയിലെ എല്ലാ ഇവന്റുകളും മാറ്റുക"</string>
    <string name="modify_all_following" msgid="3017428541066390380">"ഇതും ഭാവിയിലെ എല്ല്ലാ ഇവന്റുകളും മാറ്റുക"</string>
    <string name="new_event_dialog_label" msgid="7553105224561147916">"പുതിയ ഇവന്റ്"</string>
    <string name="new_event_dialog_option" msgid="6154657379574669371">"പുതിയ ഇവന്റ്"</string>
    <string name="delete_this_event_title" msgid="518402946676919384">"ഈ ഇവന്റ് ഇല്ലാതാക്കണോ?"</string>
    <string name="delete_recurring_event_title" msgid="5609046778422180206">"<xliff:g id="EVENTTITLE">%s</xliff:g> ഇല്ലാതാക്കണോ?"</string>
    <string name="change_response_title" msgid="7704714776070974984">"പ്രതികരണം മാറ്റുക"</string>
    <string name="menu_general_preferences" msgid="2812705323334260708">"പൊതുവായ ക്രമീകരണങ്ങൾ"</string>
    <string name="menu_about_preferences" msgid="6124375438237674973">"കലണ്ടറിനെക്കുറിച്ച്"</string>
    <string name="preferences_title" msgid="8045855493262131773">"ക്രമീകരണം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_general_title" msgid="2069075513760573117">"കലണ്ടർ കാഴ്‌ച ക്രമീകരണം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_reminder_title" msgid="5199606534191180129">"അറിയിപ്പുകളും ഓർമ്മപ്പെടുത്തലുകളും"</string>
    <string name="preferences_hide_declined_title" msgid="1849295943669890034">"നിരസിച്ച ഇവന്റുകൾ മറയ്‌ക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="preferences_week_start_day_title" msgid="4619489296444901622">"ആഴ്ച ആരംഭിക്കുന്നത്"</string>
    <string name="preferences_week_start_day_dialog" msgid="5181634128884089113">"ആഴ്ച ആരംഭിക്കുന്നത്"</string>
    <string name="preferences_clear_search_history_title" msgid="6619916370215282982">"തിരയൽ ചരിത്രം മായ്‌ക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="preferences_clear_search_history_summary" msgid="7864674093455778158">"നിങ്ങൾ നടത്തിയ എല്ലാ തിരയലുകളും നീക്കംചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="search_history_cleared" msgid="1536707558435227567">"തിരയൽ ചരിത്രം മായ്‌ച്ചു."</string>
    <string name="preferences_alerts_title" msgid="6636088008103904020">"അറിയിപ്പുകൾ"</string>
    <string name="preferences_alerts_vibrateWhen_title" msgid="8731372580674292759">"വൈബ്രേറ്റുചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="preferences_alerts_ringtone_title" msgid="1849706055052358346">"ശബ്‌ദം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_alerts_popup_title" msgid="6643468203670475296">"പോപ്പ്-അപ്പ് അറിയിപ്പ്"</string>
    <string name="preferences_default_reminder_title" msgid="5188861433342733905">"സ്ഥിരസ്ഥിതി ഓർമ്മപ്പെടുത്തൽ സമയം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_default_reminder_dialog" msgid="2490348857239323412">"സ്ഥിരസ്ഥിതി ഓർമ്മപ്പെടുത്തൽ സമയം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_default_reminder_default" msgid="2903884416749959435">"10"</string>
    <string name="preferences_use_home_tz_title" msgid="5597546849968598210">"സ്വരാജ്യത്തെ സമയ മേഖല ഉപയോഗിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="preferences_use_home_tz_descrip" msgid="4835375381297413746">"യാത്രയിലായിരിക്കുമ്പോൾ കലണ്ടറുകളും ഇവന്റ് സമയങ്ങളും നിങ്ങളുടെ സ്വദേശ സമയ മേഖലയിൽ പ്രദർശിപ്പിക്കുന്നു"</string>
    <string name="preferences_home_tz_title" msgid="6680000444088818578">"സ്വദേശ സമയ സോൺ"</string>
    <string name="preferences_show_week_num_title" msgid="5280734329664503461">"ആഴ്‌ചകളുടെ എണ്ണം കാണിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="preferences_about_title" msgid="2810624892412097879">"ആമുഖം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_build_version" msgid="8242471883413502068">"ബിൽഡ് പതിപ്പ്"</string>
    <string name="gadget_title" msgid="939918875331310945">"കലണ്ടർ"</string>
    <plurals name="month_more_events" formatted="false" msgid="6064683102623394875">
      <item quantity="other">+<xliff:g id="NUMBER">%d</xliff:g></item>
      <item quantity="one">+1</item>
    </plurals>
    <string name="gadget_no_events" msgid="5209110911088302855">"വരാനിരിക്കുന്ന കലണ്ടർ ഇവന്റുകളൊന്നുമില്ല"</string>
    <string name="preferences_experimental_category" msgid="8111213192001230350">"പരീക്ഷണാത്മകം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_reminders_category" msgid="3179315692653755740">"റിമൈൻഡറുകൾ"</string>
    <string name="preferences_reminders_responded_label" msgid="1196570678238475838">"റിമൈൻഡറുകൾ ഒഴിവാക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="preferences_reminders_responded_dialog" msgid="1873289128793828352">"റിമൈൻഡറുകൾ ഒഴിവാക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="preferences_reminders_quiet_hours_label" msgid="8529712276644546893">"നിശബ്‌ദ സമയം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_reminders_quiet_hours_description" msgid="65969073433791290">"നിർദ്ദിഷ്‌ട സമയം ഇവന്റ് റിമൈൻഡറുകൾ മ്യൂട്ടുചെയ്യുക."</string>
    <string name="preferences_reminders_quiet_hours_start" msgid="3433058529220285232">"നിശബ്‌ദസമയം ആരംഭിക്കുന്ന സമയം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_reminders_quiet_hours_end" msgid="7492883554865119346">"നിശബ്‌ദ സമയം അവസാനിക്കുന്ന സമയം"</string>
    <string name="preferences_debug_category" msgid="6203278208385095018">"ഡീബഗ് ചെയ്യുന്നു"</string>
    <string name="copy_db" msgid="437691290566699292">"ഡാറ്റ ബേസ് അയയ്ക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="directory_searching_fmt" msgid="1232037509095606687">"<xliff:g id="DOMAIN">%s</xliff:g> തിരയുന്നു…"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_remove_attendee" msgid="7082751172654698863">"പങ്കെടുത്തയാളെ നീക്കംചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_pick_start_date" msgid="3926641487042699037">"ആരംഭിക്കുന്ന തീയതി"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_pick_start_time" msgid="4913428100936555149">"ആരംഭ സമയം"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_pick_end_date" msgid="5624250196618643922">"അവസാനിക്കുന്ന തീയതി"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_pick_end_time" msgid="7120310166355224941">"അവസാനിക്കുന്ന സമയം"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_pick_time_zone" msgid="7155465783500323811">"സമയ മേഖല"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_pick_recurrence" msgid="1834311617874828931">"ഇവന്റ് ആവർത്തിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_add_reminder" msgid="2267950744060950152">"ഓർമ്മപ്പെടുത്തൽ ചേർക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_remove_reminder" msgid="5261609343259665139">"ഓർമ്മപ്പെടുത്തൽ നീക്കം ചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_add_attendee" msgid="5654014177472600916">"പങ്കെടുക്കുന്നയാളെ ചേർക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_sync_cal" msgid="6506181885764723383">"കലണ്ടർ സമന്വയിപ്പിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_all_day" msgid="4146955438811915282">"ദിവസം മുഴുവന് നീണ്ടു നില്‍ക്കുന്ന ഇവന്റ്"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_repeats" msgid="1629279916830919582">"ആവർത്തിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_reminder_time" msgid="3594100545814579575">"ഓർമ്മപ്പെടുത്തലിനുള്ള സമയം"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_reminder_type" msgid="5339120699701437227">"ഓർമ്മപ്പെടുത്തൽ തരം"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_reminder_showmeas" msgid="6669129015980006570">"എന്നെ ഇങ്ങനെ ദൃശ്യമാക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_reminder_privacy" msgid="8669288484484022771">"സ്വകാര്യത"</string>
    <string name="acessibility_cal_notification" msgid="7267601064994839394">"കലണ്ടർ അറിയിപ്പുകൾ"</string>
    <string name="acessibility_snooze_notification" msgid="5007852779125102681">"അറിയിപ്പുകൾ സ്‌നൂസ് ചെയ്യുക"</string>
    <string name="accessibility_email_notification" msgid="9124064701968129831">"അതിഥികൾക്ക് ഇമെയിൽ അയയ്‌ക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="day_view_new_event_hint" msgid="2131483437911536229">"+ പുതിയ ഇവന്റ്"</string>
    <string name="template_announce_item_index" msgid="4067877800670753110">"<xliff:g id="ITEM_INDEX">%1$s</xliff:g> / <xliff:g id="ITEM_COUNT">%2$s</xliff:g> ഇവന്റ്."</string>
    <plurals name="Nevents" formatted="false" msgid="523806278273939134">
      <item quantity="other"><xliff:g id="COUNT">%d</xliff:g> ഇവന്റ്</item>
      <item quantity="one">1 ഇവന്റ്</item>
    </plurals>
    <plurals name="N_remaining_events" formatted="false" msgid="182179062497393883">
      <item quantity="other">+<xliff:g id="COUNT">%d</xliff:g> ഇവന്റ്</item>
      <item quantity="one">+1 ഇവന്റ്</item>
    </plurals>
    <string name="acessibility_selected_marker_description" msgid="3010149843148810768">"തിരഞ്ഞെടുത്ത ഇവന്റ്"</string>
    <string name="do_not_check" msgid="7815441673853466129">"ഇത് പരിശോധിക്കരുത് ->"</string>
    <string name="recurrence_dialog_title" msgid="8093909645557717483">"ആവർത്തിക്കുക"</string>
    <string name="recurrence_dialog_title_never" msgid="2679396029776590130">"ഒരിക്കലും ആവർത്തിക്കരുത്"</string>
    <!-- no translation found for recurrence_interval_daily (4500420585186480085) -->
    <!-- no translation found for recurrence_interval_weekly (3485667498625367983) -->
    <!-- no translation found for recurrence_interval_monthly (6278422285680542608) -->
    <!-- no translation found for recurrence_interval_yearly (5954975405814707742) -->
    <string name="recurrence_month_pattern_by_day" msgid="4400107556121003459">"ഓരോ മാസവും ഒരേ ദിവസം"</string>
    <string name="recurrence_end_continously" msgid="6898950241634912991">"എന്നന്നേയ്‌ക്കും"</string>
    <string name="recurrence_end_date_label" msgid="4142791438636994952">"ഒരു തീയതി വരെ"</string>
    <string name="recurrence_end_date" msgid="3693751578164711701">"<xliff:g id="DATE">%s</xliff:g> വരെ"</string>
    <string name="recurrence_end_count_label" msgid="1233883668293087977">"ഇവന്റുകൾ ആവർത്തിക്കേണ്ട എണ്ണം"</string>
    <!-- no translation found for recurrence_end_count (6025427387167075860) -->
    <string name="acessibility_recurrence_choose_end_date_description" msgid="5899029840837836711">"അവസാനിക്കുന്ന ദിവസം മാറ്റുക"</string>
</resources>


On occasion, just about everyone needs outside help in caring for a loved one. When it happens to you, we at AmaraMedical Health Care can supply trained medical personnel who care.

CALL ANYTIME
For many of our clients, this is the first time they will need this type of service, and the information provided is intended to help you consider some ideas that we think are important.

LOVING CARE
All of our staff has experience in the health care industry. They are dedicated professionals who recognize the need for psychological as well as physical care.

AVAILABILITY
Our staff is available round-the-clock when necessary. We are one of only a few companies in the area who can provide this kind of service, and when you need it, it becomes very important. Our services are tailored to accommodate every individual’s needs, part time, full time, or 24 hours a day.

RECORD KEEPING
Complete records are kept during each shift including medication, activities, meals, and overall patient behavior. This is an incidental part of our job, but there are times when it is of utmost importance to you the patient and your Doctors.

HOME HEALTH AIDE SERVICES

Personal Care/Bathing

Conversation/Companionship

Assisting with personal hygiene

Dusting/Dishes/Vacuuming

Ambulatory/Transfer Assistance

Errands/Grocery Shopping

Feeding Assistance

Laundry/Ironing

Exercising

Meal Preparation

HOMEMAKING/COMPANION SERVICES

Making Bed/Changing Bed Linens

Reminding Clients to take their Medications

Making Appointments

Self Administering Medications

Assisting with travel to and from destinations

Light Housekeeping/Vacuuming/ appointments

Dusting/Dishes/Laundry

Errands/Grocery Shopping

Dressing Assistance

REGISTERED NURSE/ LICENSED PRACTICAL NURSESkilled Nursing Services

PERSONAL SERVICEWe feel your needs should be fulfilled with the highest quality of care. We’re sensitive to your special request and want to have your feedback.

ONE FINAL NOTEWe are in the business of providing personal service in a personal way. We understand the importance of the decision you are about to make. Feel free to interview us and ask questions that are important to your peace of mind—we’re here to help. Our caring staff will be happy to assist you 24 hours day, seven days a week.


Newslinks for Saturday 13th January 2018

Cameron suggests May used reshuffle to ‘ensure she fights the next election’…

“Theresa May used the reshuffle “to help ensure she fights the next election”, senior Conservative sources said as friends of David Cameron suggested that he compared her approach to staying in power to that of Gordon Brown. Mr Cameron was said to believe that his successor was unlikely to leave office voluntarily, in an echo of Mr Brown after he lost his Commons majority in 2010. Friends said that after the botched election in June Mr Cameron suggested that while Tony Blair and he left of their own volition when they felt their time was up he expected Mrs May to try to stay in post. “David was suggesting the idea she retires voluntarily seemed implausible”, they said.” – The Times

… as Tory peer dismisses Prime Minister’s green drive

“Theresa May’s plans to deal with plastic waste are little more than “jaw jaw”, according to the Tory peer who led a green revolution at Marks & Spencer. Lord Rose of Monewden, 68, says the prime minister needed to give big corporations a “kick up the arse” if she was serious about the environment and dealing with the scourge of waste. The former chief executive of Marks & Spencer described Mrs May’s plan to encourage supermarkets to introduce plastic-free aisles as “too simplistic”, saying it may lead to a rise in food waste – which is worse for the environment – because packaging protects and extends the shelf life of produce.” – The Times

“Boris Johnson today tore into Jeremy Corbyn and Sadiq Khan as he blamed the Labour leadership for Donald Trump cancelling his trip to London. The Foreign Secretary said Labour’s leadership appears ‘determined’ to damage the special relationship and imperil America’s investment in Britain. And in a colourful dig at Mr Khan, he pledged that the Government will not let the UK’s relationship with its closest ally ‘by some puffed up pompous popinjay in City Hall’. His remarks come after the Labour London Mayor celebrated news that the US President had pulled out of his planned trip next month saying he had ‘got the message’.” – Daily Mail

Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary clash over cancellation – The Times

Ministers 2) Chancellor criticised by ex-Army chief…

“A former head of the army has told the chancellor not to allow more cuts to the military and accused him of overseeing a “catastrophic reduction” when he was the defence secretary. In a letter to The Times General Lord Dannatt says that a series of options, reported yesterday, to reduce manpower by at least a further 14,000 and cut the number of warships and helicopters would be disastrous. “I wish Gavin Williamson [the defence secretary] all the very best as [he] fights in our best national interests in this vital battle with Philip Hammond and his Treasury officials,” the former chief of the general staff says. “Mr Hammond, as a previous defence secretary, oversaw a catastrophic reduction in defence capability during his tenure at the MoD – he must not be allowed to do it a second time. History would not judge him kindly.”” – The Times

Thousands of UK jobs ‘at risk’ after £3bn MoD order with German firm – Daily Express

Comment:

What good is an Army which appears ashamed of its own existence? – Charles Moore, Daily Telegraph

Ministers 3) …as he accuses Brussels of ‘paranoia’ over Brexit

“Philip Hammond has described EU fears that a soft Brexit could encourage other countries to leave the trading bloc as “paranoia”, saying Brussels should be doing more to keep existing members rather than “punish” Britain. The Chancellor made the comments in an interview with German newspaper Welt am Sonntag in which he branded the EU’s approach to trade talks as “backward-looking”. Mr Hammond visited Berlin this week to call for clarity on what the EU wants from future relations and to make the case for a wide-ranging Brexit deal. Responding to the interviewer’s suggestion that a soft Brexit might offer an incentive for the people in other countries to leave, Mr Hammond said: “I can understand that paranoia. But imagine you are running a successful, thriving club. If one member leaves, you don’t immediately panic that all the other members might leave, but are confident they will want to remain.” – Daily Telegraph

“The new education secretary may have a conflict of interest when making policy on faith schools, secular campaigners have claimed, pointing to a £5,000 donation from the Catholic church to fund an intern in his office. Damian Hinds, a Catholic who attended a Catholic grammar school, has previously spoken in favour of scrapping a 50 per cent cap on how many places at faith-based free schools can be reserved for pupils who practise that particular faith. Catholic bishops have called on the government to lift this cap, insisting that it prevents the Catholic church from opening any new free schools because they would have to turn away Catholic pupils once the 50 per cent quota was reached.” – The Times

Ministers 5) Fresh drive to resolve Stormont impasse

“The Irish foreign affairs minister, Simon Coveney, and the new Northern Ireland secretary have held their first meeting in an attempt to resolve the deadlock over the collapse of the Stormont executive. Mr Coveney said that discussions with Karen Bradley had been “very good”. They will meet again next week. Ms Bradley took up her post this week on the first anniversary of Northern Ireland’s institutions collapsing after the resignation of Martin McGuinness. Talks between the DUP and Sinn Fein on restoring power have proved fruitless. Mr Coveney said yesterday that there were “significant challenges” but the Irish and British governments were committed to resolving the standoff.” – The Times

May to bolster ranks of Conservative peers

“Theresa May will next week bolster Tory numbers in the House of Lords with ten more loyalists ahead of months of “bloody” Brexit battles. Long-serving former Cabinet ministers Eric Pickles and Peter Lilley lead a list put forward by the PM to get new life peerages. Other Conservative grandees being considered for ennoblement include ex- MPs Edward Garnier, Julian Brazier and Andrew Tyrie. All either stood down or lost their seats at the general election in June last year. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn is also appointing three new peers.” – The Sun

Government preparing for ‘street fight’ in the upper house – Daily Express

Labour accused of ‘failing moral duty’ over sexist MP…

“Labour has been accused of failing in its moral duty to tackle abusive behaviour amid uncertainty over the fate of an MP it suspended for making sexist and homophobic slurs. Jared O’Mara, 36, the MP for Sheffield Hallam, was suspended by the party in October after misogynistic social media posts from his twenties were discovered. He was also accused of calling a constituent an “ugly bitch” weeks before his election and voters in his seat, formerly held by Sir Nick Clegg, called this week for Labour to sack him. Yesterday, Labour refused to say when the investigation by its national executive committee into Mr O’Mara’s conduct would conclude.” – The Times

Alleged victim of Labour MP was ‘fobbed off’ for two years – Daily Telegraph

…as Corbyn promotes Lewis and Pidcock to the Shadow Cabinet

“Clive Lewis has returned to Labour’s front bench after he quit last year to defy the party whip over triggering Brexit. Last night the left-wing MP for Norwich South was appointed a shadow Treasury minister as part of a reshuffle of Jeremy Corbyn’s lower ranks. He was cleared last month of allegations that he had groped a woman at the party’s conference. Laura Pidcock, 30, who once suggested that she could not be friends with Conservatives, was also promoted, becoming shadow minister for labour… Karen Lee, a former nurse, will become shadow fire minister, replacing Chris Williamson.” – The Times

Labour leader accused of ‘sacking’ Williamson out of self-interest – The Times

Farage’s salary docked over ‘misuse of funds’

“Nigel Farage raged at ‘vindictive’ Eurocrats after it emerged he is being docked £35,000 from his salary in a row over staffing costs. The former UKIP leader, who recently complained that he was ’53, separated and skint’, is being punished after EU parliament watchdogs concluded he had misused funds. He has been accused of using official budgets to pay assistant Christopher Adams, even though he was not working on parliamentary business. Mr Adams’ contract was suspended last year… Mr Farage confirmed to MailOnline that his pay was being witheld but insisted he ‘absolutely rejected’ any suggestion of wrongdoing.” – Daily Mail

Please use the thread below to provide links to news topics likely to be of interest to ConservativeHome readers and to comment on political topics that haven’t been given their own blog. Read our comments policy.


Complement fragments suppress lymphocyte immune responses.
There has been controversy as to whether complement augments immune responses or inhibits them. In this article John Weiler and his colleagues discuss recent evidence that complement fragments can inhibit immune responses that depend upon cellular proliferation.


We hereby volunteer to go along and set up the first Mars-based media company. But let's be honest: Buzzfeed will probably beat us to it, and then beam back all these stories across interstellar space.

More From Popular Mechanics

•41 Tweets From Earth That Will Make You Glad You Left (Spoiler: They're Still Talking About Frozen)

•27 Surprising Facts You May Not Know About the Crushing Loneliness of Space

•A Definitive Ranking of the 20 Most Smoldering Geeks at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory

•18 Totally Awesome Side-Effects of Zero G

•23 Signs You're Getting a Crush on the Spaceship Roommate You've Been Stuck With for the Last 500 Days


Q:

VueJS 2 properties not being passed down in production build

I'm struggling with getting properties to work in the production build of my Vue app. Everything appears to work fine in development, but when the app is compiled it doesn't. Take this navigation component I'm using for example:
navigation.js:
import Vue from 'vue';
import template from './navigation.html';

export default Vue.extend({
  props: ['activePage'],
  template,
  methods: {
    setActivePage: function() {
      // Set activeEl to ref (see template) that corresponds to activePage parameter
      var activeEl = this.$refs[this.activePage];
      if (activeEl) {
        activeEl.className += ' active';
      }
    }
  },
  mounted: function() {
    this.setActivePage();
  }
});

navigation.html:

            <router-link to="/"></router-link>

<router-link to="/">a</router-link>

<router-link to="/b">b</router-link>

<router-link to="/c">c</router-link>

This is how I use this component:
<navigation activePage="a"></navigation>
So, this component takes an activePage property, checks the template if there is a ref that corresponds to the activePage value, and if that is true, it adds the active class to the ref element. It works with the development build, but in production it results in this:

Am I doing something wrong here? My project is based on this template, if that matters: https://github.com/villeristi/vue.js-starter-template

A:

Have a look at https://vuejs.org/v2/guide/components.html#camelCase-vs-kebab-case
You have to use kebab case when binding camelCased props. You will need to use
<navigation active-page="a"></navigation>


Q:

Windows 8, many setup files don't start, unless I run them as administrator

I recently installed Windows 8 on my computer. I have just one user, connected to a Microsoft account.
My problem is that many setup files (Chrome, Flash, Dropbox, just to mention a few), if launched with a double click, just don't start. If I right-click and choose run as administrator they run fine. Is this normal on Win 8, or there's a problem with my configuration?
EDIT
I temporarily solved the problem by creating a new local account, but after some days the problem started again.
Installers that have problem include:

The nVidia graphics driver installer
Chrome setup
Dropbox setup (I solved this by modifying the temp directory permissions allow read/write access to Users)
Steam install (MSI installer) gives error 1723 "A DLL required [...] could not be run"
Google Play music manager (if I run it as admin, the prorgam is installed but with graphical problems)

A:

Check your UAC settings. Sounds like you've got it set to Always Deny or disabled entirely so that you're not being prompted to approve elevated access.
Alternatively it may be a permissions issue. Make sure that AppData\Local\Temp is set to allow Administrators full access, Users read-only access and YOURUSERNAME full access.


Searching for Ingmar Bergman

Internationally renowned director Margarethe von Trotta takes a closer look at Bergman's life and work and explores his film legacy with Bergman's closest collaborators, both in front and behind the camera, as well as a new generation of filmmakers. The documentary presents key scenes, recurring themes in his films and his life, and journeys to the places at the center of Bergman's creative achievement and the focal points of his life such as the Royal Dramatic Theatre in Stockholm, locations and landscapes from his masterpieces, and the stations from his career in Sweden, France and Germany.

Internationally renowned director Margarethe von Trotta takes a closer look at Bergman's life and work and explores his film legacy with Bergman's closest collaborators, both in front and behind the camera, as well as a new generation of filmmakers. The documentary presents key scenes, recurring themes in his films and his life, and journeys to the places at the center of Bergman's creative achievement and the focal points of his life such as the Royal Dramatic Theatre in Stockholm, locations and landscapes from his masterpieces, and the stations from his career in Sweden, France and Germany.

Searching for Ingmar Bergman

Internationally renowned director Margarethe von Trotta takes a closer look at Bergman's life and work and explores his film legacy with Bergman's closest collaborators, both in front and behind the camera, as well as a new generation of filmmakers. The documentary presents key scenes, recurring themes in his films and his life, and journeys to the places at the center of Bergman's creative achievement and the focal points of his life such as the Royal Dramatic Theatre in Stockholm, locations and landscapes from his masterpieces, and the stations from his career in Sweden, France and Germany.


2009 UT App 155
Rob Bahr, Sherri Bahr, and Ione Senn, Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
Jim Imus and Melodee Imus, Defendants and Appellees.
Case No. 20070933-CA
Court of Appeals of Utah.
Filed June 11, 2009
This opinion is subject to revision before publication in the Pacific Reporter.
Jared L. Bramwell and Steven M. Kelly, Draper, for Appellants
Robert J. Dale and Christian D. Austin, Salt Lake City, for Appellees.
Before Judges Greenwood, Thorne, and McHugh.

OPINION
GREENWOOD, Presiding Judge:
¶1 Plaintiffs Rob and Sherri Bahr and Ione Senn (collectively the Bahrs) appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants Jim and Melodee Imus establishing the boundary line between the Bahrs' and Imuses' properties based on a theory of boundary by estoppel. Specifically, the Bahrs argue that summary judgment was inappropriate because there are material facts in dispute and the Imuses are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.

BACKGROUND
¶2 The Imuses purchased their home in 1983. Later that year, the Imuses consulted with their neighbors, the Wymans, who lived in the adjacent home directly west of the Imuses, about constructing a boundary fence (the fence) between their properties. The Wymans were unable to contribute financially, but agreed to the fence construction. Although the Imuses appear to have carried the financial burden of the fence project, the Wymans assisted with the measurements for placement of the fence on the boundary line and with the manual labor necessary to build the fence. Neither party knew, nor did they obtain a survey to determine, the exact boundary between their respective properties. There were, however, stakes and marking pins utilized by the Imuses and the Wymans. They worked together to measure and establish a boundary line, along which they ultimately built the fence. The Imuses and the Wymans treated the fence as the boundary between their properties thenceforth, and the Imuses subsequently installed "improvements, landscaping, and irrigations systems on their side of the fence."[1] Shortly thereafter, the Wymans sold their property to Joe Carlisle, who also treated the fence as the boundary line until he sold the property to the Bahrs in December 1988.
¶3 Some time in 2003, a dispute arose between the Bahrs and the Imuses regarding a Russian Olive tree growing on the Imuses' side of the fence. This dispute led to deterioration of the parties' relationship. Soon thereafter, the Bahrs complained to city officials and commissioned a survey of their property. This survey revealed that the fence deviated from the true property line and encroached upon the Bahrs' property from a few inches at the front of the property to nearly five feet at the rear, creating a pie-shaped parcel of land (Disputed Property) over which this dispute centers. Based largely on this survey, the Bahrs sued the Imuses praying for relief based upon several separate legal theories including trespass, private nuisance, and quiet title.[2] After discovery was conducted, the Imuses filed a motion for summary judgment arguing that, based on the undisputed material facts, they are entitled to ownership of the Disputed Property because the boundary was established either by agreement or acquiescence, or in the alternative, that the Bahrs should now be estopped from challenging the boundary.[3] The Bahrs responded, arguing that summary judgment was not appropriate because there are material facts in dispute and the Imuses are not legally entitled to a judgment based upon any of their asserted legal theories.
¶4 The trial court determined that the material facts are undisputed and that equity requires that the Bahrs be estopped from now disputing the boundary. Accordingly, the trial court granted the Imuses' motion for summary judgment based on equitable estoppel. This appeal followed.

ISSUE AND STANDARD OF REVIEW
¶5 The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the Imuses based on an equitable estoppel theory.[4] We "review[] a trial court's legal conclusions and ultimate grant or denial of summary judgment for correctness . . . view[ing] the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party." Orvis v. Johnson, 2008 UT 2, ¶ 6, 177 P.3d 600 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). And, although "[t]he doctrine of equitable estoppel is simply stated, . . . it is applicable to a wide variety of factual and legal situations. . . . Therefore, we properly grant the trial court's decision [thereon] a fair degree of deference." Department of Human Servs. ex rel. Parker v. Irizarry, 945 P.2d 676, 678 (Utah 1997).

ANALYSIS
¶6 Granting a party's request for summary judgment is appropriate where "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." Utah R. Civ. P. 56(c). Additionally, "Utah law does not allow a summary judgment movant to merely point out a lack of evidence in the nonmoving party's case, but instead requires a movant to affirmatively provide factual evidence establishing that there is no genuine issue of material fact." Orvis, 2008 UT 2, ¶ 16. Utah case law establishes that "[t]he elements of equitable estoppel are '(i) a . . . failure to act [that is] inconsistent with a claim later asserted; (ii) reasonable action . . . taken . . . on the basis of the . . . failure to act; and (iii) injury . . . would result from allowing [a repudiation of] such . . . failure to act.'" Dahl Inv. Co. v. Hughes, 2004 UT App 391, ¶ 14, 101 P.3d 830 (alterations and omissions in original) (quoting CECO Corp. v. Concrete Specialists, Inc., 772 P.2d 967, 969-70 (Utah 1989)); see also Black's Law Dictionary 571 (7th ed. 1999) (defining equitable estoppel as "[a] defensive doctrine preventing one party from taking unfair advantage of another when, through false language or conduct, the person to be estopped has induced another person to act in a certain way, with the result that the other person has been injured in some way" (emphasis added)). The Bahrs also cite Peterson v. Johnson, 84 Utah 89, 34 P.2d 697 (1934), and argue that in the boundary dispute context, Utah law requires a party asserting equitable estoppel to show that they have made permanent improvements to the property in dispute. To adequately evaluate this contention, we examine Peterson more closely.
¶7 In Peterson, the supreme court addressed a boundary dispute between two adjacent property owners in rural Utah regarding ownership of approximately one acre of land situated between their respective properties. See id. at 697. At the heart of the dispute in Peterson was a fence separating the properties that had allegedly long-established the boundary line. See id. In dicta and without elaboration, the supreme court stated that equitable estoppel did not support the defendant's claim: "So far as is made to appear, no permanent improvements were placed on the land in question and hence defendant is not in a position to invoke the doctrine of equitable estoppel in aid of his claim." Id. at 698. In support of this statement, the Peterson court cited Tripp v. Bagley, 74 Utah 57, 276 P. 912 (1928). Like Peterson, Tripp also involved a rural property dispute in which one party claimed legal or equitable ownership of the disputed parcel situated along the boundary line between the respective properties. See generally Tripp, 276 P. 912. The Tripp court determined that equitable estoppel was not appropriate because (1) the party defending title had received rents and profits from and had paid all taxes on the disputed property, and (2) the party asserting estoppel could not have believed that the fence was on the true boundary line and "ha[d] made no improvements" on the disputed property. Id. at 918.
¶8 We do not read these cases to require permanent improvements in order to resolve a residential boundary dispute by equitable estoppel. Neither of these cases expressly defined the elements of equitable estoppel. Further, later cases do not cite Peterson and do not include permanent improvements in the required elements of equitable estoppel.[5] Instead, they address whether the party asserting estoppel would suffer real injury if the true boundary line were now enforced. Cf. Dahl Inv. Co., 2004 UT App 391, ¶ 15 (affirming, with no reference to "permanent improvements," district court's determination that equitable estoppel applied to a portion of the boundary line upon which the asserting party had constructed a driveway, but not to the portion upon which the asserting party had done nothing, because forcing the asserting party "to abandon or remove the driveway would constitute an injury"). We therefore conclude that permanent improvements are not a separate element of equitable estoppel, but are required only insofar as they assist the court in evaluating the "reasonable action" and "injury" elements.
¶9 The Bahrs further argue that additional "nuanced requirements" must also be met to establish equitable estoppel, elements that the trial court erred in not considering. More specifically, the Bahrs argue that (1) application of equitable estoppel is disfavored generally, and contrary to public policy in the instant case; (2) wrongdoing or fraud is required of the Bahrs for equitable estoppel to be appropriate; and (3) a certain level of knowledge on the part of both parties is required.[6] For reasons explained more fully below, we disagree with the Bahrs regarding the necessity of these "nuanced requirements."
¶10 First, the Bahrs argue that application of the doctrine of equitable estoppel is generally disfavored, especially in the context of resolving boundary disputes, because it is contrary to the Utah Statute of Frauds and Utah recording statutes. The Bahrs cite no binding authority in support of this argument. The Bahrs argue that because Utah law expressly requires transfers of land to be effected through a written instrument, estoppel should not be used to effect a transfer of title based only upon an alleged oral agreement. While we agree that an oral agreement is normally insufficient to effectuate passage of legal title to real property, see Utah Code Ann. § 25-5-3 (2007), the doctrine of estoppel in the boundary dispute context has been sanctioned in Utah to provide equitable title to property. In addition, there is no evidence before us that the trial court based its decision on an oral agreement between the parties; rather, the court determined only that it would not be equitable for the Bahrs now to challenge the boundary line to which they had not objected for many years.
¶11 Second, the Bahrs argue that the Imuses are allowed to assert estoppel only if the trial court finds that the Bahrs' behavior was fraudulent, misleading, or unconscionable. In support of this, the Bahrs cite Youngblood v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co., 2007 UT 28, 158 P.3d 1088, and IHC Health Services, Inc. v. D & K Management, Inc., 2003 UT 5, 73 P.3d 320. Youngblood, an insurance case, involved the application of the equitable theory of promissory estoppel, defined by the court as where one party, in full knowledge of the material facts, makes a promise that turns out to be incorrect to the detriment of the other party who relied upon the promise. See 2007 UT 28, ¶¶ 151-6. The Youngblood court discussed the differences between equitable and promissory estoppel, and clarified that a misrepresentation as to the future is generally required for application of promissory estoppel. See id. The court described equitable estoppel as applying to "circumstances where it is not fair for a party to represent facts to be one way to get the other to agree, and then change positions later to the other's detriment." Id. ¶ 15. We see nothing in Youngblood requiring fraudulent, misleading, or unconscionable behavior by the party sought to be estopped. See generally id. Therefore, Youngblood does not change our analysis.
¶12 In IHC Health Services, Inc., the supreme court was faced with an estoppel argument based upon late acceptance of a rent payment. See 2003 UT 5, ¶ 11. The party asserting estoppel in that case argued that IHC Health Services should be estopped from requiring on-time rent payments, because IHC had not objected to a late payment one month. See id. The supreme court noted that inaction for one month was insufficient to establish estoppel, because more than inaction or silence is required to conclude "it would be unconscionable to permit a person to maintain a position inconsistent with one in which he . . . has acquiesced." Id. (omission in original) (internal quotation marks omitted). We do not read IHC Health Services, Inc. as adding a requirement for equitable estoppel, but simply as describing whether the party acted reasonably based on the facts of that case. Because these cases do not support the position taken by the Bahrs, we decline the invitation to add a requirement of wrongdoing by the party being estopped to the elements of equitable estoppel in the boundary dispute context.
¶13 Third, the Bahrs argue that there is a knowledge requirement for equitable estoppel in the boundary dispute context. More specifically, the Bahrs contend that equitable estoppel was inappropriate in this case because they "had [no] actual knowledge that the Imuses were making any supposed improvements to the [D]isputed [Property]," and they "were not in a position to have actual knowledge of the true boundary line." Both of these arguments are unpersuasive. It is not credible that neighbors of twenty years would lack knowledge of improvements made along the separating boundary fence, especially when a tree growing along the boundary fence precipitated the present dispute. Further, it is the knowledge and actions of the Wymans, the Bahrs' predecessors in title, that generates the Imuses' claim of equitable estoppel.[7]
¶14 Finally, we examine whether the trial court erred in determining that the Imuses demonstrated that they had used the Disputed Property in reasonable reliance on the Bahrs' inaction and that they would be injured if the Bahrs were allowed to now enforce the true boundary line. See Dahl Inv. Co. v. Hughes, 2004 UT App 391, ¶ 14, 101 P.3d 830 (listing the elements of equitable estoppel). After reviewing the parties' competing memoranda and hearing oral arguments, the trial court determined that the Imuses had satisfied the elements of estoppel so as to preclude the Bahrs from now objecting to the placement of the boundary fence. The trial court stated that it based this decision solely on the following undisputed material facts:
1. [The Imuses] have lived in their current home . . . since March of 1983.
2. In the summer of 1983, the Imuses met with their neighbors, the Wymans, . . . to discuss building a boundary fence along the property line dividing the two residential properties.
3. Though the lots were located in a platted subdivision and the neighbors consulted a plat map, the [Imuses and Wymans] did not know the precise location of the boundary line between their properties, nor did they obtain a survey.
4. The Imuses and Wymans then established a boundary line and the Imuses proceeded to construct a redwood fence on the agreed upon boundary line separating the two properties.
5. The Imuses and Wymans thereafter treated this fence as a boundary between their properties and the Imuses installed improvements, landscaping and irrigation systems on their side of the fence.
6. In 1984, the Wymans sold their property to Joe Carlisle, who also treated this fence as a boundary line between the properties until he sold the property to the [Bahrs], in December of 1988.
7. No change in the treatment of the boundary line by the parties occurred until sometime in 2002 or 2003.
8. During this . . . near 20 year period, the [Imuses], in addition to installing a sprinkling system, landscaped the property to their liking, which included admitted costs of improvements of $7000 to $9000.
(Footnotes omitted.)[8]
¶15 Based on these undisputed material facts, the trial court concluded that the Wymans and Imuses had mutually established a boundary line between their respective properties. The trial court also determined that, in reasonable reliance on this established boundary line, the Imuses built a fence as a property line marker and installed improvements on the Disputed Property including "a shed, koi pond, and landscaping up to the fence line." The trial court continued, stating that neither of the Bahrs' predecessors had objected to the fence line and that, for a significant time, the Bahrs "did nothing to prevent the [Imuses] from maintaining and adding further improvements, such as vegetation and fixtures to the [Disputed Property]." Following this, the trial court summarized the facts from Dahl Investment Co. v. Hughes, 2004 UT App 391, 101 P.3d 830.[9] The trial court then stated that, "[j]ust as in Dahl[], . . . the [Bahrs] may have been legally entitled to have the plat map boundary established as the legal boundary but . . . their actions (and the actions of their predecessors) estop them from [now] asserting their legal rights," because "the [Imuses] would be injured if [the Bahrs] were allowed to take possession of the [Disputed Property]." Concluding that all three elements of equitable estoppel had been met, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Imuses on that theory and denied all other relief requested.
¶16 Based on the undisputed material facts, the trial court correctly determined that the Imuses established each of the three required elements of equitable estoppel, see Dahl, 2004 UT App 391, ¶ 14, and were entitled to ownership of the Disputed Property as a matter of law, see Orvis v. Johnson, 2008 UT 2, ¶ 6, 177 P.3d 600.

CONCLUSION
¶17 We agree with the trial court that precisely when the property dispute began is not material, that there are no disputed material facts, and that the Imuses are entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law based on an equitable estoppel theory. Affirmed.
¶18 William A. Thorne Jr., Associate Presiding Judge, Carolyn B. McHugh, Judge, concur.
NOTES
[1]  Although the parties dispute the "value" of the improvements the Imuses installed over the years, the actual cost of the improvements appears to be in the $7000 to $9000 range.
[2]  The Bahrs' complaint also contained claims for slander and intentional infliction of emotional distress that were dismissed by stipulation prior to resolution of the summary judgment motions.
[3]  In addition to the Imuses' motion, the Bahrs filed a motion for partial summary judgment and a motion to compel. At the hearing to resolve all pending motions, the trial court denied the Bahrs' motions. Only the grant of the Imuses' motion is at issue in this appeal.
[4]  The Bahrs argue that we should take this opportunity to apply the factors set forth in State v. Pena, 869 P.2d 932 (Utah 1994), see id. at 935-939, to determine the correct standard of review for equitable estoppel claims. However, we find such an analysis to be unnecessary because the standard of review for the determination of equitable estoppel is established. Cf. Department of Human Servs. ex rel. Parker v. Irizarry, 945 P.2d 676, 678 (Utah 1997) (applying the Pena factors and determining the appropriate standard of review for equitable estoppel determinations).
[5]  For example, Dahl Investment Co. v. Hughes, 2004 UT App 391, 101 P.3d 830, quotes CECO Corp. v. Concrete Specialists, Inc., 772 P.2d 967 (Utah 1989), in describing the elements of equitable estoppel. See Dahl Inv. Co., 2004 UT App 391, ¶ 14. CECO, in turn, cites several cases, none of which require "permanent improvements." See 772 P.2d at 969-70.
[6]  The Bahrs also argue that equitable estoppel is not available to the Imuses because the Imuses are primarily at fault for the deviation from the boundary line, given that the Imuses measured the boundary and installed the fence. The Imuses respond that this counter-estoppel argument was not raised before the trial court and, thus, is not appropriately before us on appeal. Regardless of whether this argument was preserved, we conclude that the undisputed facts do not establish fault by the Imuses.
[7]  The Bahrs' argument that they cannot be bound by the actions of their predecessors is unavailing. See Staker v. Ainsworth, 785 P.2d 417, 423 (Utah 1990); 28 Am. Jur. 2d Estoppel and Waiver § 133 (1964).
[8]  In making finding number seven, the trial court acknowledged that precisely when the boundary dispute began "is one of the key factual disputes in this case," but nevertheless determined that it was not material and, thus, did not preclude the entry of summary judgment. This, likewise, is the only factual dispute the Bahrs refer to on appeal. Because "acquiescence time" is not a requisite element of equitable estoppel, we agree with the trial court that this factual dispute is immaterial for summary judgment purposes.
[9]  The Bahrs also argue that the trial court erred in relying on Dahl Investment Co. v. Hughes, 2004 UT App 391, 101 P.3d 830, because it is factually distinguishable from the present appeal. In particular, the Bahrs argue that Dahl is inapposite to the present case because (1) Dahl involved an appeal after a full trial, whereas this appeal follows a grant of summary judgment; (2) unlike the party seeking estoppel in Dahl, "the Imuses are not hapless, unwitting victims"; (3) the Bahrs had no notice of the Imuses' alleged improvements; and (4) the landscaping and irrigation in the Imuses' yard does not qualify as a permanent improvement, as did the driveway in Dahl. These distinctions are not persuasive, especially given the broadened discretion we grant to the trial court's estoppel determination. See Department of Human Servs. ex rel. Parker v. Irizarry, 945 P.2d 676, 678 (Utah 1997). Moreover, the trial court did not rely exclusively on Dahl, but merely found Dahl to be "instructive in this case." The trial court summarized Dahl as follows: a fence between two properties established the legal boundary line; when the fence was torn down, the plaintiff didn't object to eighteen-month construction of a driveway crossing that legal boundary; and even though the plaintiff may have been entitled to enforce the legal boundary, the plaintiff is estopped from doing so now that the driveway is built because removing the driveway would injure the defendants. The trial court then stated that, "[j]ust as in Dahl" the Bahrs may have been legally entitled to the Disputed Property, but their action and the action of their predecessors estops them from now asserting their legal rights. Because Dahl appears to be, as the trial court put it, "instructive in this case," we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in considering Dahl when making its decision. See id.


Use of oscillators employing piezo-electric transducers as frequency determining elements in applications for detecting the presence or absence of materials is well known, as for example, detecting the presence or absence of frost on cooling fins of refrigerators, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,176,524, or the presence or absence of liquid, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,019,072. In devices of this type, the oscillator has a steady state condition of operation when the transducer is not subject to load, as for example the absence of the material being detected, and ceases to oscillate when the material is present and applies a load to the transducer. More particularly, the transducer ceases to resonate when subjected to any type of damping or loading. As a result, the transducer can be used to measure qualitative changes, such as the presence or absence of material, but cannot be used to measure quantitative changes such as changes in the thickness of frost or changes in liquid levels.
In contradistinction, the present invention is directed toward measuring devices using oscillators employing piezo-electric transducers which can be used to measure quantitative changes of the character indicated.