‘I could transform
you. I can transform anyone. It’s my job.
Best make-up artist in the business,’ boasted Val, who had been a
make-up assistant on the Harry Potter films. ‘Think about it. I’ll get us another drink. Same again?’

The
next day, I’d woken up with a massive hangover and a hazy memory of our odd
conversation. But as my head became
clearer, I’d considered Val’s idea a little more seriously. Me and Harry had been together now for five
years. We’d settled into a domestic
routine, and I had to admit our relationship had become complacent. I’d lied when I told Val the sex was still
great between us. It wasn’t bad - just a
bit samey. Perhaps it wouldn’t hurt to
spice things up a bit. So Val and I
began to plot a whole scenario.

‘It’s not enough for
you to look unrecognisable,’ Val decided. ‘For the plan to succeed, Harry will
have to see you in a completely unexpected environment. Where would he think you’d never dream of
going?’

I considered for a moment. ‘Apart from a football match? Somewhere like a sleazy night club.’

‘Great. That’s it then. That’s where he has to pick you up.’

I was horrified. ‘But why would I be at a seedy club?’

‘To put on a show,
of course!’

‘You’re kidding.’

‘I know where you
can go to learn proper burlesque striptease,’ continued Val, full of
enthusiasm. ‘They teach you properly.’

‘No way.’

‘Don’t be such a
wimp. I’ll come with you. Quite fancy
learning myself.’

So, after more cajoling from Val and
a glass or two of wine, we’d gone to a burlesque workshop together. It was a bit of a joke at first, and I did
feel slightly self-conscious to start with, but once I got over my initial
shyness, I began to enjoy myself. Like I was tapping into a hidden part of me I
didn’t know existed. Maybe I secretly
liked the idea of showing my body off, but under a totally different persona. Pretending to be someone else kind of freed my
inhibitions. I booked some extra
practice sessions until I had worked out a sexy little routine. Our plan was
coming together........


Q:

Laravel , sessions just work for 1 online user

I'm new in laravel
I coded a script that many users may work with
but the problem that I have is this :
when a user like "Helen" signs in she can see her profile
but if next another user like "Maria" logs on , Marias panel will be shown for both of them
I think it means just one session can be active at the same time and the value of session will be for the latest user
and the older users session doesn't expire just the value in the session will be changed , thus she identifies as another user and can see that users profile, and also when a user logs out , because of close of the session , all users will be signed out.
here is my simple code :
public function Login(){
        $this->Token();
        $pack=Input::all();
        try {
           $result=DB::table('user')->where('Email','=',$pack['email'])->get();
            if (Hash::check($pack['password'], $result[0]->Password)){
                session(['there' => $result['0']->Email]);
                return redirect('dashboard');
            }
            return redirect('dashboard')->with('does','wrong password');
        }catch(Exception $e){
            return redirect('dashboard')->with('does',.$e);
        }
}

public function UserType() {
        if(!session('there'))
            return "Not Logged";
        else {
            $result = DB::table('user')->where('Email', '=', session('there'))->get();

        if($result!=null)
            return "User";
}

public function ShowDashboard(){
        if($this->UserType()=="Not Logged")
        else
            return view('pages/dashboard');
}

A:

I am not sure why you are session() to manage user logins... Also, they depend a lot on situations where users are login from the same computer, same browser... cookies... etc etc... and maybe that's why you might be getting 2 different session values at the same time...
In any case.. please try and prefer using Laravel's predefined functions of Auth to handle your login/logout procedures.
public function Login()
{
  // What does this do? Check for a CSRF token? If yes, then
  // please understand then Laravel automatically checks
  // for the CSRF token on POST/PUT requests and therefore
  // there is no special need to use the below function...
  $this->Token();

  $pack = request()->only(['email', 'password']);

  // I don't really feel try catch is required here... but completely your choice...
  try {
    if(auth()->attempt($pack)) {
      return redirect('dashboard')
    }
    return redirect->back()->with('does', 'wrong password');
  } catch(Exception $e) {
    return redirect->back()->with('does', $e);
  }
}

public function ShowDashboard()
{
  // You can remove this if/else by adding the 'auth' middleware
  // to this route
  if(!auth()->check())
    return view('pages.dashboard');
  else
    return redirect(route('login'));
}

I found a lot of problems in your above code...

Please use camelCase for naming functions... (I haven't changed the naming in my code above because I don't really know what rules you are following at your workplace or idk...)
Please don't return strings for a simple true/false situation.
Please try and use Models whenever possible. The raw DB commands are required for very complex and extensive queries


/*
 * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
 * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
 * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
 * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
 * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
 * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
 *
 *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
 * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */
package org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.extras.byteman;

import java.util.UUID;

import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.QueueConfiguration;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.RoutingType;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.config.CoreAddressConfiguration;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.ActiveMQServer;
import org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.util.ActiveMQTestBase;
import org.jboss.byteman.contrib.bmunit.BMRule;
import org.jboss.byteman.contrib.bmunit.BMUnitRunner;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;

@RunWith(BMUnitRunner.class)
public class QueueDeploymentFailedTest extends ActiveMQTestBase {

   @Test
   @BMRule(name = "blow up queue deployment",
      targetClass = "org.apache.activemq.artemis.core.server.impl.ActiveMQServerImpl",
      targetMethod = "createQueue(SimpleString,RoutingType,SimpleString,SimpleString,SimpleString,boolean,boolean,boolean,boolean,boolean,int,boolean,boolean,boolean,int,long,boolean",
      targetLocation = "EXIT",
      action = "throw new IllegalStateException(\"test exception\")")
   public void testQueueDeploymentFailure() throws Exception {
      ActiveMQServer server = createServer(false, createDefaultNettyConfig());
      String address = UUID.randomUUID().toString();
      server.getConfiguration().addAddressConfiguration(new CoreAddressConfiguration().setName(address).addRoutingType(RoutingType.ANYCAST).addQueueConfiguration(new QueueConfiguration(UUID.randomUUID().toString()).setRoutingType(RoutingType.ANYCAST).setAddress(address)));
      server.start();
      assertTrue(server.getRemotingService().isStarted());
   }
}


Williams Bros Brewing Co

Williams Bros Brewing Company is a Scottish family-owned microbrewery, founded and operated by brothers Bruce and Scot Williams. It is based in Alloa, Clackmannanshire, in central Scotland.

History

Williams Bros started brewing in 1988. Their first ale was inspired by a 17th-century Gaelic recipe for leann fraoich (heather ale). The heather ale is made using bog myrtle and heather flowers, and was named Fraoch, after the legendary Gaelic hero Fráech (or Fraoch). The ale was produced in a tiny brewery in Taynuilt railway station, which could make no more than five barrels per batch, just enough to supply five pubs across Scotland. As demand grew, the recipe was taken to the old Maclay's Brewery in the Scottish brewing town of Alloa.

The company developed other historic ales, using natural Scottish produce such as elderberries, the shoots of Scots pine, seaweed and gooseberries. In 1998 the Heather Ale brewery moved to Craigmill, outside Strathaven in Lanarkshire. In 2004 the company moved again, to the Forth Brewery at Kelliebank, Alloa, where they are the last remaining brewery in the former Scottish brewing capital. Following the move, the company rebranded as Williams Bros Brewing Co., and continues to expand its range.

See also
Gruit

References

External links
 Williams Bros Brewing Co. web site

Category:Breweries in Scotland
Category:Companies based in Clackmannanshire
Category:1988 establishments in Scotland
Category:Food and drink companies established in 1988


As if the chase wasn't already on for Chase Jeter, it is now a sprint. As he took a few visits during the winter, the five-star prospect got a better idea of what his future plans looked like and how they would shape up. Although he isn't ready to make any decisions yet, they will come soon.


Ethical to use untested Ebola drugs, says WHO Published duration 12 August 2014

image copyright EPA image caption Liberia is struggling to cope with the outbreak

Untested drugs can be used to treat patients infected with the Ebola virus, the World Health Organization says.

The WHO said it was ethical in light of the scale of the outbreak and high number of deaths - more than 1,000 people have died in West Africa.

The statement was made after its medical experts met in Switzerland on Monday to discuss the issue.

But officials warned there were very limited supplies of potential treatments.

media caption Dr Marie-Paule Kieny from the WHO said that there has been "unanimous agreement" among experts

The WHO said where experimental treatments are used there must be informed consent and the results of the treatment collected and shared.

In a statement, it said: "In the particular circumstances of this outbreak, and provided certain conditions are met, the panel reached consensus that it is ethical to offer unproven interventions with as yet unknown efficacy and adverse effects, as potential treatment or prevention."

But the organisation conceded there were still many questions to be answered including how data could be gathered effectively while the focus remained on providing good medical care.

It was also unclear where the funding for the treatment would come from.

Last week the WHO declared the Ebola outbreak was a global health emergency.

The move came as Liberia said it was getting an experimental drug, Zmapp, after requests to the US government.

But the WHO said there were only 12 doses.

Zmapp has been used on two US aid workers who have shown signs of improvement, although it is not certain what role the medication played in this.

A Roman Catholic priest, infected with Ebola in Liberia, who died after returning home to Spain is also thought to have been given the drug.

What drugs exist currently ?

There a handful of drugs that have been shown to work well in animals.

One is Zmapp - the drug requested by the Liberian government. This contains a cocktail of antibodies that attack proteins on the surface of the virus.

Only one drug has moved onto early safety testing in humans. Known as TKM-Ebola this interrupts the genetic code of the virus and prevents it from making disease causing proteins.

The drug was trialled in healthy volunteers at the beginning of 2014 but the American medicines regulator asked for further safety information. The manufacturer says human studies may soon resume.

Another option would be to use serum from individuals who have survived the virus - this is a part of the blood that may contain particles able to neutralise the virus.

Vaccines to protect against acquiring the disease have also been shown to work in primates. American authorities are considering fast-tracking their development and say they could be in use in 2016. Trials are likely to start soon according to the WHO.

But experts warn ultimately the only way to be sure a drug or vaccine is effective is to see if it works in countries affected by Ebola.

There is no cure for Ebola, which has infected at least 1,779 people since the outbreak was first reported in Guinea in February.

'Hard place'

The Liberian government said it was aware of the risks associated with Zmapp, but the alternative was to allow many more people to die.

"The alternative for not testing this is death, a certain death," Information Minister Lewis Brown told the BBC.

"This is not even the rock and the hard place for us.

"We think those who have been infected should be given the chance to have that tested on them if they give their consent to do so.

"We know there may be risks associated with it," the minister added, "but choosing a risk and choosing dying I am sure many would prefer to see that risk happen".

Ebola's initial flu-like symptoms can lead to external haemorrhaging from areas like eyes and gums, and internal bleeding which can lead to organ failure. Patients have a better chance of survival if they receive early treatment.

Ebola virus disease (EVD)

image copyright Science Photo Library


USP6-induced neoplasms: the biologic spectrum of aneurysmal bone cyst and nodular fasciitis.
USP6 (also known as TRE17) is a ubiquitin-specific protease that was identified as an oncogene in transfection experiments with Ewing sarcoma DNA 2 decades ago. Until recently, little was known about USP6 function and mechanisms of oncogenic activation. The identification of USP6 fusion genes in aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) and, more recently, in nodular fasciitis led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of these lesions. Furthermore, the detection of USP6 genomic rearrangements or USP6 fusion genes may be used as a diagnostic tool for these lesions. In this review, we discuss the clinicopathologic features, molecular pathology, and pathogenesis of ABC and nodular fasciitis. We also discuss the possible line of differentiation of ABC and its relationship to nodular fasciitis and other lesions.


Know the Signs, Protect the Mental Health of Your Workplace

Share this post

My fascination with workplace culture began after a very personal experience. I still remember coming into work on what seemed like a typical day at the office, to find everyone standing up at their desks. Our VP had taken away our chairs. He had done this because no one had set up a demo for a new product. It wasn’t a surprise that everyone was standing because we were never given any resources or training to help us succeed. He didn’t even show up that day, instead had my manager do the dirty work. As you might imagine, the morale in the office was at an all-time low, everyone standing around miserable, complaining of lower back pain. His plan, to “motivate” us in this way failed terribly. And, I told him. He did not like it.

A snippet of what this blog post is about:

Mental Health as the Missing Piece:

Eight years later, I ended up landing a contract at Google X, ranked the “Greatest Place to Work,” after spending years researching the connection between company culture and happiness. At that time, I was convinced that inspiration was the driving force and the key to happy culture and success in the workplace.

It wasn’t until I experienced a severe depressive episode while working for Google, that I realized that I had been missing a key piece of the puzzle: the mental health piece.

According to the World Health Organization, Depression is the number one cause of illness and disability worldwide. Affecting more than 300 million people, this is an 18% increase, from 2005 to 2015. We are living through a mental health epidemic, and it’s time to start taking it seriously. It’s time to start paying attention to warning signs before individuals are in full-blown crisis mode, at which point it’s much more difficult to take action. Mostly, it’s time to start dropping the stigma and realize that everyone deals with this, at varying levels. In all my years of research, I have never met a person who wasn’t affected by it.

And if it affects people, it affects companies, and workplace culture.

We Need to Pay Attention:

About one in four Americans, named their places of work as a source of anxiety. After having worked as a business development executive, consultant, and coach at dozens of workplaces, I’ve compiled a list of warning signs to look out for. In places where the following signs existed, the workplace culture suffered. People became unhappy, their work suffered, and so did their health.

1) Hyper Competitiveness - There are certain environments, like sales environments that are designed to be hyper-competitive. For some, this works great. For others, it creates stress every single day, week, and month. It’s very important to make sure to have the right people in these kinds of environments. A person who isn’t motivated by competition will eventually sink from the stress of burnout.

2) Fear as Inspiration - What my VP tried to do, by threatening to take away our chairs, was fear- based inspiration. And it failed miserably because, at the end of the day, we are more drawn to love than fear. While negative reinforcement might work for some, all of my research suggests that offering to receive something upon success is a much greater motivator. A great example if this is, if a team hits a goal, they have a team bonding outing. If you're not sure what type of management style you fall under, read a bit on how to have self-awareness as a leader.

3) Stagnant Work- An issue we had on my team at Google was that we had an extremely bright group of people, but we did not have enough work to do. It’s essential that when hiring talent, you provide them with an opportunity to actually contribute. While it might seem fun for a few days to relax in the office, at the end of the day, smart, motivated people want to make a contribution. When people can express their full potential at work, happiness and fulfillment grow.

4) Childlike Treatment- I once had a workplace that required I clock in by 7:30AM. If I was even a minute late four times a month, I lost my commission for the month. So I found myself literally running to work, sweating. I hated it. And despite the fact that I was the #1 producer, I quit in six months because I could not stand being treated like a child. Forcing everyone to work in the exact same way, could be a recipe for disaster. As children we are closely monitored, often for our own safety, but as self-actualized adults, it’s critical to work within a system that allows for flexibility. One of the best managers I’ve ever had always said, “flexibility is opportunity” and I agree.

I could have focused this piece on what to do, but I wanted to highlight what to look out for, because in my experience, knowing what not to do, is just as useful. Let’s all remember that when we feel better, we show up as our best selves. Whether you’re working for the greatest place to work or for a fear-based CEO doesn’t matter -it’s up to all of usto contribute to our mental health and look out for these warnings signs.

Want to get a pulse on your workplace culture and how it's affecting your teams' mental wellness? Schedule a FREE chat with us about your company culture, and we'll direct you to the right resources and solutions.


Evil is more than banal: situationism and the concept of evil.
Social psychology as a discipline has given relatively little attention to the problem of evil in society, and those discussions in this field that do exist typically regard evil actions as only varieties of aggression without any characteristics that distinguish them from other forms of intentional mistreatment of others. Because of the field's situationistic perspective emphasizing the individual's susceptibility to the power of the immediate situation, social psychoiogists generally view the fairly high levels of obedience to authority displayed in Milgram's (1963, 1974) classic experiment as the paradigmatic example of evil behavior. For them, much evil is, in Arendt's (1963) well-known phrase, only "banal," and Milgram's findings are often viewed as illustrating the "central dynamic" involved in the slaughter of millions of Jews and other "undesirables" in the Holocaust. This article holds that Milgram's (1974) obedience research does not represent significant features of the Holocaust, especially the sadism that occurred not infrequently, and disregards the vital difference between those who initiated the murderous policy and the others who followed their orders. Building on Darley's (1992) earlier conjectures about the features that ordinary people might consider in judging whether any given action is evil, I suggest that many persons have a prototypic conception of evil and speculate about the dimensions that could be involved in this prototype.


package com.example.demo.model;

import java.util.Date;
import javax.persistence.*;

@Table(name = "user_label")
public class UserLabel {
    @Id
    private String id;

    /**
     * 用户id
     */
    @Column(name = "user_id")
    private String userId;

    /**
     * 标签id
     */
    @Column(name = "label_id")
    private String labelId;

    @Column(name = "create_time")
    private Date createTime;

    /**
     * @return id
     */
    public String getId() {
        return id;
    }

    /**
     * @param id
     */
    public void setId(String id) {
        this.id = id == null ? null : id.trim();
    }

    /**
     * 获取用户id
     *
     * @return user_id - 用户id
     */
    public String getUserId() {
        return userId;
    }

    /**
     * 设置用户id
     *
     * @param userId 用户id
     */
    public void setUserId(String userId) {
        this.userId = userId == null ? null : userId.trim();
    }

    /**
     * 获取标签id
     *
     * @return label_id - 标签id
     */
    public String getLabelId() {
        return labelId;
    }

    /**
     * 设置标签id
     *
     * @param labelId 标签id
     */
    public void setLabelId(String labelId) {
        this.labelId = labelId == null ? null : labelId.trim();
    }

    /**
     * @return create_time
     */
    public Date getCreateTime() {
        return createTime;
    }

    /**
     * @param createTime
     */
    public void setCreateTime(Date createTime) {
        this.createTime = createTime;
    }
}


© Anthony Kwan/Getty Images Pro-democracy supporters protested outside a Hong Kong police station after Saturday’s arrests of opposition figures.

HONG KONG — More than a dozen leading pro-democracy activists and former lawmakers in Hong Kong were arrested Saturday in connection with the protests that raged in the city last year, the biggest roundup of prominent opposition figures in recent memory.

The arrests signaled a broader crackdown on the antigovernment movement that roiled the semiautonomous city last year, one of the most significant challenges to Communist Party rule in decades. Beijing and pro-government supporters in the city have called for lawmakers to pass national security laws that residents worry would allow mainland authorities to further encroach upon the territory’s civic freedoms.

The high-profile arrests were made as Hong Kong battled to contain the coronavirus outbreak, which has helped quiet down the huge street protests but fueled further distrust of authorities. The virus has halted protests around the world, forcing people to stay home and giving authorities new laws for limiting public gatherings, detaining people with less fear of public blowback while many residents remained under lockdowns or observing limits on their movement.

But the arrests Saturday in Hong Kong, along with a renewed push for national security legislation in the city, could anger protesters and reinvigorate the mass demonstrations that had tapered off.

Fifteen activists between 24 and 81 years old were rounded up on suspicion of organizing, publicizing, or taking part in several unauthorized assemblies between August and October and will face prosecution, police said Saturday without disclosing their names, following protocol.

The arrested democratic heavyweights included veteran lawyers Martin Lee and Margaret Ng; media tycoon Jimmy Lai; and former opposition legislators Albert Ho, Lee Cheuk-yan, and Leung Kwok-hung, political parties and aides said.

While opposition politicians have been included among the thousands of protest-related arrests over the past year, rarely have so many prominent pro-democracy figures been arrested at once.

Lau Siu-kai, vice president of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, a powerful Beijing advisory group, said that the arrests Saturday represented an early step toward a broader crackdown by Beijing on the Hong Kong opposition.

The arrests reflect an assessment by Beijing that protests in Hong Kong over the past year pose such a threat to national security that it is worthwhile to defy US threats of retaliation if a crackdown takes place, he said.

“Now Beijing is calling the US’ bluff and taking the initial steps against the Hong Kong opposition, and there will be more steps to shrink their space,” said Lau.

A Communist Party gathering late last year in Beijing, the so-called fourth plenum, set a new tone for policy in Hong Kong that will be carried out this year, Lau said. “This is the time to end the chaos in Hong Kong,” he said. “After the fourth plenum, Beijing is determined to end the chaos in Hong Kong once and for all.”

The arrests followed calls from China’s central government in recent days for Hong Kong to enact a package of national security laws that was last put forward in 2003 but shelved after a mass protest.

Luo Huining, Beijing’s top representative in Hong Kong, said this past week that national security has always been a “prominent shortcoming” since the former British colony’s return to Chinese control in 1997.

He called for urgent work on the “legal system and enforcement mechanism to safeguard national security,” a contentious issue in the city.

Legal experts and critics of Beijing have warned against perceived increased interference in Hong Kong’s local affairs by the Chinese government. The central government’s liaison office in Hong Kong has recently criticized filibustering by pro-democracy legislators, raising concerns that it was violating the “one country, two systems” principle.


Jamie Cureton

Jamie Cureton (born 28 August 1975) is an English former professional footballer. A striker, he currently plays for Hornchurch and is an academy coach at Arsenal.

He began his career at Norwich City in 1994, and after the club's relegation from the Premier League at the end of the season, has spent the majority of his career in England's lower leagues, apart from a season at South Korean side Busan I'Cons in 2003. One of only 29 footballers in the world to have made over 1,000 competitive appearances, his career has spanned eight tiers of the football pyramid from the Premier League to the Southern and Isthmian League, and has seen him score over 350 goals.

He represented England at under-18 level.

Playing career

Early years
Born in Bristol, Cureton began his professional career with Norwich City, before moving on to Bristol Rovers. In 1993, he turned down an offer from Manchester United to stay at Carrow Road. An England youth international, he achieved significant status with the Norwich fans when he dyed his hair yellow and green for an Old Farm derby game against Ipswich Town in 1996 and subsequently scoring in the same fixture. He was sold by Mike Walker to Bristol Rovers in 1996.

Bristol Rovers
Cureton enjoyed a prolific spell at his hometown club. This was particularly the case during the 1999–2000 season where he struck up a partnership with Jason Roberts that almost took the club to promotion. After the club dipped out of the play-off places on the final day of the season he decided his future lay with pastures new, and headed to Reading.

Reading
Cureton moved to Reading in 2000, playing there for three years. While at the club, the Reading supporters' trust had a newly discovered star in the "Perseus" constellation named after him. Here he struck a formidable partnership with Martin Butler, becoming one of the most feared combinations in the Football League. In his first season (2000–01), he scored 30 goals, including a goal in the play-off final against Walsall, a game which Reading went on to lose 3–2. The following season however, it was Cureton who scored the goal to get Reading promoted. He scored the equaliser against Brentford in the closing stages, with a deft flick to help it over the keeper, into the corner of the net.

Busan I'Cons
Cureton then made a mid-2003 switch to K-League side Busan I'Cons (now Busan IPark). He failed to settle in East Asia however, describing the move as "another big mistake" in 2014.

Return to England

After being released from his contract at Busan, he returned to England and joined Queens Park Rangers on 30 January 2004. One of the more memorable of the six goals he scored there was a volley from a tight angle against Coventry City which echoed Marco Van Basten's goal against USSR in the Euro 1988 final. After a mostly unsettled season at Loftus Road though, he joined Swindon Town in June 2005.

He failed to make his mark in his first spell at the club and subsequently joined Colchester United on loan. He then briefly returned to Swindon Town as they failed to avoid relegation to League Two. After Swindon's relegation, Cureton activated a clause in his contract that allowed him to leave Swindon on a free transfer, and rejoined Colchester on a permanent basis. His first full season with the U's proved to be hugely successful as the Essex club managed a 10th-place finish in the Championship, partnering Chris Iwelumo.

One of Cureton's main highlights in a Colchester shirt was the hat-trick he scored in the 3–0 away win against Essex rivals Southend United on 7 April 2007.

His 23 goals in the 2006–07 season gave him the Championship Golden Boot as the league's top scorer, and made him the first Colchester United striker since Tony Adcock to score 20 league goals in a season; the first for 22 years.

On 5 June 2007, due to agent demands, Cureton handed in a transfer request to Colchester United, citing Colchester's ambitions differing from his own, underlined when the club failed to re-sign several key players. This inevitably fuelled speculation that Cureton might return to Norwich City, the club where he began his career. Cureton himself stated that he would like to return to the club.

Colchester initially rejected the transfer request, saying that Cureton was an important part of the club's future and that they wanted to keep him, though Norwich City manager Peter Grant confirmed that he would like to sign Cureton. Cureton moved to Norwich City for £825,000 on 29 June 2007. He was signed as a replacement for Robert Earnshaw, Norwich's top scorer of the 2006–07 season, who left for Derby County in a £3.5 million deal the same day.

Norwich City
After his success at Colchester United, Cureton had a disappointing return to Norwich City.

He scored his first goals for Norwich since re-signing against King's Lynn at The Walks. This was followed up by another goal on Norwich's pre season tour of Holland against AGOVV Apeldoorn.

He then scored two in the League Cup against Barnet and two on his league debut for Norwich against Southampton.

Cureton continued to play very much a bit part during the season and one of his few goals came during the Canaries' 1–0 win at Scunthorpe United, a victory that lifted Norwich clear of the relegation places ahead of the Christmas and New Year fixtures.

Barnsley
Due to lack of first team football, on 27 November 2008, Cureton joined Barnsley on a 3-month loan deal, but on 14 January 2009, he was recalled to Norwich City after Glenn Roeder's termination as manager.

When Norwich played Barnsley on the following weekend, the Canaries were 4–0 victors with Cureton scoring one. Cureton played his 100th game for Norwich City against Coventry but put in a bad performance and was dropped for the rest of the season.

The following season, newly appointed manager Paul Lambert started Cureton for the first three games, only to drop him to the bench for the next two games, leaving him an unused sub for both.

Cureton scored his first two goals of the season, against Leyton Orient and Bristol Rovers, both in which he came on as a late sub. Cureton scored the winning penalty in a Football League Trophy match against Swindon. However this was to be his last ever appearance for Norwich as after this he failed to even secure a place on the bench. After being loaned out to Shrewsbury for the remainder of the season Cureton was released by Norwich City.

Shrewsbury Town
Cureton joined Shrewsbury Town on loan until the end of the 2009–10 season on 16 February 2010 from Norwich. After a number of starts and a number of unimpressive performances, he was sent back to Norwich prematurely.

Exeter City and Leyton Orient
Cureton spent the 2010 pre-season on trial with Exeter City, stating he would like to link up with a club closer to his Bristol home, and joined on a short-term deal in August 2010. A contract extension saw him continue with the Grecians until the end of 2010–11, a season in which he finished as the club's top scorer, with 20 goals in all competition,s and won the Supporter's Player of the Year and Player's Player of the Year awards. A deal was offered for Cureton to stay at Exeter for 2011-12 was declined by Cureton, who instead joined Leyton Orient in June 2011. He scored his first and only goal for the O's on 7 January 2012, in a 4–1 loss at Carlisle United, before re-joining Exeter on loan just under two months later. He scored one goal in seven appearances as the Grecians were relegated from League One. Cureton was released by Orient after the expiry of his contract in May 2012, and signed a permanent deal with Exeter in July 2012. He played 42 games in 2012-13, scoring 21 goals, but was released at the end of the season.

Cheltenham Town

On 17 June 2013, it was announced that Cureton had agreed terms on a one-year deal with Cheltenham Town. He ended the season with 11 goals in 36 appearances which included 12 substitute appearances. He was released by the club on 7 May 2014.

Dagenham & Redbridge
On 24 July 2014, Cureton agreed a one-year deal with League Two side Dagenham & Redbridge, the 14th different club of his senior career. Following the retirements of Ryan Giggs and Kevin Phillips and Ian Goodison's departure from Tranmere Rovers, 39-year-old Cureton was the oldest onfield player in all four of England's top divisions. He was awarded player of the Year 2014–15 at the Daggers on the last home game of the season.

Later career
Cureton signed a short-term contract with Farnborough in August 2016, before moving to Eastleigh of the National League the following month. In early December, he departed Eastleigh after a change of management, and briefly re-joined Farnborough, scoring in his first game since returning to the club in a 2–3 home defeat against Hanwell Town, before joining St Albans City that same month. He returned to Farnborough  in April 2017 on dual registration for the remainder of the 2016–17 season, and in July a permanent deal of one year was agreed. Having scored ten goals in 23 league appearances for Farnborough, Cureton joined Bishop's Stortford midway through the 2017–18 season, making his début in a 0–3 defeat to Royston Town on 1 January 2018. In April 2019 Cureton reached the landmark of 1,000 senior club appearances, scoring twice as Bishop's Stortford beat Brightlingsea Regent 3-2. In 2019 he signed dual registration terms with Enfield, who groundshare with Bishop's Stortford. After being sent off eight minutes into his debut on 8 October, he scored in his second appearance on 24 October, becoming the first player to score in the top nine levels of English football.

On 04/02/2020 it was announced that Cureton had joined Hornchurch who play in the  and play at the Hornchurch Stadium.

Coaching career
Cureton was appointed as an assistant coach at Arsenal's academy in September 2017.

Following the resignation of Adam Flint in September 2018, Cureton became manager of Bishop's Stortford alongside club owner Steve Smith, as an interim to begin with. They guided Stortford to a seventh-place finish in the Isthmian Premier that season. In October 2019 he took sole charge of the position. He left the club in February 2020, signing for Hornchurch as a player.

Career statistics

Honours
Reading
Football League Second Division runner-up: 2001–02

Queens Park Rangers
Football League Second Division runner-up: 2003–04

Individual
PFA Team of the Year: 2012–13 League Two

References

External links

England profile at theFA

Category:1975 births
Category:Living people
Category:Footballers from Bristol
Category:English footballers
Category:English expatriate footballers
Category:England youth international footballers
Category:Association football forwards
Category:Norwich City F.C. players
Category:A.F.C. Bournemouth players
Category:Bristol Rovers F.C. players
Category:Reading F.C. players
Category:Busan IPark players
Category:Queens Park Rangers F.C. players
Category:Swindon Town F.C. players
Category:Colchester United F.C. players
Category:Barnsley F.C. players
Category:Shrewsbury Town F.C. players
Category:Exeter City F.C. players
Category:Leyton Orient F.C. players
Category:Cheltenham Town F.C. players
Category:Dagenham & Redbridge F.C. players
Category:Farnborough F.C. players
Category:Eastleigh F.C. players
Category:Bishop's Stortford F.C. players
Category:Bishop's Stortford F.C. managers
Category:St Albans City F.C. players
Category:Enfield F.C. players
Category:Hornchurch F.C. players
Category:Arsenal F.C. non-playing staff
Category:Premier League players
Category:English Football League players
Category:K League 1 players
Category:National League (English football) players
Category:Southern Football League players
Category:Isthmian League players
Category:English expatriate sportspeople in South Korea
Category:Expatriate footballers in South Korea
Category:English football managers


Approval based on Phase III AURA3 trial that demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival with Tagrisso compared to chemotherapy

MISSISSAUGA, ON, Jan. 31, 2018 /CNW/ – AstraZeneca Canada announces that Health Canada has granted full approval (Notice of Compliance) for Tagrisso® (osimertinib) for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease has progressed on or after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. This full approval follows a Notice of Compliance with Conditions for Tagrisso that was granted in July, 2016. The full approval was based on results from the randomized Phase III AURA3 trial demonstrating that Tagrisso is superior to chemotherapy in prolonging progression-free survival (PFS).1 Tagrisso is the first and only approved medicine indicated for NSCLC patients who have tested positive for the EGFR T790M mutation.1

“Non-small cell lung cancer is an aggressive disease, and so timely public reimbursement to medicines that can prolong life is of the utmost importance for patients and their treating physicians,” says Dr. Glenwood Goss, Professor of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and Director of Clinical and Translational Research at the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre. “This full approval of Tagrisso, founded on data from the AURA3 trial, further underscores the progression-free survival benefit of Tagrisso, including in patients with difficult-to-treat brain metastases, and reinforces the robust clinical benefit I have seen in my own patients. We are hopeful that patients across Canada will soon have public access to this much-needed therapy.”

The pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review granted a positive recommendation for the reimbursement of Tagrisso last year. AstraZeneca remains committed to working with the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance, on behalf of the provinces and territories, to ensure that Tagrisso is made publicly available as soon as possible. For these patients, there is no time to wait.

About Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)On average, 78 Canadians are diagnosed with lung cancer every day and 58 Canadians will die from lung cancer today.2More people die of lung cancer than breast cancer, colorectal cancer and prostate cancer combined; deaths from lung cancer represented 26 per cent of all cancer deaths in Canada in 2017.2 NSCLC is the most common form of lung cancer and accounts for 85 to 90 per cent of all lung cancers in Canada.3 Often diagnosed in late stage, fewer than 17 per cent of patients with NSCLC will live more than five years following diagnosis.2 Ethnicity is correlated with an increased risk of certain identifiable genetic mutations in NSCLC. While Caucasians are found to be EGFR mutation-positive in 10-15 per cent of all NSCLC diagnosed, this proportion climbs with an Asian background to around 30-40 per cent of all diagnosed cases.4

About TagrissoTagrisso 80mg once daily tablet is approved in nearly 70 countries around the world, including Canada, and nationally reimbursed in a number of countries including the US, Japan, UK, Italy, Sweden, Israel and South Korea, as the first treatment for patients with locally-advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC whose disease has progressed on or after EGFR TKI therapy. Eligibility for treatment with Tagrisso is dependent on a validated test confirming the presence of the EGFR T790M mutation.1 In Canada, Tagrisso received a Notice of Compliance with Conditions in July 2016, and full approval (Notice of Compliance) on January 19, 2018.

Tagrsso is an irreversible EGFR inhibitor, pioneered during scientific exploration and engineered to overcome the mechanism of resistance by targeting the T790M resistance mutation. Tagrisso is also being investigated, alone or in combination, in both the adjuvant and metastatic first-line settings, including patients with and without brain metastases, and in those with leptomeningeal disease.

About AstraZenecaAstraZeneca is a global, innovation-driven biopharmaceutical business with a primary focus on the discovery, development and commercialization of primary and specialty care medicines that transform lives. Our primary focus is on three important areas of healthcare: Cardiovascular and Metabolic disease; Oncology; and Respiratory, Inflammation and Autoimmunity. AstraZeneca operates in more than 100 countries and its innovative medicines are used by millions of patients worldwide. In Canada, we employ more than 675 employees across the country and our AstraZeneca Canada headquarters are located in Mississauga, Ontario. For more information, please visit the company’s website at www.astrazeneca.ca.


Tim Howard net worth and salary: Tim Howard is an American soccer player with an estimated net worth of $6 million dollars and annual salary of $2.6 million. Born in North Brunswick, New Jersey, Tim Howard showed early athletic ability, excelling in both basketball and soccer throughout high school. His soccer abilities ended up eclipsing his very solid basketball ability, and he showed great promise as both a midfielder and a goalkeeper. He began playing on the U.S. Youth National circuit when he was 15, and was invited to play with the North Jersey Imperials of the United States Independent Soccer League just before graduating from high school. He was very quickly promoted to play with the Major League Soccer team, the MetroStars, and remained with the team from 1998 to 2003. He played very well while with the MetroStars, and became the youngest player to win the MLS Goalkeeper of the Year Award ever. He signed with Manchester United in 2003, and played moderately well for them until 2007. Since then, he has played very successfully for Everton, and is only the fourth goalkeeper to have ever scored during a Premier League game.

Timothy Matthew "Tim" Howard (born March 6, 1979) is an American soccer player who plays as a goalkeeper for English club Everton and the United States national team.Howard started his career with the North Jersey Imperials before making a move to the MetroStars. His appearances soon attracted the attention of Manchester United, who signed him in 2003. He enjoyed relative success with them as they won the 2003 FA Community Shield, the 2003???04 FA Cup and the 2005???06 League Cup. However, after United signed Edwin van der Sar, Howard went out on loan to Everton to play more first-team football and eventually signed permanently with them in February 2007. On January 4, 2012, Howard scored a goal and his first as a professional footballer against Bolton Wanderers. This made him the fourth goalkeeper to score a goal in a Premier League match.Howard first represented the United States national team in 2002 and was an unused substitute for the 2006 World Cup. He later established himself as first-choice and started all of the United States' games at the 2010 World Cup as they reached the Round of 16.Howard was born in North Brunswick, New Jersey, to Matthew Howard ??? an African American, and Esther Howard (n?(C)e Fekete), a native of Hungary. His parents divorced when he was three years old, and Howard lived with his mother, a project manager for a cosmetics distributor. His father, a long-distance truck driver for a health care firm, nonetheless maintained a presence in his life. His father was determined to get Howard and his brother, Chris, involved in sports. Before the two could walk, he bought them equipment for various sports to see which games they preferred. Tim showed a preference for basketball and soccer.Howard was diagnosed with Tourette syndrome when he was in the sixth grade. Before Howard was a teenager, Tim Mulqueen, a one time assistant coach for the United States men's national under-17 soccer team, saw his potential at a soccer camp

Tim Howard Net Worth, 3.2 out of 5 based on 5 ratings

(Visited 16 times, 1 visits today)

Tim Howard Latest News

Each of the two candidates seeking to succeed recently retired DA Stan Garnett will be strong champions of justice. I believe both men bring a passion and commitment that would serve Boulder County well. We find ourselves in uncertain times, with an EPA ...

The Rapids goalkeeper pushed back against the thought that his former Manchester United team-mate is too old to make a big impact in MLS Colorado Rapids goalkeeper Tim Howard believes Wayne Rooney will make D.C. United a better team if the club is able to ...


"use strict"

// == UTF16-BE codec. ==========================================================

exports.utf16be = Utf16BECodec;
function Utf16BECodec() {
}

Utf16BECodec.prototype.encoder = Utf16BEEncoder;
Utf16BECodec.prototype.decoder = Utf16BEDecoder;
Utf16BECodec.prototype.bomAware = true;

// -- Encoding

function Utf16BEEncoder() {
}

Utf16BEEncoder.prototype.write = function(str) {
    var buf = new Buffer(str, 'ucs2');
    for (var i = 0; i < buf.length; i += 2) {
        var tmp = buf[i]; buf[i] = buf[i+1]; buf[i+1] = tmp;
    }
    return buf;
}

Utf16BEEncoder.prototype.end = function() {
}

// -- Decoding

function Utf16BEDecoder() {
    this.overflowByte = -1;
}

Utf16BEDecoder.prototype.write = function(buf) {
    if (buf.length == 0)
        return '';

    var buf2 = new Buffer(buf.length + 1),
        i = 0, j = 0;

    if (this.overflowByte !== -1) {
        buf2[0] = buf[0];
        buf2[1] = this.overflowByte;
        i = 1; j = 2;
    }

    for (; i < buf.length-1; i += 2, j+= 2) {
        buf2[j] = buf[i+1];
        buf2[j+1] = buf[i];
    }

    this.overflowByte = (i == buf.length-1) ? buf[buf.length-1] : -1;

    return buf2.slice(0, j).toString('ucs2');
}

Utf16BEDecoder.prototype.end = function() {
}

// == UTF-16 codec =============================================================
// Decoder chooses automatically from UTF-16LE and UTF-16BE using BOM and space-based heuristic.
// Defaults to UTF-16LE, as it's prevalent and default in Node.
// http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-16 and http://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#utf-16le
// Decoder default can be changed: iconv.decode(buf, 'utf16', {defaultEncoding: 'utf-16be'});

// Encoder uses UTF-16LE and prepends BOM (which can be overridden with addBOM: false).

exports.utf16 = Utf16Codec;
function Utf16Codec(codecOptions, iconv) {
    this.iconv = iconv;
}

Utf16Codec.prototype.encoder = Utf16Encoder;
Utf16Codec.prototype.decoder = Utf16Decoder;

// -- Encoding (pass-through)

function Utf16Encoder(options, codec) {
    options = options || {};
    if (options.addBOM === undefined)
        options.addBOM = true;
    this.encoder = codec.iconv.getEncoder('utf-16le', options);
}

Utf16Encoder.prototype.write = function(str) {
    return this.encoder.write(str);
}

Utf16Encoder.prototype.end = function() {
    return this.encoder.end();
}

// -- Decoding

function Utf16Decoder(options, codec) {
    this.decoder = null;
    this.initialBytes = [];
    this.initialBytesLen = 0;

    this.options = options || {};
    this.iconv = codec.iconv;
}

Utf16Decoder.prototype.write = function(buf) {
    if (!this.decoder) {
        // Codec is not chosen yet. Accumulate initial bytes.
        this.initialBytes.push(buf);
        this.initialBytesLen += buf.length;

        if (this.initialBytesLen < 16) // We need more bytes to use space heuristic (see below)
            return '';

        // We have enough bytes -> detect endianness.
        var buf = Buffer.concat(this.initialBytes),
            encoding = detectEncoding(buf, this.options.defaultEncoding);
        this.decoder = this.iconv.getDecoder(encoding, this.options);
        this.initialBytes.length = this.initialBytesLen = 0;
    }

    return this.decoder.write(buf);
}

Utf16Decoder.prototype.end = function() {
    if (!this.decoder) {
        var buf = Buffer.concat(this.initialBytes),
            encoding = detectEncoding(buf, this.options.defaultEncoding);
        this.decoder = this.iconv.getDecoder(encoding, this.options);

        var res = this.decoder.write(buf),
            trail = this.decoder.end();

        return trail ? (res + trail) : res;
    }
    return this.decoder.end();
}

function detectEncoding(buf, defaultEncoding) {
    var enc = defaultEncoding || 'utf-16le';

    if (buf.length >= 2) {
        // Check BOM.
        if (buf[0] == 0xFE && buf[1] == 0xFF) // UTF-16BE BOM
            enc = 'utf-16be';
        else if (buf[0] == 0xFF && buf[1] == 0xFE) // UTF-16LE BOM
            enc = 'utf-16le';
        else {
            // No BOM found. Try to deduce encoding from initial content.
            // Most of the time, the content has ASCII chars (U+00**), but the opposite (U+**00) is uncommon.
            // So, we count ASCII as if it was LE or BE, and decide from that.
            var asciiCharsLE = 0, asciiCharsBE = 0, // Counts of chars in both positions
                _len = Math.min(buf.length - (buf.length % 2), 64); // Len is always even.

            for (var i = 0; i < _len; i += 2) {
                if (buf[i] === 0 && buf[i+1] !== 0) asciiCharsBE++;
                if (buf[i] !== 0 && buf[i+1] === 0) asciiCharsLE++;
            }

            if (asciiCharsBE > asciiCharsLE)
                enc = 'utf-16be';
            else if (asciiCharsBE < asciiCharsLE)
                enc = 'utf-16le';
        }
    }

    return enc;
}


Ingela Gathenhielm

Ingela Olofsdotter Gathenhielm née Hammar (11 September 1692 – 29 April 1729), was a Swedish shipowner and privateer in service of King Charles XII of Sweden during the Great Northern War.

Biography

Ingela Gathenhielm was born in Onsala as the daughter of the shipowner Olof Hammar and Gunilla Mårtensdotter. In 1711, Ingela married Lars Gathenhielm. Ingela and Lars lived on adjacent farms as children and met at a young age.  They had five children together, of which only one, the son Anders (1714–1768), survived to adulthood.  After their wedding, they settled in Gothenburg.

Privateering
The couple had both grown up in families involved in the privateering activity in Onsala.

In 1710, Lars Gathenhielm was granted royal permission to attack and plunder ships from all nations belonging to the enemy of Sweden during the Great Nordic War. Reportedly, in practice he did in fact attack ships from non-enemy nations as well, making the activity illegal piracy. The spoils were sold in Dunkerque (or Dunkirk) in northern France. Lars made a fortune, inducted to the Gothenburg city guild in 1715 and ennobled, alongside his brother Christian, for his service to the crown.

Many stories and legends have been told about Ingela Gathenhielm. She's reported to of been deeply involved in the seafarings of Lars as his business companion, adviser, and the mastermind behind many of his affairs. She was also a privateer herself, which wasn't odd in 18th-century Sweden, where married women were expected to assist their husband's in business. What's confirmed is that when Lars died in 1718, Ingela inherited his royal privateering permit and continued to manage his fleet (and his alleged pirate empire). This wouldn't have been regarded as controversial for the standards of that time, when widows by law inherited the business of their late spouse, even if the business, in this case, was unconventional; her contemporary Margareta von Ascheberg also inherited a war office in the same war. She was called the Kapardrottningen or the 'Shipping Queen'.

The Swedish privateering licenses were retracted after the peace treaty between Denmark in 1720 and Russia in 1721.  After the Peace, Ingela issued several lengthy lawsuits against the Crown for monetary compensation for the costs she had as a privateer in the service of the crown, which did in fact give her military status of a kind; this continued until after her death and was inherited by her second spouse.

Later life
Aside from her activity as a privateer, Ingela managed several other businesses in Gothenburg. She inherited the ropewalk factory and the shipping business from her spouse. She expanded it by founding many other businesses such as a bakery, forge, distillery and Sailmaker factory. Becoming successful in these businesses, particularly the ropewalk factory, which reportedly equipped a large part of the ships of Gothenburg.

In 1722, Ingela married the colonel lieutenant Isak Browald. In 1729, she was buried alongside her first husband in Onsala, Sweden, beneath the tower of the church.

Legacy
A street in Västra Frölunda is named after her: Ingela Gathenhielms gata ('Ingela Gathenhielm Street').

References

 https://web.archive.org/web/20100812142016/http://www.ericsonwolke.se/las_mer_lasse_i_gatan.htm
 http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=97619594-9250-4e8b-bd79-18262a683f31
 Göteborg - handbok för resande, Octavia Carlén 1869 s.125-130
 Berättelser ur Göteborgs Historia under envåldstiden, H.Fröding 1922 s.300-315
 Majornas Kyrkokrönika, Per Pehrsson 1926
 Det forna Majorna, Axel Rosén 1940
 Kronologiska anteckningar om viktigare händelser i Göteborg 1619-1982, Göteborgs Hembygdsförbund 1982
 Göteborg berättar, Bengt A. Öhnander 1991
 Göteborgs gatunamn, Greta Baum 2001
 Lasse i Gatan - Kaparkriget och det svenska stormaktsväldets fall, Militärhistoriker Lars Ericson/Historiska Media 1997 s.77-87

Category:1692 births
Category:Privateers
Category:Female pirates
Category:Women in 18th-century warfare
Category:Swedish pirates
Category:1729 deaths
Category:Women in war in Sweden
Category:Swedish people of the Great Northern War
Category:18th-century Swedish businesspeople
Category:18th-century pirates
Category:Swedish businesspeople in shipping


On Saturday, November 22, 2014, Teachers for Social Justice (TSJ) hosted their 13th Annual Teaching for Social Justice Curriculum Fair. TSJ is an organization of educators who is committed to education for social justice. The fair brings together educators and supporters from across the county to educate and share ideas about how schools can empower students.

(photo credit: Ervin Lopez)

This year's fair focused on 'Democratize Education! Democratize Chicago!' This year, TSJ was honored to host two educators who have dedicated their lives for a just educated. Kali Akuno from Malcom X Grassroots Movement and Jackson from the Chicago Teachers Union were the keynote speakers. In addition, 15 workshops were held on issues, a few included discussing using education to resist neoliberalism, strategizing for economic and political democracy, resisting standardize tests, cop watching, among others. Also, over 60 excellent exhibitors and organizations presented their resources and curriculum to share with attendees. This year's curriculum fair attracted over 800 people. The fair was held at North Grand High School in the North West side of Chicago.


The use of the pronoun our disturbed the chief commissioner. He had spoken with Inspector Trignant in Paris about Cooper. He's obnoxious, but he knows what he's about. If we had listened to him, we would have caught the Whitney woman red-handed. It was the same phrase Cooper had just used.

Toon Willems made his decision, and it was based partly on the well-publicized failure of the French police to apprehend the hijackers of the De Beers diamonds. Where the French police had failed, the Dutch police would succeed.


It was announced today that Global Digital Asset Exchange (GDAX) has enabled Bitcoin Cash (BCH) trading. GDAX is owned by San Francisco-based digital asset exchange Coinbase. Not long after GDAX announced, Coinbase informed users they will be able to buy, sell, send and receive Bitcoin Cash on Coinbase as well.

The BCH token was announced to the GDAX platform late afternoon Pacific time. The exchange said that BCH order books are currently in post-only mode.

New maker orders will be accepted, but no matches will occur. Regular trading will be enabled shortly.

Adam White, GM of GDAX said:

“We made the decision to list BCH by considering such factors as customer interest, developer support, network security, market capitalization, trading volume, and our Digital Asset Framework.”

The following order books have been created and will remain in post-only mode until there is sufficient liquidity for trading:

BCH–BTC

BCH–USD

BCH–EUR

Bitcoin Cash was created by a fork of the Bitcoin network on August 1st, 2017. All customers who held a bitcoin (BTC) balance on GDAX at the time of the fork have been credited an equal balance of Bitcoin Cash (BCH) in their GDAX account. BCH balances reflect users BTC balance at the time of the Bitcoin Cash fork, which occurred on August 1, 2017, at 13:20 UTC (block #478559).

BCH has doubled in price within the last 24-hours. A couple of days ago, Bitcoin payments company BitPay announced it would add support for processing multiple chains, starting with Bitcoin Cash.


digraph G{
A [label="A: *", shape="box", cond=true, getid="A"]
B [label="B: (^xor)*", shape="box", cond=true, repeat="*", lazyrepeat=true, maxchildren=1, getid="B"]
C [label="C: (xor)+", shape="box", cond="opcode is xor", repeat="+", maxchildren=1, getid="C"]
D [label="D: (*)*", shape="box", cond="true", repeat="*", getid="D"]
E [label="E: *", shape="box", cond=true, getid="E"]

A -> B
B -> C
C -> D
D -> E
D -> B
}


Performer Info

Boston Red Sox Playoff Tickets Information

The Boston Red Sox franchise dates back to 1901 when they were known as the Boston Americans which saw them win a World Series title in 1903. The team became the Red Sox in 1908 and beginning in 1912, Boston went on to win four World Series titles in seven seasons. The Red Sox didn’t win another World Series until 2004, a span of 86 years which many refer to the drought as the “Curse of the Bambino” after the franchise sold baseball great Babe Ruth to the New York Yankees after the 1919 season. Even though Boston didn’t win a World Series for a very long time, they were a successful organization as they advanced to four other World Series and appeared in numerous ALCS games. After their 2004 victory against the St. Louis Cardinals, the Red Sox went on to win two more World Series titles with the most recent occurring in the 2013 season against the Cardinals again. The Red Sox fan base has had the honor of watching all-time greats like Carl Yastrzemski, Carlton Fisk, Jim Rice, and Roger Clemens through the years.

2015 Boston Red Sox Playoff Schedule

A return trip to the 2015 MLB playoffs would put the Red Sox in position to win their eighth World Series title. To get to that level, the Red Sox would have to navigate through a very difficult AL Playoff Schedule. The 2015 Boston Red Sox playoff schedule is determined by the teams final seeding in the 2015 regular season. The final seeding will determine the Red Sox playoff opponent, as well as which team would hold home field advantage. 2015 Boston Red Sox playoff tickets are expected to be some of the highest demand tickets in the history of the franchise due to their recent success.

Boston Red Sox Playoff Video

Boston Red Sox Playoff History & Results

2013: World Series Champions (St. Louis Cardinals)

2007: World Sereis Champions (Colorado Rockies)

2004: World Sereis Champions (St. Louis Cardinals)

Boston Red Sox Playoff Event Guide

How much are 2015 Boston Red Sox Playoff Tickets?

The Boston Red Sox are one of the most beloved sports teams in the world, and Boston Red Sox playoff tickets are among the most sought after in baseball. Boston Red Sox playoff ticket prices are determined by the market and rise and fall based on demand and availability. Generally, Red Sox playoff ticket prices are higher the farther the team advances in the MLB playoffs, with tickets for the World Series and ALCS some of the highest in the MLB.

Where can I buy cheap 2015 Boston Red Sox Playoff Tickets?

TicketCity has a large inventory of Boston Red Sox home and away playoff tickets. Our inventory includes some of the top seats at Fenway Park, at some of the most competitive prices on the market.

What was the best Boston Red Sox Playoff team of all time?

The Boston Red Sox have been playing baseball for over 100 years and have produced countless World Series championship teams with players like Babe Ruth, Ted Williams, Pedro Martinez, and David Ortiz. Choosing the best Boston Red Sox playoff team of all time is an impossible task, but one team remains special in Red Sox history. The 2004 Boston Red Sox playoff team overcame a 3-0 ALCS deficit to their arch-rival New York Yankees to win the ALCS and advance to the World Series. Once in the World Series, the Red Sox swept the Cardinals, bringing Boston its first World Series title since 1918.

Does my child need a ticket to a 2015 Boston Red Sox Playoff Game?

The Boston Red Sox require that all children over the age of 2 years old have a ticket to see a Red Sox playoff game at Fenway Park. If your child is under 2 years old, they will be allowed to sit in a parent or guardians lap for the duration of the game, but will not have access to their own seat during the game.

TicketCity offers a marketplace to access tickets through our network of suppliers. Tickets are owned, priced, fulfilled and shipped by the party listing the ticket. All orders have to be confirmed. Ticket prices may be more than face value and all sales are final. Use of this website constitutes acceptance of our Terms & Conditions.


Q:

Using Grunt or Gulp with OpsWorks

I would like to trigger Grunt or Gulp when I deploy an app on Amazon OpsWorks.
By default, the Node.js layer of OpsWorks run npm install, but not gulp, and I do not know how to write custom recipes: is there another solution?

A:

No, you have to write a recipe.
Even the Node.js layer of OpsWorks installs npm via the recipe:
opsworks-cookbooks / deploy / recipes / nodejs.rb (https://github.com/aws/opsworks-cookbooks/blob/master-chef-11.10/deploy/recipes/nodejs.rb#L20 for Chef 11.10) which reads:
opsworks_nodejs do
    deploy_data deploy
    app application
end

which is defined in:
opsworks-cookbooks / deploy / definitions / opsworks_nodejs.rb (https://github.com/aws/opsworks-cookbooks/blob/master-chef-11.10/deploy/definitions/opsworks_nodejs.rb#L9 for Chef 11.10) and does:
node[:dependencies][:npms].each do |npm, version|
    execute "/usr/local/bin/npm install #{npm}" do
        cwd "#{deploy[:deploy_to]}/current"
    end
end


J-A15005-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,                    IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
                                                       PENNSYLVANIA
                           Appellee

                     v.

RITA JO ANN ARNOLD,

                           Appellant                  No. 108 EDA 2014

           Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence October 15, 2013
               In the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County
             Criminal Division at No(s): CP-15-CR-0001421-2013

BEFORE: BOWES, MUNDY, AND FITZGERALD,* JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY BOWES, J.:                        FILED NOVEMBER 17, 2015

       Rita Jo Ann Arnold appeals from the aggregate judgment of sentence

of one year and four months to two years and eight months incarceration

imposed by the court after she pled guilty to tampering with public records

and obstruction of justice. We affirm.

       Appellant is a former magisterial district judge. The criminal conduct

in this matter stems from her actions in that capacity. On January 19, 2010,

Appellant’s two adult sons were involved in an altercation at her home.

Pennsylvania State Police responded and issued a summary citation to one

of Appellant’s sons.      That son was on probation at the time.   The citation

was received in Appellant’s office on January 20, 2010, and placed in the

docketing bin.

*
    Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
J-A15005-15

      That same day, Appellant placed a telephone call to the Pennsylvania

State Police.    She informed Sergeant Brandon Daniels that the incident

occurred at her house with her son and asked why a citation had been

issued.     Sergeant Daniels was not involved in issuing the citation and

indicated that he would inquire about it. Before Sergeant Daniels responded

to Appellant’s inquiry, he received the citation from Appellant’s district court

in an envelope with his name on it. He then called Appellant and informed

her that the citation was properly issued and needed to be filed.            He

returned the citation to Appellant’s court.     The citation was stamped as

received on February 8, 2010, but Appellant failed to have the citation

docketed.

      Subsequently, on February 15, 2010, Appellant provided an employee

with the citation and instructed that individual that Appellant would advise

the employee when to docket it. She indicated that her son had a probation

hearing approaching and that she did not know if the citation would affect

his probation. Approximately one month later, the trooper who had written

the citation informed Sergeant Daniels that the citation had not yet been

docketed. Accordingly, Sergeant Daniels called Appellant’s office. Appellant

personally spoke with Sergeant Daniels. She informed Sergeant Daniels that

her court was backlogged and that the citation would be filed soon.

      Subsequently, on April 5, 2010, Appellant docketed the citation and

transferred the case to another district magistrate.    In doing so, however,

                                     -2-
J-A15005-15

Appellant did not follow proper protocol for transferring cases in Chester

County and incorrectly filled out the docket information.        Specifically,

Appellant entered an incorrect birthdate and indicated that the defendant

was a black female.

        The irregularities with the citation were discovered by the Chester

County Court Administration during a routine review. President Judge James

P. MacElree II directed Appellant to provide a written explanation for the

unusual handling of the citation. Appellant responded that the delay in the

docketing occurred because her courtroom had been closed due to noxious

fumes for a period beginning on February 8, 2010, and that her courtroom

was moved to a different location. The Chester County Court Administration

reviewed if any other citations received on the first day Appellant’s

courtroom was closed was similarly delayed. That review revealed that all

other citations received on February 8, 2010 were docketed by February 23,

2010.

        As a result of these actions, a Judicial Conduct Board investigation

occurred. As part of that investigation, Appellant’s office manager testified

that Appellant had told her in February not to docket the citation. She also

submitted that Appellant asked her to testify before the Judicial Conduct

Board that the office manager did not learn of the citation until Appellant

gave it to her to transfer to another magistrate. The Judicial Conduct Board

suspended Appellant for three months, after which Appellant resumed her

                                     -3-
J-A15005-15

judicial duties.    Prior to being reinstated, Appellant asked that her office

manager be relieved of her duties and requested that she be replaced. The

Commonwealth ultimately filed criminal charges as a result of Appellant’s

actions. Appellant resigned her position and, on June 24, 2013, entered an

open guilty plea to the aforementioned charges.1

        Thereafter, the court conducted a sentencing hearing on October 15,

2013.    After considering a pre-sentence report, the court heard testimony

from several character witnesses, argument from counsel, and Appellant’s

own statement.       At the time, Appellant was suffering from breast cancer,

and the court was aware of that fact. The court imposed a sentence of one

to two years incarceration for the tampering count and a consecutive

sentence of four to eight months imprisonment for the obstruction charge.

        Appellant filed a timely post-sentence motion seeking reconsideration

of the sentence as well as a motion for bail pending appeal.         The court

conducted a hearing on December 19, 2013, and denied Appellant’s post-

sentence motion.        This timely appeal ensued.   The trial court directed

Appellant to file and serve a Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) concise statement of errors

complained of on appeal. Appellant complied, and the matter is now ready

for our review. Appellant raises three issues for this Court’s consideration.
____________________________________________

1
   The entire Chester County Court of Common Pleas bench recused.
Accordingly, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court assigned Senior Judge John L.
Braxton to handle this matter.

                                           -4-
J-A15005-15

      A. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by imposing a
         sentence twice the outer end of the aggravated range under
         the sentencing guidelines for tampering with public records
         and in the aggravated range for obstruction of law, thus
         ignoring significant mitigating factors especially the
         Appellant’s lack of prior criminal record, her otherwise
         exemplary decades of judicial service, her acceptance of
         responsibility/remorse and resignation as a judge, and her
         grave cancerous condition, which is a manifestly excessive
         sentence and too harsh a punishment?

      B. Whether the trial court further abused its discretion by
         ordering that Appellant’s two individual sentences run
         consecutively, thereby resulting in a total aggregate sentence
         of 16 to 32 months’ incarceration, which is a manifestly
         excessive sentence and too harsh a punishment?

      C. Whether the trial court failed to articulate sufficient reasons
         on the record for imposing the sentences (one beyond the
         aggravated range and the other in the aggravated range) as
         mandated by the sentencing code?

Appellant’s brief at 4.

      Each of Appellant’s issues challenges the discretionary aspects of her

sentence.   To preserve such a sentencing claim, the defendant must raise

the issue either in a post-sentence motion or during the sentencing

proceedings.      Commonwealth      v.   Cartrette,   83   A.3d   1030,    1042

(Pa.Super. 2013) (en banc).     In addition, a defendant must “preserve the

issue in a court-ordered Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) concise statement and a

Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f) statement.”    Id. Further, “There is no absolute right to

appeal when challenging the discretionary aspect of a sentence.”            Id.

Instead, “an appeal is permitted only after this Court determines that there

is a substantial question that the sentence was not appropriate under the

                                    -5-
J-A15005-15

sentencing code.” Id.       In considering the merits of a discretionary

sentencing matter, we review the sentencing court’s decision for an abuse of

discretion.   Commonwealth v. Dodge, 77 A.3d 1263, 1274 (Pa.Super.

2013). In performing this review, we consider the statutory requirements of

42 Pa.C.S. § 9781(c) and (d). Id. Section 9781(c) provides that this Court

shall vacate a sentence and remand under three circumstances:

      (1)     the sentencing court purported to sentence within the
              sentencing   guidelines but   applied  the guidelines
              erroneously;

      (2)     the sentencing court sentenced within the sentencing
              guidelines but the case involves circumstances where the
              application   of  the    guidelines   would  be   clearly
              unreasonable; or

      (3)     the sentencing court sentenced outside the sentencing
              guidelines and the sentence is unreasonable.

42 Pa.C.S. § 9781(c). Further, we examine:

      (1)     The nature and circumstances of the offense and the
              history and characteristics of the defendant.

      (2)  The opportunity of the sentencing court to observe the
           defendant, including any presentence investigation.
      (3) The findings upon which the sentence was based.

      (4) The guidelines promulgated by the commission.

42 Pa.C.S. § 9781(d).

      Appellant timely filed a post-sentence motion asserting her claims

therein. She further preserved the issue by including it in her Rule 1925(b)

concise statement and has provided Rule 2119(f) statement.       Accordingly,

                                     -6-
J-A15005-15

we must examine whether her three issues present substantial questions for

our review. Appellant’s initial contention is that the sentencing court abused

its discretion and imposed an excessive sentence by sentencing her outside

the aggravated range of the sentencing guidelines and ignoring mitigating

factors.    This issue presents a substantial question for our review.

Commonwealth v. Bowen, 55 A.3d 1254, 1263 (Pa.Super. 2012);

Commonwealth v. Hernandez, 755 A.2d 1, 13 (Pa.Super. 2000);

Commonwealth v. Perry, 883 A.2d 599, 602 (Pa.Super. 2005); but see

Commonwealth v. Johnson, 961 A.2d 877, 880 (Pa.Super. 2008)

(“Appellant's assertion of abuse of discretion for imposing consecutive

sentences without properly considering mitigating factors fails to present a

substantial question to justify this Court's review of his claim.”).

      Appellant’s   second   issue   is    that   the   court   erred   in    imposing

consecutive sentences resulting in an excessive sentence.           Appellant relies

on Dodge, supra, and Commonwealth v. Gonzalez-Dejusus, 994 A.2d

595 (Pa.Super. 2010), in support. However, in Dodge the defendant was

sentenced to forty years and seven months to eighty-one years and two

months     imprisonment.      Similarly,    in    Gonzalez-Dejusus,          the   court

sentenced the defendant to twenty to forty years incarceration. Moreover,

the Gonzalez-Dejusus Court found no substantial question.                    Here, the

aggregate sentence of one year and four months to two years and eight

months is not, on its face, excessive in light of Appellant’s conduct. We add

                                      -7-
J-A15005-15

that Appellant is also incorrect that Dodge denied allowance of appeal.

Rather, the Dodge Court reached the merits of the sentencing issues and

denied relief.   To the extent that Appellant highlights that one of her

sentences was outside the aggravated sentencing guideline range and

another was in the aggravated range, and the sentences in Dodge and

Gonzalez-Dejusus were within the standard ranges, those cases involved

imposition of consecutive sentences resulting in lengthy prison sentences

and not two consecutive sentences resulting in an aggregate sentence of

less than three years. Therefore, we hold that Appellant’s allegation that the

sentences imposed consecutively resulted in a harsh and excessive sentence

does not present a substantial question for our review.      See Gonzalez-

Dejusus, supra; Commonwealth v. Marts, 889 A.2d 608 (Pa.Super.

2005). The final claim Appellant levels is that the court erred in failing to

provide sufficient reasons for its sentence.       This position presents a

substantial question.   Commonwealth v. Wagner, 702 A.2d 1084, 1086

(Pa.Super. 1996).

      Having determined that two of Appellant’s issues present substantial

questions, we now proceed to examine their merits.         First, we consider

Appellant’s argument that the court abused its discretion by sentencing her

outside the sentencing guidelines and allegedly failing to consider certain

mitigating factors.   Appellant maintains that the court did not impose an

individualized sentence and focused only on the aggravating fact that she

                                    -8-
J-A15005-15

committed her crimes in her capacity as a judicial official. She asserts that

the court did not give any weight to her rehabilitative needs or potential for

redemption.

      Appellant also submits that the court did not address the protection of

the public or the gravity of the offense. According to Appellant, the court

“harped on the fact that the Appellant had violated her judicial oath in

committing the crimes of tampering and obstruction[.]” Appellant’s brief at

29. She adds that the court focused extensively on Appellant’s attempt to

remove her office manager from her job and construed Appellant’s efforts as

an attempt to fire the office manager. Appellant argues that the sentencing

court did not consider her aggressive breast cancer and need for

chemotherapy treatment as mitigation evidence.

      In addition, Appellant points out that her sentence for tampering was

outside the aggravated range of the sentencing guidelines. Appellant had no

prior record score and the standard sentencing guideline range for the

tampering offense was restorative sanctions, i.e., probation, to three months

incarceration. The aggravated range was three to six months imprisonment.

Accordingly, Appellant’s tampering sentence was twice the aggravated

range.

      Appellant continues that the court did not mention these ranges, which

she posits was a “blatant violation of the Sentencing Code.” Appellant’s brief

at 32 (emphasis removed). Further, Appellant argues that the court did not

                                    -9-
J-A15005-15

note that it reviewed the presentence report and ignored her “lack of any

prior criminal record as well as her age, personal characteristics and life

situation.” Id. at 36. Appellant does acknowledge that the sentencing court

was aware of her cancer condition, but she contends that the court ignored

that factor.

      Additionally, Appellant complains that the sentencing court did not

consider her prior distinguished service as a public servant, her remorse and

acceptance of guilt, and the forfeiture of her pension and health insurance.

In Appellant’s view, “the [c]ourt exhibited a certain vindictiveness and

mean-spiritedness when sentencing Ms. Arnold, which is buttressed by its

conduct in connection the bail pending appeal.” Id. at 41. In this respect,

the court sua sponte set Appellant’s bail pending appeal at one million

dollars. This Court, in another appeal, reversed that decision.

      The Commonwealth responds that there is no requirement that a

sentencing court state that it has read a presentence report in order to

presume that the court was aware of the information provided therein. It

posits that this Court has frequently concluded that a court is assumed to be

aware of the information in a presentence report where such a report has

been prepared.    The Commonwealth adds that the sentencing court did

consider Appellant’s lack of a prior record because it was factored into the

sentencing guidelines and that the court found it insignificant since

Appellant’s conduct took place over three years.

                                    - 10 -
J-A15005-15

      The Commonwealth notes that Appellant undertook extensive and

“protracted efforts” to prevent her son from being prosecuted for a summary

offense and then attempted to cover up those efforts.            Commonwealth’s

brief at 15. It highlights that Appellant lied to Sergeant Daniels and to the

President Judge of Chester County.         Further, Appellant lied under oath

before the Judicial Conduct Board and attempted to persuade an employee

to lie on her behalf before that same tribunal.

      The Commonwealth continues that Appellant’s age, 57, was not a

mitigating factor and that the court did consider her personal characteristics,

but was unpersuaded by her arguments for a lighter sentence. It points out

that the sentencing court did not find Appellant’s claim that she did not

attempt to fire her office manager for not lying on her behalf to be credible.

The Commonwealth also disputes Appellant’s assertion that the sentencing

court did not adequately consider her medical situation. Indeed, the court

expressly stated that it considered her illness. See N.T., 10/15/13, at 34.

The Commonwealth maintains that the court did consider Appellant’s health;

it simply did not afford it the weight that Appellant wished.

      With   respect   to   Appellant’s   service   as   a   public   servant,   the

Commonwealth provides that the sentencing court stated that it was “very

sensitive to [Appellant’s] years of service.”       Commonwealth’s brief at 30

(quoting N.T., 10/15/13, at 25).     It argues, however, that the sentencing

court considered her years of service as an aggravating factor warranting

                                     - 11 -
J-A15005-15

harsher treatment since Appellant should have known, as a judicial official,

that she was held to a higher standard.

      As to Appellant’s assertion that the sentencing court ignored her

expressions of remorse, the Commonwealth maintains that the court

disbelieved her claim of remorse and instead was concerned that she

attempted to retaliate against a subordinate by seeking that person’s

removal.      Further,   the   Commonwealth    rejects   Appellant’s   claim   of

acceptance of responsibility. In this respect, it repeats the lengths to which

Appellant went to delay the filing of the citation against her son and to cover

up her actions.      The Commonwealth submits that Appellant’s actions

spanned a three year period and that “[h]er claims that she accepted

responsibility border on offensive.” Commonwealth’s brief at 36.

      The Commonwealth further disputes Appellant’s position that the court

acted in a vindictive and mean-spirited manner.            It sets forth that

Appellant’s only support for her position is what occurred with respect to

bail, which transpired two months after her sentence.          Relying on the

sentencing transcript, the Commonwealth proffers that the sentencing court

accorded Appellant and her witnesses respect and took no pleasure in

sentencing her.

      We find that Appellant is entitled to no relief. Contrary to Appellant’s

assertions, it is evident that the sentencing court considered the factors that

Appellant alleges were mitigating.     The sentencing court simply did not

                                     - 12 -
J-A15005-15

afford those facts more weight than what it considered were aggravating

circumstances.         Specifically,    the    court   was   aware   and   repeatedly

acknowledged Appellant’s medical condition.             Further, it noted Appellant’s

years of judicial service. It also acknowledged that its tampering sentence

was outside the guideline ranges, but set forth reasons for imposing such a

sentence. Notably, the court considered Appellant’s position as a magisterial

district judge, her attempts to cover up her misconduct, including repeated

lies, and found that Appellant did attempt to have her office manager fired.

These factors, it reasoned, all warranted departing from the guideline

ranges. We discern no abuse of discretion in finding that a judicial officer is

held to high ethical and legal standards and that a continuing course of

conduct in derogation of those duties justified a sentence outside the

guidelines. The sentence herein was not unreasonable.

       Having disposed of Appellant’s initial issue, we now address her

remaining position that raised a substantial question.2 Appellant asserts that

the trial court failed to articulate sufficient reasons for sentencing beyond

the aggravated range for the tampering crime and in the aggravated range

for the obstruction charge.            Portions of Appellant’s position are largely

____________________________________________

2
    Even assuming arguendo that Appellant’s second claim regarding the
consecutive nature of her sentences presents a substantial question for our
review, it would fail for the same reasons outlined with respect to her first
issue.

                                           - 13 -
J-A15005-15

repetitive of earlier arguments; namely, that the court did not indicate it

reviewed a presentence investigation report or provide an on-the-record

statement of its reasons for deviating from the standard guideline ranges.

Appellant submits that the court’s brief acknowledgment that it had

sentenced her outside the aggravated range was insufficient to support her

aggregate sixteen to thirty two month sentence of imprisonment.

      The Commonwealth rejoins that the sentencing court was aware that it

had exceeded the sentencing guideline range for tampering and provided

that it had set forth its reasons for doing so. In addition, the Commonwealth

submits that Appellant’s motion for reconsideration included the guideline

ranges and counsel argued at a hearing that the sentence exceed the

aggravated range. The court, nonetheless, despite being well aware of the

ranges, elected to retain its original sentence.   We find Appellant is not

entitled to relief. Compare Commonwealth v. Rodda, 723 A.2d 212, 214

-215 (Pa.Super. 1999) (en banc) (“we have affirmed sentence where the

record demonstrated that the sentencing court considered the guidelines and

was aware that the sentence it imposed exceeded the guidelines range,

though it did not, in fact, recite the range.”).

      The sentencing court provided lengthy reasons for its sentence.       It

highlighted that Appellant concocted a story to the President Judge, provided

a different story and lied to the Judicial Conduct Board, violated her oath of

office, and attempted to retaliate against a person with whom she had

                                      - 14 -
J-A15005-15

worked for over thirty years.    The court noted the disrepute Appellant’s

conduct placed on the judicial system as a whole. Appellant’s position that

the sentencing court did not provide reasons for its sentence is belied by the

record.

      Judgment of sentence affirmed.

      Fitzgerald, J. joins the Memorandum.

      Mundy, J. concurs in the result.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.
Prothonotary

Date: 11/17/2015

                                    - 15 -


[Discriminant analysis of age parameters of the rat (author's transl)].
The capacity of age parameters to discriminate between groups or individuals of different biological age was investigated in the course of a long-term cohort study. 23 age parameters measured in 71 male Sprague-Dawley rats at the ages of 10, 17, 25 and 30 months, were submitted to a stepwise discriminant analysis. An optimal simultaneous discrimination between the four age groups was obtained by 3 discriminant functions with scores of 89.8%, 6.2% and 4%, with a correct classification of 98,6% of all individuals. Three analyses of successive age groups (10--17, 17--25, 25--30 months) resulted in a 100% correct classification by one function each. However, it turned out that in different phases of senescence an optimal discrimination between individuals or groups of different biological age is obtained by distinct combinations and weights of the parameters.