× ![](\\" content/themes/bufale/images/logo_bufale.png\\"/) * #### Facebook * #### Twitter * #### Instagram * #### WhatsApp * #### Telegram * Hoax * Click Catcher * User Catcher * Real news * Clarifications * Misinformation * Alarmism * Facebook * Scams * The Black List * Useful Guides * Who we are * Fact Checking * * * * #### 1. Home 2. Hoax 3. In 2008 they had already discovered SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3, why are they hiding it from us? Conspiracy theory knows no end (and hyphen…) # In 2008 they had already discovered SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3, because we have it do they hide? Conspiracy theory knows no end (and hyphen…) #### by Bufale.net Team | February 20, 2021 * * ![](\\"/var/ * * ![\\"hoax](\\" content/uploads/sites/5/2021/02/sarscov3.png\\") In 2008 they had already discovered SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3, why are they hiding it from us? Conspiracy theory doesn't know stop (and hyphen…) Bufale.net In 2008 they had already discovered SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3, Twitter asked afterwards that the ongoing vaccination campaign has had its results. Some benevolent, such as a visible drop in the transmissibility index in places where the vaccination campaign travels quickly. Some less so, such as the return of "professional" figures from the world of “Not exactly verified information”, i.e. the keyboard virologist. Who, not noticing the absence of a hyphen, arbitrarily decides that SARS- CoV2 and SARS-CoV3 mentioned in a text that did not go into detail are not (as we'll see better) fragments of SARS-CoV-1 (at the time only SARS-CoV) but the COVID19 and its hypothetical plus-equipped model. What we will see is completely false. ### In 2008 they had already discovered SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3, because we have it do they hide? – The alarm (unfounded) Keyboard virologists who are armed with the Abstract, with the “Summary in mind article” of a 2008 text, deduces and declares that in 2008 they already had discovered SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3. ![\\"Nel](\\" content/uploads/sites/5/2021/02/Schermata-2021-02-20-alle-03.59.39-1024x296.png\\") In 2008 they had already discovered SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3 Adding sly people who don't tell us, even if they slammed it on a text available online. ![\\"The abstract,](\\" content/uploads/sites/5/2021/02/Schermata-2021-02-20-alle-04.00.01-1024x402.png\\") The abstract, the "summary" In summary, our keyboard virologist friends discovered that in 2008 scientists discovered SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3, which for reasons mysterious in 2008 published the result of their discovery on Internet and that only in 2021 the People of the Internet discovered the deception and asks for revenge. The questions crowd in spontaneously: 1. But are we really talking about COVID19 and an alleged and imaginary COVID21, perhaps with 5G and twenty video games promised at launch? 2. If our "counterinformant" friends were able to unravel this conspiracy, why didn't they warn us earlier, saving us from the atrocious fate? 3. But are we sure they read the essay well? Because, as we know well, we have _smoking guns taken from the Web seen too many._ For example, we had to explain for months that the existence of disinfectants effective against the Coronavirus available for sale in 2018 does not mean that COVID19 had already existed for years. Paraphrasing Lex Luthor from the Superman film saga > Some people read War and Peace and think it's just a book > adventure, others read the ingredients on a hand-washing disinfectant and > find out who created the Coronavirus _SARS_ -CoV-2 Or they read an abstract on the Internet and find out who invented SARS-CoV-2 and 3, the Virologist's Revenge._ ### In 2008 they had already discovered SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3 – But not SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-3 What our sharers didn't do, didn't want to do or didn't have been able to do, is to read even just that summary and notice that a missing dash. “By one point Martin lost his cape”, says a proverb linked to the legend of an abbot degraded and driven out of his convent. In the story, the abbot wanted to write a phrase on the wall of his convent translatable as “Open door. Let it be closed to no one”, thus inviting the charity. Wrong punctuation he wrote “Door open to no one. Yes close”, thus gaining a reputation as excommunicated and selfish. Likewise, the text talks about SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3, not SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-3. By reading the essay in full, or at least an explicated synopsis is revealed that it is a study to examine SARS-CoV-1, at the time the only "SARS- CoV”, for friends “the SARS virus” splitting the research into three viral fragments. So let's talk about fragments “one, two and three” of SARS-CoV. Virus that is **closely related to SARS-CoV-2.** Time passes, and just a year ago we found ourselves forced to explain that > Coronavirus is a very large family which includes viruses that > cause very normal colds, those that go away on their own according to > warm and drinking hot broth, leaving the body time to do its thing > havoc of the viral population in our bodies, and SARS is part of it, > MERS and the new arrival, the Novel Coronavirus called 2019-nCoV, for > friends Wuhan pneumonia, which we recently dealt with. Which we then deprived of the derogative name of _Wuhan Pneumonia_ and equipped of a taxonomically adequate name, transforming the old SARS-CoV into a retronym ### Retronym? What does it mean? The retronym is a new name that is attributed to something that already has a name he had it, when it becomes necessary to distinguish. An example is the Popes: today we have "Pope Francis". Pope Francis and that's it, like James Bond. If in a few generations there will be a "Pope Francis II", Bergoglio will become known to history as Pope Francis I too, though, of course, he couldn't know if and when there would have been a Francis II. Thus scientists when they named SARS-CoV, or “The Coronavirus which causes Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” in English, they could not predict that we would have a new terrible scion of the family of Coronavirus capable of eclipsing the public opinion in fame and fear his predecessor. They couldn't have known that journalists would talk about “Pneumonia Wuhan” could not have known that 2019-nCoV would become such a threat to be taxonomically studied and named in record time, they could not know that it would become SARS-CoV-2 “The Second Coronavirus that causes Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome” in English. So, it seemed logical to him, talking about a study that teaches how “splitting” pieces of SARS-CoV (at the time only SARS-CoV, like James Bond, not SARS-CoV-1), call the pieces SARS-CoV1, 2 and 3. Note, without the hyphen. Because the correct name is SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2. With the hyphen. ### Conclusion There is no mention of COVID19 in 2008, there is no mention of one hypothetical “Future Pandemic already planned”. In the cited text we talk about study methods that involve examining three sequences of SARS-CoV-1, the SARS virus, calling them SARS-CoV1, SARS-CoV2 and SARS-CoV3. Because obviously no one could have known that SARS-CoV would not remain alone. If you like our service, support us on PATREON or with a donation PAYPAL. * 2008 * hoax * conspiracy theory * coronavirus * COVID-19 * COVID-19 * infodemic * n-cov * nCoV-2019 * pandemic * SARS-CoV * SARS-CoV-1 * SARS-CoV-2 * scientists * study * wuhan ## Latest Articles #### Shadow Ranger ## Graphene causes small explosions with 5G like pagers: syllogisms unreal and reckless #### Shadow Ranger ## Can I use my cell phone while charging it? And if I break the cable I need it the original one? #### Hoax editorial team ## What Inter and Milan risk from the ultras case and its meaning judicial administration #### Shadow Ranger ## Kamala Harris' IQ: source "ammiocuggino" #### Shadow Ranger ## No, this video does not depict the reaction of graphene oxide to 5G radio waves #### Shadow Ranger ## The hoverboard from Back to the Future in Paris is made with effects special #### Hoax editorial team ## Tesoretto Juve in January to add a striker: names and figures in dance #### Bufale.net Team ## The GA4 Summit returns to Bologna: Friday 25 and Saturday 26 October 2024 #### Bufale.net Team ## After Bugliano, Lento: Department for Michelle Comi? #### Shadow Ranger ## Is the moth really attracted to the flame? Not exactly ![](\\" content/themes/bufale/images/segnala_una_bufala.png\\"/) ![](\\" content/themes/bufale/images/black_list.png\\"/) ![](\\" facts-2.png\\"/) ![](\\" content/themes/bufale/images/SEND_ARTICLE.png\\"/) ## Most read article ![](\\" articles.png?version=4.0\\"/) ## Divine message or chemtrails? The doubt of Enrico's followers... #### by Starlight ![](\\" content/themes/bufale/images/logo_bufale.png\\"/) Bufale.net is a service against fake news available to citizens conceived, founded and directed by Claudio Michelizza and Fabio Milella. If you like our service, support us on PATREON or with a donation PAYPAL. ©Copyright 2018, All Rights Reserved ![](\\" content/themes/bufale/images/digitrend.png\\"/) * The Editorial Staff * Contacts * What they say about us *Privacy Policy * Cookie Policy * Cookie Settings Bufale.net is a service against fake news available to citizens conceived, founded and directed by Claudio Michelizza and Fabio Milella. If you like our service, support us on PATREON or with a donation PAYPAL. ©Copyright 2018, All Rights Reserved ![\\"\\"](\\" &host=
A scientific text from 2008 talks about the viruses SARSCoV1 SARSCoV2 and SARSCoV3 So not only was the current COVID19 pandemic widely predicted and artificially created but there is a third Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus known to scientists who refuse to reveal this knowledge to the public ready to unleash a third pandemic