Accessibility statementSkip to main content Democracy Dies in Darkness Sign in Advertisement clockThis article was published more than **2 years ago** Democracy Dies in Darkness fact checkerAboutArchive fact checkerAboutArchive # A bridge too far: Jeffries doubles the number of ‘structurally deficient’ bridges Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) speaks in Washington on Nov. 17. (Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters) ![\\"\\"](\\" apps/imrs.php?src= authors/washpost/44f31222-8f22-4a07-b0eb-c77cbf11540a.png&h=196&w=196\\"/) Analysis by Glenn Kessler November 18, 2021 at 3:00 a.m. EST “There are approximately 100,000 structural — structurally deficient bridges in America that could crumble or collapse at any moment.” — Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), remarks to reporters, Nov. 16 President Biden’s signing of the infrastructure bill will unleash $550 billion in new spending over the next five years. Near the top of the list for repair are bridges, as about 42 percent are at least half a century old. But we were struck by Jeffries’s comment that about 100,000 bridges were “structurally deficient” — which he said meant that they “could crumble or collapse at any moment.” Given there are more than 600,000 bridges in the country, this number seemed rather high. And it was. ### The Facts Notice that the lawmaker used a specific term — “structurally deficient.” Under definitions crafted by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), that means a bridge is in one of five categories of “structurally deficient” condition — poor, serious, critical, imminent failure or failed. Sometimes, all five categories are labeled as “poor,” though the last category essentially means it’s out of service and beyond repair. FHWA says that the common action for bridges in the “structurally deficient” range is “rehabilitation or replacement.” Advertisement Story continues below advertisement We checked with three authoritative sources to see how many structurally deficient bridges they count: ✅ Follow Fact-checking politicians Follow * Transportation Department annual infrastructure report: 46,154 bridges in “poor” condition (2020) * FHWA bridge dashboard: 45,031 bridges in “poor” condition (2020) * American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA) bridge report: 45,023 bridges in “poor”(structurally deficient) condition (2020) In other words, Jefferies said the United States has about 100,000 structurally deficient bridges, but in all three cases the estimate is less than half that figure. ARTBA’s report even shows that the situation has improved, with more than 1,100 fewer bridges listed as structurally deficient in 2020 than 2019. Moreover, Jefferies engaged in rhetorical overkill by claiming that “structurally deficient” meant the bridges “could crumble or collapse at any moment.” In reality, ARTBA shows only 440 bridges listed in the “imminent failure” category. Under FHWA’s definition, that generally means the bridge is already closed: “Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components, or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge is closed to traffic, but corrective action may put it back in light service.” Advertisement Story continues below advertisement There are 1,668 bridges listed in critical condition. Again, FHWA’s definition suggests the bridge may be closed: “Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present, or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored, the bridge may have to be closed until corrective action is taken.” Finally, there are 967 bridges that are in failed condition and cannot be repaired. So, there are maybe 3,000 bridges that are in really bad shape and potentially close to collapse. But note that they are often closed because of their condition — and one-third have already been closed. Story continues below advertisement “There are several numeric rankings under the structurally deficient category. So one cannot say that all bridges classified as ‘structurally deficient’ could collapse at any moment,” said John Schneidawind, ARTBA’s spokesman. “The best number to use for structurally deficient bridges is 45,000, as that is the number that encompasses all five categories — zero to 4.” Advertisement He noted: “State DOT departments regularly inspect bridges for any defects.” Christiana Stephenson, communications director at the House Democratic Caucus, which Jefferies chairs, defended his comment by noting that 112,797 bridges were listed by ARTBA in another category — “fair condition.” According to FHWA, that means “all primary structural elements are sound but may have some minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.” Story continues below advertisement That doesn’t sound like imminent collapse to us. Under FHWA terminology, bridges in this category would be handled with “condition-based maintenance.” “Any number of structurally deficient bridges under any definition poses a risk to the everyday Americans who travel these crossings to get to work, bring their kids to school and make ends meet,” Stephenson said. “This is akin to debating whether a burning building is a three- or four-alarm fire before extinguishing it. According to any of the sources you point to below, our nation’s bridges and critical infrastructure are in dire need of the historic investment signed into law this week.” Advertisement She added: “No person applies this specific terminology when they are driving over clearly decrepit bridges and roads, costing Americans time, money and fuel while undermining their safety.” ### The Pinocchio Test We fail to understand why politicians have trouble admitting error. Jefferies got a bit overenthusiastic about the infrastructure bill and doubled the number of structurally deficient bridges. He then added some rhetorical overkill. Contrary to Jeffries’s suggestion that 100,000 bridges are close to collapse, the real number is under 3,000. Story continues below advertisement There’s no question that a significant percentage of bridges — about 7.5 percent — need immediate work and the infrastructure bill will go a long way in dealing with the problem. But there’s no reason to hype the figures. Doubling the number of bridges was probably worthy of Two Pinocchios, but larding on the idea that all were about to collapse gets Jefferies to Three. ### Three Pinocchios (About our rating scale) Send us facts to check by filling out this form Sign up for The Fact Checker weekly newsletter The Fact Checker is a verified signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network code of principles Share Comments ![\\"\\"](\\"/dr/resources/images/generic-newsletter-signup.png\\") ![\\"\\"](\\"/dr/resources/images/generic-newsletter-signup.png\\") Sign up Advertisement Advertisement live updatespolitics![\\"\\"](\\" apps/imrs.php?src= washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/34GPOUTQBGPJDTBZOSU6XT4H5M.JPG&w=767\\")7:48 PM #### The most memorable lines from the Vance-Walz VP debate 7:12 PMAnalysis: JD Vance is Trump 2.0 6:28 PMWalz has ‘aggressive’ travel and media schedule in coming days Advertisement Advertisement washingtonpost.com © 1996-2024 The Washington Post * washingtonpost.com * © 1996-2024 The Washington Post
There are approximately 100000 structural structurally deficient bridges in America that could crumble or collapse at any moment