In principle, the levy of a kojichi was not restricted by location and it was possible to claim it even in places with right of asylum or when the debtor was under the protection of authorities (these were regarded as extraterritorial areas in the case of Shichitori, which was the attachment of property of a third party living in the same area of a debtor in default).
原則的には場所の制約を受けず（質取行為では禁じられているアジール的空間や権力者の保護下でも）に請求が可能であった。