With regard to "Shunju," Tanjo, Chokyo, and Rikujun expressed skepticism, pointing out that the three Shunju commentaries are not annotations of "Shunju," and rejected the "Commentary of Zuo" in particular.
『春秋』では啖助・趙匡・陸淳が春秋三伝は『春秋』を注するものではないと懐疑を述べ、特に『左伝』を排斥した。