For Mitsuyuki's whereabouts in the Jokyu War that occurred thereafter, some consider that "Toki Hogandai" mentioned in the said record as a member of the Imperial forces was identified as Mitsuyuki and that he sided with Kyoto like many samurai in Mino Province, but there is no definitive explanation on his identity and whereabouts with respect to this record because there is also a persuasive theory that the said "Toki Hogandai" was somebody else in the same family (such as his brother Mitsutoki) and that Mitsuyuki himself sided with the shogunate forces considering the fact that Mitsuyuki is also mentioned in the same record as "Toki Saemon no jo" after the Jokyu War.
しかし、その後の承久の乱における動向については同書に官軍としてみえている「土岐判官代」を光行と比定し、多くの美濃国の武士たちと同じく京方に付いたとする見方がある一方で、光行が乱の後にも「土岐左衛門尉」として同書に現われていることなどから「土岐判官代」は同族の別人（弟・光時か）であるとし、光行自身は幕府方に付き行動していたとする見方も有力視されるなど明確でない。