PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 1182/05) against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a German national, Mr Ingo Hub (“the applicant”), on 4 January 2005.

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin, of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

On 22 April 2008 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaint concerning the length of the proceedings to the Government. It also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

1. Background to the case

The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in Berlin.

The applicant is the father of a son (S.), born on 30 July 1990. In 1997 the applicant and the child’s mother (K.) separated. S. remained with his mother. In 1998 the applicant and S.’s mother were divorced.

On 21 January 1998 the Pankow District Court awarded K. sole custody of S. and decided that the applicant would be entitled to personal contact with his son every other weekend. In September 1998, however, the applicant ceased to have contact with his son.

2. Proceedings before the District Court

On 7 October 1998 the applicant requested the Pankow District Court to impose a coercive fine on the mother to enforce his access rights. The District Court registered his request under file number 11 F 4813/98.

Between 9 November 1998 and 10 March 1999 the parties and the Youth Office submitted observations.

On 17 May 1999 the applicant withdrew his request and stated that he now wished the court to mediate between the parents with a view to reaching an agreement on the applicant’s contact rights according to section 52a of the Non-Contentious Proceedings Act (Gesetz über die Angelegenheiten der freiwilligen Gerichtsbarkeit – see “Relevant Domestic Law” below). The District Court pursued the applicant’s modified request under the same file number (11 F 4813/98).

On 13 August 1999 the District Court heard S., who declared that he wished to see his father only occasionally under the supervision of a third person.

At a hearing held on 23 August 1999 the parents agreed on supervised contact for the applicant.

On 18 October 1999 the District Court held a further hearing at which the parties declared that the court currently did not need to take any action.

On 22 February 2000 the applicant applied for the appointment of a guardian ad litem and a contact supervisor (Umgangsbegleitperson) arguing that the mediation proceedings had failed.

On 10 March 2000 the District Court appointed a guardian ad litem and set down the case for hearing on 5 April 2000. However, that hearing was postponed to 15 May 2000 as agreed with the parties.

On 5 June 2000 a further hearing was held, and on 14 June 2000 the District Court ordered supervised contact for a period between late June and mid-December.

On 6 September 2000 the guardian ad litem informed the court that no contact had taken place.

On 28 September 2000 the District Court asked the contact supervisor to comment on the failure to have contact established between the applicant and his son. In October and November 2000 the District Court reminded the contact supervisor of its request of 28 September 2000 and unsuccessfully attempted to contact the latter by phone.

On 26 November 2000 the applicant asked the court to continue the proceedings.

On 11 December 2000 the District Court sent a further reminder to the contact supervisor and requested the parties to comment on the question as to whether the mediation proceedings should be continued.

On 5 January 2001 the applicant asked the District Court to continue the mediation procedure.

On 20 March 2001 the District Court decided to continue the proceedings after the parties had agreed on a one-off supervised contact.

On 6 July 2001 the contact centre informed the District Court that the contact supervisor had been replaced with another person, and on 11 July 2001 the District Court appointed that person as contact supervisor.

On 14 August 2001 the District Court received the contact supervisor’s report, according to which S. refused to see his father.

On 22 September 2001 the applicant asked the District Court to declare that the mediation proceedings had failed and to commission an expert report.

On 22 November 2001 the District Court heard S. again, who firmly declared that his father no longer existed for him.

On 27 November 2001 the District Court commissioned a psychological expert report on the question of contact. That expert informed the court on 25 February 2002 that he could be biased. Accordingly, the mother’s representative challenged the expert for bias on 26 March. On 10 April 2002 the District Court ordered the expert to stop his examinations, and on 6 June 2002 the mother withdrew her challenge of bias. On 13 June 2002 the District Court ordered the expert to continue his examinations.

On 11 September 2002 the District Court requested the expert to consider further questions raised by the applicant.

On 19 November 2002 the expert informed the court that K. had refused to attend a meeting with the expert until mid-January 2003. Subsequently, the District Court asked K. to ensure that a meeting was held by the end of 2002. On 2 January 2003 the District Court asked all persons involved in the proceedings to support the expert in the preparation of his report. On 16 January 2003 the expert informed the District Court that for the time being K. was unwilling to meet the expert. On 23 January 2003 the District Court ordered K. to cooperate with the expert within two months and announced that further measures would be taken in the event of non-compliance.

On 2 April 2003 the expert informed the court that a meeting had been held with K. on 13 March 2003, that the applicant and his son had called each other and that the applicant considered withdrawing his application.

On 30 April 2003, at the applicant’s request of 11 April 2003, the District Court ordered the expert to swiftly continue his examination. On 30 June 2003 the expert gave his report in which he suggested a suspension of the applicant’s contact with S. for a period of two years.

On 21 October 2003 the District Court heard S., who insisted that he did not wish to see his father any longer.

At an oral hearing held on 22 October 2003 the applicant announced that he would withdraw his application. However, on 19 November 2003 the applicant insisted on a court decision.

On 10 December 2003 the District Court, relying on the expert’s report, suspended the applicant’s rights to access for two years.

3. Appellate proceedings and constitutional complaint

On 30 December 2003 the applicant appealed to the Berlin Court of Appeal, and on 18 January 2004 he submitted his statement of grounds of appeal, which the court received on 2 February 2004.

On 13 May 2004 the Berlin Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the District Court, arguing that S. had suffered from the persistent conflict between his parents about the applicant’s contact rights and from the respective proceedings, which had been pending now for more than five years and which had led to lasting psychological damage to the child. In order to protect himself, the boy refused to expose himself to this conflict, by refusing to see his father.

On 30 June 2004 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court, which the Federal Constitutional Court refused to admit on 14 July 2004.

On 19 July 2004 the decision was served on the applicant.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e1
001-92102_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
1182/05
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-92102_a8_e2
001-92102_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e3
001-92102_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e4
001-92102_a8_em4
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Ingo Hub
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e5
001-92102_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
4 January 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e3
001-92102_a8_em6
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e6
001-92102_a8_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-92102_a8_e7
001-92102_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministerialdirigentin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e8
001-92102_a8_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e9
001-92102_a8_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
22 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e10
001-92102_a8_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1964
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e11
001-92102_a8_em12
LOC
QUASI
Berlin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em13
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e13
001-92102_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
30 July 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e14
001-92102_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e15
001-92102_a8_em16
PERSON
QUASI
K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em17
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e16
001-92102_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em19
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e17
001-92102_a8_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
21 January 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e18
001-92102_a8_em21
ORG
QUASI
Pankow District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e15
001-92102_a8_em22
PERSON
QUASI
K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em23
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e19
001-92102_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em25
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e21
001-92102_a8_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e18
001-92102_a8_em27
ORG
QUASI
Pankow District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e22
001-92102_a8_em29
CODE
QUASI
11 F 4813/98
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e23
001-92102_a8_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e24
001-92102_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
10 March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e25
001-92102_a8_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Youth Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e26
001-92102_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
17 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-92102_a8_e22
001-92102_a8_em35
CODE
DIRECT
11 F 4813/98
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e27
001-92102_a8_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
13 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em38
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e28
001-92102_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
23 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e29
001-92102_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
18 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e30
001-92102_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
22 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e31
001-92102_a8_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
10 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e32
001-92102_a8_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
5 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e33
001-92102_a8_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e34
001-92102_a8_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
5 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e35
001-92102_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
14 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e36
001-92102_a8_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
6 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e37
001-92102_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e38
001-92102_a8_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
October and November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e37
001-92102_a8_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e39
001-92102_a8_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
26 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e40
001-92102_a8_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e41
001-92102_a8_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
5 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e42
001-92102_a8_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
20 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em62
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e43
001-92102_a8_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
6 July 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e44
001-92102_a8_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
11 July 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e45
001-92102_a8_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
14 August 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em68
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em69
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e46
001-92102_a8_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
22 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em71
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e47
001-92102_a8_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em74
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e48
001-92102_a8_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
27 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em76
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e49
001-92102_a8_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
25 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e50
001-92102_a8_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
26 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e51
001-92102_a8_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
10 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em80
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e52
001-92102_a8_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
6 June 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e53
001-92102_a8_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
13 June 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em83
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e54
001-92102_a8_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em85
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e55
001-92102_a8_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
19 November 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e15
001-92102_a8_em87
PERSON
QUASI
K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e56
001-92102_a8_em88
DATETIME
QUASI
2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em89
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e15
001-92102_a8_em90
PERSON
QUASI
K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e57
001-92102_a8_em91
DATETIME
QUASI
2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e58
001-92102_a8_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
2 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em93
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e59
001-92102_a8_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
16 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em95
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e15
001-92102_a8_em96
PERSON
QUASI
K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e60
001-92102_a8_em97
DATETIME
QUASI
23 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em98
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e15
001-92102_a8_em99
PERSON
QUASI
K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e61
001-92102_a8_em100
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e62
001-92102_a8_em101
DATETIME
QUASI
2 April 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e15
001-92102_a8_em102
PERSON
QUASI
K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e63
001-92102_a8_em103
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e64
001-92102_a8_em104
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e65
001-92102_a8_em105
DATETIME
QUASI
11 April 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em106
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e66
001-92102_a8_em107
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em108
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e67
001-92102_a8_em109
DATETIME
QUASI
two years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e68
001-92102_a8_em110
DATETIME
QUASI
21 October 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em111
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em112
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e69
001-92102_a8_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
22 October 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e70
001-92102_a8_em114
DATETIME
QUASI
19 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e71
001-92102_a8_em115
DATETIME
QUASI
10 December 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em116
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e67
001-92102_a8_em117
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e72
001-92102_a8_em118
DATETIME
QUASI
30 December 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e73
001-92102_a8_em119
ORG
QUASI
Berlin Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e74
001-92102_a8_em120
DATETIME
QUASI
18 January 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e75
001-92102_a8_em121
DATETIME
QUASI
2 February 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e76
001-92102_a8_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
13 May 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e73
001-92102_a8_em123
ORG
QUASI
Berlin Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e20
001-92102_a8_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e12
001-92102_a8_em125
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-92102_a8_e77
001-92102_a8_em126
DATETIME
NO_MASK
five years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e78
001-92102_a8_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e79
001-92102_a8_em128
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e79
001-92102_a8_em129
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e80
001-92102_a8_em130
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-92102_a8_e81
001-92102_a8_em131
DATETIME
QUASI
19 July 2004
Ingo Hub
DEU
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Ingo Hub