PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 3684/07) against the Kingdom of Sweden lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Swedish national, Mr Einar Strömblad (“the applicant”), on 15 January 2007.

The applicant was represented by R. Harrold-Claesson, a lawyer practising in Olofstorp. The Swedish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr B. Sjöberg, of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

The applicant complained that the Swedish courts’ protracted custody proceedings, including their handling of his request for the return of his daughter under the Hague Convention, and the Tax Authority’s decision to remove his daughter from the population register, violated Articles 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention.

On 26 June 2008 the President of the Third Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1).

On 1 February 2011 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1 of the Rules of Court) and the above application was assigned to the newly composed Fifth Section.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1950 and lives in Kristianstad.

In 1999 the applicant married L., a Ukrainian national holding permanent residence permits in the Czech Republic and in Sweden. In February 2004 she obtained Swedish nationality. In August 2003 their daughter, N., was born. She is also a Swedish national.

Between May and August 2005 L. visited her parents in Prague together with N. Upon their return, the applicant’s relationship with L. quickly deteriorated and, in September 2005, she returned to her parents’ home in Prague with N. They have remained there ever since.

A. The proceedings relating to custody and rights of contact

In September 2005 the applicant submitted an application for divorce from L. to the District Court (tingsrätten) in Kristianstad. He further requested sole custody of N. or, if the court decided that the parties should have joint custody, that N. should live with him. In any event, if the court were to decide that N. should live with her mother, he wanted contact rights to be exercised on a regular basis according to a specific schedule.

L. agreed to the divorce but opposed the applicant’s requests in relation to their daughter. She wanted sole custody of N. but agreed, pending the final outcome of the proceedings, that the applicant could visit N. in Prague for a few hours every other weekend with her or her mother (N.’s maternal grandmother) present.

On 14 November 2005, after having held an oral hearing, the District Court decided that, pending the final outcome of the proceedings, the applicant and L. should have continued joint custody of N. but that she should live with her mother and see her father for four hours every other weekend in the presence of L. or a person of her choice. The court further ordered the Kristianstad Social Council to carry out an investigation into the custody of N., her place of residence and contact to her. In its interim decision, the court noted that neither the applicant nor L. appeared to be unsuitable as guardians for N. Therefore, despite their difficulties in co-operating and the distance between their places of residence, there were not enough reasons to dissolve the joint custody of N. Moreover, having regard to N.’s young age and the fact that the main responsibility for her daily care had rested with L., the court found it to be in the child’s best interest to live with L. even though L., by moving to Prague, had made it more difficult for N. to see her father. In this respect, the court emphasised that L. had a great responsibility to ensure that N. would be able to see the applicant. The parties were left to agree on where it would be best for N. and the applicant to meet.

The applicant appealed against the decision to the Court of Appeal (hovrätten) of Skåne and Blekinge, maintaining his requests for sole custody of N. and for her to live with him. In the alternative, he wanted his right of contact with N. to be exercised in southern Sweden.

L. opposed any changes to the District Court’s decision.

On 13 December 2005 the Court of Appeal upheld the lower court’s decision in full. It found that no circumstances had been presented which indicated that the District Court’s decision was not in the best interests of the child. This decision was final.

Subsequently, the applicant requested the District Court to change its interim decision, inter alia, in respect of N.’s place of residence and the contact rights. He claimed that the interim decision in force had made it impossible for him to create meaningful contact with N., since it was too expensive for him to travel to Prague every other weekend. Moreover, he wanted to be able to spend time with his daughter alone.

As L. opposed any changes to the interim decision, the District Court held an oral hearing, at which the applicant, his representative and L.’s representative were present. L. did not attend.

In an interim decision of 23 January 2006, the District Court altered its previous decision by granting the applicant a right of contact to N. every other weekend for four hours on both Saturday and Sunday. For the rest, the court found it to be in the best interests of N. to keep the interim arrangements until final judgment was delivered in the case.

The applicant appealed to the Court of Appeal, demanding that N.’s permanent place of residence should be in Sweden.

On 28 February 2006 the Court of Appeal rejected the appeal, noting that it was not legally possible for it to decide where a child should live; it could only decide with whom. No appeal lay against the decision.

In 2006 the Social Council made an investigation concerning the custody of N., her place of residence and contact to her, but the District Court did not find the results satisfactory. Thus, by decision of 2 July 2007, the District Court mandated a company, Access Borders SE, to investigate N.’s living conditions in the Czech Republic. The report was to be submitted to the court at the latest on 15 October 2007. Moreover, the court decided that N. should meet with the applicant for four hours on 8 December 2007 and for four hours on 9 December 2007 in Sweden. Furthermore, the date for the main hearing in the case was fixed for 11 and 12 December 2007.

The hearing was cancelled and, apparently, the applicant and N. did not therefore meet as scheduled in Sweden.

In a report faxed to the District Court on 18 December 2007, Access Borders SE informed the court of its efforts to carry out an investigation into N.’s living conditions in Prague but stated that this had not been possible because L.’s representative in Prague had acted in a manner which obstructed the impartial investigation.

On 13 March 2008 the District Court took a number of procedural decisions, inter alia, rejecting L.’s request to have all documents in the case-file translated into Czech and deciding that the parties should finalise their pleadings by 21 April 2008 so that the main hearing could take place. Moreover, it rejected a request by the applicant to order further investigations into N.’s situation in the Czech Republic while maintaining the assignment given to Access Borders SE. In this respect, the District Court noted that a new investigation would be very time-consuming and therefore not appropriate but that it would take into consideration when deciding the case that L. had refused to co-operate in the investigation by Access Borders SE ordered by the court.

On 2 March 2010 the District Court took further procedural decisions, inter alia, rejecting a request by the applicant to hear a new witness. Moreover, it rejected the applicant’s request for edition of certain documents.

On 27 July 2010 the District Court, after having held an oral hearing, delivered its judgment. The court decided that L. should have the sole custody of N. and granted the applicant a right of contact with N. four days in a row on a monthly basis, which should gradually be increased. The District Court held that both the applicant and L. were suitable parents. It further concluded that the fact that N. had not seen her father for the last five years was to a large extent caused by L.’s behaviour and that it was to be feared that N. would not have any future contact with the applicant if she stayed with L. in Prague. However, the court held that, despite invitations from L., the applicant had not even once gone to Prague. In the court’s view he had thus not made sufficient efforts to enforce his rights of contact in respect of N. Lastly, the court concluded that the advantages of a change of N.’s domicile would not outweigh the drawbacks, inter alia, since N. had not seen the applicant for several years and no longer spoke Swedish.

The applicant appealed against the judgment to the Court of Appeal, which refused leave to appeal on 29 September 2010.

On 8 December 2010 the Supreme Court refused leave to appeal.

B. Proceedings relating to the Hague Convention

In December 2005 the applicant applied to the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs for assistance for the return of N. to Sweden in accordance with the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Hague Convention”). The Ministry for Foreign Affairs, which is the Swedish Central Authority in charge of matters falling under the Hague Convention, forwarded the applicant’s request to its Czech counterpart.

As there was no real progress in the case, the applicant contacted the Ministry for Foreign Affairs in May 2006 expressing his concern and requesting that the Ministry put some pressure on the Czech Central Authority.

Following correspondence between the authorities, the Czech Central Authority requested, in accordance with Article 15 of the Hague Convention, that the applicant obtain a decision from the Swedish courts to the effect that the removal of N. by her mother had been wrongful within the meaning of Article 3 of the Hague Convention. In June 2006 the Ministry for Foreign Affairs forwarded this request to the District Court in Kristianstad since the latter was dealing with the custody case.

By judgment of 10 October 2006 the District Court declared that L.’s retention of N. in the Czech Republic was not unlawful within the meaning of Article 3 of the Hague Convention. In reaching this conclusion, it had regard to the fact that, in November 2005 when it had taken its interim decision that N. should live with her mother, it had known that they were staying in Prague. Thus, it had accepted that N. was not in Sweden but in Prague with L. for which reason the retention was not unlawful.

The applicant appealed to the Court of Appeal, claiming that the District Court should have focused on the actual removal of N. from Sweden by L. and not on the retention. In his view, the removal had been unlawful and the Hague Convention was therefore applicable. Later decisions by the Swedish courts could not justify the removal retroactively.

On 19 December 2006 the Court of Appeal rejected the applicant’s appeal, finding that neither the removal nor the retention of N. by L. was unlawful. This judgment was final.

However, the applicant applied to the Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen) for re-opening of the case as he considered that he had suffered a miscarriage of justice. On 1 February 2007 the Supreme Court rejected the application.

C. Proceedings relating to N.’s removal from the population register

In June 2006 L. sent a notification of change of address to the Swedish Tax Authority (Skatteverket) on N.’s behalf. Since parents who have joint custody of a child need to agree on a change of address for the child, the Tax Authority forwarded the notification to the applicant for comments. The applicant opposed the change of N.’s place of residence in the Swedish population register (folkbokföringen) since he considered the removal of N. to be unlawful and the custody proceedings were still ongoing.

On 11 September 2006 the Tax Authority dismissed L.’s notification of N.’s change of address because notification had to be made jointly by both guardians. However, at the same time it decided, on its own initiative, to remove N. from the population register as having emigrated, since it was clear that N., since 10 September 2005, had no longer lived at the registered address in Sweden but with L. in Prague. In reaching this conclusion, it had regard to the District Court’s interim decision of 14 November 2005 that N. should be living with her mother.

The applicant appealed against the decision to the County Administrative Court (länsrätten) of the County of Skåne, demanding that the Tax Authority’s decision be repealed and that N.’s registered place of residence should not be changed until a final decision in the custody case had been reached.

On 10 October 2006 the County Administrative Court dismissed the appeal on the ground that both parents, since they had joint custody, had to agree on the appeal. Thus, since L. did not support the applicant’s appeal, the court could not consider it on the merits.

Upon further appeal by the applicant, the Administrative Court of Appeal (kammarrätten) in Gothenburg refused leave to appeal. However, the applicant lodged a further appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court (Regeringsrätten), maintaining his claims and invoking Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention. He considered that since the custody case and the proceedings relating to his demand under the Hague Convention were still pending, the Tax Authority should not prejudge those proceedings by removing N. from the population register as having emigrated. This was a violation of his rights under Article 8 and, consequently, he had a right under Article 13 of the Convention to have an effective remedy, that is, the national courts were under an obligation to try his appeal on the merits.

On 18 December 2006 the Supreme Administrative Court refused leave to appeal.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e1
001-110246_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
3684/07
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e2
001-110246_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Kingdom of Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e3
001-110246_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e4
001-110246_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Einar Strömblad
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e5
001-110246_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e6
001-110246_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
R. Harrold-Claesson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e7
001-110246_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Olofstorp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e3
001-110246_a8_em8
DEM
NO_MASK
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e8
001-110246_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr B. Sjöberg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e9
001-110246_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry for Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e3
001-110246_a8_em11
DEM
NO_MASK
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e10
001-110246_a8_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Tax Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e11
001-110246_a8_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
26 June 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e12
001-110246_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
1 February 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e13
001-110246_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
1950
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e14
001-110246_a8_em16
LOC
QUASI
Kristianstad
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e15
001-110246_a8_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em18
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e17
001-110246_a8_em19
DEM
QUASI
Ukrainian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e18
001-110246_a8_em20
LOC
QUASI
Czech Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e19
001-110246_a8_em21
LOC
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e20
001-110246_a8_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
February 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e3
001-110246_a8_em23
DEM
NO_MASK
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e21
001-110246_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
August 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em25
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e3
001-110246_a8_em26
DEM
NO_MASK
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e23
001-110246_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
May and August 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em28
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em29
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em30
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em31
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e25
001-110246_a8_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em33
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em34
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e25
001-110246_a8_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em36
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e26
001-110246_a8_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court (tingsrätten)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e14
001-110246_a8_em38
LOC
QUASI
Kristianstad
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em39
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em40
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em41
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em42
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em43
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em44
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em45
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em46
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e27
001-110246_a8_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
14 November 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em49
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em50
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e29
001-110246_a8_em51
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em52
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e30
001-110246_a8_em53
ORG
QUASI
Kristianstad Social Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em54
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em55
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em56
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em57
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em58
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em59
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em60
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em61
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em62
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em63
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em64
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em65
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em66
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e31
001-110246_a8_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal (hovrätten)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-110246_a8_e32
001-110246_a8_em68
LOC
QUASI
Skåne
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-110246_a8_e33
001-110246_a8_em69
LOC
QUASI
Blekinge
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em70
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em71
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e19
001-110246_a8_em72
LOC
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em73
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e34
001-110246_a8_em74
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e35
001-110246_a8_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
13 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e36
001-110246_a8_em76
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e34
001-110246_a8_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em79
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em80
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em81
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em82
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em83
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em84
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em85
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e37
001-110246_a8_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
23 January 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em88
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e29
001-110246_a8_em89
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em90
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e36
001-110246_a8_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em92
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e19
001-110246_a8_em93
LOC
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e38
001-110246_a8_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
28 February 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e36
001-110246_a8_em95
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e39
001-110246_a8_em96
DATETIME
QUASI
2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e40
001-110246_a8_em97
ORG
NO_MASK
Social Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em98
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em99
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e41
001-110246_a8_em100
DATETIME
QUASI
2 July 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em101
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e42
001-110246_a8_em102
ORG
NO_MASK
Access Borders SE
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em103
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e18
001-110246_a8_em104
LOC
QUASI
Czech Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e43
001-110246_a8_em105
DATETIME
QUASI
15 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em106
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e29
001-110246_a8_em107
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e44
001-110246_a8_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
8 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e29
001-110246_a8_em109
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e45
001-110246_a8_em110
DATETIME
QUASI
9 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e19
001-110246_a8_em111
LOC
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e46
001-110246_a8_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
11 and 12 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em113
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e19
001-110246_a8_em114
LOC
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em115
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e47
001-110246_a8_em116
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e42
001-110246_a8_em117
ORG
NO_MASK
Access Borders SE
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em118
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em119
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em120
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em121
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e48
001-110246_a8_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em123
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em124
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e49
001-110246_a8_em125
DEM
QUASI
Czech
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e50
001-110246_a8_em126
DATETIME
QUASI
21 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em127
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e18
001-110246_a8_em128
LOC
QUASI
Czech Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e42
001-110246_a8_em129
ORG
NO_MASK
Access Borders SE
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em130
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em131
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e42
001-110246_a8_em132
ORG
NO_MASK
Access Borders SE
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e51
001-110246_a8_em133
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em134
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e52
001-110246_a8_em135
DATETIME
QUASI
27 July 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em136
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em137
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em138
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em139
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e53
001-110246_a8_em140
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em141
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em142
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em143
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e54
001-110246_a8_em144
DATETIME
NO_MASK
five years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em145
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em146
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em147
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em148
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em149
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em150
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em151
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em152
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em153
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e3
001-110246_a8_em154
DEM
NO_MASK
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e36
001-110246_a8_em155
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e55
001-110246_a8_em156
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e56
001-110246_a8_em157
DATETIME
QUASI
8 December 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e57
001-110246_a8_em158
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e58
001-110246_a8_em159
DATETIME
QUASI
December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e59
001-110246_a8_em160
ORG
NO_MASK
Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em161
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e19
001-110246_a8_em162
ORG
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e9
001-110246_a8_em163
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry for Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e60
001-110246_a8_em164
ORG
NO_MASK
Swedish Central Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e49
001-110246_a8_em165
DEM
QUASI
Czech
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e9
001-110246_a8_em166
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry for Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e61
001-110246_a8_em167
DATETIME
QUASI
May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e62
001-110246_a8_em168
ORG
NO_MASK
Czech Central Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e62
001-110246_a8_em169
ORG
NO_MASK
Czech Central Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e3
001-110246_a8_em170
DEM
NO_MASK
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em171
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e63
001-110246_a8_em172
DATETIME
QUASI
June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e9
001-110246_a8_em173
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry for Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em174
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e14
001-110246_a8_em175
LOC
QUASI
Kristianstad
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e64
001-110246_a8_em176
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em177
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em178
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em179
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e18
001-110246_a8_em180
LOC
QUASI
Czech Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e65
001-110246_a8_em181
DATETIME
QUASI
November 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em182
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em183
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em184
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e19
001-110246_a8_em185
LOC
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em186
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em187
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e36
001-110246_a8_em188
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e28
001-110246_a8_em189
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em190
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e19
001-110246_a8_em191
LOC
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em192
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e3
001-110246_a8_em193
DEM
NO_MASK
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e66
001-110246_a8_em194
DATETIME
QUASI
19 December 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e36
001-110246_a8_em195
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em196
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em197
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e67
001-110246_a8_em198
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e68
001-110246_a8_em199
DATETIME
QUASI
1 February 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e57
001-110246_a8_em200
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em201
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e63
001-110246_a8_em202
DATETIME
QUASI
June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em203
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e69
001-110246_a8_em204
ORG
NO_MASK
Swedish Tax Authority (Skatteverket)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em205
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e10
001-110246_a8_em206
ORG
NO_MASK
Tax Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em207
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e3
001-110246_a8_em208
DEM
NO_MASK
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em209
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e70
001-110246_a8_em210
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e10
001-110246_a8_em211
ORG
NO_MASK
Tax Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em212
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em213
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em214
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em215
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e71
001-110246_a8_em216
DATETIME
QUASI
10 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e19
001-110246_a8_em217
LOC
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em218
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e24
001-110246_a8_em219
LOC
QUASI
Prague
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e34
001-110246_a8_em220
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e27
001-110246_a8_em221
DATETIME
QUASI
14 November 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em222
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e72
001-110246_a8_em223
ORG
NO_MASK
County Administrative Court (länsrätten
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e73
001-110246_a8_em224
LOC
QUASI
County of Skåne
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e10
001-110246_a8_em225
ORG
NO_MASK
Tax Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em226
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e64
001-110246_a8_em227
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e74
001-110246_a8_em228
ORG
NO_MASK
County Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e16
001-110246_a8_em229
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e75
001-110246_a8_em230
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court of Appeal (kammarrätten)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e76
001-110246_a8_em231
LOC
QUASI
Gothenburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110246_a8_e77
001-110246_a8_em232
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Administrative Court (Regeringsrätten)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e10
001-110246_a8_em233
ORG
NO_MASK
Tax Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e22
001-110246_a8_em234
PERSON
QUASI
N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e78
001-110246_a8_em235
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110246_a8_e79
001-110246_a8_em236
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Administrative Court
Einar Strömblad
SWE
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Einar Strömblad