PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 46601/06) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Romuald Kozłowski (“the applicant”), on 11 November 2006.

The applicant was represented by Mr A. Góźdź, a lawyer practising in Lublin. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 6 December 2007 the President of the Chamber to which the case had been allocated decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1947 and lives in Mieścisko. He is a retired police officer who had formerly been employed in the Civil Militia (Milicja Obywatelska). In 1974 the applicant had been dismissed from service for a disciplinary offence. He was rehired by the Police in 1991. He retired in 1994.

A. Civil proceedings for payment

On 27 September 1993 the applicant brought a civil action against the State Treasury for compensation on the grounds that in 1974 he had been unlawfully dismissed from his post at the Civil Militia and banned from working there until 1990. In addition the applicant claimed that he had not been hired by the new police services immediately after the change of the political regime, as he should have been, but only in April 1991.

The applicant sought compensation, which comprised damages for lost earnings from 1974 to 1990, for lost earnings and benefits from 1990 to 1991, and for alleged moral suffering due to the loss of employment.

On 9 November 1993 the Poznań Regional Court (Sąd Wojewódzki) rejected the claim on the ground that the civil court did not have jurisdiction over a dispute arising out of an employment relationship between a civil servant and the State (niedopuszczalność drogi sądowej).

As a result of an interlocutory appeal by the applicant, on an unspecified date the Poznań Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny) quashed that decision and remitted the case to the Poznań Regional Court.

On 10 August 1995 the Poznań Regional Court rejected the claim on the ground of lack of jurisdiction.

On 6 March 1996 the Poznań Court of Appeal quashed that decision and remitted the case indicating that the applicant's claim was of a civil character as it had arisen out of relations between a civil servant and the State which were of an administrative and legal character rather than from a bond of special trust and loyalty between the two.

On 4 November 1997 the Poznań Regional Court dismissed the applicant's claim.

On 25 February 1998 the Poznań Court of Appeal quashed the first-instance judgment in the part concerning the claim for compensation for lost earnings from 1990 to 1991 and remitted the case in this part to the lower court.

On 15 March 2001 the Poznań Regional Court dismissed the case. The applicant appealed.

It appears that on 25 April 2006 the appellate court issued an order to hold a hearing on 11 May 2006.

On 11 May 2006 the Poznań Court of Appeal delivered a judgment varying the judgment of the Poznań Regional Court of 15 March 2001 and ordering that the respondent pay the applicant a certain amount of compensation for lost earnings and benefits from 1990 to 1991. A cassation appeal in the case was inadmissible in law.

B. Proceedings under the 2004 Act

On 29 April 2006 the applicant lodged a complaint about the unreasonable length of proceedings for compensation for lost earnings and benefits from 1990 to 1991 under the Act of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (Ustawa o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki) (“the 2004 Act”). The applicant submitted that his civil case had been pending for over twelve years.

On 26 July 2006 the Supreme Court discontinued the proceedings under the 2004 Act on the ground that the civil proceedings which were the subject of the complaint had meanwhile terminated.

The court observed that the main purpose of the complaint about the unreasonable length of proceedings was to accelerate the proceedings before a trial court. In circumstances where the proceedings which were the subject of the complaint had already terminated it was no longer necessary for the court to examine the complaint under the 2004 Act. The Supreme Court noted that the applicant had admittedly lodged his complaint under the 2004 Act while the civil proceedings in question were still pending. Nevertheless, the appellate hearing, which turned out to be final, had been scheduled prior to the applicant's complaint. That, in the Supreme Court's opinion, constituted a decisive argument for holding that the proceedings under the 2004 Act ought to be discontinued without a ruling on the merits.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e1
001-90779_a4_em1
CODE
DIRECT
46601/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e2
001-90779_a4_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
ETHNIC
insert
001-90779_a4_e3
001-90779_a4_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish national
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e4
001-90779_a4_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Romuald Kozłowski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e5
001-90779_a4_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
11 November 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e6
001-90779_a4_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Góźdź
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e7
001-90779_a4_em7
LOC
QUASI
Lublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e8
001-90779_a4_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e9
001-90779_a4_em9
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e10
001-90779_a4_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e11
001-90779_a4_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
6 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e12
001-90779_a4_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
1947
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e13
001-90779_a4_em13
LOC
QUASI
Mieścisko
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e14
001-90779_a4_em14
DEM
QUASI
police officer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e15
001-90779_a4_em15
ORG
QUASI
Civil Militia (Milicja Obywatelska)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e16
001-90779_a4_em16
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e17
001-90779_a4_em17
ORG
QUASI
Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e18
001-90779_a4_em18
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e19
001-90779_a4_em19
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e20
001-90779_a4_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
27 September 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e21
001-90779_a4_em21
ORG
NO_MASK
State Treasury
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e16
001-90779_a4_em22
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e15
001-90779_a4_em23
ORG
QUASI
001-90779_a4_em15
Civil Militia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e22
001-90779_a4_em24
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e23
001-90779_a4_em25
MISC
QUASI
new police services
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e24
001-90779_a4_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
April 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e16
001-90779_a4_em27
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e22
001-90779_a4_em28
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e22
001-90779_a4_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e18
001-90779_a4_em30
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e25
001-90779_a4_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e26
001-90779_a4_em32
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Regional Court (Sąd Wojewódzki)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e27
001-90779_a4_em33
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e26
001-90779_a4_em34
ORG
QUASI
001-90779_a4_em32
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e28
001-90779_a4_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
10 August 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e26
001-90779_a4_em36
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e29
001-90779_a4_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
6 March 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e27
001-90779_a4_em38
ORG
QUASI
001-90779_a4_em33
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e30
001-90779_a4_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
4 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e26
001-90779_a4_em40
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e31
001-90779_a4_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
25 February 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e27
001-90779_a4_em42
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e22
001-90779_a4_em43
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e18
001-90779_a4_em44
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e32
001-90779_a4_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e26
001-90779_a4_em46
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e33
001-90779_a4_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
25 April 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e34
001-90779_a4_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
11 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e34
001-90779_a4_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
11 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e27
001-90779_a4_em50
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e26
001-90779_a4_em51
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e32
001-90779_a4_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e22
001-90779_a4_em53
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e18
001-90779_a4_em54
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e35
001-90779_a4_em55
MISC
NO_MASK
2004 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e36
001-90779_a4_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
29 April 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e22
001-90779_a4_em57
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e18
001-90779_a4_em58
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e35
001-90779_a4_em59
MISC
NO_MASK
Act of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (Ustawa o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki) (“the 2004 Act”)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e37
001-90779_a4_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
26 July 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e38
001-90779_a4_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90779_a4_e35
001-90779_a4_em62
MISC
NO_MASK
001-90779_a4_em59
2004 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e35
001-90779_a4_em63
MISC
NO_MASK
2004 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e38
001-90779_a4_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e35
001-90779_a4_em65
MISC
NO_MASK
2004 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e39
001-90779_a4_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court's
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90779_a4_e35
001-90779_a4_em67
MISC
NO_MASK
2004 Act
Romuald Kozłowski
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Romuald Kozłowski