PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 21768/02) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Vehbi Selçuk (“the applicant”), on 27 May 2002.

The applicant was represented by Ms S. Kayaalp, a lawyer practising in Izmir. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purpose of the proceedings before the Court.

On 8 November 2004 the Court decided to communicate the application to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

The applicant was born in 1985 and lives in Izmir.

On 27 December 2001 the applicant, who was sixteen years old at the time, was arrested by police officers from the Karşıyaka Police Station in connection with an ongoing investigation concerning a robbery that had taken place in a primary school. In his police statement, the applicant confessed that he had been involved in a robbery on 26 November 2001 together with two of his friends. He explained that he had helped his friends in carrying a computer from the primary school. The same day he was brought before the public prosecutor, and the investigating judge at the Karşıyaka Magistrate’s Court, where he repeated his statement to the police. Having regard to the evidence in the file and considering that there was a risk of absconding, the investigating judge ordered that the applicant be detained on remand in a prison together with adults.

The applicant’s representative challenged this decision before the Karşıyaka Criminal Court and maintained that the evidence in the file did not suffice to keep her client in detention. Invoking Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention, she requested that the applicant be released.

On 10 January 2002 the Karşıyaka public prosecutor instituted criminal proceedings against the applicant in the Karşıyaka Criminal Court. He charged him with robbery under Article 493 of the Criminal Code.

On 14 January 2002 the Karşıyaka Criminal Court commenced the trial against the applicant. Taking into account the seriousness of the offence and the evidence in the case-file, it ordered that the applicant’s detention on remand be continued.

On 16 January 2002 the applicant’s representative challenged this decision. She invoked Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention and alleged that there was not sufficient evidence in the file to keep her client in detention. She further maintained that pursuant to Article 104 of the Criminal Procedure Code, a person could only be held in detention on remand if there were a risk of absconding and/or of tampering with evidence. She stated that the authorities knew where the applicant lived and there were no sufficient grounds to believe that the applicant would try to flee. Furthermore, according to the lawyer, as all the evidence relating to the case had already been gathered by the authorities, there was no risk of tampering with evidence.

On 30 January 2002 the Karşıyaka Assize Court refused the applicant’s request for release basing itself on the nature and seriousness of the accusation, and the evidence in the file.

During the hearing which was held on 8 February 2002, the Karşıyaka Assize Court heard the applicant’s testimony. Before the court, the applicant denied the charges and stated that he had not been involved in the robbery. Underlining that the applicant was a minor, the representative of the applicant asked the court for his release. Having regard to the nature of the crime, and taking into consideration the time spent in detention, the court decided that the applicant’s detention should be continued.

On 7 March 2002 the applicant’s representative asked the Karşıyaka Criminal Court to release her client. She maintained that he had been in detention since 27 December 2002 and stated that there was no sufficient evidence to keep him in detention. The court once again refused her request.

On 28 March 2002 the applicant’s representative further requested her client’s release referring to Article 5 of the Convention. She stated that the court was not examining their requests for release thoroughly. She contended that the applicant’s release would not in any way pose a danger to public order. She also stated that the applicant was ready give a guarantee to offset any risk of absconding.

On 29 March 2002 the Karşıyaka Criminal Court dismissed the applicant’s request relying on the evidence in the file and the seriousness of the offence.

On 5 April 2002 the Karşıyaka Criminal Court held another hearing, at the end of which it ordered that the applicant remain in detention on remand.

On 9 April 2002 the applicant’s lawyer challenged this decision before the Karşıyaka Assize Court. She maintained that her client was a minor and could not be kept in detention for such a long time. In this respect, she invoked Article 5 of the Convention and Article 37 (b) of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

On 10 April 2002 the Karşıyaka Assize Court rejected the request for release basing itself on the evidence in the file, the time spent in detention and the nature of the offence.

On 1 May 2002, after spending almost four months in detention on remand, the applicant was released pending trial.

The proceedings against the applicant are still pending.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e1
001-71944_a10_em1
CODE
QUASI
21768/02
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-71944_a10_e2
001-71944_a10_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e3
001-71944_a10_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e4
001-71944_a10_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Vehbi Selçuk
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e5
001-71944_a10_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
27 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e6
001-71944_a10_em6
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms S. Kayaalp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-71944_a10_e7
001-71944_a10_em7
LOC
QUASI
Izmir
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e2
001-71944_a10_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-71944_a10_em2
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e8
001-71944_a10_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e9
001-71944_a10_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e7
001-71944_a10_em11
LOC
QUASI
Izmir
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e10
001-71944_a10_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
27 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-71944_a10_e11
001-71944_a10_em13
DEM
QUASI
sixteen years old
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e12
001-71944_a10_em14
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-71944_a10_e13
001-71944_a10_em15
ORG
QUASI
primary school
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e14
001-71944_a10_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
26 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e13
001-71944_a10_em17
ORG
QUASI
primary school
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e15
001-71944_a10_em18
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Magistrate’s Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e16
001-71944_a10_em19
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e17
001-71944_a10_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
10 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-71944_a10_e18
001-71944_a10_em21
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka public prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e16
001-71944_a10_em22
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e19
001-71944_a10_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e16
001-71944_a10_em24
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e20
001-71944_a10_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
16 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e21
001-71944_a10_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e22
001-71944_a10_em27
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e23
001-71944_a10_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
8 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e22
001-71944_a10_em29
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e24
001-71944_a10_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
7 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e16
001-71944_a10_em31
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e25
001-71944_a10_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
27 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e26
001-71944_a10_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e27
001-71944_a10_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
29 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e16
001-71944_a10_em35
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e28
001-71944_a10_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
5 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e16
001-71944_a10_em37
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e29
001-71944_a10_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
9 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e22
001-71944_a10_em39
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e30
001-71944_a10_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
10 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e22
001-71944_a10_em41
ORG
QUASI
Karşıyaka Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-71944_a10_e31
001-71944_a10_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
1 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-71944_a10_e32
001-71944_a10_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
four months
Vehbi Selçuk
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Vehbi Selçuk