PROCEDURE

The Buchholz case was referred to the Court by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany (“the Government“). The case originated in an application against that State lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission“) on 18 December 1976 under Article 25 (art. 25) of the Convention by a German national, Mr. Walter Buchholz.

The Government’s application, which referred to Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention, was lodged with the registry of the Court on 3 October 1980, within the period of three months laid down by Articles 32 par. 1 and 47 (art. 32-1, art. 47). The purpose of the application is to submit the case to the Court and invite it to find that there has been no breach of the Convention.

On 4 October, the Registrar received from the Secretary to the Commission forty copies of the latter’s report.

The Chamber of seven judges to be constituted included, as ex officio members, Mr. H. Mosler, the elected judge of German nationality (Article 43 of the Convention) (art. 43), and Mr. G. Balladore Pallieri, the President of the Court (Rule 21 par. 3) (b) of the Rules of Court). On 4 October, the President drew by lot, in the presence of the Registrar, the names of the five other members, namely Mr. Thór Vilhjálmsson, Mr. W. Ganshof van der Meersch, Mrs. D. Bindschedler-Robert, Mr. F. Matscher and Mr. E. García de Enterría (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 par. 4) (art. 43).

Mr. Balladore Pallieri assumed the office of President of the Chamber (Rule 21 par. 5). He ascertained, through the Deputy Registrar, the views of the Agent of the Government and the President of the Commission regarding the procedure to be followed. On 4 October, he directed that the Agent should have until 5 December to file a memorial and that the Delegates of the Commission should be entitled to file a memorial in reply within two months from the date of the transmission of the Government’s memorial to them by the Registrar.

On 9 October, the Secretary to the Commission informed the Registrar that the Commission had appointed Mr. Gaukur Jörundsson as its Delegate.

The Government’s memorial was received at the registry on 5 December. On 15 December, the Secretary to the Commission advised the Registrar that the Delegate would present his observations at the hearings.

After consulting, through the Deputy Registrar, the Agent of the Government and the Delegate of the Commission, Mr. Wiarda, the Vice-President of the Court, who had replaced Mr. Balladore Pallieri following the latter’s death (Rule 21 par. 3 (b) and 5), directed on 15 December that the oral hearings should open on 27 January 1981.

On 22 January 1981, he requested the Commission to produce certain documents to the Court; these documents were filed by the Commission on 27 January and 6 February.

The oral hearings were held in public at the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 27 January. Immediately before their opening, the Chamber had held a preparatory meeting; it had authorised the Agent and counsel of the Government and the person assisting the Commission’s Delegate to use the German language (Rule 27 par. 2 and 3). There appeared before the Court:

for the Government: Mrs. I. MAIER, Ministerialdirigentin at the Federal Ministry of Justice, Agent. Mr. H. STÖCKER, Regierungsdirektor at the Federal Ministry of Justice, Mr. M. LORENZ, Regierungsdirektor at the Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. Mr. H. WEGENER, Oberregierungsrat at the Department of Labour and Social Affairs of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Advisers;

for the Commission: Mr. GAUKUR JÖRUNDSSON, Delegate, Mr. K. SOJKA, the applicant’s lawyer before the Commission, assisting the Delegate under Rule 29 par. 1, second sentence, of the Rules of Court. The Court heard addresses by Mrs. Maier for the Government and by Mr. Gaukur Jörundsson and Mr. Sojka for the Commission, as well as their replies to questions put by the Court. At the hearings, the Agent of the Government made several documents available to the Court.

On 6 February, the Agent of the Government and the applicant’s lawyer supplemented in writing their answers to certain questions put to them at the hearings; on 19 February, Mrs. Maier filed observations relating to the letter received from Mr. Sojka in this connection.

AS TO THE FACTS

Mr. Buchholz was born in 1918 and lives in Hamburg. From February 1949 onwards he worked for the dry-cleaning firm of J. H. Dependorf KG; he was mainly employed as a driver until the end of 1963 and thereafter as, in particular, controller of branch establishments. On 28 June 1974, he was given notice that he was dismissed with effect from 31 December of the same year as a result of rationalisation measures. He took proceedings before the appropriate courts contesting the lawfulness of this notice; in his submission, those courts did not determine his case within “a reasonable time“ as required by Article 6 par. 1 (art. 6-1) of the Convention.

1. Proceedings before the labour courts

(a) The Hamburg Labour Court (Arbeitsgericht) 13. On 10 July 1974, the applicant commenced an action before the Hamburg Labour Court claiming that his dismissal was “socially unjustified“ (“sozial ungerechtfertigt“) within the meaning of section 1 of the Unfair Dismissal Act (Kündigungsschutzgesetz). The other party (“the defendants“) served a defence on 25 July, one day before the expiry of the time-limit granted for this purpose by the Labour Court. 14. At the first hearing on 16 August, Mr. Buchholz’s lawyer submitted new written pleadings. The Labour Court thereupon allowed an application by the defendants for time to reply and adjourned the case until 4 October. 15. In their written reply of 22 August, the defendants, as requested by the Labour Court, gave a detailed account of the reasons for the contested dismissal; they also described the economic situation of the firm and explained the rationalisation measures taken. The applicant’s lawyer appended to his counter-reply of 19 September a note written to him by his client. This note contained the charge that the managers of the Dependorf firm had “negligently squandered the millions (business and private assets) properly earned by Robert Dependorf“ but had “personally secured to themselves such a safe position that these people are no longer interested in whether or not the Dependorf firm gets even deeper into the red“. These accusations prompted the defendants on 30 September to send the applicant two further notices of dismissal, an extraordinary notice (ausserordentliche Kündigung) effective forthwith and, as an alternative or precautionary (vorsorglich) measure, an ordinary notice (ordentliche Kündigung) with effect from 31 March 1975. The extraordinary notice was based on Article 626 of the Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch) which requires a “serious reason“ for a dismissal of this kind and the giving of notice within two weeks from the moment when the employers had knowledge of the facts judged by them to constitute such a reason. On 2 October, Mr. Buchholz’s lawyer filed two further sets of written submissions dated 1 and 2 October respectively; appended to the former was a copy of the defendant’s letter of 30 September; the latter extended the plaintiff’s action to cover the two dismissal notices of 30 September. 16. At a hearing on 4 October 1974, the Labour Court adjourned the proceedings until 25 October as the defendants’ lawyer had only received the applicant’s latest written pleadings at that hearing. On 14 October, the applicant’s lawyer submitted another memorandum. At the adjourned sitting on 25 October, the Labour Court, acting in accordance with the applicable legislation, proposed a friendly settlement, but the proposal was not accepted. 17. The Labour Court delivered judgment on 8 January 1975 immediately after hearing the final submissions of the parties. It held that neither the notice of 28 June 1974 nor the extraordinary notice of 30 September 1974 had terminated the applicant’s contract, since the former was “socially unjustified“ within the meaning of section 1 of the Unfair Dismissal Act and the latter was invalid for lack of a “serious reason“ as required by Article 626 of the Civil Code. The Court also rejected an alternative request by the defendants for discharge (Auflösungsantrag) of the contract of employment in pursuance of section 7 of the Unfair Dismissal Act. It ordered the defendants to pay Mr. Buchholz DM 5,700 arrears of wages but dismissed the claim for future salary. The judgment was notified in writing to the parties on 25 February 1975. (b) The Hamburg Labour Court of Appeal (Landesarbeitsgericht) 18. The defendants appealed to the Hamburg Labour Court of Appeal on 13 March 1975. In their submission, the accusations made by Mr. Buchholz constituted a “serious reason“ warranting the extraordinary notice of 30 September 1974; the two ordinary notices of 28 June and 30 September 1974 were likewise valid, the former being “socially justified“ for pressing reasons connected with the running of the business. They called on the Court to overrule the judgment appealed from and to dismiss the plaintiff’s action or, in the alternative, to discharge the contract of employment existing between the two parties. The applicant in turn lodged a cross-appeal (Anschlussberufung) on 25 March, seeking payment of arrears of wages for the first three months of 1975. 19. The parties then filed written pleadings dated 2 April and 15 May 1975 (the defendants) and 22 April (Mr. Buchholz). The applicant maintained his accusations against the managers of the firm and asked the Court of Appeal to call for an expert’s opinion in order to corroborate the allegations made. 20. In the course of this written procedure both the applicant and the defendants had requested the Court of Appeal not to hold sittings during certain periods, namely from 25 May to 5 June for the applicant and from 11 April to 2 May and from 6 to 11 June for the defendants. 21. Taking due note of this, the Court of Appeal on 16 May 1975 set the case down for hearing on 22 July. On that date, the Court examined, amongst other matters, the exact circumstances surrounding the tendering in evidence of the applicant’s accusations which had been appended to his lawyer’s written pleading of 19 September 1974 (see paragraph 15 above). When questioned whether he had intended use to be made of these accusations in the lawsuit, he stated that he had relied on the judgment of his lawyer. The Court also raised the possibility of employing Mr. Buchholz in some other capacity; it directed the defendants to submit within one month a chart setting out the firm’s commercial staff structure, indicating for each post whether it was suitable for the applicant and, if not, the reason why. The applicant was given one month to reply. 22. The defendants filed the chart, with accompanying explanations, on 31 July; then, on 6 August, they replied to a written pleading from Mr. Buchholz which, though presented on 16 July, had been communicated to them after the hearing of 22 July. On 20 August 1975, the applicant put forward a proposal for a friendly settlement, but this was rejected by the defendants on 19 September. By letter of 3 October, Mr. Buchholz’s lawyer filed a memorandum, dated 28 September, containing comments by his client and asked the Court to set the case down for an early hearing, thereby renewing a request he had already made on 18 September, one day before the defendants had refused the offer of friendly settlement. He stated, amongst other things, that “the disproportionately long state of suspense [had] become physically and psychologically unbearable“ for Mr. Buchholz. On 9 October, the Court of Appeal decided to hold a hearing on 19 March 1976 and transmitted to the defendants the above mentioned written pleadings of 3 October. 23. On 12 November 1975, the applicant’s lawyer addressed to the Parliament (Bürgerschaft) of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg a petition seeking measures to expedite proceedings before the labour courts. Early in 1976, as an apparent sequel to this petition and following an increase in the number of judicial posts (see paragraph 39 below), the Court of Appeal was able to establish a Sixth Chamber. Almost 50 per cent of the cases pending before the Third Chamber were referred to the new Chamber, although the former continued to deal with the Buchholz action. The Parliament advised the applicant in reply on 5 May 1976 that the authorities had immediately taken the necessary steps to ease the workload of the labour courts. 24. The legal and factual questions to be decided were debated by the two parties at the hearing held on 19 March 1976. At the close of the sitting, the Court of Appeal made an order setting out the various points in issue and their possible implications as seen by the Court; it then proposed a settlement whereby the contract of employment would be considered as having terminated on 31 December 1974 and the defendants would pay the applicant a lump sum of DM 34,200. The Court called on the parties to state their views by 30 April. 25. By memorandum of 7 April, the defendants refused the settlement proposal; they referred to the “undisputed“ fact that the two notices of 30 September 1974 had been served on the applicant on the same day. For his part, Mr. Buchholz’s lawyer, in a written statement of 8 April in which he paid tribute to the Court of Appeal for its “thorough and prudent examination of the case“, declined to accept the suggested settlement; he specified that he could only agree to such a solution if the contract were regarded as terminated on 31 December 1975. In addition, on 28 April 1976 he filed a brief reply to the above-mentioned memorandum of 7 April. He contested the defendants’ affirmations “insofar as they deviate[d] from the explanations“ given by his client, but he did not however specifically deal with the matter of the date of receipt of the two notices of 30 September 1974. He added that he would be absent from 30 May to 18 June and requested the Court of Appeal to fix a hearing in May. On 3 May, the Court of Appeal directed that the hearings should resume on 27 August and so advised the parties on 1 June. 26. At the hearing on 27 August 1976, Mr. Buchholz denied that he had actually received the two notices of 30 September on that day and asked the Court to question on his wife on this point, which was material for the purposes of Article 626 of the Civil Code (see paragraph 15 above). The Court acceded to this request. Mrs. Buchholz, who was present in the court-room, confirmed the statements of her husband; she asserted that the notices had been served between 5 and 7 October 1974. The defendants contested this testimony and asked for the counter-evidence of four witnesses to be heard. The applicant objected to such a move on the ground that it would tend to protract the proceedings. The Court nevertheless decided that Mr. Buchholz, as well as the chief executive of the Dependorf firm and the four witnesses nominated by the defendants, should be heard on 11 January 1977. At the same time it invited the applicant, who had applied for free legal aid in the appeal proceedings, to supply the necessary certificate for that purpose. 27. The certificate was submitted under cover of a letter of 28 August from Mr. Buchholz’s lawyer. Consequently, on 29 September the Court granted free legal aid for the applicant’s defence against the main appeal; it reserved its decision as regards his cross-appeal (see paragraph 31 below). 28. Earlier, on 21 September 1976, the applicant had challenged the above-mentioned decision of 27 August before the Federal Constitutional Court. Complaining of the duration of the litigation and relying on Articles 2, 3, 12 and 20 of the Basic Law as well as Article 6 (art. 6) of the Convention, he had sought from the Constitutional Court an order requiring the Court of Appeal to bring its consideration of the matter to an immediate close. The case-file was sent to the Federal Constitutional Court which, sitting as a panel of three judges (section 93 (a) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz), gave judgment on 2 November. The Court refused leave for the constitutional application to proceed: even supposing the application to be admissible, it did not offer sufficient prospects of success since there was nothing in the evidence to show that the Court of Appeal had protracted the proceedings; having regard to the extreme complexity of the facts of the case, the length of the lawsuit had been caused primarily by the applicant who had continuously supplemented his submissions and called for the taking of further evidence. 29. The presiding judge of the Third Chamber of the Labour Court of Appeal, which was dealing with the applicant’s case, retired on 19 November. 30. On 11 January 1977, the Court of Appeal heard four witnesses in connection with the date of receipt of the dismissal notices. It reserved until 28 January its decision whether, despite the objections of Mr. Buchholz’s lawyer, it should hear evidence from an additional witness nominated by the defendants and from Mr. Lentfer, the chief executive of the Dependorf firm. 31. On 28 January, the Court of Appeal granted the applicant free legal aid for his cross-appeal (see paragraph 27 above) and directed that Mr. Lentfer be called to give evidence on 22 March. By letter of 31 January, the defendants’ lawyer, pleading a prior commitment, asked for adjournment of the hearing of Mr. Lentfer; he further specified that both he and Mr. Lentfer would be on leave from 15 April until 4 May. The Court of Appeal granted this request on 2 February and postponed the hearing until 6 May. The applicant wrote on 5 February to the Secretary to the Commission - his petition to the Commission having been lodged on 18 December 1976 - to complain of this decision, but according to the Government there is no trace in the record of the case of his having entered any such objection before the Court of Appeal. 32. On 6 May, the representatives of both parties declared that the two disputed dismissal notices had indeed been received by Mr. Buchholz on 30 September 1974. On 13 May, the Court of Appeal ordered that an expert opinion should be obtained on the question whether or not the applicant’s accusations against the managers of the Dependorf firm were justified (see paragraph 15 above). The Hamburg Chamber of Commerce, on being so requested, nominated an expert on 14 June; after hearing the parties, the Court appointed the expert on 30 June. The expert’s report was filed on 2 December 1977; the Court communicated it to the applicant and the defendants for comment by 5 January 1978. 33. The last hearing was held on 3 February. The parties made their final submissions, following which the Labour Court of Appeal delivered its judgment. It allowed the defendants’ appeal and dismissed the applicant’s cross-appeal, awarding the costs of the proceedings against him. The Court of Appeal held that the extraordinary notice of 30 September 1974 was valid for the following reasons. The charges made by the applicant constituted a serious reason for dismissal within the meaning of paragraph 1 of Article 626 of the Civil Code and the dismissal notice had been served within the period of two weeks laid down by paragraph 2 of that Article. The thorough and convincing explanations furnished by the expert made it clear that Mr. Buchholz’s accusations were without foundation (haltlos): apart from being extremely defamatory, they were inappropriate and quite unnecessary for his cause of action contesting the ordinary notice of 28 June 1974 (see paragraph 15 above). The judgment was notified in writing to the parties on 5 April. (c) The Federal Labour Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht) 34. With a view to bringing a petition for a review on a point of law (Revision), Mr. Buchholz applied on 13 April to the Federal Labour Court for free legal aid; his application was granted on 12 September. On 20 September, he asked the Federal Court for leave to petition notwithstanding expiry of the legal time-limit; the Court gave leave on 10 October. The petition which had been filed earlier on 22 September, was transmitted to the defendants who replied in writing on 29 December. 35. On 26 April 1979, the Federal Court, after hearing the parties, proposed a settlement whereby the contract of employment would be considered as having terminated on 31 December 1974 and the defendants would pay the applicant a lump sum of DM 24,000 in addition to the DM 5,700 already paid as arrears of wages in compliance with the Labour Court’s judgment. The proposal was rejected by the defendants; by judgment of the same day, the Federal Court dismissed the petition for review as unfounded. 2. Proceedings before the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) 36. On 10 May 1979, Mr. Buchholz challenged this decision before the Federal Constitutional Court alleging violation of several basic rights. He complained of the length of the proceedings before the various labour courts, citing this factor as the cause of the contested decision. He further criticised the Federal Labour Court for having terminated a lawsuit “which in normal circumstances should not have been terminated yet“; in view of his application to the Commission, so he contended, the Federal Labour Court had “clearly not wished to make the breach of the Convention more evident by continuing the proceedings“. In addition, the applicant claimed that the judgment being challenged was unsustainable as far as its reasoning was concerned (sachlich unhaltbar) and constituted an unacceptable domestic sanction intended to punish him for having taken his case to the Commission. On 19 July, the Constitutional Court refused leave for the constitutional application to proceed on the ground that it was inadmissible. The applicant had not, it was stated, identified with sufficient clarity any possible violation of his basic rights. In particular, his complaint regarding the length of the proceedings did not warrant a finding that the outcome of the action was incompatible with any of his basic rights; this was likewise true of his submission that the reasoning of the judgment being challenged did not bear examination. As in 1976 (see paragraph 28 above), the Court had sat in judgment as a panel of three judges.

3. The applicant’s situation after his dismissal

For a year after his dismissal, Mr. Buchholz was paid weekly unemployment benefits (Arbeitslosengeld) under the Promotion of Employment Act (Arbeitsförderungsgesetz), that is to say, DM 202.20 from 9 October to 31 December 1974, DM 228 from 1 January to 30 September 1975 and DM 250.80 until 7 October 1975. The Hamburg Employment Office (Arbeitsamt) refused, on 23 December 1975, to grant him unemployment welfare assistance (Arbeitslosenhilfe) thereafter on account of his wife’s earnings. Since 1 August 1978, the applicant has been in receipt of a social security retirement pension (Sozialversicherungsrente), the amount of which – originally DM 1,462 per month - has been periodically adjusted.

According to the Government, from October 1974 onwards the Hamburg Employment Office endeavoured in vain to find the applicant some other employment, even offering financial help to potential employers.

4. Workload of the Labour Courts of Appeal between 1974 and 1976

As the result of an economic recession in the Federal Republic of Germany, the labour courts of appeal experienced a significant increase in their workload between 1974 and 1976. According to the statistics supplied by the Government at the request of the Court, the incidence of appeals from labour court judgments rose, as compared with the previous year, by 23.1 per cent in 1974, by 20.8 per cent in 1975 and by 9.7 per cent in 1976. In order to cope with this state of affairs, the relevant authorities increased the number of judicial posts by 9.6 per cent in 1974, by 12.5 per cent in 1975 and by 11.1 per cent in 1976. There were 17.3 per cent more cases dealt with in 1974, 27.5 per cent in 1975 and 13.4 per cent in 1976. As regards the Hamburg Court of Appeal in particular, 689 appeals were entered in 1974, 758 in 1975, 786 in 1976 and 756 in 1977; 716 appeals were decided in 1974, 700 in 1975, 798 in 1976 and 788 in 1977. The average length of proceedings progressed from 2.88 months in 1974 to 3.20 months in 1975, but then fell to 2.98 months in 1976, 2.79 months in 1977 and 2.53 months in 1978. In this respect, the Hamburg Court of Appeal was more favoured than the labour courts of appeal of the other Länder where, nevertheless, a downward trend was also registered. Examination of the 255 cases decided in 1975 and 1976 by the Third Chamber, which dealt with the Buchholz appeal, showed, according to the Government, that 163 cases were disposed of after one hearing, 59 cases after two hearings, 23 cases after three hearings and 10 cases after four to six hearings.

Faced with the backlog of labour court business in the 1970’s, the Government tabled in the legislative assemblies in 1978 a Bill designed, amongst other things, to expedite proceedings before the labour courts. The resultant Act entered into force on 1 July 1979. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

In his application of 18 December 1976 to the Commission (no. 7759/77), Mr. Buchholz complained of the length of the proceedings before the German courts and alleged a breach of Articles 6 par. 1 and 8 (art. 6-1, art. 8) of the Convention. During the course of the proceedings on the merits, he also relied on Articles 3 and 12 (art. 3, art. 12).

On 7 December 1977, the Commission declared the application admissible. In its report of 14 May 1980, the Commission expressed the opinion that the requirements of Article 6 par. 1 (art. 6-1) had not been observed (seven votes to five), but that no issue arose under Articles 3, 8 or 12 (art. 3, art. 8, art. 12). FINAL SUBMISSIONS MADE TO THE COURT

At the hearings on 27 January 1981, the Government made the following final submission, which had been indicated in their memorial of 5 December 1980: “[We] request a finding that the Convention has not been violated in the instant case.“
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em1
PERSON
DIRECT
001-57451_a11_em8
Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Government of the Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em3
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57451_a11_em2
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em4
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em5
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e4
001-57451_a11_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e5
001-57451_a11_em7
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em8
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Walter Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e6
001-57451_a11_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
3 October 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e7
001-57451_a11_em11
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e8
001-57451_a11_em12
DATETIME
NO_MASK
4 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e9
001-57451_a11_em14
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. H. Mosler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e5
001-57451_a11_em15
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e10
001-57451_a11_em16
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. G. Balladore Pallieri
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e8
001-57451_a11_em17
DATETIME
NO_MASK
4 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e11
001-57451_a11_em18
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. Thór Vilhjálmsson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e12
001-57451_a11_em19
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. W. Ganshof van der Meersch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e13
001-57451_a11_em20
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mrs. D. Bindschedler-Robert
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e14
001-57451_a11_em21
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. F. Matscher
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e15
001-57451_a11_em22
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. E. García de Enterría
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e10
001-57451_a11_em23
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-57451_a11_em16
Mr. Balladore Pallieri
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em25
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e8
001-57451_a11_em26
DATETIME
NO_MASK
4 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e16
001-57451_a11_em27
DATETIME
NO_MASK
5 December
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e17
001-57451_a11_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Delegates of the Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e18
001-57451_a11_em29
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e19
001-57451_a11_em31
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e20
001-57451_a11_em34
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. Gaukur Jörundsson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e16
001-57451_a11_em36
DATETIME
NO_MASK
5 December
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e21
001-57451_a11_em37
DATETIME
NO_MASK
15 December
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e22
001-57451_a11_em41
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. Wiarda
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e10
001-57451_a11_em42
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. Balladore Pallieri
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e21
001-57451_a11_em43
DATETIME
NO_MASK
15 December
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e23
001-57451_a11_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
27 January 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e24
001-57451_a11_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
22 January 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e25
001-57451_a11_em48
DATETIME
NO_MASK
27 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e26
001-57451_a11_em49
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e27
001-57451_a11_em50
LOC
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e25
001-57451_a11_em51
DATETIME
NO_MASK
27 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e5
001-57451_a11_em54
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e28
001-57451_a11_em56
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. I. MAIER
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e29
001-57451_a11_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e30
001-57451_a11_em58
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. H. STÖCKER
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e29
001-57451_a11_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e31
001-57451_a11_em60
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. M. LORENZ
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e32
001-57451_a11_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e33
001-57451_a11_em62
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. H. WEGENER
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e34
001-57451_a11_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Department of Labour and Social Affairs of the Free
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e35
001-57451_a11_em64
LOC
QUASI
Hanseatic City of Hamburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em65
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e20
001-57451_a11_em66
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. GAUKUR JÖRUNDSSON
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e36
001-57451_a11_em67
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. K. SOJKA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em68
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e28
001-57451_a11_em69
PERSON
QUASI
001-57451_a11_em56
Mrs. Maier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e20
001-57451_a11_em71
PERSON
QUASI
001-57451_a11_em66
Mr. Gaukur Jörundsson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e36
001-57451_a11_em72
PERSON
QUASI
001-57451_a11_em67
Mr. Sojka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em74
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e26
001-57451_a11_em75
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em76
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e37
001-57451_a11_em77
DATETIME
NO_MASK
19 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e28
001-57451_a11_em78
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Maier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e36
001-57451_a11_em79
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. Sojka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em80
PERSON
DIRECT
001-57451_a11_em1
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e38
001-57451_a11_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
1918
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e39
001-57451_a11_em82
LOC
QUASI
Hamburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e40
001-57451_a11_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
February 1949
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e41
001-57451_a11_em84
ORG
QUASI
J. H. Dependorf KG
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e42
001-57451_a11_em85
DEM
QUASI
driver
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e43
001-57451_a11_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
end of 1963
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e44
001-57451_a11_em87
DEM
QUASI
controller of branch establishments
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e45
001-57451_a11_em88
DATETIME
QUASI
28 June 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e46
001-57451_a11_em89
DATETIME
NO_MASK
31 December
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e47
001-57451_a11_em90
ORG
QUASI
Hamburg Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e48
001-57451_a11_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Arbeitsgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e49
001-57451_a11_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
10 July 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e47
001-57451_a11_em93
ORG
QUASI
Hamburg Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e50
001-57451_a11_em94
MISC
NO_MASK
socially unjustified
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e50
001-57451_a11_em95
MISC
NO_MASK
001-57451_a11_em94
sozial ungerechtfertigt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e51
001-57451_a11_em96
MISC
NO_MASK
001-57451_a11_em97
Unfair Dismissal Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e51
001-57451_a11_em97
MISC
NO_MASK
Kündigungsschutzgesetz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e52
001-57451_a11_em98
DATETIME
NO_MASK
25 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e53
001-57451_a11_em99
DATETIME
NO_MASK
one day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e47
001-57451_a11_em100
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57451_a11_em90
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e54
001-57451_a11_em101
DATETIME
NO_MASK
16 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em102
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e47
001-57451_a11_em103
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e55
001-57451_a11_em104
DATETIME
NO_MASK
4 October.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e56
001-57451_a11_em105
DATETIME
NO_MASK
22 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e47
001-57451_a11_em106
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e57
001-57451_a11_em107
DATETIME
NO_MASK
19 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e58
001-57451_a11_em108
ORG
QUASI
Dependorf firm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e59
001-57451_a11_em109
PERSON
QUASI
Robert Dependorf
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e58
001-57451_a11_em110
ORG
QUASI
Dependorf firm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e60
001-57451_a11_em111
DATETIME
NO_MASK
30 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e61
001-57451_a11_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
31 March 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e62
001-57451_a11_em113
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two weeks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e63
001-57451_a11_em114
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em115
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e63
001-57451_a11_em116
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e60
001-57451_a11_em117
DATETIME
NO_MASK
30 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e60
001-57451_a11_em118
DATETIME
NO_MASK
30 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e64
001-57451_a11_em119
DATETIME
QUASI
4 October 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e47
001-57451_a11_em120
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e65
001-57451_a11_em121
DATETIME
NO_MASK
25 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e66
001-57451_a11_em122
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e65
001-57451_a11_em123
DATETIME
NO_MASK
25 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e47
001-57451_a11_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e47
001-57451_a11_em125
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e67
001-57451_a11_em126
DATETIME
QUASI
8 January 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e45
001-57451_a11_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
28 June 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e68
001-57451_a11_em128
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e50
001-57451_a11_em129
MISC
NO_MASK
socially unjustified
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e51
001-57451_a11_em130
MISC
NO_MASK
Unfair Dismissal Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e51
001-57451_a11_em131
MISC
NO_MASK
Unfair Dismissal Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em132
PERSON
DIRECT
001-57451_a11_em8
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e69
001-57451_a11_em133
QUANTITY
QUASI
DM 5,700
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e70
001-57451_a11_em134
DATETIME
QUASI
25 February 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e71
001-57451_a11_em135
ORG
QUASI
001-57451_a11_em136
Hamburg Labour Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e71
001-57451_a11_em136
ORG
NO_MASK
Landesarbeitsgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e71
001-57451_a11_em137
ORG
QUASI
Hamburg Labour Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e72
001-57451_a11_em138
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em139
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e68
001-57451_a11_em140
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e73
001-57451_a11_em141
DATETIME
NO_MASK
28 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e68
001-57451_a11_em142
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e74
001-57451_a11_em143
DATETIME
NO_MASK
25 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e75
001-57451_a11_em144
DATETIME
NO_MASK
first three months of 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e76
001-57451_a11_em145
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e77
001-57451_a11_em146
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e78
001-57451_a11_em147
DATETIME
NO_MASK
22 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em148
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e79
001-57451_a11_em149
DATETIME
QUASI
25 May to 5 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e80
001-57451_a11_em150
DATETIME
QUASI
11 April to 2 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e81
001-57451_a11_em151
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6 to 11 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e82
001-57451_a11_em152
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e83
001-57451_a11_em153
DATETIME
NO_MASK
22 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e84
001-57451_a11_em154
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em155
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e85
001-57451_a11_em156
DATETIME
NO_MASK
one month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e85
001-57451_a11_em157
DATETIME
NO_MASK
one month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e86
001-57451_a11_em158
DATETIME
NO_MASK
31 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e87
001-57451_a11_em159
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em160
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e88
001-57451_a11_em161
DATETIME
NO_MASK
16 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e83
001-57451_a11_em162
DATETIME
NO_MASK
22 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e89
001-57451_a11_em163
DATETIME
QUASI
20 August 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e57
001-57451_a11_em164
DATETIME
NO_MASK
19 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e90
001-57451_a11_em165
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em166
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e91
001-57451_a11_em167
DATETIME
NO_MASK
28 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e92
001-57451_a11_em168
DATETIME
NO_MASK
18 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e53
001-57451_a11_em169
DATETIME
NO_MASK
one day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em170
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e19
001-57451_a11_em171
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e93
001-57451_a11_em172
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e90
001-57451_a11_em173
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e94
001-57451_a11_em174
DATETIME
QUASI
12 November 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e95
001-57451_a11_em175
ORG
NO_MASK
Parliament
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e95
001-57451_a11_em176
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57451_a11_em175
Bürgerschaft
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e35
001-57451_a11_em177
LOC
QUASI
Hanseatic City of Hamburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e96
001-57451_a11_em178
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e97
001-57451_a11_em179
ORG
NO_MASK
Sixth Chamber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e98
001-57451_a11_em180
ORG
NO_MASK
Third Chamber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em181
PERSON
DIRECT
Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e95
001-57451_a11_em182
ORG
NO_MASK
Parliament
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e99
001-57451_a11_em183
DATETIME
QUASI
5 May 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e93
001-57451_a11_em184
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e100
001-57451_a11_em185
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e101
001-57451_a11_em186
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
DM 34,200
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e102
001-57451_a11_em187
DATETIME
NO_MASK
30 April.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e103
001-57451_a11_em188
DATETIME
NO_MASK
7 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e68
001-57451_a11_em189
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em190
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e104
001-57451_a11_em191
DATETIME
NO_MASK
8 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e105
001-57451_a11_em192
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e106
001-57451_a11_em193
DATETIME
QUASI
28 April 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e103
001-57451_a11_em194
DATETIME
NO_MASK
7 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e68
001-57451_a11_em195
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e107
001-57451_a11_em196
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May to 18 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e108
001-57451_a11_em197
DATETIME
NO_MASK
May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e109
001-57451_a11_em198
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e110
001-57451_a11_em199
DATETIME
NO_MASK
27 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e111
001-57451_a11_em200
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1 June.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e112
001-57451_a11_em201
DATETIME
QUASI
27 August 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em202
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e60
001-57451_a11_em203
DATETIME
NO_MASK
30 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e113
001-57451_a11_em204
DATETIME
NO_MASK
that day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e114
001-57451_a11_em205
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e115
001-57451_a11_em206
DATETIME
QUASI
between 5 and 7 October 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em207
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e58
001-57451_a11_em208
ORG
QUASI
Dependorf firm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e116
001-57451_a11_em209
DATETIME
QUASI
11 January 1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e117
001-57451_a11_em210
DATETIME
NO_MASK
28 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em211
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e118
001-57451_a11_em212
DATETIME
NO_MASK
29 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e119
001-57451_a11_em213
DATETIME
QUASI
21 September 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e110
001-57451_a11_em214
DATETIME
NO_MASK
27 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e120
001-57451_a11_em215
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e121
001-57451_a11_em216
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e120
001-57451_a11_em217
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e122
001-57451_a11_em218
MISC
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e122
001-57451_a11_em219
MISC
NO_MASK
001-57451_a11_em218
Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e123
001-57451_a11_em220
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2 November
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e124
001-57451_a11_em221
ORG
NO_MASK
Third Chamber of the Labour Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e125
001-57451_a11_em222
DATETIME
NO_MASK
19 November.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e116
001-57451_a11_em223
DATETIME
QUASI
11 January 1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e126
001-57451_a11_em224
DATETIME
NO_MASK
28 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em225
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e127
001-57451_a11_em226
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. Lentfer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e58
001-57451_a11_em227
ORG
QUASI
Dependorf firm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e126
001-57451_a11_em228
DATETIME
NO_MASK
28 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e127
001-57451_a11_em229
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. Lentfer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e128
001-57451_a11_em230
DATETIME
NO_MASK
22 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e129
001-57451_a11_em231
DATETIME
NO_MASK
31 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e127
001-57451_a11_em232
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. Lentfer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e127
001-57451_a11_em233
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. Lentfer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e130
001-57451_a11_em234
DATETIME
NO_MASK
15 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e131
001-57451_a11_em235
DATETIME
NO_MASK
4 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e132
001-57451_a11_em236
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e133
001-57451_a11_em237
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e134
001-57451_a11_em238
DATETIME
NO_MASK
5 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em239
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em240
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e4
001-57451_a11_em241
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em242
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e133
001-57451_a11_em243
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em244
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e68
001-57451_a11_em245
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e135
001-57451_a11_em246
DATETIME
NO_MASK
13 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e58
001-57451_a11_em247
ORG
QUASI
Dependorf firm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e136
001-57451_a11_em248
ORG
QUASI
Hamburg Chamber of Commerce
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e137
001-57451_a11_em249
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e138
001-57451_a11_em250
DATETIME
NO_MASK
30 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e139
001-57451_a11_em251
DATETIME
QUASI
2 December 1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e140
001-57451_a11_em252
DATETIME
QUASI
5 January 1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e141
001-57451_a11_em253
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e142
001-57451_a11_em254
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e68
001-57451_a11_em255
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e62
001-57451_a11_em256
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two weeks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em257
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e45
001-57451_a11_em258
DATETIME
QUASI
28 June 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e143
001-57451_a11_em259
DATETIME
NO_MASK
5 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e144
001-57451_a11_em260
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e144
001-57451_a11_em261
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57451_a11_em260
Bundesarbeitsgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em262
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e145
001-57451_a11_em263
DATETIME
NO_MASK
13 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e144
001-57451_a11_em264
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e146
001-57451_a11_em265
DATETIME
NO_MASK
12 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e147
001-57451_a11_em266
DATETIME
NO_MASK
20 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e148
001-57451_a11_em267
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e149
001-57451_a11_em268
DATETIME
NO_MASK
10 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e150
001-57451_a11_em269
DATETIME
NO_MASK
22 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e151
001-57451_a11_em270
DATETIME
NO_MASK
29 December
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e152
001-57451_a11_em271
DATETIME
QUASI
26 April 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e148
001-57451_a11_em272
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e100
001-57451_a11_em273
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e153
001-57451_a11_em274
QUANTITY
QUASI
DM 24,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e69
001-57451_a11_em275
QUANTITY
QUASI
DM 5,700
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e47
001-57451_a11_em276
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e148
001-57451_a11_em277
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e120
001-57451_a11_em278
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e120
001-57451_a11_em279
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57451_a11_em278
Bundesverfassungsgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e154
001-57451_a11_em280
DATETIME
QUASI
10 May 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em281
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e120
001-57451_a11_em282
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e144
001-57451_a11_em283
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em284
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e144
001-57451_a11_em285
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em286
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e155
001-57451_a11_em287
DATETIME
NO_MASK
19 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e121
001-57451_a11_em288
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e96
001-57451_a11_em289
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e156
001-57451_a11_em290
DATETIME
NO_MASK
year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em291
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e157
001-57451_a11_em292
QUANTITY
QUASI
DM 202.20
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e158
001-57451_a11_em293
DATETIME
QUASI
9 October to 31 December 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e159
001-57451_a11_em294
QUANTITY
QUASI
DM 228
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e160
001-57451_a11_em295
DATETIME
QUASI
1 January to 30 September 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e161
001-57451_a11_em296
QUANTITY
QUASI
DM 250.80
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e162
001-57451_a11_em297
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e163
001-57451_a11_em298
ORG
QUASI
Hamburg Employment Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e164
001-57451_a11_em299
ORG
NO_MASK
Arbeitsamt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e165
001-57451_a11_em300
DATETIME
QUASI
23 December 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e166
001-57451_a11_em301
ORG
NO_MASK
Arbeitslosenhilfe
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e167
001-57451_a11_em302
DATETIME
QUASI
1 August 1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e168
001-57451_a11_em303
ORG
NO_MASK
Sozialversicherungsrente
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e169
001-57451_a11_em304
QUANTITY
QUASI
DM 1,462
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em305
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e170
001-57451_a11_em306
DATETIME
NO_MASK
October 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e163
001-57451_a11_em307
ORG
QUASI
Hamburg Employment Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e171
001-57451_a11_em308
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Courts of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e172
001-57451_a11_em309
DATETIME
NO_MASK
between 1974 and 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57451_a11_e173
001-57451_a11_em310
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e172
001-57451_a11_em311
DATETIME
NO_MASK
between 1974 and 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em312
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e174
001-57451_a11_em313
ORG
NO_MASK
labour court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e175
001-57451_a11_em314
DATETIME
NO_MASK
previous year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e176
001-57451_a11_em315
QUANTITY
QUASI
23.1 per cent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e177
001-57451_a11_em316
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e178
001-57451_a11_em317
QUANTITY
QUASI
20.8 per cent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e179
001-57451_a11_em318
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e180
001-57451_a11_em319
QUANTITY
QUASI
9.7 per cent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e96
001-57451_a11_em320
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e181
001-57451_a11_em321
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
9.6 per cent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e177
001-57451_a11_em322
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e182
001-57451_a11_em323
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
12.5 per cent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e179
001-57451_a11_em324
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e183
001-57451_a11_em325
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
1.1 per cent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e96
001-57451_a11_em326
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e184
001-57451_a11_em327
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
17.3 per cent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e177
001-57451_a11_em328
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e185
001-57451_a11_em329
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
27.5 per cent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e179
001-57451_a11_em330
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e186
001-57451_a11_em331
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
13.4 per cent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e96
001-57451_a11_em332
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e187
001-57451_a11_em333
ORG
QUASI
Hamburg Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e188
001-57451_a11_em334
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
689 appeals
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e177
001-57451_a11_em335
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e189
001-57451_a11_em336
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
758
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e179
001-57451_a11_em337
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e190
001-57451_a11_em338
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
786
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e96
001-57451_a11_em339
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e191
001-57451_a11_em340
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
756
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e192
001-57451_a11_em341
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e193
001-57451_a11_em342
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
716
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e177
001-57451_a11_em343
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e194
001-57451_a11_em344
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
700
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e179
001-57451_a11_em345
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e195
001-57451_a11_em346
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
798
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e96
001-57451_a11_em347
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e196
001-57451_a11_em348
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
788
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e192
001-57451_a11_em349
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e197
001-57451_a11_em350
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.88 months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e177
001-57451_a11_em351
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e198
001-57451_a11_em352
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3.20 months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e179
001-57451_a11_em353
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e199
001-57451_a11_em354
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.98 months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e96
001-57451_a11_em355
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e200
001-57451_a11_em356
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.79 months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e192
001-57451_a11_em357
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e201
001-57451_a11_em358
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.53 months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e202
001-57451_a11_em359
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e187
001-57451_a11_em360
ORG
QUASI
Hamburg Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e203
001-57451_a11_em361
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
255 cases
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e179
001-57451_a11_em362
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e96
001-57451_a11_em363
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e98
001-57451_a11_em364
ORG
NO_MASK
Third Chamber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em365
PERSON
DIRECT
Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em366
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e204
001-57451_a11_em367
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
163 cases
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e205
001-57451_a11_em368
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
59 cases
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e206
001-57451_a11_em369
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
23 cases
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57451_a11_e207
001-57451_a11_em370
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
10 cases
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e174
001-57451_a11_em371
ORG
NO_MASK
labour court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e208
001-57451_a11_em372
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1970
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em373
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e202
001-57451_a11_em374
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e209
001-57451_a11_em375
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e210
001-57451_a11_em376
ORG
NO_MASK
COMMISSION
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e4
001-57451_a11_em377
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em378
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e211
001-57451_a11_em379
CODE
DIRECT
7759/77
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e1
001-57451_a11_em380
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Buchholz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e5
001-57451_a11_em381
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e212
001-57451_a11_em382
DATETIME
QUASI
7 December 1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em383
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e213
001-57451_a11_em384
DATETIME
QUASI
14 May 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e3
001-57451_a11_em385
ORG
NO_MASK
Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e23
001-57451_a11_em386
DATETIME
QUASI
27 January 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e2
001-57451_a11_em387
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57451_a11_e214
001-57451_a11_em388
DATETIME
QUASI
5 December 1980
Walter Buchholz
DEU
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Walter Buchholz