PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court, as established under former Article 19 of the Convention, by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) on 16March 1998, within the three-month period laid down by former Articles 32 § 1 and 47 of the Convention. It originated in an application (no. 26083/94) against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Commission under former Article 25 by two British nationals, Mr Richard Waite and Mr Terry Kennedy, on 24 November 1994. The Commission’s request referred to former Articles 44 and 48 and to the declaration whereby Germany recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (former Article 46). The object of the request was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

The applicants stated that they wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyers who would represent them (Rule 31 of former Rules of Court B0). The Government of the United Kingdom, having been informed by the Registrar of their right to intervene (former Article 48 (b) of the Convention and former Rule 35 § 3 (b)), indicated that they did not intend to do so.

As President of the Chamber which had originally been constituted (former Article 43 of the Convention and former Rule 21) in order to deal, in particular, with procedural matters that might arise before the entry into force of Protocol No. 11, Mr Thór Vilhjálmsson, acting through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the German Government (“the Government”), the applicants’ lawyers and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the written procedure. Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the applicants’ and the Government’s memorials on 30 July and 31 July 1998 respectively.

On 22 October 1998 the President of the Chamber decided, under former Rule 28 § 3, to give the applicants’ lawyers leave to use the German language at the hearing before the Court. The Agent of the Government was also given leave to address the Court in German, under former Rule 28 § 2.

After the entry into force of Protocol No. 11 on 1November 1998 and in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 § 5 thereof, the case was referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. The Grand Chamber included ex officio Mr G. Ress, the judge elected in respect of Germany (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 24 § 4 of the Rules of Court), MrL.Wildhaber, the President of the Court, Mrs E. Palm, Vice-President of the Court, and Mr J.-P. Costa and MrM.Fischbach, Vice-Presidents of Sections (Article 27 § 3 of the Convention and Rule 24 §§ 3 and 5 (a)). The other members appointed to complete the Grand Chamber were Mr L. Ferrari Bravo, Mr L. Caflisch, Mr W. Fuhrmann, Mr K. Jungwiert, Mr B. Zupančič, Mrs N. Vajić, Mr J. Hedigan, Mrs W. Thomassen, Mrs M. Tsatsa-Nikolovska, Mr T. Panţîru, Mr E. Levits and Mr K. Traja (Rule 24 § 3 and Rule 100 § 4). Subsequently, Mr Ress, who had taken part in the Commission’s examination of the case, withdrew from sitting in the Grand Chamber (Rule 28). The Government accordingly appointed Mr E. Klein to sit as an ad hoc judge (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 29 § 1).

At the Court’s invitation (Rule 99), the Commission delegated one of its members, Mr K. Herndl, to take part in the proceedings before the Grand Chamber. The Commission also produced the file on the proceedings before it, as requested by the Registrar on the President’s instructions.

By a letter sent by fax on 19 November 1998 the Committee of Staff Representatives of the Coordinated Organisations sought leave to submit written comments (Rules 61 § 3 and 71). On 20 November 1998 the President granted leave subject to certain conditions. The comments were filed at the Registry on 23 November 1998.

In accordance with the President’s decision, a hearing in this case and in the case of Beer and Regan v. Germany (application no. 28934/95) took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 25 November 1998. There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Mrs H. Voelskow-Thies, Ministerialdirigentin, Federal Ministry of Justice, Agent, Mr K.-H. Oehler, Ministerialrat, Federal Ministry of Justice, Mr D. Marschall, Ministerialrat, Federal Ministry of Labour, Mr W.M. Thiebaut, Head of Legal Division, European Space Agency, Paris, Advisers; (b) for the applicants Mr G. Laule, of the Frankfurt Bar, Counsel, Mr A. Meyer-Landrut, of the Frankfurt Bar, Mr C. Just, of the Frankfurt Bar, Advisers; (c) for Mr Beer and Mr Regan Mr W.J. Habscheid, of the Kempten Bar, Counsel, Mr E. Habscheid, of the Dresden Bar, Adviser; (d) for the Commission Mr K. Herndl, Delegate. The Court heard addresses by Mr Herndl, Mr Laule, Mr W.J. Habscheid and Mrs Voelskow-Thies.

Subsequently, applicants and the Government variously produced a number of documents, either at the President’s request or of their own accord.

THE FACTS

Mr Richard Waite is a British national, born in 1946 and resident in Griesheim. Mr Terry Kennedy is also a British national, born in 1950 and resident in Darmstadt.

I. the circumstances of the case

In 1977 the applicants, systems programmers by profession and employed by the British company SPM, were placed at the disposal of the European Space Agency to perform services at the European Space Operations Centre in Darmstadt.

The European Space Agency (“ESA”) with headquarters in Paris, formed out of the European Space Research Organisation (“ESRO”) and the European Organisation for the Development and Construction of Space Vehicle Launchers (“ELDO”), was established under the Convention for the Establishment of a European Space Agency (“ESA Convention”) of 30 May 1975 (United Nations Treaty Series 1983, vol. 1297, I – no. 21524). ESA runs the European Space Operations Centre (“ESOC”) as an independent operation in Darmstadt (Agreement concerning the European Space Operations Centre of 1967 – Official Gazette (Bundesgesetzblatt) II no. 3, 18.1.1969).

In 1979 the applicants’ contracts were taken over from SPM by CDP, a limited company established in Dublin. In 1982 the applicants founded Storepace, a limited company with its registered office in Manchester, which contracted with CDP on the services to be performed by the applicants for ESA and on the payment due. As from 1984 ESA participated in the above contractual relations through Science System, a firm associated with it. Subsequently, the applicants liquidated Storepace, replacing it by Network Consultants, a company with its registered office on the island of Jersey. These changes in contractual relations had no bearing on the applicants’ services at ESOC.

By letter of 12 October 1990, CDP informed the applicants that the cooperation with their company Network Consultants would terminate on 31 December 1990, when the term of their contracts expired.

The applicants thereupon instituted proceedings before the Darmstadt Labour Court (Arbeitsgericht) against ESA, arguing that, pursuant to the German Provision of Labour (Temporary Staff) Act (Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz), they had acquired the status of employees of ESA. In their submission, the termination of their contracts by the company CDP had no bearing on their labour relationship with ESA.

In the labour court proceedings, ESA relied on its immunity from jurisdiction under Article XV § 2 of the ESA Convention and its Annex I.

On 10 April 1991 the Darmstadt Labour Court, following a hearing, declared the applicants’ actions inadmissible, considering that ESA had validly relied on its immunity from jurisdiction. In its reasoning, the Labour Court considered in particular that ESA had been established in 1975 as a new and independent international organisation. It therefore rejected the applicants’ argument that ESA was bound by Article 6 § 2 of the Agreement concerning ESOC, which had subjected the former ESRO to German jurisdiction in cases of disputes with its employees which were outside the competence of its Appeals Board.

On 20 May 1992 the Frankfurt/Main Labour Appeals Court (Landesarbeitsgericht) dismissed the applicants’ appeal. It gave leave to an appeal on points of law (Revision) to the Federal Labour Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht).

The Labour Appeals Court, referring to sections 18 to 20 of the Courts Act (Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz), considered that immunity from jurisdiction meant that foreign States, members of diplomatic missions, etc. were generally not subject to German jurisdiction and that no judicial action could be taken against them. Section 20(2) of the Courts Act supplemented the provisions of sections 18 and 19, listing three further sources of law, inter alia international agreements, which could give rise to immunity from jurisdiction, especially for international organisations. ESA in principle enjoyed such immunity from jurisdiction under Article XV § 2 of the ESA Convention and its Annex I. Moreover, even assuming that the former ESRO had previously waived immunity as regards labour disputes outside the competence of its Appeals Board, ESA was not bound thereby. In this respect, the Labour Appeals Court, referring to the reasoning of the decision of the first instance, set out in detail that ESA had been established as a new international organisation and not as a mere legal successor to the former ESRO.

In 1992 the applicants unsuccessfully requested the German federal government and the British authorities to intervene with the Council of ESA in their favour with regard to a waiver of immunity in accordance with Article IV § 1 (a) of Annex I. While the British authorities did not reply, the German Federal Foreign Office referred the applicants to the ESA Appeals Board. In response to their letter to the Council of ESA, its Chairman, by letter of 16 December 1992, informed the applicants that the Council, at its 105th meeting of 15 and 16 December 1992, had decided not to waive the immunity from jurisdiction in their case. This position was confirmed in subsequent correspondence.

On 10 November 1993 the Federal Labour Court dismissed the applicants’ appeal on points of law (file no. 7 AZR 600/92).

The Federal Labour Court considered that immunity from jurisdiction was an impediment to court proceedings, and that an action against a defendant who enjoyed immunity from jurisdiction, and had not waived this immunity, was inadmissible. According to section20(2) of the Courts Act, German jurisdiction did not extend to international organisations which were exempted in accordance with international agreements. In this respect, the Federal Labour Court noted that, pursuant to Article XV § 2 of the ESA Convention, ESA had the immunities provided for in Annex I of the said Convention, and that it had not waived immunity under Article IV § 1 (a) of that annex.

As regards the question of waiver, the Federal Labour Court found that Article 6 § 2 of the Agreement concerning ESOC did not apply in the applicants’ situation as they had not been employed by ESA, but had worked for ESA on the basis of a contract of employment with a third person. The questions of whether the rule in question amounted to a waiver of immunity and whether ESA was bound by this rule could therefore be left open.

Furthermore, the Federal Labour Court found no violation of the right of recourse to court under Article 19 § 4 of the German Basic Law (Grundgesetz), as the acts of ESA, being those of an international organisation, could not be regarded as acts of a public authority within the meaning of that provision.

Finally the Federal Labour Court considered that a rather broad competence of international organisations to regulate staff matters was not unusual. The regulations on the immunity of ESA did not conflict with fundamental principles of German constitutional law. Employees of ESA could either lodge an appeal with the Appeals Board of the organisation, or the labour contract had to provide for arbitration in accordance with Article XXV of Annex I. In case of any contract conflicting with the Provision of Labour (Temporary Staff) Act which was not covered by the aforementioned regulation, the employee hired out was not without any legal protection, but could file an action against his or her employer. The question of whether the applicants could claim under German public law that positive action be taken by the German government to use their influence to achieve a waiver of immunity in the present case, or to submit the case to international arbitration under Article XVIII of the ESA Convention, could not be solved in labour court proceedings.

Sitting as a panel of three members, on 11 May 1994 the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) declined to accept the applicants’ appeal (Verfassungsbeschwerde) for adjudication.

The Federal Constitutional Court found in particular that the applicants’ appeal did not raise a matter of general importance. The alleged absence of rights resulted from the particular contracts entered into by the applicants, who had not been directly employed by an international organisation but had worked there on the order of a third person.

Furthermore, the alleged violation of the applicants’ constitutional rights was not of special importance, nor were the applicants significantly affected. In this respect the Constitutional Court noted the applicants’ submissions according to which they had suffered major disadvantages on the ground that the European legislation on the hiring out of temporary staff had been insufficient and that the termination of their contracts had affected their earning capacity. However, they had failed to show any disadvantages other than those associated with any loss of work. In particular there was no indication that they remained permanently unemployed and dependent upon social welfare benefits.

II. RELEVANT LAW

1. The Provision of Labour (Temporary Staff) Act

Section 1(1)(1) of the Provision of Labour (Temporary Staff) Act (Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz) provides that an employer who, on a commercial basis (gewerbsmäßig), intends to hire out his employees to third persons – hiring employers (Entleiher) – must obtain official permission. Section 1(9)(1) provides that contracts between the hirer-out (Verleiher) and the hiring employer and between the hirer-out and the employee hired out (Leiharbeitnehmer) are void if no official permission has been obtained as required by section1(1)(1). If the contract between a hirer-out and an employee hired out is void under section 1(9)(1), a contract between the hiring employer and the employee hired out is deemed to have been concluded (gilt als zustande gekommen) as from the envisaged start of employment (section1(10)(1)(1)). Section 1(10)(2) further provides for a claim in damages against the hirer-out in respect of any loss suffered as a consequence of having relied on the validity of the contract, except where the employee hired out was aware of the factor rendering the contract void.

2. Immunity from jurisdiction

Sections 18 to 20 of the German Courts Act (Gerichtsverfassungs-gesetz) regulate immunity from jurisdiction (Exterritorialität) in German court proceedings. Sections18 and19 concern the members of diplomatic and consular missions, and section 20(1) other representatives of States staying in Germany upon the invitation of the German government. Section20(2) provides that other persons shall have immunity from jurisdiction according to the rules of general international law, or pursuant to international agreements or other legal rules.

3. The ESA Convention

The ESA Convention came into force on 30 October 1980, when ten States, members of ESRO or ELDO, had signed it and had deposited their instruments of ratification or acceptance.

The purpose of ESA is to provide for and to promote, for exclusively peaceful purposes, cooperation among European States in space research and technology and their space applications, with a view to their being used for scientific purposes and for operational space applications systems (Article II of the ESA Convention). For the execution of the programmes entrusted to it, the Agency shall maintain the internal capability required for the preparation and supervision of its tasks and, to this end, shall establish and operate such establishments and facilities as are required for its activities (Article VI § 1 (a)).

Article XV regulates the legal status, privileges and immunities of the Agency. According to paragraph 1, the Agency shall have legal personality. Paragraph 2 provides that the Agency, its staff members and experts, and the representatives of its member States, shall enjoy the legal capacity, privileges and immunities provided for in AnnexI. Agreements concerning the headquarters of the Agency and the establishments set up in accordance with Article VI shall be concluded between the Agency and the member States on whose territory the headquarters and the establishments are situated (Article VI § 3).

Article XVII concerns the arbitration procedure in case of disputes between two or more member States, or between any of them and ESA, concerning the interpretation or application of the ESA Convention or its annexes, and disputes arising out of damage caused by ESA, or involving any other responsibility of ESA (Article XXVI of Annex I), which are not settled by or through the Council.

Article XIX provides that on the date of entry into force of the ESA Convention the Agency shall take over all the rights and obligations of ESRO.

Annex I relates to the privileges and immunities of the Agency.

According to Article I of Annex I, the Agency shall have legal personality, in particular the capacity to contract, to acquire and to dispose of movable and immovable property, and to be a party to legal proceedings.

Pursuant to Article IV § 1 (a) of Annex I, the Agency shall have immunity from jurisdiction and execution, except to the extent that it shall, by decision of the Council, have expressly waived such immunity in a particular case; the Council has the duty to waive this immunity in all cases where reliance upon it would impede the course of justice and it can be waived without prejudicing the interests of the Agency.

Article XXV of Annex I provides for arbitration with regard to written contracts other than those concluded in accordance with the Staff Regulations. Moreover, any member State may submit to the International Arbitration Tribunal referred to in Article XVII of the ESA Convention any dispute, inter alia, arising out of damage caused by the Agency, or involving any other non-contractual responsibility of the Agency. According to ArticleXXVII of AnnexI, the Agency shall make suitable provision for the satisfactory settlement of disputes arising between the Agency and the Director General, staff members or experts in respect of their conditions of service.

Chapter VIII of the ESA Staff Regulations (Regulations 33 to 41) concerns disputes within ESA. As regards the competence of its Appeals Board, Regulation 33 provides as follows: “33.1 There shall be set up an Appeals Board, independent of the Agency, to hear disputes relating to any explicit or implicit decision taken by the Agency and arising between it and a staff member, a former staff member or persons entitled under him. 33.2 The Appeals Board shall rescind any decision against which there has been an appeal if the decision is contrary to the Staff Regulations; Rules or Instructions or to the claimant’s terms of appointment or vested rights; and if the claimant’s personal interests are affected. 33.3 The Appeals Board may also order the Agency to repair any damage suffered by the claimant as a result of the decision referred to in paragraph 2 above. 33.4 Should the Agency – or the claimant – maintain that execution of a rescinding decision would raise major difficulties the Appeals Board may, if it considers the argument valid, award compensation to the claimant for the damage he has suffered. 33.5 The Appeals Board shall also be competent in the case where a staff member wishes to sue another staff member and such action has been prevented by the Director General’s refusal to waive the immunity of the latter. 33.6 The Appeals Board shall also be competent to settle disputes concerning its jurisdiction, as defined in these Regulations, or any question of procedure.”

4. The Agreement concerning ESOC

The Agreement was concluded between the government of the Federal Republic of Germany and ESRO for the purpose of establishing a European Space Operations Centre, including the European Space Data Centre. Articles 1 to 4 of the Agreement concern the site for construction of the ESOC buildings and related matters.

Part III of the Agreement contains general provisions. Article 6 provides as follows: “1. Subject to the provisions of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the Organisation and of any complementary Agreement between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Organisation according to Article 30 of that Protocol, the activities of the Organisation in the Federal Republic of Germany shall be governed by German law. If the terms of employment of a staff member of the Organisation are not governed by the Organisation’s staff regulations, then they shall be subject to German laws and regulations.

Disputes between the Organisation and such staff members of the Organisation in the Federal Republic of Germany who are not within the competence of the Organisation’s Appeals Board, shall be subject to German jurisdiction.” PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

Mr Waite and Mr Kennedy applied to the Commission on 24November 1994. Relying on Article 6 §1 of the Convention, they complained that they had been denied access to a court for a determination of their dispute with ESA in connection with an issue under German labour law.

On 24 February 1997 the Commission declared the application (no.26083/94) admissible. In its report of 2 December 1997 (former Article31 of the Convention), it expressed the opinion that there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 (seventeen votes tofifteen). The full text of the Commission’s opinion and of the two separate opinions contained in the report is reproduced as an annex to this judgment. FINAL SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT

In their memorial the Government asked “for the applications to be rejected as inadmissible, or as an alternative for a finding that the Federal Republic of Germany has not violated Article 6 of the Convention”.

The applicants invited the Court to hold that their rights pursuant to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention had been violated and to award them just satisfaction under former Article 50 of the Convention (now Article 41).
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e1
001-58912_a11_em1
DATETIME
QUASI
16March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e2
001-58912_a11_em2
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e3
001-58912_a11_em3
CODE
DIRECT
26083/94
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e4
001-58912_a11_em4
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e5
001-58912_a11_em5
DEM
QUASI
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e6
001-58912_a11_em6
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Richard Waite
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e7
001-58912_a11_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Terry Kennedy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e8
001-58912_a11_em8
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e4
001-58912_a11_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58912_a11_em4
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e9
001-58912_a11_em10
ORG
QUASI
United Kingdom
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e10
001-58912_a11_em11
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Thór Vilhjálmsson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em12
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e12
001-58912_a11_em13
DATETIME
NO_MASK
30 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e13
001-58912_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
31 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e14
001-58912_a11_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
22 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em16
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em17
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e15
001-58912_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
1November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e16
001-58912_a11_em19
ORG
NO_MASK
Grand Chamber of the Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e17
001-58912_a11_em20
PERSON
QUASI
Mr G. Ress
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e4
001-58912_a11_em21
ORG
NO_MASK
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e18
001-58912_a11_em22
PERSON
NO_MASK
MrL.Wildhaber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e19
001-58912_a11_em23
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mrs E. Palm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e20
001-58912_a11_em24
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J.-P. Costa
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e21
001-58912_a11_em25
PERSON
NO_MASK
MrM.Fischbach
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e22
001-58912_a11_em26
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr L. Ferrari Bravo
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e23
001-58912_a11_em27
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr L. Caflisch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e24
001-58912_a11_em28
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr W. Fuhrmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e25
001-58912_a11_em29
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr K. Jungwiert
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e26
001-58912_a11_em30
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr B. Zupančič
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e27
001-58912_a11_em31
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mrs N. Vajić
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e28
001-58912_a11_em32
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. Hedigan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e29
001-58912_a11_em33
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mrs W. Thomassen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e30
001-58912_a11_em34
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mrs M. Tsatsa-Nikolovska
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e31
001-58912_a11_em35
PERSON
QUASI
Mr T. Panţîru
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e32
001-58912_a11_em36
PERSON
QUASI
Mr E. Levits
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e33
001-58912_a11_em37
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K. Traja
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e17
001-58912_a11_em38
PERSON
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em20
Mr Ress
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e34
001-58912_a11_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr E. Klein
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e35
001-58912_a11_em40
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K. Herndl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e36
001-58912_a11_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
19 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e37
001-58912_a11_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Committee of Staff Representatives of the Coordinated Organisations
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e38
001-58912_a11_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
20 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e39
001-58912_a11_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
23 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e40
001-58912_a11_em45
MISC
QUASI
Beer and Regan v. Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e41
001-58912_a11_em46
CODE
QUASI
28934/95
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e42
001-58912_a11_em47
LOC
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e43
001-58912_a11_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e44
001-58912_a11_em49
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs H. Voelskow-Thies
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e45
001-58912_a11_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministerialdirigentin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e46
001-58912_a11_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e47
001-58912_a11_em52
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K.-H. Oehler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e46
001-58912_a11_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e48
001-58912_a11_em54
PERSON
QUASI
Mr D. Marschall
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e49
001-58912_a11_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Labour
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e50
001-58912_a11_em56
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr W.M. Thiebaut
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e51
001-58912_a11_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
Legal Division
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e52
001-58912_a11_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
European Space Agency
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e53
001-58912_a11_em59
LOC
NO_MASK
Paris
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e54
001-58912_a11_em60
PERSON
QUASI
Mr G. Laule
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e55
001-58912_a11_em61
ORG
QUASI
Frankfurt Bar, Counsel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e56
001-58912_a11_em62
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Meyer-Landrut
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e57
001-58912_a11_em63
ORG
QUASI
Frankfurt Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e58
001-58912_a11_em64
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C. Just
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e57
001-58912_a11_em65
ORG
QUASI
Frankfurt Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e59
001-58912_a11_em66
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Beer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e60
001-58912_a11_em67
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Regan Mr W.J. Habscheid
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e61
001-58912_a11_em68
ORG
QUASI
Kempten Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e62
001-58912_a11_em69
PERSON
QUASI
Mr E. Habscheid
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e63
001-58912_a11_em70
ORG
QUASI
Dresden Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e35
001-58912_a11_em71
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K. Herndl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e35
001-58912_a11_em72
PERSON
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em40
Mr Herndl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e54
001-58912_a11_em73
PERSON
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em60
Mr Laule
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e60
001-58912_a11_em74
PERSON
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em67
Mr W.J. Habscheid
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e44
001-58912_a11_em75
PERSON
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em49
Mrs Voelskow-Thies
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e6
001-58912_a11_em76
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Richard Waite
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e5
001-58912_a11_em77
DEM
QUASI
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e64
001-58912_a11_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
1946
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e65
001-58912_a11_em79
LOC
QUASI
Griesheim
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e7
001-58912_a11_em80
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Terry Kennedy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e5
001-58912_a11_em81
DEM
QUASI
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e66
001-58912_a11_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
1950
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e67
001-58912_a11_em83
LOC
QUASI
Darmstadt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e68
001-58912_a11_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e5
001-58912_a11_em85
DEM
QUASI
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e69
001-58912_a11_em86
ORG
QUASI
SPM
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e52
001-58912_a11_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
European Space Agency
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em88
ORG
QUASI
European Space Operations Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e67
001-58912_a11_em89
LOC
QUASI
Darmstadt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e52
001-58912_a11_em90
ORG
NO_MASK
European Space Agency
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e52
001-58912_a11_em91
ORG
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em90
ESA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e53
001-58912_a11_em92
LOC
NO_MASK
Paris
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e71
001-58912_a11_em93
ORG
QUASI
European Space Research Organisation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e71
001-58912_a11_em94
ORG
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em93
ESRO
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e72
001-58912_a11_em95
ORG
QUASI
European Organisation for the Development and Construction of Space Vehicle Launchers
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e72
001-58912_a11_em96
ORG
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em95
ELDO
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e73
001-58912_a11_em97
MISC
QUASI
Convention for the Establishment of a European Space Agency
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em98
MISC
QUASI
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e75
001-58912_a11_em99
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May 1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e76
001-58912_a11_em100
MISC
NO_MASK
United Nations Treaty Series
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e77
001-58912_a11_em101
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1983
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e78
001-58912_a11_em102
CODE
NO_MASK
21524
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em103
ORG
QUASI
European Space Operations Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em104
ORG
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em103
ESOC
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e67
001-58912_a11_em105
LOC
QUASI
Darmstadt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em106
ORG
QUASI
European Space Operations Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e79
001-58912_a11_em107
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1967
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e80
001-58912_a11_em108
ORG
NO_MASK
Official Gazette
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e80
001-58912_a11_em109
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58912_a11_em108
Bundesgesetzblatt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e81
001-58912_a11_em110
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e69
001-58912_a11_em111
ORG
QUASI
SPM
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e82
001-58912_a11_em112
ORG
QUASI
CDP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e83
001-58912_a11_em113
LOC
QUASI
Dublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e84
001-58912_a11_em114
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1982
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e85
001-58912_a11_em115
ORG
QUASI
Storepace
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e86
001-58912_a11_em116
LOC
QUASI
Manchester
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e82
001-58912_a11_em117
ORG
QUASI
CDP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e87
001-58912_a11_em118
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e88
001-58912_a11_em119
ORG
QUASI
Science System
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e85
001-58912_a11_em120
ORG
QUASI
Storepace
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e89
001-58912_a11_em121
ORG
QUASI
Network Consultants
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e90
001-58912_a11_em122
LOC
QUASI
Jersey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em123
ORG
QUASI
ESOC
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e91
001-58912_a11_em124
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e82
001-58912_a11_em125
ORG
QUASI
CDP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e89
001-58912_a11_em126
ORG
QUASI
Network Consultants
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e92
001-58912_a11_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e93
001-58912_a11_em128
ORG
QUASI
Darmstadt Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e93
001-58912_a11_em129
ORG
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em128
Arbeitsgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e94
001-58912_a11_em130
MISC
NO_MASK
Arbeitnehmerüberlassungsgesetz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e82
001-58912_a11_em131
ORG
QUASI
CDP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e52
001-58912_a11_em132
ORG
NO_MASK
ESA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em133
MISC
NO_MASK
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e95
001-58912_a11_em134
DATETIME
QUASI
10 April 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e93
001-58912_a11_em135
ORG
QUASI
Darmstadt Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e96
001-58912_a11_em136
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e97
001-58912_a11_em137
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1975
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em138
ORG
QUASI
ESOC
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e71
001-58912_a11_em139
ORG
QUASI
ESRO
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em140
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e98
001-58912_a11_em141
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e99
001-58912_a11_em142
DATETIME
QUASI
20 May 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e100
001-58912_a11_em143
ORG
QUASI
Frankfurt/Main Labour Appeals Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e100
001-58912_a11_em144
ORG
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em143
Landesarbeitsgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e101
001-58912_a11_em145
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e101
001-58912_a11_em146
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58912_a11_em145
Bundesarbeitsgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e102
001-58912_a11_em147
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Appeals Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e103
001-58912_a11_em148
MISC
NO_MASK
Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e104
001-58912_a11_em149
PERSON
NO_MASK
Gerichtsver
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em150
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em151
MISC
NO_MASK
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e71
001-58912_a11_em152
ORG
QUASI
ESRO
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e98
001-58912_a11_em153
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e102
001-58912_a11_em154
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Appeals Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e71
001-58912_a11_em155
ORG
QUASI
ESRO
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e105
001-58912_a11_em156
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em157
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e5
001-58912_a11_em158
DEM
QUASI
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e106
001-58912_a11_em159
ORG
QUASI
Council of ESA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e5
001-58912_a11_em160
DEM
QUASI
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e107
001-58912_a11_em161
ORG
NO_MASK
German Federal Foreign Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e108
001-58912_a11_em162
ORG
QUASI
ESA Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e106
001-58912_a11_em163
ORG
QUASI
Council of ESA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e109
001-58912_a11_em164
DATETIME
QUASI
16 December 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e106
001-58912_a11_em165
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58912_a11_em163
Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e109
001-58912_a11_em166
DATETIME
QUASI
16 December 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e110
001-58912_a11_em167
DATETIME
QUASI
10 November 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e101
001-58912_a11_em168
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e101
001-58912_a11_em169
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em170
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e101
001-58912_a11_em171
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em172
MISC
NO_MASK
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e101
001-58912_a11_em173
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em174
ORG
QUASI
ESOC
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e101
001-58912_a11_em175
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e111
001-58912_a11_em176
MISC
NO_MASK
Grundgesetz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e101
001-58912_a11_em177
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em178
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e98
001-58912_a11_em179
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em180
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em181
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em182
MISC
NO_MASK
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e112
001-58912_a11_em183
DATETIME
QUASI
11 May 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e113
001-58912_a11_em184
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e113
001-58912_a11_em185
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58912_a11_em184
Bundesverfassungsgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e113
001-58912_a11_em186
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e114
001-58912_a11_em187
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e115
001-58912_a11_em188
DEM
NO_MASK
European
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e104
001-58912_a11_em189
MISC
NO_MASK
001-58912_a11_em149
Gerichtsverfassungs-gesetz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em190
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e4
001-58912_a11_em191
LOC
NO_MASK
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em192
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em193
MISC
NO_MASK
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em194
MISC
NO_MASK
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e116
001-58912_a11_em195
DATETIME
QUASI
30 October 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e71
001-58912_a11_em196
ORG
QUASI
ESRO
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e72
001-58912_a11_em197
ORG
QUASI
ELDO
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e115
001-58912_a11_em198
DEM
NO_MASK
European
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em199
MISC
NO_MASK
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em200
MISC
QUASI
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e106
001-58912_a11_em201
ORG
NO_MASK
Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em202
MISC
NO_MASK
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e71
001-58912_a11_em203
ORG
QUASI
ESRO
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e106
001-58912_a11_em204
ORG
NO_MASK
Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e106
001-58912_a11_em205
ORG
NO_MASK
Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e117
001-58912_a11_em206
ORG
QUASI
International Arbitration Tribunal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e74
001-58912_a11_em207
MISC
NO_MASK
ESA Convention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e118
001-58912_a11_em208
ORG
NO_MASK
Agency and the Director General
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e119
001-58912_a11_em209
ORG
QUASI
ESA Staff Regulations
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e98
001-58912_a11_em210
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e98
001-58912_a11_em211
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e98
001-58912_a11_em212
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e98
001-58912_a11_em213
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e98
001-58912_a11_em214
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e98
001-58912_a11_em215
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em216
ORG
QUASI
ESOC
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e4
001-58912_a11_em217
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e71
001-58912_a11_em218
ORG
QUASI
ESRO
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em219
ORG
QUASI
European Space Operations Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e120
001-58912_a11_em220
ORG
QUASI
European Space Data Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e70
001-58912_a11_em221
ORG
QUASI
ESOC
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e4
001-58912_a11_em222
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e121
001-58912_a11_em223
ORG
NO_MASK
Organisation in the Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em224
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e121
001-58912_a11_em225
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58912_a11_em223
Organisation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em226
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e121
001-58912_a11_em227
ORG
NO_MASK
Organisation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e121
001-58912_a11_em228
ORG
NO_MASK
Organisation in the Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e122
001-58912_a11_em229
ORG
NO_MASK
Organisation’s Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em230
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e6
001-58912_a11_em231
PERSON
DIRECT
001-58912_a11_em6
Mr Waite
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e7
001-58912_a11_em232
PERSON
QUASI
001-58912_a11_em7
Mr Kennedy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e123
001-58912_a11_em233
DATETIME
QUASI
24November 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e11
001-58912_a11_em234
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e124
001-58912_a11_em235
DATETIME
QUASI
24 February 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58912_a11_e3
001-58912_a11_em236
CODE
DIRECT
26083/94
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e125
001-58912_a11_em237
DATETIME
QUASI
2 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58912_a11_e4
001-58912_a11_em238
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
Richard Waite
DEU
GRANDCHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Richard Waite