PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 31535/04) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Bayram Güçlü (“the applicant”), on 23 June 2004.

The applicant was represented by Mr H. Dilek and Mr A. Sungurtekin, lawyers practising in Samsun. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

On 10 October 2011 the application was communicated to the Government.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1966 and is currently serving a prison sentence in Samsun.

On 14 July 1999 the Istanbul State Security Court issued an order in respect of the applicant, in absentia, for him to be arrested on suspicion of trafficking illegal drugs. He was living in the Netherlands at the time. A few days later, an Amsterdam public prosecutor filed an indictment, accusing him of importing and trafficking illegal drugs.

On 21 July 1999 the public prosecutor at the Istanbul State Security Court requested that the applicant be extradited from the Netherlands in order for criminal proceedings to be instigated against him for trafficking illegal drugs as part of a criminal organisation.

On 23 July 1999 the prosecutor filed an indictment with the Istanbul State Security Court, accusing the applicant of trafficking cocaine, pursuant to Article 403 of the former Criminal Code (Law no. 765). Meanwhile, criminal proceedings were brought against other members of the criminal organisation, of which the applicant was also accused of being a member.

On an unspecified date in 2000 the Amsterdam Criminal Court found the applicant guilty as charged, and sentenced him to a fixed term of imprisonment.

After serving thirty-three months of his sentence in the Netherlands, on 19 January 2002 the applicant was released and deported to Turkey by the Dutch authorities. He was arrested and remanded in police custody upon arrival.

On 21 January 2002 the applicant was interrogated by the police at the Narcotics Branch of the Istanbul Security Directorate, in the absence of a lawyer. According to a form explaining arrested persons’ rights, which the applicant signed, he was informed of the charges against him and of his right to remain silent. It was also noted on the form that the applicant had waived his right to legal assistance.

On the same day the applicant was again questioned by the police, without being asked whether he wanted legal assistance. In the absence of a lawyer, he admitted some of the allegations made against him.

Later the same day the applicant was heard by the public prosecutor at the Istanbul State Security Court, still in the absence of a lawyer.

On 22 January 2002 the applicant was taken before the investigating judge at the Istanbul State Security Court, who remanded him in custody. Again in the absence of a lawyer, the applicant denied the statements he had given to the police and maintained that he had been compelled to sign them without having read them.

On 23 January 2002 the public prosecutor filed another indictment with the Istanbul State Security Court, accusing the applicant of trafficking heroin as part of a criminal organisation, pursuant to Article 403 of the former Criminal Code (Law no. 765).

In the meantime, the proceedings against the other members of the criminal organisation were concluded.

On 26 February 2003 the Istanbul State Security Court found the applicant guilty of trafficking cocaine and sentenced him to thirty-six years’ imprisonment. The court held that there was no need to consider the heroin charge. In convicting the applicant, it relied on his statements, the statements made by the other members of the criminal organisation, which had been taken during the proceedings against them, and forensics reports on the drugs that had been seized. The court deducted the thirty-three months the applicant had already served in the Netherlands from his total sentence.

On 6 November 2003 the Court of Cassation upheld the judgment of the first-instance court. That decision was deposited with the latter’s registry on 9 January 2004.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e1
001-140916_a6_em1
CODE
DIRECT
31535/04
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140916_a6_e2
001-140916_a6_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e3
001-140916_a6_em3
DEM
QUASI
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e4
001-140916_a6_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Bayram Güçlü
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e5
001-140916_a6_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
23 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e6
001-140916_a6_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. Dilek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e7
001-140916_a6_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Sungurtekin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140916_a6_e8
001-140916_a6_em8
LOC
QUASI
Samsun
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e9
001-140916_a6_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e10
001-140916_a6_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e11
001-140916_a6_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1966
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e8
001-140916_a6_em12
LOC
QUASI
Samsun
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e12
001-140916_a6_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e13
001-140916_a6_em14
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e14
001-140916_a6_em15
LOC
QUASI
Netherlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e15
001-140916_a6_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
few days later
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e16
001-140916_a6_em17
LOC
QUASI
Amsterdam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e17
001-140916_a6_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
21 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e13
001-140916_a6_em19
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e14
001-140916_a6_em20
LOC
QUASI
Netherlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e18
001-140916_a6_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
23 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e13
001-140916_a6_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e19
001-140916_a6_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e20
001-140916_a6_em24
ORG
QUASI
Amsterdam Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e21
001-140916_a6_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
thirty-three months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e14
001-140916_a6_em26
LOC
QUASI
Netherlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e22
001-140916_a6_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
19 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140916_a6_e23
001-140916_a6_em28
LOC
NO_MASK
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140916_a6_e24
001-140916_a6_em29
ORG
QUASI
Dutch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e25
001-140916_a6_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
21 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e26
001-140916_a6_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul Security Directorate
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e27
001-140916_a6_em32
DATETIME
NO_MASK
Later the same day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e13
001-140916_a6_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e28
001-140916_a6_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
22 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e13
001-140916_a6_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e29
001-140916_a6_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
23 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e13
001-140916_a6_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e30
001-140916_a6_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
26 February 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e13
001-140916_a6_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e31
001-140916_a6_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
thirty-six years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e21
001-140916_a6_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
thirty-three months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e14
001-140916_a6_em42
LOC
QUASI
Netherlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e32
001-140916_a6_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e33
001-140916_a6_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140916_a6_e34
001-140916_a6_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
9 January 2004
Bayram Güçlü
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Bayram Güçlü