PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 27597/06) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Ahmet Sürgit (“the applicant”), on 19 June 2006.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

On 10 September 2008 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3).

THE FACTS

The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in İzmir.

In 1998 the applicant and his wife bought a flat. In 1999 the applicant’s wife initiated divorce proceedings against the applicant and in 2000 the divorce was pronounced.

In the meantime, on 24 November 1999, the applicant brought an action before the İzmir Civil Court of General Jurisdiction, asking for compensation in an amount equal to half the value of the flat he and his former wife had bought in 1998. On 17 September 2003 the court dismissed the case as it found that it did not have jurisdiction ratione materiae, and sent the file to the İzmir Family Court. However, on 21 October 2004 the İzmir Family Court dismissed the case as it also found that it lacked jurisdiction ratione materiae, and sent the file back to the İzmir Civil Court of General Jurisdiction.

Finally, on 16 June 2005, having regard to the statements of both parties’ witnesses and an expert report to assess the contribution made by the parties to the flat, and in view of the facts of the previous divorce action, the İzmir Civil Court of General Jurisdiction dismissed the case. It held that the applicant and his former wife had been living in separate houses when the flat in question was bought. Moreover, the applicant was unemployed and unable to provide even a basic level of financial support for his wife. It was concluded that, given his financial situation, the applicant could not have contributed enough to the purchase of the flat in question to be entitled to claim a share in it. The court further noted that, at the time of purchase, the legal matrimonial regime was the system of separation of property and the title deed of the flat was registered in the wife’s name.

On 29 December 2005 and 14 April 2006 respectively, the Court of Cassation rejected the applicant’s appeal and rectification requests.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e1
001-94111_a10_em1
CODE
DIRECT
27597/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-94111_a10_e2
001-94111_a10_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e3
001-94111_a10_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e4
001-94111_a10_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ahmet Sürgit
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e5
001-94111_a10_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
19 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e6
001-94111_a10_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e7
001-94111_a10_em7
DATETIME
QUASI
10 September 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e8
001-94111_a10_em8
DATETIME
QUASI
1964
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-94111_a10_e9
001-94111_a10_em9
LOC
QUASI
İzmir
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e10
001-94111_a10_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e11
001-94111_a10_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e12
001-94111_a10_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e13
001-94111_a10_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e14
001-94111_a10_em14
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Civil Court of General Jurisdiction
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e10
001-94111_a10_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e15
001-94111_a10_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
17 September 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e16
001-94111_a10_em17
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Family Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e17
001-94111_a10_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
21 October 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e16
001-94111_a10_em19
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Family Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e14
001-94111_a10_em20
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Civil Court of General Jurisdiction
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e18
001-94111_a10_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
16 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e14
001-94111_a10_em22
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Civil Court of General Jurisdiction
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e19
001-94111_a10_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
29 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e20
001-94111_a10_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
14 April 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94111_a10_e21
001-94111_a10_em25
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
Ahmet Sürgit
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Ahmet Sürgit