PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 40072/98) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Helmut Kucera (“the applicant”), on 5 August 1997.

Initially, the applicant was represented by Mr K. Muzik, a lawyer practising in Vienna (Austria). The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Winkler, Head of the International Law Department of the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant complains under Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention that he had not been able to attend the oral hearing on his appeal against sentence before the Vienna Court of Appeal.

The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11).

The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1 of the Rules of Court.

By a decision of 20 March 2001 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible.

On 1 November 2001 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed Third Section. Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1 of the Rules of Court.

By a decision of 14 March 2002 the Court declared the applicant’s remaining complaint admissible.

Neither the applicant nor the Government filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1957 and is presently detained at the Krems Stein prison.

On 20 January 1994 the Vienna Public Prosecutor filed a bill of indictment against the applicant charging him with two counts of rape under aggravated circumstances, i.e. having caused serious injuries. The Public Prosecutor submitted that on 16 June 1993 the applicant had raped A.H., had beaten and strangled her, had forced her to swallow drugs and had threatened her with death. On 5 September 1993 he had raped E.P., had beaten and strangled her, had forced her to swallow drugs, had burned her skin with cigarettes and had cut her vagina with a knife causing a deep laceration as well as opening the abdominal cavity.

On 12 April 1994 the Court of Assizes (Geschworenengericht) of the Vienna Regional Court (Landesgericht) convicted the applicant of both offences of aggravated rape and sentenced him to 14 years’ imprisonment. In assessing the penalty, the court considered as mitigating circumstances the applicant’s partial confession regarding the rape of E.P. and, to some extent, that he had acted under the influence of alcohol and drugs. As aggravating circumstances, the court considered the applicant’s criminal record, the fact that he had committed two rapes and the extreme brutality which the applicant had shown when committing the offences.

On 27 June 1994 the applicant filed a plea of nullity (Nichtigkeitsbeschwerde) and an appeal against sentence (Berufung). In his plea of nullity the applicant complained, inter alia, that the Court of Assizes had failed to hear the requested witnesses from Poland.

On 18 August 1994 the Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof) confirmed the Court of Assize’s judgment as regards the rape of E.P. and quashed the judgment as regards the other charge of rape and the sentence. It found that there had been sufficient information to identify the witnesses from Poland and that the Court of Assizes should have attempted to take this evidence. It remitted the case to that court.

On 19 September 1995 the new trial commenced before the Court of Assizes sitting with another jury and on 14 June 1996 the Court of Assizes convicted the applicant of raping A.H. and sentenced him to 14 years’ imprisonment. When fixing the sentence the court considered as mitigating circumstances the applicant’s confession regarding some of the facts concerning the charge of having raped E.P. and, to a certain extent, his intoxication. As aggravating circumstances it considered the applicant’s criminal record, that he had committed two rapes and his extreme brutality when committing the offences.

On 29 August 1996 the applicant filed a plea of nullity and an appeal against sentence. In his appeal against sentence the applicant submitted that the Court of Assizes had failed to give sufficient weight to the mitigating circumstances, namely his neglected education, his difficult childhood and his intoxication. The applicant did not request to attend the hearings before the Supreme Court or the Vienna Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht).

On 8 October 1996 the Supreme Court, sitting in private, rejected as inadmissible the applicant’s plea of nullity.

On 4 December 1996 the Vienna Court of Appeal fixed the hearing date for the applicant’s appeal against the sentence for 18 December 1996. The applicant received a notification which stated that he, being detained, could only appear through his counsel and would not be brought to the court as the conditions of Section 296 § 3 [Section 294 § 5] of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Strafprozeßordnung) were not fulfilled.

On 18 December 1996 the Vienna Court of Appeal, after having held a hearing in the absence of the applicant but in the presence of his defence counsel, dismissed the appeal against the sentence. As regards the weighing of mitigating and aggravating circumstances by the Court of Assizes, the Court of Appeal found that the applicant’s partial confession was merely a contribution to the establishment of the truth (Beitrag zur Wahrheitsfindung) and did not qualify as a mitigating circumstance. Further, there were additional aggravating circumstances such as the particular cruelty which the applicant had used when committing the offences, as well as their concurrent nature (Zusammentreffen strafbarer Handlungen). As regards the circumstances invoked by the applicant, the Court of Appeal found that they could not be taken into consideration as mitigating circumstances. A neglected education and difficult childhood could not be considered as the applicant was now an adult and it could not explain his excessive use of brutality. Also no weight could be given to his intoxication because he should have known about the effects of alcohol on his person, and the experts had stated that it had no bearing on him committing the offences. Furthermore, the applicant’s offences were not a consequence of a mental defect but of frustration and increased aggression and he had not shown any consciousness of his guilt. Thus, there was no reason to reduce the sentence.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e1
001-60660_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
40072/98
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-60660_a8_e2
001-60660_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e3
001-60660_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e4
001-60660_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Helmut Kucera
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e5
001-60660_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
5 August 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e6
001-60660_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K. Muzik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e7
001-60660_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-60660_a8_e8
001-60660_a8_em8
LOC
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e9
001-60660_a8_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e10
001-60660_a8_em10
PERSON
QUASI
H. Winkler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e11
001-60660_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e12
001-60660_a8_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e13
001-60660_a8_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e14
001-60660_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
20 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e15
001-60660_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
14 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e16
001-60660_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1957
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-60660_a8_e17
001-60660_a8_em17
ORG
QUASI
Krems Stein prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e18
001-60660_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e19
001-60660_a8_em19
ORG
QUASI
Vienna Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e20
001-60660_a8_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e21
001-60660_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
16 June 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e22
001-60660_a8_em22
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e23
001-60660_a8_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
5 September 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-60660_a8_e24
001-60660_a8_em24
PERSON
QUASI
E.P.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e25
001-60660_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
12 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-60660_a8_e26
001-60660_a8_em26
ORG
QUASI
Court of Assizes (Geschworenengericht)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-60660_a8_e27
001-60660_a8_em27
ORG
QUASI
Vienna Regional Court (Landesgericht)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e28
001-60660_a8_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
14 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-60660_a8_e24
001-60660_a8_em29
PERSON
QUASI
E.P.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e29
001-60660_a8_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
27 June 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e30
001-60660_a8_em31
ORG
QUASI
Court of Assizes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e31
001-60660_a8_em32
LOC
QUASI
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e32
001-60660_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
18 August 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-60660_a8_e33
001-60660_a8_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e34
001-60660_a8_em35
ORG
QUASI
Court of Assize
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e24
001-60660_a8_em36
PERSON
QUASI
E.P.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e31
001-60660_a8_em37
LOC
QUASI
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e30
001-60660_a8_em38
ORG
QUASI
Court of Assizes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e35
001-60660_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-60660_a8_e30
001-60660_a8_em40
ORG
QUASI
Court of Assizes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e36
001-60660_a8_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
14 June 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e30
001-60660_a8_em42
ORG
QUASI
Court of Assizes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e22
001-60660_a8_em43
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e28
001-60660_a8_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
14 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e24
001-60660_a8_em45
PERSON
QUASI
E.P.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e37
001-60660_a8_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
29 August 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e30
001-60660_a8_em47
ORG
QUASI
Court of Assizes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e38
001-60660_a8_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-60660_a8_e39
001-60660_a8_em49
ORG
QUASI
Vienna Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e40
001-60660_a8_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
8 October 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e38
001-60660_a8_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e41
001-60660_a8_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
4 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e42
001-60660_a8_em53
ORG
QUASI
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e43
001-60660_a8_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e43
001-60660_a8_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e42
001-60660_a8_em56
ORG
QUASI
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e30
001-60660_a8_em57
ORG
QUASI
Court of Assizes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60660_a8_e13
001-60660_a8_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-60660_a8_e13
001-60660_a8_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
Helmut Kucera
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Helmut Kucera