THE FACTS

. The applicant church is a San Marinese church institution. 9. On 7 March 1985 the San Marinese government issued an expropriation order in respect of certain plots of land belonging to the applicant church. The latter was awarded 114,790,590 Italian lire (about 59,284 euros) in compensation. The land, which was earmarked for urban development projects that were scheduled for completion by 31 December 1987, was only partially used. On 16 February 1987 the applicant church applied to the government seeking to recover possession of the unused land. On 20 October 1987 the government refused the application on the ground that the land in question could still be used in the interests of the community.

1. Proceedings in the civil courts

On 10 November 1988, relying on section 14(3) of Law no. 18 of 25 March 1980 (“Law no. 18/1980”), which provides that expropriation orders lapse in the event of expiry of the deadline set for completion of the relevant work, the applicant church brought an action before the first-instance civil judge (Commissario della Legge) to recover possession. The first hearing, which was set for 19 January 1989, could not be held on that date as the government had not been notified. The government joined the proceedings on 5 May 1989. At a hearing on 23 September 1989, the government requested that a particular witness be heard. That request was granted on 12 January 1990. On the date in question, namely 5 April 1990, the witness failed to attend the hearing. On 26 September 1990 the government waived its right to have the witness heard. The parties submitted their written pleadings on 23 May 1991. Preparation of the case was concluded on 14 November 1991.

By a judgment of 14 January 1992, deposited at the registry on the same date, the court dismissed the applicant church’s request on the grounds that, firstly, the expropriation order of 20 October 1987 was an administrative act and thus fell outside the civil court’s jurisdiction and, secondly, that the applicant church could not bring an action to recover possession, since the disputed land had been lawfully expropriated and had not been obtained by the State without title.

On 12 March 1992 the applicant church brought an action before the judge of civil appeals (Giudice delle Appellazioni Civili) to establish title to land, seeking to obtain restitution of the land in question in accordance with section 14(3) of Law no. 18/1980. It also alleged that the authorities’ conduct had breached Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. The first hearing was held on 9 April 1992. On 21 May 1992 the applicant church filed a number of documents. On 29 May 1992 the proceedings were adjourned on the ground that an attempt to reach a friendly settlement was in progress. On 2 December 1992, noting that the negotiations had failed, the Commissario della Legge, the official responsible for preparing appeal cases, ordered that the proceedings be resumed. At a hearing on 25 February 1993, the applicant church requested that an expert be appointed and a witness questioned in order to determine exactly which parts of the land had not been used. By decisions of 2 March and 6 April 1993, the Commissario della Legge allowed both requests. Evidence was heard from the witness on 24 June 1993 and the expert report was filed on 7 November 1993. The parties lodged their final submissions on 10 February and 24 March 1994. Preparation of the case was concluded on 27 April 1994.

In December 1994 the appeal Judge C.P. died. No other judge could replace him, as the organisational structure of the court of civil appeals provided for only one judge. On 17 January 1995 the General Grand Council (Consiglio Grande e Generale) enacted Law no. 2/1995, section 1 of which provided: “If the judge of civil appeals dies or if, following a serious impediment, he or she is unable to perform the duties of investigating judge, those duties shall be carried out by one of the judges of criminal appeals, who shall carry out any urgent measures until such time as a replacement is appointed or the serious impediment is removed ...”

On 25 April 1995 the General Grand Council appointed Judge P.G.P. to replace the deceased judge. However, P.G.P. asked the Council of the XII for leave to withdraw from the proceedings in question on the ground that he had been involved as the first-instance civil judge. Under section 17 of Law no. 2/1995, the Council of the XII, which acted as a third-instance judicial body in cases where the appeal court did not uphold the decision of the first-instance court, was also responsible at the material time for ruling on requests to withdraw or applications challenging a judge.

On 26 September 1995 the Council of the XII granted the request and sent the case in question to P.G., an appeal judge in criminal cases (Giudice delle Appellazioni per le cause penali).

He dismissed the appeal in a judgment of 18 December 1998, which was deposited at the registry on the same date. He found that section 14(3) of Law no. 18/1980 provided that expropriation orders would lapse where the deadline for execution of the relevant work had expired, but not in the event of failure to use all of the expropriated assets; that, in any event, the administrative courts had jurisdiction to rule on the merits of expropriation proceedings; and that the appellant sought restitution of its title to the assets, whereas at first instance it had sought merely to recover possession of the land. He concluded that the request could not be granted since, according to the established case-law, “requests made for the first time on appeal [were] manifestly inadmissible” (judgment of the Giudice delle Appellazioni Civili, 20 July 1970, no. 147).

2. Proceedings in the administrative courts

In the meantime, after a new land-use plan had taken effect, changing the designated use of the land in question from industrial to agricultural, the applicant church had asked the government on 3 March 1992 to return its assets. On 24 November 1992, having received no reply, it sent the government a formal notice asking it to adopt the necessary measures for restitution. On 20 April 1993 it applied to the first-instance administrative court. A hearing took place on 3 August 1993. By a judgment of 17 August 1993, deposited at the registry on the same date, the court stated that it did not have jurisdiction to “recognise the existence of a possible right to restitution of unused land”, as the administrative courts could only examine legitimate interests. It found that the General Grand Council alone was entitled to rule on what was to be done with the said property. Noting finally that the new land-use plan had changed the designated use of the unused land, it declared the expropriation order of 7 March 1985 void in so far as it had lapsed in respect of that particular property, but pointed out that declaring it void did not create a right to reconveyance.

The government then lodged an appeal, disputing the existence of an implied refusal which would legitimise an application to the first-instance administrative courts, and also the latter’s jurisdiction to declare the expropriation order partially void. The appeal hearing, initially fixed for 13 January 1994, was adjourned to 24 May 1994 because the judge of administrative appeals was unable to attend. He allowed the appeal in a judgment of 26 May 1994, which was deposited at the registry on the same date. The judge found that the State had acquired ownership of the plots of land in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law, on payment of compensation for expropriation, and that no legislative provision obliged the government to return that property. Accordingly, he concluded that the applicant church’s request of 20 April 1993 was inadmissible, since the government’s behaviour could not be described as an implied refusal. Finally, he stated that, in declaring the expropriation order partially void – an order which, moreover, had never been contested – the first-instance administrative court had exceeded its jurisdiction, which only permitted it, where appropriate, to declare unlawful the government’s alleged implied refusal.

On an unspecified date, the administrative court of appeal ordered that the case file be sent to the Council of the XII. After taking expert advice, that body gives rulings in administrative disputes where first-instance and appeal judgments reach opposite conclusions (section 21 of Law no. 68 of 28 June 1989 establishing the administrative courts). On 27 September 1994 the Council of the XII upheld the appeal court’s judgment, thus endorsing the expert’s conclusion that, while the public-interest declaration in connection with the urban development work had transformed Beneficio Cappella Paolini’s right of property into a mere legitimate interest, section 14(3) of Law no. 15/1980 conferred not only a legitimate interest in the lawfulness of the authorities’ actions but an actual right to apply to the civil courts and obtain a declaration that the expropriation order had lapsed because the deadline for completion of the work had expired.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61897_a11_e1
001-61897_a11_em1
ORG
QUASI
San Marinese
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e2
001-61897_a11_em2
DATETIME
QUASI
7 March 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e1
001-61897_a11_em3
ORG
QUASI
San Marinese
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e3
001-61897_a11_em4
QUANTITY
QUASI
114,790,590 Italian lire
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61897_a11_e4
001-61897_a11_em5
QUANTITY
QUASI
59,284 euros
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e5
001-61897_a11_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e6
001-61897_a11_em7
DATETIME
QUASI
16 February 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e7
001-61897_a11_em8
DATETIME
QUASI
20 October 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e8
001-61897_a11_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
10 November 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e9
001-61897_a11_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
25 March 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e10
001-61897_a11_em11
CODE
NO_MASK
18/1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61897_a11_e11
001-61897_a11_em12
ORG
QUASI
Commissario della Legge
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e12
001-61897_a11_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
19 January 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e13
001-61897_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
5 May 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e14
001-61897_a11_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
23 September 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e15
001-61897_a11_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e16
001-61897_a11_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
5 April 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61897_a11_e17
001-61897_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
26 September 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e18
001-61897_a11_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
23 May 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e19
001-61897_a11_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
14 November 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e20
001-61897_a11_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e7
001-61897_a11_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
20 October 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e21
001-61897_a11_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61897_a11_e22
001-61897_a11_em24
ORG
QUASI
Giudice delle Appellazioni Civili
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e10
001-61897_a11_em25
CODE
NO_MASK
18/1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e23
001-61897_a11_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
9 April 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e24
001-61897_a11_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e25
001-61897_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
29 May 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e26
001-61897_a11_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
2 December 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e11
001-61897_a11_em30
ORG
QUASI
Commissario della Legge
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e27
001-61897_a11_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
25 February 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e28
001-61897_a11_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e29
001-61897_a11_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
6 April 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61897_a11_e11
001-61897_a11_em34
ORG
QUASI
Commissario della Legge
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e30
001-61897_a11_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
24 June 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e31
001-61897_a11_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e32
001-61897_a11_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
10 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e33
001-61897_a11_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
24 March 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e34
001-61897_a11_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
27 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e35
001-61897_a11_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
December 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61897_a11_e36
001-61897_a11_em41
PERSON
NO_MASK
C.P
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e37
001-61897_a11_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
17 January 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e38
001-61897_a11_em43
ORG
QUASI
General Grand Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61897_a11_e38
001-61897_a11_em44
ORG
QUASI
001-61897_a11_em43
(Consiglio Grande e Generale
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e39
001-61897_a11_em45
CODE
NO_MASK
2/1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e40
001-61897_a11_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
25 April 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e38
001-61897_a11_em47
ORG
QUASI
General Grand Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61897_a11_e41
001-61897_a11_em48
PERSON
NO_MASK
P.G.P
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e41
001-61897_a11_em49
PERSON
NO_MASK
P.G.P
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e42
001-61897_a11_em50
ORG
QUASI
Council of the XII
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e42
001-61897_a11_em51
ORG
QUASI
Council of the XII
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e43
001-61897_a11_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
26 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e42
001-61897_a11_em53
ORG
QUASI
Council of the XII
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e44
001-61897_a11_em54
PERSON
NO_MASK
P.G.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61897_a11_e45
001-61897_a11_em55
ORG
QUASI
Giudice delle Appellazioni per le cause penali
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e46
001-61897_a11_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e10
001-61897_a11_em57
CODE
NO_MASK
18/1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e22
001-61897_a11_em58
ORG
QUASI
Giudice delle Appellazioni Civili
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e47
001-61897_a11_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
20 July 1970
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e48
001-61897_a11_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
3 March 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e49
001-61897_a11_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e50
001-61897_a11_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e51
001-61897_a11_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
3 August 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e52
001-61897_a11_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
17 August 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e38
001-61897_a11_em65
ORG
QUASI
General Grand Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e2
001-61897_a11_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
7 March 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e53
001-61897_a11_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
13 January 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e54
001-61897_a11_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
24 May 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e55
001-61897_a11_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
26 May 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e50
001-61897_a11_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e42
001-61897_a11_em71
ORG
QUASI
Council of the XII
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e56
001-61897_a11_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
28 June 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e57
001-61897_a11_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
27 September 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e42
001-61897_a11_em74
ORG
QUASI
Council of the XII
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61897_a11_e58
001-61897_a11_em75
ORG
DIRECT
Beneficio Cappella Paolini
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61897_a11_e59
001-61897_a11_em76
CODE
NO_MASK
15/1980
Beneficio Cappella Paolini
SMR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Beneficio Cappella Paolini