PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 39595/05) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Jarosław Jakubiak (“the applicant”), on 23 September 2005.

The applicant was represented by Mr Wiesław Bielawski, a lawyer practising in Wałbrzych. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 6 June 2007 the President of the Fourth Section of the Court decided to communicate the complaint concerning the length of pre-trial detention to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it was decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1971 and lives in Jelenia Góra.

On 10 June 1999 the applicant was arrested by the police on suspicion of having committed homicide. On 12 June 1999 the Wrocław District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) remanded him in custody. It relied on the reasonable suspicion that he had committed the offence in question, the seriousness of the charges against him and the risk that he might tamper with evidence or go into hiding.

On 2 September 1999 the Jelenia Góra Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) extended the applicant’s detention until 30 September 1999. It relied on the reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence with which he had been charged, which was supported by evidence from witnesses and experts. The court made reference to the measures already taken in the investigation and indicated, in detail, the evidence that still had to be taken. Consequently, it decided that it was necessary to extend the applicant’s detention. The court also referred to the likelihood of a lengthy prison sentence being imposed on the applicant and the complexity of the case.

On 28 September 1999 the Jelenia Góra Regional Court extended the applicant’s detention until 10 December 1999. It repeated the grounds previously given for his detention.

On 7 December 1999 the Wrocław Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny) extended the applicant’s detention until 31 December 1999. On 28 December 1999 it extended that period until 15 January 2000. It emphasised that the grounds originally given for his detention were still valid.

On 14 January 2000 the Jelenia Góra Regional Court extended the applicant’s detention until 30 June 2000. It repeated the grounds that had been given in the previous decisions and added that further detention would not be excessively burdensome for the applicant or his family.

On 5 June, 19 June and 11 December 2000 and 9 April 2001 the court held hearings.

On 19 June, 11 December 2000 and 9 April 2001 the Jelenia Góra Regional Court extended the applicant’s detention. It repeated the grounds previously given for keeping him in custody.

On 21 May 2001 the Jelenia Góra Regional Court applied under Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Proceedings to the Wrocław Court of Appeal for the applicant’s detention to be extended beyond the statutory time-limit of two years. On 29 May 2001 the Wrocław Court of Appeal granted the request and extended the applicant’s detention until 20 September 2001. It held that there was a strong suspicion that he had committed the offences with which he had been charged and that the nature of the offences justified the continuation of his detention. In addition, it stressed that the case was particularly complex.

On 20 September 2001 the Wrocław Court of Appeal extended the applicant’s detention until 30 November 2001. It repeated the grounds given in the previous decisions.

On 4 October 2001 the Jelenia Góra Regional Court convicted the applicant as charged and sentenced him to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. He appealed. The applicant’s detention was subsequently extended on four occasions.

On 12 September 2002 the Wrocław Court of Appeal upheld the first-instance judgment. At the same time the Court of Appeal extended his detention.

The applicant lodged a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy). On 3 December 2003 the Supreme Court allowed the cassation appeal, quashed the appellate court’s judgment and remitted the case to the Court of Appeal.

On 3 December 2003 the Supreme Court extended the applicant’s detention until 3 April 2004, relying on the seriousness of the charges, the “degree of danger to society” (stopień społecznej szkodliwości) represented by the offence in question and the severity of the penalty imposed by the court of first instance.

On 5 March 2004 the Wrocław Court of Appeal quashed the first-instance judgment and remitted the case to the Jelenia Góra Regional Court. The court stated that the failure to call and hear evidence from six eyewitnesses, Belarus nationals, had been a serious shortcoming justifying a retrial. The trial court had not made efforts to secure their presence at the hearing or to make use of a rogatory letter in order to have them heard as witnesses by the Belarus authorities. Furthermore, as regards the anonymous witness, the court of first instance had failed to make efforts to secure his presence at the hearing. The court had not made sufficient inquiries about his whereabouts.

On 1 April and 23 September 2004 and 24 March 2005 the Wrocław Court of Appeal extended the applicant’s detention. It relied on the reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offence with which he had been charged, which was supported by evidence from witnesses and experts. It referred to the likelihood of a lengthy prison sentence being imposed on the applicant and found that holding him in custody was necessary to secure the proper conduct of the proceedings.

During the proceedings the applicant made repeated unsuccessful applications for release. He also appealed, likewise unsuccessfully, against refusals to release him and decisions extending his detention.

At a hearing held on 1 March 2005 the Regional Court decided to send a rogatory letter to the relevant Belarusian court, asking it to take evidence from six eyewitnesses. The applicant’s lawyer prepared questions in writing to be put to them on the applicant’s behalf. The court in Belarus heard evidence from three witnesses, because, despite the efforts of the authorities, it was impossible for them to establish the current addresses of the remaining witnesses. The records of evidence taken from those witnesses during the investigation were read out by the trial court.

On 8 March 2006 the Jelenia Góra Regional Court convicted the applicant as charged and sentenced him to fifteen years’ imprisonment. The court established the facts of the case on the basis of evidence taken from seventeen witnesses.

The applicant appealed. The applicant’s detention was subsequently extended on several occasions.

On 28 September 2006 the Wrocław Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal. It considered that the facts of the case had been duly established and the rules of criminal procedure, as well as guarantees of a fair trial, had been respected. As regards evidence from the anonymous witness, despite the authorities’ efforts, the court could not secure his presence at the hearing. Consequently, it was necessary to take into account evidence given by him in the investigation.

The applicant lodged a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy). On 19 December 2007 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e1
001-86681_a2_em1
CODE
DIRECT
39595/05
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-86681_a2_e2
001-86681_a2_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
001-86681_a2_em8
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e3
001-86681_a2_em3
DEM
QUASI
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e4
001-86681_a2_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jarosław Jakubiak
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e5
001-86681_a2_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
23 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e6
001-86681_a2_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Wiesław Bielawski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e7
001-86681_a2_em7
ORG
QUASI
Wałbrzych
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e2
001-86681_a2_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e8
001-86681_a2_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e9
001-86681_a2_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
6 June 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e10
001-86681_a2_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1971
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e11
001-86681_a2_em12
LOC
QUASI
Jelenia Góra
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e12
001-86681_a2_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
10 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e13
001-86681_a2_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
12 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e14
001-86681_a2_em15
ORG
DIRECT
Wrocław District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e14
001-86681_a2_em16
ORG
QUASI
001-86681_a2_em15
Sąd Rejonowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e15
001-86681_a2_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
2 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e16
001-86681_a2_em18
ORG
QUASI
Jelenia Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e16
001-86681_a2_em19
ORG
QUASI
001-86681_a2_em18
Sąd Okręgowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e17
001-86681_a2_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e18
001-86681_a2_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e16
001-86681_a2_em22
ORG
QUASI
Jelenia Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e19
001-86681_a2_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
10 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e20
001-86681_a2_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
7 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e21
001-86681_a2_em25
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e21
001-86681_a2_em26
ORG
QUASI
001-86681_a2_em25
Sąd Apelacyjny
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e22
001-86681_a2_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e23
001-86681_a2_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
28 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e24
001-86681_a2_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e25
001-86681_a2_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e16
001-86681_a2_em31
ORG
QUASI
Jelenia Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e26
001-86681_a2_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e27
001-86681_a2_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
5 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e28
001-86681_a2_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
19 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e29
001-86681_a2_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e30
001-86681_a2_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
9 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e28
001-86681_a2_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
19 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e29
001-86681_a2_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e30
001-86681_a2_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
9 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e16
001-86681_a2_em40
ORG
QUASI
Jelenia Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e31
001-86681_a2_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e16
001-86681_a2_em42
ORG
QUASI
Jelenia Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e21
001-86681_a2_em43
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e32
001-86681_a2_em44
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e33
001-86681_a2_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
29 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e21
001-86681_a2_em46
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e34
001-86681_a2_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
20 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e34
001-86681_a2_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
20 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e21
001-86681_a2_em49
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e35
001-86681_a2_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
30 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e36
001-86681_a2_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
4 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e16
001-86681_a2_em52
ORG
QUASI
Jelenia Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e37
001-86681_a2_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
twenty-five years’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e38
001-86681_a2_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
12 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e21
001-86681_a2_em55
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e39
001-86681_a2_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e39
001-86681_a2_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
001-86681_a2_em56
Sąd Najwyższy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e40
001-86681_a2_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e39
001-86681_a2_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e40
001-86681_a2_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e39
001-86681_a2_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e41
001-86681_a2_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
3 April 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e42
001-86681_a2_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
5 March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e21
001-86681_a2_em64
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e16
001-86681_a2_em65
ORG
QUASI
Jelenia Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e43
001-86681_a2_em66
QUANTITY
QUASI
six eyewitnesses
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e44
001-86681_a2_em67
DEM
QUASI
Belarus nationals
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e45
001-86681_a2_em68
ORG
QUASI
Belarus authorities
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e46
001-86681_a2_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
1 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e47
001-86681_a2_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
23 September 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e48
001-86681_a2_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
24 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e21
001-86681_a2_em72
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e49
001-86681_a2_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
1 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e50
001-86681_a2_em74
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e51
001-86681_a2_em75
MISC
QUASI
Belarusian court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e43
001-86681_a2_em76
QUANTITY
QUASI
six eyewitnesses
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e52
001-86681_a2_em77
LOC
QUASI
Belarus
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e53
001-86681_a2_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e16
001-86681_a2_em79
ORG
QUASI
Jelenia Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e54
001-86681_a2_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
fifteen years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e55
001-86681_a2_em81
QUANTITY
QUASI
seventeen witnesses
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e56
001-86681_a2_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e21
001-86681_a2_em83
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-86681_a2_e39
001-86681_a2_em84
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86681_a2_e39
001-86681_a2_em85
ORG
NO_MASK
001-86681_a2_em84
Sąd Najwyższy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e57
001-86681_a2_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
19 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86681_a2_e39
001-86681_a2_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
Jarosław Jakubiak
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Jarosław Jakubiak