PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 68250/11) against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Ramazan Erol (“the applicant”), on 24 October 2011.

The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Ms M. Oerder, a lawyer practising in Möchengladbach. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by one of their Agents, Mr H.-J. Behrens, Ministerialrat, of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that the decision of the Cologne Court of Appeal of 3 December 2010 not to stay the execution of the detention order against him breached Article 5 § 4 of the Convention.

On 4 March 2016 the complaint concerning Article 5 § 4 of the Convention was communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.

The Turkish Government, having been informed of their right to intervene in the proceedings (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court), did not make use of this right.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1974 and lives in Aachen.

On 20 April 2010 the premises in which the applicant ran a café were searched, based on a search warrant of 2 March 2010 issued by the Aachen District Court. The applicant was found in a back room of the café, weighing and packaging some 400 grams of cocaine, with a sum of 2,325 euros (EUR) in the pockets of his trousers. He was arrested.

The following day, the Aachen District Court issued a warrant for the arrest of the applicant on the ground that he was strongly suspected (dringend verdächtig) of commercial trafficking of a substantial amount of drugs and that there was a risk of his absconding. It considered that the applicant could face a considerable prison sentence for the offences in question, that he did not have strong ties to Germany, that he was unemployed and living on social security, and that he could easily abscond to Turkey.

At a detention review hearing on 5 May 2010, the applicant’s counsel applied for the applicant’s release on bail, stating that the applicant’s family were able and willing to furnish the amount of bail to be determined by the court. The following day, the applicant’s counsel withdrew the application after the court indicated that bail would not be granted.

On 6 July 2010 the Public Prosecutor’s Office lodged a bill of indictment against the applicant, charging him with three counts of commercial trafficking of a substantial amount of drugs.

On 6 August 2010 the Aachen District Court decided to open the trial against the applicant.

On 29 September 2010 the District Court convicted the applicant on one of three counts of commercial trafficking in a substantial amount of drugs and acquitted him on the other two counts. It sentenced him to two years and six months’ imprisonment and ordered the continuation of his detention.

On 30 September 2010 both the applicant and the Public Prosecutor lodged appeals against the District Court’s judgment.

That same day, the applicant lodged an appeal against the decision ordering his continued detention and asked for the detention order to be set aside or its execution to be stayed. He argued that there was no incentive for him to abscond. The strength of his ties to Germany rendered his absconding to Turkey unlikely. He had lived in Germany for twenty years, had been married for the past thirteen years, and had two children, aged eight and one. His parents and his brother also lived in Germany. His only tie to Turkey, by contrast, was his parents’ holiday home.

On 1 October 2010 the Aachen District Court decided not to grant the applicant’s appeal against the continued detention order and to refer the matter to the Aachen Regional Court. It considered that it was possible that the applicant would be sentenced to a significant prison sentence on appeal. There was, hence, an incentive for him to abscond which was not counterbalanced by his existing social ties to Germany. In that regard, it noted that the applicant and his entire family had lived on social security since 2001, that his command of the German language was insufficient and that he had no prospects of employment. Considering that his wife was also a Turkish national, that his children were of a young age and that his parents owned a holiday home in Turkey, there was a risk that the applicant would abscond to Turkey with his family. This risk could not be adequately remedied by reporting requirements or payment of security.

On 7 October 2010 the Aachen Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal. It limited the basis of the detention order to the count on which he had been convicted and annulled it for the two counts on which he had been acquitted by the District Court. Yet, referring to the reasoning of the District Court and underlining that the applicant had no legal employment whereas he had family ties to Turkey, it considered that there continued to be a risk of the applicant’s absconding.

On 26 October 2010 the applicant lodged a further appeal against that decision. After essentially reiterating his earlier submission as to why there was no risk of his absconding, he stated that such risk could, in any event, be remedied by imposing a less severe measure. In that regard, he proposed that his family furnish security of EUR 10,000.

After the Regional Court decided not to grant the applicant’s further appeal and to refer the matter to the Cologne Court of Appeal, that court informed the applicant’s counsel, in a letter dated 22 November 2010, that it was considering staying the execution of the detention order. It asked the applicant to clarify the offer made and requested that the necessary means be given to him by his family in a manner that allowed him to dispose freely of those means and to furnish the security himself. The lawful origin of those means had to be credibly demonstrated.

The following day, the applicant’s counsel informed the Court of Appeal that the applicant’s family was able and willing to furnish security of EUR 10,000 to the court and to demonstrate credibly the lawful origin of those means. The family was, however, unwilling to put the money at the applicant’s disposal as they were unwilling to run the risk of having the repayment claim attached for payment against future claims the authorities might have against the applicant. He added that, if the applicant had to assume that the security would be forfeited in any event, that is to say, even if he did not abscond, because the repayment claim would be attached for payment against other claims, the security could not effectively remedy a risk of his absconding.

On 3 December 2010 the Cologne Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s further appeal. It endorsed the assessments of the District Court and the Regional Court as to the risk of the applicant’s absconding and noted that the sentence the applicant risked incurring was not limited to two years and six months’ imprisonment, for the Public Prosecutor had appealed against the District Court’s judgment, seeking the applicant’s conviction on the two counts on which he had been acquitted. It stated that it would nonetheless consider staying the execution of the detention order if security were furnished. As long as the applicant’s family was not willing to put the necessary means at his own disposal it was, however, not ready to do so, arguing that this unwillingness indicated that his family lacked confidence in him and concluding that the family ties appeared not to be strong enough to prevent him from risking forfeiture of the security by absconding. The Court of Appeal furthermore found that there was a risk that the applicant would commit more drug-related offences if he were released from detention and also based the detention order, by way of subsidiarity, on a risk of reoffending. The decision was served on the applicant on 9 December 2010.

On 3 January 2011 the District Court’s judgment of 29 September 2010 became final, following the Regional Court’s decision to discontinue the proceedings in relation to one of the charges and the withdrawal of appeals by both the applicant and the Public Prosecutor.

That same day, the Aachen District Court stayed the execution of the detention order against the applicant on a number of conditions, including that either he or another person furnish security of EUR 5,000. Upon the furnishing of that amount by another person that same day, the applicant was released from detention.

On 14 April 2011 the Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the applicant’s constitutional complaint against the Court of Appeal’s decision not to stay the execution of the detention order against him, lodged on 10 January 2011, for adjudication, without providing reasons (file no. 2 BvR 155/11).
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e1
001-176838_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
68250/11
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-176838_a8_e2
001-176838_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e3
001-176838_a8_em3
DEM
QUASI
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e4
001-176838_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ramazan Erol
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e5
001-176838_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e6
001-176838_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Ms M. Oerder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e7
001-176838_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Möchengladbach
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e8
001-176838_a8_em8
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e9
001-176838_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H.-J. Behrens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e10
001-176838_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministerialrat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e11
001-176838_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e12
001-176838_a8_em12
ORG
QUASI
Cologne Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e13
001-176838_a8_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e14
001-176838_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
4 March 2016
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e15
001-176838_a8_em15
ORG
QUASI
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e16
001-176838_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e17
001-176838_a8_em17
LOC
QUASI
Aachen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e18
001-176838_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e19
001-176838_a8_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e20
001-176838_a8_em20
ORG
QUASI
Aachen District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e21
001-176838_a8_em21
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
400 grams
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e22
001-176838_a8_em22
QUANTITY
QUASI
2,325 euros (EUR)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e20
001-176838_a8_em23
ORG
QUASI
Aachen District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-176838_a8_e23
001-176838_a8_em24
LOC
NO_MASK
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-176838_a8_e24
001-176838_a8_em25
LOC
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e25
001-176838_a8_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
5 May 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e26
001-176838_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
6 July 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e27
001-176838_a8_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e28
001-176838_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
6 August 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e20
001-176838_a8_em30
ORG
QUASI
Aachen District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e29
001-176838_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e30
001-176838_a8_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e31
001-176838_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
two years and six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e32
001-176838_a8_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e33
001-176838_a8_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e23
001-176838_a8_em36
LOC
NO_MASK
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e24
001-176838_a8_em37
LOC
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e23
001-176838_a8_em38
LOC
NO_MASK
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e34
001-176838_a8_em39
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twenty years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e35
001-176838_a8_em40
DATETIME
NO_MASK
thirteen years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-176838_a8_e36
001-176838_a8_em41
DEM
NO_MASK
eight and one
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e23
001-176838_a8_em42
LOC
NO_MASK
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e24
001-176838_a8_em43
LOC
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e37
001-176838_a8_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
1 October 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e20
001-176838_a8_em45
ORG
QUASI
Aachen District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e38
001-176838_a8_em46
ORG
QUASI
Aachen Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e23
001-176838_a8_em47
LOC
NO_MASK
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e39
001-176838_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e8
001-176838_a8_em49
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e3
001-176838_a8_em50
DEM
QUASI
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e24
001-176838_a8_em51
LOC
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e24
001-176838_a8_em52
LOC
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e40
001-176838_a8_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e38
001-176838_a8_em54
ORG
QUASI
Aachen Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e30
001-176838_a8_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e30
001-176838_a8_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e24
001-176838_a8_em57
LOC
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e41
001-176838_a8_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
26 October 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e42
001-176838_a8_em59
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 10,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e43
001-176838_a8_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e12
001-176838_a8_em61
ORG
QUASI
Cologne Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e44
001-176838_a8_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e45
001-176838_a8_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e42
001-176838_a8_em64
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 10,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e13
001-176838_a8_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e12
001-176838_a8_em66
ORG
QUASI
Cologne Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e30
001-176838_a8_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e43
001-176838_a8_em68
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e31
001-176838_a8_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
two years and six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e46
001-176838_a8_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e33
001-176838_a8_em71
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e45
001-176838_a8_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e47
001-176838_a8_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
9 December 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e48
001-176838_a8_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
3 January 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e33
001-176838_a8_em75
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e29
001-176838_a8_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e49
001-176838_a8_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e46
001-176838_a8_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e20
001-176838_a8_em79
ORG
QUASI
Aachen District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e50
001-176838_a8_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
14 April 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e51
001-176838_a8_em81
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e45
001-176838_a8_em82
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176838_a8_e52
001-176838_a8_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
10 January 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176838_a8_e53
001-176838_a8_em84
CODE
QUASI
2 BvR 155/11
Ramazan Erol
DEU
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Ramazan Erol