PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 62543/00) against the Kingdom of Spain lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by five Spanish nationals, Mr Mateo Cruz Gorraiz Lizarraga, Mrs Catalina Echamendi Erro, Mr Francisco Javier Gorraiz Echamendi, Mr Miguel Jesús Gorraiz Echamendi and Mr Fermín Luis Gorraiz Echamendi (“the applicants”), and by the Coordinadora de Itoiz association (“the applicant association”) on 12 September 2000.

The applicants were represented by Mr M.J. Baumont Aristu and Mr J.L.Beaumont Aristu, lawyers practising in Pamplona and Madrid. The Spanish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Borrego Borrego, Head of the Legal Department for Human Rights, Ministry of Justice, until 31 January 2003. They were subsequently represented by Mr I. Blasco Lozano, new Agent of the Government and Head of the Legal Department for Human Rights, Ministry of Justice.

Relying on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicants submitted that they had not had a fair hearing in the judicial proceedings brought by them to halt construction of the Itoiz dam, in that they had been refused permission to take part in the proceedings concerning the reference of the preliminary question as to the constitutionality of Autonomous Community Law no. 9/1996 of 17 June 1996, whereas Counsel for the State and State Counsel's Office had been able to submit observations to the Constitutional Court. They also complained that the Autonomous Community law in question had been enacted with a view to preventing execution of a Supreme Court judgment which had become final. In their opinion, the enactment of that law had interfered with their right to a fair trial as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 and, for the first five applicants, with their right to respect for their private and family life and their homes, as guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention, and their right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions, as guaranteed by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

The application was allocated to the Fourth Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1.

By a decision of 14 January 2003, the Chamber declared the application admissible and reserved its position on the Government's preliminary questions as to whether the first five applicants lacked “victim” status and had failed to exhaust domestic remedies, and on the objection that Article 6 § 1 was inapplicable to the proceedings brought by the applicant association.

On 1 April 2003 the Chamber decided, having regard to the circumstances of the case, to dismiss a Rule 39 request submitted by the applicants.

The applicants and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The first five applicants are individual Spanish nationals who live in Itoiz (Navarre province). The third applicant is also the chairperson and legal representative of the sixth applicant, the Coordinadora de Itoiz association. The first, second, fourth and fifth applicants are members of this association.

A. Background to the case

The case originated in an engineering project of February 1989 for the construction of a dam in Itoiz (Navarre province) which would result in the flooding of three nature reserves and a number of small villages, including Itoiz, where the applicants live. According to the Government, the total number of landowners affected by the dam's construction is 159, thirteen of whom live in Itoiz itself.

On 6 May 1988 the Coordinadora de Itoiz association was set up; its articles of association state, inter alia, that its aim is “to coordinate its members' efforts to oppose construction of the Itoiz dam and to campaign for an alternative way of life on the site, to represent and defend the area affected by the dam and this area's interests before all official bodies at all levels, whether local, provincial, State or international, and to promote public awareness of the impact of the dam”. By a ministerial decree of 2 November 1990, the Ministry of Public Works adopted the Itoiz dam project.

B. The administrative appeal to the Audiencia Nacional

In 1991 the villages concerned by the dam and the applicant association brought an administrative appeal before the Audiencia Nacional against the ministerial decree of 2 November 1990. The appeal was based on several allegations of unlawfulness which, in their opinion, had tainted the procedure for informing the public about the proposed dam, the fact that the project had been adopted without the prior approval of the hydrological plans for each river basin or of the national hydrological plan and the lack of any public or social interest served by the project. They also claimed that the project breached the legislation on environmental protection, since no environmental impact study had been commissioned. Finally, the court's attention was drawn to the project's impact on the nature reserves and habitat within the relevant area in the light of the Council of Europe's recommendations on engineering works in the Pyrenees and the European Union's common agricultural policy.

In a judgment of 29 September 1995, the Audiencia Nacional partly upheld the appeal, considering in particular that, according to the law, the planned dam should have been based on the national hydrological plan, which had not been drawn up when the project was approved. The court also accepted the request for precise designation of the protection zones around the nature reserves affected by the dam and for a breakdown of the quarry use that would be necessary for its construction.

The applicant association applied for immediate enforcement of the judgment and, in particular, for suspension of construction work on the dam. By a decision of 24 January 1996, the Audiencia Nacional granted a suspension order but directed that the necessary measures be taken to ensure the completion of work already begun and for the maintenance and safety of the work already completed, subject to the payment of security by the applicant association.

All the parties to the proceedings lodged súplica appeals against the decision of 24 January 1996. In the context of the interim enforcement of its judgment of 29 September 1995 and, in particular, with a view to maintaining the protection zones around the three nature reserves affected by the project, the Audiencia Nacional, by a decision of 6 March 1996, prohibited the filling of the reservoir and displacement of the population concerned.

C. Enactment by the Autonomous Community of Navarre of Autonomous Community Law no. 9/1996

On 17 June 1996 the parliament of the Autonomous Community of Navarre (parlamento foral de Navarra) passed Autonomous Community Law (foral) no. 9/1996 on natural sites in Navarre (“the Autonomous Community law of 1996). This law amended Autonomous Community Law no. 6/1987 of 10 April 1987, particularly with regard to the possibility of reclassifying the protection zones or carrying out activities within them for the purpose of introducing infrastructure that had been declared in the general or public interest. According to the applicants, this Law enabled construction work on the dam to continue, with the consequent deterioration of the protected natural site. In application of the Autonomous Community law of 1996, the Autonomous Community's government adopted Decree no. 307/1996 of 2 September 1996, which identified the peripheral protection zones for certain nature reserves and strict nature reserves in Navarre.

D. Appeal on points of law by the State and the government of the Autonomous Community of Navarre against the Audiencia Nacional's judgment

In the meantime, Counsel for the State and the government of the Autonomous Community of Navarre had appealed on points of law against the Audiencia Nacional's judgment of 29 September 1995. In a judgment of 14 July 1997, the Supreme Court definitively cancelled the dam project in so far as it concerned the 500-metre protection zones around nature reserves RN 9, 10 and 11. As a result of the judgment, the size of the planned dam, and thus of the area to be flooded, was reduced, so that the village of Itoiz, where the applicants' immovable property was located, was saved from flooding.

E. Proceedings to enforce the Supreme Court's judgment

In application of the Supreme Court's judgment, by a decision of 4 September 1997, the Audiencia Nacional declared final the interim enforcement measures ordered on 6 March 1996 concerning the prohibition on filling the reservoir and other related work. Before ruling on the question of the possible suspension of construction work on a dyke, the Audiencia Nacional invited the parties to appear before it so that they could submit observations on the consequences of the new Autonomous Community law of 1996, particularly with regard to the protection zones around all the nature reserves provided for in that law, and on the impact of the maximum flood levels on the protection zones of the reserves to which the cancelled project had referred.

The central State authorities and the Navarre Autonomous Community's government argued before the Audiencia Nacional that it had become legally impossible to enforce the Supreme Court's judgment of 14 July 1997, in so far as the Autonomous Community law of 1996 had removed protection-zone status from the area within the nature reserves that was due be flooded. Accordingly, taking that legislative amendment into account, it had become possible to carry out the public-works schemes planned within those protection zones.

The applicant association contested the authorities' argument, claiming that the Autonomous Community law of 1996 was inapplicable in the instant case, since it had been enacted following the administrative decisions in the proceedings in issue and subsequent to the Audiencia Nacional's judgment and the two interim enforcement orders. In the alternative, the applicant association requested that certain provisions in the Autonomous Community law be referred to the Constitutional Court for a preliminary ruling on their constitutionality, particularly those authorising the removal of protection-zone status from the three nature reserves in the area to be flooded, which, in the applicant association's submission, would allow the work to be completed and make the reservoir cover the area specified in the original plans.

F. Reference of a preliminary question to the Constitutional Court

By a decision of 1 December 1997, the Audiencia Nacional asked the Constitutional Court to rule on the preliminary question submitted by the applicant association. By a decision of 21 May 1998, the Constitutional Court declared the application inadmissible on account of certain errors in its presentation which could nonetheless be corrected.

In order to rectify the above-mentioned errors, the Audiencia Nacional summoned the parties on 28 May 1998 so that it could hear their submissions on certain aspects of the Autonomous Community law whose constitutionality had been challenged before the Constitutional Court, and on the constitutionality of section 18(3) (A.1.) and (B) of that law. The applicant association submitted its observations on 10 June 1998. By a decision of 17 June 1998, the Audiencia Nacional again asked the Constitutional Court to rule on the preliminary question as to constitutionality and extended the question to include a new point raised by the applicant association, namely section 18(3) (B) (B.1.) of the Autonomous Community law.

By a decision of 21 July 1998, the Constitutional Court declared the issues raised in the preliminary question admissible. Under section 37(2) of the Judicature Act, it gave notice of the questions to the Chamber of Deputies, the Senate, the government and parliament of Navarre and the Spanish government, and invited them to file their observations within fifteen days. The Constitutional Court received Counsel for the State's observations on 4 September 1998. The government and parliament of Navarre submitted their observations on 11 and 15 September 1998 respectively. The Attorney General's observations were submitted on 29 September 1998. The Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies indicated that the Chamber would present no observations. The Speaker of the Senate asked that the Senate be considered a party to the proceedings and offered its assistance. On 1 March 2000 the Audiencia Nacional forwarded to the Constitutional Court the written pleadings submitted by the applicant association during the proceedings before it. These pleadings, dated 29 September 1997, 10 June 1998 and 28 February 2000, were formally included in the case file at the Constitutional Court.

G. The Constitutional Court's judgment

In a judgment of 14 March 2000, the Constitutional Court, sitting as a full court, held that the impugned provisions of the Autonomous Community law of 1996 were compatible with the Constitution. It observed at the outset that enforcement of the Supreme Court's judgment of 14 July 1997, delivered in accordance with Navarre Autonomous Community Law no. 6/1987, had become impossible since the entry into force of the Autonomous Community law of 1996, in that the cancelled project complied with the new law.

Examining the purpose of the Autonomous Community law of 1996, the Constitutional Court held as follows: “... Its purpose is to establish a general system for environmental protection of the natural sites in the Autonomous Community of Navarre. Accordingly, this protection system [was] applicable ... to the nature reserves already identified in the previous Autonomous Community law, even though the essential difference between the legal rules established by those two laws lies in the arrangements regarding the peripheral protection zones.”

The Constitutional Court held, firstly, that this was not to be seen as a legislative solution for the particular problem of the three peripheral zones around the three nature reserves affected by construction of the Itoiz dam and, secondly, that statements and parliamentary initiatives by certain politicians which, in the opinion of the Audiencia Nacional, demonstrated that the main aim of the Autonomous Community law of 1996 was to prevent execution of the Supreme Court's judgment, were immaterial in assessing whether there had been a violation of the principle of lawfulness. The Constitutional Court also ruled that, given the significance of the question raised by the Itoiz dam's construction, which could not simply be ignored, it was justifiable that the explanatory memorandum accompanying the Autonomous Community law of 1996 specifically mentioned the aim and means of environmental protection in the peripheral protection zones around the three above-mentioned nature reserves.

As to the alleged infringement of the right to a fair hearing, in so far as the Autonomous Community law of 1996 now prevented execution of the Supreme Court's judgment partly cancelling the Itoiz dam project, the Constitutional Court considered that the fact that in the meantime a new law had been passed amending the legal system applicable to the peripheral protection zones and replacing the previous law on the basis of which the project had been declared partly void was not in itself incompatible with the right to execution of judicial decisions as enshrined in Article 24 of the Constitution.

Referring to the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and, in particular, to the judgments in Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece (9 December 1994, Series A no. 301-B) and Papageorgiou v. Greece (22 October 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VI), the Constitutional Court examined whether the impossibility of executing the Supreme Court's judgment as a consequence of the enactment of the Autonomous Community law of 1996 was justified in view of the values and assets protected by the Constitution. Having held that environmental protection was enshrined in the Constitution, the Constitutional Court examined whether the prejudice arising from the failure to execute the judgment in issue was proportionate to the protected or disputed interests or was on the other hand purposeless, excessive or the cause of a clear imbalance between the interests at stake. It found that both the Supreme Court's judgment of 14 July 1997 and the new Autonomous Community law of 1996 were intended to guarantee the existence of a peripheral protection zone around the three nature reserves affected by the dam's construction. The Constitutional Court further noted that the system of peripheral protection zones introduced by this new law had not in itself been considered arbitrary in the Audiencia Nacional's decision; nor had the zones' new boundaries been held responsible for the serious deterioration of the environment. Accordingly, it held that the balance of general interests had been respected and that there was no clear lack of proportion between the conflicting interests. Consequently, the impugned provisions could not be held to be contrary to Article 24 § 1 of the Constitution.

As to the argument that the new legal rules governing the peripheral protection zones around the nature reserves appeared in a law rather than in regulations, as had previously been the case, and that this deprived the applicants of the possibility of overseeing the administration's actions through an administrative appeal or enforcement proceedings, the Constitutional Court noted that there was no legal provision requiring that certain subjects be dealt with by regulations. It added that the new law did not amount to ad causam legislation, being general in form and in substance, and pointed out that laws could be challenged before the Constitutional Court through the remedy provided for in Article 163 of the Constitution. Accordingly, the Constitutional Court dismissed the application for a preliminary ruling. The judgment was published in the Official Gazette on 14 April 2000.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e1
001-61731_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
62543/00
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61731_a11_e2
001-61731_a11_em2
ORG
QUASI
Kingdom of Spain
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e3
001-61731_a11_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Spanish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e4
001-61731_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Mateo Cruz Gorraiz Lizarraga
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e5
001-61731_a11_em5
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Catalina Echamendi Erro
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e6
001-61731_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Francisco Javier Gorraiz Echamendi
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e7
001-61731_a11_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Miguel Jesús Gorraiz Echamendi
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e8
001-61731_a11_em8
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Fermín Luis Gorraiz Echamendi
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e9
001-61731_a11_em9
ORG
QUASI
Coordinadora de Itoiz association
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e10
001-61731_a11_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
12 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e11
001-61731_a11_em11
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M.J. Baumont Aristu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e12
001-61731_a11_em12
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J.L.Beaumont Aristu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e13
001-61731_a11_em13
LOC
NO_MASK
Pamplona
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e14
001-61731_a11_em14
LOC
NO_MASK
Madrid
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e2
001-61731_a11_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
001-61731_a11_em2
Spanish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e15
001-61731_a11_em16
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Borrego Borrego
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e16
001-61731_a11_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
Legal Department for Human Rights, Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e17
001-61731_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e18
001-61731_a11_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Mr I. Blasco Lozano
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e16
001-61731_a11_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
Legal Department for Human Rights, Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61731_a11_e19
001-61731_a11_em21
MISC
QUASI
Itoiz dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e20
001-61731_a11_em22
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community Law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e21
001-61731_a11_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e22
001-61731_a11_em24
ORG
QUASI
State Counsel's Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em25
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em26
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e26
001-61731_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e27
001-61731_a11_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
1 April 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e3
001-61731_a11_em30
DEM
NO_MASK
Spanish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e28
001-61731_a11_em31
LOC
QUASI
Itoiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e29
001-61731_a11_em32
LOC
QUASI
Navarre province
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e9
001-61731_a11_em33
ORG
QUASI
Coordinadora de Itoiz association
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e30
001-61731_a11_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
February 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em35
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e28
001-61731_a11_em36
LOC
QUASI
Itoiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e29
001-61731_a11_em37
LOC
QUASI
Navarre province
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e32
001-61731_a11_em38
MISC
QUASI
three nature reserves and a number of small villages
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61731_a11_e28
001-61731_a11_em39
LOC
QUASI
Itoiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em40
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e33
001-61731_a11_em41
QUANTITY
QUASI
159
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e28
001-61731_a11_em42
LOC
QUASI
Itoiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e34
001-61731_a11_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
6 May 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e35
001-61731_a11_em44
ORG
QUASI
Coordinadora de Itoiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e19
001-61731_a11_em45
MISC
QUASI
Itoiz dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em46
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em47
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e36
001-61731_a11_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
2 November 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e37
001-61731_a11_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Public Works
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e28
001-61731_a11_em50
LOC
QUASI
Itoiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em51
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e39
001-61731_a11_em53
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em54
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e36
001-61731_a11_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
2 November 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em57
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e40
001-61731_a11_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Council of Europe
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61731_a11_e41
001-61731_a11_em59
LOC
QUASI
Pyrenees
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e42
001-61731_a11_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
European Union
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e43
001-61731_a11_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em62
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em63
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em64
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em65
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e44
001-61731_a11_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
24 January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e44
001-61731_a11_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
24 January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e43
001-61731_a11_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e45
001-61731_a11_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
6 March 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e46
001-61731_a11_em72
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community of Navarre of Autonomous Community Law no. 9/1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e47
001-61731_a11_em73
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e21
001-61731_a11_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61731_a11_e48
001-61731_a11_em75
ORG
QUASI
Autonomous Community of Navarre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e48
001-61731_a11_em76
ORG
QUASI
001-61731_a11_em75
parlamento foral de Navarra
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e20
001-61731_a11_em77
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community Law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e49
001-61731_a11_em78
LOC
QUASI
Navarre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em79
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em80
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e20
001-61731_a11_em81
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community Law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e51
001-61731_a11_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
10 April 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em83
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em84
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em85
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e47
001-61731_a11_em86
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e52
001-61731_a11_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
2 September 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e49
001-61731_a11_em88
LOC
QUASI
Navarre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e48
001-61731_a11_em89
ORG
QUASI
Autonomous Community of Navarre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em90
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e48
001-61731_a11_em91
ORG
QUASI
Autonomous Community of Navarre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em92
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e43
001-61731_a11_em93
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e53
001-61731_a11_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em95
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em96
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e54
001-61731_a11_em97
CODE
QUASI
RN 9
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em98
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e28
001-61731_a11_em99
LOC
QUASI
Itoiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em100
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em101
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e55
001-61731_a11_em102
DATETIME
QUASI
4 September 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em103
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e45
001-61731_a11_em104
DATETIME
QUASI
6 March 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em105
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em106
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em107
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e56
001-61731_a11_em108
ORG
QUASI
Navarre Autonomous Community's government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em109
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em110
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e53
001-61731_a11_em111
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em112
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em113
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em114
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em115
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em116
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em117
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em118
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em119
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e57
001-61731_a11_em120
DATETIME
QUASI
1 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em121
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em122
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e58
001-61731_a11_em123
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em125
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e59
001-61731_a11_em126
DATETIME
QUASI
28 May 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em127
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em128
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e60
001-61731_a11_em129
DATETIME
QUASI
10 June 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e61
001-61731_a11_em130
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em131
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em132
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em133
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e62
001-61731_a11_em134
DATETIME
QUASI
21 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em135
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e63
001-61731_a11_em136
ORG
NO_MASK
Chamber of Deputies
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e64
001-61731_a11_em137
ORG
NO_MASK
Senate
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e49
001-61731_a11_em138
LOC
QUASI
Navarre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e3
001-61731_a11_em139
DEM
NO_MASK
Spanish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e65
001-61731_a11_em140
DATETIME
NO_MASK
fifteen days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em141
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e66
001-61731_a11_em142
DATETIME
QUASI
4 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e49
001-61731_a11_em143
LOC
QUASI
Navarre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e67
001-61731_a11_em144
DATETIME
QUASI
15 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e68
001-61731_a11_em145
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e63
001-61731_a11_em146
ORG
NO_MASK
Chamber of Deputies
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e64
001-61731_a11_em147
ORG
NO_MASK
Senate
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e64
001-61731_a11_em148
ORG
NO_MASK
Senate
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e69
001-61731_a11_em149
DATETIME
QUASI
1 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em150
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em151
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e70
001-61731_a11_em152
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e60
001-61731_a11_em153
DATETIME
QUASI
10 June 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e71
001-61731_a11_em154
DATETIME
QUASI
28 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em155
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em156
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e72
001-61731_a11_em157
DATETIME
QUASI
14 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em158
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em159
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em160
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em161
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e53
001-61731_a11_em162
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61731_a11_e73
001-61731_a11_em163
MISC
QUASI
Navarre Autonomous Community Law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em164
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em165
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em166
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em167
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em168
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e48
001-61731_a11_em169
ORG
QUASI
Autonomous Community of Navarre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em170
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em171
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e19
001-61731_a11_em172
MISC
QUASI
Itoiz dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em173
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em174
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em175
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em176
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em177
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e28
001-61731_a11_em178
LOC
QUASI
Itoiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em179
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em180
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em181
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em182
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em183
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em184
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e28
001-61731_a11_em185
LOC
QUASI
Itoiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em186
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em187
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e74
001-61731_a11_em188
ORG
NO_MASK
European Court of Human Rights
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e75
001-61731_a11_em189
MISC
NO_MASK
Stran Greek Refineries and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e76
001-61731_a11_em190
DATETIME
QUASI
9 December 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e77
001-61731_a11_em191
MISC
NO_MASK
Papageorgiou v. Greece
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e78
001-61731_a11_em192
DATETIME
QUASI
22 October 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em193
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em194
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em195
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em196
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em197
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61731_a11_e25
001-61731_a11_em198
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e53
001-61731_a11_em199
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e24
001-61731_a11_em200
MISC
QUASI
Autonomous Community law
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e50
001-61731_a11_em201
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e31
001-61731_a11_em202
MISC
QUASI
dam
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em203
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e38
001-61731_a11_em204
ORG
NO_MASK
Audiencia Nacional
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em205
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em206
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e23
001-61731_a11_em207
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e79
001-61731_a11_em208
ORG
QUASI
Official Gazette
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61731_a11_e80
001-61731_a11_em209
DATETIME
QUASI
14 April 2000
Mateo Cruz Gorraiz Lizarraga
ESP
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Mateo Cruz Gorraiz Lizarraga