PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 8806/12) against the French Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a French national, Mr Jean-Michel Aycaguer (“the applicant”), on 20 January 2012.

The applicant was represented by Ms A.-M. Mendiboure, a lawyer practising in Bayonne. The French Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr F. Alabrune, Director of Legal Affairs with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that his conviction for having refused to undergo DNA profiling had amounted to an unjustified infringement of his right to respect for his private life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention.

On 26 March 2014 the application was communicated to the Government.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1959 and lives in Ossès.

On 17 January 2008 he attended a rally organised by a Basque agricultural trade union and by the GFAM (a mutual-benefit land alliance), the “Lurra”, on the occasion of a meeting of the Technical Committee of the Land Use and Rural Settlement Corporation (SAFER) in the Pyrénées-Atlantiques Département. That meeting had been aimed at producing an opinion on the use of the land comprising a farm which Mr F.L. had been operating for several years. The rally was held in a political and trade-union situation where tensions had been heightened by the fact that the majority agricultural union in the Département was backing candidates other than Mr F.L. At the end of the meeting scuffles broke out between the demonstrators and the gendarmerie.

The applicant was placed in police custody and brought before the Bayonne Criminal Court under “immediate summary trial” procedure, and charged with intentional violence not entailing total unfitness for work, against gendarmes whose identity has not been established, and against a person exercising public authority, using or threatening to use a weapon, in this instance an umbrella.

By judgment of 13 March 2008, the applicant was sentenced to two months’ imprisonment, suspended, for having struck gendarmes with an umbrella, which incident had not entailed unfitness for work on the latter’s part. In its judgment, the court noted that the applicant had refused to answer questions during the investigation or to admit to any wrongdoing, and had denied that he had been carrying an umbrella. The judges noted that witnesses had nevertheless stated that he had attempted to cross the barrier by clambering over demonstrators and trying to hit the gendarmes with his umbrella. The applicant pointed out that he had refrained from appealing in order to calm the situation and in the framework of a friendly settlement of the dispute that had been the cause of the rally.

On 24 December 2008, following a request from the Bayonne Public Prosecutor’s Office, the applicant was ordered by the police to give a DNA sample, on the basis of Articles 706-55 and 706-56 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CPP). He was brought before the Criminal Court on 19 May 2009 for refusing to give the sample.

By judgment of 27 October 2009, the Bayonne Regional Court imposed on the applicant a fine of five hundred euros.

On 3 February 2011 the Pau Court of Appeal upheld that judgment. As regards the legal aspect of the offence, it stated, in particular, that unlike the applicants in the case of S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, ECHR 2008), the applicant had been convicted, rather than suspected, of an offence, which precluded him from arguing that the impugned judgment had entailed a disproportionate interference with his private life. Relying, in particular, on the 16 September 2010 decision of the Constitutional Council (see paragraph 16 below), it held that “the provisions of national law applied [to the applicant] were such as to reconcile respect for private life and the protection of public order in a manner that was neither manifestly unbalanced nor in breach of the requirements of Article 8 of the Convention”. In connection with the substantive aspect of the offence, the Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s plea that a sample had already been taken from his headgear during his police custody and that he was entitled to refuse further sampling, given that there had been no DNA profiling the first time.

The applicant lodged an appeal on points of law. His first plea was that the sample geared to identifying his DNA and storing the corresponding data amounted to a disproportionate interference with his private life, having regard to the duration of the data storage and his personal situation (an easily identifiable person who was socially well-established, with a job, a family and a fixed abode). In his second plea, he argued that the Court of Appeal had provided no reasons for its decision in connection with the substantive aspect of the offence.

By judgment of 28 September 2011, the Court of Cassation dismissed the applicant’s appeal on points of law as follows: “... the Court of Appeal responded adequately and cogently to the main points of the pleadings submitted to it, and characterised all the substantive and purposive aspects of the offence of refusing to undergo a biological test, of which it found the defendant guilty, in full compliance with the provisions of Article 8 of the Convention.”
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e1
001-175007_a5_em1
CODE
DIRECT
8806/12
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e2
001-175007_a5_em2
ORG
QUASI
French Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e3
001-175007_a5_em3
DEM
QUASI
French national
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e4
001-175007_a5_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jean-Michel Aycaguer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e5
001-175007_a5_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e6
001-175007_a5_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Ms A.-M. Mendiboure
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e7
001-175007_a5_em7
LOC
QUASI
Bayonne
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e8
001-175007_a5_em8
ORG
QUASI
French Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e9
001-175007_a5_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Alabrune
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e10
001-175007_a5_em10
DEM
NO_MASK
Director of Legal Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e11
001-175007_a5_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e12
001-175007_a5_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
26 March 2014
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e13
001-175007_a5_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1959
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-175007_a5_e14
001-175007_a5_em14
LOC
QUASI
Ossès
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e15
001-175007_a5_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
17 January 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e16
001-175007_a5_em16
DEM
QUASI
Basque
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e17
001-175007_a5_em17
ORG
QUASI
GFAM
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e18
001-175007_a5_em18
MISC
QUASI
Lurra
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e19
001-175007_a5_em19
ORG
QUASI
Technical Committee of the Land Use and Rural Settlement Corporation (SAFER)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e20
001-175007_a5_em20
LOC
QUASI
Pyrénées-Atlantiques Département
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e21
001-175007_a5_em21
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F.L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e22
001-175007_a5_em22
DATETIME
NO_MASK
several years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-175007_a5_e20
001-175007_a5_em23
LOC
QUASI
001-175007_a5_em20
Département
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e21
001-175007_a5_em24
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F.L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e23
001-175007_a5_em25
MISC
QUASI
gendarmerie
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e24
001-175007_a5_em26
ORG
QUASI
Bayonne Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e25
001-175007_a5_em27
MISC
QUASI
gendarmes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e26
001-175007_a5_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e27
001-175007_a5_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
two months’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e25
001-175007_a5_em30
MISC
QUASI
gendarmes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e25
001-175007_a5_em31
MISC
QUASI
gendarmes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e28
001-175007_a5_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
24 December 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e29
001-175007_a5_em33
ORG
QUASI
Bayonne Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e30
001-175007_a5_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e31
001-175007_a5_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
19 May 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e32
001-175007_a5_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
27 October 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e33
001-175007_a5_em37
ORG
QUASI
Bayonne Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e34
001-175007_a5_em38
QUANTITY
QUASI
five hundred euros
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e35
001-175007_a5_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
3 February 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e36
001-175007_a5_em40
ORG
QUASI
Pau Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e37
001-175007_a5_em41
PERSON
NO_MASK
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e38
001-175007_a5_em42
PERSON
NO_MASK
Marper
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e39
001-175007_a5_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
United Kingdom
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e40
001-175007_a5_em44
CODE
NO_MASK
30562/04
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e41
001-175007_a5_em45
CODE
NO_MASK
30566/04
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e42
001-175007_a5_em46
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e43
001-175007_a5_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
16 September 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e44
001-175007_a5_em48
ORG
QUASI
Constitutional Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-175007_a5_e45
001-175007_a5_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e45
001-175007_a5_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e46
001-175007_a5_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e47
001-175007_a5_em52
ORG
QUASI
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-175007_a5_e45
001-175007_a5_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
Jean-Michel Aycaguer
FRA
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Jean-Michel Aycaguer