PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 59526/00) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Leszek Kaszczyniec (“the applicant”), on 16 June 2000.

The applicant was represented by Mr L. Cyrson and Mr W. Michalski, lawyers practising in Poznań. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mr K. Drzewicki, and subsequently Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 1 April 2003 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaints concerning the unreasonable length of the applicant's detention and of his trial to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, the Court decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1951 and lives in Szczecin.

On 7 March 1996 the Szczecin Regional Prosecutor laid charges of large-scale fraud against the applicant. On 17 April 1996 the prosecutor ordered his detention on remand in connection with those charges. He also issued a search and arrest warrant in respect of the applicant. Subsequently, on an unspecified date the prosecution received information that the applicant had left Poland.

On 7 October 1996 the prosecutor stayed the investigation due to the fact that the applicant was abroad. On the same day he issued an international search and arrest warrant for the applicant.

On 29 November 1996 the applicant was arrested in Germany.

On 19 March 1997 the German authorities extradited the applicant to Poland where he was placed in police custody. On 21 March 1997 the Szczecin District Court ordered his detention on remand on suspicion of large-scale fraud. His detention was subsequently prolonged on 16 September and 30 November 1997.

On 15 November 1997 the prosecution filed a bill of indictment with the Szczecin Regional Court. The applicant was charged with large-scale fraud to the detriment of the State Treasury. There were two other defendants in the case.

The Regional Court held hearings on the following dates: 22 January, 26 and 27 February, 2, 24 and 25 March, 20, 21 and 22 April, 16 June, 14 and 20 July 1998.

In the course of his original trial, the applicant lodged numerous unsuccessful applications for release and appealed – likewise unsuccessfully – against refusals to lift the detention. In his applications, he argued that his detention was excessive and had, for all practical purposes, amounted to serving a prison sentence. He asked the courts to release him either on bail or under police supervision, or to accept a guarantee from a responsible person or persons who would undertake to ensure his presence at trial, or to order him to surrender his passport, or to subject his release to all those conditions.

On 20 July 1998 the trial court gave judgment. It convicted the applicant as charged and sentenced him to 9 years' imprisonment and a fine. The court further ordered that the period spent by him in pre-trial detention from 29 November 1996 up to the date of his conviction be set off against the sentence imposed.

On 15 April 1999, on an appeal lodged by the applicant, the Poznań Court of Appeal quashed the first-instance judgment and remitted the case. The subsequent proceedings were conducted only against two defendants, including the applicant, as the third defendant had not appealed against the first-instance judgment.

On 28 December 1999 the Regional Court joined the proceedings in question to the other set of proceedings. The number of defendants increased to three.

The retrial was to begin on 28 March 2000 but was adjourned since one of the defendants had to undergo a psychiatric examination. The next hearing scheduled for 9 May 2000 had to be adjourned due to the illness of a lay judge. The Regional Court held the first retrial hearing on 20 June 2000. Subsequent hearings were held on 12, 18 and 19 July, 22 August, 20, 21 and 28 September, 17 and 18 October, 28 and 29 November and 20 December 2000.

In the meantime, on 20 May 1999 the Poznań Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's application for release on bail or under police supervision, or under guarantee by a responsible person or under the condition that he surrender his passport. The court found that there was a considerable likelihood that he had committed the offence with which he had been charged. The court further noted that the applicant had already been detained on remand for some 30 months but it considered that, given that he had previously been sought under an international arrest warrant and that he was liable to a severe penalty, there was a real risk that he might obstruct the proper conduct of the trial. In the court's view, that risk justified his being kept in custody. That decision was upheld on appeal.

On 27 May 1999 the Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant's detention pending trial until 30 November 1999. The applicant appealed, invoking, inter alia, Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. He submitted that his right to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial was not respected. He also maintained that his detention was so excessive that it amounted in reality to serving a prison sentence.

On 4 August 1999 the Court of Appeal upheld the contested order. Repeating the grounds previously given for the applicant's detention, the court stressed that he had already evaded justice and an international arrest warrant had had to be issued. It considered that the trial had not progressed because of his conduct. In the court's opinion, those circumstances clearly indicated that there was a considerable risk that the applicant, if released, might again upset the proper conduct of the proceedings. Lastly, the court noted that he faced an exceptionally heavy sentence, which had already been shown by the severity of the penalty originally imposed at first instance.

On 27 August 1999 the Szczecin Regional Court dismissed an application for release on bail or subject to other guarantees or conditions. The court repeated the grounds previously invoked, attaching particular importance to the fact that he had earlier absconded and had already been sentenced to 9 years' imprisonment. In view of the severity of the sentence to which he was liable, the court considered that neither bail, nor police supervision nor any other guarantee would secure the proper course of the trial.

On 16 November 1999 the Regional Court extended the applicant's detention until 30 April 2000, repeating the grounds mentioned in the previous decisions.

The applicant appealed, maintaining, among other things, that there was no legal basis for keeping him in custody and that, pursuant to Article 263 §§ 3 and 4 of the 1997 Code, his detention could have been prolonged only by the Supreme Court because it had exceeded the maximum statutory period of 2 years laid down in paragraph 3 of that provision.

On 11 January 2000 the Court of Appeal rejected the appeal. It stressed that both the fact that the applicant had earlier evaded justice and the nature of his, in the court's words, “criminal relations” with certain witnesses involved in the case, indicated that detention was the only preventive measure which would effectively secure the proper course of the trial. As regards the legal basis for his detention, the court pointed out that – as had already been mentioned in the previous detention decisions – his detention continued on the grounds listed in Article 258 §§ 1 (2) and 2 of the 1997 Code as there was a risk that he might obstruct the proper course of the trial and a heavy penalty was likely to be imposed on him. Lastly, as to the question of which court was competent to prolong his detention, the Court of Appeal stated that the applicant had misconstrued Article 263 §§ 3 and 4 of the 1997 Code. That provision, the court added, indeed imposed a statutory time-limit of 2 years on pre-trial detention and laid down that only the Supreme Court could prolong it beyond that term. However, that rule applied only as long as there had been no conviction at first instance. Since the applicant had already been convicted at first instance, no time-limit for detention applied to his case, even though his original conviction had subsequently been quashed on appeal.

On 4 February 2000 the Regional Court dismissed a further application for release filed by the applicant in January 2000. It reiterated the grounds invoked in the previous detention decisions and added that, in the light of the material before it, there was a considerable likelihood that the applicant had committed the offence with which he had been charged.

On 25 February 2000 the Regional Court dismissed the applicant's subsequent application for release. It recalled that it had already ruled on numerous occasions on his detention. Noting that the applicant had not adduced any new relevant circumstances, the court found it unnecessary to address his arguments.

On 26 April 2000 the Regional Court prolonged the applicant's detention until 30 October 2000. It considered that the material gathered in the case justified the opinion that the applicant had committed the offence in question. It observed that a severe penalty (up to 9 years' imprisonment) might be imposed on him. Stressing that the applicant had evaded justice at the initial stage of the proceedings, the court also pointed out that his detention served the purpose of securing the proper conduct of the trial. Furthermore, the court found it necessary to extend his detention until 30 October 2000 because the summer holidays were approaching, which, for all practical purposes, meant that the examination of the case would be postponed.

On 15 September 2000 the Regional Court dismissed the applicant's further application for release.

On 21 September 2000 the applicant requested that the three sets of criminal proceedings conducted against him before the courts in Szczecin, including the proceedings at issue, be transferred to other courts. On 13 October 2000 his request was refused.

On 18 October 2000 the Szczecin Regional Court prolonged the applicant's detention until 30 January 2001. It reiterated all the grounds previously given for his detention. The applicant's appeal, based on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, was rejected by the Court of Appeal on 31 October 2000.

On 12 January 2001 the Regional Court extended the applicant's detention until 30 July 2001. Upon the applicant's appeal, the Court of Appeal reduced the prolongation to 23 February 2001.

On 22 February 2001 the Regional Court ordered that the applicant be kept in custody until 24 April 2001. It further held that he could be released if he put up bail of PLN 40,000. The applicant appealed.

On 15 March 2001 the Court of Appeal quashed the Regional Court's decision. It ordered that the applicant should be released on condition that he put up bail of PLN 30,000 by 30 March 2001. The Court of Appeal further placed the applicant under police supervision and imposed on him a prohibition on leaving the country.

On 27 March 2001 the Regional Court ordered the applicant's release as he had paid the bail. He was released on the same day.

On 28 March 2002 the Szczecin Regional Court convicted the applicant of large-scale fraud and breach of official secrecy. It sentenced him to a cumulative sentence of 8 years' imprisonment and a fine. The applicant appealed.

On 12 February 2003 the Poznań Court of Appeal amended the Regional Court's judgment by reducing the applicant's cumulative sentence to 6 years' imprisonment. The applicant appealed.

On 1 March 2004 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's cassation appeal.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e1
001-80577_a3_em1
CODE
DIRECT
59526/00
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-80577_a3_e2
001-80577_a3_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e3
001-80577_a3_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e4
001-80577_a3_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Leszek Kaszczyniec
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e5
001-80577_a3_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
16 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e6
001-80577_a3_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr L. Cyrson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e7
001-80577_a3_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr W. Michalski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-80577_a3_e8
001-80577_a3_em8
LOC
QUASI
Poznań
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e9
001-80577_a3_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e10
001-80577_a3_em10
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K. Drzewicki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e11
001-80577_a3_em11
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e12
001-80577_a3_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e13
001-80577_a3_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1 April 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e14
001-80577_a3_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
1951
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e15
001-80577_a3_em15
LOC
QUASI
Szczecin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e16
001-80577_a3_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
7 March 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e17
001-80577_a3_em17
ORG
QUASI
Szczecin Regional Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e18
001-80577_a3_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
17 April 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-80577_a3_e19
001-80577_a3_em19
LOC
NO_MASK
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e20
001-80577_a3_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e21
001-80577_a3_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
29 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e22
001-80577_a3_em22
LOC
QUASI
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e23
001-80577_a3_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e24
001-80577_a3_em24
ORG
QUASI
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e19
001-80577_a3_em25
LOC
NO_MASK
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e25
001-80577_a3_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e26
001-80577_a3_em27
ORG
QUASI
Szczecin District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e27
001-80577_a3_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
16 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e28
001-80577_a3_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
30 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e29
001-80577_a3_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
15 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e30
001-80577_a3_em31
ORG
QUASI
Szczecin Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e31
001-80577_a3_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
State Treasury
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e33
001-80577_a3_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
22 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e34
001-80577_a3_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
26 and 27 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e35
001-80577_a3_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
2, 24 and 25 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e36
001-80577_a3_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
20, 21 and 22 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e37
001-80577_a3_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
16 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e38
001-80577_a3_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
14 and 20 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e39
001-80577_a3_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
20 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e40
001-80577_a3_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
9 years'
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e21
001-80577_a3_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
29 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e41
001-80577_a3_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
15 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e42
001-80577_a3_em44
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e43
001-80577_a3_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
28 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e44
001-80577_a3_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e45
001-80577_a3_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
9 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e46
001-80577_a3_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
20 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e47
001-80577_a3_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
12, 18 and 19 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e48
001-80577_a3_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
22 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e49
001-80577_a3_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
20, 21 and 28 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e50
001-80577_a3_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
17 and 18 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e51
001-80577_a3_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
28 and 29 November
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e52
001-80577_a3_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
20 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e53
001-80577_a3_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
20 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e42
001-80577_a3_em58
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e54
001-80577_a3_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
some 30 months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e55
001-80577_a3_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
27 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e56
001-80577_a3_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e57
001-80577_a3_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
30 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e58
001-80577_a3_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
4 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e56
001-80577_a3_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e59
001-80577_a3_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
27 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e30
001-80577_a3_em66
ORG
QUASI
Szczecin Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e40
001-80577_a3_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
9 years'
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e60
001-80577_a3_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
16 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e61
001-80577_a3_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e62
001-80577_a3_em71
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e63
001-80577_a3_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
2 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e64
001-80577_a3_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
11 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e56
001-80577_a3_em74
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e56
001-80577_a3_em75
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e63
001-80577_a3_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
2 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e62
001-80577_a3_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e65
001-80577_a3_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
4 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em79
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e66
001-80577_a3_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e67
001-80577_a3_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
25 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em82
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e68
001-80577_a3_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
26 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em84
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e69
001-80577_a3_em85
DATETIME
QUASI
30 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e70
001-80577_a3_em86
DATETIME
NO_MASK
up to 9 years'
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e69
001-80577_a3_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
30 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e71
001-80577_a3_em88
DATETIME
QUASI
summer holidays
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e72
001-80577_a3_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
15 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em90
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e73
001-80577_a3_em91
DATETIME
QUASI
21 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e15
001-80577_a3_em92
LOC
QUASI
Szczecin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e74
001-80577_a3_em93
DATETIME
QUASI
13 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e75
001-80577_a3_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
18 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e30
001-80577_a3_em95
ORG
QUASI
Szczecin Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e76
001-80577_a3_em96
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e56
001-80577_a3_em97
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e77
001-80577_a3_em98
DATETIME
QUASI
31 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e78
001-80577_a3_em99
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em100
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e79
001-80577_a3_em101
DATETIME
QUASI
30 July 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e56
001-80577_a3_em102
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e80
001-80577_a3_em103
DATETIME
QUASI
23 February 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e81
001-80577_a3_em104
DATETIME
QUASI
22 February 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em105
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e82
001-80577_a3_em106
DATETIME
QUASI
24 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e83
001-80577_a3_em107
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 40,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e84
001-80577_a3_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e56
001-80577_a3_em109
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e85
001-80577_a3_em110
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court's
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80577_a3_e86
001-80577_a3_em111
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 30,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e87
001-80577_a3_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
30 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e56
001-80577_a3_em113
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e88
001-80577_a3_em114
DATETIME
QUASI
27 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e32
001-80577_a3_em115
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e89
001-80577_a3_em116
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e30
001-80577_a3_em117
ORG
QUASI
Szczecin Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e90
001-80577_a3_em118
DATETIME
QUASI
8 years'
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e91
001-80577_a3_em119
DATETIME
QUASI
12 February 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e42
001-80577_a3_em120
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e85
001-80577_a3_em121
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court's
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e92
001-80577_a3_em122
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6 years'
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e93
001-80577_a3_em123
DATETIME
QUASI
1 March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80577_a3_e62
001-80577_a3_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
Leszek Kaszczyniec
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Leszek Kaszczyniec