PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court by a Swiss national, Mr Hans W. Kopp (“the applicant”) on 20 January 1997, by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) on 22 January 1997 and by the Government of the Swiss Confederation (“the Government”) on 27 February 1997, within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 § 1 and Article 47 of the Convention. It originated in an application (no. 23224/94) against Switzerland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 by Mr Kopp on 15 December 1993. The applicant’s application bringing the case before the Court referred to Article 48 of the Convention, as amended by Protocol No. 9, which Switzerland has ratified; the Commission’s request referred to Articles 44 and 48 and to the declaration whereby Switzerland recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46); the Government’s application referred to Articles 45, 47 and 48. The object of the request and of the applications was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention.

On 20 January 1997 the applicant had designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 31 of Rules of Court B), who was given leave by the President to use the German language in both the written and the oral proceedings (Rule 28 § 3). The applicant was initially designated by the letters H.W.K., but subsequently agreed to the disclosure of his identity.

The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Mr L. Wildhaber, the elected judge of Swiss nationality (Article 43 of the Convention), and Mr R. Bernhardt, the Vice-President of the Court (Rule 21 § 4 (b)). On 21 February 1997, in the presence of the Registrar, the President of the Court, Mr R. Ryssdal, drew by lot the names of the other seven members, namely Mr Thór Vilhjálmsson, Mr L.-E. Pettiti, Mr C. Russo, Mr A. Spielmann, Mrs E. Palm, Mr A.B. Baka and Mr M. Voicu (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 § 5). Subsequently Mr J.M. Morenilla, substitute judge, replaced Mrs Palm, who was unable to take part in the further consideration of the case (Rules 22 § 1 and 24 § 1).

As President of the Chamber (Rule 21 § 6), Mr Bernhardt, acting through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the Government, the applicant’s lawyer and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 39 § 1 and 40). Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the memorials of the Government and the applicant on 19 and 27 September 1997 respectively. On 7 October 1997 the Commission produced the documents on the proceedings before it, as requested by the Registrar on the President’s instructions.

In accordance with the President’s decision, the hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 25 November 1997. The Court had held a preparatory meeting beforehand. There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Mr P. Boillat, Deputy Director, Head of the International Affairs Division, Federal Office of Justice, Agent, Mr F. Bänziger, Deputy Federal Public Prosecutor, Mr F. Schürmann, Head of the Human Rights and Council of Europe Section, Federal Office of Justice, Advisers; (b) for the Commission Mr B. Marxer, Delegate; (c) for the applicant Mr T. Poledna, of the Zürich Bar, Counsel. The Court heard addresses by Mr Marxer, Mr Poledna and Mr Boillat.

AS TO THE FACTS

I. the CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

Mr Hans W. Kopp, a Swiss national born in 1931, was formerly a lawyer and lives in Zürich (Switzerland).

A. Background to the case

The applicant’s wife, Mrs Elisabeth Kopp, was a member of the Federal Council and head of the Federal Department of Justice and Police from 1984 until her resignation in January 1989.

1. The letter of request

On 28 February 1988 a Mr Hauser, a member of the law firm Kopp and Partners, was asked by a client to verify the legality of a request for judicial assistance sent to Switzerland by the United States authorities concerning a tax matter. After studying the file, Mr Hauser declined to accept the work, referring to a standing instruction to members of the applicant’s firm to refuse all cases concerning the Federal Department of Justice and Police, for which his wife was at that time responsible. The file was accordingly transferred to the law firm Niederer, Kraft and Frey in Zürich.

On 10 June 1988 Niederer, Kraft and Frey asked the Federal Office of Police if they could inspect the letter of request. On 23 August 1988 the Federal Office sent the firm an abridged (gestrippte) version of the document, withholding a confidential section which concerned organised crime.

2. Mrs Kopp’s resignation

In November 1988, in a separate development, the media reported allegations that a company, Shakarchi Trading AG, and Mr Kopp, who was at the relevant time the vice-chairman of its board of directors, were implicated in money laundering. At the end of 1988 Mr Kopp lodged a complaint against a newspaper.

At his wife’s request, the applicant had resigned as vice-chairman of the board in October 1988. His wife then came under suspicion of disclosing confidential information obtained in an official capacity. As her husband was also suspected of other offences, she was obliged to resign.

3. The establishment of a parliamentary commission of inquiry

On 31 January 1989 the Swiss parliament set up a parliamentary commission of inquiry to look into the way Mrs Kopp had performed her duties, and the circumstances of her resignation.

In February 1989 the chairman of the parliamentary commission of inquiry, Mr Leuenberger, was informed that a Mr X, an American citizen, had obtained from the applicant a document which the Federal Office of Police and the Federal Court had refused to communicate to him, in exchange for a payment of 250,000 Swiss francs. Mr Leuenberger was given this information by a Mr Y, who had himself obtained it from the initial informant, a Mr Z.

It subsequently transpired that Mr X was named in the American letter of request, which contained confidential information about his role in organised crime. Suspicion therefore arose that a member of the Federal Department of Justice and Police might have passed on confidential documents relating to the request, thus breaching the duty not to disclose official secrets.

B. The course of the inquiry and monitoring of the applicant’s telephone lines

On 21 November 1989 the Federal Public Prosecutor opened an investigation against a person or persons unknown in order to question the informant Y and to identify the person working at the Federal Department of Justice and Police who might have disclosed official secrets.

He also ordered monitoring of the telephone lines of the informants Y and X, and of those of Mr Kopp and his wife. The applicant was monitored as a “third party”, not as a suspect.

The monitoring began on 21 November 1989 and ended on 11 December 1989.

On 23 November 1989 the President of the Indictment Division of the Federal Court allowed an application by the Federal Public Prosecutor for monitoring of thirteen telephone lines in total, including the applicant’s private and professional lines and those of his wife, and in particular a secret line allocated to her as a former member of the Federal Council. The order expressly mentioned that “the lawyers’ conversations [were] not to be taken into account”.

On 24 November 1989 the parliamentary commission of inquiry published its report. It concluded that Mrs Kopp had performed her duties with competence, diligence and circumspection, and that the rumours to the effect that she had allowed external influences to affect the way she performed her duties were unfounded. In February 1990 the Federal Court acquitted Mrs Kopp of disclosing official secrets.

On 1 December 1989 the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office interviewed the informant Y, in the presence of the chairman of the parliamentary commission, Mr Leuenberger.

On 4 December 1989 Mr Leuenberger contacted the informant Z, who was interviewed by the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office on 8 December.

On 12 December 1989, having concluded that the suspicions regarding the disclosure of official secrets were unfounded, the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office discontinued monitoring of all Mr and Mrs Kopp’s telephone lines.

On 14 December 1989 the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office submitted its final report on the investigation, which stated that in 1988 Mr Hauser had passed on to the firm of Niederer, Kraft and Frey a file relating to the letter of request (see paragraph 8 above) and that there was no evidence that the applicant and his wife had been directly involved in that case.

On 6 March 1990 the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office decided to close the investigation, on the ground that there was no evidence to corroborate the suspicions that the applicant’s wife or a member of the Federal Department of Justice and Police had disclosed official secrets, namely certain passages of the letter of request which had been classified as confidential.

In a letter of 9 March 1990 the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office informed Mr Kopp that a judicial investigation had been opened, pursuant to Articles 320 and 340 § 1 (7) of the Criminal Code (see paragraph 34 below), in connection with the suspected disclosure of official secrets, and that his private and professional telephone lines had been tapped, in accordance with sections 66 et seq. of the Federal Criminal Procedure Act (see paragraphs 35–38 below). The letter stated that the monitoring had lasted from 21 November to 11 December 1989 and that “conversations connected with his professional activities as a lawyer [had not been] monitored”. It also stated that, pursuant to section 66(1 ter) of the Federal Criminal Procedure Act, all the recordings had been destroyed.

On 12 March 1990 the parliamentary commission of inquiry issued a communiqué concerning the monitoring of Mr Kopp’s telephone lines in connection with the judicial investigation concerning him. It stated in particular: “In the course of its inquiries, in connection with which it obtained authorisation to intercept telephone communications, the [Federal] Public Prosecutor’s Office discovered that the American citizen’s Swiss representatives had tried to obtain the confidential document in the file by applying to [the applicant]. They were hoping for privileged access to the Federal Department of Justice and Police on account of the fact that he was the husband of the Federal Councillor then responsible for that Department. For a fee, a lawyer from [the applicant]’s law firm studied the file in order to decide whether to take on the case, but turned it down. An attempt was then made to obtain the confidential part of the file through another lawyer. The American letter of request was in the end disclosed, but only after the confidential passages had been blotted out. On the basis of these findings, the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office discontinued the investigation… The suspicion that there had been a disclosure of official secrets thus proved to be unfounded. The police investigation did, however, reveal how the rumour that led to the information and the suspicion arose.”

On 13 March 1990 a number of Swiss newspapers commented on the above communiqué. They mentioned the applicant among the persons implicated and mentioned that telephones had been tapped.

C. The proceedings brought by the applicant

1. The complaint to the Federal Department of Justice and Police

On 10 April, 3 September and 10 October 1990 Mr Kopp lodged complaints with the Federal Department of Justice and Police about breaches of the legislation on telephone tapping and of Article 8 of the Convention.

On 2 November 1992 the Federal Department dismissed the applicant’s complaints. Considering that they were to be classified as complaints to a higher authority, it refused him unrestricted access to his file.

2. The administrative appeal to the Federal Council

On 2 December 1992 Mr Kopp lodged an administrative appeal with the Federal Council against the decision taken on 2 November 1992 by the Federal Department of Justice and Police. He complained, among other matters, of unlawful telephone tapping and of the refusal to give him free access to the file. Under the heading “Violation of Article 8 of the Convention”, he made the following submission in particular: “In that context, it should also be noted that the telephone lines of [the applicant]’s law firm, which included a number of partners, were tapped. Section 66(1 bis) of the Federal Criminal Procedure Act expressly prohibits the interception of such telephone conversations. Interception of telephone conversations with [the applicant]’s law firm was therefore likewise illegal under the above-mentioned provision of Swiss law.”

On 30 June 1993 the Federal Council dismissed the administrative appeal. It observed that, where telephone tapping was concerned, a complaint to a higher authority, even one which had no basis in law, was to be treated as a normal administrative appeal. It held that it had jurisdiction to determine whether monitoring of the applicant’s telephone lines had been unlawful, whether that measure had been in breach of the Convention and whether the applicant’s right to inspect his file had been infringed. If his personal rights had been infringed, the applicant could claim damages. He could also rely on the Federal Council’s decision in order to seek redress (Genugtuung) from the Federal Court. (a) The right to inspect the file The Federal Council considered that the applicant should have access only to those documents in the file which were directly relevant to the fact that he had had his telephone tapped as a “third party”. It noted that he had had restricted access to the documents, some of which had been censored, particularly as regards the informants’ names. Others, which concerned, for instance, the telephone tapping, had not been made available to him, but he had been orally informed of their existence and content. Several documents concerning third parties had not been handed over to him because their interests prevailed over his. (b) The lawfulness of the telephone tapping According to the Federal Council, section 66 of the Federal Criminal Procedure Act authorised monitoring the telephones of third parties, such as the applicant, if there was evidence giving rise to a presumption that they were receiving information from an offender or imparting information to him. It considered that in the period of general uncertainty due to rumours of subversion which had then obtained (eine durch Unterwanderungsgerüchte verunsicherte Zeit) there had been specific evidence pointing to a disclosure of official secrets by someone within the Federal Department of Justice and Police. The document in question contained confidential information about which guarantees had been given to the United States. The credibility of Switzerland had therefore been at stake. An apparent risk had been identified when the name of the applicant, who was the husband of the former head of the Department of Justice and Police, was mentioned. According to the Federal Council, it had been necessary to tap the telephone lines at the beginning of the investigation, before contacts were established with Mr Y and Mr Z. The civil servants concerned had therefore not immediately looked into the informants’ credibility, considering that any further contact would have compromised the investigation. The Federal Council observed that the applicant had had his telephone tapped not as a suspect but as a “third party” within the meaning of section 66(1 bis) of the Federal Criminal Procedure Act. The conversations he had had in the capacity of lawyer had been expressly excluded. As he was not a civil servant, he could not have been guilty of the offence concerned. His wife had been one of the theoretically possible suspects, but there was no real evidence implicating her or anyone else. The fact that the applicant’s telephone lines had been monitored did not mean, therefore, that he had been under suspicion in the criminal sense. Moreover, the fact that the police investigation had been initiated in respect of “a person or persons unknown” was not simply a ploy to preserve appearances. Lastly, the investigation had not been ordered for political reasons and the chairman of the parliamentary commission had not been in a position to influence it. In conclusion, the Federal Council observed that the conversations recorded had been of no interest to the investigators and no report on them had been made. Be that as it may, even if such a report had been sent to the parliamentary commission, it could not have been used improperly because its members were bound by the duty not to disclose official secrets.

3. The administrative-law appeal to the Federal Court

The applicant also lodged with the Federal Court an administrative-law appeal against the decision taken on 2 November 1992 by the Federal Department of Justice and Police (see paragraph 29 above). He asked the Federal Court to rule that the telephone tapping had been unlawful and accordingly to order the institution of criminal proceedings against those responsible.

On 8 March 1994 the Federal Court gave judgment against the applicant. It first considered whether he should have been permitted to inspect the whole of the file when the case had been brought before the Federal Department of Justice and Police. It noted that he had been able to inspect those passages in the document which had determined the decision (entscheidungswesentlich) and that the decision not to disclose the informants’ names had been justified. It held that the above conclusion was also consistent with the parliamentary commission of inquiry’s decision to guarantee the informants’ anonymity. Moreover, on the basis of even a partial inspection of the file (gestützt auf die ihm zugestellten “gestrippten” Akten), the applicant had been able to lodge appeals. The Federal Court then considered whether criminal proceedings should be brought in connection with the monitoring of the applicant’s telephone lines. It held that it was not required to provide a conclusive (abschliessend) answer to the question whether the telephone tapping constituted a violation of Article 8 of the Convention, having regard in particular to the fact that the applicant had already appealed to the Federal Council. It noted that criminal proceedings had been instituted for a presumed disclosure of official secrets on the basis of information passed on by the chairman of the parliamentary commission of inquiry. The applicant’s firm was involved inasmuch as one of his partners had looked into the case in order to decide whether he should take it on. The presumption by the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office that the first informant or the disloyal civil servant would contact the applicant did not seem to have been wholly unjustified.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e1
001-58144_a11_em1
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em2
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Hans W. Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e3
001-58144_a11_em3
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e4
001-58144_a11_em4
DATETIME
QUASI
22 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e5
001-58144_a11_em5
ORG
NO_MASK
Government of the Swiss Confederation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e6
001-58144_a11_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
27 February 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e7
001-58144_a11_em7
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e8
001-58144_a11_em8
CODE
DIRECT
23224/94
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e5
001-58144_a11_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58144_a11_em5
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em10
PERSON
DIRECT
001-58144_a11_em2
Mr Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e9
001-58144_a11_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
15 December 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58144_a11_e5
001-58144_a11_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e5
001-58144_a11_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e3
001-58144_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e10
001-58144_a11_em15
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58144_a11_e11
001-58144_a11_em16
PERSON
DIRECT
H.W.K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e12
001-58144_a11_em17
PERSON
QUASI
Mr L. Wildhaber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e1
001-58144_a11_em18
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e13
001-58144_a11_em19
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e14
001-58144_a11_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
21 February 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e15
001-58144_a11_em21
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e16
001-58144_a11_em22
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Thór Vilhjálmsson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e17
001-58144_a11_em23
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr L.-E. Pettiti
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e18
001-58144_a11_em24
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr C. Russo
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e19
001-58144_a11_em25
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr A. Spielmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e20
001-58144_a11_em26
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mrs E. Palm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e21
001-58144_a11_em27
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A.B. Baka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e22
001-58144_a11_em28
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Voicu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e23
001-58144_a11_em29
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J.M. Morenilla
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e20
001-58144_a11_em30
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-58144_a11_em26
Mrs Palm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e13
001-58144_a11_em31
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-58144_a11_em19
Mr Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e24
001-58144_a11_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
27 September 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e25
001-58144_a11_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e26
001-58144_a11_em34
LOC
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e27
001-58144_a11_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e28
001-58144_a11_em36
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. Boillat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e29
001-58144_a11_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
International Affairs Division
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e30
001-58144_a11_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e31
001-58144_a11_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Bänziger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e32
001-58144_a11_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e33
001-58144_a11_em41
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr F. Schürmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e34
001-58144_a11_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Human Rights and Council of Europe Section
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e30
001-58144_a11_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e35
001-58144_a11_em44
PERSON
QUASI
Mr B. Marxer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e36
001-58144_a11_em45
PERSON
QUASI
Mr T. Poledna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58144_a11_e37
001-58144_a11_em46
ORG
QUASI
Zürich Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e35
001-58144_a11_em47
PERSON
QUASI
001-58144_a11_em44
Mr Marxer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e36
001-58144_a11_em48
PERSON
QUASI
001-58144_a11_em45
Mr Poledna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e28
001-58144_a11_em49
PERSON
QUASI
001-58144_a11_em36
Mr Boillat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em50
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Hans W. Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e1
001-58144_a11_em51
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e38
001-58144_a11_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
1931
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e39
001-58144_a11_em53
LOC
QUASI
Zürich
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58144_a11_e5
001-58144_a11_em54
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e40
001-58144_a11_em55
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Elisabeth Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e43
001-58144_a11_em58
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e44
001-58144_a11_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
January 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e45
001-58144_a11_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
28 February 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e46
001-58144_a11_em61
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e47
001-58144_a11_em62
ORG
QUASI
Kopp and Partners
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e5
001-58144_a11_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e48
001-58144_a11_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e46
001-58144_a11_em65
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e49
001-58144_a11_em67
ORG
QUASI
Niederer, Kraft and Frey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e39
001-58144_a11_em68
LOC
QUASI
Zürich
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e50
001-58144_a11_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
10 June 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e49
001-58144_a11_em70
ORG
QUASI
Niederer, Kraft and Frey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e51
001-58144_a11_em71
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e52
001-58144_a11_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
23 August 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e51
001-58144_a11_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58144_a11_em71
Federal Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e53
001-58144_a11_em74
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e54
001-58144_a11_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
November 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e55
001-58144_a11_em76
ORG
QUASI
Shakarchi Trading AG
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em77
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e56
001-58144_a11_em78
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em79
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e57
001-58144_a11_em80
DATETIME
NO_MASK
October 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e58
001-58144_a11_em81
ORG
NO_MASK
parliamentary commission of inquiry
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e59
001-58144_a11_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e1
001-58144_a11_em83
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e58
001-58144_a11_em84
ORG
NO_MASK
parliamentary commission of inquiry
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e53
001-58144_a11_em85
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e60
001-58144_a11_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
February 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e58
001-58144_a11_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
parliamentary commission of inquiry
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e61
001-58144_a11_em88
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Leuenberger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e62
001-58144_a11_em89
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr X
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e63
001-58144_a11_em90
DEM
NO_MASK
American
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e51
001-58144_a11_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e64
001-58144_a11_em92
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e65
001-58144_a11_em93
QUANTITY
QUASI
250,000 Swiss francs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e61
001-58144_a11_em94
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Leuenberger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e66
001-58144_a11_em95
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Y
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e67
001-58144_a11_em96
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Z.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e62
001-58144_a11_em97
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr X
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e63
001-58144_a11_em98
DEM
NO_MASK
American
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em99
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e68
001-58144_a11_em100
DATETIME
QUASI
21 November 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e32
001-58144_a11_em101
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e69
001-58144_a11_em102
PERSON
NO_MASK
Y
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em103
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e69
001-58144_a11_em104
PERSON
NO_MASK
Y
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e70
001-58144_a11_em105
PERSON
NO_MASK
X
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em106
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e68
001-58144_a11_em107
DATETIME
QUASI
21 November 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e71
001-58144_a11_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e72
001-58144_a11_em109
DATETIME
QUASI
23 November 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e73
001-58144_a11_em110
ORG
NO_MASK
Indictment Division of the Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e32
001-58144_a11_em111
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em112
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e74
001-58144_a11_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e58
001-58144_a11_em114
ORG
NO_MASK
parliamentary commission of inquiry
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e53
001-58144_a11_em115
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e75
001-58144_a11_em116
DATETIME
NO_MASK
February 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e64
001-58144_a11_em117
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e53
001-58144_a11_em118
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e76
001-58144_a11_em119
DATETIME
QUASI
1 December 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e77
001-58144_a11_em120
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e69
001-58144_a11_em121
PERSON
NO_MASK
Y
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e58
001-58144_a11_em122
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58144_a11_em87
parliamentary commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e61
001-58144_a11_em123
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Leuenberger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e78
001-58144_a11_em124
DATETIME
QUASI
4 December 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e61
001-58144_a11_em125
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Leuenberger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e77
001-58144_a11_em126
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e79
001-58144_a11_em127
DATETIME
NO_MASK
8 December
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e80
001-58144_a11_em128
DATETIME
QUASI
12 December 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e77
001-58144_a11_em129
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e81
001-58144_a11_em130
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr and Mrs Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e53
001-58144_a11_em131
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e82
001-58144_a11_em132
DATETIME
QUASI
14 December 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e77
001-58144_a11_em133
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e56
001-58144_a11_em134
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e46
001-58144_a11_em135
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e49
001-58144_a11_em136
ORG
QUASI
Niederer, Kraft and Frey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e83
001-58144_a11_em137
DATETIME
QUASI
6 March 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e77
001-58144_a11_em138
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em139
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e84
001-58144_a11_em140
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e77
001-58144_a11_em141
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em142
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e85
001-58144_a11_em143
DATETIME
QUASI
21 November to 11 December 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e86
001-58144_a11_em144
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e58
001-58144_a11_em145
ORG
NO_MASK
parliamentary commission of inquiry
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em146
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e87
001-58144_a11_em147
ORG
NO_MASK
Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e63
001-58144_a11_em148
DEM
NO_MASK
American
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e1
001-58144_a11_em149
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em150
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e88
001-58144_a11_em151
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Councillor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e89
001-58144_a11_em152
ORG
NO_MASK
Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e63
001-58144_a11_em153
DEM
NO_MASK
American
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e77
001-58144_a11_em154
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e90
001-58144_a11_em155
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e1
001-58144_a11_em156
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em157
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e91
001-58144_a11_em158
DATETIME
NO_MASK
10 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e92
001-58144_a11_em159
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e93
001-58144_a11_em160
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em161
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em162
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e94
001-58144_a11_em163
DATETIME
QUASI
2 November 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e95
001-58144_a11_em164
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em165
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e96
001-58144_a11_em166
DATETIME
QUASI
2 December 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e2
001-58144_a11_em167
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Kopp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em168
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e94
001-58144_a11_em169
DATETIME
QUASI
2 November 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em170
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e1
001-58144_a11_em171
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e97
001-58144_a11_em172
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em173
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em174
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58144_a11_e98
001-58144_a11_em175
MISC
NO_MASK
Genugtuung
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e64
001-58144_a11_em176
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em177
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em178
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em179
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e48
001-58144_a11_em180
ORG
NO_MASK
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e5
001-58144_a11_em181
ORG
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e99
001-58144_a11_em182
ORG
NO_MASK
Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em183
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e66
001-58144_a11_em184
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Y
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e67
001-58144_a11_em185
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Z.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em186
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e58
001-58144_a11_em187
ORG
NO_MASK
parliamentary commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em188
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e64
001-58144_a11_em189
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e64
001-58144_a11_em190
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e94
001-58144_a11_em191
DATETIME
QUASI
2 November 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em192
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e64
001-58144_a11_em193
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e100
001-58144_a11_em194
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e64
001-58144_a11_em195
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e42
001-58144_a11_em196
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Department of Justice and Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58144_a11_e58
001-58144_a11_em197
ORG
NO_MASK
parliamentary commission of inquiry
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e64
001-58144_a11_em198
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e41
001-58144_a11_em199
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e58
001-58144_a11_em200
ORG
NO_MASK
parliamentary commission of inquiry
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58144_a11_e32
001-58144_a11_em201
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Public Prosecutor
Hans W. Kopp
CHE
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Hans W. Kopp