PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 66956/01) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Ingrid Ullrich (“the applicant”), on 12 October 1999.

The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Winkler, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 6 May 2003 the Court decided to communicate the complaint concerning the length of the proceedings. Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.

THE FACTS

In March 1993 welding work was carried out in the applicant’s fashion boutique. On 26 May 1995 the applicant filed an action for damages against the company which had carried out the welding work. She alleged that the welding work had soiled stored clothes and the salesroom of her boutique and had affected her health. The Salzburg Regional Court (Landesgericht), upon her request, had previously granted her legal aid for these proceedings on 4 May 1995.

On 29 August 1995 the Salzburg Regional Court held a first hearing.

On 6 October 1995 it appointed an expert and instructed him to prepare a report. The expert delivered his report on 29 January 1997.

On 2 June 1997 the court held a further hearing. It heard some witnesses and then adjourned the proceedings to hear the expert and further witnesses. On the same day the defendant challenged the expert for bias. The court dismissed this motion on 19 September 1997.

On 17 December 1997 the court held another hearing and heard further witnesses and the expert. It also ordered the parties to submit their extensive questions in writing and, on 3 February 1998, instructed the expert to supplement his opinion.

On 6 July 1998 the expert delivered his supplementary opinion. On 16 November 1998 the court held a hearing and, upon the applicant’s request, decided to appoint a further expert in order to assess the amount of damages. It further requested the applicant to declare whether she still claimed damages for injuries to her health. The proceedings were adjourned in order to appoint the expert and to hear a witness who had not appeared.

In a statement of 14 January 1999 the applicant declared that she maintained her claim for damages as regards injuries to her health.

On 4 March 1999 the court, noting that the applicant had made incorrect statements when declaring her financial situation, withdrew the legal aid granted to her. On 20 April 1999 the Linz Court of Appeal confirmed this decision. Subsequently, on 18 May 1999 the Salzburg Regional Court imposed a fine on the applicant for abuse of process. It further informed the parties that it considered it necessary to decide first whether the claim for damages was well-founded in principle before ordering further expert opinions.

On 2 July 1999 the court dismissed the applicant’s further request for legal aid. On 9 August 1999 the Linz Court of Appeal confirmed this decision.

Meanwhile, on 26 July 1999 the applicant filed an application under Section 91 of the Courts Act (Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz). In particular, she requested that the Regional Court be ordered to hold a further hearing, to question the witness H. and to take a decision. The Regional Court subsequently scheduled a hearing for 10 November 1999. On 17 August 1999 the Linz Court of Appeal dismissed the application. It found that, until the hearing of 17 December 1997, the court had been mainly concerned with obtaining the necessary expert opinions. There were no delays either during this period, or during the following period until the hearing of 16 November 1998. Subsequently, a number of procedural steps were taken by the applicant relating to the withdrawal of legal aid. Having regard to the circumstances of the case, the Regional Court had not been dilatory.

The applicant subsequently challenged the competent judge S. and, in a letter of 15 October 1999, complained that S. had not cancelled the hearing of 10 November 1999. On 15 November 1999 the applicant requested that records prepared in1994 in connection with her legal aid case be rectified.

On 16 December 1999 the Salzburg Regional Court sitting with three judges dismissed the applicant’s challenge as unfounded but found that judge S. was biased according to his own declaration (Befangenheitsanzeige). On 7 March 2000 the Linz Court of Appeal confirmed this decision.

On 28 April and on 30 May 2000, the Salzburg Regional Court, presided over by another judge, held oral hearings. On 31 August 2000, upon the parties’ requests, the court appointed two further experts. On 11 December 2000 both of the experts delivered their reports.

On 9 February 2001 the court, presided over by another judge, held another hearing and heard one expert. During this hearing the applicant’s counsel declared that he would inform the court of the outcome of friendly settlement discussions within four weeks. The court adjourned the proceedings sine die in order to obtain an opinion of another expert.

On 22 March 2001 the applicant requested the court to hear another witness. On 3 April 2001 the applicant’s counsel requested the court not to schedule any hearings because of ongoing friendly settlement discussions. The applicant’s counsel repeated this request on 23 August 2001, 25 September 2001, 17 December 2001, 26 February 2002 and on 17 May 2002. In the meantime, on 31 August 2001, the defendant’s counsel had informed the applicant’s counsel that the defendant did not agree with their proposal for a friendly settlement.

On 5 December 2002 the applicant’s counsel requested the court to hold a further hearing. On 21 January 2003 and on 25 April 2003 the court held further hearings.

On 15 July 2003 the Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s claim. It noted that the applicant’s claim had become time-barred as the applicant had not duly continued the proceedings after friendly settlement negotiations had failed in August 2001.

On 14 October 2003 the Vienna Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal.

On 3 December 2003 the Supreme Court rejected the applicant’s extraordinary appeal.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e1
001-67155_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
66956/01
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-67155_a8_e2
001-67155_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e3
001-67155_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e4
001-67155_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ingrid Ullrich
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e5
001-67155_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e6
001-67155_a8_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e7
001-67155_a8_em7
PERSON
QUASI
H. Winkler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e8
001-67155_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e9
001-67155_a8_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e10
001-67155_a8_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
6 May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e11
001-67155_a8_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
March 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e12
001-67155_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
26 May 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-67155_a8_e13
001-67155_a8_em13
ORG
QUASI
Salzburg Regional Court (Landesgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e14
001-67155_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
4 May 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e15
001-67155_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
29 August 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-67155_a8_e16
001-67155_a8_em16
ORG
QUASI
Salzburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e17
001-67155_a8_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
6 October 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e18
001-67155_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
29 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e19
001-67155_a8_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
2 June 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e20
001-67155_a8_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e21
001-67155_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
17 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e22
001-67155_a8_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
3 February 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e23
001-67155_a8_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
6 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e24
001-67155_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
16 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e25
001-67155_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e26
001-67155_a8_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
4 March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e27
001-67155_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e28
001-67155_a8_em28
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e29
001-67155_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
18 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e16
001-67155_a8_em30
ORG
QUASI
Salzburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e30
001-67155_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
2 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e31
001-67155_a8_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
9 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e28
001-67155_a8_em33
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e32
001-67155_a8_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
26 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e33
001-67155_a8_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e34
001-67155_a8_em36
PERSON
QUASI
H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e33
001-67155_a8_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e35
001-67155_a8_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
10 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e36
001-67155_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
17 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e28
001-67155_a8_em40
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e21
001-67155_a8_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
17 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e24
001-67155_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
16 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e33
001-67155_a8_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e37
001-67155_a8_em44
PERSON
NO_MASK
judge S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e38
001-67155_a8_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
15 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-67155_a8_e37
001-67155_a8_em46
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-67155_a8_em44
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e35
001-67155_a8_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
10 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e39
001-67155_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
16 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e16
001-67155_a8_em49
ORG
QUASI
Salzburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e37
001-67155_a8_em50
PERSON
NO_MASK
judge S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e40
001-67155_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
7 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e28
001-67155_a8_em52
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e41
001-67155_a8_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
28 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e42
001-67155_a8_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e16
001-67155_a8_em55
ORG
QUASI
Salzburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e43
001-67155_a8_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
31 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e44
001-67155_a8_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e45
001-67155_a8_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
9 February 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e46
001-67155_a8_em59
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four weeks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e47
001-67155_a8_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
22 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e48
001-67155_a8_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
3 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e49
001-67155_a8_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
23 August 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e50
001-67155_a8_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
25 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e51
001-67155_a8_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
17 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e52
001-67155_a8_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
26 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e53
001-67155_a8_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
17 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e54
001-67155_a8_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
31 August 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e55
001-67155_a8_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
5 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e56
001-67155_a8_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
21 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e57
001-67155_a8_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
25 April 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e58
001-67155_a8_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e33
001-67155_a8_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e59
001-67155_a8_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
August 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e60
001-67155_a8_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
14 October 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e61
001-67155_a8_em75
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e62
001-67155_a8_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67155_a8_e63
001-67155_a8_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
Ingrid Ullrich
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Ingrid Ullrich