PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 56971/10) against the Swiss Confederation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a national of both Switzerland and Egypt, Mr Saleh El Ghatet (“the first applicant”), and an Egyptian national, Mr Mohamed Saleh El Ghatet (“the second applicant”), on 28 September 2010.

The applicants were represented by Mr T. Hassan, a lawyer practising in Zurich. The Swiss Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr F. Schürmann, of the Federal Office of Justice.

The applicants alleged that the Swiss authorities’ refusal of their request for family reunification constituted a breach of their right to respect for family life as provided in Article 8 of the Convention.

On 18 January 2011 the application was communicated to the Government.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The first applicant was born in 1952 and lives in Hausen (Canton of Aargau). The second applicant, who was born in 1990, is the son of the first applicant. He lives in Egypt.

A. The background to the case

The first applicant entered Switzerland in 1997, where he applied for asylum in the same year. At that time, the second applicant remained in Egypt, where he was cared for by his mother. The first applicant’s asylum application was rejected by the competent authorities.

In March 1999 the first applicant married a Swiss national and obtained a residence permit. In 2000 a daughter was born to the couple.

In 2002 the second applicant visited his father in Switzerland for three months based on a tourist visa valid for that period.

In July 2003 the second applicant re-entered Switzerland for purposes of family reunification with his father.

In February 2004 the first applicant was granted a permanent residence permit. In August 2004 he obtained Swiss nationality and has since held nationality of both Switzerland and Egypt.

After encountering difficulties in school and with his step-mother, the second applicant returned to Egypt in January 2005, where he was cared for by his mother and his paternal grandmother.

In 2006 the first applicant separated from his spouse. The latter continued to live in Switzerland with the couple’s daughter.

B. The proceedings at issue

On 1 March 2006 the first applicant lodged a request for family reunification with the second applicant, who was 15 and a half years old at the time and for whom he had custody according to Egyptian law.

On 15 February 2007 the Migration Office of the Canton of Aargau refused that request.

On 12 March 2007 the applicant lodged an appeal against that decision with the Legal Unit of the Migration Office of the Canton of Aargau.

On 6 June 2007 that authority dismissed the appeal.

On 26 June 2007 the applicant lodged an appeal against that decision with the Court of Appeal in Foreigners’ Law (Rekursgericht im Ausländerrecht) of the Canton of Aargau.

On 7 September 2007 that court granted the applicant’s appeal. In a very detailed decision it noted that the requirements for family reunification under Article 17 § 2 third sentence of the Act on the Residence of Foreign Nationals (Bundesgesetz über Aufenthalt und Niederlassung der Ausländer, ANAG) were not met (see relevant domestic law and practice paragraphs 31‑33 below). Largely basing its reasoning on Article 8 of the Convention, it considered, however, that the applicants’ interests in respect for their family life prevailed over those of the public. It ordered the Migration Office of the Canton of Aargau to arrange for a residence permit for the second applicant.

Subsequently, the Migration Office of the Canton of Aargau declared that it would grant a permanent residence permit to the second applicant for purposes of family reunification and, on 28 January 2008, transferred the file to the Federal Office of Migration to seek the required consent. On 4 March 2008 the latter refused to give its consent, finding that the requirements for family reunification were not met and that the decision of the court of the Canton of Aargau was in contradiction to the case-law of the Federal Supreme Court.

On 4 April 2008 the first applicant lodged an appeal against that decision with the Federal Administrative Court, both in his own name and in that of his son.

On 30 July 2009 the applicants informed the authorities that the situation of the second applicant had changed. His mother had moved to Kuwait with her new spouse and he was now cared for exclusively by his paternal grandmother.

On 2 February 2010 the Federal Administrative Court dismissed the appeal. It noted, first, that the requirements for family reunification under Article 17 § 2 third sentence of the Act on the Residence of Foreign Nationals were not met (see relevant domestic law and practice paragraphs 31-33 below). It found, second, that the applicants could not rely on Article 8 of the Convention, as the second applicant had reached the age of adulthood and was not dependant on the first applicant (see relevant domestic law and practice paragraph 33 below).

On 8 March 2010 the applicants lodged an appeal against that decision with the Federal Supreme Court.

On 5 July 2010 the Federal Supreme Court dismissed that appeal. It considered, in particular, that the relationship between the two applicants was not paramount (“vorrangig”), even though the first applicant had the right of custody for the second applicant according to Egyptian law. It noted that the first applicant had not applied for family reunification immediately after his arrival in Switzerland, that the second applicant was cared for by his mother and his grandmother in Egypt until he turned 18 years, that the second applicant had lived almost all of his life in Egypt and had more important social and personal ties to his country of origin, which would be negatively affected if he moved to Switzerland, and that he had returned to Egypt after having stayed with his father in Switzerland for one and a half years. It observed that the first applicant had, thus, at that time, preferred that the second applicant lived with his mother and that the second applicant would face even more severe challenges to integration now than he had during his first stay in Switzerland, given his age. While noting that the first applicant had a close relationship to his daughter in Switzerland and that he could, thus, not be expected to relocate to Egypt to live there with the second applicant, the court noted that the applicants had not submitted sufficient reasons to justify the second applicant’s reunion with his father in Switzerland.

Moreover, the Federal Supreme Court considered that the circumstances of the present case differed from those of Tuquabo-Tekle and Others v. the Netherlands, no. 60665/00, 1 December 2005. The latter concerned a situation where only one parent, the child’s mother, was still alive. The mother had tried to bring her child to the Netherlands as soon as possible after her arrival. Moreover, the child’s grandmother who cared for her in Ethiopia had taken the child out of school against the mother’s will and planned a forced marriage.

On 7 October 2010 the Court refused to apply Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e1
001-168377_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
56971/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e2
001-168377_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Swiss Confederation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em3
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-168377_a8_e4
001-168377_a8_em4
LOC
QUASI
Egypt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e5
001-168377_a8_em5
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Saleh El Ghatet
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e6
001-168377_a8_em6
DEM
QUASI
Egyptian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e7
001-168377_a8_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Mohamed Saleh El Ghatet
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e8
001-168377_a8_em8
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e9
001-168377_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr T. Hassan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e10
001-168377_a8_em10
LOC
NO_MASK
Zurich
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e11
001-168377_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Swiss Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e12
001-168377_a8_em12
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Schürmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e13
001-168377_a8_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e14
001-168377_a8_em14
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e15
001-168377_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
18 January 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e16
001-168377_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1952
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e17
001-168377_a8_em17
LOC
QUASI
Hausen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e18
001-168377_a8_em18
LOC
QUASI
Canton
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e19
001-168377_a8_em19
LOC
QUASI
Aargau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e20
001-168377_a8_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e4
001-168377_a8_em21
LOC
QUASI
Egypt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em22
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e21
001-168377_a8_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e4
001-168377_a8_em24
LOC
QUASI
Egypt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e22
001-168377_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e14
001-168377_a8_em26
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e23
001-168377_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e24
001-168377_a8_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em29
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e25
001-168377_a8_em30
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e26
001-168377_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
July 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em32
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e27
001-168377_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
February 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e28
001-168377_a8_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
August 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e14
001-168377_a8_em35
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em36
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e4
001-168377_a8_em37
LOC
QUASI
Egypt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e4
001-168377_a8_em38
LOC
QUASI
Egypt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e29
001-168377_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
January 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e30
001-168377_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em41
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e31
001-168377_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
1 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-168377_a8_e32
001-168377_a8_em43
DEM
NO_MASK
15 and a half years old
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e6
001-168377_a8_em44
DEM
QUASI
Egyptian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-168377_a8_e33
001-168377_a8_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
15 February 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e34
001-168377_a8_em46
ORG
QUASI
Migration Office of the Canton
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e19
001-168377_a8_em47
LOC
QUASI
Aargau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e35
001-168377_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e34
001-168377_a8_em49
ORG
QUASI
Migration Office of the Canton
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e19
001-168377_a8_em50
LOC
QUASI
Aargau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e36
001-168377_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
6 June 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e37
001-168377_a8_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
26 June 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-168377_a8_e38
001-168377_a8_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e18
001-168377_a8_em54
LOC
QUASI
Canton
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e19
001-168377_a8_em55
LOC
QUASI
Aargau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e39
001-168377_a8_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
7 September 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e40
001-168377_a8_em57
ORG
QUASI
Migration Office of the Canton of Aargau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e40
001-168377_a8_em58
ORG
QUASI
Migration Office of the Canton of Aargau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e41
001-168377_a8_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
28 January 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e42
001-168377_a8_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Migration
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e43
001-168377_a8_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
4 March 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e18
001-168377_a8_em62
LOC
QUASI
Canton
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e19
001-168377_a8_em63
LOC
QUASI
Aargau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e44
001-168377_a8_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e45
001-168377_a8_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
4 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e46
001-168377_a8_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e47
001-168377_a8_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
30 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-168377_a8_e48
001-168377_a8_em68
LOC
QUASI
Kuwait
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e49
001-168377_a8_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
2 February 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e46
001-168377_a8_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e50
001-168377_a8_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e44
001-168377_a8_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e51
001-168377_a8_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
5 July 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e44
001-168377_a8_em74
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e6
001-168377_a8_em75
DEM
QUASI
Egyptian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em76
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e4
001-168377_a8_em77
LOC
QUASI
Egypt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-168377_a8_e52
001-168377_a8_em78
DEM
NO_MASK
18 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e4
001-168377_a8_em79
LOC
QUASI
Egypt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em80
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e4
001-168377_a8_em81
LOC
QUASI
Egypt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em82
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e53
001-168377_a8_em83
DATETIME
NO_MASK
one and a half years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em84
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em85
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e4
001-168377_a8_em86
LOC
QUASI
Egypt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e3
001-168377_a8_em87
LOC
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e44
001-168377_a8_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-168377_a8_e54
001-168377_a8_em89
MISC
NO_MASK
Tuquabo-Tekle and Others v. the Netherlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e55
001-168377_a8_em90
CODE
NO_MASK
60665/00
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e56
001-168377_a8_em91
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-168377_a8_e57
001-168377_a8_em92
LOC
QUASI
Netherlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e58
001-168377_a8_em93
LOC
QUASI
Ethiopia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-168377_a8_e59
001-168377_a8_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 2010
Saleh El Ghatet
CHE
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Saleh El Ghatet