PROCEDURE

The case originated in three applications (nos. 26289/12, 29062/12 and 29891/12) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three Irish nationals, Mr Gabriel Magee, Mr Colin Francis Duffy and Ms Teresa Magee (“the applicants”), on 1 May 2012, 14 May 2012 and 10 May 2012 respectively.

The first and second applicants were represented by KRW Law-LLP, a firm of solicitors based in Belfast. The third applicant was represented by Mr P. Moriarty of O’Connor and Moriarty Solicitors, a firm practising in Lurgan. The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Addis of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

On 24 September 2012 notice of the applications of the first and second applicant was given to the Government. Notice of the third applicant’s application was given to the Government on 7 November 2012. The applicants and the Government each filed observations on the admissibility and merits of the cases (Rule 59 § 1 of the Rules of Court).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The first applicant was born in 1972 and lives in Craigavon. The second applicant was born in 1967 and lives in Lurgan. The third applicant was born in 1978 and lives in Craigavon.

A. The first and third applicants

On 14 March 2009 the first and third applicants were arrested under section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (“the 2000 Act”) on suspicion of involvement in the murder of a police officer on 9 March 2009. They were detained at Antrim police station on the same day. The first applicant was interviewed twice on 15 March 2009 and once on 16 March 2009; the third applicant was interviewed three times on 15 March 2009 and once on 16 March 2009.

On 16 March 2009 the Director of Public Prosecutions (“DPP”) made applications to the County Court under paragraph 29 of Schedule 8 to the 2000 Act for warrants of further detention in respect of both applicants in order to carry out questioning and to conduct forensic examinations. The first applicant gave evidence on oath in the course of the hearing. Following the hearing, the County Court Judge granted warrants authorising a five-day extension of detention.

Each of the applicants was interviewed on twelve occasions in the following five days.

On 21 March 2009 the DPP made applications to the County Court under paragraph 36 of Schedule 8 to the 2000 Act for seven-day extensions to the periods specified in the warrants of further detention. The extensions were sought in order to facilitate further questioning of the applicants once the results of additional forensic tests were obtained. At separate hearings on 22 March 2009 a police superintendent gave evidence on oath as to the necessity of the extensions, and arguments were heard on behalf of the first and third applicants.

Following the hearings, Her Honour Judge Philpott QC delivered a written judgment in respect of the first applicant and an ex tempore decision in respect of the third applicant. She granted both applications, authorising the first applicant’s continued detention until 7.20 a.m. on 28 March 2009 and the third applicant’s continued detention until 5.52 a.m. on 28 March 2009. In her reasoning, Judge Philpott noted that the relevant forensic evidence was central to the investigation and that the investigation was being carried out diligently and expeditiously.

In the rulings Judge Philpott considered whether the 2000 Act or Article 5 of the Convention gave the court deciding whether or not to grant an extension of detention an express or implied power to examine the lawfulness of the arrest or to grant bail. She concluded that it did not as the 2000 Act only gave the judge the power to decide whether or not an extension of detention was necessary. Consequently, she had to confine herself to the issue of whether or not it was necessary to extend detention beyond forty-eight hours for investigative purposes, and any issue as to the lawfulness of the arrest would have to be determined by the High Court in either habeas corpus or judicial review proceedings.

B. The second applicant

On 14 March 2009 the second applicant was arrested under section 41 of the 2000 Act on suspicion of involvement in the murder of two soldiers at Masserene Barracks, Antrim, on 7 March 2009. He was detained at Antrim Police Station on the same day.

On 15 March 2009 the DPP made an application to the County Court under paragraph 29 of Schedule 8 to the 2000 Act for a warrant extending the second applicant’s detention as the results of a number of forensic tests were pending.

Following a hearing on 16 March 2009 a County Court Judge granted a warrant authorising a five-day extension to his detention.

The second applicant was interviewed on twelve occasions in the following five days. However, neither the interviews nor the results of the forensic tests provided any evidence linking the second applicant to the murders of the two soldiers.

On 21 March 2009 the DPP made an application to the County Court under paragraph 36 of Schedule 8 to the 2000 Act for a seven-day extension to the period specified in the warrant for further detention. The extension was sought as the results of further forensic tests which had been sent for analysis to a laboratory in Great Britain were expected to become available within the following seven days and detention was considered necessary to ensure that further questioning could take place and, if there was sufficient evidence, charges could be brought.

On 21 March 2009 Judge Philpott granted the application, authorising the second applicant’s continued detention until 7.20 on 28 March 2009.

C. Joint proceedings

The applicants sought permission to apply for judicial review of Judge Philpott’s decisions of 21 and 22 March 2009 granting further extensions to the warrants authorising their detention. They submitted, firstly, that Judge Philpott had been wrong to conclude that a court, in deciding whether or not to grant an extension of detention, was precluded from investigating the lawfulness of the arrest; secondly, that the judge had failed to address the question of whether the detention of the applicants was required while the results of the forensic examinations were expected; thirdly, that the judge had failed to give reasons for her decision that detention was required; and, finally, that Schedule 8 of the 2000 Act was incompatible with Article 5 of the Convention.

Permission to apply for judicial review was granted by the High Court of Northern Ireland on 24 March 2009 and the High Court heard the applications on 25 March 2009.

In respect of the applicants’ first submission, the High Court held that paragraphs 5 and 32 of Schedule 8 to the 2000 Act had to be read in conformity with the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention as explained in the jurisprudence of the Court. Thus, the review of the lawfulness of the detention had to embrace an examination of the basis of the arrest, otherwise a person could be detained under the 2000 Act for up to twenty-eight days without there having been any judicial review of the lawfulness of the original arrest and that could not be Convention compliant. The High Court therefore found that Judge Philpott had been wrong to disavow any review of the lawfulness of the applicants’ arrest and, as a consequence, her decision to grant extensions had to be quashed. The court accepted, however, that a review of the lawfulness of the arrest need not involve a detailed analysis of the basis for the decision to arrest and should reflect the constraints that necessarily apply in many arrests for terrorist offences.

With regard to the applicants’ second and third submissions, the High Court found that, although the judge had not focused directly on whether the applicants had to be detained rather than released pending the outcome of the remaining forensic examinations, she had not failed to have regard to the need for detention as the basis for the grant of the warrant. Moreover, although her reasons were pithily stated, they were sufficient to convey to the applicants the basis of her decision.

Consideration of the applicants’ fourth submission, namely the compatibility of Schedule 8 to the 2000 Act with Article 5 of the Convention, was adjourned. In a judgment delivered on 24 February 2011, the High Court of Northern Ireland found no basis for the submission that Schedule 8 was incompatible with Article 5 of the Convention. In particular, the court held that, although there was no doubt that the “competent legal authority” referred to in Article 5 § 1 (c) was the authority having competence to deal with a criminal charge (the magistrate in the United Kingdom), in Schiesser v. Switzerland (4 December 1979, § 29, Series A no. 34) and McKay v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no. 543/03, ECHR 2006‑X) the Court had made it clear that the function of “a judge or other officer” for the purposes of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention could be carried out by an officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power and did not necessarily have to be a person with power to conduct the trial of any eventual criminal charge; that, although there was no express power to order release in the 2000 Act as required by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, such a power must be implied; that, as paragraph 32 of Schedule 8 to the 2000 Act provided that there must be reasonable grounds for believing that the further detention of a person was necessary, it therefore contained a requirement of proportionality; that, there was no provision for conditional release on bail within the statutory scheme, an issue which did not arise in the present case but would need to be addressed in any future case in which it arose; that, although paragraph 33(3) of Schedule 8 enabled a judicial authority to exclude an applicant or anyone representing him from any part of the hearing and paragraph 34 permitted information to be withheld from the applicant or anyone representing him, there were a range of tools available to the court to preserve to the necessary extent an adversarial procedure and equality of arms; and, finally, that there was no authority which supported the applicants’ contention that Article 5 required that a detained person be charged well before the expiry of the twenty‑eight day period contemplated in the 2000 Act.

On 4 April 2011 the High Court of Northern Ireland certified that it was satisfied that the decision given on 24 February 2011 involved the following points of law of general public importance. “a) Whether paragraphs 29(3) and 36(3)(b) of Part III of Schedule 8 to the Terrorism Act 2000 (‘the Act’) permitting extended detention for more than four days are compatible with the Applicant’s rights under Article 5(1)(c), 5(2) and 5(3) of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘the Convention’)

If compliance with Article 5(3) of the Convention can only be achieved by providing for a detainee to be brought before a judicial authority (i) other than the Magistrates’ Court and (ii) without any charges having been preferred against him;

If Articles 5(1)(c) and 5(3) of the Convention are required to be read together as linked provisions and understood as creating a scheme so that the ‘judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power’ referred to in Article 5(3) and ‘the competent legal authority’ referred to in Article 5(1)(c) are one and the same;

If the ‘judicial authority’ provided for in Schedule 8 to the Act is the ‘judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of the Convention;

If Articles 5(1)(c) and 5(3) of the Convention cannot be interpreted in such a way as to permit the detention of a suspect without charge for any period specified by Parliament, subject only to the requirement of periodic judicial approval of the kind specified in Article 8 to the Act. b) Whether the absence of a power to allow for conditional release on bail rendered the scheme for extending detention set out in Part III of Schedule 8 incompatible with Article 5 [of the Convention]; and c) Whether the procedure for granting an extension of detention, in circumstances where the suspect and legal representative have been excluded by the judge for a part of the hearing (as per Schedule 8, para 33(3)) and by reason of same information is made available to the judge but withheld from the suspect and his legal representative, Schedule 8, para 34(1) and (2)(f) is incompatible with the request for an adversarial hearing as required by Article 5 in light of Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (FC) and Anor [2010] 2 AC 269.”

However, the High Court refused leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Permission to appeal was refused by the Supreme Court on 14 November 2011 on the basis that the applications did not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.

D. The applicants’ release from detention

The applicants were released without charge on 25 March 2009. The first and third applicants were not subsequently charged with any offence related to the murder of the police officer.

The second applicant was immediately rearrested and interviewed over the following two days. On 27 March 2009 he was charged with the murder of the two soldiers, five attempted murders and possession of a firearm and ammunition. He was produced before a District Judge sitting at Larne Magistrates’ Court on 27 March 2009. His application for bail was refused. Following a hearing which took place on 6 and 23 November 2009, bail was refused by the High Court on the ground that there was a real risk of reoffending on account of his suspected involvement with a dissident republican organisation. The High Court again declined to grant bail on 8 October 2010.

On 7 November 2011 the second applicant stood trial before a judge sitting without a jury. On 20 January 2012 he was acquitted on all counts of the indictment.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e1
001-154399_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
26289/12
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e2
001-154399_a11_em2
CODE
QUASI
29062/12
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e3
001-154399_a11_em3
CODE
QUASI
29891/12
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e4
001-154399_a11_em4
ORG
NO_MASK
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e5
001-154399_a11_em5
DEM
QUASI
Irish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e6
001-154399_a11_em6
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Gabriel Magee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e7
001-154399_a11_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Colin Francis Duffy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e8
001-154399_a11_em8
PERSON
QUASI
Ms Teresa Magee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e9
001-154399_a11_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
1 May 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e10
001-154399_a11_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
14 May 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e11
001-154399_a11_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
10 May 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e12
001-154399_a11_em12
ORG
QUASI
KRW Law-LLP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e13
001-154399_a11_em13
LOC
QUASI
Belfast
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e14
001-154399_a11_em14
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. Moriarty of O’Connor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e15
001-154399_a11_em15
ORG
QUASI
Moriarty Solicitors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e16
001-154399_a11_em16
LOC
NO_MASK
Lurgan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e4
001-154399_a11_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
001-154399_a11_em4
United Kingdom Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e4
001-154399_a11_em18
ORG
NO_MASK
001-154399_a11_em4
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e17
001-154399_a11_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Ms M. Addis
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e18
001-154399_a11_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e19
001-154399_a11_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e4
001-154399_a11_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e4
001-154399_a11_em23
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e20
001-154399_a11_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e4
001-154399_a11_em25
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e21
001-154399_a11_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
1972
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e22
001-154399_a11_em27
LOC
QUASI
Craigavon
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e23
001-154399_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
1967
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e16
001-154399_a11_em29
LOC
NO_MASK
Lurgan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e24
001-154399_a11_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e22
001-154399_a11_em31
LOC
QUASI
Craigavon
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e25
001-154399_a11_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
14 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em33
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e27
001-154399_a11_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e28
001-154399_a11_em35
LOC
QUASI
Antrim police station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e29
001-154399_a11_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e30
001-154399_a11_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e29
001-154399_a11_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e30
001-154399_a11_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e30
001-154399_a11_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e31
001-154399_a11_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
001-154399_a11_em42
Director of Public Prosecutions
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e31
001-154399_a11_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
DPP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e32
001-154399_a11_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
County Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em44
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e32
001-154399_a11_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
County Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e33
001-154399_a11_em46
DATETIME
NO_MASK
five-day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e34
001-154399_a11_em47
DATETIME
NO_MASK
following five days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e35
001-154399_a11_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e31
001-154399_a11_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
DPP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e32
001-154399_a11_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
County Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em51
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e36
001-154399_a11_em52
DATETIME
NO_MASK
seven-day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e37
001-154399_a11_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
22 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e38
001-154399_a11_em54
PERSON
QUASI
Philpott
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e39
001-154399_a11_em55
DATETIME
NO_MASK
7.20 a.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e40
001-154399_a11_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e41
001-154399_a11_em57
DATETIME
NO_MASK
5.52 a.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e40
001-154399_a11_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e38
001-154399_a11_em59
PERSON
QUASI
Philpott
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e38
001-154399_a11_em60
PERSON
QUASI
Philpott
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em61
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em62
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e42
001-154399_a11_em63
DATETIME
NO_MASK
forty-eight hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e43
001-154399_a11_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e25
001-154399_a11_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
14 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em66
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e44
001-154399_a11_em67
LOC
QUASI
Masserene Barracks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e45
001-154399_a11_em68
LOC
QUASI
Antrim
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e46
001-154399_a11_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
7 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e47
001-154399_a11_em70
ORG
QUASI
Antrim Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e29
001-154399_a11_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e31
001-154399_a11_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
DPP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e32
001-154399_a11_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
County Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em74
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e30
001-154399_a11_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e32
001-154399_a11_em76
ORG
NO_MASK
County Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e33
001-154399_a11_em77
DATETIME
NO_MASK
five-day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e34
001-154399_a11_em78
DATETIME
NO_MASK
following five days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e35
001-154399_a11_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e31
001-154399_a11_em80
ORG
NO_MASK
DPP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e32
001-154399_a11_em81
ORG
NO_MASK
County Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em82
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e36
001-154399_a11_em83
DATETIME
NO_MASK
seven-day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e48
001-154399_a11_em84
LOC
QUASI
Great Britain
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e49
001-154399_a11_em85
DATETIME
NO_MASK
following seven days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e35
001-154399_a11_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e38
001-154399_a11_em87
PERSON
QUASI
Philpott
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e40
001-154399_a11_em88
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e38
001-154399_a11_em89
PERSON
QUASI
Philpott
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e37
001-154399_a11_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
22 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e38
001-154399_a11_em91
PERSON
QUASI
Philpott
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em92
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e50
001-154399_a11_em93
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court of Northern Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e51
001-154399_a11_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
24 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e43
001-154399_a11_em95
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e52
001-154399_a11_em96
DATETIME
QUASI
25 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e43
001-154399_a11_em97
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em98
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em99
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e43
001-154399_a11_em100
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e38
001-154399_a11_em101
PERSON
QUASI
Philpott
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e43
001-154399_a11_em102
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em103
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e53
001-154399_a11_em104
DATETIME
QUASI
24 February 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e50
001-154399_a11_em105
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court of Northern Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e54
001-154399_a11_em106
LOC
NO_MASK
United Kingdom
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e55
001-154399_a11_em107
MISC
NO_MASK
Schiesser v. Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e56
001-154399_a11_em108
DATETIME
NO_MASK
4 December 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e57
001-154399_a11_em109
MISC
NO_MASK
McKay v. the United Kingdom
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e58
001-154399_a11_em110
CODE
NO_MASK
543/03
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em111
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em112
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e59
001-154399_a11_em113
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twenty‑eight day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e26
001-154399_a11_em114
MISC
NO_MASK
2000 Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e60
001-154399_a11_em115
DATETIME
QUASI
4 April 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e50
001-154399_a11_em116
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court of Northern Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e53
001-154399_a11_em117
DATETIME
QUASI
24 February 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e61
001-154399_a11_em118
DATETIME
NO_MASK
more than four days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e62
001-154399_a11_em119
ORG
NO_MASK
Parliament
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e63
001-154399_a11_em120
ORG
NO_MASK
Home Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e64
001-154399_a11_em121
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e43
001-154399_a11_em122
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e65
001-154399_a11_em123
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e65
001-154399_a11_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e66
001-154399_a11_em125
DATETIME
QUASI
14 November 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e52
001-154399_a11_em126
DATETIME
QUASI
25 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e67
001-154399_a11_em127
DATETIME
NO_MASK
following two days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e68
001-154399_a11_em128
DATETIME
QUASI
27 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e69
001-154399_a11_em129
MISC
QUASI
murder of the two soldiers, five attempted murders and possession of a firearm and ammunition
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-154399_a11_e70
001-154399_a11_em130
ORG
NO_MASK
Larne Magistrates’ Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e68
001-154399_a11_em131
DATETIME
QUASI
27 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e71
001-154399_a11_em132
DATETIME
QUASI
23 November 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e43
001-154399_a11_em133
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
POLITICS
insert
001-154399_a11_e72
001-154399_a11_em134
DEM
QUASI
dissident republican organisation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e43
001-154399_a11_em135
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e73
001-154399_a11_em136
DATETIME
QUASI
8 October 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e74
001-154399_a11_em137
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-154399_a11_e75
001-154399_a11_em138
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 2012
Gabriel Magee
GBR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Gabriel Magee