PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 30049/06) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Krzysztof Cynarski (“the applicant”), on 12 July 2006.

The Polish Government were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that his pre-trial detention had exceeded a “reasonable time” within the meaning of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.

On 10 October 2007 the President of the Fourth Section decided to communicate the complaint concerning the length of the applicant’s pre‑trial detention to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3 of the Convention).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1976 and lives in Warsaw.

On 12 November 2003 the applicant was arrested by the police.

On 14 November 2003 the Warsaw District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) decided to place the applicant in pre-trial detention in view of the reasonable suspicion that he had stolen four Jaguar cars as a member of an organised criminal gang. The applicant appealed against this decision.

On 15 January 2004 the Warsaw Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) dismissed his appeal.

The applicant’s pre-trial detention was prolonged on 4 February, 16 April and 28 September 2004. The court relied on the reasonable suspicion against the applicant and on the severity of the penalty that might be imposed, making it probable that the applicant would obstruct the proceedings and attempt to put pressure on witnesses.

The applicant appealed against all those decisions and applied to be released from detention, but to no avail.

On 26 July and 27 October 2005 the Warsaw District Court further prolonged the applicant’s detention on remand, giving identical reasons for its decisions as on previous occasions.

As the length of the applicant’s detention had reached the statutory time-limit of two years laid down in Article 263 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Kodeks postępowania karnego) the District Court made several applications to the Warsaw Court of Appeal for the applicant’s detention to be prolonged beyond that term. On 8 November 2005 and 10 March 2006 the Court of Appeal granted the application. The court justified its decisions with reference to the reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offences and the complexity of the case, which concerned an organised criminal gang. The court also held that the measure was justified by the severity of the sentence to which the applicant was liable. On both occasions, however, the court decided to prolong the applicant’s detention for a period shorter than had been requested by the trial court and instructed it to intensify its efforts to finish the trial, given that the most severe preventive measure had been applied to the applicant for a lengthy period.

On 9 June 2006 the Warsaw Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant’s detention until 11 November 2006, reiterating the grounds given previously.

On 26 October 2006 the Warsaw District Court decided to release the applicant from detention and to place him under the supervision of the police. The court considered that it could not be excluded that the applicant would be sentenced to a prison term amounting to the period he had already spent in detention on remand. The court also found that police supervision would secure the proper course of the proceedings. On the same day the applicant was released from detention.

In 2006 the trial court held 18 hearings. On 31 January 2007 it gave a judgment. The applicant was convicted of membership of an organised criminal gang involved in stealing cars and of having stolen three Jaguars. He was sentenced to four years and six months’ imprisonment.

The applicant lodged an appeal against the judgment. On 19 March 2008 the Warsaw Regional Court quashed the impugned judgment and remitted the case.

The proceedings are still pending before the trial court.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e1
001-89275_a6_em1
CODE
DIRECT
30049/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-89275_a6_e2
001-89275_a6_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e2
001-89275_a6_em3
DEM
QUASI
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e3
001-89275_a6_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Krzysztof Cynarski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e4
001-89275_a6_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
12 July 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-89275_a6_e2
001-89275_a6_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
001-89275_a6_em2
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e5
001-89275_a6_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e6
001-89275_a6_em8
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e7
001-89275_a6_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e8
001-89275_a6_em10
LOC
QUASI
Warsaw
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e9
001-89275_a6_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
12 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e10
001-89275_a6_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
14 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e11
001-89275_a6_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-89275_a6_e11
001-89275_a6_em14
ORG
NO_MASK
001-89275_a6_em13
Sąd Rejonowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-89275_a6_e12
001-89275_a6_em15
MISC
QUASI
Jaguar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e13
001-89275_a6_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e14
001-89275_a6_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-89275_a6_e14
001-89275_a6_em18
ORG
NO_MASK
001-89275_a6_em17
Sąd Okręgowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-89275_a6_e15
001-89275_a6_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
4 February, 16 April and 28 September 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-89275_a6_e16
001-89275_a6_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
26 July and 27 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e11
001-89275_a6_em21
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e11
001-89275_a6_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
001-89275_a6_em21
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e17
001-89275_a6_em23
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e18
001-89275_a6_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e19
001-89275_a6_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
10 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e20
001-89275_a6_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
9 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e17
001-89275_a6_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e21
001-89275_a6_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
11 November 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e22
001-89275_a6_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
26 October 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e11
001-89275_a6_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e23
001-89275_a6_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-89275_a6_e24
001-89275_a6_em32
QUANTITY
QUASI
18
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e25
001-89275_a6_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-89275_a6_e26
001-89275_a6_em34
MISC
QUASI
Jaguars
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e27
001-89275_a6_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-89275_a6_e14
001-89275_a6_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw Regional Court
Krzysztof Cynarski
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Krzysztof Cynarski