PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 80442/12) against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a French national, Ms Cécile Lecomte (“the applicant”), on 9 December 2012.

The applicant was represented by Ms U. Donat, a lawyer practising in Hamburg. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by two of their Agents, Mr H.-J. Behrens and Mrs K. Behr, of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that the conditions of her detention for preventive purposes in two police stations had violated Article 3 of the Convention.

On 12 May 2014 the application was communicated to the Government.

The Government of the French Republic, having been informed of their right to intervene in the proceedings (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court), indicated that they did not wish to exercise that right.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1981 and lives in Lüneburg.

A. The applicant’s arrest, the order for her detention, its termination and the conditions of its execution

The applicant is an anti-nuclear and environmental activist. She has repeatedly used her climbing skills to draw public attention to her protest.

1. The applicant’s arrest

On 6 November 2008 around 11 a.m. the applicant and three further persons belonging to the Robin Wood organisation, an environmental protection group, climbed on the arch of a railway bridge. The group fixed banners expressing protest against the transport, by train, of radioactive waste from La Hague, France, to the interim storage facility in Gorleben, scheduled from 7 to 9 November 2008. The members of the group refused to have themselves roped down by the police, who had dissolved their assembly. They were finally roped down by Federal Police’s mountain rescue team. The police then arrested only the applicant at 2.40 p.m. while the other three participants remained at liberty. They further seized the banners and the climbing equipment.

2. The detention order against the applicant

On 6 November 2008 at 5.30 p.m. the Lüneburg District Court, having heard the applicant and the Lüneburg police, ordered the applicant’s detention for preventive purposes under section 18 § 1 no. 2 of the Lower Saxony Public Security and Order Act (Niedersächsisches Gesetz über die öffentliche Sicherheit und Ordnung, see paragraph 42 below). That detention was to last until the arrival of the “castor”0 containers in Dannenberg train station and until 10 November 2008, 0.00 p.m. at the most.

The District Court found that the applicant, who had been represented by counsel throughout the proceedings before the domestic courts, and three further persons had let themselves down on a rope on a railway bridge. They had unrolled banners protesting against the castor transport. A commuter train had to be stopped because its passage would have put the protesters at risk.

The District Court considered that the applicant’s detention was indispensable in order to prevent the imminent commission of a regulatory offence of considerable importance to the general public, as required by section 18 § 1 no. 2 of the Lower Saxony Public Security and Order Act. There was a risk that the applicant would block the forthcoming transport of the castor containers scheduled from 7 to 9 November 2011 by a climbing action. Thereby, she would commit regulatory offences under the Railway Construction and Operation Act (Eisenbahn-Bau- und Betriebsordnung) and the Assembly Act (Versammlungsgesetz) which would be dangerous to the public. That risk was also imminent in the applicant’s case as she was known for expressing political protest, including protest against the transport of castor containers, by climbing actions and for being ready to breach the law in that context.

On 7 November 2008 at 9.15 p.m. the Lüneburg Regional Court, having heard the applicant in person at 2.10 p.m., dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the District Court’s decision.

3. The termination of the applicant’s detention

On 9 November 2008 at 5.25 p.m. the Lüneburg District Court quashed the order of 6 November 2008 for the applicant’s detention for preventive purposes and ordered the applicant’s immediate release.

The District Court found that, having regard to the applicant’s deteriorating state of health, there was no longer a risk that the applicant would commit a criminal or regulatory offence of considerable importance to the general public, as required by section 18 § 1 no. 2 of the Lower Saxony Public Security and Order Act, in the context of the transport of castor containers to Gorleben. Moreover, her continued detention was no longer proportionate in these circumstances. The District Court noted that medical doctor C., who had visited the applicant in detention on the latter’s request, had confirmed that the applicant suffered from serious rheumatism which necessitated her to move continuously and was in a poor mental condition. Her detention in Braunschweig Police Station, with little possibility to move, had already led to her joints having stiffened. The doctor had explained that she was not in a position to assess the applicant’s fitness for detention, but that it appeared excluded that the applicant would be capable of carrying out a climbing action in the days to come.

The applicant was released on the same day at 6.32 p.m.

4. The places and conditions of the applicant’s detention

Following her arrest on 6 November 2008 at 2.40 p.m. the applicant, having been found by a doctor of the Federal Police not to suffer from any health problems, was brought before the Lüneburg District Court which ordered her detention at 5.30 p.m. Following the District Court’s decision, the applicant was accompanied home by the police officers from 5.45 p.m. to 6.45 p.m. in order to enable her to take her own clothes and medication. She was detained in a cell in the Lüneburg Police Station from 7 p.m. onwards until 7 November 2008 at approximately 1.40 p.m., when she was brought to the Lüneburg Regional Court. The applicant’s small cell, equipped with a mattress and a chair, was lighted at least via a ventilation slot and by electric light.

Between the end of the hearing of the applicant by the Lüneburg Regional Court on 7 November 2008 at around 3 p.m. and its decision at 9.15 p.m. on that day, the applicant essentially stayed in the office area of the Lüneburg Police Station. She went outside for a walk on the banks of the Ilmenau river with the police officers three times during that period.

Following the Regional Court’s decision, the police decided to transfer the applicant to the Braunschweig Police Station which was considered being better equipped for police custody. When the applicant complained about breathing problems during the journey, the police called an ambulance. When both the ambulance crew and a police doctor had found that the applicant did not suffer from health problems, the transfer was continued in the ambulance.

The applicant was detained in the Braunschweig Police Station from 8 November 2008, 2.10 a.m. until her release on 9 November 2008 at 6.32 p.m. Her cell was equipped with a bed, an empty desk, a chair and an open cupboard and had a barred window with frosted glass. In the corridor of the detention wing, which she had to pass to go to the toilet, photographs of shackled persons were exposed. These included a picture of a person subject to ankle and hand cuffs, with both cuffs being tied together by a chain in the person’s back lying on a mattress on the ground.

During the applicant’s detention in the Braunschweig Police Station, the light in her cell remained switched on throughout the applicant’s first night in that cell. The applicant had climbed on the cupboard in her cell and passed the night thereon, failing to comply with the police’s order to descend. The applicant was taken out for a walk on the premises of the Braunschweig Police Station, which did not dispose of a closed courtyard, on 8 November 2008 from 2.20 p.m. until 3.02 p.m., being loosely shackled to a female police officer. On 9 November 2008 the applicant was allowed to stay outside on those premises from 12.22 p.m. until 12.35 p.m., without being shackled; she climbed on a tree on that occasion. The applicant was supplied with writing material on 8 November 2008. She was further allowed to receive three visits from a friend and two from her doctor C. She was also allowed to telephone her lawyer and her partner several times.

B. The proceedings for review of the lawfulness of the applicant’s detention and of the conditions thereof

1. The proceedings before the Lüneburg District Court

On 15 July 2009 the Lüneburg District Court dismissed the applicant’s action of 8 November 2008 under section 19 § 2 of the Lower Saxony Public Security and Order Act (see paragraph 43 below) against the Lüneburg police for a finding that both the order for her detention and the conditions of its execution had been unlawful.

As regards the lawfulness of the applicant’s detention the District Court, endorsing the findings of fact made by the Regional Court in its decision of 7 November 2008 (see paragraph 12 above) as well as its reasoning, confirmed that the detention had complied with section 18 § 1 no. 2 of the Lower Saxony Public Security and Order Act.

As regards the execution of the detention order against the applicant, the District Court considered that the manner in which the detention had been enforced had been lawful and had complied, in particular, with the provisions of the Police Custody Regulations (Polizeigewahrsamsordnung, see paragraph 45-49 below).

The District Court noted that the detention order was executed in the detention wing of the Lüneburg Police Station until 7 November 2008 and subsequently in the detention wing of the Braunschweig Police Station.

As to the applicant’s complaint that her detention cells did not have windows, but only ventilation slots, the District Court considered that the equipment of the detention cells had complied with no. 15 of the Police Custody Regulations (see paragraph 49 below) and that there had been enough light. The recommendations of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) were irrelevant here. The photographs of shackled persons exposed in the detention wing of the Braunschweig Police Station may have been tasteless, but did not render the applicant’s detention unlawful as a result of intimidation.

Moreover, there had not been a breach of the right to sufficient night’s rest provided by no. 12 of the Police Custody Regulations (see paragraph 48 below). In Lüneburg, some noise made by a ventilator may have made it more difficult for the applicant to fall asleep, but the police was not obliged to be considerate of individual sensitivities. The fact that the light had remained switched on all night in Braunschweig had been a consequence of the applicant’s own behaviour. She had insisted spending the night on the cell’s cupboard the height of which was 1.90 metres. The light had therefore been necessary for her own protection. It had not been possible for the police to guarantee that, in case the applicant had fallen down from the cupboard, they would notice it immediately otherwise. According to the District Court, the applicant could ask herself whether she would have preferred having been shackled for her protection instead.

Furthermore, the court noted that on 8 November 2008 the applicant had been outside on the premises of the Braunschweig Police Station from 2.20 p.m. until 3.02 p.m. She had to be shackled as, being an excellent climber, there had been a risk that she would climb on trees or buildings and abscond. The applicant had not, therefore, been “taken for a walk like an animal” on the parking. On 9 November 2008 the applicant had been outside from 12.22 p.m. until 12.35 p.m. She had not been shackled and had been allowed to climb on a tree. She had not objected to returning to the detention wing afterwards.

The District Court further considered that the applicant had failed to substantiate that her state of health in detention had deteriorated in a manner so as to render her detention disproportionate already prior to the District Court’s decision of 9 November 2008 ordering her release. There had not been a written and impartial medical report proving the applicant’s allegation in that respect. The doctor who had visited the applicant in detention and had persuaded the then competent District Court judge to order her release had probably been a sympathiser.

2. The proceedings before the Lüneburg Regional Court

On 28 October 2009 the Lüneburg Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the District Court’s decision of 15 July 2009.

As to the legality of the applicant’s detention, the Regional Court, endorsing the findings in its decision of 7 November 2008, confirmed that the applicant’s detention as such had complied with section 18 § 1 no. 2 of the Lower Saxony Public Security and Order Act.

The Regional Court further confirmed that the conditions of the applicant’s detention, albeit onerous for the applicant, had complied with the applicable legal provisions and had not been so unacceptable as to render the execution of her detention unlawful.

As regards the applicant’s detention during the first night in the detention cell in the Lüneburg Police Station, the Regional Court found that the cell had been uncomfortable, but had complied with no. 15.1 of the Police Custody Regulations in the version then in force (see paragraph 49 below). In that police station there were no detention cells suitable for a deprivation of liberty lasting several days. Despite this, the police had convincingly explained that transporting the applicant to and back from Braunschweig for the hearing before the Regional Court the following day would have restricted her even more in her liberty of movement. Furthermore, she had not complained to the police about the noise at night emanating from a ventilator.

Moreover, the Lüneburg police had taken care of the applicant’s well-being after her hearing before the Regional Court (on 7 November 2008 from 2.10 p.m. until 2.50 p.m.) while they waited for the Regional Court’s decision until approximately 9 p.m. with the applicant in an office in the Lüneburg Police Station in that they had taken her outside three times.

As regards the applicant’s subsequent detention in the Braunschweig Police Station, the Regional Court noted that the applicant arrived at that station on 8 November 2008 at 2.10 a.m. after the crew of the ambulance called by the police and a police doctor had confirmed her fitness for detention despite the breathing difficulties she had informed the police of. The Regional Court further confirmed the District Court’s finding that the pictures of shackled persons in the corridor of the detention wing – which included a photograph of a person subject to ankle and hand cuffs – may have been tasteless. However, it had neither been shown that the pictures had been put up to intimidate prisoners nor that the applicant had been intimidated in a considerable manner by them. Moreover, the court considered that it had been lawful for the police to leave the light switched on during the night. It noted that the applicant had climbed on a cupboard measuring 1.90 metres and had failed to descend on the police’s request. By choosing not to descend her by force and by leaving the light on instead the police had respected as much as possible the applicant’s right to liberty.

As regards the applicant’s right to stays outside during her detention in Braunschweig, the Regional Court, endorsing the findings of the District Court in this respect, found that the right provided by no. 10 of the Police Custody Regulations (see paragraph 46 below) to be allowed to stay outside for 45 minutes per day in so far as the staffing and infrastructural situation permitted had not been breached. Shackling the applicant to a female police officer on 8 November 2008 had been necessary in order to prevent the applicant from absconding. The applicant, an excellent climber, had previously shown that she was not ready to comply with the police’s orders and there had not been a closed courtyard as in prison. On 9 November 2008 the applicant had not been shackled during her time outside and had been allowed to climb on a tree. She had also been able to move within her cell in order to alleviate ailments resulting from her rheumatism.

As regards the applicant’s right to receive visits in detention, the Regional Court observed that under no. 11 of the Police Custody Regulations (see paragraph 47 below), such visits were permitted in so far as they did not endanger the purpose of the detention and were authorised by the police. The said provision had to be read in conjunction with section 20 § 4 of the Lower Saxony Public Security and Order Act (see paragraph 44 below). The Regional Court noted that the Braunschweig Police had received some 200 telephone calls of sympathisers of the applicant, some of whom had insulted the police, which had considerably disturbed the execution of the applicant’s detention. It had not been unlawful in these circumstances for the police not to permit visits by persons who had presented themselves at the police station without having lodged a request for a visit. In any event, the applicant had been visited by three persons while in detention, in addition to the two visits by her doctor, C., who had prescribed her necessary medication and had brought a couple of magazines. Her right to receive visits had not been unlawfully restricted in these circumstances.

The Regional Court’s decision was served on the applicant’s counsel on 6 November 2009.

3. The proceedings before the Federal Constitutional Court

By submissions dated 1 December 2009 the applicant, represented by counsel, lodged a constitutional complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court against the decision of the Lüneburg District Court of 6 November 2008, confirmed on appeal by the Lüneburg Regional Court on 7 November 2008, and against the decision of the Lüneburg District Court of 15 July 2009, confirmed on appeal by the Lüneburg Regional Court on 28 October 2009. She argued, in particular, that her right to liberty, the principle of proportionality and her right to freedom of assembly and of expression had been violated by her long illegal detention in unreasonable conditions in order to prevent insignificant regulatory offences. Her complaint was registered under file no. 2 BvR 2794/09.

In a letter dated 18 August 2010 addressed to the applicant in person, the Federal Constitutional Court informed the applicant that her constitutional complaint of 1 December 2009 against the decisions of the Lüneburg District Court of 15 July 2009, confirmed on appeal by the Lüneburg Regional Court on 28 October 2009, in so far as the decisions concerned the conditions of her detention, had been registered under file no. 2 BvR 1779/10.

On 24 August 2010 the Federal Constitutional Court declined to consider the applicant’s constitutional complaint against the above‑mentioned four decisions in so far as these decisions concerned the lawfulness of the applicant’s detention, without giving reasons (file no. 2 BvR 2794/09). The Federal Constitutional Court’s decision was served on the applicant’s counsel on 21 September 2010. In her letter to the Federal Constitutional Court dated 3 October 2010 the applicant’s counsel, referring to the two file numbers assigned to the applicant’s constitutional complaint, the letter of 18 August 2010 and the decision of 24 August 2010, asked for a progress report; she was informed that it was not possible to indicate when a decision on the complaint under file no. 2 BvR 1779/10 would be taken.

On 30 May 2012 the Federal Constitutional Court declined to consider the applicant’s constitutional complaint against the decision of the Lüneburg District Court dated 15 July 2009, confirmed on appeal by the Lüneburg Regional Court on 28 October 2009, without giving reasons (file no. 2 BvR 1779/10). The decision was served on the applicant’s counsel on 18 June 2012.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e1
001-157530_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
80442/12
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-157530_a11_e2
001-157530_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e3
001-157530_a11_em3
DEM
QUASI
French
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e4
001-157530_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Cécile Lecomte
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e5
001-157530_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
9 December 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e6
001-157530_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Ms U. Donat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e7
001-157530_a11_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Hamburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e8
001-157530_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
German Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e9
001-157530_a11_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H.-J. Behrens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e10
001-157530_a11_em10
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs K. Behr
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e11
001-157530_a11_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e12
001-157530_a11_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
12 May 2014
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e13
001-157530_a11_em13
ORG
QUASI
French Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e14
001-157530_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e15
001-157530_a11_em15
LOC
QUASI
Lüneburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e16
001-157530_a11_em16
DEM
QUASI
anti-nuclear and environmental activist
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e17
001-157530_a11_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e18
001-157530_a11_em18
DATETIME
NO_MASK
11 a.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e19
001-157530_a11_em19
ORG
QUASI
Robin Wood organisation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e20
001-157530_a11_em20
LOC
QUASI
La Hague, France
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e21
001-157530_a11_em21
LOC
QUASI
Gorleben
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e22
001-157530_a11_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
7 to 9 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e23
001-157530_a11_em23
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e24
001-157530_a11_em24
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.40 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e17
001-157530_a11_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e25
001-157530_a11_em26
DATETIME
NO_MASK
5.30 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em27
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e15
001-157530_a11_em28
LOC
QUASI
Lüneburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e27
001-157530_a11_em29
ORG
QUASI
Lower Saxony Public Security
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e27
001-157530_a11_em30
ORG
QUASI
001-157530_a11_em29
Niedersächsisches Gesetz über die öffentliche Sicherheit und Ordnung
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e28
001-157530_a11_em31
LOC
QUASI
Dannenberg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e29
001-157530_a11_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
10 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e30
001-157530_a11_em33
DATETIME
NO_MASK
0.00 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em35
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e27
001-157530_a11_em36
ORG
QUASI
Lower Saxony Public Security
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e31
001-157530_a11_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
7 to 9 November 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e32
001-157530_a11_em38
ORG
QUASI
Railway Construction and Operation Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e32
001-157530_a11_em39
ORG
QUASI
001-157530_a11_em38
Eisenbahn-Bau- und Betriebsordnung
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e33
001-157530_a11_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e34
001-157530_a11_em41
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9.15 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e35
001-157530_a11_em42
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e36
001-157530_a11_em43
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.10 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em44
ORG
QUASI
001-157530_a11_em27
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e37
001-157530_a11_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e38
001-157530_a11_em46
DATETIME
NO_MASK
5.25 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em47
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e17
001-157530_a11_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em49
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e27
001-157530_a11_em50
ORG
QUASI
Lower Saxony Public Security
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-157530_a11_e21
001-157530_a11_em51
LOC
QUASI
Gorleben
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em52
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e39
001-157530_a11_em53
PERSON
NO_MASK
C.
HEALTH
insert
001-157530_a11_e40
001-157530_a11_em54
DEM
QUASI
rheumatism
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e41
001-157530_a11_em55
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e42
001-157530_a11_em56
DATETIME
NO_MASK
days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e43
001-157530_a11_em57
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6.32 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e17
001-157530_a11_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e24
001-157530_a11_em59
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.40 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e23
001-157530_a11_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em61
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e25
001-157530_a11_em62
DATETIME
NO_MASK
5.30 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em63
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e44
001-157530_a11_em64
DATETIME
NO_MASK
5.45 p.m. to 6.45 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e45
001-157530_a11_em65
LOC
QUASI
Lüneburg Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e46
001-157530_a11_em66
DATETIME
NO_MASK
7 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e33
001-157530_a11_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e47
001-157530_a11_em68
DATETIME
NO_MASK
approximately 1.40 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e35
001-157530_a11_em69
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e35
001-157530_a11_em70
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e33
001-157530_a11_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e48
001-157530_a11_em72
DATETIME
NO_MASK
around 3 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e34
001-157530_a11_em73
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9.15 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e49
001-157530_a11_em74
DATETIME
NO_MASK
that day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e45
001-157530_a11_em75
LOC
QUASI
Lüneburg Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-157530_a11_e50
001-157530_a11_em76
LOC
QUASI
Ilmenau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e41
001-157530_a11_em78
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e41
001-157530_a11_em79
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e52
001-157530_a11_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e53
001-157530_a11_em81
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.10 a.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e37
001-157530_a11_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e43
001-157530_a11_em83
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6.32 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e41
001-157530_a11_em84
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e41
001-157530_a11_em85
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e52
001-157530_a11_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e54
001-157530_a11_em87
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.20 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e55
001-157530_a11_em88
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3.02 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e37
001-157530_a11_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e56
001-157530_a11_em90
DATETIME
NO_MASK
12.22 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e57
001-157530_a11_em91
DATETIME
NO_MASK
12.35 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e52
001-157530_a11_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e39
001-157530_a11_em93
PERSON
NO_MASK
C.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em94
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e58
001-157530_a11_em95
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em96
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e52
001-157530_a11_em97
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e15
001-157530_a11_em98
LOC
QUASI
Lüneburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em99
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em100
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e33
001-157530_a11_em101
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e27
001-157530_a11_em102
ORG
QUASI
Lower Saxony Public Security
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em103
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em104
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e45
001-157530_a11_em105
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e33
001-157530_a11_em106
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e41
001-157530_a11_em107
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em108
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e59
001-157530_a11_em109
ORG
NO_MASK
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e59
001-157530_a11_em110
ORG
NO_MASK
001-157530_a11_em109
CPT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e41
001-157530_a11_em111
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e15
001-157530_a11_em112
LOC
QUASI
Lüneburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e60
001-157530_a11_em113
DATETIME
NO_MASK
all night
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e61
001-157530_a11_em114
LOC
QUASI
Braunschweig
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e62
001-157530_a11_em115
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
1.90 metres
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em116
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e52
001-157530_a11_em117
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e41
001-157530_a11_em118
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e54
001-157530_a11_em119
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.20 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e55
001-157530_a11_em120
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3.02 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e37
001-157530_a11_em121
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e56
001-157530_a11_em122
DATETIME
NO_MASK
12.22 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e57
001-157530_a11_em123
DATETIME
NO_MASK
12.35 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em124
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em125
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e37
001-157530_a11_em126
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em127
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e35
001-157530_a11_em128
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e63
001-157530_a11_em129
DATETIME
QUASI
28 October 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e35
001-157530_a11_em130
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em131
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e58
001-157530_a11_em132
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em133
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e33
001-157530_a11_em134
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e27
001-157530_a11_em135
ORG
QUASI
Lower Saxony Public Security
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em136
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e64
001-157530_a11_em137
DATETIME
NO_MASK
first night
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e45
001-157530_a11_em138
LOC
QUASI
Lüneburg Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em139
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e61
001-157530_a11_em140
LOC
QUASI
Braunschweig
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em141
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e65
001-157530_a11_em142
DATETIME
NO_MASK
following day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e15
001-157530_a11_em143
LOC
QUASI
Lüneburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em144
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e33
001-157530_a11_em145
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e36
001-157530_a11_em146
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.10 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e66
001-157530_a11_em147
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.50 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em148
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e67
001-157530_a11_em149
DATETIME
NO_MASK
approximately 9 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e45
001-157530_a11_em150
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e41
001-157530_a11_em151
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police Station
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em152
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e52
001-157530_a11_em153
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e53
001-157530_a11_em154
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.10 a.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em155
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em156
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e62
001-157530_a11_em157
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
1.90 metres
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e61
001-157530_a11_em158
LOC
QUASI
Braunschweig
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em159
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em160
ORG
QUASI
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e68
001-157530_a11_em161
DATETIME
NO_MASK
45 minutes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e52
001-157530_a11_em162
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e37
001-157530_a11_em163
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2008
HEALTH
check
001-157530_a11_e40
001-157530_a11_em164
DEM
QUASI
rheumatism
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em165
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e27
001-157530_a11_em166
ORG
QUASI
Lower Saxony Public Security
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em167
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e69
001-157530_a11_em168
ORG
QUASI
Braunschweig Police
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e39
001-157530_a11_em169
PERSON
NO_MASK
C.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e51
001-157530_a11_em170
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e70
001-157530_a11_em171
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e71
001-157530_a11_em172
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e72
001-157530_a11_em173
DATETIME
QUASI
1 December 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e71
001-157530_a11_em174
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em175
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e17
001-157530_a11_em176
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e35
001-157530_a11_em177
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e33
001-157530_a11_em178
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em179
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e58
001-157530_a11_em180
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e35
001-157530_a11_em181
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e63
001-157530_a11_em182
DATETIME
QUASI
28 October 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e73
001-157530_a11_em183
CODE
DIRECT
2794/09
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e74
001-157530_a11_em184
DATETIME
QUASI
18 August 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e71
001-157530_a11_em185
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e72
001-157530_a11_em186
DATETIME
QUASI
1 December 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em187
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e58
001-157530_a11_em188
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e35
001-157530_a11_em189
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e63
001-157530_a11_em190
DATETIME
QUASI
28 October 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e75
001-157530_a11_em191
CODE
DIRECT
1779/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e76
001-157530_a11_em192
DATETIME
QUASI
24 August 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e71
001-157530_a11_em193
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e73
001-157530_a11_em194
CODE
DIRECT
2794/09
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-157530_a11_e71
001-157530_a11_em195
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e77
001-157530_a11_em196
DATETIME
QUASI
21 September 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e71
001-157530_a11_em197
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e78
001-157530_a11_em198
DATETIME
QUASI
3 October 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e74
001-157530_a11_em199
DATETIME
QUASI
18 August 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e76
001-157530_a11_em200
DATETIME
QUASI
24 August 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e75
001-157530_a11_em201
CODE
DIRECT
1779/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e79
001-157530_a11_em202
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e71
001-157530_a11_em203
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e26
001-157530_a11_em204
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e58
001-157530_a11_em205
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e35
001-157530_a11_em206
ORG
QUASI
Lüneburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e63
001-157530_a11_em207
DATETIME
QUASI
28 October 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e75
001-157530_a11_em208
CODE
DIRECT
1779/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-157530_a11_e80
001-157530_a11_em209
DATETIME
QUASI
18 June 2012
Cécile Lecomte
DEU
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Cécile Lecomte