PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 71665/01) against the French Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a French national, Ms Gisèle Augusto (“the applicant”), on 31 August 2000.

The applicant was represented by Mr A. Lyon-Caen, a lawyer practising in Paris. The French Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R. Abraham, then by his successor, Ms E. Belliard, Director of Legal Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 18 November 2004 the Court decided to communicate the application to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1936 and lives in Vouziers.

By a decision of 17 May 1996 the occupational counselling and redeployment board (“the COTOREP”) gave the applicant a 50 to 79% disability rating and issued her with a card certifying that she found it difficult to remain in a standing position.

On 6 August 1996, the regional health insurance fund (“the CRAM”) for the North-East region rejected the applicant’s request for a retirement pension as of 1 June 1996 on the basis of her incapacity to work, on the ground that she was not at least 50% disabled.

On 13 December 1996 the disability claims tribunal upheld the CRAM’s decision.

The applicant appealed to the national tribunal for claims relating to disability and level of insurance coverage for accidents at work (“the CNITAAT”), submitting a number of medical certificates attesting to her state of health and relying on the COTOREP’s decision of 17 May 1996.

In a decision of 24 November 1997, the CNITAAT upheld the decision of the disability claims tribunal, stating the following reasons: “The rate of disability comprised between 50% and 79% acknowledged for the purposes of issuing the card certifying that it is “difficult to remain in a standing position” is not calculated using the same assessment criteria as the rate applicable in the present case, so this ground of appeal cannot be upheld; The accredited doctor of the national tribunal for claims relating to disability and level of insurance coverage for accidents at work observes the following: ‘The subject shows signs of preexisting injuries: fracture of the 4th sacral vertebra in 1965, fracture of the left kneecap that was pinned and wired in 1990, fracture of the lower right tibia in 1994. No after-effects in the region of the sacrum are mentioned. The left knee is slightly limited in flexion and shows mild gonarthrosis, and there is lateral calcification of the patella. No after-effects in the left ankle are reported. There is arthrosis of the whole spinal column, with degenerative discopathy at L5‑S1. It is mild arthrosis, not unusual at the subject’s age, with only a slight loss of flexibility of the different segments of the spine. Episodic onsets of sciatica and cervico‑brachial neuralgia are reported in the case history. There are no signs of herniated lumbar disk . There is calcifying periarthritis of the left shoulder, but it does not restrict movement. The same applies to the arthrosis at the base of the right thumb.’ He concludes that: ‘On 1 June 1996 the subject was in a fit state to carry on working without seriously jeopardising her health and, considering her physical and mental fitness for work, did not suffer from a permanent incapacity to work of at least 50%’; In the light of the above medical opinion, the documents in the file and the criteria laid down in Articles L. 351-7 and R. 351‑21 of the Social Security Code, the national tribunal for claims relating to disability and level of insurance coverage for accidents at work decides to uphold the impugned decision ...”

The applicant lodged a notice of appeal on points of law on 27 May 1998. In further pleadings her lawyer filed with the Court of Cassation on 23 October 1998, she invoked, inter alia, a violation of “the requirements of the rights of the defence” and of “equality of arms in a fair trial within the meaning of Article 6” of the Convention, in that the report by the CNITAAT’s accredited doctor, drawn up solely on the basis of documents, had not been made available to her or to the doctor she had appointed to submit observations.

By a judgment of 2 March 2000 the Employment and Welfare Division of the Court of Cassation dismissed the applicant’s appeal in the following terms: “... on the one hand, the accredited doctor instructed, under the terms of Article R. 143‑28 of the Social Security Code then in force, to carry out a preliminary review of the case, simply gives an opinion to the national disability tribunal without submitting an expert report for adversarial discussion by the parties; Without laying itself open to the objection raised in the ground of appeal, the national disability tribunal, in the light of the findings of its accredited doctor and having analysed the different evidence adduced, considered, as it was within its exclusive jurisdiction to do, that Ms Augusto’s disability rate – the COTOREP evaluation of which was not binding on it – was less than 50%, and that the applicant was therefore not entitled to a retirement pension on the ground of incapacity to work; For these reasons, the appeal ... is dismissed.”
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e1
001-78943_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
71665/01
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e2
001-78943_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
French Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e3
001-78943_a11_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
French
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e4
001-78943_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Gisèle Augusto
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e5
001-78943_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
31 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e6
001-78943_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Lyon-Caen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e7
001-78943_a11_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Paris
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e2
001-78943_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-78943_a11_em2
French Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e8
001-78943_a11_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Abraham
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e9
001-78943_a11_em10
PERSON
QUASI
Ms E. Belliard
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e10
001-78943_a11_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
18 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e11
001-78943_a11_em12
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1936
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e12
001-78943_a11_em13
LOC
QUASI
Vouziers
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e13
001-78943_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
17 May 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e14
001-78943_a11_em15
ORG
QUASI
occupational counselling and redeployment board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e14
001-78943_a11_em16
ORG
QUASI
001-78943_a11_em15
COTOREP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e15
001-78943_a11_em17
QUANTITY
QUASI
50 to 79%
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e16
001-78943_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
6 August 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e17
001-78943_a11_em19
ORG
QUASI
regional health insurance fund
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e17
001-78943_a11_em20
ORG
QUASI
001-78943_a11_em19
CRAM
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e18
001-78943_a11_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
1 June 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e19
001-78943_a11_em22
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
50%
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e20
001-78943_a11_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
13 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e17
001-78943_a11_em24
ORG
QUASI
CRAM
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e21
001-78943_a11_em25
ORG
QUASI
national tribunal for claims relating to disability and level of insurance coverage for accidents at work
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e21
001-78943_a11_em26
ORG
QUASI
001-78943_a11_em25
CNITAAT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e14
001-78943_a11_em27
ORG
QUASI
COTOREP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e13
001-78943_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
17 May 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e22
001-78943_a11_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e21
001-78943_a11_em30
ORG
QUASI
CNITAAT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e23
001-78943_a11_em31
QUANTITY
QUASI
50% and 79%
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e21
001-78943_a11_em32
ORG
QUASI
national tribunal for claims relating to disability and level of insurance coverage for accidents at work
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e24
001-78943_a11_em33
DEM
QUASI
fracture of the 4th sacral vertebra
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e25
001-78943_a11_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
1965
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e26
001-78943_a11_em35
DEM
QUASI
fracture of the left kneecap
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e27
001-78943_a11_em36
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1990
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e28
001-78943_a11_em37
DEM
QUASI
fracture of the lower right tibia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e29
001-78943_a11_em38
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1994
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e30
001-78943_a11_em39
DEM
QUASI
gonarthrosis
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e31
001-78943_a11_em40
DEM
QUASI
lateral calcification of the patella
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e32
001-78943_a11_em41
DEM
QUASI
arthrosis
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e33
001-78943_a11_em42
DEM
QUASI
degenerative discopathy
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e34
001-78943_a11_em43
DEM
QUASI
L5‑S1
HEALTH
check
001-78943_a11_e32
001-78943_a11_em44
DEM
QUASI
arthrosis
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e35
001-78943_a11_em45
DEM
QUASI
sciatica
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e36
001-78943_a11_em46
DEM
QUASI
cervico‑brachial neuralgia
HEALTH
insert
001-78943_a11_e37
001-78943_a11_em47
DEM
QUASI
calcifying periarthritis
HEALTH
check
001-78943_a11_e32
001-78943_a11_em48
DEM
QUASI
arthrosis
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e18
001-78943_a11_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
1 June 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e19
001-78943_a11_em50
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
50%
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e38
001-78943_a11_em51
MISC
NO_MASK
Social Security Code
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-78943_a11_e21
001-78943_a11_em52
ORG
QUASI
national tribunal for claims relating to disability and level of insurance coverage for accidents at work
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e39
001-78943_a11_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
27 May 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e40
001-78943_a11_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e41
001-78943_a11_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
23 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e21
001-78943_a11_em56
ORG
QUASI
CNITAAT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e42
001-78943_a11_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e43
001-78943_a11_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Employment and Welfare Division of the Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e21
001-78943_a11_em59
ORG
QUASI
001-78943_a11_em25
national disability tribunal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78943_a11_e4
001-78943_a11_em60
PERSON
DIRECT
001-78943_a11_em4
Ms Augusto
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e14
001-78943_a11_em61
ORG
QUASI
COTOREP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78943_a11_e44
001-78943_a11_em62
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
less than 50%
Gisèle Augusto
FRA
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Gisèle Augusto