PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 58757/00) against the Swiss Confederation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Swiss national, Mr Andreas Jäggi (“the applicant”), on 27 June 2000.

The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Mr B. Mégevand, a lawyer practising in Geneva. The Swiss Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr P. Boillat, former Deputy Director of the Federal Office of Justice in charge of the Human Rights and Council of Europe Section.

On 26 October 2004 the President of the Third Section decided to communicate to the Government the complaints concerning the right to respect for private life. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it was decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

The applicant was born in 1939 and lives in Geneva.

On 14 July 1939, before the applicant’s birth, the State-appointed guardian brought an action against A.H., the applicant’s putative biological father, seeking a declaration of paternity and payment of a contribution towards his maintenance. A.H. admitted that he had had sexual relations with the applicant’s mother but denied paternity.

On 26 July 1939, after the applicant’s birth, his mother declared on registering the birth that the father was A.H., with whom she had had sexual relations during the period of conception.

On 30 January 1948 the Geneva Court of First Instance dismissed the action for a declaration of paternity. In the absence of an appeal, the judgment became final.

In 1958 the applicant, who had been placed with a foster family, met his mother, who informed him that his father was A.H. According to the applicant, he had regular contact with his father and received presents from him and a monthly payment of 10 Swiss francs ((CHF) – 6.40 euros (EUR)) until he reached the age of majority. A.H. and his family denied those allegations. Only A.H.’s legitimate son admitted that he had received a telephone call from the applicant after A.H.’s death.

Furthermore, A.H. always refused to undergo tests to establish his paternity. In 1976, shortly after his death, a blood-type analysis carried out at the applicant’s request did not rule out his being the latter’s father.

In 1997 the applicant contacted the Geneva University Institute of Forensic Medicine to have a private paternity test carried out, but his request was refused.

On 3 December 1997 the applicant successfully applied to renew the lease for A.H.’s tomb until 2016 for the sum of CHF 2,600 (EUR 1,657).

On 6 May 1999 the applicant applied to the Canton of Geneva Court of First Instance for revision of the judgment of 30 January 1948. In the course of the proceedings he also requested a DNA test on the mortal remains of A.H.

On 25 June 1999 the Court of First Instance refused the request for a DNA test.

On 2 September 1999 the Canton of Geneva Court of Justice rejected the applicant’s application on the ground that it was impossible to obtain a declaration of paternity without also amending the register of births, deaths and marriages.

The Court of Justice argued that the applicant was not entitled to such an amendment of the register as a result of the 1976 revision of the Civil Code abolishing the exceptio plurium constupratorum, a defence which the putative biological father could use in a paternity suit. However, in his application to the Court of First Instance the applicant had sought revision of the 1948 judgment, in which the exceptio plurium had been relied on to the benefit of A.H.

The Court of Justice noted that before 1978 (when the revised Civil Code had come into force), an illegitimate child who was under ten years of age on 1 January 1978 had had the option of converting a maintenance claim into a civil action (paternity suit) where the exceptio plurium had been raised. However, this was no longer permitted under the revised Civil Code.

The Court of Justice accordingly held that, even supposing that the applicant had been awarded maintenance in 1948, he was no longer entitled to have the register of births, deaths and marriages amended, firstly because the law had changed, and secondly because he had been born more than ten years before the end of the transition period between the old and new laws.

His request for evidence to be taken by means of a DNA test was therefore refused.

On 22 December 1999 the Federal Court adopted a judgment, served on 18 May 2000, in which it rejected the applicant’s application on the following grounds: “The right to know one’s parentage cannot be absolute in scope but must be weighed against the interests relating to protection of the personal freedom of others – in the instant case, the right of the deceased, deriving from human dignity, to protect his remains from interferences contrary to morality and custom, and the right of the close relatives to respect for the deceased and the inviolability of his corpse. ... The right to know one’s parents is generally linked to the right to be raised by them. The applicant, who is 60 years old, has been able to develop his personality and pursue a large portion of his existence without suffering any medically attested damage to his physical or mental health as a result of his uncertainty as to his parentage, despite the vicissitudes of his childhood and adolescence. On the other hand, while the reasons of family devotion opposing the exhumation of the mortal remains of the late [A.H.] are understandable, the respondents have not advanced any religious or philosophical grounds in support of their position; in particular, they have not argued that they would have renewed the lease on their relative’s tomb had the applicant not done so. However, in weighing up the conflicting interests, the refusal of the application for an expert examination may be upheld since, in the absence of any consequences of a civil-law nature, the applicant has not established that he has suffered sufficiently serious damage to his psychological well-being, as protected by the right to personal freedom, to justify the evidentiary measure requested. The measure appears excessive in view of the principle of proportionality, having regard to the applicant’s particular circumstances, from which it cannot be concluded that his personality or mental stability might be seriously threatened by the uncertainty that may still persist as regards his parentage, in spite of all the information in his possession suggesting that [A.H.] very probably is his father. The Court of Justice was therefore entitled to restrict the applicant’s personal freedom by taking into consideration that of the respondents, in view of the lack of public interest in having this parental tie established and the disproportionate nature of the steps required to establish it.”

Lastly, the Federal Court observed that there were no consequences of a civil-law nature that could justify implementing the measure sought.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e1
001-76412_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
58757/00
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e2
001-76412_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Swiss Confederation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e3
001-76412_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e4
001-76412_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Andreas Jäggi
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e5
001-76412_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
27 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e6
001-76412_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr B. Mégevand
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e7
001-76412_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Geneva
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e8
001-76412_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Swiss Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e9
001-76412_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. Boillat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e10
001-76412_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e11
001-76412_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Human Rights and Council of Europe Section
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e12
001-76412_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
26 October 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e13
001-76412_a8_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1939
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-76412_a8_e7
001-76412_a8_em14
LOC
QUASI
Geneva
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e14
001-76412_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1939
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em16
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em17
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e16
001-76412_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
26 July 1939
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em19
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e17
001-76412_a8_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 1948
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e18
001-76412_a8_em21
ORG
QUASI
Geneva Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e19
001-76412_a8_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
1958
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em23
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76412_a8_e20
001-76412_a8_em24
QUANTITY
QUASI
10 Swiss francs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76412_a8_e21
001-76412_a8_em25
QUANTITY
QUASI
6.40 euros (EUR)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em26
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em27
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em28
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em29
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e22
001-76412_a8_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e23
001-76412_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e24
001-76412_a8_em32
ORG
QUASI
Geneva University Institute of Forensic Medicine
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e25
001-76412_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em34
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e26
001-76412_a8_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
2016
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76412_a8_e27
001-76412_a8_em36
QUANTITY
QUASI
CHF 2,600
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76412_a8_e28
001-76412_a8_em37
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 1,657
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e29
001-76412_a8_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
6 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e30
001-76412_a8_em39
ORG
QUASI
Canton of Geneva Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e17
001-76412_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 1948
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em41
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e31
001-76412_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
25 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e32
001-76412_a8_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76412_a8_e33
001-76412_a8_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
2 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e34
001-76412_a8_em45
ORG
QUASI
Canton of Geneva Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e35
001-76412_a8_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e22
001-76412_a8_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
1976
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76412_a8_e32
001-76412_a8_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e36
001-76412_a8_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
1948
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em50
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e35
001-76412_a8_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e37
001-76412_a8_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76412_a8_e38
001-76412_a8_em53
DEM
NO_MASK
ten years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76412_a8_e39
001-76412_a8_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
1 January 1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e35
001-76412_a8_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e36
001-76412_a8_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
1948
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76412_a8_e38
001-76412_a8_em57
DATETIME
NO_MASK
ten years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e40
001-76412_a8_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
22 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e41
001-76412_a8_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e42
001-76412_a8_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
18 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-76412_a8_e43
001-76412_a8_em61
DEM
NO_MASK
60 years old
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em62
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e15
001-76412_a8_em63
PERSON
QUASI
A.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e35
001-76412_a8_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76412_a8_e41
001-76412_a8_em65
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
Andreas Jäggi
CHE
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Andreas Jäggi