PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission“) and by the Government of the Swiss Confederation (“the Government“) on 10 July and 28 August 1995 respectively, within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 para. 1 and Article 47 of the Convention (art. 32-1, art. 47). It originated in an application (no. 17748/91) against Switzerland lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by a Swiss national, Mr Guy Ankerl, on 10 December 1990. The Commission’s request referred to Articles 44 and 48 (art. 44, art. 48) and to the declaration whereby Switzerland recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46) (art. 46); the Government’s application referred to Articles 32, 45, 47 and 48 (art. 32, art. 45, art. 47, art. 48). The object of the request and of the application was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention (art. 6-1).

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3(d) of Rules of Court A, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings. The President gave him leave to present his own case to the Court (Rule 30).

The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Mr L. Wildhaber, the elected judge of Swiss nationality (Article 43 of the Convention) (art. 43), and Mr R. Bernhardt, the Vice-President of the Court (Rule 21 para. 4 (b)). On 13 July 1995, in the presence of the Registrar, the President of the Court, Mr R. Ryssdal, drew by lot the names of the other seven members, namely Mr F. Gölcüklü, Mr F. Matscher, Mr B. Walsh, Mr S.K. Martens, Mr J.M. Morenilla, Sir John Freeland and Mr P. Kuris (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 5) (art. 43). Subsequently Mr I. Foighel and Mr B. Repik, substitute judges, replaced Mr Martens, who had resigned, and Mr Walsh, who was unable to take part in the further consideration of the case (Rules 22 para. 1 and 24 para. 1).

As President of the Chamber (Rule 21 para. 6), Mr Bernhardt, acting through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the Government, the applicant and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 37 para. 1 and 38). Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the registry received the applicant’s and the Government’s memorials on 22 and 24 November 1995 respectively. On 14 December 1995 the Secretary to the Commission indicated that the Delegate did not wish to reply in writing.

On 27 February 1996 the Commission produced the file on the proceedings before it, as requested by the Registrar on the President’s instructions.

On 6 March 1996 the Registrar asked the applicant and the Government to supply certain documents by 5 April 1996. The applicant replied in a letter of 18 March that with one exception, of which he enclosed a copy, he was not able to produce them. The Government informed the Registrar on 3 April 1996 that it was “not possible to accede to [the] request“, but they nevertheless sent him a number of documents on 9 and 13 May 1996.

In accordance with the President’s decision, the hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 20 May 1996. The Court had held a preparatory meeting beforehand. There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Mr P. Boillat, Head of the European Law and International Affairs Section, Federal Office of Justice, Agent, Mr A.D. Schmidt, former judge in the Canton of Geneva, Mr F. Schürmann, Deputy Head of the European Law and International Affairs Section, Federal Office of Justice, Counsel; (b) for the Commission Mr F. Martínez, Delegate; (c) the applicant. The Court heard addresses by Mr Martínez, the applicant himself, Mr Schürmann and Mr Boillat.

On 28 May 1996 the President of the Chamber received a letter from Mr Ankerl in which the latter protested against the fact that the documents filed out of time by the Government had nonetheless been placed in the case file. On the President’s instructions, the Registrar sent a copy of Mr Ankerl’s letter to the Government and to the Commission. On 24 September 1996 the Court removed the documents in question from the file (Rule 37 para. 1).

AS TO THE FACTS

I. The circumstances of the case

In 1978 Mr Guy Ankerl and his wife moved into a flat on the second floor of no. 3, rue Saint-Léger, Geneva. He subleased the flat from a property-management company, Régie Immobilière SA (“Régie Immobilière“), itself the tenant of a property company, SI Chrysanthemum SA (“Chrysanthemum“), the owner of the building.

A. Background

In the autumn of 1985 Mr Ruffieux became Chrysanthemum’s main shareholder.

On 14 November 1986 the property-management company Régie Naef SA (“Naef“), which managed the building in which the flat in issue was located, informed the applicant that renovation and building work was going to be carried out on the block.

In a letter of 8 May 1987 Naef gave Régie Immobilière - which was in liquidation - notice to quit the flat with effect from 29 February 1988, the date of expiry of the lease, and requested them to terminate the subtenancy agreement with Mr Ankerl.

It would appear that Régie Immobilière asked Naef to collect the rent direct from Mr Ankerl. On 14 July 1987 Naef allegedly sent Mr Ankerl receipts relating to the payment of rent from April to July of that year and - what is denied by the applicant - specified that in collecting the sums in question they were not recognising the existence of any direct legal relationship between Mr Ankerl and Chrysanthemum.

In a registered letter of 21 July 1987 Régie Immobilière informed Mr Ankerl that they were terminating the subtenancy agreement with effect from its expiry. The applicant then applied to the Rents and Leases Conciliation Board for an extension of the agreement. No settlement having been reached, he applied to the Rents and Leases Tribunal but subsequently withdrew the application.

From February 1988 onwards the management of the block was taken over by the GPR Degenève SA agency (“GPR Degenève“). The latter notified the applicant of their bank account number. In an unanswered letter of 29 February 1988 Mr Ankerl confirmed to the agency that he would in future pay the rent into that account. He maintains that he did so each month from March 1988 to August 1991, taking care to write “rent“ on the payment advice slips, without meeting any objection.

On 22 April 1988 the applicant and his wife had an interview - the terms of which are disputed – with Mr Linder, the director of GPR Degenève (see paragraph 18 below).

B. Proceedings in the Canton of Geneva Court of First Instance

On 15 November 1988 Chrysanthemum brought an action for possession in the Canton of Geneva Court of First Instance, alleging that the applicant was occupying the premises unlawfully since his subtenancy agreement had been terminated. Mr Ankerl argued that the court had no jurisdiction ratione materiae, maintaining that he had an orally agreed lease from the plaintiff. The court thus had to determine whether the conduct of the protagonists amounted to an agreement to enter into a lease after the termination of the subtenancy.

The court held a hearing on 19 May 1989. It heard Mr Linder (GPR Degenève), Mr Veuillet (Naef) and Mrs Ankerl; Mr Ruffieux (Chrysanthemum) and the applicant also gave evidence. Only the first two were heard as witnesses on oath. The transcript of the testimony reads as follows: “...

Mr Jean-Gabriel Linder ... When I resumed [the management of the building in March 1988], Mr Ankerl was occupying the premises but he had no written or oral lease or even a tacit one. It is true that I had an interview with Mr Ankerl on my own initiative ... I wanted to know what Mr Ankerl’s position was. I made it clear to him that in my view he did not have a lease. Mr Ankerl said that he very much wished to remain in the flat on sentimental grounds, having, so he said, written a book there. He may have told me that he had earlier supposedly been granted an oral lease, but I cannot state that with certainty. At all events, Mr Ankerl did not ask me to have a lease drawn up for him. At the end of the interview Mr Ankerl suggested to me that he pay a higher rent in order to be able to stay in the flat. I suppose that implies that he was asking to be given a lease. I told the defendant that I would pass on his request to the landlord. I told him clearly, both at the beginning and at the end of the interview, that I could not take a decision myself. I consequently informed the landlord of the conversation I have just described. He told me that he did not wish to proceed in the matter and he did not give me the reasons. I did not myself communicate the shareholder’s position to Mr Ankerl but, on the other hand, I did send the file to our lawyer, who must have informed him of the shareholder’s position. My office staff must, it would seem, have communicated our account number to Mr Ankerl when we took over from Naef. ... I heard about an agreement that had earlier been made between Naef and Mr Ankerl to the effect that Mr Ankerl should pay the rent direct to Naef.

Mr Dominique Veuillet ... I have worked for Naef since 1 March 1983. ... We knew that Mr Ankerl was in de facto occupation of the premises ... ... In 1986 or 1987 Mr Ankerl came to see me and told me that his position vis-à-vis Régie Immobilière was a rather special one. I cannot remember now the exact reasons. The defendant asked that we should draw up a lease in his name. At the same time Régie Immobilière had asked us to collect the rent direct from Mr Ankerl ... I myself handed the file over to another property-management company on 31 December 1987, and at that time, as far as we were concerned, Mr Ankerl’s position remained as we had described in our letter of 14 July 1987 ... It is true that on 14 November 1986 we had informed Mr Ankerl about the proposed works in the building. That was because we could not ignore his presence in the building. ...

Mrs Méryl Ankerl ... I was present at the interview with Mr Linder in April 1988. Mr Linder asked us what our intentions were regarding this flat and we told him that we wanted to stay in it. He then explained to us that the building was going to be made higher and asked whether the works would not inconvenience us. We replied that the works might perhaps inconvenience us but that we would put up with it since we wanted to stay. Mr Linder added that at all events the process would be a long one, because the architect’s plans had not been approved by the Public Works Department. He also told us that during the building work we could occupy another flat in the block and that after the work was completed we could occupy a newly built flat at the top of the house. Or else we could move back into our second-floor flat. When we left, Mr Linder told us that he would keep us informed. When we came out we were really reassured and optimistic. Mr Linder never asked us to look for a flat elsewhere and he did not indicate that we had to leave within a given time. I cannot remember if Mr Linder said that he was going to consult the landlord. I myself had the impression that he had some freedom of action. Mr Ruffieux: I have myself been the director of the plaintiffs since October 1985. I have never set eyes on Mr Ankerl until today. I once replied to a letter he had sent me asking for an interview and I told him that his case was being dealt with by Naef’s legal department. ... It is true that I told Mr Linder that I refused to give Mr Ankerl a lease. We had never accepted that Mr Ankerl had a tenancy and I did not wish us to agree to it. I knew from the beginning that Mr Ankerl was occupying the premises. He is up to date with the rent. I would not have been opposed to a settlement at the outset but relations with Mr Ankerl have become difficult. I have already allowed Mr Ankerl four years. Mr Ankerl: When I concluded the lease with Régie Immobilière, I did not realise that it was a subtenancy. I had consulted a lawyer before signing it. Mr Ruffieux says today that it is not easy to get on with me, but he said before that he wanted us out because he wanted to renovate his building.“

On 12 October 1989 the court held that there was no lease agreement between the parties and ordered Mr Ankerl to move all property and persons from the flat and restore it to the plaintiffs in good condition. The judgment reads as follows: “... Mr Veuillet, an employee of [Naef], told the Court that the tenant, Régie Immobilière, had asked Naef to collect the rent direct from Mr Ankerl. This arrangement was accepted, the payments being received as an indemnity for unlawful occupation, as appears from a letter of 14 July 1987 ... On 20 January 1988 the new management, the GPR Degenève SA agency, wrote to Régie Immobilière SA, asking that in future the company should pay the indemnity for Mr Ankerl’s unlawful occupation to their own office. Mr Linder, an employee of the new management, told the Court that he had had an interview with Mr Ankerl and had made it clear to him that in his view Mr Ankerl did not have a lease. Mr Ankerl, he said, implicitly requested that a lease should be drawn up, to which Mr Linder said he had replied that it was not for him to decide. Mr Ruffieux, the director and shareholder of the plaintiffs, told the Court that he had never agreed, and did not wish to agree, to enter into a lease with the defendant. However, ... Mr Ankerl had been supplied personally with GPR Degenève’s account number and wrote to that company on 29 February 1988 to inform them that in future he would pay the rent into their account ... That letter does not appear to have been answered, except that, three months later, the lawyer instructed by the landlord wrote to enquire when Mr Ankerl would be leaving. The defendant’s wife - who was present at her husband’s interview with Mr Linder – recalled from that interview that the property-management company had been contemplating offering them another flat in the building for the duration of the works, and that when they had left Mr Linder, the couple had had every reason to be reassured, seeing that they were not being asked to leave the premises. ... In law the only issue which it is necessary to resolve is whether the defendant, since his sublease was terminated, has been given a lease by the landlord. A lease may be entered into orally, although it is to be noted that property-management companies customarily draw up a written agreement. In the instant case no lease has been signed since the termination of the sublease. None of the documents produced discloses any agreement by the plaintiffs to enter into a lease. It remains to be determined whether, by not immediately or clearly replying to the defendant’s letter of 29 February 1988 or by allowing an employee of the property-management company to tell the defendant that he was going to refer back to the landlord, the plaintiffs may – under the doctrine of good faith – have agreed to enter into a lease. The Court reaches the conclusion that, in the circumstances of this case, no lease was entered into orally (the existence of an oral agreement has not been proved) or even implied by the clear conduct of the parties. While it is true that the defendant wishes to remain in the flat, it is not even apparent from the evidence that he has clearly asked for a lease to be drawn up. Despite the unambiguous letters from the plaintiffs, the defendant did not take the trouble to reply in writing. He therefore could not truly suppose – in good faith – that the plaintiffs were implicitly granting him a lease. He had all the less reason to assume a tacit agreement of this kind as, since the termination of the head lease, and accordingly of the sublease, proceedings had been pending for an extension of the lease, during which the landlord had clearly denied being contractually bound to the defendant or wishing to be. Consequently, there is no lease between the parties. ... it must be held that the defendant is on the premises unlawfully. Article 641 para. 2 [of the Civil Code] applies in this case ...“

C. Proceedings in the Canton of Geneva Court of Justice

In a judgment of 7 June 1990 the Canton of Geneva Court of Justice dismissed an appeal by Mr Ankerl on the following grounds: “The Court cannot but agree with the court below that there was no contractual relationship between the landlord, Chrysanthemum SA, and Guy Ankerl. It is bold to argue that the existence of a lease is evidenced by the conduct of the landlord or of the landlord’s representatives, who, on the contrary, always emphasised their determination not to enter into a lease with Guy Ankerl for flat at no. 3, rue Saint-Léger, second floor. The fact of having handed over rent receipts accompanied by the letter of 14 July 1987 or of not having replied to the appellant’s letter of 29 February 1988 cannot be construed as meaning that a lease was in existence. It follows, in the absence of any lease, that the Court of First Instance had jurisdiction ratione materiae. ... According to this Court’s case-law, a landlord is entitled to raise his ownership against a subtenant and to rely on Article 641 para. 2 [of the Civil Code], in the absence of any legal relationship between the parties ... The sublease is a lease between the tenant and the subtenant ... Having been given notice for 28 February 1988, Guy Ankerl, from that date, no longer has any right to remain on the premises. ...“

D. Proceedings in the Federal Court

The applicant lodged a public-law appeal with the Federal Court against the Court of Justice’s judgment. In his pleading he relied, in particular, on Articles 6 and 14 of the Convention (art. 6, art. 14) and argued: “... the fact that [the cantonal courts] allowed the representative of a party to be heard as a witness on oath created a flagrant inequality vis-à-vis the other party, who by the force of circumstance was not able to call witnesses to whom the oath could be administered. The equality of arms guaranteed both in the Federal Constitution and in the European Convention on Human Rights was not ensured. Such inequality is all the more flagrant where the court dealing with the case has not taken the slightest account in its decision of statements made by a witness, even if heard purely for information purposes. This was a gross breach of the law, which expressly provides, even if it precludes taking the oath, that a spouse may testify and therefore implies that the court dealing with the case will consider that evidence.“

The First Civil Division of the Federal Court delivered its judgment on 3 October 1990. It declared inadmissible - in particular - the complaint based on a violation of Articles 6 and 14 of the Convention (art. 6, art. 14), as follows: “... On a public-law appeal, the Federal Court will consider only the complaints adequately pleaded ... the notice of appeal must contain, inter alia, a succinct statement of the constitutional rights or legal principles violated, specifying in what the breach consists (section 90 (1) (b) of the Federal Judicature Act). ... In many respects, the present appeal does not comply with this requirement that reasons must be given. This is true ... of the ground based on a breach of Articles 6 and 14 (art. 6, art. 14) [of the] European Convention on Human Rights, of which the appellant makes a bald assertion without providing any explanation.“

Dismissing the remainder of the appeal, the First Civil Division said: “The appellant also submitted that the Court of Justice had made an arbitrary assessment of the evidence taken by the court below. ... ... If the appellant’s argument, which is not very clear, has been understood correctly, the cantonal appellate court inadmissibly took into account the interview that Mr Linder had with the appellant in April 1988 in the presence of the appellant’s wife, in that it completely ignored her statements and only took Mr Linder’s statement into consideration. In this connection it must be pointed out that the appellant’s wife was heard only for information purposes and without taking the oath, in accordance with Article 226 [of the] Civil Proceedings Act [of the Canton of Geneva]. According to commentators on Geneva’s Civil Proceedings Act, however, hearing a witness for information purposes is of purely informative import and has no probative value ... There was therefore nothing arbitrary in the instant case in not taking account of the explanations provided by Mrs Ankerl. The appellant did not, moreover, show in what way the cantonal appellate court had unsustainably interpreted the statements made by the sworn witness Jean-Gabriel Linder. Contrary to what he appeared to be arguing, the court below did not infer from those statements that the witness had indicated to the appellant that he would have to leave the flat. It merely found that Mr Linder `confirmed that he would pass on to the landlord Guy Ankerl’s wish to enter into a new lease’. The appellant did not attack that finding. ... The present appeal is manifestly ill-founded, and it must accordingly be dismissed in so far as it is admissible.“

E. The applicant’s departure

Mr and Mrs Ankerl left the flat in issue on 16 October 1991.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em1
ORG
NO_MASK
Government of the Swiss Confederation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58067_a11_em1
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e2
001-58067_a11_em3
DATETIME
NO_MASK
10 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e3
001-58067_a11_em4
DATETIME
QUASI
28 August 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e4
001-58067_a11_em5
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e5
001-58067_a11_em6
CODE
DIRECT
17748/91
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em7
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58067_a11_em1
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e6
001-58067_a11_em8
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em9
PERSON
DIRECT
001-58067_a11_em58
Mr Guy Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e8
001-58067_a11_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
10 December 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e9
001-58067_a11_em13
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr L. Wildhaber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e6
001-58067_a11_em14
DEM
NO_MASK
Swiss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e10
001-58067_a11_em15
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e11
001-58067_a11_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
13 July 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e12
001-58067_a11_em17
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e13
001-58067_a11_em18
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr F. Gölcüklü
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e14
001-58067_a11_em19
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr F. Matscher
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e15
001-58067_a11_em20
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr B. Walsh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e16
001-58067_a11_em21
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr S.K. Martens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e17
001-58067_a11_em22
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J.M. Morenilla
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e18
001-58067_a11_em23
PERSON
QUASI
Sir John Freeland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e19
001-58067_a11_em24
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. Kuris
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e20
001-58067_a11_em25
PERSON
QUASI
Mr I. Foighel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e21
001-58067_a11_em26
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr B. Repik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e16
001-58067_a11_em27
PERSON
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em21
Mr Martens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e15
001-58067_a11_em28
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-58067_a11_em20
Mr Walsh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e10
001-58067_a11_em29
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-58067_a11_em15
Mr Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e22
001-58067_a11_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e23
001-58067_a11_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
14 December 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e24
001-58067_a11_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
27 February 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e25
001-58067_a11_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
6 March 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e26
001-58067_a11_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
5 April 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e27
001-58067_a11_em38
DATETIME
NO_MASK
18 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e28
001-58067_a11_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
3 April 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e29
001-58067_a11_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
13 May 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e30
001-58067_a11_em42
LOC
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e31
001-58067_a11_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
20 May 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e32
001-58067_a11_em45
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. Boillat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e33
001-58067_a11_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
European Law and International Affairs Section
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e34
001-58067_a11_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e35
001-58067_a11_em48
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A.D. Schmidt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e36
001-58067_a11_em49
LOC
QUASI
Canton of Geneva
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e37
001-58067_a11_em50
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Schürmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e33
001-58067_a11_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
European Law and International Affairs Section
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e34
001-58067_a11_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e38
001-58067_a11_em53
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Martínez
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e38
001-58067_a11_em54
PERSON
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em53
Mr Martínez
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e37
001-58067_a11_em55
PERSON
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em50
Mr Schürmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e32
001-58067_a11_em56
PERSON
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em45
Mr Boillat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e39
001-58067_a11_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
28 May 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em58
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em60
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e1
001-58067_a11_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e40
001-58067_a11_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e41
001-58067_a11_em63
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em64
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Guy Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e42
001-58067_a11_em65
LOC
QUASI
rue Saint-Léger, Geneva
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em66
ORG
QUASI
Régie Immobilière SA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em67
ORG
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em66
Régie Immobilière
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e44
001-58067_a11_em68
ORG
QUASI
SI Chrysanthemum SA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e44
001-58067_a11_em69
ORG
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em68
Chrysanthemum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e45
001-58067_a11_em70
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e46
001-58067_a11_em71
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Ruffieux
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e44
001-58067_a11_em72
ORG
QUASI
Chrysanthemum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e47
001-58067_a11_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
14 November 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em74
ORG
QUASI
Régie Naef SA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em75
ORG
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em74
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e49
001-58067_a11_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
8 May 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em77
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em78
ORG
QUASI
Régie Immobilière
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e50
001-58067_a11_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
29 February 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em80
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em81
ORG
QUASI
Régie Immobilière
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em82
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em83
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e51
001-58067_a11_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em85
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em86
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e52
001-58067_a11_em87
DATETIME
NO_MASK
April to July of that year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em88
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e44
001-58067_a11_em89
ORG
QUASI
Chrysanthemum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e53
001-58067_a11_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
21 July 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em91
ORG
QUASI
Régie Immobilière
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em92
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e54
001-58067_a11_em93
ORG
QUASI
Rents and Leases Conciliation Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e55
001-58067_a11_em94
ORG
QUASI
Rents and Leases Tribunal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e56
001-58067_a11_em95
DATETIME
NO_MASK
February 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e57
001-58067_a11_em96
ORG
QUASI
GPR Degenève SA agency
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e57
001-58067_a11_em97
ORG
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em96
GPR Degenève
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e50
001-58067_a11_em98
DATETIME
QUASI
29 February 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em99
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e58
001-58067_a11_em100
DATETIME
NO_MASK
March 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e59
001-58067_a11_em101
DATETIME
NO_MASK
August 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e60
001-58067_a11_em102
DATETIME
QUASI
22 April 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em103
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e57
001-58067_a11_em104
ORG
QUASI
GPR Degenève
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e62
001-58067_a11_em105
ORG
QUASI
Canton of Geneva Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e63
001-58067_a11_em106
DATETIME
QUASI
15 November 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e44
001-58067_a11_em107
ORG
QUASI
Chrysanthemum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e64
001-58067_a11_em108
ORG
QUASI
Geneva Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em109
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e65
001-58067_a11_em110
DATETIME
QUASI
19 May 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em111
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e57
001-58067_a11_em112
ORG
QUASI
GPR Degenève
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e66
001-58067_a11_em113
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Veuillet
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em114
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e67
001-58067_a11_em115
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e46
001-58067_a11_em116
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Ruffieux
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e44
001-58067_a11_em117
ORG
QUASI
Chrysanthemum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em118
PERSON
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em103
Mr Jean-Gabriel Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e58
001-58067_a11_em119
DATETIME
NO_MASK
March 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em120
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em121
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em122
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em123
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em124
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em125
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em126
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em127
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em128
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em129
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em130
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em131
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em132
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e68
001-58067_a11_em133
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Dominique Veuillet
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em134
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e69
001-58067_a11_em135
DATETIME
QUASI
1 March 1983
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em136
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e70
001-58067_a11_em137
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e71
001-58067_a11_em138
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em139
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em140
ORG
QUASI
Régie Immobilière
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em141
ORG
QUASI
Régie Immobilière
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em142
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e72
001-58067_a11_em143
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em144
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e51
001-58067_a11_em145
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e47
001-58067_a11_em146
DATETIME
QUASI
14 November 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em147
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e73
001-58067_a11_em148
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Méryl Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em149
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e74
001-58067_a11_em150
DATETIME
QUASI
April 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em151
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em152
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e75
001-58067_a11_em153
ORG
NO_MASK
Public Works Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em154
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em155
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em156
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e46
001-58067_a11_em157
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Ruffieux
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e76
001-58067_a11_em158
DATETIME
QUASI
October 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em159
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em160
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em161
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em162
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em163
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em164
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em165
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em166
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e77
001-58067_a11_em167
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em168
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em169
ORG
QUASI
Régie Immobilière
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e46
001-58067_a11_em170
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Ruffieux
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e78
001-58067_a11_em171
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em172
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e66
001-58067_a11_em173
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Veuillet
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em174
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em175
ORG
QUASI
Régie Immobilière
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e48
001-58067_a11_em176
ORG
QUASI
Naef
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em177
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e51
001-58067_a11_em178
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e79
001-58067_a11_em179
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e57
001-58067_a11_em180
ORG
QUASI
GPR Degenève SA agency
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e43
001-58067_a11_em181
ORG
QUASI
Régie Immobilière SA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em182
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em183
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em184
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em185
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em186
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em187
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e46
001-58067_a11_em188
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Ruffieux
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em189
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e57
001-58067_a11_em190
ORG
QUASI
GPR Degenève
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e50
001-58067_a11_em191
DATETIME
QUASI
29 February 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e80
001-58067_a11_em192
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three months later
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em193
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em194
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em195
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e50
001-58067_a11_em196
DATETIME
QUASI
29 February 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e81
001-58067_a11_em197
LOC
QUASI
Canton of Geneva Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e82
001-58067_a11_em198
DATETIME
QUASI
7 June 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e81
001-58067_a11_em199
ORG
QUASI
Canton of Geneva Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em200
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e44
001-58067_a11_em201
ORG
QUASI
Chrysanthemum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e83
001-58067_a11_em202
ORG
QUASI
Chrysanthemum SA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em203
PERSON
DIRECT
001-58067_a11_em9
Guy Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em204
PERSON
DIRECT
Guy Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e84
001-58067_a11_em205
LOC
QUASI
rue Saint-Léger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e51
001-58067_a11_em206
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e50
001-58067_a11_em207
DATETIME
QUASI
29 February 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e85
001-58067_a11_em208
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e86
001-58067_a11_em209
DATETIME
QUASI
28 February 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em210
PERSON
DIRECT
Guy Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e87
001-58067_a11_em211
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e87
001-58067_a11_em212
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e88
001-58067_a11_em213
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e89
001-58067_a11_em214
ORG
NO_MASK
First Civil Division of the Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e90
001-58067_a11_em215
DATETIME
QUASI
3 October 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e87
001-58067_a11_em216
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e91
001-58067_a11_em217
ORG
NO_MASK
First Civil Division
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e88
001-58067_a11_em218
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em219
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e74
001-58067_a11_em220
DATETIME
QUASI
April 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em221
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e36
001-58067_a11_em222
ORG
QUASI
Canton of Geneva
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e67
001-58067_a11_em223
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em224
PERSON
QUASI
001-58067_a11_em103
Jean-Gabriel Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e61
001-58067_a11_em225
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Linder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em226
PERSON
DIRECT
Guy Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58067_a11_e7
001-58067_a11_em227
PERSON
DIRECT
001-58067_a11_em9
Mr and Mrs Ankerl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58067_a11_e92
001-58067_a11_em228
DATETIME
QUASI
16 October 1991
Guy Ankerl
CHE
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Guy Ankerl