PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court on 9 September 1993 by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission“) and on 11 October 1993 by the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark (“the Government“), within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 para. 1 and Article 47 (art. 32-1, art. 47) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention“). It originated in an application (no. 15890/89) against Denmark lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by a Danish national, Mr Jens Olaf Jersild, on 25 July 1989. The Commission’s request referred to Articles 44 and 48 (art. 44, art. 48) and to the declaration whereby Denmark recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46) (art. 46); the Government’s application referred to Articles 44 and 48 (art. 44, art. 48). The object of the request and of the Government’s application was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 10 (art. 10) of the Convention.

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyers who would represent him (Rule 30).

The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Mr I. Foighel, the elected judge of Danish nationality (Article 43 of the Convention) (art. 43), and Mr R. Ryssdal, the President of the Court (Rule 21 para. 3 (b)). However, on 20 September 1993 Mr Foighel withdrew from the case pursuant to Rule 24 para. 2. On 24 September 1993, in the presence of the Registrar, the President drew by lot the names of the other seven members, namely Mr R. Macdonald, Mrs E. Palm, Mr R. Pekkanen, Mr M.A. Lopes Rocha, Mr G. Mifsud Bonnici, Mr J. Makarczyk and Mr D. Gotchev (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 4) (art. 43). By letter of 29 October the Agent of the Government notified the Registrar of the appointment of Mr K. Waaben as an ad hoc judge; in a letter of 16 November the Agent informed the Registrar that Mr Waaben had withdrawn and that they had therefore appointed Mr A. Philip to replace him (Article 43 of the Convention and Rule 23) (art. 43).

As President of the Chamber (Rule 21 para. 5), Mr Ryssdal, acting through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the Government, the applicant’s lawyers and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 37 para. 1 and 38). Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the Government’s memorial on 18 February 1994 and the applicant’s memorial on 20 February. In a letter of 7 March the Secretary to the Commission informed the Registrar that the Delegate did not wish to reply in writing.

On 23 February 1994 the President, having consulted the Chamber, had granted leave to Human Rights Watch, a New York based non-governmental human rights organisation, to submit observations on specific aspects of the case (Rule 37 para. 2). The latter’s comments were filed on 23 March. On 23 February the Chamber had authorised (Rule 41 para. 1) the applicant to show the video-recording of the television programme in issue in his case to the judges taking part in the proceedings. A showing was held shortly before the hearing on 20 April.

On 23 February the Chamber had also decided to relinquish jurisdiction forthwith in favour of a Grand Chamber (Rule 51). The President and the Vice-President, Mr R. Bernhardt, as well as the other members of the Chamber being ex officio members of the Grand Chamber, the names of the additional nine judges were drawn by lot by the President in the presence of the Registrar on 24 February (Rule 51 para. 2 (a) to (c)), namely Mr F. Gölcüklü, Mr C. Russo, Mr A. Spielmann, Mr N. Valticos, Mr S.K. Martens, Mr A.N. Loizou, Mr J.M. Morenilla, Mr L. Wildhaber and Mr B. Repik.

On various dates between 22 March and 15 April 1994 the Commission produced a number of documents and two video-cassettes, as requested by the Registrar on the President’s instructions, and the applicant submitted further details on his claims under Article 50 (art. 50) of the Convention.

In accordance with the President’s decision, the hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 20 April 1994. The Court had held a preparatory meeting beforehand. There appeared before the Court:

for the Government Mr T. Lehmann, Ambassador, Legal Adviser, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Agent, Mr M.B. Elmer, Deputy Permanent Secretary, Chief Legal Adviser, Ministry of Justice, Ms J. Rechnagel, Minister Counsellor, Ministry of Justice, Mr J. Lundum, Head of Section, Ministry of Justice, Advisers;

for the Commission Mr C.L. Rozakis, Delegate;

for the applicant Mr K. Boyle, Barrister, Professor of Law at the University of Essex, Mr T. Trier, advokat, Lecturer of Law at the University of Copenhagen, Counsel, Mrs L. Johannessen, lawyer, Adviser. The Court heard addresses by Mr Rozakis, Mr Lehmann, Mr Elmer, Mr Boyle and Mr Trier, and also replies to a question put by the President.

AS TO THE FACTS

I. THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

Mr Jens Olaf Jersild, a Danish national, is a journalist and lives in Copenhagen. He was at the time of the events giving rise to the present case, and still is, employed by Danmarks Radio (Danish Broadcasting Corporation, which broadcasts not only radio but also television programmes), assigned to its Sunday News Magazine (Søndagsavisen). The latter is known as a serious television programme intended for a well-informed audience, dealing with a wide range of social and political issues, including xenophobia, immigration and refugees.

A. The Greenjackets item

On 31 May 1985 the newspaper Information published an article describing the racist attitudes of members of a group of young people, calling themselves “the Greenjackets“ (“grønjakkerne“), at Østerbro in Copenhagen. In the light of this article, the editors of the Sunday News Magazine decided to produce a documentary on the Greenjackets. Subsequently the applicant contacted representatives of the group, inviting three of them together with Mr Per Axholt, a social worker employed at the local youth centre, to take part in a television interview. During the interview, which was conducted by the applicant, the three Greenjackets made abusive and derogatory remarks about immigrants and ethnic groups in Denmark. It lasted between five and six hours, of which between two and two and a half hours were video-recorded. Danmarks Radio paid the interviewees fees in accordance with its usual practice.

The applicant subsequently edited and cut the film of the interview down to a few minutes. On 21 July 1985 this was broadcast by Danmarks Radio as a part of the Sunday News Magazine. The programme consisted of a variety of items, for instance on the martial law in South Africa, on the debate on profit-sharing in Denmark and on the late German writer Heinrich Böll. The transcript of the Greenjackets item reads as follows [(I): TV presenter; (A): the applicant; (G): one or other of the Greenjackets]: (I) “In recent years, a great deal has been said about racism in Denmark. The papers are currently publishing stories about distrust and resentment directed against minorities. Who are the people who hate the minorities? Where do they come from? What is their mentality like? Mr Jens Olaf Jersild has visited a group of extremist youths at Østerbro in Copenhagen. (A) The flag on the wall is the flag of the Southern States from the American Civil War, but today it is also the symbol of racism, the symbol of the American movement, the Ku Klux Klan, and it shows what Lille Steen, Henrik and Nisse are. Are you a racist? (G) Yes, that’s what I regard myself as. It’s good being a racist. We believe Denmark is for the Danes. (A) Henrik, Lille Steen and all the others are members of a group of young people who live in Studsgårdsgade, called STUDSEN, in Østerbro in Copenhagen. It is public housing, a lot of the inhabitants are unemployed and on social security; the crime rate is high. Some of the young people in this neighbourhood have already been involved in criminal activities and have already been convicted. (G) It was an ordinary armed robbery at a petrol station. (A) What did you do? (G) Nothing. I just ran into a petrol station with a ... gun and made them give me some money. Then I ran out again. That’s all. (A) What about you, what happened? (G) I don’t wish to discuss that further. (A) But, was it violence? (G) Yes. (A) You have just come out of ... you have been arrested, what were you arrested for? (G) Street violence. (A) What happened? (G) I had a little fight with the police together with some friends. (A) Does that happen often? (G) Yes, out here it does. (A) All in all, there are 20-25 young people from STUDSEN in the same group. They meet not far away from the public housing area near some old houses which are to be torn down. They meet here to reaffirm among other things their racism, their hatred of immigrants and their support for the Ku Klux Klan. (G) The Ku Klux Klan, that’s something that comes from the States in the old days during - you know - the civil war and things like that, because the Northern States wanted that the niggers should be free human beings, man, they are not human beings, they are animals, right, it’s completely wrong, man, the things that happened. People should be allowed to keep slaves, I think so anyway. (A) Because blacks are not human beings? (G) No, you can also see that from their body structure, man, big flat noses, with cauliflower ears etc., man. Broad heads and very broad bodies, man, hairy, you are looking at a gorilla and compare it with an ape, man, then it is the same [behaviour], man, it’s the same movements, long arms, man, long fingers etc., long feet. (A) A lot of people are saying something different. There are a lot of people who say, but ... (G) Just take a picture of a gorilla, man, and then look at a nigger, it’s the same body structure and everything, man, flat forehead and all kinds of things. (A) There are many blacks, for example in the USA, who have important jobs. (G) Of course, there is always someone who wants to show off, as if they are better than the white man, but in the long run, it’s the white man who is better. (A) What does Ku Klux Klan mean to you? (G) It means a great deal, because I think what they do is right. A nigger is not a human being, it’s an animal, that goes for all the other foreign workers as well, Turks, Yugoslavs and whatever they are called. (A) Henrik is 19 years old and on welfare. He lives in a rented room in Studsgårdsgade. Henrik is one of the strongest supporters of the Klan, and he hates the foreign workers, ‘Perkere’ [a very derogatory word in Danish for immigrant workers]. (G) They come up here, man, and sponge on our society. But we, we have enough problems in getting our social benefits, man, they just get it. Fuck, we can argue with those idiots up there at the social benefit office to get our money, man, they just get it, man, they are the first on the housing list, they get better flats than us, man, and some of our friends who have children, man, they are living in the worst slum, man, they can’t even get a shower in their flat, man, then those ‘Perkere’-families, man, go up there with seven kids, man, and they just get an expensive flat, right there and then. They get everything paid, and things like that, that can’t be right, man, Denmark is for the Danes, right? It is the fact that they are ‘Perkere’, that’s what we don’t like, right, and we don’t like their mentality - I mean they can damn well, I mean ... what’s it called ... I mean if they feel like speaking Russian in their homes, right, then it’s okay, but what we don’t like is when they walk around in those Zimbabwe-clothes and then speak this hula-hula language in the street, and if you ask them something or if you get into one of their taxis then they say: I don’t know where it is, you give directions right. (A) Is it not so that perhaps you are a bit envious that some of the ‘Perkere’ as you call them have their own shops, and cars, they can make ends ... (G) It’s drugs they are selling, man, half of the prison population in ‘Vestre’ are in there because of drugs, man, half of those in Vestre prison anyway, they are the people who are serving time for dealing drugs or something similar. They are in there, all the ‘Perkere’, because of drugs, right. [That] must be enough, what’s it called, there should not be drugs here in this country, but if it really has to be smuggled in, I think we should do it ourselves, I mean, I think it’s unfair that those foreigners come up here to ... what’s it called ... make Denmark more drug dependent and things like that. We have painted their doors and hoped that they would get fed up with it, so that they would soon leave, and jumped on their cars and thrown paint in their faces when they were lying in bed sleeping. (A) What was it you did with that paint - why paint? (G) Because it was white paint, I think that suited them well, that was the intended effect. (A) You threw paint through the windows of an immigrant family? (G) Yes. (A) What happened? (G) He just got it in his face, that’s all. Well, I think he woke up, and then he came out and shouted something in his hula-hula language. (A) Did he report it to the police? (G) I don’t know if he did, I mean, he won’t get anywhere by doing that. (A) Why not? (G) I don’t know, it’s just kid’s stuff, like other people throwing water in people’s faces, he got paint in his. They can’t make anything out of that. --- (A) Per Axholt, known as ‘Pax’ [(P)], is employed in the youth centre in Studsgårdsgade. He has worked there for several years, but many give up a lot sooner because of the tough environment. Per Axholt feels that the reasons why the young people are persecuting the immigrants is that they are themselves powerless and disappointed. What do you think they would say that they want, if you asked them? (P) Just what you and I want. Some control over their lives, work which may be considered decent and which they like, a reasonable economic situation, a reasonably functioning family, a wife or a husband and some children, a reasonable middle-class life such as you and I have. (A) They do many things which are sure to prevent them from getting it. (P) That is correct. (A) Why do you think they do this? (P) Because they have nothing better to do. They have been told over a long period that the means by which to achieve success is money. They won’t be able to get money legitimately, so often they try to obtain it through criminal activity. Sometimes they succeed, sometimes not, and that’s why we see a lot of young people in that situation go to prison, because it doesn’t work. --- (A) How old were you when you started your criminal activities? (G) I don’t know, about 14 I guess. (A) What did you do? (G) The first time, I can’t remember, I don’t know, burglary. (A) Do you have what one might call a criminal career? (G) I don’t know if you can call it that. (A) You committed your first crime when you were 14. (G) Well, you can put it that way, I mean, if that is a criminal career. If you have been involved in crime since the age of 15 onwards, then I guess you can say I’ve had a criminal career. (A) Will you tell me about some of the things you have done? (G) No, not really. It’s been the same over and over again. There has been pinching of videos, where the ‘Perkere’ have been our customers, so they have money. If people want to be out here and have a nice time and be racists and drink beer, and have fun, then it’s quite obvious you don’t want to sit in the slammer. (A) But is the threat of imprisonment something that really deters people from doing something illegal? (G) No, it’s not prison, that doesn’t frighten people. (A) Is that why you hear stories about people from out here fighting with knives etc., night after night. Is the reason for this the fact that they are not afraid of the police getting hold of them? (G) Yes, nothing really comes of it, I mean, there are no bad consequences, so probably that’s why. For instance fights and stabbings and smashing up things ... If you really get into the joint it would be such a ridiculously small sentence, so it would be, I mean ... usually we are released the next day. Last time we caused some trouble over at the pub, they let us out the next morning. Nothing really comes of it. It doesn’t discourage us, but there were five of us, who just came out and then we had a celebration for the last guy, who came out yesterday, they probably don’t want to go in again for some time so they probably won’t commit big crimes again. (A) You would like to move back to Studsgårdsgade where you grew up, but we know for sure that it’s an environment with a high crime rate. Would you like your child to grow up like you? (G) No, and I don’t think she will. Firstly, because she is a girl, statistics show that the risk is not that high, I mean they probably don’t do it, but you don’t have to be a criminal because you live in an environment with a high crime rate. I just wouldn’t accept it, if she was mugging old women and stealing their handbags. (A) What if she was among those beating up the immigrants etc. What then? (G) That would be okay. I wouldn’t have anything against that. --- (I) We will have to see if the mentality of this family changes in the next generation. Finally, we would like to say that groups of young people like this one in STUDSEN at Østerbro, have been formed elsewhere in Copenhagen.“

B. Proceedings in the City Court of Copenhagen

Following the programme no complaints were made to the Radio Council, which had competence in such matters, or to Danmarks Radio but the Bishop of Ålborg complained to the Minister of Justice. After undertaking investigations the Public Prosecutor instituted criminal proceedings in the City Court of Copenhagen (Københavns Byret) against the three youths interviewed by the applicant, charging them with a violation of Article 266 (b) of the Penal Code (straffeloven) (see paragraph 19 below) for having made the statements cited below: “... the Northern States wanted that the niggers should be free human beings, man, they are not human beings, they are animals.“ “Just take a picture of a gorilla, man, and then look at a nigger, it’s the same body structure and everything, man, flat forehead and all kinds of things.“ “A nigger is not a human being, it’s an animal, that goes for all the other foreign workers as well, Turks, Yugoslavs and whatever they are called.“ “It is the fact that they are ‘Perkere’, that’s what we don’t like, right, and we don’t like their mentality ... what we don’t like is when they walk around in those Zimbabwe-clothes and then speak this hula-hula language in the street ...“ “It’s drugs they are selling, man, half of the prison population in ‘Vestre’ are in there because of drugs ... they are the people who are serving time for dealing drugs ...“ “They are in there, all the ‘Perkere’, because of drugs ...“ The applicant was charged, under Article 266 (b) in conjunction with Article 23 (see paragraph 19 below), with aiding and abetting the three youths; the same charge was brought against the head of the news section of Danmarks Radio, Mr Lasse Jensen.

In the City Court counsel for the applicant and Mr Jensen called for their acquittal. He argued that the conduct of the applicant and Mr Jensen could in no way be compared to that of the other three defendants, with whose views they did not sympathise. They sought merely to provide a realistic picture of a social problem; in fact the programme only provoked resentment and aroused pity in respect of the three other defendants, who had exposed themselves to ridicule on their own terms. Accordingly, it was by no means the intention of Danmarks Radio to persuade others to subscribe to the same views as the Greenjackets, rather the contrary. Under the relevant law a distinction had to be drawn between the persons who made the statements and the programme editors, the latter enjoying a special freedom of expression. Having at that time a broadcasting monopoly, Danmarks Radio was under a duty to impart all opinions of public interest in a manner that reflected the speaker’s way of expressing himself. The public also had an interest in being informed of notoriously bad social attitudes, even those which were unpleasant. The programme was broadcast in the context of a public debate which had resulted in press comments, for instance in Information, and was simply an honest report on the realities of the youths in question. Counsel, referring inter alia to the above-mentioned article in Information, also pointed to the fact that no consistent prosecution policy had been followed in cases of this nature.

On 24 April 1987 the City Court convicted the three youths, one of them for having stated that “niggers“ and “foreign workers“ were “animals“, and two of them for their assertions in relation to drugs and “Perkere“. The applicant was convicted of aiding and abetting them, as was Mr Jensen, in his capacity as programme controller; they were sentenced to pay day-fines (dagsbøder) totalling 1,000 and 2,000 Danish kroner, respectively, or alternatively to five days’ imprisonment (hæfte). As regards the applicant, the City Court found that, following the article in Information of 31 May 1985, he had visited the Greenjackets and after a conversation with Mr Axholt, amongst others, agreed that the three youths should participate in a television programme. The object of the programme had been to demonstrate the attitude of the Greenjackets to the racism at Østerbro, previously mentioned in the article in Information, and to show their social background. Accordingly, so the City Court held, the applicant had himself taken the initiative of making the television programme and, further, he had been well aware in advance that discriminatory statements of a racist nature were likely to be made during the interview. The interview had lasted several hours, during which beer, partly paid for by Danmarks Radio, was consumed. In this connection the applicant had encouraged the Greenjackets to express their racist views, which, in so far as they were broadcast on television, in itself constituted a breach of Article 266 (b) of the Penal Code. The statements were broadcast without any counterbalancing comments, after the recordings had been edited by the applicant. He was accordingly guilty of aiding and abetting the violation of Article 266 (b).

C. Proceedings in the High Court of Eastern Denmark

The applicant and Mr Jensen, but not the three Greenjackets, appealed against the City Court’s judgment to the High Court of Eastern Denmark (Østre Landsret). They essentially reiterated the submissions made before the City Court and, in addition, the applicant explained that, although he had suspected that the Greenjackets’ statements were punishable, he had refrained from omitting these from the programme, considering it crucial to show their actual attitude. He assumed that they were aware that they might incur criminal liability by making the statements and had therefore not warned them of this fact.

By judgment of 16 June 1988 the High Court, by five votes to one, dismissed the appeal. The dissenting member was of the view that, although the statements by the Greenjackets constituted offences under Article 266 (b) of the Penal Code, the applicant and Mr Jensen had not transgressed the bounds of the freedom of speech to be enjoyed by television and other media, since the object of the programme was to inform about and animate public discussion on the particular racist attitudes and social background of the youth group in question.

D. Proceedings in the Supreme Court

With leave the applicant and Mr Jensen appealed from the High Court judgment to the Supreme Court (Højesteret), which by four votes to one dismissed the appeal in a judgment of 13 February 1989. The majority held: “The defendants have caused the publication of the racist statements made by a narrow circle of persons and thereby made those persons liable to punishment and have thus, as held by the City Court and the High Court, violated Article 266 (b) in conjunction with Article 23 of the Penal Code. [We] do not find that an acquittal of the defendants could be justified on the ground of freedom of expression in matters of public interest as opposed to the interest in the protection against racial discrimination. [We] therefore vote in favour of confirming the judgment [appealed from].“ Justice Pontoppidan stated in his dissent: “The object of the programme was to contribute to information on an issue - the attitude towards foreigners - which was the subject of extensive and sometimes emotional public debate. The programme must be presumed to have given a clear picture of the Greenjackets’ views, of which the public was thus given an opportunity to be informed and form its own opinion. In view of the nature of these views, any counterbalancing during or immediately before or after would not have served a useful purpose. Although it concerned a relatively small group of people holding extreme views, the programme had a fair degree of news and information value. The fact that the defendants took the initiative to disseminate such views is not of paramount importance for the assessment of their conduct. In these circumstances and irrespective of the fact that the statements rightly have been found to be in violation of Article 266 (b), I question the advisability of finding the defendants guilty of aiding and abetting the violation of this provision. I therefore vote in favour of the defendants’ acquittal.“

When the Supreme Court has rendered judgment in a case raising important issues of principle it is customary that a member of the majority publishes a detailed and authoritative statement of the reasons for the judgment. In keeping with this custom, Justice Hermann on 20 January 1990 published such a statement in the Weekly Law Journal (Ugeskrift for Retsvæsen, 1989, p. 399). As regards the conviction of the applicant and Mr Jensen, the majority had attached importance to the fact that they had caused the racist statements to be made public. The applicant’s item had not been a direct report on a meeting. He had himself contacted the three youths and caused them to make assertions such as those previously made in Information, which he knew of and probably expected them to repeat. He had himself cut the recording of the interview, lasting several hours, down to a few minutes containing the crude comments. The statements, which would hardly have been punishable under Article 266 (b) of the Penal Code had they not been made to a wide circle (“videre kreds“) of people, became clearly punishable as they were broadcast on television on the applicant’s initiative and with Mr Jensen’s approval. It was therefore beyond doubt that they had aided and abetted the dissemination of the statements. Acquitting the applicant and Mr Jensen could only be justified by reasons clearly outweighing the wrongfulness of their actions. In this connection, the interest in protecting those grossly insulted by the statements had to be weighed up against that of informing the public of the statements. Whilst it is desirable to allow the press the best possible conditions for reporting on society, press freedom cannot be unlimited since freedom of expression is coupled with responsibilities. In striking a balance between the various interests involved, the majority had regard to the fact that the statements, which were brought to a wide circle of people, consisted of series of inarticulate, defamatory remarks and insults spoken by members of an insignificant group whose opinions could hardly be of interest to many people. Their news or information value was not such as to justify their dissemination and therefore did not warrant acquitting the defendants. This did not mean that extremist views could not be reported in the press, but such reports must be carried out in a more balanced and comprehensive manner than was the case in the television programme in question. Direct reports from meetings which were a matter of public interest should also be permitted. The minority, on the other hand, considered that the right to information overrode the interests protected by Article 266 (b) of the Penal Code. Finally, Justice Hermann noted that the compatibility of the impugned measures with Article 10 (art. 10) of the Convention was not raised during the trial.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e1
001-57891_a8_em1
DATETIME
QUASI
9 September 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e2
001-57891_a8_em2
DATETIME
QUASI
11 October 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e3
001-57891_a8_em3
ORG
NO_MASK
Kingdom of Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e4
001-57891_a8_em4
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e5
001-57891_a8_em5
CODE
DIRECT
15890/89
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e6
001-57891_a8_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e7
001-57891_a8_em7
DEM
NO_MASK
Danish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e8
001-57891_a8_em8
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jens Olaf Jersild
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e9
001-57891_a8_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
25 July 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e6
001-57891_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e10
001-57891_a8_em11
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-57891_a8_em15
Mr I. Foighel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e7
001-57891_a8_em12
DEM
NO_MASK
Danish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e11
001-57891_a8_em13
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e12
001-57891_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
20 September 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e10
001-57891_a8_em15
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Foighel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e13
001-57891_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e14
001-57891_a8_em17
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Macdonald
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e15
001-57891_a8_em18
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs E. Palm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e16
001-57891_a8_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Pekkanen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e17
001-57891_a8_em20
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M.A. Lopes Rocha
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e18
001-57891_a8_em21
PERSON
QUASI
Mr G. Mifsud Bonnici
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e19
001-57891_a8_em22
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Makarczyk
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e20
001-57891_a8_em23
PERSON
QUASI
Mr D. Gotchev
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e21
001-57891_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
29 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e22
001-57891_a8_em25
PERSON
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em27
Mr K. Waaben
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e23
001-57891_a8_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
16 November
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e22
001-57891_a8_em27
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Waaben
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e24
001-57891_a8_em28
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Philip
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e11
001-57891_a8_em29
PERSON
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em13
Mr Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e25
001-57891_a8_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
18 February 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e26
001-57891_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
20 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e27
001-57891_a8_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
7 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e28
001-57891_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
23 February 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e29
001-57891_a8_em34
ORG
QUASI
Human Rights Watch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e30
001-57891_a8_em35
LOC
NO_MASK
New York
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e31
001-57891_a8_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
23 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e32
001-57891_a8_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
23 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e33
001-57891_a8_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e32
001-57891_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
23 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e34
001-57891_a8_em40
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e35
001-57891_a8_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
24 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e36
001-57891_a8_em42
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Gölcüklü
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e37
001-57891_a8_em43
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C. Russo
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e38
001-57891_a8_em44
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Spielmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e39
001-57891_a8_em45
PERSON
QUASI
Mr N. Valticos
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e40
001-57891_a8_em46
PERSON
QUASI
Mr S.K. Martens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e41
001-57891_a8_em47
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A.N. Loizou
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e42
001-57891_a8_em48
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J.M. Morenilla
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e43
001-57891_a8_em49
PERSON
QUASI
Mr L. Wildhaber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e44
001-57891_a8_em50
PERSON
QUASI
Mr B. Repik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e45
001-57891_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
22 March and 15 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e46
001-57891_a8_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e47
001-57891_a8_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e48
001-57891_a8_em54
PERSON
QUASI
Mr T. Lehmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e49
001-57891_a8_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e50
001-57891_a8_em56
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M.B. Elmer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e51
001-57891_a8_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e52
001-57891_a8_em58
PERSON
QUASI
Ms J. Rechnagel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e51
001-57891_a8_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e53
001-57891_a8_em60
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Lundum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e51
001-57891_a8_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e54
001-57891_a8_em62
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C.L. Rozakis
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e55
001-57891_a8_em63
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K. Boyle
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e56
001-57891_a8_em64
ORG
QUASI
University of Essex
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e57
001-57891_a8_em65
PERSON
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em72
Mr T. Trier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e58
001-57891_a8_em66
ORG
QUASI
University of Copenhagen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e59
001-57891_a8_em67
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs L. Johannessen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e54
001-57891_a8_em68
PERSON
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em62
Mr Rozakis
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e48
001-57891_a8_em69
PERSON
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em54
Mr Lehmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e50
001-57891_a8_em70
PERSON
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em56
Mr Elmer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e55
001-57891_a8_em71
PERSON
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em63
Mr Boyle
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e57
001-57891_a8_em72
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Trier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e8
001-57891_a8_em73
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jens Olaf Jersild
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e7
001-57891_a8_em74
DEM
NO_MASK
Danish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e60
001-57891_a8_em75
DEM
NO_MASK
journalist
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e61
001-57891_a8_em76
LOC
QUASI
Copenhagen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e62
001-57891_a8_em77
ORG
QUASI
Danmarks Radio
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e63
001-57891_a8_em78
ORG
QUASI
Sunday News Magazine
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e63
001-57891_a8_em79
ORG
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em78
Søndagsavisen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em80
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e65
001-57891_a8_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
31 May 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em82
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em83
ORG
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em82
grønjakkerne
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e66
001-57891_a8_em84
LOC
QUASI
Østerbro
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e61
001-57891_a8_em85
LOC
QUASI
Copenhagen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e63
001-57891_a8_em86
ORG
QUASI
Sunday News Magazine
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em87
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e67
001-57891_a8_em88
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Per Axholt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e68
001-57891_a8_em89
DEM
NO_MASK
social worker
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em90
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e6
001-57891_a8_em91
LOC
NO_MASK
Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e69
001-57891_a8_em92
DATETIME
NO_MASK
five and six hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e70
001-57891_a8_em93
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two and two and a half hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e62
001-57891_a8_em94
ORG
QUASI
Danmarks Radio
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e71
001-57891_a8_em95
DATETIME
QUASI
21 July 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e62
001-57891_a8_em96
ORG
QUASI
Danmarks Radio
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e63
001-57891_a8_em97
ORG
QUASI
Sunday News Magazine
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e72
001-57891_a8_em98
LOC
NO_MASK
South Africa
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e6
001-57891_a8_em99
LOC
NO_MASK
Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e73
001-57891_a8_em100
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e74
001-57891_a8_em101
PERSON
NO_MASK
Heinrich Böll
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em102
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em103
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e6
001-57891_a8_em104
LOC
NO_MASK
Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e8
001-57891_a8_em105
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jens Olaf Jersild
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e66
001-57891_a8_em106
LOC
QUASI
Østerbro
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e61
001-57891_a8_em107
LOC
QUASI
Copenhagen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e75
001-57891_a8_em108
LOC
NO_MASK
Southern States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e76
001-57891_a8_em109
DEM
NO_MASK
American
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e77
001-57891_a8_em110
ORG
NO_MASK
Ku Klux Klan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e78
001-57891_a8_em111
PERSON
QUASI
Lille Steen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e79
001-57891_a8_em112
PERSON
QUASI
Henrik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e80
001-57891_a8_em113
PERSON
QUASI
Nisse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e6
001-57891_a8_em114
ORG
NO_MASK
Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e81
001-57891_a8_em115
DEM
NO_MASK
Danes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e79
001-57891_a8_em116
PERSON
QUASI
Henrik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e78
001-57891_a8_em117
PERSON
QUASI
Lille Steen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e82
001-57891_a8_em118
ORG
QUASI
Studsgårdsgade
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e83
001-57891_a8_em119
ORG
QUASI
STUDSEN
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e66
001-57891_a8_em120
LOC
QUASI
Østerbro
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e61
001-57891_a8_em121
LOC
QUASI
Copenhagen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e83
001-57891_a8_em122
ORG
QUASI
STUDSEN
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e77
001-57891_a8_em123
ORG
NO_MASK
Ku Klux Klan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e77
001-57891_a8_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
Ku Klux Klan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e84
001-57891_a8_em125
LOC
NO_MASK
Northern States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e85
001-57891_a8_em126
LOC
NO_MASK
USA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e77
001-57891_a8_em127
ORG
NO_MASK
Ku Klux Klan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e79
001-57891_a8_em128
PERSON
QUASI
Henrik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e86
001-57891_a8_em129
DEM
QUASI
19 years old
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e82
001-57891_a8_em130
ORG
QUASI
Studsgårdsgade
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e79
001-57891_a8_em131
PERSON
QUASI
Henrik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e87
001-57891_a8_em132
ORG
NO_MASK
Klan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e7
001-57891_a8_em133
DEM
NO_MASK
Danish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e6
001-57891_a8_em134
ORG
NO_MASK
Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e81
001-57891_a8_em135
DEM
NO_MASK
Danes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e6
001-57891_a8_em136
ORG
NO_MASK
Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e88
001-57891_a8_em137
PERSON
QUASI
Per Axholt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e88
001-57891_a8_em138
PERSON
QUASI
001-57891_a8_em137
Pax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e82
001-57891_a8_em139
ORG
QUASI
Studsgårdsgade
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e88
001-57891_a8_em140
PERSON
QUASI
Per Axholt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e82
001-57891_a8_em141
ORG
QUASI
Studsgårdsgade
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e83
001-57891_a8_em142
ORG
QUASI
STUDSEN
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e66
001-57891_a8_em143
LOC
QUASI
Østerbro
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e61
001-57891_a8_em144
LOC
QUASI
Copenhagen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e89
001-57891_a8_em145
ORG
NO_MASK
City Court of Copenhagen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e90
001-57891_a8_em146
ORG
NO_MASK
Radio Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e62
001-57891_a8_em147
ORG
QUASI
Danmarks Radio
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e89
001-57891_a8_em148
ORG
NO_MASK
City Court of Copenhagen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e89
001-57891_a8_em149
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57891_a8_em148
Københavns Byret
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e84
001-57891_a8_em150
LOC
NO_MASK
Northern States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e62
001-57891_a8_em151
ORG
QUASI
Danmarks Radio
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e91
001-57891_a8_em152
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Lasse Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e92
001-57891_a8_em153
ORG
NO_MASK
City Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e93
001-57891_a8_em154
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e93
001-57891_a8_em155
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e62
001-57891_a8_em156
ORG
QUASI
Danmarks Radio
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em157
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e62
001-57891_a8_em158
ORG
QUASI
Danmarks Radio
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e94
001-57891_a8_em159
DATETIME
QUASI
24 April 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e92
001-57891_a8_em160
ORG
NO_MASK
City Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e93
001-57891_a8_em161
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e95
001-57891_a8_em162
QUANTITY
QUASI
1,000 and 2,000 Danish kroner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e96
001-57891_a8_em163
DATETIME
QUASI
five days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e92
001-57891_a8_em164
ORG
NO_MASK
City Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e65
001-57891_a8_em165
DATETIME
QUASI
31 May 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em166
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e97
001-57891_a8_em167
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Axholt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em168
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e66
001-57891_a8_em169
LOC
QUASI
Østerbro
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e92
001-57891_a8_em170
ORG
NO_MASK
City Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e62
001-57891_a8_em171
ORG
QUASI
Danmarks Radio
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em172
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e98
001-57891_a8_em173
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court of Eastern Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e93
001-57891_a8_em174
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em175
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e92
001-57891_a8_em176
ORG
NO_MASK
City Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e98
001-57891_a8_em177
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court of Eastern Denmark
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e98
001-57891_a8_em178
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57891_a8_em177
Østre Landsret
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e92
001-57891_a8_em179
ORG
NO_MASK
City Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em180
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e99
001-57891_a8_em181
DATETIME
QUASI
16 June 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e100
001-57891_a8_em182
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em183
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e93
001-57891_a8_em184
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e101
001-57891_a8_em185
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e93
001-57891_a8_em186
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e100
001-57891_a8_em187
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e101
001-57891_a8_em188
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57891_a8_e102
001-57891_a8_em189
ORG
NO_MASK
Højesteret
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e103
001-57891_a8_em190
DATETIME
QUASI
13 February 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e92
001-57891_a8_em191
ORG
NO_MASK
City Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e100
001-57891_a8_em192
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e64
001-57891_a8_em193
ORG
QUASI
Greenjackets
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e101
001-57891_a8_em194
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e104
001-57891_a8_em195
PERSON
QUASI
Justice Hermann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e105
001-57891_a8_em196
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e93
001-57891_a8_em197
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57891_a8_e93
001-57891_a8_em198
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e93
001-57891_a8_em199
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Jensen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57891_a8_e104
001-57891_a8_em200
PERSON
QUASI
Justice Hermann
Jens Olaf Jersild
DNK
GRANDCHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Jens Olaf Jersild