PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 27556/03) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Ireneusz Lachowski (“the applicant”), on 8 August 2003.

The applicant was represented by Ms D. Wojdyło-Nafalska, a lawyer practising in Chełm. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 19 December 2005 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it was decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1961 and lives in Rejowiec Fabryczny.

The applicant was arrested on 20 September 1999 on suspicion of homicide. On 22 September 1999 the Chełm District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) ordered that the applicant be remanded in custody for a period of 3 months in view of a reasonable suspicion that he had committed homicide. It further held that the likelihood that he would be given a heavy sentence justified his detention on remand.

On 14 December 1999 the Lublin Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) prolonged the applicant’s detention until 19 March 2000. It relied on the reasonable suspicion of his having committed the offence in question and the likelihood of a heavy sentence being imposed on the applicant. In addition, it had regard to the need to obtain expert evidence and a psychiatric examination of the suspects.

On 8 March 2000 the Lublin Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny) extended the applicant’s detention until 19 June 2000. It found that in the light of the evidence obtained there was a strong likelihood that the applicant had committed the offence. Furthermore, it relied on the severity of the likely sentence and the need to obtain further expert evidence. On 24 May 2000 the Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant’s detention until 4 September 2000, reiterating the grounds previously given. It appears that his detention was subsequently prolonged on an unspecified later date.

In the course of the investigation the Regional Prosecutor obtained voluminous evidence and took a series of investigative measures. On 10 July 2000 the prosecution service filed a bill of indictment with the Lublin Regional Court. The applicant was charged with two counts of homicide and armed robbery. There were four other defendants in the case.

On 20 March 2001 the Regional Court ordered that the applicant be kept in custody until 19 September 2001. It held that the gravity of the charges and the likelihood that the applicant would be given a heavy sentence confirmed the risk that he might obstruct the proceedings. It further held that the applicant’s detention on remand was the only measure which could secure the proper conduct of the proceedings. Lastly, when extending the applicant’s detention, the Regional Court had regard to its caseload.

On 19 September 2001 the Court of Appeal granted the Regional Court’s application and prolonged the applicant’s detention until 31 December 2001. It noted that the period of the applicant’s detention had reached the 2-year statutory time-limit (Article 263 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) and criticised the trial court for not having indicated any particular circumstances which would justify the prolongation beyond the statutory time-limit. However, it held that the prolongation was justified on account of other significant obstacles to progress in the proceedings, namely the fact that one of the defendants had failed to appear at the hearing which had led to the adjournment of the trial. The Court of Appeal also noted that although the bill of indictment had been filed on 10 July 2000, the trial court listed the first hearing only for 16 May 2001.

The applicant’s detention was subsequently prolonged on 28 November 2001 (until 15 March 2002), on 13 March 2002 (until 30 April 2002) and on 24 April 2002 (until 30 September 2002). In all those decisions the Court of Appeal relied on the same grounds as had been given in the earlier decisions.

The trial court held 20 hearings in the period from 16 May 2001 to 19 September 2002. On 23 September 2002 the Lublin Regional Court convicted the applicant as charged and sentenced him to 25 years’ imprisonment. The applicant, who remained in detention, appealed against the first-instance judgment.

On 22 October 2003 the Lublin Court of Appeal quashed the judgment of the Regional Court and ordered a retrial.

It appears that the applicant’s detention was prolonged on further unspecified dates. On 7 May 2004 the Regional Court ordered that the applicant be kept in custody until 31 December 2004. The applicant’s detention was subsequently prolonged on 3 December 2004 (until 31 March 2005), on 29 March 2005 (until 30 September 2005) and on 19 September 2005 (until 31 December 2005). In all those decisions, the Regional Court relied on the reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offences in question and the likelihood of a heavy sentence being imposed.

The applicant appealed against the decision of 3 December 2004 to prolong his detention. He argued, in particular, that the Regional Court had failed to explain why other non-custodial measures were considered insufficient in his case. On 21 December 2004 the Court of Appeal upheld the contested decision. It agreed with the applicant that the reasons given by the Regional Court were very brief and general. However, referring to Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, it held that the applicant’s continued detention served the public interest of protecting society, given that the applicant had been charged with the homicide of two women, having first cruelly treated them.

In its decision of 20 April 2005 upholding the decision of 29 March on the prolongation of the applicant’s detention, the Court of Appeal held that his continued detention on the basis of Article 258 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure remained valid. Having regard to the nature of the alleged offences, it held that Article 258 § 2 established a presumption to the effect that the likelihood of a severe penalty being imposed on an accused might induce him to obstruct the proceedings.

On 5 October 2005 the Court of Appeal, having examined the applicant’s appeal against the decision of 19 September 2005 on prolongation of his detention, ordered the applicant’s release under police supervision. It also imposed a ban on leaving the country. The Court of Appeal had regard to the excessive length of the applicant’s detention on remand and the fact that the process of hearing evidence was very advanced. In those circumstances, it was not necessary to prolong further the applicant’s detention. The Court of Appeal also noted that despite the significant length of the applicant’s detention, the Regional Court had failed to ensure the diligent conduct of the trial and, in particular, had not held hearings at reasonable intervals. Furthermore, it observed that the reasons for the continued detention as given by the Regional Court in its decision of 19 September 2005 were very terse. The applicant was released on 6 October 2005.

The Regional Court held 22 hearings in the period from 28 January 2004 to 11 April 2006. The proceedings are still pending.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e1
001-78289_a2_em1
CODE
DIRECT
27556/03
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-78289_a2_e2
001-78289_a2_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
001-78289_a2_em8
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e3
001-78289_a2_em3
DEM
QUASI
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e4
001-78289_a2_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ireneusz Lachowski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e5
001-78289_a2_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
8 August 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e6
001-78289_a2_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Ms D. Wojdyło-Nafalska
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e7
001-78289_a2_em7
LOC
QUASI
Chełm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e2
001-78289_a2_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e8
001-78289_a2_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e9
001-78289_a2_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
19 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e10
001-78289_a2_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1961
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e11
001-78289_a2_em12
LOC
QUASI
Rejowiec Fabryczny
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e12
001-78289_a2_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
20 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e13
001-78289_a2_em14
MISC
QUASI
homicide
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e14
001-78289_a2_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
22 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e15
001-78289_a2_em16
ORG
QUASI
001-78289_a2_em17
Chełm District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e15
001-78289_a2_em17
ORG
QUASI
001-78289_a2_em17
Chełm District Court (Sąd Rejonowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e16
001-78289_a2_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
3 months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e13
001-78289_a2_em19
MISC
QUASI
homicide
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e17
001-78289_a2_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
14 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e18
001-78289_a2_em21
ORG
QUASI
001-78289_a2_em22
Lublin Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e18
001-78289_a2_em22
ORG
QUASI
001-78289_a2_em22
Lublin Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e19
001-78289_a2_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e20
001-78289_a2_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em25
ORG
QUASI
001-78289_a2_em26
Lublin Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em26
ORG
QUASI
001-78289_a2_em26
Lublin Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e22
001-78289_a2_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
19 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e23
001-78289_a2_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
24 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
001-78289_a2_em26
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e24
001-78289_a2_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
4 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e25
001-78289_a2_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e26
001-78289_a2_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
10 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e18
001-78289_a2_em33
ORG
QUASI
Lublin Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e27
001-78289_a2_em34
QUANTITY
QUASI
two counts
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e13
001-78289_a2_em35
MISC
QUASI
homicide
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e28
001-78289_a2_em36
QUANTITY
QUASI
four other defendants
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e29
001-78289_a2_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
20 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e31
001-78289_a2_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e31
001-78289_a2_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e32
001-78289_a2_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e26
001-78289_a2_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
10 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e33
001-78289_a2_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e34
001-78289_a2_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
28 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e35
001-78289_a2_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e36
001-78289_a2_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e37
001-78289_a2_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e38
001-78289_a2_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
24 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e39
001-78289_a2_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e40
001-78289_a2_em55
QUANTITY
QUASI
20 hearings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e33
001-78289_a2_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e41
001-78289_a2_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e42
001-78289_a2_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
23 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e18
001-78289_a2_em59
ORG
QUASI
Lublin Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e43
001-78289_a2_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
25 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e44
001-78289_a2_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
22 October 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em62
ORG
QUASI
Lublin Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e45
001-78289_a2_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
7 May 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em65
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e46
001-78289_a2_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e47
001-78289_a2_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e48
001-78289_a2_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
31 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e49
001-78289_a2_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
29 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e50
001-78289_a2_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e51
001-78289_a2_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e52
001-78289_a2_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e47
001-78289_a2_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em75
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e53
001-78289_a2_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
21 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e13
001-78289_a2_em79
MISC
QUASI
homicide
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e54
001-78289_a2_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e55
001-78289_a2_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
29 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em82
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e56
001-78289_a2_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
5 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em84
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e51
001-78289_a2_em85
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em86
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e21
001-78289_a2_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em89
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e51
001-78289_a2_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e57
001-78289_a2_em91
DATETIME
QUASI
6 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e30
001-78289_a2_em92
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78289_a2_e58
001-78289_a2_em93
QUANTITY
QUASI
22 hearings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e59
001-78289_a2_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
28 January 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78289_a2_e60
001-78289_a2_em95
DATETIME
QUASI
11 April 2006
Ireneusz Lachowski
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Ireneusz Lachowski