PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 17912/05) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Kurt Bösch (“the applicant”), on 10 May 2005.

The applicant was represented by Mr W.L. Weh, a lawyer practising in Bregenz. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador Mr F. Trauttmansdorff, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

The applicant complained, in particular, about a breach of Article 6 of the Convention on account of unreasonably lengthy proceedings in which no oral hearing before a tribunal was held.

On 10 April 2006 the Court decided to give notice of the application to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant is the owner of a farm in Frastranz. On 21 April 1999 he asked the Mayor (Bürgermeister) of Frastanz to grant him a permit for the building of roofing between two buildings in order to create a tool shed on his farm.

On 12 July 1999 the Mayor, acting as building authority of first instance, dismissed this request as the project was contrary to the relevant area zoning plan (Flächenwidmungsplan). On 22 July 1999 the applicant appealed and submitted in particular that permits had been granted for the building of the other two buildings. He had constructed the roofing at issue at the same time and then sought a building permit for it as in the other cases. He further requested, should it be necessary, that the Municipal Council grant him an exemption permit under Section 22 of the Regional Planning Act (Raumplanungsgesetz). Under this provision a land owner may be exempted under certain conditions from the application of the relevant area zoning plan.

The Municipal Council (Gemeindeamt) remitted the case back to the Mayor. Having held a hearing on 15 March 2000, the Mayor, on 13 September 2000, again dismissed the applicant's request for a building permit. He referred to the relevant area zoning plan (Flächenwidmungsplan) and further noted that the local council (Gemeindevorstand) had not granted an exemption permit. The Mayor finally observed that for the construction of the two other buildings there had been proceedings for re-designation of the concerned land. The applicant had then promised to demolish the already existing roofing which had been built without the authorities' consent and the relating demolition order had not been challenged by the applicant.

By a decision of 15 January 2001 the local council dismissed the applicant's request for an exemption permit. It noted that the building project concerned 60 square metres while the relevant provisions of the Vorarlberg Regional Planning Act (Raumplanungsgesetz) provided such an exemption only for a small-sized project of around 25 square meters.

On 16 January and 11 July 2001 respectively the Municipal Council (Gemeindeamt) dismissed the applicant's appeals of 27 September 2000 against the above decisions.

The Feldkirch District Administrative Authority (Bezirkshaupt-mannschaft) confirmed these decisions on 28 March and 8 October 2001 respectively.

On 15 May 2001 the applicant filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof) concerning the refusal of the building permit and requested the court to examine the lawfulness of the underlying area zoning plan. He further requested the Constitutional Court to hold an oral hearing.

On 20 June 2001 the Constitutional Court declined to deal with the applicant's complaint as it had no prospect of success.

The applicant subsequently filed two complaints with the Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof). In the first complaint, of 24 September 2001, he submitted that the refusal to grant him a building permit had been unlawful as the actual designation of the land concerned was not clear and the underlying area zoning plan was unlawful. In the latter regard, he requested the Administrative Court to institute proceedings for examination of the lawfulness of the area zoning plan with the Constitutional Court after having established the relevant facts. He further submitted that the relevant authorities should have waited for the outcome of the proceedings concerning his request for an exemption permit. In his second complaint, of 20 November 2001, the applicant submitted that an exemption should have been granted as his project was small-sized within the meaning of the Regional Planning Act. In both complaints the applicant asked the Administrative Court to hold a hearing.

On 21 October 2004 the Administrative Court dismissed both complaints, which it had joined. The Administrative Court found, in accordance with Section 39(2) of the Administrative Court Act (Verwaltungsgerichtshofgesetz), that there was no need for a hearing as the applicant's complaints concerned only legal questions of no particular complexity. The question of the lawfulness of the area zoning plan had been considered by the Constitutional Court, which had no doubts as to the lawfulness either. This decision was served on the applicant's counsel on 11 November 2004.

In the meantime, on 29 June 2000, the Municipal Council dismissed the applicant's request for re-designation of the land concerned. The applicant did not pursue these proceedings any further.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e1
001-80444_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
17912/05
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-80444_a8_e2
001-80444_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e3
001-80444_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e4
001-80444_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Kurt Bösch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e5
001-80444_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
10 May 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e6
001-80444_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr W.L. Weh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e7
001-80444_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Bregenz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e8
001-80444_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e9
001-80444_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Trauttmansdorff
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e10
001-80444_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e11
001-80444_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e12
001-80444_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
10 April 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-80444_a8_e13
001-80444_a8_em13
LOC
QUASI
Frastranz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e14
001-80444_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
21 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-80444_a8_e15
001-80444_a8_em15
LOC
QUASI
Frastanz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e16
001-80444_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
12 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e17
001-80444_a8_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
22 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e18
001-80444_a8_em18
ORG
NO_MASK
Municipal Council (Gemeindeamt)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e19
001-80444_a8_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e20
001-80444_a8_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
13 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e21
001-80444_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e22
001-80444_a8_em22
QUANTITY
QUASI
60 square metres
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80444_a8_e23
001-80444_a8_em23
QUANTITY
QUASI
25 square meters
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e24
001-80444_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
16 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e25
001-80444_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
11 July 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80444_a8_e18
001-80444_a8_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
Municipal Council (Gemeindeamt)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e26
001-80444_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
27 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80444_a8_e27
001-80444_a8_em28
ORG
QUASI
Feldkirch District Administrative Authority (Bezirkshaupt-mannschaft)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e28
001-80444_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e29
001-80444_a8_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
8 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e30
001-80444_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80444_a8_e31
001-80444_a8_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80444_a8_e32
001-80444_a8_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e33
001-80444_a8_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
20 June 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e32
001-80444_a8_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80444_a8_e34
001-80444_a8_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e35
001-80444_a8_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80444_a8_e36
001-80444_a8_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e32
001-80444_a8_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e37
001-80444_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
20 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e36
001-80444_a8_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e38
001-80444_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
21 October 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e36
001-80444_a8_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e36
001-80444_a8_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e36
001-80444_a8_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e32
001-80444_a8_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e39
001-80444_a8_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
11 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80444_a8_e40
001-80444_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
29 June 2000
Kurt Bösch
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Kurt Bösch