PROCEDURE

The case originated in five applications (nos. 57818/10, 57822/10, 57825/10, 57827/10, 57829/10) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by five Turkish nationals, Mr Tibet Menteş, Mr Atilla Kantar, Mr Birol Arısoy, Mr Rahmi Aydoğmuş and Mr Muhammed Erkan Güneri (“the applicants”), on 9 August 2010.

The applicants were represented by Ahmet Okyay, a lawyer practising in İzmir. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The applicants alleged, in particular, that the final judgment in their case, dismissing their claims for overtime pay, had amounted to a denial of justice which had run contrary to the prohibition of forced labour.

On 26 May 2014 the application was communicated to the Government under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

Third-party comments were received from the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC), which had been given leave by the President to intervene in the written procedure (Article 36 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 44 § 2 of the Rules of Court).

On 24 September 2015, the Vice-President of the Section decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (c), to invite the parties to submit further observations on whether there had been a violation of Article 4 § 2 of the Convention owing to the fact that the applicants had worked overtime without any remuneration and in excess of the limits permitted by the national legislation.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicants were born in 1967, 1965, 1968, 1960 and 1958 respectively and live in İzmir.

The facts of the case may be summarised as follows.

The applicants have been employed in the duty-free shops at İzmir Adnan Menderes Airport since 1993. They are members of the Tekgıda Work Union, which had signed a collective labour agreement with the General Directorate of Monopolies on Spirits and Tobacco, the applicants’ employer and formerly a State-run enterprise.

During their employment the applicants operated in “work and rest cycles”. Accordingly, in the four months of the summer period they worked continuously for twenty-four hours and rested the next twenty-four hours. For the remaining eight months of the year, the winter period, they worked for twenty-four hours and rested for the next forty-eight hours. Their work schedule did not take account of weekends or public holidays as the duty‑free shops remained open twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. As regards rest breaks and periods, section 22 of their collective labour agreement provided that such periods would be counted as working time and that they could not be subject to wage deductions.

On 10 October 2003 the applicants, with the assistance of their lawyer, instituted individual and separate proceedings against their employer before the İzmir Labour Court. They claimed compensation for the overtime hours they had worked beyond the legal working time for the previous five years of their employment. They referred to the Labour Code in force at the material time and to their collective agreement. Both documents defined overtime as work in excess of the regular forty-five-hour working week and provided for remuneration for such work at one and a half times the regular hourly rate.

On 1 November 2003 the applicants instituted new proceedings against their employer before the İzmir Labour Court and requested further remuneration for work done on weekends and public holidays and compensation for annual leave that they had not taken.

Having regard to the common background of the applicants’ complaints in both sets of proceedings, the İzmir Labour Court decided to join each applicant’s proceedings and to seek an expert report concerning the calculation of their claims for overtime, weekend and public holiday pay and remuneration for unused annual leave.

On 14 July 2004 the expert submitted a report in which he noted, inter alia, that clause 25 (c) of the collective agreement concluded between the parties provided for an entitlement to overtime pay, calculated on the basis of one and half times the hourly rate. He further referred to an official audit report by the Ministry of Labour, dated 10 September 2003, which noted that during the preceding summer period, between the months of June and September, workers at the company in question had worked overtime of 139.5 hours in months which had thirty-one calendar days and 135 hours in the remaining months. In the previous winter period, between October and May, they had worked 22.5 hours and fifteen hours of overtime respectively. The hours worked in excess of the legal working time should have been remunerated accordingly. According to the expert report, the applicants’ employer had previously been cautioned, on 25 November 1996, by the Ministry of Labour concerning its practices on working hours.

On the basis of his examination of the company’s timekeeping records, the expert calculated the number of hours worked as overtime in respect of each applicant, deducting three hours of rest per each day worked.

The expert determined that the employer did not owe anything to the applicants for weekend and public holiday work as the remuneration for those days had been in accordance with the applicable regulations. The expert also noted that the applicants could not claim any compensation for unused annual leave as they were still working at the company and such leave was only payable at the end of a contract.

The applicants raised a number of objections to the expert report. They stated that the timekeeping records used for the calculation did not reflect the actual hours worked as they were unofficial copies kept by the employer, which were not signed by employees. In that regard, the applicants submitted that they had worked for more hours than established by the expert. They requested that the court take other evidence into account, including the defendant employer’s shift orders, which detailed who would work when and for how long, as well as reports from the Regional Labour Inspectorate. They also submitted that the deduction of three hours of rest per day was not based on fact but was an assumption by the expert. The applicants submitted that in any event the expert’s hypothetical conclusion on rest periods could not be relied on because the collective agreement had expressly provided for the inclusion of such periods as a part of working time. The applicants raised no objections to the expert’s conclusion on the dismissal of their claims for pay for work at the weekend and on public holidays and for unused annual leave.

In submissions of 22 July 2004, the defendant employer raised objections to the expert report and also argued that the timekeeping documents could not be relied on as they were unofficial copies. It also maintained that it had been unable to pay overtime in full owing to a lack of funds from the State. It submitted that the applicants had in any event been aware of the working arrangements and had never requested a transfer to another unit of the General Directorate of Monopolies.

The İzmir Labour Court asked the expert to supplement his report with findings concerning the parties’ objections.

On 4 July 2005, the expert submitted a supplement to his report, in which he corrected his findings concerning the rest periods in the light of the applicants’ objection and calculated the hours they had worked as twenty-four in the course of a twenty-four-hour shift. He maintained his findings regarding the timesheets, submitting that his in situ examination of the workplace and comparisons between the official record and the employer’s copies had not revealed any inconsistencies.

On 12 September 2005 the İzmir Labour Court found in favour of the applicants in part and awarded them the amounts given in the expert’s report in respect of the unpaid overtime. It rejected their claims for pay for weekend and public holiday work and for unused annual leave.

Both parties appealed to the Court of Cassation.

On 17 April 2006 the Court of Cassation quashed the decision and remitted the case. It found that the Labour Court had not taken into account any time that could have been used for rest periods and that therefore the calculation of overtime could not be deemed accurate. It also stated that the overtime calculation should be based on weekly working hours rather than the monthly working time used in the expert report.

In the resumed proceedings, the İzmir Labour Court requested that the expert amend the report in light of the Court of Cassation’s decision.

On 11 September 2007 the expert revised the findings as ordered and concluded that the applicants were likely to have had a minimum of three hours for rest during a twenty-four-hour shift. The expert therefore recalculated their entitlement to overtime on the basis of twenty-one hours of actual work and compared it with the legal working week of forty‑five hours.

On 26 May 2008 the İzmir Labour Court awarded the applicants compensation for overtime as determined in the revised expert report.

The defendant employer appealed, arguing that the presumption established in the case-law of the Court of Cassation that a person could not work more than fourteen hours in the course of a twenty-four-hour shift should be applied to the facts of the dispute. The Court of Cassation then quashed the first-instance judgment on 28 October 2008 and remitted the case on the following grounds: “It can be seen from the case file that during the summer months [the applicants] worked for 24 hours and subsequently rested for 24 hours; and in the winter months they worked for 24 hours and subsequently rested for 48 hours. However, as determined by the well-established case-law of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Cassation’s Civil Division, in workplaces where there are 24-hour shifts, after the deduction of time spent on certain activities such as resting, eating and fulfilling other needs, a person can only work for 14 hours a day ... This approach must also be followed in the present case.”

In the resumed proceedings, the İzmir Labour Court decided to follow the decision of the Court of Cassation and another expert report was drawn up for that purpose. The report, dated 21 July 2009, calculated the applicants’ daily working time as fourteen hours, in line with the Court of Cassation’s presumption of fact. The calculation in the new report led to no overtime being found for the weeks in which the applicants had worked three days as the working time was less than the legal limit of forty-five hours. For the weeks in which the applicants had worked four days, the report calculated the total working time as fifty-six hours, leading to an assessment in the report of nine hours of overtime. On 28 December 2009 the İzmir Labour Court rendered a final judgment in the applicants’ case, based on the expert report of 21 July 2009. As a result of that interpretation, some of the applicants’ claims were dismissed entirely, while the others were awarded almost ninety percent less than the previous expert report had calculated.

On 25 January 2010 the applicants appealed against the decision and maintained that the fact that they had worked continuously for twenty-four hours had already been confirmed by the legal records of the Ministry of Labour, both parties’ witness statements and other evidence in the file, including the expert reports overturned by the Court of Cassation. Although they had proven that fact, the judgment had been based on the presumption that working for more than fourteen hours a day was physically impossible.

On 18 March 2010 the Court of Cassation upheld the İzmir Labour Court’s decision without responding to the applicants’ objections.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e1
001-177938_a3_em1
CODE
DIRECT
57818/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e2
001-177938_a3_em2
CODE
DIRECT
57822/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e3
001-177938_a3_em3
CODE
DIRECT
57825/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e4
001-177938_a3_em4
CODE
DIRECT
57827/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e5
001-177938_a3_em5
CODE
DIRECT
57829/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e6
001-177938_a3_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e7
001-177938_a3_em7
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e8
001-177938_a3_em8
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Tibet Menteş
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e9
001-177938_a3_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Atilla Kantar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e10
001-177938_a3_em10
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Birol Arısoy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e11
001-177938_a3_em11
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Rahmi Aydoğmuş
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e12
001-177938_a3_em12
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Muhammed Erkan Güneri
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e13
001-177938_a3_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
9 August 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e14
001-177938_a3_em14
PERSON
DIRECT
Ahmet Okyay
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-177938_a3_e15
001-177938_a3_em15
LOC
QUASI
İzmir
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e16
001-177938_a3_em16
ORG
NO_MASK
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e17
001-177938_a3_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
26 May 2014
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e18
001-177938_a3_em18
ORG
NO_MASK
European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e19
001-177938_a3_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 2015
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e20
001-177938_a3_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
1967
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e21
001-177938_a3_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
1965
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e22
001-177938_a3_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
1968
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e23
001-177938_a3_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
1960
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e24
001-177938_a3_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
1958
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e15
001-177938_a3_em25
LOC
QUASI
İzmir
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e25
001-177938_a3_em26
DEM
NO_MASK
employed in the duty-free
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e26
001-177938_a3_em27
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Adnan Menderes Airport
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e27
001-177938_a3_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-177938_a3_e28
001-177938_a3_em29
ORG
QUASI
Tekgıda Work Union
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e29
001-177938_a3_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
General Directorate of Monopolies on Spirits and Tobacco
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e30
001-177938_a3_em31
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four months of the summer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e31
001-177938_a3_em32
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twenty-four hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e31
001-177938_a3_em33
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twenty-four hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e32
001-177938_a3_em34
DATETIME
NO_MASK
remaining eight months of the year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e33
001-177938_a3_em35
DATETIME
NO_MASK
winter period
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e31
001-177938_a3_em36
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twenty-four hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e34
001-177938_a3_em37
DATETIME
NO_MASK
next forty-eight hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e31
001-177938_a3_em38
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twenty-four hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e35
001-177938_a3_em39
DATETIME
NO_MASK
seven days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e36
001-177938_a3_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e37
001-177938_a3_em41
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e38
001-177938_a3_em42
DATETIME
NO_MASK
overtime hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e39
001-177938_a3_em43
DATETIME
NO_MASK
previous five years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e40
001-177938_a3_em44
DATETIME
NO_MASK
forty-five-hour working week
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e41
001-177938_a3_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
1 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e37
001-177938_a3_em46
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e37
001-177938_a3_em47
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e42
001-177938_a3_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e43
001-177938_a3_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Labour
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e44
001-177938_a3_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
10 September 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e45
001-177938_a3_em51
DATETIME
NO_MASK
preceding summer period
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e46
001-177938_a3_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
months of June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e47
001-177938_a3_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e48
001-177938_a3_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
139.5 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e49
001-177938_a3_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
thirty-one calendar days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e50
001-177938_a3_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
135 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e51
001-177938_a3_em57
DATETIME
NO_MASK
remaining months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e52
001-177938_a3_em58
DATETIME
NO_MASK
previous winter period
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e53
001-177938_a3_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e54
001-177938_a3_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
May,
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e55
001-177938_a3_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
22.5 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e56
001-177938_a3_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
fifteen hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e57
001-177938_a3_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e43
001-177938_a3_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Labour
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e58
001-177938_a3_em65
DATETIME
NO_MASK
working hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e59
001-177938_a3_em66
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e60
001-177938_a3_em67
DATETIME
NO_MASK
those days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e61
001-177938_a3_em68
DATETIME
NO_MASK
actual hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-177938_a3_e62
001-177938_a3_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Labour Inspectorate
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e59
001-177938_a3_em70
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e63
001-177938_a3_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
22 July 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e64
001-177938_a3_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
General Directorate of Monopolies
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e37
001-177938_a3_em73
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e65
001-177938_a3_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
4 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e66
001-177938_a3_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
12 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e37
001-177938_a3_em76
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e67
001-177938_a3_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e68
001-177938_a3_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
17 April 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e67
001-177938_a3_em79
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e69
001-177938_a3_em80
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e58
001-177938_a3_em81
DATETIME
NO_MASK
working hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e37
001-177938_a3_em82
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e67
001-177938_a3_em83
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e70
001-177938_a3_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e59
001-177938_a3_em85
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e71
001-177938_a3_em86
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twenty-one hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e72
001-177938_a3_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
26 May 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e37
001-177938_a3_em88
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e67
001-177938_a3_em89
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e73
001-177938_a3_em90
DATETIME
NO_MASK
fourteen hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e67
001-177938_a3_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e74
001-177938_a3_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
28 October 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e75
001-177938_a3_em93
DATETIME
NO_MASK
summer months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e76
001-177938_a3_em94
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e76
001-177938_a3_em95
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e77
001-177938_a3_em96
DATETIME
NO_MASK
winter months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e76
001-177938_a3_em97
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e78
001-177938_a3_em98
DATETIME
NO_MASK
48 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e79
001-177938_a3_em99
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24-hour
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e80
001-177938_a3_em100
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e37
001-177938_a3_em101
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e67
001-177938_a3_em102
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e81
001-177938_a3_em103
DATETIME
QUASI
21 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e73
001-177938_a3_em104
DATETIME
NO_MASK
fourteen hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e67
001-177938_a3_em105
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e82
001-177938_a3_em106
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e83
001-177938_a3_em107
DATETIME
NO_MASK
forty-five hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e84
001-177938_a3_em108
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e85
001-177938_a3_em109
DATETIME
NO_MASK
fifty-six hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e86
001-177938_a3_em110
DATETIME
NO_MASK
nine hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e87
001-177938_a3_em111
DATETIME
QUASI
28 December 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e37
001-177938_a3_em112
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-177938_a3_e81
001-177938_a3_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
21 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e88
001-177938_a3_em114
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
almost ninety percent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e89
001-177938_a3_em115
DATETIME
QUASI
25 January 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e31
001-177938_a3_em116
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twenty-four hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e43
001-177938_a3_em117
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Labour
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e67
001-177938_a3_em118
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e73
001-177938_a3_em119
DATETIME
NO_MASK
fourteen hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e90
001-177938_a3_em120
DATETIME
QUASI
18 March 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e67
001-177938_a3_em121
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-177938_a3_e91
001-177938_a3_em122
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Labour Court’s
Tibet Menteş
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Tibet Menteş