PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 45369/07) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Austrian nationals, Mr Wolfgang Rambauske and Mrs Martina Rambauske (“the applicants”), on 15 October 2007.

The applicants were represented by Mr P.-L. Kirste, a lawyer practising in Salzburg. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador F. Trauttmansdorff, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs.

On 11 February 2009 the President of the First Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3).

THE FACTS

THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicants are the joint owners of a house in Salzburg which they had acquired in 1996. In spring 1997 they discovered that the distance between an annex to their house and the neighbouring plot of land did not correspond to the minimum distance required by the building permit.

On 24 November 1997 the applicants applied to the Salzburg Municipal Authority (Magistrat) for a retrospective building permit including, among other points, the authorisation to go below the minimum distance between the annex to their house and the neighbouring plot.

The Salzburg Municipal Authority fixed a date for a hearing on the property in question, but cancelled that date on the applicants’ request. Subsequently, the applicants and their neighbours filed comprehensive submissions and the applicants submitted substitute plans which were then examined by a court-appointed expert, A.

A hearing on the applicants’ property was held on 4 November 1998. On the applicants’ request the time-limit for commenting on the results of the hearing was extended from 4 to 31 December 1998. Having announced to submit a private expert opinion by the end of January 1999 the applicants did so on 2 June 1999. On 1 August 1999 the applicant’s neighbours filed comments. The Salzburg Municipal Authority granted the applicants’ request on 7 December 1999.

On 23 December 1999 the applicants’ neighbours appealed against the authorisation to reduce the minimum distance between their property and the applicants’ house.

Until August 2000 the Appeals Commission (Bauberufungs-kommission) tried to achieve a settlement between the applicants and their neighbours. As these efforts failed, it took further evidence, asking expert A. to supplement his opinion. The parties were asked to comment by 21 February 2001. That time-limit was extended several times on the applicants’ request until 30 March 2001. The Appeals Commission held an on-site hearing on 6 July 2001.

On 17 October 2001, after a further attempt to achieve a friendly settlement had failed, the Appeals Commission requested the applicants for further comments by 6 November. On their request the time-limit was extended until 28 November 2001. Following a change in the designation of the applicants’ property, the Appeals Commission asked them to comment by 13 February 2002. On that date the applicants submitted comments and amended their request which was subsequently submitted to expert A. The latter submitted his opinion, after the applicants had made further necessary amendments of the plan, on 24 September 2002. On the applicants’ request, the time-limit for filing comments was extended from 12 November until 9 December 2002. The time-limit for replying to their neighbours’ comments was extended from 2 January until 28 January 2003.

On 18 March 2003 the Appeals Commission confirmed the Municipal Authority’s decision.

On 2 May 2003 the applicants’ neighbours lodged a complaint to the Administrative Court. The Appeals Commission submitted its observations on 3 July and the applicants submitted their observations in reply on 24 July 2003.

On 27 March 2007 the Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) dismissed the neighbours’ complaint as being unfounded. The judgment was served on the applicants’ counsel on 19 April 2007.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e1
001-97002_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
45369/07
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e2
001-97002_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e3
001-97002_a11_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e4
001-97002_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Wolfgang Rambauske
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-97002_a11_e5
001-97002_a11_em5
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Martina Rambauske
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e6
001-97002_a11_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
15 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e7
001-97002_a11_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P.-L. Kirste
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e8
001-97002_a11_em8
LOC
NO_MASK
Salzburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e2
001-97002_a11_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
001-97002_a11_em2
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-97002_a11_e2
001-97002_a11_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
001-97002_a11_em2
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e9
001-97002_a11_em11
PERSON
QUASI
F. Trauttmansdorff
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e10
001-97002_a11_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e11
001-97002_a11_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e12
001-97002_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
11 February 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e2
001-97002_a11_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e8
001-97002_a11_em16
LOC
NO_MASK
Salzburg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e13
001-97002_a11_em17
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e14
001-97002_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
spring 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e15
001-97002_a11_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e16
001-97002_a11_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
Salzburg Municipal Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-97002_a11_e17
001-97002_a11_em21
ORG
NO_MASK
Magistrat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e16
001-97002_a11_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
Salzburg Municipal Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-97002_a11_e18
001-97002_a11_em23
PERSON
NO_MASK
A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e19
001-97002_a11_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
4 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e20
001-97002_a11_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
4 to 31 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e21
001-97002_a11_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
end of January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e22
001-97002_a11_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
2 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e23
001-97002_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
1 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e16
001-97002_a11_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
Salzburg Municipal Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e24
001-97002_a11_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
7 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e25
001-97002_a11_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
23 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e26
001-97002_a11_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e27
001-97002_a11_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-97002_a11_e27
001-97002_a11_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
001-97002_a11_em33
Bauberufungs-kommission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e18
001-97002_a11_em35
PERSON
NO_MASK
A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e28
001-97002_a11_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
21 February 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e29
001-97002_a11_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
30 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e27
001-97002_a11_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e30
001-97002_a11_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
6 July 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e31
001-97002_a11_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
17 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e27
001-97002_a11_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e32
001-97002_a11_em42
DATETIME
NO_MASK
6 November
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e33
001-97002_a11_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
28 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e27
001-97002_a11_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e34
001-97002_a11_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
13 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e18
001-97002_a11_em46
PERSON
NO_MASK
A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e35
001-97002_a11_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e36
001-97002_a11_em48
DATETIME
NO_MASK
12 November
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e37
001-97002_a11_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
9 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e38
001-97002_a11_em50
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e39
001-97002_a11_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
28 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e40
001-97002_a11_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
18 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e27
001-97002_a11_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-97002_a11_e41
001-97002_a11_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Municipal Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e42
001-97002_a11_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
2 May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e43
001-97002_a11_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e27
001-97002_a11_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e44
001-97002_a11_em58
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e45
001-97002_a11_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
24 July 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e46
001-97002_a11_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
27 March 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e43
001-97002_a11_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-97002_a11_e43
001-97002_a11_em62
ORG
NO_MASK
001-97002_a11_em61
Verwaltungsgerichtshof
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-97002_a11_e47
001-97002_a11_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
19 April 2007
Wolfgang Rambauske
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Wolfgang Rambauske