PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 54640/00) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a national of the United States of America, Mr Thomas R. Sylvester (“the applicant”), on 23 August 1999.

The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Winkler, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

The applicant complained about the length of proceedings relating to his request to have a divorce decree and custody decision issued by a United States court recognised in Austria.

The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1.

By a decision of 9 October 2003 the Court declared the application admissible.

On 1 November 2004 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed First Section (Rule 52 § 1).

THE FACTS

The applicant was born in 1953 and lives in Cincinnati, Ohio.

In April 1994 the applicant married an Austrian citizen. The marriage was concluded in the United States of America and the couple set up their common residence in Michigan. On 11 September 1994, their daughter was born.

On 31 October 1995, after his wife had left the United States with their daughter without obtaining the applicant’s consent and had set up her residence in Austria, he brought a petition for divorce in the Oakland Circuit Court (Michigan). He also introduced court proceedings in Austria requesting the return of his daughter under the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Child Abduction.

On 2 November 1995 the applicant’s wife brought a petition for divorce in the Graz District Civil Court.

On 16 April 1996 the Oakland Circuit Court confirmed a default decree of divorce issued in January 1996, noting that Mrs Sylvester had failed to comply with the requirements for setting aside the default. Further, it awarded the applicant sole custody over the couple’s daughter and ordered that she should reside with him in case of her return.

On 5 June 1996 the applicant filed a request for recognition of the divorce decree with the Austrian Federal Ministry of Justice.

On 26 September 1996 the Federal Ministry of Justice refused to grant this request. Referring to Section 24 § 1 of the Fourth Implementing Regulation to the Marriage Act (4. Durchführungsverordnung zum Ehegesetz), it considered that a recognition of the divorce decree would be contrary to Austrian ordre public as the applicant’s wife, being the defendant in the proceedings before the Oakland Circuit Court, had not been heard as she was considered to be in default, despite the fact that the applicant’s petition for divorce had not been duly served on her.

Thereupon, on 15 November 1996 the applicant filed a complaint with the Administrative Court. The latter instituted preliminary proceedings on 25 November 1996.

On 9 January 1997 the Administrative Court received the observations of the Federal Ministry of Justice and, on 20 January 1997, it received the observations of Mrs Sylvester as a third party.

On 18 December 1998 the Administrative Court referred the case to the Constitutional Court requesting it to review the constitutionality of Section 24 § 1 of the Fourth Implementing Regulation to the Marriage Act.

It argued that Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms which has constitutional rank in Austrian law, applied to the proceedings concerning the recognition of foreign divorce decrees as their outcome had a direct effect on the civil law relationship of the persons concerned. However, it was incompatible with that Article that the Federal Ministry of Justice, an administrative authority, decided upon the request for recognition. The subsequent control by the Administrative Court was not sufficient where the subject matter, such as family law relations, fell within the very core of the notion of “civil rights”.

The Constitutional Court received the Administrative Court’s request on 19 February 1999. The Administrative Court submitted three further requests raising the same issue, which were received by the Constitutional Court on 13 July, 21 October and 12 November 1999, respectively. The proceedings in these cases were joined to proceedings in the applicant’s case.

On 4 February 2000 the Administrative Court supplemented its request in the applicant’s case.

On 28 February 2001 it supplemented its requests in the three other cases.

On 16 June 2001 the Constitutional Court gave its judgment, finding that Section 24 § 1 of the Fourth Implementing Regulation to the Marriage Act was in conformity with the constitution.

The Constitutional Court noted firstly that the proceedings at issue were concerned with the questions whether recognition was compatible with Austrian ordre public. Thus, the recognition of foreign divorce decrees was closely linked to the question whether they could be enforced in Austria. Referring to a number of decisions, in which the European Commission of Human Rights had found that Article 6 did not apply to enforcement proceedings, the Constitutional Court expressed doubts as to the applicability of Article 6.

Even assuming that Article 6 applied, referring to the Court’s Zumtobel v. Austria judgment (of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A), the Constitutional Court held that the Administrative Court’s scope of review was sufficient, since proceedings concerning the recognition of foreign divorce decrees involved mainly questions of law. Where an assessment of facts was required, as for instance where the question arose whether an action had been duly served, the Administrative Court was empowered to review whether the administrative authority’s assessment was correctly based on the contents of the file.

On 5 October 2001 having resumed its proceedings, the Administrative Court dismissed the applicant’s complaint. The decision was served on the applicant on 29 October 2001.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e1
001-68160_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
54640/00
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-68160_a8_e2
001-68160_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-68160_a8_e3
001-68160_a8_em3
LOC
QUASI
United States of America
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e4
001-68160_a8_em4
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Thomas R. Sylvester
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e5
001-68160_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
23 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e6
001-68160_a8_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e7
001-68160_a8_em7
PERSON
QUASI
H. Winkler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e8
001-68160_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e9
001-68160_a8_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-68160_a8_e10
001-68160_a8_em10
LOC
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e11
001-68160_a8_em11
LOC
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e12
001-68160_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
9 October 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e13
001-68160_a8_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1953
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e14
001-68160_a8_em14
LOC
QUASI
Cincinnati, Ohio
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e15
001-68160_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e16
001-68160_a8_em16
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e3
001-68160_a8_em17
LOC
QUASI
United States of America
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e17
001-68160_a8_em18
LOC
QUASI
Michigan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e18
001-68160_a8_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e19
001-68160_a8_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
31 October 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e10
001-68160_a8_em21
LOC
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e11
001-68160_a8_em22
LOC
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-68160_a8_e20
001-68160_a8_em23
ORG
QUASI
Oakland Circuit Court (Michigan)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e11
001-68160_a8_em24
LOC
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e21
001-68160_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
2 November 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e22
001-68160_a8_em26
ORG
QUASI
Graz District Civil Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e23
001-68160_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
16 April 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e24
001-68160_a8_em28
ORG
QUASI
Oakland Circuit Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e25
001-68160_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e26
001-68160_a8_em30
PERSON
DIRECT
Mrs Sylvester
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e27
001-68160_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
5 June 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e28
001-68160_a8_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e29
001-68160_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
26 September 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e30
001-68160_a8_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e16
001-68160_a8_em35
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e24
001-68160_a8_em36
ORG
QUASI
Oakland Circuit Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e31
001-68160_a8_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
15 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e32
001-68160_a8_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e33
001-68160_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e34
001-68160_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
9 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e32
001-68160_a8_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e30
001-68160_a8_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e35
001-68160_a8_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-68160_a8_e26
001-68160_a8_em44
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Sylvester
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e36
001-68160_a8_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e32
001-68160_a8_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e37
001-68160_a8_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e16
001-68160_a8_em48
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e30
001-68160_a8_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e32
001-68160_a8_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-68160_a8_e37
001-68160_a8_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e32
001-68160_a8_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e38
001-68160_a8_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
19 February 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e32
001-68160_a8_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e37
001-68160_a8_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e39
001-68160_a8_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
13 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e40
001-68160_a8_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
21 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e41
001-68160_a8_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
12 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e42
001-68160_a8_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
4 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e32
001-68160_a8_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e43
001-68160_a8_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
28 February 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e44
001-68160_a8_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
16 June 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e37
001-68160_a8_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e37
001-68160_a8_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e16
001-68160_a8_em65
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e11
001-68160_a8_em66
LOC
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e37
001-68160_a8_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-68160_a8_e45
001-68160_a8_em68
MISC
NO_MASK
Zumtobel v. Austria judgment
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e46
001-68160_a8_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
21 September 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e37
001-68160_a8_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e47
001-68160_a8_em71
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e32
001-68160_a8_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e48
001-68160_a8_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
5 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e32
001-68160_a8_em74
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-68160_a8_e49
001-68160_a8_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
29 October 2001
Thomas R. Sylvester
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Thomas R. Sylvester