PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 23279/06) against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a German national, Mr Ilyas Yildiz (“the applicant”), on 6 June 2006.

The applicant was represented by Mr E. Eyl, a lawyer practising in Strasbourg. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel, Ministerialdirigentin, of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

On 30 April 2008 the President of the Fifth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3).

THE FACTS

The applicant was born in 1963 and lives in Anzing.

A. Background to the case

On 8 August 1994 the applicant had an accident at work – a cut of about one centimetre to his right wrist. The same day he was treated by the company doctor, Dr B. On 10 August 1994 his general practitioner transferred him to hospital. That day and again on 24 August 1994 he was examined by a Dr M. On his second examination Dr M. diagnosed that the applicant was unable to flex his thumb. On 5 September 1994, following a further examination, he had surgery on a muscle, the flexor pollicis longus.

B. Proceedings before the Munich Regional Court

On 28 January 1997 the applicant instituted proceedings in the Munich Regional Court against Dr B. and Dr M., seeking an award of compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 60,000 euros (EUR). He argued that if the defendants had treated him properly, the operation would have been avoided, which in turn would have avoided severe pain and further problems, including reactive depression.

In February 1997 the court scheduled a hearing for 21 April 1997. Submissions by the parties followed and in April the case was transferred to a single judge.

On 12 May 1997, following the hearing, the Munich Regional Court decided to hear the applicant's general practitioner and scheduled a new hearing for 28 July 1997. On account of the absence of the first defendant's legal counsel, it later postponed it to 24 November 1997. It refused a subsequent request for a further postponement.

On 18 August 1997 the applicant's legal counsel ceased taking instructions from the applicant. On 24 October 1997 his new lawyer addressed the court.

In November 1997 the parties agreed on written submissions.

In February 1998 the applicant's second lawyer also ceased taking instructions from the applicant; subsequently, a new lawyer was appointed and requested access to the files.

On 26 March 1998 the applicant requested the court to await the outcome of the social court proceedings, which were also pending, and returned the files.

On 13 April 1999 the applicant's third lawyer also ceased taking instructions but was subsequently reappointed in May.

On 15 April 1999, upon the request of one of the defendants to continue the proceedings, the court scheduled a hearing for 10 May 1999. At the hearing the parties agreed that the files of the social court proceedings should be consulted. Between June and September 1999, having been granted access to those files, the parties submitted further observations.

In October 1999 the applicant asked for an expert to be commissioned. In November 1999 he submitted documents which had until then been missing.

In February and April 2000 he requested the court to continue with the proceedings. On 5 April 2000 he was informed that the judge had fallen ill.

On 23 June 2000 the Munich Regional Court decided to obtain an expert opinion. On 22 August 2000 the expert submitted his report.

The court then set the parties a time-limit for their observations of 18 September 2000.

On 5 October 2000 the court decided to obtain a supplementary report. On 31 October 2000, after payment of an advance, it transferred the files to the expert. In January 2001 it asked the expert when he would be submitting his report.

On 20 February 2001 the applicant did not attend the examination arranged with the expert. On 16 May 2001 the expert examined the applicant.

On 31 May 2001 the court set the expert a time-limit of four weeks for the submission of his report. On 27 June 2001 it set him another deadline of two weeks. On 3 July 2001 the expert submitted the supplementary report. The parties' submissions followed.

On 28 August 2001 the court scheduled the hearing for 29 October 2001 and also summoned the expert. It later had to be postponed to 13 November 2001 on account of the absence of one of the legal counsel.

On 27 December 2001, following the hearing, the Munich Regional Court rejected the applicant's claim. Relying on the expert opinion obtained and a statement from the applicant's general practitioner, it found that the muscle had not been cut and that no liability on the part of the doctors could be established.

C. Proceedings before the Munich Court of Appeal

On 11 February 2002 the applicant appealed. In April 2002, following an extension of the time-limit, he submitted the grounds of his appeal.

On 18 April 2002 the Munich Court of Appeal scheduled the hearing for 16 May 2002. A subsequent request by the applicant for a postponement was rejected.

At the hearing the Munich Court of Appeal heard the doctor who had operated on the applicant.

The parties' submissions followed. In July 2002 the applicant requested a further expert opinion regarding a number of questions.

The court then scheduled a hearing for 17 October 2002 and decided to obtain an additional statement from the expert appointed at first instance, which was submitted on 22 August 2002.

On 18 September 2002 the applicant challenged the expert on grounds of bias. On 2 October 2002 the Munich Court of Appeal rejected this challenge.

Subsequently, it commissioned another expert. The parties did not object when the expert announced that he would not submit his report before the following summer.

In May 2003 the applicant transferred further documents. On 16 June 2003 the expert examined the applicant.

On 1 August 2003 the expert submitted his report. The court then scheduled the hearing for 13 November 2003. The applicant again requested the court to obtain another expert opinion.

On 27 November 2003, following the hearing, the Munich Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's appeal and refused leave to appeal on points of law. Relying on the experts' statements, it found that no liability of the defendants could be established.

D. Proceedings before the Federal Court of Justice and the Federal Constitutional Court

On 29 December 2003 the applicant appealed against the refusal of leave to appeal. On 30 April 2004, following two requests for an extension of the time-limit set, he lodged the grounds of his appeal.

On 29 June 2004 the Federal Court of Justice dismissed the applicant's appeal.

On 2 August 2004 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint.

On 7 December 2005 the Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept his constitutional complaint for examination.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e1
001-94875_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
23279/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-94875_a8_e2
001-94875_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e3
001-94875_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e4
001-94875_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ilyas Yildiz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e5
001-94875_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
6 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e6
001-94875_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr E. Eyl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e7
001-94875_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e3
001-94875_a8_em8
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e8
001-94875_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs A. Wittling-Vogel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-94875_a8_e9
001-94875_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministerialdirigentin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e10
001-94875_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e11
001-94875_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e12
001-94875_a8_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1963
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e13
001-94875_a8_em14
LOC
QUASI
Anzing
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e14
001-94875_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
8 August 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-94875_a8_e15
001-94875_a8_em16
PERSON
QUASI
Dr B.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e16
001-94875_a8_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
10 August 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e17
001-94875_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
24 August 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e18
001-94875_a8_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Dr M.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-94875_a8_e18
001-94875_a8_em20
PERSON
QUASI
Dr M.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e19
001-94875_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
5 September 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e20
001-94875_a8_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
Munich Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e21
001-94875_a8_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
28 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e20
001-94875_a8_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Munich Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e15
001-94875_a8_em25
PERSON
QUASI
Dr B.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e18
001-94875_a8_em26
PERSON
QUASI
Dr M.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-94875_a8_e22
001-94875_a8_em27
QUANTITY
QUASI
60,000 euros (EUR)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e23
001-94875_a8_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
February 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e24
001-94875_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
21 April 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e25
001-94875_a8_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e26
001-94875_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
12 May 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e20
001-94875_a8_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Munich Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e27
001-94875_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
28 July 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e28
001-94875_a8_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e29
001-94875_a8_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
18 August 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e30
001-94875_a8_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e31
001-94875_a8_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e32
001-94875_a8_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
February 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e33
001-94875_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
26 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e34
001-94875_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
13 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e35
001-94875_a8_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
15 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e36
001-94875_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
10 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-94875_a8_e37
001-94875_a8_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
June and September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e38
001-94875_a8_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e39
001-94875_a8_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-94875_a8_e40
001-94875_a8_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
February and April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e41
001-94875_a8_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
5 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e42
001-94875_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
23 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e20
001-94875_a8_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Munich Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e43
001-94875_a8_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
22 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e44
001-94875_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
18 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e45
001-94875_a8_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
5 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e46
001-94875_a8_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
31 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e47
001-94875_a8_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e48
001-94875_a8_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
20 February 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e49
001-94875_a8_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e50
001-94875_a8_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
31 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e51
001-94875_a8_em58
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four weeks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e52
001-94875_a8_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
27 June 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e53
001-94875_a8_em60
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two weeks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e54
001-94875_a8_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
3 July 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e55
001-94875_a8_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
28 August 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e56
001-94875_a8_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
29 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e57
001-94875_a8_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
13 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e58
001-94875_a8_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
27 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e20
001-94875_a8_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Munich Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e59
001-94875_a8_em67
ORG
QUASI
Munich Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e60
001-94875_a8_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
11 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e61
001-94875_a8_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e62
001-94875_a8_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
18 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e59
001-94875_a8_em71
ORG
QUASI
Munich Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e63
001-94875_a8_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e59
001-94875_a8_em73
ORG
QUASI
Munich Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e64
001-94875_a8_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
July 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e65
001-94875_a8_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
17 October 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e66
001-94875_a8_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
22 August 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e67
001-94875_a8_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
18 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e68
001-94875_a8_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
2 October 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e59
001-94875_a8_em79
ORG
QUASI
Munich Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e69
001-94875_a8_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e70
001-94875_a8_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
16 June 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e71
001-94875_a8_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
1 August 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e72
001-94875_a8_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
13 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e73
001-94875_a8_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
27 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e59
001-94875_a8_em85
ORG
QUASI
Munich Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e74
001-94875_a8_em86
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e75
001-94875_a8_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e76
001-94875_a8_em88
DATETIME
QUASI
29 December 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e77
001-94875_a8_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e78
001-94875_a8_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
29 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e74
001-94875_a8_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e79
001-94875_a8_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
2 August 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e80
001-94875_a8_em93
DATETIME
QUASI
7 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94875_a8_e75
001-94875_a8_em94
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
Ilyas Yildiz
DEU
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Ilyas Yildiz