PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 38907/09) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Bayram Koç (“the applicant”), on 15 July 2009.

The applicant was represented by Mr İ. Akmeşe, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that he had been denied access to a lawyer while in police custody and that his police statements had been relied on by the trial court to convict him.

On 19 June 2013 the complaint concerning restriction on access to a lawyer was communicated to the Government and the remainder of the application was declared inadmissible pursuant to Rule 54 § 3 of the Rules of Court.

On 7 October 2016 the Vice-President of the Second Section invited the Government to submit further observations, if they so wished, following the judgment in Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 50541/08 and 3 others, 13 September 2016).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1980 and lives in Diyarbakır.

On 17 January 2003 the applicant was arrested and taken into police custody on suspicion of membership of an illegal organisation.

On 18 January 2003 his statements were taken by the police in the absence of a lawyer. The applicant confessed to being a member of an illegal organisation. He gave a detailed account of its structure and his acts within the illegal organisation. On the same day the applicant was heard by a public prosecutor and an investigating judge respectively. In these statements to the public prosecutor and the investigating judge, he denied his police statements and argued that they had been taken under duress. Following his questioning, the investigating judge ordered that the applicant be held on remand.

On 28 January 2003 a public prosecutor at the Istanbul State Security Court filed an indictment with that court, charging the applicant under Article 146 of the former Criminal Code.

State Security Courts were later abolished by Law no. 5190 of 16 June 2004, and the case was transferred to the Istanbul Assize Court.

On 10 June 2008 the Istanbul Assize Court found that, inter alia, on the basis of the applicant’s statements to the police, the public prosecutor and the investigating judge, the applicant had committed the offence under Article 314 of the Criminal Code and sentenced him to two years and one month’s imprisonment.

On 27 May 2009 the applicant’s lawyer appealed against the judgment, arguing that the applicant had been convicted on the basis of statements taken under duress.

On 3 March 2010 the Court of Cassation upheld the judgment of the first-instance court.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e1
001-176762_a10_em1
CODE
DIRECT
38907/09
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-176762_a10_e2
001-176762_a10_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e3
001-176762_a10_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e4
001-176762_a10_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Bayram Koç
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e5
001-176762_a10_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e6
001-176762_a10_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr İ. Akmeşe
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e7
001-176762_a10_em7
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e2
001-176762_a10_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-176762_a10_em2
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e8
001-176762_a10_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
19 June 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e9
001-176762_a10_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 2016
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e10
001-176762_a10_em11
CODE
NO_MASK
50541/08
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e11
001-176762_a10_em12
DATETIME
NO_MASK
13 September 2016
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e12
001-176762_a10_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e13
001-176762_a10_em14
LOC
QUASI
Diyarbakır
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e14
001-176762_a10_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
17 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e15
001-176762_a10_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
18 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e16
001-176762_a10_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
28 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e17
001-176762_a10_em18
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e18
001-176762_a10_em19
ORG
NO_MASK
State Security Courts
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e19
001-176762_a10_em20
DATETIME
NO_MASK
16 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e20
001-176762_a10_em21
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e21
001-176762_a10_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
10 June 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e20
001-176762_a10_em23
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e22
001-176762_a10_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
two years and one month’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e23
001-176762_a10_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
27 May 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e24
001-176762_a10_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
3 March 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-176762_a10_e25
001-176762_a10_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
Bayram Koç
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Bayram Koç