PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 4789/10) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Ms Nigar Gözüm (“the applicant”), on 12 January 2010.

The applicant was represented by Ms Habibe Yılmaz Kayar, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention, taken separately or together with Article 14, on account of the refusal by the national authorities to indicate her forename in the civil register of births as that of the mother of her adopted child.

On 31 August 2012 notice of the application was given to the Government.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Istanbul.

In a decision of 22 May 2007, which became final on 20 July of that year, the Üsküdar Family Court (Istanbul) authorised the applicant, who was then single, to adopt a child, E., born on 5 November 2003 to Ms S.Ö. Consequently, under Article 314 §§ 2 and 3 of the Civil Code (no. 4721), “Gözüm” was registered as the surname of E. in the register of births and on the child’s identity documents. However, the registrar refused to indicate the applicant’s forename under the heading “mother”, where the name “S.” was retained, this being the forename of the child’s biological mother.

On 23 November 2007 the applicant applied to Üsküdar District Court seeking the replacement of the forename “S.” by her own. In her view, the fact that her forename had not been given as that of the mother of her adopted son was both discriminatory and unconstitutional, likely to undermine their personal, family and social development, and thus constituting a violation of, among other provisions, Articles 8 and 14 of the Convention. She argued that in relation to single-parent adoptions there was a lacuna in the Civil Code which required the court to make provision for such a situation of its own motion, pursuant to Article 1 of that Code or, failing that, to request a preliminary ruling of the Constitutional Court.

On 26 February 2008 the court dismissed the applicant’s request on the ground that it had no legal basis. It found that the Civil Code, in choosing to regulate only two-parent adoptions – those granted to a couple jointly –, intended to treat the legal relationship between the adoptive parents and the adopted child as “a biological relationship”, which was not possible in the case of single-parent adoptions, where either a mother or a father was absent. Thus the legal situation obtaining in the present case could not be regarded as unconstitutional. On 14 April 2008 the applicant appealed on points of law.

On 15 March 2009, when those proceedings were still pending, a new regulation entered into force entitled “Regulation on the implementation of mediation services for the adoption of minors” (“the Regulation”), enabling a single adoptive parent to have his or her forename registered in the place of that of the biological parent ...

On 5 November 2009 the Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the court below in a judgment which made no mention of the legislative reform.

On 14 December 2009 the applicant was notified of that judgment.

On 9 November 2010 she applied to the registry office for the registration of her forename as that of the mother of E., relying on Article 20 § 4 of the new Regulation. That request was granted on the same day and the record entries concerning the child were consequently amended with immediate effect. ...
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e1
001-150800_a10_em1
CODE
DIRECT
4789/10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-150800_a10_e2
001-150800_a10_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e3
001-150800_a10_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e4
001-150800_a10_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Nigar Gözüm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e5
001-150800_a10_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-150800_a10_e6
001-150800_a10_em6
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Habibe Yılmaz Kayar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e7
001-150800_a10_em7
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e2
001-150800_a10_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-150800_a10_em2
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e8
001-150800_a10_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
31 August 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e9
001-150800_a10_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1966
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e7
001-150800_a10_em11
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e10
001-150800_a10_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
22 May 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-150800_a10_e11
001-150800_a10_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
20 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e12
001-150800_a10_em14
ORG
QUASI
Üsküdar Family Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e7
001-150800_a10_em15
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-150800_a10_e13
001-150800_a10_em16
PERSON
QUASI
E.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e14
001-150800_a10_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
5 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-150800_a10_e15
001-150800_a10_em18
PERSON
QUASI
Ms S.Ö.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-150800_a10_e4
001-150800_a10_em19
PERSON
DIRECT
001-150800_a10_em4
Gözüm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e13
001-150800_a10_em20
PERSON
QUASI
E.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-150800_a10_e16
001-150800_a10_em21
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e17
001-150800_a10_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
23 November 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e18
001-150800_a10_em23
ORG
QUASI
Üsküdar District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e16
001-150800_a10_em24
PERSON
QUASI
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-150800_a10_e19
001-150800_a10_em25
MISC
QUASI
single-parent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e20
001-150800_a10_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-150800_a10_e21
001-150800_a10_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
26 February 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e19
001-150800_a10_em28
MISC
QUASI
single-parent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e22
001-150800_a10_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
14 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e23
001-150800_a10_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e24
001-150800_a10_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
5 November 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e25
001-150800_a10_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e26
001-150800_a10_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
14 December 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e27
001-150800_a10_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-150800_a10_e13
001-150800_a10_em35
PERSON
QUASI
E.
Nigar Gözüm
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Nigar Gözüm