PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 56827/00) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Koray Düzgören (“the applicant”), on 15 October 1999.

The applicant was represented by Ms A. J. Stock, Mr M. Muller, Mr T. Otty and Ms J. Gordon of the Kurdish Human Rights Project in London. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court.

On 28 September 2004 the Court (Second Section) declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaint concerning the alleged lack of independence and impartiality of the military court, the alleged interference with the applicant's right to freedom of expression and the alleged lack of an effective remedy to the Government. Under Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1947 and lives in London.

On 1 April 1998 the applicant, who is a journalist, distributed a leaflet concerning the conscientious objector Mr O.M.U, outside the Ankara State Security Court. He also handed the leaflet to the public prosecutor at the Ankara State Security Court together with a petition stating that he should be prosecuted for having committed a crime.

The leaflet, entitled “Freedom to think - an initiative against the crime of thought” contained the press release issued by O. M. U on 1 September 1995. The latter had been previously convicted and sentenced on account of this press release. The relevant parts of the leaflet are as follows: Preface and Epilogue: “... For the purpose of defending the free expression of every kind of thought, we who have signed as publishers, convey this 'convicted' text to the people, regardless of its contents and the question whether or not we share its contents, even though some of us do not agree with some lines in it...' The press release of O. M. U: “Good morning, Today's press conference is not organised by the Izmir Association of the Opponents of War. The responsibility for this conference rests exclusively with me. As you know, the case, which was brought before the Ankara Military Court of the Office of the Chief of Staff where I was allegedly accused of committing the crime of 'inciting others to evade military service', was concluded on 29 August. ... The army, unable to deal with us through judicial methods, think that they can draw the opponents of war away from the public view. First of all, I am not a deserter; I am a 'conscientious objector'. I neither intend to do military service nor desert. There is no reason to desert, because I defend the principle that people should exercise their right not to do military service without having to go into hiding. As to the papers given by the Recruitment Office...I am going to burn them right now before your eyes... I am not a soldier and I never will be. Of course, I am aware that I will be summoned for military service, but until I am summoned, whenever that may be there will be no changes to my lifestyle. They can find me here and take me by force. But I will resist to the end in the barracks, and I am underlining that I will refuse to do military service in any shape or fashion.”

On 1 April 1998 the public prosecutor at the Ankara State Security Court took the applicant's statement in which the applicant reiterated the content of his petition. He maintained that, by publishing and distributing the above-mentioned leaflet, he had committed the same offence for which O. M. U. had been convicted. He contended that he agreed with the contents of the leaflet. He further pointed out that there were judgments of the European Court of Human Rights which referred to conscientious objectors. He claimed that the leaflet was not intended to dissuade people from doing military service or to incite them to desert. He further stated that in the Netherlands conscientious objectors did not do their military service, but were given other jobs. He commented that maybe in the future the same would also be true for Turkey. He concluded that his aim was to obtain the abolition of compulsory military service in Turkey.

On 4 June 1998 the military public prosecutor at the General Staff Court in Ankara filed a bill of indictment, accusing the applicant of inciting others to evade military service. He requested that the applicant be convicted and sentenced under Article 155 of the Criminal Code and Article 58 of the Military Penal Code.

On an unspecified date, the criminal proceedings against the applicant commenced before the General Staff Court in Ankara. During the proceedings the applicant reiterated his previous submissions. In particular, he claimed that he was a defender of freedom of expression and challenged the independence and impartiality of the court.

On 9 March 1999 the court convicted the applicant as charged and sentenced him to two months' imprisonment and to a fine of 1,520,000 Turkish Liras (TL) (approximately 3.5 Euros (EUR) at the time of the events). In its reasoning, the court held that it had competence to deal with the case pursuant to the Constitution and domestic law and that there was no ruling of the European Court of Human Rights which had concluded that military courts were extraordinary courts. As regards the merits, the court considered that, by distributing the leaflet containing the press release which led to O. M. U's conviction and by handing the leaflet to the public prosecutor and asking the latter to take legal action, the applicant's actions were deliberate and that he had committed the offence knowingly and willingly. The court, relying on Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution, Article 10 § 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 29 § 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, affirmed that freedom of expression and the free dissemination of ideas was not an absolute right. Citing relevant articles of the Criminal Code, it reasoned that the provisions under which the applicant was charged pursued the aim of eliminating threats to the unity of the country, national security and sovereignty. The court observed that Article 155 of the Criminal Code was in accordance with international law and that the applicant's case fell within the scope of Article 155 of the Criminal Code.

On 19 April 1999 the applicant appealed to the Military Court of Cassation. In his appeal, the applicant, relying on Articles 6 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, contended that he should not have been tried by a military court and that the act which he had committed could not be considered to be an offence.

On 25 May 1999 the Military Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the General Staff Court. In its decision the court, referring to domestic law and the jurisprudence of the Court, held that the military courts had jurisdiction and competence to try the applicant and, after having assessed the contents of the leaflet, concluded that the judgment given by the General Staff Court was in accordance with the law.

On 17 July 1999 the applicant left Turkey in order to avoid imprisonment.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e1
001-77919_a2_em1
CODE
DIRECT
56827/00
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e2
001-77919_a2_em2
ORG
QUASI
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e3
001-77919_a2_em3
DEM
QUASI
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e4
001-77919_a2_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Koray Düzgören
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e5
001-77919_a2_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
15 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e6
001-77919_a2_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Ms A. J. Stock
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e7
001-77919_a2_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Muller
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e8
001-77919_a2_em8
PERSON
QUASI
Mr T. Otty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e9
001-77919_a2_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Ms J. Gordon
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e10
001-77919_a2_em10
ORG
QUASI
Kurdish Human Rights Project
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e11
001-77919_a2_em11
LOC
QUASI
London
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e2
001-77919_a2_em12
ORG
QUASI
001-77919_a2_em2
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e12
001-77919_a2_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e13
001-77919_a2_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
1947
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e11
001-77919_a2_em15
LOC
QUASI
London
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e14
001-77919_a2_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1 April 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e15
001-77919_a2_em17
DEM
QUASI
journalist
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e16
001-77919_a2_em18
PERSON
QUASI
Mr O.M.U
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e17
001-77919_a2_em19
ORG
QUASI
Ankara State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e17
001-77919_a2_em20
ORG
QUASI
Ankara State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e18
001-77919_a2_em21
MISC
QUASI
Freedom to think - an initiative against the crime of thought
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e16
001-77919_a2_em22
PERSON
QUASI
001-77919_a2_em18
O. M. U
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e19
001-77919_a2_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
1 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e20
001-77919_a2_em24
MISC
NO_MASK
Preface and Epilogue: “... For the purpose of defending the free expression of every kind of thought, we who have signed as publishers, convey this 'convicted' text to the people, regardless of its contents and the question whether or not we share its contents, even though some of us do not agree with some lines in it...
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e16
001-77919_a2_em25
PERSON
QUASI
O. M. U
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e21
001-77919_a2_em26
MISC
NO_MASK
Good morning, Today's press conference is not organised by the Izmir Association of the Opponents of War. The responsibility for this conference rests exclusively with me. As you know, the case, which was brought before the Ankara Military Court of the Office of the Chief of Staff where I was allegedly accused of committing the crime of 'inciting others to evade military service', was concluded on 29 August. ... The army, unable to deal with us through judicial methods, think that they can draw the opponents of war away from the public view. First of all, I am not a deserter; I am a 'conscientious objector'. I neither intend to do military service nor desert. There is no reason to desert, because I defend the principle that people should exercise their right not to do military service without having to go into hiding. As to the papers given by the Recruitment Office...I am going to burn them right now before your eyes... I am not a soldier and I never will be. Of course, I am aware that I will be summoned for military service, but until I am summoned, whenever that may be there will be no changes to my lifestyle. They can find me here and take me by force. But I will resist to the end in the barracks, and I am underlining that I will refuse to do military service in any shape or fashion.
POLITICS
check
001-77919_a2_e22
001-77919_a2_em27
ORG
QUASI
Izmir Association of the Opponents of War
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e23
001-77919_a2_em28
ORG
QUASI
Ankara Military Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e24
001-77919_a2_em29
ORG
QUASI
Office of the Chief of Staff
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e25
001-77919_a2_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
29 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e26
001-77919_a2_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Recruitment Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e14
001-77919_a2_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
1 April 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e17
001-77919_a2_em33
ORG
QUASI
Ankara State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e27
001-77919_a2_em34
PERSON
QUASI
O. M. U.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e28
001-77919_a2_em35
LOC
NO_MASK
Netherlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e2
001-77919_a2_em36
ORG
QUASI
001-77919_a2_em2
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-77919_a2_e2
001-77919_a2_em37
ORG
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e29
001-77919_a2_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
4 June 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e30
001-77919_a2_em39
ORG
QUASI
General Staff Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e31
001-77919_a2_em40
LOC
QUASI
Ankara
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e32
001-77919_a2_em41
MISC
QUASI
Article 155 of the Criminal Code
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e33
001-77919_a2_em42
MISC
QUASI
Article 58 of the Military Penal Code
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e30
001-77919_a2_em43
ORG
QUASI
General Staff Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e31
001-77919_a2_em44
LOC
QUASI
Ankara
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e34
001-77919_a2_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e35
001-77919_a2_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
two months'
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e36
001-77919_a2_em47
QUANTITY
QUASI
1,520,000 Turkish Liras (TL)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e37
001-77919_a2_em48
QUANTITY
QUASI
approximately 3.5 Euros (EUR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e16
001-77919_a2_em49
PERSON
QUASI
O. M. U
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e38
001-77919_a2_em50
MISC
QUASI
Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e39
001-77919_a2_em51
MISC
NO_MASK
Article 10 § 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-77919_a2_e40
001-77919_a2_em52
MISC
NO_MASK
Article 29 § 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e32
001-77919_a2_em53
MISC
QUASI
Article 155 of the Criminal Code
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e32
001-77919_a2_em54
MISC
QUASI
Article 155 of the Criminal Code
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e41
001-77919_a2_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
19 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e42
001-77919_a2_em56
ORG
QUASI
Military Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e43
001-77919_a2_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
25 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e42
001-77919_a2_em58
ORG
QUASI
Military Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e30
001-77919_a2_em59
ORG
QUASI
General Staff Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e30
001-77919_a2_em60
ORG
QUASI
General Staff Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e44
001-77919_a2_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
17 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-77919_a2_e2
001-77919_a2_em62
ORG
QUASI
Turkey
Koray Düzgören
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Koray Düzgören