PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 41656/02) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Polish nationals, Mr Adam Mazgaj and his son, Mr Grzegorz Mazgaj (“the applicants”), on 8 June 2001.

The applicants were represented by Mr S. Kotuła, a lawyer practising in Lublin. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 25 May 2009 the President of the Fourth Section of the Court decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3 of the Convention).

On 24 September 2009 the Government requested the Court to sever the complaints of the applicants.

On 22 October 2009 the Court granted the Government's request and decided to sever the complaints of Adam Mazgaj (“the applicant”) from the rest of the application.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that the restrictions placed on his contacts with his close family members when he was detained amounted to a violation of his right to respect for family life under Article 8 of the Convention.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1928 and lives in Włodawa.

A. The applicant's arrest and detention

On 28 June 2000 the Rzeszów District Court remanded the applicant in custody for two months. The court relied on a statement given on 27 June 2000 by the applicant's mentally ill son, G.M., who accused the applicant of homicide. The court also referred to the likelihood that a heavy penalty would be imposed on the applicant.

On an unspecified date the applicant appealed and requested that the preventive measure imposed on him be reduced in severity. He relied on his age (he was seventy-two years old at the time) and on the fact that he was undergoing medical treatment.

On 12 July 2000 the Rzeszów Regional Court, relying on the same grounds as the District Court, upheld the challenged decision.

On 23 August 2000 the Rzeszów Regional Prosecutor requested the court to extend the applicant's detention.

On 25 August 2000 the Rzeszów District Court granted the request and extended the applicant's detention for another month, until 28 September 2000.

On an unspecified date the applicant's lawyer appealed against that decision.

On 12 September 2000 the Rzeszów Regional Court upheld the challenged decision. The court recognised that the only evidence against the applicant was the statement by the applicant's son, who had undergone a psychiatric examination. It stressed, however, that according to the results of the psychiatric report, the applicant's son's mental condition had improved. The court also relied on the risk that the applicant could obstruct the proceedings.

The Rzeszów Regional Court, relying on the same grounds as previously, extended the applicant's detention on 22 September 2000 for three months, and then, on 22 December 2000 for a further three months.

The applicant and his lawyer appealed against the latter decision.

On 18 January 2001 the Rzeszów Court of Appeal gave a decision and released the applicant. The court referred to a psychiatric opinion of 2 January 2001 concerning the applicant's son and found that his statements could not be considered reliable evidence.

B. Criminal proceedings against the applicant

On 20 December 2001 the Rzeszów Regional Court gave judgment and acquitted the applicant.

On an unspecified date the Regional Rzeszów Prosecutor appealed against that judgment.

On 9 May 2002 the Rzeszów Court of Appeal upheld the first‑instance judgment.

C. Proceedings for compensation for manifestly unjustified detention of the applicant

On an unspecified date the applicant lodged a claim for compensation for manifestly unjustified detention with the Rzeszów Regional Court.

On an unspecified date the Rzeszów Regional Court gave judgment, against which the applicant appealed.

On 22 December 2004 the Rzeszów Court of Appeal remitted the case.

On 29 June 2005 the Rzeszów Regional Court granted the applicant compensation in the amount of 10,360 Polish zlotys (PLN).

The applicant appealed against that judgment, arguing that the instructions given by the Court of Appeal, which had remitted the case, had not been followed.

On 22 September 2005 the Rzeszów Court of Appeal granted the appeal in part, amended the first-instance judgment and increased the compensation to PLN 10,809. The court considered that the compensation should also include the travelling costs borne by the applicant's family to visit him in prison.

D. Restrictions placed on the applicant's contact with his family

On 10 July 2000 J.M., the applicant's wife, and R.M., the applicant's second son, asked the Rzeszów Regional Prosecutor for permission to see the applicant. They also requested information on the applicant's state of health.

According to the applicant's submissions the prosecutor did not reply to their request.

On 3 August 2000 the applicant's lawyer requested the Rzeszów Regional Prosecutor to allow him to see his wife and son. He relied on the applicant's age and state of health.

On 17 August 2000 the Rzeszów Regional Prosecutor refused to allow the applicant personal contact with his family. The refusal was motivated by the need to secure the proper conduct of the investigation (z uwagi na dobro toczącego się śledztwa).

On 21 September 2000 J.M. and R.M. again requested the prosecutor to allow them to visit the applicant. They submitted that for almost three months they had been denied personal contact with the close family members. Apparently this request remained unanswered.

According to the findings of the Court of Appeal which examined the matter of the applicant's family's visits in prison for the purposes of calculating their travelling costs, the applicant's son visited him twice in the hospital wing of the Kraków Remand Centre on 14 October and 18 November 2000, and once, on 7 January 2001, in the Remand Centre itself. The applicant's wife was allowed to see her husband on 14 January 2001.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e1
001-100543_a4_em1
CODE
DIRECT
41656/02
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-100543_a4_e2
001-100543_a4_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
ETHNIC
insert
001-100543_a4_e3
001-100543_a4_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish nationals
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e4
001-100543_a4_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Adam Mazgaj
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e5
001-100543_a4_em5
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Grzegorz Mazgaj
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e6
001-100543_a4_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
8 June 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e7
001-100543_a4_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr S. Kotuła
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e8
001-100543_a4_em8
LOC
QUASI
Lublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e9
001-100543_a4_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e10
001-100543_a4_em10
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100543_a4_e11
001-100543_a4_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e12
001-100543_a4_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
25 May 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e13
001-100543_a4_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e14
001-100543_a4_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
22 October 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e4
001-100543_a4_em15
PERSON
DIRECT
001-100543_a4_em4
Adam Mazgaj
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e15
001-100543_a4_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1928
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e16
001-100543_a4_em17
LOC
QUASI
Włodawa
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e17
001-100543_a4_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
28 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e18
001-100543_a4_em19
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e19
001-100543_a4_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
two months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e20
001-100543_a4_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
27 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e5
001-100543_a4_em22
PERSON
QUASI
001-100543_a4_em5
G.M.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-100543_a4_e21
001-100543_a4_em23
DEM
QUASI
seventy-two years old
HEALTH
insert
001-100543_a4_e22
001-100543_a4_em24
MISC
NO_MASK
undergoing medical treatment
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e23
001-100543_a4_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
12 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e24
001-100543_a4_em26
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e25
001-100543_a4_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e26
001-100543_a4_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
23 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e27
001-100543_a4_em29
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e28
001-100543_a4_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
25 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e18
001-100543_a4_em31
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e29
001-100543_a4_em32
DATETIME
NO_MASK
another month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e30
001-100543_a4_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e31
001-100543_a4_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
12 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e24
001-100543_a4_em35
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e24
001-100543_a4_em36
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e32
001-100543_a4_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
22 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e33
001-100543_a4_em38
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e34
001-100543_a4_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
22 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e33
001-100543_a4_em40
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e35
001-100543_a4_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
18 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e36
001-100543_a4_em42
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e37
001-100543_a4_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
2 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e38
001-100543_a4_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
20 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e24
001-100543_a4_em45
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e39
001-100543_a4_em46
ORG
QUASI
Regional Rzeszów Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e40
001-100543_a4_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
9 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e36
001-100543_a4_em48
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e24
001-100543_a4_em49
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e24
001-100543_a4_em50
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e41
001-100543_a4_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
22 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e36
001-100543_a4_em52
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e42
001-100543_a4_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
29 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e24
001-100543_a4_em54
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100543_a4_e43
001-100543_a4_em55
QUANTITY
QUASI
10,360 Polish zlotys (PLN)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100543_a4_e44
001-100543_a4_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e45
001-100543_a4_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
22 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e36
001-100543_a4_em58
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100543_a4_e46
001-100543_a4_em59
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 10,809
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e47
001-100543_a4_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
10 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100543_a4_e48
001-100543_a4_em61
PERSON
QUASI
J.M.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-100543_a4_e49
001-100543_a4_em62
PERSON
QUASI
R.M.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e27
001-100543_a4_em63
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e50
001-100543_a4_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
3 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e27
001-100543_a4_em65
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e51
001-100543_a4_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
17 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e27
001-100543_a4_em67
ORG
QUASI
Rzeszów Regional Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e52
001-100543_a4_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
21 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e48
001-100543_a4_em69
PERSON
QUASI
J.M.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-100543_a4_e49
001-100543_a4_em70
PERSON
QUASI
R.M.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e53
001-100543_a4_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
almost three months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e44
001-100543_a4_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e54
001-100543_a4_em73
ORG
QUASI
Kraków Remand Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100543_a4_e55
001-100543_a4_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
14 October and 18 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e56
001-100543_a4_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
7 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e57
001-100543_a4_em76
LOC
NO_MASK
Remand Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100543_a4_e58
001-100543_a4_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 2001
Adam Mazgaj
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Adam Mazgaj