PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 29360/06) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Ms Teresa Jerzak (“the applicant”), on 3 July 2006.

The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 25 September 2007 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it was decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1940 and lives in Sulejówek.

A. Civil proceedings for division of inheritance

On 8 March 1994 the applicant lodged an application for division of an inheritance with the Warsaw District Court (Sąd Rejonowy).

On 7 November 1997 the Warsaw District Court stayed the proceedings. It referred to the fact that related criminal proceedings concerning fraudulent acquisition of land, which could affect the outcome of the case, had first to be terminated.

On 9 February 1998 the applicant asked for the proceedings to be resumed.

On 3 July 1998 the court refused that request.

On 3 July 1998 the applicant complained to the Warsaw District Court about the delays in the proceedings. On 14 July 1998 the court informed her that the proceedings would be resumed after the criminal proceedings had been terminated.

On 3 August 2000 the court refused to resume the proceedings. The applicant lodged an interlocutory appeal against that decision. The applicant referred to the fact that the prosecution had discontinued the investigation.

On 15 January 2001 the applicant asked once more for the proceedings to be resumed, to no avail.

The proceedings were resumed on 14 February 2002.

On 30 June 2004 the Warsaw District Court ruled that some of the issues raised in the application, concerning the acquisition of property, should be examined in separate proceedings. Consequently, part of the claim, concerning the expropriation of property, was referred to the Warsaw District Court as a separate case. The applicant appealed. On 26 July 2004 the Warsaw Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) dismissed the appeal.

On 25 October 2004 the court stayed the proceedings pending the outcome of the parallel proceedings for the expropriation of property. The applicant appealed.

On 24 October 2006 the Regional Court quashed that decision and resumed the examination of the case. It referred to the fact that the District Court had erroneously referred part of the claim to other proceedings. It relied on the need to examine both cases simultaneously within the scope of the same proceedings.

On 9 May 2007 the court stayed the proceedings because the parallel proceedings for the expropriation of property were pending before the appellate court.

The case is still pending before the District Court.

B. Proceedings under the 2004 Act

On 2 January 2006 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Warsaw Regional Court, alleging a breach of her right to a hearing within a reasonable time. She relied on section 2 of the Act of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (Ustawa o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki) (“the 2004 Act”), which entered into force on 17 September 2004.

On 9 May 2006 the Warsaw Regional Court acknowledged the excessive length of the proceedings before the Warsaw District Court. It awarded the applicant 200 Polish zlotys (PLN – approximately 50 euros (EUR)) by way of just satisfaction. The court referred to the resolution of the Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy) of 18 January 2005 (no. III SPP 113/04) in which it ruled that while the 2004 Act produced legal effects as from the date of its date of entry into force, its provisions applied retroactively to all proceedings in which delays had occurred before that date and had not yet been remedied. The Regional Court held that the overall length of the proceedings before the District Court had been excessive, there had been long periods of inactivity and the hearings had not been held on a regular basis. These delays had taken place before the date of entry into force the 2004 Act and had not been remedied afterwards. Referring to the amount of just satisfaction, the court held that having analysed all the circumstances of the case it found this amount to be sufficient for the applicant.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e1
001-88725_a4_em1
CODE
DIRECT
29360/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e2
001-88725_a4_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
ETHNIC
insert
001-88725_a4_e3
001-88725_a4_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish national
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e4
001-88725_a4_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Teresa Jerzak
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e5
001-88725_a4_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
3 July 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e6
001-88725_a4_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e7
001-88725_a4_em7
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e8
001-88725_a4_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e9
001-88725_a4_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
25 September 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e10
001-88725_a4_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1940
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-88725_a4_e11
001-88725_a4_em11
LOC
QUASI
Sulejówek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e12
001-88725_a4_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e13
001-88725_a4_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw District Court (Sąd Rejonowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e14
001-88725_a4_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e13
001-88725_a4_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
001-88725_a4_em13
Warsaw District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e15
001-88725_a4_em16
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 February 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e16
001-88725_a4_em17
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e16
001-88725_a4_em18
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e13
001-88725_a4_em19
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e17
001-88725_a4_em20
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e18
001-88725_a4_em21
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e19
001-88725_a4_em22
DATETIME
NO_MASK
15 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e20
001-88725_a4_em23
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e21
001-88725_a4_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e13
001-88725_a4_em25
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e13
001-88725_a4_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e22
001-88725_a4_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
26 July 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e23
001-88725_a4_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e24
001-88725_a4_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
25 October 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e25
001-88725_a4_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e23
001-88725_a4_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
001-88725_a4_em28
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e26
001-88725_a4_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e27
001-88725_a4_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
9 May 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e26
001-88725_a4_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e28
001-88725_a4_em35
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2 January 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e23
001-88725_a4_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
001-88725_a4_em28
Warsaw Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e29
001-88725_a4_em37
MISC
NO_MASK
Act of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (Ustawa o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki) (“the 2004 Act”)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e30
001-88725_a4_em38
DATETIME
NO_MASK
17 September 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e31
001-88725_a4_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
9 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e23
001-88725_a4_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e13
001-88725_a4_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e32
001-88725_a4_em42
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
200 Polish zlotys (PLN – approximately 50 euros (EUR))
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e33
001-88725_a4_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e34
001-88725_a4_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
18 January 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-88725_a4_e35
001-88725_a4_em45
CODE
NO_MASK
no. III SPP 113/04
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e23
001-88725_a4_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-88725_a4_e26
001-88725_a4_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
Teresa Jerzak
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Teresa Jerzak