PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) on 2 November 1998 within the three-month period laid down by former Articles 32 § 1 and 47 of the Convention. It originated in an application (23867/94) against Austria lodged with the Commission under former Article 25 by Mr Josef Prinz, an Austrian national, on 28 March 1994. The President gave him leave to present his own case and to use German in his communications with the Court. The Government of Austria are represented by their Agent, Mr F. Cede, Ambassador, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Commission’s request referred to former Articles 44 and 48 and to the declaration whereby Austria had recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (former Article 46). The object of the request was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c).

On 14 January 1999 the Panel of the Grand Chamber decided, pursuant to Article 5 § 4 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention and Rules 100 § 1 and 24 § 6 of the Rules of Court, that the application would be examined by one of the Sections. It was, thereupon, assigned to the Third Section.

The Chamber constituted with the Section included ex officio Mr W. Fuhrmann, the judge elected in respect of Austria (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 26 § 1 (a) of the Rules of Court) and Mr J.-P. Costa, Vice-President of the Section (Rules 12 and 26 § 1 (a)). The other members designated by the latter to complete the Chamber were Mr P. Kūris, Mrs F. Tulkens, Mr K. Jungwiert, Mrs H.S. Greve and Mr K. Traja.

In accordance with Rule 59 § 3, the President of the Chamber invited the parties to submit memorials on the issues in the application. The Registrar received the applicant’s and Government’s memorials on 18 June 1999 and on 23 August respectively.

After consulting the Agent of the Government and the applicant, the Chamber decided not to hold a hearing in the case.

AS TO THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

On 4 October 1993 the Krems Regional Court (Landesgericht), sitting with two professional and two lay judges (Schöffengericht), having held an oral hearing in the presence of the Public Prosecutor, the applicant and his official defence counsel, ordered that the applicant be detained in an institution for mentally ill offenders (Anstalt für geistig abnorme Rechtsbrecher), pursuant to section 21 § 1 of the Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch). The Regional Court found that the applicant had intimidated numerous persons by threats of murder, but that he could not be held responsible because he was suffering from a mental illness. The applicant had, in several letters addressed to judicial authorities and lawyers, respectively, stated his intention to murder particular judges and lawyers, mentioning also either his “list of death“ or details of the threatened offence.

In its decision, the Regional Court noted that the applicant had twelve previous convictions, inter alia, of intimidation, coercion, bodily injury and property offences. The offences at issue in the pending proceedings had started in the context of civil proceedings, which had been instituted by the Austrian Auditor-General's Department (Finanzprokuratur), claiming compensation for damages of Austrian schillings (ATS) 2,000 caused by the applicant in the context of a burglary. In a judgment of October 1991, the St. Pölten District Court (Bezirksgericht) had decided against the applicant. The applicant had filed counter-claims for compensation in respect of an illness suffered while serving a prison sentence and had threatened terrorist attacks. Following the institution of criminal proceedings against him concerning this threat, the applicant addressed written threats of murder to various persons involved in these criminal proceedings, in particular to judges and lawyers.

Furthermore, having heard two psychiatric experts, the Regional Court considered that the applicant suffered from a mental illness, namely paranoia querulans. He had a system of fixed ideas and a missionary devotion to the implementation of his plans. His mental disturbances, combined with the further symptoms of aggressiveness, his cruelty and recklessness, entailed a high risk for third persons. The Regional Court regarded a faculty opinion on these matters as unnecessary, taking into account that the two experts largely concurred in their opinions and that there were no contradictions or shortcomings, within the meaning of the relevant provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Strafprozeßordnung).

Moreover, the Regional Court considered that it had not been required to hear the judges and other victims concerned, as requested by the applicant. In this respect, the Regional Court observed that the question of whether these persons had in fact been intimidated was irrelevant for legal reasons, the offence of intimidation being committed in case of threats of such a nature as to intimidate third persons in general, if the offender intended to intimidate. The Regional Court, having regard to the details stated in the applicant's various letters, found that his threats of murder were of such a nature as to intimidate third persons in general, and he had in fact intended to intimidate the persons concerned. Considering his mental illness, there was also a risk of further offences of the same kind.

The written judgment was served upon the applicant's official defence counsel on 29 October 1993.

The applicant, assisted by his official defence counsel, filed a plea of nullity (Nichtigkeitsbeschwerde) with the Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof), challenging the dismissal of his requests for the taking of further evidence as well as the part of the legal reasoning and the findings as to his dangerousness in future. He further lodged an appeal (Berufung). Defence counsel did not file any grounds of appeal, and did not request that the applicant be permitted to attend the Supreme Court hearing.

On 15 February 1994 the applicant personally filed submissions with the Supreme Court. According to the applicant, he also requested the Supreme Court for leave to attend the hearing of his plea of nullity and appeal, but this request was to no avail.

On 2 March 1994 the Supreme Court held the hearing on the plea of nullity and the appeal in the absence of the applicant, who was represented by his official defence counsel. The Supreme Court rejected the plea of nullity as well as the appeal.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, found that the rejection by the trial court of the applicant's requests for the taking of evidence did not impair the rights of the defence. In particular, the Supreme Court confirmed the reasoning of the trial court that the applicant had failed to show any contradictions or shortcomings in the expert opinions which would be the only reason to justify a faculty opinion. Moreover, the question of whether the victims had in fact been intimidated had been irrelevant. The Supreme Court also confirmed the legal qualification of the offences committed by the applicant.

Finally, the Supreme Court proceeded of its own motion to an examination of the applicant’s appeal. While noting that the applicant had not submitted any grounds of appeal, it examined the arguments challenging the trial court’s findings as to his dangerousness in the future, which he had submitted in his plea of nullity. In this respect, the Supreme Court considered that the prognosis was reliably founded on the expert psychiatric opinions and was confirmed by the general impression conveyed by the applicant's criminal acts.

The decision was received at the registry of the Krems District and Regional Court on 17 March 1994.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e1
001-58459_a8_em1
DATETIME
QUASI
2 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e2
001-58459_a8_em2
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e3
001-58459_a8_em3
CODE
DIRECT
23867/94
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e4
001-58459_a8_em4
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e5
001-58459_a8_em5
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Josef Prinz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e6
001-58459_a8_em6
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e7
001-58459_a8_em7
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e8
001-58459_a8_em8
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e4
001-58459_a8_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e9
001-58459_a8_em10
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Cede
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e10
001-58459_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e11
001-58459_a8_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e4
001-58459_a8_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e12
001-58459_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e13
001-58459_a8_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Panel of the Grand Chamber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e14
001-58459_a8_em16
PERSON
QUASI
Mr W. Fuhrmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e4
001-58459_a8_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58459_a8_e15
001-58459_a8_em18
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J.-P. Costa
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e16
001-58459_a8_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. Kūris
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e17
001-58459_a8_em20
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs F. Tulkens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e18
001-58459_a8_em21
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K. Jungwiert
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e19
001-58459_a8_em22
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs H.S. Greve
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e20
001-58459_a8_em23
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K. Traja
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e21
001-58459_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
18 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e22
001-58459_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
23 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e23
001-58459_a8_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
4 October 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58459_a8_e24
001-58459_a8_em27
ORG
QUASI
Krems Regional Court (Landesgericht)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e25
001-58459_a8_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e26
001-58459_a8_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e26
001-58459_a8_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58459_a8_e27
001-58459_a8_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Auditor-General's Department (Finanzprokuratur)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58459_a8_e28
001-58459_a8_em32
QUANTITY
QUASI
Austrian schillings (ATS) 2,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e29
001-58459_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
October 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58459_a8_e30
001-58459_a8_em34
ORG
QUASI
St. Pölten District Court (Bezirksgericht)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e26
001-58459_a8_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
HEALTH
insert
001-58459_a8_e31
001-58459_a8_em36
DEM
QUASI
paranoia querulans
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e26
001-58459_a8_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e26
001-58459_a8_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e26
001-58459_a8_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e26
001-58459_a8_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e32
001-58459_a8_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
29 October 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58459_a8_e33
001-58459_a8_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e35
001-58459_a8_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
15 February 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e36
001-58459_a8_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e34
001-58459_a8_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58459_a8_e37
001-58459_a8_em55
ORG
QUASI
Krems District and Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58459_a8_e38
001-58459_a8_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
17 March 1994
Josef Prinz
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Josef Prinz