PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 52443/07) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Jacek Mościcki (“the applicant”), on 19 November 2007.

The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged that the lustration proceedings brought against him had been unfair.

On 12 March 2009 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.

Written submissions were received from the Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights in Warsaw, which had been granted leave by the President to intervene as a third party (Article 36 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 44 § 2).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1939 and lives in Koszalin. He began to practise as an advocate in 1971.

On 11 April 1997 the parliament passed the Law on disclosing work for or service in the State’s security services or collaboration with them between 1944 and 1990 by persons exercising public functions (ustawa o ujawnieniu pracy lub służby w organach bezpieczeństwa państwa lub współpracy z nimi w latach 1944-1990 osób pełniących funkcje publiczne) (the “1997 Lustration Act”). Persons falling under the provisions of the Lustration Act, i.e. candidates or holders of public office such as ministers and members of parliament, were required to declare whether or not they had worked for or collaborated with the security services during the communist regime. The provisions of the Act extended to, inter alia, judges, prosecutors and advocates.

In May 1999 the applicant in his lustration declaration stated that he had not been an intentional and secret collaborator of the communist-era security services.

On 11 May 2005 the Commissioner of Public Interest (Rzecznik Interesu Publicznego) notified the applicant that he had instituted proceedings aimed at verifying the truthfulness of the applicant’s declaration.

The Commissioner heard the applicant on 2 June 2005. The applicant stated that in the 1980s he had been harassed by two officers of the security service. However, he averred that his contacts with the security service had not amounted to secret and conscious collaboration. He stated that he had ceased all the contacts with the security services in August 1984. The applicant unsuccessfully requested the Commissioner to hear eight advocates of the Koszalin Regional Bar Association.

On 8 August 2005 the Commissioner made an application to the Lustration Chamber of the Warsaw Court of Appeal, in which he challenged the truthfulness of the applicant’s declaration.

On 11 August 2005 the Warsaw Court of Appeal instituted lustration proceedings in the applicant’s case.

On 15 September 2005 the court held a hearing. The applicant stated that he would not make any statements and would not answer any questions put to him by the court. He upheld his statements given before the Commissioner on 2 June 2005. The applicant did not request the court to call advocates of the Koszalin Bar as witnesses. However, the court decided to hear two of those advocates (K.G. and R.K.). They stated that the applicant had informed them about the meetings with the security services but not about their contents.

On 5 January 2006 the Warsaw Court of Appeal, acting as the first‑instance lustration court, held that the applicant’s declaration had been untruthful. The court relied, in particular, on evidence given by J.B., an officer of the security services who had managed the applicant as a secret collaborator. It further had regard to the applicant’s statements given before the Commissioner and documentary evidence. It found that the applicant, albeit for a limited period of time, had been an intentional and secret collaborator with the security services within the meaning of the Lustration Act.

The applicant lodged an appeal. He argued that his meetings with the officers of the security services had not amounted to secret collaboration as he had informed his fellow advocates (K.G. and R.K.) about those meetings. Furthermore, he had never consented to collaborate with the security services and there had been no material evidence of his alleged collaboration. The applicant also argued that he had been registered as a “secret collaborator” without his knowledge. He requested the court to call further witnesses.

On 25 April 2006 the Warsaw Court of Appeal agreed to hear four witnesses called by the applicant (M.C., A.B.-S., J.T. and W.W.). It refused to hear the remaining witnesses since their evidence was not strictly related to the applicant’s alleged collaboration with the security services and thus would be irrelevant for the case.

On 30 May 2006 the Warsaw Court of Appeal heard three witnesses called by the applicant (M.C., J.T. and W.W.). It did not hear A.B.-S. as the applicant withdrew his request to hear that witness.

On 30 May 2006 the Warsaw Court of Appeal, acting as the second‑instance lustration court, upheld the judgment of 5 January 2006. It found that the first-instance court had duly assessed all relevant evidence and provided sufficient reasons for its findings which were confirmed by the additional witnesses heard by the appellate court. It held that according to the evidence given by J.B. the applicant had not signed a collaboration declaration, but had been orally providing information to the security services about advocates of the Koszalin Bar.

The applicant lodged a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court. He contested, amongst others, the Court of Appeal’s refusal to hear some of his witnesses. On 22 May 2007 the Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal. It found that the Court of Appeal’s refusal to hear certain witnesses had been justified and duly reasoned.

On 17 September 2007 the Koszalin Regional Bar Association struck the applicant off the roll of advocates. It found that in accordance with section 30 of the Lustration Act the applicant had lost his right to practise as an advocate following the dismissal of his cassation appeal by the Supreme Court. On 23 October 2007 the National Bar Association upheld the impugned decision. The applicant appealed to the Minister of Justice who however dismissed his appeal on 13 May 2008.

The applicant filed an appeal against the Minister’s decision with the Warsaw Regional Administrative Court. On 13 August 2008 the applicant requested the court to stay the proceedings on the ground that the Ombudsman had challenged the constitutionality of a relevant section of the amended Lustration Act and proceedings had been instituted before the Constitutional Court. On 11 December 2008 that court stayed the proceedings as requested. On 16 March 2010 the court resumed the proceedings at the applicant’s request. On 10 June 2010 the court again stayed the proceedings. On 8 November 2010 the applicant filed a complaint with the Supreme Administrative Court under the Law of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (“the 2004 Act”). On 30 November 2010 the Supreme Administrative Court dismissed his complaint. The proceedings before the Constitutional Court appear to be pending.

By a letter dated 9 March 2009 the Szczecin Branch of the Institute of National Remembrance notified the applicant that doubts had arisen as to the truthfulness of his lustration declaration. He was summoned for 17 April 2009. The applicant has submitted no further information as regards the notification.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e1
001-105123_a2_em1
CODE
DIRECT
52443/07
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e2
001-105123_a2_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e3
001-105123_a2_em3
DEM
QUASI
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e4
001-105123_a2_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jacek Mościcki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e5
001-105123_a2_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
19 November 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e6
001-105123_a2_em6
ORG
QUASI
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e7
001-105123_a2_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e8
001-105123_a2_em8
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e9
001-105123_a2_em9
ORG
QUASI
Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e10
001-105123_a2_em10
LOC
QUASI
Warsaw
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e11
001-105123_a2_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1939
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-105123_a2_e12
001-105123_a2_em12
LOC
QUASI
Koszalin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e13
001-105123_a2_em13
DEM
QUASI
advocate
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e14
001-105123_a2_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
1971
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e15
001-105123_a2_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
11 April 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e16
001-105123_a2_em16
DEM
QUASI
advocates
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e17
001-105123_a2_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e18
001-105123_a2_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
11 May 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e19
001-105123_a2_em19
PERSON
NO_MASK
Commissioner of Public Interest
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e19
001-105123_a2_em20
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-105123_a2_em19
Rzecznik Interesu Publicznego
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e19
001-105123_a2_em21
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-105123_a2_em19
The Commissioner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e20
001-105123_a2_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
2 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e21
001-105123_a2_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
1980s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e22
001-105123_a2_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
August 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e23
001-105123_a2_em25
PERSON
NO_MASK
the Commissioner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e16
001-105123_a2_em26
DEM
QUASI
advocates
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e24
001-105123_a2_em27
ORG
QUASI
Koszalin Regional Bar Association
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e25
001-105123_a2_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
8 August 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e23
001-105123_a2_em29
PERSON
NO_MASK
the Commissioner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e26
001-105123_a2_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Lustration Chamber of the Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e27
001-105123_a2_em31
ORG
QUASI
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e28
001-105123_a2_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
11 August 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e27
001-105123_a2_em33
ORG
QUASI
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e29
001-105123_a2_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
15 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e23
001-105123_a2_em35
PERSON
NO_MASK
the Commissioner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e20
001-105123_a2_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
2 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e16
001-105123_a2_em37
DEM
QUASI
advocates
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e30
001-105123_a2_em38
ORG
QUASI
Koszalin Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e16
001-105123_a2_em39
DEM
QUASI
advocates
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-105123_a2_e31
001-105123_a2_em40
PERSON
QUASI
K.G.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-105123_a2_e32
001-105123_a2_em41
PERSON
QUASI
R.K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e33
001-105123_a2_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
5 January 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e27
001-105123_a2_em43
ORG
QUASI
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e34
001-105123_a2_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
first‑instance lustration court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-105123_a2_e35
001-105123_a2_em45
PERSON
QUASI
J.B.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e23
001-105123_a2_em46
PERSON
NO_MASK
the Commissioner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e16
001-105123_a2_em47
DEM
QUASI
advocates
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e31
001-105123_a2_em48
PERSON
QUASI
K.G.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e32
001-105123_a2_em49
PERSON
QUASI
R.K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e36
001-105123_a2_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
25 April 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e27
001-105123_a2_em51
ORG
QUASI
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e37
001-105123_a2_em52
QUANTITY
QUASI
four witnesses
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e38
001-105123_a2_em53
PERSON
QUASI
M.C.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e39
001-105123_a2_em54
PERSON
QUASI
A.B.-S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e40
001-105123_a2_em55
PERSON
QUASI
J.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-105123_a2_e41
001-105123_a2_em56
PERSON
QUASI
W.W.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e42
001-105123_a2_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e27
001-105123_a2_em58
ORG
QUASI
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e43
001-105123_a2_em59
QUANTITY
QUASI
three witnesses
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e38
001-105123_a2_em60
PERSON
QUASI
M.C.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e40
001-105123_a2_em61
PERSON
QUASI
J.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e41
001-105123_a2_em62
PERSON
QUASI
W.W.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e39
001-105123_a2_em63
PERSON
QUASI
A.B.-S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e42
001-105123_a2_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e27
001-105123_a2_em65
ORG
QUASI
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e44
001-105123_a2_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
second‑instance lustration court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e33
001-105123_a2_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
5 January 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-105123_a2_e35
001-105123_a2_em68
PERSON
QUASI
J.B.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e16
001-105123_a2_em69
DEM
QUASI
advocates
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e30
001-105123_a2_em70
ORG
QUASI
Koszalin Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e45
001-105123_a2_em71
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e46
001-105123_a2_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
22 May 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e45
001-105123_a2_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e47
001-105123_a2_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
17 September 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e24
001-105123_a2_em75
ORG
QUASI
Koszalin Regional Bar Association
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e16
001-105123_a2_em76
DEM
QUASI
advocates
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e13
001-105123_a2_em77
DEM
QUASI
advocate
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e45
001-105123_a2_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e48
001-105123_a2_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
23 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e49
001-105123_a2_em80
ORG
QUASI
National Bar Association
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e50
001-105123_a2_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
13 May 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e51
001-105123_a2_em82
ORG
QUASI
Warsaw Regional Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e52
001-105123_a2_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
13 August 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-105123_a2_e53
001-105123_a2_em84
PERSON
NO_MASK
Ombudsman
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e54
001-105123_a2_em85
ORG
QUASI
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e55
001-105123_a2_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e56
001-105123_a2_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e57
001-105123_a2_em88
DATETIME
QUASI
10 June 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e58
001-105123_a2_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e59
001-105123_a2_em90
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e60
001-105123_a2_em91
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e61
001-105123_a2_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
30 November 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e59
001-105123_a2_em93
ORG
QUASI
Supreme Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e54
001-105123_a2_em94
ORG
QUASI
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e62
001-105123_a2_em95
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e63
001-105123_a2_em96
LOC
QUASI
Szczecin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e64
001-105123_a2_em97
ORG
NO_MASK
Institute of National Remembrance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-105123_a2_e65
001-105123_a2_em98
DATETIME
QUASI
17 April 2009
Jacek Mościcki
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Jacek Mościcki