PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 21539/07) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a business firm registered in Austria, company Franz Steininger (“the applicant company”), on 3 May 2007.

The applicant was represented by Mr J. Hofer and Mr T. Huemer, lawyers practising in Wels. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that no tribunal within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention had decided on the imposition of surcharges for unpaid contributions to the Austrian Agricultural Marketing Association.

On 23 October 2008 the application was communicated to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant company, which has its seat of business in Ernstbrunn (Austria), carries out cattle and pig slaughter, and is therefore liable to agricultural marketing charges, calculated on the basis of the number of animals slaughtered, to be paid to Agrarmarkt Austria (AMA) under the Agricultural Market Act (Agrarmarktgesetz).

On 30 May 2006 the AMA issued a payment order against the applicant company, ordering it to pay outstanding contributions for the period of December 2005 and January 2006 in the amount of 11.730,05 euros (EUR) and, in addition, imposing a surcharge for failure to pay, amounting to 60% of the unpaid contributions. The applicant company appealed against the order. It argued in particular that the above system was contrary to the rules of the European Union on state aid. It also asked for oral hearings to be held on the appeal and also asked that the proceedings for enforcing the payment order be suspended.

The Federal Minister of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water (Bundesminister für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasser­wirtschaft), acting as the appeal authority, dismissed the applicant company’s appeal on 17 July 2006 without holding a hearing.

As regards the applicant’s argument that the AMA contributions were levied for financing activities, the AMA quality programme, which was not in accordance with EU law, the Federal Minister found that after the decision of the European Commission of 30 June 2004 (C(2004)2037), the applicant company was in a position to know precisely which charges it had to pay. In that decision the European Commission had expressed that it had no objection to the AMA Quality programmes and quality mark registered as state aid NN 34A/2000 (“Qualitätsprogramme und das AMA-Biozeichen und das AMA-Gütezeichen”), because that state aid was in accordance with the Common Market provided for in the Treaty establishing the European Community. The Federal Minister referred further to the Administrative Court’s decision of 20 March 2006, no. 2005/17/230, according to which also the levying of AMA contributions was in accordance with the relevant provisions of EU law (se §§ 24-27 below). The Federal Minister further held that it had not been necessary to hold a hearing because a hearing was only held if a decision was taken by a panel on an appeal against the decision of a tax office or a regional directorate of finance, which was not the case here.

On 25 July 2006 AMA dismissed the request for suspension of the enforcement.

Thereupon the applicant company lodged complaints with the Constitutional Court and the Administrative Court against the Federal Minister’s decision. Before the Constitutional Court the applicant company complained, inter alia, that the surcharge imposed violated its constitutional right to property. Before the Administrative Court the applicant company complained that the appeal authority was not a court within the meaning of the case-law of the European Court of Justice which prevented it from having the lawfulness of the decision by the European Commission of 30 June 2004 reviewed by the European Court of Justice in proceedings under Article 234 of the Treaty of the European Union. As regards the imposition of the surcharge the applicant company complained that the findings of fact were insufficient. In particular the authority had failed to establish whether the objective and subjective elements of the offence (objektiven und subjektiven Tatbildvoraussetzungen) had been met. Relying on Article 6 of the Convention it complained further that no public hearing had been held and that no impartial tribunal established by law decided on the criminal charge against it (“es ist kein unparteiisches, auf Gesetz beruhendes Gericht über den erhobenen strafrechtlichen Vorwurf eingeschritten”). As the authorities imposing the surcharges had failed to hold an oral hearing, the applicant company asked the Administrative Court for a public hearing.

On 25 September 2006 the Constitutional Court declined to deal with the applicant company’s complaint under Article 144 of the Federal Constitution for lack of prospect of success.

The Administrative Court dismissed the applicant company’s complaint on 30 January 2007 and held as follows: “The present case does not differ in the questions of relevance to the decision from the one decided by the Administrative Court on 20 March 2006, no. 2005/17/230. Pursuant to Section 43(2) of the Administrative Court Act reference is made to it. For the reasons set out in that decision the breach of law complained of by the applicant company also does not exist in view of the present complaint, for which reason it can be dismissed without further proceedings in camera. For the reasons set out in the decision referred to also Article 6 of the Convention is of no relevance here.”
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e1
001-110483_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
21539/07
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-110483_a8_e2
001-110483_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e3
001-110483_a8_em3
LOC
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e4
001-110483_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Franz Steininger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e5
001-110483_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
3 May 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e6
001-110483_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Hofer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e7
001-110483_a8_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr T. Huemer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-110483_a8_e8
001-110483_a8_em8
LOC
NO_MASK
Wels
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e9
001-110483_a8_em9
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e10
001-110483_a8_em10
PERSON
QUASI
H. Tichy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e11
001-110483_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e12
001-110483_a8_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e13
001-110483_a8_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Agricultural Marketing Association
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e14
001-110483_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
23 October 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e15
001-110483_a8_em15
LOC
QUASI
Ernstbrunn
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110483_a8_e3
001-110483_a8_em16
LOC
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110483_a8_e16
001-110483_a8_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
Agrarmarkt Austria (AMA)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e17
001-110483_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110483_a8_e16
001-110483_a8_em19
ORG
NO_MASK
001-110483_a8_em17
AMA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e18
001-110483_a8_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e19
001-110483_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
January 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110483_a8_e20
001-110483_a8_em22
QUANTITY
QUASI
11.730,05 euros (EUR)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e21
001-110483_a8_em23
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
60%
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e22
001-110483_a8_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
European Union
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e23
001-110483_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
17 July 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e16
001-110483_a8_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
AMA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e16
001-110483_a8_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
AMA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e24
001-110483_a8_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
European Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110483_a8_e25
001-110483_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e24
001-110483_a8_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
European Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e16
001-110483_a8_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
AMA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e16
001-110483_a8_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
AMA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e26
001-110483_a8_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Common Market
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110483_a8_e27
001-110483_a8_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e28
001-110483_a8_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
20 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-110483_a8_e29
001-110483_a8_em36
CODE
NO_MASK
2005/17/230
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e16
001-110483_a8_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
AMA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e30
001-110483_a8_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
25 July 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e16
001-110483_a8_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
AMA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e31
001-110483_a8_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e27
001-110483_a8_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e31
001-110483_a8_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e27
001-110483_a8_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e32
001-110483_a8_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
European Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e24
001-110483_a8_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
European Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e25
001-110483_a8_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e32
001-110483_a8_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
European Court of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e27
001-110483_a8_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e33
001-110483_a8_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
25 September 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e31
001-110483_a8_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e27
001-110483_a8_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e34
001-110483_a8_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e27
001-110483_a8_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e28
001-110483_a8_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
20 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e29
001-110483_a8_em55
CODE
NO_MASK
2005/17/230
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-110483_a8_e27
001-110483_a8_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
Franz Steininger
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Franz Steininger