PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court on 8 December 1994 by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission“) and on 23 December 1994 by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“the Government“), within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 para. 1 and Article 47 (art. 32-1, art. 47) of the Convention. It originated in an application (no. 23389/94) against the United Kingdom lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) on 25 January 1994 by a British citizen, Mr Prem Singh. The Commission’s request referred to Articles 44 and 48 (art. 44, art. 48) and to the declaration whereby the United Kingdom recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46) (art. 46); the Government’s application referred to Article 48 (art. 48). The object of the request and of the application was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 5 para. 4 (art. 5-4) of the Convention.

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3 (d) of Rules of Court A, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 30).

The President of the Court decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice this case and the case of Hussain v. the United Kingdom (no. 55/1994/502/584) should be heard by the same Chamber (Rule 21 para. 6) and that a joint hearing should be held. The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Sir John Freeland, the elected judge of British nationality (Article 43 of the Convention) (art. 43), and Mr R. Ryssdal, the President of the Court (Rule 21 para. 3 (b)). On 27 January 1995, in the presence of the Registrar, the President drew by lot the names of the other seven members, namely Mr F. Gölcüklü, Mr R. Macdonald, Mr A. Spielmann, Mr N. Valticos, Mrs E. Palm, Mr F. Bigi and Mr P. Jambrek (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 4) (art. 43).

As President of the Chamber (Rule 21 para. 5), Mr Ryssdal, acting through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the Government, the applicant’s lawyer and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 37 para. 1 and 38). Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the Government’s memorial on 13 April 1995 and the applicant’s memorial on 3 May. The Secretary to the Commission informed the Registrar that the Delegate would submit his observations at the hearing.

In accordance with the President’s decision, the hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 27 September 1995. The Court had held a preparatory meeting beforehand. There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Mr I. Christie, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Agent, Mr D. Pannick QC, Mr M. Shaw, Barrister-at-Law, Counsel, Mr H. Carter, Mr H. Bayne, Mr R. Harrington, Home Office, Advisers; (b) for the Commission Mr N. Bratza, Delegate; (c) for the applicant Mr E. Fitzgerald QC, Mr J. Cooper, Barrister-at-Law, Counsel, Mr R. King, Solicitor. The Court heard addresses by Mr Bratza, Mr Fitzgerald and Mr Pannick.

AS TO THE FACTS

I. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

Mr Prem Singh was born in 1957 and is currently resident in Wakefield, West Yorkshire.

On 19 February 1973, the applicant - then aged 15 - was convicted at Leeds Crown Court of the murder of a 72-year-old woman. He had broken into her home, strangled her, cut her throat and had sexual intercourse with her at around the time of her death. Mr Singh received a mandatory sentence of detention “during Her Majesty’s pleasure“ pursuant to section 53 (1) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (as amended) (see paragraph 29 below). Its effect was to render the applicant “liable to be detained in such a place and under such conditions as the Secretary of State [for the Home Department] may direct“.

In October 1990, having served the punitive part of his sentence (“tariff“ - see paragraph 33 below), Mr Singh was released on licence.

On 11 March 1991 the applicant was arrested and interviewed at Southmead police station, Bristol, in connection with a number of alleged offences involving deception, and one of using threatening behaviour. He denied the allegations.

On 12 March 1991 the Parole Board considered Mr Singh’s case, and on 21 March 1991 his life licence was revoked by the Secretary of State on its recommendation. On 21 March 1991 the applicant received a formal notice of the reasons for this decision, which he was entitled to by virtue of section 62 (3) of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 (see paragraph 43 below). It informed him that the Secretary of State had revoked his licence in the light of: “(i) Reports indicating that you had lied to and misledyour supervising officers and avoided telling them of avariety of significant events following your release onlicence. (ii) Your arrest and subsequent appearances beforeBristol Magistrates on several criminal charges includingfraud and using threatening behaviour, set against thecircumstances surrounding the offence for which you weregiven a life sentence in 1973, make it impossible for theSecretary of State to be satisfied that your continuedpresence in the community did not constitute a risk tothe public.“

On 27 August 1991, having complained to the Avon Probation Service about its recommendation, Mr Singh received a more detailed explanation of his recall in a letter from the chief probation officer. The reason given for his recall was not the alleged offences (which were a matter for the court), but rather his failure to provide accurate information about his circumstances to his supervising probation officer. The letter cited specifically his failure to inform her about the purchase of a motor vehicle; getting a job and giving false information to his employers about his age and character; having a relationship and not telling his girlfriend all about his background; and falling into arrears with his rent.

Mr Singh denied the accuracy of most of these allegations, and asked the Parole Board to review the merits of the revocation of his licence. Under section 62 (4) of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 (now section 39 (4) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991 - see paragraph 43 below), the Parole Board was empowered at this stage to take a binding decision for Mr Singh’s immediate release.

The Parole Board considered the applicant’s case on 27 August and 19 December 1991. It had before it a number of reports from the probation service and the police, none of which was disclosed to the applicant. On 19 December 1991 the Board decided against recommending Mr Singh’s immediate release. He was not told the reasons for this decision.

On 2 March 1992 the criminal charges against Mr Singh (see paragraph 9 above) were dismissed because the prosecution had presented the indictment out of time. Mr Singh asked for his case to be reconsidered in the light of this development, and the Secretary of State accordingly referred it back to the Parole Board, under the procedure set out in section 61 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 (see paragraph 34 below). On 30 July 1992 the Board again declined to recommend Mr Singh’s release.

The applicant then sought judicial review (see paragraph 47 below) of the two decisions of the Parole Board of 19 December 1991 and 30 July 1992. On 20 April 1993 the Divisional Court quashed the Parole Board’s decision of 19 December 1991 on the ground that there had been a breach of natural justice because of the Board’s failure to disclose to Mr Singh all the reports before it. The court held that the applicant was entitled to a fresh consideration by the Parole Board under the terms of section 39 (4) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, at which the Board would be empowered to order (not merely to recommend) his release (see paragraph 43 below). Lord Justice Evans found, inter alia, that: “[Mr Singh’s] status is that of a person whose continueddetention can only be justified if the test ofdangerousness, meaning an unacceptable risk of physicaldanger to the life or limb of the public, is satisfied“(R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, exparte Prem Singh, unreported, transcript pp. 26F-27B) He further commented that the disclosed facts “scarcely seem able to support a positive answer to [this question]“.

As a result of the Divisional Court’s decision, Mr Singh received a complete file of the documents which were before the Parole Board. This included a number of detailed probation reports alleging deception of his supervising officers by Mr Singh, and also several hundred pages of witness statements obtained by the police in connection with the criminal charges which had been dismissed (see paragraphs 9 and 14 above).

With the help of his solicitor, Mr Singh made written representations to the Parole Board. He denied the allegations contained in the letter from the chief probation officer that he had deceived his supervising probation officer (see paragraph 11 above) and supported his case with witness statements from his girlfriend and landlady.

On 18 June 1993 the Parole Board considered Mr Singh’s case. He was not permitted to be present at the review and had no opportunity to give oral evidence or to question those who had made allegations against him. The Board decided not to recommend release, and gave the following reasons: “The Panel accepted that Mr Singh’s representationsanswered some matters which were of concern to hisprobation officer. However, there was a lack of opennessin his dealings with the Probation Service. The Panelalso considered that the conduct which led to thecriminal charges indicated a serious kind ofdeceptiveness. His behaviour under supervision led thePanel to conclude that the nature of his personality andbehaviour had not changed significantly since theoriginal offence at the age of 15. His failure to complywith the discipline of licence supervision, bearing inmind the original offence, gives rise to considerableconcern.“

Mr Singh applied for judicial review of this decision, but he withdrew his application on or about 7 March 1994 because he had been offered an early review of his case by the Parole Board.

In June 1994 the Parole Board reconsidered Mr Singh’s case in accordance with section 35 (2) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991 (see paragraph 35 below). Mr Singh entered detailed representations and the file before the Board was disclosed to him; it contained recent reports from probation officers, from a psychologist working with Mr Singh and from the Local Review Committee (see paragraph 46 below). All the reports which made a specific recommendation were in favour of the applicant’s release as soon as possible via a pre-release hostel.

As the applicant was informed on 21 July 1994 the Parole Board unanimously recommended his release subject to six months in a pre-release employment scheme. The reasons given were as follows: “On the evidence presented to [the panel], theyconsidered Prem Singh no longer constituted a danger tolife or limb of committing further life threateningoffences to justify his continued detention since hisrecall in March 1991.“

The applicant was also informed on 21 July 1994 that the Secretary of State was “not prepared to accept this recommendation and [did not agree] to [the applicant’s] release“. The Secretary of State so decided in exercise of his statutory powers (see paragraph 43 below).

By a communication of 8 September 1994 the applicant was given the reasons for the Secretary of State’s decision. These were that Mr Singh had misled the probation service after his release in October 1990 and had appeared before the magistrates on several criminal charges, although these had subsequently been dismissed on technical grounds. Thus, he had been recalled to prison “following serious breaches of the trust placed in [him] as a life licensee“. The Secretary of State was unable to assess accurately whether he was still a threat to the public, because he had spent the three and a quarter years since his recall in a closed prison. He considered that Mr Singh’s relationship with the probation service needed to be tested in the “more challenging environment of an open prison“. For these reasons, he believed that Mr Singh should be transferred to an open prison for further testing. His next formal review by the Parole Board would begin in October 1995.

Mr Singh applied for judicial review of the Secretary of State’s decision. On 16 March 1995 the Divisional Court quashed the Secretary of State’s decision and ordered him to reconsider it. The court found, inter alia, that the correct test to be applied was whether Mr Singh constituted a danger to the “life or limb“ of the public, and that the reasoning process of the Secretary of State had been flawed because he had not properly explained how the findings he had made related to the test of dangerousness (R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Prem Singh (no. 2), unreported).

In September 1995 Mr Singh joined a pre-release employment scheme. His provisional date for release is 18 March 1996.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e1
001-57984_a8_em1
DATETIME
QUASI
8 December 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e2
001-57984_a8_em2
DATETIME
QUASI
23 December 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e3
001-57984_a8_em3
ORG
NO_MASK
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e4
001-57984_a8_em4
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e5
001-57984_a8_em5
CODE
DIRECT
23389/94
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e6
001-57984_a8_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
United Kingdom
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e7
001-57984_a8_em7
DATETIME
QUASI
25 January 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e8
001-57984_a8_em8
DEM
NO_MASK
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e9
001-57984_a8_em9
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Prem Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e6
001-57984_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
United Kingdom
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e10
001-57984_a8_em11
MISC
QUASI
Hussain v. the United Kingdom
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e11
001-57984_a8_em12
CODE
QUASI
55/1994/502/584
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e12
001-57984_a8_em13
PERSON
NO_MASK
Sir John Freeland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e8
001-57984_a8_em14
DEM
NO_MASK
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e13
001-57984_a8_em15
PERSON
QUASI
001-57984_a8_em24
Mr R. Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e14
001-57984_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
27 January 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e15
001-57984_a8_em17
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Gölcüklü
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e16
001-57984_a8_em18
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Macdonald
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e17
001-57984_a8_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Spielmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e18
001-57984_a8_em20
PERSON
QUASI
Mr N. Valticos
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e19
001-57984_a8_em21
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs E. Palm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e20
001-57984_a8_em22
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Bigi
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e21
001-57984_a8_em23
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. Jambrek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e13
001-57984_a8_em24
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e22
001-57984_a8_em25
ORG
NO_MASK
Delegate of the Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e23
001-57984_a8_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
13 April 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e24
001-57984_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
3 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57984_a8_e25
001-57984_a8_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e26
001-57984_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
27 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e27
001-57984_a8_em30
PERSON
QUASI
Mr I. Christie
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e28
001-57984_a8_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e29
001-57984_a8_em32
PERSON
QUASI
Mr D. Pannick QC
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e30
001-57984_a8_em33
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Shaw
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e31
001-57984_a8_em34
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. Carter
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e32
001-57984_a8_em35
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. Bayne
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e33
001-57984_a8_em36
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Harrington
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e34
001-57984_a8_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Home Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e35
001-57984_a8_em38
PERSON
QUASI
Mr N. Bratza
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e36
001-57984_a8_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr E. Fitzgerald QC
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e37
001-57984_a8_em40
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Cooper
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e38
001-57984_a8_em41
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. King
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e39
001-57984_a8_em42
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Bratza
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e40
001-57984_a8_em43
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Fitzgerald
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e41
001-57984_a8_em44
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Pannick
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e9
001-57984_a8_em45
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Prem Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e42
001-57984_a8_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
1957
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e43
001-57984_a8_em47
LOC
QUASI
Wakefield, West Yorkshire
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e44
001-57984_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
19 February 1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e45
001-57984_a8_em49
DEM
QUASI
aged 15
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57984_a8_e46
001-57984_a8_em50
ORG
QUASI
Leeds Crown Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57984_a8_e47
001-57984_a8_em51
DEM
NO_MASK
72-year-old
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em52
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e49
001-57984_a8_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Home Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e50
001-57984_a8_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
October 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em55
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e51
001-57984_a8_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
11 March 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e52
001-57984_a8_em57
ORG
QUASI
Southmead police station, Bristol
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e53
001-57984_a8_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em60
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e55
001-57984_a8_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e55
001-57984_a8_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e56
001-57984_a8_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e57
001-57984_a8_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
27 August 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e58
001-57984_a8_em65
ORG
QUASI
Avon Probation Service
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em66
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em67
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em68
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em70
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em71
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e59
001-57984_a8_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
27 August and 19 December 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e60
001-57984_a8_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
19 December 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em74
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e61
001-57984_a8_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em76
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em77
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e62
001-57984_a8_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
30 July 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em80
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em81
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e60
001-57984_a8_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
19 December 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e62
001-57984_a8_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
30 July 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e63
001-57984_a8_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e64
001-57984_a8_em85
ORG
NO_MASK
Divisional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em86
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e60
001-57984_a8_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
19 December 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em88
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em89
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e65
001-57984_a8_em90
PERSON
QUASI
Lord Justice Evans
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em91
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e66
001-57984_a8_em92
MISC
QUASI
R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, exparte Prem Singh, unreported, transcript pp. 26F-27B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e64
001-57984_a8_em93
ORG
NO_MASK
Divisional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em94
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em95
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em96
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em97
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em98
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e67
001-57984_a8_em99
DATETIME
QUASI
18 June 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em100
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em101
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em102
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e68
001-57984_a8_em103
ORG
NO_MASK
Probation Service
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57984_a8_e69
001-57984_a8_em104
DEM
QUASI
age of 15
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em105
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e70
001-57984_a8_em106
DATETIME
QUASI
about 7 March 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em107
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e71
001-57984_a8_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
June 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em109
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em110
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em111
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em112
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e72
001-57984_a8_em113
ORG
NO_MASK
Local Review Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e73
001-57984_a8_em114
DATETIME
QUASI
21 July 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em115
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e74
001-57984_a8_em116
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e75
001-57984_a8_em117
PERSON
DIRECT
Prem Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e76
001-57984_a8_em118
DATETIME
QUASI
March 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e73
001-57984_a8_em119
DATETIME
QUASI
21 July 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e77
001-57984_a8_em120
DATETIME
QUASI
8 September 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em121
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e50
001-57984_a8_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
October 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e78
001-57984_a8_em123
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three and a quarter years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em124
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em125
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e54
001-57984_a8_em126
ORG
NO_MASK
Parole Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e79
001-57984_a8_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
October 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em128
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e80
001-57984_a8_em129
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e64
001-57984_a8_em130
ORG
NO_MASK
Divisional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em131
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57984_a8_e81
001-57984_a8_em132
MISC
QUASI
R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Prem Singh (no. 2), unreported
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e82
001-57984_a8_em133
DATETIME
QUASI
September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e48
001-57984_a8_em134
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Singh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57984_a8_e83
001-57984_a8_em135
DATETIME
QUASI
18 March 1996
Prem Singh
GBR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Prem Singh