PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 60682/00) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a British national, Ms Anna Young (“the applicant”), on 4 July 2000.

The applicant, who was granted legal aid, was represented by Mr Christian Fisher Khan, a firm of solicitors practising in London. The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agents, Mr C.A. Whomersley and, subsequently, Mr J. Grainger, both of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

The applicant’s admissible complaints concerned the compliance with Article 6 of prison adjudication proceedings against her.

By a decision of 11 October 2005, a Chamber of the Fourth Section of the Court declared the application partly admissible.

The applicant and the Government each filed further written observations (Rule 59 § 1). The Chamber decided, after consulting the parties, that no hearing on the merits was required (Rule 59 § 3 in fine).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in London. In or around late 1999 the applicant breached an earlier probation order (concerning a charge of deception) and was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment. It was her first time in prison.

Her term of imprisonment began in November 1999. She was accorded an unconditional release date of 23 January 2000.

A. The applicant’s disability

The applicant suffered from cerebral palsy, a disorder of the central nervous system which can inhibit voluntary muscle control. She used a wheelchair and could only walk a few steps with assistance. She did not have voluntary control of her bladder meaning that on occasion she either could not urinate for several hours or she urinated uncontrollably and required medication to restrain this. The condition did not affect her intelligence but rather her ability to process information so that she required explanations in plain language and sufficient time for full comprehension.

A short medical report from a general practitioner dated 15 August 2000 noted that the applicant was a patient of the relevant practice and that her condition could have affected her ability to produce a urine sample on demand as voluntary control of the nervous system is always affected by cerebral palsy. While he suggested obtaining a neurologist’s report on these matters, the applicant stated that she could not afford to obtain one.

The prison psychotherapist’s report of 31 January 2000 noted that the applicant had been referred in December 1999 given her distress and difficulties in coping with her imprisonment. It noted as follows: “Largely confined to a wheelchair, [the applicant] manifests obvious physical symptoms of cerebral palsy as well as somewhat less obvious mental ones. [The applicant] possesses an excellent vocabulary and a reasonably well-developed capacity to think logically that places her well in the highest range of mental functioning for those who have the condition from which she suffers. Thus it seems that she often strikes those who meet her as an individual with a normal range of mental functioning but a difficult personality. In fact, [the applicant] experiences problems dealing with any sort of symbolism in language: she is openly vocal about her distaste for what she calls slang. Any explanation given to her needs to be couched in concrete terms devoid of metaphor or simile. Often it may be advisable or necessary to write down an explanation so that she may study it at her leisure in order to take it in fully and remember it. When this procedure is followed, she proves well able to make use of information or advice. From [the applicant’s] standpoint, these features of her mental functioning often make it difficult for her to think things through completely and thus to envision what the consequences of her actions may be. From the view point of those who deal with her, it often may seem that she is being difficult or uncooperative when it is in reality the case that she simply has not fully grasped the nuances of the subject at hand. [The applicant’s] life circumstances seem to have been troubled and unhappy. She has felt it necessary to fight ferociously to consolidate and maintain her independence. Thus the stay in [prison] appears to have been a sobering experience for her. It seems rather graphically to have brought home to her the consequences of some of her own actions – actions for which she previously had been unable to envisage consequences. It is difficult for [the applicant] to trust anyone completely, as she feels herself to have been badly let down by key figures in her life (including her mother, foster carers et al). Yet, in a relationship which [the applicant] experiences as one of confidence and caring, she is able to show herself as a warm, even endearing individual.”

The applicant was detained in the medical wing of the prison since the normal prison cells were not wheelchair accessible.

B. Mandatory drug testing (“MDT”)

At about 11.20am on 6 January 2000 a female prison officer asked the applicant to leave her education classes. They were then met by two other female prison officers. One of them asked the applicant if she had heard about MDT. The applicant replied that she had not and she was informed that it was mandatory drug testing. One of the officers requested the applicant to provide a urine sample immediately. The applicant alleged that she said that she would not be able to produce a sample: the Government did not accept this.

She was taken to the MDT unit, given a container and asked to provide a specimen. While the applicant claimed that she said again that she could not provide a urine sample, the Government maintained that she simply refused to provide a sample. She claimed that she began to explain why she could not provide a sample but that her explanation was brushed aside. She was offered a cup of water, which she declined. She maintained that this was because she knew that the water would not assist because the problem was not whether her bladder was full or not but whether she had the motor control to provide a specimen on demand and because she was concerned as to whether the water was fresh.

The applicant was taken to her cell by the officers and she was told that she could provide her sample there. A female officer remained in the cell with her and the applicant felt distressed by this. She claimed that, at about midday, she reiterated that she could not urinate. She submitted that the prison officer appeared irritated and informed her that she was going to put that down as a refusal which could result in additional days’ detention. The Government claimed that she refused once again to provide a sample.

She claimed that the officers who dealt with her were brusque and business-like. None of the officers asked her about her condition or whether she would need assistance in providing the urine sample and she was not offered the possibility of speaking confidentially with a medical officer or a structured manner of providing the sample over several hours. She admitted, however, that she did not explain to them that she could not urinate as a result of her disability. She alleged that she did inform the officers that she was menstruating (the Government disputed this) but, in any event, she accepted that she did not use her menstruation as an excuse for not providing a urine sample.

C. The adjudication proceedings

On 7 January 2000, at approximately 7.00-7.30 a.m., a male officer came into the applicant’s cell and read an “official-sounding” paper about “a refusal”. The applicant was asked to sign it but refused to do so. She maintained that this was because she had just woken up and did not understand what was happening. The paperwork was left in her cell. This paperwork appears to have been a notice of report, which informed the applicant that she had been placed on report for the alleged offence of disobeying a lawful order to provide a urine sample.

Later that day, she was sent to see the Governor when it was explained to her that she was being “put on report”. There were two officers in the room at the same time. Her account was that, feeling intimidated and not understanding the jargon they were using, she asked if she could have someone with her. The Governor refused, stating that this would only be allowed for someone with severe learning difficulties. The Governor did not ask her if there were any medical reasons why she should be assisted. The Government disputed the applicant’s account of this meeting.

The matter was adjourned to the following week, to allow the relevant prison officer to attend to give evidence. In the meantime, the applicant was seen by a medical officer who certified her as fit to take part in the hearing. She did not inform the medical officer either that her disability had prevented her from providing a urine sample, explaining that this was because the medical officer never asked.

On 11 January 2000 the applicant appeared again before the Governor. The Government submitted the record of the adjudication hearing which was filled out by the Governor at the hearing. Question 7 on Part 2 of the form enquires: “Do you want any additional help at this hearing? (If yes, explain the possibilities of assistance by a legal friend or legal representative)”. The Governor had ticked the box saying “No”. The applicant claimed that her request for legal representation was refused.

The applicant submitted that she was not asked any questions about her disability or whether she had problems urinating. The allegation of a refusal to give a sample was put to her. She claimed that she tried to explain as best she could and that the Governor indicated that most people could provide a sample when asked and he noted that she had refused water. She accepted that she did not inform the Governor during the adjudication hearing that her disability had prevented her from providing a urine sample. The Governor found the charge of disobeying a lawful order to have been proven and sentenced the applicant to 14 additional days’ detention. She was informed that she could appeal.

With the assistance of the prison chaplain, she obtained and completed on 12 January 2000 a complaint form. She noted in the form that she had not represented herself as well as she wished and would have benefited from a prepared statement. She indicated that she had bladder problems, exacerbated by the stress of her imprisonment and she disclosed that she had been menstruating. She indicated her willingness to provide a urine sample and requested to be allowed the time for which Rule 46A(7) of the Prison Rules 1964 had provided. In an attached statement, she made it clear that she had not refused to provide the sample but simply could not due to her disability. She indicated that she had recently gone more than 24 hours without urinating. She further requested some assistance in order to comply with the prison rules as they had been drafted with able-bodied persons in mind and did not make allowances for those with disabilities. She expressed extreme distress at having to discuss her bodily functions and requested that the 14 additional days’ be withdrawn.

On 14 January 2000 the Governor replied that he had spoken to the prison chaplain, read the applicant’s submissions and discussed the case with the prison service area manager, the latter of whom had read the papers. The area manager agreed that the charge had been proven and that the award of additional days could be reduced to 3 additional days (with no association with other prisoners for 3 nights and 7 days’ stoppages in pay). She was also to provide a urine sample under the MDT arrangements.

The applicant sought legal advice. Her legal representatives could not contact her by telephone and were offered a visit after her initial release date. Accordingly, they made written representations by letter dated 19 January 2000 to the Governor and to the prison service area manager outlining the applicant’s condition, how that had prevented her providing the sample and her distress and embarrassment. They sought the withdrawal of the 14 additional days’ award, in default of which proceedings under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 would be pursued.

The applicant was released on 26 January 2000. In his letter of 27 January 2000 to the applicant’s representatives (confirming a telephone conversation of 20 January 2000) the area manager stated that, while information was received by the Governor after the adjudication causing him to vary the sentence, that information did not cause the Governor or the writer to consider that the finding of guilt was flawed or should be quashed. He was further satisfied that the adjudication was conducted in a fair and proper manner. He noted that the applicant had not explained her difficulties to the officers involved in the test process, nor availed herself of the opportunity subsequently to talk through the issues with the Governor. That letter indicated that a medical officer had informed the Governor that she had been fit to appear and had made no comment to the Governor that she was unable to comply with an order to provide a sample.

On 11 July 2000 the applicant’s representatives complained to the Home Secretary about the prison adjudication matter. They received an acknowledgement dated 8 August 2000.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e1
001-79042_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
60682/00
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e3
001-79042_a11_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e4
001-79042_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Anna Young
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e5
001-79042_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
4 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e6
001-79042_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Christian Fisher Khan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e7
001-79042_a11_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
London
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-79042_a11_em2
United Kingdom Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
001-79042_a11_em2
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e8
001-79042_a11_em10
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C.A. Whomersley
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e9
001-79042_a11_em11
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Grainger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e10
001-79042_a11_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e11
001-79042_a11_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
11 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e12
001-79042_a11_em14
ORG
NO_MASK
Chamber of the Fourth Section of the Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e13
001-79042_a11_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1965
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e7
001-79042_a11_em17
LOC
NO_MASK
London
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a11_e14
001-79042_a11_em18
DATETIME
NO_MASK
late 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e15
001-79042_a11_em19
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e16
001-79042_a11_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e17
001-79042_a11_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
23 January 2000
HEALTH
insert
001-79042_a11_e18
001-79042_a11_em22
DEM
QUASI
cerebral palsy
HEALTH
insert
001-79042_a11_e18
001-79042_a11_em23
DEM
QUASI
001-79042_a11_em22
disorder of the central nervous system which can inhibit voluntary muscle control
HEALTH
insert
001-79042_a11_e19
001-79042_a11_em24
DEM
QUASI
not have voluntary control of her bladder
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e20
001-79042_a11_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
15 August 2000
HEALTH
check
001-79042_a11_e18
001-79042_a11_em26
DEM
QUASI
cerebral palsy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e21
001-79042_a11_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e22
001-79042_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
December 1999
HEALTH
check
001-79042_a11_e18
001-79042_a11_em29
DEM
QUASI
cerebral palsy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a11_e23
001-79042_a11_em30
MISC
NO_MASK
001-79042_a11_em31
Mandatory drug testing
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e23
001-79042_a11_em31
MISC
NO_MASK
MDT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-79042_a11_e24
001-79042_a11_em32
DATETIME
NO_MASK
about 11.20am
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e25
001-79042_a11_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
6 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-79042_a11_e23
001-79042_a11_em34
MISC
NO_MASK
MDT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e26
001-79042_a11_em35
MISC
NO_MASK
mandatory drug testing
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-79042_a11_e23
001-79042_a11_em37
MISC
NO_MASK
MDT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e27
001-79042_a11_em39
DATETIME
NO_MASK
about midday
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a11_e28
001-79042_a11_em40
DATETIME
NO_MASK
additional days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e29
001-79042_a11_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
7 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e30
001-79042_a11_em44
DATETIME
NO_MASK
7.00-7.30 a.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e31
001-79042_a11_em45
DATETIME
NO_MASK
Later that day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em46
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em47
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em48
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e33
001-79042_a11_em50
DATETIME
NO_MASK
following week
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e34
001-79042_a11_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
11 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em52
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e2
001-79042_a11_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em54
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em55
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em56
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em57
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em58
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a11_e35
001-79042_a11_em59
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 additional days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e36
001-79042_a11_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 2000
HEALTH
insert
001-79042_a11_e37
001-79042_a11_em61
DEM
QUASI
bladder problems
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e38
001-79042_a11_em62
DATETIME
NO_MASK
more than 24 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e35
001-79042_a11_em63
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 additional days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e39
001-79042_a11_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em65
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e28
001-79042_a11_em66
DATETIME
NO_MASK
additional days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e40
001-79042_a11_em67
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 additional days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a11_e41
001-79042_a11_em68
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 nights and 7 days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e23
001-79042_a11_em69
MISC
NO_MASK
MDT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e42
001-79042_a11_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
19 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em71
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e35
001-79042_a11_em72
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 additional days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e43
001-79042_a11_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
26 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e44
001-79042_a11_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
27 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e45
001-79042_a11_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em76
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em77
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em78
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em79
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e32
001-79042_a11_em80
PERSON
NO_MASK
Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e46
001-79042_a11_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
11 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a11_e47
001-79042_a11_em82
ORG
NO_MASK
Home Secretary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a11_e48
001-79042_a11_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
8 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e1
001-79042_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
60682/00
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a8_e2
001-79042_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e3
001-79042_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
British
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e4
001-79042_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Anna Young
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e5
001-79042_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
4 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e6
001-79042_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Christian Fisher Khan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e7
001-79042_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
London
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e8
001-79042_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
United Kingdom Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e9
001-79042_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C.A. Whomersley
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e10
001-79042_a8_em10
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Grainger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e11
001-79042_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e12
001-79042_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
11 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e13
001-79042_a8_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Chamber of the Fourth Section of the Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e14
001-79042_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
1965
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e7
001-79042_a8_em15
LOC
NO_MASK
London
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a8_e15
001-79042_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e16
001-79042_a8_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e17
001-79042_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e18
001-79042_a8_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
23 January 2000
HEALTH
insert
001-79042_a8_e19
001-79042_a8_em20
DEM
QUASI
cerebral palsy
HEALTH
insert
001-79042_a8_e20
001-79042_a8_em21
DEM
NO_MASK
wheelchair
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e21
001-79042_a8_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
15 August 2000
HEALTH
check
001-79042_a8_e19
001-79042_a8_em23
DEM
QUASI
cerebral palsy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e22
001-79042_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e23
001-79042_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
December 1999
HEALTH
check
001-79042_a8_e20
001-79042_a8_em26
DEM
NO_MASK
wheelchair
HEALTH
check
001-79042_a8_e19
001-79042_a8_em27
DEM
QUASI
cerebral palsy
HEALTH
check
001-79042_a8_e20
001-79042_a8_em28
DEM
NO_MASK
wheelchair
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a8_e24
001-79042_a8_em29
DATETIME
NO_MASK
11.20am
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a8_e25
001-79042_a8_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
6 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e26
001-79042_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
7 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e27
001-79042_a8_em32
DATETIME
NO_MASK
7.00-7.30 a.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e28
001-79042_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
11 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e29
001-79042_a8_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a8_e30
001-79042_a8_em35
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e31
001-79042_a8_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a8_e32
001-79042_a8_em37
QUANTITY
QUASI
3 nights
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79042_a8_e33
001-79042_a8_em38
QUANTITY
QUASI
7 days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e34
001-79042_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
19 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e35
001-79042_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
26 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e36
001-79042_a8_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
27 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e37
001-79042_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e38
001-79042_a8_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
11 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79042_a8_e39
001-79042_a8_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
8 August 2000
Anna Young
GBR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Anna Young