PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission“) and by the Government of the Republic of Austria (“the Government“) on 16 March and 7 April 1989 respectively, within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 § 1 and Article 47 (art. 32-1, art. 47) of the Convention. It originated in an application (no. 11761/85) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by an Austrian national, Mr Karl Obermeier, on 24 September 1985. The Commission’s request referred to Articles 44 and 48 (art. 44, art. 48) and to the declaration whereby Austria recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46) (art. 46); the Government’s application referred to Articles 45, 47 and 48 (art. 45, art. 47, art. 48). The object of the request and the application was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 6 § 1 (art. 6-1) and Articles 13 and 14 (art. 13, art. 14) of the Convention.

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 § 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 30).

The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Mr F. Matscher, the elected judge of Austrian nationality (Article 43 of the Convention) (art. 43), and Mr R. Ryssdal, the President of the Court (Rule 21 § 3 (b)). On 30 March 1989, in the presence of the Registrar, the President drew by lot the names of the other five members, namely Mr R. Macdonald, Mr J. De Meyer, Mr N. Valticos, Mr S.K. Martens and Mr I. Foighel (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 § 4) (art. 43). Subsequently Mr R. Bernhardt, substitute judge, replaced Mr Valticos, who was unable to take part in the consideration of the case (Rule 24 § 1).

Mr Ryssdal assumed the office of President of the Chamber (Rule 21 § 5) and, through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the Government, the Delegate of the Commission and the applicant on the need for a written procedure (Rule 37 § 1). In accordance with the orders made in consequence, the Registrar received: (a) on 30 October 1989, the applicant’s memorial, which, with the President’s leave (Rule 27 § 3), was submitted in German; (b) on 10 November 1989, the Government’s memorial; (c) on 14 December 1989 and 24 January 1990, the day of the hearing, various documents which, acting on the President’s instructions, he had requested the participants in the proceedings to produce; (d) on 9, 10 and 25 April 1990, a number of documents submitted by the applicant in support of his claims under Article 50 (art. 50) and, on 23 April, the Government’s observations on the application of this provision.

Having consulted, through the Registrar, those who would be appearing before the Court, the President on 14 September 1989 had directed that the oral proceedings should open on 24 January 1990 (Rule 38).

The hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on the appointed day. The Court had held a preparatory meeting beforehand. There appeared before the Court:

for the Government Mr H. Türk, Legal Adviser, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Agent, Mrs S. Bernegger, Federal Chancellery, Mrs I. Gartner, Federal Ministry of Justice, Mr H. Hofer, Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, Advisers;

for the Commission Mr J. Frowein, Delegate;

for the applicant Mr H. Blum, Rechtsanwalt, Counsel. The Court heard addresses by Mr Türk, Mrs Bernegger and Mrs Gartner for the Government, Mr Frowein for the Commission and Mr Blum for the applicant, as well as their answers to its questions.

On 16 May 1990 the registry received from Mr Obermeier various documents, whose production had not been requested. The Court decided not to have regard to them on account of the lateness of their submission.

AS TO THE FACTS

Mr Karl Obermeier, who resides at Linz, was formerly employed by a private insurance company (“the company“) as the director of their regional branch office for Upper Austria.

I. THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

1. The applicant’s suspension

In 1974 a dispute arose between the applicant and the company concerning various paid activities which it proposed to withdraw from him. Mr Obermeier instituted proceedings in the Vienna Labour Court (Arbeitsgericht). On 10 March 1978, the day following the first hearing, he was suspended from his duties by his employer; the company considered that it was entitled to take such a decision at any time without giving reasons.

2. The first round of the proceedings concerning the applicant’s suspension

After having unsuccessfully sought the opening of disciplinary proceedings, the applicant decided to challenge his suspension in the courts. Accordingly, on 9 March 1981, he brought, in the Linz Labour Court, an action for a declaratory judgment (Feststellungsklage) and, in the alternative, an action for performance (Leistungsklage). The first action was intended to establish the invalidity of the contested measure, while the second sought its revocation. He alleged in particular that the measure in question was designed to penalise him for having instituted legal proceedings against the company and was therefore unjustified.

On 23 April 1981 the Linz Labour Court dismissed the applicant’s claims. On 25 November 1981 the Linz Regional Court (Landesgericht) allowed Mr Obermeier’s appeal as regards the part of the judgment concerning the revocation of the suspension. It considered that by virtue of clause 32 of the collective agreement for insurance employees (see paragraph 45 below), which was applicable, suspension of an employee was subject to certain conditions and that the first-instance court should have ascertained whether they were satisfied. The fact that Mr Obermeier had instituted legal proceedings against his employer could not in itself justify the impugned measure. The court dismissed the remainder of the appeal, finding that, under Article 228 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Zivilprozessordnung), a declaratory judgment may bear only on the existence of a legal relationship (Rechtsverhältnis) and not on the validity of a legal measure (Rechtshandlung) such as the suspension of an employee.

The company appealed on points of law to the Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof) which, on 30 March 1982, upheld the Regional Court’s judgment. The case was therefore remitted to the Labour Court.

The first dismissal and the administrative proceedings concerning prior authorisation

In the meantime the company had decided to terminate Mr Obermeier’s employment, his dismissal taking the form of “administrative retirement“ (administrative Pensionierung). This decision, taken pursuant to clause 33 § 9 of the collective agreement (see paragraph 44 below), was notified to him on 14 July 1981 and was due to become operative on 31 March 1982.

Previously, on 8 May 1981, the company had, as it was required to do under section 8 § 2 of the Disabled Persons (Employment) Act (Invalideneinstellungsgesetz, see paragraph 47 below), sought the authorisation of the Disabled Persons Board (Invalidenausschuss, “the Board“) for the applicant’s dismissal. On 21 May 1980 Mr Obermeier had been declared disabled for the purposes of that Act.

The Board took the view that section 8 § 2 left the decision concerning the authorisation in question to its discretion but that it had to exercise that discretion in accordance with the spirit of the Act, in other words taking account of the legitimate interest of the employer in the dismissal and the employee’s special need for social protection. Following a hearing, the Board gave its consent to the dismissal on 8 July 1981, finding that the relationship of trust between the parties had been irremediably undermined.

Mr Obermeier appealed against this decision, alleging inter alia that the Board had failed to hold an inquiry into the case and had obtained only the company’s observations. The Provincial Governor (Landeshauptmann) for Upper Austria confirmed the Board’s decision on 16 October 1981, after proceedings in which no argument was taken.

The applicant then appealed to the Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) which dismissed his appeal on 9 March 1983. It considered that the authorisation for his dismissal given by the Board and confirmed on appeal was not unlawful since it was not vitiated by errors of law; the contested decision had not exceeded the discretionary power which the law conferred on the administrative authorities in this field (see paragraph 53 below). It added that the procedural requirements had been complied with in the administrative proceedings, in particular as regards Mr Obermeier’s access to the file.

The applicant sought relief from the Administrative Court’s judgment by an application (no. 10247/83) to the European Commission of Human Rights, which was declared inadmissible on 12 March 1986 (Decisions and Reports no. 46, pp. 77-80).

4. The second round of the proceedings concerning the applicant’s suspension

Simultaneously with the administrative proceedings relating to the authorisation for the applicant’s dismissal, the Linz Labour Court resumed consideration of his suspension, following the Supreme Court’s decision remitting the case to it (see paragraph 12 above).

The company pleaded Mr Obermeier’s lack of a legal interest (Rechtsschutzbedürfnis) in the revocation of his suspension, since in the meantime he had been dismissed. The applicant, for his part, challenged the lawfulness of his dismissal. He stressed in particular that it had been pronounced before the authorisation from the Disabled Persons Board had become final, as the case was still pending before the Administrative Court.

On 9 December 1982 the court rejected the applicant’s claim. The dismissal had been pronounced with the authorisation of the competent administrative authority and the proceedings in the Administrative Court did not have suspensive effect. On 11 May 1983 the Linz Regional Court upheld this judgment, observing that, in the intervening period, the Administrative Court had dismissed Mr Obermeier’s appeal.

The applicant appealed on points of law to the Supreme Court which, on 23 October 1984, quashed the decisions of the labour courts. Overruling its previous case-law, it found that the company should have waited until the Disabled Persons Board’s authorisation had become final (rechtskräftig). Since the applicant’s dismissal was therefore invalid, he had an interest in challenging his suspension; accordingly, the Supreme Court remitted the case to the Labour Court.

The administrative proceedings concerning the retroactive authorisation of the first dismissal

Following this judgment, the company sent to the applicant, on 21 December 1984, a further notification of dismissal, which was to take effect on 30 June 1985. On 9 January 1985 it requested the Disabled Persons Board for a retroactive authorisation for the dismissal pronounced on 14 July 1981. It alleged that the Supreme Court’s overruling of its own case-law had not been foreseeable and therefore constituted an exceptional case for the purposes of section 8 § 2 of the Disabled Persons (Employment) Act.

On 14 March 1985 the Board rejected the company’s request on the ground that its decision of 8 July 1981 (see paragraph 15 above) had final effect (Rechtskraft). On appeal by both parties, the Provincial Governor set aside this decision on 17 June 1985 and gave his retroactive consent to the applicant’s first dismissal.

On 23 July 1985 the applicant appealed on points of law to the Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof) which, on 25 November 1985, referred the case to the Administrative Court. The latter court allowed the appeal on 21 May 1986, finding that the company had committed an error of law by dismissing Mr Obermeier before the authorisation had become final. Consequently, on 1 June 1986, the Provincial Governor confirmed the Board’s decision of 14 March 1985.

Mr Obermeier then asked the Board to declare, pursuant to sections 8 to 12 of the Disabled Persons (Employment) Act, that his employment contract subsisted. The Board and the Provincial Governor found, on 10 February 1986 and 12 January 1987 respectively, that they lacked jurisdiction to make such a declaration, the matter being one for the ordinary courts.

6. The third round of proceedings concerning the suspension

Following the Supreme Court’s order of 23 October 1984 remitting the applicant’s case to it (see paragraph 22 above), the Linz Labour Court allowed the applicant’s claim on 30 January 1985. In its view, the legal proceedings instituted against the company by Mr Obermeier were in no way vexatious and therefore did not justify a measure of suspension, by which the employer had prejudged the outcome of the proceedings pending.

On 31 July 1985, on an appeal by the company, the Linz Regional Court set aside this decision, notwithstanding the applicant’s request for a stay pending the decisions of the Constitutional Court and the Administrative Court (see paragraph 25 above). The Regional Court considered itself bound by the Provincial Governor’s decision of 17 June 1985 authorising Mr Obermeier’s dismissal as from 31 March 1982 (see paragraph 24 above). It concluded therefrom that the applicant no longer had any legal interest in obtaining the revocation of his suspension.

On 15 July 1986 the Supreme Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal on points of law lodged on 7 October 1985. It found that the Regional Court had been correct in regarding the Provincial Governor’s authorisation as binding; since only the administrative authorities were competent to apply the Disabled Persons (Employment) Act, those authorities were not bound by the opinion expressed by the Supreme Court in its judgment of 23 October 1984 (see paragraph 22 above) that the conditions laid down in section 8 § 2 of the Act in question for the granting of retroactive authorisation were not satisfied. The Supreme Court stated that it was not for the civil courts to review the decisions of the administrative authorities. On the contrary, they were required to base their own judgments on such decisions, without any further examination. In its judgment, the Supreme Court did not take into account the applicant’s appeal to the Constitutional Court and the Administrative Court. Indeed it seems to have been unaware of the Administrative Court’s judgment of 21 May 1986 (see paragraph 25 above).

7. Proceedings in the labour courts relating to both dismissals

Simultaneously with the administrative proceedings instituted by him, Mr Obermeier also challenged his dismissal in the labour courts. On 16 August 1982 he brought an action in the Linz Labour Court for a declaration that his dismissal was invalid. He argued that the company had not waited until the authorisation given by the Disabled Persons Board had become final in law and had in addition failed to inform the works council, as it was required to do under section 105 § 1 of the Industrial Relations Act (Arbeitsverfassungsgesetz, see paragraph 46 below).

After having stayed these proceedings on 9 December 1982, the court dismissed Mr Obermeier’s action on 14 August 1985 on the ground that, in the meantime, the Provincial Governor had given his retroactive consent to the applicant’s dismissal from employment (see paragraph 24 above). The parties did not appeal from this decision.

Following the Administrative Court’s judgment of 21 May 1986 (see paragraph 25 above), the applicant filed an application on 22 July 1986 for the proceedings to be reopened (Wiederaufnahmsklage) and requested that such proceedings also deal with the second dismissal from employment. The Linz Labour Court’s judgment of 24 September 1986, which allowed this application, was upheld on 3 February 1987 by the Linz Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) and, on 15 July 1987, by the Supreme Court.

Ruling on the merits on 15 September 1987, the Labour Court found that Mr Obermeier had never been validly dismissed. It took the view that the effects of the prior authorisation given by the Board were not permanent and that such authorisation could provide the legal basis only for a dismissal which was closely linked to it both in terms of the period of time which had elapsed and as regards the substance; this was not the case in respect of the second dismissal.

On an appeal by the company, the Linz Court of Appeal set aside this decision on 15 March 1988 on the ground that the situation was a continuous one so that there was a sufficient connection between the consent given by the administrative authority and the dismissal from employment pronounced on 21 December 1984.

The applicant claimed that he had cited at the hearing, as an additional ground for the invalidity of his dismissal, disregard of clause 33 § 9 of the collective agreement (see paragraph 44 below), which requires the valid consent of the works council. The transcript of the hearing, notified to the applicant on 31 March 1988, did not refer to his statements in this respect; he therefore lodged an objection to it on 5 April 1988, which the Court of Appeal dismissed on 12 April as out of time.

In the meantime, the applicant had appealed on a point of law against the Court of Appeal’s judgment of 15 March 1988 (see paragraph 34 above). On 23 June 1988 in a supplementary memorial he stressed that for his second dismissal no valid prior consent had been obtained from the works council as was required under clause 33 § 9 of the collective agreement.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on 29 June, holding that section 105 of the Industrial Relations Act, by virtue of which any dismissal from employment without prior consultation of the works council is invalid, did not apply to a disabled person. In such cases the consultation of the works council had already been effected by the interposition of the Board, acting in pursuance of section 8 § 2 of the Disabled Persons (Employment) Act. The Supreme Court declared the memorial of 23 June inadmissible under the rule that only one appeal may be lodged (Grundsatz der Einmaligkeit des Rechtsmittels, see paragraph 60 below).

On 30 June 1988, even before a copy of the Supreme Court’s judgment had been served on him, the applicant instituted new proceedings in the Linz Regional Court, sitting as a social and labour court. He sought a declaration that the second dismissal was void on the ground that the company had not obtained the prior consent of the works council, as it was required to do under clause 33 § 9 of the collective agreement. The court dismissed the action on 23 September 1988, finding that the agreement given by the works council in 1981 was also valid in relation to the 1984 dismissal. The Court of Appeal, and subsequently the Supreme Court, dismissed Mr Obermeier’s appeals on 28 February and 14 June 1989 respectively.

On 21 March 1989 the applicant applied again to the Linz Regional Court for a declaration that the dismissal of 21 December 1984 and the authorisation given by the administrative bodies were void as being contrary to honest practices (Sittenwidrigkeit). On 12 May 1989 the court rejected the claim. It took the view that the administrative organs in question had, by implication, expressed their opinion on the matter by giving their agreement pursuant to section 8 § 2 of the Disabled Persons (Employment) Act, because an authorisation accorded for a dismissal contrary to honest practices would have been inconsistent with the criteria which the Administrative Court had laid down for the validity of such decisions. On 10 October 1989 the Linz Court of Appeal upheld this judgment. On appeal on points of law by Mr Obermeier, the Supreme Court quashed these two decisions but dismissed his application on 14 March 1990, on the ground that the judicial decisions which had closed the proceedings in which the applicant had already contested the validity of his dismissal in the labour courts (see paragraphs 30-38 above) were final.

8. The fourth round of the proceedings concerning the suspension

In the intervening period, Mr Obermeier had, on 22 July 1986, applied to the labour courts for the reopening of the proceedings concerning his suspension, proceedings which had been terminated by the Supreme Court on 15 July 1986 (see paragraph 29 above). He relied on the judgment delivered by the Administrative Court on 21 May 1986 (see paragraph 25 above).

On 15 October 1986 the Regional Court dismissed the application for the proceedings to be reopened, on procedural grounds. However, on 15 July 1987 the Supreme Court allowed the applicant’s appeal on points of law and remitted the case to the Linz Court of Appeal which had acquired jurisdiction by virtue of a new Act on the social and labour courts.

On 19 November 1987 the Linz Court of Appeal ordered the proceedings to be reopened but allowed the company’s application for a stay pending the conclusion of the proceedings concerning the dismissal of 21 December 1984. It did so despite the protracted nature of the proceedings, because the decision on the dismissal was clearly crucial to the suspension proceedings. The proceedings remain stayed.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57631_a11_e1
001-57631_a11_em1
ORG
NO_MASK
Government of the Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e2
001-57631_a11_em2
DATETIME
NO_MASK
16 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e3
001-57631_a11_em3
DATETIME
QUASI
7 April 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e4
001-57631_a11_em4
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e5
001-57631_a11_em5
CODE
DIRECT
11761/85
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57631_a11_e1
001-57631_a11_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57631_a11_em1
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e6
001-57631_a11_em7
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em8
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Karl Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e8
001-57631_a11_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e1
001-57631_a11_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57631_a11_em1
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e9
001-57631_a11_em11
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Matscher
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e6
001-57631_a11_em12
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e10
001-57631_a11_em13
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-57631_a11_em22
Mr R. Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e11
001-57631_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
30 March 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e12
001-57631_a11_em15
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Macdonald
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e13
001-57631_a11_em16
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. De Meyer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e14
001-57631_a11_em17
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr N. Valticos
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e15
001-57631_a11_em18
PERSON
QUASI
Mr S.K. Martens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e16
001-57631_a11_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Mr I. Foighel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e17
001-57631_a11_em20
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e18
001-57631_a11_em21
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Valticos
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e10
001-57631_a11_em22
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e19
001-57631_a11_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
30 October 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e20
001-57631_a11_em24
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e21
001-57631_a11_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
10 November 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e22
001-57631_a11_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
14 December 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e23
001-57631_a11_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
24 January 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e24
001-57631_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
25 April 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e25
001-57631_a11_em29
DATETIME
NO_MASK
23 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e26
001-57631_a11_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
14 September 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e23
001-57631_a11_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
24 January 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e27
001-57631_a11_em32
LOC
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e28
001-57631_a11_em33
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. Türk
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e29
001-57631_a11_em34
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs S. Bernegger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e30
001-57631_a11_em35
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs I. Gartner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e31
001-57631_a11_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e32
001-57631_a11_em37
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. Hofer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e33
001-57631_a11_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e34
001-57631_a11_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Frowein
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e35
001-57631_a11_em40
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. Blum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e28
001-57631_a11_em41
PERSON
QUASI
001-57631_a11_em33
Mr Türk
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e29
001-57631_a11_em42
PERSON
QUASI
001-57631_a11_em34
Mrs Bernegger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e30
001-57631_a11_em43
PERSON
QUASI
001-57631_a11_em35
Mrs Gartner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e34
001-57631_a11_em44
PERSON
QUASI
001-57631_a11_em39
Mr Frowein
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e35
001-57631_a11_em45
PERSON
QUASI
001-57631_a11_em40
Mr Blum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e36
001-57631_a11_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em47
PERSON
DIRECT
001-57631_a11_em8
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em48
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Karl Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57631_a11_e37
001-57631_a11_em49
LOC
QUASI
Linz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e38
001-57631_a11_em50
MISC
NO_MASK
private insurance company
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e39
001-57631_a11_em51
LOC
QUASI
Upper Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e40
001-57631_a11_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em53
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e41
001-57631_a11_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57631_a11_e42
001-57631_a11_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Arbeitsgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e43
001-57631_a11_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
10 March 1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e44
001-57631_a11_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e45
001-57631_a11_em58
ORG
QUASI
Linz Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e46
001-57631_a11_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
23 April 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e45
001-57631_a11_em60
ORG
QUASI
Linz Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e47
001-57631_a11_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e48
001-57631_a11_em62
ORG
QUASI
Linz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57631_a11_e49
001-57631_a11_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Landesgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em64
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em65
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57631_a11_em66
Oberster Gerichtshof
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e51
001-57631_a11_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
30 March 1982
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e48
001-57631_a11_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57631_a11_em62
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e45
001-57631_a11_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57631_a11_em58
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em71
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e52
001-57631_a11_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e53
001-57631_a11_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
31 March 1982
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e54
001-57631_a11_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
8 May 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em75
ORG
QUASI
Disabled Persons Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em76
ORG
QUASI
001-57631_a11_em75
Invalidenausschuss
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57631_a11_em75
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e56
001-57631_a11_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em79
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em80
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em81
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e57
001-57631_a11_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
8 July 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em83
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em84
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e39
001-57631_a11_em85
LOC
QUASI
Upper Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em86
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e58
001-57631_a11_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
16 October 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em89
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57631_a11_em88
Verwaltungsgerichtshof
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e60
001-57631_a11_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 1983
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em92
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em93
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e61
001-57631_a11_em94
CODE
DIRECT
10247/83
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e62
001-57631_a11_em95
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e45
001-57631_a11_em96
ORG
QUASI
Linz Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em97
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em98
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em99
ORG
QUASI
Disabled Persons Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em100
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e63
001-57631_a11_em101
DATETIME
QUASI
9 December 1982
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em102
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e64
001-57631_a11_em103
DATETIME
QUASI
11 May 1983
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e48
001-57631_a11_em104
ORG
QUASI
Linz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em105
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em106
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em107
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e65
001-57631_a11_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
23 October 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em109
ORG
QUASI
Disabled Persons Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em110
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e45
001-57631_a11_em111
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e66
001-57631_a11_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
21 December 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e67
001-57631_a11_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e68
001-57631_a11_em114
DATETIME
QUASI
9 January 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em115
ORG
QUASI
Disabled Persons Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e52
001-57631_a11_em116
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em117
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e69
001-57631_a11_em118
DATETIME
QUASI
14 March 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em119
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e57
001-57631_a11_em120
DATETIME
QUASI
8 July 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e70
001-57631_a11_em121
ORG
NO_MASK
Provincial Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e71
001-57631_a11_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e72
001-57631_a11_em123
DATETIME
QUASI
23 July 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e73
001-57631_a11_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e74
001-57631_a11_em125
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em126
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e75
001-57631_a11_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em128
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e76
001-57631_a11_em129
DATETIME
QUASI
1 June 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e70
001-57631_a11_em130
ORG
NO_MASK
Provincial Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em131
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e69
001-57631_a11_em132
DATETIME
QUASI
14 March 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em133
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em134
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em135
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e77
001-57631_a11_em136
DATETIME
QUASI
10 February 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e78
001-57631_a11_em137
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em138
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e65
001-57631_a11_em139
DATETIME
QUASI
23 October 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e45
001-57631_a11_em140
ORG
QUASI
Linz Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e79
001-57631_a11_em141
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em142
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e80
001-57631_a11_em143
DATETIME
QUASI
31 July 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e48
001-57631_a11_em144
ORG
QUASI
Linz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e73
001-57631_a11_em145
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em146
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e48
001-57631_a11_em147
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e81
001-57631_a11_em148
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em149
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e53
001-57631_a11_em150
DATETIME
QUASI
31 March 1982
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e82
001-57631_a11_em151
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em152
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e83
001-57631_a11_em153
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e48
001-57631_a11_em154
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em155
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e65
001-57631_a11_em156
DATETIME
QUASI
23 October 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em157
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em158
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e73
001-57631_a11_em159
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em160
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em161
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e75
001-57631_a11_em162
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em163
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e84
001-57631_a11_em164
DATETIME
QUASI
16 August 1982
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e45
001-57631_a11_em165
ORG
QUASI
Linz Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em166
ORG
QUASI
Disabled Persons Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e63
001-57631_a11_em167
DATETIME
QUASI
9 December 1982
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em168
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e85
001-57631_a11_em169
DATETIME
QUASI
14 August 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e70
001-57631_a11_em170
ORG
NO_MASK
Provincial Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em171
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e75
001-57631_a11_em172
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e86
001-57631_a11_em173
DATETIME
QUASI
22 July 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e45
001-57631_a11_em174
ORG
QUASI
Linz Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e87
001-57631_a11_em175
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e88
001-57631_a11_em176
DATETIME
QUASI
3 February 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e89
001-57631_a11_em177
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57631_a11_e90
001-57631_a11_em178
ORG
NO_MASK
Oberlandesgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e91
001-57631_a11_em179
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em180
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e92
001-57631_a11_em181
DATETIME
QUASI
15 September 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e45
001-57631_a11_em182
ORG
NO_MASK
Labour Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em183
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em184
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e89
001-57631_a11_em185
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e93
001-57631_a11_em186
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e66
001-57631_a11_em187
DATETIME
QUASI
21 December 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e94
001-57631_a11_em188
DATETIME
QUASI
31 March 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e95
001-57631_a11_em189
DATETIME
QUASI
5 April 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57631_a11_e96
001-57631_a11_em190
DATETIME
NO_MASK
12 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e93
001-57631_a11_em191
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e97
001-57631_a11_em192
DATETIME
QUASI
23 June 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em193
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e98
001-57631_a11_em194
DATETIME
NO_MASK
29 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e99
001-57631_a11_em195
ORG
NO_MASK
works council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e99
001-57631_a11_em196
ORG
NO_MASK
works council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e55
001-57631_a11_em197
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em198
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e100
001-57631_a11_em199
DATETIME
NO_MASK
23 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e101
001-57631_a11_em200
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em201
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e48
001-57631_a11_em202
ORG
QUASI
Linz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e102
001-57631_a11_em203
DATETIME
QUASI
23 September 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e99
001-57631_a11_em204
ORG
NO_MASK
works council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e103
001-57631_a11_em205
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e104
001-57631_a11_em206
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em207
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em208
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e105
001-57631_a11_em209
DATETIME
NO_MASK
28 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e106
001-57631_a11_em210
DATETIME
QUASI
14 June 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e107
001-57631_a11_em211
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e48
001-57631_a11_em212
ORG
QUASI
Linz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e66
001-57631_a11_em213
DATETIME
QUASI
21 December 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e108
001-57631_a11_em214
DATETIME
QUASI
12 May 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em215
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e109
001-57631_a11_em216
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e89
001-57631_a11_em217
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em218
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em219
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e110
001-57631_a11_em220
DATETIME
QUASI
14 March 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e7
001-57631_a11_em221
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Obermeier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e86
001-57631_a11_em222
DATETIME
QUASI
22 July 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em223
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e82
001-57631_a11_em224
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e59
001-57631_a11_em225
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e75
001-57631_a11_em226
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e111
001-57631_a11_em227
DATETIME
QUASI
15 October 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e48
001-57631_a11_em228
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e91
001-57631_a11_em229
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e50
001-57631_a11_em230
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e89
001-57631_a11_em231
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e112
001-57631_a11_em232
DATETIME
QUASI
19 November 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e89
001-57631_a11_em233
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57631_a11_e66
001-57631_a11_em234
DATETIME
QUASI
21 December 1984
Karl Obermeier
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Karl Obermeier