PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 38030/12) against the Federal Republic of Germany lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Pakistani national, Ms Farida Kathoon Khan (“the applicant”), on 19 June 2012.

The applicant was represented by Ms E. Gabsa, a lawyer practising in Gießen. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr H. J. Behrens, from the Federal Ministry of Justice.

The applicant alleged that her envisaged expulsion to Pakistan would breach Articles 8 and 6 of the Convention.

On 25 November 2013 the President of the Fifth Section, to which the case was allocated, decided to give notice of the application to the Government.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1963 in Pakistan and currently lives in sheltered accommodation (betreutes Wohnen) in Haina (Land of Hesse, Germany).

In 1990 the applicant married in Pakistan and converted to her husband’s faith, that of the Ahmadiyya.

The applicant and her husband moved to Germany in 1991. The husband was granted refugee status but the applicant’s own application for asylum was refused. As the spouse of a refugee, she received a temporary residence permit on 16 June 1994.

On 11 February 1995 the applicant gave birth to her son. In 1998 the applicant and her husband separated. The son stayed with the applicant. From then on the applicant worked as a cleaner in different companies. On 7 September 2001 she was awarded a permanent residence permit.

In March 2004 the applicant became unemployed due to behavioural issues that appeared to be caused by psychological problems. In July 2004 she and her spouse divorced. In 2005 the domestic family court transferred custody rights over her son to her husband and her son was living with him from then on.

On 31 May 2004 the applicant killed a neighbour by strangling her and pushing her down a staircase. Subsequently, she was detained and held in pre-trial detention. Following an attempt to harm herself, a domestic court ordered her committal to a psychiatric hospital.

On 13 July 2005 the Gießen Regional Court established that the applicant had committed manslaughter in a state of mental incapacity. At the time of the act she had been in a state of acute psychosis. A medical expert noted that she suffered from symptoms of schizophrenia and had diminished intelligence. She did not acknowledge her own psychological condition. The domestic court therefore concluded that she remained a danger for the general public and a continuous stay in a psychiatric hospital had to be ordered. The applicant was also appointed a legal guardian.

On 4 June 2009 the administrative authority Waldeck-Frankenthal ordered the applicant’s expulsion. Relying on Section 55 § 2 of the Act on the Residence, Economic Activity and Integration of Foreigners in the Federal Territory (hereafter “the Residence Act”, Aufenthaltsgesetz, see paragraph 25 below), the authority referred to the offence which had led to the applicant’s committal to the psychiatric hospital and her mental condition in general. The authority concluded that she posed a danger to public safety. In such a case her personal circumstances, namely her long stay in Germany and her residence status, were secondary. She was neither economically integrated nor sufficiently able to communicate in German, which was an obstacle to her therapy. She only had limited contacts with her former husband and her son and she was still familiar with the Pakistani culture. Adequate medical care was available in Pakistan and the applicant’s family there could assist her.

In November 2009 the applicant was granted privileges in the hospital, for example she was granted days of leave, which had not led to any complaints. She also started working full‑time in the laundry department of the clinic. This was possible due to her improved mental health. In proceedings concerning a provisional stay on the expulsion, the authorities committed themselves not to execute the expulsion decision before a court ruling on the merits.

On 1 March 2011 the Kassel Administrative Court refused the applicant’s action against the expulsion order. It upheld the decision that the applicant could be deported, on the grounds of the serious offence committed by her, lack of awareness of her own condition and given that a high probability of reoffending therefore existed. Moreover, she was not integrated into German society, especially due to her lack of German language skills. Article 8 of the Convention was not applicable as the applicant had no significant family relationships. The domestic court noted that, in principle, in Pakistan basic medical care for psychiatric patients existed in big cities like Lahore and that the applicant could afford treatment, including medication, as she would be receiving a small pension in the amount of around 250 euros (EUR). The domestic court recognised that family members in Pakistan had explicitly ruled out that they would take her in, when asked by the German Embassy. However, the domestic court thought it conceivable that the applicant’s relatives would help her with organising the required treatment if she were to provide them with small sums in euros in return. Furthermore, the applicant did not hold a visible position within the Ahmadiyya religion, so there would be no specific danger for her in that regard.

On 23 May 2011 the Hessian Administrative Court of Appeal dismissed the application for leave to appeal. It noted that the administrative court had taken into account all relevant facts of the case.

The applicant complained in vain of the breach of her right to be heard (Gehörsrüge). She argued that her submissions on her improved state of health, the death of her sister in Pakistan and the expected living conditions there had not been given proper consideration. Moreover, she claimed that she had close contact with her son who visited her on a regular basis.

On 24 November 2011 the Marburg Regional Court lifted the hospital treatment order on the recommendation of a medical report and released the applicant on probation, ordering a five-year probation period. It ordered the applicant to remain in regular contact with the medical personnel of the clinic and to continue to take the prescribed medication. The domestic court held that, due to the treatment, the danger of the applicant’s re-offending had diminished to such an extent that a residual risk had to be tolerated.

The medical report in question further indicated that, after having overcome some initial difficulties, she was reachable, while deficits in her cognitive performance remained. The language barrier caused problems during some therapy sessions and due to cognitive deficiencies difficulties remained, even with the assistance of an interpreter. She continued to work in the laundry, took her medication regularly and ultimately showed balanced behaviour. Her son visited her on a regular basis and wished to be more involved in her care. Such involvement, however, would have to be limited due to his situation as a young adult beginning his studies. She was compliant with all requirements and embraced the stable environment in which she was settled. Her prognosis could be considered positive.

The applicant was transferred to sheltered accommodation close to the clinic, where the required structure would be ensured.

On 13 December 2011 the applicant’s constitutional complaint against the deportation order was not admitted for review by the Federal Constitutional Court.

The applicant was notified on 19 September 2013 that a petition to the parliament of the Land of Hesse in this matter had not been successful.

So far, no date for the applicant’s removal to Pakistan has been set.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e1
001-153909_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
38030/12
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-153909_a8_e2
001-153909_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Republic of Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e3
001-153909_a8_em3
DEM
QUASI
Pakistani
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e4
001-153909_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Farida Kathoon Khan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e5
001-153909_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
19 June 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e6
001-153909_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Ms E. Gabsa
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-153909_a8_e7
001-153909_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Gießen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e8
001-153909_a8_em8
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e9
001-153909_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. J. Behrens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e10
001-153909_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-153909_a8_e11
001-153909_a8_em11
LOC
QUASI
Pakistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e12
001-153909_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e13
001-153909_a8_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1963
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e11
001-153909_a8_em14
LOC
QUASI
Pakistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e14
001-153909_a8_em15
LOC
QUASI
Haina
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-153909_a8_e15
001-153909_a8_em16
LOC
QUASI
Land of Hesse, Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e16
001-153909_a8_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e11
001-153909_a8_em18
LOC
QUASI
Pakistan
BELIEF
correct
001-153909_a8_e17
001-153909_a8_em19
DEM
QUASI
Ahmadiyya
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-153909_a8_e18
001-153909_a8_em20
LOC
NO_MASK
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e19
001-153909_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e20
001-153909_a8_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
16 June 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e21
001-153909_a8_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
11 February 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e22
001-153909_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e23
001-153909_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
7 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e24
001-153909_a8_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e25
001-153909_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
July 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e26
001-153909_a8_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e27
001-153909_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
31 May 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e28
001-153909_a8_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
13 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e29
001-153909_a8_em31
ORG
QUASI
Gießen Regional Court
HEALTH
insert
001-153909_a8_e30
001-153909_a8_em32
DEM
QUASI
acute psychosis
HEALTH
insert
001-153909_a8_e31
001-153909_a8_em33
DEM
QUASI
schizophrenia
HEALTH
insert
001-153909_a8_e32
001-153909_a8_em34
DEM
NO_MASK
diminished intelligence
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e33
001-153909_a8_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
4 June 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e34
001-153909_a8_em36
ORG
QUASI
Waldeck-Frankenthal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e18
001-153909_a8_em37
LOC
NO_MASK
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e8
001-153909_a8_em38
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e3
001-153909_a8_em39
DEM
QUASI
Pakistani
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e11
001-153909_a8_em40
LOC
QUASI
Pakistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e35
001-153909_a8_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
November 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e36
001-153909_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
1 March 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e37
001-153909_a8_em43
ORG
QUASI
Kassel Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e8
001-153909_a8_em44
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e8
001-153909_a8_em45
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e11
001-153909_a8_em46
LOC
QUASI
Pakistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e38
001-153909_a8_em47
LOC
QUASI
Lahore
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-153909_a8_e39
001-153909_a8_em48
QUANTITY
QUASI
250 euros (EUR)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e11
001-153909_a8_em49
LOC
QUASI
Pakistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e40
001-153909_a8_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
German Embassy
BELIEF
correct
001-153909_a8_e17
001-153909_a8_em51
DEM
QUASI
Ahmadiyya
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e41
001-153909_a8_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
23 May 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e42
001-153909_a8_em53
ORG
QUASI
Hessian Administrative Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e11
001-153909_a8_em54
LOC
QUASI
Pakistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e43
001-153909_a8_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e44
001-153909_a8_em56
ORG
QUASI
Marburg Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e45
001-153909_a8_em57
DATETIME
NO_MASK
five-year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e46
001-153909_a8_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
13 December 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e47
001-153909_a8_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e48
001-153909_a8_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-153909_a8_e49
001-153909_a8_em61
LOC
QUASI
Land of Hesse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-153909_a8_e11
001-153909_a8_em62
LOC
QUASI
Pakistan
Farida Kathoon Khan
DEU
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Farida Kathoon Khan