PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 44292/04) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Erol Cihangül (“the applicant”), on 25 October 2004. The applicant was represented by Mr O. Çelen, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

On 29 November 2007 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1980 and lives in Istanbul. On 5 March 2003 he was expelled from a military academy as he was found unsuitable to be a student there following a secret security investigation conducted on him and his family. The applicant was not notified of the specific reasons for his expulsion.

Subsequently, the applicant asked the Supreme Military Administrative Court to annul the expulsion decision. During the proceedings, he did not have access to the classified documents and information submitted by the Ministry of Defence to the Supreme Military Administrative Court in support of its decision to expel him from the military academy.

On 25 February 2004 the Supreme Military Administrative Court rejected the applicant’s request. It stated that information and documents the confidentiality of which was required and necessitated for the performance of military service could not be disclosed to the applicant. The court further emphasised that it was not bound by the classification made by the administration and that it made its own assessment as to whether the confidentiality of the documents was justified in each case. The written opinion submitted by the public prosecutor to the Supreme Military Administrative Court during the proceedings was not communicated to the applicant.

The applicant subsequently requested the rectification of the Supreme Military Administrative Court’s decision, arguing that his inability to access the results of the security investigation due to their allegedly confidential nature precluded him from duly defending himself.

On 20 May 2004 the Supreme Military Administrative Court rejected the applicant’s rectification request.

II. RELEVANT LAW

A description of the relevant domestic law can be found in the decision of Karayiğit v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 45874/05, 23 September 2008).
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e1
001-94415_a5_em1
CODE
DIRECT
44292/04
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-94415_a5_e2
001-94415_a5_em2
ORG
QUASI
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-94415_a5_e3
001-94415_a5_em3
DEM
QUASI
Turkish national
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e4
001-94415_a5_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Erol Cihangül
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e5
001-94415_a5_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
25 October 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e6
001-94415_a5_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr O. Çelen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e7
001-94415_a5_em7
LOC
QUASI
Ankara
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e8
001-94415_a5_em8
ORG
QUASI
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e9
001-94415_a5_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
29 November 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e10
001-94415_a5_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e11
001-94415_a5_em11
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e12
001-94415_a5_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
5 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e13
001-94415_a5_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Military Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e14
001-94415_a5_em14
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Defence
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e13
001-94415_a5_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Military Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e15
001-94415_a5_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
25 February 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e13
001-94415_a5_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Military Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e13
001-94415_a5_em18
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Military Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e16
001-94415_a5_em19
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Military Administrative Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e17
001-94415_a5_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
20 May 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e13
001-94415_a5_em21
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Military Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-94415_a5_e18
001-94415_a5_em22
PERSON
QUASI
Karayiğit
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e19
001-94415_a5_em23
ORG
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e20
001-94415_a5_em24
CODE
DIRECT
45874/05
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-94415_a5_e21
001-94415_a5_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
23 September 2008
Erol Cihangül
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Erol Cihangül