PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 33829/07) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Bogusław Kijowski (“the applicant”), on 15 June 2007.

The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Mr Z. Cichoń, a lawyer practising in Krakow. The Polish Government were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that the domestic authorities had failed to take effective steps to enforce his right to respect for his family life in respect of his two sons, as guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention.

On 12 October 2009 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 1). The President also gave priority to the application, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Rules of the Court.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1966 and lives in Kraków.

The applicant married in 1996 and has two sons, A, born on 3 December 1996, and B, born on 4 February 2003.

In November 2002 the applicant's wife moved to her parents' house, taking A with her. One month later she instituted divorce proceedings. The applicant visited them on several occasions. However, most of these visits were disrupted by the couples' mutual hostility. In February 2003 the applicant's wife informed him that she would not allow further visits, but the applicant continued to go to her flat, sometimes with other members of his family.

On 3 August 2003 the applicant, during one of the visits, took his son A away with him, without his wife's consent and apparently by force. Afterwards A lived with the applicant in Kraków until 8 March 2007.

The applicant submitted that A had been neglected and that he had acted in the best interests of his son. A subsequently received dental treatment, psychological support and speech therapy, and started going to school. The Government submitted that the child's psychological problems had been caused by the trauma of being kidnapped by his father, which had also led to the aggravation of his stutter. They relied on the reasoning of the Regional Court judgment of 30 June 2006 (see paragraph 16 below).

In August 2003 the applicant's wife informed the prosecutor that her son had been kidnapped by the applicant. The applicant's wife also applied to the court for sole residence of A; however, on 19 November 2003 the Kraków Regional Court decided to make a temporary residence order for A with the applicant. The applicant's wife was granted contact rights. The Government submitted that the applicant had been hindering her contact with A; the applicant denied this.

In May 2004 the parties and A were examined by experts from the RODK (Regional Family Consultation Centre). Their opinion was that A should live with his mother, although the applicant should enjoy extensive contact rights.

On 22 November 2004 the court changed its decision of 19 November 2003 and made a residence order for A with the applicant's wife. The applicant was granted contact rights and was ordered to return the child to his wife. An appeal by the applicant against this decision was dismissed on 22 March 2005.

The applicant failed to comply with this decision and refused to return A.

On 8 December 2004 the Brzesko District Court dismissed in the light of DNA tests the applicant's action contesting his paternity of B. Subsequently, the applicant attempted to visit B; however, his wife apparently hindered his contact with his younger son.

The applicant continued to live with A, who changed schools; they apparently moved house more than once. The applicant's wife complained to the prosecutor and attempted to have the decision of 22 November 2004 enforced.

On 30 June 2006 the Kraków Regional Court granted the applicant's petition for divorce. The court further decided to limit the applicant's parental responsibility for A and to deprive him altogether of parental responsibility for B. Residence of both children was ordered to be with the applicant's former wife. The court also allowed the applicant contact rights in respect of both his sons.

An appeal by the applicant against the judgment was dismissed on 28 December 2006 by the Kraków Court of Appeal. The reasoned judgment was notified to the applicant on 15 February 2007.

The applicant's former wife made contact with B impossible for the applicant. However, he failed to institute enforcement proceedings against his former wife or to apply to the court for a fine to be imposed on her.

On 8 March 2007 the applicant was arrested by the police in view of the reasonable suspicion that he had kidnapped A and kept him, in spite of the final judgment of 30 June 2006 and the previous order of 22 November 2004. He remained in pre-trial detention for six months and was released in September 2007. On 25 May 2007 the applicant was indicted before the Kraków District Court. Subsequently, the applicant and his mother were found guilty of keeping A with them, in breach of domestic decisions. On 4 December 2009 the Krakow Regional Court quashed that judgment. It appears that the proceedings are pending before the trial court.

A was only returned to residence with his mother three months after the applicant's arrest, because between 8 March and 8 July 2007 he had been living with the applicant's mother.

On 25 January 2008 A was heard by the prosecutor in the criminal proceedings against the applicant. The child stated that he preferred to live with his father and that his mother had been threatening him and had forbidden him to call his father.

In March 2008 A ran away from his mother's and went to his father's house, located 100 kilometres away. The applicant took him to the police station and A was returned to his mother.

On 1 April 2008 A ran away again and joined his father in Kraków. They have been living together since then.

On 8 April 2008 the applicant applied to the Dąbrowa Tarnowska District Court for a new decision regarding parental responsibility and for an order for A's residence with him.

On 10 April 2008 the court guardian visited the applicant and A. According to her opinion, A did not want to live with his mother, had good living conditions with his father and paternal grandmother in Kraków and preferred to stay with his father.

On 14 April 2008 the court dismissed the applicant's request for an interim order changing the child's place of residence (o zabezpieczenie wniosku).

On 23 June 2008 the Tarnow Regional Court made an interim order suspending contact between the applicant and B, which had been ordered in the divorce judgment of 30 June 2006.

At a hearing on 6 October 2008 the Dąbrowa Tarnowska District Court heard, inter alia, the director of A's former school, which he had been attending while living at his mother's. She testified that A had very often spoken to her complaining about his situation at home, in particular that his mother had prohibited him from visiting his father as well as from calling the applicant or using a computer for the purpose of contacting him. During the stay at his mother's the child apparently felt that he had been treated differently from his brother B and that his mother had threatened that he would be taken to a children's home and that his father would be arrested again.

On 6 October 2008 the court again dismissed the applicant's request for an interim order allowing A's place of residence to be with him. The court established that A had had de facto residence with the applicant between August 2003 and March 2007 and since April 2008. The child obviously had a stronger attachment to his father. However, the court did not consider that there was enough evidence to issue an interim order changing the earlier decision of A's place of residence before the case was ready for a decision on the merits.

At the hearing on 27 April 2009 the court heard A, who was then twelve years old, for the first time.

On the same date the court dismissed the applicant's request for the interim residence of A to be with him. The court again considered that without a thorough examination of the case it would not be possible to assess whether the best interests of the child required him to stay with his mother or with his father. Therefore the court decided to first hear experts and to obtain their opinion in order to establish the reasons for A's hostility towards his mother. An appeal by the applicant against this decision was dismissed on 20 July 2009.

On 11 August 2009 the Dąbrowa Gornicza District Court ordered an opinion to be prepared by the RODK. The opinion was finally submitted to the court on 16 December 2009. According to the experts the best interests of A required that the residence order be changed to allow A to live with the applicant. The experts took into account the feelings and choices made by A and the family situation characterised by a prolonged conflict between his parents, with A caught in the middle of that conflict. Nevertheless the experts noticed that A had been influenced by the applicant, who had enlisted him in a coalition against his mother and expected absolute loyalty from him. Such behaviour worked against the applicant's ability to be a good parent and violated the child's right to express his feelings freely and to form views about the family and the world on the basis of his own experience.

On 15 February 2010 the Kraków District Court allowed the applicant's request of 8 April 2008, granted him full parental responsibility and ordered A's residence with him. It limited the parental responsibility of the applicant's former wife in respect of A. The court considered that A's negative attitude towards his mother, which manifested itself during the period when he was under her care in 2007, had been caused by the lengthy period of total deprivation of any contact between them and during which the applicant had isolated A from his mother. Moreover, for a prolonged period of time the applicant had the undisturbed opportunity to influence his child and create a very strong bond between them. Nevertheless, the court considered that the situation of the child had substantially changed since the divorce judgment of 30 June 2006. A had been living with the applicant, who has been securing his emotional and material needs. The court also took into account the wish of the child as to his preferred place of residence, given his age and level of maturity. Regard being had to the above, the court decided that the best interests of the child required the previous decisions to be modified and an order made for A's place of residence to be with the applicant.

The applicant's former wife appealed against the decision, but on 15 July 2010 the Tarnów Regional Court dismissed the appeal.

On 7 April 2010 the Dąbrowa Tarnowska District Court modified the judgment of 30 June 2006 and banned any contact between the applicant and his younger son B. The court found that the applicant had never wanted his second child, contested his paternity of him and had seen B only twice: once after B's birth in 2003 and once in connection with the preparation of a psychological opinion at the RODK. In consequence B, seven years old, had not developed any emotional ties with the applicant, and in fact was afraid of him and perceived him as a threat to the stability of his family. The court concluded that the best interests of the child required all contact between him and the applicant to cease.

The applicant appealed against this decision, but on 11 June 2010 the Dabrowa Tarnowska District Court rejected the appeal for failure to lodge it in accordance with formal requirements, namely by lodging it out of time. A further appeal against the latter decision was dismissed on 20 July 2010 by the Tarnów Regional Court.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e1
001-104361_a3_em1
CODE
DIRECT
33829/07
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104361_a3_e2
001-104361_a3_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e3
001-104361_a3_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e4
001-104361_a3_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Bogusław Kijowski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e5
001-104361_a3_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
15 June 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e6
001-104361_a3_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Z. Cichoń
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e7
001-104361_a3_em7
LOC
QUASI
Krakow
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e8
001-104361_a3_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e9
001-104361_a3_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e10
001-104361_a3_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e11
001-104361_a3_em11
DEM
NO_MASK
two sons
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e12
001-104361_a3_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e13
001-104361_a3_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1966
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e14
001-104361_a3_em14
LOC
QUASI
Kraków
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e15
001-104361_a3_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e11
001-104361_a3_em16
DEM
NO_MASK
two sons
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em17
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e17
001-104361_a3_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e18
001-104361_a3_em19
PERSON
NO_MASK
B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e19
001-104361_a3_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
4 February 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e20
001-104361_a3_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
November 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em22
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e22
001-104361_a3_em23
LOC
QUASI
her parents' house
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em24
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e23
001-104361_a3_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
One month later
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e24
001-104361_a3_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
February 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em27
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e25
001-104361_a3_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
3 August 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em29
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em30
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em31
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104361_a3_e14
001-104361_a3_em32
LOC
QUASI
Kraków
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e26
001-104361_a3_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em34
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em35
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e27
001-104361_a3_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e28
001-104361_a3_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e29
001-104361_a3_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
August 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em39
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em40
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em41
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e30
001-104361_a3_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
19 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e31
001-104361_a3_em43
ORG
QUASI
Kraków Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em44
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em45
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em46
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e32
001-104361_a3_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
May 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em48
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e33
001-104361_a3_em49
ORG
QUASI
RODK (Regional Family Consultation Centre)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em50
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e34
001-104361_a3_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e30
001-104361_a3_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
19 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em53
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em54
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em55
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e35
001-104361_a3_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
22 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em57
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e36
001-104361_a3_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
8 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e37
001-104361_a3_em59
ORG
QUASI
Brzesko District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e38
001-104361_a3_em60
PERSON
NO_MASK
B.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e18
001-104361_a3_em61
PERSON
NO_MASK
B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em62
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em63
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em64
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e34
001-104361_a3_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e28
001-104361_a3_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e31
001-104361_a3_em67
ORG
QUASI
Kraków Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em68
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e18
001-104361_a3_em69
PERSON
NO_MASK
B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em70
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e39
001-104361_a3_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
28 December 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e40
001-104361_a3_em72
ORG
QUASI
Kraków Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e41
001-104361_a3_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
15 February 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em74
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e18
001-104361_a3_em75
PERSON
NO_MASK
B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em76
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e26
001-104361_a3_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em78
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e28
001-104361_a3_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e34
001-104361_a3_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e42
001-104361_a3_em81
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e43
001-104361_a3_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
September 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e44
001-104361_a3_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
25 May 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e45
001-104361_a3_em84
ORG
QUASI
Kraków District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em85
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e46
001-104361_a3_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
4 December 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e47
001-104361_a3_em87
ORG
QUASI
Krakow Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em88
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e48
001-104361_a3_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
three months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e49
001-104361_a3_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e50
001-104361_a3_em91
DATETIME
QUASI
8 July 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e51
001-104361_a3_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
25 January 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em93
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e52
001-104361_a3_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
March 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em95
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e53
001-104361_a3_em96
QUANTITY
QUASI
100 kilometres
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em97
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e54
001-104361_a3_em98
DATETIME
QUASI
1 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em99
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104361_a3_e14
001-104361_a3_em100
LOC
QUASI
Kraków
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e55
001-104361_a3_em101
DATETIME
QUASI
8 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e56
001-104361_a3_em102
ORG
QUASI
Dąbrowa Tarnowska District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em103
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e57
001-104361_a3_em104
DATETIME
QUASI
10 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em105
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em106
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e14
001-104361_a3_em107
LOC
QUASI
Kraków
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e58
001-104361_a3_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
14 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e59
001-104361_a3_em109
DATETIME
QUASI
23 June 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e60
001-104361_a3_em110
ORG
QUASI
Tarnow Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e18
001-104361_a3_em111
PERSON
NO_MASK
B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e28
001-104361_a3_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e61
001-104361_a3_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
6 October 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e56
001-104361_a3_em114
ORG
QUASI
Dąbrowa Tarnowska District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em115
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em116
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e18
001-104361_a3_em117
PERSON
NO_MASK
B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e61
001-104361_a3_em118
DATETIME
QUASI
6 October 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em119
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em120
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e29
001-104361_a3_em121
DATETIME
QUASI
August 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e62
001-104361_a3_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
March 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e63
001-104361_a3_em123
DATETIME
QUASI
April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em124
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e64
001-104361_a3_em125
DATETIME
QUASI
27 April 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em126
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104361_a3_e65
001-104361_a3_em127
DEM
QUASI
twelve years old
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em128
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em129
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e66
001-104361_a3_em130
DATETIME
QUASI
20 July 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e67
001-104361_a3_em131
DATETIME
QUASI
11 August 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e68
001-104361_a3_em132
ORG
QUASI
Dąbrowa Gornicza District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e69
001-104361_a3_em133
ORG
QUASI
RODK
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e70
001-104361_a3_em134
DATETIME
QUASI
16 December 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em135
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em136
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em137
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em138
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em139
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e71
001-104361_a3_em140
DATETIME
QUASI
15 February 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e45
001-104361_a3_em141
ORG
QUASI
Kraków District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e55
001-104361_a3_em142
DATETIME
QUASI
8 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em143
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em144
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em145
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em146
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e72
001-104361_a3_em147
DATETIME
QUASI
2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em148
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e28
001-104361_a3_em149
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em150
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em151
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e21
001-104361_a3_em152
PERSON
NO_MASK
wife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e73
001-104361_a3_em153
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e74
001-104361_a3_em154
ORG
QUASI
Tarnów Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e75
001-104361_a3_em155
DATETIME
QUASI
7 April 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e56
001-104361_a3_em156
ORG
QUASI
Dąbrowa Tarnowska District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e28
001-104361_a3_em157
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e38
001-104361_a3_em158
PERSON
NO_MASK
B.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e18
001-104361_a3_em159
PERSON
NO_MASK
B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e18
001-104361_a3_em160
PERSON
NO_MASK
B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e76
001-104361_a3_em161
DATETIME
QUASI
2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104361_a3_e69
001-104361_a3_em162
ORG
QUASI
RODK
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e18
001-104361_a3_em163
PERSON
NO_MASK
B
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104361_a3_e77
001-104361_a3_em164
DEM
QUASI
seven years old
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e78
001-104361_a3_em165
DATETIME
QUASI
11 June 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104361_a3_e79
001-104361_a3_em166
ORG
QUASI
Dabrowa Tarnowska District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e16
001-104361_a3_em167
PERSON
NO_MASK
A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e80
001-104361_a3_em168
DATETIME
QUASI
20 July 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104361_a3_e74
001-104361_a3_em169
ORG
QUASI
Tarnów Regional Court
Bogusław Kijowski
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Bogusław Kijowski