PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 64916/01) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Jerzy Bobrowski (“the applicant”), on 19 September 2000.

The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Ms M. Filipowicz, a lawyer practising in Opole. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged, inter alia, that the court’s unreasoned decisions to refuse to grant him legal aid in connection with the preparation of an appeal against a first-instance judgment infringed his right to a fair hearing.

On 10 October 2007 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant owned and ran a company. On an unspecified date before 1998 the factory owned by the company burned down. Subsequently, the applicant was involved in a number of proceedings in connection with serious financial difficulties which had been caused by the fire.

1. Civil proceedings against the State Insurance Company (“PZU”)

On 19 August 1999 the Opole Regional Court in part dismissed and in part rejected the applicant’s compensation claim against the State Insurance Company, in connection with an insurance contract. On 14 September 1999 the applicant filed an appeal against this judgment with that court.

On 21 September 1999 he requested the court to grant him full exemption from court fees. He referred to the fact that he had been partially exempted, by a decision of 30 September 1998, from the obligation to pay court fees. He submitted that his financial situation had further deteriorated since then. This request apparently remained unanswered.

On 25 November 1999 the Wrocław Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal.

On 1 February 2000 the applicant, represented by a privately hired lawyer, lodged with that court a cassation appeal to the Supreme Court. On 21 February 2000 the Wrocław Court of Appeal rejected the cassation appeal, finding that it failed to comply with the relevant formal requirements.

On 16 March 2000 the applicant requested that a legal‑aid lawyer be assigned to the case for the purpose of preparing an appeal to the Supreme Court against that decision.

On 20 March 2000 the Wrocław Court of Appeal dismissed the request. This decision did not contain any grounds or reference to its legal basis. The applicant appealed. On 10 April 2000 the Wrocław Court of Appeal rejected his appeal, holding that no appeal lay against the contested decision. It was only possible to submit an appeal to the Supreme Court against a decision rejecting a cassation appeal.

On 25 April 2000 the applicant appealed against the decision of 10 April and reiterated his request that a legal‑aid lawyer be assigned to represent him.

On 8 May 2000 the Wroclaw Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal, pointing to the fact that the applicant had already hired a lawyer privately. The applicant appealed.

On 26 May 2000 the Wroclaw Court of Appeal rejected the applicant’s appeal, prepared and lodged by a lawyer, holding that no appeal was available in law against the contested decision.

2. Civil proceedings against the BGŻ bank (“Bank Gospodarki Żywnościowej”)

By a judgment of 7 April 2000, the Opole Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s claim against the BGŻ Bank by which he had sought that a bank enforcement title against him, arising from the fact that after the fire he had defaulted on a bank loan, be declared null and void.

On 6 June 2000 the applicant requested the court to exempt him fully from the obligation to pay court fees in the appellate proceedings, referring to the fact that he had been partially exempted, by a decision of 30 September 1998, from the obligation to pay them.

On 28 June 2000 the court, by a decision which did not contain grounds, granted the applicant partial exemption from court fees.

On 1 September 2000 the applicant requested the court to assign a legal-aid lawyer to the case, referring again to his very difficult financial situation.

By a decision of 4 September 2000 the court refused to assign a legal‑aid lawyer to the case. This decision did not contain any grounds. On 19 September 2000 the applicant appealed against it.

By a decision of 26 September 2000 the Wrocław Court of Appeal rejected his appeal. This decision did not contain written grounds, apparently because no appeal was available in law against it.

By a judgment of 25 September 2000 the Wrocław Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the first-instance judgment.

On 31 October 2000 the applicant requested retrospective leave to submit, out of time, a request that written grounds be prepared for the second-instance judgment.

By a decision of 24 November 2000 the Wrocław Court of Appeal rejected his request without giving reasons. On 7 December 2000 the applicant lodged with that court an appeal to the Supreme Court against that decision. On 5 January 2001 the Wrocław Court of Appeal rejected his appeal, holding that no appeal was available against the contested decision.

On 8 March 2001 the applicant, represented by a privately hired lawyer, lodged with the Supreme Court a cassation appeal against the second‑instance judgment.

On 22 March 2001 the Supreme Court rejected the cassation appeal, holding that the applicant had failed to submit, within seven days from the date on which the second-instance judgment had been delivered in open court, a request for the written grounds of this judgment to be prepared. A failure to do so resulted in a cassation appeal being inadmissible.

Civil proceedings against a trustee in bankruptcy of “Westa” Insurance Company

On 24 May 1999 the Łódź Regional Court in part allowed and in part dismissed the applicant’s compensation claim against the trustee in bankruptcy of “Westa” Insurance Company.

On 9 November 1999 the Łódź Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal.

The applicant lodged a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court. On 22 November 2001 the Supreme Court refused to entertain that appeal. It relied on a provision of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended in May 2000, which allowed it to leave without examination manifestly ill‑founded cassation appeals or appeals in cases where no serious legal issue arose, also when those appeals had been lodged prior to the amendments entering into force.

Proceedings in which the applicant challenged the acts of the court bailiff conducting the enforcement proceedings

On 25 July 2003 the Kędzierzyn‑Koźle District Court dismissed the applicant’s complaint about allegedly unlawful actions of the court bailiff in the enforcement proceedings instituted against him by the BGŻ bank following the judgment given in the second set of proceedings, referred to above (see paragraphs 15 – 25 above).

On 11 April 2005 another complaint against the bailiff was dismissed by the same court, which was of the view that the actions complained of were lawful. On 5 May 2005 the same court rejected the applicant’s appeal against this decision, considering that no appeal was available in law.

In 2005 the applicant instituted civil proceedings against the bailiff, claiming compensation for damage caused by his allegedly unlawful acts in the enforcement proceedings. The proceedings are pending.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e1
001-86982_a2_em1
CODE
DIRECT
64916/01
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e2
001-86982_a2_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e3
001-86982_a2_em3
DEM
QUASI
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e4
001-86982_a2_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jerzy Bobrowski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e5
001-86982_a2_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e6
001-86982_a2_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Ms M. Filipowicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e7
001-86982_a2_em7
ORG
QUASI
Opole
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-86982_a2_e8
001-86982_a2_em8
ORG
QUASI
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e9
001-86982_a2_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e10
001-86982_a2_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86982_a2_e11
001-86982_a2_em11
MISC
NO_MASK
owned and ran a company
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e12
001-86982_a2_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86982_a2_e13
001-86982_a2_em13
MISC
QUASI
burned down
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86982_a2_e14
001-86982_a2_em14
MISC
QUASI
fire
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e15
001-86982_a2_em15
ORG
QUASI
001-86982_a2_em16
State Insurance Company
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86982_a2_e15
001-86982_a2_em16
ORG
QUASI
001-86982_a2_em16
State Insurance Company (“PZU”)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e15
001-86982_a2_em17
ORG
QUASI
001-86982_a2_em16
PZU
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e16
001-86982_a2_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
19 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e17
001-86982_a2_em19
ORG
QUASI
Opole Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e15
001-86982_a2_em20
ORG
QUASI
State Insurance Company
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e18
001-86982_a2_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
14 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e19
001-86982_a2_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
21 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e20
001-86982_a2_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e21
001-86982_a2_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e22
001-86982_a2_em25
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e23
001-86982_a2_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
1 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e24
001-86982_a2_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e25
001-86982_a2_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
21 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e22
001-86982_a2_em29
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e26
001-86982_a2_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e24
001-86982_a2_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e27
001-86982_a2_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
20 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e22
001-86982_a2_em33
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e28
001-86982_a2_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
10 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e22
001-86982_a2_em35
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e24
001-86982_a2_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e29
001-86982_a2_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
25 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e30
001-86982_a2_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
10 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e31
001-86982_a2_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
8 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e32
001-86982_a2_em40
ORG
QUASI
Wroclaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e33
001-86982_a2_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
26 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e32
001-86982_a2_em42
ORG
QUASI
Wroclaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e34
001-86982_a2_em43
ORG
QUASI
001-86982_a2_em44
BGŻ
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e34
001-86982_a2_em44
ORG
QUASI
Bank Gospodarki Żywnościowej
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e35
001-86982_a2_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
7 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e17
001-86982_a2_em46
ORG
QUASI
Opole Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e34
001-86982_a2_em47
ORG
QUASI
001-86982_a2_em43
BGŻ Bank
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e14
001-86982_a2_em48
MISC
QUASI
fire
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e36
001-86982_a2_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
6 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e20
001-86982_a2_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e37
001-86982_a2_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
28 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e38
001-86982_a2_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
1 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e39
001-86982_a2_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
4 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e5
001-86982_a2_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e40
001-86982_a2_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
26 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e22
001-86982_a2_em56
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e41
001-86982_a2_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
25 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e22
001-86982_a2_em58
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e42
001-86982_a2_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
31 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e43
001-86982_a2_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e22
001-86982_a2_em61
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e44
001-86982_a2_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
7 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e24
001-86982_a2_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e45
001-86982_a2_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
5 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e22
001-86982_a2_em65
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e46
001-86982_a2_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e24
001-86982_a2_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e47
001-86982_a2_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
22 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e24
001-86982_a2_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e48
001-86982_a2_em70
DATETIME
NO_MASK
seven days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86982_a2_e49
001-86982_a2_em71
ORG
QUASI
“Westa” Insurance Company
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-86982_a2_e49
001-86982_a2_em72
ORG
QUASI
001-86982_a2_em71
Westa
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e50
001-86982_a2_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
24 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86982_a2_e51
001-86982_a2_em74
ORG
QUASI
Łódź Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-86982_a2_e49
001-86982_a2_em75
ORG
QUASI
“Westa” Insurance Company
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-86982_a2_e49
001-86982_a2_em76
ORG
QUASI
001-86982_a2_em75
Westa
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e52
001-86982_a2_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e53
001-86982_a2_em78
ORG
QUASI
Łódź Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e24
001-86982_a2_em79
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e54
001-86982_a2_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e24
001-86982_a2_em81
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e55
001-86982_a2_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e56
001-86982_a2_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
25 July 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e57
001-86982_a2_em84
ORG
QUASI
Kędzierzyn‑Koźle District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e34
001-86982_a2_em85
ORG
QUASI
BGŻ
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e58
001-86982_a2_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
11 April 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e59
001-86982_a2_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
5 May 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-86982_a2_e60
001-86982_a2_em88
DATETIME
QUASI
2005
Jerzy Bobrowski
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Jerzy Bobrowski