PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 3994/03) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Jarosław Kąkol (“the applicant”), on 15 November 2002.

The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 18 October 2005 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaint concerning the length of the applicant's detention to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1969 and lives in Gdynia.

On 21 April 1999 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of armed robbery. On 22 April 1999 the Gdańsk District Court remanded him in custody in view of the reasonable suspicion that he had committed several offences of armed robbery.

Later, several other persons were detained and charged in connection with the same investigation conducted by the Department of Organised Crime of the Gdańsk Regional Prosecutor's Office. In the course of the investigation, the applicant's detention was prolonged several times.

On 13 December 2000 the Gdańsk Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant's and his eight co-suspects' detention until 31 March 2001.

On 7 March 2001 the Gdańsk Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant's detention until 31 May 2001. It relied on the reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offences with which he had been charged and the severity of the anticipated penalty. The Court of Appeal further held that the detention on remand was the only measure which could secure the proper conduct of the proceedings given the nature of the charges and the relations between the suspects, who had acted in an organised group. It also considered that the prolongation of detention was justified by the need to obtain DNA evidence in order to corroborate evidence previously obtained.

On 15 May 2001 the prosecution filed a bill of indictment with the Gdańsk Regional Court. The applicant was charged with several dozen counts of armed robbery which had been committed in an organised armed criminal group. The bill of indictment listed 120 charges brought against 19 defendants, who were all detained on remand. The case file comprised 114 volumes. The prosecution asked the court to hear evidence from 366 witnesses.

On 23 May 2001 the Court of Appeal ordered that the applicant be kept in custody until 31 October 2001. In addition to the grounds previously invoked, it referred to the complexity of the case, the significant number of defendants and the number of witnesses to be heard in the trial.

On 24 October 2001 the Court of Appeal extended the applicant's detention until 31 March 2002, relying on the same grounds as in its earlier decisions.

The trial began on 28 December 2001. However, as of 22 April 2002 the reading out of the bill of indictment by the prosecution had still not been concluded. Initially, the trial court held three hearings per month.

During the hearing held on 30 January 2002 the trial court ordered the removal of the applicant and two other defendants from the court room. They disrupted the trial by screaming when the prosecutor was reading the bill of indictment, notwithstanding a warning from the presiding judge. Similarly, during the hearings held on 27 May and 14 October 2002 the trial court ordered the applicant's removal on the ground that he had disrupted the trial.

On 13 March 2002 the Court of Appeal ordered that the applicant and his seven co-defendants be held in custody until 30 September 2002. It considered that the trial could be terminated by the last-mentioned date. In addition to the grounds previously invoked, the Court of Appeal found that the prolongation of detention was justified under Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the particular complexity of the case. It further observed that the delays in the trial were partly attributable to some of the defendants who had attempted to disrupt the proceedings and, consequently, had to be removed from the court room. The Court of Appeal instructed the trial court to hold more than 3 hearings per month. Furthermore, it held that no other preventive measure could secure the proper conduct of the trial. In that respect, the Court of Appeal observed that there was a reasonable risk that the applicant and other defendants might interfere with the proceedings, given the nature of the charges, the severity of the anticipated penalty and the fact that such attempts had been made in the course of the investigation.

On 27, 28 and 29 May 2002 the Gdańsk Regional Court dismissed the applicant's requests for the presiding judge to withdraw.

On 11 September 2002 the Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant's and his nine co-defendants' detention until 31 December 2002. In addition to the grounds previously relied on, it considered that the applicant's detention was justified under Article 258 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure since that provision established a presumption to the effect that the likelihood of a severe penalty being imposed on the applicant might induce him to obstruct the proceedings. It also noted that the prolongation of his detention was justified by the volume of evidence to be heard at the trial.

On 18 December 2002 the Court of Appeal ordered that the applicant and his 17 co-defendants be kept in custody until 30 June 2003. It held that the grounds invoked in its previous decisions were still valid.

On 13 January and 31 March 2003 the Gdańsk Regional Court dismissed the applicant's request for the judges and lay members of the trial court to withdraw. On 15 January 2003 the applicant and seventeen of his co-defendants unsuccessfully challenged the judges and lay members of the trial court.

On 13 January 2003 the trial court refused the applicant's request for dismissal of his legal-aid counsel. Similar requests were dismissed on 12 February and 20 March 2003.

On 25 June 2003 the Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant's and eighteen of his co-defendant's detention until 31 December 2003, relying on the same grounds as given previously. In addition, it observed that the trial could not have been terminated due to obstructiveness on the part of the defendants who had filed numerous requests challenging the trial court. It also noted that the trial court had taken various procedural steps in order to accelerate the proceedings.

In its decision of 30 July 2003 dismissing the applicant's appeal against the decision of 25 June 2003 prolonging his detention, the Court of Appeal held that Article 258 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure established a presumption to the effect that the likelihood of a severe penalty being imposed on the applicant might induce him to obstruct the proceedings. It added that the risk of absconding or tampering with witnesses in the present case did not have to be supported by any concrete facts, but resulted from the above presumption. The Court of Appeal also observed that although the applicant and other defendants were free to make use of their procedural rights, the abuse of those rights undoubtedly led to delays in the trial.

On 1 September 2003 a new legal-aid counsel was appointed for the applicant. The previous counsel was discharged by the trial court from his duties at his own request and following a number of complaints made by the applicant.

Subsequently, the Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant's detention on several occasions. The relevant decisions were given on 17 December 2003 (prolonging his detention until 30 June 2004), 23 June 2004 (extending his detention until 31 December 2004), 15 December 2004 (ordering his continued detention until 31 March 2005), 30 March 2005 (prolonging his detention until 30 June 2005) and 22 June 2005 (extending his detention until 30 September 2005). In all those decisions the Court of Appeal stated that the grounds previously given for the applicant's detention were still valid. It also stressed the exceptionally complex nature of the case.

In its decision on the applicant's detention of 23 June 2004, the Court of Appeal observed that up to April 2003 the main reason for the delays during the trial was the obstructiveness of the defendants and the abuse of the rights of the defence. It also observed that the trial could be concluded by the end of 2004 provided that the Regional Court endeavoured to organise the trial efficiently.

On 15 January and 29 July 2004 and 16 and 31 May 2005 the Gdańsk Regional Court dismissed as unfounded the applicant's requests for various members of the trial court to withdraw.

On 8 March and 24 May 2005 the trial court dismissed the applicant's application for release on health grounds, relying on the report prepared by the experts from the Gdańsk Medical Academy. The applicant was diagnosed with a number of ailments, including a brain tumour. However the experts determined that he could remain and receive treatment in detention.

In its decision of 27 July 2005 dismissing the applicant's appeal against the decision of 22 June 2005 prolonging his detention, the Court of Appeal referred, inter alia, to the presumption established under Article 258 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and held that that presumption alone justified the applicant's continued detention. It also held that keeping the applicant in custody was necessary in order to prevent him from interfering with the trial, given the reasonable risk of such interference which flowed from the fact that he had been charged with commission of offences as a member of an organised criminal group.

By March 2006 the trial court had held some 135 hearings of the 162 which had been scheduled. It heard more than 400 witnesses.

During the trial the applicant filed numerous but unsuccessful applications for release and appealed, likewise unsuccessfully, against the decisions prolonging his detention. He maintained that the length of his detention was excessive and that the charges against him lacked a sufficiently strong basis.

On 21 March 2005 the Gdańsk Regional Court made a severance order with a view to expediting the proceedings, and thereafter four defendants (J.N., G.P., Z.S. and Z.C.), who in the meantime had been released from detention, were to be tried separately.

After 20 June 2005 no hearing was held due to the serious illness of the judge rapporteur. On 21 September 2005 the President of the IV Criminal Section of the Gdańsk Regional Court assigned a new judge rapporteur. Consequently, the trial had to commence de novo.

On 20 September 2005 the Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant's detention until 31 January 2006. The applicant appealed against that decision. On 18 October 2005 a different panel of the Court of Appeal quashed the impugned decision and ordered the applicant's release under police supervision. It also imposed on him a prohibition on leaving the country. The Court of Appeal had regard to the fact that the trial had to commence de novo and that the applicant had already spent a few years in pre-trial detention.

The applicant was released on 19 October 2005.

On 24 November 2005 the trial court made a further severance order and divided the case into eleven separate cases.

It appears that the proceedings are still pending before the first-instance court.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e1
001-82213_a3_em1
CODE
DIRECT
3994/03
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-82213_a3_e2
001-82213_a3_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e3
001-82213_a3_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e4
001-82213_a3_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jarosław Kąkol
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e5
001-82213_a3_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
15 November 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e6
001-82213_a3_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e7
001-82213_a3_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e8
001-82213_a3_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e9
001-82213_a3_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
18 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e10
001-82213_a3_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1969
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e11
001-82213_a3_em11
LOC
QUASI
Gdynia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e12
001-82213_a3_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
21 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e13
001-82213_a3_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
22 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e14
001-82213_a3_em14
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e15
001-82213_a3_em15
ORG
QUASI
Department of Organised Crime of the Gdańsk Regional Prosecutor's Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e16
001-82213_a3_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
13 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e17
001-82213_a3_em17
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e18
001-82213_a3_em18
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
eight co-suspects
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e19
001-82213_a3_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
31 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e20
001-82213_a3_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
7 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e17
001-82213_a3_em21
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e21
001-82213_a3_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
31 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em23
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e23
001-82213_a3_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e24
001-82213_a3_em25
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e25
001-82213_a3_em26
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
several dozen counts of armed robbery
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e26
001-82213_a3_em27
QUANTITY
QUASI
120 charges
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e27
001-82213_a3_em28
QUANTITY
QUASI
19 defendants
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e28
001-82213_a3_em29
QUANTITY
QUASI
114 volumes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e29
001-82213_a3_em30
QUANTITY
QUASI
366 witnesses
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e30
001-82213_a3_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
23 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e31
001-82213_a3_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
31 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e32
001-82213_a3_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e33
001-82213_a3_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
31 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e34
001-82213_a3_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
28 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e35
001-82213_a3_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
22 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e36
001-82213_a3_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e37
001-82213_a3_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
27 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e38
001-82213_a3_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
14 October 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e39
001-82213_a3_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e40
001-82213_a3_em44
QUANTITY
QUASI
seven co-defendants
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e41
001-82213_a3_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e42
001-82213_a3_em48
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
more than 3 hearings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e43
001-82213_a3_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
27, 28 and 29 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e24
001-82213_a3_em51
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e44
001-82213_a3_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e45
001-82213_a3_em54
QUANTITY
QUASI
nine co-defendants
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e46
001-82213_a3_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e47
001-82213_a3_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e48
001-82213_a3_em58
QUANTITY
QUASI
17 co-defendants
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e49
001-82213_a3_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e50
001-82213_a3_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
13 January and 31 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e24
001-82213_a3_em61
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e51
001-82213_a3_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e52
001-82213_a3_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
13 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e53
001-82213_a3_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
12 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e54
001-82213_a3_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
20 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e55
001-82213_a3_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
25 June 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e56
001-82213_a3_em68
QUANTITY
QUASI
eighteen of his co-defendant
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e57
001-82213_a3_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e58
001-82213_a3_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
30 July 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e55
001-82213_a3_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
25 June 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e59
001-82213_a3_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
1 September 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em75
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e60
001-82213_a3_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
17 December 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e61
001-82213_a3_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e62
001-82213_a3_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
23 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e63
001-82213_a3_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e64
001-82213_a3_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
15 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e65
001-82213_a3_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
31 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e66
001-82213_a3_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
30 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e67
001-82213_a3_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e68
001-82213_a3_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
22 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e69
001-82213_a3_em85
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em86
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e62
001-82213_a3_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
23 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e70
001-82213_a3_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
April 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e71
001-82213_a3_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e72
001-82213_a3_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e73
001-82213_a3_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January and 29 July 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e74
001-82213_a3_em93
DATETIME
QUASI
16 and 31 May 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e24
001-82213_a3_em94
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e75
001-82213_a3_em95
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e76
001-82213_a3_em96
DATETIME
QUASI
24 May 2005
HEALTH
check
001-82213_a3_e77
001-82213_a3_em97
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Medical Academy
HEALTH
insert
001-82213_a3_e78
001-82213_a3_em98
MISC
NO_MASK
ailments
HEALTH
insert
001-82213_a3_e79
001-82213_a3_em99
DEM
QUASI
brain tumour
HEALTH
insert
001-82213_a3_e80
001-82213_a3_em100
MISC
NO_MASK
receive treatment in detention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e81
001-82213_a3_em101
DATETIME
QUASI
27 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e68
001-82213_a3_em102
DATETIME
QUASI
22 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em103
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e82
001-82213_a3_em104
DATETIME
QUASI
March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e83
001-82213_a3_em105
QUANTITY
QUASI
135 hearings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e84
001-82213_a3_em106
QUANTITY
QUASI
162
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e85
001-82213_a3_em107
QUANTITY
QUASI
more than 400 witnesses
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e86
001-82213_a3_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e24
001-82213_a3_em109
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e87
001-82213_a3_em110
PERSON
QUASI
J.N.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e88
001-82213_a3_em111
PERSON
QUASI
G.P.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-82213_a3_e89
001-82213_a3_em112
PERSON
QUASI
Z.S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-82213_a3_e90
001-82213_a3_em113
PERSON
QUASI
Z.C.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e91
001-82213_a3_em114
DATETIME
QUASI
20 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e92
001-82213_a3_em115
DATETIME
QUASI
21 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e93
001-82213_a3_em116
DEM
NO_MASK
President of the IV Criminal Section
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-82213_a3_e24
001-82213_a3_em117
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e94
001-82213_a3_em118
DATETIME
QUASI
20 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em119
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e95
001-82213_a3_em120
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e9
001-82213_a3_em121
DATETIME
QUASI
18 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em122
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e22
001-82213_a3_em123
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e96
001-82213_a3_em124
DATETIME
NO_MASK
few years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e97
001-82213_a3_em125
DATETIME
QUASI
19 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-82213_a3_e98
001-82213_a3_em126
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 2005
Jarosław Kąkol
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Jarosław Kąkol