PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court, as established under former Article 19 of the Convention, by the Polish Government (“the Government”) on 26 February 1998, by a Polish national, Mr Józef Janowski (“the applicant”), on 27 February 1998 and by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) on 16 March 1998, within the three-month period laid down by former Articles 32 § 1 and 47 of the Convention. It originated in an application (no. 25716/94) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Commission under former Article 25 by the applicant on 25 January 1994. The Government’s application referred to former Article 48; the applicant’s application to the Court referred to former Article 48 as amended by Protocol No. 90, which Poland had ratified; the Commission’s request referred to former Articles 44 and 48 and to the declaration whereby Poland recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (former Article 46). The object of the applications and of the request was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 10 of the Convention.

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 35 § 3 (d) of former Rules of Court B0, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyer who would represent him (former Rule 31). The lawyer was given leave by Mr R. Bernhardt, the President of the Court at the time, to use the Polish language (former Rule 28 § 3).

As President of the Chamber which had originally been constituted (former Article 43 of the Convention and former Rule 21) in order to deal, in particular, with procedural matters that might arise before the entry into force of Protocol No. 11, Mr Bernhardt, acting through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the Government, the applicant’s lawyer and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the written procedure. Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the applicant’s and the Government’s memorials on 13 July and 7 August 1998 respectively. On 15 September 1998 the Delegate of the Commission submitted written observations.

After the entry into force of Protocol No. 11 on 1 November 1998 and in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 § 5 thereof, the case was referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. The Grand Chamber included ex officio Mr J. Makarczyk, the judge elected in respect of Poland (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 24 § 4 of the Rules of Court), Mr L. Wildhaber, the President of the Court, Mrs E. Palm and Mr C.L. Rozakis, the Vice-Presidents of the Court, and Sir Nicolas Bratza and Mr M. Pellonpää, Presidents of Sections (Article 27 § 3 of the Convention and Rule 24 § 3). The other members appointed to complete the Grand Chamber were Mr B. Conforti, Mr A. Pastor Ridruejo, Mr G. Bonello, Mr P. Kūris, Mrs V. Strážnická, Mr C. Bîrsan, Mr M. Fischbach, Mr J. Casadevall, Mrs H.S. Greve, Mr A.B. Baka and Mr R. Maruste (Rule 24 § 3 and Rule 100 § 4). Subsequently Mr R. Türmen, substitute judge, replaced Mrs Strážnická who was unable to take part in the further consideration of the case (Rule 24 § 5 (b)).

At the Court’s invitation (Rule 99), the Commission delegated one of its members, Mr M.A. Nowicki, to take part in the proceedings before the Grand Chamber.

In accordance with the President’s decision, a hearing, at which the applicant was present, took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 18 November 1998. There appeared before the Court:

(a) for the Government

Mr K. Drzewicki, Professor of Public International Law, Agent, Ms E. Chałubińska, Judge on secondment to the Ministry of Justice, Counsel, Mr A. Kaliński, Office of the Agent, Mr M. Łuczka, Deputy to the Permanent Representative of Poland to the Council of Europe, Ms M. Dębska, Office of the Agent, Advisers;

(b) for the applicant

Mrs B. Banasik, of the Łódź Bar, Counsel;

(c) for the Commission

Mr M.A. Nowicki, Delegate, Ms M.-T. Schoepfer, Secretary to the Commission. The Court heard addresses by Mr Nowicki, Mrs Banasik and Mr Drzewicki.

THE FACTS

I. the CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1937. He is a journalist and lives in Zduńska Wola, Poland.

According to the applicant, on 2 September 1992 he noticed two municipal guards who were ordering street vendors to leave a square in Zduńska Wola where selling was allegedly not authorised by the municipal authorities and to move their makeshift stands to a nearby market-place. The Government maintain however that the guards, who were acting on sanitary and traffic considerations, merely requested the vendors to move to a nearby market-place. The applicant further submits that he intervened, informing the guards that their actions had no legal basis and infringed the laws guaranteeing freedom in the economic field. He pointed out that the municipal authorities had not passed any resolution which would allow the guards to clear the square. The applicant observed that the guards were apparently acting only on the basis of verbal instructions from the mayor and urged the vendors to stay. The exchange between the applicant and the guards was witnessed by a group of bystanders.

Subsequently, on an unspecified date, the Zduńska Wola district prosecutor (Prokurator Rejonowy) instituted criminal proceedings against the applicant. On 5 January 1993 the district prosecutor lodged a bill of indictment with the Zduńska Wola District Court (Sąd Rejonowy). The applicant was charged with having insulted municipal guards while they were carrying out their duties and with having acted with flagrant contempt for legal order, an offence specified in Article 236 of the Criminal Code read together with Article 59 § 1.

On 29 April 1993 the District Court convicted the applicant under Article 236 of the Criminal Code of verbally insulting two municipal guards. It held that the offence was an act of hooliganism within the meaning of Article 59 § 1 of the Criminal Code. The applicant was sentenced to eight months’ imprisonment suspended for two years and a fine of 1,500,000 old zlotys (PLZ). He was also ordered to pay the sum of PLZ 400,000 to charitable institutions and court costs of PLZ 346,000.

On an unspecified date the applicant filed an appeal against this judgment, submitting that his conviction was based on insufficient evidence. He pointed out that the District Court had failed to establish precisely what defamatory words had been used and had only found that the applicant had called the guards “ignorant”. This word should not have been regarded as an insult but as an acceptable criticism of public servants. The applicant further contended that the trial court had wrongly applied the law since, contrary to its findings, it was evident that his acts had not involved any act of hooliganism as he had only intended to protect street vendors from illegal actions of the municipal guards.

On 29 September 1993 the Sieradz Regional Court (Sąd Wojewódzki) quashed the part of the contested judgment relating to the sentence of imprisonment and the order to pay PLZ 400,000 to charitable institutions. However, it upheld the fine of PLZ 1,500,000 and reduced the court costs to the sum of PLZ 150,000. The Regional Court was of the opinion that the trial court had wrongly considered that the offence at issue had been hooligan in nature as the applicant’s motive had been to defend street vendors against the acts of the municipal guards which he had considered illegal. Therefore the applicant had not acted as he did without any justifiable motive, which was a prerequisite for finding that the offence was an act of hooliganism.

Furthermore, the Regional Court agreed with the applicant that the Zduńska Wola municipal council had not passed any resolution prohibiting the sale of merchandise on the streets and that no public notice to this effect had been posted at the material place and time. Therefore, there were no grounds for the trial court’s finding that the applicant had demonstrated flagrant contempt for legal order.

Finally, the Regional Court observed that the judgment had not mentioned the abusive words used by the applicant. Nevertheless, it considered that there was sufficient evidence in the case file to conclude that the applicant had in fact insulted the guards by calling them “oafs” and “dumb” (“ćwoki” and “głupki”). These words were widely considered to be offensive and by using them the applicant had exceeded the limits of freedom of expression. The court found that the resulting conviction was rightly imposed under Article 236 of the Criminal Code whose object was to ensure that civil servants were not hindered in carrying out their duties. ii. relevant domestic law

At the relevant time the legislation provided as follows: Article 236 of the Criminal Code: “Anyone who insults a civil servant ... during and in connection with the carrying out of his official duties is liable to up to two years’ imprisonment, to restriction of personal liberty or to a fine.” “Kto znieważa funkcjonariusza publicznego … podczas i w związku z pełnieniem obowiązków służbowych, podlega karze pozbawienia wolności do lat 2, ograniczenia wolności albo grzywny.” Article 59 § 1 of the Criminal Code: “If a perpetrator has committed a premeditated offence of a hooligan nature, the court shall impose a sentence of imprisonment not lower than one and a half times the minimum sentence provided ...” “Jeżeli sprawca dopuścił się umyślnego występku o charakterze chuligańskim, sąd wymierza karę pozbawienia wolności nie niższą od dolnego zagrożenia zwiększonego o połowę …” Article 120 § 14 of the Criminal Code provided that an offence should be regarded as being of a hooligan nature if the perpetrator acted in public, without any justifiable motive or with an obviously unjustified one, thus demonstrating flagrant contempt for legal order. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

Mr Janowski applied to the Commission on 25 January 1994. He relied on Article 6 of the Convention, complaining that the Zduńska Wola District Court had refused to grant him legal aid and hear two defence witnesses and had produced minutes which did not reflect statements made by witnesses and the applicant during the hearing. He also complained under Article 10 that his conviction violated his right to freedom of expression.

The Commission declared the application (no. 25716/94) admissible on 27 November 1996 with the exception of the applicant’s complaints under Article 6. In its report of 3 December 1997 (former Article 31 of the Convention), it expressed by eight votes to seven the opinion that there had been a violation of Article 10. The full text of the Commission’s opinion and of the dissenting opinion contained in the report is reproduced as an annex to this judgment. FINAL SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT

The applicant in his memorial requested the Court to find that the facts of the case disclosed violations of Articles 3, 6, 7 § 1 and 10 of the Convention and to award him just satisfaction under former Article 50 (now Article 41). The Government for their part requested the Court to find that Article 10 had not been violated in the present case.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e1
001-58909_a3_em1
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e2
001-58909_a3_em2
DATETIME
QUASI
26 February 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e3
001-58909_a3_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e4
001-58909_a3_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Józef Janowski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e5
001-58909_a3_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
27 February 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e6
001-58909_a3_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e7
001-58909_a3_em7
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e8
001-58909_a3_em8
CODE
DIRECT
25716/94
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58909_a3_e9
001-58909_a3_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e10
001-58909_a3_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
25 January 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e11
001-58909_a3_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e11
001-58909_a3_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e12
001-58909_a3_em13
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e3
001-58909_a3_em14
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e13
001-58909_a3_em15
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e14
001-58909_a3_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
13 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e15
001-58909_a3_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
7 August 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e16
001-58909_a3_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
15 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e17
001-58909_a3_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Makarczyk
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e11
001-58909_a3_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e18
001-58909_a3_em21
PERSON
QUASI
Mr L. Wildhaber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e19
001-58909_a3_em22
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs E. Palm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e20
001-58909_a3_em23
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C.L. Rozakis
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e21
001-58909_a3_em24
PERSON
QUASI
Sir Nicolas Bratza
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e22
001-58909_a3_em25
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Pellonpää
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e23
001-58909_a3_em26
PERSON
QUASI
Mr B. Conforti
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e24
001-58909_a3_em27
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Pastor Ridruejo
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e25
001-58909_a3_em28
PERSON
QUASI
Mr G. Bonello
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e26
001-58909_a3_em29
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. Kūris
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e27
001-58909_a3_em30
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs V. Strážnická
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e28
001-58909_a3_em31
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C. Bîrsan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e29
001-58909_a3_em32
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Fischbach
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e30
001-58909_a3_em33
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Casadevall
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e31
001-58909_a3_em34
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs H.S. Greve
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e32
001-58909_a3_em35
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A.B. Baka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e33
001-58909_a3_em36
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Maruste
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e34
001-58909_a3_em37
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Türmen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e35
001-58909_a3_em38
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Strážnická
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e36
001-58909_a3_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M.A. Nowicki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e37
001-58909_a3_em40
LOC
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e38
001-58909_a3_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
18 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e39
001-58909_a3_em42
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K. Drzewicki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e40
001-58909_a3_em43
DEM
QUASI
Professor of Public International Law,
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e41
001-58909_a3_em44
PERSON
QUASI
Ms E. Chałubińska
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e42
001-58909_a3_em45
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Kaliński
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e43
001-58909_a3_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Office of the Agent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e44
001-58909_a3_em47
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Łuczka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e45
001-58909_a3_em48
DEM
QUASI
Deputy to the Permanent Representative of Poland to the Council of Europe
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e46
001-58909_a3_em49
PERSON
QUASI
Ms M. Dębska
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e43
001-58909_a3_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Office of the Agent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e47
001-58909_a3_em51
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs B. Banasik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e48
001-58909_a3_em52
ORG
QUASI
Łódź Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e36
001-58909_a3_em53
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M.A. Nowicki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58909_a3_e49
001-58909_a3_em54
PERSON
QUASI
Ms M.-T. Schoepfer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e50
001-58909_a3_em55
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Nowicki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e51
001-58909_a3_em56
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Banasik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e52
001-58909_a3_em57
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Drzewicki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e53
001-58909_a3_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
1937
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e54
001-58909_a3_em59
DEM
QUASI
journalist
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e55
001-58909_a3_em60
LOC
QUASI
Zduńska Wola, Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e56
001-58909_a3_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
2 September 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e57
001-58909_a3_em62
DEM
QUASI
municipal guards
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e58
001-58909_a3_em63
DEM
QUASI
street vendors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e55
001-58909_a3_em64
LOC
QUASI
001-58909_a3_em60
Zduńska Wola
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e59
001-58909_a3_em65
DEM
QUASI
vendors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e59
001-58909_a3_em66
DEM
QUASI
vendors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e60
001-58909_a3_em67
ORG
QUASI
Zduńska Wola district prosecutor (Prokurator Rejonowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e61
001-58909_a3_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
5 January 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e62
001-58909_a3_em69
ORG
QUASI
Zduńska Wola District Court (Sąd Rejonowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e57
001-58909_a3_em70
DEM
QUASI
municipal guards
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e63
001-58909_a3_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
29 April 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e64
001-58909_a3_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e57
001-58909_a3_em73
DEM
QUASI
municipal guards
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e65
001-58909_a3_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
eight months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e66
001-58909_a3_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
two years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e67
001-58909_a3_em76
QUANTITY
QUASI
1,500,000 old zlotys (PLZ)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e68
001-58909_a3_em77
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLZ 400,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e69
001-58909_a3_em78
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLZ 346,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e64
001-58909_a3_em79
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e58
001-58909_a3_em80
DEM
QUASI
street vendors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e57
001-58909_a3_em81
DEM
QUASI
municipal guards
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e70
001-58909_a3_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e71
001-58909_a3_em83
ORG
QUASI
Sieradz Regional Court (Sąd Wojewódzki)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e68
001-58909_a3_em84
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLZ 400,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e72
001-58909_a3_em85
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLZ 1,500,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e73
001-58909_a3_em86
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLZ 150,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e74
001-58909_a3_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e58
001-58909_a3_em88
DEM
QUASI
street vendors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e57
001-58909_a3_em89
DEM
QUASI
municipal guards
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e74
001-58909_a3_em90
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e75
001-58909_a3_em91
ORG
QUASI
Zduńska Wola municipal council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e74
001-58909_a3_em92
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e76
001-58909_a3_em93
MISC
QUASI
ćwoki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e77
001-58909_a3_em94
MISC
QUASI
głupki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e78
001-58909_a3_em95
DATETIME
NO_MASK
up to two years’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e4
001-58909_a3_em96
PERSON
DIRECT
001-58909_a3_em4
Mr Janowski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e10
001-58909_a3_em97
DATETIME
QUASI
25 January 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58909_a3_e79
001-58909_a3_em98
ORG
QUASI
Zduńska Wola District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e8
001-58909_a3_em99
CODE
DIRECT
25716/94
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e80
001-58909_a3_em100
DATETIME
QUASI
27 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58909_a3_e81
001-58909_a3_em101
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 1997
Józef Janowski
POL
GRANDCHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Józef Janowski