PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 35115/97) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Oliver Riepan (“the applicant”), on 23 December 1996.

The applicant had been granted legal aid. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr H. Winkler, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged that in criminal proceedings against him, relating to charges of threatening behaviour, he did not have a public hearing as the trial was held in the prison where he was detained.

The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11).

5. The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court

(Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1. 6. By a decision of 15 June 2000 the Chamber declared the application partly admissible [Note by the Registry. The Court's decision is obtainable from the Registry.]. 7. The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). 8. A hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 29 August 2000 (Rule 59 § 2). There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Mr W. Okresek, Head of the Constitutional Law Section at the Federal Chancellery, Agent, Mrs E. Schindler, Federal Ministry of Justice, Adviser; (b) for the applicant Mr H. Blum, of the Linz Bar, Counsel. The Court heard addresses by Mr Blum, Mr Okresek and Mrs Schindler.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant is serving an eighteen-year prison term following his conviction for murder and burglary in 1987. He was first detained at Karlau Prison, from which he escaped in 1991 but was rearrested within a day. In September 1994 he was transferred to Stein Prison and on 8 May 1995 to Garsten Prison, as the prison administration feared that he and a number of other inmates were devising an escape plan.

On 8 May 1995, when prison personnel at Garsten carried out the necessary reception formalities, the applicant refused to cooperate and demanded to be returned to Stein Prison, threatening that otherwise he and other inmates would set fire to Garsten Prison. On the following day, in the course of an interview with a senior prison officer, he again insisted on being returned to Stein Prison and threatened the prison officer that otherwise someone would pay the officer “a private visit”. A few days later he threatened a prison warder saying “that he should not turn his back on him”. On account of these incidents, criminal proceedings on charges of threatening behaviour (gefährliche Drohung) were instituted against the applicant.

The Steyr Regional Court (Landesgericht) decided to hold the hearing at Garsten Prison, which is situated about 5 km from Steyr. It set down 29 January 1996 as the date for the trial. The summons indicating the date and place of the hearing was served on the applicant as well as on his official defence counsel a month before the hearing.

At the material time information about hearings held at the Steyr Regional Court was given as follows. The public prosecutor's office at the Regional Court issued a hearing list (Verhandlungsspiegel) in the middle of each week for the following week, containing, inter alia, the date and place of all hearings in criminal proceedings. This information would also include the number of the court hearing room and would, if appropriate, indicate that the hearing was to be held at the scene of the crime or the name of the prison at which it was to take place. The Government were unable to provide the list for the week of 29 January 1996, as these lists are not kept, but asserted that it would, in accordance with the usual practice, have indicated Garsten Prison as the place of the hearing in the applicant's case. The hearing list was distributed by the public prosecutor's office to the media, namely to the most important national and regional newspapers, as well as to the national broadcasting station. Furthermore, a copy was given to the Regional Court's registry and information desk. Thus, interested persons could obtain information about forthcoming hearings either by calling the court's registry or by presenting themselves at the court's entrance.

On 29 January 1996 the Steyr Regional Court, sitting with a single judge, held a hearing in the closed area (Gesperre) of Garsten Prison. The hearing room measured about 25 sq. m. It was furnished with a table and seats for the judge, the secretary, the public prosecutor, the applicant and his defence counsel. There is disagreement between the parties as to whether there were further seats available for witnesses and potential spectators.

The hearing, which according to the minutes was public, was opened at 8.30 a.m. It lasted thirty-five minutes. The applicant, assisted by counsel, pleaded not guilty. The court heard the four prison officers to whom the applicant had allegedly addressed threats as witnesses. Neither the applicant nor his counsel complained about a lack of publicity at that time. Following the hearing, the Regional Court convicted the applicant of threatening behaviour, finding that he had on three occasions threatened prison personnel with arson or assault, and sentenced him to ten months' imprisonment.

Thereupon, the applicant filed an appeal on points of law and fact, as well as against sentence (Berufung wegen Nichtigkeit, Schuld und Strafe). He complained, in particular, as a ground of nullity, that the hearing on 29 January 1996 had not been public since it took place in the closed area of Garsten Prison, to which only people with special permits, other than prison personnel, had access. He also claimed that the room in which the hearing was held was too small to accommodate any spectators and alleged that not even the witnesses had been able to stay in the room simultaneously. Moreover, he challenged the Regional Court's assessment of the evidence and its establishment of the facts. Finally, he complained that the sentence was too severe.

On 5 July 1996 the Linz Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) held a public hearing in the court building in the presence of the applicant and his counsel. The appellate court is about 50 km from Garsten Prison. The hearing lasted three-quarters of an hour. The court heard the applicant as regards the alleged lack of publicity of the hearing on 29 January 1996. It also heard him on the various counts of threatening behaviour, questioning him as regards the statements made by the witnesses at the trial. It did not rehear the witnesses and the defence made no request to this effect.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the case. As to the complaint that the hearing on 29 January 1996 had not been public, the court noted that, according to information submitted by the Steyr Regional Court, the hearing was public in the sense that any interested person would have been allowed to attend. Had the prison governor been concerned that interested persons should not be granted access to the closed area, he would have been obliged to prohibit the conduct of the trial in that part of the prison. In any case, no such persons wishing to attend the trial had been present at the beginning of the hearing, and the judge had not been informed of any potential spectators.

As to the applicant's appeal on points of fact, the Court of Appeal stated that it had no doubts regarding the Regional Court's evaluation of the evidence and its establishment of the facts. The appellate court also confirmed the Regional Court's legal view that the applicant had, by threatening prison personnel with arson or assault, committed the offence of threatening behaviour. Finally, it found that the sentence was commensurate with the applicant's guilt.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e1
001-58978_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
35115/97
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58978_a8_e2
001-58978_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e3
001-58978_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e4
001-58978_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Oliver Riepan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e5
001-58978_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
23 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58978_a8_e6
001-58978_a8_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e7
001-58978_a8_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. Winkler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e8
001-58978_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e9
001-58978_a8_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e10
001-58978_a8_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
15 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58978_a8_e11
001-58978_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e12
001-58978_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
29 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e13
001-58978_a8_em13
PERSON
QUASI
Mr W. Okresek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e14
001-58978_a8_em14
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs E. Schindler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e15
001-58978_a8_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e16
001-58978_a8_em16
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. Blum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e17
001-58978_a8_em17
ORG
QUASI
Linz Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e16
001-58978_a8_em18
PERSON
QUASI
001-58978_a8_em16
Mr Blum
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e13
001-58978_a8_em19
PERSON
QUASI
001-58978_a8_em13
Mr Okresek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e14
001-58978_a8_em20
PERSON
QUASI
001-58978_a8_em14
Mrs Schindler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e18
001-58978_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
eighteen-year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e19
001-58978_a8_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58978_a8_e20
001-58978_a8_em23
ORG
QUASI
Karlau Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e21
001-58978_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e22
001-58978_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
September 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58978_a8_e23
001-58978_a8_em26
ORG
QUASI
Stein Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e24
001-58978_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
8 May 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58978_a8_e25
001-58978_a8_em28
ORG
QUASI
Garsten Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e24
001-58978_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
8 May 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e23
001-58978_a8_em30
ORG
QUASI
Stein Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58978_a8_e25
001-58978_a8_em31
ORG
QUASI
Garsten Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e23
001-58978_a8_em32
ORG
QUASI
Stein Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58978_a8_e26
001-58978_a8_em33
ORG
QUASI
Steyr Regional Court (Landesgericht)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e25
001-58978_a8_em34
ORG
QUASI
Garsten Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58978_a8_e27
001-58978_a8_em35
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
5 km
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e28
001-58978_a8_em36
LOC
QUASI
Steyr
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58978_a8_e29
001-58978_a8_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
29 January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e30
001-58978_a8_em38
ORG
QUASI
Steyr Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e31
001-58978_a8_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e29
001-58978_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
29 January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58978_a8_e25
001-58978_a8_em41
ORG
QUASI
Garsten Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e32
001-58978_a8_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court's
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e29
001-58978_a8_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
29 January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e30
001-58978_a8_em44
ORG
QUASI
Steyr Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e25
001-58978_a8_em45
ORG
QUASI
Garsten Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58978_a8_e33
001-58978_a8_em46
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
25 sq. m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e34
001-58978_a8_em47
DATETIME
NO_MASK
8.30 a.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e35
001-58978_a8_em48
DATETIME
NO_MASK
thirty-five minutes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e31
001-58978_a8_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58978_a8_e36
001-58978_a8_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
ten months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e29
001-58978_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
29 January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e25
001-58978_a8_em52
ORG
QUASI
Garsten Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e32
001-58978_a8_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court's
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e37
001-58978_a8_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
5 July 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58978_a8_e38
001-58978_a8_em55
ORG
QUASI
Linz Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58978_a8_e39
001-58978_a8_em56
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
50 km
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e25
001-58978_a8_em57
ORG
QUASI
Garsten Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e40
001-58978_a8_em58
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-quarters of an hour
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e29
001-58978_a8_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
29 January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e29
001-58978_a8_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
29 January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e30
001-58978_a8_em61
ORG
QUASI
Steyr Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e32
001-58978_a8_em62
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court's
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58978_a8_e32
001-58978_a8_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court's
Oliver Riepan
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Oliver Riepan