PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission“) on 25 May 1992, within the three- month period laid down by Article 32 para. 1 and Article 47 (art. 32-1, art. 47) of the Convention. It originated in an application (no. 12914/87) against the French Republic lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) by a French national, Mr Pierre-André Melin, on 21 November 1986. The Commission’s request referred to Articles 44 and 48 (art. 44, art. 48) and to the declaration whereby France recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46) (art. 46). The object of the request was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under paragraph 1 of Article 6 taken in conjunction with paragraph 3 (b) and (c) thereof (art. 6-1, art. 6-3-b, art. 6-3-c).

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para. 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings. He also sought leave, as a former lawyer, to present his own case (Rule 30 para. 1). The President of the Court granted this request on 22 June 1992.

The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Mr L.-E. Pettiti, the elected judge of French nationality (Article 43 of the Convention) (art. 43), and Mr R. Ryssdal, the President of the Court (Rule 21 para. 3 (b)). On 29 May 1992, in the presence of the Registrar, the President drew by lot the names of the other seven members, namely Mr F. Gölcüklü, Mr R. Macdonald, Mr A.N. Loizou, Mr J.M. Morenilla, Mr A.B. Baka, Mr L. Wildhaber and Mr B. Repik (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 4) (art. 43). Subsequently, Mr S.K. Martens and Mr R. Pekkanen, substitute judges, replaced Mr Repik, whose term of office had come to an end on 1 January 1993 due to the dissolution of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic (Articles 38 and 65 para. 3 of the Convention and Rule 22 para. 1) (art. 38, art. 65-3), and Mr Macdonald, who was unable to take part in the further consideration of the case (Rules 22 para. 1 and 24 para. 1).

Mr Ryssdal assumed the office of President of the Chamber (Rule 21 para. 5) and, through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the French Government (“the Government“), the Delegate of the Commission and the applicant on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 37 para. 1 and 38). Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the applicant’s memorial on 2 November 1992 and the Government’s memorial on 20 November. On 4 January 1993 the Secretary to the Commission informed the Registrar that the Delegate would submit oral observations. On the same day the applicant lodged his claims under Article 50 (art. 50) of the Convention.

On 12 January 1993 the Commission produced the file on the proceedings before it, as requested by the Registrar on the President’s instructions.

In accordance with the President’s decision, the hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 25 January 1993. The Court had held a preparatory meeting beforehand. Mr R. Bernhardt, the Vice-President of the Court, replaced Mr Ryssdal, who was unable to take part in the further consideration of the case (Rule 21 para. 5, second sub-paragraph). There appeared before the Court:

for the Government Mr B. Gain, Head of the Human Rights Section, Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Agent, Mr P. Titiun, magistrat, on secondment to the Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mr J. Carrère, magistrat, on secondment to the Department of Criminal Affairs and Pardons, Ministry of Justice, Mr D. Caron, magistrat, legal officer at the Court of Cassation, Counsel;

for the Commission Mr J.-C. Soyer, Delegate;

the applicant. The Court heard addresses by Mr Gain for the Government, by Mr Soyer for the Commission and by the applicant.

AS TO THE FACTS

I. THE PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

Mr Pierre-André Melin, a French national, lives off private means and resides at Courbevoie (Hauts-de-Seine). He formerly practised as a lawyer.

On 6 May 1985 the Nanterre Criminal Court convicted him of fraud and sentenced him to a suspended term of sixteen months’ imprisonment, combined with an order (mise à l’épreuve) requiring him, inter alia, to compensate the victim for the damage which he had sustained.

The applicant appealed immediately to the Versailles Court of Appeal, which, giving judgment on 15 January 1986 in Mr Melin’s presence, upheld the lower court’s guilty verdict. On the other hand, it deferred pronouncement of sentence until 25 June 1986 as the accused had undertaken to reimburse the victim within six months if the court were to find him guilty. This aspect of the proceedings is not in issue. The typed text of the judgment was filed with the registry on the same day as its delivery.

Two days later Mr Melin lodged an appeal on points of law against the Court of Appeal’s judgment with the latter’s registry (Article 576 of the Code of Criminal Procedure). He stated that he reserved the right “to put forward any other relevant ground once he had received the certified copy of the decision in question“. According to the applicant, he requested a copy of the judgment on the same occasion. A registry official allegedly took down his address and the case references, so as to be able to send him one in return for a forty franc fiscal stamp. The Government maintain that there were two possibilities: either the applicant had not requested a copy and could not therefore be surprised at not receiving one; or he had in fact asked for one, in which case a copy had undoubtedly been sent to him.

On 14 February 1986 the appeal file reached the registry of the Court of Cassation. Three and a half months later, on 27 May, the Criminal Division dismissed the appeal because no grounds had been put forward and because the contested judgment did not disclose any procedural defect. This decision was notified to Mr Melin on 18 June and recorded that the party seeking damages had submitted a memorial.

In a letter of 23 June to the President of the Criminal Division, the applicant explained that he had been unable to submit a memorial because he had not had available to him the text of the judgment of 15 January 1986; in addition he complained that the judge-rapporteur had failed to communicate to him a time-limit for the submission of a memorial. On 4 July the Chief Registrar replied to him that, as the judgment of the Court of Cassation was final, he could not appeal against it.

Throughout these various proceedings Mr Melin had conducted his own defence, though he had been assisted by a lawyer at first instance.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e1
001-57833_a11_em1
DATETIME
QUASI
25 May 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e2
001-57833_a11_em2
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three- month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e3
001-57833_a11_em3
CODE
DIRECT
12914/87
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57833_a11_e4
001-57833_a11_em4
ORG
NO_MASK
French Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57833_a11_e5
001-57833_a11_em5
DEM
NO_MASK
French
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e6
001-57833_a11_em6
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Pierre-André Melin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e7
001-57833_a11_em7
DATETIME
QUASI
21 November 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e8
001-57833_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
France
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e9
001-57833_a11_em9
DEM
QUASI
lawyer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e10
001-57833_a11_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
22 June 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57833_a11_e11
001-57833_a11_em11
PERSON
QUASI
Mr L.-E. Pettiti
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e5
001-57833_a11_em12
DEM
NO_MASK
French
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e12
001-57833_a11_em13
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-57833_a11_em28
Mr R. Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e13
001-57833_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
29 May 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e14
001-57833_a11_em15
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr F. Gölcüklü
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e15
001-57833_a11_em16
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Macdonald
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e16
001-57833_a11_em17
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr A.N. Loizou
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e17
001-57833_a11_em18
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J.M. Morenilla
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e18
001-57833_a11_em19
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr A.B. Baka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e19
001-57833_a11_em20
PERSON
QUASI
Mr L. Wildhaber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e20
001-57833_a11_em21
PERSON
QUASI
Mr B. Repik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e21
001-57833_a11_em22
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr S.K. Martens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e22
001-57833_a11_em23
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Pekkanen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e20
001-57833_a11_em24
PERSON
QUASI
001-57833_a11_em21
Mr Repik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e23
001-57833_a11_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
1 January 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57833_a11_e24
001-57833_a11_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
Czech and Slovak Federal Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e15
001-57833_a11_em27
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-57833_a11_em16
Mr Macdonald
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e12
001-57833_a11_em28
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e5
001-57833_a11_em29
DEM
NO_MASK
French
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e25
001-57833_a11_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Delegate of the Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e26
001-57833_a11_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
2 November 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e27
001-57833_a11_em32
DATETIME
NO_MASK
20 November
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e28
001-57833_a11_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
4 January 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e29
001-57833_a11_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e30
001-57833_a11_em35
LOC
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e31
001-57833_a11_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
25 January 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e32
001-57833_a11_em37
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e12
001-57833_a11_em38
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e33
001-57833_a11_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr B. Gain
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e34
001-57833_a11_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Human Rights Section
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e35
001-57833_a11_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Department of Legal Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e36
001-57833_a11_em42
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr P. Titiun
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e35
001-57833_a11_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Department of Legal Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e37
001-57833_a11_em44
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. Carrère
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e38
001-57833_a11_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Department of Criminal Affairs and Pardons
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e39
001-57833_a11_em46
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr D. Caron
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e40
001-57833_a11_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e41
001-57833_a11_em48
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J.-C. Soyer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e33
001-57833_a11_em49
PERSON
QUASI
001-57833_a11_em39
Mr Gain
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e41
001-57833_a11_em50
PERSON
QUASI
001-57833_a11_em48
Mr Soyer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e6
001-57833_a11_em51
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Pierre-André Melin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e5
001-57833_a11_em52
DEM
NO_MASK
French
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57833_a11_e42
001-57833_a11_em53
LOC
QUASI
Courbevoie
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57833_a11_e43
001-57833_a11_em54
LOC
QUASI
Hauts-de-Seine
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57833_a11_e9
001-57833_a11_em55
DEM
QUASI
lawyer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e44
001-57833_a11_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
6 May 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e45
001-57833_a11_em57
ORG
QUASI
Nanterre Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e46
001-57833_a11_em58
DATETIME
NO_MASK
sixteen months’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e47
001-57833_a11_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Versailles Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e48
001-57833_a11_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e6
001-57833_a11_em61
PERSON
DIRECT
001-57833_a11_em6
Mr Melin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57833_a11_e49
001-57833_a11_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
25 June 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e50
001-57833_a11_em63
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e51
001-57833_a11_em64
DATETIME
NO_MASK
Two days later
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e6
001-57833_a11_em65
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Melin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e52
001-57833_a11_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e53
001-57833_a11_em67
QUANTITY
QUASI
forty franc
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e54
001-57833_a11_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
14 February 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e40
001-57833_a11_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e55
001-57833_a11_em70
DATETIME
NO_MASK
Three and a half months later
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e56
001-57833_a11_em71
DATETIME
NO_MASK
27 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e57
001-57833_a11_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
Criminal Division
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e6
001-57833_a11_em73
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Melin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e58
001-57833_a11_em74
DATETIME
NO_MASK
18 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e59
001-57833_a11_em75
DATETIME
NO_MASK
23 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e57
001-57833_a11_em76
ORG
NO_MASK
Criminal Division
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e48
001-57833_a11_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e60
001-57833_a11_em78
DATETIME
NO_MASK
4 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e40
001-57833_a11_em79
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e6
001-57833_a11_em80
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Melin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57833_a11_e9
001-57833_a11_em81
DEM
QUASI
lawyer
Pierre-André Melin
FRA
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Pierre-André Melin