PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 65436/01) against the French Republic lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a French national, Mr Albert Hénaf, (“the applicant”), on 13 November 2000.

The French Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R. Abraham, Director of Legal Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged that he had been subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention.

The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1.

On 1 November 2001 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed First Section (Rule 52 § 1).

By a decision of 24 January 2002 the Chamber declared the application admissible, while noting that the objections raised by the Government were inseparable from the examination of the merits.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant, who was born in 1925, is currently in prison in Nantes.

During the past few years he has been convicted of various criminal offences. In particular, he was sentenced on 9 November 1992 by the Assize Court for the département of Cher to ten years' imprisonment for armed robbery; on 2 September 1998 by the Bernay Criminal Court to six months' imprisonment for making off without payment; on 14 January 1999 by the Nevers Criminal Court to five years' imprisonment for armed robbery; and on 20 January 1999 by the Rouen Court of Appeal to six months' imprisonment for making off without payment. He was due for release from September 2001 onwards according to him, and from 17 February 2002 onwards according to the Government.

In February 1998 the applicant was also sentenced to six months' imprisonment by the Nevers Criminal Court for failing to return to prison on time after his last period of leave in 1998, having complied with the arrangements on the previous four occasions. The experts who examined him on the subject concluded that “at the material time” he had been suffering from a “psychological disorder” that had temporarily “impaired his judgment” and that prison could not be “therapeutic” for him, especially in view of his advanced age.

The applicant subsequently underwent a medical examination in prison and was found to have swollen glands in the throat area. The relevant service accordingly prescribed medical treatment. It was decided that the applicant would undergo an operation on 8 November 2000 after being taken to hospital on 7 November 2000 at 2.30 p.m.

On 6 November 2000 the governor of Eysses Prison informed the prefect that the prisoner needed to be taken to hospital and requested the presence of a police escort to supervise and guard him throughout his stay. As regards the security risk, the prison staff were issued with instructions that the applicant was to be kept under normal and not heightened supervision, left to the discretion of the senior escorting officer but in principle not requiring the permanent use of handcuffs and restraints.

On 7 November 2000, the day before the operation, the applicant was transferred, in handcuffs, to Pellegrin Hospital in Bordeaux in a prison van. Two police officers were waiting for him at the hospital in order to supervise and guard him throughout his time there. For the rest of the day the applicant remained handcuffed but not shackled.

During the night, a restraint was used on the applicant, consisting of a chain attaching one of his ankles to the bedpost. The Government assert that the restraint left him considerable freedom to move about in the bed, whereas the applicant maintains that the tension of the chain made any movement difficult or painful and sleep impossible.

On 8 November 2000, in the morning, the applicant stated that, if he could not be kept in humane conditions in hospital, he would prefer to be operated on once he had been released from prison. After a meeting with the hospital staff, he returned to prison on the same day at 11.45 a.m.

On 9 November 2000 the applicant lodged a criminal complaint, together with an application to join the proceedings as a civil party, with the senior investigating judge at the Agen tribunal de grande instance, alleging “serious ill-treatment”, “assault” and “torture”. In the complaint, lodged against the two police officers who had guarded him while he was in hospital, he alleged a violation of Article 803 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and of Article 3 of the Convention, on account of the use of a restraint during the night of 7 to 8 November 2000.

In an order of 16 November 2000, served on 24 November, the senior investigating judge set the amount of the security payable for costs at 6,000 French francs.

On 24 November 2000 the applicant appealed against that order in a registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt to the senior registrar of the Agen tribunal de grande instance, and also applied to the legal aid office on account of his limited resources. On the same day, he informed the senior investigating judge that he was appealing because his means were insufficient.

The application for legal aid was registered on 8 December and refused on 15 December 2000. In an order of 23 March 2001 the President of the Agen tribunal de grande instance confirmed the refusal on the following ground: “The Code of Criminal Procedure expressly reserves the use of restraints for persons who are likely to attempt to abscond. That is so in the case of a prisoner who is outside the prison compound.”

In an order of 15 May 2001, the senior investigating judge declared the applicant's complaint inadmissible for failure to pay the security.

In the meantime, on 4 April 2001, the Investigation Division of the Agen Court of Appeal had declared the appeal against the order for payment of a security inadmissible for failure to comply with Article 503 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by which an appeal by a prisoner must be lodged through the prison governor.

On 11 April 2001 the applicant appealed on points of law against that judgment. The proceedings are currently pending before the Court of Cassation.

Having been released on 1 October 2001 after completing his sentence, the applicant has subsequently been imprisoned in the context of separate proceedings.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e1
001-61480_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
65436/01
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61480_a11_e2
001-61480_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
French Republic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61480_a11_e3
001-61480_a11_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
French
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e4
001-61480_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Albert Hénaf
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e5
001-61480_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
13 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61480_a11_e6
001-61480_a11_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
French Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e7
001-61480_a11_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr R. Abraham
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e8
001-61480_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Legal Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e9
001-61480_a11_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
1 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e10
001-61480_a11_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
24 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e11
001-61480_a11_em11
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1925
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e12
001-61480_a11_em12
LOC
QUASI
Nantes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e13
001-61480_a11_em13
DATETIME
NO_MASK
past few years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e14
001-61480_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e15
001-61480_a11_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61480_a11_e16
001-61480_a11_em16
ORG
QUASI
département of Cher
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61480_a11_e17
001-61480_a11_em17
DATETIME
NO_MASK
ten years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e18
001-61480_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
2 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e19
001-61480_a11_em19
ORG
QUASI
Bernay Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61480_a11_e20
001-61480_a11_em20
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e21
001-61480_a11_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e22
001-61480_a11_em22
ORG
QUASI
Nevers Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61480_a11_e23
001-61480_a11_em23
DATETIME
NO_MASK
five years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e24
001-61480_a11_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e25
001-61480_a11_em25
ORG
QUASI
Rouen Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e20
001-61480_a11_em26
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e26
001-61480_a11_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e27
001-61480_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
17 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e28
001-61480_a11_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
February 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e20
001-61480_a11_em30
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e22
001-61480_a11_em31
ORG
QUASI
Nevers Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e29
001-61480_a11_em32
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e30
001-61480_a11_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e31
001-61480_a11_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e32
001-61480_a11_em35
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2.30 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e33
001-61480_a11_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61480_a11_e34
001-61480_a11_em37
ORG
QUASI
Eysses Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e31
001-61480_a11_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e35
001-61480_a11_em39
ORG
QUASI
Pellegrin Hospital
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e36
001-61480_a11_em40
LOC
QUASI
Bordeaux
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e30
001-61480_a11_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e37
001-61480_a11_em42
DATETIME
NO_MASK
11.45 a.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e38
001-61480_a11_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61480_a11_e39
001-61480_a11_em44
ORG
QUASI
Agen tribunal de grande
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e40
001-61480_a11_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
16 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e41
001-61480_a11_em46
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24 November
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e42
001-61480_a11_em47
QUANTITY
QUASI
6,000 French francs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e43
001-61480_a11_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e39
001-61480_a11_em49
ORG
QUASI
Agen tribunal de grande
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e44
001-61480_a11_em50
DATETIME
NO_MASK
8 December
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e45
001-61480_a11_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
15 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e46
001-61480_a11_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
23 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e39
001-61480_a11_em53
ORG
QUASI
Agen tribunal de grande
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e47
001-61480_a11_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e48
001-61480_a11_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
4 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e49
001-61480_a11_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
Investigation Division of the Agen Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e50
001-61480_a11_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
11 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e51
001-61480_a11_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61480_a11_e52
001-61480_a11_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
1 October 2001
Albert Hénaf
FRA
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Albert Hénaf