PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 42914/98) against the Kingdom of Belgium lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Belgian national, Mr Wim Capeau (“the applicant”), on 29 May 1998.

The applicant was represented by Mr N. van Overloop, a lawyer practising in Ghent. The Belgian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr C. Debrulle, Director-General, Federal Justice Department.

The applicant complained of a violation of Articles 5 § 1 (c), 6 § 2 and 14 of the Convention, contending that the statutory requirement to establish his innocence by adducing factual evidence or submitting legal argument to that effect was incompatible with the presumption of innocence.

The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11).

The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1.

By a decision of 6 April 2004, the Chamber declared the application partly admissible.

The Government filed observations on the merits of the case (Rule 59 § 1). The applicant did not submit any observations within the time allowed.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1967 and lives in Ghent.

On 29 March 1994 he was arrested in connection with an investigation concerning a case of arson committed on 25 May 1993.

On 1 April 1994 the Committals Division of the Ghent Criminal Court refused to extend the validity of the arrest warrant. On appeal, the Indictment Division of the Ghent Court of Appeal overturned that decision and prolonged the applicant's pre-trial detention.

On 21 April 1994 the investigating judge rescinded the warrant concerned.

On 29 June 1994 and 2 June 1995 respectively the Committals Division and the Indictment Division, ruling on the action to be taken on the basis of the investigation to date, held that there was insufficient evidence to commit the applicant for trial and discontinued the proceedings.

On 25 October 1996 the applicant claimed compensation for unwarranted pre-trial detention, relying on the Law of 13 March 1973 (see “Relevant domestic law” below).

On 12 May 1997 the Minister of Justice refused the applicant's claim on the ground that he had not “established his innocence by adducing factual evidence or submitting legal argument to that effect”, as required by section 28(1)(b) of the Law of 1973. That requirement was justified, according to the Minister, in the case of an order or judgment discontinuing criminal proceedings, given that a discontinuation decision was not a bar to the reopening of the case if new information or evidence were to come to light.

On 4 July 1997 the applicant contested the Minister's decision by means of an application to the Unwarranted Pre-trial Detention Appeals Board.

On 1 December 1997 the applicant appeared before the Appeals Board, which upheld the refusal of his claim by a decision taken on the same day and served on the applicant on 29 March 1998. It noted that the grounds for presuming the guilt of the applicant, who had always denied committing the offence he stood accused of when appearing before the courts investigating the charge, had been held to be insufficient to justify committing him for trial. It observed that, although the applicant had announced his intention of submitting a pleading setting out the evidence in the file which “amply” proved his innocence, he had not done so and had not replied to the Government's submissions. Consequently, the Appeals Board found that he had not proved his innocence as the law required (dat verzoeker derhalve het bij de wet van hem vereiste bewijs van onschuld niet bijbrengt).
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-67961_a11_e1
001-67961_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
42914/98
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-67961_a11_e2
001-67961_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Kingdom of Belgium
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e3
001-67961_a11_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Belgian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e4
001-67961_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Wim Capeau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e5
001-67961_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
29 May 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e6
001-67961_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr N. van Overloop
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e7
001-67961_a11_em7
LOC
QUASI
Ghent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e2
001-67961_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-67961_a11_em2
Belgian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e8
001-67961_a11_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C. Debrulle
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e9
001-67961_a11_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Justice Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e10
001-67961_a11_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e11
001-67961_a11_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
6 April 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e12
001-67961_a11_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1967
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e7
001-67961_a11_em14
LOC
QUASI
Ghent
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e13
001-67961_a11_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
29 March 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e14
001-67961_a11_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
25 May 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e15
001-67961_a11_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
1 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e16
001-67961_a11_em18
ORG
QUASI
Committals Division of the Ghent Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e17
001-67961_a11_em19
ORG
QUASI
Indictment Division of the Ghent Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e18
001-67961_a11_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
21 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e19
001-67961_a11_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
29 June 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e20
001-67961_a11_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
2 June 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e21
001-67961_a11_em23
ORG
NO_MASK
Committals Division
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e22
001-67961_a11_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Indictment Division
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e23
001-67961_a11_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
25 October 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e24
001-67961_a11_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
12 May 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e25
001-67961_a11_em27
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e26
001-67961_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
4 July 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e27
001-67961_a11_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
Detention Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e28
001-67961_a11_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
1 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e27
001-67961_a11_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
001-67961_a11_em29
Appeals Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e29
001-67961_a11_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
29 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-67961_a11_e27
001-67961_a11_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Board
Wim Capeau
BEL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Wim Capeau