PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 7971/07) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Ms Bahar Leventoğlu Abdulkadiroğlu (“the applicant”), on 8 February 2007.

The applicant was represented by Mr B. Balpazarı, a lawyer practising in İzmir. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that the refusal by the domestic courts to allow her to bear only her maiden name unjustifiably interfered with her right to respect for her private life under Article 8 of the Convention. She claimed that the fact that Turkish law allowed married men but not married women to bear their own surname after marriage constituted discrimination on grounds of sex and was incompatible with Article 14 of the Convention.

On 22 October 2010 the application was communicated to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1972 and lives in İzmir.

Following her marriage to Atila Abdulkadiroğlu on 6 July 1996, the applicant, whose surname was “Leventoğlu” prior to her marriage, had to take her husband’s surname pursuant to Article 153 of the Turkish Civil Code. As she was known by her maiden name in her academic and professional life, she continued to use it; however, she could not use it in any official documents.

An amendment to Article 153 of the Civil Code on 14 May 1997 meant that married women acquired the right to put their maiden name in front of their husband’s surname. The applicant preferred not to make use of that option because, in her view, the amendment in question did not satisfy her request, which was to use her maiden name on its own.

Following the enactment of the new Civil Code on 22 November 2001, Article 187 was worded identically to the former Article 153 (see “Relevant domestic law and practice” below).

On 26 September 2005 the applicant brought proceedings before the İzmir Court of First Instance seeking permission to use only her maiden name, Leventoğlu.

On 6 December 2005 the court dismissed the applicant’s request on the grounds that, pursuant to Article 187 of the Civil Code, married women had to bear their husband’s name throughout their marriage and were not permitted to use their maiden name alone.

The applicant appealed against that judgment and on 21 March 2006 it was upheld by the Court of Cassation. A request by the applicant for the proceedings in her case to be reopened was further rejected by the same court on 14 July 2006. That decision was served on the applicant on 11 August 2006.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e1
001-119957_a10_em1
CODE
DIRECT
7971/07
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-119957_a10_e2
001-119957_a10_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e3
001-119957_a10_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e4
001-119957_a10_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Bahar Leventoğlu Abdulkadiroğlu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e5
001-119957_a10_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
8 February 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e6
001-119957_a10_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr B. Balpazarı
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-119957_a10_e7
001-119957_a10_em7
LOC
QUASI
İzmir
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e2
001-119957_a10_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-119957_a10_em2
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e8
001-119957_a10_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
22 October 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e9
001-119957_a10_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1972
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e7
001-119957_a10_em11
LOC
QUASI
İzmir
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e10
001-119957_a10_em12
PERSON
DIRECT
Atila Abdulkadiroğlu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e11
001-119957_a10_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
6 July 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-119957_a10_e4
001-119957_a10_em14
PERSON
DIRECT
001-119957_a10_em4
Leventoğlu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e12
001-119957_a10_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
14 May 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e13
001-119957_a10_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-119957_a10_e14
001-119957_a10_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
26 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-119957_a10_e15
001-119957_a10_em18
ORG
QUASI
İzmir Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-119957_a10_e4
001-119957_a10_em19
PERSON
DIRECT
Leventoğlu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e16
001-119957_a10_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
6 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e17
001-119957_a10_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e18
001-119957_a10_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e19
001-119957_a10_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-119957_a10_e20
001-119957_a10_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
11 August 2006
Bahar Leventoğlu Abdulkadiroğlu
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Bahar Leventoğlu Abdulkadiroğlu