PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 822/05) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Ms Barbara Poznańska (“the applicant”), on 26 December 2004.

The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 25 September 2007 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1943 and lives in Katowice.

A. First set of proceedings for payment

1. Main proceedings

On 5 January 1993 the applicant filed with the Katowice Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) a claim for payment of maintenance contributions made between 1987 and 1993 for property located in Katowice, at Stawowa Street.

On 23 August 1993 the court held a hearing. The applicant was ordered to specify her claim.

On 23 March 1994 the applicant was urged to specify her claim. On 9 April 1994 the applicant complied with the court’s order.

On 8 June, 21 September and 30 November 1994 the court held hearings, one of which was adjourned on the applicant’s motion.

On 7 June 1995 the proceedings were stayed at the parties’ request.

On 11 November 1997 the applicant lodged an application for resumption of the proceedings. They were resumed after thirteen months – on 16 December 1998.

On 25 August 2000 the Katowice Regional Court stayed the proceedings pending the completion of civil proceedings for the annulment of a donation contract. The applicant’s appeal against this decision was rejected by the Katowice Court of Appeal on 10 January 2002, following the dismissal of her application for exemption from court fees.

On 2 March 2004 the applicant lodged an application to resume the proceedings, to no avail.

On 9 May 2006 the applicant, following the defendant’s death, withdrew her claim.

On 15 May 2006 the Katowice Regional Court resumed the proceedings.

On 31 August 2006 the proceedings were discontinued.

2. The applicant’s complaint under the 2004 Act

On 28 July 2005 the applicant lodged with the Katowice Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny) a complaint under section 5 of the Law of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (Ustawa o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki) (“the 2004 Act”) which entered into force on 17 September 2004.

The applicant sought a ruling declaring that the length of the proceedings before the Katowice Regional Court had been excessive and an award of just satisfaction in the amount of 10,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 2,500 euros (EUR)).

On 24 August 2005 the Katowice Court of Appeal dismissed her complaint. It observed that the provisions of the 2004 Act could be applied only to proceedings pending after 17 September 2004, that is, the date of the entry into force of the 2004 Act. As the main proceedings had been stayed in 2000, the case – in the opinion of that court – was not pending within the meaning of the 2004 Act.

B. Second set of proceedings for payment

1. Main proceedings

On 9 December 1996 the applicant lodged with the Katowice Regional Court a claim for payment of maintenance contributions made between 1993 and 1995 for property located in Katowice, at Stawowa Street, together with a request for exemption from court fees.

On 21 April 1997 the court dismissed the applicant’s request. She appealed against this decision.

On 11 August 1997 the Katowice Court of Appeal dismissed her appeal.

On 10 January 1999 the defendant lodged a counterclaim against the applicant, together with a request for exemption from court fees.

On 12 October 2000 the court, after having examined several requests for exemption from court fees, returned the counterclaim.

On 28 March, 9 May, 4 June and 30 July 2001 the court held hearings. Five witnesses gave evidence and the court ordered that an expert report be obtained.

On 13 February 2003 the Katowice Regional Court stayed the proceedings pending the completion of the proceedings for the annulment of a donation contract. The defendant’s appeal was rejected on 24 November 2003.

On 2 March 2004 the applicant lodged an application to resume the proceedings, to no avail.

On 12 June 2006 the court resumed the proceedings.

On 14 June 2006 the proceedings were discontinued due to the defendant’s death.

2. The applicant’s complaint under the 2004 Act

On 28 July 2005 the applicant lodged with the Katowice Court of Appeal a complaint under section 5 of the 2004 Act. She sought a ruling declaring that the length of the proceedings before the Katowice Regional Court had been excessive and an award of just satisfaction in the amount of PLN 10,000 (approx. EUR 2,500).

On 12 August 2005 the Katowice Court of Appeal dismissed her complaint. It observed that the provisions of the 2004 Act could be applied only to proceedings pending after 17 September 2004, that is, the date of the entry into force of the 2004 Act. As the main proceedings had been stayed in 2003, the case – in the opinion of that court – was not pending within the meaning of the 2004 Act.

C. Third set of proceedings for payment

1. Main proceedings

At the hearing held on 29 May 2003 in the civil proceedings for compensation, the applicant extended her claim. It was registered on 30 May 2003 by the Katowice Regional Court as a new case.

On the same date the Katowice Regional Court requested that the applicant’s lawyer comply with the procedural requirements in respect of lodging such a new claim and pay a court fee. An appeal against the decision was allowed by the Katowice Regional Court.

Between 1 August 2003 (when the Katowice Regional Court again requested the applicant’s lawyer to fulfil the procedural requirements for the statement of claim) and 2 September 2005 (when the Katowice Court of Appeal examined her complaint under section 5 of the 2004 Act), the proceedings focused exclusively on an examination of procedural issues, raised by the applicant and/or her lawyer (namely, whether the exemption from court fees and the authorisation of a legal-aid lawyer granted to the applicant in another set of civil proceedings was ex lege extended for the proceedings).

In particular, on 14 September 2004 the applicant’s lawyer lodged with the Katowice Regional Court an appeal against a decision of that court given on 30 August 2004. The case file was transferred to the Katowice Court of Appeal by virtue of a decision of 1 October 2004. It was sent back to the Katowice Regional Court on 9 November 2004 in order to comply with procedural requirements. That instruction was completed by the Katowice Regional Court on 25 January 2005.

On 30 March 2005 the case file was again sent back to the Katowice Court of Appeal, which on 10 May 2005 quashed the decision of 30 August 2004.

After the return of the case file on 7 June 2005 to the Katowice Regional Court, no action was taken until 28 July 2005 – the date on which the applicant lodged the length complaint.

On 13 March 2006, due to the defendant’s death, the court stayed the proceedings.

On 27 July 2006 the court discontinued the proceedings.

2. The applicant’s complaint under the 2004 Act

On 28 July 2005 the applicant lodged with the Katowice Court of Appeal a complaint under section 5 of the 2004 Act. The applicant sought a ruling declaring that the length of the proceedings before the Katowice Regional Court had been excessive and an award of just satisfaction in the amount of PLN 10,000 (approx. EUR 2,500).

On 2 September 2005 the Katowice Court of Appeal partly allowed her length complaint and confirmed that the proceedings had indeed been protracted between 9 November 2004 and 25 January 2005 and between 7 June 2005 and 28 July 2005. However, the court did not award the applicant any just satisfaction under the 2004 Act. It explained that the legal conditions for granting just satisfaction had not been satisfied, as the case had not reached the lis pendens stage.

D. Proceedings for the annulment of a donation contract

1. Main proceedings

On an unknown date in 1992, the applicant’s mother lodged with the Katowice Regional Court a claim for the annulment of a 1990 donation contract in respect of property located in Katowice, at Stawowa Street. It seems that the mother, who had been suffering from atherosclerosis, was represented by the applicant.

During the proceedings several psychiatric opinions concerning the mother’s state of health were obtained.

On 13 July 1995 the Katowice Regional Court gave judgment and declared the donation contract null and void.

The first-instance judgment was quashed by the Katowice Court of Appeal on 24 October 1996.

On 20 February 2003 the Katowice Regional Court again annulled the donation contract.

On an unspecified date the judgment was challenged by the other party to the proceedings.

On 2 March 2003 the applicant’s mother died. The proceedings have been stayed since that time pending termination of the inheritance proceedings.

2. The applicant’s complaint under the 2004 Act

On 28 June 2005 the applicant lodged with the Katowice Court of Appeal a complaint under section 5 of the 2004 Act. The applicant sought a ruling declaring that the length of the proceedings before the Katowice Regional Court had been excessive and an award of just satisfaction in the amount of 10,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 2,500 euros (EUR)).

On 1 July 2005 the Katowice Court of Appeal rejected her complaint on the procedural ground that the applicant was not a party to the proceedings for the annulment of the donation contract. The court relied on section 3 of the 2004 Act, according to which only a party to the proceedings is entitled to lodge a complaint under the 2004 Act. Given that relevant inheritance proceedings were still pending, the applicant could not be recognised as a formal heir of her mother and could not act as a successor party in the proceedings for the annulment of the contract.

E. Proceedings for compensation

1. Main proceedings

On 1 July 1999 the applicant lodged with the Katowice Regional Court a claim for compensation.

On 15 September 1999 a defendant lodged a counterclaim against the applicant.

The first hearing was scheduled for 16 September 1999.

In the course of hearings held on 9 November 2001 and 11 January 2002 the Katowice Regional Court heard evidence from eight witnesses.

On 29 May 2003 the applicant extended her claim. It was registered on 30 May 2003 by the Katowice Regional Court as a new case (see paragraph 31 above).

On 30 April 2004 the Katowice Regional Court ordered compensation in the amount of PLN 2,000 (approximately EUR 500) to be paid to the applicant.

On 17 February 2005 the Katowice Court of Appeal increased the amount of compensation to PLN 7,000 (approximately EUR 1,750).

A cassation appeal was not lodged.

2. The applicant’s complaint under the 2004 Act

On 28 July 2005 the applicant lodged with the Katowice Court of Appeal a complaint under section 5 of the 2004 Act. The applicant sought a ruling declaring that the length of the proceedings before the Katowice Regional Court had been excessive and an award of just satisfaction in the amount of 10,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 2,500 euros (EUR)).

On 1 July 2005 the Katowice Court of Appeal rejected her complaint on a procedural ground, as it had been lodged after the termination of the proceedings. The court relied on section 5 of the 2004 Act, according to which a length complaint could only be lodged during the proceedings.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e1
001-90285_a3_em1
CODE
DIRECT
822/05
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90285_a3_e2
001-90285_a3_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e3
001-90285_a3_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e4
001-90285_a3_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Barbara Poznańska
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e5
001-90285_a3_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
26 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e6
001-90285_a3_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e7
001-90285_a3_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e8
001-90285_a3_em8
DATETIME
QUASI
25 September 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e9
001-90285_a3_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
1943
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e10
001-90285_a3_em10
LOC
QUASI
Katowice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e11
001-90285_a3_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
5 January 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em12
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e13
001-90285_a3_em13
MISC
NO_MASK
maintenance contributions
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e14
001-90285_a3_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e15
001-90285_a3_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e10
001-90285_a3_em16
LOC
QUASI
Katowice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e16
001-90285_a3_em17
LOC
QUASI
Stawowa Street
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e17
001-90285_a3_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
23 August 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e18
001-90285_a3_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
23 March 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e19
001-90285_a3_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
9 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e20
001-90285_a3_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
8 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e21
001-90285_a3_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
21 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e22
001-90285_a3_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
30 November 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e23
001-90285_a3_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
7 June 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e24
001-90285_a3_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
11 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e25
001-90285_a3_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
thirteen months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e26
001-90285_a3_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
16 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e27
001-90285_a3_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
25 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em29
ORG
QUASI
001-90285_a3_em12
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em30
ORG
QUASI
001-90285_a3_em38
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e29
001-90285_a3_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
10 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e30
001-90285_a3_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e31
001-90285_a3_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
9 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e32
001-90285_a3_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em35
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e33
001-90285_a3_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
31 August 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e34
001-90285_a3_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
28 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em38
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e35
001-90285_a3_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
17 September 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em40
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e36
001-90285_a3_em41
QUANTITY
QUASI
10,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 2,500 euros (EUR))
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e37
001-90285_a3_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
24 August 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em43
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e35
001-90285_a3_em44
DATETIME
NO_MASK
17 September 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e38
001-90285_a3_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e39
001-90285_a3_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
9 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em47
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e13
001-90285_a3_em48
MISC
NO_MASK
maintenance contributions
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e15
001-90285_a3_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e40
001-90285_a3_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e10
001-90285_a3_em51
LOC
QUASI
Katowice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e16
001-90285_a3_em52
LOC
QUASI
Stawowa Street
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e41
001-90285_a3_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
21 April 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e42
001-90285_a3_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
11 August 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em55
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e43
001-90285_a3_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
10 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e44
001-90285_a3_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e45
001-90285_a3_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e46
001-90285_a3_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
9 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e47
001-90285_a3_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
4 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e48
001-90285_a3_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
30 July 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e49
001-90285_a3_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
13 February 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em63
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e50
001-90285_a3_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e30
001-90285_a3_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e51
001-90285_a3_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
12 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e52
001-90285_a3_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
14 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e34
001-90285_a3_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
28 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em69
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em70
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e53
001-90285_a3_em71
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 10,000 (approx. EUR 2,500)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e54
001-90285_a3_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
12 August 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em73
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90285_a3_e35
001-90285_a3_em74
DATETIME
NO_MASK
17 September 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e55
001-90285_a3_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e56
001-90285_a3_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
29 May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e57
001-90285_a3_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em78
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em79
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em80
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e58
001-90285_a3_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
1 August 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em82
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e59
001-90285_a3_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
2 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em84
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e60
001-90285_a3_em85
DATETIME
QUASI
14 September 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em86
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e61
001-90285_a3_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
30 August 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em88
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e62
001-90285_a3_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
1 October 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em90
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e63
001-90285_a3_em91
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em92
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e64
001-90285_a3_em93
DATETIME
QUASI
25 January 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e65
001-90285_a3_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
30 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em95
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e66
001-90285_a3_em96
DATETIME
QUASI
10 May 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e61
001-90285_a3_em97
DATETIME
QUASI
30 August 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e67
001-90285_a3_em98
DATETIME
QUASI
7 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em99
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e34
001-90285_a3_em100
DATETIME
QUASI
28 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e68
001-90285_a3_em101
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e69
001-90285_a3_em102
DATETIME
QUASI
27 July 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e34
001-90285_a3_em103
DATETIME
QUASI
28 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em104
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em105
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90285_a3_e53
001-90285_a3_em106
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 10,000 (approx. EUR 2,500)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e59
001-90285_a3_em107
DATETIME
QUASI
2 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em108
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e63
001-90285_a3_em109
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e64
001-90285_a3_em110
DATETIME
QUASI
25 January 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e67
001-90285_a3_em111
DATETIME
QUASI
7 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e34
001-90285_a3_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
28 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e70
001-90285_a3_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em114
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e71
001-90285_a3_em115
DATETIME
QUASI
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e10
001-90285_a3_em116
LOC
QUASI
Katowice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e16
001-90285_a3_em117
LOC
QUASI
Stawowa Street
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e72
001-90285_a3_em118
DATETIME
QUASI
13 July 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em119
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em120
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e73
001-90285_a3_em121
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e74
001-90285_a3_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
20 February 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em123
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e75
001-90285_a3_em124
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e76
001-90285_a3_em125
DATETIME
QUASI
28 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em126
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em127
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e36
001-90285_a3_em128
QUANTITY
QUASI
10,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 2,500 euros (EUR))
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e77
001-90285_a3_em129
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em130
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e78
001-90285_a3_em131
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em132
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e79
001-90285_a3_em133
DATETIME
QUASI
15 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e80
001-90285_a3_em134
DATETIME
QUASI
16 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e81
001-90285_a3_em135
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e82
001-90285_a3_em136
DATETIME
QUASI
11 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em137
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e56
001-90285_a3_em138
DATETIME
QUASI
29 May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e57
001-90285_a3_em139
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em140
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e83
001-90285_a3_em141
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em142
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e84
001-90285_a3_em143
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 2,000 (approximately EUR 500)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e85
001-90285_a3_em144
DATETIME
QUASI
17 February 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em145
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90285_a3_e86
001-90285_a3_em146
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 7,000 (approximately EUR 1,750
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e34
001-90285_a3_em147
DATETIME
QUASI
28 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em148
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e12
001-90285_a3_em149
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e36
001-90285_a3_em150
QUANTITY
QUASI
10,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 2,500 euros (EUR))
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e77
001-90285_a3_em151
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90285_a3_e28
001-90285_a3_em152
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
Barbara Poznańska
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Barbara Poznańska