PROCEDURE

The case originated in two applications (nos. 35109/06 and 38112/06) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Austrian nationals, Mr Jochen Penias and Mr Walter Ortmair (“the applicants”), on 8 August 2006 and on 21 August 2006 respectively.

The applicants were represented by Mr J. Postlmayr, a lawyer practising in Mattighofen. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs.

The applicants alleged in particular that the quashing of their convictions by the Independent Administrative Panel upon an official complaint by the relevant Federal Minister violated Article 6 of the Convention and Article 4 of Protocol No. 7. They also complained under Articles 6 and 13 about the length of the proceedings and lack of an effective remedy in that respect.

On 18 June 2007 and 28 August 2008 respectively, the President of the First Section decided to give notice of the applications to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the applications at the same time (Article 29 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The first applicant was born in 1979 and lives in St Peter am Hart. The second applicant was born in 1955 and lives in Maria Schmolln.

A. Mr Penias (application no. 35109/06)

On 14 February 2002 the Braunau District Administrative Authority (Bezirkshauptmannschaft) informed the applicant that he was suspected of having driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol contrary to sections 5(1) and 99(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act (Strassenverkehrsordnung) on 10 February 2002. The breathalyser test had shown an alcohol level of 0.63 mg/l in his breath.

In his submissions of 1 March 2002 the applicant argued that allowance should be made for 5% inaccuracy in the result of the breathalyser test. This would lead to an established alcohol level of less than 0.60 mg/l and his conduct would therefore constitute a less serious offence under Sections 5(1) and 99(1)(b) of the Road Traffic Act.

On 8 April 2002 the Braunau District Administrative Authority found the applicant guilty of the offence of drunk driving under sections 5(1) and 99(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act, which provides for a fine of between 872 and 4,360 euros (EUR). It imposed a fine of EUR 1,162 on him with seventeen days’ imprisonment in the event of default. Having regard to the evidence before it, the District Authority noted that the breathalyser at issue had been duly checked by the Office of Weights and Measurements (Bundesamt für Eich-und Vermessungswesen) and the test had been carried out correctly. Referring to the Administrative Court’s case-law, it noted that in such circumstances there was no need to make any allowance for inaccuracy.

The applicant appealed, repeating his argument as regards the alleged imprecision of the breathalyser test.

After holding a hearing, the Upper Austria Independent Administrative Panel (Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat) allowed the applicant’s appeal in part. In its decision of 17 June 2002 it found that an alcohol level in the applicant’s breath of 0.59 mg/l could be considered to have been confirmed, since allowance had to be made for a possible inaccuracy in the result of the breathalyser test. Consequently, it convicted the applicant under sections 5(1) and 99(1)(b) of the Road Traffic Act, which provides for a fine of between EUR 581 and EUR 3,633, and reduced the fine to EUR 1,000 with fourteen days’ imprisonment in the event of default.

The Independent Administrative Panel considered that the question about possible inaccuracy of the breathalyser test was not a matter of law but a matter of fact. There was documentary evidence, and also evidence from an expert on weights and measurements, that for this particular type of breathalyser 5% inaccuracy could not be ruled out.

The decision was served on the applicant on 24 July 2002. He did not lodge a complaint with the Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof) or the Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) within the statutory six-week time-limit. There was no other party to the proceedings who could lodge a complaint.

On 7 August 2002 the Independent Administrative Panel’s decision of 17 June 2002 was served on the Federal Minister for Traffic, Innovation and Technology.

On 18 September 2002 the Federal Minister for Traffic, Innovation and Technology lodged an official complaint (Amtsbeschwerde) under Article 131 (1) subparagraph (2) of the Federal Constitution (Bundes‑Verfassungsgesetz) against that decision, on the ground that it contained an error of law. According to the Administrative Court’s case-law the authority was obliged to base its finding in respect of the blood alcohol level of the accused on the result of the breathalyser test. In the present case, the breathalyser had been duly examined by the Office for Weights and Measurements and no doubts had been raised as to its correct functioning.

On 18 February 2005 the Administrative Court, following the official complaint, quashed the Independent Administrative Panel’s decision of 17 June 2002 and referred the case back to it. It found that the decision had applied the law incorrectly, since there was no ground to make allowance for inaccuracy in the breathalyser test.

In his submissions of 15 March 2005 the applicant asserted that it would violate the requirements of a fair trial if the quashing of the Independent Administrative Panel’s decision following the Federal Minister’s official complaint had any negative consequences for him.

On 21 March 2005 the Independent Administrative Panel, noting that it was bound by the Administrative Court’s legal view, dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the Braunau District Authority’s decision of 8 April 2002. Consequently, his conviction under section 99(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act was upheld.

As regards the sentence, the Independent Administrative Panel noted that section 99(1)(a) provided for a fine of between EUR 872 and EUR 4,360. It found that the minimum fine of EUR 872 with ten days’ imprisonment in the event of default was appropriate. It noted that the applicant had no prior convictions, and also had regard to the Constitutional Court’s case-law, according to which unreasonably lengthy proceedings could lead to a reduction of the sentence.

The applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court, claiming several violations of Article 6 of the Convention. He submitted, in particular, that the proceedings had been unreasonably lengthy and that he had no remedy in this respect; that the Administrative Court and subsequently the Independent Administrative Panel had disregarded the expert opinion and documentary evidence on the reliability of the breathalyser test and that his conviction had thus been based on a mere presumption.

Moreover, the applicant alleged that the proceedings were unfair, and violated the ne bis in idem principle, since the proceedings had been reopened following the Federal Minister’s official complaint, although the Independent Administrative Panel’s decision had already become final. However the reopening was not justified by any of the reasons mentioned in Article 4 § 2 of Protocol No. 7, and the new proceedings had produced a result which was unfavourable to him.

The applicant also complained that he did not have a review by a higher tribunal as required by Article 2 of Protocol No. 7, since the scope of the Administrative Court review was limited. Finally, relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, he complained that the fixing of sentences in administrative criminal law did not take offenders’ financial situations into account.

On 13 June 2005 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s complaint for lack of prospects of success. On a request by the applicant on 21 July 2005 it transferred the case to the Administrative Court.

On 23 May 2006 the Administrative Court dismissed the applicant’s complaint as being unfounded. This decision was served on the applicant’s counsel on 21 June 2006.

B. Mr Ortmair (application no. 38112/06)

On 1 December 2001 the applicant was stopped by a traffic patrol and asked to undergo a breathalyser test. The test showed an alcohol level of 0.60 mg/l in his breath.

On 5 December 2001 the Braunau District Administrative Authority informed the applicant that he was suspected of the offence of driving under the influence of alcohol under sections 5(1) and 99(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act, with a breath alcohol level of 0.60 mg/l. The authority requested the applicant to submit his defence.

By a penal order of 17 January 2002 the District Administrative Authority found the applicant guilty of drunk driving under sections 5(1) and 99(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act and sentenced him to a fine of EUR 872.07 with 13 days’ imprisonment in the event of default. Noting that the breathalyser used had been correctly calibrated, it dismissed the applicant’s argument that the result of the breathalyser test could not be deemed to be completely accurate and that allowance had to be made for possible calibration and measurement errors. As to the fixing of the sentence, the authority noted that despite its request the applicant had not submitted evidence of his income. Thus, it based itself on his unsupported submission that he had a net income of EUR 1,100 per month and no maintenance obligations.

The applicant appealed on 24 January 2002.

On 12 March 2002 the Upper Austria Independent Administrative Panel held a hearing. It questioned the applicant and an expert on weights and measurements. In addition it took documentary evidence, including submissions from the Federal Office of Weights and Measurements relating to the calibration of the breathalyser at issue, and an expert opinion which had been published in a professional journal.

By a decision of 19 March 2002 the Independent Administrative Panel allowed the applicant’s appeal in part. Referring to the evidence before it, the Independent Administrative Panel held that a certain imprecision of the measurement could not be excluded. Even making allowance for possible inaccuracy a breath alcohol level of 0.57 mg/l could be established beyond all doubt. The offence therefore fell under section 99(1)(b) of the Road Traffic Act and the fine was to be reduced to EUR 700, with nine days’ imprisonment in the event of default.

The Independent Administrative Panel’s decision was served on the applicant’s counsel on 3 April 2002. The applicant did not lodge a complaint with the Administrative Court or the Constitutional Court within the statutory six-week time-limit. There was no other party to the proceedings who could lodge a complaint.

On 10 May 2002 the Independent Administrative Panel’s decision of 19 March 2002 was served on the Federal Minister for Traffic, Innovation and Technology.

On 19 June 2002 the Federal Minister for Traffic, Innovation and Technology lodged an official complaint under Article 131(1) subparagraph (2) of the Federal Constitution, arguing that the Independent Administrative Panel’s decision had applied the law incorrectly in that it had made allowance for a possible inaccuracy in the result of the breathalyser test.

The Administrative Court served the official complaint on the applicant, informing him that he could submit observations. The applicant did not make use of this possibility.

On 25 January 2005 the Administrative Court, following the official complaint, quashed the Independent Administrative Panel’s decision of 19 March 2002 and referred the case back to it. It observed that a driver who was required to undergo a breathalyser test had the right to request that a blood sample be taken to confirm the result, while the law and its own case‑law did not provide for a conclusion to be drawn from the result of the breathalyser test.

On 7 March 2005 the Independent Administrative Panel asked the applicant to submit his comments and to indicate whether he wished a further hearing to be held. On 8 March 2005 the applicant submitted comments and stated that a further hearing could be dispensed with.

On 14 March 2005 the Independent Administrative Panel dismissed an appeal by the applicant against the penal order of 17 January 2002. Applying the Administrative Court’s legal view, it held that an alcohol level of 0.60 mg/l in the applicant’s breath had been established by the breathalyser test. Therefore the conviction under section 99(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act stood. However, the Independent Administrative Panel noted that it shared the applicant’s concerns as regards a possible violation of Article 6 and Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 by the use of the official complaint procedure. It also noted that it had to set a fine of EUR 872, as this was the minimum fine applicable for the offence at issue. Taking the duration of the proceedings into account the Independent Administrative Panel reduced the default term of imprisonment from thirteen to ten days.

The applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court on 19 May 2005. He raised complaints identical to the ones raised by the first applicant (see paragraphs 19‑21 above).

On 13 June 2005 the Constitutional Court refused to deal with the applicant’s complaint for lack of prospects of success. In respect of the applicant’s complaint about the length of the proceedings, it noted that the Independent Administrative Panel had taken the lengthy duration of the proceedings into account. Upon the applicant’s request, the Constitutional Court referred the case to the Administrative Court by a decision of 29 July 2005.

The applicant made submissions on 5 September 2005 to supplement his complaint to the Administrative Court.

The Independent Administrative Panel submitted its observations in reply on 10 October 2005.

On 14 July 2006 the Administrative Court, referring to its previous decision, dismissed the applicant’s complaint as unfounded. The judgment was served on the applicant’s counsel on 14 August 2006.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e1
001-107026_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
35109/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e2
001-107026_a11_em2
CODE
QUASI
38112/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107026_a11_e3
001-107026_a11_em3
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e4
001-107026_a11_em4
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e5
001-107026_a11_em5
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jochen Penias
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e6
001-107026_a11_em6
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Walter Ortmair
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e7
001-107026_a11_em7
DATETIME
QUASI
8 August 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e8
001-107026_a11_em8
DATETIME
QUASI
21 August 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e9
001-107026_a11_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Postlmayr
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107026_a11_e10
001-107026_a11_em10
LOC
NO_MASK
Mattighofen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e3
001-107026_a11_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
001-107026_a11_em3
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e3
001-107026_a11_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
001-107026_a11_em3
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e11
001-107026_a11_em13
PERSON
QUASI
H. Tichy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e12
001-107026_a11_em14
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e13
001-107026_a11_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em16
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e15
001-107026_a11_em17
PERSON
NO_MASK
Federal Minister
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e16
001-107026_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
18 June 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e17
001-107026_a11_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
28 August 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e3
001-107026_a11_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e18
001-107026_a11_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107026_a11_e19
001-107026_a11_em22
LOC
QUASI
St Peter am Hart
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e20
001-107026_a11_em23
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1955
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e21
001-107026_a11_em24
LOC
QUASI
Maria Schmolln
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e5
001-107026_a11_em25
PERSON
DIRECT
001-107026_a11_em5
Mr Penias
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e1
001-107026_a11_em26
CODE
DIRECT
35109/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e22
001-107026_a11_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
14 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e23
001-107026_a11_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Braunau District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107026_a11_e24
001-107026_a11_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
Bezirkshauptmannschaft
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e25
001-107026_a11_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
10 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e26
001-107026_a11_em31
QUANTITY
QUASI
0.63 mg/l
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e27
001-107026_a11_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
1 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e28
001-107026_a11_em33
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
5% inaccuracy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e29
001-107026_a11_em34
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
0.60 mg/l
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e30
001-107026_a11_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
8 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e23
001-107026_a11_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Braunau District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e31
001-107026_a11_em37
QUANTITY
QUASI
872 and 4,360 euros
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e32
001-107026_a11_em38
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 1,162
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e33
001-107026_a11_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
seventeen days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e34
001-107026_a11_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
District Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e35
001-107026_a11_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Office of Weights and Measurements
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107026_a11_e36
001-107026_a11_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Bundesamt für Eich-und Vermessungswesen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e38
001-107026_a11_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Upper Austria Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107026_a11_e39
001-107026_a11_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e40
001-107026_a11_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e41
001-107026_a11_em47
QUANTITY
QUASI
0.59 mg/l
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e42
001-107026_a11_em48
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 581
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e43
001-107026_a11_em49
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 3,633
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e44
001-107026_a11_em50
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 1,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e45
001-107026_a11_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
fourteen days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e28
001-107026_a11_em53
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
5% inaccuracy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e46
001-107026_a11_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
24 July 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e47
001-107026_a11_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e47
001-107026_a11_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
001-107026_a11_em55
Verfassungsgerichtshof
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107026_a11_e48
001-107026_a11_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Verwaltungsgerichtshof
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e49
001-107026_a11_em59
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six-week
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e50
001-107026_a11_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
7 August 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e40
001-107026_a11_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e15
001-107026_a11_em63
PERSON
NO_MASK
Federal Minister for Traffic, Innovation and Technology
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e51
001-107026_a11_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
18 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e15
001-107026_a11_em65
PERSON
NO_MASK
Federal Minister for Traffic, Innovation and Technology
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e52
001-107026_a11_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
Office for Weights and Measurements
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e53
001-107026_a11_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
18 February 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e40
001-107026_a11_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e54
001-107026_a11_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e15
001-107026_a11_em74
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-107026_a11_em63
Federal Minister
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e55
001-107026_a11_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em76
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e56
001-107026_a11_em78
ORG
QUASI
Braunau District Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e30
001-107026_a11_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
8 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em80
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e57
001-107026_a11_em81
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 872
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e58
001-107026_a11_em82
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 4,360
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e57
001-107026_a11_em83
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 872
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e59
001-107026_a11_em84
DATETIME
NO_MASK
ten days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e47
001-107026_a11_em85
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e47
001-107026_a11_em86
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e15
001-107026_a11_em89
PERSON
NO_MASK
Federal Minister
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em90
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e60
001-107026_a11_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
13 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e47
001-107026_a11_em93
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e61
001-107026_a11_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
21 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em95
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e62
001-107026_a11_em96
DATETIME
QUASI
23 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em97
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e63
001-107026_a11_em98
DATETIME
QUASI
21 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e6
001-107026_a11_em99
PERSON
QUASI
001-107026_a11_em6
Mr Ortmair
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e2
001-107026_a11_em100
CODE
QUASI
38112/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e64
001-107026_a11_em101
DATETIME
QUASI
1 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e29
001-107026_a11_em102
QUANTITY
QUASI
0.60 mg/l
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e65
001-107026_a11_em103
DATETIME
QUASI
5 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e23
001-107026_a11_em104
ORG
NO_MASK
Braunau District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107026_a11_e29
001-107026_a11_em105
QUANTITY
QUASI
0.60 mg/l
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e66
001-107026_a11_em106
DATETIME
QUASI
17 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e67
001-107026_a11_em107
ORG
NO_MASK
District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e57
001-107026_a11_em108
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 872
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e68
001-107026_a11_em109
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 872.07
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e69
001-107026_a11_em110
DATETIME
QUASI
13 days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e70
001-107026_a11_em111
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 1,100
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e71
001-107026_a11_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
24 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e72
001-107026_a11_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e38
001-107026_a11_em114
ORG
NO_MASK
Upper Austria Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e73
001-107026_a11_em115
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Office of Weights and Measurements
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e74
001-107026_a11_em116
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em117
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em118
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e75
001-107026_a11_em119
QUANTITY
QUASI
0.57 mg/l
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e76
001-107026_a11_em120
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 700
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107026_a11_e77
001-107026_a11_em121
DATETIME
QUASI
nine days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em122
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e78
001-107026_a11_em123
DATETIME
QUASI
3 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e47
001-107026_a11_em125
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e49
001-107026_a11_em126
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six-week
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e79
001-107026_a11_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
10 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em128
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e74
001-107026_a11_em129
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e15
001-107026_a11_em130
PERSON
NO_MASK
Federal Minister for Traffic, Innovation and Technology
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e80
001-107026_a11_em131
DATETIME
QUASI
19 June 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e15
001-107026_a11_em132
PERSON
NO_MASK
Federal Minister for Traffic, Innovation and Technology
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em133
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em134
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e81
001-107026_a11_em135
DATETIME
QUASI
25 January 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em136
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em137
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e74
001-107026_a11_em138
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e82
001-107026_a11_em139
DATETIME
QUASI
7 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em140
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e83
001-107026_a11_em141
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e84
001-107026_a11_em142
DATETIME
QUASI
14 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em143
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e66
001-107026_a11_em144
DATETIME
QUASI
17 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em145
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e29
001-107026_a11_em146
QUANTITY
QUASI
0.60 mg/l
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em147
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e57
001-107026_a11_em148
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 872
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em149
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e85
001-107026_a11_em150
DATETIME
QUASI
thirteen to ten days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e47
001-107026_a11_em151
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e86
001-107026_a11_em152
DATETIME
QUASI
19 May 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e60
001-107026_a11_em153
DATETIME
QUASI
13 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e47
001-107026_a11_em154
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em155
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e47
001-107026_a11_em156
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em157
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e87
001-107026_a11_em158
DATETIME
QUASI
29 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e88
001-107026_a11_em159
DATETIME
QUASI
5 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em160
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e14
001-107026_a11_em161
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e89
001-107026_a11_em162
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e90
001-107026_a11_em163
DATETIME
QUASI
14 July 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e37
001-107026_a11_em164
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107026_a11_e91
001-107026_a11_em165
DATETIME
QUASI
14 August 2006
Jochen Penias
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Jochen Penias