PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 18283/06) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Arnold Fragner (“the applicant”), on 4 May 2006.

The applicant was represented by Mr M. Lechner, a lawyer practising in Lochau. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs.

The applicant alleged that the proceedings concerning his doctor's fees had not been dealt with within a reasonable time and that the Regional Appeals Commission which dealt with his case had not been impartial or independent.

On 19 June 2008 the President of the First Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant lives in Engelhartstetten.

The applicant is a practitioner of general medicine. He has an individual contract with the Lower Austrian Health Insurance Board (Niederösterreichische Gebietskrankenkasse).

One part of the contract between the applicant and the Lower Austrian Health Insurance Board is the Remuneration Regulation (Honorarordnung) which states that certain types of examinations will only be reimbursed if they are performed by a specialist doctor.

In 1995 the applicant treated two patients carrying out minor chirurgical interventions. He claimed payment for these treatments from the Lower Austrian Health Insurance Board, submitting that the chirurgical interventions had been so urgent that he could not obtain the necessary visa from a chief physician (Chefarztgenehmigung). Moreover, the restriction excluding general practitioners from administering certain types of therapy (Fachgruppenbeschränkung) was arbitrary and against honest practices (gute Sitten).

The Lower Austrian Health Insurance Board refused to pay the fees claimed as the applicant is not a specialist doctor but a general practitioner.

Thereupon, on 2 May 1996, the applicant claimed fees in the amount of 1,770 Austrian Schillings (ATS), approximately 128.63 euros (EUR), before the Joint Arbitration Committee (Paritätische Schiedskommission).

On 4 September 1996 the Joint Arbitration Committee held a hearing but, because of a tie vote, it could not take a binding decision.

Therefore the applicant filed an application for the transfer of jurisdiction (Devolutionsantrag) to the Regional Appeals Commission (Landesberufungskommission) on 23 September 1996.

On 11 December 1996 the Regional Appeals Commission dismissed the applicant's claim as it found that the applicant had failed to obtain the necessary visa from a chief physician.

On 9 May 1997 the applicant filed a complaint with Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof) and on 13 October 1999 that court quashed the Regional Appeals Commission's decision. The Constitutional Court found that the alleged unlawfulness of the restriction excluding general practitioners from administering certain types of therapy was a preliminary question which the Appeals Commission had failed to address.

On 3 May 2000 the applicant filed a request for proceedings to be resumed and, on 8 November 2000, the Appeals Commission held an oral hearing in which it decided to appoint an expert for examining the question of urgency of the chirurgical interventions forming the basis of the dispute.

Since the expert did not deliver the report, the applicant, on 15 January 2001, urged the Appeals Commission to continue its examination.

After the expert finally delivered the report a further hearing in camera was scheduled for 15 May 2002.

At the hearing the applicant's lawyer argued that the applicant was professionally competent to do the interventions at issue and that to give such treatment was his basic contractual obligation. Any conflicting restriction was therefore unlawful.

Subsequently the Appeals Commission scheduled a further hearing, this time in public, for 26 November 2003 as in the meantime the Constitutional Court, on 25 November 2002, had found that Article 6 of the Convention required the Appeals Commissions to hold their hearing in public.

Thus, on 26 November 2003 a public hearing before the Appeals Commission took place in which the taking of evidence was repeated and the applicant's lawyer argued as in the previous hearing.

On 10 December 2004 the Appeals Commission dismissed the applicant's claim. It was not persuaded that there had actually been a situation of emergency allowing the applicant not to obtain the necessary visa from a chief physician beforehand. It also held that the restriction excluding general practitioners from administering certain types of therapy was lawful. This decision was served on the applicant's lawyer on 3 June 2005.

On 3 June 2005 the applicant complained to the Constitutional Court, alleging a breach of the principle of equal treatment, and partiality and lack of independence of the Regional Appeals Commission.

On 27 September 2005 the Constitutional Court found no violation of the right to a fair trial and upheld the contested decision. It held that the assessors of the Regional Appeals Commission were independent in exercising their function and no circumstances giving rise to doubts about their impartiality and independence had arisen in the present case. This decision was served on counsel on 29 November 2005.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e1
001-100487_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
18283/06
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-100487_a8_e2
001-100487_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e3
001-100487_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e4
001-100487_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Arnold Fragner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e5
001-100487_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
4 May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e6
001-100487_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Lechner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-100487_a8_e7
001-100487_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Lochau
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e8
001-100487_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e9
001-100487_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
H. Tichy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e10
001-100487_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e11
001-100487_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e12
001-100487_a8_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e13
001-100487_a8_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
19 June 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e14
001-100487_a8_em14
LOC
QUASI
Engelhartstetten
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100487_a8_e15
001-100487_a8_em15
DEM
QUASI
practitioner of general medicine
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100487_a8_e16
001-100487_a8_em16
ORG
NO_MASK
Lower Austrian Health Insurance Board (Niederösterreichische Gebietskrankenkasse)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100487_a8_e17
001-100487_a8_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
Lower Austrian Health Insurance Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e18
001-100487_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e17
001-100487_a8_em19
ORG
NO_MASK
Lower Austrian Health Insurance Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e17
001-100487_a8_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
Lower Austrian Health Insurance Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e19
001-100487_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
2 May 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100487_a8_e20
001-100487_a8_em22
QUANTITY
QUASI
1,770 Austrian Schillings (ATS)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100487_a8_e21
001-100487_a8_em23
QUANTITY
QUASI
128.63 euros (EUR)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100487_a8_e22
001-100487_a8_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Joint Arbitration Committee (Paritätische Schiedskommission)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e23
001-100487_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
4 September 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e24
001-100487_a8_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
Joint Arbitration Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100487_a8_e25
001-100487_a8_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Appeals Commission (Landesberufungskommission)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e26
001-100487_a8_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
23 September 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e27
001-100487_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e12
001-100487_a8_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e28
001-100487_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
9 May 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100487_a8_e29
001-100487_a8_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e30
001-100487_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
13 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e31
001-100487_a8_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Appeals Commission's
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e32
001-100487_a8_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e33
001-100487_a8_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e34
001-100487_a8_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
3 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e35
001-100487_a8_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e33
001-100487_a8_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e36
001-100487_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e33
001-100487_a8_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e37
001-100487_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e33
001-100487_a8_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100487_a8_e38
001-100487_a8_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
26 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e32
001-100487_a8_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e39
001-100487_a8_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e38
001-100487_a8_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
26 November 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e33
001-100487_a8_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e40
001-100487_a8_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
10 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e33
001-100487_a8_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e41
001-100487_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
3 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e41
001-100487_a8_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
3 June 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e32
001-100487_a8_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e12
001-100487_a8_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e42
001-100487_a8_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
27 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e32
001-100487_a8_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e12
001-100487_a8_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Appeals Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100487_a8_e43
001-100487_a8_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
29 November 2005
Arnold Fragner
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Arnold Fragner