PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 35070/97) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Ms Ayşe Tezcan Uzunhasanoğlu (“the applicant”), on 23 January 1997.

The applicant was represented by Mr K.T. Sürek, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Convention institutions.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that she had been denied a fair hearing on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench of the Istanbul State Security Court which tried and convicted her. She further complained that the Court of Cassation had based its decision on witness statements taken at the police station, which the witnesses subsequently repudiated as having been made under duress. The applicant finally contended that the Court of Cassation had not respected the principles of an adversarial procedure or respect for equality of arms and had not held a hearing.

The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11).

The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1.

On 1 November 2001 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed Second Section (Rule 52 § 1).

By a decision of 20 May 2003, the Court declared the application partly admissible.

The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1963 and lives in Istanbul.

On 30 May 1992 the applicant was taken into police custody on suspicion of aiding and abetting an illegal organisation, the Devrimci-Sol (Revolutionary-Left).

On 3 June 1992 the public prosecutor at the Istanbul State Security Court filed an indictment with the latter charging the applicant, under Article 169 of the Criminal Code and Articles 4 and 5 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, with aiding and abetting members of an illegal armed organisation.

On 7 September 1993 the Istanbul State Security Court acquitted the applicant of the charges against her for lack of evidence.

On 23 December 1993 the Court of Cassation quashed the judgment of the Istanbul State Security Court. The court noted that the applicant had been in charge of communications among members of the Devrimci-Sol and that she had allowed them to organise meetings in her house. It further held that the first instance court had failed to take into account the applicant's confessions and the statements given by witnesses against her at the police station.

On 12 April 1994 the Istanbul State Security Court delivered a judgment identical to the first one. The court noted that the applicant had refuted the confession statements she made in police custody and that the two witnesses had rejected their statements as they had allegedly been made under duress at the police station. The court reiterated that there was insufficient evidence to convict the applicant. It ruled that the applicant should be acquitted.

On 3 October 1994 the Plenary Chamber of the Court of Cassation (Yargıtay Ceza Genel Kurulu) quashed the Istanbul State Security Court's judgment on the ground that there was sufficient evidence to convict the applicant. The case was referred once again to the Istanbul State Security Court.

On 18 December 1995 the Istanbul State Security Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced her to three years and nine months' imprisonment and debarred her from holding public office for three years. The applicant appealed. Furthermore, she requested a hearing before the Court of Cassation.

On 9 July 1996 the Court of Cassation dismissed the applicant's request for a hearing holding that the request had been introduced out of time. Moreover, it upheld the judgment of the Istanbul State Security Court.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e1
001-61712_a6_em1
CODE
DIRECT
35070/97
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61712_a6_e2
001-61712_a6_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
001-61712_a6_em8
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e3
001-61712_a6_em3
DEM
QUASI
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e4
001-61712_a6_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Ayşe Tezcan Uzunhasanoğlu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e5
001-61712_a6_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
23 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e6
001-61712_a6_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr K.T. Sürek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e7
001-61712_a6_em7
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e2
001-61712_a6_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e8
001-61712_a6_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e9
001-61712_a6_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e9
001-61712_a6_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e10
001-61712_a6_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
20 May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e11
001-61712_a6_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1963
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e7
001-61712_a6_em14
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e12
001-61712_a6_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
30 May 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61712_a6_e13
001-61712_a6_em16
ORG
QUASI
Devrimci-Sol
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61712_a6_e13
001-61712_a6_em17
ORG
QUASI
001-61712_a6_em16
Revolutionary-Left
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e14
001-61712_a6_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
3 June 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e8
001-61712_a6_em19
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e15
001-61712_a6_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
7 September 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e8
001-61712_a6_em21
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e16
001-61712_a6_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
23 December 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e9
001-61712_a6_em23
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e8
001-61712_a6_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e13
001-61712_a6_em25
ORG
QUASI
001-61712_a6_em16
Devrimci-Sol
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e17
001-61712_a6_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
12 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e8
001-61712_a6_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e18
001-61712_a6_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
3 October 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e19
001-61712_a6_em29
ORG
QUASI
Plenary Chamber of the Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61712_a6_e19
001-61712_a6_em30
ORG
QUASI
001-61712_a6_em29
Yargıtay Ceza Genel Kurulu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e20
001-61712_a6_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court's
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e8
001-61712_a6_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e21
001-61712_a6_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e8
001-61712_a6_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e22
001-61712_a6_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
three years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e22
001-61712_a6_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
three years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e9
001-61712_a6_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e23
001-61712_a6_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
9 July 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e9
001-61712_a6_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61712_a6_e8
001-61712_a6_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Istanbul State Security Court
Ayşe Tezcan Uzunhasanoğlu
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Ayşe Tezcan Uzunhasanoğlu