PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 38544/97) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Austrian nationals, Mr Ludwig Weh and Mrs Evi Weh (“the applicants”), on 8 August 1997.

The applicants were represented by the first applicant, a lawyer practising in Bregenz. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Winkler, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicants alleged, inter alia, that the first applicant's right to remain silent and not to incriminate himself had been breached in criminal proceedings against him.

The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11).

The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1.

On 30 January 2001 the Court decided to communicate to the respondent Government both applicants' complaint about the lack of a prosecuting authority before the Vorarlberg Independent Administrative Panel and the first applicant's complaint concerning the alleged violation of his right to remain silent and not to incriminate himself and declared the remainder of the application inadmissible. The Government filed observations on the admissibility and merits. On 7 September 2001 the President of the Third Section refused the applicants' request to include their observations in reply of 8 and 9 August and 3 September 2001, filed outside the time-limit, in the case file (Rule 38 § 1).

On 1 November 2001 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed First Section (Rule 52 § 1).

By a decision of 4 July 2002 the Court declared the application partly admissible, namely as regards the first applicant's (hereafter “the applicant”) complaint that his right to remain silent and not to incriminate himself had been breached in criminal proceedings against him.

The applicant filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant, Mr W. Weh, was born in 1952 and lives in Bregenz.

On 21 March 1995 the Bregenz District Authority (Bezirkshaupt-mannschaft) served an anonymous order (Anonymverfügung) upon the applicant in the sum of 800 Austrian schillings (ATS). It stated that on 5 March 1995 the driver of the car, registered in the applicant's name, had exceeded the city area speed limit of 50 km/h by 21 km/h.

The applicant did not comply with the anonymous order. Consequently, the order became invalid (see paragraph 31, below).

Subsequently, the Bregenz District Authority opened criminal proceedings for exceeding the speed limit against unknown offenders and, on 27 April 1995, it ordered the applicant as the registered car owner, under section 103 § 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act (Kraftfahrgesetz), to disclose who had been driving his car. The applicant answered that “C.K.[first and family name in full]”, living in “USA/University of Texas” was the person who had used the car.

On 25 July 1995 the Bregenz District Authority issued a provisional penal order (Strafverfügung) in which it sentenced the applicant under sections 103 § 2 and 134 of the Motor Vehicles Act to pay a fine of ATS 900 (with 54 hours' imprisonment in default). It noted that he had submitted inaccurate information.

The applicant filed an objection (Einspruch) against this decision. On 22 August 1995 the Bregenz District Authority requested the applicant to submit his defence either in writing or to appear at an oral hearing. The applicant did not react to this request.

On 18 September 1995 the Bregenz District Authority issued a penal order (Straferkenntnis) confirming its previous decision and sentenced the applicant to a fine of ATS 900 (with 24 hours' imprisonment in default). In addition it ordered him to pay ATS 90 by way of contribution to the costs of the proceedings. The District Authority found that the information supplied by the applicant had been inaccurate.

The applicant appealed to the Vorarlberg Independent Administrative Panel (Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat).

On 15 April 1996 the Vorarlberg Independent Administrative Panel dismissed the applicant's appeal and ordered him to pay ATS 180 by way of contribution to the costs of the appeal proceedings. Prior to giving its decision, the Panel held a hearing in the presence of the applicant who stated that he considered the information submitted by him to be sufficiently accurate.

The Panel dismissed the applicant's defence, noting that section 103 § 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act required the registered car owner to disclose the name and address of the driver. Further, it referred to the Administrative Court's case-law according to which not only the failure to give any information at all but also the disclosure of inaccurate information amounted to a failure to comply with section 103 § 2. Finally, the Panel observed that the University of Texas had 14 different locations in Texas. Therefore the information provided by the first applicant had indeed been inaccurate.

On 3 June 1996 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof). He raised various issues regarding the tribunal quality of the Independent Administrative Panel and the fairness of the proceedings. However, given that the relevant sentence of section 103 § 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act has the rank of constitutional law (see paragraph 25, below), he did not raise the issue of his right to remain silent and not to incriminate himself.

On 26 November 1996 the Constitutional Court refused to deal with the applicant's complaint for lack of prospects of success.

On 27 June 1997 the Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) refused to deal with the applicant's complaint pursuant to section 33a of the Administrative Court Act (Verwaltungsgerichtshofgesetz) since the amount of the penalty did not exceed ATS 10,000, and no important legal problem was at stake.

The applicant was not prosecuted for exceeding the speed limit.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e1
001-61701_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
38544/97
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61701_a8_e2
001-61701_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e3
001-61701_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e4
001-61701_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Ludwig Weh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e5
001-61701_a8_em5
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Evi Weh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e6
001-61701_a8_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
8 August 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e7
001-61701_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Bregenz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e8
001-61701_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e9
001-61701_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
H. Winkler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e10
001-61701_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e11
001-61701_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e12
001-61701_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e13
001-61701_a8_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Vorarlberg Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e14
001-61701_a8_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
7 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e15
001-61701_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
8 and 9 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e16
001-61701_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
3 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e17
001-61701_a8_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
4 July 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e4
001-61701_a8_em18
PERSON
DIRECT
001-61701_a8_em4
Mr W. Weh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e18
001-61701_a8_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
1952
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e7
001-61701_a8_em20
LOC
NO_MASK
Bregenz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e19
001-61701_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e20
001-61701_a8_em22
ORG
QUASI
Bregenz District Authority (Bezirkshaupt-mannschaft)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e21
001-61701_a8_em23
QUANTITY
QUASI
800 Austrian schillings (ATS)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e22
001-61701_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
5 March 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e23
001-61701_a8_em25
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
50 km/h
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e24
001-61701_a8_em26
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
21 km/h
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e25
001-61701_a8_em27
ORG
QUASI
Bregenz District Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e26
001-61701_a8_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
27 April 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e27
001-61701_a8_em29
PERSON
QUASI
C.K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e28
001-61701_a8_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
USA/University of Texas
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e29
001-61701_a8_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
25 July 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e25
001-61701_a8_em32
ORG
QUASI
Bregenz District Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e30
001-61701_a8_em33
QUANTITY
QUASI
ATS 900
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e31
001-61701_a8_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
54 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e32
001-61701_a8_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
22 August 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e25
001-61701_a8_em36
ORG
QUASI
Bregenz District Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e33
001-61701_a8_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
18 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e25
001-61701_a8_em38
ORG
QUASI
Bregenz District Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e30
001-61701_a8_em39
QUANTITY
QUASI
ATS 900
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e34
001-61701_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
24 hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e35
001-61701_a8_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
District Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e36
001-61701_a8_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Vorarlberg Independent Administrative Panel (Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e37
001-61701_a8_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
15 April 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61701_a8_e13
001-61701_a8_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Vorarlberg Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e38
001-61701_a8_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e39
001-61701_a8_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
University of Texas
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e40
001-61701_a8_em47
LOC
NO_MASK
Texas
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e41
001-61701_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
3 June 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e42
001-61701_a8_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e43
001-61701_a8_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e44
001-61701_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
26 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e45
001-61701_a8_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61701_a8_e46
001-61701_a8_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
27 June 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e47
001-61701_a8_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61701_a8_e48
001-61701_a8_em55
QUANTITY
QUASI
ATS 10,000
Ludwig Weh
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Ludwig Weh