PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 10104/08) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Grzegorz Zabłocki (“the applicant”), on 26 February 2008.

The applicant was represented by Mr M. Pietrzak, a lawyer practising in Warsaw. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged, inter alia, that the lustration proceedings in his case had been unfair, in violation of Article 6 of the Convention.

On 24 November 2008 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1949 and lives in Koszalin.

On 11 April 1997 the parliament passed the Law on disclosing work for or service in the State’s security services or collaboration with them between 1944 and 1990 by persons exercising public functions (ustawa o ujawnieniu pracy lub służby w organach bezpieczeństwa państwa lub współpracy z nimi w latach 1944‑1990 osób pełniących funkcje publiczne; “the 1997 Lustration Act”). It entered into force on 3 August 1997. Persons falling under the provisions of the 1997 Lustration Act, i.e. candidates or holders of public office such as ministers and members of parliament, were required to declare whether or not they had worked for or collaborated with the security services during the communist regime. The provisions of the Act extended to, inter alia, judges, prosecutors, advocates and members of the supervisory boards and boards of directors of the “Polish Television SA” and “Polish Radio SA” as well as their local branches.

On 15 December 1998 the applicant, a member of the supervisory board of the Koszalin Branch of the National Radio (Rada Nadzorcza Rozgłośni Regionalnej Polskiego Radia, Radio Koszalin SA) declared that he had not collaborated with the communist‑era secret services.

In 2002 the applicant became a member of the board of directors of the same radio (Zarząd).

In February 2005 the Commissioner of the Public Interest (Rzecznik Interesu Publicznego) informed the applicant that he had doubts as to the truthfulness of his lustration declaration.

On 23 September 2005 the Warsaw Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny) decided to institute lustration proceedings against the applicant following a request made by the Commissioner on the grounds that the applicant had lied in his lustration declaration by denying that he had cooperated with the secret services.

The Court of Appeal held hearings on 23 November, 8 December 2005 and 25 July and 20 September 2006. The applicant, who was not represented, attended the hearings although he lived in Koszalin, 450 kilometres away from the court. The hearings were not open to the public.

On 20 September 2006 the Warsaw Court of Appeal, acting as the first‑instance lustration court, found that the applicant had submitted an untrue lustration declaration since he had been an intentional and secret collaborator with the State’s secret services. The court established that between 1971 and 1974 the applicant, at that time a student at Torun University, had been a secret collaborator (TW, tajny współpracownik) and had signed a so‑called collaboration commitment (zobowiązanie do współpracy). The court based its findings on the statements made by Mr A.W., an officer of the Security Service (Służba Bezpieczeństwa, “the SB”) who had recruited him. The court established that the applicant had met with Mr A.W. several times and had once received financial payment. All the documents collected in the case were classified as confidential and could be consulted by the applicant in the secret registry of the lustration court.

The applicant appealed against the decision. He submitted that he had never collaborated with the SB and had not passed any information to it. He contested the authenticity of the documents, the originals of which had been destroyed and only microfilms of which had been preserved.

On 10 January 2007 the Warsaw Court of Appeal, acting as the second‑instance lustration court, upheld the impugned judgment. The court established that the evidence in the case had not been extensive but had obviously pointed to the fact that the applicant had been an intentional and secret collaborator with the SB.

On 28 August 2007 the Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy) dismissed the applicant’s cassation appeal as being manifestly ill‑founded. The applicant was barred from holding public office for a period of ten years in application of the 1997 Lustration Act.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e1
001-104962_a4_em1
CODE
DIRECT
10104/08
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104962_a4_e2
001-104962_a4_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
ETHNIC
insert
001-104962_a4_e3
001-104962_a4_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish national
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e4
001-104962_a4_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Grzegorz Zabłocki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e5
001-104962_a4_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
26 February 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e6
001-104962_a4_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Pietrzak
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e7
001-104962_a4_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Warsaw
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e8
001-104962_a4_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e9
001-104962_a4_em9
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e10
001-104962_a4_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e11
001-104962_a4_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e12
001-104962_a4_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
1949
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104962_a4_e13
001-104962_a4_em13
LOC
QUASI
Koszalin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e14
001-104962_a4_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
11 April 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e15
001-104962_a4_em15
MISC
QUASI
Law on disclosing work for or service in the State’s security services or collaboration with them between 1944 and 1990 by persons exercising public functions (ustawa o ujawnieniu pracy lub służby w organach bezpieczeństwa państwa lub współpracy z nimi w latach 1944‑1990 osób pełniących funkcje publiczne; “the 1997 Lustration Act”)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e16
001-104962_a4_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
3 August 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e15
001-104962_a4_em17
MISC
QUASI
001-104962_a4_em15
1997 Lustration Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e17
001-104962_a4_em18
ORG
QUASI
“Polish Television SA”
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104962_a4_e18
001-104962_a4_em19
ORG
QUASI
Polish Radio SA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e19
001-104962_a4_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
15 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e20
001-104962_a4_em21
ORG
QUASI
Koszalin Branch of the National Radio (Rada Nadzorcza Rozgłośni Regionalnej Polskiego Radia, Radio Koszalin SA)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e21
001-104962_a4_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e22
001-104962_a4_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
February 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e23
001-104962_a4_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Commissioner of the Public Interest (Rzecznik Interesu Publicznego)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e24
001-104962_a4_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
23 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e25
001-104962_a4_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e26
001-104962_a4_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e27
001-104962_a4_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
23 November
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e28
001-104962_a4_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
8 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e29
001-104962_a4_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
25 July and 20 September 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e13
001-104962_a4_em31
LOC
QUASI
Koszalin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e30
001-104962_a4_em32
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
450 kilometres
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e31
001-104962_a4_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
20 September 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e32
001-104962_a4_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e33
001-104962_a4_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
between 1971 and 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e34
001-104962_a4_em36
ORG
QUASI
Torun University
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e35
001-104962_a4_em37
MISC
QUASI
secret collaborator (TW, tajny współpracownik)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e36
001-104962_a4_em38
MISC
QUASI
collaboration commitment (zobowiązanie do współpracy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e37
001-104962_a4_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A.W.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e38
001-104962_a4_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Security Service (Służba Bezpieczeństwa, “the SB”)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e37
001-104962_a4_em41
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A.W.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e38
001-104962_a4_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
001-104962_a4_em40
SB
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e39
001-104962_a4_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
10 January 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e32
001-104962_a4_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e38
001-104962_a4_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
SB
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e40
001-104962_a4_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
28 August 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104962_a4_e41
001-104962_a4_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e42
001-104962_a4_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
ten years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104962_a4_e15
001-104962_a4_em49
MISC
QUASI
1997 Lustration Act
Grzegorz Zabłocki
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Grzegorz Zabłocki