PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 46034/99) against the Republic of Poland lodged on 30 January 1998 with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Polish nationals, Danuta Gryziecka and Henryk Gryziecki (“the applicants”).

The applicants were represented by Mrs Koczorowska, a lawyer practising in Szczecin, Poland. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Krzysztof Drzewicki, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicants alleged that their right to a “hearing within a reasonable time” had not been respected.

The application was transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998, when Protocol No. 11 to the Convention came into force (Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11).

The application was allocated to the Fourth Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1 of the Rules of the Court.

On 1 November 2001 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed Fourth Section (Rule 52 § 1).

By a decision of 10 January 2002 the Court declared the application admissible.

THE FACTS

The applicants, Danuta Gryziecka (“the first applicant”) and Henryk Gryziecki (“the second applicant”), were born in 1950 and 1949 respectively, and live in Niedźwiedź, Poland.

On 31 August 1981 J.P. (“the plaintiff”) sued the applicants in the Szczecin Regional Court (Sąd Wojewódzki) seeking repayment of the money he had invested in the applicants’ hen house.

On 11 September 1981 the case was transferred to the Stargard Szczeciński District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) as the court competent to decide it.

On 11 November 1981 the applicants filed their pleadings with the court. They acknowledged the plaintiff’s claim in respect of 728,000 old Polish zlotys.

On 17 March 1982 the court stayed the proceedings because the plaintiff had not complied with a certain court order. On 30 September 1982 the plaintiff’s lawyer requested to resume the proceedings. On 7 March 1983 the court resumed the proceedings.

On 22 March 1983 the court held the first hearing. Subsequently, from that date to 9 February 1989 the court held approximately nine hearings. In the meantime the plaintiff had modified his claim.

On an unknown date in 1984 the applicants transferred the sum of 728,000 old Polish zlotys to the plaintiff’s account.

In July 1984 the plaintiff died. Subsequently, his wife and daughter (“the plaintiffs”) joined the proceedings as his legal successors.

On 9 February 1989 the court held a hearing. The witness did not appear. The court decided to obtain evidence from a bank.

On an unknown date in 1989 the plaintiffs modified their claim.

From that date to 9 November 1992 the court held a number of hearings. It obtained three expert reports, held one view of the site and heard some witnesses. The plaintiffs again modified their claim.

On 9 November 1992 the court decided to obtain fresh expert evidence in order to determine the value of certain construction works made by the second applicant. The expert report was submitted to the court on 22 December 1992.

On 27 May 1993 the expert report was served on the applicants’ lawyer. On 3 June 1993 the applicants submitted their observations on it. On 19 April 1994 the plaintiffs asked the court to set a date for a hearing.

On 7 July and on 11 August 1994 respectively the court ordered the parties to produce the evidence in support of their submissions.

On 19 May 1995 the court held a hearing and heard evidence from certain witnesses. It also ordered the plaintiffs’ lawyer to specify their claim and to produce the marriage certificate of the late plaintiff. On 5 April 1996 the plaintiffs specified the value of the claim.

On 10 and on 21 May 1996 respectively, the plaintiffs requested the court to list a hearing. In the meantime, the case had been assigned to a new judge.

On 20 August 1996 the court decided that fresh expert evidence be obtained, in order to determine the value of the land on which the hen house had been constructed. On 12 November 1996 the expert report was submitted to the court. On 11 December 1996 it was served on the applicants. On 27 December 1996 they submitted their observations on the report.

On 14 January 1997 the plaintiffs’ lawyer requested the court to list a hearing. On 18 March 1997 the applicants filed their pleadings with the court.

On 24 March 1997 the court held a hearing. The applicants requested that the court index the repayment of their bank loan and the payment made to the original plaintiff in 1984. The applicants also requested to obtain documentary evidence from the land register. The court fixed a one-month time-limit for the parties to produce the evidence. Subsequently, the parties filed their pleadings with the court on 22 April 1997. On 22 May 1997 the applicants filed additional pleadings.

On 2 June and on 14 July 1997 respectively the court held hearings. On both occasions a certain witness did not appear before the court. The court fined him. On 16 September 1997 the plaintiffs again modified their claim.

On 17 September 1997 the court held a hearing and heard evidence from one witness. The applicants requested the court to obtain expert evidence in order to determine an indexed value of the repayment of their bank loan and the payment made by the applicants in 1984.

In the meantime the case had been assigned to a new judge. Subsequently, on 22 January 1998 the court held a hearing.

On 12 March 1998 the court held a hearing. The plaintiffs withdrew their claims against the first applicant. The court closed the proceedings. It did not obtain any expert report even though the applicants had secured money for such a report.

On 26 March 1998 the court gave judgment. It partly granted the claim of the original plaintiff’s daughter against the second applicant and dismissed the claim of the original plaintiff’s wife. The court discontinued the proceedings in respect of the first applicant. None of the parties submitted a notice of appeal.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e1
001-61087_a4_em1
CODE
DIRECT
46034/99
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-61087_a4_e2
001-61087_a4_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e3
001-61087_a4_em3
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 1998
ETHNIC
insert
001-61087_a4_e4
001-61087_a4_em4
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish nationals
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e5
001-61087_a4_em5
PERSON
DIRECT
Danuta Gryziecka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e6
001-61087_a4_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Henryk Gryziecki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e7
001-61087_a4_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs Koczorowska
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e8
001-61087_a4_em8
LOC
NO_MASK
Szczecin, Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e9
001-61087_a4_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e10
001-61087_a4_em10
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Krzysztof Drzewicki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e11
001-61087_a4_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e12
001-61087_a4_em12
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e13
001-61087_a4_em13
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e14
001-61087_a4_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
10 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e5
001-61087_a4_em15
PERSON
DIRECT
Danuta Gryziecka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e6
001-61087_a4_em16
PERSON
QUASI
Henryk Gryziecki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e15
001-61087_a4_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
1950
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e16
001-61087_a4_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
1949
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e17
001-61087_a4_em19
LOC
NO_MASK
Niedźwiedź, Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e18
001-61087_a4_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
31 August 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e19
001-61087_a4_em21
PERSON
QUASI
J.P.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e20
001-61087_a4_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
Szczecin Regional Court (Sąd Wojewódzki)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e21
001-61087_a4_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e22
001-61087_a4_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Stargard Szczeciński District Court (Sąd Rejonowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e23
001-61087_a4_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
11 November 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e24
001-61087_a4_em26
QUANTITY
QUASI
728,000 old Polish zlotys
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e25
001-61087_a4_em27
DATETIME
NO_MASK
17 March 1982
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e26
001-61087_a4_em28
DATETIME
NO_MASK
30 September 1982
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e27
001-61087_a4_em29
DATETIME
NO_MASK
7 March 1983
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e28
001-61087_a4_em30
DATETIME
NO_MASK
22 March 1983
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e29
001-61087_a4_em31
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 February 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e30
001-61087_a4_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e24
001-61087_a4_em33
QUANTITY
QUASI
728,000 old Polish zlotys
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e31
001-61087_a4_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
July 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e29
001-61087_a4_em35
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 February 1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e32
001-61087_a4_em36
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e33
001-61087_a4_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e33
001-61087_a4_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e34
001-61087_a4_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
22 December 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e35
001-61087_a4_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
27 May 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e36
001-61087_a4_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
3 June 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e37
001-61087_a4_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
19 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e38
001-61087_a4_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
7 July and on 11 August 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e39
001-61087_a4_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
19 May 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e40
001-61087_a4_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
5 April 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e41
001-61087_a4_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
10 and on 21 May 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e42
001-61087_a4_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
20 August 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e43
001-61087_a4_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
12 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e44
001-61087_a4_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e45
001-61087_a4_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
27 December 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e46
001-61087_a4_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e47
001-61087_a4_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
18 March 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e48
001-61087_a4_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
24 March 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e30
001-61087_a4_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e49
001-61087_a4_em55
DATETIME
NO_MASK
one-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e50
001-61087_a4_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
22 April 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e51
001-61087_a4_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
22 May 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-61087_a4_e52
001-61087_a4_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
2 June and on 14 July 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e53
001-61087_a4_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
16 September 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e54
001-61087_a4_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
17 September 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e30
001-61087_a4_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e55
001-61087_a4_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
22 January 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e56
001-61087_a4_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-61087_a4_e57
001-61087_a4_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
26 March 1998
Danuta Gryziecka
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Danuta Gryziecka