PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 49490/08) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Ms Grace Przybylska-Conroy (“the applicant”), on 1 October 2008.

The applicant was represented by Mr J. Pruchniewski, a lawyer practising in Poznań. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 8 June 2009 the President of the Fourth Section of the Court decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3).

On 23 December 2009 the Government submitted a unilateral declaration and invited the Court to strike out the application, in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention. The applicant filed an objection.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1957 and lives in New York, USA.

A. Main proceedings [civil proceedings for division of matrimonial property]

On 19 January 1987 the applicant lodged a request for the division of matrimonial property with the Poznań District Court (Sąd Rejonowy).

A hearing, held on 14 December 1987, was adjourned to give the parties an opportunity to settle the case. However, they apparently failed to do so and on 13 April 1988 the first hearing on the merits was held.

Between 18 May 1988 and 26 April 1993, the District Court scheduled 21 hearings, 13 of which were adjourned mostly due to the failure of witnesses to appear or for lack of documents which the parties were expected to supply. During that period the court asked experts to prepare six opinions and supplementary opinions on the value of the matrimonial property.

In the meantime, on 2 February 1993, the case was assigned to another judge.

Between 1 July 1993 and 28 May 2004 the District Court scheduled 49 hearings, 28 of which were adjourned. One hearing was adjourned due to the failure of the applicant to appear. During that period the court asked experts to prepare 10 reports and supplementary opinions on the value of the matrimonial property.

On 4 June 2004 the Poznań District Court gave a decision. The applicant appealed.

On 21 March 2006 the Poznań Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) partly quashed the first-instance decision and remitted the case.

Between 13 November 2006 and 18 February 2008 the District Court scheduled 6 hearings, during which the witnesses and the applicant were heard.

On 17 March 2008 the Poznań District Court gave a decision. The applicant appealed.

On 22 December 2008 the Poznań Regional Court dismissed the appeal.0

B. Proceedings under the 2004 Act

On 29 February 2008 the applicant lodged with the Poznań Regional Court a complaint under section 5 of the Law of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial within a reasonable time (Ustawa o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki) (“the 2004 Act”) which entered into force on 17 September 2004. She sought a ruling declaring that the length of the proceedings before the Poznań District Court had been excessive and an award of just satisfaction in the amount of 10,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 2,500 euros (EUR)).

On 29 April 2008 the Poznań Regional Court dismissed her complaint. It limited its examination of the length of the proceedings to the period after 15 November 2005. On that date the Poznań Regional Court had analysed the conduct of the District Court following the complaint lodged by the applicant's former husband ‑ the other party to the proceedings. The excessive length of the proceedings in question had been acknowledged and just satisfaction in the amount of 4,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 1,000 euros (EUR)) was granted to him. Having analysed the conduct of the District Court during the period after 15 November 2005, the Regional Court found that the proceedings had been conducted with due diligence and within a reasonable time. The court stressed that the conduct of the District Court could not be analysed twice, especially since there had been no undue delay after this date.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e1
001-98502_a6_em1
CODE
DIRECT
49490/08
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-98502_a6_e2
001-98502_a6_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e2
001-98502_a6_em3
DEM
QUASI
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e3
001-98502_a6_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Grace Przybylska-Conroy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e4
001-98502_a6_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
1 October 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e5
001-98502_a6_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Pruchniewski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-98502_a6_e6
001-98502_a6_em7
LOC
QUASI
Poznań
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-98502_a6_e2
001-98502_a6_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-98502_a6_em2
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e7
001-98502_a6_em9
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e8
001-98502_a6_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
8 June 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e9
001-98502_a6_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
23 December 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e10
001-98502_a6_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
1957
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e11
001-98502_a6_em13
LOC
QUASI
New York, USA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e12
001-98502_a6_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
19 January 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Poznań District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em16
ORG
NO_MASK
001-98502_a6_em15
Sąd Rejonowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e14
001-98502_a6_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
14 December 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e15
001-98502_a6_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
13 April 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e16
001-98502_a6_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
Between 18 May 1988 and 26 April 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
001-98502_a6_em15
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e17
001-98502_a6_em21
QUANTITY
QUASI
21
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e18
001-98502_a6_em22
QUANTITY
QUASI
13
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e19
001-98502_a6_em23
QUANTITY
QUASI
six
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e20
001-98502_a6_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
2 February 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e21
001-98502_a6_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
Between 1 July 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e22
001-98502_a6_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
28 May 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e23
001-98502_a6_em28
QUANTITY
QUASI
49
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e24
001-98502_a6_em29
QUANTITY
QUASI
28
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e25
001-98502_a6_em30
QUANTITY
QUASI
10
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e26
001-98502_a6_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
4 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Poznań District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e27
001-98502_a6_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e28
001-98502_a6_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-98502_a6_e28
001-98502_a6_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
001-98502_a6_em34
Sąd Okręgowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e29
001-98502_a6_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
Between 13 November 2006 and 18 February 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e30
001-98502_a6_em38
QUANTITY
QUASI
6
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e31
001-98502_a6_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
17 March 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Poznań District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e32
001-98502_a6_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
22 December 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e28
001-98502_a6_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e33
001-98502_a6_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
29 February 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e28
001-98502_a6_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e34
001-98502_a6_em45
DATETIME
NO_MASK
17 June 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e35
001-98502_a6_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
17 September 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Poznań District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e36
001-98502_a6_em48
QUANTITY
QUASI
10,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 2,500 euros (EUR))
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e37
001-98502_a6_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
29 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e28
001-98502_a6_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e38
001-98502_a6_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
15 November 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e28
001-98502_a6_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Poznań Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-98502_a6_e39
001-98502_a6_em54
QUANTITY
QUASI
4,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) (approx. 1,000 euros (EUR))
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e38
001-98502_a6_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
15 November 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e28
001-98502_a6_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
001-98502_a6_em52
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-98502_a6_e13
001-98502_a6_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
Grace Przybylska-Conroy
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Grace Przybylska-Conroy