PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 7436/02) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three Turkish nationals, Mr İsmail Şencan, Ms Hülya Şencan and Mr Nejdet Şencan (“the applicants”), on 12 October 2001.

The applicants were represented by Mr F. Yurdakul, a lawyer practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court.

On 1 June 2006 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaint concerning the length of the proceedings to the Government. Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.

THE FACTS

THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicants were born in 1955, 1973 and 1962 respectively and live in Istanbul.

The applicants signed contracts with third persons before the notary public to acquire de facto possession (zilyedlik) of a plot of land in Gökçeada.

On 10 May 1990, 27 August 1991 and 18 May 1992 respectively, the applicants filed three separate actions with the Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction and requested that their title to the plot in question be registered in the Land Registry records.

On 11 September 1991 and 16 March 1992 respectively the first‑instance court partially accepted the requests of the first and third applicants. Subsequently, on 28 April 1992 and 6 November 1992 respectively, the Court of Cassation quashed these judgments, holding that the Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction had failed to carry out the necessary examination in order to determine the nature of the plot. The cases were remitted to the first-instance court.

On 12 October 1992 and 15 March 1993 the first-instance court once again partially accepted İsmail and Nejdet Şencan's claims. On 21 June 1993 the Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction also partially accepted the second applicant's claim. In its judgments, the first-instance court held that the fact that the land in question appeared as “meadowland” in the tax registration records did not mean that it could not be the subject of private ownership.

On 18 April 1994 the Court of Cassation quashed the three judgments of the first-instance court and held that the first-instance court should have taken into account the tax registration records and accepted the applicants' claims only in respect of the parts of the plot which were used for agriculture. It further held that meadowlands could not be subject to private ownership. The cases were remitted to the Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction.

On 26 September 1994 all three cases were joined.

On 13 June 1995 the first-instance court again partially accepted the applicants' claims. In its judgment, the court stated that the plot in question was not designated as “meadowland” in the land registration records and that, therefore, it could be subject to private ownership.

On 24 June 1996 the Court of Cassation once again quashed the judgment of the first-instance court, holding that according to the documents in the case-file, the plot in question was meadowland and that therefore the applicants could not have their title registered.

On 31 July 1996 the Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction issued a decision of non-jurisdiction and sent the case file to the Gökçeada Cadastre Court.

On 5 June 1997 the Gökçeada Cadastre Court rendered its judgment and partially accepted the applicants' claims.

On 20 May 1998 the Court of Cassation quashed the judgment of the cadastre court.

On 16 April 1999 the Gökçeada Cadastre Court abided by the Court of Cassation's decision, holding that according to the tax registration records the land in question was meadowland and that it could not be subject to private ownership. The court further held that the land should be officially designated as a second degree conservation area.

On 21 March 2000 the Court of Cassation upheld the judgment of the first-instance court.

On 6 April 2001 the Court of Cassation dismissed the applicants' request for rectification. This decision was served on the applicants' representative on 30 April 2001.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e1
001-83961_a6_em1
CODE
DIRECT
7436/02
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-83961_a6_e2
001-83961_a6_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e3
001-83961_a6_em3
DEM
QUASI
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e4
001-83961_a6_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr İsmail Şencan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e5
001-83961_a6_em5
PERSON
QUASI
Ms Hülya Şencan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e6
001-83961_a6_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Nejdet Şencan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e7
001-83961_a6_em7
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e8
001-83961_a6_em8
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Yurdakul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e9
001-83961_a6_em9
LOC
NO_MASK
Ankara
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e2
001-83961_a6_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
001-83961_a6_em2
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e10
001-83961_a6_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e11
001-83961_a6_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
1955
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e12
001-83961_a6_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e13
001-83961_a6_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
1962
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e14
001-83961_a6_em15
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e15
001-83961_a6_em16
LOC
QUASI
Gökçeada
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e16
001-83961_a6_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
10 May 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e17
001-83961_a6_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
27 August 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e18
001-83961_a6_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
18 May 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e19
001-83961_a6_em20
ORG
QUASI
Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e20
001-83961_a6_em21
ORG
NO_MASK
Land Registry
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e21
001-83961_a6_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e22
001-83961_a6_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e23
001-83961_a6_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
first‑instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e24
001-83961_a6_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
28 April 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e25
001-83961_a6_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e26
001-83961_a6_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e19
001-83961_a6_em28
ORG
QUASI
Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e27
001-83961_a6_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e28
001-83961_a6_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
15 March 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e4
001-83961_a6_em31
PERSON
DIRECT
001-83961_a6_em4
İsmail
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e6
001-83961_a6_em32
PERSON
QUASI
001-83961_a6_em6
Nejdet Şencan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e29
001-83961_a6_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
21 June 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e19
001-83961_a6_em34
ORG
QUASI
Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-83961_a6_e30
001-83961_a6_em35
MISC
NO_MASK
meadowland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e31
001-83961_a6_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
18 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e26
001-83961_a6_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-83961_a6_e32
001-83961_a6_em38
MISC
NO_MASK
meadowlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e19
001-83961_a6_em39
ORG
QUASI
Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e33
001-83961_a6_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
26 September 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e34
001-83961_a6_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
13 June 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e30
001-83961_a6_em42
MISC
NO_MASK
meadowland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e35
001-83961_a6_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
24 June 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e26
001-83961_a6_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-83961_a6_e30
001-83961_a6_em45
MISC
NO_MASK
meadowland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e36
001-83961_a6_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
31 July 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e19
001-83961_a6_em47
ORG
QUASI
Gökçeada Civil Court of General Jurisdiction
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e37
001-83961_a6_em48
ORG
QUASI
Gökçeada Cadastre Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e38
001-83961_a6_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
5 June 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e37
001-83961_a6_em50
ORG
QUASI
Gökçeada Cadastre Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e39
001-83961_a6_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
20 May 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e26
001-83961_a6_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e40
001-83961_a6_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
16 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e37
001-83961_a6_em54
ORG
QUASI
Gökçeada Cadastre Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e41
001-83961_a6_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation's
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e30
001-83961_a6_em56
MISC
NO_MASK
meadowland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e42
001-83961_a6_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e26
001-83961_a6_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e43
001-83961_a6_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
6 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e26
001-83961_a6_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-83961_a6_e44
001-83961_a6_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2001
İsmail Şencan
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: İsmail Şencan