PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 75107/01) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Jacek Dombek (“the applicant”), on 10 October 1999.

The Polish Government were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 25 October 2005 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaints concerning alleged unlawfulness and length of the applicant’s detention on remand to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1965 and lives in Gdańsk.

1. First set of criminal proceedings (“the Bydgoszcz case”)

On 9 July 1996 the applicant was arrested and detained on remand. On 12 August 1996 the Kędzierzyn-Koźle District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) released the applicant.

On 20 October 1997 the applicant was again arrested by the police in connection with the same criminal investigation. On 21 October 1997 the Częstochowa District Court decided to detain him on remand in view of the reasonable suspicion that he had committed several offences acting in an organised group of criminals.

The applicant’s appeal against this decision was dismissed by the Częstochowa Regional Court (Sąd Wojewódzki) on 6 November 1997. The appeal lodged by his lawyer was dismissed on 20 November 1997.

On 8 December 1997 the Częstochowa Regional Court prolonged the applicant’s pre‑trial detention reiterating the grounds originally given for his detention and adding that the measure was necessary to secure the proper conduct of the investigation.

On 4 March 1998 the Katowice Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny) further prolonged his detention on remand. That decision was upheld by the Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy) on 24 April 1998.

Subsequently, the applicant’s detention was prolonged by the Katowice Court of Appeal on 8 July 1998. The court considered that the severity of the anticipated penalty and the risk of collusion justified keeping him in detention.

On 11 September 1998 the Supreme Court allowed an application made by the Prosecutor General under Article 263 of the 1997 Code of Criminal Procedure (“1997 Code”) and further prolonged the applicant’s detention on remand. The Supreme Court considered that the reasonable suspicion of his having committed the offences in question and the risk of collusion justified keeping the applicant in detention to secure the proper conduct of the proceedings. The court also considered that the investigation could not be terminated earlier due to circumstances for which the authorities could not be held responsible, such as the complexity of the case and the seriousness of the offences.

On 31 December 1998 the applicant and 14 co‑accused were indicted before the Bydgoszcz Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy).

On 11 January 1999 the Częstochowa Regional Court prolonged the applicant’s detention until 30 June 1999 reiterating the grounds previously given for the applicant’s detention.

On 23 June 1999 the Bygodszcz Regional Court decided to prolong until 30 September 1999 the applicant’s detention on remand. It considered, for the same reasons as previously given, that keeping the applicant in detention was the only means to secure the proper conduct of the proceedings. The applicant appealed.

The applicant’s trial started on 24 August 1999 and continued for three days. It appears that the hearing was subsequently adjourned.

On 27 August 1999 the Bygdoszcz Regional Court examined the applicant’s appeal against its decision of 23 June 1999 and partly allowed it. The court considered that the pre-trial detention of the applicant should be prolonged only until 17 September 1999. It established that in assessing the length of the applicant’s detention with respect to the present case, and for the purpose of the time-limits provided for by Article 263 of the 1997 Code, the period between 9 July and 12 August 1996 should have been added. Accordingly, the Regional Court applied to the Supreme Court asking for the applicant’s detention to be prolonged beyond the term of two years provided for in Article 263 § 3 of the 1997 Code.

On 16 September 1999 the Bydgoszcz Detention Centre asked the Supreme Court whether any decision had been given in the applicant’s case. On the same date the President of Chamber III of the Supreme Court informed the Detention Centre by fax that a session on prolongation of the applicant’s detention had been scheduled for 1 October 1999. The President further noted that on the basis of the transitional provisions in the 1997 Code, the applicant’s detention should be ipso jure prolonged until the date of the Supreme Court’s session.

On 22 September 1999 the applicant’s lawyer submitted pleadings to the Supreme Court in which he argued that the applicant had been illegally detained as the detention order given on 27 August 1999 had expired on 17 September 1999 and therefore he should have been released. In particular, he maintained that the transitional provisions were not applicable in the applicant’s case and that the 1997 Code did not contain a provision which would allow detention on the basis of a fax sent by the Supreme Court.

On 1 October 1999 the Supreme Court held its session and prolonged the applicant’s detention until 27 February 2000 relying on the strong suspicion against the applicant, the complexity of the case and the need to continue the process of gathering the evidence.

On 10 February and 24 May 2000 the Supreme Court further prolonged the applicant’s detention reiterating the grounds previously given. In the first of those decisions the Supreme Court added: “...There is no evidence that could prove [the applicant’s] assertion that his wife and children ‘would soon have nothing to eat’. Moreover, it should be noted that there is a particular reason why the pre-trial detention of [the applicant] should not be lifted. From the information obtained by the Presiding Judge it appears that [the applicant] might obstruct the proceedings.”

Subsequently, the Bydgoszcz Regional Court made several applications to the Court of Appeal asking that the applicant’s detention be prolonged as, following an amendment to the 1997 Code, the Supreme Court was no longer competent to prolong the detention beyond the statutory time-limit of 2 years, as laid down in Article 263 § 3 of the Code.

On 27 September 2000 the Gdansk Court of Appeal granted the application and prolonged the applicant’s detention on remand until 30 December 2000. The court relied in particular on the complexity of the case and the conduct of the accused who had contributed to the prolongation of the proceedings. The court found as follows: “Of course, the applicant’s detention for over three years in this case requires particular attention to be given to the process of gathering evidence, above all, to examine without further delay the defence motions concerning evidence. However, in the light of the proceedings as a whole, the conduct of the Regional Courts should be assessed positively”.

On 21 December 2000 as well as on 25 April and 20 June 2001 the Gdańsk Court of Appeal prolonged the applicant’s detention. In addition to the strong probability that he had committed the offences, the court found that the proceedings had been conducted diligently and concluded that only the applicant’s detention would guarantee the proper conduct of the final stage of the proceedings.

Between 15 February and 15 October 2001 the applicant served a prison sentence ordered by the Inowrocław District Court in another set of criminal proceedings brought against him.

During his pre‑trial detention the applicant lodged several hundred applications for release. However, these applications and his appeals against the decisions to prolong his detention on remand were to no avail.

On 27 September 2001 the Bydgoszcz Regional Court gave judgment. The trial court convicted the applicant and sentenced him to eight years’ imprisonment. The applicant and the prosecutor appealed.

Subsequently, the applicant’s detention with respect to this set of criminal proceedings was not prolonged. However, the applicant had not been released as he remained in pre-trial detention ordered in the second set of criminal proceedings (see below).

On 17 June 2003 the Gdansk Court of Appeal allowed the appeals and quashed the impugned judgment. The case was remitted to the Bydgoszcz Regional Court which, on 14 January 2004, stayed the proceedings because the other set of criminal proceedings before the Zielona Góra Regional Court were pending and the applicant could not be transported to the Bygdoszcz Detention Centre.

On 25 May 2005 the Bydgoszcz Regional Court resumed the proceedings. The proceedings are pending before that court.

2. Second set of criminal proceedings (“the Zielona Góra case”)

On 11 September 1991 the applicant was arrested by the police in connection with criminal proceedings pending against him. On the same date the Zielona Góra Regional Prosecutor decided to detain him on remand.

On 12 July 1994 the Zielona Góra Regional Court acquitted the applicant.

On 14 December 1994 the applicant was released from detention.

On 24 January 1996 the Poznań Court of Appeal quashed the impugned judgment and remitted the case to the Regional Prosecutor.

Between December 1997 and November 1999 the prosecutor stayed the proceedings.

On 30 January 2001 the Poznań Court of Appeal decided to detain the applicant on remand in view of the reasonable suspicion that he had committed, with an accomplice, a robbery and three offences of homicide.

The applicant appealed, but on 13 January 2001 the Poznań Court of Appeal dismissed his appeal.

On 19 April, 24 July and 25 October 2001 and 24 April, 23 July and 24 October 2002 as well as on 22 January 2003 the Poznań Court of Appeal further prolonged his detention. The court held that the reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed the offences with which he had been charged, the severity of the anticipated sentence and the need to secure the proper conduct of the investigation justified keeping the applicant in detention.

On 13 March 2003 the applicant was indicted before the Zielona Góra Regional Court.

On 26 March 2003 the Poznań Court of Appeal further prolonged the applicant’s detention. Subsequently, the applicant’s detention was prolonged on three occasions in 2003, and on 25 March, 24 June, 23 September and 21 December 2004. The court in all those decisions found that the grounds for keeping him in detention were still valid.

On 28 April 2005 the trial court gave judgment. The applicant was convicted as charged and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment.

The applicant requested that the written reasons for the judgment be prepared by the trial court so as to allow him to lodge an appeal.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e1
001-78435_a2_em1
CODE
DIRECT
75107/01
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e2
001-78435_a2_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e2
001-78435_a2_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e3
001-78435_a2_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Jacek Dombek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e4
001-78435_a2_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e2
001-78435_a2_em6
DEM
NO_MASK
001-78435_a2_em2
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78435_a2_e2
001-78435_a2_em7
ORG
NO_MASK
001-78435_a2_em2
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e5
001-78435_a2_em8
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e6
001-78435_a2_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
25 October 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e7
001-78435_a2_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1965
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-78435_a2_e8
001-78435_a2_em11
LOC
QUASI
Gdańsk
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e9
001-78435_a2_em12
MISC
QUASI
Bydgoszcz case
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e10
001-78435_a2_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
9 July 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e11
001-78435_a2_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
12 August 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78435_a2_e12
001-78435_a2_em15
ORG
QUASI
Kędzierzyn-Koźle District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-78435_a2_e13
001-78435_a2_em16
ORG
NO_MASK
Sąd Rejonowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e14
001-78435_a2_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
20 October 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e15
001-78435_a2_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
21 October 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e16
001-78435_a2_em19
ORG
QUASI
Częstochowa District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e17
001-78435_a2_em20
ORG
QUASI
Częstochowa Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-78435_a2_e18
001-78435_a2_em21
ORG
NO_MASK
Sąd Wojewódzki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e19
001-78435_a2_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e20
001-78435_a2_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
20 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e21
001-78435_a2_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
8 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e17
001-78435_a2_em25
ORG
QUASI
Częstochowa Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e22
001-78435_a2_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
4 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e23
001-78435_a2_em27
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-78435_a2_e24
001-78435_a2_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Sąd Apelacyjny
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
001-78435_a2_em30
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Sąd Najwyższy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e26
001-78435_a2_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
24 April 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e23
001-78435_a2_em32
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e27
001-78435_a2_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
8 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e28
001-78435_a2_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em35
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e29
001-78435_a2_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Prosecutor General
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e30
001-78435_a2_em37
MISC
NO_MASK
1997 Code
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e31
001-78435_a2_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e32
001-78435_a2_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
co‑accused
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e33
001-78435_a2_em41
ORG
QUASI
Bydgoszcz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-78435_a2_e34
001-78435_a2_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Sąd Okręgowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e35
001-78435_a2_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
11 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e17
001-78435_a2_em44
ORG
QUASI
Częstochowa Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e36
001-78435_a2_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
30 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e37
001-78435_a2_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
23 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e38
001-78435_a2_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Bygodszcz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e39
001-78435_a2_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e40
001-78435_a2_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
24 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e41
001-78435_a2_em50
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e42
001-78435_a2_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
27 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e43
001-78435_a2_em52
ORG
QUASI
Bygdoszcz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78435_a2_e37
001-78435_a2_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
23 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78435_a2_e44
001-78435_a2_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
17 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e45
001-78435_a2_em55
DATETIME
NO_MASK
between 9 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e11
001-78435_a2_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
12 August 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e46
001-78435_a2_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e47
001-78435_a2_em59
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e48
001-78435_a2_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
16 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e49
001-78435_a2_em61
ORG
QUASI
Bydgoszcz Detention Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em62
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e50
001-78435_a2_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
Detention Centre by fax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e51
001-78435_a2_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
1 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e52
001-78435_a2_em66
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e53
001-78435_a2_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
22 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e42
001-78435_a2_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
27 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e44
001-78435_a2_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
17 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e52
001-78435_a2_em72
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e51
001-78435_a2_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
1 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em75
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e54
001-78435_a2_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
27 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e55
001-78435_a2_em77
DATETIME
NO_MASK
10 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e56
001-78435_a2_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
24 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em79
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em80
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e33
001-78435_a2_em81
ORG
QUASI
Bydgoszcz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e25
001-78435_a2_em82
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e57
001-78435_a2_em83
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e58
001-78435_a2_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
27 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e59
001-78435_a2_em85
ORG
QUASI
Gdansk Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e60
001-78435_a2_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
30 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e61
001-78435_a2_em87
DATETIME
NO_MASK
over three years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e62
001-78435_a2_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Courts
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e63
001-78435_a2_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
21 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e64
001-78435_a2_em90
DATETIME
NO_MASK
25 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78435_a2_e65
001-78435_a2_em91
DATETIME
QUASI
20 June 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e66
001-78435_a2_em92
ORG
QUASI
Gdańsk Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e67
001-78435_a2_em93
DATETIME
NO_MASK
Between 15 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e68
001-78435_a2_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
15 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e69
001-78435_a2_em95
ORG
QUASI
Inowrocław District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e70
001-78435_a2_em96
DATETIME
QUASI
27 September 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e33
001-78435_a2_em97
ORG
QUASI
Bydgoszcz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e71
001-78435_a2_em98
DATETIME
NO_MASK
eight years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e72
001-78435_a2_em99
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e59
001-78435_a2_em100
ORG
QUASI
Gdansk Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e33
001-78435_a2_em101
ORG
QUASI
Bydgoszcz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e73
001-78435_a2_em102
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e74
001-78435_a2_em103
ORG
QUASI
Zielona Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e75
001-78435_a2_em104
LOC
NO_MASK
Bygdoszcz Detention Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e76
001-78435_a2_em105
DATETIME
QUASI
25 May 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e33
001-78435_a2_em106
ORG
QUASI
Bydgoszcz Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e77
001-78435_a2_em107
MISC
QUASI
Zielona Góra
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e78
001-78435_a2_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-78435_a2_e79
001-78435_a2_em109
PERSON
QUASI
Zielona Góra Regional Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e80
001-78435_a2_em110
DATETIME
QUASI
12 July 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e74
001-78435_a2_em111
ORG
QUASI
Zielona Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e81
001-78435_a2_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
14 December 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e82
001-78435_a2_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
24 January 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e83
001-78435_a2_em114
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e84
001-78435_a2_em115
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e85
001-78435_a2_em116
DATETIME
QUASI
Between December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e86
001-78435_a2_em117
DATETIME
QUASI
November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e87
001-78435_a2_em118
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e83
001-78435_a2_em119
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e88
001-78435_a2_em120
DATETIME
QUASI
13 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e83
001-78435_a2_em121
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e89
001-78435_a2_em122
DATETIME
NO_MASK
19 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e90
001-78435_a2_em123
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e91
001-78435_a2_em124
DATETIME
QUASI
25 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e92
001-78435_a2_em125
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e93
001-78435_a2_em126
DATETIME
NO_MASK
23 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e94
001-78435_a2_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e95
001-78435_a2_em128
DATETIME
QUASI
22 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e83
001-78435_a2_em129
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e96
001-78435_a2_em130
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e74
001-78435_a2_em131
ORG
QUASI
Zielona Góra Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e97
001-78435_a2_em132
DATETIME
QUASI
26 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e83
001-78435_a2_em133
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e98
001-78435_a2_em134
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e99
001-78435_a2_em135
DATETIME
NO_MASK
25 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e100
001-78435_a2_em136
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e101
001-78435_a2_em137
DATETIME
NO_MASK
23 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e102
001-78435_a2_em138
DATETIME
QUASI
21 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e103
001-78435_a2_em139
DATETIME
QUASI
28 April 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-78435_a2_e104
001-78435_a2_em140
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twenty-five years
Jacek Dombek
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Jacek Dombek