PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 19844/08) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Michael Becker (“the applicant”), on 22 April 2008.

The applicant was represented by Ms U. Koller, a lawyer practising in Melk. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs.

The applicant complained, in particular, that in the proceedings for the withdrawing of his driving licence he did not have a hearing before the Administrative Court.

On 28 September 2009 the application was communicated to the Government.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1959 and lives in Vienna.

On 3 October 2000 the applicant was stopped by the police at 11.05 p.m. while driving his car on a public road. He was ordered to undergo a breathalyser test. After nine attempts to measure the amount of alcohol, among which only one was valid, the test was discontinued. The applicant’s conduct was considered to amount to a refusal to undergo the breathalyser test and his driving licence was temporarily withdrawn. Two different sets of proceedings were initiated against the applicant.

On 15 December 2000 the Melk District Administrative Authority (Bezirkshauptmannschaft, DAA) issued a decision to withdraw the applicant’s driving licence for a period of four months as a preventive measure to secure road safety. The DAA observed that, according to the case-law of the Administrative Court, it amounted to a refusal to undergo a breathalyser test if the person who had been ordered to undergo the test had made four invalid attempts out of five. According to the statements of police officers W. and R. and the paper print outs of the test results, the applicant had been allowed to make much more attempts, namely nine and only one had produced a valid result. When the applicant had claimed that the breathalyser had been defective, police officer R had made himself two attempts using the same mouthpiece as the applicant and both attempts had produced valid results. The DAA also noted that technical tests of the breathalyser had been carried out on 15 May 2000 and on 9 November 2000 and each time the breathalyser had been found fully functioning. On the basis of this evidence it was safe to conclude that the applicant had refused to undergo the breathalyser test. The DAA also ordered that an appeal had no suspensive effect because it was necessary to avoid the risk that a person lacking trustworthiness for road traffic might drive. Moreover the applicant was ordered to follow driver improvement training before his driving licence would be returned.

The applicant appealed and argued that the DAA should have obtained the report of a technical expert on the functioning of the breathlyser as only such an expert could clarify whether the machine was working properly.

On 19 December 2005 the Lower Austria Regional Governor (Landeshauptmann) dismissed the applicant’s appeal. He found that according to the paper print out of the breathalyser test the applicant had made nine attempts of which only one had been valid whereas during the other attempts the applicant had not blown sufficient air into the mouth-piece. Thereupon two attempts with the same mouth-piece as used by the applicant had been made by police officer R., which both produced valid results. Thus, there were no indications that the breathalyser did not function properly or that it had not been handled correctly by the police officers who had been specially trained for this task. In such circumstances a request for obtaining a report by a technical expert, without giving clear indications in what the malfunctioning of the breathalyser might have consisted, amounted to an inadmissible request for evidence (Erkundungsbeweis). The Regional Governor concluded that refusing to undergo a breathalyser test was as serious as driving under the influence of alcohol because it prevented the authorities from verifying whether a person was actually drunk. The additional measure imposed on the applicant was therefore justified in order to improve his attitude.

On 8 February 2006 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Administrative Court and requested an oral hearing. In his complaint he argued that the Lower Austria Regional Government had not been competent to decide on his case as he resided in Vienna. He further complained about the authority’s assessment of evidence, as the statements of the police officers who had ordered him to undergo the breathalyser test were contradictory and stated that they should be questioned on the precise circumstances in which breathalyser test had been carried out. Lastly he complained that the authority had wrongly applied the law because it should not have refused to obtain the opinion of a technical expert on the functioning of the breathalyser.

On 27 September 2007 the Administrative Court dismissed the applicant’s complaint. It found that on the basis of the evidence before them the authorities had arrived at the conclusion that the applicant had refused to undergo the breathalyser test. The applicant had failed to raise any substantial arguments against these findings and had not shown that the assessment of the evidence carried out by the authorities was contradictory or implausible. In accordance with Section 39 § 2 of the Administrative Court Act (Verwaltungsgerichtshofgesetz) the Administrative Court dismissed the applicant’s request for a hearing as it found that an oral hearing was not likely to contribute to the clarification of the case. This decision was served on the applicant’s counsel on 25 October 2007.

On 20 April 2001 the DAA issued a penal order (Straferkenntnis) and imposed a fine for refusal to take the breathalyser test.

On 30 April 2001 the applicant appealed.

On 30 September 2005 the Lower Austria Independent Administrative Panel found that, since no decision had been taken within the prescribed time limit of 15 months after the lodging of the appeal, the fine imposed by the DAA had expired ipso iure.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e1
001-155088_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
19844/08
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e2
001-155088_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e3
001-155088_a11_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-155088_a11_e4
001-155088_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Michael Becker
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e5
001-155088_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
22 April 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e6
001-155088_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Ms U. Koller
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-155088_a11_e7
001-155088_a11_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Melk
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-155088_a11_e2
001-155088_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-155088_a11_em2
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-155088_a11_e2
001-155088_a11_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
001-155088_a11_em2
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e8
001-155088_a11_em10
PERSON
QUASI
H. Tichy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e9
001-155088_a11_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e10
001-155088_a11_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry for Europe
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e11
001-155088_a11_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e12
001-155088_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e2
001-155088_a11_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e13
001-155088_a11_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1959
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e14
001-155088_a11_em17
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e15
001-155088_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
3 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e16
001-155088_a11_em19
DATETIME
NO_MASK
11.05 p.m.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em20
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-155088_a11_e18
001-155088_a11_em21
MISC
QUASI
amount of alcohol
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em22
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e19
001-155088_a11_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
15 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e20
001-155088_a11_em24
ORG
QUASI
Melk District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-155088_a11_e20
001-155088_a11_em25
ORG
QUASI
001-155088_a11_em24
Bezirkshauptmannschaft
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e20
001-155088_a11_em26
ORG
QUASI
001-155088_a11_em24
DAA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e21
001-155088_a11_em27
DATETIME
NO_MASK
four months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e20
001-155088_a11_em28
ORG
QUASI
DAA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e11
001-155088_a11_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em30
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e22
001-155088_a11_em31
PERSON
NO_MASK
W.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-155088_a11_e23
001-155088_a11_em32
PERSON
NO_MASK
R.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-155088_a11_e24
001-155088_a11_em33
PERSON
NO_MASK
R
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e20
001-155088_a11_em34
ORG
QUASI
DAA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e25
001-155088_a11_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e26
001-155088_a11_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em37
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e20
001-155088_a11_em38
ORG
QUASI
DAA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e20
001-155088_a11_em39
ORG
QUASI
DAA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e27
001-155088_a11_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
19 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-155088_a11_e28
001-155088_a11_em41
PERSON
QUASI
Lower Austria Regional Governor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-155088_a11_e29
001-155088_a11_em42
PERSON
QUASI
Landeshauptmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em43
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e23
001-155088_a11_em44
PERSON
NO_MASK
R.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em45
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-155088_a11_e30
001-155088_a11_em46
MISC
QUASI
drunk
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e31
001-155088_a11_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
8 February 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e11
001-155088_a11_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e32
001-155088_a11_em49
ORG
QUASI
Lower Austria Regional Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e14
001-155088_a11_em50
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em51
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em52
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e33
001-155088_a11_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
27 September 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e11
001-155088_a11_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em55
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e11
001-155088_a11_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e34
001-155088_a11_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
25 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e35
001-155088_a11_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e20
001-155088_a11_em59
ORG
QUASI
DAA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e17
001-155088_a11_em60
MISC
QUASI
breathalyser test
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e36
001-155088_a11_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e37
001-155088_a11_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e38
001-155088_a11_em63
ORG
QUASI
Lower Austria Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e39
001-155088_a11_em64
DATETIME
NO_MASK
15 months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-155088_a11_e20
001-155088_a11_em65
ORG
QUASI
DAA
Michael Becker
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Michael Becker