PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 92/03) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Andrzej Pisk-Piskowski (“the applicant”), on 13 November 2002.

The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz, of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 24 March 2004 the President of the Fourth Section decided to communicate the complaint concerning the monitoring of the applicant’s correspondence to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it was decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1967 and lives in Opole, Poland.

A. The criminal proceedings

In 1998 the prosecution service filed with the Opole District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) a bill of indictment in which it charged the applicant with making unlawful threats. In the course of the court proceedings the applicant was represented by a court-appointed lawyer. On 6 November 2001 the trial court held a hearing at which the applicant and his court‑appointed lawyer were present. During the hearing, the court scheduled the next hearing for 4 December 2001 about which the applicant was informed.

On 4 December 2001 a hearing took place before the trial court. The applicant did not attend the hearing but his counsel was present. The applicant failed to give any reasons for his absence and the trial court finished the proceedings and decided in the presence of the counsel that the judgment would be delivered on 11 December 2001.

On 11 December 2001 the Opole District Court delivered a judgment in which it convicted the applicant as charged and sentenced him to a prison term of one year and six months. Neither the applicant nor his counsel was present at the delivery of the judgment.

The applicant did not appeal against the judgment of 11 December 2001 and did not apply for a copy of the reasons of that judgment.

Subsequently, the applicant lodged an application for leave to apply for a reasoned judgment out of time. In his application, he argued that his absence at the hearing held on 4 December 2001 was justified because he had been recently released from the detention and on 5 December 2001 he had been assaulted. The applicant also complained that he had not been informed about the date of the delivery of the judgment. On 9 April 2002 the Opole District Court examined the application and dismissed it. The court, in a reasoned decision, established that the applicant had known about the hearing scheduled for 4 December 2001. He failed to attend it without providing any justification for his absence. Therefore, the trial court was entitled to terminate the proceedings in his absence on the basis of Article 376 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court further examined the reasons for the absence submitted by the applicant. It established that in fact he had been released on 22 November 2001 - two weeks prior to the hearing. Moreover, while it was true that the applicant had been assaulted, nevertheless, that had happened the day following the hearing and the injuries sustained by the applicant, according to a hospital certificate, were not serious and the applicant was not admitted to hospital. With regard to the complaint that he was not informed about the date of the delivery of the judgment, the court found that the applicant had not been diligent since he had not contacted his lawyer. The applicant was aware of the scheduled hearing and knew the address and the name of his court‑appointed lawyer. The applicant appealed against this decision. On 16 May 2003 the Opole Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) examined the reasons given by the District Court and upheld the decision.

On 14 January 2002 the applicant started serving the prison sentence ordered by the judgment of 11 December 2001.

B. The monitoring of the applicant’s correspondence

On 6 December 2002 the Court received the applicant’s first letter dated 13 November 2002. The letter was sent while the applicant was serving a prison sentence in the Wrocław Detention Centre. The envelope in which the letter was delivered bears the following stamps: “District Court in Legnica, censored on 22.11.02” (Sąd Rejonowy w Legnicy, cenzurowano dnia 22.11.02) and “252, 14 NOV 2002, register number 2738/01” (252, 14 LIS 2002, numer ewid. 2738/01).
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e1
001-69356_a4_em1
CODE
DIRECT
92/03
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e2
001-69356_a4_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
ETHNIC
insert
001-69356_a4_e3
001-69356_a4_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish national
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e4
001-69356_a4_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Andrzej Pisk-Piskowski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e5
001-69356_a4_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
13 November 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-69356_a4_e6
001-69356_a4_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e7
001-69356_a4_em7
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-69356_a4_e8
001-69356_a4_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e9
001-69356_a4_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
24 March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e10
001-69356_a4_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1967
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e11
001-69356_a4_em11
LOC
QUASI
Opole, Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e12
001-69356_a4_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-69356_a4_e13
001-69356_a4_em13
ORG
QUASI
Opole District Court (Sąd Rejonowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e14
001-69356_a4_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e15
001-69356_a4_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
4 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e15
001-69356_a4_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
4 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e16
001-69356_a4_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e16
001-69356_a4_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-69356_a4_e13
001-69356_a4_em19
ORG
QUASI
001-69356_a4_em13
Opole District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e17
001-69356_a4_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
one year and six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e16
001-69356_a4_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e15
001-69356_a4_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
4 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e18
001-69356_a4_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
5 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e19
001-69356_a4_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
9 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e13
001-69356_a4_em25
ORG
QUASI
Opole District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e15
001-69356_a4_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
4 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-69356_a4_e20
001-69356_a4_em27
MISC
NO_MASK
Article 376 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-69356_a4_e21
001-69356_a4_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e22
001-69356_a4_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-69356_a4_e23
001-69356_a4_em30
ORG
QUASI
Opole Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e24
001-69356_a4_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
14 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e16
001-69356_a4_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e25
001-69356_a4_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
6 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-69356_a4_e5
001-69356_a4_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
13 November 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-69356_a4_e26
001-69356_a4_em35
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Detention Centre
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-69356_a4_e27
001-69356_a4_em36
MISC
QUASI
District Court in Legnica, censored on 22.11.02” (Sąd Rejonowy w Legnicy, cenzurowano dnia 22.11.02)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-69356_a4_e28
001-69356_a4_em37
MISC
QUASI
252, 14 NOV 2002, register number 2738/01” (252, 14 LIS 2002, numer ewid. 2738/01)
Andrzej Pisk-Piskowski
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Andrzej Pisk-Piskowski