PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) on 28 October 1996 and by the Government of the Republic of Austria (“the Government”) on 25 November 1996, within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 § 1 and Article 47 of the Convention. It originated in an application (no. 21835/93) against Austria lodged with the Commission under Article 25 by an Austrian national, Mr Johannes Werner, on 16 March 1993. The Commission’s request referred to Articles 44 and 48 and to the declaration whereby Austria recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46); the Government's application referred to Article 48. The object of the request and of the application was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

The applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 31 of Rules of Court B). The lawyer was given leave by the President to use the German language (Rule 28 § 3).

The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Mr F. Matscher, the elected judge of Austrian nationality (Article 43 of the Convention), and Mr R. Ryssdal, the President of the Court (Rule 21 § 4 (b)). On 29 October 1996 the President decided that in the interests of the proper administration of justice this case and the case of Szücs v. Austria should be heard by the same Chamber (Rule 21 § 7). On the same day, in the presence of the Registrar, he drew by lot the names of the other seven members, namely Mr F. Gölcüklü, Mr L.-E. Pettiti, Mr A. Spielmann, Mr N. Valticos, Mrs E. Palm, Mr L. Wildhaber and Mr B. Repik (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 § 5).

As President of the Chamber (Rule 21 § 6), Mr Ryssdal, acting through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the Government, the applicant’s lawyer and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 39 § 1 and 40). Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the Government’s and the applicant’s memorials on 2 April 1997. On 24 January 1997 the Commission had produced various documents relating to the proceedings before it, as requested by the Registrar on the President’s instructions.

In accordance with the President’s decision, the hearing in this case and in the Szücs case took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 25 June 1997. The Court had held a preparatory meeting beforehand. There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Mr F. Cede, Ambassador, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Agent, Mrs I. Gartner, public prosecutor, Department of Criminal Affairs and Pardons, Federal Ministry of Justice, Mrs I. Siess, Constitutional Service, Federal Chancellery, Advisers; (b) for the Commission Mr A. Weitzel, Delegate; (c) for the applicant Mr G. Bürstmayr, of the Munich Bar, Counsel; (d) for Mr Szücs Mr T. Schreiner, of the Eisenstadt Bar, Counsel. The Court heard addresses by Mr Weitzel, Mr Bürstmayr, Mr Schreiner, Mr Cede and Mrs Gartner.

AS TO THE FACTS

I. circumstances of the case

Mr Johannes Werner, an Austrian national born in 1963, lives in Vienna.

A. Detention pending trial

On 15 May 1991 the police arrested a Mr and Mrs Hauser (see paragraph 25 below), who were suspected of fraudulently using a credit card which did not belong to them when making purchases in various shops in Vienna to the value of about 200,000 Austrian schillings (ATS). On 17 May they were detained pending trial.

On 1 July 1991 the police also arrested the applicant, who was suspected of having aided and abetted Mr and Mrs Hauser by forging the signature on the credit card. On 3 July he was detained pending trial.

On 8 July 1991 Mr and Mrs Hauser were released, and on 19 July the applicant was released.

B. Discontinuance of the proceedings

On 24 February 1992 the investigating judge at the Vienna Regional Court (Landesgericht) decided to discontinue the proceedings in the light of a graphologist’s finding that it was unlikely that the signatures on the payment slips for the purchases made with the stolen credit card were in Mr Werner’s hand and of the fact that the witnesses called by the public prosecutor did not have sufficiently clear memories.

C. The claim for compensation for detention

In the meantime, on 4 February 1992, the public prosecutor’s office (Staatsanwaltschaft) had asked the Regional Court to declare that the applicant and Mr and Mrs Hauser were not entitled to compensation for their detention under section 2 (1) (b) of the Compensation (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1969 (Strafrechtliches Entschädigungsgesetz, “the 1969 Act” – see paragraph 19 below), on the ground that the suspicion concerning them had not been dispelled.

On 21 April 1992 the investigating judge interviewed the applicant and Mr and Mrs Hauser and told them of the application made by the public prosecutor’s office.

The applicant and Mr and Mrs Hauser sought compensation from the State for the pecuniary damage sustained on account of their detention.

On 3 June 1992 the Review Division (Ratskammer) of the Vienna Regional Court, sitting in private, refused their compensation claims on the ground that, contrary to the requirements of section 2 (1) (b) of the 1969 Act, the suspicion concerning them had not been dispelled. No representative of the public prosecutor’s office attended the deliberations.

On 15 June 1992 Mr Werner and Mr and Mrs Hauser appealed against that decision to the Vienna Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht). They asked the Court of Appeal to take further evidence and, in particular, to hear witnesses.

On 2 September 1992 the principal public prosecutor’s office (Oberstaatsanwaltschaft) submitted written observations. It asked the Court of Appeal to dismiss the appeal and not to take further evidence as the witnesses’ statements were not capable of exculpating the appellants. These observations were not communicated to the applicant or to Mr and Mrs Hauser.

On 29 October 1992 the Vienna Court of Appeal, sitting in private, dismissed the appeal. It ruled as follows: “In the first place, the appellants’ argument that suspicion does not have to be wholly dispelled for compensation to be payable under section 2 (1) (b) of the Compensation (Criminal Proceedings) Act is contradicted by the settled case-law of the Austrian courts. It has been consistently held that suspicion must be dispelled sufficiently to establish that the detained person is not punishable, and cannot be prosecuted, on account of the conduct in respect of which his detention was ordered. Where that remains only doubtful, suspicion is not dispelled within the meaning of section 2 (1) (b) of the Act. The appellants’ assertion that this case-law reverses the burden of proof is incorrect, since cogent evidence must be adduced before it can be accepted that suspicion has been dispelled. In this connection, there is no justification for giving the appellants, as they demanded, the opportunity to prove their innocence by taking further evidence, since the evidence they propose to adduce cannot be considered likely to lead to such a result. Seeing that the suspicion concerning the appellants is based mainly on the witness statements of 16 March 1991 and that, in addition, it is not possible to determine when the other offences were committed, conclusive results cannot be expected if fresh evidence is taken in the form of the appellant Johannes Werner’s time-sheets and itineraries for 18 and 19 March, together with his tachograph discs, because the offences could have been committed during the rest stops on those journeys, or before or after them, especially as there are gaps in the time-sheets submitted by Mr Werner. The witnesses it was proposed to call have already been interviewed by the police and have already been confronted with the appellants. The main reason why the prosecution was abandoned was that with the passing of time those witnesses’ memories had begun to falter. However, if their memories were so defective that they could no longer be considered adequate to establish guilt, neither can they in the present proceedings form an adequate basis for awarding compensation. The appellants did not dispute that the police inquiries had given rise to real suspicion concerning them. That suspicion was not subsequently dispelled, but on account of some remaining doubt was simply not sufficient to support a finding of guilt. The conditions which must be met under section 2 (1) (b) of the Compensation (Criminal Proceedings) Act in order to be able to claim compensation have accordingly not been satisfied and the appellants’ claims must therefore fail.” No representative of the principal public prosecutor’s office attended the deliberations.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e1
001-58114_a8_em1
DATETIME
QUASI
28 October 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e2
001-58114_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Government of the Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e3
001-58114_a8_em3
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e4
001-58114_a8_em4
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e5
001-58114_a8_em5
CODE
DIRECT
21835/93
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e6
001-58114_a8_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e7
001-58114_a8_em7
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e8
001-58114_a8_em8
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Johannes Werner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e9
001-58114_a8_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e6
001-58114_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e10
001-58114_a8_em11
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e11
001-58114_a8_em12
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr F. Matscher
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e7
001-58114_a8_em13
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e12
001-58114_a8_em14
PERSON
QUASI
001-58114_a8_em24
Mr R. Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e13
001-58114_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
29 October 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e14
001-58114_a8_em16
MISC
NO_MASK
Szücs v. Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e15
001-58114_a8_em17
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Gölcüklü
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e16
001-58114_a8_em18
PERSON
QUASI
Mr L.-E. Pettiti
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e17
001-58114_a8_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Spielmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e18
001-58114_a8_em20
PERSON
QUASI
Mr N. Valticos
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e19
001-58114_a8_em21
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs E. Palm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e20
001-58114_a8_em22
PERSON
QUASI
Mr L. Wildhaber
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e21
001-58114_a8_em23
PERSON
QUASI
Mr B. Repik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e12
001-58114_a8_em24
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e22
001-58114_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
2 April 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e23
001-58114_a8_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
24 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58114_a8_e24
001-58114_a8_em27
PERSON
QUASI
Szücs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58114_a8_e25
001-58114_a8_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e26
001-58114_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
25 June 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e27
001-58114_a8_em30
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Cede
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e28
001-58114_a8_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e29
001-58114_a8_em32
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs I. Gartner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e30
001-58114_a8_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Department of Criminal Affairs and Pardons
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e31
001-58114_a8_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e32
001-58114_a8_em35
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs I. Siess
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e33
001-58114_a8_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Service
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e34
001-58114_a8_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Chancellery
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e35
001-58114_a8_em38
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Weitzel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e36
001-58114_a8_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr G. Bürstmayr
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e37
001-58114_a8_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Munich Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e38
001-58114_a8_em41
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Szücs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e39
001-58114_a8_em42
PERSON
QUASI
Mr T. Schreiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e40
001-58114_a8_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Eisenstadt Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e35
001-58114_a8_em44
PERSON
QUASI
001-58114_a8_em38
Mr Weitzel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e36
001-58114_a8_em45
PERSON
QUASI
001-58114_a8_em39
Mr Bürstmayr
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e39
001-58114_a8_em46
PERSON
QUASI
001-58114_a8_em42
Mr Schreiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e27
001-58114_a8_em47
PERSON
QUASI
001-58114_a8_em30
Mr Cede
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e29
001-58114_a8_em48
PERSON
QUASI
001-58114_a8_em32
Mrs Gartner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e8
001-58114_a8_em49
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Johannes Werner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e7
001-58114_a8_em50
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e41
001-58114_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
1963
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e42
001-58114_a8_em52
LOC
QUASI
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e43
001-58114_a8_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e44
001-58114_a8_em54
PERSON
QUASI
Mr and Mrs Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e42
001-58114_a8_em55
LOC
QUASI
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e45
001-58114_a8_em56
ORG
QUASI
200,000 Austrian schillings (ATS)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e46
001-58114_a8_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
17 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e47
001-58114_a8_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e44
001-58114_a8_em59
PERSON
QUASI
Mr and Mrs Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e48
001-58114_a8_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
3 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e49
001-58114_a8_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
8 July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e44
001-58114_a8_em62
PERSON
QUASI
Mr and Mrs Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e50
001-58114_a8_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
19 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e51
001-58114_a8_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
24 February 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e52
001-58114_a8_em65
ORG
QUASI
Vienna Regional Court (Landesgericht)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e53
001-58114_a8_em66
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Werner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e54
001-58114_a8_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
4 February 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e55
001-58114_a8_em68
ORG
NO_MASK
public prosecutor’s office (Staatsanwaltschaft)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e56
001-58114_a8_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e44
001-58114_a8_em70
PERSON
QUASI
Mr and Mrs Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e57
001-58114_a8_em71
DATETIME
QUASI
21 April 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e44
001-58114_a8_em72
PERSON
QUASI
Mr and Mrs Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e58
001-58114_a8_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
public prosecutor’s office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e44
001-58114_a8_em74
PERSON
QUASI
Mr and Mrs Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e59
001-58114_a8_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
3 June 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e60
001-58114_a8_em76
ORG
NO_MASK
Review Division (Ratskammer)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e61
001-58114_a8_em77
ORG
QUASI
Vienna Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e58
001-58114_a8_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
public prosecutor’s office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e62
001-58114_a8_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
15 June 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e53
001-58114_a8_em80
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Werner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e44
001-58114_a8_em81
PERSON
QUASI
Mr and Mrs Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e63
001-58114_a8_em82
ORG
QUASI
Vienna Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e64
001-58114_a8_em83
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e65
001-58114_a8_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
2 September 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e66
001-58114_a8_em85
ORG
NO_MASK
public prosecutor’s office (Oberstaatsanwaltschaft)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e64
001-58114_a8_em86
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58114_a8_e44
001-58114_a8_em87
PERSON
QUASI
Mr and Mrs Hauser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e67
001-58114_a8_em88
DATETIME
QUASI
29 October 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e68
001-58114_a8_em89
ORG
QUASI
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e7
001-58114_a8_em90
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e69
001-58114_a8_em91
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e70
001-58114_a8_em92
PERSON
DIRECT
Johannes Werner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e71
001-58114_a8_em93
DATETIME
QUASI
18 and 19 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e53
001-58114_a8_em94
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Werner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58114_a8_e58
001-58114_a8_em95
ORG
NO_MASK
public prosecutor’s office
Johannes Werner
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Johannes Werner