PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 65631/01) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Paul Kugler (“the applicant”), on 16 January 2001.

The applicant was represented by Mr W.L. Weh, a lawyer practising in Bregenz. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador H. Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that proceedings for a building permit had lasted unreasonably long, that no public hearing had been held and that the proceedings had been unfair.

By a decision of 27 November 2008 the Court declared the application partly admissible. In particular, it declared the application inadmissible as regards the complaints raised by the then first applicant Mr Peter Kugler.

The applicant, but not the Government, filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant lives in Imst, Austria.

The applicant is the co-owner of a plot of land in Lech, Austria which had been designated as building land (Bauland); one building had already been constructed on the land. On 22 July 1987 the Lech municipal authorities informed the applicant that they intended to modify the area zoning plan (Flächenwidmungsplan) and to designate the remaining part of the land as open land (Freihaltefläche) because, being located on a steep slope, they considered that the remaining part was not suitable for construction under the Vorarlberg Regional Planning Act (Raumplanungs‑gesetz).

On 6 August 1987 the applicant lodged an application for a building permit in order to construct a hotel on the plot of land at issue.

On 14 June 1988 the Lech municipal authorities issued a building prohibition in respect of the applicant's plot of land.

The Bludenz District Administrative Authority (“the District Administrative Authority”) (Bezirkshauptmannschaft) held a hearing on 23 September 1988 concerning the applicant's application for a building permit. On 4 July 1991 the Lech municipal authorities extended the building prohibition.

On 31 July 1991 the applicant lodged an application for a transfer of jurisdiction (Devolutionsantrag) because the District Administrative Authority had not reached a decision within the statutory six-month time-limit.

The Vorarlberg Regional Government (“the Regional Government”) allowed that application on 10 October 1991 but dismissed the applicant's application for a building permit on the ground that the permit would contravene the building prohibition. The applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court.

On 19 March 1992 Lech Municipal Council (“the Municipal Council”) issued a decree determining the maximum building density (Baunutzungszahl) for the category of land which included the applicant's land, and on 2 July 1992 it lifted the building prohibition. The applicant thereupon asked the Regional Government to reopen the building permit proceedings.

On 28 September 1992 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint against the decision of 10 October 1991. It found that the building prohibition was lawful.

On 29 September 1992 the Regional Government dismissed the request to reopen the building permit proceedings. The applicant lodged a complaint with the Administrative Court.

On 28 January 1993 the Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's complaint. It found that the conditions for reopening the building permit proceedings had not been met. That decision was served on 24 February 1993.

The applicant requested a partition of land (Grundstücksteilung) on 26 September 1995, but withdrew this request on 30 April 1996.

On 11 November 1996 the applicant lodged a fresh application for a building permit to enable him to carry out construction work on his land.

On 26 February 1997 the District Administrative Authority informed the applicant of the Lech municipal authorities' submissions to the effect that the maximum building density laid down by the decree of 19 March 1992 did not allow the construction of another building on his plot of land. The applicant commented on this information. After the Lech municipal authorities had submitted further comments on 6 October 1997, the applicant asked the District Administrative Authority to decide on his application.

On 25 June 1997 the Municipal Council adopted a building plan (Bebauungsplan) which amended the decree of 19 March 1992 but left the maximum building density unchanged. On 1 July 1997 the Regional Government approved the building plan.

On 28 October 1997 the District Administrative Authority dismissed the applicant's application for a building permit. It found that the maximum building density defined in the building plan did not allow the construction of another building on the applicant's plot of land. On 12 November 1997 the applicant lodged an appeal.

The Regional Government dismissed the appeal on 2 June 1998 and upheld the District Administrative Authority's finding.

On 16 July 1998 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court and requested an oral hearing. He submitted that the area zoning plan and the building plan were unlawful, and claimed that the Regional Government had refused to allow him to consult the case file in the building plan proceedings.

On 7 September 1998 the Lech municipal authorities submitted their observations; on 15 September 1998 the Regional Government did likewise.

On 6 October 1998 the applicant's counsel consulted the case file at the Constitutional Court, which, on the following day, forwarded all the case file documents to him.

On 8 June 2001 the applicant's counsel asked the Constitutional Court if he could consult further documents concerning the original area zoning plan.

On 12 June 2001 the Constitutional Court declined to deal with the complaint because it lacked any prospect of success. It found that, considering the hillside location of the plot of land, its allegedly unlawful designation appeared to be reasonable.

Subsequently, the case was transferred to the Administrative Court and on 11 October 2001 the applicant amended his complaint and requested an oral hearing. He submitted that the refusal to issue the building permit had been based on an unlawful area zoning plan and building plan. He requested that a hearing be held and an on-site inspection carried out, and that he be given the opportunity to consult all the documents concerning his plot of land.

On 20 March 2003 the Administrative Court dismissed the complaint. It found that the refusal to issue the building permit had been lawful, because the maximum building density for the plot of land at issue had already been exceeded by the construction of the existing buildings. Furthermore, it found that it was not necessary to hold a hearing or to carry out an on-site inspection, because the applicant had merely contested the lawfulness of the area zoning plan and the building plan, which had already been reviewed by the Constitutional Court. That decision was served on 30 April 2003.

On 19 January 2005 the applicant applied for a building permit for a private house on the same plot of land.

Following a hearing held on 5 August 2005, on 2 September 2005 the Lech municipal authorities granted the application; the decision was served on the applicant's counsel on 5 December 2005.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e1
001-100928_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
65631/01
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-100928_a8_e2
001-100928_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e3
001-100928_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e4
001-100928_a8_em4
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Paul Kugler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e5
001-100928_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
16 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e6
001-100928_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr W.L. Weh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e7
001-100928_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Bregenz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e8
001-100928_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e9
001-100928_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
H. Tichy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e10
001-100928_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e11
001-100928_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e12
001-100928_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
27 November 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e13
001-100928_a8_em13
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Peter Kugler
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e14
001-100928_a8_em14
LOC
QUASI
Imst, Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e15
001-100928_a8_em15
LOC
QUASI
Lech, Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e16
001-100928_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
22 July 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e17
001-100928_a8_em17
LOC
QUASI
Lech
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e18
001-100928_a8_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
6 August 1987
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e19
001-100928_a8_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
14 June 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e17
001-100928_a8_em20
LOC
QUASI
Lech
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e20
001-100928_a8_em21
ORG
QUASI
Bludenz District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100928_a8_e20
001-100928_a8_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
001-100928_a8_em21
the District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100928_a8_e20
001-100928_a8_em23
ORG
NO_MASK
001-100928_a8_em21
Bezirkshauptmannschaft
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e21
001-100928_a8_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
23 September 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e22
001-100928_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
4 July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e17
001-100928_a8_em26
LOC
QUASI
Lech
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e23
001-100928_a8_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
31 July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e20
001-100928_a8_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
the District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e24
001-100928_a8_em29
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e25
001-100928_a8_em30
ORG
QUASI
Vorarlberg Regional Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100928_a8_e25
001-100928_a8_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
001-100928_a8_em30
the Regional Government”
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e26
001-100928_a8_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e27
001-100928_a8_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e28
001-100928_a8_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e29
001-100928_a8_em35
ORG
QUASI
Lech Municipal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100928_a8_e30
001-100928_a8_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
the Municipal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e31
001-100928_a8_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
2 July 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e32
001-100928_a8_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e33
001-100928_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
28 September 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e27
001-100928_a8_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e26
001-100928_a8_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e34
001-100928_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e32
001-100928_a8_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e35
001-100928_a8_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e36
001-100928_a8_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
28 January 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e35
001-100928_a8_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e37
001-100928_a8_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
24 February 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e38
001-100928_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
26 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e39
001-100928_a8_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e40
001-100928_a8_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
11 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e41
001-100928_a8_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
26 February 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e20
001-100928_a8_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
the District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e17
001-100928_a8_em53
LOC
QUASI
Lech
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e28
001-100928_a8_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e17
001-100928_a8_em55
LOC
QUASI
Lech
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e42
001-100928_a8_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
6 October 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e20
001-100928_a8_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
the District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e43
001-100928_a8_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
25 June 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e44
001-100928_a8_em59
ORG
NO_MASK
Municipal Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e28
001-100928_a8_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e45
001-100928_a8_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e32
001-100928_a8_em62
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e46
001-100928_a8_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
28 October 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e20
001-100928_a8_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
the District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e47
001-100928_a8_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
12 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e32
001-100928_a8_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e48
001-100928_a8_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
2 June 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-100928_a8_e49
001-100928_a8_em68
ORG
NO_MASK
District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e50
001-100928_a8_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
16 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e27
001-100928_a8_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e32
001-100928_a8_em71
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e51
001-100928_a8_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
7 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e17
001-100928_a8_em73
LOC
QUASI
Lech
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e52
001-100928_a8_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
15 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e32
001-100928_a8_em75
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e53
001-100928_a8_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
6 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e27
001-100928_a8_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e54
001-100928_a8_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
8 June 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e27
001-100928_a8_em79
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e55
001-100928_a8_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
12 June 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e27
001-100928_a8_em81
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e35
001-100928_a8_em82
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e56
001-100928_a8_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
11 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e57
001-100928_a8_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
20 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e35
001-100928_a8_em85
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e27
001-100928_a8_em86
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e58
001-100928_a8_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e59
001-100928_a8_em88
DATETIME
QUASI
19 January 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e60
001-100928_a8_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
5 August 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e61
001-100928_a8_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
2 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e17
001-100928_a8_em91
LOC
QUASI
Lech
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-100928_a8_e62
001-100928_a8_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
5 December 2005
Paul Kugler
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Paul Kugler