PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) on 4 July 1996 and by the Government of the Republic of Austria (“the Government”) on 11 September 1996, within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 § 1 and Article 47 of the Convention. It originated in an application (no. 22714/93) against Austria lodged with the Commission under Article 25 by an Austrian national, Mr Alfred Worm, on 28 July 1993. The Commission's request referred to Articles 44 and 48 and to the declaration whereby Austria recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46); the Government's application referred to Articles 44 and 48. The object of the request and of the application was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 10 of the Convention.

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 35 § 3 (d) of Rules of Court B, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 31). The lawyer was given leave by the President to use the German language (Rule 28 § 3).

The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Mr F. Matscher, the elected judge of Austrian nationality (Article 43 of the Convention), and Mr R. Bernhardt, the Vice-President of the Court (Rule 21 § 4 (b)). On 7 August 1996, in the presence of the Registrar, the President of the Court, Mr R. Ryssdal, drew by lot the names of the other seven members, namely Mr F. Gölcüklü, Mr B. Walsh, Mr J.M. Morenilla, Mr B. Repik, Mr K. Jungwiert, Mr U. Lōhmus and Mr J. Casadevall (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 § 5).

As President of the Chamber (Rule 21 § 6), Mr Bernhardt, acting through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the Austrian Government, the applicant's lawyer and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 39 § 1 and 40). Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the applicant's and the Government's memorials on 21 and 28 February 1997 respectively. The Commission produced the file on the proceedings before it, as requested by the Registrar on the President's instructions.

In accordance with the President's decision, the hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 22 April 1997. The Court had held a preparatory meeting beforehand. There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Mr F. Cede, Ambassador, Legal Adviser, Head of the International Law Department, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Agent, Mr S. Benner, Public Prosecutor, Criminal Affairs and Pardons Department, Federal Ministry of Justice, Ms E. Bertagnoli, International Law Department, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ms I. Ermacora, Constitutional Department, Federal Chancellery, Advisers; (b) for the Commission Mr J.-C. Geus, Delegate; (c) for the applicant Mr W. Masser, of the Vienna Bar, Counsel. The Court heard addresses by Mr Geus, Mr Masser and Mr Cede and also replies to its questions.

AS TO THE FACTS

I. circumstances of the case

The applicant, Mr Alfred Worm, is a journalist. He was born in 1945 and lives in Vienna.

At the material time the applicant was working for Profil, an Austrian periodical dealing mostly with politics. For several years, he investigated into and reported on the case of Mr Hannes Androsch, a former Vice-Chancellor and Minister of Finance, who was involved in certain criminal proceedings.

A. Mr Androsch's criminal record

In 1989 Mr Androsch had been convicted by the Vienna Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) of having made false statements as a witness on two occasions. The court found that he had, before a parliamentary investigating committee (Untersuchungsausschuß), wrongly stated that certain amounts of money had been put at his disposal by a Mr S., whereas in fact they had been transferred from anonymous bank accounts operated by his wife and himself. Furthermore, in the context of criminal proceedings against financial officers charged with abuse of authority, Mr Androsch had stated that several anonymous accounts were held by a Mr S., whereas in fact they were operated by his wife, his mother and himself.

In 1991 the Vienna Regional Criminal Court (Landesgericht für Strafsachen), sitting as a court of two professional judges and two lay judges (Schöffengericht), conducted criminal proceedings against Mr Androsch concerning charges of tax evasion. It held hearings, inter alia, on 25 and 26 May 1991. On 8 October 1991 Mr Androsch was convicted of having evaded taxes between 1973 and 1981. He was sentenced to a fine of 1.8 million Austrian schillings (ATS).

B. The article

On 1 July 1991 Profil had published a two-page article written by the applicant, relating to the above proceedings. It read as follows: “ADJOURNED FOR REFLECTION A criminal court sitting with lay judges spent two days considering Hannes Androsch's tax evasion. The atmosphere during the trial was glacial. ‘Above all, there were to be no mistakes during the proceedings. The case was to be handled with common prudence, properly and to the best of our knowledge and belief – but not with kid gloves!’ (Mr Heinz Tschernutter, tax investigator and witness, when asked what principles had governed the hearing of the Androsch case.) On the day before the trial [the Austrian newspaper] Die Presse dropped the bombshell that was meant to shake all Austria. Lawyer Herbert Schachter was quoted as saying: ‘I’m sure that Dr Androsch will present his case in an impressive manner.’ The horizon was darkened by this impressive presentation and the earth shook as the accused worsened his lousy position by taking refuge in lapses of memory (‘I can't remember’ – ‘I don't have any detailed knowledge’) and by attempting to shift the blame onto others (‘I was represented by tax advisers in all those years’) or by playing the animal that has been maltreated (‘There is not a single large-scale business in the whole of Austria that has been subjected for years to as many inspections as I have been’). Hannes Androsch's biggest problem is Hannes Androsch. His second biggest problem is his lawyer, Herbert Schachter. Together, defending counsel and client are invincible. If blatant scorn could change the temperature, the courtroom would be covered by a thick layer of ice. The patient judge, Friedrich Zeilinger, enquires, ‘So, what exactly happened?’ The blasé defendant replies, ‘I would ask you to infer exactly what happened from the file. You have the documents in front of you – I haven't.’ At another point Androsch said, with a disdainful gesture towards Friedrich Matousek: ‘You, my dear Public Prosecutor ...’ in a tone as if to say ‘You wretched worm!’ Androsch underestimates the judiciary. Once again. Judge Zeilinger knows the file inside out, as was clear from each of his questions. The public prosecutor, Matousek, is able to find his way around in the dark generated by the ‘international legal adviser's’ murky financial deals, and, after all, the prosecuting authorities have been examining the flow of funds to and from Hannes Androsch for a good decade. The accused mistook the excessively polite and markedly accommodating manner of the presiding judge for weakness. He has also known the public prosecutor for years and yet still doesn't know him properly. Matousek speaks quietly and slowly so that one can follow what he says, and acts in a spectacularly unspectacular manner. Only the arrogant interpret his lack of grand gestures as cluelessness. Even the public prosecutor did make one mistake, however, when he cited the judgment of the Court of Appeal in the proceedings against Androsch for giving false evidence (now concluded) and referred to ‘long-term, ingenious and sophisticated linking of accounts’. The alleged tax evasion was perhaps ‘long-term’ but by no means ‘ingenious and sophisticated’. The opposite was true: anyone venturing into the maze of Androsch's accounts containing undeclared money is amazed by the structure's simplicity. It is not only wholly lacking in sophistication but is almost astoundingly crude. Crude not because Androsch lacked intelligence but rather because it was based on the cast-iron foundation of the misplaced loyalty of officials. While Androsch was Finance Minister, until January 1981, he could rely on the zealous but unlawful obedience of a number of powerful officials. As soon as Androsch left, those officials had their hands full concealing their complicity in the cover-up. Admittedly, a whole string of other officials, by no means excessively brave but simply law-abiding, attempted again and again to ensure that the law prevailed. They foundered, however, on practicalities. The team led by the Carinthian tax investigator, Adolf Panzenböck (1982 to 1984) certainly gathered all the relevant details, but the head of one of the Vienna tax offices who had been in charge of the case for only a day and a half issued a clean bill of health. And last week, when they appeared as witnesses, the tax officials Walter Handerek, Heinz Tschernutter and Gerhard Berner, who reopened the file between 1985 and 1988, were treated by defending counsel Herbert Schachter as though they were the accused rather than Androsch. It has been known since 1980 that Androsch evaded taxes. The legal proceedings which were adjourned on Friday furnished further proof that for years the accused escaped prosecution thanks to the zealous obedience of officials. When this was no longer possible as an independent judge was in charge of the investigations, Androsch's advisers took every opportunity to delay the proceedings. It is both symptomatic and revealing that Androsch told the trial court again and again that ‘seven inspections’ had been carried out and on each occasion had found in his favour, and that it was very unfair that just the eighth inspection should shatter the ideal world of his illusory innocence. Everyone except him is to blame for this. Androsch has in the meantime become so completely immersed in the role of the innocent victim that he cannot subjectively conceive of ever having been the guilty party. From an objective point of view, it should be pointed out in Androsch's favour that there may be several people in Austria who in nearly two decades (from 1965 to 1983) have evaded more than 6.3 million schillings in tax without, however, being subjected to such intensive publicity. On the other hand, no Austrian Finance Minister has simultaneously operated seven accounts containing undeclared funds. And, as the public prosecutor put it, although the origin of part of the money had been established, approximately five million schillings were left from unknown sources. It was impious of Androsch to wheel out his ‘adoptive uncle’ again at the trial. Admittedly, he argued eloquently that the ‘adoptive uncle’ was actually an ‘adoptive father’, but nonetheless the name of a dead person had been taken in vain. Androsch alarmingly implicated not only his ‘adoptive father’ Gustav Steiner but also his father-in-law Paul Schärf in these financial proceedings. Both were induced to sacrifice themselves for Androsch and to assume a responsibility for undeclared funds and fiduciary relationships which they had never had. The investigating judge Anton Zelenka and subsequently the tax authorities and other judges (Josef Zehetmayer and later the Court of Appeal) proved long ago that Androsch was lying on this point. The flow of funds into and out of the seven accounts containing money not declared to the tax authorities allows of no other interpretation than that Androsch was evading taxes. His defence in court was disgraceful; after so many years one would at least have expected properly constructed arguments. Each time Judge Zeilinger asked him a specific question he either took refuge in lapses of memory or blamed his ‘adoptive father’. He even trotted out the late Sir Arthur Stein, the explorer of the Silk Road, from whom he claims to have received a legacy. No new submissions were made in court – either as regards the accounts containing undeclared money or as regards the funding for his villas. Anyone who had expected Androsch to tell all and, as announced in the newspapers, to reveal new facts and adduce convincing arguments in his defence was bitterly disappointed. Only in respect of the charges of ‘covert distribution of profits’ was there any legal skirmishing. Mr Schachter told the court that Androsch was a ‘victim of politics’. ‘Crimes had been attempted’ against Androsch and his client had always had ‘opponents who had gone as far as attempting to destroy Androsch psychologically and physically’. Bruno Kreisky and others were to blame for this. The court kept trying very gently to bring the defendant back down to earth from his long-winded waffling. And each time he replied ‘I can't say. After all, I do have other things to do’ (i.e. than grapple with such stupid questions). If necessary, the authorities can always be blamed for everything. In the instant case this cliché clearly did not apply to Judge Zeilinger. For two mornings he demonstrated drawing-room justice at its best. The judge forced himself to be polite even when he was clearly irritated by the defendant's bored self-assurance. On the very first day of the trial an area of psychological tension built up which the former Minister clearly misinterpreted. From time to time the 53-year-old slipped into the role of a public speaker talking politics. He paid less and less attention to the judge's questions and treated the public prosecutor with increasingly provocative contempt. He turned to look more and more often at the public in the gallery, seeking approval, and his gestures increasingly reminded one of the self-satisfied, powerful Vice-Chancellor and Finance Minister accustomed to victory. In those circumstances serious tactical errors were made. Defence counsel interrupted the judge and Androsch succumbed to his own charm. He talked and talked, a volubility that the Kronen Zeitung mistook for ‘brilliant rhetoric’. In reality the defendant was distancing himself as much as possible from his own responsibility. Others were to blame. Judge Zeilinger did not lose control of the situation for a second, however. From time to time, as was apparent from his posture, he had a sharp word on the tip of his tongue, but he never actually uttered it. The defendant sensed weakness and made full use of his own – supposed – strength; he forged a link with the public while severing the one with the court. Judge Zeilinger had prepared for this trial keenly and diligently. By citing facts he kept forcing Androsch into corners from which he could only escape by taking refuge in memory lapses. In many major trials the sinner has been given a fair chance to the very end. Androsch too had a fair chance last Friday; of twelve defence motions, ten were dismissed and two allowed. The court admitted evidence as to whether in the tax proceedings against Androsch any unlawful influence had been exerted or instructions issued which adversely affected the taxpayer. In the next stage of trial, in August or September (the court even took account of defence counsel's summer holidays!), officials from the Regional Tax Office and the Ministry of Finance will therefore be heard as witnesses. There comes, however, a point in every trial after which the court expects some sign of understanding. It hopes for a trace of humility that may be appraised as a mitigating circumstance. The defendant has shown no humility to date, not even for a second. But he now has a few weeks to consider whether it is consonant with the principles of a State based on the rule of law for a Finance Minister and his family to have at their disposal accounts containing millions in undeclared funds. It is now for him to display greatness. The judicial system has uncovered serious matters. The court nevertheless was guided wholly by the principles of fairness up to the very last moment of the trial last Friday, when it adjourned the proceedings. For reflection.”

C. Proceedings in the Vienna Regional Criminal Court

Mr Worm was charged under section 23 of the Media Act (Mediengesetz – see paragraph 23 below) for having exercised prohibited influence on criminal proceedings (verbotene Einflußnahme auf ein Strafverfahren).

On 12 May 1992 the Vienna Regional Criminal Court, sitting with one judge (Einzelrichter), acquitted the applicant. It found that the text in issue was not capable of influencing the outcome of the proceedings against Mr Androsch and that it was not established that the applicant had acted with such an intention.

The court recalled that in 1991 Mr Androsch had been convicted of tax evasion (see paragraph 9 above). In establishing whether the impugned article was capable of influencing the result of these proceedings, the court noted that the wording and content of the article as a whole, as well as the development of the proceedings reported upon, the person of the accused, and the person of the applicant had to be taken into account. The article, unlike court reports of the scandal press, analysed the conduct of the presiding judge, the public prosecutor, defence counsel and in particular the accused, Mr Androsch, almost as a psychologist would have done. Furthermore, the court found that it was clear for every reader, who was vaguely familiar with the issue, that the applicant, who had been working for Profil for many years, had intensively dealt with the so-called “Causa Androsch” and had frequently reported on it. It appeared from the article that the applicant assumed that the investigations carried out by the tax authorities were correct. He subjected the statements made by the accused at the trial to a critical psychological analysis. However, his way of writing and the wording used were not capable of influencing these proceedings. Even to a lay judge, the applicant's person and his activities as a journalist in the Androsch case were well known. Thus he would not expect the applicant to give a neutral account of the proceedings. Moreover, it had not been established that the applicant had acted with the intention of influencing the outcome of the proceedings, in particular as it appeared that he was convinced that Mr Androsch would in any event be convicted.

D. Proceedings in the Vienna Court of Appeal

On 19 October 1992 the Vienna Court of Appeal, sitting as a court of three professional judges on an appeal by the public prosecutor, held a hearing in the presence of the applicant and his counsel. Mr Worm was questioned and stated in particular that the first sentence of the incriminated passage, namely that “the flow of funds into and out of the seven accounts containing money not declared to the tax authorities allows of no other interpretation than that Androsch was evading taxes”, was a quotation from the public prosecutor's statement during the trial. The latter had also frequently made reference to Mr Androsch's conviction for having made false statements as a witness (see paragraph 8 above).

At the end of the hearing, the operative provisions of the judgment as well as the relevant reasons were read out. The court convicted the applicant of having exercised prohibited influence on criminal proceedings and imposed on him forty day-fines of ATS 1,200 each, that is ATS 48,000, or twenty days' imprisonment in default of payment. The publishing firm was made jointly and severally liable for payment of the fine.

The full text of the judgment was served on the applicant on 25 March 1993.

The court held, inter alia: “The prosecution appeal is therefore well-founded. It rightly takes as its starting-point that the offence defined in section 23 of the Media Act must be classified as a potentially endangering offence [abstraktes Gefährdungsdelikt] … In general, a potentially endangering offence is defined as conduct typically capable of bringing a dangerous situation into existence, even if in any given case no one is actually exposed to the danger concerned ... The law regulates only the offender's conduct – in this case comment on the value of evidence – and links to it the inference that such comment is also capable of influencing the outcome of criminal proceedings. A potentially endangering offence accordingly amounts to conduct which is criminal irrespective of any result it may have [schlichtes Tätigkeitsdelikt] ... The considerations set out in the judgment at first instance as to the extent to which the comment on Mr Androsch's defence was capable of influencing the outcome of the criminal proceedings were therefore pointless ... The defendant's replies under examination in criminal proceedings constitute evidence ... [The passage in issue] constitutes (unfavourable) comment on the value of the answers given by Mr Androsch, not just – as the court below held – a critical psychological analysis ...”

It observed that “the objective element of the offence defined in section 23 of the Media Act is constituted not only by unfavourable comment on evidence but also by favourable comment”.

The Court of Appeal also contested the Regional Court's assumption that everybody, including the lay judges, knew the applicant's long-standing commitment in the Androsch case and would therefore not be influenced by his article. It was in no way certain that the lay judges regularly read Profil. On the contrary, in spectacular proceedings like the ones in issue, it happened frequently that lay judges would follow the reports in papers they did not usually read. There was no doubt that, at least with regard to the lay judges, the reading of the incriminated article was capable of influencing the outcome of the criminal proceedings.

The court added: “[The above finding] is all the more true in the present case because it can be inferred from the article that the accused wished to usurp the position of the judges dealing with the case. The objective element of the offence defined in section 23 of the Media Act is accordingly made out. As regards the subjective element, it should be observed that it is hard to understand why the court below should have concluded that there was no intention to influence the outcome of the trial when that intention was, on the contrary, quite obvious.”

The court further found that the applicant's expertise and involvement in the subject matter rather reinforced the impression that he had written the article with the intention of influencing the outcome of the proceedings. He had researched into the case since 1978 and had written more than a hundred articles about it. From the beginning he had been convinced that Mr Androsch had committed tax evasion. In the article in issue he had not only criticised Mr Androsch's statement but had also anticipated the outcome of the proceedings, namely the conviction of the accused.

The judgment ended as follows: “Even the quotation of the answer given by Mr Heinz Tschernutter placed at the top of the article – ‘Above all, there were to be no mistakes during the proceedings. The case was to be handled with common prudence, properly and to the best of our knowledge and belief – but not with kid gloves!’ – gives the average reader the impression that the court was being advised and urged to follow the same approach, in other words not to make any mistakes and not to handle Mr Androsch with kid gloves.”
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e1
001-58087_a11_em1
DATETIME
QUASI
4 July 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e2
001-58087_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Government of the Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e3
001-58087_a11_em3
DATETIME
QUASI
11 September 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e4
001-58087_a11_em4
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e5
001-58087_a11_em5
MISC
QUASI
Article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e5
001-58087_a11_em6
MISC
QUASI
Article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e6
001-58087_a11_em7
CODE
DIRECT
22714/93
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e2
001-58087_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58087_a11_em2
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e5
001-58087_a11_em9
MISC
QUASI
Article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e7
001-58087_a11_em10
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em11
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Alfred Worm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e9
001-58087_a11_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
28 July 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e2
001-58087_a11_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e5
001-58087_a11_em14
MISC
QUASI
Article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e5
001-58087_a11_em15
MISC
QUASI
Article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e10
001-58087_a11_em16
DEM
NO_MASK
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e11
001-58087_a11_em17
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Matscher
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e7
001-58087_a11_em18
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e5
001-58087_a11_em19
MISC
QUASI
Article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e12
001-58087_a11_em20
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e13
001-58087_a11_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
7 August 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e14
001-58087_a11_em22
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e15
001-58087_a11_em23
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr F. Gölcüklü
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e16
001-58087_a11_em24
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr B. Walsh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e17
001-58087_a11_em25
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J.M. Morenilla
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e18
001-58087_a11_em26
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr B. Repik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e19
001-58087_a11_em27
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr K. Jungwiert
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e20
001-58087_a11_em28
PERSON
QUASI
Mr U. Lōhmus
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e21
001-58087_a11_em29
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Casadevall
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e5
001-58087_a11_em30
MISC
QUASI
Article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e22
001-58087_a11_em31
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr Bernhardt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e2
001-58087_a11_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58087_a11_em2
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e23
001-58087_a11_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
28 February 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e24
001-58087_a11_em34
LOC
QUASI
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e25
001-58087_a11_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
22 April 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e26
001-58087_a11_em36
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. Cede
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e27
001-58087_a11_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e28
001-58087_a11_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e29
001-58087_a11_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr S. Benner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e30
001-58087_a11_em40
ORG
NO_MASK
Criminal Affairs and Pardons Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e31
001-58087_a11_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e32
001-58087_a11_em42
PERSON
QUASI
Ms E. Bertagnoli
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e27
001-58087_a11_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e28
001-58087_a11_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e33
001-58087_a11_em45
PERSON
QUASI
Ms I. Ermacora
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e34
001-58087_a11_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e35
001-58087_a11_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Chancellery
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e36
001-58087_a11_em48
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J.-C. Geus
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e37
001-58087_a11_em49
PERSON
QUASI
Mr W. Masser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e38
001-58087_a11_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Bar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e39
001-58087_a11_em51
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Geus
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e40
001-58087_a11_em52
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Masser
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e41
001-58087_a11_em53
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Cede
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em54
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Alfred Worm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e42
001-58087_a11_em55
DEM
QUASI
journalist
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e43
001-58087_a11_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
1945
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e44
001-58087_a11_em57
LOC
QUASI
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58087_a11_e45
001-58087_a11_em58
ORG
QUASI
Profil
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e7
001-58087_a11_em59
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e46
001-58087_a11_em60
MISC
QUASI
periodical dealing
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e47
001-58087_a11_em61
MISC
QUASI
politics
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e48
001-58087_a11_em62
DATETIME
NO_MASK
several years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e49
001-58087_a11_em63
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Hannes Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e50
001-58087_a11_em64
MISC
QUASI
Vice-Chancellor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e51
001-58087_a11_em65
MISC
QUASI
Minister of Finance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e52
001-58087_a11_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
1989
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em67
PERSON
QUASI
001-58087_a11_em11
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e53
001-58087_a11_em68
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58087_a11_e54
001-58087_a11_em69
ORG
NO_MASK
Oberlandesgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e55
001-58087_a11_em70
ORG
QUASI
parliamentary investigating committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e55
001-58087_a11_em71
ORG
QUASI
001-58087_a11_em70
Untersuchungsausschuß
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e56
001-58087_a11_em72
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e57
001-58087_a11_em73
MISC
QUASI
financial
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em74
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e56
001-58087_a11_em75
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e58
001-58087_a11_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e59
001-58087_a11_em77
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Regional Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58087_a11_e59
001-58087_a11_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58087_a11_em77
Landesgericht für Strafsachen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em79
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e60
001-58087_a11_em80
MISC
QUASI
tax evasion
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e61
001-58087_a11_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
26 May 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e62
001-58087_a11_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
8 October 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em83
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e63
001-58087_a11_em84
MISC
QUASI
taxes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e64
001-58087_a11_em85
DATETIME
NO_MASK
between 1973 and 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e65
001-58087_a11_em86
QUANTITY
QUASI
1.8 million Austrian schillings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e7
001-58087_a11_em87
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em88
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e67
001-58087_a11_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e45
001-58087_a11_em90
ORG
QUASI
Profil
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em91
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e68
001-58087_a11_em92
MISC
QUASI
written
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e69
001-58087_a11_em93
MISC
QUASI
ADJOURNED FOR REFLECTION A
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e70
001-58087_a11_em94
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em95
PERSON
QUASI
Hannes Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e60
001-58087_a11_em96
MISC
QUASI
tax evasion
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e72
001-58087_a11_em97
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Heinz Tschernutter
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e73
001-58087_a11_em98
MISC
QUASI
tax investigator and witness
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em99
PERSON
QUASI
001-58087_a11_em95
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e7
001-58087_a11_em100
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e74
001-58087_a11_em101
ORG
QUASI
Die Presse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e2
001-58087_a11_em102
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e75
001-58087_a11_em103
PERSON
QUASI
Herbert Schachter
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em104
PERSON
QUASI
001-58087_a11_em95
Dr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em105
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e77
001-58087_a11_em106
DATETIME
NO_MASK
years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e2
001-58087_a11_em107
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e77
001-58087_a11_em108
DATETIME
NO_MASK
years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em109
PERSON
QUASI
Hannes Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em110
PERSON
QUASI
Hannes Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e78
001-58087_a11_em111
MISC
QUASI
His second biggest problem is his lawyer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e75
001-58087_a11_em112
PERSON
QUASI
Herbert Schachter
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e79
001-58087_a11_em113
PERSON
QUASI
Friedrich Zeilinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e80
001-58087_a11_em114
MISC
QUASI
I would ask you to infer exactly what happened from the file.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em115
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e81
001-58087_a11_em116
PERSON
QUASI
Friedrich Matousek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em117
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e82
001-58087_a11_em118
PERSON
QUASI
Zeilinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e81
001-58087_a11_em119
PERSON
QUASI
001-58087_a11_em116
Matousek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e83
001-58087_a11_em120
MISC
QUASI
is able to find his way around in the dark generated by the ‘international legal adviser's’ murky financial deals
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em121
PERSON
QUASI
Hannes Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e84
001-58087_a11_em122
DATETIME
NO_MASK
decade
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e77
001-58087_a11_em123
DATETIME
NO_MASK
years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e81
001-58087_a11_em124
PERSON
QUASI
Matousek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e85
001-58087_a11_em125
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em126
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e60
001-58087_a11_em127
MISC
QUASI
tax evasion
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em128
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em129
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em130
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e86
001-58087_a11_em131
MISC
QUASI
Finance Minister
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e87
001-58087_a11_em132
DATETIME
QUASI
January 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em133
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e88
001-58087_a11_em134
DEM
QUASI
Carinthian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em135
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e89
001-58087_a11_em136
PERSON
QUASI
Adolf Panzenböck
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e90
001-58087_a11_em137
DATETIME
QUASI
1982 to 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e44
001-58087_a11_em138
LOC
QUASI
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em139
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e91
001-58087_a11_em140
DATETIME
NO_MASK
only a day and a half
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e92
001-58087_a11_em141
DATETIME
NO_MASK
week
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em142
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e93
001-58087_a11_em143
PERSON
QUASI
Walter Handerek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58087_a11_e94
001-58087_a11_em144
PERSON
QUASI
Heinz Tschernutter
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e95
001-58087_a11_em145
PERSON
QUASI
Gerhard Berner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e96
001-58087_a11_em146
DATETIME
QUASI
between 1985 and 1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e75
001-58087_a11_em147
PERSON
QUASI
Herbert Schachter
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em148
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e97
001-58087_a11_em149
DATETIME
QUASI
1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em150
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e63
001-58087_a11_em151
MISC
QUASI
taxes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e77
001-58087_a11_em152
DATETIME
NO_MASK
years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em153
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em154
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em155
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em156
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e2
001-58087_a11_em157
LOC
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e98
001-58087_a11_em158
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two decades
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e99
001-58087_a11_em159
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1965 to 1983
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e100
001-58087_a11_em160
MISC
QUASI
6.3 million schillings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em161
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e7
001-58087_a11_em162
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e86
001-58087_a11_em163
MISC
QUASI
Finance Minister
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e101
001-58087_a11_em164
QUANTITY
QUASI
five million schillings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em165
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em166
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e102
001-58087_a11_em167
PERSON
QUASI
Gustav Steiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e103
001-58087_a11_em168
PERSON
QUASI
Paul Schärf
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e57
001-58087_a11_em169
MISC
QUASI
financial
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em170
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e104
001-58087_a11_em171
PERSON
QUASI
Anton Zelenka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em172
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e105
001-58087_a11_em173
PERSON
QUASI
Josef Zehetmayer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e85
001-58087_a11_em174
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em175
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em176
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em177
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e63
001-58087_a11_em178
MISC
QUASI
taxes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e77
001-58087_a11_em179
DATETIME
NO_MASK
years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e82
001-58087_a11_em180
PERSON
QUASI
Zeilinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e106
001-58087_a11_em181
PERSON
QUASI
Sir Arthur Stein
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e107
001-58087_a11_em182
ORG
QUASI
Silk Road
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em183
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e108
001-58087_a11_em184
MISC
QUASI
new facts and adduce convincing arguments in his defence was bitterly disappointed
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e75
001-58087_a11_em185
PERSON
QUASI
001-58087_a11_em103
Mr Schachter
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em186
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e47
001-58087_a11_em187
MISC
QUASI
politics
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em188
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em189
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e109
001-58087_a11_em190
PERSON
QUASI
Bruno Kreisky
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e82
001-58087_a11_em191
PERSON
QUASI
Zeilinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e110
001-58087_a11_em192
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two mornings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e111
001-58087_a11_em193
DATETIME
NO_MASK
very first day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e112
001-58087_a11_em194
MISC
QUASI
Minister
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58087_a11_e113
001-58087_a11_em195
DEM
QUASI
53-year-old
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e114
001-58087_a11_em196
MISC
QUASI
public speaker
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e47
001-58087_a11_em197
MISC
QUASI
politics
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e50
001-58087_a11_em198
MISC
QUASI
Vice-Chancellor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e86
001-58087_a11_em199
MISC
QUASI
Finance Minister
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em200
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e115
001-58087_a11_em201
ORG
QUASI
Kronen Zeitung
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e82
001-58087_a11_em202
PERSON
QUASI
Zeilinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e82
001-58087_a11_em203
PERSON
QUASI
Zeilinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em204
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em205
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em206
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em207
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e116
001-58087_a11_em208
DATETIME
NO_MASK
August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e117
001-58087_a11_em209
DATETIME
NO_MASK
September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e118
001-58087_a11_em210
ORG
QUASI
Regional Tax Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e119
001-58087_a11_em211
ORG
QUASI
Ministry of Finance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e120
001-58087_a11_em212
DATETIME
NO_MASK
few weeks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e86
001-58087_a11_em213
MISC
QUASI
Finance Minister
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e59
001-58087_a11_em214
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Regional Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em215
PERSON
QUASI
001-58087_a11_em11
Mr Worm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e121
001-58087_a11_em216
MISC
QUASI
prohibited influence on criminal proceedings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e122
001-58087_a11_em217
MISC
QUASI
verbotene Einflußnahme auf ein Strafverfahren
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e123
001-58087_a11_em218
DATETIME
QUASI
12 May 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e59
001-58087_a11_em219
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Regional Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e124
001-58087_a11_em220
PERSON
QUASI
Einzelrichter
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em221
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e58
001-58087_a11_em222
DATETIME
QUASI
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em223
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e60
001-58087_a11_em224
MISC
QUASI
tax evasion
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e125
001-58087_a11_em225
MISC
QUASI
impugned article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em226
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em227
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em228
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e45
001-58087_a11_em229
ORG
QUASI
Profil
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e77
001-58087_a11_em230
DATETIME
NO_MASK
years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e126
001-58087_a11_em231
MISC
QUASI
Causa Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em232
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em233
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e42
001-58087_a11_em234
DEM
QUASI
journalist
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em235
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em236
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e53
001-58087_a11_em237
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e127
001-58087_a11_em238
DATETIME
QUASI
19 October 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e53
001-58087_a11_em239
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em240
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Worm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e76
001-58087_a11_em241
MISC
QUASI
tax
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em242
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e63
001-58087_a11_em243
MISC
QUASI
taxes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em244
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e121
001-58087_a11_em245
MISC
QUASI
prohibited influence on criminal proceedings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e128
001-58087_a11_em246
DATETIME
NO_MASK
forty day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e129
001-58087_a11_em247
QUANTITY
QUASI
ATS 1,200
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e130
001-58087_a11_em248
QUANTITY
QUASI
ATS 48,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e131
001-58087_a11_em249
DATETIME
QUASI
25 March 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em250
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em251
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e85
001-58087_a11_em252
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e132
001-58087_a11_em253
ORG
QUASI
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e71
001-58087_a11_em254
PERSON
QUASI
Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em255
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e45
001-58087_a11_em256
ORG
QUASI
Profil
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em257
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em258
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e68
001-58087_a11_em259
MISC
QUASI
written
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em260
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e133
001-58087_a11_em261
DATETIME
QUASI
1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e68
001-58087_a11_em262
MISC
QUASI
written
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58087_a11_e134
001-58087_a11_em263
MISC
QUASI
hundred articles
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em264
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e60
001-58087_a11_em265
MISC
QUASI
tax evasion
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em266
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em267
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e72
001-58087_a11_em268
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Heinz Tschernutter
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e66
001-58087_a11_em269
MISC
QUASI
article
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58087_a11_e8
001-58087_a11_em270
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Androsch
Alfred Worm
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Alfred Worm