PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 43807/07) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Turkish nationals, Mr Mehmet Fatih Kılıç and Mr Kemal Eren (“the applicants”), on 1 October 2007.

The applicants were represented by Mr C. Demir, a lawyer practising in Van. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

On 11 December 2009 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1).

Following the communication of the application, the Government, but not the applicants, filed further written observations (Rule 54 § 2). However, the applicants indicated their wish to pursue their application.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicants were born in 1986 and 1980 respectively and live in Ağrı.

On 21 March 2006 the applicants attended the Newroz celebrations in Patnos, a district of Ağrı. During the gathering, the crowd shouted slogans. Subsequently, the Patnos Security Directorate initiated an investigation on account of the fact that some of the participants had shouted slogans praising the imprisoned leader of the PKK (the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, an illegal organisation). Following an examination of a recording of the gathering, it was reported that the first applicant had shouted “Biji Serok Apo” (“Long live President Öcalan”), while the second applicant was seen as shouting slogans such as “Biji Serok Apo” and “Gençlik Aponun Fedaisidir” (“Youth are the guardsmen of Öcalan”).

On 28 March 2006 the applicants were taken into police custody. In police statements taken from them on the same date, they both denied shouting slogans in support of the PKK. They maintained that they had shouted slogans in support of peace. Again on the same date, the applicants were subsequently taken before the public prosecutor and the investigating judge in turn. In their statements to the prosecutor and the judge, they maintained that they had only shouted “Kurds and Turks are brothers” and denied the accusations. The investigating judge released the applicants when the interrogation was over.

On 29 March 2006 the Patnos Public Prosecutor initiated criminal proceedings against the applicants in the Patnos Criminal Court, charging them with disseminating the propaganda of an illegal organisation, based on the slogans shouted during the Newroz celebrations. The prosecution accordingly called for the applicants to be sentenced pursuant to Article 220 § 8 of the Criminal Code.

On 15 August 2006 the court received an expert report regarding the video footage of the event. According to this report, the second applicant was seen shouting slogans in Kurdish and Turkish such as “Dısa dısa serhildan serokeme Öcalan” (“Rise up again and again, our president is Öcalan”), “Biji Serok Apo” (“Long Live President Apo”) and “Gençlik Aponun Fedaisidir” (“Youth are the guardsmen of Öcalan”). The report stated that in the video footage there was no sign of the first applicant.

On an unspecified date, the Patnos Criminal Court declared that it lacked jurisdiction and transferred the case file to the Erzurum Assize Court, holding that offence with which the applicants were charged ought to be classified as praising a crime or a criminal and thus fell to be examined under Article 215 of the Criminal Code.

On 12 July 2007 the Erzurum Assize Court delivered its decision. While noting that the applicants had denied shouting the alleged slogans, based on the recording of the event, the court found the applicants guilty of praising both a crime and a criminal pursuant to Article 215 of the Criminal Code. It accordingly sentenced the applicants to twenty-five days’ imprisonment each. The court then commuted the prison sentence to a fine of 500 Turkish liras (TRY) (the equivalent to 270 euros). As domestic legislation did not provide for an appeal, this decision was final.

On 19 October 2007 the first applicant paid the fine.

Subsequently, on 26 February 2008 the Erzurum Public Prosecutor reopened the proceedings against the second applicant for reconsideration of his case in view of Section 562 of Law no. 5728, which was published in the Official Gazette on 7 February 2008.

On 27 February 2008 the Erzurum Assize Court found that in view of the new provision, the second applicant had become entitled to benefit from Section 231 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Law no. 5271), which provided the possibility of suspending his sentence. Consequently, it decided to suspend the enforcement of the judgment for a period of five years in respect of the second applicant.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e1
001-107591_a10_em1
CODE
DIRECT
43807/07
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107591_a10_e2
001-107591_a10_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e3
001-107591_a10_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e4
001-107591_a10_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Mehmet Fatih Kılıç
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e5
001-107591_a10_em5
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Kemal Eren
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e6
001-107591_a10_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
1 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e7
001-107591_a10_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C. Demir
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107591_a10_e8
001-107591_a10_em8
LOC
QUASI
Van
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e2
001-107591_a10_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
001-107591_a10_em2
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e9
001-107591_a10_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
11 December 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e10
001-107591_a10_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e11
001-107591_a10_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e12
001-107591_a10_em13
LOC
QUASI
Ağrı
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e13
001-107591_a10_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
21 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107591_a10_e14
001-107591_a10_em15
MISC
QUASI
Newroz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107591_a10_e15
001-107591_a10_em16
LOC
QUASI
Patnos
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e12
001-107591_a10_em17
LOC
QUASI
Ağrı
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e16
001-107591_a10_em18
ORG
QUASI
Patnos Security Directorate
POLITICS
insert
001-107591_a10_e17
001-107591_a10_em19
ORG
QUASI
PKK (the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, an illegal organisation)
POLITICS
insert
001-107591_a10_e18
001-107591_a10_em20
MISC
QUASI
“Biji Serok Apo” (“Long live President Öcalan”)
POLITICS
insert
001-107591_a10_e18
001-107591_a10_em21
MISC
QUASI
001-107591_a10_em20
“Biji Serok Apo”
POLITICS
insert
001-107591_a10_e19
001-107591_a10_em22
MISC
QUASI
“Gençlik Aponun Fedaisidir” (“Youth are the guardsmen of Öcalan”)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e20
001-107591_a10_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
28 March 2006
POLITICS
insert
001-107591_a10_e21
001-107591_a10_em24
ORG
QUASI
PKK.
POLITICS
insert
001-107591_a10_e22
001-107591_a10_em25
ORG
QUASI
“Kurds and Turks are brothers”
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e23
001-107591_a10_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
29 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e24
001-107591_a10_em27
ORG
QUASI
Patnos Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e25
001-107591_a10_em28
ORG
QUASI
Patnos Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e14
001-107591_a10_em29
MISC
QUASI
Newroz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e26
001-107591_a10_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
15 August 2006
ETHNIC
check
001-107591_a10_e27
001-107591_a10_em31
DEM
QUASI
Kurdish
ETHNIC
correct
001-107591_a10_e3
001-107591_a10_em32
DEM
QUASI
Turkish
POLITICS
insert
001-107591_a10_e28
001-107591_a10_em33
MISC
QUASI
“Dısa dısa serhildan serokeme Öcalan” (“Rise up again and again, our president is Öcalan”)
POLITICS
insert
001-107591_a10_e29
001-107591_a10_em34
MISC
QUASI
“Biji Serok Apo” (“Long Live President Apo”)
POLITICS
insert
001-107591_a10_e19
001-107591_a10_em35
MISC
QUASI
“Gençlik Aponun Fedaisidir” (“Youth are the guardsmen of Öcalan”)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e25
001-107591_a10_em36
ORG
QUASI
Patnos Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e30
001-107591_a10_em37
ORG
QUASI
Erzurum Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e31
001-107591_a10_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
12 July 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e30
001-107591_a10_em39
ORG
QUASI
Erzurum Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e32
001-107591_a10_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
twenty-five days’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107591_a10_e33
001-107591_a10_em41
QUANTITY
QUASI
500 Turkish liras (TRY) (the equivalent to 270 euros)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e34
001-107591_a10_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
19 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e35
001-107591_a10_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
26 February 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e36
001-107591_a10_em44
ORG
QUASI
Erzurum Public Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e37
001-107591_a10_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Official Gazette
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e38
001-107591_a10_em46
DATETIME
NO_MASK
7 February 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e39
001-107591_a10_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
27 February 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e30
001-107591_a10_em48
ORG
QUASI
Erzurum Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107591_a10_e40
001-107591_a10_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
five years
Mehmet Fatih Kılıç
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Mehmet Fatih Kılıç