PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 69917/01) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a national of the United States of America, Mr Stephen Anthony Saccoccia (“the applicant”), on 27 April 2001.

The applicant was represented by Mr J. Hock, a lawyer practising in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambasssador F. Trauttmansdorff, Head of the Law Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that in proceedings before the Austrian courts concerning the execution of a forfeiture order issued by the United States courts he had not had a hearing and that the Austrian courts’ decisions had violated his right to property.

By a decision of 5 July 2007 the Court declared the application partly admissible.

The Government filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). The applicant requested the Court to instruct the respondent Government to disclose a complete list of the values of all his Austrian assets at the time of their seizure and at the time when they were forfeited following the judgment by the Vienna Court of Appeal of 7 October 2000 in order to enable him to calculate his just satisfaction claims. Having regard to its decision under Article 41 of the Convention (see paragraphs 98-100 below), the Court dismisses this request.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1958. He is currently serving a prison term in the United States.

A. Background

In 1992, in the context of criminal proceedings for large-scale money laundering conducted against the applicant before the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island (“the Rhode Island District Court”), the Austrian courts were requested under letters rogatory to seize assets which had been found in two safes in Vienna rented by the applicant. On 10 February 1992 the Vienna District Criminal Court ordered the seizure and put the assets, mostly cash and bearer bonds, at the disposal of the Rhode Island District Court as evidence in the criminal proceedings against the applicant, on the condition that the assets were to be returned upon termination of the proceedings.

The parties disagree as to whether or not the applicant was the owner of the assets at issue. The applicant claims that the assets stemmed from lawful business activities carried out until 1988, while the Government claim that they stemmed from the money laundering in 1990 and 1991 of which he was convicted (see below) and that he was holding them as a trustee for the drug cartel for which he had worked.

In February 1993 the Rhode Island District Court convicted the applicant of money laundering and related charges, finding that he had headed an organisation which had laundered more than a hundred million United States dollars (USD) in 1990 and 1991, and sentenced him to 660 years’ imprisonment. Subsequently, on 30 August 1993, the court issued a preliminary forfeiture order.

On 28 June 1995 the United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, dismissed an appeal by the applicant against his conviction and against the forfeiture order. The reasons, in so far as relevant in the context of the present case, were as follows. As to the applicant’s claim that he was represented at his trial by counsel (H.) who had a conflict of interest, the court noted that the applicant had been informed of his rights but had insisted on being represented by counsel H. Finally, he had executed a written waiver retaining H. as counsel and confirming that he had been fully advised and had considered the possible adverse consequences for his defence. Since counsel H. had only informed the court in vague terms that he feared being charged or called as a witness in the applicant’s case, the District Court was justified in accepting the waiver. In any event, the applicant was represented by a second, conflict-free counsel, D. As to the applicant’s complaint that he had had no hearing in the forfeiture proceedings, the appellate court noted that the applicant, represented by counsel, had waived his right to a jury hearing in the separate forfeiture proceedings on the ground that they purely concerned matters of legal argument. The case had been heard on 26 March 1993 in the presence of the applicant’s counsel. The applicant had not been present since he had to appear before another court. Counsel had requested that the applicant be heard but had refused the court’s offer to have a further hearing in the presence of the applicant before the delivery of the judgment.

On 25 March 1996 the United States Supreme Court rejected an appeal on points of law by the applicant.

On 7 November 1997 the Rhode Island District Court issued a final forfeiture order relating to a total amount of USD 136 million, including some USD 9 million in respect of the applicant, “being the proceeds of narcotics money laundering for which the following property has been partially substituted”. There followed an enumeration of cash amounts in Swiss francs, United States dollars and Austrian schillings seized in Vienna in 1992 and a list of bearer bonds issued by Austrian banks and, finally a bank account in Vienna.

On 9 December 1997 the Rhode Island District Court issued letters rogatory which, so far as relevant, read as follows: “... the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island requests enforcement in Austria of the enclosed Final Forfeiture Order against said cash, bonds and other financial instruments. To the extent possible under Austrian law and consistent with any sharing agreement between the United States and Austria, please convert the cash and the proceeds of the bonds and other instruments into United States dollars and transfer those funds by wire into the above referenced United States Customs Service Account. ...”

The United States Department of Justice transmitted this request to the Austrian authorities on 18 December 1997. On 23 January 1998 the Austrian Ministry of Justice requested the Vienna Senior Public Prosecutor’s Office to open “exequatur” proceedings to enforce the foreign court’s decision.

B. The proceedings before the Austrian courts

Preliminary confiscation in order to secure the enforcement of the final forfeiture order of 7 November 1997

On 12 March 1998 the Vienna Regional Criminal Court (Landesgericht für Strafsachen), as an interim measure, ordered the confiscation of the applicant’s assets, of a total value of about 80,000,000 Austrian schillings (ATS – approximately 5,800,000 euros), in cash, bearer bonds and a bank account, for the purpose of securing the enforcement of the final forfeiture order of 7 November 1997. It referred to the above request and noted that enforcement proceedings under the Extradition and Legal Assistance Act (Auslieferungs- und Rechtshilfegesetz – “the ELAA”) were pending.

The applicant appealed on 26 March 1998, submitting in particular that the Regional Court’s decision amounted to an unlawful interference with his right to property, as it lacked a legal basis. Moreover, an enforcement of the forfeiture order for the benefit of the United States was not admissible in Austria as section 64(7) of the ELAA provided that any fines or forfeited assets obtained by executing a foreign decision fell to the Republic of Austria.

Further, the applicant claimed that the final forfeiture order also included “substitute assets”, i.e. assets not connected to or derived from criminal activity. Thus the measure requested did not correspond in any way to forfeiture (Verfall) or withdrawal of enrichment (Abschöpfung der Bereicherung) within the meaning of the Austrian Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch). In any event these penalties could not be applied in his case, as the relevant provisions had not been in force at the time he committed the offences. Furthermore, he had been convicted of money laundering in the United States, an offence which had not been punishable under Austrian law at the time of its commission.

Relying on section 64(1) of the ELAA, the applicant also argued that the forfeiture proceedings had failed to comply with the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention, since the proceedings had not been public and he had not been heard. Moreover, his defence rights had been violated in the underlying criminal proceedings, his defence lawyer having been caught in a conflict of interests.

Lastly, the applicant claimed that there was a lack of reciprocity as decisions of Austrian courts were not enforceable in the United States.

Meanwhile, on 12 March 1998, the Vienna Regional Criminal Court had made a formal request to the United States authorities to hear the applicant in connection with the request for execution of the final forfeiture order. On 16 April 1998 the United States Department of Justice transmitted the applicant’s submissions to the Austrian Ministry of Justice.

On 22 May 1998 the United States Department of Justice addressed a note to the Austrian Ministry of Justice concerning reciprocity in providing legal assistance in forfeiture proceedings. The applicant denies that this note contains assurances of reciprocity.

On 1 August 1998 the Treaty between the Government of the Republic of Austria and the Government of the United States of America on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (“the 1998 Treaty”) entered into force.

On 12 October 1998 the Vienna Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the Regional Court’s decision of 12 March 1998.

The Court of Appeal found that the Regional Court’s decision was based on Article 144a of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Strafprozeßordnung). In this connection, the court noted that pursuant to section 9(1) of the ELAA, the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure had to be applied mutatis mutandis unless explicitly provided otherwise.

As to the applicant’s assertion that a forfeiture for the benefit of the United States would be contrary to section 64(7) of the ELAA, the court observed that the letters rogatory requested first and foremost that any measures required under Austrian law for the execution of the final forfeiture order be taken. Only as an additional point did they ask for the transfer of the assets, provided that this was admissible under Austrian law or any bilateral treaty. In this connection it referred to Article 17(3) of the 1998 Treaty.

As regards the applicant’s assertion that the final forfeiture order covered substitute assets which could not be subject to forfeiture under Austrian law, the court observed that it followed from the judgment concerning the applicant’s conviction that he had led an organisation which had laundered large sums of money derived from drug dealing and had usually received a 10% commission for each amount laundered. Between 1 January 1990 and 2 April 1991 he had transferred more than USD 136 million of drug-related money from the account of a sham company to various foreign bank accounts. Thus, there were good reasons to assume that the applicant’s Austrian assets were monies received for or derived from the commission of a crime and subject to withdrawal of enrichment under Article 20 of the Criminal Code, or monies directly obtained through drug dealing, subject to forfeiture under Article 20b of the Criminal Code, in the version in force since its 1996 amendment. The final forfeiture order made a clear link between the offence of money laundering of which the applicant had been convicted and the forfeiture of all monies obtained thereby.

Articles 20 and 20b in the version in force since the 1996 amendment of the Criminal Code were not regarded as penalties under Austrian law, but as measures sui generis. The fact that they had not been in force at the time of the commission of the offences was therefore not material.

Even if one applied the law in force at the time of the commission of the offences, the requirements for withdrawal of enrichment were met. Article 20a(1) of the Criminal Code, in the version in force at that time, provided that an offender who had unjustly enriched himself could be ordered to pay an amount equivalent to the enrichment if the latter exceeded ATS 1 million. Although there had been no offence of money laundering under Austrian law at the time, the facts constituted the offence of receiving stolen property (Hehlerei) under Article 164(1)(4) of the Criminal Code, which made it an offence to assist the perpetrator of an offence (here, the drug dealers) in concealing assets derived from or received for the commission of the offence or to acquire such assets.

As to the applicant’s allegation that both the criminal proceedings against him and the proceedings resulting in the final forfeiture order had failed to comply with Article 6 of the Convention, the court referred to the documents of those proceedings contained in its file and noted the following. In the criminal proceedings, the applicant had been present and had been represented by two counsel. It noted that it was the applicant who had insisted on being represented by counsel H. although the latter had voiced concerns, albeit without substantiating them, that he might himself be charged. In any case, the applicant had been represented by a second counsel, who was free from any potential conflict of interests. In the forfeiture proceedings he waived his right to a public hearing before a jury since they only concerned questions of law. On 26 March 1993 the judge had heard the case in the presence of the applicant’s counsel but without the applicant being present. The applicant’s lawyer had requested that the applicant be heard but had refused the court’s offer to hold a further hearing in the presence of the applicant before the delivery of the judgment. In sum, the Vienna Court of Appeal found no indication that the proceedings before the United States courts had failed to comply with Article 6 of the Convention.

As regards the alleged lack of reciprocity, the court noted that when the request for enforcement of the final forfeiture order had been made, there had been no bilateral treaty between the United States and the Republic of Austria. Thus, only the provisions of the ELAA had to be applied, section 3(1) of which required reciprocity. The Regional Court had duly investigated the issue in that it had required the United States Department of Justice to submit information as to the possibilities of enforcing an Austrian forfeiture order in the United States. Meanwhile, however, the 1998 Treaty had entered into force. Under Article 20(3) of that Treaty, it applied irrespective of whether the underlying offences were committed before or after its entry into force. Article 17 provided for mutual legal assistance in forfeiture proceedings.

2. The enforcement of the final forfeiture order of 7 November 1997

On 25 August 1999 the United States central authority, relying on the 1998 Treaty, made a new request for enforcement of the final forfeiture order of 7 November 1997. According to the applicant, this second request for legal assistance was not served on him.

The applicant made submissions on 22 December 1998, on 11 March 1999 and on 11 May 2000.

On 14 June 2000 the Vienna Regional Criminal Court, without holding a hearing, decided to take over the enforcement of the final forfeiture order of 7 November 1997 and ordered the forfeiture of the applicant’s Austrian assets for the benefit of the United States.

Having regard to the 1998 Treaty, the requirement of reciprocity was fulfilled. The submissions by the applicant which disputed this were no longer relevant as they referred to the legal position before the entry into force of the 1998 Treaty. As to the question of the beneficiary of the forfeiture, it noted that Article 17(3) of the 1998 Treaty provided optionally that each State party could hand over forfeited assets to the other party.

Referring to the Court of Appeal’s decision of 12 October 1998, it noted that the applicant’s conduct had been punishable under Austrian law. Thus, the forfeiture was not contrary to Article 7 of the Convention. Finally, the court noted that the applicant had been given an opportunity to comment on the request for legal assistance.

The applicant appealed on 7 July 2000. He asserted that the 1998 Treaty provided for legal assistance in pending criminal proceedings, but did not contain a legal basis for mutual execution of final decisions. Even assuming that the 1998 Treaty applied in the present case, the enforcement of the final forfeiture order would violate Article 7 of the Convention as the said Treaty had not been in force in 1997 when the forfeiture order was issued. Moreover, money laundering had not been punishable under Austrian law at the time of the commission of the offences. Consequently, his assets could not be subject to forfeiture or withdrawal of enrichment under Austrian law.

Furthermore, the applicant repeated his argument that his Austrian assets were substitute assets and claimed that, at the time of the commission of the offences, such assets had not been subject to forfeiture or withdrawal of enrichment under Austrian law.

Relying on expert opinions submitted by him, the applicant maintained that the condition of reciprocity required by section 3(1) of the ELAA was not fulfilled, as United States constitutional law did not permit the enforcement of decisions given by foreign criminal courts. He further submitted that the five-year limitation period for enforcement had started running on 30 August 1993, when the preliminary forfeiture order was issued (as it was, despite its name, a final and enforceable decision), and not only on 7 November 1997, when the final forfeiture order was issued.

In addition the applicant alleged that the criminal proceedings and the forfeiture proceedings before the United States courts had not complied with the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention. He submitted the same arguments as in the proceedings relating to the preliminary confiscation of his assets. Moreover, he referred in general terms to the fact that the United States still applied the death penalty.

The applicant also complained about a number of procedural shortcomings as regards the proceedings in Austria. He alleged in particular that the Regional Court had refused to take into account the aforesaid expert opinions submitted by him, which showed that United States constitutional law excluded any enforcement of decisions of foreign criminal courts. Moreover, he had not been given sufficient opportunity to advance his arguments as, in his view, that would have required his personal presence in court. Finally, he complained that the Regional Court had failed to hold a public oral hearing and requested that such a hearing be held by the appellate court.

The Public Prosecutor’s Office also appealed. Its appeal was served on the applicant for comments, which he submitted on 21 September 2000.

On 7 October 2000 the Vienna Court of Appeal, sitting in camera, dismissed the applicant’s appeal. Upon the public prosecutor’s appeal, it amended the Regional Court’s decision and ordered the forfeiture to the benefit of the Republic of Austria.

The court noted at the outset that, pursuant to its Article 20(3), the 1998 Treaty applied irrespective of whether the underlying offences were committed before or after its entry into force. It dismissed the applicant’s argument that the said Treaty did not provide a basis for the mutual enforcement of decisions. Article 1, paragraphs (1) and (2)(h) of the Treaty, in conjunction with Article 17, governed legal assistance in forfeiture proceedings. As to the alleged lack of reciprocity, it was sufficient to refer to those provisions. It was therefore not necessary to examine questions of United States constitutional law.

Moreover, referring to its decision of 12 October 1998, the court reiterated that the facts underlying the applicant’s conviction for money laundering would have been punishable as receiving stolen property under Article 164(1)(4) of the Criminal Code at the time of the commission of the offences. Further, it reiterated that withdrawal of enrichment pursuant to Article 20 of the Criminal Code and forfeiture pursuant to Article 20b, both in the version in force since 1996, were not regarded as penalties, but served the purpose of neutralising proceeds of criminal activities. These measures covered any proceeds of an offence, irrespective of whether they were directly derived from the offence or given for its commission or whether they had already been converted into other assets.

With regard to the applicant’s complaint that the proceedings in the United States had not complied with the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention, the court referred to the reasons given in its previous decision of 12 October 1998.

The court dismissed the applicant’s plea that the enforcement of the final forfeiture order was time-barred, noting that the United States Supreme Court, on 25 March 1996, had refused leave to appeal against the provisional forfeiture order, whereupon the final forfeiture order had been issued on 7 November 1997. Consequently, the five-year limitation period pursuant to section 59 of the Criminal Code had not expired.

As to the applicant’s procedural rights, the court noted that he had been represented by counsel throughout the proceedings and had had the opportunity to submit extensive written pleadings.

Finally, the court considered that the public prosecutor’s appeal was well-founded in that section 64(7) of the ELAA provided that forfeited assets fell to the Republic of Austria. Thus, forfeiture to the benefit of the United States under Article 17(3) of the 1998 Treaty was not admissible.

The decision was served on the applicant on 30 October 2000.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e1
001-90342_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
69917/01
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90342_a11_e2
001-90342_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em3
ORG
QUASI
United States of America
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e4
001-90342_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Stephen Anthony Saccoccia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e5
001-90342_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
27 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e6
001-90342_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Hock
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e7
001-90342_a11_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e2
001-90342_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-90342_a11_em2
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e8
001-90342_a11_em9
PERSON
QUASI
F. Trauttmansdorff
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e9
001-90342_a11_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e10
001-90342_a11_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em12
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em13
ORG
QUASI
001-90342_a11_em3
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em14
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e12
001-90342_a11_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
5 July 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em16
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e13
001-90342_a11_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e14
001-90342_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e15
001-90342_a11_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
1958
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em20
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e16
001-90342_a11_em21
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e17
001-90342_a11_em22
MISC
QUASI
money laundering
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e18
001-90342_a11_em23
ORG
QUASI
United States District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e19
001-90342_a11_em24
LOC
QUASI
District of Rhode Island
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e18
001-90342_a11_em25
ORG
QUASI
001-90342_a11_em23
Rhode Island District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em26
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e7
001-90342_a11_em27
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e20
001-90342_a11_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
10 February 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e21
001-90342_a11_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna District Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e18
001-90342_a11_em30
ORG
QUASI
Rhode Island District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e22
001-90342_a11_em31
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e17
001-90342_a11_em32
MISC
QUASI
money laundering
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e23
001-90342_a11_em33
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e24
001-90342_a11_em34
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e25
001-90342_a11_em35
MISC
QUASI
drug
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e26
001-90342_a11_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
February 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e18
001-90342_a11_em37
ORG
QUASI
Rhode Island District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e17
001-90342_a11_em38
MISC
QUASI
money laundering
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e27
001-90342_a11_em39
MISC
QUASI
laundered
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e28
001-90342_a11_em40
QUANTITY
QUASI
hundred million United States dollars (USD)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em41
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e23
001-90342_a11_em42
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e24
001-90342_a11_em43
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e29
001-90342_a11_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
660 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e30
001-90342_a11_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
30 August 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e31
001-90342_a11_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
28 June 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e32
001-90342_a11_em47
ORG
QUASI
United States Court of Appeals
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e33
001-90342_a11_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
First Circuit
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e34
001-90342_a11_em49
PERSON
NO_MASK
H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e34
001-90342_a11_em50
PERSON
NO_MASK
H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e34
001-90342_a11_em51
PERSON
NO_MASK
H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e34
001-90342_a11_em52
PERSON
NO_MASK
H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90342_a11_e35
001-90342_a11_em53
PERSON
NO_MASK
D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e36
001-90342_a11_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
26 March 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e37
001-90342_a11_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
25 March 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e38
001-90342_a11_em56
ORG
QUASI
United States Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e39
001-90342_a11_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e18
001-90342_a11_em58
ORG
QUASI
Rhode Island District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e40
001-90342_a11_em59
QUANTITY
QUASI
USD 136 million
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e41
001-90342_a11_em60
QUANTITY
QUASI
USD 9 million
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e17
001-90342_a11_em61
MISC
QUASI
money laundering
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em62
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e42
001-90342_a11_em63
MISC
QUASI
United States dollars
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em64
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e7
001-90342_a11_em65
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e16
001-90342_a11_em66
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em67
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e7
001-90342_a11_em68
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e43
001-90342_a11_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
9 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e18
001-90342_a11_em70
ORG
QUASI
Rhode Island District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e18
001-90342_a11_em71
ORG
QUASI
United States District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e19
001-90342_a11_em72
LOC
QUASI
District of Rhode Island
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90342_a11_e44
001-90342_a11_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em74
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em75
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e44
001-90342_a11_em76
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em77
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e45
001-90342_a11_em78
ORG
QUASI
United States Customs Service Account
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e46
001-90342_a11_em79
ORG
QUASI
United States Department of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em80
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e47
001-90342_a11_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e48
001-90342_a11_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
23 January 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e49
001-90342_a11_em83
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e50
001-90342_a11_em84
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Senior Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em85
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e39
001-90342_a11_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e51
001-90342_a11_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e52
001-90342_a11_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Regional Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90342_a11_e53
001-90342_a11_em89
ORG
NO_MASK
Landesgericht für Strafsachen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e54
001-90342_a11_em90
QUANTITY
QUASI
80,000,000 Austrian schillings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em91
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90342_a11_e55
001-90342_a11_em92
MISC
NO_MASK
ATS
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e56
001-90342_a11_em93
QUANTITY
QUASI
5,800,000 euros
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e39
001-90342_a11_em94
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e57
001-90342_a11_em95
DATETIME
QUASI
26 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e58
001-90342_a11_em96
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em97
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e44
001-90342_a11_em98
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e2
001-90342_a11_em99
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em100
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e17
001-90342_a11_em101
MISC
QUASI
money laundering
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em102
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em103
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em104
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em105
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e51
001-90342_a11_em106
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e52
001-90342_a11_em107
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Regional Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em108
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e59
001-90342_a11_em109
DATETIME
QUASI
16 April 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e46
001-90342_a11_em110
ORG
QUASI
United States Department of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e49
001-90342_a11_em111
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e60
001-90342_a11_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
22 May 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e46
001-90342_a11_em113
ORG
QUASI
United States Department of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e49
001-90342_a11_em114
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e61
001-90342_a11_em115
DATETIME
QUASI
1 August 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e2
001-90342_a11_em116
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em117
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em118
ORG
QUASI
United States of America
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em119
MISC
QUASI
001-90342_a11_em120
Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em120
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e63
001-90342_a11_em121
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e13
001-90342_a11_em122
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90342_a11_e64
001-90342_a11_em123
ORG
NO_MASK
Oberlandesgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e58
001-90342_a11_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e51
001-90342_a11_em125
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e58
001-90342_a11_em126
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em127
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em128
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em129
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em130
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em131
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e27
001-90342_a11_em132
MISC
QUASI
laundered
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e25
001-90342_a11_em133
MISC
QUASI
drug
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e65
001-90342_a11_em134
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
10%
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e27
001-90342_a11_em135
MISC
QUASI
laundered
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e66
001-90342_a11_em136
DATETIME
NO_MASK
Between 1 January 1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e67
001-90342_a11_em137
DATETIME
QUASI
2 April 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e40
001-90342_a11_em138
QUANTITY
QUASI
USD 136 million
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e25
001-90342_a11_em139
MISC
QUASI
drug
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em140
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e25
001-90342_a11_em141
MISC
QUASI
drug
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e68
001-90342_a11_em142
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e17
001-90342_a11_em143
MISC
QUASI
money laundering
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e68
001-90342_a11_em144
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em145
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e55
001-90342_a11_em146
MISC
NO_MASK
ATS
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-90342_a11_e69
001-90342_a11_em147
QUANTITY
QUASI
1 million
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e17
001-90342_a11_em148
MISC
QUASI
money laundering
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em149
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e25
001-90342_a11_em150
MISC
QUASI
drug
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e34
001-90342_a11_em151
PERSON
NO_MASK
H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e36
001-90342_a11_em152
DATETIME
QUASI
26 March 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e13
001-90342_a11_em153
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em154
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em155
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e2
001-90342_a11_em156
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e58
001-90342_a11_em157
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e46
001-90342_a11_em158
ORG
QUASI
United States Department of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em159
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em160
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em161
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e39
001-90342_a11_em162
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e70
001-90342_a11_em163
DATETIME
QUASI
25 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em164
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em165
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e39
001-90342_a11_em166
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e71
001-90342_a11_em167
DATETIME
QUASI
22 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e72
001-90342_a11_em168
DATETIME
QUASI
11 March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e73
001-90342_a11_em169
DATETIME
QUASI
11 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e74
001-90342_a11_em170
DATETIME
QUASI
14 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e52
001-90342_a11_em171
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Regional Criminal Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e39
001-90342_a11_em172
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em173
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em174
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em175
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em176
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em177
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e63
001-90342_a11_em178
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em179
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e75
001-90342_a11_em180
DATETIME
QUASI
7 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em181
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em182
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e76
001-90342_a11_em183
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e17
001-90342_a11_em184
MISC
QUASI
money laundering
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em185
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em186
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em187
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e11
001-90342_a11_em188
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em189
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e77
001-90342_a11_em190
DATETIME
NO_MASK
five-year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e30
001-90342_a11_em191
DATETIME
QUASI
30 August 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e39
001-90342_a11_em192
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em193
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em194
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-90342_a11_e78
001-90342_a11_em195
MISC
QUASI
death penalty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e44
001-90342_a11_em196
ORG
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e58
001-90342_a11_em197
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em198
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e58
001-90342_a11_em199
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e79
001-90342_a11_em200
ORG
NO_MASK
Public Prosecutor’s Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e80
001-90342_a11_em201
DATETIME
QUASI
21 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e14
001-90342_a11_em202
DATETIME
QUASI
7 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e13
001-90342_a11_em203
ORG
NO_MASK
Vienna Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e58
001-90342_a11_em204
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e2
001-90342_a11_em205
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em206
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em207
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e63
001-90342_a11_em208
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e17
001-90342_a11_em209
MISC
QUASI
money laundering
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e68
001-90342_a11_em210
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em211
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e63
001-90342_a11_em212
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e38
001-90342_a11_em213
ORG
QUASI
United States Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e37
001-90342_a11_em214
DATETIME
QUASI
25 March 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e39
001-90342_a11_em215
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e77
001-90342_a11_em216
DATETIME
NO_MASK
five-year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e2
001-90342_a11_em217
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e3
001-90342_a11_em218
ORG
QUASI
United States
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e62
001-90342_a11_em219
MISC
QUASI
1998 Treaty
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-90342_a11_e81
001-90342_a11_em220
DATETIME
QUASI
30 October 2000
Stephen Anthony Saccoccia
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Stephen Anthony Saccoccia