PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 32602/08) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Henryk Stokłosa (“the applicant”), on 2 July 2008.

The applicant was represented by Mr J. Majewski, Mr A. Reichelt and Mr M. Gutowski, lawyers practising in Warsaw and Poznań respectively. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged that the assessor who had remanded him in custody had lacked independence, contrary to Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.

On 7 September 2009 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.

On 30 November 2010 the Court (Fourth Section), having regard to the declaration submitted by the Government and the applicant’s reply to that declaration, decided to strike out the application of its list of cases in so far as it related to the complaints under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention. It also decided to adjourn the examination of the applicant’s complaint under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1949 and lives in Śmiłowo. He was a member of the Senate (the upper chamber of the Parliament) between 1989 and 2005 and a prosperous businessman.

On an unspecified date the prosecution authorities instituted criminal proceedings against the applicant. It appears that he left Poland in December 2006. On 30 January 2007 the Warsaw-Praga Północ District Court ordered that the applicant be remanded in custody. That decision was upheld on appeal.

On 23 July 2007 the Warsaw-Praga Regional Court issued a European Arrest Warrant for the applicant. On 12 November 2007 he was arrested in Germany on the basis of that warrant. On 19 December 2007 the applicant was extradited to Poland.

Subsequently the Warsaw-Praga Regional Prosecutor charged the applicant with, inter alia, numerous counts of bribery of high-ranking officials of the Ministry of Finance and bribery of a judge of the administrative court. The applicant was represented by three defence counsel.

On 21 December 2007, on an application from the Warsaw-Praga Regional Prosecutor, the assessor R.Z. (junior judge) of the Warsaw‑Praga Północ District Court remanded the applicant in custody until 19 March 2008.

Two of the applicant’s counsel (Mr J. Majewski and Mr M. Boruc) lodged appeals against the detention order on 28 December 2007. Counsel J. Majewski argued, invoking Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, that the detention order had been given by an assessor who could not be considered “a judge” or “other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power” because he lacked independence from the executive. Relying on Article 439 § 1 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“CCP”) he submitted that the detention order had been given by a “non-authorised person” (osoba nieuprawniona). In this respect he referred to the Constitutional Court’s judgment of 24 October 2007.

On 11 January 2008 the applicant’s third counsel (Mr J. Naumann) filed an appeal against the detention order.

On 12 February 2008 the Warsaw-Praga Regional Court, sitting as a bench of three professional judges, dismissed the appeals against the detention order of 21 December 2007. It held that the assessor could not be considered as “a non-authorised person to give a decision” within the meaning of Article 439 § 1 (1) of the CCP. The Constitutional Court had struck down the provisions allowing the Minister of Justice to delegate judicial powers to assessors; however the relevant decisions given by assessors had not been automatically negated. The court observed that following Poland’s accession to the European Union domestic law was undergoing a continuous process of adjustment to the requirements of European law. However, the transformation of domestic law should not lead to chaos in the legal order and for that reason the Constitutional Court had allowed 18 months for the necessary legislative changes to be implemented. The court observed that at the relevant time the applicant could only challenge an alleged lack of impartiality on the part of the assessor under Article 41 § 1 of the CCP.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e1
001-107273_a6_em1
CODE
DIRECT
32602/08
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107273_a6_e2
001-107273_a6_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
001-107273_a6_em11
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e3
001-107273_a6_em3
DEM
QUASI
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e4
001-107273_a6_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Henryk Stokłosa
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e5
001-107273_a6_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
2 July 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e6
001-107273_a6_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Majewski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e7
001-107273_a6_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Reichelt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e8
001-107273_a6_em8
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Gutowski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e9
001-107273_a6_em9
LOC
QUASI
Warsaw
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107273_a6_e10
001-107273_a6_em10
LOC
QUASI
Poznań
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e2
001-107273_a6_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e11
001-107273_a6_em12
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e12
001-107273_a6_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
7 September 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e13
001-107273_a6_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
30 November 2010
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e14
001-107273_a6_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
1949
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e15
001-107273_a6_em16
LOC
QUASI
Śmiłowo
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e16
001-107273_a6_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
Senate
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107273_a6_e17
001-107273_a6_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
between 1989 and 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107273_a6_e18
001-107273_a6_em19
LOC
NO_MASK
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e19
001-107273_a6_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
December 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e20
001-107273_a6_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107273_a6_e21
001-107273_a6_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw-Praga Północ District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e22
001-107273_a6_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
23 July 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e23
001-107273_a6_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw-Praga Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e24
001-107273_a6_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
12 November 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e25
001-107273_a6_em26
LOC
QUASI
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e26
001-107273_a6_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
19 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e18
001-107273_a6_em28
LOC
NO_MASK
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e27
001-107273_a6_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Finance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e28
001-107273_a6_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
21 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e29
001-107273_a6_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw-Praga Regional Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-107273_a6_e30
001-107273_a6_em32
PERSON
QUASI
R.Z.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107273_a6_e31
001-107273_a6_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw‑Praga Północ District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e32
001-107273_a6_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
19 March 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e6
001-107273_a6_em35
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Majewski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e33
001-107273_a6_em36
PERSON
QUASI
Mr M. Boruc
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e34
001-107273_a6_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
28 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e35
001-107273_a6_em38
PERSON
QUASI
J. Majewski
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e36
001-107273_a6_em39
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e37
001-107273_a6_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e38
001-107273_a6_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
11 January 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e39
001-107273_a6_em42
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Naumann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e40
001-107273_a6_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
12 February 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e23
001-107273_a6_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Warsaw-Praga Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-107273_a6_e28
001-107273_a6_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
21 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e41
001-107273_a6_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
CCP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e42
001-107273_a6_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e43
001-107273_a6_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e18
001-107273_a6_em49
LOC
NO_MASK
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e44
001-107273_a6_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
European Union
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e42
001-107273_a6_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-107273_a6_e45
001-107273_a6_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
18 months
Henryk Stokłosa
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Henryk Stokłosa