PROCEDURE

The case originated in two applications (nos. 70084/01 and 70085/01) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Turkish nationals, Mr Selim Kabasakal and Mr Hasan Atar (“the applicants”), on 13 December 2000.

The applicants were represented by Mr H. Erdoğan and Mr L. Kanat, lawyers practising in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court.

The applicants alleged that they were denied a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench of the State Security Court which tried them and the non-communication of the written opinion of the principal public prosecutor at the Court of Cassation.

The applications were allocated to the Fourth Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1.

The Chamber decided to join the proceedings in the applications (Rule 42 § 1).

By a decision of 8 March 2005 the Court declared the applications admissible.

On 1 November 2004 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed Fourth Section (Rule 52 § 1).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicants were born in 1979 and 1977 respectively and were serving their prison sentences in Ordu prison at the time of their applications to the Court.

On 11 November 1998 the applicants were arrested and taken into custody by police officers at the Anti-terror branch of the Sivas Security Directorate on suspicion of membership of an illegal organisation, namely the TDP0.

On 18 November 1998 they were brought before a judge who ordered their remand in custody.

On 31 December 1998 the public prosecutor at the Erzurum State Security Court filed a bill of indictment with the latter charging the applicants under Article 168 § 2 of the Criminal Code with membership of an illegal organisation.

The first hearing, held before the Erzurum State Security Court on 12 January 1999, in the applicants’ absence, was taken up with procedural matters, such as the measures to be taken for securing the presence of the accused.

On 5 February 1999 the court heard the applicants. The first applicant stated that he accepted in part the accusations against him. In this respect he maintained, inter alia, that he had wanted to join the armed forces of the TDP and that he was apprehended, together with the co‑accused, on his way to the rural area. The second applicant also stated, inter alia, that he was apprehended, together with the co‑accused, before he had joined the rural cadre of the organisation. He maintained that he was a sympathiser of the organisation and not a member. Both applicants also repudiated the statements they had given to the police, claiming that they had been made under duress.

In the next hearing held on 2 March 1999 the applicants stated that they had nothing to say. On 23 March 1999 the court heard a witness and one of the co‑accused. The witness stated that he knew only one of the accused and that he had loaned his car to him. The applicants maintained that, in view of the judgment of the European Court on Human Rights concerning State Security Courts, they were boycotting the court and were not going to give any statements.

In the next hearing held on 20 April 1999, the first applicant submitted that he was neither a member nor a participant in any activity of the organisation in question and that he had been apprehended prior to attending a meeting with members of the organisation.

In the hearings held on 18 May 1999 and 15 June 1999 the second applicant stated that he had nothing to say. The first applicant requested the rectification of some of his words contained in the previous minutes of the hearings.

In a hearing held on 13 July 1999 the civilian judge who had been appointed to replace the military judge sat as a member of the trial court for the first time. At this hearing and the next one held on 10 August 1999, the court took some procedural decisions and heard several of the co-accused, including the second applicant who maintained that he had nothing to say.

In a hearing held on 8 September 1999 the applicants submitted their written submissions in which they challenged, in particular, the veracity of their statements given in police custody.

On 5 October 1999 before the court two persons filed petitions to intervene as third-parties in the proceedings. The applicants reiterated their previous submissions.

At a hearing held on 12 October 1999 the court accepted the request for the third-party intervention of two persons. On the same day, the public prosecutor read out his observations on the merits. The public prosecutor, relying on the submissions of the applicants, the co-accused and the materials found during the applicants’ arrest, requested that the applicants be convicted and sentenced under Article 168 § 2 of the Criminal Code and Article 5 of Law no. 3713. The applicants’ request for an extension of time to submit their observations on the merits was granted by the court.

At each hearing, the court examined and dismissed the requests of the applicants to be released.

On 26 October 1999 the court heard the submissions of the applicants on the merits. The applicants also submitted four pages of written submissions. On the same day the Erzurum State Security Court convicted the applicants as charged and sentenced them to twelve years and six months’ imprisonment.

On 6 December 1999 the applicants appealed to the Court of Cassation against the judgment of the State Security Court. In their petition the applicants submitted arguments based on domestic law and, in particular, challenged the veracity of their statements to the police.

Following a hearing held on 5 June 2000, the Court of Cassation dismissed the applicants’ appeal and upheld the judgment of the first‑instance court. This decision was pronounced, in the absence of the applicants’ representative, on 14 June 2000.

On an unspecified date, the applicants were released from prison.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e1
001-76890_a10_em1
CODE
DIRECT
70084/01
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e2
001-76890_a10_em2
CODE
DIRECT
70085/01
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76890_a10_e3
001-76890_a10_em3
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e4
001-76890_a10_em4
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e5
001-76890_a10_em5
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Selim Kabasakal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e6
001-76890_a10_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Hasan Atar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e7
001-76890_a10_em7
DATETIME
QUASI
13 December 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e8
001-76890_a10_em8
PERSON
QUASI
Mr H. Erdoğan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e9
001-76890_a10_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr L. Kanat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e10
001-76890_a10_em10
LOC
QUASI
Ankara
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e3
001-76890_a10_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
001-76890_a10_em3
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e11
001-76890_a10_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e12
001-76890_a10_em13
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e13
001-76890_a10_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
8 March 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76890_a10_e14
001-76890_a10_em15
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e15
001-76890_a10_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e16
001-76890_a10_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76890_a10_e17
001-76890_a10_em18
ORG
QUASI
Ordu prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e18
001-76890_a10_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
11 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76890_a10_e19
001-76890_a10_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
Anti-terror branch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e20
001-76890_a10_em21
ORG
QUASI
Sivas Security Directorate
POLITICS
insert
001-76890_a10_e21
001-76890_a10_em22
ORG
QUASI
TDP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e22
001-76890_a10_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
18 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e23
001-76890_a10_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
31 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e24
001-76890_a10_em25
ORG
QUASI
Erzurum State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e24
001-76890_a10_em26
ORG
QUASI
Erzurum State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e25
001-76890_a10_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e26
001-76890_a10_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
5 February 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e21
001-76890_a10_em29
ORG
QUASI
TDP
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e27
001-76890_a10_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e28
001-76890_a10_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
23 March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76890_a10_e29
001-76890_a10_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
European Court on Human Rights
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76890_a10_e30
001-76890_a10_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
State Security Courts
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e31
001-76890_a10_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
20 April 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e32
001-76890_a10_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
18 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e33
001-76890_a10_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
15 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e34
001-76890_a10_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
13 July 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e35
001-76890_a10_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
10 August 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e36
001-76890_a10_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
8 September 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76890_a10_e37
001-76890_a10_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
5 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e38
001-76890_a10_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
12 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76890_a10_e39
001-76890_a10_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
26 October 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e24
001-76890_a10_em43
ORG
QUASI
Erzurum State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-76890_a10_e40
001-76890_a10_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
twelve years and six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e41
001-76890_a10_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
6 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e12
001-76890_a10_em46
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e11
001-76890_a10_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e42
001-76890_a10_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
5 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e12
001-76890_a10_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-76890_a10_e43
001-76890_a10_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
14 June 2000
Selim Kabasakal
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Selim Kabasakal