PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 35630/02) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Ukrainian national, Mr Igor Chernyshov (“the applicant”), on 12 August 2002.

The applicant, who had been granted legal aid, was represented by Mr P. Sendecki, a lawyer practising in Lublin. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that his pre-trial detention exceeded a “reasonable time” within the meaning of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.

On 6 December 2007 the President of the Fourth Section of the Court decided to give notice of the application to the Polish Government. It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 1). The Ukrainian Government did not exercise their right to intervene (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 § 1 (b) of the Rules of Court).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1977. He is currently detained in Hrubieszów Prison.

A. Criminal proceedings against the applicant and his pre-trial detention

On 19 August 1998 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of murder.

On 20 August 1998 the Słubice District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) remanded him in custody, relying on the reasonable suspicion that he had committed the offence in question. It considered that keeping the applicant in detention was necessary to secure the proper conduct of the proceedings, given the risk that he might tamper with evidence or go into hiding. As regards the latter, the court relied on the fact that he did not have his place of residence in Poland. It also stressed the severity of the anticipated prison sentence.

The applicant’s appeal against the detention order, likewise his further appeals against decisions extending his detention and all his subsequent applications for release and appeals against refusals to release him, were unsuccessful.

In the course of the investigation, the applicant’s detention was extended on 14 October 1998 to 15 January 1999. The Słubice District Court relied on the original grounds given for the applicant’s detention. It also underlined that the applicant was a foreign national and therefore there was a risk of his absconding if released.

The applicant asserted that at the early stage of the investigation he had admitted to having committed the offence he had been charged with. He further submitted that he had agreed to cooperate with the authorities in order to have his future sentence mitigated.

On 28 December 1998 the Słubice District Prosecutor lodged a bill of indictment with the Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy). The applicant was charged with murder. The bill of indictment comprised several charges brought against three defendants.

The applicant was tried on the basis of the relevant provisions of the Criminal Code of 6 June 1997 (the so-called “New Criminal Code”) which entered into force on 1 September 1998, replacing the Criminal Code of 19 April 1969 (the so-called “Old Criminal Code”). According to Article 4 of the New Criminal Code, in the event that a case is being examined at a time when the New Criminal Code is in force but concerns an offence which was committed prior to its entry into force, the new law shall nevertheless apply if it is more lenient for the perpetrator (względniejszy dla sprawcy).

On 18 February and 18 March 1999 the trial court held hearings. The applicant pleaded guilty before the trial court. In particular, he testified that he had committed the murder together with a certain W.B. and a certain A.T.

During the trial the authorities further extended the applicant’s detention pending trial on 13 January 1999 (to 15 June 1999). The courts repeated the grounds previously given for the applicant’s continued detention.

On 18 March 1999 the Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court gave judgment. The applicant was convicted as charged and sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. The court noted, inter alia, that although the applicant pleaded guilty, his testimonies had not been fully coherent and contained a number of inconsistencies. It therefore considered that the conditions for the extraordinary mitigation of sentence had not been met in the case.

The applicant, other co-accused and the District Prosecutor appealed. The applicant’s legal-aid counsel argued that the first-instance court had not mitigated the applicant’s sentence as required by Article 60 § 3 of the New Criminal Code, despite the fact that the applicant had cooperated with the authorities. According to that provision, a domestic court shall mitigate the sentence if the defendant committed the offence with accomplices, and revealed to the prosecution information about the persons involved in the commission of the offence and any significant circumstances in which the offence was committed.

The applicant was kept in detention pending appeal.

On 23 November 1999 the Poznań Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny) heard the appeals. It quashed the first-instance judgment and remitted the case for retrial. The appellate court observed at the outset that the appeals lodged by the applicant and the District Prosecutor contested only the severity of the penalty imposed and not the applicant’s guilt which was clearly established. It further considered the arguments advanced on behalf of the applicant to be reasonable. However, it found that the evidence examined by the first-instance court had not been sufficient to allow for a definite conclusion as to whether or not the provision on the mitigation of the sentence was applicable in the circumstances of the case, namely whether or not the applicant had disclosed a full and accurate account of events. It further ordered that the applicant’s detention should continue until 30 April 2000. The court repeated the grounds previously given for the applicant’s continued detention. In addition, it underlined the need to obtain a report from an expert in graphology.

On 15 February, 21 March and 11 April 2000 the trial court held hearings.

On 18 April 2000 the Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court convicted the applicant as originally charged and sentenced him to 15 years’ imprisonment. The other defendants were likewise convicted.

The applicant, other co-accused and the District Prosecutor appealed. The applicant remained detained pending appeal.

It appears that the applicant changed his testimony in that he no longer claimed that A.T. had been an accomplice to the offence he had been charged with. He continued to admit his own guilt.

On 9 November 2000 the Poznań Court of Appeal again quashed the first-instance judgment and remitted the case for retrial. It ordered that the applicant’s detention should continue until 31 January 2001.

On 14 March, 15 March and 27 April 2001 the trial court held hearings.

In the retrial proceedings the applicant made numerous, unsuccessful applications for release and appealed, likewise unsuccessfully, against decisions extending his detention. The relevant decisions on the extension of his detention were given by the Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court on 30 January 2001 (to 30 April 2001), on 27 April 2001 (to 27 July 2001), on 10 July 2001 (to 10 October 2001) and on 9 October 2001 (to 9 January 2002).

On 5 December 2001 the Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court convicted the applicant as originally charged and sentenced him to 25 years’ imprisonment. As concerns the other defendants, the court convicted W.B. but acquitted A.T.

The applicant appealed. The applicant’s legal-aid counsel argued, inter alia, that the trial court had erred in that it had not mitigated the applicant’s sentence. The lawyer noted that the material in the case file clearly indicated that the applicant had cooperated with the authorities and therefore had complied with the requirements of Article 60 § 3 of the New Criminal Code. Admittedly, the applicant had changed his pleadings after the judgment of 18 April 2000. That, however, should not have had any bearing on the outcome of the case, since the applicant had undoubtedly been coerced into changing his testimony by his co-defendants.

On 16 May 2002 the Poznań Court of Appeal upheld the first‑instance judgment. It acknowledged that the applicant had given an account of his own wrongdoing. The court observed however that the remainder of his testimony, in particular in part regarding the responsibility of other co-accused had not been credible and had not been taken into consideration by the trial court. The appellate court concluded that the applicant’s testimonies had not been wholly credible and therefore he was not entitled to an extraordinary mitigation of his sentence.

By letter of 3 December 2002 the applicant’s legal-aid lawyer informed the Poznań Court of Appeal that he had not found any grounds for lodging a cassation appeal in the case.

It appears that throughout the trial the applicant was represented by a lawyer assigned to him under the legal-aid scheme. The applicant submitted that between 1999 and 2000 his legal-aid lawyer had never met him to prepare the case and had put forward an ineffective defence.

B. Conditions of the applicant’s detention

On 19 August 1998 the applicant was committed to Międzyrzecz Remand Centre. Since that date he has been continuously detained in several penitentiary facilities. On 10 December 2007 the applicant was transferred to Hrubieszów Prison where he is currently detained.

The parties gave partly differing accounts of the conditions of the applicant’s detention.

The applicant maintained that during most part of his detention he was held in overcrowded cells in conditions which did not comply with the basic standards of hygiene.

The Government submitted that they could not formally confirm whether during his detention from 19 August 1998 to 28 November 2000, from 22 March to 25 April 2001, from 6 June to 29 November 2001, from 28 February to 15 May 2002, from 27 August to 29 November 2002, from 7 to 18 March 2003 and from 26 August 2005 to 2 February 2006 the applicant was detained in cells with a surface area of at least 3 m² per person. The Government further submitted that the period of the applicant’s detention in cells in which the statutory minimum requirement of 3 m² per person had not been respected amounted to some 979 days. Finally, they maintained that the applicant was currently detained in a cell in which the statutory minimum requirement of 3 m² per person was respected. This submission was not contested by the applicant.

At the beginning of his detention the applicant lodged numerous complaints with the penitentiary authorities regarding the conditions of his detention. He submitted that he had later given up as his complaints had no prospects of success and he had feared being persecuted by the prison authorities. The applicant did not bring a civil action in tort to seek compensation for the infringement of his personal rights.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e1
001-104653_a2_em1
CODE
DIRECT
35630/02
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e2
001-104653_a2_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e3
001-104653_a2_em3
DEM
QUASI
Ukrainian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e4
001-104653_a2_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Igor Chernyshov
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e5
001-104653_a2_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
12 August 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e6
001-104653_a2_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. Sendecki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e7
001-104653_a2_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Lublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e2
001-104653_a2_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-104653_a2_em2
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e8
001-104653_a2_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e9
001-104653_a2_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
6 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e2
001-104653_a2_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e10
001-104653_a2_em12
ORG
QUASI
Ukrainian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e11
001-104653_a2_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1977
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e12
001-104653_a2_em14
LOC
QUASI
Hrubieszów Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e13
001-104653_a2_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
19 August 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e14
001-104653_a2_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
20 August 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e15
001-104653_a2_em17
ORG
QUASI
Słubice District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104653_a2_e16
001-104653_a2_em18
ORG
NO_MASK
Sąd Rejonowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e17
001-104653_a2_em19
LOC
NO_MASK
Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e18
001-104653_a2_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
14 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e19
001-104653_a2_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e15
001-104653_a2_em22
ORG
QUASI
Słubice District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e20
001-104653_a2_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
28 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e21
001-104653_a2_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Słubice District Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e22
001-104653_a2_em25
ORG
QUASI
Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104653_a2_e23
001-104653_a2_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
Sąd Okręgowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e24
001-104653_a2_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
1 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e25
001-104653_a2_em28
DATETIME
QUASI
19 April 1969
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e26
001-104653_a2_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
18 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e27
001-104653_a2_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
18 March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e28
001-104653_a2_em31
PERSON
NO_MASK
W.B.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e29
001-104653_a2_em32
PERSON
NO_MASK
A.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e30
001-104653_a2_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
13 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104653_a2_e31
001-104653_a2_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
15 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e27
001-104653_a2_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
18 March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e22
001-104653_a2_em36
ORG
QUASI
Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e32
001-104653_a2_em37
DATETIME
NO_MASK
15 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e33
001-104653_a2_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
District Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e34
001-104653_a2_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
23 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e35
001-104653_a2_em40
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104653_a2_e36
001-104653_a2_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Sąd Apelacyjny
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e33
001-104653_a2_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
District Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e37
001-104653_a2_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e38
001-104653_a2_em44
DATETIME
NO_MASK
15 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e39
001-104653_a2_em45
DATETIME
NO_MASK
21 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e40
001-104653_a2_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
11 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e41
001-104653_a2_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
18 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e22
001-104653_a2_em48
ORG
QUASI
Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e32
001-104653_a2_em49
DATETIME
NO_MASK
15 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e33
001-104653_a2_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
District Prosecutor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-104653_a2_e29
001-104653_a2_em51
PERSON
NO_MASK
A.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e42
001-104653_a2_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e35
001-104653_a2_em53
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e43
001-104653_a2_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e44
001-104653_a2_em55
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e45
001-104653_a2_em56
DATETIME
NO_MASK
15 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e46
001-104653_a2_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
27 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e22
001-104653_a2_em58
ORG
QUASI
Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e47
001-104653_a2_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e48
001-104653_a2_em60
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e46
001-104653_a2_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
27 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e49
001-104653_a2_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
27 July 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e50
001-104653_a2_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
10 July 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e51
001-104653_a2_em64
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e52
001-104653_a2_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
9 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e53
001-104653_a2_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
9 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e54
001-104653_a2_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
5 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e22
001-104653_a2_em68
ORG
QUASI
Gorzów Wielkopolski Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e55
001-104653_a2_em69
DATETIME
NO_MASK
25 years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e28
001-104653_a2_em70
PERSON
NO_MASK
W.B.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104653_a2_e29
001-104653_a2_em71
PERSON
NO_MASK
A.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e41
001-104653_a2_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
18 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e56
001-104653_a2_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e35
001-104653_a2_em74
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e57
001-104653_a2_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e35
001-104653_a2_em76
ORG
QUASI
Poznań Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e58
001-104653_a2_em77
DATETIME
NO_MASK
between 1999 and 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e13
001-104653_a2_em78
DATETIME
QUASI
19 August 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e59
001-104653_a2_em79
LOC
QUASI
Międzyrzecz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e60
001-104653_a2_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
10 December 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e12
001-104653_a2_em81
ORG
QUASI
Hrubieszów Prison
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e13
001-104653_a2_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
19 August 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e61
001-104653_a2_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
28 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e62
001-104653_a2_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
22 March to 25 April 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e63
001-104653_a2_em85
DATETIME
QUASI
6 June to 29 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e64
001-104653_a2_em86
DATETIME
NO_MASK
28 February
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e65
001-104653_a2_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e66
001-104653_a2_em88
DATETIME
NO_MASK
27 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e67
001-104653_a2_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
29 November 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e68
001-104653_a2_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
7 to 18 March 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e69
001-104653_a2_em91
DATETIME
QUASI
26 August 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e70
001-104653_a2_em92
DATETIME
QUASI
2 February 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-104653_a2_e71
001-104653_a2_em93
QUANTITY
QUASI
3 m² per person
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e72
001-104653_a2_em94
QUANTITY
QUASI
3 m²
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e73
001-104653_a2_em95
DATETIME
QUASI
some 979 days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-104653_a2_e72
001-104653_a2_em96
QUANTITY
QUASI
3 m²
Igor Chernyshov
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Igor Chernyshov