PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 35810/09) against Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Irish national, Ms Louise O’Keeffe (“the applicant”), on 16 June 2009.

The applicant was represented by Mr E. Cantillon, a lawyer practising in Cork. The Irish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr P. White, of the Department of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant mainly complained under Article 3 of the Convention that the system of primary education had failed to protect her from sexual abuse by a teacher in 1973 and, under Article 13, that she did not have an effective domestic remedy in that respect. She also relied on Article 8 and Article 2 of Protocol No. 1, both alone and in conjunction with Article 14. She also complained of the length of her civil proceedings and of the absence of an effective domestic remedy in that respect, relying on Article 6 alone and in conjunction with Article 13.

The application was allocated to the Fifth Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Ann Power-Forde, the judge elected in respect of Ireland, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28). On 13 June 2012 the President of the Chamber decided to appoint Mr Justice Charleton to sit as an ad hoc judge (Article 26 § 4 of the Convention, and Rule 29 § 1).

On 26 June 2012 a Chamber of that Section (composed of Dean Spielmann, President, Mark Villiger, Karel Jungwiert, Boštjan M. Zupančič, Ganna Yudkivska, André Potocki, judges, Peter Charleton, ad hoc judge, and Claudia Westerdiek, Section Registrar) examined the case. The Chamber, unanimously, struck out the complaints regarding the length of the domestic proceedings and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in that regard, given the friendly settlement reached between the parties on those issues. It also, unanimously, declared admissible the remaining complaints.

On 20 September 2012 that Chamber (Angelika Nußberger, substitute judge, replaced Ganna Yudkivska who was unable to take part in the further consideration of the case (Rule 24 § 3)) relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber, neither of the parties having objected to relinquishment (Article 30 of the Convention and Rule 72).

The composition of the Grand Chamber was determined according to the provisions of Article 26 §§ 4 and 5 of the Convention and Rule 24, with Mr Justice Charleton continuing to act as ad hoc judge (Article 26 § 4 of the Convention and Rule 29 § 1).

The applicant and the Government each filed further observations (Rule 59 § 1) on the merits. In addition, the Irish Human Rights Commission and the European Centre for Law and Justice had been given leave by the President of the Chamber (Article 36 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 44 § 3) to intervene in the written procedure and their submissions to the Chamber were admitted to the Grand Chamber file.

A hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 6 March 2013 (Rule 59 § 3).

There appeared before the Court: (a) for the Government Mr P. White, Agent, Mr F. McDonagh, Senior Counsel, Mr C. Power, Barrister, Counsel, Ms S. Farrell, Office of the Attorney General, Ms M. McGarry, Department of Education and Skills, Advisers; (b) for the applicant Mr D. Holland, Senior Counsel, Mr A. Keating, Senior Counsel, Counsel, Mr E. Cantillon, Solicitor, Mrs M. Scriven, Solicitor, Representatives. The applicant also attended.

The Court heard addresses by Mr Holland and Mr McDonagh.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1964 and lives in Cork, Ireland.

A. Background

The following facts were not contested by the parties.

The applicant attended Dunderrow National School from 1968. The school was owned, through trustees, by the Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Cork and Ross who was recognised by the Department of Education and Science (“the Department”) as the school’s patron. The manager (S.), acting on behalf of the bishop, was the local parish priest. The latter being elderly and infirm, a local priest (Ó.) was the de facto manager who acted on behalf of, and in the interests of, S. The term “manager” used below refers both to Ó. and to the management function he performed. Dunderrow National School had two teachers, one of whom (L.H.) was the school’s principal, a married man. Dunderrow was one of four national schools in the applicant’s parish.

In 1971 a parent of a child complained to the manager that L.H. had sexually abused her child. That complaint was not reported to the police, to the Department or to any other State authority and was not acted upon by the manager.

During the first six months of 1973 the applicant was subjected to approximately twenty sexual assaults by L.H. during music lessons in his classroom. During the time she attended those lessons, the applicant and her parents were unaware of the allegation made in 1971 about L.H.

In September 1973 other parents brought to the applicant’s parents’ attention similar allegations concerning L.H. Following a meeting of parents chaired by the manager about this, L.H. went on sick leave. In September 1973 he resigned from his post. Those allegations were not reported at that time to the police, to the Department or to any other State authority. In a brief conversation, the applicant’s mother asked her whether L.H. had touched her. The applicant responded to the effect that something of a sexual nature had happened but she did not recall the conversation going any further. In January 1974 the manager notified the Department that L.H. had resigned and named his replacement. Soon thereafter L.H. took up a position in another national school where he taught until his retirement in 1995.

Between 1969 and 1973, the inspector assigned to the region visited Dunderrow National School on six occasions which was, as he later stated in evidence, an above average number of visits. He met with L.H. and S. He attended parent meetings on the question of Dunderrow’s amalgamation with other schools. No complaint about L.H. was made to him. He observed the teaching work of L.H. and considered it satisfactory.

The applicant suppressed the sexual abuse. While she had significant psychological difficulties, she did not associate those with the abuse. In 1996 she was contacted by the police who were investigating a complaint made in 1995 by a former pupil of Dunderrow National School against L.H. The applicant made a statement to the police in January 1997 and was referred for counselling. During the investigation a number of other pupils made statements. L.H. was charged with 386 criminal offences of sexual abuse involving some twenty-one former pupils of the school during a period of about ten years. In 1998 he pleaded guilty to twenty-one sample charges and was sentenced to imprisonment. His licence to teach was withdrawn by the Minister for Education (“the Minister”) under Rule 108 of the National School Rules 1965 (“the 1965 Rules”).

In or around June 1998, and as a consequence of the evidence of other victims during the criminal trial and subsequent medical treatment, the applicant realised the connection between her psychological problems and the abuse by L.H. and understood the extent of those problems.

B. Criminal Injuries Compensation Tribunal (“the CICT”)

In October 1998 the applicant applied to the CICT for compensation. An initial award (44,814.14 euros (EUR)) was made by a single judge. The applicant appealed to a CICT panel. She claimed that the CICT gave her the option of continuing her appeal (at the risk of finding that her CICT application would be rejected as out of time) or of accepting the initial offer of the CICT with some additional expenses (EUR 53,962.24, the non-pecuniary aspect being EUR 27,000). The applicant accepted the offer by letter of 5 November 2002 and gave the standard undertaking to repay the CICT award from any other award she may receive, from whatever source, in relation to the same injury. The award was made on an ex gratia basis. Since the State is never a party to CICT proceedings, it became aware of this award later before the High Court (see directly below).

C. Civil action for damages (No. 1998/10555P)

1. High Court

On 29 September 1998 the applicant instituted a civil action against L.H. and the Minister, as well as against Ireland and the Attorney General, claiming damages for personal injuries suffered as a result of assault and battery including sexual abuse by L.H. Her claim against the latter three defendants (“the State Defendants”) was threefold: (a) negligence by the State arising out of the failure of the State Defendants in relation to the recognition, examination and supervision of the school and in failing to put in place appropriate measures and procedures to protect against, and put a stop to, the systematic abuse by L.H. since 1962; (b) vicarious liability of the State Defendants for the acts of L.H. since, inter alia, the true relationship between him and the State was one of employment; and (c) liability given the applicant’s constitutional right to bodily integrity, the responsibility of the State Defendants to provide primary education under Article 42 of the Constitution and the measures put in place to discharge that responsibility.

Since L.H. did not file a defence, on 8 November 1999 the applicant obtained judgment in default against him. On 24 October 2006 the High Court assessed and awarded damages payable by L.H. in the sum of EUR 305,104, comprising EUR 200,000 in general damages, EUR 50,000 in aggravated damages, EUR 50,000 in exemplary damages, and EUR 5,104 in special damages. The applicant took enforcement proceedings. L.H. claimed he had insufficient means and she obtained an instalment order of EUR 400 per month. The first payment was received in November 2007 so that she has been paid in the region of EUR 31,000 to date. She registered a judgment mortgage against that part of the family home owned by L.H.

As regards her case against the State Defendants, she requested a Professor Ferguson to advise her on the question of the adequacy of child-protection mechanisms in Ireland in the 1970s. He responded by letter of 14 April 2003. Professor Ferguson agreed that, if the child-protection protocols existing in 2003 had been in place in 1973, it was very likely that the applicant’s abuse would have been acted upon in a manner which would have ensured the promotion of her welfare. He feared that pleading the case on the basis of what the State should have known at the time would be unsuccessful because it would not be possible to project onto the past the knowledge and systems of accountability that existed in the present day.

The High Court hearing against the State Defendants began on 2 March 2004. On 5 March 2004, while the applicant was presenting her evidence, the High Court judge, in response to the applicant’s complaint regarding the absence of a State system for adverting to and addressing sexual abuse in national schools, asked Counsel for the applicant as follows: “What evidence do I have, or what should I have deduce[d] from the evidence that has been given that either the system in operation was a bad system, and I will come back to that, or that there was an alternative system that should have been applied, and what that alternative system might have been.”

When the applicant’s case concluded, the State Defendants applied for a direction to strike out the case on the basis that no prima facie case had been made out by the applicant as regards all three grounds, submitting, inter alia, that there was no evidence of negligence. On 9 March 2004 the High Court accepted the State Defendants’ application, the court being “satisfied that the plaintiff had not established a case in negligence against the [State Defendants]” (the “non-suit” order). The court did not and was not called upon to distinguish between the two bases of the negligence claim. However, a prima facie case had been made out on the questions of vicarious and constitutional liability and evidence would be called from the defendants on those matters. The trial finished on 12 March 2004.

On 20 January 2006 the High Court delivered judgment. It found that the action was not statute barred. It also concluded that the State was not vicariously liable for the sexual assaults perpetrated by L.H. given the relationship between the State and the denominational management of national schools. Although counsel for the applicant had orally suggested that the State should be vicariously liable for the inaction of the manager, the High Court judgment did not address this point. Finally, the High Court found that no action lay for a breach of a constitutional right where existing laws (in this case, tort) protected that right. The costs of the proceedings against the State Defendants were awarded against the applicant.

2. Supreme Court (O’Keeffe v. Hickey, [2008] IESC 72)

In May 2006 the applicant appealed to the Supreme Court. Her Notice of Appeal challenged the finding on vicarious liability and referred to two matters: the absence of reasons for the interim ruling of 9 March 2004 and the High Court judgment’s failure to rule on the vicarious liability for the inaction of the manager. Mr Justice Hardiman described the appeal as limited to the State’s vicarious liability for the acts of L.H. and the manager, although he commented in his judgment on the other two initial claims of the applicant (direct negligence and the constitutional claim). Mr Justice Fennelly also considered that the appeal concerned only vicarious liability for the acts of L.H., although he refused to accept that the State was vicariously liable for the manager.

The appeal was heard from 11 to 13 June 2006. By a majority judgment of 19 December 2008 (Hardiman J and Fennelly J, with whom Chief Justice Murray and Mr Justice Denham concurred and Mr Justice Geoghegan dissented), the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.

Hardiman J described in detail the legal status of national schools. While the arrangements for national-school education might “seem rather odd today”, they had to be understood in the context of Irish history in the early nineteenth century. Following denominational conflict and the later concession of Catholic emancipation in 1829, the dissenting churches and the Catholic Church wished to ensure that children of their denominations be educated in schools controlled by the denomination and not by the State or the established (Anglican) Church. Those churches were “remarkably successful” in achieving this aim: from the very beginning of the Irish system of national education (encapsulated in the “Stanley letter” of 1831), State authorities paid for the system of national education “but did not manage it or administer it at the point of delivery”. The latter function was left to the local denominational manager. While State funding was accorded on a proportionate basis to all denominational schools, the population was at the time overwhelmingly Catholic so that the majority of national schools had Catholic patrons and managers.

Hardiman J went on to describe as “remarkable” the fact that, whilst in nineteenth-century Europe firmer distinctions were being drawn between Church and State and Church influence in the provision of public services (including education) was ebbing, in Ireland the position of the Church became stronger and more entrenched. He adopted the evidence of one expert witness (in the history of education in Ireland) who described the position after the inception of the Irish Free State in 1922 and noted that the Catholic managers in this “managerial” system “were very clearly articulate and very absolutely ... precise in how they interpreted what the situation was for national schools in the new Ireland ... It had to be Catholic schools under Catholic management, Catholic teachers, Catholic children”.

That expert witness went on to describe the answer of the Catholic Church in the 1950s to a request by a teachers’ trade union to have local committees deal with maintaining and repairing school buildings. The Catholic Church had responded that there could be no interference whatever with the “inherited tradition of managerial rights of schooling”. The limited proposal of the union was considered to be the thin edge of the wedge because, in due course, the request might be to interfere with “other aspects of the manager’s authority vis-à-vis the appointment and dismissal of teachers which was of course the key concern that had been fought for and won over the years”. Hardiman J referred to the “urgent desire” of the denominations to maintain their role in primary education.

As Hardiman J explained, the Constitution reflected this managerial structure: the obligation in Article 42 § 4) on the State to “provide for” free primary education reflected a largely State-funded, but entirely clerically administered, system of education. As a result there were approximately 3,000 national schools in Ireland: most were under the control of Catholic patrons and managers, a few were under the control of other denominations and even fewer were controlled by non-denominational groups.

Hardiman J noted that, in recent times and after more than a century and a half, the provision of education was belatedly and at least partially placed on a statutory basis by the Education Act 1998; prior to that Act the system had been administered by the 1965 Rules as well as by other ministerial letters, circulars and notes.

As to what could be gleaned from the 1965 Rules, Hardiman J noted: “The Minister laid down rules for national schools but they were general in nature and did not allow him to govern the detailed activities of any individual teacher. He inspected the schools for their academic performance, other than religious instruction, but it did not go further than that. He was ... deprived of the direct control of the schools, and of the enormous power which that brings, because ‘there was interposed between the State and the child the manager or the committee or board of management’. Equally, the Minister did not appoint the manager or the teacher or directly supervise him. This, indeed, was the essence of the ‘managerial system’. I cannot see, on the evidence, that he had any scope whatever to make a personal judgment about either of these two individuals. Moreover, it seems to have been instinctively recognised by the parents who complained about the first defendant that the person with direct authority to receive the complaint and do something about it was the clerical and clerically appointed manager. No complaint, on the evidence, was directed to the Minister or to any State body. The matter was handled, so to speak, ‘in house’ at the election of the complainants. The end result of the process was a voluntary resignation followed by the employment of [L.H.] in another school in the vicinity. All these factors tending to distance the Minister and the State authorities from the management of the school and the control of the first defendant are direct consequences of the long established system of education, described above and mandated in the Constitution whereby the Minister pays and, to a certain extent, regulates, but the schools and the teachers are controlled by their clerical managers and patrons. It is not the concern of the Court either to endorse or to criticise that system but merely to register its existence and the obvious fact that it deprives the Minister and the State of direct control of schools, teachers, and pupils.”

Hardiman J observed that the sexual abuse of a pupil was the negation of what L.H. was employed to do but he also found that in 1973 it “was an unusual act, little discussed, and certainly not regarded as an ordinary foreseeable risk of attending at a school”. He considered it “notable” that she did not sue the patron, the diocese of which he was bishop, his successors or his estate, the trustees of the property of the Diocese of Cork and Ross (owners of the school), the manager or his estate or successors.

Hardiman J concluded that, having regard to the relevant test for vicarious liability and to the above-described arrangements for the control and management of national schools, the State Defendants were not liable to the applicant for the wrongs committed against her. In particular, even applying the wider form of vicarious liability invoked, the Minister’s absence of direct control over L.H., long since ceded to the manager and the patron, prevented a finding against the Minister. The relationship of L.H. and the State – a “triangular one with the Church” – was entirely sui generis and a product of Ireland’s unique historical experience. The manager was “the nominee of the patron, that is of a power other than the Minister and he did not inform the Minister of any difficulties with, or complaints about, [L.H.] or of his resignation and appointment to teach elsewhere until they were faits accomplis. He was the agent not of the Minister, but of the Catholic Church, the power in whose interest the Minister was displaced from the management of the school”.

Hardiman J commented on two of the applicant’s original claims which had “not been proceeded with”.

As to the claim of negligence by the State, he remarked “... this is a claim which could more appropriately be made against the manager. It was he who had the power to put in place appropriate measures and procedures governing the running of the school. The Minister can hardly be responsible for a failure to ‘cease’ a course of action of whose existence he was quite unaware”.

As to the claim about the responsibility of the State in the provision of primary education under Article 42 of the Constitution and the measures put in place to discharge that responsibility, Hardiman J stated: “I have already analysed the terms of Article 42 from which it will be seen that the Minister, in the case of this national school, was simply providing assistance and subvention to private and corporate (i.e. Roman Catholic) endeavour, leaving the running of the school to the private or corporate entities. The Minister is thereby, as Kenny J pointed out in Crowley v. Ireland [1980] I.R. 102, deprived of the control of education by the interposing of the patron and the manager between him and the children. These persons, and particularly the latter, are in much closer and more frequent contact with the school than the Minister or the Department. I do not read the provisions of Article 42.4 as requiring more than that the Minister shall ‘endeavour to supplement and give reasonable aid to private and corporate educational initiative’, to ‘provide for free primary education’. ... In my view the Constitution specifically envisages, not indeed a delegation but a ceding of the actual running of schools to the interests represented by the patron and the manager.”

Hardiman J concluded by pointing out that nothing in the judgment could be interpreted as suggesting liability on the part of the Church and, in any event, it was quite impossible to do so because those authorities had not been heard by the Supreme Court since the applicant had not sued them.

Fennelly J, who delivered the other majority judgment, began by noting that the “calamity of the exploitation of authority over children so as to abuse them sexually” had shaken society to its foundations. Cases of sexual abuse had preoccupied the criminal courts and the Supreme Court for many years and it was surprising that that court was confronted for the first time with questions relating to the liability of institutions including the State for sexual abuse of schoolchildren in a national school by a teacher.

Fennelly J also described in some detail the history and consequent legal status of national schools, which system had survived independence in 1922 and the enactment of the Constitution in 1937. He accepted the expert’s evidence that it was not a State system but rather a “State-supported system”. He noted the clear division of power between the State (funding and fixing the curriculum) and the manager (day-to-day running of the school including hiring and firing teachers), noting that the different religions were determined to preserve and guard their own distinct religious education so that national schools developed on a denominational basis.

He considered inspectors to be a crucially important part of the system of State oversight and maintenance of standards which enabled the Minister to be satisfied about the quality of the system. However, he noted that the inspection regime did not alter the division of responsibilities between the State and the manager, the inspectors having no power to direct teachers in the carrying out of their duties. The 1965 Rules reflected this allocation of responsibilities between the Church and State authorities. Even if, in modern times, the State played a more intrusive role, responsibility for day-to-day management remained with the manager. He concluded that the State was not vicariously liable for the acts of L.H. or, for the same reasons, for the failure of the manager to report the 1971 complaint to the State. L.H. was not employed by the State but, in law, by the manager. While L.H. had to have the qualifications laid down by the Minister and had to observe the 1965 Rules and while the State had disciplinary powers in those respects, L.H. was not engaged by the State and the State could not dismiss him.

Referring back to the reference in the Notice of Appeal to the State’s liability for the failure of the manager to report the 1971 complaint, Fennelly J concluded that “[f]or the same reason, insofar as it is necessary to say so, there can be no liability for the failure of [the manager] to report the 1971 complaint. [The manager] was not the employee of the second defendant.”

Geoghegan J dissented. He accepted that neither the Department nor its inspectors had any knowledge of the assaults. He noted that, for all practical purposes, most primary education in Ireland took the form of a joint enterprise between Church and State and he considered that that relationship was such that there was a sufficient connection between the State and the creation of the risk as to render the State liable. Geoghegan J relied, notably, on the role of school inspectors. He examined in some detail the evidence given by, and concerning the role of, school inspectors noting, inter alia, that if an allegation of sexual assault by a teacher on a national-school pupil was considered well-founded by an inquiry set up by the Department, it could lead to the withdrawal of recognition or to a police investigation and, if the police found the complaint justified, to the withdrawal of the teacher’s licence to teach.

By a judgment of 9 May 2009 the Supreme Court vacated the High Court order for costs against the applicant since it was not disputed that hers was an important and complex test case. It determined that each party had to bear its own costs related to the action against the State Defendants.

The applicant was legally represented throughout the civil proceedings, although she did not have legal aid.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e1
001-140235_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
35810/09
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e3
001-140235_a11_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Irish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e4
001-140235_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Louise O’Keeffe
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e5
001-140235_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
16 June 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e6
001-140235_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr E. Cantillon
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e7
001-140235_a11_em7
LOC
QUASI
Cork
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-140235_a11_em2
Irish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
001-140235_a11_em2
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e8
001-140235_a11_em10
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. White
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e9
001-140235_a11_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Department of Foreign Affairs
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em12
MISC
QUASI
sexual abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e11
001-140235_a11_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e12
001-140235_a11_em14
PERSON
QUASI
Ann Power-Forde
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em15
LOC
QUASI
Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e13
001-140235_a11_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
13 June 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e14
001-140235_a11_em17
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Justice Charleton
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e15
001-140235_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
26 June 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e16
001-140235_a11_em19
PERSON
NO_MASK
Dean Spielmann
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e17
001-140235_a11_em20
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mark Villiger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e18
001-140235_a11_em21
PERSON
NO_MASK
Karel Jungwiert
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e19
001-140235_a11_em22
PERSON
NO_MASK
Boštjan M. Zupančič
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e20
001-140235_a11_em23
PERSON
QUASI
Ganna Yudkivska
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e21
001-140235_a11_em24
PERSON
QUASI
André Potocki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e22
001-140235_a11_em25
PERSON
NO_MASK
Peter Charleton
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e23
001-140235_a11_em26
PERSON
QUASI
Claudia Westerdiek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e24
001-140235_a11_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
20 September 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e25
001-140235_a11_em28
PERSON
QUASI
Angelika Nußberger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e20
001-140235_a11_em29
PERSON
QUASI
Ganna Yudkivska
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e14
001-140235_a11_em30
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Justice Charleton
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e26
001-140235_a11_em31
MISC
NO_MASK
act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e27
001-140235_a11_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
Irish Human Rights Commission
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e28
001-140235_a11_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
European Centre for Law and Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e29
001-140235_a11_em35
LOC
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e30
001-140235_a11_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
6 March 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e8
001-140235_a11_em38
PERSON
QUASI
Mr P. White
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e31
001-140235_a11_em39
PERSON
QUASI
Mr F. McDonagh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e32
001-140235_a11_em40
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C. Power
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e33
001-140235_a11_em41
PERSON
QUASI
Ms S. Farrell
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e34
001-140235_a11_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Office of the Attorney General
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e35
001-140235_a11_em43
PERSON
QUASI
Ms M. McGarry
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e36
001-140235_a11_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Department of Education
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e37
001-140235_a11_em45
PERSON
QUASI
Mr D. Holland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e38
001-140235_a11_em46
PERSON
QUASI
Mr A. Keating
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e6
001-140235_a11_em47
PERSON
QUASI
Mr E. Cantillon
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e39
001-140235_a11_em48
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs M. Scriven
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e37
001-140235_a11_em49
PERSON
QUASI
001-140235_a11_em45
Mr Holland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e31
001-140235_a11_em50
PERSON
QUASI
001-140235_a11_em39
Mr McDonagh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e40
001-140235_a11_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
1964
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e7
001-140235_a11_em52
LOC
QUASI
Cork
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em53
LOC
NO_MASK
Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e41
001-140235_a11_em54
ORG
QUASI
Dunderrow National School
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e42
001-140235_a11_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
1968
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em56
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e44
001-140235_a11_em57
PERSON
QUASI
Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Cork and Ross
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e7
001-140235_a11_em58
LOC
QUASI
Cork
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e45
001-140235_a11_em59
LOC
QUASI
Ross
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e46
001-140235_a11_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
Department of Education and Science
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e46
001-140235_a11_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
001-140235_a11_em60
Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e47
001-140235_a11_em62
PERSON
NO_MASK
S.
HEALTH
insert
001-140235_a11_e48
001-140235_a11_em63
DEM
QUASI
elderly and infirm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e49
001-140235_a11_em64
PERSON
NO_MASK
Ó.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e47
001-140235_a11_em65
PERSON
NO_MASK
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e49
001-140235_a11_em66
PERSON
NO_MASK
Ó.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e41
001-140235_a11_em67
ORG
QUASI
Dunderrow National School
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em68
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e41
001-140235_a11_em69
ORG
QUASI
001-140235_a11_em54
Dunderrow
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e51
001-140235_a11_em70
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1971
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em71
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
SEX
insert
001-140235_a11_e52
001-140235_a11_em72
MISC
QUASI
sexually abused
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e46
001-140235_a11_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e53
001-140235_a11_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
first six months of 1973
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e54
001-140235_a11_em75
MISC
QUASI
sexual assaults
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em76
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e51
001-140235_a11_em77
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1971
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em78
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e55
001-140235_a11_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
September 1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em80
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em81
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e55
001-140235_a11_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
September 1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e46
001-140235_a11_em83
ORG
NO_MASK
Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em84
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e56
001-140235_a11_em85
MISC
QUASI
touched
SEX
insert
001-140235_a11_e57
001-140235_a11_em86
MISC
QUASI
sexual nature
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e58
001-140235_a11_em87
DATETIME
QUASI
January 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e46
001-140235_a11_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em89
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em90
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e59
001-140235_a11_em91
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e60
001-140235_a11_em92
DATETIME
NO_MASK
Between 1969 and 1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e41
001-140235_a11_em93
ORG
QUASI
Dunderrow National School
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em94
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e47
001-140235_a11_em95
PERSON
NO_MASK
S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e41
001-140235_a11_em96
ORG
QUASI
Dunderrow
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em97
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em98
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
SEX
insert
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em99
MISC
QUASI
sexual abuse
HEALTH
insert
001-140235_a11_e61
001-140235_a11_em100
DEM
QUASI
psychological difficulties
SEX
insert
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em101
MISC
QUASI
001-140235_a11_em99
abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e62
001-140235_a11_em102
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e59
001-140235_a11_em103
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e41
001-140235_a11_em104
ORG
QUASI
Dunderrow National School
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em105
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e63
001-140235_a11_em106
DATETIME
NO_MASK
January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em107
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em108
MISC
QUASI
sexual abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e64
001-140235_a11_em109
DATETIME
NO_MASK
about ten years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e65
001-140235_a11_em110
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e66
001-140235_a11_em111
PERSON
NO_MASK
Minister for Education
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e66
001-140235_a11_em112
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-140235_a11_em111
Minister
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e67
001-140235_a11_em113
MISC
QUASI
National School Rules 1965
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e67
001-140235_a11_em114
MISC
QUASI
001-140235_a11_em113
1965 Rules
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e68
001-140235_a11_em115
DATETIME
NO_MASK
June 1998
HEALTH
insert
001-140235_a11_e69
001-140235_a11_em116
DEM
QUASI
psychological problems
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em117
MISC
QUASI
abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em118
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e70
001-140235_a11_em119
ORG
NO_MASK
001-140235_a11_em120
Criminal Injuries Compensation Tribunal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e70
001-140235_a11_em120
ORG
NO_MASK
CICT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e71
001-140235_a11_em121
DATETIME
QUASI
October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e70
001-140235_a11_em122
ORG
NO_MASK
CICT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e72
001-140235_a11_em123
QUANTITY
QUASI
44,814.14 euros
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e70
001-140235_a11_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
CICT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e70
001-140235_a11_em125
ORG
NO_MASK
CICT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e70
001-140235_a11_em126
ORG
NO_MASK
CICT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e70
001-140235_a11_em127
ORG
NO_MASK
CICT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e73
001-140235_a11_em128
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 53,962.24
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e74
001-140235_a11_em129
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 27,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e75
001-140235_a11_em130
DATETIME
QUASI
5 November 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e70
001-140235_a11_em131
ORG
NO_MASK
CICT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e70
001-140235_a11_em132
ORG
NO_MASK
CICT
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e76
001-140235_a11_em133
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e77
001-140235_a11_em134
CODE
DIRECT
1998/10555P
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e78
001-140235_a11_em135
DATETIME
QUASI
29 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em136
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em137
LOC
QUASI
Ireland
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em138
MISC
QUASI
sexual abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em139
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e79
001-140235_a11_em140
MISC
NO_MASK
State Defendants
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em141
MISC
QUASI
abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em142
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e80
001-140235_a11_em143
DATETIME
QUASI
1962
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em144
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em145
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e81
001-140235_a11_em146
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e82
001-140235_a11_em147
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e76
001-140235_a11_em148
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em149
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e83
001-140235_a11_em150
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 305,104
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e84
001-140235_a11_em151
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 200,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e85
001-140235_a11_em152
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 50,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e85
001-140235_a11_em153
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 50,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e86
001-140235_a11_em154
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 5,104
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em155
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e87
001-140235_a11_em156
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 400
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e88
001-140235_a11_em157
DATETIME
QUASI
November 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e89
001-140235_a11_em158
QUANTITY
QUASI
EUR 31,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em159
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e90
001-140235_a11_em160
PERSON
NO_MASK
Ferguson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em161
LOC
NO_MASK
Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e91
001-140235_a11_em162
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1970s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e92
001-140235_a11_em163
DATETIME
QUASI
14 April 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e90
001-140235_a11_em164
PERSON
NO_MASK
Ferguson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e93
001-140235_a11_em165
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e11
001-140235_a11_em166
DATETIME
QUASI
1973
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em167
MISC
QUASI
abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e94
001-140235_a11_em168
DATETIME
NO_MASK
present day
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e76
001-140235_a11_em169
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e95
001-140235_a11_em170
DATETIME
QUASI
2 March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e96
001-140235_a11_em171
DATETIME
QUASI
5 March 2004
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em172
MISC
QUASI
sexual abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e97
001-140235_a11_em173
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e76
001-140235_a11_em174
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e98
001-140235_a11_em175
DATETIME
QUASI
12 March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e99
001-140235_a11_em176
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e76
001-140235_a11_em177
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
SEX
insert
001-140235_a11_e54
001-140235_a11_em178
MISC
QUASI
sexual assaults
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em179
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e76
001-140235_a11_em180
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e76
001-140235_a11_em181
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e100
001-140235_a11_em182
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e101
001-140235_a11_em183
MISC
DIRECT
O’Keeffe v. Hickey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e102
001-140235_a11_em184
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e103
001-140235_a11_em185
MISC
DIRECT
IESC 72
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e104
001-140235_a11_em186
DATETIME
NO_MASK
May 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e100
001-140235_a11_em187
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e97
001-140235_a11_em188
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e76
001-140235_a11_em189
ORG
NO_MASK
High Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em190
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Justice Hardiman
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em191
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e106
001-140235_a11_em192
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Justice Fennelly
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em193
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e107
001-140235_a11_em194
DATETIME
QUASI
11 to 13 June 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e108
001-140235_a11_em195
DATETIME
QUASI
19 December 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em196
PERSON
QUASI
001-140235_a11_em190
Hardiman J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e106
001-140235_a11_em197
PERSON
QUASI
001-140235_a11_em192
Fennelly J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e109
001-140235_a11_em198
PERSON
QUASI
Murray
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e110
001-140235_a11_em199
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Justice Denham
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e111
001-140235_a11_em200
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Justice Geoghegan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e100
001-140235_a11_em201
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em202
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e3
001-140235_a11_em203
DEM
NO_MASK
Irish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e112
001-140235_a11_em204
DATETIME
QUASI
early nineteenth century
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em205
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e113
001-140235_a11_em206
DATETIME
QUASI
1829
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e114
001-140235_a11_em207
ORG
QUASI
Catholic Church
BELIEF
insert
001-140235_a11_e115
001-140235_a11_em208
ORG
QUASI
(Anglican) Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e3
001-140235_a11_em209
DEM
NO_MASK
Irish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e116
001-140235_a11_em210
MISC
QUASI
“Stanley letter”
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e117
001-140235_a11_em211
DATETIME
QUASI
1831
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em212
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em213
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em214
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e118
001-140235_a11_em215
DATETIME
QUASI
nineteenth-century
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e119
001-140235_a11_em216
LOC
NO_MASK
Europe
BELIEF
insert
001-140235_a11_e120
001-140235_a11_em217
ORG
QUASI
Church
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e120
001-140235_a11_em218
ORG
QUASI
Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em219
LOC
QUASI
Ireland
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e120
001-140235_a11_em220
ORG
QUASI
Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em221
LOC
QUASI
Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e121
001-140235_a11_em222
ORG
QUASI
Irish Free State
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e122
001-140235_a11_em223
DATETIME
QUASI
1922
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em224
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em225
LOC
QUASI
Ireland
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em226
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em227
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em228
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em229
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e114
001-140235_a11_em230
ORG
QUASI
Catholic Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e123
001-140235_a11_em231
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1950s
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e114
001-140235_a11_em232
ORG
QUASI
Catholic Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e124
001-140235_a11_em233
DATETIME
NO_MASK
years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em234
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em235
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e125
001-140235_a11_em236
MISC
QUASI
clerically
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-140235_a11_e126
001-140235_a11_em237
QUANTITY
QUASI
approximately 3,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em238
LOC
QUASI
Ireland
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e43
001-140235_a11_em239
DEM
QUASI
Catholic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em240
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e127
001-140235_a11_em241
DATETIME
NO_MASK
more than a century and a half
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e128
001-140235_a11_em242
MISC
NO_MASK
Education Act 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e128
001-140235_a11_em243
MISC
NO_MASK
001-140235_a11_em242
Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e129
001-140235_a11_em244
DATETIME
QUASI
1965
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e129
001-140235_a11_em245
DATETIME
QUASI
1965
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em246
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e130
001-140235_a11_em247
MISC
QUASI
Minister laid down rules for national schools but they were general in nature
BELIEF
insert
001-140235_a11_e131
001-140235_a11_em248
MISC
QUASI
religious instruction
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e132
001-140235_a11_em249
ORG
NO_MASK
board of management
BELIEF
insert
001-140235_a11_e133
001-140235_a11_em250
MISC
QUASI
clerical
BELIEF
insert
001-140235_a11_e125
001-140235_a11_em251
MISC
QUASI
clerically
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em252
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e133
001-140235_a11_em253
MISC
QUASI
clerical
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em254
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em255
MISC
QUASI
sexual abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em256
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e11
001-140235_a11_em257
DATETIME
QUASI
1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e26
001-140235_a11_em258
MISC
NO_MASK
act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e7
001-140235_a11_em259
LOC
QUASI
Cork
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e45
001-140235_a11_em260
LOC
QUASI
Ross
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em261
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em262
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em263
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e120
001-140235_a11_em264
ORG
QUASI
Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em265
LOC
QUASI
Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em266
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e114
001-140235_a11_em267
ORG
QUASI
Catholic Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em268
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em269
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e134
001-140235_a11_em270
DEM
QUASI
Roman Catholic
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e135
001-140235_a11_em271
PERSON
QUASI
Kenny J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e136
001-140235_a11_em272
MISC
QUASI
Crowley v. Ireland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e137
001-140235_a11_em273
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e138
001-140235_a11_em274
CODE
QUASI
102
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e46
001-140235_a11_em275
ORG
NO_MASK
Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e105
001-140235_a11_em276
PERSON
QUASI
Hardiman J
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e120
001-140235_a11_em277
ORG
QUASI
Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e100
001-140235_a11_em278
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e106
001-140235_a11_em279
PERSON
QUASI
Fennelly J
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em280
MISC
QUASI
abuse
SEX
insert
001-140235_a11_e139
001-140235_a11_em281
MISC
QUASI
abuse them sexually
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em282
MISC
QUASI
sexual abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e100
001-140235_a11_em283
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e140
001-140235_a11_em284
DATETIME
NO_MASK
many years
SEX
check
001-140235_a11_e10
001-140235_a11_em285
MISC
QUASI
sexual abuse
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e106
001-140235_a11_em286
PERSON
QUASI
Fennelly J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e122
001-140235_a11_em287
DATETIME
QUASI
1922
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e141
001-140235_a11_em288
DATETIME
QUASI
1937
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e129
001-140235_a11_em289
DATETIME
QUASI
1965
BELIEF
check
001-140235_a11_e120
001-140235_a11_em290
ORG
QUASI
Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em291
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e51
001-140235_a11_em292
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1971
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em293
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em294
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e129
001-140235_a11_em295
DATETIME
QUASI
1965
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e50
001-140235_a11_em296
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.H.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e142
001-140235_a11_em297
MISC
NO_MASK
Notice of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e51
001-140235_a11_em298
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1971
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e106
001-140235_a11_em299
PERSON
QUASI
Fennelly J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e51
001-140235_a11_em300
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1971
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e143
001-140235_a11_em301
PERSON
QUASI
Geoghegan J
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e46
001-140235_a11_em302
ORG
NO_MASK
Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-140235_a11_e2
001-140235_a11_em303
LOC
QUASI
Ireland
BELIEF
insert
001-140235_a11_e120
001-140235_a11_em304
ORG
QUASI
Church
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e143
001-140235_a11_em305
PERSON
QUASI
Geoghegan J
BELIEF
insert
001-140235_a11_e144
001-140235_a11_em306
MISC
QUASI
sexual assault
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e46
001-140235_a11_em307
ORG
NO_MASK
Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e145
001-140235_a11_em308
DATETIME
QUASI
9 May 2009
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-140235_a11_e100
001-140235_a11_em309
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
Louise O’Keeffe
IRL
GRANDCHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Louise O’Keeffe