PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 31300/05) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Turkish nationals, Mr Abdulvahap Terzi and Mr Recahi Erkmen (“the applicants”), on 23 August 2005.

The applicants were represented by Mr S. Ulufer, a lawyer practising in Adana. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The applicants alleged that they had been subjected to torture during their detention in the custody of security forces and that the national authorities had failed to establish the criminal and administrative responsibilities of the accused police officers. This had consequently allowed the police officers to enjoy impunity. The applicants relied on Articles 3, 5, 6 and 13 of the Convention.

On 15 May 2008 the President of the Second Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicants were born in 1969 and 1971 and live in Malatya and Sivas respectively.

On 21 May 1997, at about midnight, the applicants were taken into police custody at the Mersin Security Headquarters for car theft. They were allegedly ill-treated by police officers, who stripped them naked, beat them and subjected them to electric shocks.

On 23 May 1997, at about 9.35 a.m., the applicants were brought before a forensic doctor (S.T.) who reported that there were no traces of ill‑treatment on their bodies.

The applicants were released the same day (23 May), following which they lodged a complaint with the public prosecutor against the police officers (S.D. and I.A.) who had interrogated them and against the doctor (S.T.) who had drawn up their medical report.

The public prosecutor referred the applicants to a forensic doctor who reported the same day (23 May) that the first applicant had red marks of various sizes on both the scapula and the thorax, a 2‑cm‑wide bruise on the lower right lip and an 0.5‑cm‑wide ecchymosis on his right eye. Moreover, it was noted that the second applicant had a red 1 x 1 cm skin wound on his groin. The report stated that the marks and bruises on their bodies did not render the applicants unfit for work.

By an indictment filed on 27 November 1997, the public prosecutor instituted criminal proceedings against S.D. and I.A. for having insulted and tortured the applicants, and against S.T. for professional misconduct.

On 13 December 1999 the Mersin Assize Court delivered its judgment. Referring to the second medical report, which noted the presence of marks on the applicants’ bodies, the court found S.D. and I.A. guilty of ill-treatment during the performance of their duties under Article 245 of the former Criminal Code, and sentenced them to imprisonment, which was converted to a fine. The court added that for treatment to be qualified as torture under domestic law, the victims needed to have been charged with a particular crime, whereas in the present case the applicants had only been suspects and were later released without charge. Therefore the officers’ acts could not be qualified as torture under Article 243 of the Criminal Code, but as ill-treatment under Article 245. The court acquitted S.T., however. It noted that, although S.T. had not examined the applicants, he had simply written down what they had said and had therefore had no criminal intention.

On 31 January 2001 the Court of Cassation quashed the judgment on the ground that the provisions applicable to the police officers and the doctor were contained in Articles 243 and 230 of the Criminal Code which concerned the offences of torture and negligence in the performance of public duties respectively. The Court of Cassation added that S.D. had previously been convicted of the same offence; therefore the prison sentence should not have been converted to a fine.

On 30 January 2002 the Mersin Assize Court persisted in its earlier judgment on the same grounds.

By a decision of 15 November 2002, the Joint Criminal Chambers of the Plenary Court of Cassation (Criminal Divisions) (Yargıtay Ceza Genel Kurulu) quashed the Mersin Assize Court’s judgment and held that the evidence in the case file showed that the applicants had been subjected to torture by S.D. and I.A., who had intentionally inflicted ill-treatment in order to extract confessions; their acts therefore fell under Article 243 of the Criminal Code. As for S.T., he had drawn up the applicants’ medical report in the presence of police officers without examining the applicants, and had thus committed an offence under Article 230 of the Criminal Code.

On 16 January 2004 the Mersin Assize Court held that the prosecution was time-barred in respect of S.T. However, it convicted and sentenced S.D. to two years and two days’ imprisonment and I.A. to two years’ imprisonment. S.D. and I.A. were further prohibited from holding public office for a period of six months. S.D. and I.A. appealed.

On 24 June and 15 October 2004 the applicants’ representatives asked the Court of Cassation to expedite the proceedings, as there was a danger that the prosecution of the offences would also become time-barred in respect of the accused police officers.

On 15 December 2004 the Court of Cassation held that the prosecution was indeed time-barred and dismissed the criminal proceedings under the statute of limitations. The decision was deposited with the first-instance court’s registry on 24 February 2005.

On 11 August 2005 the applicants requested the Ministry of Justice to identify the judges involved in the proceedings and to hold them responsible for not having shown due diligence and for ultimately having allowed the proceedings to become time-barred.

On 16 December 2005 the Court of Cassation, and on 13 March 2006 the Ministry of Justice, replied in respect of the judges who had sat on the bench of the Court of Cassation and the Mersin Assize Court respectively. It notified the applicants that no proceedings or investigations were to be instituted against the judges since the complaint concerned the use of judicial power.

S.D. was still on duty at the Organised Crime and Trafficking Branch of the Muğla Security Headquarters at the time the application was lodged with the Court.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e1
001-93823_a10_em1
CODE
DIRECT
31300/05
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-93823_a10_e2
001-93823_a10_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e3
001-93823_a10_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e4
001-93823_a10_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Abdulvahap Terzi
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e5
001-93823_a10_em5
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Recahi Erkmen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e6
001-93823_a10_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
23 August 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e7
001-93823_a10_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr S. Ulufer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e8
001-93823_a10_em8
LOC
QUASI
Adana
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e2
001-93823_a10_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
001-93823_a10_em2
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e9
001-93823_a10_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e10
001-93823_a10_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1969
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e11
001-93823_a10_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
1971
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-93823_a10_e12
001-93823_a10_em13
LOC
QUASI
Malatya
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-93823_a10_e13
001-93823_a10_em14
LOC
QUASI
Sivas
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e14
001-93823_a10_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e15
001-93823_a10_em16
ORG
QUASI
Mersin Security Headquarters
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-93823_a10_e16
001-93823_a10_em17
MISC
NO_MASK
car theft
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e17
001-93823_a10_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
23 May 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-93823_a10_e18
001-93823_a10_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
9.35 a.m
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-93823_a10_e19
001-93823_a10_em20
PERSON
QUASI
S.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e20
001-93823_a10_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
23 May
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-93823_a10_e21
001-93823_a10_em22
PERSON
QUASI
S.D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-93823_a10_e22
001-93823_a10_em23
PERSON
QUASI
I.A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e19
001-93823_a10_em24
PERSON
QUASI
S.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e20
001-93823_a10_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
23 May
HEALTH
insert
001-93823_a10_e23
001-93823_a10_em26
MISC
NO_MASK
red marks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-93823_a10_e24
001-93823_a10_em27
QUANTITY
QUASI
2‑cm
HEALTH
insert
001-93823_a10_e25
001-93823_a10_em28
MISC
NO_MASK
bruise
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-93823_a10_e26
001-93823_a10_em29
QUANTITY
QUASI
0.5‑cm
HEALTH
insert
001-93823_a10_e27
001-93823_a10_em30
MISC
NO_MASK
ecchymosis
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e28
001-93823_a10_em31
QUANTITY
QUASI
1 x 1 cm
HEALTH
insert
001-93823_a10_e29
001-93823_a10_em32
MISC
NO_MASK
skin wound
HEALTH
insert
001-93823_a10_e30
001-93823_a10_em33
MISC
NO_MASK
marks
HEALTH
insert
001-93823_a10_e31
001-93823_a10_em34
MISC
NO_MASK
bruises
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e32
001-93823_a10_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
27 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-93823_a10_e21
001-93823_a10_em36
PERSON
QUASI
S.D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e22
001-93823_a10_em37
PERSON
QUASI
I.A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e19
001-93823_a10_em38
PERSON
QUASI
S.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e33
001-93823_a10_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
13 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e34
001-93823_a10_em40
ORG
QUASI
Mersin Assize Court
HEALTH
check
001-93823_a10_e30
001-93823_a10_em41
MISC
NO_MASK
marks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e21
001-93823_a10_em42
PERSON
QUASI
S.D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-93823_a10_e22
001-93823_a10_em43
PERSON
QUASI
I.A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e19
001-93823_a10_em44
PERSON
QUASI
S.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e19
001-93823_a10_em45
PERSON
QUASI
S.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e35
001-93823_a10_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e36
001-93823_a10_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e36
001-93823_a10_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e21
001-93823_a10_em49
PERSON
QUASI
S.D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e37
001-93823_a10_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
30 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e34
001-93823_a10_em51
ORG
QUASI
Mersin Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e38
001-93823_a10_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
15 November 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-93823_a10_e39
001-93823_a10_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Joint Criminal Chambers of the Plenary Court of Cassation (Criminal Divisions) (Yargıtay Ceza Genel Kurulu)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e40
001-93823_a10_em54
ORG
QUASI
Mersin Assize Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e21
001-93823_a10_em55
PERSON
QUASI
S.D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e22
001-93823_a10_em56
PERSON
QUASI
I.A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e19
001-93823_a10_em57
PERSON
QUASI
S.T.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e41
001-93823_a10_em58
DATETIME
QUASI
16 January 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e34
001-93823_a10_em59
ORG
QUASI
Mersin Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e21
001-93823_a10_em60
PERSON
QUASI
S.D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e42
001-93823_a10_em61
DATETIME
QUASI
two years and two days’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e22
001-93823_a10_em62
PERSON
QUASI
I.A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e43
001-93823_a10_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
two years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e21
001-93823_a10_em64
PERSON
QUASI
S.D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e22
001-93823_a10_em65
PERSON
QUASI
I.A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e44
001-93823_a10_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e21
001-93823_a10_em67
PERSON
QUASI
S.D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e22
001-93823_a10_em68
PERSON
QUASI
I.A.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e45
001-93823_a10_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
24 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e46
001-93823_a10_em70
DATETIME
QUASI
15 October 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e36
001-93823_a10_em71
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e47
001-93823_a10_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
15 December 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e36
001-93823_a10_em73
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e48
001-93823_a10_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
24 February 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e49
001-93823_a10_em75
DATETIME
QUASI
11 August 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e50
001-93823_a10_em76
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e51
001-93823_a10_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
16 December 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e36
001-93823_a10_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e52
001-93823_a10_em79
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-93823_a10_e50
001-93823_a10_em80
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e36
001-93823_a10_em81
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e34
001-93823_a10_em82
ORG
QUASI
Mersin Assize Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e21
001-93823_a10_em83
PERSON
QUASI
S.D.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-93823_a10_e53
001-93823_a10_em84
ORG
NO_MASK
Organised Crime and Trafficking Branch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-93823_a10_e54
001-93823_a10_em85
ORG
QUASI
Muğla Security Headquarters
Abdulvahap Terzi
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Abdulvahap Terzi