PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 20482/03) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Lesław Cibicki (“the applicant”), on 13 June 2003.

The applicant was represented by Ms J. Okonek, a lawyer practising in Wrocław. The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

The applicant alleged that he had been deprived of his right of access to a court, contrary to Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

On 10 October 2007 the President of the Fourth Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3). The President also gave priority to the application, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Rules of the Court.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1931 and lives in Wrocław.

In 1997 the applicant instituted civil proceedings in which he asked for the division of his late parents’ marital property. The applicant’s mother died in the 1960s and he was her heir. The applicant’s father died in 1992 and his second wife inherited after him according to his last will. The applicant claimed that his parents’ marital property included a collection of 300 valuable paintings worth approximately 460,000 Polish zlotys (PLN). The applicant’s father’s second wife contested the fact that the paintings belonged to the estate in question and submitted that they were her own assets.

On 23 December 1997 the applicant was exempted from court fees.

In 2001 the other party to the proceedings, the second wife of the applicant’s late father, died and her daughter joined the proceedings as her heir.

On 17 July 2003 the Wrocław District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) decided of its own motion to order the preparation of an expert opinion regarding the value and origin of the paintings allegedly acquired during the applicant’s parents’ marriage. The court found that the applicant described many of the paintings, some of which had been in the possession of the other party and whose existence and ownership had been contested, as belonging to his parents. The assessment of his submissions required special knowledge concerning the authors of the paintings, their description and authenticity. It had thus been impossible to assess those issues without the assistance of an expert. The court considered that since the applicant had initiated the proceedings he should bear the costs of the opinion and ordered him to pay PLN 5,000 (approximately 1,200 euros (EUR)) as an advance on the costs of the expert opinion.

On 21 August 2003 the applicant applied for an exemption from court fees. He submitted that he was a pensioner and was receiving an old‑age pension of PLN 550. His unemployed wife and her mentally handicapped brother, the latter receiving PLN 400 in invalidity benefit, were both in his sole charge. The applicant explained that although he had been represented by a lawyer of his choice, the latter had not received any payment but had agreed to accept a certain percentage of the award received at the end of the proceedings.

On 12 January 2004 the Wrocław District Court dismissed his application. The court acknowledged the applicant’s difficult financial situation. However, it considered that since the beginning of the proceedings in 1997 he should have saved money for the purpose of paying the future court fees. The court calculated that by putting aside between ten and twenty percent of his income the applicant could have saved up PLN 5,000 since 1997.

The applicant’s lawyer appealed against this decision, explaining at length the difficult financial situation of the applicant’s family. He submitted that 75% of the family’s monthly income went on rent for their flat, monthly charges and the costs of medicines for the applicant and his wife’s brother. The remaining sum of money did not allow for any savings; in fact, it was not sufficient for the applicant to support himself and his family; they had been surviving with the financial help of their friends and relatives.

On 15 April 2004 the Wrocław Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) dismissed the appeal. The court underlined the fact that the applicant had already benefited from an exemption from the court fees for lodging his civil claim, thus it had not been justified to expect the State Treasury to cover further costs for the applicant.

On 18 November 2004 the Wrocław District Court gave a decision in the applicant’s case in which it divided the property in question. The court found that the estate in question consisted only of a wardrobe and a grandfather clock. The applicant was awarded the latter and ordered to pay the other party PLN 2,225 and to reimburse them PLN 14,400 for the costs of the proceedings. With regard to the issue of the expert opinion concerning the paintings that had been described by the applicant as having been acquired during his father’s first marriage, the court found: “The consequence [of the applicant’s failure to pay the court fees for the expert opinion] was to omit this evidence as the court had established that this evidence was not necessary to reach a decision in the instant case – it was not the only piece of evidence on which it could base its finding. Producing this evidence was in the applicant’s own interest, as he had borne the burden of providing evidence of the elements of the estate that belonged to his parents and was his mother’s inheritance. The assessment of other evidence collected in the case leads to unequivocal conclusion that the marital property in question did not include any of the known and existing paintings of the disputed collection.”

The applicant’s lawyer appealed against the decision in particular as regards the court’s assessment that the paintings had not belonged to his parents’ estate.

The court ordered the applicant to pay court fees for his appeal in the amount of PLN 4,649. The applicant appealed against this decision and applied to be exempted from court fees.

On 22 April 2005 the Wrocław District Court, composed of the same judge who had given the decision on the merits in the applicant’s case, dismissed his application. The court found that the applicant’s financial standing had not changed since 2004 when his application for exemption from the court fees for the expert opinion had been dismissed. Moreover, he had not incurred any expenses afterwards as he had failed to pay for the expert opinion. Thus, in the court’s opinion the applicant should have saved enough money to pay the future costs of the proceedings.

The applicant’s lawyer appealed against the decision.

On 7 July 2005 the Wrocław District Court partly allowed the appeal and exempted the applicant from fees exceeding PLN 600 (approximately EUR 150). The court considered that a total refusal to exempt the applicant from court fees for pursuing his appeal would deprive him of the possibility to pursue his claim before the second-instance court. It found however that the applicant would be able to pay the sum of PLN 600 without harming his own well-being or that of his family. It based its finding on the fact that the applicant’s monthly income was PLN 700 and the family’s income had also included his wife’s brother’s monthly benefit of PLN 450.

Since the applicant failed to pay the court fees for proceeding with his appeal, on 19 September 2005 the Wrocław District Court rejected the appeal.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e1
001-91552_a2_em1
CODE
DIRECT
20482/03
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-91552_a2_e2
001-91552_a2_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e3
001-91552_a2_em3
DEM
QUASI
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e4
001-91552_a2_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Lesław Cibicki
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e5
001-91552_a2_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
13 June 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e6
001-91552_a2_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Ms J. Okonek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-91552_a2_e7
001-91552_a2_em7
LOC
QUASI
Wrocław
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e2
001-91552_a2_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-91552_a2_em2
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e8
001-91552_a2_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e9
001-91552_a2_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e10
001-91552_a2_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1931
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e7
001-91552_a2_em12
LOC
QUASI
Wrocław
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e11
001-91552_a2_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e12
001-91552_a2_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
1960s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e13
001-91552_a2_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e14
001-91552_a2_em16
QUANTITY
QUASI
300 valuable paintings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e15
001-91552_a2_em17
QUANTITY
QUASI
460,000 Polish zlotys (PLN)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e16
001-91552_a2_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
23 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e17
001-91552_a2_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e18
001-91552_a2_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
17 July 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e19
001-91552_a2_em21
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e19
001-91552_a2_em22
ORG
QUASI
001-91552_a2_em21
Sąd Rejonowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e20
001-91552_a2_em23
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 5,000 (approximately 1,200 euros (EUR))
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e21
001-91552_a2_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
21 August 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e22
001-91552_a2_em25
DEM
NO_MASK
pensioner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e23
001-91552_a2_em26
MISC
NO_MASK
old‑age pension
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e24
001-91552_a2_em27
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 550
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e25
001-91552_a2_em28
MISC
NO_MASK
unemployed
HEALTH
insert
001-91552_a2_e26
001-91552_a2_em29
MISC
NO_MASK
mentally handicapped
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e27
001-91552_a2_em30
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 400
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e28
001-91552_a2_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e19
001-91552_a2_em32
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e11
001-91552_a2_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e29
001-91552_a2_em34
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 5,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e11
001-91552_a2_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e30
001-91552_a2_em36
QUANTITY
QUASI
75%
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e31
001-91552_a2_em37
MISC
QUASI
medicines
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e32
001-91552_a2_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
15 April 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e33
001-91552_a2_em39
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e33
001-91552_a2_em40
ORG
QUASI
001-91552_a2_em39
Sąd Okręgowy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e34
001-91552_a2_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
18 November 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e19
001-91552_a2_em42
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e35
001-91552_a2_em43
MISC
QUASI
a wardrobe
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e36
001-91552_a2_em44
MISC
QUASI
a grandfather clock
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e37
001-91552_a2_em45
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 2,225
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e38
001-91552_a2_em46
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 14,400
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e39
001-91552_a2_em47
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 4,649
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e40
001-91552_a2_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
22 April 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e19
001-91552_a2_em49
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e41
001-91552_a2_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e42
001-91552_a2_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
7 July 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e19
001-91552_a2_em52
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e43
001-91552_a2_em53
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 600 (approximately EUR 150)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e44
001-91552_a2_em54
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 600
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e45
001-91552_a2_em55
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 700
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-91552_a2_e46
001-91552_a2_em56
QUANTITY
QUASI
PLN 450
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e47
001-91552_a2_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-91552_a2_e19
001-91552_a2_em58
ORG
QUASI
Wrocław District Court
Lesław Cibicki
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Lesław Cibicki