PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 2881/04) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mrs Franziska Prischl (“the applicant”), on 20 January 2004.

The applicant was represented by Mr E. Fritsche, a lawyer practising in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador F. Trauttmansdorff, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 5 January 2006 the Court decided to give notice of the application to the Government. Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1930 and lives in Gerasdorf.

The application concerns land consolidation proceedings involving land belonging to some 500 owners, including the applicant's husband.

In 1986 a valuation schedule (Bewertungsplan) was issued, which became final in October of that year. None of the plots of land belonging to the applicant's husband was considered to be of special value. By decision of 13 November 1986 the provisional transfer of land (vorläufige Übernahme) was ordered.

In 1990 the Regional Land Reform Board (Landesargarsenat) issued a consolidation plan (Zusammenlegungsplan) for the Gerasdorf community. The applicant's husband did not appeal, while a number of other parties did. Some of these appeals were successful and the case was remitted to the Regional Land Reform Board.

The applicant's husband died in 1993 and, by court decision of 15 November 1994, the applicant became his principal heir.

On 20 June 1995 the Regional Land Reform Board amended the consolidation plan making changes, inter alia, as regards one of the applicant's compensatory parcels. The applicant appealed on 21 August 1995, claiming that some of the plots of land which had belonged to her late husband and had been allocated to another party, were of special value since they could be used for gravel production and that her late husband had not been duly compensated. The applicant was represented by counsel in these and the subsequent proceedings.

On 6 December 1995 the Supreme Land Reform Board (Oberster Agrarsenat) decided to suspend the appeal proceedings pending further amendments of the consolidation plan.

The applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof). On 13 March 1996 the Constitutional Court declined to deal with the complaint and transferred the case to the Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) which received the file on 7 May 1996. On 7 November 1996 the Supreme Land Reform Board submitted its comments.

On 26 May 1998 the Administrative Court quashed the Supreme Land Reform Board's decision and ordered it to continue the proceedings.

The Supreme Land Reform Board resumed the proceedings and carried out a visit on the spot on 30 September 1998. Subsequently, it took an expert opinion concerning the value of the plots of land given up by the applicant's late husband and those received in compensation. On 2 December 1998 the Supreme Land Reform Board, after having held a hearing dismissed the applicant's appeal. It found that the compensation in land she had received fulfilled the requirements of the Regional Agricultural Act. A change in value of land could only be taken into account before the valuation schedule became final. This was not the applicant's case, since the licences allowing gravel production had only been issued between 1995 and 1997.

On 12 February 1999 the applicant filed a complaint with the Constitutional Court. On 8 June 1999 the latter declined to deal with the applicant's case for lack of prospects of success and transferred the case to the Administrative Court. In 1999 six other complaints also relating to the Gerasdorf land consolidation proceedings were lodged with the Administrative Court. The proceedings in all these cases were joined.

On 3 July 2003 the Administrative Court dismissed the applicant's complaint. It referred to its case-law relating to Section 18 § 4 of the Regional Agricultural Act (Flurverfassungs-Landesgesetz) according to which a change in value of land could only be taken into account until the validation schedule became final. In support of this view it quoted a number of its judgments given between September 1986 and October 1997.

The judgment was served on the applicant's counsel on 22 July 2003.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e1
001-80316_a8_em1
CODE
DIRECT
2881/04
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e2
001-80316_a8_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e3
001-80316_a8_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e4
001-80316_a8_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mrs Franziska Prischl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e5
001-80316_a8_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e6
001-80316_a8_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr E. Fritsche
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e7
001-80316_a8_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e8
001-80316_a8_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e9
001-80316_a8_em9
PERSON
QUASI
F. Trauttmansdorff
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e10
001-80316_a8_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e11
001-80316_a8_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e12
001-80316_a8_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
5 January 2006
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e13
001-80316_a8_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
1930
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e14
001-80316_a8_em14
LOC
QUASI
Gerasdorf
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e15
001-80316_a8_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e16
001-80316_a8_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
13 November 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e17
001-80316_a8_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
1990
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e18
001-80316_a8_em18
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Land Reform Board (Landesargarsenat)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e19
001-80316_a8_em19
ORG
QUASI
Gerasdorf community
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e20
001-80316_a8_em20
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Land Reform Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e21
001-80316_a8_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e22
001-80316_a8_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
15 November 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e23
001-80316_a8_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
20 June 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e20
001-80316_a8_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Land Reform Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e24
001-80316_a8_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
21 August 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e25
001-80316_a8_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
6 December 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e26
001-80316_a8_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Land Reform Board (Oberster Agrarsenat)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e27
001-80316_a8_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e28
001-80316_a8_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
13 March 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e29
001-80316_a8_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e30
001-80316_a8_em31
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e31
001-80316_a8_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
7 May 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e32
001-80316_a8_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
7 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e33
001-80316_a8_em34
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Land Reform Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e34
001-80316_a8_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
26 May 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-80316_a8_e35
001-80316_a8_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e33
001-80316_a8_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Land Reform Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e33
001-80316_a8_em38
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Land Reform Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e36
001-80316_a8_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e37
001-80316_a8_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
2 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e33
001-80316_a8_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Land Reform Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e38
001-80316_a8_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e39
001-80316_a8_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e40
001-80316_a8_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
12 February 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e29
001-80316_a8_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e41
001-80316_a8_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
8 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e35
001-80316_a8_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e42
001-80316_a8_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e35
001-80316_a8_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e43
001-80316_a8_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
3 July 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-80316_a8_e35
001-80316_a8_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e44
001-80316_a8_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
September 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e45
001-80316_a8_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
October 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-80316_a8_e46
001-80316_a8_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
22 July 2003
Franziska Prischl
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Franziska Prischl