PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 50615/99) against the Kingdom of Belgium lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Greek national, Mrs Stavroula Boca (“the applicant”), on 11 June 1999.

The applicant was represented before the Court by Mrs F. Legros, a lawyer practising in Brussels. The Belgian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr C. Debrulle, Head of Department, Ministry of Justice.

Relying on Article 6 of the Convention, the applicant alleged that the civil proceedings to which she had been a party had been excessively long.

The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1.

By a decision of 12 June 2001, the Court declared the application admissible and invited the parties to submit additional observations on one question (Rule 59 § 1).

The Government filed their written observations within the time allowed, but the applicant did not.

On 1 November 2001 the Court changed the composition of its Sections (Rule 25 § 1). This case was assigned to the newly composed First Section (Rule 52 § 1).

THE FACTS

The application relates to two sets of proceedings. The first concerns the divorce proceedings proper before the court of first instance and the second concerns the interim measures in respect of which Article 1280 of the Judicial Code gives the summary applications court special power and jurisdiction to hear applications for interim measures during the divorce proceedings.

A. Divorce proceedings: merits

On 17 March 1998 the applicant's husband filed a divorce petition against her on a specified ground.

After a hearing on 20 October 1998 judgment was reserved until 4 November 1998, when the Brussels Court of First Instance granted a divorce against the applicant and ordered each party to pay its own costs.

On 22 December 1998 the applicant's husband appealed against the costs order.

At a preliminary hearing on 26 January 1999 the parties declared that the case was ready for trial. It was immediately set down for hearing in the relevant ordinary division. On 7 May 1999, in reply to a letter from the applicant's lawyer, the registry of the Brussels Court of Appeal informed her that it would take eight months for the appeal to be heard. On 25 November 1999 the registry listed the case for hearing on 24 February 2000. At the hearing the applicant's husband stated that he was withdrawing his appeal. The court gave judgment on 16 March 2000 acknowledging that the appeal had been withdrawn.

The divorce decree was registered on 24 October 2000.

B. Summary proceedings

On 17 March 1998 the applicant was summoned before the Brussels Court of First Instance, as the court hearing summary applications, to deal with interim measures relating to the divorce petition and, more particularly, to the two children, born in 1984 and 1988, of whom the father had had custody since the couple had separated in 1995. The parties filed their main pleadings before the hearing of 17 June 1998. The applicant then filed further pleadings at the hearing. In an order of 26 June 1998 the President of the Brussels Court of First Instance provisionally granted the mother renewed contact with the children and determined the maintenance payable to the applicant by the father per child and per month.

On 31 July 1998 the applicant's husband appealed against that order. Neither party appeared at a preliminary hearing on 11 August 1998 and the appeal was re-listed for hearing. On 21 October 1998 the appellant asked for the hearing date to be fixed by judicial recorded delivery. At the hearing listed for 24 November 1998 the appeal was adjourned until 12 January 1999 for the court to check that it was ready for hearing. At the hearing the parties filed their grounds of appeal and a timetable for subsequent pleadings. On 21 January 1999 the applicant filed further pleadings and a list of documents. Her ex-husband filed further pleadings on 27 January 1999. On 28 January 1999 the case, which was now ready for hearing, was set down for hearing in an ordinary division.

On 6 May 1999, in reply to a letter from the applicant's lawyer, the registry of the Brussels Court of Appeal stated that the case had been set down for hearing and would take approximately eight months to come to a hearing. On 14 December 1999 the registry informed the parties that the case would be heard on 24 March 2000 but did not specify how the hearing would be conducted.

On 16 May 2000 the parties filed joint pleadings with the registry of the Court of Appeal stating that they intended to withdraw from the proceedings. After a hearing on 23 June 2000 the Court of Appeal gave judgment on 27 June 2000 acknowledging their decision. In its judgment it noted that counsel for the parties had stated at the hearing that the parties would continue to comply with the interim measures set out in the order of 26 June 1998.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e1
001-60775_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
50615/99
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-60775_a11_e2
001-60775_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Kingdom of Belgium
ETHNIC
check
001-60775_a11_e3
001-60775_a11_em3
DEM
QUASI
Greek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e4
001-60775_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mrs Stavroula Boca
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e5
001-60775_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
11 June 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e6
001-60775_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs F. Legros
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e7
001-60775_a11_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Brussels
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e2
001-60775_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-60775_a11_em2
Belgian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e8
001-60775_a11_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr C. Debrulle
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e9
001-60775_a11_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
12 June 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e10
001-60775_a11_em11
DATETIME
QUASI
1 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e11
001-60775_a11_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
17 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e12
001-60775_a11_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
20 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e13
001-60775_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
4 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e14
001-60775_a11_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Brussels Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e15
001-60775_a11_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
22 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e16
001-60775_a11_em17
DATETIME
QUASI
26 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e17
001-60775_a11_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
7 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e18
001-60775_a11_em19
ORG
NO_MASK
Brussels Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e19
001-60775_a11_em20
DATETIME
NO_MASK
eight months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e20
001-60775_a11_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
25 November 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e21
001-60775_a11_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
24 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e22
001-60775_a11_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
16 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e23
001-60775_a11_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e11
001-60775_a11_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
17 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e14
001-60775_a11_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
Brussels Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e24
001-60775_a11_em27
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e25
001-60775_a11_em28
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1988
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e26
001-60775_a11_em29
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e27
001-60775_a11_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
17 June 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-60775_a11_e28
001-60775_a11_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
26 June 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e14
001-60775_a11_em32
ORG
NO_MASK
Brussels Court of First Instance
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e29
001-60775_a11_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
31 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e30
001-60775_a11_em34
DATETIME
QUASI
11 August 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e31
001-60775_a11_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
21 October 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e32
001-60775_a11_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
24 November 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e33
001-60775_a11_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e34
001-60775_a11_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
21 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e35
001-60775_a11_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
27 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e36
001-60775_a11_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
28 January 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e37
001-60775_a11_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
6 May 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e18
001-60775_a11_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Brussels Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-60775_a11_e19
001-60775_a11_em43
DATETIME
NO_MASK
eight months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e38
001-60775_a11_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
14 December 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e39
001-60775_a11_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
24 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e40
001-60775_a11_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e41
001-60775_a11_em47
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e42
001-60775_a11_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
23 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e41
001-60775_a11_em49
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e43
001-60775_a11_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
27 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-60775_a11_e28
001-60775_a11_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
26 June 1998
Stavroula Boca
BEL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Stavroula Boca