PROCEDURE

The present case was referred to the Court by the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission“) and by the Government of the Republic of Austria (“the Government“) on 14 March and 30 April 1985 respectively, within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 § 1 and Article 47 (art. 32-1, art. 47) of the Convention. The case originated in an application (no. 9120/80) against the Republic of Austria, lodged with the Commission under Article 25 (art. 25) on 1 September 1980 by an Austrian citizen, Mr. Alois Unterpertinger. The Commission’s request referred to Articles 44 and 48 (art. 44, art. 48) and to the declaration whereby Austria recognised the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court (Article 46) (art. 46); the Government’s application referred to Article 48 (art. 48). Both sought a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) (art. 6-1, art. 6-3-d).

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 § 3 (d) of the Rules of Court, the applicant stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings pending before the Court and designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 30).

The Chamber of seven judges to be constituted included, as ex officio members, Mr. F. Matscher, the elected judge of Austrian nationality (Article 43 of the Convention) (art. 43), and Mr. G. Wiarda, the President of the Court (Rule 21 § 3 (b)). On 27 March 1985, the President drew by lot, in the presence of the Registrar, the names of the five other members, namely Mrs. D. Bindschedler-Robert, Mr. J. Pinheiro Farinha, Mr. E. García de Enterría, Mr. B. Walsh and Sir Vincent Evans (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 § 4) (art. 43). Subsequently, Mr. García de Enterría, Mr. Pinheiro Farinha and Mrs. Bindschedler-Robert, who were unable to take part in the proceedings, were replaced by Mr. W. Ganshof van der Meersch, Mr. C. Russo and Mr. R. Macdonald, substitute judges (Rule 24 § 1).

Having assumed the office of President of the Chamber (Rule 21 § 5), Mr. Wiarda ascertained, through the Deputy Registrar, the views of the Agent of the Government, the Delegate of the Commission and Mr. Unterpertinger’s representative on the need for a written procedure (Rule 37 § 1). On 24 April, he directed that the applicant’s representative should have until 6 June 1985 to submit a memorial and that the Delegate should be entitled to file a reply within two months of the transmission of that memorial to him by the Registrar. On 12 April, the President had granted the applicant’s lawyer leave to use the German language (Rule 27 § 3).

The Registrar received the applicant’s memorial on 10 June. On 11 July, the Secretary to the Commission notified the Registrar that the Delegate would submit his observations orally at the hearing. At the Delegate’s request, the President directed on 3 December 1985 that one paragraph in the applicant’s memorial should not be published or otherwise made accessible to the public (Rule 55).

Earlier, on 23 October, after consulting - through the Deputy Registrar - the Agent of the Government, the Delegate of the Commission and the applicant’s representative, the President had directed that the oral proceedings should open on 17 February 1986 (Rule 38). On 3 February 1986, the Commission supplied to the Registrar certain documents which he had requested on the President’s instructions.

The hearings were held in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on the appointed day. The Court had held a preparatory meeting immediately beforehand. There appeared before the Court:

for the Government Mr. H. Türk, Legal Adviser, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Agent, Mr. M. Matzka, Federal Chancellery, Mr. H. Epp, Federal Ministry of Justice, Advisers;

for the Commission Mr. Gaukur Jörundsson, Delegate;

for the applicant Mr. F. Krall, Rechtsanwalt, Counsel. The Court heard their addresses as well as their replies to its questions. The Government and the applicant produced documents at the hearings.

THE FACTS

Mr. Unterpertinger, who is an Austrian national born in 1938, lives in Wörgl. He complains of criminal proceedings brought against him for causing actual bodily harm to his step-daughter on 14 August 1979 and to his wife on the following 9 September.

1. Police proceedings

The incident on 14 August 1979 was reported to the Wörgl police (Gendarmeriepostenkommando) that day, first by a neighbour at the applicant’s request and then by the applicant himself. According to him, his wife and step-daughter - who had that morning called him a “convict“ (Zuchthäusler) - attacked him at about midday during a quarrel. In particular, he claimed that his wife had inflicted several head wounds with a paper-knife and gashed his forehead close to his eyebrow. He had needed treatment by a doctor. He admitted that he had pushed his wife at the time and had tried unsuccessfully to slap his step-daughter in the face.

On 22 August 1979, the police questioned the applicant’s wife as a “suspect“ (Verdächtige) and his step-daughter, Miss Tappeiner, as a “person involved“ (Beteiligte). Mrs. Unterpertinger stated that she had been slapped in the face and beaten by her husband, who had grabbed her daughter by the hair to stop her running away; both of them had then fought back. She had been holding a paper-knife and had, she said, probably struck him with it, but neither she nor her daughter had deliberately caused him any wounds to the head or face. Miss Tappeiner admitted having called her step-father a “convict“ that morning, and said that he had responded by slapping her in the face, but without injuring her. During the quarrel at midday, he had hit her mother several times, once in the face. When she herself had tried to escape, he had grabbed her by the hair and scratched her just below the right eye. He had also grabbed her mother by the hair and by the scruff of the neck. The two women had therefore fought back, and she had pulled her step-father’s hair but had not hit him; she had not seen her mother strike him with the paper-knife. Her step-father’s forehead was bleeding, but she had not seen a wound on the back of his head. She added that a doctor she had consulted had issued a certificate in respect of her own injury.

On 28 August 1979, the Wörgl police sent the Kufstein District Court (Bezirksgericht) a report (Strafanzeige) “concerning Alois Unterpertinger and Rosi Unterpertinger, suspected of causing actual bodily harm (Körperverletzung)“. According to the police, Mrs. Unterpertinger and her daughter had attacked the applicant in the course of a quarrel, during which the former had probably (vermutlich) struck him several times with a paper-knife, causing a laceration on the back of his head and again close to his eyebrow. He himself had allegedly (angeblich) hit his step-daughter in the face and scratched her slightly just below the right eye. Under the heading “Evidence“, the report referred to the statement by the above-mentioned neighbour of the Unterpertingers to the effect that the applicant, whose face was covered in blood, had asked her to alert the police. The applicant had appeared in person at the police station ten minutes later holding a paper-knife; he had explained that his wife had struck him on the head with it several times. Since Mr. Unterpertinger seemed to need first aid, the officer on duty had suggested that he should see a doctor. The police went on to say that they had already had to intervene in several quarrels in the household. They added that the three protagonists had given conflicting accounts of the incident on 14 August. Miss Tappeiner, who had been questioned as an informant (Auskunftsperson), had clearly taken her mother’s side. The report indicated that the applicant’s injuries had been described as “slight“ by the doctor. Under the heading “Information given by the suspects“, the police summarised Mr. and Mrs. Unterpertinger’s statements. The report was accompanied by several documents, including the statements made by the applicant, his wife and his step-daughter and the certificate issued by the doctor who had examined Miss Tappeiner.

The second incident, which took place on 9 September 1979, was reported to the Wörgl police on 14 September by Mrs. Unterpertinger. She stated that her husband, who was slightly drunk, had kicked her right arm during a quarrel, causing her acute pain. An X-ray at the hospital next day had shown that her right thumb was broken, and this had left her unfit for work for a period of four weeks. She added that she had started divorce proceedings against her husband. On 11 September, the hospital in Wörgl had sent the police a report stating that the injury, inflicted by the complainant’s “own husband“, should be regarded as serious.

The police took a statement from Mr. Unterpertinger on 17 October. He denied injuring his wife on 9 September, saying that her hand had already been bandaged when he had come home. She had actually attempted to hit him on the head with a hairbrush, but had missed and collided with the stair-rail instead. This might have aggravated the thumb injury, but the accusation she had made against him was a complete fabrication. The applicant confirmed that divorce proceedings had been pending for some time.

On 20 October, the Wörgl police sent the Kufstein District Court a report “concerning Alois Unterpertinger, suspected of causing grievous bodily harm“. This stated that the couple had had a quarrel on 9 September, during which Mr. Unterpertinger had kicked his wife’s right arm. It went on to summarise Mrs. Unterpertinger’s and her husband’s statements, which were appended.

2. The investigation (Vorerhebungen)

On an application from the Innsbruck Public Prosecutor’s Department, the Kufstein District Court decided on 9 November 1979 to open an investigation against the applicant in respect of the two incidents. After separating the proceedings against Mrs. Unterpertinger in respect of the first incident (see paragraph 11 above), the District Court acquitted her on 28 January 1980.

On 3 December 1979, Mrs. Unterpertinger appeared before a judge at Kufstein, who told her that, as the wife of the accused (Beschuldigter), she was entitled to refuse to give evidence. In fact, Article 152(1)(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides: “members of the accused’s family ... shall not be required to give evidence“. She replied that she nonetheless wished to do so, and gave an account of the facts in dispute, summarising what she had already told the police and disputing her husband’s version of the incident on 9 September. Suspected of causing actual bodily harm contrary to Articles 83 et seq. of the Criminal Code, the applicant was questioned on 12 December by a judge of the Innsbruck District Court. He admitted slapping his wife in the face on 14 August. According to him, he had pulled Miss Tappeiner’s hair in order to escape the two women’s attacks and might in so doing have injured her close to her eye; he had also struck her in the face. As regards the second incident, he repeated what he had already said (see paragraph 13 above); he also stated that he had not seen his wife come into contact with the stair-rail and added that he was not sufficiently agile to have been able to kick her thumb.

3. The proceedings at first instance

The case was heard on 10 March 1980 by a judge of the Innsbruck Regional Court (Landesgericht), sitting alone.

According to the record of the hearing, the applicant pleaded not guilty. He admitted that he had hit his step-daughter on the head, but not that he had injured her. Nor had he broken his wife’s thumb by kicking it; he had no idea where she had broken it.

The Regional Court then called Mrs. Unterpertinger and Miss Tappeiner. On being told by the court of their right to refuse to give evidence (see paragraph 16 above), they replied that they wished to avail themselves of that right. The court was consequently unable to examine them or to read out the record of Mrs. Unterpertinger’s interview with the judge at Kufstein (Article 252(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure). At the request of the Public Prosecutor’s Department, however, the documents it had mentioned in its application for leave to prosecute (Strafantrag), including the police reports, the accused’s criminal record and two files relating to previous convictions of his, were read out. These documents thus included the various statements made to the police: in Austrian judicial practice these had to be regarded as documents for the purposes of Article 252(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see in particular judgment of 14 November 1974 of the Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof, Österreichische Juristenzeitung 1975, p. 304); this meant that they had to be read out, unless the parties agreed that they should not be.

At the end of the hearing, the Regional Court found the applicant guilty of having committed, on 14 August 1979, the offence (Vergehen) of causing actual bodily harm (Article 83(1) of the Criminal Code) to his step-daughter and, on 9 September 1979, the offence of causing grievous bodily harm (schwere Körperverletzung, Articles 83(1) and 84(1) of the Criminal Code) to his wife. He was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment. Referring to the “inquiries made“ and to the defence (Verantwortung) put forward by Mr. Unterpertinger, the court held that the following facts had been established. During the quarrel on 14 August 1979, the applicant had hit his wife several times and had struck his step-daughter in the face, bruising her between the eye and nose and scratching her close to her right eye. His account could not be believed: he had admitted to the judge at Kufstein that he had struck Miss Tappeiner in the face and he had not ruled out the possibility that this might have caused the scratch. The injuries were slight, but his conduct showed that his actions had been deliberate. On 9 September, Mr. Unterpertinger had broken his wife’s right thumb by kicking her. Again, his defence did not stand up to examination. In addition, his record showed that he was quite capable of behaving in this way. He and his wife had had frequent quarrels, often ending in assault. The court pointed out that Mrs. Unterpertinger - who in the meantime had divorced her husband - and her daughter had refused to give evidence at the trial. It nonetheless found their statements to the police “sufficiently clear and specific to support a conviction“; “there [could be] no doubt as to the truth of these statements“. In this instance too, the applicant had acted deliberately. The court found no mitigating circumstances; on the contrary, it saw the applicant’s criminal record as an aggravating circumstance.

4. The appeal proceedings

Mr. Unterpertinger appealed on 9 April 1980. He argued that the judgment of 10 March was null and void (Article 281(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure): in spite of Article 152 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, his former wife and step-daughter, whose statements to the police had formed the sole basis of his conviction, had not been informed at the outset that they were entitled to refuse to give evidence, and had thus been unable to avail themselves of this right. Furthermore, the Regional Court had not taken sufficient account of certain circumstances which made the credibility of Mrs. Unterpertinger and her daughter doubtful. In this connection, the applicant requested that evidence should be taken from several witnesses, including two doctors, a police officer, a neighbour and his own mother, step-daughter and former wife. Finally, he emphasised that in the past he had always admitted the offences with which he had been charged - as was clear from the files on the earlier proceedings. In this instance, however, he had acted in self-defence during the first incident and with no intention of injuring his step-daughter - if indeed he really had injured her. The Regional Court had disregarded his version of the events of 14 August 1979. As for the incident of 9 September 1979, he repeated that his former wife had been having trouble with her right thumb even before that date, as he had mentioned when he was first questioned. He further claimed that he himself had been suffering from a knee injury which would have prevented him from kicking hard enough to break his wife’s thumb. He requested that these points should be investigated further and, in particular, that evidence should be taken from a number of people and an expert opinion (Sachbefund) obtained. In conclusion, Mr. Unterpertinger asked the Innsbruck Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) to quash the conviction of 10 March and acquit him. Failing this, he asked it to review his sentence in the light of the degree of his guilt.

The Court of Appeal sat on 4 June 1980. Counsel for the applicant submitted the grounds of appeal and requested, inter alia, that additional witnesses be called by the court. He added that the fact that his client was not allowed to put questions concerning the statements made to the police by the prosecution witnesses contravened the European Convention on Human Rights. The prosecution sought to have the appeal dismissed. Thereupon, the court decided to re-examine the evidence submitted to the court of first instance and to supplement it (Wiederholung und Ergänzung) by having the file on the divorce proceedings read out and hearing testimony from the wife of Mr. Unterpertinger’s brother. She was unable to say whether the applicant’s former wife had had a bandage on her hand in the autumn or summer of 1979. The applicant waived his right to cross-examine her. The court had the documents in the file on the case read out and put several questions to Mr. Unterpertinger, in particular about his knee injury. According to him, he was asked to walk up and down so that the judges could form an idea of his condition. The court refused to admit the remaining evidence proffered, as to part, on the ground that the circumstances to which it related were of no importance and, as to the rest, because the applicant had not specified the matters he wished to be investigated further.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant’s appeal immediately after the hearing on 4 June 1980. With regard to the ground of nullity on which he had relied (see paragraph 21 above), it noted, on the basis of the Supreme Court’s case-law, that a lawful refusal to give evidence did not prevent the court from having read out witnesses’ statements which had been made to the police (Sicherheitsbehörden) and not during the judicial proceedings proper. It added that the Supreme Court had ruled that the courts were indeed obliged to have such statements read out and to weigh them as evidence. Otherwise, the Court of Appeal was of the opinion that the evidence it had heard confirmed the findings of the Regional Court. The victims’ statements to the police were plausible and credible; their account of the incident was logically coherent. The applicant’s previous convictions showed that conduct like that of which he was accused was by no means alien to his nature. Moreover, he had given the police and the investigating judge conflicting versions of what had happened on 9 September 1979. His sister-in-law, who had been called as a witness, had been unable to give any information in this regard. As for his claim that he was not sufficiently agile to have been able to break his wife’s thumb with a kick, this did not stand up to examination either. Except for his sister-in-law, it was unnecessary to hear the witnesses the applicant had sought to have called, since he had referred to them in connection with matters that were either of no importance or else extremely vague. Consequently, Mr. Unterpertinger’s conviction on the two counts against him was justified; he had not been acting in self-defence on 14 August 1979. The sentence imposed was consistent with the degree of his guilt (schuldangemessen).

The applicant served his sentence from 22 September 1980 to 22 March 1981. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION

Before the Commission, to which he applied on 1 September 1980 (application no. 9120/80), Mr. Unterpertinger complained of the proceedings which had led to his conviction and alleged that they had violated Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) (art. 6-1, art. 6-3-d) of the Convention.

The Commission declared the application admissible on 8 July 1983. In its report of 11 October 1984 (Article 31) (art. 31), the Commission expressed the opinion that there had been no breach of paragraph 3 (d) of Article 6 (art. 6-3-d) (five votes to five, with the President’s casting vote, Rule 18 § 3 of the Rules of Procedure) or of paragraph 1 (art. 6-1) (five votes to four, with one abstention). The full text of the Commission’s opinion and of the separate opinions contained in the report is reproduced as an annex to the present judgment. FINAL SUBMISSIONS BY THOSE APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT

At the hearing on 17 February 1986, the Court was requested

by the Government, “to hold that in the present case the provisions of Article 6 §§ 3 (d) and 1 (art. 6-3-d, art. 6-1) of the European Convention on Human Rights have not been violated and that therefore the facts underlying the dispute do not reveal any breach by the Republic of Austria of its obligations under the Convention“;

by the Delegate of the Commission, “to find, in accordance with the majority of the Commission, no violation of Article 6 (art. 6)“;

by the applicant, “to find that the Republic of Austria violated several provisions of the Convention in these criminal proceedings“ and “to require the Republic of Austria to pay appropriate compensation“.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e1
001-57588_a11_em1
ORG
NO_MASK
Government of the Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e2
001-57588_a11_em2
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e3
001-57588_a11_em3
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e4
001-57588_a11_em4
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three-month
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e5
001-57588_a11_em5
CODE
DIRECT
9120/80
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e1
001-57588_a11_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57588_a11_em1
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e6
001-57588_a11_em7
DATETIME
QUASI
1 September 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e7
001-57588_a11_em8
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em9
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Alois Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e1
001-57588_a11_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57588_a11_em1
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e9
001-57588_a11_em11
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. F. Matscher
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e7
001-57588_a11_em12
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e10
001-57588_a11_em13
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. G. Wiarda
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e11
001-57588_a11_em14
DATETIME
QUASI
27 March 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e12
001-57588_a11_em15
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mrs. D. Bindschedler-Robert
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e13
001-57588_a11_em16
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. J. Pinheiro Farinha
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e14
001-57588_a11_em17
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. E. García de Enterría
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e15
001-57588_a11_em18
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. B. Walsh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e16
001-57588_a11_em19
PERSON
QUASI
Sir Vincent Evans
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e14
001-57588_a11_em20
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-57588_a11_em17
Mr. García de Enterría
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e13
001-57588_a11_em21
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-57588_a11_em16
Mr. Pinheiro Farinha
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e12
001-57588_a11_em22
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-57588_a11_em15
Mrs. Bindschedler-Robert
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e17
001-57588_a11_em23
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. W. Ganshof van der Meersch
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e18
001-57588_a11_em24
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. C. Russo
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e19
001-57588_a11_em25
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr. R. Macdonald
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e10
001-57588_a11_em26
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-57588_a11_em13
Mr. Wiarda
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em27
PERSON
DIRECT
001-57588_a11_em9
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e20
001-57588_a11_em28
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e21
001-57588_a11_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
6 June 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e22
001-57588_a11_em30
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e23
001-57588_a11_em31
DATETIME
NO_MASK
12 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e24
001-57588_a11_em32
DEM
QUASI
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e25
001-57588_a11_em33
DATETIME
NO_MASK
10 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e26
001-57588_a11_em34
DATETIME
NO_MASK
11 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e27
001-57588_a11_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 1985
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e28
001-57588_a11_em36
DATETIME
NO_MASK
23 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e29
001-57588_a11_em37
DATETIME
QUASI
17 February 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e30
001-57588_a11_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
3 February 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e31
001-57588_a11_em39
LOC
NO_MASK
Human Rights Building, Strasbourg
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e32
001-57588_a11_em40
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. H. Türk
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e33
001-57588_a11_em41
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. M. Matzka
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e34
001-57588_a11_em42
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. H. Epp
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e35
001-57588_a11_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Justice
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e36
001-57588_a11_em44
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. Gaukur Jörundsson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e37
001-57588_a11_em45
PERSON
QUASI
Mr. F. Krall
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em46
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e7
001-57588_a11_em47
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e38
001-57588_a11_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
1938
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e39
001-57588_a11_em49
LOC
QUASI
Wörgl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e40
001-57588_a11_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
14 August 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e41
001-57588_a11_em51
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e40
001-57588_a11_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
14 August 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e39
001-57588_a11_em53
LOC
QUASI
Wörgl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e42
001-57588_a11_em54
DATETIME
NO_MASK
that morning
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57588_a11_e43
001-57588_a11_em55
MISC
QUASI
head wounds
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57588_a11_e44
001-57588_a11_em56
MISC
QUASI
paper-knife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e45
001-57588_a11_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
22 August 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e46
001-57588_a11_em58
PERSON
QUASI
Miss Tappeiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em59
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e44
001-57588_a11_em60
MISC
QUASI
paper-knife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e46
001-57588_a11_em61
PERSON
QUASI
Miss Tappeiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e42
001-57588_a11_em62
DATETIME
NO_MASK
that morning
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e48
001-57588_a11_em63
DATETIME
NO_MASK
midday
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e44
001-57588_a11_em64
MISC
QUASI
paper-knife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e49
001-57588_a11_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
28 August 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e39
001-57588_a11_em66
LOC
QUASI
Wörgl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e50
001-57588_a11_em67
ORG
QUASI
Kufstein District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e51
001-57588_a11_em68
ORG
NO_MASK
Bezirksgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e52
001-57588_a11_em69
PERSON
DIRECT
Alois Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e53
001-57588_a11_em70
PERSON
QUASI
Rosi Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em71
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e44
001-57588_a11_em72
MISC
QUASI
paper-knife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e54
001-57588_a11_em73
PERSON
QUASI
Unterpertingers
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e55
001-57588_a11_em74
DATETIME
NO_MASK
ten minutes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e44
001-57588_a11_em75
MISC
QUASI
paper-knife
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em76
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e56
001-57588_a11_em77
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e46
001-57588_a11_em78
PERSON
QUASI
Miss Tappeiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em79
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e46
001-57588_a11_em80
PERSON
QUASI
Miss Tappeiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e57
001-57588_a11_em81
DATETIME
QUASI
9 September 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e39
001-57588_a11_em82
LOC
QUASI
Wörgl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e58
001-57588_a11_em83
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em84
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e59
001-57588_a11_em85
DATETIME
QUASI
four weeks
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e60
001-57588_a11_em86
DATETIME
NO_MASK
11 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e39
001-57588_a11_em87
LOC
QUASI
Wörgl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em88
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e61
001-57588_a11_em89
DATETIME
NO_MASK
17 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e41
001-57588_a11_em90
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e62
001-57588_a11_em91
DATETIME
NO_MASK
20 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e39
001-57588_a11_em92
LOC
QUASI
Wörgl
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e50
001-57588_a11_em93
ORG
QUASI
Kufstein District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e52
001-57588_a11_em94
PERSON
DIRECT
Alois Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e41
001-57588_a11_em95
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em96
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em97
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e63
001-57588_a11_em98
ORG
QUASI
Innsbruck Public Prosecutor’s Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e50
001-57588_a11_em99
ORG
QUASI
Kufstein District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e64
001-57588_a11_em100
DATETIME
QUASI
9 November 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em101
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e50
001-57588_a11_em102
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57588_a11_em67
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e65
001-57588_a11_em103
DATETIME
QUASI
28 January 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e66
001-57588_a11_em104
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em105
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e67
001-57588_a11_em106
LOC
QUASI
Kufstein
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e41
001-57588_a11_em107
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e68
001-57588_a11_em108
DATETIME
NO_MASK
12 December
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e69
001-57588_a11_em109
ORG
QUASI
Innsbruck District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e56
001-57588_a11_em110
DATETIME
NO_MASK
14 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e46
001-57588_a11_em111
PERSON
QUASI
Miss Tappeiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e70
001-57588_a11_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
10 March 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e71
001-57588_a11_em113
ORG
QUASI
Innsbruck Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e72
001-57588_a11_em114
ORG
NO_MASK
Landesgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e71
001-57588_a11_em115
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57588_a11_em113
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em116
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e46
001-57588_a11_em117
PERSON
QUASI
Miss Tappeiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em118
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e67
001-57588_a11_em119
LOC
QUASI
Kufstein
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e73
001-57588_a11_em120
ORG
NO_MASK
Public Prosecutor’s Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e7
001-57588_a11_em121
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e74
001-57588_a11_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
14 November 1974
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e75
001-57588_a11_em123
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e75
001-57588_a11_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
001-57588_a11_em123
Oberster Gerichtshof
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e71
001-57588_a11_em125
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e40
001-57588_a11_em126
DATETIME
QUASI
14 August 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e57
001-57588_a11_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
9 September 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e76
001-57588_a11_em128
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em129
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e40
001-57588_a11_em130
DATETIME
QUASI
14 August 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e67
001-57588_a11_em131
LOC
QUASI
Kufstein
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e46
001-57588_a11_em132
PERSON
QUASI
Miss Tappeiner
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e41
001-57588_a11_em133
DATETIME
NO_MASK
9 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em134
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em135
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em136
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e77
001-57588_a11_em137
DATETIME
QUASI
9 April 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e78
001-57588_a11_em138
DATETIME
NO_MASK
10 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e71
001-57588_a11_em139
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e47
001-57588_a11_em140
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e71
001-57588_a11_em141
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e40
001-57588_a11_em142
DATETIME
QUASI
14 August 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e57
001-57588_a11_em143
DATETIME
QUASI
9 September 1979
HEALTH
insert
001-57588_a11_e79
001-57588_a11_em144
DEM
QUASI
knee injury
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em145
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e80
001-57588_a11_em146
ORG
QUASI
Innsbruck Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-57588_a11_e81
001-57588_a11_em147
ORG
NO_MASK
Oberlandesgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e78
001-57588_a11_em148
DATETIME
NO_MASK
10 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e82
001-57588_a11_em149
DATETIME
QUASI
4 June 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em150
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e83
001-57588_a11_em151
DATETIME
NO_MASK
autumn
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e84
001-57588_a11_em152
DATETIME
NO_MASK
summer of 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em153
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
HEALTH
check
001-57588_a11_e79
001-57588_a11_em154
DEM
QUASI
knee injury
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e82
001-57588_a11_em155
DATETIME
QUASI
4 June 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57588_a11_e75
001-57588_a11_em156
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e75
001-57588_a11_em157
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e71
001-57588_a11_em158
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e57
001-57588_a11_em159
DATETIME
QUASI
9 September 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em160
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e40
001-57588_a11_em161
DATETIME
QUASI
14 August 1979
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e85
001-57588_a11_em162
DATETIME
QUASI
22 September 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-57588_a11_e86
001-57588_a11_em163
DATETIME
QUASI
22 March 1981
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e6
001-57588_a11_em164
DATETIME
QUASI
1 September 1980
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e5
001-57588_a11_em165
CODE
DIRECT
9120/80
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e8
001-57588_a11_em166
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr. Unterpertinger
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e87
001-57588_a11_em167
DATETIME
QUASI
8 July 1983
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e88
001-57588_a11_em168
DATETIME
QUASI
11 October 1984
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e29
001-57588_a11_em169
DATETIME
QUASI
17 February 1986
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e1
001-57588_a11_em170
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e1
001-57588_a11_em171
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-57588_a11_e1
001-57588_a11_em172
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
Alois Unterpertinger
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Alois Unterpertinger