PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 20204/02) against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Polish national, Mr Dariusz Kwiatek (“the applicant”), on 19 November 2001.

The Polish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr J. Wołąsiewicz of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 4 May 2004 the Court declared the application partly inadmissible and decided to communicate the complaint concerning the length of the applicant’s pre-trial detention to the Government. Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1970 and lives in Dąbrowa Górnicza.

On 22 February 2000 the applicant was arrested by the police. On 23 February 2000 the Katowice District Court (Sąd Rejonowy) ordered that he be detained on remand in view of the reasonable suspicion that he had committed two burglaries.

On 28 April 2000 the Katowice Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy) prolonged the applicant’s detention until 9 July 2000. It held that there was a strong suspicion that he had committed the offences with which he had been charged and that keeping him in custody was necessary to secure the proper conduct of the proceedings. The Katowice Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny) upheld that decision on 24 May 2000. It found, invoking Article 258 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, that the applicant had been charged with two burglaries committed as a recidivist offender and thus he was liable to a statutory maximum sentence of at least 8 years’ imprisonment.

On 3 July 2000 the Regional Court extended the applicant’s detention until 22 August 2000. In addition to the grounds previously invoked, it also relied on the severity of the anticipated penalty. That decision was upheld on appeal on 2 August 2000.

On 9 August 2000 the Court of Appeal prolonged his detention until 30 September 2000 pending the outcome of the investigation on the grounds that there was a reasonable suspicion that he had committed the offences in question and that he was potentially liable to a severe penalty, which justified the fear that he would obstruct the proper conduct of the proceedings. The court also held that due to the close links between the suspects there was a risk that, if released, they might interfere with the course of the investigation. Thus it was justified to keep them in custody pending the termination of the investigation. That decision was upheld on appeal by the Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy) on 31 August 2000.

The investigation was terminated on 14 September 2000. On 15 September 2000 the prosecution filed a bill of indictment with the Katowice Regional Court. The applicant was charged with 2 burglaries. The bill of indictment comprised 19 charges (nearly each of them consisted of several counts of burglary) brought against 11 defendants (including the applicant). Five of them were remanded in custody. The prosecution asked the court to hear evidence from 34 witnesses. The case file comprised at that time some 32 volumes. The prosecution had obtained voluminous evidence, including various expert reports.

On 25 September 2000 the Regional Court ordered that the applicant be kept in custody until 23 February 2001, relying on the same grounds as in the previous decisions.

On 13 November 2000 the Regional Court ordered that the case be joined to that of a certain M.K.

On 15 January 2001 the Katowice Regional Court prolonged the applicant’s detention until 15 May 2001. It found that the nature of the offences with which the applicant had been charged, the defendants’ modus operandi and the severity of the likely penalty justified the prolongation of the detention. It further held that there was a risk that the applicant would obstruct the proceedings, given, inter alia, that he had not confessed. The Regional Court found that the prolongation of the applicant’s detention was necessary in order to secure the proper conduct of the proceedings for the time needed for the examination of the case. It held that no other measures could prevent the applicant from attempting to interfere with the proceedings or even from going into hiding.

The first hearing was listed for 22 March 2001 but it was cancelled.

On 14 May 2001 the Regional Court ordered that the applicant be held in custody until 15 October 2001, relying on the same grounds as previously. In addition, it observed that so far the trial court had not commenced an examination of the merits due to reasons that were beyond the court’s control, such as the failure of some of the co-defendants or their counsel to appear before the court or the police’s failure to bring the detained co-defendants from prison for trial. The Regional Court noted that the continued detention of the applicant and some of his co-defendants was necessary in order to secure the proper conduct of the proceedings in the case. That decision was upheld on appeal on 13 June 2001.

On 8 October 2001 the Regional Court prolonged the applicant’s detention until 17 January 2002. It reiterated the grounds given in its previous decisions and stressed that since the principal defendants (including the applicant) had not confessed, there was a risk that, once released, they might interfere with the proceedings. The Regional Court also noted that all of the 8 hearings scheduled to date had had to be cancelled for various reasons such as: the illness of the trial judge or one of the co-defendants, the unwarranted absence of some of the co-defendants, the absence of the legal-aid lawyer of one of the co-defendants, the fact that one of the lawyers had left the courtroom when the bill of indictment was being read out and the failure of the police to bring the detained co-defendants from prison for trial. The applicant and two other co-defendants appealed against that decision.

On 30 October 2001 the Court of Appeal upheld the decision. It found that there was a real risk that the defendants, including the applicant, would obstruct the proceedings by exerting pressure on P.S. (a co-defendant who had incriminated them), given the fact that they had resorted to very aggressive language in their correspondence when referring to P.S. Further, there was a risk of their going into hiding.

Two hearings had to be cancelled due to the police’s failure to bring the detained co-defendants from prison (18 October and 8 November 2001).

On 22 November 2001 the trial began. However, the Regional Court was only able to hear two defendants. Two subsequent hearings had to be cancelled due to the absence of one of the defence counsel (29 November 2001) and the illness of one of the defence counsel (20 December 2001).

On 28 December 2001 the Regional Court ordered that the applicant be held in custody until 22 February 2002. It reiterated the grounds given in its earlier decisions.

On 28 December 2001 the Regional Court made an application under Article 263 § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to the Katowice Court of Appeal for prolongation of the applicant’s detention until 15 June 2002, since the statutory 2-year time-limit of detention pending trial was soon to be exceeded (Article 263 § 3 of the CCP). It emphasised that the grounds originally given for his detention were still valid and that the court was not able to proceed with the hearing of evidence due to reasons that could not be attributed to it. It noted that out of 13 hearings scheduled to date 12 had had to be cancelled. In addition to the reasons specified in the decision of 8 October 2001, the Regional Court also mentioned the illness of one of the defence counsel and the police’s failure to bring the detained co-defendants from prison (on two occasions). It also observed that the continued detention of the applicant was necessary in order to secure the proper conduct of the trial and that no other measures would prevent the applicant and his co-accused from obstructing the proceedings or going into hiding.

On 9 January 2002 the Court of Appeal granted the Regional Court’s application. In addition to the reasons previously given, it held that the case was particularly complex. It also emphasised that the trial court should take all necessary measures to organise the proceedings in a diligent manner so as to hold hearings at reasonable intervals and terminate the trial by 15 June 2002. The applicant appealed against that decision, but to no avail.

On 20 May 2002 the Regional Court made another application to the Katowice Court of Appeal, requesting an extension of the applicant’s detention until 1 October 2002. It stressed that, despite some progress in the trial (all the co-defendants and 23 out of 34 witnesses called by the prosecution had been heard), there were still prosecution witnesses (11) and witnesses called by the co-accused (20) to be heard.

On 29 May 2002 the Court of Appeal granted that application. It held that the applicant was charged with armed robbery, a serious offence for the commission of which an offender was liable to a minimum sentence of 3 years’ imprisonment; however, in reality the charges of armed robbery were brought against other defendants and the applicant had been, and still was, charged with 2 burglaries. The Court of Appeal considered that the serious nature of the offences, the complexity of the case as well as the fact that the original grounds for keeping him in custody were still valid warranted a further prolongation of his detention.

On 16 September 2002 the trial court made yet another application to the Court of Appeal for an extension of the applicant’s detention until 4 November 2002. It referred to the necessity to hear witnesses called by the co-defendants and to obtain an expert report as to the mental health of one of the co-defendants. On 25 September 2002 the Court of Appeal granted that application. Another similar application of the trial court of 18 October 2002 was granted by the Court of Appeal on 30 October 2002. The latter court considered that the proceedings had not been terminated due to reasons beyond the trial court’s control. The applicant’s detention was prolonged until 20 December 2002.

The trial court held hearings on the following dates: 31 January, 15 and 21 March, 11 and 25 April, 16 May 2002, 3 and 27 June, 31 July, 29 August and 12 September 2002. Four hearings were cancelled for the following reasons: the absence of some of the co-defendants and defence counsel (24 January 2002); the trial judge’s illness (22 February 2002); the failure of one of the co-defendants to appear (26 September 2002) and the failure of the defence counsel to appear (17 October 2002).

All of the applicant’s applications for release on bail or under police supervision, likewise his appeals against decisions prolonging his detention, were to no avail.

On 3 December 2002 the Regional Court closed the trial. On 10 December 2002 it gave judgment. The applicant was convicted of one burglary and sentenced to 2 years’ and 10 months’ imprisonment, which was nearly (less 12 days) the period he had spent in detention on remand. In sentencing the applicant the trial court took into account his two earlier convictions for similar offences.

The applicant appealed against the first-instance judgment. On 23 October 2003 the Katowice Court of Appeal upheld the Regional Court’s judgment in respect of the applicant.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e1
001-79342_a3_em1
CODE
DIRECT
20204/02
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-79342_a3_e2
001-79342_a3_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Poland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e3
001-79342_a3_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Polish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e4
001-79342_a3_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Dariusz Kwiatek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e5
001-79342_a3_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
19 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e6
001-79342_a3_em6
ORG
NO_MASK
Polish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e7
001-79342_a3_em7
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Wołąsiewicz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e8
001-79342_a3_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e9
001-79342_a3_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
4 May 2004
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e10
001-79342_a3_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1970
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-79342_a3_e11
001-79342_a3_em11
LOC
QUASI
Dąbrowa Górnicza
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e12
001-79342_a3_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
22 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e13
001-79342_a3_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
23 February 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e14
001-79342_a3_em14
ORG
QUASI
Katowice District Court (Sąd Rejonowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e15
001-79342_a3_em15
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
two burglaries
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e16
001-79342_a3_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
28 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e17
001-79342_a3_em17
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court (Sąd Okręgowy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e18
001-79342_a3_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
9 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e19
001-79342_a3_em19
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal (Sąd Apelacyjny)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e20
001-79342_a3_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
24 May 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e15
001-79342_a3_em21
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
two burglaries
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e21
001-79342_a3_em22
DATETIME
NO_MASK
at least 8 years’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e22
001-79342_a3_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
3 July 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em24
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e24
001-79342_a3_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
22 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e25
001-79342_a3_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
2 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e26
001-79342_a3_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
9 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e27
001-79342_a3_em28
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e28
001-79342_a3_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
30 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e29
001-79342_a3_em30
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court (Sąd Najwyższy)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e30
001-79342_a3_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
31 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e31
001-79342_a3_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
14 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e32
001-79342_a3_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
15 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e33
001-79342_a3_em34
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e34
001-79342_a3_em35
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
2 burglaries
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e35
001-79342_a3_em36
QUANTITY
QUASI
19 charges
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e36
001-79342_a3_em37
QUANTITY
QUASI
11 defendants
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e37
001-79342_a3_em38
QUANTITY
QUASI
Five
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e38
001-79342_a3_em39
QUANTITY
QUASI
34 witnesses
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e39
001-79342_a3_em40
QUANTITY
QUASI
32 volumes
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e40
001-79342_a3_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
25 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em42
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e41
001-79342_a3_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
23 February 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e42
001-79342_a3_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
13 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e43
001-79342_a3_em46
PERSON
QUASI
M.K.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e44
001-79342_a3_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e33
001-79342_a3_em48
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e45
001-79342_a3_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
15 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em50
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e46
001-79342_a3_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
22 March 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e47
001-79342_a3_em52
DATETIME
QUASI
14 May 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e48
001-79342_a3_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
15 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em55
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e49
001-79342_a3_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
13 June 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e50
001-79342_a3_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
8 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e51
001-79342_a3_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
17 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e52
001-79342_a3_em61
QUANTITY
QUASI
8 hearings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e53
001-79342_a3_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
30 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e27
001-79342_a3_em63
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e54
001-79342_a3_em64
PERSON
QUASI
P.S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e54
001-79342_a3_em65
PERSON
QUASI
P.S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e55
001-79342_a3_em66
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
Two hearings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e56
001-79342_a3_em67
DATETIME
QUASI
18 October
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e57
001-79342_a3_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e58
001-79342_a3_em69
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e59
001-79342_a3_em71
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
Two subsequent hearings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e60
001-79342_a3_em72
DATETIME
QUASI
29 November 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e61
001-79342_a3_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
20 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e62
001-79342_a3_em74
DATETIME
QUASI
28 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em75
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e63
001-79342_a3_em76
DATETIME
QUASI
22 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e62
001-79342_a3_em77
DATETIME
QUASI
28 December 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e64
001-79342_a3_em79
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e65
001-79342_a3_em80
DATETIME
QUASI
15 June 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e66
001-79342_a3_em81
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2-year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e67
001-79342_a3_em82
QUANTITY
QUASI
13 hearings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e68
001-79342_a3_em83
QUANTITY
QUASI
12
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e50
001-79342_a3_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
8 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em85
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e69
001-79342_a3_em86
DATETIME
QUASI
9 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e27
001-79342_a3_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e70
001-79342_a3_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e65
001-79342_a3_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
15 June 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e71
001-79342_a3_em90
DATETIME
QUASI
20 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e64
001-79342_a3_em92
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e72
001-79342_a3_em93
DATETIME
QUASI
1 October 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e73
001-79342_a3_em94
QUANTITY
QUASI
23 out of 34 witnesses
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e74
001-79342_a3_em95
DATETIME
QUASI
29 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e27
001-79342_a3_em96
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e75
001-79342_a3_em97
DATETIME
NO_MASK
3 years’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e34
001-79342_a3_em98
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
2 burglaries
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e27
001-79342_a3_em99
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e76
001-79342_a3_em100
DATETIME
QUASI
16 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e27
001-79342_a3_em101
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e77
001-79342_a3_em102
DATETIME
QUASI
4 November 2002
HEALTH
insert
001-79342_a3_e78
001-79342_a3_em103
DEM
NO_MASK
mental health
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e79
001-79342_a3_em104
DATETIME
QUASI
25 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e27
001-79342_a3_em105
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e80
001-79342_a3_em106
DATETIME
QUASI
18 October 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e27
001-79342_a3_em107
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e81
001-79342_a3_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
30 October 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e82
001-79342_a3_em109
DATETIME
QUASI
20 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e83
001-79342_a3_em110
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e84
001-79342_a3_em111
DATETIME
QUASI
15 and 21 March
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e85
001-79342_a3_em112
DATETIME
QUASI
1 and 25 April
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e86
001-79342_a3_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
16 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e87
001-79342_a3_em114
DATETIME
QUASI
3 and 27 June
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e88
001-79342_a3_em115
DATETIME
QUASI
31 July
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e89
001-79342_a3_em116
DATETIME
QUASI
29 August
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e90
001-79342_a3_em117
DATETIME
QUASI
12 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e91
001-79342_a3_em118
QUANTITY
QUASI
Four hearings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e92
001-79342_a3_em119
DATETIME
QUASI
24 January 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e63
001-79342_a3_em120
DATETIME
QUASI
22 February 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e93
001-79342_a3_em121
DATETIME
QUASI
26 September 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e94
001-79342_a3_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
17 October 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e95
001-79342_a3_em123
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e23
001-79342_a3_em124
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e96
001-79342_a3_em125
DATETIME
QUASI
10 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e97
001-79342_a3_em126
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2 years’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e98
001-79342_a3_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
10 months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e99
001-79342_a3_em128
DATETIME
QUASI
12 days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-79342_a3_e100
001-79342_a3_em129
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
two earlier convictions
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e101
001-79342_a3_em130
DATETIME
QUASI
23 October 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e64
001-79342_a3_em131
ORG
QUASI
Katowice Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-79342_a3_e70
001-79342_a3_em132
ORG
NO_MASK
Regional Court’s
Dariusz Kwiatek
POL
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Dariusz Kwiatek