PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 18015/03) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Roland Schutte (“the applicant”), on 23 May 2003.

The applicant was represented by Mr J. Postlmayr, a lawyer practising in Mattighofen. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador F. Trauttmansdorff, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

On 15 September 2005 the Court decided to communicate the complaints concerning the length of the proceedings and the lack of remedies in that respect and the complaint about the alleged violation of the ne bis in idem principle to the Government. Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. The Government, in their observations, requested the Court to give a separate decision on the admissibility of the application. However, the Court has found no reasons to discontinue the application of Article 29 § 3. It therefore rejects the request.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1963 and lives in Ostermiething.

In the early hours of 5 October 1997 the applicant drove a car through a village. Police officers required him to stop by giving a sign with a red light. The applicant disregarded their sign and drove on, obliging the police officers to step aside.

On 21 November 1997 the Ried im Innkreis Public Prosecutor's Office charged the applicant with resisting the exercise of official authority (Widerstand gegen die Staatsgewalt) under Article 269 § 1 of the Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch) in that he had prevented the police officers from carrying out a traffic control by driving towards them with his vehicle, thus threatening them with bodily harm.

On 12 December 1997 the Ried im Innkreis Regional Court (Landesgericht), having held a trial, acquitted the applicant of the above charge. As neither party appealed, the judgment became final.

By letter of 29 January 1998 the Braunau District Administrative Authority (Bezirkshauptmannschaft) charged the applicant with failure to comply with a request to stop for the purpose of a traffic control contrary to Section 97 § 5 of the Road Traffic Act (Straßenverkehrsordnung).

The applicant submitted his defence on 4 February 1998, asserting in particular that the conduct of proceedings for the said traffic offence violated Article 4 of Protocol No. 7, given that he had been acquitted of the offence of resisting the exercise of official authority in respect of the same act.

On 11 March 1998 the District Administrative Authority issued a penal order (Straferkenntnis) against the applicant finding him guilty of the offence under Section 97 § 5 in conjunction with Section 99 § 3 (a) of the Road Traffic Act, and imposed a fine of 4,000 Austrian schillings on him (approximately 290 euros) with 6 days' imprisonment in default. Furthermore, it ordered the applicant to pay a contribution to the costs of the proceedings.

Upon the applicant's appeal, the Upper Austria Independent Administrative Panel (Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat) held a hearing on 17 September 1998 at which it heard the applicant and the three police officers concerned.

By decision of 15 December 1998 the Independent Administrative Panel dismissed the applicant's appeal. It noted that the applicant admitted to having disregarded the police officers' request to stop. It dismissed his argument that his conviction under the Road Traffic Act violated the ne bis in idem principle. The offence under Section 97 § 5 of the Road Traffic Act concerned a simple omission, namely the failure to comply with a request to stop for the purpose of a traffic control whereas Article 269 § 1 of the Criminal Code required the use of dangerous threat or force. It followed from the court file and from the police officers' statements that the applicant had been acquitted of resisting the exercise of official authority, as it had not been shown that he had driven towards the police officers and thus threatened them with bodily harm. In sum, the two offences were distinct and the applicant's acquittal under Article 269 § 1 of the Criminal Code did not hinder his conviction under Section 97 § 5 of the Road Traffic Act.

On 8 February 1999 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court (Verfassungsgerichtshof). The Independent Administrative Panel submitted observations in reply on 24 March 1999.

On 19 June 2000 the Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's complaint as being unfounded. Referring to the Court's judgment in the case of Oliveira v. Switzerland (30 July 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998‑V), it found that the present case concerned an example of a single act constituting more than one offence (Idealkonkurrenz) which was in itself not contrary to Article 4 of Protocol No. 7. Further, it confirmed the Independent Administrative Panel's view that the offences at issue differed in their constituent elements.

Upon the applicant's request the Constitutional Court referred the case to the Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof) by decision of 17 August 2000.

The latter requested the applicant to supplement his complaint on 2 October 2000. The applicant complied with that request on 8 November 2000. He reiterated his complaint about a violation of the ne bis in idem principle and requested the Administrative Court to hold a hearing. On 11 April 2002 the Administrative Court requested the Independent Administrative Panel to submit observations. The latter did so on 23 May 2002.

On 20 December 2002 the Administrative Court refused to deal with the applicant's complaint pursuant to Section 33a of the Administrative Court Act (Verwaltungsgerichtshofgesetz) as the fine imposed did not exceed 726 euros and the case did not raise an important legal issue.

The decision was served on the applicant's counsel on 31 January 2003.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e1
001-81922_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
18015/03
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e2
001-81922_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e3
001-81922_a11_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e4
001-81922_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Roland Schutte
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e5
001-81922_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
23 May 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e6
001-81922_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr J. Postlmayr
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-81922_a11_e7
001-81922_a11_em7
LOC
QUASI
Mattighofen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e2
001-81922_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-81922_a11_em2
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-81922_a11_e2
001-81922_a11_em9
ORG
NO_MASK
001-81922_a11_em2
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e8
001-81922_a11_em10
PERSON
QUASI
F. Trauttmansdorff
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e9
001-81922_a11_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e10
001-81922_a11_em12
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-81922_a11_e11
001-81922_a11_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
15 September 2005
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e2
001-81922_a11_em14
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e2
001-81922_a11_em15
ORG
NO_MASK
Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e12
001-81922_a11_em16
DATETIME
QUASI
1963
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e13
001-81922_a11_em17
LOC
QUASI
Ostermiething
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e14
001-81922_a11_em18
DATETIME
NO_MASK
early hours
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e15
001-81922_a11_em19
DATETIME
QUASI
5 October 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e16
001-81922_a11_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
21 November 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e17
001-81922_a11_em21
ORG
QUASI
Ried im Innkreis Public Prosecutor's Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-81922_a11_e18
001-81922_a11_em22
MISC
QUASI
resisting the exercise of official authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-81922_a11_e18
001-81922_a11_em23
MISC
QUASI
001-81922_a11_em22
Widerstand gegen die Staatsgewalt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e19
001-81922_a11_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
12 December 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-81922_a11_e20
001-81922_a11_em25
ORG
NO_MASK
Ried im Innkreis Regional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-81922_a11_e21
001-81922_a11_em26
ORG
NO_MASK
Landesgericht
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e22
001-81922_a11_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
29 January 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e23
001-81922_a11_em28
ORG
QUASI
Braunau District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e24
001-81922_a11_em29
ORG
NO_MASK
Bezirkshauptmannschaft
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e25
001-81922_a11_em30
DATETIME
QUASI
4 February 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e18
001-81922_a11_em31
MISC
QUASI
resisting the exercise of official authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e26
001-81922_a11_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
11 March 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e27
001-81922_a11_em33
ORG
NO_MASK
District Administrative Authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-81922_a11_e28
001-81922_a11_em34
QUANTITY
QUASI
4,000 Austrian schillings
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e29
001-81922_a11_em35
QUANTITY
QUASI
approximately 290 euros
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-81922_a11_e30
001-81922_a11_em36
DATETIME
NO_MASK
days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e31
001-81922_a11_em37
ORG
QUASI
Upper Austria Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-81922_a11_e32
001-81922_a11_em38
ORG
QUASI
Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e33
001-81922_a11_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
17 September 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e34
001-81922_a11_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
15 December 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e35
001-81922_a11_em41
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e18
001-81922_a11_em42
MISC
QUASI
resisting the exercise of official authority
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e36
001-81922_a11_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
8 February 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e37
001-81922_a11_em44
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e35
001-81922_a11_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e38
001-81922_a11_em46
DATETIME
QUASI
24 March 1999
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e39
001-81922_a11_em47
DATETIME
QUASI
19 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e37
001-81922_a11_em48
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-81922_a11_e40
001-81922_a11_em49
MISC
QUASI
Oliveira v. Switzerland
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e41
001-81922_a11_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
30 July 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-81922_a11_e35
001-81922_a11_em51
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e37
001-81922_a11_em52
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e42
001-81922_a11_em53
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-81922_a11_e42
001-81922_a11_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
001-81922_a11_em53
Verwaltungsgerichtshof
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e43
001-81922_a11_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
17 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e44
001-81922_a11_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
2 October 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e45
001-81922_a11_em57
DATETIME
QUASI
8 November 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e42
001-81922_a11_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e46
001-81922_a11_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
11 April 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e42
001-81922_a11_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e35
001-81922_a11_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
Independent Administrative Panel
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e47
001-81922_a11_em62
DATETIME
QUASI
23 May 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e48
001-81922_a11_em63
DATETIME
QUASI
20 December 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e42
001-81922_a11_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
Administrative Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e49
001-81922_a11_em65
QUANTITY
QUASI
726 euros
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-81922_a11_e50
001-81922_a11_em66
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 2003
Roland Schutte
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Roland Schutte