PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 71932/12) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Afghan national, Mr Qadam Shah Mohammadi (“the applicant”), on 13 November 2012.

The applicant was represented by Mrs N. Lorenz, a lawyer practising in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Ambassador H. Tichy, Head of the International Law Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs.

The applicant alleged that his forced transfer to Hungary under the Dublin II Regulation would subject him to inhuman and degrading treatment, that he would face imprisonment under deplorable detention conditions, and that he would run risk of refoulement to Serbia.

On 20 November 2012 the Court decided to apply Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, indicating to the Government that it was desirable in the interests of the parties and the proper conduct of the proceedings not to expel the applicant to Hungary until further notice.

On the same day the Court decided to communicate the application to the Austrian Government and to grant priority to the application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court. It further requested the Hungarian Government to provide information regarding the status of the applicant’s asylum proceedings, as well as the reception conditions for unaccompanied minor asylum-seekers in Hungary.

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1995 and currently lives in Rein.

He entered Austria on 20 October 2011 and lodged an asylum application. It remained undisputed by the Austrian authorities that at that time he was still a minor, even though his exact date of birth is unknown. He was not accompanied by any family members, nor were any of his relatives present in another member State of the European Union.

The applicant stated that he had left his village in Afghanistan three months earlier, crossed the border to Iran and then the border to Turkey by foot. With the aid of a trafficker he reached Istanbul, where he stayed for three days. Together with a group of other refugees, he crossed into Greece by boat, where he was arrested and processed. He was released shortly after with an order to leave the country. He travelled to Athens, where he stayed for a month. He then left Greece together with two other refugees via the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia, from where he crossed the border to Hungary by foot.

In Hungary, the applicant was arrested and processed. He claimed that he was forced to lodge an asylum request and placed in an open camp. Allegedly, the Hungarian authorities did not give any consideration to the fact that he was a minor. Because he had never planned to stay in Hungary, but wanted to lodge an asylum application in Austria, he left the camp two or three days later and took a train to Vienna.

When the applicant was interviewed by the Austrian authorities on 21 October 2011, he stated that he did not want to return to Hungary. He claimed not to know the status of his asylum proceedings there because he was illiterate. In a second interview on 18 November 2011, he stated that he was arrested and detained for three days in Hungary. He was not given enough to eat and suffered from hunger in detention. He claimed that the conduct of the police towards him was rough. Officers were armed at all times, and he was woken up during the night for interviews. He further stated that he was afraid of being sent back to Serbia.

When the applicant was asked why he had left Afghanistan, he stated that his family had sent him away so he could live a safer life. His father had died in Afghanistan six years earlier. His mother lived with the applicant and his three young siblings in the Jaghori district in Ghazni province. The precarious security situation and the lack of access to subsistence and education in the region prompted him to leave the country.

On 15 December 2011 the Traiskirchen Federal Asylum Office (Bundes­asylamt – hereinafter “the Asylum Office“) rejected the applicant’s asylum request and established Hungary’s jurisdiction in this regard in accordance with Article 16 § 1 (c) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 343/2003 (“the Dublin II Regulation“). On 11 January 2012 the Asylum Court (Asylgerichtshof) quashed that decision pursuant to Article 66 § 2 of the Code of General Administrative Procedure (Allgemeines Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz) on the grounds that the facts had not been established exhaustively. It stated that the Asylum Office had failed to update its country information regarding the risk of refoulement of asylum‑seekers from Hungary to Serbia. Furthermore, the decision had not established the legal framework under which minors could be detained in Hungary and what the conditions of detention were.

On 28 February 2012 the Asylum Office again rejected the applicant’s asylum request and ordered his expulsion to Hungary under the Dublin II Regulation. In addition to general information on the situation of asylum-seekers in Hungary, the Asylum Office referred to information obtained from the Austrian Embassy in Hungary dated 25 January and 2 February 2012. According to that information, the detention of minors could not be ordered in Hungary. If a detained refugee claimed to be a minor, an age assessment was ordered and the minor was released if his or her age was confirmed. As regards the evaluation of Serbia by Hungary as a safe third country, the Hungarian authorities stated that they did not have a list of safe third countries and evaluated each case individually. However, in most cases Serbia was considered to be a safe third country. Hungary expelled asylum-seekers to Serbia, if their first asylum proceedings were terminated and there was no obstacle under the non-refoulement rule. A person lodging a subsequent asylum request was not allowed to remain in Hungary. The same applied for Dublin returnees if their first asylum proceedings were terminated. If asylum proceedings were discontinued after an asylum-seeker left Hungary, an asylum request after his or her return under the Dublin regulation was considered a subsequent asylum request. It was further established that appeals against asylum decisions at first instance and during the first proceedings had automatic suspensive effect. However, appeals against decisions in subsequent asylum proceedings did not. It was in any event possible to lodge an appeal against the expulsion order itself. It was then up to the judge’s discretion to award the proceedings suspensive effect.

When it came to the personal credibility of the applicant, the Asylum Office stated that it found his allegations of having been detained in Hungary for three days unconvincing, as the country information had shown that the detention of minors could not be ordered in Hungary. It further held that the information had shown that Hungary did not practise refoulement to Serbia. Finally, the Hungarian authorities had assumed jurisdiction over the applicant’s asylum request under Article 16 § 1 (c) of the Dublin II Regulation, which proved that the applicant still had access to asylum proceedings on the merits in Hungary. The Asylum Office concluded that it hence did not consider itself legally obliged to make use of the sovereignty clause and rejected the asylum request.

On 20 March 2012 the Asylum Court awarded suspensive effect to the applicant’s appeal against that decision, but on 24 September 2012 dismissed it as unfounded. It pointed out that the Hungarian authorities had informed the Asylum Office that they had planned an age assessment, but could not carry it out because the applicant had left the country. Thereupon, on 24 October 2011 the Hungarian authorities had discontinued his proceedings. However, the Asylum Court assumed that because of Hungary’s acceptance of jurisdiction under Article 16 § 1 (c) of the Dublin II Regulation the applicant would have access to asylum proceedings on the merits in Hungary. In its reasoning the Asylum Court took note of a letter from the UNHCR Office in Vienna dated 3 February 2012, seemingly citing problems with the techniques of age assessment in Hungary, detention and the detention conditions for asylum-seekers, refoulement to Serbia and the fact that a Dublin-returner’s asylum request was considered a subsequent asylum request if the proceedings had been discontinued in Hungary. However, the Asylum Court noted a lack of sources in the UNHCR’s letter and referred to the recently updated country information obtained by the Austrian asylum authorities, which did not indicate systematic deficiencies in the Hungarian asylum proceedings and reception conditions that would have warranted an extensive use of the sovereignty clause of Article 3 § 2 of the Dublin II Regulation.

On 10 October 2012 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court, which was rejected on 22 November 2012. This decision was served on the applicant’s counsel on 30 November 2012. An arrest order stated that a transfer of the applicant to the Hungarian authorities was planned for 22 November 2012. At that time, the applicant was still a minor.

On 20 November 2012 the Court applied an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and requested the Austrian Government to stay the applicant’s transfer to Hungary until further notice. The Austrian Government complied with this request.

On 3 December 2012 the Hungarian Government informed the Court that the applicant’s asylum proceedings in Hungary had been discontinued on 24 October 2011. The decision had become final on 4 November 2011. The first asylum proceedings would not be reopened upon his return to Hungary. If he was returned to Hungary, an asylum request would be considered a subsequent request which would not have automatic suspensive effect if there were no new circumstances supporting his application but there was a safe third country which he could be returned to. Regarding the issue of appointing a guardian for the minor applicant, the Hungarian authorities stated that unaccompanied minor asylum-seekers were usually immediately assigned a guardian, except when the applicant would reach the age of majority before the decision on the merits was taken. Unaccompanied minors were placed in a children’s home in Fót, where care and education were provided to them according to their age. Having regard to the fact that the applicant would turn 18 on 1 January 2013, it was very unlikely that a guardian would be appointed for him upon his return.

II. RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION

A. Relevant European and Austrian law

1. Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 (“the Dublin II Regulation”)

The Court notes that on 1 January 2014 Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (“the Dublin III Regulation“) entered into force. However, at the time of the decision by the Austrian authorities to expel the applicant to Hungary, the Dublin II Regulation was the applicable legal basis.

Under the Dublin II Regulation, member States must determine, based on a hierarchy of objective criteria (Articles 5 to 14), which member State bears responsibility for examining an asylum application lodged on their territory. The aim is to avoid multiple applications and to guarantee that each asylum-seeker’s case is dealt with by a single member State.

Where it is established that an asylum-seeker has irregularly crossed the border into a member State having come from a third country, the member State thus entered is responsible for examining the application for asylum (Article 10 § 1). This responsibility ceases twelve months after the date on which the irregular border crossing took place. Where the criteria in the regulation indicate that another member State is responsible, that State may be asked to take charge of the asylum-seeker and examine the application for asylum. The requested State must answer the request within two months of the date of receipt of the request. Failure to reply within two months is stipulated to mean that the request to take charge of the person has been accepted (Articles 17 and 18 §§ 1 and 7).

By way of derogation from the general rule, each member State may examine an application for asylum lodged with it by a third-country national, even if such examination is not its responsibility under the criteria laid down in the Regulation (Article 3 § 2). This is called the “sovereignty” clause. In such cases the State concerned becomes the member State responsible and assumes the obligations associated with that responsibility.

Article 19 § 2 provides that appeals and reviews concerning a decision of a requesting member State in which an applicant is informed that his or her request is not being examined by the requesting member State and that he will be transferred to the responsible member State shall not suspend the implementation of the transfer unless the courts and competent bodies so decide on a case-by-case basis.

Article 6 of the Dublin II Regulation provides that, the member State responsible for examining an asylum application of an unaccompanied minor shall be that where a member of his or her family is legally present, provided that this is in the best interests of the minor. In the absence of a family member, the member State responsible for examining the application is that where the minor has lodged his or her application for asylum.

For more detailed information on proceedings under the Dublin II Regulation see M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC] (no. 30696/09, §§ 65‑75, ECHR 2011).

2. Austrian Asylum Act

Section 5 of the Asylum Act 2005 (Asylgesetz) provides that an asylum application must be rejected as inadmissible if, under treaty provisions or pursuant to the Dublin Regulation, another State has jurisdiction to examine it. When rendering a decision rejecting an application, the authority must specify which State has jurisdiction in the matter.

3. Austrian Code of General Administrative Procedure

Article 66 § 2 of the Code of General Administrative Procedure provides that the appellate body can quash a decision and remit the matter to the lower instance, if the facts have been established so inconclusively that the renewal of an oral hearing and the issuing of a new decision appears to be indispensable.

B. International documents describing the reception and detention conditions of asylum-seekers in Hungary

International documents describing the conditions of detention and reception of asylum-seekers in Hungary are extensively summarised in the judgment in Mohammed v. Austria (no. 2283/12, §§ 32-50, 6 June 2013). In the paragraphs that follow, the most relevant information will be reiterated, and new developments after the adoption of that judgment will be taken into account.

1. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)

In October 2012 the UNHCR published a note on Hungary and Serbia as countries of asylum and concluded that it maintained its previously expressed concerns regarding Hungary’s ongoing practice of treating the asylum claims of most Dublin transferees as second applications, without guaranteed protection from removal to third countries before an examination of the merits of the asylum claims. The UNHCR was also particularly concerned about Hungary’s continuing policy and practice of considering Serbia as a safe third country and returning asylum-seekers to that country without conducting an examination of the merits of their claims.

In an update to that note dated December 2012 the UNHCR observed that in November 2012 the Hungarian Parliament had adopted a comprehensive package of legislative amendments, and the UNHCR welcomed these initiatives and the amendments’ reported aim of ensuring that asylum-seekers whose claims had not yet been decided might remain in Hungary pending an examination of the merits of their claims, and would not be subject to detention, as long as they applied for asylum immediately. Furthermore, the UNHCR appreciated the State’s reported intention to introduce additional legal guarantees concerning detention to ensure, inter alia, unhindered access to basic facilities such as toilets, and access for detainees with special needs to appropriate treatment.

The UNHCR further observed that Hungary no longer denied an examination of asylum claims on the merits where asylum-seekers had transited via Serbia or Ukraine prior to their arrival in Hungary. Such asylum-seekers were no longer returned to Serbia or Ukraine. In addition, access to asylum proceedings in Hungary had improved for those asylum‑seekers transferred to Hungary under the Dublin system whose claims had not been examined and decided in Hungary (in other words, those for whom no final decision on the substance of the asylum claim had been taken). Such asylum-seekers had access to an examination of the merits of their claims upon their return, provided they made a formal application to (re)initiate the examination of the previously made asylum claim. They would then not be detained and could await the outcome of the proceedings in Hungary.

Some improvements had also been observed with regard to the detention of asylum-seekers. The UNHCR noted that the number of asylum‑seekers detained had significantly declined in 2012. Asylum-seekers who applied for asylum immediately upon their arrival, or at the latest during their first interview with the immigration police, were no longer detained. People who failed to apply immediately, or who otherwise failed to communicate such an intention, continued to be subject to detention for the duration of the entire asylum proceedings.

2. Hungarian Helsinki Committee

(a) Statement on the Status of the Asylum Processes of Asylum-seekers returned under the Dublin II Regulations, 8 April 2013 33. In this statement, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee commented on legislative changes in Hungary which entered into force on 1 July 2013. It raised concerns that there might be a threat that asylum-seekers were placed in alien policing detention upon return to Hungary under the Dublin II Regulation for up to twelve months, if the person already had an expulsion order in Hungary before leaving for another EU member State. Arbitrariness could not be excluded, as detention was up to the discretion of the Office of Immigration and Nationality. The proposed detention regime for asylum‑seekers would also foresee the detention of first-time asylum-seekers as well as those whose cases had started even before the adoption of the proposed regulations. (b) Protection Interrupted – Jesuit Refugee Service Europe, DIASP national Report: Hungary, June 2013 34. The Hungarian Helsinki Committee noted that following the changes in legislation in January 2013 Dublin returnees were now considered as first-time applicants if they did not have a negative decision on the merits in their asylum procedure before leaving Hungary. They had the chance to substantiate the reasons for their application in a detailed “in-merit procedure” and were not detained. Those asylum-seekers who had withdrawn their application, or had received a negative decision on the merits, may however be placed in immigration detention after being returned under the Dublin II Regulation. (c) Brief information note on the main asylum-related legal changes in Hungary as of 1 July 2013, 28 June 2013 35. In this note, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee concluded that the amendments introducing a separate detention regime for asylum-seekers seriously weakened the judicial review of immigration and asylum detention and the right to appeal in asylum proceedings, and failed to ensure adequate reception conditions. (d) Country Report: Hungary, update of 30 April 2014, published on the Asylum Information Database (AIDA) 36. The Hungarian Helsinki Committee reported that following the changes in legislation taking effect in January 2013, asylum-seekers would not be automatically detained anymore if they submitted their first asylum application immediately upon apprehension. Those who were returned to Hungary under the Dublin II Regulation were not detained anymore either. Dublin returnees were therefore guaranteed access to the asylum procedures and to a full examination of their asylum claim if it was not yet examined on its merits, or if it was not rejected as manifestly unfounded or if they had not previously withdrawn the claim in writing. 37. From 1 July 2013, pursuant to Act XCIII of 2013, the Asylum Act provides for a newly created detention regime called “asylum detention”. These amendments widen the grounds for detention of asylum-seekers, applicable also to those who submitted their first asylum application immediately upon apprehension or return in the Dublin procedure. Under section 31/A of the Asylum Act, the refugee authority may detain asylum‑seekers if their identity or nationality is uncertain; if they absconded from the proceedings; if there is a risk of them obstructing, frustrating or delaying the asylum procedure; if they pose a threat to national security or public order or safety; if the application has been submitted at an airport; or if they have failed to appear on summons. The maximum period of asylum detention is six months. Asylum seekers submitting subsequent applications remain subject to immigration detention. 38. Between July and December 2013, 1762 asylum-seekers were detained under the asylum detention regime. The Hungarian Helsinki Committee observed that since the introduction of that regime, the asylum detention facilities were usually at full capacity. It calculated that on average, approximately 26% of all asylum-seekers were in asylum detention, while the number of male asylum-seekers in detention increased to around 42%. Vulnerable people were not excluded from detention, with the exception of unaccompanied children. 39. Alternatives to detention were available in the form of bail, a designated place to stay, and periodic reporting obligations. However, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee criticised that the scope of application of bail as alternative to asylum detention was not defined clearly enough, which it feared could result in the non-application of this measure in practice. Further, the conditions of assessment were not properly defined by law, which casted doubt on its transparent and coherent application. 40. Concerning conditions of detention, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee noted that the legal amendments relating to asylum detention provided that detention shall be carried out in “closed asylum reception centres“, which cannot be established on the premises of police jails or penitentiary institutions. The new rules specified minimum requirements for such facilities, including material conditions such as freedom of movement, access to open air, as well as access to recreational facilities, the Internet and phones, and a 24-hour availability of social assistance from social workers. 41. When carrying out visits to asylum detention facilities in Békéscsaba and Nyírbátor in summer 2013, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee noted that both facilities were at full capacity, which meant that there was a significant increase in the number of detained asylum-seekers. It examined some of the detention orders and observed that the Office of Immigration and Nationality failed to carry out a proper individual assessment of the cases before subjecting asylum-seekers to detention. It criticised that detention orders did not contain any justification why alternatives to detention were not used, despite the consideration of such alternatives being obligatory under the law. Further, it observed that the detention conditions for families were not appropriate; that the majority of the social workers hardly spoke any foreign languages and were mainly performing administrative tasks rather than engaging with the detainees; and that there were no psychologists working at the asylum detention facilities. 42. During a field visit under the auspices of the UNHCR Regional Representation for Central Europe in September 2013, detainees complained about inadequate housing conditions, such as a lack of equipment and cleaning materials, inadequate water quality, and difficulties in practising their religion. Further, there were complaints of a lack of access to specialist medical care. On a positive note, it was found that although the centres were usually at full capacity, there were no problems with overcrowding. Asylum-seekers had outdoor access during the day, and each centre was equipped with a fitness room and computers with internet access. Religious dietary requirements were always respected. Lawyers, family members and non-governmental organisations were able to access the detention centres, as long as they gave prior notice to the facility. 43. Turning to the issue of possible refoulement to countries which Hungary previously considered to be “safe third countries”, such as Serbia, the Hungarian Helsinki Committee noted that following the changes in legislation which took effect in January 2013, deportation could no longer be imposed on asylum-seekers during the asylum procedure.

3. UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention

In its Statement on the conclusion of its visit to Hungary from 23 September to 2 October 2013, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention reported on its visits to two detention facilities for irregular migrants and asylum-seekers in Nyírbátor and Békéscsaba. It highlighted the pressure and challenges faced by Hungary as a transit country, having seen a radical increase in the numbers of asylum-seekers in 2013 alone. While in 2012 a total of 2,157 asylum-seekers’ applications were registered, in 2013 an estimated 15,000 were registered. It noted that the Government had responded in the last few years with different approaches to the influx of people crossing Hungary’s borders. The legislative changes to the Asylum Act that had come into effect in July 2013 had led to some positive changes, such as asylum detention having to be based on individual assessment; the introduction of alternatives to detention such as bail, and benefits such as the availability of social workers to assist those in detention. Unaccompanied minors remained exempted from detention.

However, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention expressed its concern that there had been a significant focus on detaining asylum‑seekers. The issue of prolonging the detention of an asylum-seeker and the lack of proper judicial review were consistently raised during interviews it conducted. The right to a complaint which could be submitted against a detention order was not often explicitly communicated to those being detained. The Working Group therefore called to the Hungarian Government’s attention the fact that the situation of asylum-seekers and migrants in irregular situations needed robust improvements and attention to ensure against arbitrary deprivation of liberty. It recommended that the measures introduced by the recent law, which were considered to be positive, should be implemented in a clear and defined manner. Detention should not be the common and first resort and should be for the shortest possible duration, especially when genuine asylum-seekers may be overlooked or detained unnecessarily without proper justification.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e1
001-145233_a11_em1
CODE
DIRECT
71932/12
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e2
001-145233_a11_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e3
001-145233_a11_em3
DEM
QUASI
Afghan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e4
001-145233_a11_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Qadam Shah Mohammadi
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e5
001-145233_a11_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
13 November 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e6
001-145233_a11_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mrs N. Lorenz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e7
001-145233_a11_em7
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e2
001-145233_a11_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-145233_a11_em2
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e8
001-145233_a11_em9
PERSON
QUASI
H. Tichy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e9
001-145233_a11_em10
ORG
NO_MASK
International Law Department
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e10
001-145233_a11_em11
ORG
NO_MASK
Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em12
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em13
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em14
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e14
001-145233_a11_em15
DATETIME
QUASI
20 November 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em16
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e2
001-145233_a11_em17
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em18
ORG
QUASI
001-145233_a11_em12
Hungarian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em19
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em20
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e16
001-145233_a11_em21
DATETIME
NO_MASK
1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e17
001-145233_a11_em22
LOC
QUASI
Rein
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e2
001-145233_a11_em23
ORG
QUASI
001-145233_a11_em2
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e18
001-145233_a11_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
20 October 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e19
001-145233_a11_em25
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em26
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e20
001-145233_a11_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
European Union
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e21
001-145233_a11_em28
LOC
QUASI
Afghanistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e22
001-145233_a11_em29
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three months earlier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e23
001-145233_a11_em30
LOC
QUASI
Iran
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e24
001-145233_a11_em31
LOC
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e25
001-145233_a11_em32
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e26
001-145233_a11_em33
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e27
001-145233_a11_em34
LOC
QUASI
Greece
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e28
001-145233_a11_em35
LOC
QUASI
Athens
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e27
001-145233_a11_em36
LOC
QUASI
Greece
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e29
001-145233_a11_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em38
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em39
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em40
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e30
001-145233_a11_em41
DEM
QUASI
Hungarian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em42
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em43
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e2
001-145233_a11_em44
LOC
NO_MASK
Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e31
001-145233_a11_em45
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two or three days later
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e7
001-145233_a11_em46
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e19
001-145233_a11_em47
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e32
001-145233_a11_em48
DATETIME
QUASI
21 October 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em49
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e33
001-145233_a11_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
18 November 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e26
001-145233_a11_em51
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em52
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em53
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e21
001-145233_a11_em54
ORG
QUASI
Afghanistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e21
001-145233_a11_em55
LOC
QUASI
Afghanistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e34
001-145233_a11_em56
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six years earlier
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e35
001-145233_a11_em57
LOC
QUASI
Jaghori district
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e36
001-145233_a11_em58
LOC
QUASI
Ghazni province
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e37
001-145233_a11_em59
DATETIME
QUASI
15 December 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e38
001-145233_a11_em60
ORG
NO_MASK
Traiskirchen Federal Asylum Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e38
001-145233_a11_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
001-145233_a11_em60
Bundes­asylamt
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e38
001-145233_a11_em62
ORG
NO_MASK
001-145233_a11_em60
Asylum Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em63
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em64
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e39
001-145233_a11_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
11 January 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e40
001-145233_a11_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e40
001-145233_a11_em67
ORG
NO_MASK
001-145233_a11_em66
Asylgerichtshof
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e38
001-145233_a11_em68
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em69
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em70
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e41
001-145233_a11_em71
MISC
QUASI
minors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em72
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e42
001-145233_a11_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
28 February 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e38
001-145233_a11_em74
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em75
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em76
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em77
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e38
001-145233_a11_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e43
001-145233_a11_em79
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Embassy
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em80
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e44
001-145233_a11_em81
DATETIME
NO_MASK
25 January
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e45
001-145233_a11_em82
DATETIME
QUASI
2 February 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e41
001-145233_a11_em83
MISC
QUASI
minors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em84
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em85
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em86
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em87
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em88
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e30
001-145233_a11_em89
DEM
QUASI
Hungarian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em90
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em91
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em92
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em93
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em94
MISC
NO_MASK
001-145233_a11_em13
Dublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em95
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em96
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e38
001-145233_a11_em97
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em98
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e26
001-145233_a11_em99
DATETIME
NO_MASK
three days
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e41
001-145233_a11_em100
MISC
QUASI
minors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em101
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em102
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em103
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e30
001-145233_a11_em104
DEM
QUASI
Hungarian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em105
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em106
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e38
001-145233_a11_em107
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e46
001-145233_a11_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
20 March 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e40
001-145233_a11_em109
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e47
001-145233_a11_em110
DATETIME
QUASI
24 September 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e30
001-145233_a11_em111
DEM
QUASI
Hungarian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e38
001-145233_a11_em112
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e48
001-145233_a11_em113
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e30
001-145233_a11_em114
DEM
QUASI
Hungarian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e40
001-145233_a11_em115
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em116
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em117
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em118
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e40
001-145233_a11_em119
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e49
001-145233_a11_em120
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR Office
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e7
001-145233_a11_em121
LOC
NO_MASK
Vienna
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e50
001-145233_a11_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
3 February 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em123
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em124
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em125
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em126
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e40
001-145233_a11_em127
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em128
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e19
001-145233_a11_em129
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e30
001-145233_a11_em130
DEM
QUASI
Hungarian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em131
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e52
001-145233_a11_em132
DATETIME
QUASI
10 October 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e53
001-145233_a11_em133
ORG
NO_MASK
Constitutional Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e54
001-145233_a11_em134
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e55
001-145233_a11_em135
DATETIME
QUASI
30 November 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e30
001-145233_a11_em136
DEM
QUASI
Hungarian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e54
001-145233_a11_em137
DATETIME
QUASI
22 November 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em138
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e14
001-145233_a11_em139
DATETIME
QUASI
20 November 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e2
001-145233_a11_em140
ORG
NO_MASK
Austrian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em141
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e56
001-145233_a11_em142
DATETIME
QUASI
3 December 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em143
ORG
QUASI
001-145233_a11_em12
Hungarian Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em144
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e48
001-145233_a11_em145
DATETIME
QUASI
24 October 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e57
001-145233_a11_em146
DATETIME
QUASI
4 November 2011
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em147
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em148
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em149
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e30
001-145233_a11_em150
DEM
QUASI
Hungarian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em151
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e41
001-145233_a11_em152
MISC
QUASI
minors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e58
001-145233_a11_em153
LOC
QUASI
Fót
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e59
001-145233_a11_em154
DEM
QUASI
turn 18
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e60
001-145233_a11_em155
DATETIME
QUASI
1 January 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e19
001-145233_a11_em156
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em157
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e61
001-145233_a11_em158
DATETIME
QUASI
1 January 2014
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e62
001-145233_a11_em159
ORG
NO_MASK
EU
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e63
001-145233_a11_em160
ORG
NO_MASK
European Parliament
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e64
001-145233_a11_em161
ORG
NO_MASK
Council
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e65
001-145233_a11_em162
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin III Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e19
001-145233_a11_em163
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em164
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em165
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em166
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e66
001-145233_a11_em167
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twelve months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e67
001-145233_a11_em168
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e67
001-145233_a11_em169
DATETIME
NO_MASK
two months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em170
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em171
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em172
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e15
001-145233_a11_em173
DEM
QUASI
minor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em174
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e68
001-145233_a11_em175
MISC
NO_MASK
M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e19
001-145233_a11_em176
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e69
001-145233_a11_em177
MISC
NO_MASK
Asylum Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e69
001-145233_a11_em178
MISC
NO_MASK
Asylum Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e69
001-145233_a11_em179
MISC
NO_MASK
001-145233_a11_em178
Asylgesetz
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e70
001-145233_a11_em180
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e19
001-145233_a11_em181
DEM
NO_MASK
Austrian
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em182
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em183
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e71
001-145233_a11_em184
MISC
NO_MASK
Mohammed v. Austria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e72
001-145233_a11_em185
CODE
NO_MASK
2283/12
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e73
001-145233_a11_em186
DATETIME
QUASI
6 June 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em187
ORG
NO_MASK
001-145233_a11_em188
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em188
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e74
001-145233_a11_em189
DATETIME
QUASI
October 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em190
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em191
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em192
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em193
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em194
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em195
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em196
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em197
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e75
001-145233_a11_em198
DATETIME
QUASI
December 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em199
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e76
001-145233_a11_em200
DATETIME
QUASI
November 2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e77
001-145233_a11_em201
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Parliament
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em202
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em203
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em204
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em205
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em206
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em207
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e78
001-145233_a11_em208
ORG
NO_MASK
Ukraine
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em209
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em210
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e78
001-145233_a11_em211
ORG
NO_MASK
Ukraine
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em212
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em213
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em214
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em215
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em216
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e51
001-145233_a11_em217
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e79
001-145233_a11_em218
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em219
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e81
001-145233_a11_em220
DATETIME
QUASI
8 April 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em221
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em222
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e82
001-145233_a11_em223
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em224
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em225
ORG
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e66
001-145233_a11_em226
DATETIME
NO_MASK
twelve months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em227
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e62
001-145233_a11_em228
ORG
NO_MASK
EU
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e83
001-145233_a11_em229
ORG
NO_MASK
Office of Immigration and Nationality
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e84
001-145233_a11_em230
ORG
NO_MASK
Jesuit Refugee Service Europe
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e85
001-145233_a11_em231
ORG
NO_MASK
DIASP national Report
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em232
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e86
001-145233_a11_em233
DATETIME
NO_MASK
June 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em234
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e87
001-145233_a11_em235
DATETIME
NO_MASK
January 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em236
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em237
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em238
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em239
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e82
001-145233_a11_em240
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e86
001-145233_a11_em241
DATETIME
NO_MASK
June 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em242
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em243
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e88
001-145233_a11_em244
DATETIME
QUASI
30 April 2014
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e89
001-145233_a11_em245
ORG
NO_MASK
Asylum Information Database
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e89
001-145233_a11_em246
ORG
NO_MASK
001-145233_a11_em245
AIDA
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em247
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e87
001-145233_a11_em248
DATETIME
NO_MASK
January 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em249
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em250
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin II Regulation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em251
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e82
001-145233_a11_em252
DATETIME
QUASI
1 July 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e90
001-145233_a11_em253
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e69
001-145233_a11_em254
MISC
NO_MASK
Asylum Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e12
001-145233_a11_em255
MISC
NO_MASK
Dublin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e69
001-145233_a11_em256
MISC
NO_MASK
Asylum Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e91
001-145233_a11_em257
DATETIME
NO_MASK
six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e92
001-145233_a11_em258
DATETIME
QUASI
Between July and December 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e93
001-145233_a11_em259
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
1762
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em260
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e94
001-145233_a11_em261
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
26%
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e95
001-145233_a11_em262
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
42%
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em263
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em264
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e96
001-145233_a11_em265
DATETIME
NO_MASK
24-hour
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e97
001-145233_a11_em266
LOC
QUASI
Békéscsaba
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e98
001-145233_a11_em267
LOC
QUASI
Nyírbátor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e99
001-145233_a11_em268
DATETIME
NO_MASK
summer 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em269
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e83
001-145233_a11_em270
ORG
NO_MASK
Office of Immigration and Nationality
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e100
001-145233_a11_em271
ORG
NO_MASK
UNHCR Regional Representation for Central Europe
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e101
001-145233_a11_em272
DATETIME
QUASI
September 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em273
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e13
001-145233_a11_em274
ORG
QUASI
Serbia
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e80
001-145233_a11_em275
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Helsinki Committee
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e87
001-145233_a11_em276
DATETIME
NO_MASK
January 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e102
001-145233_a11_em277
ORG
NO_MASK
UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em278
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e103
001-145233_a11_em279
DATETIME
NO_MASK
23 September
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e104
001-145233_a11_em280
DATETIME
QUASI
2 October 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e102
001-145233_a11_em281
ORG
NO_MASK
UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e98
001-145233_a11_em282
LOC
QUASI
Nyírbátor
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e97
001-145233_a11_em283
LOC
QUASI
Békéscsaba
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em284
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e90
001-145233_a11_em285
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e79
001-145233_a11_em286
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2012
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-145233_a11_e105
001-145233_a11_em287
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
2,157
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e90
001-145233_a11_em288
DATETIME
NO_MASK
2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e106
001-145233_a11_em289
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
15,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e107
001-145233_a11_em290
DATETIME
NO_MASK
last few years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em291
ORG
QUASI
Hungary
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e69
001-145233_a11_em292
MISC
NO_MASK
Asylum Act
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e108
001-145233_a11_em293
DATETIME
NO_MASK
July 2013
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e41
001-145233_a11_em294
MISC
QUASI
minors
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e102
001-145233_a11_em295
ORG
NO_MASK
UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-145233_a11_e102
001-145233_a11_em296
ORG
NO_MASK
001-145233_a11_em277
Working Group
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-145233_a11_e11
001-145233_a11_em297
ORG
QUASI
Hungarian Government
Qadam Shah Mohammadi
AUT
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Qadam Shah Mohammadi