PROCEDURE

The case was referred to the Court on 18 December 1995 by the applicant, Mr Rolf Gustafson, a Swedish national, within the three-month period laid down by Article 32 para. 1 and Article 47 of the Convention (art. 32-1, art. 47). It originated in an application (no. 23196/94) against the Kingdom of Sweden lodged by the applicant with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission“) under Article 25 (art. 25) on 5 November 1993. The applicant’s application bringing the case before the Court referred to Article 48 of the Convention (art. 48), as amended by Protocol No. 9 (P9), which has been ratified by Sweden. The object of the application was to obtain a decision as to whether the facts of the case disclosed a breach by the respondent State of its obligations under Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention (art. 6-1).

On 29 March 1996 the Court’s Screening Panel decided not to decline consideration of the case and to submit it to the Court (Article 48 para. 2 of the Convention) (art. 48-2).

In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 35 para. 3 (d) of Rules of Court B, the applicant designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 31).

The Chamber to be constituted included ex officio Mrs E. Palm, the elected judge of Swedish nationality (Article 43 of the Convention) (art. 43), and Mr R. Ryssdal, the President of the Court (Rule 21 para. 4 (b)). On 27 April 1996, in the presence of the Registrar, the President drew by lot the names of the other seven members, namely Mr F. Matscher, Mr B. Walsh, Mr C. Russo, Mr J. De Meyer, Mr J.M. Morenilla, Mr B. Repik and Mr P. Jambrek (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 5) (art. 43).

As President of the Chamber (Rule 21 para. 6), Mr Ryssdal, acting through the Registrar, consulted the Agent of the Government, the applicant’s lawyer and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 39 para. 1 and 40). Pursuant to the order made in consequence, the Registrar received the applicant’s memorial on 25 October 1996 and the Government’s memorial on 6 November 1996.

On 15 January and 3 February 1997 the Commission produced various documents from the file on the proceedings before it, as requested by the Registrar on the President’s instructions.

On 20 January 1997 the Chamber, having regard to the views expressed by the applicant, the Agent of the Government and the Delegate of the Commission, decided to dispense with a hearing in the case, having satisfied itself that the condition for this derogation from its usual procedure had been met (Rules 27 and 40). On 22 and 30 January 1997 the Registrar received supplementary memorials from the applicant and the Government. On 3 February 1997 the Delegate informed the Registrar that he did not wish to submit written observations in reply to these memorials.

AS TO THE FACTS

I. Circumstances of the case

The applicant is a Swedish citizen resident in Stockholm. Since 1973 he has spent a total of eight years in prison for the commission of serious economic offences. Most recently, in October 1996 he was sentenced to a one-year term of imprisonment for a serious forgery offence.

The applicant claims that on two occasions, in April-June and June‑July 1991, he was the victim of kidnapping and extortion perpetrated by three persons. According to the applicant, one of the alleged perpetrators, a certain Mr L., had wanted to be paid for the part he played with him in the commission of certain economic crimes.

On 25 March 1993 the public prosecutor charged L. with one count of kidnapping on 17 April 1991, one count of aggravated extortion committed between 17 April 1991 and June 1991 and one count of kidnapping and aggravated extortion committed between 27 June and 3 July 1991. No proceedings were instituted against the other two persons, one of whom had been named by the applicant as a certain Mr P. (see paragraph 17 below).

A. Proceedings before the Stockholm District Court

In the criminal proceedings instituted against L. before the Stockholm District Court (tingsrätt), the applicant requested the court, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 22 of the Code of Judicial Procedure (Rättegångsbalken: see paragraph 20 below), to order L. to pay him a total of 169,350 Swedish kronor (SEK) in compensation in respect of the following items: (a) SEK 9,350 in material damages to his clothes; (b) SEK 10,000 in non-pecuniary damages for injury caused to his head; (c) SEK 50,000 for suffering resulting from an eye injury; (d) SEK 100,000 in non-pecuniary damages for the mental suffering caused by the two alleged kidnappings (see paragraph 9 above). The applicant reserved his right to present further claims in respect of any such damage as he might suffer in the future.

B. The applicant’s claim for compensation before the Criminal Damage Compensation Board

On 15 April 1993 the applicant applied for compensation to the Criminal Damage Compensation Board (Brottsskadenämnden - hereinafter “the Board“) under the Criminal Damage Act 1978 (brottsskadelagen 1978:413 - hereinafter “the 1978 Act“; see paragraphs 20-29 below). In his application he stated that he had sought compensation for personal injury in the amount of SEK 160,000 in the proceedings against L. and that he had reserved his right to make any further claims with regard to future damage. In view of the rules on prescription of compensation claims, he submitted to the Board at that stage a claim for compensation of SEK 160,000 along the lines stated above. He enclosed a copy of the indictment against L.

C. The decision of the Stockholm District Court

On 28 April 1993 the Stockholm District Court convicted L., sentenced him to six years’ imprisonment and ordered him to pay SEK 144,350 in damages to the applicant. The District Court found, inter alia, that, on the whole, the applicant could not be considered a particularly trustworthy person in view of the fact that he had been convicted of several economic offences (see paragraph 8 above). It stated, however, that this fact did not in itself mean that his allegations concerning his kidnapping and extortion were untrue and it found the evidence to be such that the prosecution’s case against L. had been partially proven.

D. The decision of the Svea Court of Appeal

On 2 July 1993 the Svea Court of Appeal (Svea hovrätt) reversed the District Court’s decision on the ground that the charges against L. had not been proven, acquitted L. and rejected the applicant’s claim for compensation. The Court of Appeal found that the applicant, in view of his criminal background, could not be deemed a trustworthy person. It followed that the information he had provided on the events which had given rise to the charges against L. (åtalade händelserna) could not, in the absence of strong supporting evidence, ground L.’s conviction, even though the applicant’s evidence had been corroborated by others whom he had told about the incidents. The applicant did not seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen) against the decision.

E. The Board’s examination of the applicant’s claim

On 12 August 1993 the applicant, referring to his application for compensation of 15 April 1993 (see paragraph 12 above), asked the Board to proceed with its examination of his claim, stating that he had no insurance which would cover the damage in question. He supplied the Board with copies of the judgments of the District Court and the Court of Appeal.

On 26 August 1993 the Board rejected the applicant’s compensation claim, stating as follows: “A condition for a grant of compensation is that damage has in fact been caused by crime. The Board ... cannot find it established that [the applicant] has suffered damage as a result of crime. Consequently, compensation for damage caused by crime cannot be awarded.“

F. The Board’s reconsideration of the claim

On 11 November 1993 the applicant requested the Board to reconsider its decision. He argued that it was clear from the judgments of the District Court and the Court of Appeal that he had been the victim of a crime and that he had suffered the damage for which he requested compensation. He had identified two of the three persons who were allegedly involved in the offences; the fact that the Court of Appeal had not found it proven that the only one to be charged, L., was guilty was not a reason to doubt that he had been the victim of crime. In support of his request for reconsideration of the decision the applicant submitted a copy of the investigation report concerning the alleged kidnappings and extortions, including a medical report drawn up on 25 February 1993 by Dr Lennart Berglin, a Deputy Senior Physician. According to this report, on 4 July 1991 the applicant had sought emergency care for his right eye, which he stated had been punched. He had been operated on by Dr Berglin on 5 July 1991 and had remained hospitalised until 15 July 1991. On 26 February 1992 he underwent a further operation. Dr Berglin concluded in his report that the applicant’s eye injury could have been caused by a punch. The applicant also submitted a transcript of the testimony given by Crime Inspector S. at the District Court’s oral hearing in the criminal proceedings against L. Inspector S. had been the principal investigator into the economic offences of which the applicant had previously been convicted. He had interrogated both the applicant and L. on a number of occasions. Inspector S. had told the District Court, inter alia: “I was, probably on 4 July 1991, informed [about the alleged kidnapping of the applicant]. A colleague ... telephoned me to say that he had been informed that [the applicant] had been kidnapped ..., that the kidnapping had been staged by [L.] with the help of two ‘gorillas’, ... and that the kidnapping had been combined with an extortion threat against [the applicant] in the amount of SEK 5 million. ... I then ... telephoned [the applicant], who ... denied that he had been kidnapped ... ... I saw [the applicant] in August [1991] in connection with ... criminal proceedings brought against him ... and noted that he had a bruise at [one of] his eye[s]. I asked him what had happened and he stated that he had been the victim of a robbery committed by some persons ... ... Probably in May 1992 [the applicant] mentioned the kidnappings when he was being interrogated as a suspect in another case ... He stated that [they had been carried out] by two black men and a third one, whom he did not wish to name ... He repeated several times that one kidnapping had taken place in April [1991] and [the other] towards the end of June [1991], lasting until the beginning of July [1991] ... We took [the applicant’s statements] seriously ... I have come to know [the applicant] so well that I can somehow see when he is lying or when he is telling the truth ... Having been asked on a number of occasions to name the perpetrators, [the applicant] stated that he would do so, but not right away ... In the autumn [of 1991] he named one of the assistants [during the kidnappings], [P.] ... [The applicant’s description of the environment and premises where he had been kept during the kidnappings] was very accurate as regards many details ...“

Both Dr Berglin’s report and Crime Inspector S.’s testimony had in essence been reproduced in the District Court’s judgment. Inspector S. had also been heard orally before the Court of Appeal, where he had more or less repeated the same evidence he gave to the District Court.

On 1 June 1994 the Board rejected the applicant’s request, for the following reasons: “The submissions in this case in support of the request for reconsideration are not such as to be a reason for the Board to change its previous decision. Nor is there any other reason for changing the decision.“
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e1
001-58051_a7_em1
DATETIME
QUASI
18 December 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e2
001-58051_a7_em2
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Rolf Gustafson
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e3
001-58051_a7_em3
DEM
QUASI
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e4
001-58051_a7_em4
CODE
DIRECT
23196/94
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e5
001-58051_a7_em5
ORG
NO_MASK
Kingdom of Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e6
001-58051_a7_em6
DATETIME
QUASI
5 November 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e7
001-58051_a7_em7
ORG
NO_MASK
Sweden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e8
001-58051_a7_em8
DATETIME
QUASI
29 March 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e9
001-58051_a7_em9
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mrs E. Palm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e3
001-58051_a7_em10
DEM
QUASI
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e10
001-58051_a7_em11
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr R. Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e11
001-58051_a7_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
27 April 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e12
001-58051_a7_em13
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr F. Matscher
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e13
001-58051_a7_em14
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr B. Walsh
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e14
001-58051_a7_em15
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr C. Russo
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e15
001-58051_a7_em16
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J. De Meyer
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e16
001-58051_a7_em17
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr J.M. Morenilla
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e17
001-58051_a7_em18
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr B. Repik
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e18
001-58051_a7_em19
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr P. Jambrek
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e10
001-58051_a7_em20
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-58051_a7_em11
Mr Ryssdal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e19
001-58051_a7_em21
DATETIME
QUASI
25 October 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e20
001-58051_a7_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
6 November 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e21
001-58051_a7_em23
DATETIME
QUASI
15 January and 3 February 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e22
001-58051_a7_em24
DATETIME
QUASI
20 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e23
001-58051_a7_em25
DATETIME
QUASI
22 and 30 January 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e24
001-58051_a7_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
3 February 1997
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e3
001-58051_a7_em27
DEM
QUASI
Swedish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e25
001-58051_a7_em28
LOC
QUASI
Stockholm
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e26
001-58051_a7_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
1973
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e27
001-58051_a7_em30
DATETIME
NO_MASK
eight years
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e28
001-58051_a7_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
October 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e29
001-58051_a7_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
one-year
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e30
001-58051_a7_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
April-June and June‑July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e31
001-58051_a7_em34
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
three persons
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em35
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e33
001-58051_a7_em36
DATETIME
QUASI
25 March 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em37
PERSON
NO_MASK
001-58051_a7_em35
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e34
001-58051_a7_em38
DATETIME
QUASI
17 April 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e35
001-58051_a7_em39
DATETIME
QUASI
between 17 April 1991 and June 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e36
001-58051_a7_em40
DATETIME
QUASI
between 27 June and 3 July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e37
001-58051_a7_em41
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
two persons
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e38
001-58051_a7_em42
PERSON
NO_MASK
Mr P.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em43
ORG
NO_MASK
Stockholm District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em44
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em45
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58051_a7_em43
Stockholm District Court (tingsrätt)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em46
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e40
001-58051_a7_em47
QUANTITY
QUASI
169,350 Swedish kronor (SEK)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e41
001-58051_a7_em48
QUANTITY
QUASI
SEK 9,350
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e42
001-58051_a7_em49
QUANTITY
QUASI
SEK 10,000
HEALTH
insert
001-58051_a7_e43
001-58051_a7_em50
MISC
NO_MASK
injury caused to his head
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e44
001-58051_a7_em51
QUANTITY
QUASI
SEK 50,000
HEALTH
insert
001-58051_a7_e45
001-58051_a7_em52
MISC
NO_MASK
eye injury
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e46
001-58051_a7_em53
QUANTITY
QUASI
SEK 100,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em54
ORG
NO_MASK
Criminal Damage Compensation Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e48
001-58051_a7_em55
DATETIME
QUASI
15 April 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em56
ORG
NO_MASK
Criminal Damage Compensation Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em57
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58051_a7_em56
Brottsskadenämnden
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em58
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e49
001-58051_a7_em59
QUANTITY
QUASI
SEK 160,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em60
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em61
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58051_a7_em56
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e49
001-58051_a7_em62
QUANTITY
QUASI
SEK 160,000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em63
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em64
ORG
NO_MASK
Stockholm District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e50
001-58051_a7_em65
DATETIME
QUASI
28 April 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em66
ORG
NO_MASK
Stockholm District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em67
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e51
001-58051_a7_em68
DATETIME
QUASI
six years’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e52
001-58051_a7_em69
QUANTITY
QUASI
SEK 144,350
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em70
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58051_a7_em66
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em71
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e53
001-58051_a7_em72
ORG
NO_MASK
Svea Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e54
001-58051_a7_em73
DATETIME
QUASI
2 July 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e55
001-58051_a7_em74
ORG
NO_MASK
Svea Court of Appeal (Svea hovrätt)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em75
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em76
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em77
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e55
001-58051_a7_em78
ORG
NO_MASK
001-58051_a7_em74
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em79
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em80
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e56
001-58051_a7_em81
ORG
NO_MASK
Supreme Court (Högsta domstolen)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em82
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e57
001-58051_a7_em83
DATETIME
QUASI
12 August 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e48
001-58051_a7_em84
DATETIME
QUASI
15 April 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em85
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em86
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em87
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e55
001-58051_a7_em88
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e58
001-58051_a7_em89
DATETIME
QUASI
26 August 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em90
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em91
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em92
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e59
001-58051_a7_em93
DATETIME
QUASI
11 November 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em94
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em95
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e55
001-58051_a7_em96
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e31
001-58051_a7_em97
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
three persons
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e55
001-58051_a7_em98
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em99
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e60
001-58051_a7_em100
DATETIME
QUASI
25 February 1993
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e61
001-58051_a7_em101
PERSON
QUASI
Dr Lennart Berglin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e62
001-58051_a7_em102
DEM
NO_MASK
Deputy Senior Physician
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e63
001-58051_a7_em103
DATETIME
QUASI
4 July 1991
HEALTH
insert
001-58051_a7_e64
001-58051_a7_em104
MISC
QUASI
right eye
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e61
001-58051_a7_em105
PERSON
QUASI
001-58051_a7_em101
Dr Berglin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e65
001-58051_a7_em106
DATETIME
QUASI
5 July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e66
001-58051_a7_em107
DATETIME
QUASI
15 July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e67
001-58051_a7_em108
DATETIME
QUASI
26 February 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e61
001-58051_a7_em109
PERSON
QUASI
Dr Berglin
HEALTH
check
001-58051_a7_e45
001-58051_a7_em110
MISC
NO_MASK
eye injury
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58051_a7_e68
001-58051_a7_em111
PERSON
QUASI
Crime Inspector S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em112
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em113
PERSON
QUASI
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e68
001-58051_a7_em114
PERSON
QUASI
001-58051_a7_em111
Inspector S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em115
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e68
001-58051_a7_em116
PERSON
QUASI
Inspector S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em117
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e63
001-58051_a7_em118
DATETIME
QUASI
4 July 1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e32
001-58051_a7_em119
PERSON
NO_MASK
L.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e69
001-58051_a7_em120
MISC
NO_MASK
two ‘gorillas’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e70
001-58051_a7_em121
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
SEK 5 million
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e71
001-58051_a7_em122
DATETIME
QUASI
August [1991]
HEALTH
check
001-58051_a7_e72
001-58051_a7_em123
MISC
NO_MASK
eye[s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e73
001-58051_a7_em124
DATETIME
QUASI
May 1992
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e74
001-58051_a7_em125
QUANTITY
NO_MASK
two black men and a third one
ETHNIC
insert
001-58051_a7_e75
001-58051_a7_em126
DEM
NO_MASK
black
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e76
001-58051_a7_em127
DATETIME
QUASI
April [1991]
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e77
001-58051_a7_em128
DATETIME
QUASI
end of June [1991]
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e78
001-58051_a7_em129
DATETIME
QUASI
beginning of July [1991
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e79
001-58051_a7_em130
DATETIME
QUASI
autumn [of 1991]
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-58051_a7_e80
001-58051_a7_em131
PERSON
NO_MASK
P.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e61
001-58051_a7_em132
PERSON
QUASI
Dr Berglin
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-58051_a7_e68
001-58051_a7_em133
PERSON
QUASI
Crime Inspector S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em134
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e68
001-58051_a7_em135
PERSON
QUASI
Inspector S.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e55
001-58051_a7_em136
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Appeal
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e39
001-58051_a7_em137
ORG
NO_MASK
District Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e81
001-58051_a7_em138
DATETIME
QUASI
1 June 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em139
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-58051_a7_e47
001-58051_a7_em140
ORG
NO_MASK
Board
Rolf Gustafson
SWE
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Rolf Gustafson