PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 29851/96) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Mr Mehdi Zana (“the applicant”), on 1 September 1995.

The applicant was represented by Mr Sezgin Tanrıkulu, a lawyer practising in Diyarbakır (Turkey). The Government (“the Government”) did not designate an Agent for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that his conviction constituted an unjustified interference with his right to freedom of expression and that he was denied a fair hearing on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench of the Istanbul State Security Court.

The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1 of the Rules of Court. Mr Rıza Türmen, the judge elected in respect of Turkey, withdrew from sitting in the case (Rule 28). The Government accordingly appointed Mr Feyyaz Gölcüklü to sit as an ad hoc judge (Article 27 § 2 of the Convention and Rule 29 § 1).

By a decision of 19 September 2000 the Chamber declared the applicant’s complaint under Articles 9 and 10 of the Convention inadmissible and retained his complaint under Article 6 § 1 for examination on the merits.

The applicant and the Government each filed observations on the merits (Rule 59 § 1). The Chamber decided, after consulting the parties, that no hearing on the merits was required (Rule 59 § 2 in fine).

THE FACTS

I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

On 28 June 1992 the applicant participated in a meeting organised by a political party, the People’s Labour Party (Halkın Emek Partisi, HEP), in Bursa. At this meeting he made a speech on the Kurdish question.

The Chief Public Prosecutor at the Istanbul State Security Court instituted criminal proceedings against the applicant charging him with disseminating separatist propaganda against the indivisibility of the State on account of his speech. The charges were brought under section 8 § 1 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 1991 (hereinafter “the 1991 Act”).

In the proceedings before the Istanbul State Security Court, the applicant denied the charges and requested his acquittal. He asserted that he had made this speech because he felt responsible for the Kurdish problem.

In a judgment dated 14 April 1994, the Istanbul State Security Court found the applicant guilty of an offence under section 8 § 1 of the 1991 Act. It sentenced the applicant to 2 years’ imprisonment and a fine of 100,000,000 Turkish Liras (TRL). The court held that the following phrases in the applicant’s speech contravened section 8 of the 1991 Act: “... We know how to die for our cause and we do even die...O Kurds! join hands, give a martyr every day... we will maintain our cause until we achieve it... we are going to stop this oppression and we are going to get our rights with our fists... if the present Government do not say ‘stop’ to this oppression, we are going to stop it... we have taken an oath not to withdraw, even if only a single warrior remains... Kurdistan is seen on the horizon...”

The Istanbul State Security Court considered that the incriminated speech, taken as a whole, amounted to propaganda, including violence, against the indivisible integrity of the State. The court found that the applicant had alleged that the State was guilty of oppression and the infliction of torture. It held that this allegation constituted a clear and present danger since the applicant had given incorrect information about the incidents and the Government’s policies in the south-east. The applicant appealed against his conviction.

On 31 January 1995 the Court of Cassation upheld the Istanbul State Security Court’s judgment. The applicant learned of this decision in July 1995 while he was in prison.

Following the amendments made by Law no. 4126 of 27 October 1995 to the 1991 Act, the Istanbul State Security Court ex officio re‑examined the applicant’s case. On 16 February 1996 the court confirmed the applicant’s conviction, but reduced the sentence imposed on the applicant. It finally sentenced the applicant to 1 year’s imprisonment and a fine of 100,000,000 TRL. The applicant appealed.

On 12 January 1998 the Court of Cassation dismissed the applicant’s appeal, upholding the State Security Court’s reasoning and its assessment of the evidence.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e1
001-59335_a10_em1
CODE
DIRECT
29851/96
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-59335_a10_e2
001-59335_a10_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e3
001-59335_a10_em3
DEM
NO_MASK
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e4
001-59335_a10_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Mr Mehdi Zana
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e5
001-59335_a10_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
1 September 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e6
001-59335_a10_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Sezgin Tanrıkulu
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-59335_a10_e7
001-59335_a10_em7
LOC
QUASI
Diyarbakır (Turkey)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e8
001-59335_a10_em8
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e9
001-59335_a10_em9
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Rıza Türmen
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-59335_a10_e10
001-59335_a10_em10
ORG
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e11
001-59335_a10_em11
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Feyyaz Gölcüklü
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e12
001-59335_a10_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
19 September 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e13
001-59335_a10_em13
DATETIME
QUASI
28 June 1992
POLITICS
insert
001-59335_a10_e14
001-59335_a10_em14
ORG
QUASI
People’s Labour Party (Halkın Emek Partisi, HEP)
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-59335_a10_e15
001-59335_a10_em15
LOC
QUASI
Bursa
ETHNIC
check
001-59335_a10_e16
001-59335_a10_em16
DEM
NO_MASK
Kurdish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e8
001-59335_a10_em17
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e8
001-59335_a10_em18
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court
ETHNIC
check
001-59335_a10_e16
001-59335_a10_em19
DEM
NO_MASK
Kurdish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e17
001-59335_a10_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
14 April 1994
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e8
001-59335_a10_em21
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e18
001-59335_a10_em22
DATETIME
QUASI
2 years’
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-59335_a10_e19
001-59335_a10_em23
QUANTITY
QUASI
100,000,000 Turkish Liras (TRL)
ETHNIC
correct
001-59335_a10_e20
001-59335_a10_em24
MISC
NO_MASK
Kurdistan
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e8
001-59335_a10_em25
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e21
001-59335_a10_em26
DATETIME
QUASI
31 January 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e22
001-59335_a10_em27
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e23
001-59335_a10_em28
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e24
001-59335_a10_em29
DATETIME
QUASI
July 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e25
001-59335_a10_em30
DATETIME
NO_MASK
27 October 1995
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e8
001-59335_a10_em31
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e26
001-59335_a10_em32
DATETIME
QUASI
16 February 1996
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e27
001-59335_a10_em33
DATETIME
QUASI
1 year’s
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-59335_a10_e28
001-59335_a10_em34
QUANTITY
QUASI
100,000,000 TRL
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e29
001-59335_a10_em35
DATETIME
QUASI
12 January 1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e22
001-59335_a10_em36
ORG
NO_MASK
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-59335_a10_e30
001-59335_a10_em37
ORG
NO_MASK
State Security Court’s
Mehdi Zana
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Mehdi Zana