PROCEDURE

The case originated in an application (no. 7070/03) against the Republic of Turkey lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Turkish national, Ms Burcu Ballıktaş (“the applicant”), on 3 January 2003.

The applicant was represented by Mr Ercan Kanar, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The applicant alleged, in particular, that she had been subjected to ill-treatment in a gendarmerie station and that the criminal proceedings subsequently brought against her had not been fair.

On 29 November 2007 the President of the Court's Second Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3).

THE FACTS

THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE

The applicant was born in 1978 and lives in Ankara.

On 6 March 2000 the applicant was arrested by the gendarmerie in the border city of Edirne on her return from Bulgaria. She was detained in a gendarmerie station. According to an arrest report prepared by the gendarmerie the same day, the applicant was informed of her right to be represented by a lawyer and to inform her family about her arrest. Nevertheless, it was also stated in the same document that, if the offence in respect of which she was arrested fell within the jurisdiction of State Security Courts, she could consult a lawyer only if her detention period was extended by a judge or if a judge ordered her detention in a prison. The applicant signed the report and wrote on it that she had “no requests”.

The applicant was interrogated during her detention at the gendarmerie station, and an eight-page statement was taken from her between 7 and 9 March 2000. In her statement the applicant admitted to having engaged in activities on behalf of the PKK0.

On 9 March 2000 the applicant was examined by a doctor at the Edirne branch of the Forensic Medicine Directorate. According to the medical report drawn up the same day, there were “no injuries or signs of ill-treatment on her body”.

The same day she was brought before the prosecutor and then before the Edirne Magistrates' Court, which ordered her pre-trial detention in prison. In two statements made during meetings with the prosecutor and the judge the applicant admitted to being a member of the PKK.

According to the three statements referred to above, the applicant did not want to be represented by a lawyer during the questioning.

On 3 April 2000 the prosecutor at the Istanbul State Security Court filed an indictment against the applicant with that court for the offence of membership of an illegal organisation, namely the PKK. The prosecutor, referring to the above-mentioned statements made by the applicant, alleged that the applicant had left Turkey in 1996 and had been taken to the PKK's training camp in Lavrion, Greece, where she had received training. Following her training she had obtained a false German passport in order to enter the Netherlands. During her time in Europe she had engaged in activities on behalf of the PKK in Germany and the Netherlands.

Criminal proceedings against the applicant commenced before the Istanbul State Security Court (hereafter “the trial court”). During the proceedings the applicant was represented by a lawyer.

During the first hearing, which was held on 22 June 2000, the applicant rejected the allegations against her and alleged that, before she was brought before the prosecutor and the judge on 9 March 2000, she had been told by the gendarmes that if she did not accept the accusations before the judge and the prosecutor she would be taken back to the gendarmerie station and tortured again. That had been the reason she had accepted the accusations before the prosecutor and the judge. When asked by the trial court what she had to say about the medical report of 9 March 2000 in which it was stated that her body bore no signs of ill-treatment, the applicant replied that the medical report had been prepared before she was beaten up by gendarme officers and threatened with rape. She also alleged that she had been stripped naked by the gendarmes during her detention. The applicant further informed the trial court that the gendarmes had not asked her whether she wanted to be represented by a lawyer during the questioning.

During the second hearing, which was held on 29 August 2000, the applicant submitted a handwritten letter to the trial court. In the letter she alleged, in particular, that while she was being detained in the gendarmerie station she had been insulted by gendarme officers, blindfolded, beaten up and drenched with water. Before being questioned she had been undressed and “they” had touched various parts of her body. Threats of rape and death, directed at her and her mother, had also been made.

The lawyer representing the applicant told the trial court that his client's questioning had been in breach of the applicable procedure and legislation and, as such, the statements taken from her constituted unlawfully obtained evidence which was not admissible in a court of law. Other than the statements taken from his client by the gendarmerie and then by the prosecutor and the judge on 9 March 2000, there was no evidence against her. The lawyer drew the trial court's attention to a Court of Cassation decision according to which confessions not supported by further evidence were not admissible as evidence.

The lawyer further asked the trial court to hear a “cassette of the questioning” of the applicant which had apparently been mentioned in a document drawn up by the gendarmerie. This request was rejected by the trial court which noted that the cassette was not in its possession.

The lawyer also pointed out that there was no mention of his client's name in the statements taken from E.Ş. who, according to the indictment, had helped his client to go to Greece.

On 9 October 2001 the applicant was found guilty as charged and sentenced to twelve years and six months' imprisonment. In convicting the applicant the trial court had regard to the statements taken from her at the gendarmerie station and then by the prosecutor and the judge on 9 March 2000, as well as to the statements made by E.Ş. in the course of his trial in 1998.

The applicant appealed against her conviction and argued, in particular, that the decision of the trial court had not been adequately reasoned. In the grounds of appeal the applicant's lawyer also repeated his earlier defence submissions concerning the allegedly unlawful nature of the evidence used in convicting his client, and referred to various Articles of the Convention.

On 8 July 2002 the Court of Cassation upheld the applicant's conviction.

At the time notice of the application was given to the respondent Government, the Government were requested to submit to the Court a copy of the “cassette of questioning” referred to above (see paragraph 16 above). It appears from the documents submitted to the Court by the applicant that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs requested the Ministry of Justice to obtain the cassette so that it could be submitted to the Court. The gendarmerie, who were requested by the domestic judicial authorities to produce the cassette, stated in their letter of 21 May 2008 that they had “no records of the cassette being handed over to the Edirne prosecutor”.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e1
001-95203_a2_em1
CODE
DIRECT
7070/03
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-95203_a2_e2
001-95203_a2_em2
ORG
NO_MASK
Republic of Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e3
001-95203_a2_em3
DEM
QUASI
Turkish
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e4
001-95203_a2_em4
PERSON
DIRECT
Ms Burcu Ballıktaş
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e5
001-95203_a2_em5
DATETIME
QUASI
3 January 2003
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e6
001-95203_a2_em6
PERSON
QUASI
Mr Ercan Kanar
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e7
001-95203_a2_em7
LOC
QUASI
Istanbul
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e2
001-95203_a2_em8
ORG
NO_MASK
001-95203_a2_em2
Turkish Government
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e8
001-95203_a2_em9
DATETIME
QUASI
29 November 2007
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e9
001-95203_a2_em10
DATETIME
QUASI
1978
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e10
001-95203_a2_em11
LOC
QUASI
Ankara
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e11
001-95203_a2_em12
DATETIME
QUASI
6 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-95203_a2_e12
001-95203_a2_em13
MISC
QUASI
the border city
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e13
001-95203_a2_em14
LOC
QUASI
Edirne
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e14
001-95203_a2_em15
LOC
QUASI
Bulgaria
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e15
001-95203_a2_em16
ORG
NO_MASK
State Security Courts
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-95203_a2_e16
001-95203_a2_em17
QUANTITY
QUASI
eight-page statement
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e17
001-95203_a2_em18
DATETIME
QUASI
7 and 9 March 2000
POLITICS
insert
001-95203_a2_e18
001-95203_a2_em19
ORG
QUASI
PKK0
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e19
001-95203_a2_em20
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e13
001-95203_a2_em21
LOC
QUASI
Edirne
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e20
001-95203_a2_em22
ORG
NO_MASK
Forensic Medicine Directorate
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e21
001-95203_a2_em23
ORG
NO_MASK
Edirne Magistrates' Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-95203_a2_e22
001-95203_a2_em24
QUANTITY
QUASI
two statements
POLITICS
check
001-95203_a2_e23
001-95203_a2_em25
ORG
QUASI
PKK
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-95203_a2_e24
001-95203_a2_em26
QUANTITY
QUASI
three statements
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e25
001-95203_a2_em27
DATETIME
QUASI
3 April 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e26
001-95203_a2_em28
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court
POLITICS
check
001-95203_a2_e23
001-95203_a2_em29
ORG
QUASI
PKK
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e27
001-95203_a2_em30
ORG
QUASI
Turkey
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e28
001-95203_a2_em31
DATETIME
QUASI
1996
POLITICS
check
001-95203_a2_e23
001-95203_a2_em32
ORG
QUASI
PKK
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e29
001-95203_a2_em33
LOC
QUASI
Lavrion, Greece
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e30
001-95203_a2_em34
DEM
QUASI
German
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-95203_a2_e31
001-95203_a2_em35
LOC
QUASI
Netherlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e32
001-95203_a2_em36
LOC
QUASI
Europe
POLITICS
check
001-95203_a2_e23
001-95203_a2_em37
ORG
QUASI
PKK
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e33
001-95203_a2_em38
LOC
QUASI
Germany
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e31
001-95203_a2_em39
LOC
QUASI
Netherlands
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e26
001-95203_a2_em40
ORG
QUASI
Istanbul State Security Court
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e34
001-95203_a2_em41
DATETIME
QUASI
22 June 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e19
001-95203_a2_em42
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e19
001-95203_a2_em43
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e35
001-95203_a2_em44
DATETIME
QUASI
29 August 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e19
001-95203_a2_em45
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e36
001-95203_a2_em46
ORG
QUASI
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
correct
001-95203_a2_e37
001-95203_a2_em47
PERSON
QUASI
E.Ş.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e38
001-95203_a2_em48
ORG
QUASI
Greece
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e39
001-95203_a2_em49
DATETIME
QUASI
9 October 2001
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
insert
001-95203_a2_e40
001-95203_a2_em50
DATETIME
QUASI
twelve years and six months
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e19
001-95203_a2_em51
DATETIME
QUASI
9 March 2000
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e37
001-95203_a2_em52
PERSON
QUASI
E.Ş.
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e41
001-95203_a2_em53
DATETIME
QUASI
1998
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e42
001-95203_a2_em54
DATETIME
QUASI
8 July 2002
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e36
001-95203_a2_em55
ORG
QUASI
Court of Cassation
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e43
001-95203_a2_em56
DATETIME
QUASI
21 May 2008
NOT_CONFIDENTIAL
check
001-95203_a2_e13
001-95203_a2_em57
LOC
QUASI
Edirne
Burcu Ballıktaş
TUR
CHAMBER
Task: Annotate the document to anonymise the following person: Burcu Ballıktaş