 










Conservatives Still Love Their Hitler-Loving Candidate






































































 

























Intelligencer
The Cut
Vulture
The Strategist




Curbed
Grub Street


Magazine


Subscribe to the Magazine
Give a Gift Subscription
Buy Back Issues
Current Issue Contents
New York Shop







Subscribe
Sign In


Account





Profile





Sign Out











 










Menu



Menu





Close



Close








Politics


Business


Technology


Ideas






About Intelligencer


Newsletters


New York App






Like Us



Follow Us




NYMag.com
New York Magazine
Intelligencer
Vulture
The Cut
The Strategist
Grub Street
Curbed




















Search


Search




Close












Subscribe
Give A Gift












Menu



Menu





Close



Close








Politics


Business


Technology


Ideas






About Intelligencer


Newsletters


New York App






Like Us



Follow Us




NYMag.com
New York Magazine
Intelligencer
Vulture
The Cut
The Strategist
Grub Street
Curbed




























Leave a Comment












Search


Search




Close

















 Things you buy through our links may earn Vox Media a commission.

 





 






Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer; Photo: Getty Images





the national interest

Oct. 24, 2024



Conservatives Still Love Their Hitler-Loving Candidate
The right’s response to Hitlergate is to give Trump’s authoritarianism advance permission.


By 
Jonathan Chait,
          who’s been a New York political columnist since 2011. 
He writes the newsletter &c.







Photo-Illustration: Intelligencer; Photo: Getty Images






Nearly half of the Cabinet-level officials who served in Donald Trump’s first term have refused to endorse his reelection. Many have spoken out against him, at deep personal and political risk. Their descriptions all revolve around familiar themes: Trump is unfit to lead a democratic government; he either cannot understand or simply refuses to accept distinctions between his personal interests and those of the state; he admires dictators and wishes to emulate their methods.
Kamala Harris, like Joe Biden, Barack Obama, George W. Bush, and almost every president in history, has had zero high-level officials from her Cabinet describe her as fascistic or otherwise fundamentally unfit for high office. The number of Trump officials who have made this claim about him is extraordinary.
Conservatives have largely ignored or dismissed these warnings. The recent flare-up over revelations by former chief of staff John Kelly that Trump repeatedly expressed a desire for his generals to display the level of fealty that Trump believed was given by Adolf Hitler’s forced them to acknowledge the issue. The responses they’ve offered have been revealing.
The reactions I’m collecting here are representative of the conservative movement’s impulse to dismiss or deflect from the overwhelming evidence that Trump is considered dangerous by many officials he appointed to office.
Conservative talk-radio personality Erick Erickson waves away warnings about Trump on the grounds that some liberals have made claims about other figures that Erickson disagrees with:

Y’all, it’s not that I believe or don’t believe John Kelly.  It’s that I don’t care.  Democrats have been calling Republicans “Hitler” since Reagan.  The Democrats are as authoritarian as Trump, but he never threw a grandmother in prison for praying at an abortion clinic.— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) October 24, 2024



Donald Trump is a fascist say the people who believe this nation was conceived in slavery and is systemically racist and a force for evil.— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) October 24, 2024


Of course, what makes the new claims about Trump distinctive is that they come from Republicans who have not made similar statements about Reagan or systemic racism. But this is a useful way to categorize criticism of Trump as coming from the opposing side and therefore not requiring substantive rebuttal.
Daniel McCarthy, a columnist at The Spectator, argues that fascism is not refusing to accept the legitimacy of election defeat or defining political opposition as inherently criminal but is defined by “war” (which must refer to aiding Ukraine, as the United States is not at war), affirmative action, and the activities of left-wing demonstrators in 2020 that were not connected to Harris or the Democratic Party:

The Democratic Party today stands for war, prosecution of political opponents, racial preferences, and mob intimidation of voters (but not congressmen—the powerful must be protected). You don’t have to like Trump, but if you’re worried about fascism you can’t support Harris.— Daniel McCarthy (@ToryAnarchist) October 24, 2024


This is close to endorsing Trump’s view that “fascism” is a major force in American politics, and it definitionally excludes any activities by Trump or his allies, such as a violent attempt to seize power, and includes all positions he opposes.
Ben Shapiro responds by recounting at length a recent mugging attempt against a friend of his, from which he concludes, “This is why people increasingly don’t give a shit about the media’s latest horror story about Trump Saying Bad Things™.”

You want to know why nobody cares about the Left-wing media's latest oppo dump? The answer is obvious: people care about the quality of their lives. And life is getting worse under Democratic governance.Here's just a quick story.We're in LA this week. So we decided to go out…— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) October 23, 2024


While Shapiro’s anecdote is lengthier than the justifications supplied by other conservatives, it has resemblance to an actual argument about Trump’s authoritarian tendencies. He appears to be suggesting that the continued existence of street crime (which not only existed under Trump but was at far higher levels) is a thing conservatives can focus on to avoid the mental work of formulating any justification for Trump’s unfitness for office.
David Harsanyi, writing in the Washington Examiner, argues that Kelly is unreliable and likely to lie because he believes Trump is authoritarian:
“Anyway, journalistically, it doesn’t really matter if Kelly said he was an anonymous source in Goldberg’s story. No other person has verified his claims. Kelly detests Trump. He said the man is an authoritarian sociopath. He may well rationalize lying as a means of saving the country, which is standard behavior.”
James Antle, another Examiner columnist, similarly argues that the existence of Republicans who consider Trump a dangerous authoritarian is evidence that they are plotting to steal the election. “A bipartisan establishment full-court press, with Harris enlisting everyone from Kelly to Liz Cheney, against Trump appears to confirm what many of his supporters already believe. Why, they ask, wouldn’t the deep state rig the election against the second coming of Hitler?”
The reasoning here is that anybody who believes Trump is authoritarian has a sufficient motive to lie about him to prevent his election, which makes any testimony they offer about his authoritarianism inherently suspect. This syllogism does offer a useful way to discard massive amounts of damning testimony against Trump. It does, however, elide the rather obvious question of why Kelly and so many other Trump veterans arrived at their belief that he is a dangerous authoritarian in the first place.
John David Danielson, writing in the Federalist, calls Kelly’s comments a “smear” without offering a substantive defense. He argues that the existence of articles reporting on the concerns of former Trump officials like Kelly is itself evidence for the danger posed by liberals. “This is why, after the first assassination attempt back in July, many of us called for a cooling of the rhetoric coming from the left,” he writes. (Note that Danielson does not advocate cooling of rhetoric on all sides. The right is very much welcome to indulge in the most heated kind of rhetoric.) This is in keeping a favored mantra by his Federalist colleague Mollie Hemingway that any discussion of Trump’s authoritarian tendencies is “assassination prep.”
Danielson predicts that Harris will encourage “resistance” in “coded terms” disguised as endorsements of peaceful protest:
She’s going to call for resistance. “Patriotic resistance,” she might call it, but it will be coded as a call for street violence or worse. After all, you don’t just accept a Hitler-like, fascist regime. You fight it any way you can.
This argument lays the groundwork for defining criticism of Trump, even the kind that explicitly calls for peaceful action, as violent and dangerous. This runs close to Trump’s own view, which was a source of his conflicts with Kelly and other staff, centering on Trump’s desire to use military force against a wide array of domestic opposition.
Most conservatives do not directly advocate these iron-fisted measures. Instead, they deflect. But when they deflect, they are revealing in advance that they have no intention of objecting seriously to any authoritarian moves Trump might make. They have decided he is on their team. The justifications they offer in reaction to undeniable evidence of his authoritarian ambitions is a preview of how they will act if and when the real thing occurs.





Sign up for &c.
Irregular musings from the center left.




Email










          This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
          Privacy Policy and
          Terms of Service apply.
        
Vox Media, LLC Terms and Privacy Notice
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email correspondence from us.





Tags:


remove interruptions


politics


the national interest


donald trump


john kelly


authoritarianism

More








Show 


Leave a Comment


Conservatives Still Love Their Hitler-Loving Candidate






 Things you buy through our links may earn Vox Media a commission.












Most Viewed Stories





Wokeness Is Not to Blame for Trump






The Sneaky Ways Parents Transfer Money to Their Adult Children






Meghan Markle Gives Lifestyle Brand New, Still Bad Name






People With Parents With Money






When Will the Declassified JFK Files Be Released Publicly?








Wokeness Is Not to Blame for Trump






The Sneaky Ways Parents Transfer Money to Their Adult Children






Meghan Markle Gives Lifestyle Brand New, Still Bad Name






When Will the Declassified JFK Files Be Released Publicly?






People With Parents With Money
















Editor’s Picks








spring fashion

Buy All This, Look Rich
Buy All This, Look Rich










tablets and smartwatches

This Case Turns My Apple Watch Into an iPod
This Case Turns My Apple Watch Into an iPod










trendlet

How Cinnamon Rolls Became the Anti-Croissant
How Cinnamon Rolls Became the Anti-Croissant









 
Sign In to Comment





THE FEED






3:58 p.m.
we'll do it live



       


we'll do it live
Adams, DOJ Defend Dropped Charges In Court: Live Updates

By Intelligencer Staff

A federal judge ordered the mayor and Justice Department officials to appear in court Wednesday  to explain their dismissal motion for the record.





2:43 p.m.
nyc



       


nyc
Trump Is Officially Trying to Kill NYC’s Congestion Pricing

By Matt Stieb

The Trump administration called the toll to drive into lower Manhattan a “slap in the face to working class Americans.”





1:11 p.m.
early and often



       


early and often
Trump Blows Up Senate Budget Bill at the Last Minute

By Ed Kilgore

Presumably, House Republicans will now take the lead on enacting Trump’s agenda — but he’s also made their job a lot harder.








Most Popular





Wokeness Is Not to Blame for Trump


By Rebecca Traister






The Sneaky Ways Parents Transfer Money to Their Adult Children


By Katie Arnold-Ratliff






Meghan Markle Gives Lifestyle Brand New, Still Bad Name


By Margaret Hartmann






People With Parents With Money


By Paula Aceves and Julia Edelstein






When Will the Declassified JFK Files Be Released Publicly?


By Matt Stieb








Wokeness Is Not to Blame for Trump


By Rebecca Traister






The Sneaky Ways Parents Transfer Money to Their Adult Children


By Katie Arnold-Ratliff






Meghan Markle Gives Lifestyle Brand New, Still Bad Name


By Margaret Hartmann






When Will the Declassified JFK Files Be Released Publicly?


By Matt Stieb






People With Parents With Money


By Paula Aceves and Julia Edelstein








12:27 p.m.
doge fail compilation



       


doge fail compilation
Elon Musk’s DOGE Keeps Accidentally Firing Very Important People

By Matt Stieb

Like the government experts responsible for stopping the spread of bird flu and keeping America’s nuclear stockpile safe.





9:41 a.m.
early and often



       


early and often
Trump Cabinet: Hearings Schedule & Who’s Confirmed

By Margaret Hartmann and Chas Danner

The Senate has approved Trump’s most controversial picks, including Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. Here’s the full list and hearings schedule.





6:00 a.m.
games



       


games
The Luka Trade Finally Ended the NBA’s LeBron Era

By Will Leitch

And other miscellaneous thoughts on a transitional but excellent season.





5:00 a.m.
early and often



       


early and often
We’ll Soon Find Out How Much Permanent Damage Trump Can Do

By Ross Barkan

Executive actions are one thing, but what Congress does next will determine the scope of the president’s slash-and-burn legacy.





2/18/2025
early and often



       


early and often
Elon Musk and GOP Pretend No One Is Responsible for DOGE Chaos

By Ed Kilgore

Republicans in Congress have no control over DOGE, and now the White House denies Elon Musk is running it. Convenient!





2/18/2025
royal rumblings



       


royal rumblings
Meghan Markle Gives Lifestyle Brand New, Still Bad Name

By Margaret Hartmann

The Duchess is relaunching herself as a modern-day Martha Stewart, without the business acumen.





2/18/2025
conspiracy



       


conspiracy
When Will the Declassified JFK Files Be Released Publicly?

By Matt Stieb

The president has ordered their disclosure with a timeline that suggests it might actually happen this time.





2/18/2025
early and often



       


early and often
All the Drama Around the Trump Movie The Apprentice

By Margaret Hartmann

From Donald Trump’s legal threats to the Ivana rape scene, the biopic has long been mired in controversy. And now it has two Oscars nominations.





2/18/2025
the body politic



       


the body politic
Wokeness Is Not to Blame for Trump

By Rebecca Traister

How a misdiagnosis of the 2024 election has calcified into self-defeating conventional wisdom.







2/17/2025
politics



       


politics
Trump and Musk’s Government Purge Is Intensifying: Updates

By Intelligencer Staff

Scores of federal workers are getting axed, endangering many government services, and Trump has now literally declared himself above the law.





2/17/2025
screen time



       


screen time
Is Google Eating Reddit?

By John Herrman

The Google-Reddit partnership has definitely been mutually beneficial, but it’s also showing signs of strain.





2/17/2025
the law



       


the law
The Justice Department’s Existential Crisis Is Self-Inflicted

By Elie Honig

Trump’s DOJ didn’t just bungle the Eric Adams case, it foolishly forfeited its credibility and institutional independence.





2/16/2025
early and often



       


early and often
6 Big Problems Congressional Republicans Need to Solve

By Ed Kilgore

From how many budget bills to adopt, to which toxic cuts to make, to what to do about DOGE, Johnson and Thune face a political minefield.





2/16/2025
media



       


media
Upending Language: The Times and Its Trump Verb of Choice

By Justin Davidson

As the paper tries to find measured phrasing to describe his seizure of power, it goes for the same word over and over.





2/15/2025
the city politic



       


the city politic
How New York’s Black Leaders Are Trying to Move Past Eric Adams

By Errol Louis

The mayor has become a national embarrassment, and the city’s Black political leaders are working to line up candidates to defeat him.





2/15/2025
conspiracy theories



       


conspiracy theories
Barack and Michelle Obama Quash Divorce Rumors via Subtweet

By Margaret Hartmann

The former First Couple made it clear they are still very much in love … or very committed to needlessly lying about their relationship status!





2/15/2025
early and often



       


early and often
DOGE Is About Ideology and Mindless Budget Cutting, Not Efficiency

By Ed Kilgore

For all the whiz-bang rhetoric, DOGE reflects an ancient right-wing belief that even good government is wasteful and its beneficiaries are parasites.





2/15/2025
just asking questions



       


just asking questions
The Adams Quid Pro Quo Is Unlike Anything Since Watergate

By Nia Prater

Former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance says this week’s drama is shocking in a different, possibly more disturbing way than the Nixon scandal.







2/15/2025
politics



       


politics
How the Fringe Captured the Right

By Sarah Jones

Long before RFK Jr., or even COVID, a movement was born to undermine public health.





2/14/2025
the city politic



       


the city politic
Kathy Hochul’s Enormous Decision Over Eric Adams

By Ross Barkan

Will she ditch the city’s incredibly beleaguered mayor?





2/14/2025
scandals



       


scandals
Trump’s Friendship With Jeffrey Epstein: Everything We Know

By Margaret Hartmann

Several GOP senators called on President Trump to release the Epstein files, even if he’s in them. Here’s what we know about their friendship.





2/14/2025
politics



       


politics
Trump’s Immigration Czar Parades Eric Adams on Fox News

By Nia Prater

The mayor cozied up to Tom Homan amid emerging allegations of a quid pro quo with the Trump administration over his bribery case.


























 










Like Us



Follow Us



Follow Us




About Intelligencer


About New York Magazine


Newsletters


Help


Contact


Press


Media Kit


We’re Hiring


Privacy


Terms


Ad Choices


Accessibility



Do not sell or share my personal data








intelligencer is a Vox Media Network.
 © 2025 Vox Media, LLC. All rights reserved. 



 





 






Cruelty is the point.

The base doesn’t seem to mind sharing a team with the KKK, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, Three Percenters, American Identity Movement (formerly Project Evropa), Aryan Nations, Vanguard America, Nationalist Socialist Movement, The Base, League of the South, and other white supremacy organizations and gangs. 

Aligning with these groups is a means to an end.