




 





















Tucker Carlson’s Weird Spanking Fantasy Is Designed to Stir Up MAGA Misogyny | The Nation



























































 


























































 









Log In











Email *





Password *










Remember Me





							
								Forgot Your Password?							
							










Log In






New to The Nation? SubscribePrint subscriber? Activate your online access









 







Skip to content
Skip to footer

















                    Tucker Carlson’s Weird Spanking Fantasy Is Designed to Stir Up MAGA Misogyny
                



Magazine


Newsletters



















 


Subscribe


Log In



















Search


















Subscribe


Donate


Magazine


Latest


Archive


Podcasts


Newsletters





Sections



Politics


World


Economy


Culture


Books & the Arts



The Nation



About


Events


Contact Us


Advertise





Current Issue



















 














 


 








Society


 / 
October 25, 2024


Tucker Carlson’s Weird Spanking Fantasy Is Designed to Stir Up MAGA Misogyny
By extolling Trump as “Daddy” meting out corporal punishment, the disgraced TV host is pitching authoritarian patriarchy.



Jeet Heer 


Share


Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email


 







Ad Policy

Who’s the daddy? Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.(Tom Williams / CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

The two remarkable facts about Tucker Carlson are that he lost a high-profile TV post by being too racist even for Fox News—and that he has been rehabilitated by the Trump campaign. In 2023, as a result of a lawsuit launched by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News for lying about the 2020 election, the network’s executives saw a memo that Carlson wrote to his producer where the cable news star exulted in Trump supporters’ beating up a protester. Carlson enthused: “A group of Trump guys surrounded an Antifa kid and started pounding the living shit out of him. It was three against one, at least. Jumping a guy like that is dishonorable obviously. It’s not how white men fight.” Carlson, already under fire for repeatedly employing white nationalists and for echoing neo-Nazi ideas such as the “Great Replacement” theory on his show, now had his fingerprints on a smoking gun: It was clearly racist to equate honorable fighting with white men. Fox, as part of its house cleaning to salvage the network’s reputation after the fiasco of its libelous attacks on Dominion Voting Systems, pushed Carlson out the door.

Post-Fox, Carlson remade himself as a social-media provocateur—one who is even more openly bigoted. Last month, he hosted a lengthy interview with Darryl Cooper, an amateur historian and Holocaust revisionist. The New York Times reported that on Carlson’s show, Cooper “proceeded to make a variety of false claims about the Holocaust and World War II, including that millions of people in concentration camps ‘ended up dead’ merely because the Nazis did not have enough resources to care for them, rather than as a result of the intentional genocide that it was.”
In the pre-Trump era, someone like Carlson who was so intimately linked to not just racism but even Nazi apologia would be regarded as radioactive for any mainstream political campaign. But the Trump campaign, in keeping with its strategy of outreach to cranky constituencies neglected by mainstream Republicans, has repeatedly used Carlson as an honored surrogate.
On Wednesday, Carlson was warming up the audience at a Trump rally in Duluth, Georgia. In his praise of Trump, Carlson broke new rhetorical ground by celebrating the former president as a stern “daddy” who would inflict physical punishment on childish Democrats.
Working himself up to a lather and often laughing manically, Carlson conjured up a lurid vision of America as a dysfunctional family under the Democrats. Carlson’s bizarre speech deserves to be quoted at length.


                    Current Issue
            





            March 2025 Issue
        


The situation, Carlson said, “is very familiar to anyone who has children, which is if you allow it, you will encourage more of it. If you allow people to get away with things that are completely over the top and outrageous. If you allow your 2-year-old to smear the contents of his diapers on the wall of your living room and you do nothing about it, if you allow your 14-year-old to light a joint at the breakfast table, if you allow your hormone addled 15-year-old daughter to slam the door of her bedroom and give you the finger, you’re going to get more of it. Those kids are going to wind up in rehab. It’s not good for you. It’s not good for them. No, there has to be a point at which Dad comes home. Yeah, that’s right, Dad comes home—and he’s pissed! Dad is pissed. He’s not vengeful. He loves his children—disobedient as they may be—he loves them because they’re his children. They live in his house. But he’s very disappointed in their behavior.…
“You know what he says? ‘You’ve been a bad girl, you’ve been a bad little girl, and you’re getting a vigorous spanking right now…. And no, it’s not going to hurt me more than it hurts you. No, it’s not. I’m not going to lie. This is going to hurt you a lot more than it hurts me. And you earned this. You’re getting a vigorous spanking because you’ve been a bad girl.’”
The image of Donald Trump inflicting a “vigorous spanking” on a 15-year-old girl is disturbing by itself—and becomes even more so when one remembers Trump’s long record as a sexual harasser. Trump once boasted about walking into a changing room filled with teenage beauty pageant contestants. Trump has been accused of sexual assault by more than 20 women, and a court found him guilty of abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll.
Given Trump’s history, Carlson’s attempt to recast the GOP presidential nominee as a stern but just patriarch seems both absurd and politically self-defeating. One is almost tempted to advise Carlson to give up political speeches and seek a therapist for his unresolved “daddy” issues.




The Nation Weekly

Fridays. A weekly digest of the best of our coverage.




Email






By signing up, you confirm that you are over the age of 16 and agree to receive occasional promotional offers for programs that support The Nation’s journalism. You may unsubscribe or adjust your preferences at any time. You can read our Privacy Policy here.




Sign Up






But Carlson’s speech, however delusional, is a product of cold political calculation as much as personal pathology. Trump is running for the second time against a female candidate, one who has energized women enraged by the ending of reproductive freedom by Supreme Court justices Trump appointed.
Trump is facing what is shaping up to be the largest gender gap in American presidential history. According to USA Today, Trump is “leading among men 53% to 37%. Vice President Kamala Harris’ lead with women is 53% to 36%.” The problem for Trump is that women vote at a higher rate than men: In early voting in six states (Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Michigan, North Carolina, and Virginia), women make up at least 54 percent of the electorate. This is an excellent sign for Harris.
The Trump campaign has responding by doubling down on patriarchy as a way to mobilize low-propensity male voters (and perhaps traditionalist women). This is the logic behind Trump’s references to himself as the “protector” of women, as well as Carlson’s spanking-daddy rhetoric.
In her thoughtful new book. Wild Faith, the journalist Talia Lavin notes that the culture of evangelical Protestants encourages the corporal punishment of children as a necessary part of the social order. In 1970, evangelical child psychologist James Dobson (who would go on to found Focus on the Family) argued in his book Dare to Discipline, “The parent’s relationship with his child should be modeled after God’s relationship with man. This same love leads the benevolent father to guide, correct, and even bring some pain to the child when it is necessary for his eventual good.”


Ad Policy







Lavin reports that the influence of Dobson and many other influential evangelicals of his ilk have

made corporal punishment of children not just permissible but nearly mandatory within church communities. Their relentless pursuit of obedience in children created a culture across evangelical denominations that made the beating of children with rods and hands a daily ritual; the theological framework they provided made it seem like a mortal sin to refrain from doing so; and they preached to congregations that took sin very seriously indeed.




Popular
“swipe left below to view more authors”Swipe →






Why Democrats Won’t Throw a Real Punch

                Why Democrats Won’t Throw a Real Punch
            


Dave Zirin 







How Do You Solve a Problem Like Eric Adams?

                How Do You Solve a Problem Like Eric Adams?
            


Elie Mystal 







Donald Trump’s Next Diversity Target: People With Disabilities

                Donald Trump’s Next Diversity Target: People With Disabilities
            


Sam Gustin 







If Trump Crushes Federal Workers, We’re All Next

                If Trump Crushes Federal Workers, We’re All Next
            


Eric Blanc 






This is the audience Carlson is hoping to mobilize with his talk of Daddy Trump punishing the errant children of America. But Carlson’s rhetoric surely risks a backlash of biblical proportions. It’s unlikely that most American women want to be treated like misbehaving children deserving a thrashing. In fact, like JD Vance’s grumblings about childless cat ladies, Carlson will likely seem weird to mainstream America. The best hope for the Democrats is that Carlson’s creepy fantasies intensify opposition to Trump’s third presidential bid.




Keep Reading







                Submit a correction
            



                Send a letter to the editor
            



                Reprints & permissions
            






Jeet Heer







Jeet Heer is a national affairs correspondent for The Nation and host of the weekly Nation podcast, The Time of Monsters. He also pens the monthly column “Morbid Symptoms.” The author of In Love with Art: Francoise Mouly’s Adventures in Comics with Art Spiegelman (2013) and Sweet Lechery: Reviews, Essays and Profiles (2014), Heer has written for numerous publications, including The New Yorker, The Paris Review, Virginia Quarterly Review, The American Prospect, The Guardian, The New Republic, and The Boston Globe.















More from The Nation







Javier Milei’s Crypto Scandal Is Part of a Larger Network of Grift and Graft

                Javier Milei’s Crypto Scandal Is Part of a Larger Network of Grift and Graft
            

The Argentinian president faces impeachment charges for endorsing a crypto rug pull, via the same network that apparently launched Melania Trump’s memecoin.

Jacob Silverman 








The “Teenage Dream” in an Era of Isolation

                The “Teenage Dream” in an Era of Isolation
            


Curfew restrictions and the policing of public spaces prevent teens from “getting into trouble.” But to some, it feels like it’s preventing them from getting anywhere at all.


StudentNation

                            /
                        
Aina Marzia 








Donald Trump’s Next Diversity Target: People With Disabilities

                Donald Trump’s Next Diversity Target: People With Disabilities
            


The president’s disdain for disabled people—and obsession with genetic superiority—harks back to a grim past.


Sam Gustin 








Trump’s Guantánamo Plan Will Be a Costly, Morally Bankrupt Fiasco

                Trump’s Guantánamo Plan Will Be a Costly, Morally Bankrupt Fiasco
            


The US government has begun to shuttle immigrants from the United States to Gitmo, post photos of them in shackles, and lock them away.


Jeffrey S. Kahn 








What Harm Reduction Really Looks Like

                What Harm Reduction Really Looks Like
            


Harm reduction advocates are implementing solidarity-based strategies for curbing drug overdoses in Minneapolis.


Photo Essay

                            /
                        
Tim Evans 








Will Academia Survive the Criminalization of Dissent?

                Will Academia Survive the Criminalization of Dissent?
            


Professors are experiencing an overwhelming sense of fear and disillusionment amid the crackdown of pro-Palestine protests. “I don’t know anybody who’s not scared right now.”


StudentNation

                            /
                        
Lucy Tobier 




















Sections


Politics


World


Economy


Culture


Books & the Arts


OppArt


Poetry


Letters




Magazine


Current Issue


Masthead


Archive


Subscription Services


Reprints




More


About Us


Contact Us


Advertise


Nation Events


Nation Shop


Nation Travels


Nation Podcasts


Newsletters




Follow


Facebook


Twitter


Instagram


YouTube


RSS





Founded by abolitionists in 1865, The Nation has long believed that independent journalism has the capacity to bring about a more democratic and equitable world.
Donate




Privacy Policy


Terms of Use


Accessibility Statement


Help


Careers


Nation Fund


Privacy Manager












 










x










Latest from the nation


Today 10:52 amArmed Conflicts
What’s Next for Syrian Refugees?
Helen Benedict


Today 8:30 am
5 Stages of GOP
Peter Kuper


Today 8:24 am
How Do You Solve a Problem Like Eric Adams?
Elie Mystal


Today 5:30 am
How to Organize Our Way Out of the Trump-Musk Putsch
Ezra Levin and Leah Greenberg


Today 5:30 am
A New International Campaign Rises in Ukraine
Mary Kaldor and Luke Cooper




editor's picks





VIDEO: People in Denmark Are a Lot Happier Than People in the United States. Here’s Why.
The Nation





Historical Amnesia About Slavery Is a Tool of White Supremacy
Mychal Denzel Smith










































The guy has three daughters 🤮