











































Is the GOP strategy to use old talking points to demonize abortion working?


































Skip to content
Skip to search




























































































































































































































































Republish This Story
Close


* Please read before republishing *
We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.
To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].
— The Editors








Loading...

          

Copy HTML





Modal Gallery
Close






 / 



























Sign up for our newsletter



Menu


Topics


Abortion
Politics
Education
LGBTQ+
Caregiving
Environment & Climate
Business & Economy


View all topics




The 19th News(letter)
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.



You have been subscribed!



Email


Subscribe








I agree to
the terms




Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.









Submitting...


Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.


This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].






Latest Stories


Our Mission


Our Team


Ways to Give


Search


Contact













































 








Search






Open Menu





      Donate
    





Home








We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.



Topics


Abortion
Politics
Education
LGBTQ+
Caregiving
Environment & Climate
Business & Economy


View all topics





The 19th News(letter)
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.



You have been subscribed!



Email


Subscribe








I agree to
the terms




Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.









Submitting...


Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.


This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].








Latest Stories


Our Mission


Our Team


Ways to Give


Search


Contact













































 



We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.






19th News Fellowships
HBCU alums, become a fellow in our newsroom.



        Apply Today
      



Sign up for our newsletter













The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.














      Election 2024
    

        Republicans are using old talking points to demonize abortion — but are they landing?      
Despite reviving "vintage" ideas on abortion, GOP candidates are struggling to sway voters as support for access grows.







Former President Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Reading, Pennsylvania in October 2024.
(Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post/Getty Images)












Shefali Luthra
 Reproductive Health Reporter 




 

Published

 

2024-10-18 10:27
10:27
October 18, 2024
am



Republish this story








Share



Bluesky







Facebook







Email









Republish this story








Your trusted source for contextualizing abortion and Election 2024 news. Sign up for our daily newsletter.
Confronted with polling that shows access to abortion remains a key issue for voters, anti-abortion activists and GOP leaders are making a final pre-Election Day push to paint Democratic nominee Kamala Harris as an extremist on the issue, and abortion as unsafe. 
The emphasis offers a preview of how a Republican administration headed by Donald Trump and JD Vance could further crack down on abortion rights, by moving to limit access to abortion medications or pushing for nationwide restrictions on the procedure for people later in pregnancy.




The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.








But more than two years after the undoing of Roe v. Wade, the push to demonize abortion — which involves reviving old talking points about banning “late-term abortion” and “abortion after birth” — may no longer be landing. 
“We’re seeing a shift in people not wanting restrictions on abortion at all, including later abortion, and that is brand new,” said Tresa Undem, a public opinion researcher and partner and co-founder at the firm PerryUndem. “They can go out talking about later abortion, but it’s not as effective as it used to be because people are hearing stories about why it’s needed.”
Trump himself has attempted to rebrand his position on abortion, claiming that if elected, he would veto any proposed national ban on the procedure. But he’s continued to muddy his own position, first saying in a recent Fox News interview that an abortion ban is “off the table,” but then adding later in the conversation that “we’ll see what happens.”
Meanwhile, Vance has said that if elected, a Republican administration would cut Planned Parenthood out of federal funding programs, arguing that “taxpayers shouldn’t fund late-term abortions.” In a recent Fox News interview, Vance declined to answer whether he would support a 15- or 20-week ban on abortion, instead saying that “it’s reasonable to say late-term abortions are barbaric.”



                            Explore more coverage from The 19th
                    

                In-depth reporting on topics you care about
            

 Abortion 
 Politics 
 Education 
 LGBTQ+ 
 Caregiving 


View all topics



“Late-term abortion” has no medical meaning and most abortions take place in the first trimester of pregnancy. Though Planned Parenthood receives federal funding through the Title X program, which supports affordable contraception for low-income Americans, it is already legally prohibited from using that money or any other federal dollars to pay for abortion. (The vast majority of abortions in the United States happen in the first trimester; those that take place later typically involve medical complications uncovered later in pregnancy, or happen because the pregnant patient has faced financial and logistical barriers that delayed them getting an abortion.)
These vintage talking points about “defunding Planned Parenthood,” which predate Roe’s overturn, represent an effort by the GOP ticket and its allies to backtrack — at least rhetorically — from unpopular stances such as banning abortion nationally. But those arguments may be less effective given the growing popularity of abortion rights.
“Most Americans are in favor of allowing access to abortion at least in most cases. Americans have even grown slightly more accepting of abortion in the past few years,” said Mallory Newall, vice president of public polling for Ipsos Public Affairs, which has extensively polled on the issue. “What you’re seeing on the talking points from Republicans at large is trying to throw a little bit of red meat at their base. But it’s a hard tightrope to walk, because it’s still out of steps with where the public is.”
Still, abortion opponents have been focusing on states that could tip the election and control of the U.S. Senate, as well as those where voters could weigh in directly on abortion. 
The anti-abortion group Students for Life has organized door-knocking events in Florida and Missouri, which both have abortion rights measures on their November ballots, arguing that the measures would allow abortion throughout pregnancy. (They would actually allow for restrictions after fetal viability, typically around 23 to 25 weeks.) 
A political action committee associated with SBA Pro-Life America, an influential anti-abortion group, is spending $2 million on a digital ad campaign targeting Harris, who has said she supports passing a federal law that codifies Roe’s protections. The ads target voters in Georgia, North Carolina, Montana, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Ohio, and they claim that Harris, too, would support abortion throughout pregnancy — even though the framework she supports would also allow for restrictions after fetal viability. 
The same campaign characterized medication abortion, the two-pill regimen that accounts for most abortions done in the country, as dangerous, even though the drugs involved — mifepristone and misoprostol — have an incredibly low risk of complication and are largely safe and effective. 
That’s an argument the organization has made before. In September, the PAC aired another Georgia-focused set of digital and televised ads blaming doctors and medication for the deaths of two women in the state. The state’s maternal mortality review committee and other experts attributed those deaths, first reported by ProPublica, to the state’s six-week abortion ban. 
Though that law has exceptions for medical emergencies, doctors have repeatedly said they are exceptionally difficult to use in practice, adding that the law’s narrow wording has forced them to delay care for patients. In these cases, the law resulted in delayed follow-up care for one woman, Amber Thurman, when she developed rare side-effects after her medication abortion; the other woman, Candi Miller, did not receive follow-up care because she feared criminal punishment for getting an abortion. 
Since Roe’s fall, abortion opponents have sought to argue that the pills used in medication abortion, the method used in the vast majority of pregnancy terminations in the country, are unsafe and should be taken off the market, or at the very least be put under heavy new regulations. 
The argument, the substance of a case dismissed by the Supreme Court earlier this year, defies decades of serious medical research that shows the safety and effectiveness of mifepristone and misoprostol. But it has taken on greater urgency for national and state-based anti-abortion organizations, who have pointed in particular to the growing prevalence of mail-order telehealth abortion services, which a growing share of Americans have used to circumvent their states’ bans on the procedure. Medical professionals who prescribe and mail the pills operate from states with abortion-friendly governments, under the protection of “shield laws” meant to guard them from out-of-state prosecution. 
The renewed focus on medication abortion, and in particular false claims about its danger, suggest that major anti-abortion lobbies would likely push for national restrictions on the drugs involved if Trump wins a second term. And the increase in attacks on “late-term abortions” — a stance Trump too has adopted — could preview efforts to enact some kind of national restrictions. 
SBA Pro-Life America did not directly answer a question about what kind of policies it would prioritize if Trump is elected. But in a statement, Marjorie Dannenfelser, the organization’s president, echoed Vance’s talking points, saying that Democratic leadership would result in “painful late-term abortions through the ninth month paid for by taxpayers.”
“Strategically, they’re going in two directions,” said Greer Donley, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh who studies abortion law. “One is trying to build support for a national abortion ban at some point in pregnancy. And two, trying to build support to take medication abortion off the market, make it harder to access, remove telehealth — whatever it’s going to be.”
That could have profound consequences. Data from the Society of Family Planning suggests that about 1 in 5 abortions done in the United States are now performed through telehealth, and about half of those are shield-law backed abortions for people in states with bans. In states with these bans, activists and anti-abortion lawmakers have struggled to find new avenues to curb access to medication abortion. But medical professionals who use shield laws to provide abortions have expressed concern that a hostile presidential administration could leverage its executive authority — particularly the Food and Drug Administration — to limit access to mifepristone. 
While publicly, Trump has disavowed a national ban, he’s been far less clear about what approach he would take to medication abortion. Project 2025, the conservative policy blueprint crafted by the Trump-aligned Heritage Foundation, argues that a Republican administration should push the FDA to reverse its decision that mifepristone is safe to prescribe through telehealth, or even undo the drug’s approval altogether. 
Vance has endorsed enforcing a different law, a dormant 1800s anti-obscenity law known as the Comstock Act, to outlaw the mailing of abortion medication.
“The one thing I feel confident he will go after is medication abortion through the FDA,” Donley said. “That’s the one that’s having very serious effects for the anti-abortion movement across the country, because of shield laws and shield provision and telehealth.”

Republish this story








Share



Bluesky







Facebook







Email









Recommended for you





These states already restrict abortion. Their legislatures could push it even further.




The tools Trump could use to curb abortion access if he’s elected




All of the ways Trump could impact abortion policy from day one




Republican-led states are trying to crack down on abortion medication
 






19th News Fellowships
HBCU alums, become a fellow in our newsroom.



        Apply Today
      



Sign up for our newsletter








                            Explore more coverage from The 19th
                    

 Abortion 
 Politics 
 Education 
 LGBTQ+ 
 Caregiving 


View all topics











Support representative journalism today.
Learn more about membership.




        Give $19
        






        Give $50
        






        Give $100
        






        Any amount
        










Transparency



                        About
                      



                        Team
                      



                        Contact
                      



                        Privacy Policy
                      



                        Community Guidelines
                      






Newsroom



                        Latest Stories
                      



                        19th News Network
                      



                        Podcast
                      



                        Events
                      



                        Careers
                      



                        Fellowships
                      






Newsletters



                        Daily
                      



                        Weekly
                      



                        The Amendment
                      



                        Event Invites
                      






Support



                        Ways to Give
                      



                        Sponsorship
                      



                        Republishing
                      



                        Volunteer
                      







The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.











































 














>Though that law has exceptions for medical emergencies, doctors have repeatedly said they are exceptionally difficult to use in practice, adding that the law’s narrow wording has forced them to delay care for patients. In these cases, the law resulted in delayed follow-up care for one woman, Amber Thurman, when she developed rare side-effects after her medication abortion; the other woman, Candi Miller, did not receive follow-up care because she feared criminal punishment for getting an abortion. 


As intended. 


There was plenty of testimony from doctors before these laws were passed. Republicans did not care. They were paid to pass abortion bans and pass them they did. And at every opportunity, they're narrowing the exceptions and keeping the language of the law vague on purpose.