


'Fact check' has become just another word for censorship










 

 

























  
































































































 
















































Primary Menu




Sections




US News

Metro
Long Island
Politics


World News
Page Six
Sports

NFL
MLB
Olympics
NBA
NHL
College Football
College Basketball
WNBA


Post Sports+
Sports Betting
Business

Personal Finance


Opinion
Entertainment

TV
Movies
Music
Celebrities
Awards
Theater


Shopping
Lifestyle

Weird But True
Sex & Relationships
Viral Trends
Human Interest
Parenting
Fashion & Beauty
Food & Drink
Travel


Health

Wellness
Fitness
Health Care
Medicine
Men’s Health
Women’s Health
Mental Health
Nutrition


Real Estate
Alexa
Media
Tech
Science

Space
Environment
Wildlife
Archaeology


Astrology
Video
Photos
Visual Stories


Today’s Paper
Covers
Columnists
Horoscopes
Crosswords & Games
Sports Odds
Podcasts
Careers




Email Newsletters
Official Store
Home Delivery
Tips


 



Search



Email




New York Post






 












				Search			



Search




Recommended

	Skip to main content

















































































 










 







 







 




Exclusive



					NYC congestion pricing axed as Trump’s DOT pulls approval of hated toll				











 
Douglas Murray



Opinion



		‘Fact check’ has become just another word for censorship	


		By 
Douglas Murray 




				Published 			
Oct. 3, 2024, 6:15 p.m. ET















 
					The CBS News moderators attempted to "fact-check" Sen. JD Vance during the vice presidential debate on Oct. 1, 2024.						
							Photo by ANGELA WEISS/AFP via Getty Images						




“Fact-checking” is like “fake news”: something that is now entirely in the eye of the beholder.
At the vice presidential debate this week, the CBS moderators once again tried to show that they were the fair and impartial people in the room
Except that — as with the Trump-Harris debate — they only seemed interested in fact-checking in one direction. Against the Republican.
On Tuesday night, the subject of Springfield, Ohio, once again came up. And once again, Springfield revealed one of the big problems of this media era.
CBS’s Margaret Brennan decided to fact-check something that JD Vance said and immediately relayed a piece of false information herself.

Following Vance’s point about the number of illegal migrants, Brennan announced authoritatively that Springfield does in fact have “a large number of Haitian migrants” but that they have “legal status [and] Temporary Protected Status.”
It was then down to Vance to fact-check the fact-checker by pointing out — correctly — that what Brennan had just described was actually a “pathway” opened up by Kamala Harris explicitly to fudge the true levels of illegal immigration.




			More From							Douglas Murray









 



								Douglas Murray: Trump wants peace and an end to the war in Ukraine – it’s by far his toughest objective							









 



								Soros-funded Dems suddenly upset by billionaires in government							









 



								Douglas Murray: Gaza must reject terror of Hamas for war to end							










Without his correction, viewers could easily have come away with the idea that there are no problems in places like Springfield because the stories of illegal migrants are untrue and what Ohio actually has is just a large collection of people with “legal status” in the United States.
At least Vance got a chance (albeit very interrupted) to correct his interviewer. When Harris used the presidential debate to make a set of verifiably untrue claims, her ABC hosts repeatedly let her get away with it.
For instance, they must have known that the big Democratic boogey man “Project 2025” has nothing to do with Donald Trump or his campaign.
 


			See Also		



 




editorial




		Ridiculous ‘fact check’ of a true statement during CBS debate	






But they let Harris make her claims anyway, safe in the knowledge that her ABC hosts would let her get away with it.
This is such a counter-productive way to operate. It is one thing to show that Donald Trump was exaggerating or wrong when he talked about Haitian immigrants eating dogs and cats.
It is quite another to go so far the other way that you end up pretending that places like Springfield do not in fact have found it impossible to assimilate numbers of illegal migrants living in their communities.
Look around the media and you see the same problem everywhere. Much of the media will tell you that they regard their job as being to decide what is true and what is false. But the problem is that most of them aren’t any good at the task they set themselves.
In Britain, the national broadcaster — the BBC — recently set up a special department called “BBC Verify” that is meant to “fact-check” content across the media. But it can’t even get the BBC’s own facts right.
On issue after issue — foreign and domestic — “BBC Verify” has overseen verifiably untrue stories.
I understand the panic in these media institutions.
It is true that since the arrival of social media, the role of the media as the “gatekeepers” of what is true has fallen away.
On platforms like X, anybody can point to a piece of false information put out on the main news channels.
At the same time, the eruption of a whole new set of media platforms has diluted the power of the gatekeepers.
 


			See Also		



 






		Government censorship is a greater threat than ‘disinformation’	






But the truth is that the new landscape is not so impossible to walk across as the BBC, ABC and others seem to think.
The public is wiser than it knows.
For instance, a story can be “fake” not just because it is untrue, but because it is a story that is either published or not published in order to suit a particular narrative.
Take yesterday’s front-page story in the New York Post about Doug Emhoff. You would have thought that a story about the potential “first husband” assaulting an ex-girlfriend would be the sort of story that would interest all the media.
But many papers and channels are rooting for Vice President Harris and her husband, and so a strange veil of silence has been cast over the story by Democrat-supporting media.
If there was a time in the past when papers could snuff out such a story, that time is past.
Today readers can find it anyway. But as they do so, the media that won’t cover it look more and more transparent. And ever less trustworthy.
It is the same with the latest October surprise, with the unsealing of new evidence in the federal election case against Trump.
When Judge Tanya Chutkan takes the unprecedented move of making public filings by prosecutors about whether a case should go forward, is the public actually persuaded by the anti-Trump media snapping into line?








					Get opinions and commentary from our columnists				

					Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter!				



					Thanks for signing up!				







 


Enter your email address





								Please provide a valid email address.							






					By clicking above you agree to the 					Terms of Use
					 and 					Privacy Policy.
				



					Never miss a story.				


Check out more newsletters







Giving Harris her newest line of attack? Or does the public in fact see through this? Knowing that this is just the sort of trick it was expecting in the month before the election?
I think it is the latter.
You used to know where you were with certain media. Today, with some papers, you still do.




For instance, if you pick up this paper, you do so in the knowledge that the New York Post does not like crime and would prefer that it not run rampant in our city.
But not all the media are so open about their views. And the ones that pretend to be “unbiased” or “impartial” are in fact the most biased and partial of the lot.


A reminder of who enemy is
Good news stories are hard to come by today. But the rescue of Fawzia Amin Sido this week is one.
At the age of 11, a decade ago, the Yazidi girl was taken as a slave by ISIS in Iraq. There she was “bought” by a member of Hamas-ISIS and taken to Gaza as his “wife.”
Since her rescue by the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza, she has been reunited with her family.
How many students in North America know about such cases? Or even know who the Yazidi people are? Very few, I would think.
Another Yazidi survivor of ISIS sexual slavery had her campus lectures canceled a couple years ago — out of fears that telling her story might “foster Islamophobia.” Interesting the priorities some institutions have.
 



Filed under



									2024 Presidential Debates								



									2024 presidential election								



									censorship								



									JD Vance								



									migrants								


10/3/24 





Read Next


				Karine Jean-Pierre's sanctions gaslighting, Tim Walz's Tia...			


































 










 


		Trending Now			
				on NYPost.com			




 


This story has been shared 170,761 times.
170,761






							NYC congestion pricing axed as Trump's DOT pulls approval of hated toll						






 


This story has been shared 55,951 times.
55,951






							Teen who died after injecting himself with butterfly remains spent 7 agonizing days in the hospital						






 


This story has been shared 51,595 times.
51,595






							Popular artificial sweetener can increase risk of heart attack, stroke: new study						






 


This story has been shared 46,579 times.
46,579






							Trump signs executive order to expand his control over FCC, SEC and more						















 






Now on
 Page Six













							Justin Baldoni allegedly asked Blake Lively if she and Ryan Reynolds ‘climax simultaneously’ during sex: complaint						





							Kim Kardashian frolics on the beach wearing leopard-printed bikini for mystery photoshoot						





							NYU club president resigns after calling Barron Trump an ‘oddity on campus’						




		See All	











 








		Video			
 







								NYC felony drug raid: Tren gangsters walk free | Reporter Replay							










































				More Stories			







											Page Six										





												Blake Lively claims her children are 'traumatized' by Justin Baldoni drama as she struggles to leave home											




















											NYPost										





												NYC congestion pricing axed as Trump's DOT pulls approval of hated toll											


















Facebook




Twitter




Instagram




LinkedIn




Email




YouTube







Sections & Features

US News
Metro
World News
Sports
Sports Betting
Business
Opinion
Entertainment
Fashion & Beauty
Shopping
Lifestyle
Real Estate
Media
Tech
Science
Health
Travel
Astrology
Video
Photos
Visual Stories
Alexa
Covers
Horoscopes
Sports Odds
Podcasts
Crosswords & Games
Columnists
Classifieds


Post Sports+

Subscribe
Articles
Manage


Newsletters & Feeds

Email Newsletters
RSS Feeds
NY Post Official Store
Home Delivery

Subscribe
Manage Subscription


Delivery Help


Help/Support

About New York Post
Customer Service
Apps Help
Community Guidelines
Contact Us

Tips
Newsroom
Letters to the Editor
Licensing & Reprints
Careers
Vulnerability Disclosure Program




Apps

iPhone App
iPad App
Android Phone
Android Tablet
Advertise

Media Kit
Contact




 


© 2025 NYP Holdings, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use
Membership Terms
Privacy Notice
Sitemap


				Your California Privacy Rights			

Do Not Sell My Personal Information















































 




Republicans believe facts don't matter, because they believe the story is true.