




 





















Immunity Doesn’t Apply to Trump for January 6 | The Nation



























































 




































































Log In











Email *





Password *










Remember Me





							
								Forgot Your Password?							
							










Log In






New to The Nation? SubscribePrint subscriber? Activate your online access









 







Skip to content
Skip to footer

















                    Immunity Doesn’t Apply to Trump for January 6
                



Magazine


Newsletters



















 


Subscribe


Log In



















Search


















Subscribe


Donate


Magazine


Latest


Archive


Podcasts


Newsletters





Sections



Politics


World


Economy


Culture


Books & the Arts



The Nation



About


Events


Contact Us


Advertise





Current Issue



















 














 


 








Politics


 / 
October 4, 2024


Immunity Doesn’t Apply to Trump for January 6
A new filing by special counsel Jack Smith argues that even in light of the Supreme Court ruling granting immunity to presidents, a seeker of office is liable for criminal activity.



Chris Lehmann 


Share


Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email


 







Ad Policy


Special counsel Jack Smith in Washington, DC, on August 1, 2023, and former president Donald Trump in Palm Beach, Florida, on November 8, 2022.(Saul Loeb and Eva Marie Uzcategui / AFP)
Despite the heroic exertions of Donald Trump to dismiss, downplay, and otherwise memory-hole his shameful role in fomenting the MAGA coup attempt on January 6, 2021, that deranged moment in Republican political history keeps resurfacing, like the madwoman in the attic in a Victorian novel. In this week’s vice -presidential debate, the standout exchange occurred near the end, when JD Vance brazenly lied about the transfer of power to the Biden White House as a smooth and peaceful affair. Then, when confronted by his opponent, Tim Walz, on the key question of whether he believed Trump lost the 2020 election, Vance refused to answer, saying he was only “speaking about the future.”

Well, January 6 is the future should Trump reassume the presidency, and federal prosecutor Jack Smith, who is leading the long-delayed prosecution of Trump for his central role in promoting the coup attempt, drove that point home in unmistakable terms with a newly released filing in support of his indictment. Smith had been forced to revamp his case with a superseding indictment this August, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ludicrous, Trump-osculating decision granting unfathomably broad executive immunity protections to the presidency. The new 165-page filing from Smith supplies a detailed factual foundation for his argument that Trump doesn’t come under these expansive new immunity protections when it comes to the election he was acting to overturn, since “where the defendant is acting as an office-seeker, not an office-holder, no immunity attaches.”
The chronology in the filing’s finding of fact makes it clear just how manic and deranged Trump was in seeking to cling to the presidency—to the point of deliberately dismissing the actual outcome of the election. During Trump’s months-long crusade to discredit the balloting, without a shred of evidence, one White House staffer overheard him telling his nepo-adjutants Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, “It doesn’t matter if you won or lost the election. You still have to fight like hell.”
That was the de facto motto of the whole unfounded assault on a free and fair election. As election officials in downtown Detroit continued to count ballots the day after the election, a group of GOP protesters, high on bogus “stop the steal” rhetoric, tried to break into the building and disrupt the count. An operative at the scene texted a Trump campaign official—whose identity is redacted in the filing, but who appears to be the campaign’s elections operations director, Mike Roman. That campaign official had initially parried an earlier text indicating that the counting was legitimate with the directive, “Find a reason it isn’t.” Now told that the confrontation could explode into another “Brooks Brothers riot”—the Roger Stone–orchestrated campaign op that stymied a critical recount effort in Florida after the 2000 election—the official replied, “Make them riot. Do it!!!”
That was the Trump team’s ethos on January 6 as well, as Smith’s filing makes painfully clear. As frantic White House officials sought to get Trump to issue a statement telling the January 6 rioters to stand down, Trump instead churlishly repaired to the White House dining room to watch TV and tweet. This was when he issued the fateful tweet excoriating his vice president, Mike Pence, for lacking the “courage” to throw out the election results and anoint Congress with nonexistent powers to overturn the ballots of 81 million Americans. In no time flat, Pence’s Secret Service detail was forced to evacuate him from the Capitol, since, per Smith’s filing, “the defendant personally posted the tweet…at a point when he already understood the Capitol had been breached.” When another White House aide informed Trump of Pence’s evacuation as rioters came within 40 feet of his location, Trump’s reply was “So what?”
Whatever else this is, it’s clearly not the conduct of a US president honoring his constitutional oath or carrying out the duties of his office. As Smith’s filing points out, the president has no designated role in overseeing or certifying election results—for the obvious reason that doing so represents a howling conflict of interest.


                    Current Issue
            





            March 2025 Issue
        


Many of the other revelations in Smith’s report rehearse the well-known chronology of lies, evasions, threats, and incitements to violence and chaos cataloged in the second Trump impeachment and in the report by United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack. There’s the pathetic promotion of phony claims of election fraud in the fraught post-election voting counts in Arizona and Georgia—and the utter absence of any supporting evidence behind them. There are the outlandish claims of rigged voting machine algorithms, administered by sinister actors in foreign lands. There are the musterings of “fake elector” slates to swoop in and overturn the results in the MAGA-fomented crisis Trump dreamed of touching off. The rank cynicism of this maneuver was conveyed in communications from another lickspittle Trump campaign lawyer, evidently Mike Cheseboro, that unironically designated the fake electors as just that.
Even at this late date in the sorry history of MAGA demagogy and delusion, the details of the whole deeply cynical, authoritarian counter-empirical putsch are appalling. Among other things, Smith’s filing dramatizes just how the drift into the modern imperial presidency—a trend that the Roberts immunity ruling has put on steroids—threatens the core operations of democratic governance, from the protections of ballot access to (pace JD Vance) the peaceful transfer of power. In his January 6 speech at the Capitol Ellipsis, Trump reprised his counsel to Ivanka and Jared, telling the crowd of incipient rioters that they needed “to fight like hell” against the sinister power grab of the Biden organization or they “won’t have a country.” Yet this sobering documentary review of the Trump-led election scam and path to violent incitement makes it clear that the real forces jeopardizing our country are the MAGAfied GOP power elite.




Keep Reading







                Submit a correction
            



                Send a letter to the editor
            



                Reprints & permissions
            






Chris Lehmann







Chris Lehmann is the DC Bureau chief for The Nation and a contributing editor at The Baffler. He was formerly editor of The Baffler and The New Republic, and is the author, most recently, of The Money Cult: Capitalism, Christianity, and the Unmaking of the American Dream (Melville House, 2016).















More from The Nation







5 Stages of GOP

                5 Stages of GOP
            

The Republican Party’s fealty to a totalitarian leader.

OppArt

                            /
                        
Peter Kuper 








How Do You Solve a Problem Like Eric Adams?

                How Do You Solve a Problem Like Eric Adams?
            


As long as Eric Adams refuses to resign, New Yorkers must contemplate other options, including—but not limited to—intervention by the state’s governor.


Elie Mystal 








How to Organize Our Way Out of the Trump-Musk Putsch

                How to Organize Our Way Out of the Trump-Musk Putsch
            


By firing Gwynne Wilcox, Trump is hoping the Supreme Court will overrule 90 years of legal precedent and give him the authority to fire members of independent boards.


Ezra Levin and Leah Greenberg 








How Donald Trump Dismantled a Worker Protection Agency With One Late-Night E-Mail

                How Donald Trump Dismantled a Worker Protection Agency With One Late-Night E-Mail
            


By firing Gwynne Wilcox, Trump is hoping the Supreme Court will overrule 90 years of legal precedent and give him the authority to fire members of independent boards.


Lynn Rhinehart 








Francesca Albanese Wants to Put an End to Israel’s Impunity

                Francesca Albanese Wants to Put an End to Israel’s Impunity
            


A conversation with the UN special rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories on the plain facts of Israel’s war crimes.


Nadine Talaat 








If Trump Crushes Federal Workers, We’re All Next

                If Trump Crushes Federal Workers, We’re All Next
            


Bosses everywhere are itching to wage a DOGE-style war against their workers. That’s why it’s so important that Trump and Musk fail. 


Eric Blanc 




















Sections


Politics


World


Economy


Culture


Books & the Arts


OppArt


Poetry


Letters




Magazine


Current Issue


Masthead


Archive


Subscription Services


Reprints




More


About Us


Contact Us


Advertise


Nation Events


Nation Shop


Nation Travels


Nation Podcasts


Newsletters




Follow


Facebook


Twitter


Instagram


YouTube


RSS





Founded by abolitionists in 1865, The Nation has long believed that independent journalism has the capacity to bring about a more democratic and equitable world.
Donate




Privacy Policy


Terms of Use


Accessibility Statement


Help


Careers


Nation Fund


Privacy Manager












 










x










Latest from the nation


Today 10:52 amArmed Conflicts
What’s Next for Syrian Refugees?
Helen Benedict


Today 8:30 am
5 Stages of GOP
Peter Kuper


Today 8:24 am
How Do You Solve a Problem Like Eric Adams?
Elie Mystal


Today 5:30 am
How to Organize Our Way Out of the Trump-Musk Putsch
Ezra Levin and Leah Greenberg


Today 5:30 am
A New International Campaign Rises in Ukraine
Mary Kaldor and Luke Cooper




editor's picks





VIDEO: People in Denmark Are a Lot Happier Than People in the United States. Here’s Why.
The Nation





Historical Amnesia About Slavery Is a Tool of White Supremacy
Mychal Denzel Smith










































I’m hopeful his arguments will be upheld but I’ve learned that the SCOTUS majority can manipulate and reverse engineer their interpretation of the constitution to any outcome they may choose.