classify text {gangguan, kebencian, porno, penyakit psikiatri atau mental, sifat perkauman, penghinaan agama, selamat untuk bekerja, mencederakan diri sendiri, seksis}

teks: We know that most verses of the Quran rely on Hadith for interpretation, especially those involving the differences between ASWJ and Shia. If we don't use Hadith, it's like relying solely on logic, similar to the GAH group. It seems more reasonable to argue using: 1. The Quran, 2. Authentic Hadith, 3. Historical books. ASWJ primarily relies on evidence based on the Quran and is supported by authentic Hadith. Historical books are not necessary to strengthen ASWJ's argument. However, in this discussion, if ASWJ Hadith is used, the Shia group will certainly reject it, and vice versa. But if the Quran is used, both groups cannot reject it because they both claim to accept the Quran as the main reference. Except for Shia, who openly claim that the current Quran has been distorted and cannot be used as evidence anymore., return JSON {'label'}
{"label": "penghinaan agama"}