Internet-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health Outcomes for Abused Women
The purpose for this trial is to test the effectiveness of the first interactive internet-based safety decision aid on abused women's exposure to repeat intimate partner violence (IPV) and mental health outcomes. An improved safety decision-making process (e.g., knowing the advantages and disadvantages of the relationship, having enough information to make a decision) will increase safety-seeking behaviors which in turn will decrease exposure to repeat IPV and improve mental health outcomes. Findings from the development and initial test of our computerized safety decision aid suggests that it offered abused women privacy to consider personalized safety options, informed them about danger in their relationship and would be used again if they had access to it through a safe internet site.
The investigators are conducting a five year experimental trial in four states (Oregon, Maryland, Missouri, and Arizona) to address the following aims:
- Test the effectiveness of an interactive internet-based safety decision aid on abused women's safety seeking behaviors and exposure to violence compared to women assigned to control websites. The investigators hypothesize that at three, six, and 12 months post-baseline the intervention group will have increased safety seeking behaviors and reduced IPV exposure in comparison to the control group.
- Test the effectiveness of an interactive internet-based safety decision aid on abused women's mental health compared to women assigned to control websites. The investigators hypothesize that at three, six, and 12 months post-baseline the intervention group will have improved mental health in comparison to the control group.
- Test if the effect of an interactive internet-based safety decision aid on abused women's mental health and exposure to violence is mediated by the safety decision making process and safety-seeking behaviors. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention group will have a better decision making process and have greater safety seeking behavior over the year in comparison to the control group, and that this better decision process and increased safety seeking behavior will mediate improvement in mental health and exposure to violence at 12 months post baseline.
This study will provide much needed new information about safety planning's impact on making difficult safety decisions, exposure to violence, and mental health effects.
|Domestic Violence||Behavioral: Internet-based safety decision aid Behavioral: Usual Care Safety Plan|
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose: Other
|Official Title:||Internet-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health Outcomes for Abused Women|
- Severity of Violence Against Women [ Time Frame: 6 months ]This 46-item scale has been widely used with ethnically diverse women. It is designed to address types and severity of physical and sexual violence, including the threat of violence. The frequency of violence is based on a four-point scale (1=never to 4=many times) and the participants rank the severity of violence from mild to serious.
- Women's Experience with Battering [ Time Frame: 6 months ]The WEB is a 10-item scale designed to capture a wide variety of abuse behaviors women experience from an intimate partner, including emotional abuse.
- Safety Behavior Checklist [ Time Frame: 6 months ]This includes a checklist of safety steps abused women may use (asking for help, removing gun from home, hiding important papers) and utilization of community resources. Questions will be asked about women's access and use of criminal justice, health, and social resources and how helpful the safety steps are in coping with abuse.
- Decisional Conflict Scale [ Time Frame: 6 months ]The DCS consists of twelve items, with each question having three response options (yes, no, and unsure). The DCS provides a total score, which is a measure of the decision process, as well as scores for four subscales (feeling informed, certainty about decision, values clarity, and support), with higher scores on the DCS indicating a greater degree of decisional conflict (indicative of a poorer decision process).
- Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Revised [ Time Frame: 6 months ]A 20-item self report measure, designed to screen for depressive symptoms in community samples and assess the probability that an individual meets the criteria for major depressive disorder.
- PTSD Checklist [ Time Frame: 6 months ]A self-report measure of PTSD symptoms, designed for use in community samples to measure symptoms and assess the probability that an individual meets DSM-IV criteria for PTSD.
|Study Start Date:||March 2011|
|Study Completion Date:||February 2016|
|Primary Completion Date:||May 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Experimental: Internet Based Safety Decision Aid||
Behavioral: Internet-based safety decision aid
Participants will log into the the intervention website at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post baseline and receive:
|Active Comparator: Control Website||
Behavioral: Usual Care Safety Plan
Participants will log into a control website at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post baseline. Website will include the "usual services" provided to IPV survivors looking for safety planning resources on the internet. Participants will receive:
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is well established as a widespread problem with important negative physical and mental health, social and cost consequences for victims, their families and the community. Beyond the physical conditions associated with IPV, research has consistently demonstrated a strong association between experiencing IPV and increased rates of anxiety, depression, low-self esteem, substance abuse and suicidality. Increasing abused women's safety and reducing ongoing exposure to violence is key to minimizing such consequences.
Building from the empowerment framework, safety planning interventions focus on protecting women from exposure to repeat violence. However, despite the significant evidence of the negative outcomes of IPV and the complex individual and community factors that influence safety, little is known about what interventions improve the safety and mental health outcomes of abused women. While experimental trials are beginning, to date there has not been a trial to examine the effectiveness of safety planning, a cornerstone of IPV interventions, on exposure to repeat violence, safety, and mental health outcomes for women. An internet-based safety decision aid may assist abused women in weighing risks and benefits of safety options, assessing danger, and identifying the factors that are most important in their safety decisions. Further, it provides personalized links with community mental health and domestic violence resources, which are invaluable in assisting women in planning for safety, thereby reducing the immediate and long terms risk of negative mental health consequences of violence.
Women who consent to participate in this study and who have access to a safe computer (e.g. at home, work, community agency, friend/family) will be randomized to the intervention or control group. If a woman is randomized into the intervention group, she will complete the internet-based safety decision aid program. The decision aid program will be located on a confidential password protected and secured study website and will take approximately 60 minutes to complete. Participants will first be asked demographic and relationship questions as well as questions about their ability to make decisions about safety in their relationship. Next, participants will be asked to make a series of comparisons to determine the importance of specific factors such as: keeping the abuse private, safety of self, family and children, feelings for partner, resources such as housing and employment and maintaining norms within family, to safety decisions. Participants will then be asked questions specific to risk factors for violence and safety seeking behaviors in their relationship. After completion, the safety decision aid generates results to provide an individualized safety plan to the participant. Women randomized into the control group will access the confidential and password protected control website which includes a brief assessment of risk factors and their history of violence, and will provide a list of local resources, but not an individualized safety plan. Both intervention and control group participants will then complete a series of instruments to measure intimate partner violence, mental health outcomes, and safety seeking behaviors. Each participant will have a skilled and trained research assistant available by phone or email to assist them in understanding questions, interpreting the results, developing strategies for safety and providing referrals for community-based services.
Follow up sessions on the study website will be conducted at 3, 6, and 12 months post-baseline. Participants will be encouraged by the RA through phone or email contact to access the password-protected website to complete the internet session and follow-up assessment questions. Post-baseline questions will be the same as the baseline, but will focus on outcomes since the previous internet session.
To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the contact information provided by the sponsor.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01312103
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT01312103
|United States, Arizona|
|Arizona State University|
|Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85004|
|United States, Maryland|
|Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing|
|Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205|
|United States, Missouri|
|University of Missouri|
|Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65233|
|United States, Oregon|
|Oregon Health Sciences University|
|Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239|
|Principal Investigator:||Nancy Glass, PhD||Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing|