https://www.omglinux.com/gnome-thumbnails-file-picker/



gnome has finally fixed its only flaw. are you now ready to accept the footy supremacy?

>>92851108 (OP)

>fixed its only flaw

You mean one of the many flaws?

It fixed the apple tablet design and stopped removing functionality?

They're trying to invent system tray as we speak

It switched to the qt toolkit?

He mean the only flaw left after every other buggy feature has been removed

But they didn't remove scrolling (to their credit though they sort of fixed it with gtk 4.11, from testing it on fed ora rawhide)

Is there any other DE that doesn't feel like shit to use? Resizing windows on KDE for comparison is laggy as shit, amonge other things

GNOMECHADS we eating good

HOLY BASED

Will check out, ty, but isn't XFCE using X11?

I would've thought the main reason KDE feels like shit when compared to GNOME is that the latter uses Wayland

>>92851108 (OP)

Do you get thumbnails in browser as well? They all use gtkpicker

based

cringe xfeces mouthbreather

gnome works on both

>>92851108 (OP)

now we have to wait until both kde and gnome implement a quick look feature.

I hate gnome and I'm having a really nice day

not lagging on my machine

but browser show/minimize animation is lagging

>>92851108 (OP)

Now they're just missing a taskbar and a system tray.

>>92851108 (OP)

Footy supremacy? It can't even kick a ball, lmao

all desktop environments are shit. use a window manager.

>>92851108 (OP)

I’m using gnome on unbuntu but I’m thinking to switch to arch/hyperland

Hyperland? Which do you recommend

abandonware

No it's just finished.

>>92851108 (OP)

>select files on windows

>file picker is literally just the file explorer

>freetards couldn't figure out how to do this for 20 years

>>92851108 (OP)

>gifs and webms aren't animated

oof, yikes, sweaty, not a good look

>file picker is literally just the file explorer

That's false, file picker of Windows is not an instance of file explorer.

On a laptop (X270), there's a drastic difference in resizing applications between KDE and GNOME. KDE feels fairly responsive still, but looks pretty shitty next to gnome.

>>92851108 (OP)

holy shit...

>>92851108 (OP)

the mad lads actually did it. I kneel.

windows took the same years to have tabs in the file explorer and a text editor that doesn't suck.

Probably Qt Quick apps that are doing that, i.e. you'll find Dolphin to be very responsive and most System Settings pages or Welcome Center not.

It has VRR and fractional scaling support?

XFCE is the only good DE left.

>the apple tablet design

Care to explain this more? I don't understand what makes it an "apple tablet" design. You're saying the gnome design language is bad but I don't understand why

totally coincidental that exactly around that time cultural war started in America and all the white men got replaced with pajeets who can't even make a properly working calculator while the one from Bill Gates era just works.

>>92851108 (OP)

Will it take gnome another 20 years to fix the next flaw that comes up?



Or will they be able to cut the time in half to only 10 years?

You can do that with a nautilus plugin

Meanwhile



>https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285711



>Opened 7 years ago
