Matrox is back and this time with an Intel GPU.

The LUMA series is based on A380 and A310 chips so it's pretty low end but I guess it could be useful if you need a lot of monitors but don't need the performance. I wonder if Matrox will have more stable drivers than Intel LMAO

matrox? didn't know they still exist. i used to have one of picrel back in the days

company that builds voting machines and rfid scanners for warehouses bought the name last year

>>93105991 (OP)

I'd reckon they would be great encoder GPUs for those who want fast AV1 encoding.

>>93105991 (OP)

Sparkle is also coming back into the GPU business with new Intel Arc cards. The same week as Matrox, no less.



https://www.tomshardware.com/news/sparkle-returns-to-the-gpu-landscape-launches-three-intel-arc-cards

Kind of surprised Titan isn't called Balrog, for the full Tolkien set.

>Balrog



That'll probably be the name for their overclocked A770.

>64-bit memory

why

why why why



is Arcs high idle power draw fixed yet?

>64-bit

if youre in control of yer heap ie can rationally reasonably apply its operation and output

why not 128-bit?

1024-bit?

why not byte?

did hamming win?

Yes for a while I think my a770 doesnt draw shit while idle

they would probably get sued by the tolkein estate or some shit like that

>>93105991 (OP)

Matrox cards are mostly meant for videowalls and other niche embedded use these days so they've got an absolutely massive price premium on them compared to other manufacturers

>>93105991 (OP)

>ReBar is not necessary for full encoding performance on Intel Arc GPUs. Anywhere from no performance advantage, to 10% more.

Just in case anybody is wondering, I've done as much research as I can on this and this is just from the handful of posts and threads I've seen by people who run this set up.

Nice to see they're all 1 slot. Too bad the passively cooled A310 probably won't see much dissemination, because it would be pretty nice as a modern architecture video-out.

is still that bad? didn't the drivers improve that?

i was wondering about the 380 for desktop use and very light gaming in a egpu dock i have.

Not sure if you're replied to the wrong post. Just to clarify, I'm only talking about the transcode performance, and that it appears is perfectly fine even without rebar.



I'm excited about these cards. A fan less, slot-only power, LP card for like $75 that can just slot in and give you QSV transcoding of everything up to AV1? sign me up.

>for like $75

Matrox version of it will be more like 750 bucks, they're not meant for consumer use

sorry i missed saying that is still that bad without rebar? as like for general use, not only encoding, you seem to know about this.

I though was lack of driver support for non rebar, but they improved a ton the drivers so i was wondering if they are better now

>matrox? didn't know they still exist.

They have been making multi monitor displays since forever. The multi displays on airports, railway stations, stock exchanges and whatnots - all matrox. If you need 8 screen display, you get it from them.

Matrox is back with a brand new invention SOMETHIN

Doubt it
