You're not wasting precious resources encrypting things are you?

>>93090783 (OP)

He doesn’t even look like a real person.

If you work for the government in the Wset you encrypt and pseudo-anonymize data and put it behind firewalls because otherwise china and russia will destroy your government and country.



In other words, this so-called "chief information security officer board qualified technology expert" (sounds like a durgasoft certified java expert to me) has not worked on any real projects.

Man, the shit I miss by not being on LinkedIn!

There are so fucking many answers to this question, but why bother? Let dumb ass "CISOs" find out the hard way. It's funnier that way anyways.

>>93090783 (OP)

People who treat linkedin as social media are a different breed. They literally just say random shit and hope it comes off as smart. I refuse to believe anybody can be this dumb. He's a good goy though

>Mad props

Why are millennials like this?

>be a massive fucking retard with extreme negligence for data security

>become a CISO

How did this fuckface pull that one off?

>>93090783 (OP)

this s.oyfaced faggit is paid to shill the 'encyption is not needed. and here why that's a good thing' lines to condition the goyim brains to accept the next round of nwo rape

>>93090783 (OP)

the only time you could need disk encryption is if your computer is stolen and even that assumes there is something of value there

So just don't have your computer stolen(not very hard) and you don't have to use encryption

>>93090783 (OP)

>CISO

>doesn't know shit

>talks shit

>makes a clown of himself

I'm not surprised



most CISOs are corporate LARPers. I've met a few of them in my country and they are ignorant retards.

>>93090783 (OP)

Never seen a CISO/CSO who actually knew what they were doing. Anyone have the posts about the one that didn't understand the Monty Hall problem?

because millennials are the most fucked over generation



t. millennial

so whose gonna jak him?

>>93090783 (OP)

>Chief Information Security Officer

>"Actually, information security is a meme and isn't necessary at all"

How does this guy have a job? Either he's got a point and his job is a sham, or he's a retard that doesn't have the first clue about how to do his job. Either way, why hasn't he been fired?

>>93090783 (OP)

>muh state level actors

Fucking pseuds, you want FDE for the opposite reason. Jamal is 100x more likely to swipe your laptop than the police and any form of encryption is going to be enough to keep him out of your files. Most petty thieves are retards.



Glowniggers will just lock you in a cage or beat you until you hand over the password.

it doesn't matter

encryption is ezpz

>>93090783 (OP)

Ban encryption and force tech giants 1/ to log everything in case of investigation 2/ examine proactively private comms to find evidence of illegal activity from hate speech to terror attacks.

Yeah, the politicians are discussing it.

>>93090783 (OP)

is this gaslighting?

>>93090783 (OP)

Cool - still using Bitlocker.

>inb4 your cope - citation needed

>>93090783 (OP)

what a retard. 

if it can be read, someone's going to find a way to apply analytics to it and peg it to you to "build a better picture of your consuming habits." 

that alone makes encryption a hard requirement for all data in rest and transit.
