>fuck Cyrillic, bro, just use infinity hideous digraphs like an asshole

Why are they like this?

>>181289704 (OP)

inb4

>sczsczcszsczszcsczscsczsczcscszsczcsczcscszczcs

>>181289704 (OP)

try writing "ą" or "ę" with cyrilic

Needs more y's and k's. Throw those in there and a Pole will believe you've written words. Maybe an ł here and there, too, then you're a poet.

You say "ch" and "sh", nobody bats an eye. But then you say "cz" and "sz", and everyone loses their minds.

No, YOU try doing that. YOU

ä ë

I can't cause there's no way to write these sounds in cyrilic, at least without modifing it

Ah, yes, unlike the pristine, unedited, mint in box version of Latin text you use.

A

E

There you go

This post amused me

Not a single country in Europe uses

pristine, unedited, mint in box version of Latin text.

English does. None of our letters are bullshit. Ł is bullshit, ö is bullshit, ø, ř, ñ: bullshit. We don't have any of that crap.

Maybe that's why english spelling makes no sense

polish could be economised if they adopted Š and Č

szczupid system polebros

No, that's because we're a creole of Germanic languages and early French. If you cut out one half our language the other half is pretty consistent, and vice versa.

Although, maybe it's because we're used to the idea of each letter having 11 possible sounds that we don't need deviantart OC letters, so I guess you've got a point.

Don’t make fun of me but I really don’t understand why all languages can’t just be spelled phonetically with the basic letters, like why add all that other nonsense?

>If you cut out one half our language the other half is pretty consistent

You aren't making very good arguments Mr. Yankee

Some of them use different sounds than other ones. Think of how rare zh and kh sounds are for us, in other languages those are super common. Because letters were invented by humans, and not people who use noises like that, alternative ways to make those letters had to be figured over the centuries. Other languages chose to invent new letters, or modify old letters. We English speakers tend to choose digraphs for rare sounds.

Polacks, on the other hand, use digraphs for sounds that are regular for them, because they've got nothing better to do than spend 11 minutes writing a single sentence.

Languages aren’t logical ameribro. They’re the result of various customs that evolved over the years.

There is definitely a gap in the market in my view for an AI-optimised language with logical and easy structure and spelling.

Esperanto was created too soon.

>spelt queue

>read q

Because you will never find sh followed by ch in a english word like in "szczęście"

In cyrillic only one letter would be enough (щ - šč)

>kh



This is a retarded Russian meme. There is no kh, just write it as a h.

It's actually a really cool exercise to try to stick to either just German or just romance English. They give you different feelings for the concepts, since so many of our words have one German version and one French/romance version.

I saw a post recently talking about how cemetery and graveyard give you a different feel, and how this is also true for most other word pairs of the sort.

English is a Germanic language. And it uses constructs like 'th' that is not 'pure' latin script.
