Christanons, I have a question for you - does this GPT that I see advertised on 4chan explain the Bible correctly?

>>21956732 (OP)

I have no idea what this is but the Bible is the kind of thing that feels incredibly difficult if not impossible for AI to properly analyze. Bible verses are incredibly interconnected, yet through very broad strokes that require a lot of historical/literary context but also the ability to see similarities between both abstract concepts and imagery that uses lots of different wordings in different contexts. That's literally just not how AI spits shit out.

>avoid hell by having hell explain how to avoid hell

Hell are other people

Chat GPT is heavily influenced by the devils who live inside of computers, you cannot trust them to tell you the truth about anything, especially not salvation

>>21956732 (OP)

Wasn't this a joke in something?

>>21956732 (OP)

Because that's not how this 'AI' works, it literally just pulls from books and the internet and putting it all together and generating a response based on that. It doesn't have its own mind. So since there's an abundance of information on Christianity it's actually pretty good. It's useful as long as you read secondary literature alongside it such as Church Fathers commentaries.



This output for example is on par with all study bibles, if not better.

>>21956732 (OP)

A perverse mockery.

>>21956732 (OP)

Unironocally this is so over

You are a retard

AI is great at understanding the outerlayer of things. It sees pic related and thinks: This guy has 2 fingers! Everyone has 2 fingers.



It doesn't understand the mind, it doesn't understand the layers that make up a human. The atoms, it understands only vague smears of color. It doesn't know when it is contradicting itself. At least not the consumer grade tier AI that gets peddled inthe news media.

>ITT retards who have absolutely no clue the power of these AI tools and are coping for the inevitable sentient takeover.

Why would I need an AI for that? Abrahamic religion is easy to remember. Everything is based on blaming others for your own fuck ups. That's pretty much it

>my sky daddy... uhh I mean superhuman AI will come here any second to beat the shit out of you!

>any moment now...

>>21956732 (OP)

I would be very hesitant to trust it. I think that it may be useful as a supplement to the writings of the Church Fathers and Saints, as well as commentaries written by qualified people, but keep in mind AI just generates weird stuff from time to time. You need to be highly on guard against heresies. And given that it is made by man, it cannot be perfectly objective and will have biases. Keep in mind there are denominations of Protestantism which have highly heretical doctrines, and I say this as a Lutheran. There are Protestant denominations which hold God to not be infallible, or that Scripture is not divinely inspired, or that Christ is a created being. Moreover, if Mormon, Jehovah's Witness, or similar material has been included in any capacity, it becomes a great deal more dangerous.

Having looked at the webpage on the app store, the developers do not state their intentions for developing the app (material gain, charity, something else?), and do not have even have a summary of the list of sources the AI is trained on. It also appears to be closed-source, proprietary software, which means we don't have a way to investigate or audit it. 



Tread with extreme caution.
