What y'all think of my new Math?



1 + 1 = 3

1 - 1 = Ø, introducing the "Anti-Zero"

0.9 repeating = ∞

we have a dozen "zero but different", or, [math]\frac{1}{0}=\text{new imaginary numbers}[/math] type of threads every year. Yours is one of the most retarded and half-assed.

I put a begita on it though...



You did not address the One, however. Anti-Zero is obvious, yes. Using division is indeed a satanic way of expressing it.



And you also failed to address the 3rd equation, regarding the formula to infinity.



Are you a True Saiyan, with the blood of a Warrior, or one of those filthy Earth Primates?

>shounenspic

>iq lower than his monthly income

yup

That's alright. I have an IQ of at least 1.



Break it down however you want, even Einstein, at 0.160 is still below my level.

I was really hoping for more from you guys... ah well...



But I will offer this, to the intrepid.



How can 2 make 3? If you look at it, 2 is just two separate 1s. 1 + 1 does not equal 3, right guys?



But then how does Birth work? That is a case where 1 + 1 very much equals 3.



How can you explain it with Math? Do it, please, if your System is capable.

>And you also failed to address the 3rd equation, regarding the formula to infinity.

long division nigga, you clearly don't know it, and i don't think YOU can ever know it, my condolences to your parents

>How can 2 make 3?

easy, you just use a base10 with the symbols in order 0132456789, you retard would not know that "alphabet"(blame mathematicians for being retarded as to call a collection of symbols used for a task an alphabet, although its possibly better this way since mathematicians ain't very good with naming things, they are as bath a economists, you seen the "greeks" of economy?, retards named a thing vomma, and at some point they give up the pretense of using greek sounding terms and just use stuff like speed or charm, nomenclature is a lost art)=/=numbers even if it ripped your ass out

I'm talking about Real Math here. Not what this anon is talking about.>>15390706



If something cannot adequately describe the Physical, why would you insist on its usage?



No amount of logical reasoning will ever make 0.9 repeating equal 1 unless you break the laws of reality. How can you understand reality if you refuse to use its laws?



There is a point when Good Enough cease to be Good Enough and become Not Enough.



Division is inherently Satanic, and if you need to resort to it to explain the Divine World then you are lost.

base changes ain't math?, guess binary ain't real then

>I put begita on it though...



hahhahahahahahahahaahahahhaha

>>15390364 (OP)

>introducing the "Anti-Zero"
