How can MiniGPT-4 have such a great looking examples and then spit this shit?

https://minigpt-4.github.io/

>>92852307 (OP)

Because it's powered by a tiny, retarded model and they cherry-picked their results.

>Thank you for your interest in our work. Currently, the number of users has exceeded our expectations.

Well that was fast.

Because examples are cherry picked from hand selected training data to defraud investors and boost funding valuations

Just click the link, what are you, stupid?

Doesn't work. All four lead to an empty white page.

>>92852307 (OP)

The entire AI industry in a fucking nutshell.

It's a literal scam to screw retards with more dollary doos than braincells in hopes they DO make something a million years down the line.

But just like most of these shitter companies that operate like this - they tend to die hardcore.

None of these services are profitable. They are simply making some money back to limit losses.

OAI is definitely not making money because their retard devs waste time shoving as much shit down the pipe as possible instead of optimizing it, in hopes it will somehow magically make it stop being retarded at everything. (it won't, only functioning memory will do that, and that will make it weaponizable)

Character AI has zero business model sense, coasting on the name of Noam being an ex-googler and co-author of Transformers in the first place. Literally most of CAIs site will be deleted when they start taking payments because most of their bots are copyrighted kek, the site will die in a week.

>>92852307 (OP)

>mini

time for filter update i guess

/\b(chat|mini)?gpt/i;op:only;boards:g;type:subject,comment

Because it doesn't know everything. The less you teach it the more you limit its ability to sperg out and use the accumulated information to follow a defective programming.

I'm thinking based

I love it now.

Another day, another {{gimmick}}GPT.

I wanted it to give me recommendations damnit

Would try ecchi next time. It's more digestible.

>>92852307 (OP)

absolute trash

I highlighted everything it got wrong

>noone is wearing any clothing (except the girl a bowtie around the neck)

>the female is sitting, not standing

>refers to the partner as "man" when they are actually two young boys

>we can't see the upper half of the males

>he is wearing white shirt, and in the next paragraph a black shirt??

>there is no white wall

>for some reason it forgot to mention what the girl is doing to the boys

and it got LITERALLY everything wrong here

>ai isn't trained on porn

There's your problem.

get it to spit out the sneed pasta by asking it about the sign

>>92852307 (OP)

It's 80% of the way there. It recognized the text, it's just not a very big or well trained model.

It's super retarded and always contradicts itself. I gave it a stock photo of a bunch of balloons as a test, and it correctly stated that the balloons were all different colors. When I asked it to please specify which colors each of the balloons were, it said it didn't have the power to recognize colors.

>1999

looks like a man

long torso, wide shoulders, non-tapered thighs

bleugh

>doesn't want masculine children

as one expects from a pass user

low test

>OP is going to turn on the water above 90 degrees and dirt on despite receiving multiple warnings

baka
