How would history be different if women were the biologically superior sex (physically and intellectually)?

>>14950484 (OP)

they already are.

We’d be like Hyenas. Basically Orcs.

>>14950484 (OP)

then women would've become the men of society. They'd strive to conquer, advance, endure; they'd hunt and provide for the tribe, whereas the men would take care of the children and spend all day doing menial shit. So women would just evolve to be big, muscular and with a go-getter attitude while men would become all femboys. Society would evolve as normal then.

Anime website

>>14950484 (OP)



Women have more power in a relationship.

Its men that have to compete for a woman's vagina, not the other way around.

>>14950484 (OP)

Look to an american ghetto to see what a real matriarchy looks like.

>>14950484 (OP)

humans would be different 

they would evolve differently in that case

so, all of history and culture would be 100% different and not in any way similar to how it is now



It's kind of a pointless what-if. Like all those "what if in the past there was x" what-ifs. if there was x in the past everything would be different because of the butterfly effect which is overly complex and unpredictable

>>14950484 (OP)

Women would have more societal power, but outside of leadership I'm not sure they would actually perform different roles as men, because pregnancy works the same in this scenario. Women can't serve in combat because they are still the population bottleneck and they can't be a reliable labor base because they are spending much of their physical prime pregnant

So men would still do most of the physical labor and fighting with women remaining in the home - but the power dynamic between the two roles, and the composition of the ruling class, would be reversed

>>14950484 (OP)

Very

Dear Jesus, send me to this Universe NOW. I just want to be a househusband while my wife fights in a war or goes to work.

>So women would just evolve to be big, muscular and with a go-getter attitude while men would become all femboys.

Imagine

>>14950484 (OP)

Their groups will be like most animal hierarchies when they're larger than their male counterpart.

They'll form matriarchies and possibly cannibalize males. So no real sociological difference from feminism today.

True, but I think what OP meant was physically stronger, and so able to dominate men with physical force instead of just psychologically.

these posts are good, but consider this:

like this faggot post >>14951006 women have more power in relationships, because, like many mammals, the reproductive ability is exclusive of females, The nature's way to balance this, is with testosterone, so males can be bigger and stronger, and with that, keep females in check while they have to compete to each other. If women were just stronger than males, the disparity between sexes would be humongous, far more unjust than whatever radical muslim society could be now, look at hyenas, the males are literally second class individuals, it would be hell for males. 

>and know you should think about a future where any strenght factor could be replaced by machines/cyborg bodies/genetic manipulaton, you can start looking at human relations right now

>>14950484 (OP)

*blocks your way*

Good one
