I can see this thing with my eyes 



I clicked traffic lights on captcha for 5 years straight and a missile cant see a triangle against a blue background?

>>57945812 (OP)

Welcome to computers

>yfw AI-sensed warheads that can identify and classify objects then decide whether or not to hit them are the future of missiles

I truly believe Fox 4s will be AI-guided

>>57945812 (OP)

Now see it with radar.

>>57945812 (OP)

>I can see this thing with my eyes

and by that time it's too late. Can you see it with radar?

Launch aircraft already does that, target classification and IFF are considered before the missile is launched.

> look at it with satellites

> send missile to location 

> visually tracks 

 

b2 and f117 are cool af and I am a fan but i cant help but feel stealth is a shrinking niche as more potential enemies gain tech

>>57945812 (OP)

That's because its optical stealth (still classified) has not been engaged.

that is not what op said learn how to read. the question is why not just a webcam with a telens in the tip of the missile with some image recognition software



my first answer was be that it takes too much processing power but even a rpi could do it so no idea

>>57945812 (OP)

>He hasn't seen them with their active camouflage on.

The sky is a very, very big place and even a big plane isn't visible at several times zoom if it is at 60,000 feet. How do you find it without radar telling you where to look? Satalites map the world by taking images over long periods and piecing them together, they don't scan the globe with that resolution in real time. Not to mention clouds are thing. This whole concept falls to shit whenever it is cloudy or foggy or night time. Most of the major nations it is night 14+ hours a day for half the year.

You need some extremely high-spec cameras to come even close to being able to positively identify aircraft at long range, which are not gonna fit on a missile and even if not they would be way too expensive. Not only that, but they're gonna get significantly outranged by radar guided weapons. The best you can hope for is optical guidance from on launch vehicle-mounted cameras.

fucking retard

You mean Fox 5, Fox 4 means guns

You are massively retarded. Everything you've described has already been done 1000 times better with IR-guided missiles, except they never made stealth obsolete for the aforementioned reasons.

>step 1: find a speck of black with satellites in an entire sky

>what are clouds/night

isnt that just photo image censoring?

doesn't google earth and other aerial image providers have to do this regularly for national security reasons?

>why not imaging-infrared missiles

Have you heard of clouds? Distance?

First u need to see it to aim before you can shoot your sight-based missiles, and that's what radar is for.

>>57945812 (OP)

The triangle is just a hologram projection. The real plane is the blue part in the background of your picture.

delete this
