scientifically what is the correlation between IQ and ability to solve brain teasers?

>>15406638 (OP)

Line them up and cut off 1/3rd of both apples at the same time.

>>15406638 (OP)

Stab one of them, ez

>>15406638 (OP)

Cut both apples in half, no one eats the 4th piece

give the 2 apples to the boys, women aren't equal

this is the intended answer but >>15406661 is thinking out of the box here, i like it

These

Nah, that was obvious.

>>15406638 (OP)

Slice and dice the commies

>>15406638 (OP)

Eat the two apples and commit seppuku. No apple for these three faggots is definitely an equal share.

>>15406638 (OP)

The obvious one is killing one of them but is there another way?

>>15406638 (OP)

the correlation is that only retards care about IQ and brain teasers

>>15406638 (OP)

Use Banach-Tarski theorem to rearrange the two apples into three apples by invoking measure theory. Then use the knife to cut off your own dick and become a woman.

How do you cut off 1/3 of an apple?

42% will get this wrong.

>>15406638 (OP)

2/3 of an apple isn't enough to keep the doctor away. I'd give two of them an apple each, and the third can have the knife. This way all three are protected against doctors.

Then, if the person with the knife so chooses, they can kill the other two, take the two apples, then combined with the knife possess maximum possible protection. The two corpses may also distract the doctor's long enough for the survivor to gain a potential surprise attack against the doctor, thereby further improving their chances.

how can that be the intended answer? it makes no sense, you can't cut a third of an apple by eye

>>15406638 (OP)

You kill the female. There solve it for you

>>15406638 (OP)

>how you handle this with using only one stroke of the knife

that sentence gave me a stroke.

this is 100% correct. You can't eyeball 1/3 horizontally or vertically. plus, IRL apples will all have different dimensions, so they won't even have parallel sides to line up easily.



>intended answer

wrong. the intended answer is clearly to stab someone; presumably the other male so you become the Alpha Adam with two apples

>presumably the other male

the blonde faggot even has a vertical guide on his shirt, indicating where to aim for the heart. it couldn't be more obvious (to 6% of people at least)

>>15406638 (OP)

kill the girl fuck the blonde

thatsthejoke.png



 "Around 6%* of people are sociopaths/psychopaths or borderlines, who would think of murder before math.

>You can't eyeball 1/3 horizontally or vertically.



I'm going to try this right now and weight the results and report - disregarding the problem of the core of the apple

Problem: given natural numbers n,m, we want to divide each of n apples into two parts such that we can rearrange those parts to give an equal amount (n/m of an apple) to each of m people. For which pairs (n,m) can this be done?

Clearly (n, 2n) works by dividing each apple by half, so does (n, n+1) by cutting off 1/n of each apple.(3, 5) doesn't work.

I messed up : I've cut one piece of 50g and the rest is 110g.

Conjecture: all (n,m) for n >= m works. If n&lt;m, n=m-1 or 1

Not that bad

I thought better of my eyeballing abilities desu

>You can't eyeball 1/3 horizontally or vertically.

>tried to math it

>failed after a few seconds

>can cut two throats in one stroke

Logic conquers laziness
