There are obviously comic writers who try to buck this trend and write more thoughtful stories into the genre, but they are not typical and their work on a given legacy character often stands out as being unusual. Similarly there is occasionally attempts to do big brand wide events that change the settings somewhat, but these typically return to the same ideological status quo afterward, with people resurrected or replaced, evil personality changes reversed etc. This second aspect is more to do with the aforementioned economic constraint of selling content for a legacy character however, I believe. There is little in the way of superhero fiction that is in any way ideologically progressive, in that largely valourises status quo maintenance as being the default morally good action. The true heroes of superman are ma and pa kent for raising that boy right and giving the world Clarke Kent and superman who spends his time maintaining the american way of life instead of God King kal-el who changes the world to suit his personal vision. Batman doesn't do anything to improve gotham with his vast fortune and insight in to crime, he just beats up dudes in weird outfits. Tony stark might have access to crazy technology and immense wealth and philanthropic spirit, but the world he looks to build is basically just modern America anyway. Superheroes do not desire change. 

Superheroes seem to largely be the product of chance rather than choice. I am not sufficiently steeped in the medium to know if there is a tendency for villains to have got their powers by choice while heroes have their powers by chance. I suspect there is probably plenty of both but I wonder if there is a tendency toward a division. 

Anyway, that's my take. Fantasy as a genre is largely about change, either as restoration or a prior, more just order or as progress toward a new order. Superheroes as a genre are largely about maintenance of status quo against those who would change it

>>136823465 (OP)

I know a futa version exists don't it.

>>136823465 (OP)

>that dialogue

yes that seems to be the case, supervillains tend to have much more agency, theyre more often fueled by a choice rather than being thrust into the super lifestyle, and their powers or persona is usually their own decision 

even if they made the choice as a result some kinda tragic event or accident beyond their control, the choice they make is usually more out of a desire to regain power despite the tragic situation, rather than the tragic situation forcing them INTO power



but none of that matters 

you chose that OP image, youre not getting an interesting thread, youre getting a coomthread where most anons only focus on the image

this is what YOU choice

the artist uses selfies of herself as her reference photos.

>>136823465 (OP)

You're just beginning to realize the 'heros' were really the antagonists all along

Now read with fresh eyes

 K

He said dialogue. As in writing.



Not everyone can write. And I suspect the artist isn't a native speaker. Cultural stuff such as small-talk, flirting and banter translate really poorly, because you can't directly translate such things, you need to adapt them. For that knowing the words is not enough, you need to know a big chunk of culture or have a lot of exposure to casual language.

Proof?
