HAHA WTF ZERO IS THE FRIST NUMBER (LET ASSUME)

HAHA WTF (AXIOM OF WTF)

0? => 1

ITT: the existential explosive nature of 0, where 0 := nothing (existential equivalency)

chicken before the egg

However, we can assert a parity. This is addition (double meaning).

Primes then emerge

and then we have multiples

and then we have inverses

zero might be the first number, but it does not invent 1

how could we assert there is exists A thus there exists B unless B is among things which potentially exist and therefore always exist.

My question is

how can I tell the difference between 0 and 1?

wut

>>15415203 (OP)

>ZERO IS THE FIRST NUMBER

Technically, its the original number, 0 and 1 are both the first numbers since 1+0 =1.



> the existential explosive nature of 0, where 0 := nothing 

The explosive part comes from the fact that 0=-0 because anything that is its own opposite is a logical explosion per the principle of explosion and zero is its own opposite number.



>However, we can assert a parity. 

The parity between 0 and 1 comes from the fact that 0 is 1 whole amount of nothing.



>Primes then emerge and then we have multiples and then we have inverses

and then we have infinities because logical explosions tend to yield infinite arbitrary values



>zero might be the first number, but it does not invent 1

They depend on each other, 1 is a function of 0. 0! = 1, you need an empty hole to place a single pole.



>how could we assert there is exists A thus there exists B unless B is among things which potentially exist and therefore always exist.

Observe A and prove B and A have a functional relationship.





>how can I tell the difference between 0 and 1?

1 is the thing you observe and 0 is the unobserved thing it is put in.

>1+0 =1

It all makes sense now

Thank you for your words

but how will I ever sleep again knowing this information and the following implications?

I feel myself in a daze as if I am not longer here

Is this some sort of strange abstract art routine?



Who says you were sleeping well before coming to understand the concept of an additive identity?

Yes, I suppose I have always been somewhat disturbed, but now I am certain the world is void of peace

Man should have never attempted to know God's wisdoms.

God is just a greedy faggot who disturbed the monad's infinite peace just to manifest evil for the lulz and mock you relentlessly.
