should I learn french or latin?

>>21960242 (OP)

I don't know

>>21960242 (OP)

You should learn how to tie a hangman's knot and then throw it over your nearest tree and kys, faggot

I learned french rectally in just few weeks

>I'm going to post kys kys kys in every thread

go away underage retard

>>21960242 (OP)

English, french and german are the only languages any respectable man needs to learn.

>>21960242 (OP)

no one speaks latin besides homosexual pedophiles

no one speaks french besides retarded homosexuals

I started learning French 3 years ago and then started learning Latin, then abandoned Latin for French again and then did some more Latin and now I am learning French again

I weirdly have little interest in Rome, I am a Russophile at heart and so my motivation for learning Latin wasn't all that great

>French takes way less time to learn

>there is way more content in French for comprehensible input than there is in Latin which only has Lingua Latina

>there is more that I want to read written in French than there is in Latin

I don't feel like the time I spent with Latin was a waste of time though, I learnt a lot

>>21960242 (OP)

yeah, that sounds like a good idea.

>>21960242 (OP)

Who the fuck keeps olive oil in the fridge?

>I am a Russophile at heart

Disgusting.

>>21960242 (OP)

>latin

Latin is useless. You'll get only rip-offs of Homer (Virgil's Aeneid), some shitty treaties on rhetoric and morals, and semi-broken medieval mumbo-jumbo.



Pick Ancient Greek. You'll get masterpieces like Thucydides and Sextus Empiricus, that look decent even up to day.



>french

Useless. But if you're a native English speaker, you already know its syntax and ~60-70% of vocab.

French... Jean-Jacques Rousseau...

>Jean-Jacques Rousseau

"I talk about a 'return to nature' too, although it is not really a going-back as much as a coming-towards - towards a high, free, even terrible nature and naturalness, the sort of nature that plays, that can play, with great tasks ... &lt;...> - But Rousseau what did *he* really want to return to? Rousseau, this first modern person, idealist and rabble rolled into one; who needed moral 'dignity' in order to stand the sight of himself; sick from unrestrained vanity and unrestrained self-contempt. Even this deformity of a person who lay himself down on the threshold of a new age wanted to 'return to nature' - but once again: what did Rousseau want to return to? - I still hate Rousseau *in* the Revolution; it is the world-historical expression of this duality of idealist and rabble. I do not really care about the bloody farce played out in this Revolution, its 'immorality' : what I hate is its Rousseauean mortality - the so-called 'truths' that give the Revolution its lasting effectiveness, attracting everything flat and mediocre. The doctrine of equality! ... But no poison is more poisonous than this: because it *seems* as if justice itself is preaching here, while in fact it is the end of justice ... 'Equality for the equal, inequality for the unequal' - that is what justice would *really* say: along with its corollary, 'never make the unequal equal'."
