>iq of average college grad =114



>mostly women graduate

>women tend to stay around 100 with less deviation than men



>at most the average iq should be 100-105



Either college automatically jumps the iq of everyone who goes in it by 10 points OR College grad iq statitic is inflated



OR



the average iq is closer to 114, and that is the new iq 100



In conclusion i refuse to believe the average women is one standard deviation above the mean. Every basic women can get a degree right out of high school. It takes almost no skill or dedication.

>>15397491 (OP)

It's an outdated statistic because giving IQ tests is considered discriminatory now. At best, colleges are full of 105 IQ halfwits, not even 115 IQ midwits anymore.

Im in my senior year going into engineering phd.



I get 95-100 on every test in gen ed. The class average is 70. I consider myself average. I don't know most of the calculus or organic chem i was taught. The class is just knowledge of word meanings, and is logic questions (word problems). I have yet to study for a single test.



Yet still the gen ed seems like a cakewalk, and people struggle.



I really doubt the general population is "Smarter than average."

>>15397491 (OP)

I believe it has been found that in more sexually equal societies that women display the more spread out IQ distribution that men do, instead of it all clustered around the center. 

Which does make sense in a way. Sink or swim inter-individual competition pushes people down to states of underdevelopment just as much as it lifts some up to high levels of development.

Do you think the average college grad is 114? From what i can tell they are handing out degrees in liberal arts. Maybe its top heavy with alot of 130's in stem.



My experience in chemistry has not been promising though? Why would any idiot get a chem degree over chem engineering. Same with physics? Why not just get nuclear physics for obscure stuff, and mechanical engineering for practical physics.



I think stem has just as many idiots as geniuses. Not too mention all the onlyfans girls who have comp sci degrees.

I'd believe it. 

There are morons that coast on through, but the required rigor even in liberal arts does mean that you have to be fairly clever to get good scores.

>>15397491 (OP)

>OP doesn't realize he is assuming college grads are a representative sample of the population

ngmi

Bro, please don't go into any career that requires reasoning or problem solving.

Women have always performed better on exams.

They also make up ~60% of university attendees now.

Does that mean we'll now see a females dominate Nobel prizes and fields medals? Unlikely.

>Women have always performed better on exams.

Not aptitude exams like IQ or SAT.

Yeah you're right. It would probably lower the average by a few points then.
