Recommend me more books like this.

feet

Nothing else like it, sadly.

My diary desu

>>21936130 (OP)

yes officer, this post right here

is there a short version of this? containing only the best parts

based footbro

you have to go back

Tiger, tiger

epub? can't find on zlibrary

Dostoyevsky - The Meek One (Krotkaya)

Where's the pasta?

Bump

Pedofag zoomer reveals himself

>>21936130 (OP)

the quran

The bible actually has lots of accounts of men fucking little girls and fathers fucking their own daughters

Off topic, but i couldn't be arsed to make a new thread about this: what are (you)r thoughts on the movie adaptation by Kubrick? The only contact that i had with Lolita was that movie and if it is anything to go by, i'd rather stay away from the book

The movie sucks and is very loosely based on the book

The book is probably too spicy for you

>>21936130 (OP)

Justine (Sade), Bastard Out of Carolina (Dorothy Allison), Confessions of an English Maid (anonymous).

Synopsis?

>The book is probably too spicy for you

The reason that i disliked it hasn't anything to do with its content, in fact, the spicier it gets the better

>>21936130 (OP)

Ada or ardor if you like the weird underage girl sex stuff written by Nabokov.

Lolita is not even about the sex

The sex is specifically the parts that the author skips over

>>21936130 (OP)

Nothing fancy or spectacular, but it's okay and an enjoyable read.

imagine reading this in the subway

Is her family name "nutting" for real?

She looks like this btw. Imagine knowing that your milf English professor has written a book about fucking little boys.

Is there a Lolita equivalent for bestiality or do I have to write it myself?

Fuck off

WARNING!



this book is even more sad than lolita

read with caution

Oh

I haven't read it yet but was going to read it after Lolita

id say its better than lolita at some things

having the girl be the protagonist offers a unique perspective on her situation and her relationship with the older man

but of course the writing itself doesnt even come close nabokov



its also a lot more erotic than lolita

anything by eliot, pound or faulkner

Filtered

You were filtered out of the gene pool

no it doesn't

Lot*

Write it yourself, sis

You clearly don't know shit about the bible

Go read original kjv

>you're a pedo

>you're a little kid

what did he mean by this

STOLEN , STOLEN POST , MODS , JANNIES

Penguin knew what they wuz doin' with that cover.

They knew.

>>21936130 (OP)

when I was going through puberty I jerked off to this cover

>>21936130 (OP)

Off topic, but where can I get the Humbert Humbert cover? You know... that disturbing one...

I think that wasn't actually put into production.

It was just making a point.



But yeah, it is the cover that makes the most sense and fits what the author was going for.
