>what if we stretched a mig21 and gave it TWO engines

kino, china is based

>>57977081 (OP)

>mig21

Oh for God's sake, it's painfully obvious that the J-8 is a fusion of the SU-15 and the MiG-19

>>57977081 (OP)

The J-8II is a derivation of the J-8, which was upscaled from the J-7 and is a license produced MiG-21. While it did have inspiration from several other aircraft, it was indeed at one point a MiG-21.

meant for 

it uses two Tumansky R-13s which is the mig21 engine

Ahem

>Specifications (Su-15TM)

>Powerplant: 2 × Tumansky R-13F-300 afterburning turbojet engines, 40.21 kN (9,040 lbf) thrust each dry, 70 kN (16,000 lbf) with afterburner

>It was conceived in the early 1960s as a low-risk program based on enlarging the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-21F, a version of which the PRC was producing as the Chengdu J-7.

It's a mix of Mig-21 with Mig-23 and F-4 Phantom.



Also i really like Sino-Flankers, it's what the Flankers were actually supposed to be if Russia wasn't a broken mess.

what does a single seater non carrier capable plane initially with no radar and an internal gun have in common with a two seater naval fighter with a radar and no gun?

Why are they incapable of originality? holy shit

The intakes are clearly copied from the F-4 my dude.



At first i thought it was a Chinese WT copy, but it's just the name of the artist.

>The intakes are clearly copied from the F-4 my dude.

Wrong

Well it still copied the F-4, then they copied from the Su-15. Points still stands :)

Aircraft are more or less a solved design. Doubly so that they're developing off of Soviet derived aircraft to begin with. What are they supposed to do, build a forward swept wing jet biplane just so that their stuff looks different from Western or Soviet stuff?

>Air intake of the F-4 is curved and not straight but tilting forward

>Air intake of the J-8 is squared and straight

Have your eyesight checked anon

>>57977081 (OP)

>MiG-21

I will not stand for Flagon erasure.

convergent evolution bud. The Su-15 and J-8-II are convergent designs the same way the MiG-21 and Su-11 are. The original J-8 was literally a stretched MiG-21 with two side-by-side engines.



Later on, they got their hands on better tech and kludged together an upgrade. I'm not 100% sure on specifics, but they did get their hands on Egyptian MiG-23s at one point, so the new nose and intakes are either MiG-23 derived or they're from that weird period at the end of the Cold War when they were getting tech from the West.

That's just nitpicking, the basic design is the same, the point is that they clearly took that intake design from the F-4 and adapted it.

there are only so many ways to do a supersonic inlet geometry. kys

I know, still, F-4 intake. Can't unsee.



Same as the J-10 intake, i see it and think F-16.

how do you see a diverterless intake and decide "f-16"



i mean come on



do you also look at a P-51 and think F-16

No i think of P-63 but the intake in down below.

Yes.

It's not hard to connect the J-10 to the F-16 seeing as the J-10 is a Lavi copy which was the jew take on the F-16.

Nowadays the Lavi and J-10 are pretty much different aircraft desu.

Shame for the jews i guess, they could've had their own neat F-16, but they opted for cheap F-16's instead.

>kikes opting for cheap

now theres a surprise
