What a massive downgrade from Arthur

i implore you to reconsider

>>634913095 (OP)

RDR2 tried to make John as least likeable as possible. I hated it so much, it actually made me mad.

>>634913095 (OP)

Zoomer bait

>>634913095 (OP)

Both are great characters.



John had a better story arc though, and I like that he actually tried to raise a family.

>>634913095 (OP)

>implying

Kino ending and music. I still liked it more than 2's ending

https://youtu.be/Yag41F7eCLU [Embed]

No it didn't you retard. It's a simple coming of age story.

>It's a simple coming of age story.

It was poorly done imo. it sucked and that's why people say he's a downgrade compared to Arthur

>>634913095 (OP)

Arthur is a fucking schizophrenic whose personality seemingly changes wildly from one cutscene to the next, both before and after he gets sick. Marston is a far more consistent and better written character in his own game.

>seemingly changes wildly from one cutscene to the next

do you have an example? i noticed hes just an asshole to white guys but nicer to everyone else which i guess is consistent

why do 4channelers not raise a fuss about this cutscene

>Murfree brood encounter where they lure to a pitfall

>ragdoll into the hole

>orthur casually goes "dammit"

other than that john had way better combat dialogue since he throws out area specific one liners

BILL BILLSON

COME OUT HERE

RIGHT NOW

>>634913095 (OP)

John is better written and better voice acted than Arthur, and is cooler overall.

JOHN WHY DON'T YOU TELL ROCKSTAR TO SEND SOMEONE JUST A *LITTLE BIT* MORE IMPRESSIVE NEXT TIME? FOR EXAMPLE, ARTHUR MORGAN, OUR OLD GANG LEADER, YOU REMEMBER ARTHUR MORGAN, AND HIS RED DEAD REDEMPTION, TOO? ANYWAY...

>asshole to white guys

Majority of the strangers and NPCs that Arthur helps in side missions are white guys.

>>634913095 (OP)

No not really. I enjoyed both, but I preferred John as he was a colder, whatever-it-takes outlaw. Arthur moralized too much. Like the revolution stuff in Mexico from the first game. If you had been playing as Arthur he would have gotten all invested in the rebel cause and exclaimed how brave and strong the women were for fighting the good fight. 

John on the other hand just used it to his own advantage to get what he wanted and didn't actually give a shit about it.

Arthur = Bros before hoes. conscience demon that wants to do good for everyone.

John = Wife before bros. just a lost man who wants to please his wife.

what happens in it?

I can't remember every single scene from every game I played

>>634913095 (OP)

I agree its too much gary stu he even survives future john deathtrap and you need plot disease to kill it

It was fine ignoring the herd tutorial before 1 there had to be lazy fuck to have redemption in 1

Arthur is more realistic than John, because the concept of faithful men, as presented by Marston in RDR1, can only exist in fiction.

what game did you play? Arthur never gets invested in causes.

Some of the funniest shit I’ve ever seen

https://youtu.be/r5KsJ4cBHPg [Embed]

>murders like 15 people 

>3 minutes later

>mr strauss I don't like taking money from these poor desperate folks no more
