Would anyone have a problem with trannies if they looked like this in real life?

>>14906657 (OP)

Humanities or history?

>>14906657 (OP)

Of course not, but I still want to have children, so I will have to respectfully decline her advances.

Transgenderism has existed throughout history and it is also a topic of discussion in the humanities.

you can discuss this inhumanity over here: >>>/lgbt/

>>14906657 (OP)

Yes, of course. Some people will never accept minorities regardless of how much they integrate into society.



They'd have far less problems though, realistically.

Gender studies is part of the humanities.

>>14906657 (OP)

If technology does progress to the point where you can turn a man into a genuine genetically indistinguishable from a real woman woman what would the argument against them become?

What are you struggling to understand? Transgenderism existed thoughout human history and it is a topic of investigation and discussion in the humanities, even moreso than religion.

>>14906657 (OP)

If trannies could actually magically turn into women they would not be as hated, no. But they will never be women, down to their genetic makeup through every cell in their body they are men, so it doesn't matter.

>even moreso than religion.

Nice attempt but you jumped the shark.

they would not even be the same person anymore because those male genes exist in the whole body

>>14906657 (OP)

Because they don't look like that in real life.

>>14906657 (OP)

Anime is a weaponised way to spread faggotry and trannism. Just look at that shit. It's very, very gay. Never got the appeal.



Japanese obsession with "cute", "chibi" and so on has turned their men into hikkomori cucks. There is nothing to emulate from that society, they are going extinct.



This, and it's no surprise the weirdo freak beta males are attracted to it

ynbaw kys

>There is nothing to emulate from that society

This website is emulating a Japanese one.

>Would your opinion on sex change if you had sex?

>what do you mean? I've never had sex.

>ok, but what if you did?

>No, I've never had sex before.

>>14906657 (OP)

No, my problem with trannies is that most of them look like monsters

>>14906657 (OP)

>Would anyone have a problem with trannies if they looked like this in real life?



I think people would have 'less' of a problem with them, but there'd still be friction. 

There's basically three aspects to the transexual/transgender controversy:

-The visual discomfort caused by the ugly ones. That isn't complicated. This is purely a natural visceral response to just not liking ugly things.

-The socially disruptive contaminate of being told you can be a man or a woman. Lets just assume for the sake of the argument that we can be whatever gender we want to be: not everybody gets to be who they want to be and in some circumstances it's irresponsible or disruptive to those around you to just do whatever you want. It's kind of like how your parents tell you you can be an astronaut or the president, but in reality you'll probably become a mechanic, or an IT tech, or a plumber, and while it wasn't your 'dream' you'll probably still be perfectly happy. 

-A certain portion of transgenderism is just the mental illness of gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria isn't a lifestyle and it shouldn't be treated as something fashionable, but it's getting associated with those kinds of things. That's a problem.
