*BSD:

- No hardware support.

- 2 developers, 3 users.

- Call it bug free because there aren't enough people to notice the bugs.



Linux:

- Written by a greasy neckbeard to copy off Unix.

- Can't even manage to certify as Unix.

- Bugs galore. No hardware support. No drivers.

- Kernel written in Rust.



Windows:

- Not even good enough to copy off Unix.



Apple:

- Derived from BSD, which is derived from Unix.

- Certified as true Unix.

- BSD with most active development, best hardware support, and least exposed bugs.

- No Rust in the kernel.



Clearly macOS is the superior OS of choice. Long live Unix.

meds

>>93151040 (OP)

>Linux:

>- Written by a greasy neckbeard to copy off Unix.

Most Linux kernel development is corporate these days, Linus just started it



>- Can't even manage to certify as Unix.

Because it costs thousands of dollars. The UNIX certification is just a corporation charging exorbitant amounts of money for a useless "certification"



>- Bugs galore. No hardware support. No drivers.

Plenty of Hardware support if you use a distro that includes them by default (like Pop_OS)



>- Kernel written in Rust.

this isn't a problem for the end user



>Apple:

>- Derived from BSD, which is derived from Unix.

you forgot to mention that it includes code from the Mach kernel and who knows whawt else. Again, macOS is proprietary so these claims can't be verified



>- Certified as true Unix.

because Apple paid a bunch of money to the people that own the UNIX trademark



>- BSD with most active development, best hardware support, and least exposed bugs.

we can't confirm how "developed" macOS is because it is proprietary



>- No Rust in the kernel.

again, doesn't matter for the end user

Is this the thread?

>>- Kernel written in Rust.

>this isn't a problem for the end user

>>93151040 (OP)

Don't use Takagi-san to peddle your fruit toys. Thank you!

i will pollute and corrupt Takagi-san with my Linux-user body (300lbs)

>c-com...compile... errr...

>well.. because it just is! okay!

>>93151040 (OP)

>Unix

Troonix was never good.

>>93151040 (OP)

>best hardware support

the distinct lack of hardware support is one of the defining features of macos if anything.

>you vill use our preselected processor lineup

>you vill not use AMD

>you vill not get a running system on custom hardware ootb

meds, NOW

>>93151040 (OP)

All unix distributions and their clones are buggy, unreliable pieces of mess. Unix was supposed to be a minimalist system for computers that were severly limited even by late 1960s standards, but with all the basic things that were originally missing that got bolted on top of it, the multiple incompatible implementation of the same features on the various distribution, the retarded reimplementation of said features that were supposed to be compatible with all previous implementations but ended up compatible with none, the thousands of overly simple utils that share no concistency whatsoever, and other issues inherent with systems with no proper direction, unixes and their clones just became freaks.

Unixes &amp; clones are a setback of 50 years in computing history and are still less mature than MVS, VMS and other systems it replaced were in the 1980s. The fact that unixians discovered hypervisors last decade when it was a thing since the 70s for real enterprise systems is just a single example among others.

fpbp

really made me think

yes

>>93151040 (OP)

>No drivers

Funny haha pacman -S nvidia

for me its windows and linux

same

same

Absolutely this.

samefag

meds

BTFO
