Holy shit these genes are found from all over animal kingdom + also protistan (there is one protist in here)

>>15382828 (OP)

OMG!!! All organisms have ATCG!!!! WOOOAAAAAHHH I FRICKIN LOVE BASEDENCE

not sure what you're trying to prove, retarded thread

>Confusing genes with nucleotides

>>15382828 (OP)

>amino acids are the building block of proteins

Wow. Shocking.

I am thinking maybe you have zero T so not all organisms

>>15382828 (OP)

You cut the full sequence off.



Is there any place we can look at these?

>>15382828 (OP)

One would expect as much, or so I'd hope, given simpler organisms are comprised of more generalizable genes given more generalizable traits. Same goes for its necessity as biology has to work with what is already there, as regress to more general and simplified adaptations would take the same amount of time with an equally protracted reversal of environmental circumstances. That would definitely be rather unique due to how implausible it would be.



I am not sure which paper or dataset you got the image from? There are a lot of interesting homologies found in attempting reconstructions of LUCA, or hypotheses on the structuring of the constituents of LUCA. For the most basal generalized structures found in all life there is a ton of genetic homology due to shared ancestry of course. Research on LUCA and toward abiogenesis would tell you a lot more neat things like that if you're curious.

I accept the L, great comeback and gr8 get. I kneel.

Wait until you learn about human accelerated regions and genomic conservation. Essentially a large amount of human specific DNA is actually just back-evolved from mammals. So for instance mammals might have evolved a G -> A 500 million years ago from fish, but when we look at certain regions of the human genome humans evolved back the A -> G independently of other species, i.e. chimps still have an A there, as do every other mammal, but fish still have the G along with humans.



best fits are noted with asterisk

>>15382828 (OP)

I don't get why this is interesting. Life shares common ancestry and small differences in genotype make huge differences in phenotype. So what?

I think its interesting, because it means that something like that sequence must have been present in the common ancestor of all those organisms.

yes, for a billion years



of course one or two of these organisms could have randomly generated out of thin air the same sequence when enough time passes but thats highly doubtful

>I think its interesting, because it means that something like that sequence must have been present in the common ancestor

Of course, that's why the story is that all life came from the first replicating molecule, or Adam and Eve, or the one consciousness, or an alien engineer, or...By the way: didn't the fact that all life forms are cells tell you they have something in common?

what the fuck are you talking about schizo

>Retard doesn't know Dawkins, Bible, Hinduism and truthers

>>15382828 (OP)

>mfw all of these have a common ancestor

>mfw all of these are either aquatic, invertebrate, or both.

WAOW WHAT A SURPRISE ANON!
