>Society is geared to reward high math and spatial IQ people

>LLMs are best used by high verbal IQ people

>High Math/Spatial IQ but verbally stunted 'geniuses' are too stupid to see how fucked they are



What are the scientific implications of this? I think we're about to witness a power shift that has never been seen before in the history of mankind.

>>15395323 (OP)

Everyone talking about ai is a retard as it's obviously worthless.

Sci is a retard board so I anticipate 300 replies and daily spam of ai threads.

>Too low IQ to tell the difference between sci-fi plot devices and IRL 

>>>/lit/21950333

This is exactly what I'm talking about.

You're probably a verbally student math/code 'genius', and lack the kind of intelligence necessary to make best use of a tool like this.



It's seriously worrisome to see relatively intelligent people miss the potential of a technology like this right under their noses. I guess this is proof of the multiple intelligence types idea.

Great, you'll die of peak oil anyway.

>>15395323 (OP)

>Society is geared to reward high math and spatial IQ people

Lol

Society is geared for these things

Ai is not worthless. Search engines often give worthless garbage search results and that's where Ai comes in. Where the Ai struggles is at basic math and logic. It even gets basic facts wrong too.

>>15395323 (OP)

OP you are stupid, why make a thread about your cope here? Go use GPT-4 to learn kid

If you have such high "verbal" IQ then you should be able to use GPT AI to become filthy rich, right? So why don't use do that instead of shilling on /sci/?

Isn't it ironic that AI is mathematical formulas but mathematics is precisely what it is not capable of? It's really retarded when you think about it.

statistics is not mathematical formulas, its hardly even math

Which is why it's so bizarre that people think GPT AI is "intelligent".

our nervous systems also consist of largely statistical/cumulative, rather than strictly formulaic, processes (at the relevant scale, ofc). The biochemical physics are just as rigid as the computational rules underlying machine learning algorithms. And we think we are "intelligent," perhaps statistical processes are better equipped to 'realize' a novel, surprising, and largely random universe, than we give it credit for.

>>15395323 (OP)

https://ojs.aaai.org/aimagazine/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/2642/2532

tl;dr ai will compliment people who already do well in their respective fields 

if you think otherwise you might be retarded

This is the right answer

>>15395323 (OP)

Its the opposite, LLMs help those with low to medium verbal skills the most.

AI is only as good as its teacher.

Believe me - it's retarded.

>>15395323 (OP)

"AI" is a tool, nothing else. there is no actual I in AI.



>Ai is not worthless. Search engines often give worthless garbage search results

lmao, what do you think search engines are? they are AI... e.g.: google used to be very fucking good until they modified it to be more politically correct.

You are just extremely ignorant about your own ignorance. GPT can't even do Caesar encoding without fucking it from time to time. You can't even use it to browse for stuff because censorshit. Is only good at gaslighting morons like you.
