you do run with mitigations off right anon? you're not a paranoid freakazoid right?

my cpu is new enough that only retbleed decreases performance, so for me it's just retbleed=off

>>93009679 (OP)

My PC is slower with mitigations off so I keep them on.

>>93009679 (OP)

why are you using a fag shell, where's your st

>only disabling one 

just disable them all.

explain how disabling them decreases your performance?

how dare you call bash a fag shell you mongrel. bash is love. bash is pure. bash is life itself.

please read >>93009783

also dilate

>>93009679 (OP)

I deleted all the microcode updates dont need none of that crap slowing down mah Pee See

>>93009679 (OP)

I've got an Alder Lake so mitigations on is faster

>explain how disabling them decreases your performance?

Come on Anon nobody here is an Intel or AMD engineer all we can do is compare 2 numbers.

>explain how disabling them decreases your performance?

It just does with recent enough kernels and CPUs that were optimized for the patches. Verified using unixbench.

>mitigations on is faster

i'm curious how you measure faster. Which benchmarks did you use?

post benchmarks that show mitigations on making your cpu go faster.

Look it up yourself, brainlet. It's common knowledge at this point.

the only brainlet is you for stating something and unable to back it up with facts. stop embarrassing yourself, kid.

Alright CIA retard, I'm still not changing my boot flags.

>can't support his claims because he knows they are baseless

>others won't spoonfeed me so I live in ignorance

Not my problem.

LOL bro if you can't back your stuff up with facts then the only one who is ignorant is you. sorry, people are not mindless sheep who will just blindly "trust me bro" not my responsibility to go looking for claims you state to see if they are true. if you can't back up your claims, then i'm not believing it. 



you stated a claim and refuse to back it up. therefor, its a lie.

the performance difference is so minuscule that it's not worth the effort to add the line to my boot args

>minuscule

I've seen this said but I've also seen claims of up to 30%.

>>93009679 (OP)

yes

ok cry more

>still doubling down on his baseless claims

>>93009679 (OP)

I switched all my equipment over to AMD when this shit started hitting the fan. Feels good.

amd is affected too.

according to phoronix you are are wrong: https://www.phoronix.com/review/alder-lake-mitigations/3

a very small performance bump with them off. very, very small, but overall, its not faster with them on at all. its either no difference with on or off or tiny gain with them off.

those results are from before spectre v2 hit. the gain with mitigations off is bigger now because of spectre v2 mitigations hurting performance.

for the lazy: https://www.phoronix.com/review/spectre-bhi-retpoline/2



I/O and networking takes a massive hit with mitigations on thanks to spectre v2.

depends on the CPU generation

on Haswell the performance cost is brutal, even SMT has to be turned off to be considered (((secure)))

pretty sad that you have to use windows 7 to turn off mitigations on windows.

no you don't

then explain how to turn off mitigations on windows 11.

no

Of course no. That's because you can't on windows 11. They are baked in.

>>93009679 (OP)

im so paranoid i wont use *nix

nice image yaara

Sorry, your cope card was denied. You won't be getting your shekels from Intel this week.
