Is this explosion big enough to be a nuke?

>>58046874 (OP)

Unironically no. If a nuke went off, you would know.

>>58046874 (OP)

It's GEPTIL detonation i think

>>58046874 (OP)

No, looks like solid fuel exploding and deflagrating.

>>58046874 (OP)

no, not even a tiny one.

explosion pattern is all wrong

all of those burning fragments raining down like fireworks are completely uncharacteristic of one.

its a bunch of stuff going off and exploding other stuff into the air where it proceeds to burn up slower as it falls away from the main fireball.

>>58046874 (OP)

Lol nope. Looks like your usual chinese factory explosion.

burning grains trailing white smoke (would be white in color picture) are always solid rocket fuel, when you see that it's a dead giveaway something like an SAM installation, missile depot, launch site or something else went off

solid, not hypergols

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_aHEit-SqA [Embed]

is this being passed around as footage of the big explosion on the ukrainian side from the other day?

>burning grains trailing white smoke (would be white in color picture) are always solid rocket fuel

One exception, white phosphorous munitions can kinda look like this. But those munitions are generally in ammo depots anyway since they're used for smoke generation.



It's irrelevant really because anything that looks like what you described you should stay the fuck away from.

>>58046874 (OP)

>that smoke and flash of burning Al

Solid rocket fuel burning quickly

Reminds me of the Pepcon explosion (but not nearly as big).



https://youtu.be/gGSx54CkWsQ?t=10 [Embed]

Nukes generate way more heat, the typical ring or ip security camera on the market would have melted within a second of detonation. The close up cameras that filmed those nuke tests were insulated in lead and brick structures and filmed the explosion through mirrors so it actually didn't look directly at it, and protected the film.

>>58046874 (OP)

Considering that nothing's on fucking fire, no.

>>58046874 (OP)

Anyone who actually thinks this looks like a nuke should just do humanity a favor and shoot themself for that retardation

White smoke trails = chemical explosion

>Protected the film

Nigger, while they did do that, what really protected it was them running the film fast as fuck and a filter.

Low yield nuclear detonation at least initially can almost be indistinguishable from conventional explosives since both will blind cameras temporarily and not do a whole lot of collateral compared to what you see in high yield bomb tests videos.

Either way the conflagration afterwards proves it is likely some sort of liquid fuel. Solid fuel looks similar sure but to me it's just not the same.

https://youtu.be/N38qd_A4DwM [Embed]

More complete footage.

How many kilo of fuel and warhead are in 12 fully armed s-300 batteries?

Less than in 20 SS24 ICBMs

>First it was 16 missiles now it's 12 batteries

Yep Russian disnfo

if it wasn't in the exact place where this>>58046912 was located, I could buy that, but the simplest explanation is the rocket fuel from the ICBMs
