This shows that the Riemann hypothesis is necessarily false if Proposition 1.8 is valid.

This shows that Proposition 1.8 is valid, and that, as a consequence, the Riemann hypothesis is false.

This one also shows rigorously that RH is false and it doesn't depend on any propositions.

Here is one that lays out the idea very quickly but without rigor.

About a week ago I told you to refer to theorem 1.9 with regards to proposition 1.8, and you still haven't done that you worthless idiot.



Enjoy coping in thinking you still have successfully done it.

I told you that I believe the reason you refer to a problem but do not state it is because it doesn't exist.

Well duh I already did it countless times you retard.



Also regarding axiom 1.14 I'm not sure but maybe it's provable from already established and "commonly" used axioms, it just makes the whole thing seem obsolete

>Well duh I already did it countless times you retard.

I believe you are lying.

I believe you are a fucking schizo, also a bit stupid one at that

>regarding axiom 1.14 I'm not sure but maybe it's provable

>Axiom

>Provable

I'm not Tooker but none of your critiques are valid after this level of stupidity.

Ahh another worthless schizo student kiddy that misunderstood my point.



You see, Tooker is fucking lazy and just makes up axioms even though those are actually provable statements from already commonly accepted axioms.



Why am I supposed to repeat myself for a stupid worthless college student like you piece of shit?

Imagine being such a worthless schizophrenic piece of shit that you misread what I've written, you literally just made up stuff to make me look stupid



DO YOUR HOMEWORK AND STOP ARGUING WITH ME

What this idiot is calling "commonly accepted axioms" didn't exist when Riemann formulated his hypothesis, and that is only one of the reasons why I don't use them.

Fuck schizos and ocd'ers in academia.

>DO YOUR HOMEWORK AND STOP ARGUING WITH ME

Thats my line, stop copying me, you crazy person you.

>>15367129 →

>>15367032 (OP)

Mathematics is subjective and you are not well liked.

>Mathematics is subjective

Until it becomes Objective.



When the human experience becomes an expression of Mathematics, and Base Reality itself.



BECOME PHYSICA, REEE ETERNAL!

Mathematics is not subjective and I am not well liked, the latter being a rather profound understatement.

>>15367032 (OP)

Toker, did you write this will the CIA was sending electric shocks to your testicles? None of this shit make any sense.

>>15367032 (OP)

I'm glad to see you again. Are you still homeless? Are you finally taking your meds?

I think I wrote that one while they were still only electroshocking my asshole and legs. It didn't escalate to my dick and balls until Chauvin approached me disguised as a woman and then put an electroshock device down my pisshole after I paid him to suck my dick, thinking he was a female prostitute. That's the real thing that George Floyd was about.

>>15367032 (OP)

This makes a lot of sense, Toker! Did your RH proof really come to you while you had George Floyd's BBC inside your electroshocked asshole as you screamed 'I CAN'T BREED'

Link to your blog?

http://gg762.net/
