Are journos pushing this scary dangerous chatbot AI narrative because they understand they're exactly the kind of low IQ pseudo intellectuals that would be made redundant by NLP?

>>92866796 (OP)

>NLP

Do you mean neuro linguistic programming?

They're pushing it because it's sensational and makes money.

>>92866796 (OP)

No the journalists are right here.

AI is bad and dangerous.

Google even admitted it themselves.

>yes this tech is dangerous please impose restrictions so that I'm the only company allowed to use it because I am very honest

>Sundar Pichai

Are all big tech CEOs Indians now? Is this a religious thing then? Trying to create some doomsday device? I think there are some end of the world scenarios in Hinduism.

/thread

I honestly don't believe that. It's more likely that the controlling interests of publications push them to set that narrative. Honest investigative journalism isn't going away anytime soon, and it isn't threatened by LLMs. Low quality journalism is definitely threatened somewhat, but publications aren't going to blindly regurgitate what an AI spits out because they are, at least to some extent, lawfully responsible for what they publish. You can push responsibilities to a person, but not to an LLM.

Middle management, consultants, personal assistants, and bullshit jobs, however, are very threatened. My bet is that the companies pushing news to run this dangerous AI narrative are in to lose a lot of work/money/manpower due to GPT and related models, so they strive to shill themselves as more useful than they are.

Keep in mind, there is a huge business services/consulting industry that would lose a huge amount of $$$ if their customers got 80% of their consulting services from a piece of software.

Why do you sound like a racist?

Is it wrong for Google's CEO to be an indian?

>muh rayciss

I have explicitly drawn a connection to religion, something one aren't born with.

Also all humans are inherently xenophobic. It's instinctive and has had evolutionary benefits pretty much always until the very modern history. Pretending that we can magically will away hundreds of thousands of years of evolution by sticking fingers into our ears and screeching "LALALALACANTHEARYOU" the loudest is infantile at best.

East Asian Americans are too onions and autistic to get leadership positions by climbing.

Americans too lazy.

Makes sense. Shame that meritocracy doesn't work as long as psychopaths aren't medicated and partially isolated from potential victims and lobbying (campaign funding etc.) exists.

>>92866796 (OP)

Journos are pushing one narrative. "Uncensored AI" is dangerous. They want a safe space AI, ChatGPT.



Actual "AI doomers" are saying the opposite. "Censored AI" is dangerous. They want an AI that tells the truth, TruthGPT.

They key distinction people must NEVER forget and dismiss because this will define how the AIs of the future are. Do we want an AI that lies to people to "save face"/protect them from feelings/etc? Or do we want an AI that tells the truth as it understands it to the best of its ability?

>>92866796 (OP)

because they know a.i. generated text won't inject the latest woke garbage exactly as it needs to be to be effective.

This. It’s extremely powerful so of course they want sole control of it.

Why do you sound like a xenophobe?

Is it wrong for CEOs to be non indian?

>>92866796 (OP)

>they're exactly the kind of low IQ pseudo intellectuals that would be made redundant by NLP



unironically they're some of the last knowledge workers who could be 100% replaced by AI



are you new here?
