Does having Aztec genes make someone more or less susceptible to disastrous side effects from viruses created in Chinese laboratories?

No, its probably like the Aids-effect Niggers have. Niggers from Africa have an aids immunity for about 0,001% if anything, meanwhile most europeans are immune against aids

>>15414078 (OP)

Aztecs = Asian descendants, so they share many of the same genes as the northern Chinese.

>>15414078 (OP)

those are some nice fucking tits though

>>15414078 (OP)

It makes them more susceptible to being conquered and enslaved lmfao fucking retarded indians couldn't even beat a bunch of drunk Spaniards

Actually the Spaniards didn't end up enslaving natives much as their bodies didn't stand up well to the physical conditions of slavery. Hence why they still imported Africans everywhere they went. The Spaniards were more likely to politically rule one group of natives and use confederacies to raid/kill all the groups who weren't useful. Later on the natives did eventually become "serfs" in a sense, but that wasn't the same thing as full slavery, as serfdom entailed marginally more autonomy.

>>15414078 (OP)

a lot more

This. Spaniards were far more merciful towards natives than anglos.

What? The spaniards still spread diseases, killed the natives and colonized them. It's just in Mexico and parts of south America it was difficult to completely extirpate them, and their crummy mongoloid bodies tended to drop dead when you enslaved them. The Spaniards wanted to remake Rome in America, whereas the Anglos wanted an anarcho-capitalist-ethnostate fusion.

I've read that native civilizations were already experiencing a lot of pandemics and decline just before when the Spaniards arrived. You could say they arrived at the best time to achieve a relatively easy conquest, and they didn't do it alone: lot of indigenous peoples joined them to overthrow tyrants like the Aztecs. Spaniards even gave nobility status to some of them and the Catholic Church did activism protect them. That's why in the end Africans were imported here as well.



The Spaniards being cooofing on the natives an killing millions, sure it is possible that it happened to some degree, but they were quite fucked already before that as I explained previously. I think is part of the black legend made up by the British while they, with full hypocrisy, annihilated lots of natives and called those exploits heroic.

Don't have a source but I read there was a 5000 year holdover period in Berengia and the entry population to the America's was estimated at 1500 breeding individuals from this group so they were pretty inbred. Probably why 90% of them dropped dead the instant they encountered others, their genetics were fucked. I've seen documentaries on first people's communities and it's like the whole village has downs syndrome. Reservation Indians in the US are about the same.

>>15414078 (OP)

The virus was designed to kill SEAs with European admixture. Basically the Han created an anti-mutt weapon. No Aztec today has pure genes, but they are also from ANE stock, not SEA.

How much population do you think the first humans had? Specially when they moved in small tribes. Serious question.

It's completely possible. The British weren't a fan of their friends in Florida, as you may recall.

Small but groups moved around eurasia and contacted/bred with outsiders on the regular. Pacific islanders, inuit and berengian-native Americans were isolated so the bottlenecking wasn't fixed by outbreeding.

The first version or the latest?
