See picrel.



https://www.pcgamer.com/you-can-buy-a-portable-quantum-computer-for-under-dollar9k/



These are NMR quantum computers (meaning Nuclear Magnetic Resonance). They cost $8,700 - $58,000 (American equivalent of the original prices in Yen that they're selling it). 



Would these be a nice upgrade from microcomputers? China is home to lots of semiconductors and if a trade war started and America sanctioned China, wouldn't we still be able tp use these since Quantum computers use superconductors? Because it seems as if regular PCs are no longer safe anymore, given how Quantum computers can break ANY encryption. I don't know if these things can be bugged or not. Especially with Quantum encryption.



These computers would basically be good for superhackers. How safe would you rate these miniature Quantum computers (which I shouldn't call a Quantum Circuit a "computer" because the Turing Model doesn't apply to such machines). Lastly, if China stopped giving America semiconductors, could we still make these computers?

Can it run Linux

>>93093110 (OP)

>the Turing Model doesn't apply to such machines

A quantum computer is turing complete, but a no turing machine is capable of properly simulating a quantum computer (in theory)

Question: if America and China entered a trade war, and stopped selling us their semiconductors, would this still work, since it uses superconductors instead of semiconductors? I know it would still be a devastating blow to silicon valley regardless.



Also Quantum Circuits are not Turing machines.

>no turing machine is capable of properly simulating a quantum computer

Now I've finally learned something from this board. Thank you.

>>93093110 (OP)

Can they run Minecraft

>>93093110 (OP)

No games

>>93093110 (OP)

jew scam

>>93093110 (OP)

god doesn't roll dice you fucking retard quantum mechanics isn't real take your meds NOW

Really? I thought they were in the same class, just with a different time complexity, similarly to how NDFSA and DFSA are of the same order.



Do you have a reference?

>>93093110 (OP)

SGI and 1999 Apple called, they want their case designs back.

>>93093110 (OP)

Lol that's a scam

There's no way they can put what IBM is doing into that box. How the fuck do you even cool this thing?

Fuck off, it's nice to see this kind of design again.

>>93093110 (OP)

ngl this post has revived me, been feeling pretty apathetic but that's a real goal to work towards. To own a quantum computer, now that's more niche than freeBSD or plan9 memes. Gonna grind again quantum computers and see how I figure out how to get one in the next year or so

>>93093110 (OP)

>autistic gaylienware case

kek

>>93093110 (OP)

a japanese person using chatgpt wrote this

Current quantum computers aren't even as powerful as regular computers.

test

What are the specs?

>see picrel



Wait, this isn't the frutiger aero thread...

>>93093110 (OP)

Looks like soulful hardware design is back on the menu. In all seriousness however, how difficult would it be to get to work with one of these? As far as I understood quantum comp was still below assembly language level

>>93093110 (OP)

Ok, so what does the assembly code for one of these look like?

>>93093110 (OP)

IBM Q System One costs millions of dollars and still isn't actually faster than a high end desktop PC at doing any actual real world task (including cryptography).

>>93093110 (OP)

don't you need temps near the absolute zero to make them work?
