It's so over aether sisters.

>>15354384 (OP)

yes, we know you watch Exurb1a

>>15354384 (OP)

Classical Doppler effect

i don't know why people think this aether wind concept is a neccesary part of a luminiferous aether theory.

How you know the mirrors are 90 degree apart if you measure by windy light

Because you can't have a physical medium without physical effects.

propose an aether theory without the aether wind then.

i used to think he was so cool and edgy and provacative, until i realized what a massive fag he is and his ideas and stories are retarded

This.

Either you have a wind or you have aether drag to keep it at local rest. Drag was also tested independently and discarded.

M-M was the only experiment to test drag that the scientific community believes in, but it was performed in a location where it could never happen. Tests outdoors and in high places showed aether dragging as expected.

You seriously think a 135 year old experiment is the only time such a measurement have been done? I can't tell if you're an idiot or just utterly delusional.

It's the only design of that experiment that physics soientists ever care about, despite being debunked by replication.

I see, you're both.

The actual state of physics, everyone.

>>15354384 (OP)

aether is stationary silly man, btw thats 2 way speed of light, cya soi

There isn't necessarily a wind, but we are moving relative to the supposed weather from either orbital motions or other observable motion

Wait six months from any given time and you will be moving in completely the opposite direction, orbitally speaking. The different relative velocity to the weather should be detectable but isn't because it doesn't exist

*aether

>Projecting the post.

that's the whole point of the aether

if you don't have a wind then you end up with spacetime i.e. no special reference frame

silvertooth 1986

>drops mic

>Nathan is still getting called a schizo

Kek

>>15354384 (OP)

This just proves the Earth is flat.

I don't know why people only think there's one theory of the Aether and that disproving one theory means the others are automatically disproved.



The Michelson-Morely assuption doesn't even classify as an experiment and yet it was used to explain the unproven nature of light that it never actually showed.





>"Yesh and we would call zis ze "idiot-delusional duality" because not only does he recognize it as an experiment in the first place, but he discusses the "results" that mean nothing and uses it as a foundation of his own argument against it.





>This medium is stationary

>But I still refer to light as "having a speed

How? Figure that one out, smartass.

>physical medium

u even dont know what is a physical(nature) medium(mid), so shut the fuck up, retard

>>15354384 (OP)

Does this experiment not work or what?
