Is evolution still the current science trademark symbol? 



https://youtu.be/sGWyK7cDo0Y [Embed]

>>15389077 (OP)

>It seems strange to me that he uses selection gradually on birds and dogs causing changes to their form building up over time then jumps to the weird strawman that one species can't give birth to a radically different species when this isn't claimed by anyone, I find this a dishonest method of argumentation and quite lazy. Unless he goes on to actually confront real problems while indicating he actually understands the subject matter I will struggle to take his arguments seriously

Also saying "it happens because god ___" is really sloppy and does a gross disservice to god.

>>15389077 (OP)

okay he brought up how different species can hybridise and interbreed, he doesn't mention whether these interspecific hybrids have impaired fitness or are unfertile such as donkey and horse hybrids like the ass and mule.

This would seem like a weakness in his argument he doesn't expand on

>>15389077 (OP)

13:00

just sidestepping a huge amount of dispute there over whether human races are subspecies aren't you huh, care to elaborate OP?

>>15389077 (OP)

I would agree to some extent with that socialistic argument about how it teaches a nihlistic world view

Human biodiversity is the third rail of modern science. Nobody wants to get shocked by touching it.

>>15389077 (OP)

>contradicts the bible

open for debate if you're serious

>evangelical christianity

ah fuck, these are probably those arrogant retarded fuckheads.

there are a few respectable evangelical sects bu the majoirity are the product of jewish corruption along the megachurch pathway

>>15389077 (OP)

>16:00

If the previous 16 minutes are anything to go by you haven't actually understood or proven anything so we can't make any statements as to the validity of evolution, there are legitimate limitations to evolutionary theories but this here is like arguing green doesn't exist because red isn't blue.

>>15389077 (OP)

I watched 20 minutes of this to see if you had any legs or could present something that looked like a real argument but I got handwaves and mistakes even a middleschooler shouldn't make.

this is a deep topic but you have no idea what you're talking about you seem to halfheartedly echo what you've heard others say leaving you confused and nonsensical.

put aside your preconceptions and actually try tp understand the topic and maybe you''ll find a real argument



>Human biodiversity is the third rail of modern science. Nobody wants to get shocked by touching it.



Very true anon. They will admit biological differences among phenotypes for every other species, except for humans. Culture of Critique (book) explains how jews took over anthropology and changed the (((science))) to negate evolutionary traits in humans.

Bro are you having a coping reaction righr now

No, you are a dumb faggot. I can't be bothered to waste more time on this attempt to shill a shitty youtube channel



>bro



bro bro bro, dog yo, dog.

>evolution wrong because [insert here philosophical gibberish arguments]

POST PROOFS AND MATHEMATICAL EQUATIONS YOU FUCKING INBRED SUBHUMAN.

Enlighten me.

>>15389077 (OP)

>Be a pseud

>have a channel no one gives a fuck about

>video no one watches

>absolutely idiotic arguments

>posts it to /sci/ with some bait picture to attract viewers

Is this the best creationists can do in 2023?

You don't understand God, nor do you know what he desires. You're a brainlet who took the ''vaccine'', I'm sure.

OP here 

This video isn't his or at lwast he isn't the person talking neither is it mine



It's just the read version of some text

>>15389077 (OP)
