Which books should I read to explain to me why homosexuals and transsexuals are alright and the dislike of them is unfair and childish?

>>21960247 (OP)

You sound like a closeted faggot. Try watching a sissy hypnosis video.

I have a wife and kids

>>21960247 (OP)

Homosexuals are fine and can be perfectly healthy well-adjusted individuals. Transsexuals on the other hand are almost by definition highly deranged and delusional individuals who are dangerous to themselves and in our society at least to others as well. Ironically homosexual children are the people they threaten the most. Gay writers like Andrew Sullivan have written eloquently about how the current trans hysteria is turning into a new form of conversion therapy.

I asked which book explains why dislike of transsexuals is unfair, not for anti tranny/homo post #5 million

>>21960247 (OP)

>Which books should I read to explain to me why homosexuals and transsexuals are alright and the dislike of them is unfair and childish?

Just keep smelling your own farts.

prove it

>please give me books to reinforce my priors

Stop engaging in motivated reasoning

You care more than I do

You’re projecting. I have already entertained the anti trans/homo standpoint as its 25% of all posts on this website. This is why I request something on the alternative view.

Giving equal weight to 4chan posts as you would to a book really shows how you desire be nonpartisan. How about you entertain "the alterative view" by browsing some trans subreddits and or leftypol.

More projecting?



I have read dozens of anti trans/homo articles and a couple of books at the recommendation of anons, find it rather unconvincing and now seek the alternative view

You're using the word projecting wrong. I hope you find the answer to why homos are "alright." The question is certainty one that deserves an entire book to tackle. Terrible bait thread do better next time.

I'm my opinion, abnormal sexual impulses should not be normalized, and if someone has such impulses they should do their best to suppress them. Aside from venereal diseases particular to homosexual activity, the act itself is harmful to the body even if precautions are taken.



Trigger warning for a disgusting topic: 

The anal mucosa is thinner, and anal sphincter muscles are more easily worn out, than those of the vagina. This is why anal whores and fags often shit themselves when they reach old age. There is no safe way to have homosexual penetrative sex because the anus is not a sex organ and is not structured for such use.



Anyway, I have no books for you, OP. Check the NYT best sellers list .

Projecting is ascribing your own thoughts and actions to others. I have a mere interest in the arguments around the pro side of the subject, and you enter the thread to aggressively push the con side of the subject, while accusing me of motivated reasoning. Seems like you're the one who's motivated here.

Gays are only based when they repress and hide it like Henry James. This lends them a kino tragic aspect.

This. The only good gays are the repressed ones.

>>21960247 (OP)

Judith Butler Gender Trouble or whatever it's called
