He's never done any research or experiments. All of his papers are just analysis of other people's experiments.

>>15358035 (OP)

>All of his papers are just analysis of other people's experiments.

I mean technically that's still a valid paper. 99% of all PhD's papers are derivative and won't amount to much. He's not the exception he's the rule.

I'm so fucking tired of /pol/tards thinking this nigger is an actual scientist, he's a fucking communicator who engages with laymen. They're too retarded to tell the difference and use him as a strawman against astrophysics

>>15358035 (OP)

And coincidently he now analyses papers and presents them to the public! Almost like he did in his PhD!

I mean he kinda talks a lot of shit to be fair.

The Faint-End Slopes of Galaxy Luminosity Functions in the COSMOS Field

C. T. Liu et al., 2008, Astrophysical Journal Letters, v.672, p.198

COSMOS: Hubble Space Telescope Observations

N. Scoville et al., 2007, Astrophysical Journal Supplement, v.172, p.38

The Cosmic Evolution Survey (COSMOS): Overview

N. Scoville et al., 2007, Astrophysical Journal Supplement, v.172, p.1

Optical light curves of the Type IA supernovae SN 1990N and 1991T

P. Lira et al., 1998, Astronomical Journal, v.115, p.234

(See also Erratum: 1998, Astronomical Journal, v.116, p.1006)

BVRI Light Curves For 29 Type Ia Supernovae

M. Hamuy et al., 1996, Astronomical Journal, v.112, p.2408

The Type Ia Supernova 1989B in NGC3627 (M66)

L. A. Wells et al., 1994, Astronomical Journal, v.108, p.2233

The Expanding Photosphere Method Applied to SN1992am at cz = 14600 km/s

B. P. Schmidt et al., 1994, Astronomical Journal, v.107, p.1444

On the Possibility of a Major Impact on Uranus in the Past Century

Neil D. Tyson et al, 1993, Astronomy &amp; Astrophysics (Research Notes), v.275, p.630

An Exposure Guide for Taking Twilight Flatfields with Large Format CCDs

Neil D. Tyson &amp; Roy R. Gal, 1993, Astronomical Journal, v.105, p.1206

Radial Velocity Distribution and Line Strengths of 33 Carbon Stars in the Galactic Bulge

Neil D. Tyson &amp; R. Michael Rich, 1991, Astrophysical Journal, v.367, p.547

On the possibility of Gas-Rich Dwarf Galaxies in the Lyman-alpha Forest

Neil D. Tyson, 1988, Astrophysical Journal (Letters), v.329, p.L57

Bursting Dwarf Galaxies: Implications for Luminosity Function, Space Density, and Cosmological Mass Density

Neil D. Tyson &amp; John M. Scalo, 1988, Astrophysical Journal, v.329, p.618

uvby Photometry of Blue Stragglers in NGC 7789

Bruce A. Twarog &amp; Neil D. Tyson, 1985, Astronomical Journal, v.90, p.1247

>>15358035 (OP)

>All of his papers are just analysis of other people's experiments.

Albert Einstein? Niels Bohr?

>>15358035 (OP)

All of them puppets. This world is a psyop, particle physics is a meme.
