Gödel’s incompleteness theorems are bullshit.



https://www.jamesrmeyer.com/pdfs/FFGIT_Meyer.pdf

>>15389424 (OP)

You can be correct for the wrong reasons, Anon. 

Shit gets meta.

Getting mad is just part of the process.

>>15389424 (OP)

Where do you people find these crazies?

>>15389424 (OP)

Oh my Godel, someone just proved that Godel cannot prove Godel's incompleteness theorem

Atheist cope

Refuted by reality

Define reality and derive your refutation from it.

Nope, word salads and logic chopping have nothing to do with reality

ad hominem

not an argument. 



Just face it. There is no self-reference going on. There is a meta-language interacting with a sub-language. Self-reference isn’t real, actual infinities aren’t real, empty sets are meaningless, there aren’t different “sizes” of limitless quantities, undefinable numbers are useless and fake, etc. Even if Gödel’s theorems were true, it only proves things about pointlessly contrived “self-referential” statements. Whereas all statements that actually are contained by their formal system, and are meaningful, can be proven. The very fact that Gödel “proved” the statement true proves that he created the statement under the umbrella of a broader language

My imaginary magical unicorn exists by this same proof

Prove it.

just replace “God” with “magical unicorn.” Look, when you define something to have all positive properties (what does that even entail, exactly?), you basically assume what you are trying to prove, as existence is a positive property. If this proof were actually substantial and logical, then it would be famous

Axiom 3.5: The property of owning a magical pony is positive

By T3, God exists and owns a magical pony because god has all positive properties.

>if you rename god to unicorn it sounds stupid!! TRUST SCIENCE

no problem here, God in his omnipotence could make unicorns if he wished to

where is my unicorn

It's not a matter of wishing it. My proof shows that the magical pony necessarily exists whether god wants it or not. In fact, by including the axiom

Axiom 3.6: The property of gifting magical ponies to anon 15390102 on /sci/ on their 20th birthday is positive

it follows that I was gifted a magical pony on my 20th birthday

>TRUST SCIENCE

modern science and mathematics are religions too. You’re the one saying “TRUST MATH” and “TRUST RELIGION” and “TRUST GÖDEL.” And people like me are called “cranks” and “crazies” lol.

learn 2 read

>t. mathlet

nothing to trust here, it is all derived a priori

Why didn't you reply to my post? >>15390135

Are you jealous or afraid of my magical pony?

>it is all derived a priori

right, because monkeys on earth have developed perfect logical systems just based on their experiences on earth across millions of years and because of that we can prove the existence of infinities and gods and unicorns, how could I forget
