Aside from avoiding the retarded jokes, why don't people talk about Uranus nearly as much as the other planets?

Like, it is a world more massive and with just as many moons as Neptune, but the latter gets 10x more attention.

Why?

>>15354689 (OP)

It’s boring to look at. Every other gas giant has multiple colors and defining features. The moons are boring generic gray rocks.

>>15354689 (OP)

Because its unusual qualities make it very difficult for soientists to address how it formed.

The public imagination tends to get snagged on the closer gas giants. Most people can't get past those to even consider the ice giants. 



>"We have Jupiter and Saturn at home!" 

They're just smaller and less interesting. I mean I think they're interesting, but for consideration they really lose the popularity contest.

>>15354689 (OP)

It doesn't have interesting moons. I would bet money they are not compatible with life, whereas Triton at Neptune is the best candidate for life outside the orbit of Saturn (probably outside the orbit of Jupiter), ahead of Pluto.

We would have explored Uranus more, but you have to remember it's twice the distance as Saturn is, and taking shit to Saturn takes ages.

planets other than earth are all worthless, people who waste their time on that stuff are all useless morons trying to escape the reality of who they are via idiotic fantasy lives

i dont talk about any of the planets, like ever.

there it is



the reality of how Uranus fits into our solar system literally destroys all of cosmology (other planets do this as well) and soifags can't cope with that

>>15354689 (OP)

Anon, Uranus is not that interesting, or else your Onlyfans account wouldn't have failed.

>>15354689 (OP)

Neptune in its role as furthest planet out interacts much more with the Kuiper belt, including Pluto, Charon, and Neptune's largest moon Triton, which is orbiting retrograde to the planet because it's a captured KBO. Neptune also has an anomalously wide magnetic field, which is weird. Uranus has none of those features, and is visually much more uniform, so its only unique feature is its angle of rotation, which we can only vaguely speculate at the cause of because we can't check the surface for impact craters.

ok so whats your explanaition?

Not boring at all. With good enough telescope you can see it's clearly a planet, not just a point of light like a star.

>>15354689 (OP)

The earth is flat with a dome. They are laughing at you.

Aetheral condensation guided by direct divine intervention

>>15354689 (OP)

/sci/ will avoid astronomy now that is has been made into total bunk from JWST. The establishment needs to put forward a new explanation with which to combat the schizos who were right again. Consider all topics on space a purely /x/-topic for the next twenty years.

>>15354689 (OP)

>Aside from avoiding the retarded jokes

that's literally it

nobody wants to siphon billions of taxpayer dollars into an interstellar buttprobe

This. Uranus bit of a boring planet you look at the list of moon and like oh wow he has 45 moon but can you remember them? Can you remember a uranus moon? But try neptune. You remember a neptune moon

?? JWST is astronomy which is /sci/

Debunked was cosmology which is /x/

JWST is /ck/

>>15354689 (OP)

I definitely feel like people talk about Uranus more than neptune, but either way as neat as they are in most people's mind they're just shrimpier versions of the two big-dick gas giants Saturn and Jupiter.
