The death of the vast majority of American native population due to disease brought by Europeans is a well-known fact, but why hasn't Europe experienced the same thing? Why didn't Europe suffer a similar fate by some Native American disease brought from the new world?

>>14960688 (OP)

Because they took baths

aryan magics

European exposure to livestock animals and urbanized living conditions bolstered the hell out of their immune system.

>>14960688 (OP)

>what is Black Death

Basic Medieval Education.

>>14960688 (OP)

I remember reading de soto's diary and he finds some euro settlements wiped off by disease

>disease brought from the new world?

reading comprehension much?

Natives bathed more than smell Europeans Navigators and hand washing was associated with Jews in Black Death times.

Black Death came from Asia and was exacerbated in Europe because of an idiot pope who killed cats because they were worshiped by a Luciferian sect.

>disease brought from the new world?

anon,i want you to read that sentence one more time,slowly.

>Natives bathed more

I doubt they even bathed at all looking at how a meme disease like smallpox wiped them all out when the old world survived much worse

Samefag.

people who survived the black plague are superhuman mutants immune wise.

schizo

>inb4 inspect element

euros had lots of domestic animals to incubate zoonotic diseases in. Natives mostly hunted their protein.

Paintfag.

>>14960688 (OP)

>Syphilis

/thread

you cant /thread your own reply retard

There is no longer consensus on that

>>14960688 (OP)

The real black pill is that there just wasnt that many natives to begin with outside of the Incas and Meso American cunts. While we have massive cities and ruins every mile in Mexico from the natives, you have snow flakes in the US claiming their small mud hut village of 4 buildings housed 500,000 natives out of the surely 200 million present in the current day US, but there just arent the massive burial sites and ruins to prove it

/Thread should have ended here

very little supporting evidence for the theory. It's hard to identify disease based on symptoms alone but the current consensus is that it probably existed in Europe since antiquity.

At the very least it existed in ancient Egypt because it was found in a tomb iirc.

>>14960688 (OP)

We've had issues with syphilis until the invention of antibiotics and it's not like smallpox didn't occasionally wreck a town or two in the old world throughout the period. The entire plague thing is kind of fake because it would take a generation or two for the injuns to recover their population after the first contact and they'd be largely immunised since. We don't have good statistics on that because savagery doesn't lend itself to conducting census but it was always noted that indians weren't exactly breeding like rabbits which with modern knowledge you'd expect from hunter gatherers. American indian were a race that started their decline into savagery around 1200's, the contact just sped it up at the point where there was just no return, but if it wasn't for it and we'd discover them in 21st century we'd consider them to be a lost species of great apes.
