character models look more realistic compared frozen and the other 2010's disney cg movies. It reminds me of Dreamworks stuff from the 00's.

Might wanna work on your English and try again.

>>136691117 (OP)

They spent a lot more on making them than they ever did again.

>>136691117 (OP)

I recently learned Tangled cost roughly 150% of what Frozen tallied up to. It shows, but it would still be the superior film otherwise on the story and characters alone.

what about frozen 2?

she looks like a barbie doll. very cheap cg model

Frozen and Frozen 2 had the same budget and both of them made almost tens times their budget back. Tangled cost almost twice as much to produce and only made back just over double its budget.

According to wikipedia: 

>Tangled: $260 million 

>Frozen and Frozen II: $150 million each



So that's almost 175% the budget in Tangled, not just 150%

still can't fucking believe they left that scene in

>>136691117 (OP)

she makes my pp so happy, bros

>shoes in bed

You can tell Tangled was someone's passion project, there's a certain something to it you cannot find in the rest of Disney's CG output. And still holds up visually after almost 15 years, which is a fucking miracle by computer animation standards.

you'll never get a scene like the king and queen lighting the lantern again.

There is similarities to the Little Mermaid where they defined the style going forward spending quite a bit but then cheaped out on subsequent films where it was just copying what they did before. The Little Mermaid cost $40M which was almost as much as the $44M for the Black Cauldron which almost bankrupted the company. For Beauty and the Beast they spent only $25M and didn't even finish the animation as they instead just reused scenes from Sleeping Beauty when they ran out of time. They even spent more producing Oliver and Company which was the one before The Little Mermaid for $30M. The thing is though that how much they spend often has very little to do with how much the movies make as Beauty and the Beast almost made twice as much as The Little Mermaid.

I mean...good on them for delivering something that the toys might ACTUALLY resemble.

punzie bros...

>>136691117 (OP)

Iirc Tangled visuals were based on someone's paintings, and was deliberately made to look like a moving painting rather than just a regular cgi movie

Rapunzel can play guitar very well.

Cute and perfect

They're slippers, anon. You don't wear them outside.

That strikes me as being applicable more to the background than for the character models.

It was just a general color/mood inspiration from rococo paintings, not a real attempt at reproducing the style in 3d iirc

Mosr expensive animated film ever. Only the "live action" Lion King comes close.

Elsa should be tried for her crimes against humanity.
