Who would have won in a war between Britain and Nazi Germany if all other countries were 100% neutral and not involved?

>>14917793 (OP)

>Worlds largest empire

VS

>Retard ethnostate

Gee IDK

>>14917793 (OP)



Meaning no trade? Or with trade?

>>14917793 (OP)

Britain would have literally starved Germany for resources since they wouldn’t have access to Romanian oil

>>14917793 (OP)



You need to be a little bit more specific. Do you mean Germany with 1938 borders before annexation of Austria? 

Or Germany with summer 1940 borders with most of western and Central Europe in its control?



Also, how "neutral" must these nations be?

>>14917793 (OP)

Germany needed access to the Channel Ports to threaten Britain and was reliant on trade with the Soviet Union for various war materials such as oil, food, etc. to conduct the various successful campaigns it did.

1940

>>14917793 (OP)

Answer these two questions anon

1. How would these two countries reach each other if they have no land connection?

2. Which of these two countries controlled the seas?

Germans have planes though

>>14917793 (OP)

Man, wehraboos are delusional

It would ultimately make no difference either way

Germany obviously

Wow yeah true anon, never thought of that, but the UK made just as many planes if not more so what's your point?

Germany had their heart in it more

>Britain blockades Germany

>Germany has no way to break the blockade, let alone use its ground forces in any way

>????

>Peace in Britain's favour

Germany vs Britain is a whale vs an elephant. It's a fight that isn't going to happen.



Britain would have assumed a Napoleonic stance of continental blockade and simply wait for a sudden turn of events that would bring other nations into the war like the USSR, while inflicting crippling economic damage from its continental blockade, which in turn makes Germany almost completely dependent on the USSR for trade, which isn't a good thing as a National Socialist. Add a further economic drain from having a constant massive mobilized army that isn't doing anything but maintaining a costly occupation. Germany will have to deal with constant partisans, SOE raids, and probably some hunger revolts after 1945 in a few occupied nations.



Germanys main way of victory would be to somehow sway British politicians to abandon their support for Churchill as the war is taking its toll.

Shooting down British bombers and sinking merchant ships to inflict damage and casualties, but overall you're looking at a very stagnated war since Germany won't be able to win the Atlantic war and bombing campaigns will only result in losses primarily from the attacker.

When the war is going nowhere, time drags on, casualties are mounting, worries of a stronger USSR emerging, then there's going to be pressure on Churchill for how long he intends to keep it up.



However, there's probably going to be some rapid peace talks occurring at the end of the decade when Britain obtains nuclear weapons.
