What is your honest opinion about this collection of OVAs? Is it a pretentious product of late bubble era Japan, or an important, well made classic?

hipster shit

>1987

>hipster



Larper, you better get the fuck back to your momma before Samuel L Jackson slaps the shit out of you.

>>21671344 (OP)

Animation wise it's really great stuff, but outside of that it's really nothing to write home about, Umetsu's episode was all around really good but that's kind of a given, those two tower over the rest imo.

Dumb 4channel ate part of my post, I meant to say Umetsu and Morimoto's episodes tower over the rest, that is to say Presence and Franken's Gear

Thank you for your input anon.

>>21671344 (OP)

Both. It has some very pretentions parts but also some very good ones too. I don't know who signed off on Cloud but they should be shot.

>>21671344 (OP)

Some are really good, my favorite was either Chicken Man and Red Neck, Franken's Gears, or maybe the OP/ED ova.

A couple were pretty mid

>>21671344 (OP)

One of the directors was a part of this one fucking Chinese black magic 1975 sequel called Gong Tau 1989 that may or may not exist, anyways it looks ok I am just more interested in the other film

>>21671344 (OP)

The whole point of cash cow stuff like this is to give talented animators a chance to direct short pieces without worrying about reception. Just like Otomo and Anno have done now a few times too. Calling someone's project pretentious because it isn't your cup of tea is subhuman IQ shit. 

Art is art, whether you get it or not. It's not like these animation teams were out there wrapping bridges in fabric. 

Cloud was great though and is my favorite even over Umetsu's 1000% sakuga Presence. 

People like different things and Manabu ŌHASHI was a really fucking good animator just flexing his drawing skills.

>>21671344 (OP)

The shorts collection is for people that like ANIMATION, not anime or cartoon shows.

I regret buying it on blu-ray years ago......not enough content

Uhh...okay? Your point?

>>21671344 (OP)

In what way would it be pretentious?

>Calling someone's project pretentious because it isn't your cup of tea is subhuman IQ shit.



No it's not, and there is plenty of pretentious ''Ask me what it means!!!!!'' garbage out there.

>>21671344 (OP)

Describe in detail how it's pretentious.

No. There's no discussion required. It's pretentious garbage simple as.

Jesus, stop being such a nitpicking fuck. People are allowed to have contrarian opinions.

they can't handle seeing opposite opinions online. best to disengage
