Now that the dust has settled, who had the better cartoons?

WB is funnier

I agree, but there's something uncannily polished about Disney. Not saying WB is less polished, but compared to some other studios, especially Terry Toons, every short was like a minnie movie.

>>137006770 (OP)

WB had better shorts, Disney had better movies. 



These two things can not be compared and any preference is purely based on what form of content someone likes more.

>>137006770 (OP)

Both are shit now. But in the 90s it wasn't even a competition.



WB is Kiki and Disney is Bobo

>>137006770 (OP)

>>137006770 (OP)

I do

Show us...

WB.

Warner Bros undeniably.

Disney films are just takeovers of public domain fairytales which are then sanitized and made worse. If it was all gone not much would change, those fairytales would still exist, just unbastardized. (Also the current copyright hellscape would be gone too, if disney never existed the world would be an objectively better place.)



WB has original content and actual cultural significance.

>WB has original content and actual cultural significance.

>their most recognizeble characters are all either spoofs or straight up rip-offs of Disney's character

Another day of pajeets being pajeets.

>>137006770 (OP)



Warner seems to be a better company. At least they're not trying to erase their past as racy as it might have been.

WB has much better shorts and animated shows. Disney just has better movies, mostly because WB has never tried to make a good animated movie besides Iron Giant

I do remember there being warnings for offensive content by Leonard Maltin on the Walt Disney Treasures DVDs.

>>137006770 (OP)

Disney’s we’re prettier but WB’s we’re funnier.

>were

Fucking autocorrect…

Warner Bros hands down

>>137006770 (OP)

Disney has great skill and draftsmanship but I have to go with Warner Bros because it's a lot less cutesy. 

I recognize the skill and influence of Disney in the 20th century, but Warner Bros and even Nickelodeon are more entertaining to me. I don't laugh very much with Disney films, but I can indeed marvel at the prowess of animation like the black cauldron or snow white.

So for polish, I'll say disney.

For actual entertainment, I'll say WB.

>>137006770 (OP)

WB

>>137006770 (OP)

Top

This is a pretty good analogy.

Bugs Bunny is the edgy New York guy who thinks on his feet, while Mickey's the plucky, cute determined one.

bump

>>137006770 (OP)

Disney had better technical animation but the WB were way more entertaining.

this perfectly encapsulates jones philosophy of expectation then subversion.

Which would you rather have sex with, Bug Bunny or Mickey Mouse?

Depends am I the one fucking them or are they fucking me? If I’m the top Bug if I’m the bottom Mickey.

Mickey, I guess. He's so corruptible.

Bugs likes to crossdress but Mickey seems vulnerable

neither because i am not a furfag but i am surprised so many japanese westaboo women want to bang mickey

I've always been more of a disneyfag because that was what I mainly grew up

Pretty much I grew up watching old disney cartoons and tom and jerry
