Wtf happened to ddg??

>>92926015 (OP)

Hmm, that's odd. Let me try

Didn't work for me either

Can't get it to work on chrome either. Android phone. Never had the issue before.

>>92926015 (OP)

Are people still using ddg in 2023? Why?

What should i use?

searx 

startpage

but honestly ddg works on my machine op just doesnt know how to use a search engine

yandex

bing

unironically

I can't get nude teens to work on yandex either what the fuck?

That is so fucking weird, I can search all sorts of porn on any search engine but that term nude teens shows nothing on ddg and just swimsuit girls in yandex. Searxh engines have gone full retard.

>Use Bing instead of DuckDuckGo, which uses Bing

Absolute galaxy brain move, anon.

>werks on my machine

DDG might have wrongthink filters based on geolocation.

How about searching for something that's not illegal? Like "nude women over 21"

>>92926015 (OP)

It rats itself out if you turn safe search back on: "Images blocked by safe search."

>>92926015 (OP)

try searching "nn IMG SRC" on https://bing.com instead. Check out the images.

>Like "nude women over 21"

This is the cutoff. "naked photos of 20 year old women" will show NO nudity even with safe search off, "naked photos of 21 year old women" only shows porn.

If you set your location to some Europoor country, you will get porn on the 20 year old one, too.

>can we have Google dorks

>we have google dorks at home

mossad forgot to pay the power bills

>>92926015 (OP)

ddg images are a thing? Yandex is the only non-meme image browser

>yandex

The mini man from Moscow doesn't want his footmen looking at teenagers when they should be busy shelling Ukrainian ones.

look up "GBY index" problem. basically the three main players outside of China are google bing and yandex. these are HEAVILY manipulated by american and russian intelligence respectively to shape the global narrative. it's very important to NOT use a search engine that proxies one of these three indexes, as doing so cements them as the defacto gateways to all information. this will first astroturf all non-approved opinions on the internet and then gradually astroturf reality itself, as people have no way of accessing genuine information. this is very very important



check out marginalia.nu

>>92926015 (OP)

nude college girls is more accurate, that starts at 18

DONT DO THIS, IT MAKES MUSTARD GAS. UNIRONICALLY DONT DO THIS YOURE GONNA BE PUT ON A LIST>>92926776

oh shit I spelled it wrong and it still give me cunny

see you in 25 to life boys

>marginalia.nu

this guy can't even configure his https redirects properly and he wants to build a search engine? lol

>>92926015 (OP)

Stop searching for illegal content, OP

>>92926015 (OP)

>openly searching for potentially illegal material 

actually retarded

Reported it to Microsoft.

it's legal to look at 18+ year old girls naked. 18 and 19 year old girls are teens. there is no physical difference between an 18 year old and a 21 year old so your assertion that one should search for women over 21 is arbitrary and you're basically a dork.

try not being a pedo

If you're gonna be a retard, at least be a smart one and use tor instead of doxxing yourself on the clearnet you fucking retard
