What's the difference between the Panoramic 150 and Panoramic 150i Game Cameras?
1789762
The new 150i has a no-glow (or black) lens... Update: According to Moultrie, the effective range is also shorter for the No-Glow 150i...
1607382
Interesting question. If you still have the 300, changing your viewpoint may make more sense than changing your camera. You get to keep the 300's excellent IQ... and keep your money. Just set it to EXR Automatic and forget those other features. Which is the exact setting you'll do best with on the 660. So, settings/ease of use-wise, it's a wash. About the only substantive difference between the two cams lies in their respective sensors. I don't think you want to have that discussion, but if you did, many knowledgeable folks would argue the edge goes to the 300. On paper, at least, the 660 offers much faster continuous shooting: 11 fps versus 2. And it costs about 70 bucks less than the 300, new, on Amazon. I don't see you going wrong with either choice...if I've read you right.
1254698
The number o megapixals is only part of the what makes a good camera.This camera supports 24p in the video. records at 240fps in video. has panorama built into camera, is a CMOS vs most cheaper being CCD, It has a higher resolution screen at 461 dots , 20x Zoom, The light sensitivity is 3,200ISO vs others at 800 ISO, It shoots more pictures faster than less expensive cameras 3.2 Photos ps. I frequently shoot photos while Horse Riding, This camera gives me much crisper photos. Other cameras I've owned always seemed to be slightly blurred because the horse just won't hold totally still. Because of this cameras faster speed, my photos turn out much better than most 16m cameras. The number o megapixals is only part of the what makes a good camera.This camera supports 24p in the video. records at 240fps in video. has panorama built into camera, is a CMOS vs most cheaper being CCD, It has a higher resolution screen at 461 dots , 20x Zoom, The light sensitivity is 3,200ISO vs others at 800 ISO, It shoots more pictures faster than less expensive cameras 3.2 Photos ps. I frequently shoot photos while Horse Riding, This camera gives me much crisper photos. Other cameras I've owned always seemed to be slightly blurred because the horse just won't hold totally still.... » Read More The number o megapixals is only part of the what makes a good camera.This camera supports 24p in the video. records at 240fps in video. has panorama built into camera, is a CMOS vs most cheaper being CCD, It has a higher resolution screen at 461 dots , 20x Zoom, The light sensitivity is 3,200ISO vs others at 800 ISO, It shoots more pictures faster than less expensive cameras 3.2 Photos ps. I frequently shoot photos while Horse Riding, This camera gives me much crisper photos. Other cameras I've owned always seemed to be slightly blurred because the horse just won't hold totally still. Because of this cameras faster speed, my photos turn out much better than most 16m cameras. « Show Less
345232
My perspective on this is that they both perform the same function. It is a matter of where the camera display is located
1103916
Hey Josh,The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely whatever you use to edit/burn your video will encode the video upon output. So a bit more versatile but also a bit bulkier camera.Bryan Hey Josh,The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely... » Read More Hey Josh,The image sensor in the two cameras is the same so low light performance will be the same as well. The major difference here is going to be the added xlr compatiblity and the handle/shotgun microphone atachment. As Michael stated, and these were differences that I didn't realize, There is an IR capability and different encoding format on the XA10. The IR capabilitys wouldn't apply to you because they wouldn't match the other shots, think of the green light video you see on tv. I don't know as though you would notice the different encoding format either, and likely whatever you use to edit/burn your video will encode the video upon output. So a bit more versatile but also a bit bulkier camera.Bryan « Show Less
838555
The difference is the mounts that are included. The motorsport edition comes with several vehicle mounting options. The camera specs are identical.
2038195
PIR. However, FWIW, I have had trail cameras since they first came out. This is the worst one I've ever owned. I've set it up, walk tested to get the blinking light, then to "ON" and subsequently watched game walk by and "No picture". I suggest you get a real trail camera, e.g., Bushnell or Simmons. v
1438108
I don't think there is any difference, or any such camera. I ordered the D3 and received the D2 apparently. I hadn't noticed that until you asked. Some PT cameras pan around endlessly without having to reverse. This one does not. There is a blind spot in the rear where the camera mounts. There is no D3 listed on their website Loftek.com, but the D1 is without the IR lights.
2025423
I don't know as I haven't compared the two. I can tell you that this one was very easy to install. It works flawlessly and the quality of the captures is at least 720p. It is also VERY easy to use. The dude below isn't really correct. You can record 1080p through HDMI but you cannot output it with HDMI through tv. Component cables are what you need. I went with this one for the price and I couldn't be happier. I might even attempt cutting cable and using this for over the air. Edit: Avermedia does capture 1080i with HDMI but you won't be to output it. This is true of all pvr.
219021
If you look at the tech specs, you'll find that the CMOS cameras (D5000, D300S) have slightly more pixels (height x width) than the CCD cameras like the D3000 in each of the three sizes. The actual difference isn't huge, though.
1850587
You can find a full list of features in the link below. I didn't look into all the details but it appears that the only two differences are: 1. The lens: 5x optical zoom for the FH6 Vs. 4x optical zoom for the FH4, and the FH6 has a Leica DC Vario-Summarit which I believe is supposed to be better than the DC Vario lens of the FH4. Finally the FH6 is Ultra Wide angle (24mm) while the FH4 is only Wide Angle (28mm) which means the FH6 captures a bit more (or wider) photos than the FH4 2. The FH6 has a burst mode of 10 frames per second (at 3 megapixel resolution) while nothing is mentioned about the burst mode for the FH4. Both of them can do continuous capture at full resolution at 1.5 frame per second. Please note that I just did a quick look, double check in case there is another feature that is important to you that differs between the two cameras. Here's the link http://panasonic.net/avc/lumix/pressrelease/first_half_new_production2012/
1706521
It took me a while to find this information myself! On the manufacturer's website, if you look at the instruction manuals for these Truth Cams, it does list the resolution which is adjustable. The 60 goes to 7MP and the 46 goes to 5MP. The instruction manual also mentions the trade off in image quality vs performance so you may only want 7MP if you are looking to frame a photo of a buck not for everyday trail monitoring.
1328180
Hi, in this link you can see a comparison of both models: http://www.samsung.com/ve/consumer/cameras-camcorders/smart-cameras/productcompare?prda=EC-DV150FBPWPA&prdb=EC-DV300FBPRPA Basically have the same features, the only difference I see is the physical design
978615
i had called aiptek before i purchased this camera, wanting to know why there was such a price difference. the tech guy told me the ability to record from an external source was the only difference. i have no use for the feature, so i went with the 'silver' model and saved the extra cash.
134354
The two biggest differences between the ZS1 and ZS3 are the ZS3s ability to shoot HD video and the much higher quality LCD on the ZS3. The LCD size is only sightly higher, but the resolution of the screen is substantially higher than that of the ZS1. Also, the ZS3 will produce better videos. It can film HD and has a stereo microphone instead of a mono one. In addition, according to Cnet "The ZS3 actually uses a 12-megapixel sensor in order to maintain the same angle of view 16:9 and 4:3 aspect modes" while the ZS1 only features a 10mp sensor. All that said, Panasonic just announced the specifications and pricing of the new versions of this line of cameras so if you are willing to wait I would try to see if the price drops on these next month when the new ones arrive or just skip this model and get one of the newer ones. http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/12/panasonic-prices-lumix-dmc-ts2-dmc-zs5-dmc-zs7-and-dmc-zr3-cam/
1393900
I got confused reading the reviews in the search engine over this, and I almost bought the wrong model. This camera (HX400V) is NOT the same as the H400, and reviews about this camera compared with the Sony website is a bit confusing. One reviewer said they are both the same except for GPS, which is incorrect. The basic model has a 63x zoom, and no GPS or WiFI, and some other features are missing, but the HX 400B/V is the high end model with the Carl Zeiss 50x lens, (better glass, lower f/stop) the Wifi, GPS and the upgraded capabilities.
1447681
I didn't see any difference. I am very happy with mine, it woulds like I believe it should. There was only one issue with the viewfinder which in my opinion become too easily detached, but I am sure that's only my model. I would say do more research on this 1d in comparison to others. You can always buy and return it to if you don't mind spending a few bucks on shipping it back if you don't like it.