Is there screen quality difference between NC10-11PBK and NC110? Does anyone know if the screen in the new NC110 will be different/better than the NC10-11PBK?
1777439
Does anyone knows the real difference between these two models and which one is better buy? I see the Special Edition has better screen and I know it has better/bigger mouse pad, but what else?
1777440
For one it will be glossy and does NOT say it has anti glaring coating like the NC10 Special edition has.
1613581
FYI -- estarling makes a much better 8" screen with 800x600 nowadays. The wireless setup is still sub-par, but it seems they all still are. The online service is free, and is pretty decent. I have zero complaints. The new version really does have one of the best screens I've seen, and I saw the old 7" one, which was amazingly horrible.
501555
Hello, I actually returned the "17 for the "19 because the screen has to be measured diagonally not in height & width. I learned something new.... You also have to consider if you screen is a wide or "17W" or not. Mine's was not a wide.
732742
I don't really do photographic work. It is far superior to the old TN screen it replaced. Without putting an IPS display next to it I couldn't make a decent comparison. Now that Dell is running sales on their 24" 4K IPS display I'd take a closer look at that. If you do get this 28" display keep fluorescent lights away from it. Fluorescent flicker plus 30Hz refresh = ugh.
1047489
I just ordered the HP W2207. I went back and forth trying to decide on both, because Samsung has a really great reputation. However, the HP W2207 seemed to have better reviews. No bleeding, tilts for both landscape and portrait views, etc. I saw over and over again where people said it was by far the best display out there right now at this size and price. I saw lots of consistent negatives for the Samsung 226BW: Bleeding; the VERY annoying blue light on the power button which stays on even in sleep mode; the loud, constant buzzing noise after adjusting brightness (most all said it's default brightness is WAY too bright and needs to be dimmed- which means there'll always be the buzzing); no tilting to portrait view; and no height adjustment. Although it can be mounted on the wall, the mounting equipment must be bought separately. The only negative comments I saw repeated with the HP were the possible glare if light hits the screen (because of the glossy screen), and it is more compatible with a PC than a Mac, although it works fine with Macs, there were comments that it is truly best suited for a PC. So it seems as if the HP2207 is probably newer and is overall a better buy. So we'll see how great it is when it gets here. Hope this helps...if you've not already made your decision.
673110
11.2 the screen is nice but because they are so large u may need a av booster I think it's called that if not u will have like lines on the screen I had 7 inch before I up graded and did not need the booster. But adding the booster made the difference and the picture is nice hope this helped let me know
1368970
Thanks for the reply. Eagle came and picked it up today. I am going LCD this time...Amazon really came through with the return.
1386590
Hey T. McAnaney,Yes, when I compared specs, I too looked and said, why should I pay more for an item that has the same specs? What is so different about this new model. I even went to web sites that had incorrect information on the specs of the TH-42PX600U, and the TH-42PX75U had the specs of the TH-42PX600U. So I ended up buying the TH-42PX600U. Even from what I heard that the 75U is supposed to have 1080p, versus the 1080i, I did not believe it would be worth the additional cost.
999237
Hey, Just noticed your post. I don't own either, but from what I've gleaned from my research, there really is no comparison. The Samsung has a bigger screen, a better processor, and most important a more ergonomic keyboard. The only advantages of the Acer is that it has a more svelt form factor, and is a bit heavier, neither of which are that huge to me. I'm on the fence between the two right now, and believe it or not, I'm leaning towards the Acer. Main reason is price. For all its advantages, I can't justify paying $221 more for a netbook. Last I checked, I can get an Acer 751 (with the 3 cell) for $279, vs. $500 for the NC20. I know the Acer's going to be slow, but I don't believe the NC20 is that much zippier. I'm hoping that the Acer with XP will run reasonably fast enough for limited internet usage and word processing, which is mostly what I need it for. Even if I ad a gig of ram for $30, it's still almost $200 cheaper than the NC20.
913068
I, myself think that the rounded edges on the n110 makes it look cheap and babyish. The graphics may be better but the design itself seems to have regressed. That red line that at first looked interesting now seems to me almost vulgar and sl***y. Anyhow to each his own.
638281
I own the N120, and the screen is beautiful. I have avoided glossy screens before, but this one is unquestionably the best screen I have had in all of my 6 laptops so far. Also, the N120 has a full size keyboard. I love the machine.
638283
It seems like the NC10SE has the matte screen and the nice keyboard, putting it ahead of the 120 in my book. I haven't bought either so I'm not trying to justify a purchase after the fact. I guess the touchpad is bigger on the 120 and the battery life is better on the 120 with the ability to only charge to 80%. Wish I could see these matte and glossy screens in person.
181720
Just the front clear cover difference ! As no cover block, NC-229WF has better image quality and night vision . Dear Antonio, We are wondering why you are not happy with NC-227WF. Any problems ? if yes, please contact our service and technical support : info@trivisiontech.comwarm regards,Pingan
913065
I suggest you keep the NC10SE and skip the 110. The NC110 has a maximum 1GB of RAM vs the 2 GB of RAM that you can upgrade to with the NC10 line. I too considered waiting for the NC110 but called Samsung after hearing rumors that the NC110 would max out at 1 GB. They confirmed it and had no explaination why.
295029
It actually has an AHVA screen which is similar to IPS (very wide angles, no color shift at extreme angles). I use IPS screens exclusively on my desktops, but I don't feel this is any worse for normal usage (I don't use it for graphics work so I don't know how accurate the color is).
927268
I had the same question about the G10. I asked the BB guy and he said for some reason the stores try to sell the LCDs more and the G10 was set at a less bright setting, appearing less attractive to a buyer (??). He also changed the setting to VIVID and the PQ looked as bright as anything else. I did a lot of research online and both G10 and G15 are hands down the best plasma for the money, if you care about true picture quality and not just think brighter is better. I'm monitoring the price of G15 to order mine.
568729
Apparently they have upgraded to what they call "near HD"... 1280x540. I would like to know if anyone has actually seen this on a decent size 1080p screen, and how it looks. Also, can it pass 5.1 sound?