Going to Europe-how does this lens do for architectural photography. What is best lens to limit distortion without breaking the bank?
1773171
I agree with Patrick as far as the tilt and shift lens goes and I would agree that it would be a good idea to rent it rather than buy it. I have the 28mm. in question and I love it although it is a bit long on a DX body. For me it is fine on a FX body. The optical quality of the lens is superb as is the clarity and color saturation.I have had several 28's and this is by far the best I have owned.
1773172
This lens would be OK for architectural shots just as long as you do not need to tilt the lens too much. Nikon makes a tilt shift lens which is much better suited for thistype of work. You could rent the tilt shift if need be.
1773173
This lens would be OK for architectural shots just as long as you do not need to tilt the lens too much. Nikon makes a tilt shift lens which is much better suited for this type of work. You could rent the tilt shift if need be.
1773174
If you are shooting full frame the new Sigma 35mm f1.4 ART lens would be a better lens for architecture. If you are shooting crop-sensor then the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 ART lens would be a very good bet.
1773175
I think this is the best option without going nuts on budget, not cheap not so expensive. Distortion for Architectural is acceptable, obviously the more closer you are you will notice some, its not the 24mm or the zoom but believe me is sharp as hell, even more at f2.5 and f8 ... careful with a lil shift focus at night mostly at f4, other than that im super happy with this lens and i take it to travel a lot
1773176
If your using an FX full frame camera its great. If you have a DX camera the 18mm would be the equivalent. If you want to limit distortion with out breaking the bank. But Capture NX2 and click on lens Distortion. It automatically fixes the Distortion on your PC Nikkor Lens. If your shooting NIKON you NEED capture NX2 or your not getting your money's worth.When you buy this lens your paying to shoot in LOW LIGHT!!! ;D
11788
This is very good lens that covers wide range with very shape image quality. Little bit heavy so might lose some portability, considering the lightness of a3000
1938141
I have used this lens almost exclusively thus far for Architectural photography. It is fantastic! You have to slow down and set up properly by going through a sequence to prepare for the shot. This lens is tripod use only. Manual focus and making the adjustments require that. Easy to use the variable adjustments once you get the hang of it. Stunning results! It requires some reasonable practice time, and a patient persevering attitude. I purchased just a few days before going on a trip to Australia, had great opportunities to use it while there and came back with the highest scoring images for local club competitions ever. -John I have used this lens almost exclusively thus far for Architectural photography. It is fantastic! You have to slow down and set up properly by going through a sequence to prepare for the shot. This lens is tripod use only. Manual focus and making the adjustments require that. Easy to use the variable adjustments once you get the hang of it. Stunning results! It requires some reasonable practice time, and a patient persevering attitude. I purchased just a few days before going on a trip to Australia, had great opportunities to use it while there and came back with the highest scoring images... » Read More I have used this lens almost exclusively thus far for Architectural photography. It is fantastic! You have to slow down and set up properly by going through a sequence to prepare for the shot. This lens is tripod use only. Manual focus and making the adjustments require that. Easy to use the variable adjustments once you get the hang of it. Stunning results! It requires some reasonable practice time, and a patient persevering attitude. I purchased just a few days before going on a trip to Australia, had great opportunities to use it while there and came back with the highest scoring images for local club competitions ever. -John « Show Less
2227139
I used the lens extensively for landscape photos but also for interiors. It works pretty well with reduced, if any, distortion. Colors are consistent with white balance settings. Highly recommended also for interiors photos from "strange" or "naive" perspectives such as very high or very low positions, e.g. floors and ceilings to produce a different view of the rooms. Good photos also without any tripod by increasing the ISO to 800 and switching on the lights even with NO FLASH.
990745
Congrats on the D5000 (and both great lenses you have). Be sure and get that 35mm down the road, believe me it will probably be the best 200$ you'll ever spend if you do any shooting indoors. I have tons of other lenses (including a 50mm f/1.4) so I held off for a while on getting the 35mm f/1.8, once I did finally get it I was kicking myself for not getting it sooner, it's that good. Happy shooting.
1356282
It doesn't get super close, but it's really damn sharp. If you want to get closer, I'd suggest Sigma's 28mm f1.8 macro (they also have a 24, a 50, etc.)The macros are reviewed well enough, may not be as optimal in the corners, but for center-frame macro shots, everything else will be bokeh-d out anyway. This is more of a perfect travel lens- sharp as anything corner to corner for the landscape shots, and wide f1.8 for the people shots, while still being practical and relatively distortion-free.
1125760
No, its not "THE" best, but it is one of the best. It is a sharp, quick lens, quite good for low lighting or for a fabulous bokeh. It should be part of your arsenal for sure; I know its part of mine. Cheers
342852
Overall I am delighted with the image quality of this lens. I'd prefer to use the 24mm setting to minimize distortion in a group of people (if conditions permit). I use it mainly as a landscape lens and still use it extensively.
435060
I've had both IS and non IS, I have found that for the price this is a very handy lens to have. It works great outside, and as long as you have a semblance of a half way steady hand then not having the IS won't be a problem. Some of the issues you might encounter with this lens is when it comes to shooting in lower light situations, for example trying to take pictures inside especially at night if the room is not heavily lit. In that case the IS would help but that would only take you so far. Part of that is due to the lens speed. I found that if you take more pictures and try to stay aware of light you should do just fine. I love that this lens has the wide angle and the ability to super zoom. This has become my main travel lens, because of its versatility. For the price you can't beat it, I think its like $199 and just starting off as a new photographer its a good start. Yes there are better lenses out there BUT you will pay a Lot more for them as well.
1728846
I was in an art museum and took several pictures of framed paintings. I did have very significant distortion at that closer range. No experience as of yet with buildings but I would assume that with a 17mm there would be some distortion.
513850
Great lens for all of the above. A little heavy for walking around but keep your camera on the neck strap and you won't have problems. Fantastid for portraits and weddings. Will be good all around.
1239752
The 85 is going to give you a tighter shot. I have the 35 and it is a beautiful lens. I would highly suggest Rokinon, great glass for the price!
597334
thanks tom. took your advise bought the 15-85. all i can say the image the quality is superb for a non l lense. thank you for recommending this lens.
608930
I have a D80 too and it's an awesome lens. I'm an amateur as well so I don't know too much about photography but this lens has a decent balance between depth of field and zoom for its affordable price.
173418
Hi, I was faced with the same dilemma last year. I chose 14-45. It is a sharp lens with good auto focus and stabilization. I use it mainly as a travel lens and photograph historical monuments.Prakash
873522
I am shooting on a Nikon 3200. I went with the 55-300 for its flexibility. It gives great depth of fields and allows me take great pics no matter what. Being in an austere environment this lens works great for long range and close range photograph. The longer 400mm lens has some problems and the 300mm gives better f-stop in my opinion. I found for cost and range of meters to be perfect. Clear shots, great DOF and quickness is great. I shot 90% free hand and have no vibration problems/blurry in my photos thanks to the VR.
1247240
hum... what do you mean, by a "base" lens? I consider myself a "advanced" amateur haha... i also have a D7000, and i use this lens mostly for street-photography and some portraits. This lens are definitely for open space when you use it in a crop sensor (which is the case), if you need a lens for indoor, i would go for some sigma or even tamron 17-50mm f2.8 which is more expensive. I even have a nikkor 35mm f1.8 which is not wide enough for small indoor places, but it is also one great lens.Talking about the image quality it is amazing. It's always nice to have one prime lens. You will never regret. hum... what do you mean, by a "base" lens? I consider myself a "advanced" amateur haha... i also have a D7000, and i use this lens mostly for street-photography and some portraits. This lens are definitely for open space when you use it in a crop sensor (which is the case), if you need a lens for indoor, i would go for some sigma or even tamron 17-50mm f2.8 which is more expensive. I even have a nikkor 35mm f1.8 which is not wide enough for small indoor places, but it is also one great lens.Talking about the image quality it is amazing. It's always nice to have one... » Read More hum... what do you mean, by a "base" lens? I consider myself a "advanced" amateur haha... i also have a D7000, and i use this lens mostly for street-photography and some portraits. This lens are definitely for open space when you use it in a crop sensor (which is the case), if you need a lens for indoor, i would go for some sigma or even tamron 17-50mm f2.8 which is more expensive. I even have a nikkor 35mm f1.8 which is not wide enough for small indoor places, but it is also one great lens.Talking about the image quality it is amazing. It's always nice to have one prime lens. You will never regret. « Show Less