I assume this is improperly labeled? On amazon this is listed as LC1053, but the picture says LC105M. Does this ever worry anyone else?
1806447
No. This is the same product image you'll find on the Brother site for the LC1053PKS. LC105M is the product ID for the Magenta cartridge included in the set. If you look closely at the picture, you'll see that each cartridge has a different product ID on it - LC105C for Cyan, LC105Y for yellow.
1806448
I would be skeptical in ordering in today's market unless there is a statement that it can be used with such and such a machine. One letter or number does make a difference.
1806449
The whole "3PKS" part of that item number stands for 3-pack, as in 3 cartridges of ink - magenta, cyan, and yellow. The "LC105" part is technically separate. This is the correct product for Brother printers labeled for LC105 ink.
467272
I can't speak to what other reviewers received but I can tell you the item I received a was a Doan's. My advice is to stay away from sellers that are way below the price that other sellers have the item listed at. If the deal seems too good to be true than it probably is and you should look elsewhere. Good luck to you and I hope you find what you're looking for!
1392808
Sorry, Jeff, I just ordered this for a gift that was suggested to me and know nothing about it. Why not call the manufacturer? Or visit the website. That's where I found it.
1996863
Yeah, I see that too. Under item description it describes a laptop or something. Amazon messed this one up.
711348
I really have no idea. Amazon should have some contact information as they sell the brand. I do not remember who actually fulfilled my order. So far mine is doing great and I am sorry you are having problems with yours.
1986906
Hi VicYou are right Amazon has the wrong pic from what we can tell. We sent an email to them to check inventory with listing.ThanksLou
1232372
Yes, I remember the issue. I think I checked other websites that had more detailed information or you might see if this brand has a website and contact them asking for advice. I bought this a while ago and cannot remember exactly how I determined which one to purchase. I'm sorry I cannot be of more assistance.
1340636
I suggest contacting the seller to let them know, there may have been a mix up/mistake with the packaging. If the seller is uncooperative or doesn't respond I would contact Amazon and see what options are available to you in this situation.
632649
The reason is that it's an older picture on Amazon. We've been trying to have the picture updated for quite some time but as there are many contributors to each listing, sometimes submitting conflicting information, it can take quite a while. The product you would receive from us would be what you have been receiving from Nutrition53.- Thank you, VF Solutions.
332039
Yes, I noticed this as well. The picture gives a bit of false advertising. I purchased mine over a year ago so they really have no excuse if the product changed to update that photo.
1636716
Great. Thank you! Did you get a chance to ask them why L32D1120 is now shown on their website? It's weird.
178354
You are absolutely right, thought I was losing my mind but the Amazon photo is the wrong product. Wonder how long it will be before they correct it.
1556729
I would call Lock & Lock customer service. They may have posted a different picture on amazon than what they have on their records for the set name/number. If its that kind of mix up they are usually able to clear it up and correct the mistake.
2158049
Someone down the line of listing this item has designated as this in their listing. Amazon probably wont change it even though it does not apply.
1772508
It was listed when I ordered mine? Check with the Company or Amazon and see if they can help? Sorry...
895954
Looks like one of the vendors (the one currently the cheapest) uploaded invalid imagery that does not match the product being sold.. and actually that looks like a used T9 as well. The real product is the 8FG with a receiver.
1468698
I agree, this is a new model, even I was confused with it. Hopefully Amazon.com will correct it.