Is there an available inseam measured for these pants considering they're claiming to run long??
846962
Sorry, I threw these away about a month ago. I repaired them twice, where they tore on the seams, but the last tear was huge and in the middle of the rear, and not worth fixing. I should update the review, it is worth saying that the person I bought them for wore them a lot and is very hard on clothing. I bought him a similar pair that were Hanes, and he has torn them already as well, so it is likely the man not the pants that is at fault.
1730049
I am 5'11" 180 lbs, my pants size is 32 inseam, 30 length. I ordered them size (M) and they fit perfect!
115942
I wear a 34 inseam too! these are a 32-33 inseam they fit great.... they are very warm too!...and if you wear them with boots you could not tell that they was a inch to short!
545914
I didn't look for one - if it's any help- I'm 5'8 and 200# - 33" inseam - thes fit great - not tight - very comfortable - I bought an XL.
653139
ask your local bike shop! your inseam measurement is much more important. any bike shop can size you to a bike with your height inseam and riding style.
1854920
I am 6 foot 215 with 32 inseam and I got the extra large. That fit me best but I wear sweat pants under usually.
1166851
The inseam on men's small denim is 29 inches after several washings. There is a two inch hem, so they could be lengthened.
2034765
They are Mens as far as I know. I bought a mens Large and the Inseam is 9" lg. I am 5'6" and they hit me right at the knee.
29542
I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the... » Read More I just measured mine. The stretch is almost 4 inches in total circumference. Now that is starting out completely slack, and going to complete stretch, so keep that in mind. My 34s are about 33 when slack, and 36 1/2 when stretched. Logically the 30 would have less stretch. As far as the pocket goes, I love them. Both sides are the same depth and they go down to the top of the cargo pocket. Any lower and there would be interference issues. There is a reason that these pants are so well loved. If they offered them in an 11 inch inseam, I'd own a ton of them. At 6'2" the inseam is too short and my wife hates the way they look. I still love them for their comfort and versatility, so I wear them when she's not around. « Show Less
1634990
The pants are in inches for waist. No length. Mine have elastic and run a little large to allow expansion for IWB carry. Well constructed. M
323806
Sorry to say I really don't know. I was not happy with this purchase, not so much the quality of the pants, but the fact that I (mistakenly) ordered the wrong size (way too small) and there was no way to return them. I tried returning them to the vendor in England, and many weeks later, the whole package came back to me, unopened.
1136374
There is no difference as far as make. The Extended, I think, are for those longer legged folks.. I rodered mine in 32 long as a true 32 is to short and the 34's are way to long.. So basically it's a 33 inch inseam.
2093667
I wear a 34 waist 30 inseam and I ordered the Medium regular and they fit just a little big. They are actually a little long but not enough to be a problem and I pull the draw straps on the waist pretty tight so I think a medium regular would be a good fit for your dimensions. Great pants. I wear them for work as a service manager/technician in an Evinrude dealership and they have held up to grease, gasoline, oil, battery acid, bay mud and salt water pretty well so far!
18466
The X is meaningless. The pants come in short, regular and long, If no length is indicated, they are regular length.
932243
I am 5ft 10in and the pants go past my heel. That's how much longer they are. Not so bad when you tuck them in using the Velcro blousing straps or blousing rubber bands. If you are just wearing them and don't have to wear everyday military boots or are authorized to wear Merrill's, Id stick with the Large Regulars.
204030
I can't remember off hand what the pant size was because I used it for screen used wardrobe, but I have the measurements for you if that helps. Waist is 27.5", hips are 36", and you could get away with using an inseam of 30 to 32".
250322
I bought a size large. I have a 36" waist and 32 inseam. The issue with these pants are the legs. I could literally fit two of my legs in one side. There's about 10-12 inches of fabric that I can fold over. I can't recommend these for motorcycle riding.