progressive vs. interlaced: where's the difference?
1802730
I don't mean to start an argument here but, some LCD and Plasma panels are available with refresh rates of 72Hz and even 120Hz, and as far as I know, 60Hz refresh rates are the norm for almost all HDTV's. Also, CRT is the only technology that can display interlaced video as such, "fixed pixel" displays paint their pictures progressively.
636310
Yes, technically answering your question. The pads are not touch sensitive to begin with. But you can resample on multiple pads with varying volumes or effects and line them up consecutively if you want the sample to be progressive for whatever reason.
526977
Paul I do not. I just know that For me the big difference is the ability to use the same profile (the recognition of a certain spoken word which becomes a written word) on multipile machines. Dragon learns as you go if you correct the mistakes it makes. You want to save this learning http://www.nuance.com/ucmprod/groups/dragon/@web-enus/documents/collateral/nc_025214.pdf
526134
it can't accurately be called both.. both DVI connections are dual-link DVI-I. DVI-I can pass digital and analog signals (the 'I' stands for interlaced), so it is compatible with both DVI-D (digital) and DVI-A (analog) cables as well as DVI-I.
221542
Hornady progressive is faster, RCBS is easier. but you're comparing apples ti zebras with these two.
1228107
It's much more flexible in that allows for separate channel processing with its own mixer and internal plugins (compressors, transient processors, filters, EQs, etc.) - It's also upgradable with add-ons if you want some extra drums for assembling unique kits or brush hit samples, stick type variations (nylon/wood tips, etc.) - I have both EZ and Superior and still use EZ for some stuff but the Superior Drummer version is likely all you'll ever need for any pro or broadcast work.
782477
I can't find any difference at all besides on the top banner after Coreldraw X6 it says "Not for Commercial Use" ... otherwise it is exactly the same for all intensive purposes.
11441
The opposite of Progressive is Batch. With the single-stage Classic, you must batch operations into Resize/Decap, Bell, seat, and crimp (while loading powder offline) all in seperate operations... Imagine doing 50 at a time, changing dies, doing the next operation on 50, changing dies, loading powder then seating/crimping the projectile.
568656
In my opinion...they are interchangeable - just one costs more. I have both types and do not notice any difference.
517415
I think they are they same thing but not 100% sure of that. You may have to check with Progressive on this one.
928065
I believe it reads different symbologies automatically. The manual has instructions for both "industrial" and "interleaved" 2 of 5...but no mention of "interval 2 of 5". I have used my scanner to successfully read UPC, code 3 of 9, and ISBN barcodes without doing ANYTHING to configure the scanner. If you meant to say "interleaved" instead of "interval" 2 of 5, I think the scanner will simply work the way you want it to work...automatically.
1316960
I only use the WordPerfect part not the other components. It serves my purpose. Not knowing what the professional version has that the standard doesn't, I can't answer that.
285035
Hi, I found no difference whatsoever! I alternate between the 2 of them depending on which one is cheaper! Hope that helps! :)
794634
Lorraine, I do not think that there is a whole lot of difference between the two models. I own the variable speed version and I happen to use it at the upper end of the speed scale most of the time. About the only time I've really needed to slow it down was when I was sanding some non kiln dried pine and found that the higher speads heated up the wood and the sap began to run (a lot). At the lower speads I was better able to sand the pine without having as much sap run and therefore clog the dandpaper. If you don't want to pay the premium for the variable, I'm pretty sure in day to day use you really won't see the difference. However, my opinion comes from a hobbyist woodworker. Cheers! -steve- Lorraine, I do not think that there is a whole lot of difference between the two models. I own the variable speed version and I happen to use it at the upper end of the speed scale most of the time. About the only time I've really needed to slow it down was when I was sanding some non kiln dried pine and found that the higher speads heated up the wood and the sap began to run (a lot). At the lower speads I was better able to sand the pine without having as much sap run and therefore clog the dandpaper. If you don't want to pay the premium for the variable, I'm pretty sure in day to day use... » Read More Lorraine, I do not think that there is a whole lot of difference between the two models. I own the variable speed version and I happen to use it at the upper end of the speed scale most of the time. About the only time I've really needed to slow it down was when I was sanding some non kiln dried pine and found that the higher speads heated up the wood and the sap began to run (a lot). At the lower speads I was better able to sand the pine without having as much sap run and therefore clog the dandpaper. If you don't want to pay the premium for the variable, I'm pretty sure in day to day use you really won't see the difference. However, my opinion comes from a hobbyist woodworker. Cheers! -steve- « Show Less
2176770
That depends... PT 10 and PT 11 (And I think maybe PT 9) have finally adapted the open market standards like ASIO and CORE Audio. Any Pro Tools versions before that required proprietary Avid hardware... Probably one of the main reasons I use Cubase! But Yes, the current version of PT11 can most definitely interface with the 16.4.2.
2111134
I'm not certain what the context of the question is (there's no reference to either on this product page), but in video technology, i and p refer to interlaced and progressive, two different formats for sending video data over a cable. Interlaced is the more traditional format, and it sends half of the total lines per frame, then sends the other half the next frame, with the two sets interlaced, so that your eyes blend the two lines together to form one picture at any given point in time. Interlacing conserves bandwidth. Progressive sends every line progressively (in order from top to bottom) with every frame. Progressive results in a higher-quality image.
1420449
Thank you. I sort of thought it had something to do with that but it seems so long. Thought I was missing some obvious feature. Thanks for your input