Is this the same as nokero lumiquest?
1799577
James, I am sorry I can not answer your question. I have not even used it yet. I just thought it was something I could use if the electricity ever went out. And so far have not had an electricial outage.
42098
The Nocticron IMO is better corrected and more Leica-like. The Voigtlanders get a tiny bit more light but the rendering is different. The 42.5/0.95 was excellent before the Nocticron was released but after comparing images from both, the Nocticron just seems to be better. The 25/0.95 is a different focal length but is also a fast lens which now has a clickless aperture ring. I'm a stills person so this is from a stills perspective. If you're into video, the Voigtlanders are tough to beat due to the clickless aperture rings. If you need optical stabilization however, the Nocticron is your best bet that is still fast and mid-telephoto. The Nocticron IMO is better corrected and more Leica-like. The Voigtlanders get a tiny bit more light but the rendering is different. The 42.5/0.95 was excellent before the Nocticron was released but after comparing images from both, the Nocticron just seems to be better. The 25/0.95 is a different focal length but is also a fast lens which now has a clickless aperture ring. I'm a stills person so this is from a stills perspective. If you're into video, the Voigtlanders are tough to beat due to the clickless aperture rings. If you need optical stabilization however, the Nocticron is your... » Read More The Nocticron IMO is better corrected and more Leica-like. The Voigtlanders get a tiny bit more light but the rendering is different. The 42.5/0.95 was excellent before the Nocticron was released but after comparing images from both, the Nocticron just seems to be better. The 25/0.95 is a different focal length but is also a fast lens which now has a clickless aperture ring. I'm a stills person so this is from a stills perspective. If you're into video, the Voigtlanders are tough to beat due to the clickless aperture rings. If you need optical stabilization however, the Nocticron is your best bet that is still fast and mid-telephoto. « Show Less
1065477
I'm not sure. Looking at their website, it seems like MagicQ is designed mainly for ChamSys's own devices. I'm using it with QLC+.
109761
Nope. Not at all. If you looking for a projector for outside. 3lcd is the brightest projector for outside. Don't use DLP for outside they suck.
2284753
Yes, you could even use the Nomad 3.5. So the range of devices that this Guide 10 can charge is the Switch 8 to the Lighthouse 250 Lantern. However, the larger the storage device the longer charge times.
816807
No it's not the same. There is cheaper version out there for about $50. This one actually has flashing lights around mirrors and talks.
735894
Thanks. I am trying to get used to Lightroom. I have been using iPhoto for a few years, and is a lot different.Thanks again.FG
2111532
Only differences are the handle for XLR and infrared light for complete darkness. Otherwise all specs the same.
1028056
Alright here it is ; v 3.0+edr a2dp , avrcp. this is from Lumace themselves.
1751042
I don't know. I have two flashes and it does not fit either one, to small. I would recommend spending a little more and purchase a soft box. I have a Luniquest and although they can be a little awkward to attach, they will fit any size and work very well. I've used mine for about 20 years and still good.
798637
I have a suprrnova pandigital. I don't know about coby. I suggest getting the most recent flash for coby.
1306349
Yes it is comparable. Turn it to f22 and keep it there and take your photos. I was told to do that. Give it a try on your D3.
58220
Ir works great on my Lumix LX7 but don't know anything about the Stylus. There is an electrical connector that the LVF2 has to connect to for power so I kind of doubt it (unless there is a standard for such things....)
2119316
Yes with no problems. Same item except for the Leica logo and price... I switch the viewfinder between my GF1 and the D-Lux 5.
2059603
anyone care to elaborate on the codec differences in gritty detail? H.264 and AVCHD Lite are both relatively knew. It would appear the Lumix can capture comparable PQ at a lower bit rate (-3 to 4mbps) but anyone have any real world results of what this translates to in terms of file size difference on a given clip?
1847157
It is a softbox, in that it is a rectangular light modifier that you fire your flash into the back of, where the light is then reflected back out the front. Functionally, it works just the same as any softbox, albeit is not made of the highest quality materials. The bag it comes in is horrible, and the softbox itself is relatively poorly made. I would not buy another, but it gets the job done in a pinch.
511535
I'm not sure, have you tried the company to see if they offer this? LumiSource.com