What size sack would work for my Alps mountaineering mummy bagGirth (shoulder/hip/foot): 64/60/40" Fits to: 6' Length: 80" Stuff size: 18x9"
398339
The extra large I have would probably be big for that bag. I have a large winter sleeping bag about that size and it is a little loose in the x large. I stuff my dry clothes and down jacket in with the sleeping bag so I have everything in one dry spot just in case.
398340
It looks like it's rated to 20 degrees...? I wouldn't go with the extra large unless your pack is extra large, otherwise it will only fit in the pack vertically, leaving an odd-sized shape in the pack which would need to be filled for balance. I'd do my best to stuff the sack into a large bag.
167760
Depending on how much you pack for a 2 week trip, this bag could be sufficient or total overkill. The L size is 90 Liter capacity whereas the XL is 155 Liter, or 9,548 Cubic Inches. That is gargantuan. The XL size of the North Face Base Camp Duffel is the bag to end all bags.The only thing I can say for sure is you will not find a larger Camp/Weather proof duffel on the market than the Extra Large North Face Base Camp Duffel.
89989
Yes, buy you'll have to get the right size. I used to use the Army water proof bag with a plastic bag inside of that and this is a much better option for water proofing. Depending on they type of sleeping bag you have (which I'm assuming is a "mummy" stuff bag and not one that rolls up with a wide opening) then you are good. The largest Sea to Summit will hold a -40 degree Wigley sleeping bag with a gortex cover. Fitting is important and too big or too small can be frustrating or waste room in a backpack - cheers and good luck!
130633
I am 5'6'' and Small/Medium size works just fine. In my opinion, the best approach is to go to a local outfitter store, they might have a special measuring device from Osprey. That what I did.
191852
Hi Dave, I measured the pack for you and it is 22 inches long by 14 inches wide in the compressed sack. The total weight is just about 8 pounds and I cannot stress enough that this system is one of the warmest you can buy and will protect you in the coldest environments.
671583
Do not go by the pack volume (65L) to determine if it will fit your body. 65L is the volume of gear that can be internally carried in the pack. The pack harness size comes in small, medium and large. To determine what size you need, look on the osprey website. They have a fit guide that will tell you how to measure for the right fit. You can also go to an Osprey dealer such as REI or Eastern Mountain Sports and they will fit a pack to you. I am 6' and about 240lbs 46/48 chest 38/40 waist, and the large is what I have, but the harness size is more based on torso length.
1458308
A large would probably be your best fit. However, Go to a local dive shop and try on a couple. That will give you an idea of what you will need. It can be a crappy thing to do to a small business owner so I always try to buy something I need for my gear bag. Just for letting me try one on.
666048
Yes - It should fit. It fits easily in my Kelty 80. I have only used the bag once, but I was impressed with the comfort and warmth. Good product for the price.
223267
We have both a medium kelty sack maximum size is 20x38 cm or 8x15 inches. The large is 25x38 cm or 10x18 inches. Large enough to fit a long sleeping bag.
599090
My compression sack stuffed with the bag is approx 12" deep/tall by 15" in length with an inch either way for margin of error. It's pretty difficult to completely stuff it in there and I might be able to do it slightly better length-wise.
1931005
Well as I am 5' 8" I can't comment on how it would fit you at 6' 2" but I checked my shoulder strap setting and I am at about 50% so there is a lot of adjustment left. The other responders seem to indicate that it should fit you as they are closer to your height. I can say that this is now my bag of choice when I do a bit of trekking. It is light, holds a lot of gear and I do like that it accommodates a water bladder.
334584
Its big. Its not necessarily for backpacking. In the original compression sack the bag is about 11x6inches. Otherwise you can compress it down to about 8X5 inches. The circumference barely compresses. Its a thick bag.
1036430
The total capacity of the bag is 2803 cubic inches from what I could find. I imagine if your also attaching a sleeping bag you will need to calculate that as well. I have a much smaller Maxpedition bag with the XS size and it fits perfect. I also have attachements on the bag. I would use the size chart and add for the sleeping bag. Or worst case by the size that looks like it should fit and the next size up and send whichever doesn't work back.
1092766
I bought a large and my pack is 80L. I think they only offered large when I bought mine though. My pack fits in the large with extra room. If you were looking for a more snug fit a medium might be the better option. I would just buy both and return the size you don't want after you try both of them out. Good luck
1396887
First, it doesn't come with a stuff sack. But it does have an elastic band to keep it rolled up. I don't have it in front of me but it rolls up to be about a foot and a half wide (obviously you can change this depending on how you roll it) and about as big around as a large pineapple I guess, maybe like 6-8 inches diameter. It won't compress too much because it's fleece, but it's lightweight. My summer sleeping bag compresses smaller.
191854
Hi Dave, I measured the pack for you and it is 22 inches long by 14 inches wide in the compressed sack. The total weight is just about 8 pounds and I cannot stress enough that this system is uone of the warmest you can buy and will protect you in the coldest environments. The two main components of this system way about 3 pounds each with the cover weighing about 2 pounds. All together the total around 8 pounds. I hope this helps.
2244814
I got a compression sack that was roughly the same size as the stuff sack that came with it, but it only compressed end-to-end. I didn't realize that what I needed was more of something to make it thinner, not as much shorter. The bag actually fits well in the stuff sack, and into the "stuff" compartment of my backpack, so I am sticking with that setup until I find the "perfect" compression sack. The number 30 comes to mind for what I did buy, though. I would go a step lower than that if I really had to have a stuff sack...that wasn't "perfect". Hope this helps.....