How does the sound quality (bass particularly) compare with the P-105?
1794233
The bass sound is quite similar, perhaps a bit richer with this model, but the main advantages of the DGX650 are mainly found in the higher degree of bells and whistles, i.e. more sounds, more programs, better pedals, etc.
1794234
This is the only electronic piano we had ever owned. We love it. During our search, we looked at several but did not get this one next to the 105. So I can't give you a fair answer. I can say that this one has a very robust soud quality and I doubt you will be disappointed.
784013
I've had the PB1000 for a few weeks now. For listening to music, you probably want the SB1000. I liked that the PB1000 gets down to 20Hz comfortably, but since I listen to music more than watch movies on my setup, I'm considering returning it for the SB1000.I should point out that it will depend on what kind of speakers you are using it with. I'm using it with some Orb Audio satellites, and in-ceiling speakers. For music, I'm definitely missing some of the mid/low bass because of this configuration. If you have some solid towers with 8-10" drivers to fill in that part of the spectrum, you'd likely be very happy with the PB1000. I've had the PB1000 for a few weeks now. For listening to music, you probably want the SB1000. I liked that the PB1000 gets down to 20Hz comfortably, but since I listen to music more than watch movies on my setup, I'm considering returning it for the SB1000.I should point out that it will depend on what kind of speakers you are using it with. I'm using it with some Orb Audio satellites, and in-ceiling speakers. For music, I'm definitely missing some of the mid/low bass because of this configuration. If you have some solid towers with 8-10" drivers to fill in that part of... » Read More I've had the PB1000 for a few weeks now. For listening to music, you probably want the SB1000. I liked that the PB1000 gets down to 20Hz comfortably, but since I listen to music more than watch movies on my setup, I'm considering returning it for the SB1000.I should point out that it will depend on what kind of speakers you are using it with. I'm using it with some Orb Audio satellites, and in-ceiling speakers. For music, I'm definitely missing some of the mid/low bass because of this configuration. If you have some solid towers with 8-10" drivers to fill in that part of the spectrum, you'd likely be very happy with the PB1000. « Show Less
742559
CX200 is better because is capable with low frequency waves. It means better bass experience.
799698
For me the bass is fine but I am not a big bass head. I can only compare them to the other headphones I own the Bose QC 15 wired noise cancellation headphones and to me they had better bass than those. However I did have an opportunity to listen to the Bludio's before I returned them for the Sony MK2's and they had more bass than the MK2's but I didn't think they sounded as good and they were a bit bulky and didn't fit on my head as well. The Bluedio's are substantially less expensive though and they did sound pretty good. Probably the best bang for the buck.
830669
I feel that the bass is just a tad strong, but not bothersome. I also have the DT770 Pro which sounds very neutral, but being that the T51P is aimed at portability and using the headphones in probable less-than-desirable circumstances, I'd have to go along with having a bit stronger bass. All in all, I'm very pleased with the T51's with one exception, the cord could be a little bit longer, maybe 4"-6".
230540
I tried 215 & 315, then I bought 315. The reason is that 315 makes me listen every single line of different sound clearly, no matter its from instruments or vocal. However, it is lacking of bass compared with 215 if you are a bass lover. That's because of the different positioning of the product. I already have a Denon one which performs with rich and deep bass so that I choose 315 just for different type of music. FYR ^^
1379893
I have the m50s limited edition. I prefer the hm5 better just because it's more neutral sounding. M50s is abit v shape to me, where you can hear the high and bass really well but the mid abit laid back. I also think the hm5 have better soundstage. However do note you will need about 100 hours of burning time for the hm5 to get it settled and the sound will change through out the burning process. The other thing I like about the hm5 that it is quite easy to mod. Mine has a cable upgrade and a wood cup now. However if u looking for option should check out Beyer and akg as they also have good stuffs as well just not in the price range of hm5.
273402
Yes! I own both and there is a clearly discernible improvement in sound quality with the Bamboo model. The bamboo has a much crisper sound and a slight increase in bass output in my opinion.
1598353
Even though I haven't listened to both, I thought I'd reply anyway. I combed thru the net for reviews on both. There are many for the 10.1 and only a couple for the 10.2. None compared the two. Obviously, 10.2 will produce more bass, but I was afraid that larger woofer wouldn't handle the upper midrange as well. No review discussed that, so it's my own supposition. I bought the 10.1, and the bass is very solid and goes lower than I anticipated. Very happy with it. Hope this helps at least a little bit.
2146449
I did short comparison before I purchase it, and previously I owned SR 80When I listen to SR 125, I can tell much different from SR 80 except the bassWhen I test SR 255i, I can hear how much the sound stage changed and the bass as wellI also tested SR 325 and I think my ear just cant hear the tiny difference vs SR 225SR 225 will be the top of the line grado that you can hook up directly without amp, so take that into consideration
1390839
the bass is better with a bit narrower sound stage. refer to the following link for more discussion on that product. http://www.head-fi.org/t/626971/akg-k702-65th-anniversary-edition
830665
"True" requires a lot of qualification, but I would say the T51P has great balance across the board. It accurately produces bass (if it's present in the recording); there's clarity but no "sizzle" in the highs; and it's not overly "warm" (the way many headphones seemed to be tuned these days). The sound quality of the T51P far exceeds just about any of the portable headphones out there on the market right now. It's pricey, but the sound (and build) quality more than justify the cost.
1535019
I'm unsure. I'm not an avid audiophile. Sorry I couldn't help you, I don't know how those p2's compare.
2175461
Both are great headphones. Everyone's description is pretty head-on from what I've read. I remember buying the HD280's at target on clearance- I opened them in the car out of excitement. They had REALLY TIGHT bass. The PX100 is more sloppy, but it's a really fun headphone unlike the PX100. I enjoyed it alot for most of my music (Electronica, Rap, Metal, Trance). The bass really hits on the 280's.
610233
I have not compared them, but the A5 from Bowers & Wilkins is the best sounding wireless speaker I have listened to.
847806
I have no experience with the PSW505 or PL-200 so I can't vouch for them. However, I can say a bit about the Sub-12HG. IN MY OPINION this sub is not very "musical". It doesn't play upper frequencies (60Hz+) very well and isn't very accurate (punchy). On the other hand, this sub is excellent for low frequency needs (down to around 25Hz-40Hz). I have found that it produces more quantiful bass rather than tight and accurate bass. Therefore, it CAN be great for movies, some rap/hip-hop -- pretty much anything needing strictly low end boom. I personally would not advise it for just music use. This is based on my personal experience.
130312
The Grado's are a bit more flat and maybe a bit treble-heavy and bass-lite. The PX100s are a bit more bassy and can't get ultra-highs. It all prefers really on what you listen to. The PX100s are best for hip-hop, dance, pop, or if you strictly want something comfortable. The SR60s are best for rock, classical, more upbeat techno, and a bit less comfortable. It's all based on taste.