1 )What's the difference between this (AF-3) and Sub-zero booster ?
1804566
the af-3 is a synthetic and it has oil for your bearings and sealer for your o-rings and gets much colder 134-a....... its great
1804567
Nothing, they are all formulated fairly close to each other with the only real difference being the lubricant they use. They cooling chemicals are all the same at about the same percentage by weight. Just buy the cheapest name brand you can find. This one was a good price when I got it last year. My AC is still running strong.
1804568
They are both Synthetics. I found the AF-3 worked great in my truck. Sealed the leak when others didn't and blows cold.
1770723
The Black edition has the same forward lens as the 9500xi, so supposedly it boosts the range an additional 40%. Not to sway you towards a different detector, but I bought a Valentine One about a year ago. I would highly recommend getting that over any of the Escorts. Knowing WHERE the radar is, is way nicer than IF there's radar, and IF it's fake or legit.
1669006
It depends on who you buy it from. It's really an AF sensor. It is OEM and had the original part #. Only difference I can gather is my car is set up for Calif emissions so they call it AF.
1191839
There is a concentrated version which is 7 times stronger than the regular, it is called modulator. It is to be used in cancer, autoimmune disorders and such. I use it myself. And the booster is the regular one, just to boost immunity, it is the one sold here. The concentrated one can only be purchased directly from Dr. Edwin Cevallos in Quito, Ecuador. It costs 126 usd plus postage. Of course you could use the regular one, just take 7 times more than directed if you need the concentrated version.
1366202
III is optimized for the Version II super telephoto lenses, allowing for faster af focusing/tracking. II works very well, and optically superior to the version 1.
1974034
Not sure exactly what you are asking. I ordered three of them and dont see any difference between them. If you could be more specific with
1074279
I believe, the at-x pro fx in it's name refers to it having been engineered for the full frame camera. The full frame shooter benefits the most. Sorry, I don't have a substitute recommendation. I only buy Canon or Tokina.
1525532
As far as I know, a booster just boosts your existing wifi signal at the source while a repeater extends the range of your wifi's signal from a separate location.
2281138
See if you can find this particular lens with the "AF-D" designation (vs plain old "AF"). On this particular lens model Nikon changed the AF gearing resulting in autofocus that's much faster. (D does not signify an AF speed increase on other Nikkor lenses, just this one -- it's a designator that indicates that distance info is passed to the camera.)
851241
I tried both side-by-side. F/3.5 model focused noticeably faster in low light. It also has a better build. On the other hand it is larger, heavier and uses more expensive 82mm filters (F/4-5.6 uses 77mm filters). Plus at the time I purchased it, the 4-5.6 model cost $407$ at my local store and the 3.5 model cost $649, which is $250 difference. At that price difference you might as well get excellently reviewed Tokina 11-16 constant F/2.8. Some food for thought
1254997
Nope. Strictly hand launch (no landing gear so the propeller would rip itself right off), ive been able to dead start it into the wind with the as3x version, and it lifts right off my palm. This version is strictly 3 channel, which in this case means throttle, elevator, and rudder. It will do a barrel roll, but not an aileron roll. Its a great plane to learn with! Binds right up to spekrum 2.4ghz transmitters, or you can buy it RTF. I put about 11g of ballast right at the nose to fix the tail heavy problem. It sounds like a lot, but it needs it. Its easily my favorite plane to date, and ive been flying 3d, large scale, and and helis for a few years now.im working on building one with flaperons and no as3x :0 Nope. Strictly hand launch (no landing gear so the propeller would rip itself right off), ive been able to dead start it into the wind with the as3x version, and it lifts right off my palm. This version is strictly 3 channel, which in this case means throttle, elevator, and rudder. It will do a barrel roll, but not an aileron roll. Its a great plane to learn with! Binds right up to spekrum 2.4ghz transmitters, or you can buy it RTF. I put about 11g of ballast right at the nose to fix the tail heavy problem. It sounds like a lot, but it needs it. Its easily my favorite plane to... » Read More Nope. Strictly hand launch (no landing gear so the propeller would rip itself right off), ive been able to dead start it into the wind with the as3x version, and it lifts right off my palm. This version is strictly 3 channel, which in this case means throttle, elevator, and rudder. It will do a barrel roll, but not an aileron roll. Its a great plane to learn with! Binds right up to spekrum 2.4ghz transmitters, or you can buy it RTF. I put about 11g of ballast right at the nose to fix the tail heavy problem. It sounds like a lot, but it needs it. Its easily my favorite plane to date, and ive been flying 3d, large scale, and and helis for a few years now.im working on building one with flaperons and no as3x :0 « Show Less
1725053
I dont know. I did buy the unit to boost the sound for 2 headphones while flying, as before I couldnt hear properly over the engine noise. The Boosteroo works great and the battery life is pretty good too. You can connect up 2 3 devices. For what it is i am very impressed.
561331
This IS the booster so you will get more channels. I've tried 3 different amplifiers and this one works the best for me. With this amp I get 3 new channels I didn't receive before. I highly recommend this amp.
1977442
the difference is the size, type 3 is for FX sensor and type 2 for DX, which is what you need.
1311514
I don't believe there is a difference between other than how individuals name it. There may a level of confusion as Sony will be releasing the new A7r as it's next generation. I have had my NEX-7 for a couple of weeks and am starting to learn how to use it. I must say that I'm happy with the initial results but also will have a lot to learn going forward.
580716
The card I got is U3. I'm not shooting 3K video, so the U1 versus U3 did not bother me, but I did research it to see what the difference was.
620935
Hi , Stephen u can see the difference at this website link : http://www.skins.net/intl/product-comparison-chart/ at the skins website it seems to say a400 is advance version for serious athletes doing &gt; 10 hrs per week . Also a400 has 3 diff length sizes . Whereas a200 is for usual people who do about 10hrs training per week . U might like to study the product chart at this website link . Cheers . Das