How does this unit compare to the 751BD?
1791686
The audio and video are superb on both but the 752BD is a step forward. It also adds HDMI and other digital inputs. See the full review of the 752BD in the March 2013 issue of WIDESCREEN REVIEW for a more detailed reply.
2004349
When I purchased the 75T's, I had the same question. The most detailed comparisons I found said that the low frequency range was slightly larger for the 75T's and that the highs are somewhat muted. The overall consensus was that it is very difficult to hear any difference between the two speakers; both are great pieces of equipment.
1051819
Hi Dave,Sorry, my writing style isn't always clear - I wrote a review of the LN52B750 only. My encouragement was meant to say, read all the user reviews on the various models that one is interested in, because that is what helped me.BTW - that's some company you've got there Dave, sounds like I've benefited more than I know as a viewer - many thanks for your good work!
528475
Don't know of any other differences except to say that the 750 is simpler and therefore probably will live longer. Great iron though, and a "steamin' deamon."
1240822
I have made the decision to purchase the ln40a750, the only difference is the 750 has a subwoofer bass speaker in it. Worth it to me because I had no plans in hooking it up to stereo system.
354927
I'm also trying to decide between the two. Only difference seems to be that the 52b750 is 240hz instead of 120hz for the 55b650. I think that has something to do with response time. Hoping that we can get responses indicating whether or not the average person can notice the difference when watching tv. I would rather spend an extra $100 for a larger tv but wonder if I would be missing out on a better picture with the 240hz.
213256
Not sure. 750 is the artisan series only sold by higher end kitchen stores. Has better book by the actual chef and the biggest 2.2 HP motor as well as 40% quieter than older versions.
2108827
In fact i return this model back and got the B490B model form the same manufacturer. It worth the +$65. You get a better illumination "halogen" and a better controllers. The quality is much better in the B490B. The bulb heat in the B490B is much less than the one in the B100B, since it uses halogen vs tungsten.
148790
There are some differences between the two receivers that may or may not be important to you. Here are links to the specs. you can compare them side by side.http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Home/AV-Receivers/Elite+Receivers/SC-75http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Home/AV-Receivers/Elite+Receivers/SC-72
959337
Hello Antwoine. This is an excellent question, and one we respond to quite often. Being the Flagship in the line the F8000 series must be special in some way, and it is. The key differences are as follows: - Better Image Processing - CMR (Clear Motion Rate) of 1200 as opposed to 960 for the F7500 - Improved Black Level - Micro Dimming Ultimate w/Local Dimming, as opposed to standard Micro Dimming Pro on the F7500 As you can see this is an "All Performance" upgrade as the feature set of the F8000 mimics the F7500. Thank you very much for your inquiry! Tom Thehighdefinitionstore.com 516-931-6800
1311308
Look at the description of both to compare. I am thrilled with the 9200. Call them if you're not sure.
2123945
I have the 746 on a 46" Samsung LED and it works fine and was much easier to install than the 751, which I put on a 55" Samsung. The 751 is heavy duty and I had issues with the 751 mount blocking access to the A/v connections.
2176140
What I understand...7500 is the surge or start up watts......6000 running....great unit.....
1473513
I'm not familiar with the unit you're comparing to, but I bought this one, use it constantly and love it. Recently went full time in an rv, and couldn't be w/o it!
957022
No significant advantage to the 9200. I suggest avoiding Parrott BT car products. They are notoriously unreliable. I'm on my second unit and will not get another. Neither I have had lasted more than 2 months.
687969
The only difference I see in the two models is the dimension and weight. The TRO480 is slightly bigger and heavier. TRO490: 18.1 x 13.3 x 10.8 inches ; 9 pounds TRO480: 18.1 x 13.3 x 15 inches ; 10.8 pounds The letters b and s represent the color. bs is for Black and Silver, while b is just black. Ranjana
892425
The only difference in the models of BotVac (70e, 75, 80, 85) is the supplies (brushes and filters) packed in the box. You can always buy the least expensive BotVac now, and get the supplies later. Compared to the older model XV, the Botvac runs a lot longer on one charge, covers a lot more territory, moves faster and more efficiently and is about 10 db quieter. Unlike the XV, it navigates my open floor plan without getting stuck in a continuous loop. I have only had the BotVac for a week, and use it on a combination of hardwood and carpeting. Now that the batteries are fully conditioned, the BotVac runs two hours, then it recharges for about an hour, then it runs for one more hour to finish my whole place of 2500 square feet. The old model ran for 45-50 minutes per charge and would never finish my whole place in three runs. I had to have two Neato XVs running at the same time to do the job, (starting from opposite ends of my floorplan). So one BotVac does the job of two XVs, and does a better job of picking up crumbs as well.