Are these headphones more comfortable than Bose QuietComfort over-ear headphones?
1779078
This one is pretty comfortable, but I think QC series are lighter. If you want a lighter and better noise cancelling, QC15 or QC3 would be the best choice. If you think better sound quality is more important, then you should choose parrot zik.
1779079
Incredibly comfortable. I use these headphones 8 hours a day, they are simply outstanding.
1779080
I don't know much about the Bose Quiet Comfort but I give these 5stars with quality, being light as well.
1779081
I find the Ziks to be very comfortable. I also wear them for hours at a time and have never felt the need to take them off. I also had a pair of Bose headphones and I agree with Junggue that they are lighter but the sound is not near as good (or flexible) with the application.
1779082
HII purchased these to replace the Bose Over=Ear. I had the Bose On-Ear headphones, which hurt my ears, so I traded them in for the Bose Over Ear headphones, which i lost on an airplane. The Parrot earphones do cause me some discomfort if i am not careful to make sure that my entire ear is inside the ear cup. This did not happen with the Bose. However, the Parrot earphones are superior in my opinion because they are wireless and are easy to control just by touch and swipe on the right ear. the Noise supression is excellent as well.
1779083
Junggey Y. said it perfectly. I would add that the Bluetooth allowing you to not have a cord connecting you to your device is something I would call an addition point of "comfort" as well.
792278
I dont know if they have "superior sound quality" but what i do lnow is that they have very different uses. The QC 25 are intended for traveling while the SEN HD8 are for djing. Sennheiser (in their higher range headphones) has way better quality making different instruments and sound in general clearer and easier to identify therefore better to dj with. They are pretry good traveling and listening headphones. They do not have noise canceling but still do a pretty good job at isolating as long as its not VERY noisy. NOW! i would NEVER buy Bose cans...they break, period. bose has great marketing bit their crap breaks. Dont waste your money, go Senn. They are solid and confortable. I dont know if they have "superior sound quality" but what i do lnow is that they have very different uses. The QC 25 are intended for traveling while the SEN HD8 are for djing. Sennheiser (in their higher range headphones) has way better quality making different instruments and sound in general clearer and easier to identify therefore better to dj with. They are pretry good traveling and listening headphones. They do not have noise canceling but still do a pretty good job at isolating as long as its not VERY noisy. NOW! i would NEVER buy Bose cans...they break, period. bose has... » Read More I dont know if they have "superior sound quality" but what i do lnow is that they have very different uses. The QC 25 are intended for traveling while the SEN HD8 are for djing. Sennheiser (in their higher range headphones) has way better quality making different instruments and sound in general clearer and easier to identify therefore better to dj with. They are pretry good traveling and listening headphones. They do not have noise canceling but still do a pretty good job at isolating as long as its not VERY noisy. NOW! i would NEVER buy Bose cans...they break, period. bose has great marketing bit their crap breaks. Dont waste your money, go Senn. They are solid and confortable. « Show Less
618622
Ok. First off, these have memory foam cushions for ear paddings, second these do not require batteries, third the sound on these blows Bose out of the water. It feels as if the sound is 3D Bose is more accoustic. I just want to say once you put then on you won't be able to take them off, the sound is that good. For noise cancelation, it's better than Bose.
1818440
I found these to be too heavy and I wasn't very pleased with the sound quality. I've never tried the Bose headphones.
1195150
I have tried many headphones in the last 20 years. (both in-ear and ones that lay over the ears. These are as comfortable in-ear headphones as I have tried. I do suggest you play with the sizes they send you to make sure you find the right fit.
1850946
I can't comment on how they compare to the Bose headphones but I find the sound quality and sound isolation to be excellent. I typically wear them when exercising and find them as comfortable as any other ear buds I've used.
856998
I did not have Bose ear buds before, so don't really know. Comfort and sound quality is great - but I primarily use for phone calls (a lot). Would buy again.
509652
i definitely tried a pair of Bose ones but these produce a much richer sound and as far as noise canceling goes, i liked these better as well. it was a no brainer for me to buy these. have been using them every day for the past year or so and still consider one of the best purchases i ever made
1316250
better， i owned a beats and it is a overpriced headphone. this one is more comfortable and the sound is great.
184452
They are no more or less comfortable than the ones you can order from Bose. I find that the headphones with either makers earpads tend to squeeze my glasses into the area above my ears, and for me, that gives me a headache after a period of extended use, but the Bose earpads did that as well
746548
No! They are stereo (crisp audio) and extremely comfortable. Sound quality vs computer/tablet is an added advantage. hs
773474
I have gotten used to them and I can wear them for two to three hours without problem. For me, these headphones did not seem to be difficult to wear for two/three hours. I can wear them longer than I can tolerate the Bose Quiet Comfort 15 (which after a while tend to make my ears sweaty). But do keep in mind this is dependent on the individual, just because these headphones work for me it does not mean they will work for everyone. It is easy to forget that every person has a different head size, differently shaped ears, and perhaps many other subtle differences that are hard to see in a review. I admit that it is hard finding comfortable headphones; you kind of have to try them for a while and see if you accommodate/tolerate them. One thing I do know, if they do hurt your ears do look for something else. It doesn't matter if they sound good but you can't wear them, then they are no good to you. Sometimes it is worth to visit a real store and try many headphones and see if there is a pattern in terms of comfort and fit. But if I do visit a store, I feel compelled to buy from the store to remain fair to the fact that I use the store to test and try out the product.
1684291
The bass response, while it will be audibly heard in extended lows will NOT be felt. It's more of a sounded punch than one you could feel compared to ATH-M50'S. That is an unfair comparison though because of the open design and closed difference on the m50's. These are the most comfortable headphones i've ever worn, though.
509653
No idea. I'm happy with the Audio Technica. I bought the headphones bc online reviews rated them at least as good as the Bose, and cheaper. The Bose are prettier, though
1808084
I find these to be some of the more comfortable headphones I've ever owned.
2264309
Yes, defintley . I feel these are little better than my original apple headphones. I'm definitely listening to more music than outside noise.
1439105
I have had problem on airplanes with people next to me hearing my music - likely because the are a closed earphone design. Batteries aren't rechargeable but seem to last for 20hrs of listening. Audio quality is much better the Bose however Bose has slight better noise canx