Would this paper be sturdy enough for mounting photos?
669200
The paper is sturdy, but porous. I wouldn't use anything but mini glue dots for adhesive. Anything even a little moist would most likely cause the paper to wrinkle as it dried.
28253
I would think that it should be sturdy enough. The reason I purchased this monopod was because it was so compact. Really glad that I purchased it.
1703696
just one document on the bottom; you can probably add a picture on the top inside with your own adhesive; some self-adhesive black mounting corners would look nice.
524709
Yes, absolutely! I have two of these racks and both are attached to the wall with the simple brass hardware that you use to hang pictures. Use two hangers per rack for stability and you are good to go!
509638
I would say it would be secure enough for this. the thing that MIGHT be a concern for photo equipment would be that the wheels/tires are not pneumatic, therefore over rough surfaces there might a good bit of vibration. hopes this helps
1257321
I got them for vintage postcards & old photos and I did do a bit of research on them and the material used IS photo safe, at least that's what they said. Product is of good quality! Hopes this helps.
1099807
It's pretty thin. I've never tried using it to mount copy paper to copy paper though. I would look on the 3M website for the answer to this question. They may have an even better product for the purpose you've described.
312932
If you are considering using this for photos, I would strongly suggest you get something more durable and watertight. These are okay for simple storage but the tops are not sturdy, will crack.
1916606
Yes. I use them for family antique photos. I place the photo in the sleeve and usehindge tape to place them in scrap books. Many of the old photos have writing on the back and this way people can flip them over and see the writing without actully toucking the photos.
894660
I used it to frame an unopened record. Shrink wrap and all and didn't have any trouble with it. Double vinyl albums might be tight, but otherwise you should be fine.
477703
I think it's strong enough. It's hard cardboard with a thin padding over top so it should be strong enough so the paper wont tear
77072
not sure...but I think the laminate that works for it would work...if you just use one side of the laminate maybe? The laminate self adhesive...if just use one side of adhesive it would adhere your photo to whatever you run it through with I would think.
262774
Wouldn't know to be honest.. Where you place the photos is a hard material .. Really good quality or so I think.. With a thin plastic sheet over .. Holds a lot of pictures.. Hope this helps if anything.. :)
1780934
Depends on how you mount it. If you use the sticky tape option, it might not handle, but if you use the included screws, and use the proper hardware (for example, if hanging on drywall), then this should work nicely. My two are hung using the attached tape. I regularly hang fine art photo prints in my studio from it. 24X30 on heavy paper, two or three at a time. I love the ability to preview the prints I am working on in the proper wall placement, then easily swap them out as I move on. Hope this helps.
722958
I have not tried to do this, but I suspect that a) the photos may stick together and not feed well, especially if they are glossy, and b) the scan path is not very friendly to paper as heavy as photo stock.I would check HP's scanner specs to see what they say about maximum paper weight.But my best guess is no.
1743220
This is a great labeling machine for paper and plastic. Fabric perhaps not the best choice. It will stick to fabric for a photo yet not lasting for more than that. Good luck.
1805972
It is quite sturdy. I am a teacher, and I just have papers in mine. However, I THINK that it would be sturdy enough.