What is the difference between difference between CX 300B MK II and CX 300 II? are both same? which one is good?
1505274
Hello Subhakar, the difference between this two senheiser, well both are the same, both sound amazing, great bass response. Check the senheiser webpage, you will find the details. For me, both models are the same in sound. try the cx 300b mk ii. Take care, rock on.
1505275
They're the same, "B" is the designation for black (the other color available at one point was silver).
121782
There isn't really an "old" or "new" model. There is the standard K-3, which is this one, and there is the Prestige model. There is no functional difference between them. The Prestige model has blacked-out lettering of the Pentax name on the front of the camera.
572666
Owning both the 55-200VR and the 70-300VR and have compared not only both but two copies of the 55-200 on two Nikon DX cameras against the 70-300. Viewing was done on two hi-def monitors (25" and 27") using close to two thousand pics. Bottom line- the 70-300 blows away the 55-200. It is not even close. The MUCH heavier 70-300 is considerably sharper, colors are balanced and accurate (as they are on the 55-200) but much richer, brighter, with better contrast and much better bokeh. Skin tones and portraits in particular are wonderful with the 70-300. Downside on the 70-300 is that it is heavier. I have read some comments that the 70-300 begins losing sharpness after 200mm but my copy is super sharp at all focal lengths. If you are a serious amature and can justify the price go for the 70-300.
1116908
I can't make a comparison with the Mk II since I've never owned one but I've used a 7D for three years and the Mk III AF is noticeably faster plus is has the availability of more focus points.
742559
CX200 is better because is capable with low frequency waves. It means better bass experience.
124027
I think the lens coating is one of the differences. I own the VX 1 all the way up to the MK IV and have never had a problem with any, the warranty is the same for all models as well
1606296
I've had both. They both have the same light gathering abilities, but the version II is smaller and is a bit better optically the the original 14-42, although I think you'd be hard pressed to see the difference in most situations. The version II is a smoother lens, mechanically.
1259587
The differences between the two reels are the 300 is physically bigger than the 250. The 300 is 10.2 oz and the 250 is 9.8 oz. The 300 has a higher line capacity than the 250. The 300 has a max drag of 11 lbs and the 250 has a max drag capacity of 8.8 lbs. The 250 action is a medium heavy in freshwater and medium in saltwater. The 300 action is heavy in freshwater and medium heavy in salt water. The gear ratio is the same in both reels, 5.1:1. Check out Daiwa's website for more info.
2041125
Check the lb/pull or draw weight, the one I have is the Covert cx2- it has a 200 lb pull. I believe there are sister models with a little less-185 or 165. Hope that helps.
1704108
The II is the newest version. The Canon version is roughly identical in the DX & DX II, however the Nikon version has added functionality from the DX to the DX II, I believe by making auto focusing is now functional on all Nikon Cameras
1225985
I have the SX, the difference between the SX and CX is the blade (SX has combo blade) and the CX has the Carbon Fiber frame. I carry it every day and have the replaceable bit set to go along with it. It's like having a small toolbox in my pocket.
107775
My understanding is the 55-300 DA L is sold as part of the kit only. The optical performance apparently is the same, but it is a lighter lens matched to the K-X. You have already mentioned the other differences. I have the same kit you do. You may also want to do a search on the Pentax User Forum. I have found many of my Pentax K-X questions are common ones that have been posed & answered before.
1069243
I own both. This is sharper and faster to focus than the 70-300. With either lens, "faster" is not a consideration. Both lenses are sharpest at f8 and require plenty of bright light. BTW, the lens hood from the 70-300 works on this version for those wondering...
1409498
I believe the 3000 replaces the 300.They have about the same rpm range. The 3000 has a newer design, probably some features I can't really think of right not but mostly the same
825084
CX150 has been dead for a long time. Its replacement was the CX200, I prefer the CX300 of course. They just go up in quality and price. CX200 is the cheapo model and the CX400 is the reasonably expensive one. They have a lot more that just increase in price and quality. I prefer the CX300 because they are sub $50 and are great. The CX400 is ok, kinda overpriced for what they are, really just nicer looking CX300s. They with a holder, case, and a bunch of other stuff,
658789
I prefer the SP280. I did own the PX350 but returned it for the following reasons: Although the key action was nice; some of the keys were unevenly spaced and the sound of the speakers was not loud enough and not as loud as my other Casio the PX-130. The SP280 has a natural sounding piano sample and excellent speakers. The action is not as good as the PX350 to be honest but it sounds better and more realistic.
1678424
Can't seem to find any difference between the two. Both come with 2011/136x/115x part. Both look visually the same, both have the same pump. Perhaps just a different naming code from the factory? I would buy the $50 one. I have it, and it runs like a beaut.