VSX-1020-K Comparison: Is this the result of a significant amplifier downgrade or enhanced manufacturing technologies, etc.
1805141
According to the Pioneer website the output is actual slightly higher in the 1021. http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Home/AV-Receivers/Pioneer+Receivers/VSX-1020-K http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/PUSA/Home/AV-Receivers/Pioneer+Receivers/VSX-1021-K
1763060
to all google search vsx-9040thx and go to pioneers link it will tell you all the specs then compare
697194
Hi Folks,I just purchased the Pioneer Elite VSX-31 but I am most likely taking it back to buy the VSX-1021. The 31 has very limited network capability and the i-phone app is weak as well. I also couldn't find a way to increase the base response. I am also considering the RX-V671 from Yamaha. It comes out next Month and has many more features. Has anyone looked at the RX-V671.Thanks,chuckp
1938810
I agree with Archie Leach. I would also like to point out, probably just bad luck, but I've had issues with the VIP 3 cutting out on me randomly where the volume suddenly drops, whatever effects are being used then drop, and then it cuts out completely.. I haven't had anyone look at it, but this has been the behavior since day 1 about 8 months ago when I bought the amp. I suspect it got bounced around during shipping, but figured I'd mention it. Maybe others have experienced the same issue. Eventually, I'll have an authorized shop take a look at it. I do like the presets, and for now, I'm using a Marshall MG102CFX but miss the presets that come with the VIP 3 I agree with Archie Leach. I would also like to point out, probably just bad luck, but I've had issues with the VIP 3 cutting out on me randomly where the volume suddenly drops, whatever effects are being used then drop, and then it cuts out completely.. I haven't had anyone look at it, but this has been the behavior since day 1 about 8 months ago when I bought the amp. I suspect it got bounced around during shipping, but figured I'd mention it. Maybe others have experienced the same issue. Eventually, I'll have an authorized shop take a look at it. I do like the presets, and for now, I'm... » Read More I agree with Archie Leach. I would also like to point out, probably just bad luck, but I've had issues with the VIP 3 cutting out on me randomly where the volume suddenly drops, whatever effects are being used then drop, and then it cuts out completely.. I haven't had anyone look at it, but this has been the behavior since day 1 about 8 months ago when I bought the amp. I suspect it got bounced around during shipping, but figured I'd mention it. Maybe others have experienced the same issue. Eventually, I'll have an authorized shop take a look at it. I do like the presets, and for now, I'm using a Marshall MG102CFX but miss the presets that come with the VIP 3 « Show Less
1511294
The reviews I've seen on Pyle don't look too good. Haven't purchased yet but am looking seriously at the QSC GX5 1400-Watt Power Amplifier.
311982
There are no other differences, and I think that the 95W vs 85W is just on paper. Onkyo reps have stated on the internet that they are "the same build".
2015594
I have had the same issue with 2 separate TDK A33's. Called tech support and they were very uninformed. No rest that they could tell me. Suggested that I go to another area (!) and purchase another, since it might be a "bad batch!" They really need to fix this issue. Otherwise the sound is good and I wanted to keep it, but 2 strokes and you're out.
1663729
Look at the picture of the back of the amp (4th picture). Almost right over the speaker, you will see it says V.2
1114996
There is a very extensive thread on this unit at head-fi. There is a FAC on the first page that has a lot of different tubes tried by the owners & their impressions of them. Most were an improvement over the stock tube.
2052067
Personally I have not compared specs against the x4000, but I will say I am dissatisfied with my 4520CI and would recommend against it. Hopefully Denon has upped their quality in their newer models, but the 4520 is buggy, and not of the quality I am used to for Denon. I have been using Denon myself for the past 30 years and every iteration gets a little worse. Ill be looking for a different brand for my next AV receiver unless I see som significant improvement in their reviews.
1974915
I have never heard the DV64's so I cannot accurately compare the two. I have heard various Pioneer, Kenwood, Onkyo, and other major brands in stores and in homes. In my opinion, the Acoustech brand blows them all away. I'm driving them with a pioneer VSX 1020 receiver and they sound clear and strong at any volume. One fault: They put out so much bass that the covers tend to create a sound of their own. I've come to the conclusion that the sound is coming from the fabric vibrating against the frame of the cover. Can't bring myself to gluing the fabric just yet, so just pull the cover off to crank it up. I have never heard the DV64's so I cannot accurately compare the two. I have heard various Pioneer, Kenwood, Onkyo, and other major brands in stores and in homes. In my opinion, the Acoustech brand blows them all away. I'm driving them with a pioneer VSX 1020 receiver and they sound clear and strong at any volume. One fault: They put out so much bass that the covers tend to create a sound of their own. I've come to the conclusion that the sound is coming from the fabric vibrating against the frame of the cover. Can't bring myself to gluing the fabric just yet, so just pull the cover off to... » Read More I have never heard the DV64's so I cannot accurately compare the two. I have heard various Pioneer, Kenwood, Onkyo, and other major brands in stores and in homes. In my opinion, the Acoustech brand blows them all away. I'm driving them with a pioneer VSX 1020 receiver and they sound clear and strong at any volume. One fault: They put out so much bass that the covers tend to create a sound of their own. I've come to the conclusion that the sound is coming from the fabric vibrating against the frame of the cover. Can't bring myself to gluing the fabric just yet, so just pull the cover off to crank it up. « Show Less
2010472
Sorry, I don't recall. (My guess would be it's 970.) In the overall scheme of things, the small differences you're asking about, would probably not be noticeable with this unit.
947431
just figured this out myself. sounds weak, even when hooked up to a 50 watt per channel amp. volume is literally cut in half. forced to pump the stereo receiver up to twice or more. absolutely dismal, even with a receiver. note to self... going forward, any tv that doesn't have variable out, doesn't get into my shopping cart LOL.
271018
My comment is that I agree that underpowered receivers or amps will easily damage your speakers. I learned the hard way when I was a teenager 25 years ago and the receivers I used then blew tweeters. Then I bought a Carver amp and felt the difference. At this time, I have Carver amps driving L/R/C/Sub Channels on my system. It is safer to have a 250RMS Watts per channel amp than a 40watt receiver. Of course if the Low Frequency Driver is damaged, obviously it was defective.
849698
I've personally spoken to the SI about this and had some others chime in as well. It is a 1.1 gain screen
1291267
Probably the size and quality of the amp. Double check, but I think the $259 version has a 15 watt amp.
1503517
That significantly had an effect on the sound quality. The X-230 sounds a lot better in comparison. I get a more surround sound feel with the X-230, but I can't say the same about the X-240's. Easily X-230 > X-240.