For the flared saute, what is the capacity? I have read 2.75 quarts and 3.2 quarts. Could someone measure theirs and let me know? Thank you!
1793105
The manufacturers description for item 373024 is as follows:Bourgeat flared saute pan without lid: Diameter 9 1/2 in. , height 3 1/8 in. , 2 3/4 quarts. These values are conversions from the following metric values: 240 mm dia, 80 mm Height, 3 liter capacity. Please note that capacity is full to the rim and is not indicative of volume when cooking. CulinaryCookware and Equipment
74351
The skillet has a three quart capacity with liquid coming to 1/4 " from the top of the pan. My experience is that you can cook with 2 to 2 1/2 quarts of liquid comfortably without worry of boil over.
534079
It is rated at 1.5 quart. Which is 6 cups. 1) The crock, filled to the brim only holds 6 cups. You can't cook that much volume in it. 2) The crock, with the suggested 2-inch space between the top and food, only leaves 2 cup food volume. The 2 inch head space the manufacture recommends is probably to help prevent boil over. I did not do test the difference of cooking meat with low liquid content against soup with a high liquid content to see if you could cook a larger volume than was recommended.
422647
This pan holds approximately 3 quarts at a functional level (not all the way to the top). It works best for something you may want a deep frying or saut pan for, it is not like a dutch oven. Very useful pan though, use them all the time. Very good depth for risotto.
620447
The sizes (capacity, I should say) are listed in the description (one quart, etc). I realized that I had the original set instead of the set II, and mine includes a 3-quart sauce pan instead of 2-quart, which is the only difference I can see. If you want measurements by the inch, you might check online for actual physical size of the pans.
1501327
Personally, I use it almost exclusively for large batches of spaghetti sauce and Italian sausage or meat sauce and I let it simmer for hours. I gently stir every half hour as usual, but no problems with anything I cook. This is my third Tramontina. Have an 18 qt., 20 qt, and now this 24 qt. This is my preferred brand for mass cooking soups, sauces, chili. I love it! I hope this helps. :-)
521162
You are absolutely correct, we messed up and it is a typo. They hold as follows: Small holds 1.25 qts, the medium holds 3.5 qts, and the large holds 4.5 qts (not to the border but a quatity you would would normally put in a pot without it spilling). I hopw that helps, and we have updated the listing to have to correct information. Thanks for pointing it out.
228567
yes, I measured the capacity...3 qts. comes up to the top of the pan, with no room to spare, so if you have to stir it, you would have to take care not to go over the side of the pan...good luck, Howard
2037459
there's a 91/2 inch and an 8 inch....and then a deeper 3 quart deeper pan......I just love the set......cant say enough good things about it....I had some other odd pieces so I didnt mind that there wasnt a bigger saute pan I guess.
1166059
3.5-4" this is a great product. I use it for everything.pot roast, spaghetti are some different things I use it for.I love the sear feature. Alex
1259547
12" across. This is a fabulous pan for the money. If you purchased an All Clad of this size it would probably run $200. It's great for sauteeing large amounts of food. I always warm up the pan a little before putting oil in it. Then after it's warmed up I add oil, and let that warm up a bit too before adding food. I don't use the highest setting on my burner with any pan as that causes sticking. Medium high heat is enough.
2091366
Mine had the special bottom on the 4 quart only but both pots seem to be fairly non-stick. I use the 4 quart for oil free sauteing and browning with a quick final pressure cook. The eight quart I use for beans and steaming larger items like artichoke or squash. Great set. Highly recommend!
339639
It holds 3 quarts. But 2 comfortably, I would say, depending on what you're cooking. 3 quarts of liquid puts it within a half inch of the top of the pan.
1085377
Gosh I'm sorry. I have no idea. And I don't have the unit anymore. It was ok. And probably fine for low heat cooking. But the finish was kind of cheap and I worry about that, so I chucked it. Sorry....wish I could have more information for you.
1135236
Approximately 10x6 and holds 5-6 quarts. This is perfect for soups or stews,deep frying,sautéing,great multi purpose pan.This is always on use at our home.NS
1608247
You could use this for any of your recipes, seeing that it's misleading.... it's only got a 6 quart capacity! I just received mine, and measured it. Yep, only 6 quarts will fit in it.
182626
It got thrown away, so I can't measure it, but I can imagine it might have held about 3 quarts. It certainly did have one long handle as shown (and would not stand on its otherwise usefully curved base). I'd be very inclined to find one in a shop to check with the pan you intend to use beneath it before buying!