text: The writer has a point when he says: "All the claims of Jesus Christ hang on this one event – his resurrection." I cannot see how an educated adult in our age can be expected to rely on the gospels as evidence of this event. This simple test illustrates that difficulty - http://exchristian.net/3/. 
  
  He also writes: "If that did not happen, Christianity is false and Jesus was the greatest hoaxer of all time"
  This exposes him as someone who has not studied the scriptures he relies on at all and he certainly doesn't grasp the nuances in christology and soteriology  contained in the new testament. He relies heavily on the gospel of John when there is no reason why he should reject the versions contained in the synoptic gospels in as far as the idea that Jesus is God is concerned.
  
  From Mark 3:21 it is clear that Jesus's family didn't think that he was God incarnate, placed on earth through immaculate conception. Why should I?