text: Yes, he said not all of you can live by this rule, and if you can't, then DON'T MARRY.  And you think the implication is, "But for you who can't live by this rule, then you can marry anyway and break the rule"??  Does that make sense to you?
  
  You say:  "One would then see marriage in a new light but not be bound to deny the limitations of human nature and the human condition, as church teaching has sometimes done."  Tell me:  On the issue of the indissolubility of marriage, where is the difference between Church teaching and what Christ taught?