text: Good.  Then you can tell us the purpose in hauling out a year-and-a-half old op-ed hit piece that was factually suspect and downright deceitful....
  
  Want just one example?  The referenced article states "More than 90 Catholic theologians and scholars at the Jesuit university argued Ryan was "profoundly misreading church teaching" and distorting Catholic social doctrine to fit his political agenda." Stuff and nonsense..unless everyone is  now considered a "theologian" if he/she disagrees with Mr. Ryan?
  
  The truth of the matter? According to HuffPo, it was "nearly 90 Georgetown University faculty and administrators"...later referred to as "scholars" - not "theologians." (btw - the op-ed never referenced the actual university, either...)
  
  Whether you agree with what was proposed almost 2 years ago or not..(it has changed) the minute the referenced article distorted the truth to suit the author's agenda, it lost ALL credibility.
  
  And therefore the question remains - why drag it out again?