text: While some will love seeing Cosby taken down just for the sake of it, I have deep deep reservations about charges in cases like this that are associated with large cash payments.  Each of the "accusers" may be in line for big civil case payouts that are somehow engineered despite any temporal limits on suing as in the Catholic priest cases.  Also, as cited in the article, the age of the case, means that there is no evidence.  None whatsoever that can be used in defense.  The case will be decided purely on the words of the man and woman involved and how they carry themselves in front of the jury.  Absent evidence, no justice can truly be achieved.  Regarding his "admissions," I can't help but wonder whether that was a condition of settlement in the civil case, i.e. that he "admit" to a list of things in order to settle the case for a less than insane amount.  On top of all this, ten years for a hand in the pants?   Murderers sometimes get less.  Rationality?