text: Is this a theological argument? No. Pure social science. They have become as predicatable as lab rats in a maze or Trump defenders in a Frank Luntz focus group.
  
  As for the first part of Walford’s essay on infalliability. Either those passages on papal teaching are relativism (for Catholics by their Pope) or they still endow all Popes with Magic. The charitable view is the former, but authoritarians essentially believe the latter, except about this Pope. He does not seem to have the right spells for these Trads.