text: Believing that we should ensure the freedom  from, more than of, religion,  hostile to all forms of fundamentalism, as much Christian, (born again and Catholic integrist) and Jewish (ulta-Orthodoxy) as well as Islamic fundamentalism (Salafism or Wahhabism), and attached to the right to blaspheme, I am very worried about the consequences of the passing of M-103.  In a recent book, "Un racism imaginaire, islamophobie et culpabilité", Pascal Bruckner expresses his fear that the notion of islamophobia could be used to silence any criticism of Islam itself.  While the personal security of Muslims should be ensured, so should that of people who subscribe to Voltaire's statement that Moses, Christ and Muhammad were three imposters.  Is one who would encourage Muslims to approach their sacred text the way that Thomas Römer dissects the Hebrew Bible at the Collège de France, and who criticises Muslims who refuse to do so, engaged in an Islamophobic act?