text: You are missing the point. Yes, the past was bloody, Christians today reject that kind of action, they don't claim it with pride, but shame. They have learned from history, and evolved.
  
  So what does that have to do with the present?
  
  In the present, some groups commit acts of terrorism *in the name of* their religion. That is what makes it "Muslim terrorism", rather than "Communist terrorism", or "Anarchist terrorism", etc.
  
  The Weathermen, the Baader-Meinhoff Gang, etc.,  were organised terrorist groups who acted out of a common ideology, so are ISIS or al-Quaeda-inspired terrorists.
  
  There is no equivalent so far for Bissonnette, he did not claim to be acting in the name of Christianity, so why describe him as a Christian terrorist? Because of his ethnic origins?
  
  So are atheists also going to be considered "Christian" because of their ethnic origins?