text: -If one trusts a "distributor" of (good) news, and, if that distributor demands acceptance of its "subscribers"- or else - is there not a possibility that "alternative facts" might be proffered "as if" they are  real/true?  Where alternative conclusions might be derived, is there not a danger that the distributor dictate conclusion to the exclusion of alternative(s) or observation?
  -If the efficacy of the contender for leadership is irrespective of his/her moral integrity, is it not familiar to the efficacy of sacrament being irrespective of the moral integrity of the clergy, is that not familiar?
  Is it any wonder that Roman Catholics have minimal concern for deception "in the world" as "in the church"/