text: He is, I think, trying to move the church "out of the way", so to speak, so that the "message" will be freed from its institutional confines on the one hand, and so that we might hear it more clearly on the other. This frightens those who want dictate of their particular view and punishment for the "other side". 
  This is scary for a lot of us, especially those who see "church" as their ambition and security.
  We certainly need "gurus" of our faith but do we really need "priests"? The "sacrament" is our redemption, our inclusion, our encounter. It happened. "Liturgy" - Eucharist, Baptism, etc. -d, are expressions, celebrations, "re-freshening" not the essence.  We have reversed the "essence" and the decoration. Increasingly I am thinking that we don't "receive" sacrament as much as we "enter into", we are embraced and we embrace. We are "ordained" into Christ's redemption and go out for/with Him in message/mission. "Should", that is
  We children of the Word need more nurturing less dogma.