text: Bringing married priests back is the next step for the Roman Rite of the Catholic Church.  Romanist Catholicism has gender bias embedded in its theology, governance and liturgy.  Does the Women's Ordination Conference want to continue in this direction?
  
  Even if women were to be ordained deacons or deaconettes, they would never have full deacon-authority as defined by the Roman Rite.
  
  Those who object to Francis' desire to open the Church to Vatican II are stronger than we think.  Since Pope Francis is NOT interested in moving doctrine to the next level, there will be little left to sustain his personal desire to reform the Church.  We must also take into account that people want security & certainty in an age of change; this they can find abundantly in Roman Rite Catholicism.
  
  Why is the Women's Ordination Conference fighting married priests?  Must WOC be so preoccupied with earning Rome's approval?  Aren't they only buying into genderist Romanist theology?  Google RiteBeyondRome.