text: I disagree that "fundamentalism" and "non-fundamentalism" are the right ways to separate this. (Disclosure: I am strong United Church - once a "mainline" denomination!). Jim Wallis and the Sojourners are fundamentalist in their Christian path, I believe, and any justice-seeking Christian would be pleased to have the Sojourners on their side. And there are mainline Christians of all denominational ties who would be Franklin Graham fans.
  
  Fundamentalism is a specific late 19th Century movement in response to mainline indifference. I believe it is better to differentiate along the lines of violence. Two or three decades ago someone wrote that the most rapidly growing spirituality was "belief in the redeeming power of violence," or words to that effect. Franklin Graham really does seem to fall into that category, and so do many other Christians, some Muslims and some Jews. And it is belief in violence that some people desire to see cross into the state (or vice versa).