text: "But God doesn't interfere with human government, organization of cultural or social understanding. "
  OK, so now that you've dispensed with the OT, the Christian mystery, the conversion of Paul, and anything with the trappings of what we know of Christianity, I see your point.  And you suggest that I have an odd concept of theology :-).
  Is this, really, the argument you want to make?  Because it appears that this is the argument you are making.
  Again, "Father" isn't specifically the gender but the relationship.  Neither you nor I can change the fact that this is how Jesus referred to The First Person of the Holy Trinity, personal preference notwithstanding.  The fixation on the gender in gendered titles hinders growth.  I think that you reflect God no less than I despite the name "Father".  It seems to me that in seeking some imagined "balance" in how we refer to God we turn the focus away from God and toward ourselves.