text: RD is saying "You can't call me a liar because you are a liar". Even if I am a liar, it has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with YOUR lying. It is an excellent example of the Tu Quoque logical fallacy. Would you come before a judge and say, "You can't say I'm a thief, since Joe Doaks is a thief."?
  
  Since I have disposed of your fallacious response, how about you doing what you say others should do and apologize to me for your having lied about me? Do you need to be reminded of your lie? It was when I called you on having said that the Turing machine was another name for the Turing test in the "Pope Francis discusses married priests, women deacons with German newspaper" thread. You replied in the "Delve into the Bible during Reformation anniversary" thread "Except I never said 'the Turning [sic, Turing; he got it wrong twice] Machine is another name for the Turing Test.' That my dear friend is a falsehood, a lie."
  
  It was, in fact, the complete truth, as shown by actual quotation. You lied.