text: "Tell me there's not targeting BASED ON RELIGION underway."
  
  How does this square with the fact that Episcopalians, Presbyterians and Unitarians hold beliefs that gay marriage is moral and valid?  Are those who are denied services not being targeted based on religion?
  
  Protection of conscience is important, but I think it would also be important to evaluate how one's conscience is being applied.  For example, people have argued for Kim Davis' conscience rights (the Kentucky recorder of deeds).  I question this, however.  Kim Davis is married five times.  No Christian faith actually permits this.  We know for a fact she went five times to get a marriage license.  How can we say this is accurately a matter of conscience when she is picking and choosing which Christian beliefs she will enforce?  Same with the bakers and florists:  how do they verify the purity of heterosexual couples?