text: The historical Jesus and the Jesus of faith, i.e. built up from various portraits (themselves not consistent) in the NT, are most certainly not "the same." By "apocalyptic timetable" in this context I don't refer to any anxious interpretation of the Book of Revelation, but rather to what seems from many of his reliable sayings to have been in Jesus' mind, viz. that the end times would begin soon after his death. He did not know when exactly, but did not expect a long delay.
  
  Most feminist theologians are not challenging the unity of the church at all. It's those who hold these people suspect and keep them at a distance, themselves not liking to be challenged, who perhaps violate that unity.
  
  "Deep" is that Jesus did not stay dead, but was experienced by a few disciples as having overcome death and established his unseen presence among them, e.g. "Shallow" is the exclusively Lucan, rather anxious timeline of an Ascension after 40 days and a Pentecost after 50 -- still very Large-T!