text: "Love the sinner; hate the sin" is so ingrained, hypocritical and telling that it establishes Ms.Manson's op-review as a "beyond the call" act of tolerance in itself. She is right. Just for a moment, pretend that Fr. Martin is addressing women's access to ordination and its source, or even more profoundly, victims of sexual abuse. He would, I suggest, be pilloried.
  The LGBT community would, hopefully, be generous in their views about the effects of tradition (emotional and "teaching") on the psyche of lay and cleric. At least I hope so as a recovering "cathoholic".  To suggest that LGBT respect the very people and institution that has hammered them and hammered into people like me a disdain for the sin that cannot be separated from the sinner.  If there were no "sinner" the sin would, in old Catholic parlance, be a despicably sinful, dirty, disgusting thought.
  A more appropriate advice from him might be a "supererogatory tolerance with little hope of reciprocity".