text: You simply don't understand what "hate speech" is, John.   Nor do you understand the precise legal definition of free speech.
  
  Listen closely:
  
  The ONLY speech that is banned by law is speech that calls for or incites imminent violence.
  
  What Milo has to say doesn't fit into that category.  Not even close.  He has never in any way advocated violence.
  
  Therefore, his rights to speech fall under the 1st Amendment.  They are protected by law.
  
  People can protest his speech, BUT THEY DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO USE VIOLENCE TO STOP HIS SPEECH, simply because they don't like what he has to say.
  
  What I'm describing here is free speech 101.
  
  The same rights that (are supposed to) protect Milo are supposed to protect the rest of us, ie you and me, all Catholics, everyone.
  
  Labeling opinions you don't like as "hate speech" and claiming this give you the right to stop others from speaking is against the law.  It's un-Constitutional.