text: I think you're right that the pro-life movement is largely about voting; but precisely because they think that with the right set of circumstances (the right case, the right lawyers, the right judges) they can achieve a ban on abortion, and that the ban will end abortion.  I think they're wrong in several respects, but I do think they genuinely believe that they can end abortion at the ballot box.  
  I think Bernardin didn't so much try to refute that argument as to lay out the case that it was not/is not the only way for Catholics to analyze the issues, and that any analysis must recognize that the so-called life issues are connected.  Bernardin would never have been duped by Trump.