text: 1. That particular cross is not 75 years old. The cross that is there is not the original cross. The standing cross has been there since the late 60's. 2. If Becket has led you to believe that they represent religious freedom for people of all faiths, you've been bamboozled. Simply took at their case database; clearly they represent just one faith. I doubt Becket would represent Satanists' or Muslims' efforts to put up their own monuments alongside Christian ones that stand on public ground. 3. The plaintiffs (some of whom are local) would be happy if the cross were moved to private property for Christians to enjoy; it doesn't have to be destroyed. 4. This case is not about the "right to remember." 5. Thanks for wasting public funds fighting a losing battle. This case has already cost us over $130,000. "Pro bono" representation will not cover AHA attorney fees if Pensacola loses this case.