text: If Vat II did what you say it did regarding the very nature of the Mass itself --- to return the Mass to a communal meal rather than a bloodless sacrifice --- then Catholics have all the more reason to be disturbed by Vat II.  According to the Council of Trent:  "If any one saith that in the Mass a true and proper sacrifice is not offered to God; or, that to be offered is nothing else but that Christ is given us to eat; let him be anathema."
  Yes, you're right.  "Unfortunately, too many dioceses neglected relevant education when liturgical changes were made, and we're still paying for that lazy rebellion 70+ years later."  Even a majority progressive meal-goers don't even get THAT part right --- polls show they either don't know what transubstantiation is or, if they know, they don't believe it.  That is was a "lazy rebellion" is exactly right.