text: Canon law is not the free variable you would have it be since it exists for a purpose.  But rather than get into that--since it is a distraction you introduced here, as is equivocating by conflating "canonical gospels" with the the term "gospel" as used in Paul's epistle--we should just observe that your sect preaches a different gospel than the Church.  That much is manifest in your sect's literature.  And you have no reason to be in schism without a difference in teaching.
  
  This remark of yours here, in context of what you say you do, affirms the difference.  You "welcome all to God's altar" not as Christ's church welcomes all, but without asking repentance.  You distribute a maybe-valid Eucharist to people even if they may (per St Paul) be eating and drinking their own destruction!  And if you are in schism with St. Paul you are preaching another gospel.
  
  The act is transparent, and one wishes you'd repent of it and come to Christ.