text: First of all, the definition of schism given by Fr. Reese is inaccurate. Code of Canon Law 751: "Schism is the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him." There is no need for illicit ordinations and the setting up of another quasi-Church for there to be a real schism. Even if the results of the four cardinals' intervention/formal correction did not mean canonical schism, you'd still have a very open, ugly, public de-facto schism between those with and those against the pope as we already do. 
  
  More to the point, Fr. Reese makes it clear that he doesn't take Jesus seriously. Three Gospel accounts report the ban on divorce and remarriage as adultery. Jesus' rebuke of the Pharisees is not contextualized by concern over the social/economic difficulties of women put away by husbands (although I'm sure he cared about this). The sole context Jesus gives is the Gen 2 plan for marriage and the avoidance of adultery. Full stop.