text: Yes, many “experts” bandy about theories about Paul’s authorship, the authorship of the Gospels (all three synoptics of course relied on a text called “Q”, which text has never been found nor is it referenced anywhere in the first 19 centuries), and so on and so forth.
  
  They even incorporate these theories at “reputable” catholic colleges - Georgetown and Notre Dame are two - coursework.
  
  The only problem is .... these are theories. They rely primarily on techniques developed in the 19th century by German Protestants, many of whom abandoned Christianity.
  
  That  “some of the Pauline epistles’ authorship are questioned” I believe that to be accurate. “X, Y, and Z question the authorship of some of the Pauline epistles” is even better since we can discuss X, Y, and Z.
  
  But “take a Scripture study of St. Paul at a reputable Catholic College” is of no value at all. Sharing erroneous “common knowledge” does no one any favors.