text: We can sort this out rather quickly.
  
  Unless ScottG is every participant, the conclusion that I post in vain seems presumptuous.
  
  If at National Catholic Reporter someone takes the position that the Catholic Church actually teaches with authority, he can hardly be accused of sowing discontent.
  
  If by regulars you mean people who heretofore dominated the conversations and pine for the Block Function, why should they be given veto power over other opinions?
  
  As a progressive sort of guy, I am sure you believe every opinion should have its day and let the chips fall where they fall.