text: According to Alceste, this case is about:
  
  "* TWU rules allowed married heterosexual students to have sex together.
  
  * TWU rules do NOT allow same-sex married students to have sex together."
  
  As you can see, TWU's policy has a discriminatory feature. It doesn't treat same-sex married students the same as it treats heterosexual married students. As you can also see, TWU can rectify that discrimination in more than one way. The first way would be to allow same-sex married students to have sex together. However, that would be a total repudiation of TWU's principles and beliefs. The second way would be to ask all students, married or not, to refrain from having sex while attending the university. That would treat all students equally, and hence LSUC's case would immediately fall apart.
  
  Given that TWU is a school of devout Christian believers, if forced to do so which do you think they would choose: To repudiate their beliefs, or to make a temporary sacrifice for them?