text: "Women are not all of the same affinity any more than all men."  
  
  I never said "all" women had the exactly same interests. Is that really what you thought I meant? Really? To say there's a natural affinity among women is self-evident. If it were otherwise, there'd be no basis for Women's Studies, or "Women's Rights." Women, in general, have similar interests. As do men, in general. Your resort to arguing about a hetero man going to a gay rights parade and proclaiming his affinity to the men there is pathetic, precisely because gay men have so little affinity with men in general, the vast majority of whom are hetero. Your hypo intentionally overlooks that I was talking about men and women in general.
  
  As to you other pathetic hypo, the Church requiring private sex acts to be ordained.  Somewhere, there IS such a church. Does it oppress you?
  
  Your DOJ hypo doesn't work, either. I have a civil right, protected by law, not to be discriminated against for such a job.  Like priesthood?  No.