text: Your critique of Atwood's glory is weakened by your self-defensive desire to see Islam punished in her literature, not Christianity. Atwood's views have nothing to do with either Christianity or with Islam. She's a feminist, period, and her villains are men, not men's 'religions'. She distorts her own message with the silly stuff about enslaving women in middle-America. All this can be confusing, because religious fundies (like yourself, I suppose) are not going to "enslave" women soon, or perhaps ever. But you will restrict their access to birth control, and some, like Mike Pence, will promote a kind of subservience to men and glorify the Abuser-in-Chief, Trump.
  Atwood's "dystopia" would have been set in a Buddhist society if she had been an Asian, not a middle-class Anglo from Ontario (where there are more crosses on the horizon than crescents). Your own agenda can be met by writing an anti-Islamic dystopia, which you should do. You really have missed the mark here.