text: Cherry-picking the definition of "oath" to fit your own false assertion.  Attaching Judeo-Christian to any action somehow defines it as a "principle".  The Supreme Court opening has no relevancy to the Constitution, just as "under god" in the Pledge of Allegiance wasn't even in it until the 1950's Republican/McCarthy CONgress interjected it and is actually a violation of the Constitution whenever the "Pledge" is required recitation in government or schools.  All of this injection of "god" into any governing component is a violation of the Constitution's basic human rights principles.  It is accomplished by elected traitors and the voters who blindly follow anyone with religious name attachment despite most of them are criminals and traitors.  One of the problems with democracy where the entire idea can be subsumed by a brainwashed majority.