text: I have to question the intelligence of the author... There are two disturbing facts in this article. 
  
  First, the author's statement: <b><i>"By 10:30 Friday morning, LGBTQ advocates on campus had completed one act of resistance. "</i></b>
  
  How is this 'resistance'?  Ms. Munoz clearly doesn't understand the meaning of the term <i>resistance</i>.   I think it would be more accurate to state that the chalk commentary was their response to the group. 
  
  The other issue is that the vote was 8 to 4.  It should have been 12 to 0. 
  You may not agree with what the Catholic group was saying, but you should at least be willing to allow them to say it and then discuss why you think its wrong.