text: Priests are largely (numerically) as Jekyll/Hyde. They may advance to a higher position, but they don't change their stripes - up to and including cardinals - and the popes all began as Jekyll/Hyde priests.
  Pious, as circumstances necessitate, and freewheeling otherwise. 
  Virtually all priests were viewed as pillars of christian values in the eyes of the pious around them - until they were exposed to be criminals. 
  
  Law et al....
  
  So those authors/clerics that Roberts quotes may be Hydes not yet exposed.
  I've seen it too many times. How many closeted but sexually active gay priests have roundly condemned homosexuality from the pulpit. 
  
  This article is nothing new, mostly claptrap and ends casting blame on the laity for allowing the abuse to continue. 
  
  A flock of sheep doesn't condemn their shepherd when he slaughters one of them to satisfy his hunger. The sheep have been long and very well domesticated.