text: Huh? You (and another guardian of the faith) disagreed with my opposition to an interloper who expressed admiration for E. Michael Jones, a Catholic and virulent anti-Semite/neo-Nazi. I was so appalled I took a screen shot.
  
  <<Traddie neo-Nazis and their defenders at NCR are an abomination.>>
  
  https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/young-voices/why-i-marched-and-why-we-cant-stop-marching
  
  You wrote:
  
  <<And you bet I gave you a frowny face when you continually accuse those who disagree with you of being Nazis.>>
  
  This is a lie. Which was my point when I brought it up above.
  
  <<You made a series of accusations and even you had to roll a couple back.>>
  
  Inaccurate and misleading.
  
  <<YOU made a mistake, I believed you, you recanted.>>
  
  Recant? Like I SAID above, I immediately noted the error and apologized. You expressed elsewhere your moral conviction that silence is complicity. Care to apply that standard when a neo-Nazi troll drops by? No, you'd prefer to slam a nun who marched on Washington.