text: "Your critique... is weakened by your self-defensive desire to see Islam punished in her literature, not Christianity", as "religious fundies (like yourself, I suppose)" are wont to do.
  
  Wrong. I have no "self-defensive" drive of any kind in this matter, as I see not a speck of scientific evidence for the existence of any god(s).
  
  Your attempt at rebuttal is bizarre, a not-cloaked form of personal attack in which you hurl accusations of alleged religious beliefs and weirdly claim that I oppose policies on birth control that I do not oppose. You might as well jump up and down and loudly claim that I think Santa Claus exists and that I always vote for free ice cream distribution in Australian national elections. You fully ignore the core of my comment, which recognized a glaring double standard in the arts community. 
  
  Your claim is silly her dystopia WOULD (roll eyes) have been set in Buddhist society had she been Asian (etc). Fiction writers have greater imaginations than you pretend.