Goober - it's a rational and factual assessment in that it's based on the actual language of the motion and not on wild theories about the motion criminalizing criticism of Islam or the start of imposing sharia law.

I'd suggest that your use of rational and factual in the first half of your post is a bit ironic when contrasted with your statement about "progressives' well-known lack of commitment to freedom of speech and expression" and "reasonable suspicion".

Please tell us what you think the conservatives are correct about using actual facts.