except that Mr Cotler's 2015 anti-semitism motion didn't rely on anyone's dislikes or aversions, it was based on a defined set of interpretations about what signatory nations have agreed anti-semitism means as per the Ottawa Protocol.... and the Ottawa Protocol references the EUMC Working Definition of Anti-Semitism.....all of which is why Mr Cotler has come out and said he would have moved for M-103 to be redrawn to align with his 2015 motion had he been in Parliament today...referencing anti-Muslim bigotry or anti-Muslim hate with a working definition based on actions similar to that used in his motion as opposed to the undefined and open-ended concept of Islamophobia.....