Let's try to navigate the crazy for a moment, shall we?
What, exactly, is your REASON for disagreeing with the motion?  This is what I've heard from various sources so far:
1. It's legally binding (it isn't)
2. It's only about Islamophobia (it's not, read it)
3. It will lead to Sharia law (it can't... been tried... failed...  read the Charter)
4. Immigrants shouldn't be able to run for office (nutbar)
5. All muslims actually ARE evil (nutbar)
6. Fear is a right (well no, actually it's not... but the motion doesn't discuss it so that's irrelevant)
7. Islamophobia is undefined (that's not the core of the motion. if it was, I'd oppose it... again, read it)
8. It will turn into law (it's a suggestion for community outreach... not a legal proposal... again, READ IT!)
9. Progressives are naive and Islam will take over the world (nutbar)

The funny thing is that the motion is really quite generic.  Amazing how many of its critics haven't even looked at it.