The Alabi case did not involve prosecution, it was at the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal, so in the nature of a civil case seeking damages. It involved devout Muslim tenants suing their landlord for, among other things, insisting on entering their apartment's prayer space without removing his shoes, belligerently and without good reason.  As you know, he lost, and had to pay his tenants modest damages.

The case of  Gregory Alan Elliott is unfortunate.  He was acquitted of criminal online harassment of three women.  There were some pretty nasty messages sent, but it appears the worst of them were not sent by Elliott, but by someone impersonating him.   And yes, like anyone aquitted of criminal charges (hello Mike Duffy) he is left with significant legal expenses.

Nothing in either of these two cases suggest that anyone will be prosecuted for misusing pronouns, which is the nonsense claim that began this thread.