. Up to now, the court's responsibility to judge whether such an order is legal and constitutional, not if it is sound policy.. Up to now court's judged orders on what was in the order- what is says- not on campaign rhetoric. This is quite a change and if sustained through the Courts of Appeals and Supreme Court will be interesting to see how it is applied to other orders by this and other Presidents in the future. Also I am curious on why folks insist on calling the order a Muslim ban when over 90% of the world's Muslims are not impacted by it. If he had banned travel from just one Muslim Nation or two would this have been a Muslim ban as well?