The narrative is that those murders targeted muslims. But there were a number of incidents before and after at that mosque which suggest more to the story. The killer was not tried as a terrorist. Why? He'd have to testify about his motives. The imam of that mosque is listed as a muslim brotherhood representative in Canada. The other incidents suggest it was targeted not because it's muslim but because it's Muslim Brotherhood. This is banned as a terror group in Saudi Arabia. They use politics and violence to gain power as demonstrated in Egypt and elsewhere. They have many front groups including MSAs, of which Khalid was a former executive. In Ontario last year a bill against the campaign of Anti Semitism the MSAs were pushing was rejected. Why? "Free speech is important to protect." But now we're going to ask the radical imams what we need to do to take a "whole of government approach" for them to feel happy? This is ripe for abuse, emotional blackmail and manipulation.