I think the last thing we need is inflammatory speech directed at Muslim terrorists.
Walk softly and propel a %$&! load of drones!
Personally, I favor a leader that doesn't inflame, that doesn't seek to intensify already inflamed emotions but rather is a calming influence. 
Closing the borders, patrolling neighborhoods--- I think we all know this is empty rhetoric, as is the "carpet-bombing" Trumpism.
You simply cannot successfully wage war against largely urban terrorists using conventional warfare. It is a dirty, house-by-house effort that always (see Israel in Lebanon) is highly lethal to those on the attacking side. It always is to be avoided.
By seeking to kill and capture the leaders, we are doing what is the most intelligent and mature response possible: it is highly effective, but it takes a little time. Note how successful this strategy was in derailing and castrating A Q. It will work, again, against these vile creatures, ISIL.