I find this article not only one-sided but completely lopsided. The use of military terms to define the objection of a health worker to terminate a life through abortion cuts to the heart of the debate: The battle of Pro-life vs. Abortion. The question is: Who represents the rights of the health worker and who represents the rights of the unborn baby? 
There are documented cases where German soldiers refused to comply with the internment and termination of Jews in Nazi death-camps. According to this article, as it uses military terms (as if abortion is war), these soldiers, who were court-martialed or shot, were in the wrong. They should have toed the line and were executed for being “dishonourably disobedient”. 
Even if the system says that abortion is legal, where does this leave the health-worker? Should the beliefs of the worker, e.g. being Muslim, govern their actions, it is wrong?
The lopsided argument is one of causality: Illegal abortions are caused by objectors? Really?