Why not just say I'm pro choice and don't like Brownback, rather than try to argue that "restricting access to abortion is a type of religious restriction"?   There are plenty of protestants, Jews, Muslims and even atheists who are pro life.

If you don't like Brownback, fine, and if you're pro choice, fine.    But let's not say access to abortion belongs in the category of religious freedom.    It has nothing whatever to do with freedom of religion.  Even the most extreme pro choice activist wouldn't make that argument.  Why?  Because if people differ with each other on moral or ethical issues,  it's not the same thing as religious intolerance.

Again, if others see Brownback as a terrible politician, I can allow they have their views -- but there's no evidence he's  would actually restrict other people's religious freedom.