Let's get this straight.  You are all but stating that the ADN is not reliable in relaying the facts in this instance?  That we cannot go to the relevant FB page and see the exact same thing as noted by the ADN?

Let's take a quick spin to the show's FB page (which conveniently enough is cited by the article) which shows an image titled "Islamist Compounds in the U.S." and identifies the relevant party as "a candidate pops up in the last Alaska election, who is a member of this group[.]"

Now let's compare it to the article's assertion.  "Demboski posted a link to a blog about "Islamic compounds" across the United States that were supposedly "stockpiling weapons" . . . Without identifying Jones by name, Demboski wrote that the group responsible for the "compounds" had a member in Alaska, and that he had run for political office.

Your criticism of "all us folks" seems entirely valid and shocking given how unreliable and inaccurate the ADN was.