"Radicalized" is in the headline, but what does that mean?   It is only in the eighth paragraph that the article gets around to telling readers that it relates to ISIS, but nowhere is it spelt out that the concern is a potential radical Islamic terrorist attack.  It is only in the last paragraph where Tony Clement is quoted as stating that that is the concern. Is it because of M-103 that Canadian Press fails to use the words "radical Islamic terrorist attack" ?