I just read the whole comment set and here are my observations:

1. The vast majority of people feel she has crossed the line from political to hate speech, especially after follow up remarks.
2. The vast majority believe the law professors are setting a free speech double standard
3. A minority point out the irony versus military campaigns and actions of Muslims through history
4. A minority express some sympathy to her view of Canada's treatment of Indigenous People
4. A minority try to exonerate themselves from it because it was not them per se.
5. A minority point out that universities have crossed over into unfair territory with respect to certain views and express concern about this pro forma.
6. A minority address Khan's apparent purpose as an activist.

My conclusion is that this is a very open and accepting country that seeks to move the right direction.  It is not the place as vilified by Khan.

My worry is such strong language hurts rather than helps in our  advancement.