What is of dismay by Mr. Chin's actions is that he sees the administrations immigration efforts 'simply' as discriminatory against select Muslim groups and not as an effort in deterring future attacks by known terrorist groups within the United States. I would like to suggest to Mr. Chin and all the naysayers (until it happens to them) that if the proposals offered by the administration is not satisfactory "Why are you not proposing an alternative through your representatives or party in an effort to control terrorism within our borders?" Is it just policy to say 'No' or is it that the Left, Democrats and Liberals all agree that 'there never has been and there is no possibility of an act of terrorism within our borders'.  Or is it because they are all of the opinion that no matter what efforts are made to address the 'terrorist' issue by the Trump administration it is always without merit and credence? Isn't the fact that it is at least addressed, that makes it a positive move?