Not terrorism?  How so?  Are we moving toward a definition of "terrorism" as being only that perpetrated by persons of Middle Eastern descent?  How is it not terroristic to open fire with a weapon and kill numerous people?  There's something in our State laws called "terroristic threatening".  Is it now a valid defense to such a charge that at no time were arabic language statements made?  Or that a charged "terroristic" threatener was not of Middle Eastern descent or Muslim?  Seems like the definition of "terrorism" should include all acts of violence designed to advance and agenda or express anger.  Or, does that definition make the Trump Travel Ban more difficult to justify?