Robert - is this a game to you where journalists have a duty to support each side equally?

Why would you expect to find columnists who were NOT agains outright racism (like calling mexicans rapists and for a wall to be built) and outright bigotry (against muslims, registering and banning) against outright xenophobia (and the fascist threat of mass deportations) and against gross misogyny (bragging about his sexual assaults and admitting he has no time for women who aren't tens)? 

Wouldn't it be a gross betrayal of truth and honesty for them to report on these things as if they were no problem, and to support a bigoted sexual predator? 

Or what journalists, in your opinion, would applaud the naming of a young-earth creationist to head up the education department? Who would cheer for the naming of a climate change denier to head the EPA? 

Totally different teams with totally different platforms and promises don't deserve the same coverage. That's why it's not possible.