Again, I never said you did. But there are plenty among both the so-called "liberals" and "conservatives" posting herein for whom censorship as a debate tactic. What's disappointing to me--and somewhat astonishing--is that you seem to think the Democratic Party is "revolutionary". If I misunderstood you, I apologize.

You've certainly misunderstood me. I'm not sitting on the fence, I'm want to kick it down. It's rotten through and through, and it WILL fall. The only question is how disastrous will be its fall.

My position is the opposite of "approval"--it's rejection of BOTH factions of neo-fascists. And I say so as someone who fully recognizes that the current version of your quote is "first they came for the Blacks, then they came for the Muslims". My family is both.

Since Killary KKKlinton has for the last DECADE promised to deploy nuclear weapons against Muslim countries which won't bow to the Zionist entity, why should we see her as any better than Frumpy the KKKlown?