The problem with this motion is the ever increasing elastic definition of hate speech. Where any criticism of Islam no matter how measured or founded in facts can be construed as hate speech. You only need to look back at Mark Steyn's trials with various Human Rights Commissions where the veracity or truth of a statement could not be used as a defence. When uttering the truth can run afoul of the law we have entered an Orwellian state where the cure is worse than the disease.