The projects that you describe would actually likely be classified as "gender significant" and therefore fit under the new (actually same old) policy.    Knowing that, you may 1) be relieved that we haven't lost all common sense and judgement 2) wonder why the government has to brag and posture to call everything a feminist/gender/women project instead of calling it "vaccination" or "clean water", which as part of any sound planning and development process would be analyzed from a gender perspective beforehand (as has been required for 25+ years for all projects) to document the potential differential impacts on men AND women, and make adjustments accordingly.  Furthermore, yes you would consult with men and women in the design, work with both on the management, promote empowerment and equal participation/decision-making, etc. - this is all standard stuff.