I find it fascinating that a female PHD in STEM is asserting that she's not competent to be a PHD in STEM by nature since she's a female and hasn't been subject to prenatal testosterone.  By her own arguments, doesn't that mean we can't trust her to know what she's talking about, being biologically unfit for STEM? (I say this as a woman who believes women ARE totally capable of STEM fields, and in fact in programming especially, where James Damore makes his living, women are the ones who *created* that field and consistently innovated it, until men decided it belonged to them.)