I don't see how you can fault the sentence for being misleading. I mean, it says right there that he was black, male, and young.  That alone is evidence of a clear and present danger. And that a police officer shot him proves it. Any right-thinking person would automatically know that Brown was far from innocent. There is no need to repeat his sordid particulars. I really can't see any inaccuracy here. 

Properly, all the dangerous young Black men I know get rousted by police officers. So far, they have been able to curb their violent natures enough to spare the officers the necessity of shooting them. At 14, D.J.  can choke down his foolish angst at being thrown against a car, cuffed and sat on a curb, while the milk he was sent to purchase turns sour. But the wanton criminality bred into him could show itself eventually.  One day, it may even surface as an ill-conceived expression of indignation. 

Kids. You can't live with them, but at least you can shoot them.