No, my standard of comparison is the old times when they were honest enough to admit that the reason that women could not be ordained was that women are inferior to men. See, for just one example among many:  Aquinas, in the Summa Theologica Supplement, q 39 art 1 considers the question, "Whether the female sex is an impediment to receiving Orders?". He says that it is, for two reasons. The first is that women are inferior to men, "since it is not possible in the female sex to signify eminence of degree, for a woman is in the state of subjection, it follows that she cannot receive the sacrament of Orders". The other has to do with the tonsure being inappropriate for women.

Though the traditionalists don't admit it, this is still their real argument. They try to pretty it up with words like "complementarity" and "ontological differences", but "inferior" is what they really mean.

Blathering about liberal, secular, atheistic humanism is meaningless. YOUR actual argument is pure sexism