"dubious facts and unbalanced claims"

potential green jobs? Potential is a dubious fact. The standard for us was set by the Obama administration. Obama is the guy who, like Hillary, wanted to put the coal industry out of business, so any Obama standard would hurt the country economically.

The plans were not legally binding? What exactly does that mean? Other countries could cheat, but not us? If nothing was legally binding, then what was the point of the accord, for us, a treaty for the other countries.

Of course this was a small step. Climate change is a business. The climate is never going to be controlled because 1) it can't, and 2) there is to much government money at stake.

We are told that without this accord the temperature will rise .02 of a degree by 2100. However these same people can't tell me today, with any certainty, what the temperature will be next Saturday for me to make a tee time.