You wrote the other day that the march was populated by people who were just curious. 
As to the hypocrisy of the call for inclusion while calling it a "Women's March,"  the title of the march did not imply that only women could march. There were men there because they also were marching FOR the equal treatment of women.
As to protesting Trump's actions, the marchers had many signs noting Trump's actions in his speech about grabbing women. He has also said women who get an abortion should be punished. Yes, some signs were crude. But just as so many have excused Trump, who among us has not said something we later regretted?
Considering the marchers were a bunch of "liberal women" (and curiosity seekers, as you said before) it is "funny" (using the passive aggressive sarcastic term) that you seem to put so much effort in discrediting that 7,000 PEOPLE marched on a cold rainy day to air their grievances. Only 7,000? My 83 year-old mother hoped to march, but infirmity kept her home. 7001?