That list was a mistake.

Maynard v. Hill, 125 U.S. 190, 205, 211 (1888) supports the natural law theory of the family as the foundation of society, and marriage as the foundation of the family through procreation. Obergefell scrapped the entire natural law theory.

Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923) also supported the natural law theory with marriage as the mechanism by which a man and woman brought up children. Scratch that.

Ditto Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942).

And so on.

What Obergefell does is scrap marriage as part of the building block of society and fashion it as a private enterprise for any purpose chosen based on right to privacy not specified anywhere in the Constitution. In theory it could include more than two people.

I admit the word “marriage” appears in all of the cases.