The article bagins:

"Well, gentlemen, are you entirely finished? Or are there more of you out there..."

Wow.

What a shocking way to not-so-subtly taint ALL MEN under a shaming category of guiltiness.

There is only one thing fundamentally different between HER intro and one that might follow multiple recent Islamist terrorist attacks, a hypothetical column beginning: "Well, Muslims, are you entirely finished? Or are there more of you out there...".

And there is only one thing fundamentally different between HER opening and one that might follow multiple recent incidents of child neglect by mothers, a hypothetical column beginning: "Well, ladies, are you entirely finished? Or are there more of you out there...".

And that ONE THING that is different is that this newspaper ALLOWS columnist to make glaringly sexist attacks against all men, but refuses to allow columnists to make glaringly sexist attacks against all women or to make glaringly bigoted attacks against all Muslims.