As always, these discussions remind me more about dancing on hot coals than a scientific discussion.  I think there are two questions which are much more interesting:  1. is it possible to create a "technology" where females do better than males?  2. is it possible to create a "technology" where males do better than females?  There appears to be no inherent reason why technology, per se, ought to favor one gender over another - technology is multifaceted and constantly changing, how could such a thing be possible?  Too much of this discussion reminds me of the arguments about the safety of cigarette smoke or leaded gasoline - it seems to me that science would be better served if we spent less time making blanket statements and more time digging into underlying biological and environmental root causes of diversity, and then leveraging the good stuff we find instead of reacting in fear.