My point is the Sabbath and WO can't be explored hermeneutically using the same expansive methodology and still reach the contrary conclusions. 

The plain reading of all the relevant texts leads to a single conclusion,  neither Jesus nor  Paul supported the idea of women sharing equally with men in leadership. 

It's the hermeneutic.  The same plain reading  hermeneutic that leads to a consistent simplification of complex doctrines like 'just war'  'Sabbath day observance'  'unclean meats'.   On what basis can we switch hermeneutic method?    If you switch to the pro-WO hermeneutic you will reach different  conclusions about many other SDA doctrines.