the RCC as an institution has no rights in this issue. by denying the validity of contraception it forces us to produce children that we perhaps didn't really want nor could ill afford. the RCC would suggest the alternative  in the case of children conceived by parents who do not want to  birth or raise them nor are able to afford them should be placed for adoption- thereby creating its own acceptable status of surrogate parent.(hypocrisy AGAIN.) we are back to another case of 'repair vs repeal.'  why isn't it possible that the law be repaired so as to address some of the situations that are cited in the article???   I would like to suggest that some  pregnancies are accomplished for the purpose of  1. perhaps saving a marriage?... 2. wanting someone to love?   3. wanting to see oneself as 'being loved...being a true woman. etc etc??.''     birthing a baby is not something that most men would wish to take on. I used to say: ''men go to war and women deliver babies.'' that is about it.