Oh, stop it. She used a common defence, which is to poke holes in the story of the victim. This is why rape victims have to be so carefully prepared before trial. She did not concoct ideas about the victim; she received information about the victim that she used in defence of her client. Thousands of attorneys, women and men, do this every day. Whether this was "pro-woman" or not is totally beside the point and says zero about her character.