Concerned Citizen ETown - I don't really.  That's why I'm pretty much opposed to the whole "big man/woman of history" thing.  There's not a soul without flaws and often the bigger the man/woman, the bigger the flaw(s).

Winston Churchill was a great man to have in charge when fighting Hitler.  A pretty awful guy to have in charge when India was fighting for freedom.

The whole idea of heroes who are (in the words some religious sects use to refer to their preferred President) "good in all he says and does" is just kind of childish.  Isn't it?

Since people seem to like strong dad and mom figures - perhaps we could have statues at a place they did something great - like Churchill giving his "fight on the beaches" speech.  Then we would be honouring the action, not the (almost always deeply flawed) person.