"No gentleman should ever do that, even if he is inebriated as well"

So, what you want then is a double standard.  SHE isn't responsible enough to give consent because she's drunk, but HE is still expected to be responsible  .enough to be a gentleman EVEN when drunk. 
 THIS is the crux of the problem;  Fuzzy logic, weighted automatically in the woman's favour, is what we get non-stop in article after article, and comment after comment - allowing her to claim   no responsibility but insisting that the man must always be responsible no matter HOW drunk HE is. 
 Do you people really think  everyone is too dumb to recognize this double standard? Shame on you for trying it, and shame on those who  go along with it!