"It adds another dimension to the clerical abuse of children."

I agree with you, dennism; but there is also "abuse," as it were, on the woman's part, too, owing to her willingness to get intimate with a guy (supposedly committed to a church, by promise, a vow,  similar to the solemn promise a husband makes in a commitment to his wife) and get pregnant by him. She is responsible in some way for the pregnancy, and the abuse or privation that follows owing to the absence of a committed father? No? My women students -- college and university, many of them very savvy -- tell me that it's impossible to get pregnant today (unless you want to be or are raped) because of contraceptives, etc. They are so, so aware of these "love-wares," as they call them. So why get intimate, have sex without "love-wares," with a "contaminant" (their word) - with a sexually active married man or with a priest - if she knows he's already broken one vow, is a cheater? Why irresponsibly risk having a kid by him?