Yes, you did (finally) comment on the addressing the male side which I could support. I did have to get through a reiteration of your views on the women's side. That was tough for me and made me want to not sustain connection, where my hope in the first place was to find a meeting area. Instead I got a clarification of where we don't meet. That part didn't help. But thanks for trying. I would suggest we find way to continue to try and meet instead of oppose. In the meantime as for the male side, I wish we could get to a point where the conversation as a whole would amp the focus on males as in this example (an extreme one at that): when folks with a critical eye look at women who have had an abortion that the same eye and voice would cast itself upon the male who is a causal factor in the pregnancy with as much concern. In the same light, couldn't unwed fathers getting the same focus in those kind of concerns?