Me too. Berdahl's piece seemed to be highlighted by personal opinion and subjective bias. When she was questioned on the background of the content, she reacted as if her work was beyond reproach. What did Berdahl expect? The integrity of the Board was effectively being called into questioned as being tainted by "masculinity" and all based on what? Supposition? It seemed like an attempt to be provocative by pushing a biased narrative independent of what actually happened. It turns out her academic freedom wasn't being challenged but the University didn't stick up for her enough...