Funny how when the left is in power that the existing system is fine (e.g. Alberta) but when they are not, the system needs to be reformed.  So lets take his proposition at face value - it potentially won't make a hill of beans voting for your individual MLA or MP if the party gets less popular vote than the "winning party with the popular vote" even if your MLA or MP wins his riding by 99% of the vote.  How would we feel about that?  Or take the case that the enlightened urban populace wins the popular vote and then decides that the rural folks should have price controls on agricultural products.  How fair would that be?  I know that I will be accused of using a straw man argument but isn't that the same as Trump being the worst.  What if Hillary had gotten elected.  Guess the system must have worked then!  Just look at the lack of majority governments in Europe and see how much you like it.  Democracy  isn't perfect but the alternatives (even PP) might be worse.