What is argued by DD here is precisely the bedeviling issue which data journalism presents to traditional journalists. That is, the "story" in the piece is about the generalized low rate of women entrepreneurs, but the "data" says that there quite large ethnic/cultural differences in that low rate. How do you assign weight to both things? How do you introduce the notion that entrepreneurship may have a big cultural/ethnic divide? Not easily because it confuses the simple story narrative which journalists are taught to convey.  What the data says is that there are numbers of stories to be told, some of which are contradictory.
Finally, it would be interesting to see some data on the effect of pregnancy and childbirth and motherhood on women entrepreneurs and their drives to succeed. It is not that biology is absolutely deterministic, it is rather the reality that men don't get pregnant, men don't give birth, men don't have the capacity to use their bodies to feed children.