That is not what she does.

She is arguing that fewer women than men are attracted to some fields like C.S., so not to expect a 50-50 distribution at Google or elsewhere. The latter is what has no basis in evidence.

The distribution at Google is 30% while the proportion of women graduating with C.S. degrees is much smaller, so in fact it is doing pretty well.

If you want higher numbers, you need to convince women to go into the field in larger numbers in the first place.