from the article (which reads like an Army press release): "After the images were shared widely online, the journal wrote: "This edition of the Military Review is focused on promoting the concepts of gender equality and these photographs illustrate the dangers our military men and women face both in training and in combat."
.
So, what company built the mortar that killed Spc. Hilda Clayton and her Afghani colleague?  Did the same company make the round?  Which caused the failure, the round or the tube?  This is not news - it's junk writing to make us think that the Army really cares about who dies.  What's worse, is that it uses a graphic photograph, taken at the moment of death as a "come on," an enticement to viewers and readers.  Nice propaganda piece (this is what it looks like).  The editors at ADN should be ashamed for printing this kind of c.... on their website.