The argument is sound, women with similar desires have just as much ability as men, but I find it ironic that the same woman who set the women's movement back and made the lives of sexual assault victims (past, present, and future) that much harder for fear of getting "whacked" on the stand, is now attempting to be a voice for women? As a lawyer myself while we owe a duty to protect the interests of our clients, we do have a choice on which clients we wish to represent. This string of "feminist" pieces appears to nothing more than veiled attempt at repairing her street creed with women and women's rights who actually advance causes and issues important to women.