3/3
<the proper role of the Church is to laicize them and have nothing further to do with them.>
As I indicated above, I regard that as an abdication of the church's responsibility not only to the priest but to the community. While laicization and separation are always available options for a priest who will not cooperate with a program of support and supervision, it is profoundly wrong not to attempt to support the accused in living a healthy, appropriate life. I point out again that most of these men are not in the criminal justice system and thus not under any other form of supervision. 
<In all fairness, that's exactly what SNAP has been asking for all these years.>
SNAP has been incoherent about this.  On the one hand, they claim to support the bishops' policy of laicizing, ostracizing and demonizing accused priests; on the other hand, they demand that the bishops exercise the authority over the accused that the bishops forfeit by laicizing them.
Re: SNAP: follow the money.