(cont)  This was a very complex, interesting incident, with no clear picture of "guilt" or "innocence" to the alleged crime......That difficulty was based on the question of the consensual element (or lack thereof) of the sexual involvement.  The DA determined there was insufficient evidence to successfully prosecute the men for sexual assault...not because they denied sexual involvement....but because he felt he could not make a successful case that they involvement was NOT consensual.  If you study the police report and the many articles in the RG at the time, I think you will better understand the circumstances and the difficulties the DA cited for his decision to not prosecute. 

BTW:  Your insult......"You're such a special flower. I'm always pleased to see a person with your challenges succeed in the world." is gratuitous and adds nothing to the conversation.