Dear Sister Webb,

The problem is not with the exact translation, the problem is you drawn unwarranted conclusions with your interpretation.  You should begin by acknowledging Rm. 16:7 is an obscure salutation that raises more questions than it answers.  We don't know from the text if Junias is a man or a woman, we don't know if he/she is of note among the apostles or if  he/she is noted among the apostles.

I called it gnostic nonsense because write as though you know Junias was a woman apostle.  If you do know it is secret knowledge: no one else knows this.  You say there is plenty of proof God gave women leadership positions. Let's consider St. Paul -  he didn't. Consider 1 Tim 2:

"Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. "