I find the selectively prosecution of male offenders to be interesting.  Among the most high profile cases, Weinstein has been rightly outed and chastized.  He is persona non grata everywhere.  But how much worse was he as a sexual predator than Bill Clinton.  Bill used his office and privileged position to extract sex from women.  So did Harvey.  Harvey settled claims against him over sexual improprieties by writing large cheques.  So did Bill.  Bill also lied about it to Congress.  Harvey hasn't done that yet.  

But Harvey is a fat, somewhat slimy looking creepy guy.  Bill is smart, hugely charismatic, and good looking.  Feminists everywhere should ask themselves - should that matter? If we are going to permanently ostracize offenders like Harvey Weinstein (and Bill Cosby, Rogers Ailes, Bill O'Reilly etc), why should Bill Clinton continue to get a free pass?