But what's the current scientific consensus on this topic? Danmore is saying there is  mainstream research evidence suggesting a biological basis for gender associated career preferences (on average over large populations). He is claiming  that this accounts for the over representation of men in tech, not that individual women applicants should be discriminated against.  Now shouldn't that claim be refuted? Another thought experiment: what if further studies published in high impact peer  reviewed journals come out supporting the hypothesis of biologically determined gender preferences/aptitudes ? What then?  Or should we just avoid studying these topics for fear of the results they may yield.