No.  My point is that the law is offensive and unhelpful.  
The only alternatives were not this law, or nothing.  The proper alternative would be to devise  a system that would provide assistance to families and to children.  If those men truly cared about disabled children, that is what they would do.   
Giving a mother $1000 to give birth to a disabled child, without providing any support is to condemn that child to a life of misery.  That is certainly not evidence of any concern for that child.