Is it perhaps possible that at least some accused men were innocent? 

How could any objective juror find Ghomeshi guilty given the appallingly underhanded and deceptive actions of his accusers? Should a legal system simply disregard collusion and concocted evidence? 

Justice Camp appears to have been hopelessly ill-qualified, and he perhaps should be fired for basic incompetence, but was he wrong to question the veracity of the young woman's version of events? Wagar, after all, was acquitted on the re-trial. 

Justice Lenehan obviously arrived at a controversial decision in the recent case involving the sleazy taxi driver, but was it beyond a reasonable doubt -- something approaching entirely fanciful -- to believe that the young woman had consented? If drunkenness precludes consent, as critics insist, there will be very little lawful sex during weekend evenings. 

Those same critics are dangerously close to treating all accusations of sexual assault as conclusive proof of crime.