You're confusing a straightforward discussion of the facts with lack of compassion on the part of men. In other words, you're stereotyping the male gender

A dispassionate reading of the evidence leaves an unbiased person with doubts that an assault even took place. That's why the judge ruled not guilty and yet- precisely because he's a male- he's excoriated for doing so. Some of the commentary makes him sound worse than the accused. Add to that the obvious risks that the complainant freely took on, and yes, compassion for her is understandably muted.

That doesn't mean that men think the woman deserved to be preyed on. Nothing of the sort. We just reserve our greatest compassion for proven cases of sexual assault involving victims who contributed nothing to their own fate. It's just common sense, not a lack of sympathy for victims of crime.