What is more you didn't address what "ontological" really is. To EVEN ask the question "how many" is to speak of quantity not quality (qualitative difference). Ergo, irrelevant."  

Before one can determine the nature of a thing, he must look at many instances of its activities and see whether it exhibits this is or that characteristic. My examples show that significantly more men than women do this or that; that significantly more women than men do this or that.  These differences hold fairly constant across time and culture. One can reasonably conclude that the differences are attributable to nature rather than nurture. Your suggestion that aside from genitalia, there are NO INHERENT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN is absurd and reflects a conscious avoidance of facts. You are a silly man, and your thinking that priests and cardinals wear "dresses" is a guffaw. I suggest you read Edith Stein, whose work is widely respected and seminal. Or talk to someone outside your bubble