Okay, the woman reported the event 4 months after it occurred.  This means that there was no physical evidence.  It was her word against his word.  No criminal charges were filed so the DA clearly decided that a compelling case could not be made.

Despite the absence of compelling evidence, the young man's life is put on hold for two years before he can complete his degree.  Yeah, I know he deserves it because he is a scumbag, but seriously, things are out of balance.  The UO had no evidence except he said, she said.  They take what she said, showing gender bias.  If UO was a private school, arbitrary actions might be okay.  But UO is a public institution.  Every citizen has a right to an education there (or should have).

The notion that the woman was at risk is not supported by evidence and is really a non-issue.

We are watching a serious erosion of respect for human rights because men are human too.