"Reviews really need to be front-line violence-against-women advocates"   This line says it all.  It tells us that the only people capable of assessing the validity, and potential for a successful prosecution are in fact violence against women advocates.  All thought of due process is gone, in its place is a campaign to ensure that all complainants are not just victims, but 'survivors.'  Every male accused will automatically become the ' suspect', rather than the subject of the complaint.  
Again, I challenge the Globe and Mail to complete their 'investigation' by presenting a rounded perspective and include interviews/comments from experienced sexual assault investigators and Crown Counsel.  
However, in the end, the courts will have the final say.  And,  I dare say, judges in the higher courts will be very short in ripping into Crown Counsel if they allow charges to be laid where the likelihood of a successful prosecution do not exist.