germany in the 1900's - lol.  
thats about as cogent as the biased, non-reviewed survey "research" from one feminist organization that the journalist cites.  Her argument presents fake and biased evidence, not because shes a female, but because shes a sloppy, biased journalist.

Biological differences exist, like it or not, but thats not the point. She can rail against 
"Hostile macho cultures" and "hostile bro club[s]" and get paid for it, while the man expressing far less vitriolic and biased opinions loses his job. 

"We are not always nice, and we’ll refuse to adhere to some sexist excuse of a biological notion about how we’re supposed to be" but  "a lot of them flee their jobs within the first year because they can’t handle the hostile atmosphere." Make up your mind.

Her harangue ends with a lame straw woman argument "Maybe that’s what men such as Mr. Damore fear most."