If you weren't commenting out of context perhaps you should have considered that the board made their decision AFTER finding out about his previous conviction.  Therefore they aren't acting on a presumed innocent before guilty, this just happens to be his second incident.  They initially only knew of this incident which was why they let him participate the first time because they were waiting for the outcome of the case and ended go find if out about a new case decided that he would be banned indefinitely.

Secondly I don't judge based on sex, as far as I'm concerned a violent offender whether male or female is a violent offender.  I advocate for the safety of all and not just the safety of some, I'm willing to look at evidence without a conviction and if the evidence leaves little doubt no I rather not wait for a court date to make sure others are safe.  That is how we differ.