So, the Globe and Mail has a prominent article to anxiously sound the alarm bells because, after all, "the trend is unsettling", the trend of going from about 50 percent new shows with female leads some time back, to now the newly-minted shows having only about 30 percent female leads.

Um, hello?

Where exactly do I find the article explaining that "the trend is unsettling" where medical schools that used to be 50-50 for students are now 65 percent female and 35 percent male?

And where exactly do I find the article explaining that "the trend is unsettling" that entire entering classes of universities that used to be 50-50 are now 60 percent female and 40 percent male?

What's that you say? The Globe and Mail has never anxiously described those women-predominating trends in those terms, has never criticized them as "unsettling"?

Why is that? Is it systemic anti-male sexism in journalism that explains the dichotomy?