What a surprise! University protects a famous? Professor who brings in lots of research money against apparently corroborated charges of sexual harassment (not sexual assault); so the remedy is to subject hapless, powerless male undergrads to Kangaroo courts without the right to:  cross-examine witnesses against him; be represented by counsel; and confront his accuser in front of an impartial fact finder  in a proceeding conducted in accordance with the rule of law?

After Ms. Czekai goes  far to establish that College Leaders Simply Lack Any Moral  Principles, she implies that  gross injustices will result if these same college leaders do not retain unfettered discretion to adjudicate sexual assault charges as they see fit.  It seems to me that if Ms. Czekai is to be believed, these leaders could not be trusted with determining  whether a student had committed plagiarism. Or, is her real position that the word of a female should always be accepted over the word of a male