Not a strawman at all. My statement is consistent with the mosaic thesis. Something quite different from a bell curve or linear range. What I wrote suggests that the non-linear variability is so complex and wide it might be incorrect to try to draw neat binary categories such as male brain/female brain.

While Dr. Soh says it was refuted, the science of the mosaic has not been refuted. It is not conclusive and can be contested, but that is very different from refuted. Just as the research she cites is contested (but she presents as accepted scientific fact). A very large proportion of neuroscientists would not agree with her "fact".