"To hermeneutically explain away the plain meaning of the texts concerning WO lays a foundation to explain away all the distinctive Adventist teachings, which up until the present have been pretty consistent hermeneutically."

This sound like a way to get around something you don't want to change and are settled in--stuck. Maybe I am too but have the backing of various seminaries in Andrews and in Europe where they are smarter than both of us. Otherwise, why do we have them and support them?  This is going nowhere. There is, of course, no ordination in the Bible. If we take Paul's words out of context and use them literally for all time, then one should not be an SDA as EGW certainly  spoke to men and women and taught them. Otherwise you are merely taking only the supposed ordination part of the texts and not the role of women in that society. That's illogical to me.