That is NOT what I'm arguing; I argue for the direct opposite--and you know it. 

You falsely claim I argue for consideration of limited competency when I  argue for consideration of far broader competencies.  Unambiguously. 

You falsely claim I argue that the sick are the only competent ones to consider their illness (talk about sophistries that take on lives of their own).

Indeed,  in your misdirected criticism of my thinking, you might have diagnosed your own weakness: you are saying that the "only people competent" to discuss marriage, intimacy, sexuality, women's reproduction,  and family are chaste men who never have been married, had children, or been women.  

Let's agree on Catholic common sense: on the morality topic of sex, intimacy, marriage, women's reproduction, and family what is needed is access to the broadest possible data, information, knowledge, and wisdom  and the broadest possible access to those who know most...or at least know more. Agree? Whom do YOU trust?