See here's the dope dude.  You don't know the man from a hole in the wall do you?  You project your world view of how men are.  You have no clue what has transpired between the man and woman involved or whether she really had slashed tires or whether it was unusual for the man to be in grocery stores or whatever.  You haven't a blasted clue right.  The story written here was written from the police and woman's perspective.  Note that the reporter made zero effort to get the other side of the story.  Perhaps you have personal knowledge of the man independent of what the story says.  If so, what's up.  Why did he do the things he is charged to have done?  If you have no independent personal experience on the matter then you are simply projecting your illusions onto reality to make it appear as you are deep inside.