I read nothing about any concern for her supervisors regarding inappropriate attire.  Your posts make chiefly two points: a) it was OK for Kamkar to take a secret photo of a subordinate's cleavage. and b) if she didn't like it, she should not have had her cleavage exposed to "tempt" him.  For decades one of the defense arguments in rape cases was "she asked for it", she was "dressed like a tramp", she "led me on."  ....classic "blame the victim" defenses.  
You offer exactly the same defense for Kamkar's, again, at the very very least, creepy behavior.  You, in this post, propose that women wear revealing attire in the workplace as a "tool" to achieve power over men.  Please don't be too insulted, but I think you and Captain Kamkar have a lot in common.   Gary Crum