Not if it is done properly. Acts says clearly that some were pastors, some preachers, some teachers, etc. etc. That means that all the functions of the church community were not on the shoulders of just one person, as they often are now. If the lay people were trained and empowered for everything but the sacramental ministries and functioned in a truly collaborative way,  married clergy could be an asset. As I see it, the hardest effects are on the wife and kids because of the experience of growing up and parenting in a dishbowl. 

If married clergy were limited to mature men whose children were grown and so would not have unreasonable expectations placed on them and the priest had work experience outside a church career, a married clergyman could offer much to the community.