My question is why are gender imbalances only a problem when there are more men than women or when the jobs are seen as desirable?

My daughter's elementary school is taught by 95% women. Does this extreme imbalance not represent a potential institutional bias? Where's the outrage?

My problem with gender equality warriors is it really isn't about equality for all; just getting more jobs for women where they want jobs (ie "good, high paying, jobs"). 

The Kristy Duncan's of the world are not fighting for more women in jobs women don't want (construction) or more men in traditionally female occupations.

And finally, the title of this article is silly. Science can't be sexist, people are sexist. Further, your own experience proves nothing, it is anecdotal.