CHP3: LEARNING FROM HISTORY, RE: THE IMPORTANCE OF.

Arguments abound trying to use the millenia of human history with TWO 'accepted' genders as evidence of the validity of the gender dyad as apoditic fact. I...disagree.

For 99% of history, men have been defined as the biologically superior gender, and as such, men have taken charge of everything involving intellectual/creative effort, based on  whatever primitive 'science' early civilizations managed millenia ago.  Women have spent most of history cramped in a few, forced social roles based on the same facile 'biology' of aeons ago - subjugation through lack of control over their own actions, restricted opportunities, and rights more appropriate for their historical status as men's possessions/breeding sows. The fight for women's education allowed our gender the context to really SEE their inequality - and the reasoning skills  to slay the flaws that underpin sexist beliefs. 

And cons have a ton of science advancement to read up on.