The article refers to studies of anti-female bias in the tech sector. In my experience this is not the reason for fewer females in the tech sector.
 
If anything, there has been a concerted effort for the last two decades to actively promote inclusion of women in the tech sector. Since my university days there have been a plethora of scholarships and initiatives targeted to women in STEM, and this remain true (see the fund discussed in the article). 

Notwithstanding, female enrolment in engineering remains low compared to male enrolment. I think this has to be attributed at least partly to personal choice rather than widespread systemic discrimination.

Let's stop pretending that biology has no role in personal interests, and insinuating that the cause of fewer female in the tech sector is caused by systemic harassment (re: the allusion to Weinstein).  It slanders men in the tech sector, and it undermines the seriousness of harassment cases when they do take place, in any industry.