First thoughts:

Now that the abuse survivors are no longer on the Commission, he can meet with the Commission formally, and express regrets that the hierarchy "didn't get it" for too many years.  So, avoidance much, these past three years?  Safe, now, when he doesn't have to face survivors there who might challenge him?

But the Congregation remains in charge of how "these things" will be handled.  "Proven" abusers, whatever that means, will have no appeal and will be out the door.

There's an acknowledgment that abusers were "moved around" which apparently made them hard to see (which makes no sense to me). 

So what about the bishops who covered up and moved those abusers?   What about the men who saw evil and protected it, tried to hide it, insisted it didn't exist, in the face of all evidence?