But there was evidence that she was coherent enough to text friends when she got into the cab and there was no evidence presented by the crown that any sexual contact even took place - the woman's DNA was found on the man's upper lip but that could have happened in a hundred innocent ways including from him handling the money she had already paid him and then itching his lip.  The woman could have asked the cabbie to stop so she could urinate but soiled her pants instead, taken them off herself and propped her legs up to dry them off.  Maybe the cabbie also took a leak and hadn't done up his pants when the officer arrived on scene.  Maybe he was just nervous about having a half naked woman that just pissed in his cab.  She testified that she doesn't remember.  This is just a witch hunt, maybe the feminists will be happy when we start burning men at the stake for being men.  Seriously, our adversarial justice system doesn't work for cases like these as no one walks away a winner.