I'm disappointed by Austin's failure to seek clarity on the sex charge.    While privacy may protect some records, I have not seen anything that clearly identifies the crime.    I do know that every year, thousands of folks, across state lines, are making appeals to be removed from these 'predator' list.    

The young man was 15, we do know it's crime with a low risk to be repeated.

It's bias for Meek to assume that sports should be more or less sensitive to sexual crimes than any other business.    Is it OK, for bankers, clergy, landlords, coach etc.. to be granted forgiveness/privacy even though those positions may have far more power than a student athlete?  Sexual abuse, like any abuse is also a function of highly inequitable power.   Adult/child, student/teacher, adult/clergy, worker/employee, male/female, parent/child all risk abuse, often sexual, and it's at least partly a function of inequitable power.

I wish Austin would have shown more curiosity and less condemnation.