In theory a woman can't abort unless there is a threat to her life.    In practice, I think that means that a woman can be 'emotionally traumatized' and that be considered a risk to her life by physicians willing to subvert the intent of the law.    Do you know frequency?

Can you please clarify just how the intent of the law is subverted?

Abortion is clearly used as a method of contraception, and all the talk of a woman's life being endangered, while it CAN be true, is NOT the primary motive for women attaining abortion.

No contraception is 100% effective.    These are only 2 reasons for abortion, one law does not fit all circumstances.  Which is the reason why it's a health choice of the woman, as it should be.

Here's a hypothesis.  Women like sex every bit as much as men do and want to enjoy the freedom that men have to have sex without the risk of altering their entire life path at that point in their life.

It's a issue of equal opportunity for women to control their lives.