The previous position paper on the ordination of women, Inter Insigniores, uses such arguments as "since a priest is 'another Christ', and Christ was incarnated as a man", one could not see Christ in a woman. This has a couple of problems: first, it's the old "women are inferior to men" tripe. Second, it's saying that the laity are too stupid to see Christ in a woman. There is plenty more wrong with it: dubious history, strained biblical interpretation and so on.

The overly restrictive rules on divorce and remarriage. I'm sure that it is entirely cynical of me to see any connection between the rigidity of these rules and the fact that they are formulated by a group of unmarried men.

The whole thing about sex -- rules and policies formulated by celibates. That ignorance of a subject by those making policy on that subject is acceptable is not a good thing.