This whole proposition just seems odd to me.  At present, people use the bathroom, etc., that suits them best and (I would hope) most of us are just fine with that.  This proposition - if it was enforceable & enforced - would change that for no purpose.

Imagine a man. This man looks male, dresses male & has male plumbing. This man was, however born with genitalia that, while male, looked female externally and were surgically altered when he was 6 months old.  As a result, this man's "original birth certificate" describes him as female.

If the yes vote wins, this man will be required by law to use the female restrooms etc.

Imagine him out one night attending a show at the PAC.  He goes to use the male bathroom, an attendant who knows his history (this is Anchorage, people know people) spots him and, acting in accordance with the law, redirects him to the female line where he stands humiliated in full public view.

Who on earth would want such a law enforced in such a way?