All the quotations are taken out of context.  Professor Johnson's opinion may be academically more authoritative than mine, but I have a different understanding of the TOB.  Have you read the book yourself?  Please go here:

http://www.ewtn.com/library/papaldoc/jp2tb8.htm

Consider, for example, the last paragraph of section 1 and the first paragraph of section 4.  It is clearly explained that "corporality" (being a body) and "sexuality" (being anatomically male or female) are not identical realities, and also that man and women are homogeneous in "their whole being."  So, with all due respect for Professor Johnson, I disagree with his "telescopic" assessment of the TOB.  

There is a PONY under all the TOB stuff...  and the PONY  smells good... we have to keep digging... we have to avoid the mistake of reading the TOB via a patriarchal lens... the TOB is *not* patriarchal gender ideology... for your consideration and prayers:

http://pelicanweb.org/CCC.TOB.1701.html