So...the article decries how women are taught to hate themselves ("socialised into an internalised misogyny") and how they have to put up with being told by men what they can and can't do ("They are taught to adjust and curb their attitudes and behaviours to suit the patriarchal script")...the authors then go onto say that men should internalise misandry (because all men are potential abusers after all) and that men need to adjust and curb their attitudes and behaviours to meet the requirements of the two (female) authors...

How does the irony of this escape the authors? Surely what's good for the goose is good for the gander (or in this case what's good for the goosx is good for the gandxr...)