You get to a critical point here. Even if the theological objections could somehow be overcome we are left with the prudential question of should we proceed. If women would be admitted to orders the fact would remain that no one, neither man nor woman, has a right to ordination so theological resolution would not create a mandate to do it. That being the case, would it be wise to do it, because the kind of strikes you describe would surely bring us to schism. Much as this is a cause celebre for some in the west it would cause severe divisions even there and be outright rejected in much of the rest of the world. While there is next to nil hope for theological resolution, is imposing it worth the price of the schism that would ensue? Is the good that it might do in Minnesota worth the damage it would do in Kenya?