I hate to play the sexism card here, I really do, but I'm taking your bait. How is it that when a male politician is really into pointless wars under false pretense (Iraq I, II, and III), trillions of dollars sunk into the military industrial complex (um, the F-35, anyone), and endless adventuring in foreign wars (like, all of them), those politicians are "strong" and seen as "hawks."

But a woman who is tough on foreign policy, and stands up to Putin (who's recently completely out of control on the world stage, and needs to have his little PootyPoot self checked), she's a scary, biatchy "warmonger?"