Why can't we agree on a reasonable system of selection cutting of federal timber?  Environmentalists emphasize no harvesting and underemployed men in rural Oregon act like saving a single tree is sacrilegious.  Tired of the jokers, like those posting here, who poison this debate and put off progress.  The real villains are mostly lone gone, those who couldn't resist cutting old-growth trees when the rivers (or trucks) were already overflowing with timber less than 300 years old.