I read the article over again and I finally could pin down what bothered me.

 The author somehow implied that women's lack of security is somehow different from men's lack of security, and that particularly minority women are being singled out. However, I don't see how for a family (and most of us eventually form one) men's lack of security is different form women's lack of security: either way, lost job blows a hole in the budget, and, in my case, it will be a far bigger hole if I am fired - simply because I make more.

 This way, the whole complaint reads like "minority women don't have men who are as effective at home as non-minority men" - but this is a harmful way to go after equality; asking men to pick up slack after deadbeat hubbies who nevertheless procreated is a program that is guaranteed to brew a lot of resentment due to simple biology and psychology of infidelity.