It is rare an article is so successful at peddling a wanted narrative, no matter how badly it collides with reality.

The narrative is that in the modern history of feminism, well, things happened, and at times there was less of a sense of all of us, men and women, being humans, all together somehow, and more of a sense of men and women being in separate camps, a viewpoint that, oh, I dunno, just sort of happened, somehow.

Nice try!

Look, just admit it. Many vocal, self-declared feminists, active around 1975 to 1995, were EVERY BIT as sexist as men they were opposing. Those activists, for crying out loud, were the ones who, in the hours after the Montreal Massacre, were jumping in front of the CBC cameras to "explain" (roll eyes) that the shooter was simply one man on the massive spectrum of violence against women upon which all men belong, some merely being more violent than others. Men (only) rape. Men are monsters.

Own it. Spell it out, how the movement made the two-state mess.