"In a limited context, we must trust the majority in church government until and unless our personal convictions will not allow us to agree with the decision they make. And this is where we are today over male headship vs. WO. The bible must rule, period."

What does male headship have to do with ordination? Herein lies the contradiction of anti-WO supporters. They refer to male headship to deny women's ordination when male headship denies women AUTHORITY. And EGW was the highest doctrinal authority in our church. They have to use Paul's writings to support an anti-biblical practice of WO because if they took Paul at his word, EGW would be thrown out the window. Let us keep in mind that Paul, though intitially in agreement with the church council of Jerusalem regarding their insistence for Gentiles to keep certain Jewish practices, later went against those decisions. The GC is not always right.