If not me, you certainly require someone to tell you what “ad hominem” means. More amusing is the fact that direct negative assessments of others’ positions is a characteristic of your own posts:

“This is both false and a weak attempt to discredit an entire academic discipline with conspiracy theory.”

Paul was apocalyptic in the sense everyone should be apocalyptic. That position is not only not eccentric, it was the only position on Paul’s epistles for 1,800 years or more.

Pointing that out is not an attempt to “discredit an entire academic discipline”. It is an attempt to point out that the modern textual criticism that you seem to prefer is post-Christian, decontenting, and in the big picture a dead-end.