Our Constitution and law are based on Judeo-Christian biblical principals that define right and wrong in a way that is subtilely distinct from other traditions, the differences being exemplified by what to do when a stranger is drowning in a dangerous river. We, if we are brave enough, jump in to save them. Science based secular morals, devoid of religious principals, by contrast, are cruel, survival of the fittest being an example. Religious moral principals separate us from the animal world. To say a judicial nominee should be excluded because she adheres to Judeo-Christian morality ignores the religious underpinnings of our Constitution and legal system, who's absence would make them unrecognizable. Democrats question Amy Barrett's fitness because they've strayed from traditional shared moral beliefs, because they don't trust democracy, and because they have become reliant on liberal judges to thwart the will of the people who they profoundly mistrust.