Oh dear, even for those of us used to seeing your simplistic thinking in the comments you share, this reaches a new low (symbolically bolstered by your blatantly defiant use of archaic language).
Why?
1. Because it flies in the face of history.
As in, when Charlemagne got interested in liturgical reform, was it because he was guided by the Holy Spirit, or because he saw the political usefulness of a uniform liturgy in being a uniting factor for his empire?
As in, when the medieval Church started to model the liturgy on royal or courtly proceedings, was this an inspiration of the Holy Spirit?
In both instances, there may have been sound human reasons: political, aesthetic ... but divine inspiration?

2. Because it is actually part of Church teaching that the Church needs constant reform. The particular application of this principle to the liturgy is in SC 21.