I do not think that Sister Mary McGlone is fair to Mel Gibson or Leonardo da Vinci here. She posits a false opposition between them on the one hand, and Saint Paul and the Prophet Isaiah on the other, but there is no evidence in the art of the former two to suggest that they are ignorant of the inspired words of the latter two. For example, there is no more stirring depiction of tender strength on film than what Gibson gave to Mary, the mother of Jesus, in "The Passion of the Christ." And when da Vinci chose to paint women, he gave us the Mona Lisa, who is arguably the most famous woman in western art next to Mary. That da Vinci did not include women in his painting of the Last Supper means only that as a supremely competent artist, he knew good and well that it's hard to paint more than 13 people in the same frame. Sister McGlone's pining for inclusivity seems misplaced, as does her implication that "Suffering Servant" and "atonement" theologies are at odds with each other.  Not so!