In Hobby Lobby, the court said that not only is a corporation a person (see Southern Pacific Railroad vs Santa Clara County), but under some circumstances it is a person with religious beliefs. Moreover, the religious beliefs of the corporation supersede the religious beliefs of the employees. This case went against actual religious freedom, in allowing an employer to insist that the employee must abide by the employer's religious beliefs.

The whole deal with Zubik is that the Catholic bishops are trying to do the same thing: Insist that their employees abide by the religious beliefs of the bishops, whether or not the employee shares those beliefs.

All that the plaintiff in the Zubik case needed to do was sign a form saying "we are not going to have contraceptive coverage in our health plans". But this was too onerous for them. Because, after all, Catholic bishops believe that "religious freedom" means "you have to do things our way". Freedom for us, not for you.