This case was mispled, no? The founding of the Abrahamic religions is in Abraham's torture of his son, Isaac, to prove Abraham's fealty to "God". If the religion requires children's lives be put at risk then the religion itself is violating the rights of the children and it, and parents who put their children at risk in a church facility (or who do things in their own homes that violate the child's rights, in obeisance to these religious laws and legal fictions or otherwise) are responsible for addressing the problem, no?

The Mediterranean/Abrahamic/Cult of ISIS religious laws and legal fictions are framed to institutionalize child abuse, neglect and abandonment - and even require it of their adherents. Buddhism as well is based in Buddha's (Siddharta's) neglect and abandonment of his child, Rahula.

The SCOTUS is 100% adherents of the Mediterranean religions (6/9 Catholic, 3/9 Jewish) and excludes anyone with substantial knowledge in the Anglo-legal systems.  The RFRA laws, also.