Typical liberal.  Misses the point entirely. Let me spell it out for you more clearly:

My point was that the author claims newer priests are less "doctrinal."  The implication, of course, is that this is a good thing.  I was taking that logic and turning it around.  Liberal priests who constantly harp on Catholic Social Teaching, the environment, etc, are just as dogmatic and "doctrinal" as any conservative priest who harps on the moral teachings of the Church.  How is a pope who constantly harps on Catholic Social Teaching somehow better or less "doctrinal" than past popes who were concerned about moral teachings and other church doctrines? 

I wonder if the author realizes that when he criticizes priests for being too "doctrinal" that such a criticism applies both ways.  If it is too "doctrinal" to teach the Faithful about the moral demands of the Gospel, then it is too "doctrinal" to teach the Faithful about the social demands of the Gospel.

Is that clear now?  Crystal? Good.