Yes, the problem with your analogy is that it is not the one used by Christ for the Eucharist.  In the gospels, Christ refers to the Eucharist as body, bread, flesh, blood.  I cannot find any reference to fruits, and I cannot find him saying that his own sexuality is essential for the Eucharist.  I cannot find any such teaching in the Trent definition, or in the CCC, or in the TOB.  In the TOB, Part I is a general theological anthropology that applies to humanity in general, and therefore to all the sacraments.  Part II is the application to the sacrament of marriage, but this does not mean that Part I is not applicable to the other sacraments.  If you really believe, with certainty of faith, that maleness is intrinsic to priesthood, you may be a victim of the vexing conflation of patriarchal sex/gender theory with our current sacramental theology.  Sorry, but I DO NOT believe, with certainty of faith, that Jesus' maleness is essential for the redemption, let alone the priesthood.