Both my statements above are proved by our discussions here, in the past few days and weeks.
For example, on my 'press citation' point:- You claimed that the 'US non-Catholic media' only wrote about Cardinal Burke, and you stated that none of that media had bothered even to mention the '13 Cardinals letter' (prior to the 2nd synod) because Burke wasn't one of the 13 signatories. It then took me about 5 minutes online searching, to turn up the fact that that the New Yorker had mentioned the 13 Cardinals letter. I stopped looking at that point, having proved you wrong. I gave you my findings, and/but you then came back with a comment along the lines that one press source wasn't enough. Well, yes it was. 
And so on.
I am well able to prove what I write.
BTW, I have not made an 'ad hominem' attack on you. What I have been doing, is to criticise your method of 'reporting' (too partial), and your 'analysing' (based on biased sources, and too speculative).
PS - You said you were done?