"Supports"?  You're again arguing from "associated with."   It does not work.   "Associated with" is the basis of all conspiracy theories.   

The American Communist Party officially supported Hillary for President.    Does that mean Hillary is a Putin agent?  BLM endorsed Hillary for President.  Does that mean Hillary shouts "pigs in a blanket fry em up like bacon"?    Of course not.

Didn't you even read my post?   The "associates with" argument has nothing to do with reason or evidence.  Nothing!  

The Pope met with Castro.   Many Catholics on the right feel that Francis "associated with" a  Socialist leader and is thus endorsing Castro and all he stands for.  

Obviously that's not true.  "Associated with" is not evidence of anything, and I asked for actual evidence.

So I ask again -- what has La Pen said or done that radically differentiates her from Fillon?

If your claims of "associated with" have merit, surely you can cite somethi