No it's the author's words that are at issue here.  And I gave them twice.  You took the full length of a civil comment to meander around making small remarks, and never got to the author's words.

As the Athanasian Creed says (it's a masterpiece and should be read in full frequently. Marvelous prayer material).  Had you ever read it your intellect would have been assaulted when you read the author's words that I gave. 

"...As God, He was begotten of the substance of the Father before time; as man, He was born in time of the substance of His Mother.
He is perfect God; and He is perfect man, with a rational soul and human flesh.
He is equal to the Father in His divinity, but inferior to the Father in His humanity.
Although He is God and man, He is not two, but one Christ.
And He is one, not because His divinity was changed into flesh, but because His humanity was assumed unto God."