It's your medieval objections that confuse me.  Luther ushered in the post-medieval Reformation.  He, Calvin and the other reformers rejected the Thomistic medieval worldview which held sway from the 13th century onwards that human reason was unfallen.  Why are Hodge and Pius IX (to very different 19th century minds) standing together 'prima facie' proof that Zinke is a neo-medievalist?

All the popes from Pius XII (1950) until now have said there is no intrinsic conflict between evolution and Christianity.  That type of thinking is dependent on the foundation of medieval scholasticism. Epistemologically, a coherent rebuttal to Zinke only derives from the towering mind of Thomas Aquinas.  Mr. Medieval himself.

BTW, Darwin himself understood his theory destroyed belief in God.  As he said,  "As soon you realize that one species could evolve into another, the whole structure wobbles and collapses"