"Your essential argument is that as a conquered people, Hawaiians should assimilate to the colonial government institutions or leave their native lands"

False.  A scurrilous personal attack.  My essential argument is that Hawaiian natives welcomed European, American, and Asian newcomers as full partners. The unified Kingdom embracing all islands and all people had never before happened and could not have been achieved without newcomer participation.  Natives supplied land.  Newcomers supplied capital investment, labor, and expertise.  Natives eagerly engaged in cultural appropriation of written language, Christianity, and rule of law.  It is both illegal and immoral for descendants of one partner to now demand land and power for themselves exclusively, which is what the proposed constitution for a "Hawaiian nation" clearly demands.  You may disagree with what I say, but I will not allow you to falsely ascribe to me a viewpoint which you can then use in a strawman argument.