This article inadvertently points out one of those uncomfortable seams between science and faith that gets conveniently ignored when people write well-meaning essays about how compatible they are.
Science observes that nature routinely "thins out the herd" in most species by allowing the weak and poorly-adapted to die. Christian Faith, on the other hand, moves us to preserve (and value) the weak and poorly-adapted because, allegedly, God loves them or has a preferential option for their welfare. If people of faith choose the latter option, it becomes difficult to reconcile that preference with one of the most fundamental elements of evolution. 
I'm not arguing for thinning out the human herd and leaving non-producers at the mercy of the elements, but simply pointing out that science and faith give us very different perspectives on life, and facile statements about their compatibility are wishful thinking.