I think I'll stick with Cardinal Farrell over the Burkes and Chaputs who see alleged or imagined  confusion as "of the devil" (Chaput actually said that). And I personally would bet Cardinal Burke and Archbishop Chaput simply disagree with--rather than are confused by--Amoris Letitia. Either way, I think Farrell is on target. Or do you think he's wrong?
"

"If you find Pope Francis 'confusing,' you have not read or do not understand the Gospel of Jesus Christ." Cardinal Farrell

Sometimes ambiguity--and attendant  "confusion"--is the natural state, and demanded clarity is actually an artificial  perversion of it. It's like saying "2+2=4" is clear and unambiguous dogma, ego "3+1=4" is confusing and "5-1=4" is downright of the devil.

Be not afraid of "confusion;" it's often a gift Catholics are afraid to unwrap or accept because it's easier, more scrupulous,  and more comfortable to live without it. 

I wonder: can a lazy demand for "no confusion" sometimes be "of the devil"?