"The president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops has called on President Donald Trump to ease the "onerous" contraceptive mandate of the Department of Health and Human Services under the Affordable Care Act because it violates religious freedom."

Under this logic, shouldn't mandating services that cover blood transfusions be deemed "onerous" as a violation of the religious freedom of Jehovah's Witnesses who teach that blood transfusions, even if needed to save a person's life, must not be accepted?  Or should mandating of medical services of any kind be deemed "onerous" as the violation of the religious freedom of Christian Scientists whose faith proscribes healing of physical and mental illnesses and disorders through prayer?

Giving the USCCB position special consideration while ignoring similar "onerous" mandates from the perspective of other faiths could arguably violate the First Amendment insofar as "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion".