First, I didn't say that. I responded to your claim of an "unadulterated" message. Since we have no first-person accounts from Jesus, and the earliest extant Christian texts were written decades after the Crucifixion, and the earliest manuscripts are from the late 2nd-3rd century, what we have is an "adulterated message," though that isn't the term I'd use.

What does my opinion have to do with these facts?