Cuda's coment is puzzling. How does theology desecrate law? St. Paul writes in the Epistles that (in answering objections that the Christian is not under law grace) that "On the contrary we uphold the law".
As far as God not being immanent AND transcendent, what is the Incarnation all about? How are we temples of the spirit of God if God is only transcendent? (Rhetorically put.) 
     As far as religion (elsewhere in the article) having nothing to do with philosophy, what of Soren Kierkegaard , the Danish Existentialist?
     Cudos for the subject of the article, but if we now live in a post-factual world there must be dissenting voices to alert us of the iceberg ahead, before the institutional Titanic meets an immovable object and sinks with all aboard. 
      As for the adoption of Greek philosophy to make theology a critique of  religion, this does nothing but please the vain and intellectually proud. The Word of God is still good news for those who can receive it.