I said Jesus condemned her ACTIONS. He did.  By instructing her to go and sin no more, he condemned her actions as...SIN.  You confuse sin with crime.  The men charged her with a CRIME. She could not be justly punished for the crime but her eternal state was still in jeopardy and Jesus addressed what could be addressed, FOR SHE HAD SINNED. Jesus actually elevated the DEMANDS of the Law HIGHER than the criminal portions cited in the Pentateuch. Thus one can be guilty before God of murder and adultery for desires, not just actions. That principle even exists in the Decalogue in the condemnation of coveting. God is not mocked, and He judges and will judge all of us for our sins both of the heart and actions. As for the crime, I have no reason to doubt that Jesus would affirm the  punishment of a criminal for crimes committed, which He made plain when he offered no argument to the just confession of St Dismas, but did absolve him of sin.