Sarasi, I hope you will write about "in persona" and how the priest should represent the Church, not a god.The idea that a priest is "in persona Christi Capitis," meaning that he represents Jesus the Head of the Christ, is a recently blossomed idea with Vatican II. Yes, there is 2Co 2:10 which is mistranslated in the Vulgate to mean "in the person of" (now correctly translated in the Catholic NABRE to mean "in the presence of"). Aquinas wrote one sentence on the mistranslation. A Pope in 1947 wrote one sentence on Aquinas. The Baltimore Catechism has nothing on "in persona." And yet we are told now by the new "traditionalists" that this is part of the faith tradition, that the priest is like unto a god, a representative of Jesus no less.  Nonsense. Then some extrapolate from these errors to infer that since Jesus was a man, the Bridegroom, then women may not be priests. Apparently, representing a god is men's work only.  See #1548 in the Catechism. NCR should address teaching errors