Funny.  But still missing the point:

1)  The church was wrong about protecting priests.   But how does that imply the church has lost all authority, and should now have an "anything goes" policy respect to other areas of priest's actions?

2)  The church was wrong about  protecting priests.   Some bishops were at fault.  No, actually all bishops were at fault, given that no bishops had a policy of forwarding errant priests to law enforcement.  The reason for this was that the pope of the time explicitly did not care about the allegations against priests, and moreover, upholded canon law that forbade clerics from advertising scandal (ie, contacting the police when a priest molested a child).

So the key question:   if the pope himself was as complicit as the worst bishop, who in the Church as the moral authority to punish bishops?