I agree with you, Jim. Rarely is there any concession that the person in question might have thought deeply about the matter and concluded that some of the Church's position are flawed, possibly even immoral. Instead, people of this ilk insist it boils down to a refusal to listen to the "truth," being awash in "secular culture" (where the Holy Spirit is actually hanging out, though that's lost on Chaput), and having dangerous erotic or selfish impulses. There's a great deal of projection in these accusations, of course. It would be terrible of Chaput woke up one day, had a change of heart, and there was no one left to minister to. But he'd be at least partly responsible. Quite frankly, I find his particular notion of "church" as outlined here the antithesis of Christianity.