Your comment is based on a silly and incorrect premise--that Vat II was somehow about the 70s and that we who think it got the Church moving in the right direction are looking backwards. We are, but not to the 70s. The whole point of the liturgical reform of Vat II was that it was going back to our roots, that is, remaking the Church back to its original intent as it was in the early Church. If you don't see that, you misunderstand what the VatII liturgical reform was about.
Somewhere along the way, certainly before Trent, but amply illustrated by the worship style that Trent epitomizes, the Church lost its proper focus on the Eucharist as sacrifice AND meal and on Jesus present in the worshipping community. Instead it got stuck on rubrics, elevating the priesthood to some sort of special class,  a dead language, and worship of the wafer. In that way, the so-called "new Mass", now nearly fifty years old, is  back to the way the early Christians  meant it to be.