At no point did the Catholic Church consider “(e)ating shellfish, wearing gold, men cutting their hair, eating pork, eating any meat with dairy products” as immoral under the natural law or divine law.

Because they are ritual prohibitions based on a covenant, they could never be interpreted as natural law prohibitions.

Because they are not part of the moral law imparted to the Jews, when attempts were made to impose them on converts, the Church declined to do so.

This attempt to do an end run around the moral prohibition against same-sex sexual activity is doomed to failure, therefore, because it is based on falsehoods.

And, of course, “(t)he church will change, as it always has, or it will die a deserved death of natural causes” contradicts Jesus’ own words, which is part and parcel of the defective theology that led to it.