IRT "Provide help, not ‘tough love’"
Actually Mr. Kappos, not quite "nuff said" as of yet.  You establish the rule of social charity and aloha with which we certainly all agree, but I don't believe your Waikiki home ownership is any reason to quit thinking.  Charity is not free.  Even for the Christ, a donee was inherently expected to "pay it forward," somehow.  Donees become "individually accountable" BECAUSE of the gifts received.  It's the donor-giver that is charitable, not the donee-receiver.  While the donee is blessed by the donor, the donor is instead blessed by "Society under God" to which, in turn, the donee becomes accountable  I think what the author intended was that welfare and entitlements are not free, but instead require individual accountability.  I see you as agreeing to the charity but MIA concerning the flip side of the "yin/yang"...the issue of individual accountability.