Fr Cole has some problems with logic. He begins by quoting Canon law:
"§2. Furthermore, each and everything set forth definitively by the Magisterium of the Church regarding teaching on faith and morals must be firmly accepted and held; namely those things required for the holy keeping and faithful exposition of the deposit of faith; therefore, anyone who rejects propositions which are to be held definitively sets himself against the teaching of the Catholic Church."
He even quotes Cardinal Ratzinger to emphasize his point.
Then he describes the first dubia, asserting that the teaching in AL "is in contrast to the teaching of St John Paul II..." But then he takes an abrupt turn, and asks which we should believe in, John Paul II's teaching or AL's.

Canon law says "each and everything" commands assent, not to which of these we should assent. We are to assent to both. Logically, this means we have to figure out how they do not contradict, not how do we choose between them.