Part 4 of 4
Your Fourth point suggests the US media ignored the 13 Cardinals’ letter to the Pope prior to the second synod, simply because Burke was not a signatory.
You are mistaken here, because a quick bit of online searching finds that The New Yorker covered the story on October 16, 2015. There may be other 'non-Catholic' reports too, but I stopped at the first one that disproved your suggestion.
To conclude: As stated, your overall thesis is that Burke is an unimportant bishop, about whom we are talking only because the US media has inflated his importance in order (so you say) to make it seem that Francis has a stronger opposition than is the case. The reason you make this claim, is because you wish us to believe that Francis is an all-powerful dictator, who - if he desired - could do whatever he wanted. From this, you wish us to believe that everything in the Church is the Pope’s fault. 
Well, big organisations don’t work like this in the real world. And I reject your thesis.