Hello "Just as good as you",

Thank you for your personal insults based on my name. Personal insults are always compelling in debate (roll eyes).

If you go to the news report about the recent airline flight from the Middle East, you will see my comment: 

"This news report does a good job of reporting on the constitutionality matter of Trump's recent move on refugees, for example from Syria, to ban all Muslim refugees but to have a case-by-case basis review of Christians for possible admittance. My prediction would be that a US Court judge (or Supreme Court) would likely rule against Trump. The establishment of religion clause of the US Constitution has been widely interpreted as providing a muscular freedom of religion, and a requirement for hands-off from government in he area of religious favouratism. I predict that Trump does not have a leg to stand on, legally, with that part of his proposal on refugees."

Ah, but perhaps you dismiss the above as the mere ramblings of dementia?