Which was relevant only because religious liberty was at stake. Persons can assert religious liberties. It did not extend “the rights of corporate personhood” to religious convictions - it recognized that a closely held family business with religious beliefs can assert them.

In Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. Burwell, the justices sent the government lawyers packing by noting the government had always had the option whereby "petitioners' insurance company, aware that petitioners are not providing certain contraceptive coverage on religious grounds, would separately notify petitioners' employees that the insurance company will provide cost-free contraceptive coverage, and that such coverage is not paid for by petitioners and is not provided through petitioners's health plan.", speaking of paranoid imaginations.

Kathleen Sebelius, house “Catholic”, had cooperated in the fabrication of a pretext to intrude upon the consciences of several religious organizations.