Your first para presumes to speak authoritatively about hylomorphism, but when you elaborate that hylomorphism (the metaphysical concept the everything consists of matter + form) equates with sexual dualism (female body has a female soul) you demonstrate that your understanding of Aristotelian hylomorphism if rather primitive. 

And when you elevate your simplistic understanding of hylomorphism to the status of Catholic doctrine, one hardly knows what to say, Purg.

While it is true that, since the seminary reforms instituted by the Council of Trent, there has been a powerful tendency to COMBINE Aristotelian philosophy as expressed by Thomas Aquinas (especially psychology and metaphysics) with theology by explaining many fundamental Christian concepts in terms of that psychology and metaphysics, one must always distinguish between a philosophy borrowed to explain theology, and doctrine itself.

Theology is not intrinsically tied to the truth/falseness of ANY philosophy.