Yes, he was fully masculine, but what matters is that he was fully human, not that he was masculine.  And what about the divine "feminine genius"?

That Christ incarnated as a male is revelation, but that his masculinity matters as much as his humanity, and excludes femininity, is revelation filtered via the lens of patriarchal gender theory.

When did Christ commanded the Church to ordain only males to the priesthood?  When he chose 12 male apostles during his public ministry to patriarchal Israel, *before* the resurrection?  See John 16:12.  Did he confirmed this choice *after* the resurrection as a timeless rule?  Would Jesus, in today's church, choose 12 males to represent the patriarchs of the 12 tribes of Israel?  Why should we assume that he would make the same choice today?  

Sorry, I recognize the inconvenience of reconsidering the matter, but it is a bizarre assumption.  Don't worry, the Church will come to a mind on this in due time, no new revelation needed.  Peace!