Some people go looking for slights where there are none, like hallucinations in sensory deprivation chambers.  Nobody thinks translating "propter nos homines et propter nostram saultem" as "for us men and for our salvation" somehow changes the meaning to male men to the exclusion of female men without being taught that by somebody with an axe to grind.  There is no authentic confusion about Christian doctrine caused by this translation.

Concede this change, in the awful way 1998 did it or some other, and what is next?  This kind of feigning that one doesn't know one's own language never ends.  The demands never end.  A slight will be found someplace else.  And given the origin of these feigned slights and this pressure campaign, not out of Christianity itself but out of a worldly and often atheistic and hostile ideology they should be nonstarters. We should no more change a translation of the Credo because feminists find English defective than we should change words for Ayn Rand fans.