It is not that Jesus was not male.  My point is that maleness is a limitation of the human condition, not essential for his priesthood.  Divine persons cannot be reduced to the limitations of human gender pronouns.  God the Father is not exclusively male.  God the Son was not a male before the incarnation.  For the redemption, and the sacramental economy, the masculinity of Jesus is as incidental as the color of his eyes.  If my theology of the priesthood is incoherent, then the patriarchal theology of the priesthood is even more incoherent and utterly incompatible with the "new creation" brought about by the redemption.  Again, please study St John Paul II's TOB (for example, section 8:1) on the difference between bodiliness and sexuality.  Let me know if you find, in the Gospels, any explicit revelation about the maleness of Jesus being instrumental for the redemption. See also the TOB 114, 116, 117 on Tobit.  I find nothing on masculinity having intrinsic value apart from femininity