I would just like to add that while the pope is at it (the stroke of his pen), he could also redefine Canon 384 (and any others which could be seen to encourage clericalism or at least a wagon circling approach to abuse (eg. see http://www.intratext.com/IXT/ENG0017/_P1D.HTM). 

According to Provost (1992) “Clergy form part of the hierarchical structure of the Church, which of its nature calls for respect and obedience within the hierarchical structure. Corresponding to this obligation on the part of clergy is the obligation binding on diocesan bishops, for example, that they have special concern for their presbyters (c. 384) and indeed, for all their clergy”. 

What I still find astounding is the continued inability for the Church/hierarchy, to fully culturally adopt the laity (i.e. here, victims both child and adult victims of clergy abuse) as just as important as their brother clergy, in the eyes of God/Christ, if not more important in regards to care, a la JC. Great article Kieran.