There is a difference between took form, and incarnation, one assumes that Jesus was more spirit than man and only took appearance of a man, this is a heresy and assumes Christ had no human nature. He incarnated as a man in flesh and spirit. It may seem arbitrary but it is a distinction that exemplifies that salvation and justification is attainable by humans by being Christ like. By saying taking form one could misunderstand that the incarnation was akin to other religions idea of avatars, I had this mistaken understanding until I read more about the early councils of the Church and St Augustines "City of God".

The priest acts in persona of Christ in his liturgical and sacramental priesthood, in this way the priest is a husband and father of the church, these are distinctly male roles. 

There is no basis for female priests in scripture, tradition or theology. If all these things are invalid on this central issue than isn't Catholicism pointless and false? Please answer my other post