It is interesting again Pandora the you suggest that Cornwall's book "takes apart Yallop' s."   How could that be so when Cronwell's book was first published in 2001 or 2002, while Yallop's was published in 2007?   I have read both books and would say rather the opposite is the case.  Yallop is highly regarded for this piece of investigational reporting and points out why most people who have studied all the facts know that JP I's death was under highly questionable circumstances and that in fact a simple post mortem, or a Pope JP II that should have been interested in investigating what happened, was totally lacking.  For you to say that I am some how anti-catholic as you did in your first diatribe is one of the reasons I have in the past and  will now again cease to comment on your presentations.  Here you have really twisted the facts as is usual.  This is what I mean about the use of "factoids."