I've said this before and I'll keep saying it: Jesus' condemnation of divorce was based on the very real and very precarious situation in which women living in first century Palestine found themselves after their husbands tossed them out in favor of a younger model (much like the new Groper-in-Chief has done.) Unlike the Groper's exes, however, most first century women had no alimony to depend upon, which meant they usually had to resort to begging or prostitution in order to survive. Jesus understood this. I personally believe that Jesus would likewise understand that under today's law, releasing women (or men, for that matter) from an abusive marriage when they have something to fall back on is the right thing to do. You're engaging in fundamentalist thinking, and I agree with Maureen Fiebich that this is a situation in which the spirit rather than the letter of the law is what deserves respect. But since you seem comfortable damning divorce, tell us how you feel about Trump's two.