You continue your inane -- and that is the proper word for your view -- position that an unmarried man has better knowledge of what married life is than actual married couples. 

When "the successor to Peter" is talking through his hat, then it is quite proper to reject what he says.

As, in fact, you do. You reject Laudato Si' apparently in toto, and at least part of Evangelium Vitae. So clearly your sole criterion for determining is something is part of the authentic magisterium is "do I agree with it", which is the definition of "cafeteria Catholic". Stop blathering that we should follow the pope since YOU do not do it. 

You tell us to take Eichmann as our model when you say that we should not question the magisterium. I notice that you do not actually address this. You p!ss and moan about my bringing in Eichmann, yet you do not say "following orders is not the way to behave", which is the clear response to what I say.