No argument here.   

I would be comfortable being called agnostic because I have so little regard for religious mythology.   The idea that human's can  intellectual or emotional fully grasp the 'the truth' of a universal being transcending all space and time, seems more than a little vain.

I prefer 'Christian' because I have a real fondness for the person of Jesus.   I believe he challenged the established church (I like the anti-establishment radical), and he offered nonviolent path to happiness.     The fact that a church grew from his life is testament to the strength of his message of love, humility, grace, forgiveness.  The growth and behavior of organized religions seem very incongruent with my love for Jesus.

The bible was modifed thousands of times by early scribes applying their own interpretation of what was meant.   'Inspired by God' I can hope, but there is no doubt the bible was written by very fallable humans.   I like the Quakers use of meditation and self revelation.