So you are authentically confused, and sincerely believe that the translated credo is is saying that Christ was incarnate for males only?--not importing some distaste for standard English from secular movements that have us calling meeting leaders "chairs" and letter carriers "mailpersons"?

Are you aware that the Church went over this decades ago when the NRSV and RNAB were rejected for liturgical use?  

And that the data show that Catholics by and large don't request or require an artificial, neutered language?  (https://adoremus.org/2007/12/31/Catholics-Favor-Standard-English/)  The language has been stable in the last couple of decades, would you claim that although Catholics weren't confused then they are confused now by translating "homines" as "men"?

Moreover, not applicable to "for us men" but to "Sons of Israel" and similar constructions: neutered language was found to violate the principle that translations must preserve both connotation and denotation of the original.