No I wouldn't. I promise you that.
Quality of sources is the key, not quantity.
And then it's important to evaluate each source - its reliability, its 'agenda' (if any).
Now you have given me, I see, a report from the Catholic Herald. Its agenda must be well-known to anyone who has ever read it. It leans towards the 'conservative' or 'traditionalist' wing of Christianity - i.e., Burke's wing, not Pope Francis's.
Let's review the content of the report that you have given me here:-
The opening statement from the 'Communications Director' is banal. Yes, 'complex' reasons. Not just the contraception issue. So what?
The rest of the spin doctor's  statement has been disproved by subsequent disclosures. Why are you relying on it still? We now know that Burke wasn't involved in this incident merely as an observer or 'neutral' person. He was the prime reason that the 'old' cause (the contraception element) was brought back to the surface. He it was who pressed for Boeselager to be dismissed.