The title of the article was "whose Gospel is it anyway".

Ah..it was written by men.

This articel is a non issue. Shoe horning quotas like this - for this function - is the work of small and incapable minds.

It does give NCR press space, however, and a job, labor better spent flipping burgers, serving the needs of others.

This is the real problem: "The question is not so much what is true and what is false, but rather what people perceive as true and what people perceive as false. "

This idea undergirds "relativism" by the way, which began with "cogito ergo sum".  We are not the source of truth.  Our perceptions aren't truth.

Maybe the first Christian lesson of this idea came from doubting St Thomas.