OK, well, now you are talking about something very different from what you originally said. You originally called for: "a return to the actions and words of Jesus as the basis for the mass and our common liturgical celebration." That's not what the Mass promulgated by Pope Paul VI, after Vatican II, was or was even intended to be. Nowhere do any of the Council documents talk about what you are talking about. On the contrary, the Council presupposed the existing Mass -- as it stood at the Council -- as the basis of some reform, and only those truly necessary. Vatican II was certainly not a "do over."

And, for all your complaining about the translation of the Latin, you do realize that the Latin text of the Mass is the normative text? The old English translation was awful; whole sections of prayers were simply left out. The new translation, whatever complaints anyone may have, is not inaccurate; it's *very* accurate. Maybe what you don't like is what the Latin prayers actually say?