No, the argument that YOU are giving is "Christ chose only males to be apostles, therefore non-males cannot be ordained". The LOGIC of that argument is exactly the same as the logic of the argument "Christ chose only Jews to be apostles, therefore non-Jews cannot be ordained". In both cases the argument is "Christ chose only <X> to be apostles, therefore non-<X> cannot be ordained". YOU are claiming that the first argument is good, the second is not. Since they are, in fact, exactly the same argument, either both are good or both are bad. 

In fact, both are bogus arguments. Since you have nothing better -- and refuse to recognize that the actual argument for not ordaining women is "women are inferior to men", you insist on pushing your bogus argument.