Thanks, Mokantz. Just once, I would like to read something that acknowledges the differences between the ways men and women think about intimacy. For example, when women consider intimacy, they also consider where they are in their cycles, what intimacy will mean to their partners, and a whole host of other thoughts and emotions. Men, as far as I can tell, are not likely to be so reflective in the moment. And yet, every book I've read on moral theology deals with sex as if men and women experienced it in substantially identical ways. Even the underlying assumption of many comments here is that a married priesthood would mean married men, not married women.
In the process of historical development, Catholic theology of sex is still at the training bra stage.