I noted in the bishop's statement that he indicated that Priests for Life (PFL) is a civil organization, not subject to any ecclesiastical supervision.  While what he is saying is true, it is also true that an organization known as "Priests for Life", with several full-time priests, all in good standing with their bishops and/or religious communities, is widely seen as a Catholic ministry.  The bishops and superiors of these priests need to discern whether allowing them to continue working for PFL is good for the church, or even good for the pro-life movement.

Even if PFL is not under the jurisdiction of the bishop of Amarillo, Fr. Pavone is; and it's time, and past time, for Fr. Pavone to come home.

EWTN is rightly understood as primarily an outlet to foster and promote conservative politics and politicians.  Obviously they should lose their tax-exempt status; more important, they should lose the support of the USCCB, which has cowered before and pandered to EWTN for decades.