What's hilarious about this podcast is how one-sided it was.  If NCR was really interested in 'dialogue', why didn't they include among the guests anyone who has an alternative view?

And since I'm one such person, I'll voice it here.  The basic questions are: 
 
1) are there certain positions/ideas that are so discordant with Catholic teaching that reasonable people can agree that such opinions are 'not Catholic'?
2)  should a Catholic institution invite someone to proclaim and promote such views, especially if that someone is ostensibly Catholic (perhaps even a priest or bishop)?  (Note I said 'promote', not 'debate', because that reflects the format for the events that were to involve Fr Martin et al.)   Does sponsoring a dissenting cleric (viz. 1) cause scandal or confusion?  

If we can answer 'yes' to both questions, then the next question is:  does the proposed speaker promote non-Catholic teaching?  (And remember we're talking about speeches here, not debates.)