Tobit is irrelevant.

Maleness is not a limitation of the human condition, it is part of it. Our glorified or condemned bodies will be male or female.

In order to assert that maleness is not essential for his priesthood, you have to have a theology of the priesthood which supports that. In a couple of decades of discussing this with you, last over at America, you have been unable to provide one.

Since God the Son is only relevant to the priesthood in his Incarnation, in which He sacrificed Himself and became High Priest, his maleness is completely relevant, not “as incidental as the color of his eyes”. That error stems from your misunderstanding of the priesthood.

So, to proceed you need (a) a coherent theology of the priesthood and (b) an explanation of what the priest does at the Eucharist.