"It’s one type of model (folks of various religions showing up in marches of support), a model which, regrettably if ironically, is rejected by anti-Muslim bigots in the West, many of whom took the opportunity today to further Islamophobia."

Hello?

Seriously, hello?

Why is it that, when Christians are slaughtered en masse by violent Islamists, the subsequent columns always dutifully have some quip about Islamophobic bigots being present among the Christian hordes?

I mean, when the Montreal Massacre happened, killing 14 women, I do not remember the columns dutifully including some quip about how some women in Canada are sexist and anti-male.

And when the Quebec mosque massacre happened more recently,  I do not remember the columns dutifully including some quip about how some Muslims in Canada are bigoted against non-Muslims.

Seriously, what gives? Why the special spread-the-hate-reporting (i.e. pampering) of only "group X" in columns after deadly massacres?