(Part one of two)  Dogmatic teaching needs no "updating".—mjmchale  Really.  updating considerations of human sexuality based on experiences of the Faithful, is called for, as social sciences learn more about experiences of the Faithful.  At this time, there may be no need to “update” dogmatic teaching, though the administration of The Catholic (Pontifical) University of America seems to think so, by refusing to give professors a chance to explain themselves before firing them, thereby earning the continuing 1990 censure of the American Association of University Professors.  When it comes to human sexuality, the Teaching Magisterium has changed its proclamation from denying human sexual pleasure is a legitimate part of the purpose of human sexuality, to accepting that human sexual pleasure is a legitimate part of the purpose of human sexuality.  The problem is determining the criteria for exactly what constitutes dogma.