I'll help you out: it's kind of a hopeless endeavor. AlwaysThere pretends to play the logical argument game, but when he's presented with facts or logic that contradicts himself he'll just pull the "you're incapable of being right, that's why I'm right" card. 

Some examples:
I argued things from a theological perspective and he told me that I was never a "real Christian" so I couldn't be right.
I argued against his point as being a "false cause" logical fallacy and he said that I must have gone to a 4J school and therefore I'm incapable of understanding what true logic is.

I wouldn't waste your time. The New York Times is a credible journalistic source, the right thing for him to do would be to take your examples and contradict with other credible sources if he disagrees. But you're not going to get that.