I disagree because I don't think there exist any more than a remnant who know the differences between Roman Catholic faith and Bible faith.
Re: The article itself I find it a bogus attempt at "Catholic Apologetics"
by spurious attacks such as in the opening paragraph:
"Illicit trade in antiquities" and "questionable scholarship."
How many Bible believers have ever heard of "papyrologym" I ask?
What can be the meaning of  a "King James Bible world view" when Catholic versions are virtually word-for-word, except for the addition of the apocrypha.
I think the thrust of the book is the same old same old apologetic that says <i>one cannot simply take the Bible for what it says, or doesn't say, but must have an official interpretation from a priest.</i>