Exactly. The upshot of the idea that Christ was incarnated as a male is more important than Christ's incarnation as a human being is that women cannot be saved. Which shoots the "priests must resemble the male Christ" argument in the foot.

A related argument is expressed in the document Inter Insigniores:

<blockquote>“Sacramental signs,” says Saint Thomas, “represent what they signify by natural resemblance.”19 The same natural resemblance is required for persons as for things: when Christ's role in the Eucharist is to be expressed sacramentally, there would not be this “natural resemblance” which must exist between Christ and his minister if the role of Christ were not taken by a man: in such a case it would be difficult to see in the minister the image of Christ. For Christ himself was and remains a man.</blockquote>

In other words, the laity is too stupid to see Christ in a woman.