Yesterday I commented that face-to-face discussion is the best way to deal with this difference in opinion. The chances for that happening is however slim. Therefore some comments. 
I find the way that Ivo deals with his opposition ("christians", an extremely vague, multi coloured grouping) extremely disrespectful and inappropriate. He deals with their deeds lightly, then goes on to criticize their motives and logic, which is irrelevant and inappropriate.  Even our constitution allows freedom of belief and requests respect about differing beliefs and only focus on behavior and deeds.  Ivor however degrades a different belief as illogical and perverse (in a comment). If "they" ascribe things to "their god", so what? You have the right to do everything positive about Knysna, but the same as Christians, your motives and logic are none of my business. It became arrogant. Your picture of Christianity are a caricature. My faith and reasoning is different. People oversimplified.