(ONE)
Yes there is every reason to invite you to step back, since you have once again refused to refrain from leaping ahead to the magisterium and only then looking back at what the pericopes say.

So let me be be pedantic in my clarification. Acceptance of the two pillars of revelation does NOT negate the option of intelligent distinctions. There is a distinction to be made between the scriptural exegetical meaning of this or that pericope (roughly, the meaning placed there by the inspired author as understood by the original readers), and the interpretation that the episcopal magisterium may give to those same pericopes. 

And in our time, you and I and every Christian has choices to make concerning our role in attempting to actualize the plaintive plea of our Lord "that we might be one."  Mindful of the fact all Christian traditions accept scripture as inspired, I suggest it is sound eccumenical practice to be very sensitive to the distinction between exegesis and  magisterium