Yes, thank you, I was responding to McHale's post:

<<You are a walking fallacy. Apparently the Resurrection, Assumption, and Original Sin are not historical facts because no scientific formula can establish their legitimacy.>>

I'm acquainted with the development of the dogma of Original Sin, but as you say, it's dependent on an original human pair who are entirely mythical.

The Resurrection doesn't rise to the level of historical fact. It's a supernatural occurrence that Christians believe on faith. Likewise, for Catholics, the Assumption.