Isn't it fair though to ask which wing of the RCC is more willing to "tolerate" this type of behavior? Those whose clear goal is to protect the institutional church at all costs have been conditioned to deal with this deviant behavior (perpetrating the evil deeds and ensuing cover up but perhaps not in speech), and it seems apparent that many church right wingers (ardent pro-lifers, etc.) are employing their right to be single-issue voters in hopes that the Donald will be less of a threat to the "ruling class" of the institutional church. Am I wrong about this?

I certainly don't want to see our religious freedoms attacked but I see terrible hypocrisy in voting for a low-life predator in order to (hypothetically) preserve this. Strength of character and morality are important and IMO Catholics/Christians should not be so willing to overlook obvious character flaws in order to protect their institution. This cuts both ways so it behooves us to resist the urge to be single-issue voters.