There is a crying need for such an analysis of OS.  

Pope John Paul II's argument against women priests in both "Mulieris Dignitatem" and "Ordinatio Sacerdotalis" is based on the premise that Jesus felt "free" to defy social convention, but chose only males to be apostles anyway. The pope's supposed proof is Matthew 22:16 (saying that Jesus shows "deference to no one"), but those words were spoken by Jesus' ENEMIES as they tried to trick him and goad him into attacking Roman taxation. Proof from the mouths of Jesus' enemies?!!  OS quotes an earlier anti-woman document (Inter Insigniores) to say the most important gift is love, and then closes by making mention of Luke 22:32 in which Jesus tells Peter that when he has turned back to the faith after making a mistake, he should strengthen the other disciples. So is it a mistake to set aside love in favor of misogyny?  Did JPII intentionally make a very weak argument -- '12 apostles were male' and intentionally point to 'love'?