The Globe has persistently and purposefully ignored the political ideology associated with face coverings due to a hypersensitive commitment to political correctness and a fear of perpetuating "Islamaphobia" (whatever that is). Ultimately, the Globe's position only leads to full censure of any critical analysis of the politics and culture of that religion - like the TDSB's definition that included criticism of culture and politics of Islam, that language was not an accident. We can criticize the Catholic position on birth control in developing countries but not the subjugation of women in countries under Islamic law, the Globe (and the "establishment" media) afford a double standard when it comes to critical analysis and satire of religion. 
The Globe is incapable of addressing Islamism (or political Islam) - the belief that all levels of society should be governed by Islamic law. Why is that? Why does the Globe ignore reformers like Tarek Fatah and Ayaan Hirsi Ali?