Sorry but you are responding from your faith convictions which are different from mgarderner's reflections which come out of rational, scientific studies.
Examples - fetus is a child (faith conviction) - medical science sees much more nuance based upon proven facts (and not your simplistic division using actual birth - it is much more complex than that)

OR

access = free (biased opinion)......can you prove or document this opinion?

We also have faith convictions based upon catholic social justice thought that sees health care as a right (including contraception); that every person has dignity (including their health decisions); that medical decisions are often conscience decisions (they have a right to exercise their own conscience); etc.

Too often, access also means that anyone can *get* contraception, etc. even though they can not afford to purchase it; etc.  So, it is a hypocritical statement about access knowing that the person can't get it to begin with.  Sad.