There is nothing 'unfounded' in what I wrote. 
I have 'elaborated' many times before - and you have refused to produce anything by way of explanation other than that you don't believe Vatican 2 introduced new teachings. 
Well, of course it did. 
I don't have time now to look back for your previous comments, in particular because (unlike your friend Marty) I do not 'archive' all of the conversation threads.
Do not worry about the 'reactions' to my comments. I am talking to you in the first instance; and secondly I am talking to anyone who may not know you, and who may wonder at your credentials in accusing others of 'picking and choosing' from Church teachings.
It is well-known, to anyone who has followed your comments, that you:- reject the teachings of Vatican 2 (e.g., ecumenism; synodality; liturgy); that you lean towards the SSPX; and that you consider every Pope since Pius XII to have erred.
Hence it is hypocritical of you to accuse others of 'picking and choosing'. You do the same