So in this case, "compromise" means liberty for the baker, not for the customer. In other words, as I said, liberty for me, not for thee.

Given that the baker's idea of "religious liberty" means "the liberty to discriminate against gays"; I would say that the Christian religion, which does NOT say "love your neighbor, unless that neighbor is LGBT", would call on him to serve the customer.

I believe that to practice arbitrary discrimination is a far greater sin than being homosexual. I see no difference whatsoever between a baker who would not bake for blacks and one who would not bake for gays. Both are perverting the Christian religion by claiming that their "religious liberty" would be damaged by doing so. Both bakers are bigots, "justifying" their bigotry in the name of religion.