"Purcell, meanwhile, parried a number of tough questions from Judge Clifton, who appeared unconvinced by the states’ argument that Trump’s order violated the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over another. Pointing out that only a small fraction of the world’s Muslims population was affected by the order, Clifton asked how that could be construed as discrimination against Muslims. 'I have trouble understanding where we’re supposed to infer religious animus when in fact the vast majority of Muslims would not be affected,' Clifton said."

So by Clifton's "logic," if Drumpf had long been bad mouthing Catholics and saying that he was going to "have to find out what's going on here," and that he was going to keep Catholics from emigrating to the U.S., and then if he wrote an executive order one day, to keep anyone from Vatican City from traveling to the U.S., it wouldn't be necessarily be "anti-Catholic," because most Catholics don't live there.