So I guess we are to take it as defined teaching at this point that, yesterday's milquetoast "criticism" of the tribalist problems of "some on the left" notwithstanding, basically anyone to the right of George W. Bush is to be taken as distorting Catholic teaching for purely political ends, even when they offer criticisms of policies that even some on the left thought misguided. And how, exactly, is this view going to be the undoing of  reductionistic, thoroughgoing Maincheism that has infected the Church? How is citing Ratzinger in his prime, but setting up a dichotomy of "Francis bishops" versus what came before, with Chaput as Exhibit A, challenging the distortion of the Church via politics?