I think you've got me confused with some other poster. 
I commented on the article - about Tumi Morake's Apartheid analogy - stating that it "should really give a clearer picture as to why many black people are still angry about things, 25 years later. But typically, instead of having a meaningful conversation about racial politics and the Apartheid legacy, white listeners immediately got defensive instead".
I never mentioned anything about SA being a 'prosperous, racially integrated society but for Apartheid' - that's clearly a conclusion you jumped to.
I said we need to start having meaningful conversations between the races about Apartheid, its legacy and its impacts, conversations where we actually listen to one another, rather than hearing what we want to and immediately jumping to conclusions (as the Jacaranda listeners did).
Only by doing this can we ever move past the racially divided, nasty place we currently all find ourselves trapped in.