You misread what I said. It isn't the act of disobeying that is in question. It is the act of doing something in a provocative manner while disobeying. If the man with his hands up simply refused to sit down, he wouldn't have been shot. The issue was he had his hands up and was refusing to stop what he was doing. The real question in this one will be if he was reaching into the window. If he refused to stop while having his hands up and reached into his window, then yes, he deserved what he got. If the window was up and he simply leaned against the car, then no, he shouldn't have been. Two officers reacted in the exact same way at the exact same time, leading me to believe the window was down and he was reaching for something. Though that is speculation on my part. 

I don't believe there is a war on black people and that police are intentionally shooting black people. That is nonsense. If he would've stopped when ordered to, the situation wouldn't have escalated to that point. Period.