Hillarp is right on.  Succinct and accurate.  I'm not sure why someone has to point out the obvious but if that's the limit your acumen, so be it.  Now I understand.  As for you claiming the article states that the second amendment has its roots in slavery, that's a bit of a stretch, isn't it.  Fairly hypocritical of you to talk about attacking rather than responding.  Pot.  Kettle.  Black.  Lol.