Absolutely wrong.  You would be correct if you wrote "A Democrat who thinks of a Republican as a lowlife simply for being a Republican can not help but make a tainted article about a Republican. Much the same way as a KKK on Blacks."  I know not a single democrat who would ever think of a republican as a lowlife just because they identify as a republican.  I realize that is anecdotal evidence and that there must be some democrats out there that would do that, but let's be honest with ourselves here.  Lastly, a "tainted article"?  What is tainted about the piece?  If you mean bias, then you are still confused on what an op-ed is.  It would be fair to pick apart what Adrian Tam wrote based on substance, but it is unfair to critique someone for having an opinion in an opinion piece.  It would be like lambasting an encyclopedia author for only including objective facts.