Alright, I did exaggerate a bit. But if you did read his past articles, you should understand where I am coming from. The word "many" (and that he does use alot) implies that it is a majority or large number of people of that group that have the described trait.. Maybe it's the frequency at which these generalizations are written that irritate me...I don't know.
How about a statement like many black people are corrupt? Horrible and definitely racist. So,why is the reverse ok? And especially at this point in time, where race is being used to stoke hate for political purposes, I believe such generalizations to be dangerous.

So, if I could edit my comment to remove "without exception" I would, but the general point still stands...

This by the way does not mean that there is no white privilege or racists, just means, for me at least, that painting large groups with a single brush is wrong.