[he says "both sides are guilty" more than once.]
Damnit.  I almost forgot to get back to this one after the last response ran out of characters.  I got distracted by the article you provided.
I believe the term was "both sides are to blame." He made a big deal about the protesters who weren't part of neo-nazis or KKK but never addressed a question about white supremacists.  All he address was "bad people on both sides" and "violence" but not about white supremacists or the hate message they portray.  Isn't it the hate message of white supremacy that drives even these not "bad people" or not "violent people" that drove the protest to taking down the Gen. Lee's statue?  Is this not the message that the protesters tried to convey during, correct me if I'm wrong, the illegal parade through the University Friday?
[Or the conduct of someone who knows his words will be warped and twisted]
Please don't tell me you support his "fake news" attacks on all media but the ones he likes?