While the article ends well, there is implicit bigotry in both the headline and early text of the article. It's what I would expect from the Post vs. the Globe. 

BTW,  who asked the Native people's if all those "white" people could come over and change the ethnic makeup of the country?

 To be clear, immigration was never about the colour of people's skin for the "white" people.  Let's not forget about the 900+ (white) Jewish refugees on the St. Louis who were rejected by Canada.  

The presumption that the "white" (Anglo and French etc.) citizenry (not the elected government) in the country when immigration was opened up had the right to decide who gets in and who doesn't is utterly false.  Those "white" people were themselves immigrants and it is hypocritical to say their status as immigrants was somehow superior to others, simply due their timing and numbers.

Harper's bigoted policies were rejected by Canadians AND the Supreme Court. We need to look forward and not back.