Truly.  Points one, two, and three are universal and non-controversial 'givens' with which we can all agree.  Point four carries the interesting idea that Emma Lazarus' POEM, by some bizarre stretch, is some form of Law of the Land, to be adhered to over actual REAL laws passed by Congress.  
     I know a LOT of poems, and many are very pretty and sentimental.  We do not mold our national policy around them, however.  I lean more toward T. S. Eliot, myself.
    Point five, of course, is a Liberal Progressive justification for institutional racial discrimination against innocents, such as that 'white' heterosexual young man who never did anything to anyone, never owned a slave, never discriminated, and never offended, and who in their right mind would be in favor of THAT?!