AJ, obviously you are of the school that believes that generalising about what whites think in a negative connotation is not racist. You may continue but to rabbit on about "lying" is not helpful although the same type of debate de Vos uses in that any attempt to defuse, rationalise and calm issues immediately puts one in the opposite camp with say, Dan Roodt. Turn it around, write something that says "many" or "most" black South Africans support say the Gupta looting (if you believe it even happens) or "Kill the boer". Somehow I suspect you won't.

But I agree with you - I misread de Vos. I really thought when he proposes "get rid of" etc he meant legally not some convoluted guilt based Hitler or Henry 8 question that it should be done in a extra judicial "burn it" way, avoiding the dispassionate and technical application of the law.

As for most of his anecdotal ranting in a "we had it tuff" Monty Pythonesque way; it could have been written as satire by David Bullard.