You can hope.  So do I.  But experience suggests that a betting man (I'm not one for religious reasons) would put his money on harsher penalties across the board for defendants who ain't white.  And before you ask, the last such study done by this state was in 1973--overall native defendants got 43% more time than white counterparts (controlled for criminal history, crime severity etc.).  I've been unable to find one more recent, but the Bashore, Gross and Ellis verdicts suggest very little has changed.  You seem relatively reasonable.  Can you with a straight face argue that had Bashore and Gross been UNDER the wheel instead of behind them, and their victims the drivers, that they would have gotten the same leniency?