This "article" is awful.  Like, "Women made the least money in Mississippi, where their median weekly earnings were $591."  -- so what?  A man's median earnings in Mississippi was $771-- so that additional $181 a week was made because he's a man?  "Black women earned less than white women,"  hmmm- suppose that has nothing to do with the fact that the single motherhood rate in the black community is 72% though, right?  The BLS stats show that Asian women out-earned white women-- so that clearly means Asians are being prejudiced against white women, right?   There should be a journalism class about how to properly write and interpret articles that involve wage statistics-- or this is what you get.