As a white male, I am actually okay with the sentences used by the student leader.

Her sentences are striking, they are comparable to some kind of rough poetry.

I do not think she should face disciplinary action by the administration.

I think that more speech is the best recourse, that is, the offended white student ought to be free to unleash with his own rough poetry.

Indeed, out of every event described in the article, the one that has me most troubled is where the student union representatives passed a formal motion opposing Canada 150 celebrations and to officially label the celebrations as acts of colonialism.

That is crossing a line. A student union, which has mandatory membership and financial support from all who study there, has NO BUSINESS passing such motions which have nothing - zero - to do with what brought the citizens together (which was to pursue degrees at a university). That motion-passing by the student union is a thousand times worse than her coarse poems.