This is a rather jaundiced view of who Angus Buchan is and what he stands for. It also leans on speculative statements by obviously biased commentators. The slant of the article appears to be distorted by the preconceived mindset of the writer. For example, I think it would be rather hard to find a million white males in this country older than 40, let along get them to attend a meeting in the Free State at short notice.
The writer also seems to have failed to internalise the obvious fact that this part of Angus' outreach (the Mighty Men's Conferences) is aimed at men! Note also, that one of the primary things that Angus aims at is to get men to fulfil their God-given role to love their wives. (Take a good honest look at Ephesians 5 and the attendant onerous role assigned to men.) This is exactly the opposite to abusing women or children (as obliquely implied).