Not really. I didn't give it much thought because I don't think we were discussing the same things...still don't. I've no understanding of what the term "foreign objects" means, applies to, or is contained in the constitution, but it seems like and arcane and imprecise reference to something written in the context of an 18th century world lens by white wealthy men. How it has been subsequently interpreted and applied over the centuries is probably across the spectrum. I'm afraid that the constitution is a completely outdated document that has long sense outlived it's practical usefulness. Anyone that relies on it in as literal gospel is as deluded as one is thinking a bible is a factual document rather than a collection of stories and myths.