Western Woods writes:

"When the person shot is unarmed, that is worthy of interest. "

Wow.

Strange that you have not been out there complaining over recent years, then, that when it is white cop shooting black unarmed guy, it gets a hundred times the media attention of white unarmed guy getting shot by non-white cop.

In any event, the massively loaded term in your entry is "worthy of interest". You seem to want readers to infer you mean worthy in the sense of some kind of dispassionate journalistic measuring stick of objectivity. 

Laugh out loud. The media is propelled by agendas with ten thousand horsepower engines. And if you think for a second that editors do not have a "teachable moment" for a wanted narrative in mind, with their focus on the Australian's incident, then you must have an awful lot of faith in strangely presuming straightforwardness, and lack of coy, from editors.