Denial is not the same as skepticism, Outsider, and you know it. Science works through a process of reasoned skepticism. And through that process, science has arrived at a conclusion on manmade climate change that is as solid as that on evolution, the health impacts of smoking, and the connection between AIDS and HIV.

To DENY that these consensuses don't exist is not free speech as much as it is a assault on the laws of physics and nature, two forces that have nasty habit of surprising a hubristic humanity. 

To say that the Holocaust warrants more study and data collection, that reasoned skepticism is necessary, is NOT the same as saying that it didn't happen. To DENY that it happened is to invite the forces of anti-Semitism and white supremacy back into history.

You seem to be a lot more prone to denial than skepticism, especially when you associate the climate change consensus--a scientific conclusion--with a political ideology.