"The purpose of art is to speak truth to power, so not to consult with communities is to invert art!"  If you begin with a fatuous premise, you will end with a fatuous conclusion.  What a ridiculous proposition. What truth and what truth were being spoken when the great works over the ages were created? Surely there were all sorts of motivations and all sorts of outcomes. You've reduced all of art to something found on a Lulu Lemon bag. 

And even if someone accepts your cliche about privileged white straight males, WHY should they consult with anyone? Why is their perspective any more or less legitimate? I would have thought that if the artist has any function at all, it's to convey whatever is on his or her mind -- without bowing and scraping to which victim group currently is in favour. 

Push off, Mel from Eckville. If you want to take your marching orders from the victim industry, that's your business. But don't presume to foist your pathetic philosophy on anyone else.