I have no idea what Meghan Clark is talking about. It sounds like theo-babble to me. Can someone please translate?

Sarasi1 already said it beautifully, but I think the church has many things right on matters of sexuality. Sex  is fraught and ripe for exploitation and should be approached scrupulously. I also agree with Sarasi1 that sexual essentialism and "natural law" arguments against LGBTs are bunk. It's a conundrum for the church to unwind its views on homosexuality from its teleological perspective on sexuality.