I am always intrigued when the theme of 'it wasn't the sexual revolution or Vat II or homosexuality' comes up. I always ask why these three issues in particular need to be cleared. They are part of the 'barrell' as well. Never mind. This is an excellent report but something kept jarring on me as I read it and the same thing has jarred me when reading almost any critique of the sex abuse scandal (involving children, not adults as my own study does), is that the whole issue is a 'systemic' one, but then there are, especially in this study, the constants referrals to "psychosexually immature men" especially in relation to the three issues above. My question is, what was it, 'systemic' or individual 'bad apples'? Personally I prefer to approach this whole issue, including the sexual abuse of adults, as being a problem of all three: bad apples (psychological/individual), bad apple barrels (sociological/cultural) AND bad apple barrel makers (canonical/heirarchical), not just the bad barrel.