And where in any post today or ever have I compared the likelihood of being a child abuser between gay men or lesbian women, or heterosexual males or heterosexual  females or even transgenders?

I merely acknowledged that such deviants do in fact exist in all those categories and their customary  habits of grooming their victims and going to the places where they can be found.

The liberal knee-jerking response to any such truth is to assume antipathy towards those so  identified.  

I lump all those sexual people in one pile when any of them choose to abuse children.  At that point, they are all slime.  

Gay, Lesbian, Straight, whatever.  Doesn't matter. They are all, without equivocation, just slime. 

Any questions?