However, this case that is being talked about isn't about that.  It's about a baker refusing to serve gays a wedding cake, no matter how it is decorated, when he serves wedding cakes to straight people.  I know this, because I've actually read the case, and the refusal of service was before any discussion of how the cake was decorated.  From the Colorado Court of Appeals decision, in the statement of facts: "Craig and Mullins promptly left Masterpiece without discussing with Phillips any details of their wedding cake."  So, this isn't about how the cake was decorated.

So, my statement of this being about whether or not someone can get an religious exemption from obeying anti-discrimination laws still holds true.  I personally like Antonin Scalia's take on religious exemptions to laws when the case of Employment Division v. Smith came accross the Supreme Court.  He wrote for the court that to force every law to have a religious exemption would be nothing more than anarchy.