The flashlightonroaches.wordpress site has a lot of Jagad Guru/Gabbard bashing stuff for those who go in for that type of "research." 
My assertion is that an elected official's religious world view is secondary to their policy world view, and therefore disparaging someone's religiousness versus their policy-making practice isn't really logical--unless of course there is an ulterior reason. 
Using a recent example, being against same sex marriage (or said another way, advocating for traditional marriage) might initially be rooted in one's religious world view, but as long as the politician bends to the public will, they can still make sound policy. Don't forget, there are many, many constituencies who are anti-gay marriage, and agree or not, they deserve to be heard and included in the discourse.
As for her "decision makers" are, that should come out in her policies, testimony, and voting, eh? That's why one could say that policy is king, and religion is the court jester.