Why all the  schadenfreude regarding Cardinal Sarah, who it seems to me, is a very honest and pious person (though wrongheaded in some areas) who tries to express his points of view carefull? Why not employ the more sober and  more accurate "corrects" instead of the hot-headed  "rebukes" and "spanks"?  This  schadenfreude puts you in the same boat with the ultra-conservative media that spoke of  Cardinal Sarah's mild and thoughtful (and perhaps partially wrongheaded) piece in the Wall Street Journal on the pastoral treatment of homosexual persons as "Cardinal Sarah blasts Father James Martin." Tone down the rhetoric and you will communicate better and make your points better.