I would even say that C-16 and M-103 could even be saved if they were thought through, and Peterson has more or less suggested such. To quote Section 2 Purpose from the Canadian Human Rights Code, few people have problems with protecting the rights of transgendered or non-binary individuals from "an opportunity equal with other individuals to make for themselves the lives that they are able and wish to have and to have their needs accommodated, consistent with their duties and obligations as members of society, without being hindered in or prevented from doing so by discriminatory practices". Discriminating against somebody because they are transgendered or non-binary is wrong.

The issue is failing to analyze the legislation effects. If a non-binary demands a fabricated pronoun and can have you fired and guilty of a hate crime for refusing, is that "opportunity equal with other individuals", or does it make people fear going near them instead? That's a problem.