I can't get to the more important substance of the matter here, i.e. gay relationships.  Because, I can't move past this typical legal advocacy that despite whatever the Truth, nevertheless, misleads and insults the human intellect.  Curious context injected into accepted theology are used to declare self-serving legal findings...like a ghastly summary judgment commonly committed by 1st circuit judges.  It's sad to find  here just another court argument in priestly drag.  One can play with my mind and even disparage my intellect.  But, just be fair when doing so.  So, despite the matter of veracity over the issue of this article, this sermon is a patronizing ripoff.