Yep. Phillips is now trying the "artistic freedom" gambit.
But, unlike the Azucar case, where the baker offered to a bake a cake of the customer's choosing and give the customer the decorating tools to decorate the cake, Phillips refused to even discuss design.
If you say to any heterosexual couple "Sure! I'll design a cake for you", but you say to a gay couple "So sorry, no can do, but I've got a lovely sheet cake in the cooler I'll sell you", that is discrimination.
I'm highly concerned the SCOTUS is hearing this case. If they wanted to confirm the Colorado Supreme Court decision, they could have denied the appeal.