I don't see the value is resorting to the name calling and making of accusations.  Once one begins to claim others are rabid, or make other nasty snarky attacks, one's point loses all veracity.  This is an unfortunate tendency among some posters here and it impedes the discussion of idears.  Your earlier deletion was a good example of admitting error in this aspect, but this most recent post appears to be a step back.  Perhaps another stab at satire?  If so, I fear it misses the mark.  Perhaps another deletion is in order?  If not another time out?  But really, why the comment on homosexuality?  That issue is not raised by the article or comments.  One wonders if the issue isn't becoming an obsession with some who self-identify as defenders of the church...sigh.