Homosexuality creates a clouded circumferencing/surrounding definition of adult men in the priesthood who exhibited preference to boys and enacted upon them. That is why by definition homosexuality encompasses male preference to mere orientation to even boys (i.e. the same gender/sex.) And, that is why the arguments for that orientation (mainly Freudian/Darwin) have been emboldened under such premises for the lifestyle to begin with/engage, and has no sense of moral wrongs of that tendency with a child (which homosexuality doesn’t.). And, hence why the Church must make an alarming choice/concern over the arrangement of the set characteristics of behavior of those in the priesthood. There’s the explicit incident of boys being sexually abused – which She is condemned for - that which the male homosexual lifestyle/preference took place by men who served under the priesthood. Truth/fact, not fiction.