BS. The article clearly states that Justice Wagner felt that the views of the LGBTQ community were adequately represented by the groups that were already granted intervenor status. Therefore, in his view, there was input from all relevant stakeholders. If, for example, the Supreme Court granted intervenor status to seven out of twenty LGBTQ groups, would a reasonable person conclude that it is necessary to hear from all twenty to pass the "test of objectivity"? I don't think so.