Everything was fine until the ninth paragraph: "The bill’s language doesn’t include transgender men and nonbinary people who menstruate."

I'm just appalled that there's no concern for the agender people in that statement. Actually, I'm not appalled, but I just learned that word, "agender," this week, and that's the first time I've been able to use it. Seems like if you menstruate, you're a woman, despite the fact that you might think you are a man or a cat or a sunflower.