All those replies, as well as the to which I'm replying to now, are just dodging the question.

1)  The John Jay report says that 15 to 50% of priests are gay.

2)  It also says that 4 out of 5 of the abuse cases were men raping boys (not girls).

Then it wants to say that the perpetrators of these rapes were somehow not gay men?

“What is not well understood,” we learn from the study, “is that it is possible for a person to participate in a same-sex act without assuming or recognizing an identity as a homosexual.”

Yes, it is entirely possible for a homosexual not to recognize that he is a homosexual. So what? Isn’t it behavior — not self-perception — that objectively defines one’s sexual orientation?