Interesting article. "victim was brutally assaulted"  BUT the detective said the "victim was not physically injured." We should chastise this person, in the court of social journalism, for using gay slurs but calling him a "redneck" is good journalism. He is expected to make a full recovery from being not physically injured.  And now a vigil for the man brutally assaulted who was not physically injured?
THIS IS TERRIBLE REPORTING?  
This is the second article I have read by this reporterette that is total nonsense. The other article is about a found gun.
guns and gays, I guess that pretty much sums up our interest in the news of the day.
I've seen better reporting in high school newspapers.