I have never argued that two gays have a right to marry, only that two persons, having satisfied the requirements of the law regarding age, residence and freedom, do. You're entitled to your idiosyncratic reading of the Constitution, but the reading that counts -- the one by the Supreme Court -- differs from yours.  You'll get used to it; or not.  It doesn't really matter.
At best, you used "sic" incorrectly .  Your understanding of "no-one" is, like your understanding of the Constitution, idiosyncratic, but at odds with the authorities.  Your incorrect use of "sic" appears consistent with the rest of your thinking and writing. (Good writers use 'sic' conservatively and precisely.)