Haven't read the decision?  Of course, I've read the decision.  Closely.  And have compared it with other decisions in the due process and equal protection genre going back 50 years or more.  Have you done that?  Do you even know the legal test used to determine whether an asserted right is "fundamental"?    If  you did, and applied those principles neutrally, you'd laugh at the assertion that the right of gays to marry is "fundamental."  The Court trashes the Constitution and its own precedent to reach a result you like, and you go on, happy with all in your little Progressive bubble, glad that the Constitution and laws have been trashed.