Huh, well, you haven't acknowledged that TWU discriminates against LGBT either, meaning they have different rules for married hetero students than married LGBT.

I don't like the language of "violating" rights in this discussion.  I'd say TWU is limiting equality rights in the exercise of its religious rights, and LSUC is limiting religious rights in the exercise of its regulatory duty in the public interest.

At issue is whether LSUC's decision reflects a reasonable limitation of TWU's religious rights in the context.

My guess:  I can't imagine the SCC would interfere with the LSUC's decision.  They were thorough in their process, analysis, and balancing of rights.  So why is SCC hearing the appeal?  Dunno.  Maybe they want to weigh in on reasonable accommodation for potential future graduates from TWU's law school.  So far, LSUC has only denied TWU accreditation, but they haven't yet specifically addressed the religious rights of individual students should the law school open.