That is utterly heretical. From Vatican I's Dogmatic Constitution DEI FILIUS: "For the doctrine of the faith has not been handed down as philosophic invention to the human mind to be perfected, but has been entrusted as a Divine deposit to the Spouse of Christ to be FAITHFULLY GUARDED and INFALLIBLY INTERPRETED. Hence, also, that understanding of its sacred dogmas MUST BE PERPETUALLY RETAINED, which Holy Mother Church has once declared; and there MUST NEVER BE RECESSION FROM THAT MEANING {Wait for it, modernists} UNDER THE SPECIOUS NAME OF DEEPER UNDERSTANDING". And can you please show me where the Magisterium has declared it a DOGMA that the Church in Ireland is to reject the "priority {whatever that means}" of a homosexual companion? In other words, you reject actual dogma, and then whine about some non existent dogma. That would not even constitute a disciplinary rule, let alone a De Fide teaching. How do you expect to be taken seriously when you simply make something up?