Basically, the SSM ruling is a non-ruling.  It is impossible for two justices to participate and officiate in a same sex marriage ceremony, then go into chambers and rule for what they just participated in.  It can't get more conflict than that.  Without those two conflicts, SSM would not have passed.  Also, Justice Kennedy cited 40,000 children in SSM, without comparing it to the hundreds of thousands of children in common law marriages, and in the same boat as homosexuals.  The 14th Amendment cannot be used for equality because it cannot compare  apples with oranges.  People married to people not married.  Male and female to male and male.  SSM is a form of discrimination, where only one gender can enter and bar the other.  SSM is there for unconstitutional.  Our Constitution CANNOT recognize an orientation, it is an