I didn't say "they/homosexuals" have monopoly. You were refusing to believe/allow/conclude from the course of the argument that began, that the abuse of non-adult person's of the same sex does relate to being homosexual. And your refute was faulty, for since by the orientation one makes towards a non-adult person does fall under the definition. You then proceeded in defense of someone being a homosexual excludes the identity of persons of same sex preference to non-adult persons of the same gender. You were excluding "pederasty" from homosexuality. You continued to endorse studies/views held they were hetero persons - which you even referred the Spartans (apparently straight) of the Greek City state of Sparta - were only in fact leaning to preference with non-adult person's of the same sex. So you excluded homosexuality having nothing to do with someone's disordered/perverse inclination towards non-adult person's of the same gender.