There is a pattern of chorus members grooming children in shelters that they might at best see once and they live hours apart? Or are you just saying that generally speaking,  men do groom children, so it is a possibility here? Would you raise that particular point with any gift involving men and youth, or did you just decide to bring it up here for this particular case? You can call it liberal knee-jerking about a protected class, but you are making wild accusations without any actual reason and we're calling you on it and you are falling back on "liberal knee-jerking" as a defense for your crazy theory. Your theory is truly crazy. A chorus gives money, and "grooming" is what you decide to bring up as a reason. Never mind that gay men are more frequently runaways and users of shelters, or that they might have a kind heart, or are looking out for fellow humans. You insult them, casually and without logic or reason, and then dismiss arguments against your ludicrous idea as knee-jerking.