"I'm sure you know that my post was serious; perhaps labeling it as unserious is your way of not dealing with it. My first point simply goes to the hypocrisy of persons who, on grounds of 'religious liberty', seek to restrict the liberty of other persons."

YOU'RE not dealing with it.  You assume there is a true liberty for two gays to marry.  There isn't --- short of perverting the Constitution beyond recognition, which the Supreme Court did.  Reasonable people can, and do, dispute the "liberty" of gay marriage.  It does not seriously meet their argument to say, "Then don't marry someone of the same sex."  That doesn't meet their reasonable objection, which is that marriage has always meant the union of people of the opposite sex.  If your post were serious, you would not have proposed as a solution something that doesn't resolve the objections one iota.  And if you think your first "solution" was "serious," you don't understand the objection.

"No-one" is sloppy and non-standard.