You have not refuted the claim that LGBT are cruelly singled out by the covenant, you simply ignore the equality rights of LGBT to be married, as does TWU.  All LGBT are unmarried to TWU by definition.  But as all courts have ruled so far, just because it's legal in BC for TWU to discriminate against LGBT on religious grounds doesn't mean it's not discriminatory, and it is.  And it certainly doesn't mean that the LSUC is obliged to endorse and accept discriminatory access to the legal profession contrary to their own fundamental principles and Ontario's HRA.

As for what the SCC has to say about it, we'll have to wait and see.  I wouldn't be surprised if Alceste is right and they uphold LSUC's right to not accredit the school as well as the BC Court's decision that their law society did not act reasonably in denying accreditation.  Also, the BC government withdrew accreditation pending the rights issues, and the new government might not be as motivated to accredit it.