So who will be representing the church in this dialogue?  Martin?  That would be homosexuals talking to homosexuals.  Martin talking to Church officials?  That would be homosexuals talking to homosexuals.  "Straight" Church officials who side with homosexual activists to change Church teaching?  Still more people talking to themselves.

Let's bring an uninterested party to the table instead.  I mentioned elsewhere that Michael Voris would be an excellent choice since he credits his move away from the homosexual lifestyle to the compassion of the Church's teaching.  Or, perhaps, one those who took advantage of the Courage Apostolate who has embraced the Church's teaching, not felt alienated by it.

The fact is it is the homosexuals who refuse to have a dialogue; they want to debate and win, not discuss open-mindedly.