I have neither called you names nor attacked you, nor would I.  But I won't lie just to make you "feel good", either.

And you and others have failed to provide the only thing I've asked for all along with respect to this topic--empirical evidence predicated on quantitative data, and identification of a so-called "gay gene" and its location(s) in the human genome.  Your feelings (or mine) have nothing whatsoever to do with it.

Links between behavior and genetic heritage certainly exist, but the DEGREE to which they influence (still less "determine") human behavior have NOT been established.  Not since Watson and Crick.

And in all sincerity I caution that trying to FORCE recognition of genetic/behavioral links without empirical evidence is NOT science--it's very DANGEROUS.  Claiming behavior is inextricably controlled by genetics is the first step toward designating certain genetic heritages "inferior".  That's been done before, in this country and elsewhere.  It didn't turn out well.