A reply that is intended to give us the impression that you understand "consubstantial".   (As in “it’s too hard for you, but not for me”.)

Suppose we give you the benefit of the doubt:
1. for how many people is that an intelligible word?
2. given that the Creed was originally compiled in Greek, why should be we stuck with a latinism? 

Your literalism (so often deployed in these threads) surely means you should be advocating that we ought to be declaring our belief that Christ is homo-ousial with the Father ...

In all events the pastoral question was the more important … for which you have displayed an evident disdain.