Although I couldn't find the 20-year old decisions in Doug Collins' case, I found this additional info:

"In 1997, the tribunal dismissed one complaint against something Collins wrote about the Jews. But in 1999, after a second complainant cited four of his columns, the tribunal decided that, taken together, they portrayed Jews as selfish, greedy and manipulative. They reinforced negative stereotypes and were "likely to increase the risk to Jewish people of being exposed to hatred or contempt." 

"The tribunal ordered Collins and the North Shore News to pay $2,000 to the complainant, Harry Abrams, an advertising man. That ruling was under appeal when Collins died in October at the age of 81."

So, still no fine.  You may think the difference between a fine and an order to pay damages to the plaintiff is a  "technicality"  but it is not.  One is the state against an individual; the other is a civil dispute between two individuals, similar to a libel case.

And Ezra - nothing at all.