This comment is inaccurate on so many levels, there is almost no point. However, it would be helpful if the writer would fine tune his argument against the Jews a bit by being kind enough to breakdown the 5% he claims(evidence would be nice, but that might be asking too much)by judiciously allocating it between the Brits and the Jews, especially given that the Brits were mostly hand in glove with the Arabs, which led to the Jews committing terrorist acts(though that term had a different meaning those days, at least as far as such acts committed by Jews was concerned since, for example, in the case of the bombing of the King David Hotel, the Jews warned the Brits - all soldiers by the way, since it was headquarters, not a hotel -  with plenty of time to clear, but the Brits chose to ignore the warning, but I digress) against the British, which in turn made the Brits look the other way so much that they only hanged Jewish terrorists in the years, never Arab ones. Go figger.