Faulty premises of your argument:

(1) There were Arabs and Berbers already living in Palestine when the Israelites arrived according to the book of Genesis.  Therefore the latter's "link" to Palestine was no different qualitatively than Anglo-Texans' link to what is today called 'the Lone Star State.'

(2) To denounce Zionist apartheid doesn't mean dismissing native peoples' grievances in Alaska from consideration--or Siberia, Panama, Brazil or Australia for that matter.

(3) Nor is there an imaginary double-standard whereby nobody but the Israelis should be required to vacate their usurped land.  I couldn't argue for that on religious grounds.  Qur'an itself acknowledges the right--indeed the obligation--of Jews to inhabit the Holy Land.

(4) The condition, however, is acting like 'the chosen people', not 'the master race': "Justice and ONLY justice shall ye follow, if ye would live long in the land YHWH gave you; Deuteronomy 16:20--note the "IF".

MaSalaam.