"Europe’s far-right parties have stopped talking about “devious Jews” and instead use euphemisms such as “globalists” and “cosmopolitan elites,” Europe’s far-right parties have stopped talking about “devious Jews” and instead use euphemisms such as “globalists” and “cosmopolitan elites...” 

Ah yes, you can't criticize globalism or the elites without inspiring the worst of motives in people. Might not it be fairer to argue that the author and those who think like him are intent on pushing an agenda rather than examining and presenting the actual issues underlying the rise of antiglobalism?