Correction, his religion isn't mentioned AT ALL.  

The only highly likely thing that can be extracted from this "interview" is that he's not Jewish.

I did find his evasive answer sufficient to conclude he is not objective, all the more reason that his religion should be listed as part of the short bio on each article.

Interviewer's question: "Didn't many Jews also lose their homes and properties in Arab countries?"

Answer:  "There is no moral or legal justification for confiscating another's property, whether Palestinian or Israeli..."

A yes answer would have added to his credibility, and then he could have gone on and given the "general rule" governing loss of property.

That he didn't, tells us something revealing about his character and bias.