Btw you probably have a better chance with strychnine than arsenic but I am merely indulging your hyperbolic hysteria. 
If you're chilled, put on a thick coat and disabuse yourself of your infantile illusions about the American political system. You don't "care more about" the dangers women face or you'd have stated that you're voting for Clinton since she clearly has the means to make major improvements as regards women's healthcare access and rights via Supreme court nominations and executive orders.
I call you out as disingenuous because above you state "Who said anything about not voting? " and yet say you won't vote for Clinton. So you must be voting for an unviable candidate which makes you like the Green voters in 2000 who helped elect Bush.  You've put yourself in a dilemma by trying to convince yourself that Clinton is just as bad as Trump although you know this proposition to be false. Perhaps you're having an instinctive, mechanical reaction to voting for a powerful woman?