#1. Your examples are clearly so far from being "ontological" that they are really risible.
What is more you didn't address what "ontological" really is. To EVEN ask the question "how many" is to speak of quantity not quality (qualitative difference). Ergo, irrelevant.
#2. Your examples are actually reflective of sexism not, in any way, reasonable or "metaphysical". To refer to my position as "guffaw", is not only insulting and "UNCIVIL" but reflects directly back upon your own nonsensical justification for your position. You have "risked" and, demonstrated that I was correct.
Just for a smile, I would ask you how many priests and bishops and cardinals wear dresses? It actually seems de jure, no? By your reasoning they are all women or pseudo-women. Don't bother to answer. I think you have demonstrated that you are either one of the "trawlers" under a new guise or a new recruit. I won't engage. Cheers.