. . . but, then again, there are a great 'many others' who agree with 'pioneer27', thereby disagreeing with both you and Alceste and the 'many others' that you claim exist.

Certainly it would be interesting to have an exact number of women who believe that 'covering their face' is a 'religious tenet' & not the obvious self-induced 'erogenous act' & 'attention getter' it seems to be.

As well, it would be interesting to have an exact number of Cdn women who believe 'covering the female face' showing only the eyes through a slit in cloth is nothing but a subjugating imagined naiveté pandering to the anachronistic paternalistic hedonistic myths of primitive misogyny.

Certainly, all Cdn Women have the right to Reality -- rather than having foisted upon them oppressive, imaginary dreams of the special & pretend 'Unknown Women'.. visually imposing an expectation of subjugation on 'every other Cdn Female Citizen' absorbing this visual imperative to buckle-under to grotesque visual misogyny.