Why does it have to be binary? Could there not be reasonable discussion about access to abortions? I can still support a woman's right to choose but at the same time recognize that after 25 weeks or so there's a baby that needs to be considered? The specific issues brought up by Ms Harder are that there are no consequences relating to the loss of a fetus if a woman is attacked, and gender selective abortions (typically families aborting healthy female babies) that appear to be on the rise in Canada. One can reasonably oppose or at least question these things without being "anti-abortion". Your position is similar to the pro-gun argument from our southern neighbours, when ever the issue of restricting types of available weapons comes up the NRA shout "keep your hands off my guns" as if people are trying to take their weapons away. When in fact no one is saying that at all. There can be more to a position than a simple "pro-choice" slogan.