They seem to think that the 2 are somehow related...go figure.  So the comments about people being "against Hillary because she's a woman" make sense in that fantasy world.  Why can't "it" be about the facts?  Every time facts are mentioned or honest parallels illustrated,[Bryan Nishamura comes to mind] Clinton apologists change the subject....because there IS no defense possible! Comey clearly stated that anyone in his organization doing the same, would be "severely reprimanded or terminated."  Since Clinton was at the time, under the same laws, she is culpable under the statue Comey mentioned - it's that pesky "gross negligence" thing - put in to specifically catch those "extremely careless" employee's.  The real question should be why are liberals defending her?