I take issue with some of the incorrect wording in the editorial.  It isn't possible for someone to not "believe" in abortion.  Abortion exists.  The editorial is sloppy in its wording and misleading in its conclusion.

What Rachael Harder does not believe in, are the rights of women to have reproductive autonomy in Canada.  As of today, this is a fact of Canadian law and legislation; women have this right.  Rachael Harder does not believe that women should have this right in Canada.

Therefore, she is not equipped to hold a position as the chair of a committee on the status of women as she does not believe that the rights that women have in this country should be upheld.  It is that simple, and justifiable to withhold her appointment to this committee. The comparison to a private company is weak.  She is simply not fit for the job.