"If they does consider it human life (as I do), I just don't see how you can then argue that a woman's right to control her body supercedes the right to live." I find that a terrifying argument. I don't see how you can argue the woman's right to control her body DOESN'T supercede the right of the fertilized egg, or embryo, or fetus to live. The woman is here, living in the world, a viable human being. Of COURSE her rights supercede an entity that is unborn! No question about it!