You, or anyone else, can be repulsed by Trump's boastful lying about grabbing womens' genitalia in greeting *and* be repulsed by the policy actions you cite.  There is no sense arguing deductions from a faulty premise, in this case that the two are mutually exclusive.

The point of the comment thread has to do with Glenn Oshiro's satirical comment being taken out of context by Johnson and then Oppegaard to charge him with the thing he finds repulsive.   It seems to me that the Readers' Rep has done one of his readers a disservice.