Yes, the things you mention are merely lip service: none of them will reduce the number of abortions. They may make it more difficult for poor women to access them, but they will also make it more likely that poor women will seek them. It's diabolical.
You object to my calling Clinton "pro-choice"?? Would you prefer that I call her "pro-life"? I nearly did; she far better fits that label than Trump does -- even if you reduce "pro-life" to "anti-abortion", as you and some others do.
Of course it's an abuse of language to describe Trump as "pro-life"; even if you believe that his opposition to abortion is sincere, he nonetheless embraces a militantly anti-life agenda across a broad spectrum of issues, as I delineated in a previous post. Trump "pro-life": it's a preposterous notion.