My first point had nothing to do with what is legal, but with the humanity of the unborn - they are children too, "unborn children" as the first editorial stated. I agreed.
Regarding my claim about what I think is the real question - if what is in the womb is the same as what is out of the womb (mostly change of location and method of getting nutrients/oxygen), than poverty, education, etc. is not the issue. You changed the subject from the child to the pregnant women. To a child in the womb facing death, the potential for poverty or education is irrelevant.