Let's compare your list of character evaluations to what we know without question about Mrs. Clinton as well.

Arrogance (check), ignorance (check), incompetence (check), bigotry (more subtle and devious, so I'll be charitable and say maybe but likely), buffoonery ("what difference does it make!" - check), and boorishness (political drivel from a lifetime politician.  Hmm, boring - check)...despicable (double check), amoral (exponential check), and dangerous woman (dangerous enough to cost lives, lie, and risk our security with carelessness - CHECK!!!).

So who is better?  The dEVIL in the dress/pantsuit or the one with slacks and a tie?!  The lessor of two evils is still evil!!!

With that on the table now, please explain and detail as best you can what you're referring to with regards to your comment about facilitating unjust discrimination in the public square.  I would genuinely like to know, because I have no idea what you're referring to.