Sorry for the levity. Since you have dealt with this legally and have read the literature, I accept your wisdom on this, but I am not sure what that wisdom is?

I do not follow this topic at all, but was vaguely under the impression that fighting back was the considered advice? Surely a woman must resist verbally and physically to remove any shadow of doubt about consent, both at the time and with a view to eventual legal testimony? I presume what you are saying is that fighting back should have limits somewhere short of the way one would fight back if one's life were under threat?