Talk about Cherry picking the rebuttal.  Ms Soh completely misses the point that the manifesto is presuming that the behaviours more commonly associated with women are not valued in development or engineering.  Nothing could be father from the truth.  The reality is that the days of the lone wolf anti-social developer are numbered.  As the rebuttal stated, this is the thinking of a junior employee who has no idea what is of real value in senior development or engineering roles.  

The facts and science he quotes may be accurate, but it is the conclusions and the arguments that are totally flawed and that is where the offense comes in.  I would have fired him because this isn't a case of science, or freedom of expression.  If you want to make a scientific argument, do it in a non-offensive way.  This is a case of an elitist academic male PhD sticking his foot in it.