What these people should be writing letters for is restorative justice for cases like these where there is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt that any crime took place.  The woman herself only hoped the judge would listen to testimony, examine the evidence, and come up with a “fair decision,” ...  she did't want a conviction, she just wanted to be heard.  We should reserve criminal courts for cases where there is evidence that a crime took place and the victim wants prosecution to the fullest extent of the law.  Restorative justice can be less public and more comfortable for alleged victims while still holding alleged perpetrators responsible for their actions.  From what I've read elsewhere, the alleged victim actually agrees with the judgement in this case but is worried that others will interpret it incorrectly.  Womens' rights aren't suspended when they are drunk, this includes the right to give consent and the right to withhold consent.  Consent is rescinded when incapacitated.