Those who support him very likely know him and are well suited to evaluate what he has and has not done.  People like you have likely never met the dude and project your vile world view upon him.  The woman was paid via dropping of prostitution charges to testify against him.  Once payment is made, I cannot trust what is said especially when her trial and grand jury testimony disagree and she explains by saying that she was on drugs before the grand jury.  This is reliable testimony?  But never mind, you will say he was convicted and is therefore guilty.  The petitioners likely know him personally and are better placed to judge than either you or the jury.