Hadd makes his case that he surveyed women he met in person, online and even friends and family, discovering that none of those he asked could answer the question "Why were women marching?" Did he ask a marcher?
Then Hadd tells us why the women marched: "they somehow think because they didn’t get their female president, that all rights afforded to women will magically disappear." By using the term "female president" in that sentence Hadd plays his card: He thinks the march was about just wanting a woman president.
As a segue, Hadd let's loose his other issues, connecting his first assumption about why women marched (wanted a woman president) by saying it's "sort of"  how minorities believed their lives would be vastly improved under an African-American president."
So now Hadd has spoken for women, identified their issue and decided what minorities think too. 
Hadd ends with a flurry, calling them hypocrites and then filthy. 
Does Hadd represent the thought processes of the opposition?