Another "immoral equivalency" is using the blanket word "inconvenience" to describe why women seek abortions when the documented reasons are 
- because a child would interfere with working or caring for dependents (74 percent)
- because they cannot afford to provide for a child (73 percent)
(Guttmacher)

While these situations may be flattened to inconvenience by those peering in from the outside, they are surely not merely inconvenient to the women experiencing them. What happens when abortion rights are rolled back without alternative--basically no parental leave (most developed countries have a year + ), reduced access to contraception, and a whittling away of other forms of social assistance? Will there really be enough Trump Jobs to make up the difference?