The revolution was about openess. People were having the same amout and kinds of sex before it simply became a topic not to be ignored. I am not arguing for promiscuity. Not at all. I am simply arguing that sex can be an end in itself, not a means to a greater good. It would not destroy Church. Indeed, an authetic pro-life witness must come from a female voice, and not simply from the avowed. That was tried at the March for Live two years ago (someone is listening), but we don't need spokes-nuns but females with Magisterial Authority. What do you want more, traditional asexual maleness (already destroying the Church) or a strong female ecclesial pro-life-witness? No one is persecuting the Church, either from outside or inside. It’s wounds are self-inflicted.