No, that's your interpretation, based entirely on your well-chronicled contempt for female accusers of sexual misconduct, and yes, you most certainly don't understand. Your threadbare worldview is that district attorneys and judges are evil; just because that belief is reinforced by personal anecdotal evidence -- the only kind that ever matters to you despite being diametrically opposed to your purported professional training -- doesn't make it valid.
Facts are by definition true (e.g. that statement is both). The judge will have his correct ruling appealed. Then, when it's upheld, you will have another judge or judges to pillory. That's really all you want, anyway.