Consider the lead story the Globe has chosen for this series on sexual assault victims: 
"Ava", admits she brought her own alcohol mixed with lemonade then seems to blame the lemonade for hiding the taste of the alcohol thus enabling her to get too drunk. Excuse me?
She brought her own alcohol and still blames something else for getting drunk. Ridiculous!
Then admits she was consensually "making out" with some guy she met. Then claims she "blacked out" and found herself engaging in sex but in the middle of it remembers saying "no" and not being listened to. 
By the sounds of it she was completely responsible for the scenario she found herself in. 
The article purposely chooses to not tell the story of an out and out assault such as: woman jogging attacked and raped. The article chooses this variety of story for a purpose and I believe that purpose is a long running campaign of misandry cloaked as women's rights.