The real question is how much "biological reality" is being overcome by individual achievement.    Google is hardly representative of society as a whole.    Each employee has been widely screened for desirable achievements, and attributes so what science says for the general population is no longer applicable, since Google is a pre-selected sub category of society.

This makes the entire argument kind of silly since you could very well argue "science" and point to "statistics" when in fact the statistics aren't applicable to the population sample you're talking about.

eg:  for the population as a whole, it may be true that there are gender stereotypes which favour one sex over the other.    But in a sub-population already screened for certain attributes, the exact opposite may be true.   Eg:  Women in STEM careers may actually be better at their jobs because they have overcome certain societal pressures as well as any genetic disadvantage to achieve what they have achieved.