Perhaps you might want to ask yourself why you examined her argument with an eye to defeating it. You mention no points of hers you found worthy or acceptable (there are a few) so yours is not a balanced, dispassionate, disinterested critique. Your remarks constitute bias masquerading as critical rigour, which is the same game women in the sciences always have to deal with. We see you and see how this works, and it's the reason action needs to be taken.