Because this needs to be called out.
Speculative opinion pieces certainly have a place in modern journalism, but when those speculative piece writers are repeatedly off the mark, full of bias and twisted facts, they demean the organ that publishes. Fair comment? Not really. We saw the same writer trot out his equally worthless speculations in the months leading up to the election. Nothing he prophesied or claimed was accurate either in process or result.

In contrast, the Globe's Patrick Martin actually travelled to Ohio and reported it was hard to find women there voting for Hillary — http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/support-for-hillary-clinton-sparse-in-ohio/article32385151 — the exact opposite of claims made elsewhere in the Globe. Martin's reporting wasn't based on spin or gut feel, it was based on going there. When one listened to those who actually reported, one saw a different election race. The same is true since the election. Obama has been shameful. But let off hook.