I suppose there's a rationale for entrusting the review of this important book to an unpublished feminist pseudo-editor (what's an "editor-at-large", anyway?) from a long-irrelevant magazine (where is Doris Anderson these days?) but this boiler-plate insipid commentary fails.

Why a reviewer, so interested in feminist issues, would not identify the most basic question: Why did women fail to vote for Hillary? is problematical.

A grocery list of potential factors is not analysis or exposition of the title.