“I think the complainant in this case was an extraordinarily brave and persistent young woman to have to have gone through this twice,”
And yet found not credible by two different judges, one trying the case with the public spotlight fully focused on him. The two middle paragraphs are an attempt to make it seem like there is an epidemic of sexist judges. The entirety of the last four paragraphs of the article are an attempt to make this anonymous complainant look good. This isn't reporting it is at best an opinion piece that is proselytizing. Meanwhile this guy, whose presumption of innocence remains intact, has had his life turned upside down. Twice.