The original New York Times article profiled a period in Hillary Clinton's life--just after Bill Clinton lost the governorship of Arkansas--when they were younger and struggling more financially. The article highlights Hillary's initiative in improving the financial well-being of her family and how the birth of her child, Chelsea, was the impetus for her initiative. At that time there was no Clinton foundation and HRC had not formed the political relationships that she now has. 
That you "detest the nominees of both parties equally" or "Clinton a bit more than Trump" when HRC is a self-made woman whereas Trump is an heir who could and always did beg his daddy for more money when he ran out, which was frequently, demonstrates that you suffer from the same allergy to women exercising power that so many Trump supporters do. You don't measure HRC by the same standards as you do most other politicians who, by and large, follow the same routes to political success as she has.