SHE WAS BADLY ADVICED AS TO THE MANDATE OF HER POSITION .HERS WAS TO REPRESENT THE AU  BUT SHE SEEMED TO HAVE BEEN UNDER PRESSURE TO TAKE THE ANC WITH HER!HERS WAS NOT TO REFORM THE AU BUT TO PUSH SO THAT ALL MEMBER STATES INCORPORATE ITS HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER INTO THEIR CONSTITUTIONS THE WAY APARTHEID WASFORCED FORCED INTO EVERY INSTITUTION.HERS WAS TO DESTABILISE THE CONTINENT BY STRENGHTENING THE AU`S MILITARY OUTFIT TO BE EFFECTIVE IN ENDING WARS AND TO DEFEND AND PROTECT WOMEN AND CHILDREN DURING WARS!HERS WAS TO PROPOSE DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONAL LAWS TO EASE WOMEN OPPRESSION CAUSED BY THESE CHAUVINISTIC AND PARTRIACHIC CUSTOMARY LAWS.