This is an official editorial from the G&M? 

I don't think this was a massive issue overall, but let's be clear: the interaction wasn't the issue. The issue was the multiple accusations by the BC Liberals that this woman was an NDP plant, despite zero evidence to support this assertion (and her clear denials). Just as was seen with the blatantly false assertion of NDP hacking of BC Liberal servers (never happened).

How on earth does this editorial not even reference this fact?