It isn't remotely "abuse".  Whether you agree with the procedure or not, there are medically valid reasons for justifying circumcisions and very limited reasons not to do it as it doesn't really have any permanent negative consequences.  I would agree that the medical justifications are not strong and that it really comes down to a risk/benefit decision to be made by both parents but to call it "abuse" or put it in the same area code as female genital mutilation is silly.  It's much more like ear piercing for 12 year old girls (or baby's as sometimes Mom's do).  I personally don't care one way or the other but would go nuclear if a parent tattooed their child as there is no justifiable reason medically to do so (neither for ear piercing but that's easily reversed).