Another case of basic journalistic standards being tossed for virtue-signal barking at the wrong tree. 

First of all, the issue is not about whether the fellow is wrong on the official received catechism on gender relations, but about his right to argue a different position ...rather mildly, one might add... on an internal board after being assured that <i>diverse</i> opinions are welcome. 

Secondly, the situation of women in the workforce is not solely due to sexism. Women have preferences ...we can all engage in the messy fight about whether they are cultural, economic or biological... for certain occupations and work conditions. So, for example, as  women repeatedly indicate that by and large they do not want to make a career their number one aim, are not willing to work insane hours and spend half of their lives on travelling to useless boozy meetings, it would make more sense to address criteria for advancement, rather than to shout stale Third Wave Feminism slogans.