You know, people might actually take you seriously if your moniker was a bit more mature. 420? really? Do you really need proof to understand that humans are quite complex in total, and the assumption that all who identify as something alternate to what you consider the norm is a failure to understand that complexity. 

"Ron Boyer believes the election of Hillary Clinton would be a positive signal because she’s a woman (letters, May 21). Our president’s already dictated that a 15-year-old boy who “feels like” a girl must be allowed to use the girls’ restroom and even shower with the girls." ...this contains no logic. There is literally no association between the two sentences. The first is in regard to the gender of the President and the historical precedent that would be altered (similar to the first half-black pres), while the other criticizes the push towards civil rights for all, regardless of sexual orientation. Why not complain about LBGTQ folks in lavs? It's an irrelevant issue.