Demonstrating in a foreign country is not the same as hacking internal communications and leaking them to the press. Your engaging a logical fallacy by false comparison and then using it to make a claim of hypocrisy. Even if hypocrisy is a valid claim, it's a separate claim. 
Claims of hypocrisy are difficult to refute, and thus their attraction. First, it assumes actions by different people are comparable, as in the claim, "hypocrite, you did the same thing."
A person might slight Trump for his comments about women and believe the 10 women who said he sexually assaulted them. But then others might counter with claims that Lewinsky and Flowers were assaulted, claiming it's the same thing. But they are not the same thing AND both are inappropriate. Trump is not now excused because of what Clinton did?
Calling "hypocrite" redirects the original argument, usually to one of "oh, but he was not as bad." Then a new argument starts but each side rates the actions on a different scale. No end.