I posed a question to the SA (not that I really expect an answer).  Your argument holds true if someone thinks that an unborn baby is NOT human life.  If they does consider it human life (as I do), I just don't see how you can then argue that a woman's right to control her body supercedes the right to live.  I have yet to hear from ONE SINGLE person that can explain to me how they could justify such a thing.  Too me the only defense is that despite all the evidence, they don't consider an unborn human.