So  if I was censored, it MUST be because I was "uncivil" and must have angered *moderates*, it can't be because there are, in fact, several people here with extreme definitions of what is acceptable? Using "witch-hunt" and "extreme leftist fringe" in response is "uncivil", that is a moderate position? 

The theme is whether the CPC should "lose the anger", because only some fringe would respond, and I am responding with why at least one normally non-CPC voter is listening. Because it IS about Free Speech and the I word.

As for what was censored: saying one can see how the *I* word would be interpreted from what gets censored here. Period. Quite inflammatory stuff, huh?

Was threatened with banishment for approving as civil a mildly worded comment about how women are happier at home in a traditional role, etc. I voted no to is this a good comment, but yes to is it civil. Threat of banishment if I did it again!

Is this uncivil by any reasonable standard?