The businesses are specifically objecting to a medical product based on religious grounds. Doesn't matter how much you righties love your callous and immoral "they can always buy it themselves" excuses about access, for many women it's a hardship, and it's a public health issue that saves us all money when women have the ability to afford BC.

Freedom of association is irrelevant here. The government regulates business. Setting insurance standards is well within the constitutional powers of government. Same with setting standards regarding compensation (minimum wage). Religious zealots don't get to pick and choose what standards they want to adhere to, do business in American you need to abide by the same rules as everyone else.

And once again, health benefit plans are compensation, earned by the employee. The owner's religious freedom is not being violated by them not being able to tell their employees how to spend their earned compensation. That argument hasn't a leg to stand on.