Your own words: "This woman donates to and supports The Clinton Foundation, and Heather Bresch’s father is West Virginia Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin, a Hillary Clinton supporter and donor, as well. They have EVERYTHING to do with each other." (I don't know how to do those groovy italics, but, seriously, respect. It's like you're yelling, but with a jazz-fusion kind of vibe.)

Anyway, I think I see where your trouble originates. You are arguing backwards from conclusion to premise, a logical fallacy of the cart-before-the-horse variety.

Instead of starting with, "Hillary Clinton is Satan's sister, therefore she gets money from contributors who may later do bad things," try swapping them around: "Because people who may later do bad things give money to Hillary Clinton, she is Satan's sister." See? Problem solved, still no thinking required.

Also, don't exaggerate. Satan's sister-IN-LAW gives you that same oomph, but doesn't strain your credibility with your readers.

Enjoy homecoming!