{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rook/rook/issues/3104","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rook/rook","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rook/rook/issues/3104/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rook/rook/issues/3104/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rook/rook/issues/3104/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/3104","id":439865831,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWU0Mzk4NjU4MzE=","number":3104,"title":"Ceph Nautilus does not use msgr2 protocol if port is 6790 after upgrade from 0.9.3 to 1.0.0","user":{"login":"sinqinc","id":16611527,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE2NjExNTI3","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/16611527?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc","html_url":"https://github.com/sinqinc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinqinc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":405241115,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw0MDUyNDExMTU=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rook/rook/labels/bug","name":"bug","color":"ee0000","default":true}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2019-05-03T02:57:54Z","updated_at":"2019-05-09T04:27:33Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":" Bug Report\r\n\r\nAfter upgrade from Rook 0.9.3 to 1.0.0 Ceph complain that monitors can't use msgr2 protocol.\r\n\r\n**Environment**:\r\n* OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release):\r\nNAME=\"Container Linux by CoreOS\"\r\nID=coreos\r\nVERSION=2079.3.0\r\nVERSION_ID=2079.3.0\r\nBUILD_ID=2019-04-22-2119\r\nPRETTY_NAME=\"Container Linux by CoreOS 2079.3.0 (Rhyolite)\"\r\nANSI_COLOR=\"38;5;75\"\r\nHOME_URL=\"https://coreos.com/\"\r\nBUG_REPORT_URL=\"https://issues.coreos.com\"\r\nCOREOS_BOARD=\"amd64-usr\"\r\n\r\n* Kernel (e.g. `uname -a`):\r\nLinux coreos201 4.19.34-coreos #1 SMP Mon Apr 22 20:32:34 -00 2019 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6148 CPU @ 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux\r\n* Cloud provider or hardware configuration:\r\nCloudSigma\r\n* Rook version (use `rook version` inside of a Rook Pod):\r\n1.0.0\r\n* Kubernetes version (use `kubectl version`):\r\nClient Version: version.Info{Major:\"1\", Minor:\"12\", GitVersion:\"v1.12.1\", GitCommit:\"4ed3216f3ec431b140b1d899130a69fc671678f4\", GitTreeState:\"clean\", BuildDate:\"2018-10-05T16:46:06Z\", GoVersion:\"go1.10.4\", Compiler:\"gc\", Platform:\"linux/amd64\"}\r\nServer Version: version.Info{Major:\"1\", Minor:\"13\", GitVersion:\"v1.13.5\", GitCommit:\"2166946f41b36dea2c4626f90a77706f426cdea2\", GitTreeState:\"clean\", BuildDate:\"2019-03-25T15:19:22Z\", GoVersion:\"go1.11.5\", Compiler:\"gc\", Platform:\"linux/amd64\"}\r\n* Kubernetes cluster type (e.g. Tectonic, GKE, OpenShift):\r\nRKE (Rancher)\r\n* Storage backend status (e.g. for Ceph use `ceph health` in the [Rook Ceph toolbox](https://rook.io/docs/rook/master/ceph-toolbox.html)):\r\n2019-05-03 02:57:32.538 7f8a0f7fe700 -1 --2- 10.42.0.0:0/345491633 >> v2:10.43.180.58:6790/0 conn(0x7f8a10155690 0x7f8a10153670 unknown :-1 s=BANNER_CONNECTING pgs=0 cs=0 l=1 rx=0 tx=0)._handle_peer_banner peer v2:10.43.180.58:6790/0 is using msgr V1 protocol\r\nHEALTH_WARN 3 monitors have not enabled msgr2"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rook/rook/issues/comments/490738595","html_url":"https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/3104#issuecomment-490738595","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rook/rook/issues/3104","id":490738595,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5MDczODU5NQ==","user":{"login":"travisn","id":1048514,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjEwNDg1MTQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/1048514?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn","html_url":"https://github.com/travisn","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/travisn/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2019-05-09T04:27:33Z","updated_at":"2019-05-09T04:27:33Z","author_association":"MEMBER","body":"@conet I don't see why it would be necessary to add both ports to the service definition. When the new mons start they will be listening on 6789, while the old mons will be listening on 6790. I would expect that these single ports on their respective services would be sufficient. A couple other users also verified the original steps worked for them, but I must be missing something."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"travisn"}}