{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/issues/24","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/issues/24/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/issues/24/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/issues/24/events","html_url":"https://github.com/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/pull/24","id":546531945,"node_id":"MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzYwMTkyNjg2","number":24,"title":"Re-jigger logic for SVP Report based on additional test cases","user":{"login":"rowle1tj","id":131370,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjEzMTM3MA==","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/131370?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj","html_url":"https://github.com/rowle1tj","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rowle1tj/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2020-01-07T22:03:06Z","updated_at":"2020-01-08T15:06:14Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/pulls/24","html_url":"https://github.com/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/pull/24","diff_url":"https://github.com/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/pull/24.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/pull/24.patch"},"body":""},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/issues/comments/572110841","html_url":"https://github.com/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/pull/24#issuecomment-572110841","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/USGS-CIDA/aqcu-svp-report/issues/24","id":572110841,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3MjExMDg0MQ==","user":{"login":"zmoore-usgs","id":20842403,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjIwODQyNDAz","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/20842403?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs","html_url":"https://github.com/zmoore-usgs","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/zmoore-usgs/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2020-01-08T15:06:14Z","updated_at":"2020-01-08T15:06:14Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"Also just an FYI we don't generally worry about small coverage drops (i.e: < 1% like this one) so even though it's showing a fail that can be ignored since it's such a small amount"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"zmoore-usgs"}}