{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/issues/8","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/issues/8/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/issues/8/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/issues/8/events","html_url":"https://github.com/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/pull/8","id":433427872,"node_id":"MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjcwNjMxNzc1","number":8,"title":"Address feedback from IETF 104:","user":{"login":"tfpauly","id":1609964,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE2MDk5NjQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/1609964?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly","html_url":"https://github.com/tfpauly","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2019-04-15T18:50:37Z","updated_at":"2019-05-20T16:28:12Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"COLLABORATOR","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/pulls/8","html_url":"https://github.com/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/pull/8","diff_url":"https://github.com/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/pull/8.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/pull/8.patch"},"body":"- Set values in inner RA message header\r\n- Register media type for JSON\r\n- Remove \"x-\" recommendation\r\n\r\nI didn't go with the \"IETF-\" prefix for now, since I think that becomes a bit messy. The recommendation from RFC 6648 seems to be that we just allow easy additions of new keys to be standardized."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/issues/comments/494059125","html_url":"https://github.com/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/pull/8#issuecomment-494059125","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IPv6-mPvD/mpvd-ietf-drafts/issues/8","id":494059125,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NDA1OTEyNQ==","user":{"login":"tfpauly","id":1609964,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE2MDk5NjQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/1609964?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly","html_url":"https://github.com/tfpauly","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/tfpauly/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2019-05-20T16:28:12Z","updated_at":"2019-05-20T16:28:12Z","author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"I don't love having the top-level standard keys be marked \"ietf\", as that brands the tech really strongly to IETF standards. If you had some other standards body adding in values into the IANA registry with expert review, would they have some other category (as a straw man)?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"tfpauly"}}