{"push_id":2381949776,"size":2,"distinct_size":0,"ref":"refs/heads/canary","head":"5ada55b9a81161728f1cb33e3d77d1420a85cb54","before":"15f86e158a2696ed0b9e1169e74f4e44adc297a0","commits":[{"sha":"6c64cf17155688f7086dbb0490da15417c8e9b41","author":{"name":"Alex Navasardyan","email":"e1f124ede7625663dd6ad91868ed49070ec1a4f5@gmail.com"},"message":"Extract `contentFor` into `ember-app-utils`\n\nMain motivation behind this change is on-going extraction into default\npackager. Because, we previously bound `contentFor` to application's\ncontext, it was harder to extract the way we assemble certain trees\n(config tree, for example).\n\nThis change does the following:\n\n+ removes that binding and replaces it with explicit contract (we pass\nnow pass in additional `options` object) which makes it easier to test\n(no need to set up `EmberApp`) and easier to reason about\n+ adds missing tests for both \"app-boot\" and \"test-body-footer\"\ntypes\n+ removes `contentFor` method from `EmberApp`: not a breaking change\nsince it is a private method","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ember-cli/ember-cli/commits/6c64cf17155688f7086dbb0490da15417c8e9b41"},{"sha":"5ada55b9a81161728f1cb33e3d77d1420a85cb54","author":{"name":"Alex Navasardyan","email":"a2571bc212163f96d224f2fe9771368d262c523b@users.noreply.github.com"},"message":"Merge pull request #7656 from twokul/content-for\n\nExtract `contentFor` into `ember-app-utils`","distinct":false,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ember-cli/ember-cli/commits/5ada55b9a81161728f1cb33e3d77d1420a85cb54"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ember-cli-canary-sync"}}