{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle/issues/384","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle/issues/384/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle/issues/384/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle/issues/384/events","html_url":"https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle/issues/384","id":321583438,"number":384,"title":"Move to fsprojects?","user":{"login":"dsyme","id":7204669,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/7204669?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme","html_url":"https://github.com/dsyme","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2018-05-09T14:02:16Z","updated_at":"2018-05-10T00:59:05Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"I value Deedle and think it's a good addition to the ecosystem.   At least, there should be an active data frame library designed specifically for use from F#.\r\n\r\nHowever, as discussed [here](https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle/issues/383), it seems that Blue Mountain Capital is no longer contributing a maintainer for this component? If so it seems it would be valid to either move the repo to https://github.com/fsprojects? Or take a clone of the repo and issues into there?\r\n\r\nFrom my experience projects in `fsprojects` stand a higher chance of bringing new community maintainers on board.  It doesn't always work, but it has worked for other projects such as `FAKE`, `Paket`, `FSharp.Control.AsyncSeq` and many others.\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle/issues/comments/387918704","html_url":"https://github.com/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle/issues/384#issuecomment-387918704","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/BlueMountainCapital/Deedle/issues/384","id":387918704,"user":{"login":"dsyme","id":7204669,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/7204669?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme","html_url":"https://github.com/dsyme","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/dsyme/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-05-10T00:59:05Z","updated_at":"2018-05-10T00:59:05Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"I'm not sure about documentation.  I think the documentation will just appear at the new site, but yes any explicit links back to this sit will be broken . Github does a great job of redirecting everything else though.  \r\n\r\nfslaborg  makes sense at the high level. However if you I think you/we should resolve a couple of things about fslaborg to make it a healthier space for incubation?\r\n\r\n* Give it a better front page like https://github.com/fsprojects explicitly calling out that it's a space for incubation.  The automated listing of repos and incubation policy in a nice way makes it feel cosy too.\r\n\r\n* Decide if FsLab as \"a collective bundle of curated software\" is going to continue or not. For better or worse people will perceive the health of projects under fslaborg through the lens of \"Can I install and use FsLab\".  fsprojects is different that way - everyone knows fsprojects is \"alive\" even if half the projects in it are actually \"dead\"....\r\n\r\nIn short if we go down that route then make fslaborg a data-science oriented incubation space like more like fsprojects?\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"dsyme"}}