{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/778","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/778/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/778/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/778/events","html_url":"https://github.com/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/778","id":321281210,"number":778,"title":"Create & label P1 issues needed for an initial release of Horvod support","user":{"login":"jlewi","id":777219,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/777219?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi","html_url":"https://github.com/jlewi","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jlewi/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":926796042,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/labels/area/horvod","name":"area/horvod","color":"9177e5","default":false},{"id":806984230,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/labels/priority/p1","name":"priority/p1","color":"db03cc","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2018-05-08T17:41:58Z","updated_at":"2018-05-08T22:44:03Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"We should create issues for everything that needs to happen to do an initial release of Horvod support. All such issues should be priority/p1.\r\n\r\nWe'd like to include Horvod in our 0.2 release. We need to figure out all the work that needs to happen to support that. \r\n\r\nI created the label area/horvod\r\n\r\nAnyone in the org should be able to label issues as follows\r\n\r\n/area horvod\r\n/priority p1\r\n\r\n@jiezhang @everpeace Could you take a stab at coming up with a list of issues and labeling existing issues?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/comments/387565668","html_url":"https://github.com/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/778#issuecomment-387565668","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/778","id":387565668,"user":{"login":"everpeace","id":608782,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/608782?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace","html_url":"https://github.com/everpeace","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/everpeace/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-05-08T22:44:03Z","updated_at":"2018-05-08T22:44:03Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"@jlewi Yeah, naming is a bit complicated.  as jiezhang said, openmpi package is technically independent from Horovod.  And, actually, I'm using this package with [Chainer](https://chainer.org/)/[ChainerMN](https://github.com/chainer/chainermn).\r\n\r\n> Could you take a stab at coming up with a list of issues and labeling existing issues?\r\n\r\nSure.  I'm happy to do it.  Here are several new issues which I would like to put in 0.2. \r\nWhat do you think @jiezhang ??\r\n\r\n- support securityContext(especially `RunAs`)\r\n  - In our cluster, we use NFS.  when mounting NFS, we prohibit users to run pods with root from security reason. \r\n- support volume and volume mounts (relates to #713 ?)\r\n- pave e2e test (at least on basic sample??)\r\n- (low priority) support `initContainer`\r\n  - Imagine pulling user code via `git-sync` or so.\r\n\r\n> labeling existing issues?\r\n\r\n@jlewi I opened three PR yesterday,  How should I handle them?  I think I would create stab isseues for them and put the label.  Is that ok?? cc/ @jiezhang \r\n\r\noff topic here though, I'm now thinking  I would make a proposal of `chainer-operator` by the way.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"everpeace"}}