{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/723","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/723/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/723/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/723/events","html_url":"https://github.com/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/723","id":317648777,"number":723,"title":"UID of JupyterHub image","user":{"login":"pdmack","id":2380545,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2380545?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack","html_url":"https://github.com/pdmack","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pdmack/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-04-25T14:17:49Z","updated_at":"2018-04-25T14:25:18Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"MEMBER","body":"Some Kube platforms such as OpenShift by default have restricted UID ranges for any new project or namespace, thus necessitating this troubleshooting [note](https://github.com/pdmack/kubeflow/blob/master/user_guide.md#openshift).\r\n\r\nWe should look at making modifications to our JupyterHub image similar to what the [radanalytics.io](https://radanalytics.io/) project has done for some of its images.\r\n/cc @tmckayus \r\n/cc @willb "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/comments/384305895","html_url":"https://github.com/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/723#issuecomment-384305895","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/kubeflow/kubeflow/issues/723","id":384305895,"user":{"login":"willb","id":1161,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/1161?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb","html_url":"https://github.com/willb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/willb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-04-25T14:25:17Z","updated_at":"2018-04-25T14:25:17Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"I agree that it would be great to get rid of the `anyuid` workaround wherever possible.  I'll try and take a look at this this week."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"willb"}}