{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netket/netket/issues/128","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netket/netket","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netket/netket/issues/128/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netket/netket/issues/128/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netket/netket/issues/128/events","html_url":"https://github.com/netket/netket/pull/128","id":390313852,"node_id":"MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjM4MTA3MTIy","number":128,"title":"Remove dependence from mpi4py directly calling MPI_Init and MPI_Finalize","user":{"login":"gcarleo","id":28149892,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI4MTQ5ODky","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/28149892?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo","html_url":"https://github.com/gcarleo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2018-12-12T16:47:16Z","updated_at":"2018-12-12T18:53:39Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netket/netket/pulls/128","html_url":"https://github.com/netket/netket/pull/128","diff_url":"https://github.com/netket/netket/pull/128.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/netket/netket/pull/128.patch"},"body":"A slightly different approach to what proposed by @twesterhout in #109 , with the help of @femtobit "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netket/netket/issues/comments/446701100","html_url":"https://github.com/netket/netket/pull/128#issuecomment-446701100","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/netket/netket/issues/128","id":446701100,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NjcwMTEwMA==","user":{"login":"gcarleo","id":28149892,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI4MTQ5ODky","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/28149892?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo","html_url":"https://github.com/gcarleo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/gcarleo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-12-12T18:53:39Z","updated_at":"2018-12-12T18:53:39Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"@twesterhout I thought that putting it inside a module would guarantee that the member would be destructed by the garbage collector in python. It seems that unfortunately this is not the case, at least this should be the reason why the linux tests are failing here... Your solution to have a static variable however also doesn't have guarantees? "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"gcarleo"}}