{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Kennisland/EuropeanaLicensingFramework/issues/17","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Kennisland/EuropeanaLicensingFramework","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Kennisland/EuropeanaLicensingFramework/issues/17/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Kennisland/EuropeanaLicensingFramework/issues/17/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Kennisland/EuropeanaLicensingFramework/issues/17/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Kennisland/EuropeanaLicensingFramework/issues/17","id":305159134,"number":17,"title":"DEA review: Adding a reference to the Europeana Publishing Framework ","user":{"login":"paul2keller","id":5593766,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/5593766?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller","html_url":"https://github.com/paul2keller","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/paul2keller/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-03-14T13:31:45Z","updated_at":"2018-03-14T13:31:45Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"Some of you have noted that we should include a reference to the Europeana Publishing Framework to the Definition of Metadata Specifications. This rationale for this would be that the EPF provides minimum requirements that need to be met.\r\n\r\nWe do not believe that this is currently true (there are no minimum requirements in the EPF) and even if it was referencing the EPF would be a bad idea.    \r\n\r\nThe Europeana Publishing Framework document as available at [https://pro.europeana.eu/post/publishing-framework](https://pro.europeana.eu/post/publishing-framework) does not contain any mandatory requirements. It does reference the Europeana Publishing Guide available at [https://pro.europeana.eu/post/publication-policy](https://pro.europeana.eu/post/publication-policy) which contains a section 3.6 titled \"Minimum requirements for digital objects\". However this section does not contain language that establishes minimum requirements for previews, it simply encourages the submission of previews (\"you should provide\",\"we recommend that you provide\"). These are recommendations and not minimum requirements and as such do not need to be referenced in the DEA.  \r\n\r\nEven if these recommendations would become minimum requirements at some stage we believe that instead of referencing the Publishing Guide we should ensure that these minimum requirements are specified directly in the EDM specifications. If we follow this approach there is no need to reference additional external documents."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"paul2keller"}}