{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Workiva/workflow/issues/12","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Workiva/workflow","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Workiva/workflow/issues/12/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Workiva/workflow/issues/12/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Workiva/workflow/issues/12/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Workiva/workflow/pull/12","id":351667951,"node_id":"MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjA5MjA0NTI2","number":12,"title":"Simplify Testing Principles in Team Agreement","user":{"login":"leviwith-wf","id":3202589,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMyMDI1ODk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/3202589?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf","html_url":"https://github.com/leviwith-wf","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2018-08-17T16:58:37Z","updated_at":"2018-08-24T19:07:29Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Workiva/workflow/pulls/12","html_url":"https://github.com/Workiva/workflow/pull/12","diff_url":"https://github.com/Workiva/workflow/pull/12.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/Workiva/workflow/pull/12.patch"},"body":"## Problem\r\nMuch of the testing-related documentation in the leftover skaardb team agreement is specific to that team’s testing process. Other parts are complex to the point of being difficult to consume and enact.\r\n\r\n## Solution\r\n- Try to boil down initial WAP quality principles to a concise set of guidelines included in our current Code Review agreement.\r\n- Remove testing-related chapters from our current team agreement, with the understanding that we can introduce our own versions of these as the need arises."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Workiva/workflow/issues/comments/415854330","html_url":"https://github.com/Workiva/workflow/pull/12#issuecomment-415854330","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Workiva/workflow/issues/12","id":415854330,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxNTg1NDMzMA==","user":{"login":"leviwith-wf","id":3202589,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMyMDI1ODk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/3202589?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf","html_url":"https://github.com/leviwith-wf","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leviwith-wf/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-08-24T19:07:29Z","updated_at":"2018-08-24T19:07:29Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"@nateallen-wk yeah, ok. The type of tests could be any of the above IMO, just what we feel is the best approach to cover a specific change. I re-linked to a Workiva blog post about test-types, perhaps this can enhance clarity. \r\n\r\nI think the ultimate aim here should be the idea that the testing story should always be included in the conversation, even if it's not literally paired to the change. "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"leviwith-wf"}}