{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tuvtran/project-based-learning/issues/143","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tuvtran/project-based-learning","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tuvtran/project-based-learning/issues/143/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tuvtran/project-based-learning/issues/143/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tuvtran/project-based-learning/issues/143/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tuvtran/project-based-learning/issues/143","id":377968092,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNzc5NjgwOTI=","number":143,"title":"Proposal for better gatekeeping: stick to masterpiece materials","user":{"login":"guilsa","id":6107640,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjYxMDc2NDA=","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/6107640?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa","html_url":"https://github.com/guilsa","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/guilsa/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-11-06T18:03:59Z","updated_at":"2018-11-06T18:03:59Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"### Description\r\n\r\nCan we please refrain from adding things if content isn’t unique? \r\n<!--- Provide a detailed description of the change or addition you are proposing -->\r\n\r\n### Why\r\n\r\nI’ve been following the changes happening lately and I’m concerned making changes to this repo is turning into a popularity contest. Below are a few reasons why.\r\n\r\n### Possible Implementations\r\n\r\nI propose contributors ask themselves these questions before opening a PR:\r\n\r\n- Does the writing follow a unique pedagogy? \r\n- Does the writing put you outside your comfort zone by taking an unfamiliar and scary topic and making you happy, instead of overwhelmed?\r\n- Is the writing from a portal, aggregator or a commercial site (constains ads, etc)? That should be a yellow flag as these places favor breath over depth.\r\n\r\nA few other random points: \r\n\r\n- I would prefer that topics ensure test of time and that they stay away from frameworks. Thoughts here?\r\n- If we link to an aggregator site, we defeat the point of being curators here.\r\n\r\n<!--- Why is this change important to you? How would you use it? -->\r\n\r\n\r\n<!--- Not obligatory, but suggest an idea for implementing addition or change -->\r\n\r\n<!--- What still needs to be discussed -->\r\n\r\n### Is this something you're interested in working on?\r\n\r\n<!--- Yes or no -->\r\n- [x] YES\r\n- [ ] NO"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"guilsa"}}