{"push_id":2320896169,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/telemetry_et_al","head":"16ee14aa846be6437dd21bb8fec28655e41fd0fc","before":"57c380ab8e153e4b3c39c16d1a30b6501bc68462","commits":[{"sha":"ab410655b3aa1f4924fe5a4f58e24a1c8b19d026","author":{"name":"Brian L. Troutwine","email":"52eddd4f667f56b34f7c36ac14536ed56cf5efc2@postmates.com"},"message":"Passing tests on deque\n\nWe still yet need to do an AFL run and longer-duration QC runs as\nwell but this is progress. The primary change is we no longer point\nto contiguous options but to const pointers, being sure to synchronize\non size as AoMP suggests for ARM and friends' sake.\n\nSpecial thanks to https://users.rust-lang.org/t/why-do-my-distinct-values-resolve-to-the-same-pointer/15517/3\nfor help figuring out my stack allocation issue.\n\nSigned-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <blt@postmates.com>","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/postmates/hopper/commits/ab410655b3aa1f4924fe5a4f58e24a1c8b19d026"},{"sha":"16ee14aa846be6437dd21bb8fec28655e41fd0fc","author":{"name":"Brian L. Troutwine","email":"52eddd4f667f56b34f7c36ac14536ed56cf5efc2@postmates.com"},"message":"Worked myself into a corner, but closer to done\n\nI've currently got a double mut issue with the way deque works\nbut I'm closer to where I need to be. Namely, the sender / receiver\n_should_ have fine grained control over their locks and the sender\nloop is closer to functional. Now I just have to figure out how\nto take a lock and then meddle with it. I think the answer is\npushing InnerQueue back up into Queue.\n\nSigned-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <blt@postmates.com>","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/postmates/hopper/commits/16ee14aa846be6437dd21bb8fec28655e41fd0fc"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"blt"}}