{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/circleci/circleci-docs/issues/355","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/circleci/circleci-docs","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/circleci/circleci-docs/issues/355/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/circleci/circleci-docs/issues/355/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/circleci/circleci-docs/issues/355/events","html_url":"https://github.com/circleci/circleci-docs/issues/355","id":180496161,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUxODA0OTYxNjE=","number":355,"title":"Update URL to use for viewing branch statuses on all repos (_cc1/polling-project-status.md)","user":{"login":"ljwagerfield","id":3638917,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjM2Mzg5MTc=","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/3638917?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield","html_url":"https://github.com/ljwagerfield","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljwagerfield/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2016-10-02T05:25:46Z","updated_at":"2018-09-04T16:39:50Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"Which URL do I use to view the status of all branches on all repositories?\n\nThe documentation implies the following URL should work...\n\n`https://circleci.com/cc.xml?circle-token=:circle-token`\n\n.. but this only returns the state of the `master` branch for each repository.\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/circleci/circleci-docs/issues/comments/418436493","html_url":"https://github.com/circleci/circleci-docs/issues/355#issuecomment-418436493","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/circleci/circleci-docs/issues/355","id":418436493,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxODQzNjQ5Mw==","user":{"login":"reebalazs","id":490635,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjQ5MDYzNQ==","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/490635?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs","html_url":"https://github.com/reebalazs","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/reebalazs/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-09-04T16:39:50Z","updated_at":"2018-09-04T16:39:50Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"Hi @smart-alek, thanks for looking at this! Originally I used this on CircleCI 1.0, and it was failing. Just a few days ago, I migrated this stuff on CircleCI 2.0, so now I am trying to use it on 2.0 and it fails the same way.\r\n\r\nI've never found the link in the document that you've just quoted, and it probably would have solved my problem on Circle 1, but since Circle 1 is deprecated and closed, my interest is now to make this work on CircleCI 2.0. That said, besides fixing the results to reflect all branches instead of master only, I think it _might_ make sense also to change the status in a way that it polls the workflow results instead of the job results, or provide an alternate way to poll workflows, so that the users decide whether to poll the results for whole workflows or individual jobs only. (To me workflow results seem more useful at the first sight, but I might be wrong.)\r\n\r\nThanks again!"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"reebalazs"}}