{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/htmlburger/wpemerge/issues/7","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/htmlburger/wpemerge","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/htmlburger/wpemerge/issues/7/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/htmlburger/wpemerge/issues/7/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/htmlburger/wpemerge/issues/7/events","html_url":"https://github.com/htmlburger/wpemerge/issues/7","id":354130277,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNTQxMzAyNzc=","number":7,"title":"Feature request: app_partial function that returns instead of echoes","user":{"login":"VesterDe","id":722505,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjcyMjUwNQ==","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/722505?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe","html_url":"https://github.com/VesterDe","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2018-08-26T21:23:05Z","updated_at":"2018-08-28T10:14:20Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"Would it be against the general design of this framework to make a new function (let's say) app_partial_s, which is exactly the same as app_partial, but returns the output of the composed View, instead of echoing it?\r\n\r\nI want to handle shortcodes within wpemerge, and app_partial can't work in that situation, since it echoes.\r\n\r\nI can write the PR, if it's approved.\r\n\r\nEdit: To clarify, I can wrap ob_start() around it, but I'd rather not."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/htmlburger/wpemerge/issues/comments/416529426","html_url":"https://github.com/htmlburger/wpemerge/issues/7#issuecomment-416529426","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/htmlburger/wpemerge/issues/7","id":416529426,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxNjUyOTQyNg==","user":{"login":"VesterDe","id":722505,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjcyMjUwNQ==","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/722505?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe","html_url":"https://github.com/VesterDe","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/VesterDe/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-08-28T10:14:20Z","updated_at":"2018-08-28T10:14:20Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"Yeah ok, I saw that, I guess that also an ok option.\r\n\r\nThanks."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"VesterDe"}}