{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/925","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/925/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/925/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/925/events","html_url":"https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/925","id":302606692,"number":925,"title":"Exporting the reference of a journal's double issues","user":{"login":"laspic","id":3339204,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/3339204?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic","html_url":"https://github.com/laspic","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/laspic/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":57237790,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/labels/awaiting-user-feedback","name":"awaiting-user-feedback","color":"b60205","default":false},{"id":231666162,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/labels/question","name":"question","color":"006b75","default":true}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":39,"created_at":"2018-03-06T08:30:50Z","updated_at":"2018-03-31T23:02:21Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"- [x] I have verified that I am on the latest release of BBT (https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/releases/latest) and Zotero\r\n- [x] I am posting a single question, bug or feature request\r\n- [x] I have included a descriptive subject of the problem\r\n- [x] I am available for follow-up questions and testing\r\n\r\n## Exporting references\r\nI noticed something strange when exporting the reference of a journal's double issue. \r\n\r\nHere is two slightly different references:\r\n- Bob Bob, « A Very Nice Title », Annual Review of Nothing 10, **nᵒ 2** (1996)\r\n- John John, « A Nice Title », Annual Review of Something 10, **nᵒ 2‑3** (1996).\r\n\r\nHere is what ZBB gives when exporting them in .bib file, using Better BibLaTeX format:\r\n```\r\n@article{Bob1996,\r\n  title = {A {{Very Nice Title}}},\r\n  volume = {10},\r\n  number = {2},\r\n  journaltitle = {Annual Review of Nothing},\r\n  date = {1996},\r\n  author = {Bob, Bob}\r\n}\r\n\r\n@article{John1996,\r\n  title = {A {{Nice Title}}},\r\n  volume = {10},\r\n  issue = {2-3},\r\n  journaltitle = {Annual Review of Something},\r\n  date = {1996},\r\n  author = {John, John}\r\n}\r\n\r\n```\r\n\r\nWhy does the field name 'number' turns into 'issue' when its content is not a specifically numerical value? Is it a bug or a feature ?\r\nWhen you customize a biblatex style, dealing with that causes some headaches ! :-)\r\n\r\nReport ID : 4DCD7RZU\r\n\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/comments/377729531","html_url":"https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/925#issuecomment-377729531","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/retorquere/zotero-better-bibtex/issues/925","id":377729531,"user":{"login":"retorquere","id":132108,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/132108?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere","html_url":"https://github.com/retorquere","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/retorquere/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-03-31T23:02:21Z","updated_at":"2018-03-31T23:02:21Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"All my tests pass on the new rules. Could you guys give 6116 a go to see if it behaves as you want?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"retorquere"}}