{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SICKAG/sick_safetyscanners/issues/1","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SICKAG/sick_safetyscanners","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SICKAG/sick_safetyscanners/issues/1/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SICKAG/sick_safetyscanners/issues/1/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SICKAG/sick_safetyscanners/issues/1/events","html_url":"https://github.com/SICKAG/sick_safetyscanners/issues/1","id":379087581,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNzkwODc1ODE=","number":1,"title":"/sick_safetyscanners/laser_scan publish frequency is very slow (1.6 - 2Hz)","user":{"login":"xdaco","id":3727335,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjM3MjczMzU=","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/3727335?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco","html_url":"https://github.com/xdaco","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2018-11-09T09:35:19Z","updated_at":"2018-11-10T03:57:49Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"Hi, I am testing Microscan3 Pro  (MICS3-CBAZ55IZ1) . I am experiencing very slow laser_scan messages and occasional TCP error code: 0. The average publish frequency is around 1.6Hz to 2 Hz even after setting the publish frequency to 50Hz with Dynamic reconfigure. Can anyone point me some direction to resolve this ?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SICKAG/sick_safetyscanners/issues/comments/437556129","html_url":"https://github.com/SICKAG/sick_safetyscanners/issues/1#issuecomment-437556129","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SICKAG/sick_safetyscanners/issues/1","id":437556129,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNzU1NjEyOQ==","user":{"login":"xdaco","id":3727335,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjM3MjczMzU=","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/3727335?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco","html_url":"https://github.com/xdaco","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/xdaco/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-11-10T03:57:49Z","updated_at":"2018-11-10T03:57:49Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"Thank you so much for your reply.  Yes, this clears the issue. TCP error 0 should not be reported as ROS_ERROR as this is misleading.  Also, I think the dynamic reconfigure window is misleading as one can assume that publishing frequency as the message publishing frequency as this is not consistent with the next param viewing angle."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"xdaco"}}