{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tristen/tablesort/issues/94","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tristen/tablesort","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tristen/tablesort/issues/94/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tristen/tablesort/issues/94/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tristen/tablesort/issues/94/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tristen/tablesort/issues/94","id":117922282,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUxMTc5MjIyODI=","number":94,"title":"Allow sort types to be included with Browserify","user":{"login":"ryangiglio","id":314511,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMxNDUxMQ==","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/314511?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio","html_url":"https://github.com/ryangiglio","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ryangiglio/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2015-11-19T22:23:46Z","updated_at":"2018-07-31T16:02:02Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"Currently you can require('tablesort') to get the basic functionality, but there's no way to require the additional sorting functions into a Browserify project.\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tristen/tablesort/issues/comments/409274750","html_url":"https://github.com/tristen/tablesort/issues/94#issuecomment-409274750","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tristen/tablesort/issues/94","id":409274750,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwOTI3NDc1MA==","user":{"login":"olets","id":3282350,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMyODIzNTA=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/3282350?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets","html_url":"https://github.com/olets","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/olets/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-07-31T16:02:02Z","updated_at":"2018-07-31T16:02:02Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"A fancy refactor would be neat, but I wonder if a much simpler solution would be just as good.\r\n\r\n@tristen how would you feel about simply adding oob support for all the sorts? In this day and age of `import`/`require`, this issue is going to be a common stumbling block. To my thinking the value this would add easily outweighs the drag of increased size."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"olets"}}