{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dbplyr/issues/113","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dbplyr","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dbplyr/issues/113/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dbplyr/issues/113/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dbplyr/issues/113/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tidyverse/dbplyr/issues/113","id":335371121,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMzUzNzExMjE=","number":113,"title":"Add option for NOLOCK against MS SQL Server","user":{"login":"move[bot]","id":33596368,"node_id":"MDM6Qm90MzM1OTYzNjg=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/in/6673?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D","html_url":"https://github.com/apps/move","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/move%5Bbot%5D/received_events","type":"Bot","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2018-06-25T11:43:47Z","updated_at":"2018-09-18T16:30:47Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"*@mkirzon commented on Apr 5, 2018, 11:38 PM UTC:*\n\nWhen using dplyr directly against databases, it'd be helpful to have a NOLOCK options when configuring table connections.\n\nThis is a common practice in MSSQL to ensure complex queries don't lock the database for other read/writes. The tradeoff is that the read may be uncommited so this should be a toggleable option.\n\n*This issue was moved by [krlmlr](https://github.com/krlmlr) from tidyverse/dplyr/issues/3484.*"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dbplyr/issues/comments/422461176","html_url":"https://github.com/tidyverse/dbplyr/issues/113#issuecomment-422461176","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dbplyr/issues/113","id":422461176,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyMjQ2MTE3Ng==","user":{"login":"Prometheus77","id":2449309,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI0NDkzMDk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/2449309?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77","html_url":"https://github.com/Prometheus77","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Prometheus77/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-09-18T16:30:47Z","updated_at":"2018-09-18T16:30:47Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"Until this gets incorporated into the package, is there a hacky way that we can put this into our code, e.g. dropping a sql(\"WITH NOLOCK\") somewhere into the code?\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Prometheus77"}}