{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/arpitbbhayani/umysql3/issues/5","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/arpitbbhayani/umysql3","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/arpitbbhayani/umysql3/issues/5/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/arpitbbhayani/umysql3/issues/5/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/arpitbbhayani/umysql3/issues/5/events","html_url":"https://github.com/arpitbbhayani/umysql3/issues/5","id":377113195,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNzcxMTMxOTU=","number":5,"title":"socket receive buffer full","user":{"login":"jacob019","id":1281112,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjEyODExMTI=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/1281112?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019","html_url":"https://github.com/jacob019","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jacob019/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-11-04T02:16:47Z","updated_at":"2018-11-04T02:16:47Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"First, thanks for making this fork, it really saved me.\r\n\r\nQueries with large responses result in the socket receive buffer full error. This is a known old issue.  There are several open pull requests on esnme/ultramysql.\r\n\r\nI think this is the best fix:\r\nhttps://github.com/esnme/ultramysql/pull/64\r\nI'm not sure about changing the response type for decimal columns, that seems like a different issues and may affect application behavior.\r\n\r\nWould it be possible to merge this change into your branch?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jacob019"}}