{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TRIQS/dft_tools/issues/102","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TRIQS/dft_tools","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TRIQS/dft_tools/issues/102/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TRIQS/dft_tools/issues/102/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TRIQS/dft_tools/issues/102/events","html_url":"https://github.com/TRIQS/dft_tools/issues/102","id":354226264,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNTQyMjYyNjQ=","number":102,"title":"SrVO3","user":{"login":"Reyhanehe","id":32782014,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMyNzgyMDE0","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/32782014?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe","html_url":"https://github.com/Reyhanehe","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2018-08-27T08:24:47Z","updated_at":"2018-08-27T10:30:26Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"### **Dear** all\r\n### Hi\r\n### I executed DFT+DMFT calculation for SrVO3 compound . At the end of each itration I have the below context when I used \"cat nohup.out\" in the folder that I run the DFT+DMFT calculation for SrVO3 on it , for example foe itration 21 I have :\r\n**\"Iteration =  21\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.204657  \r\n    Total Density = 12.937535\r\n    0.295343 < Chemical Potential < -0.204657\r\n    13.092914 < Total Density < 12.937535\r\n    0.295343 < Chemical Potential < 0.294309\r\n    13.092914 < Total Density < 13.092523\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 2 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092523;Chemical Potential = 0.294309\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.095606\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.49783*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.49783*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.49783*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.49783*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.49783*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.49783*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; Insert error : recovering ... \r\n16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; Insert error : recovering ... \r\n61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0111467\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0109014\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0109503\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0110411\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0113811\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0111705\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0114359\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0111465\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0109043\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0109496\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0110389\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0113763\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0111686\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0114414\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.170339\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 3188 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.107030\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 5.784678\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 5.784678\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.766440115718\"**\r\n### Is it error in my calculation or not?\r\n### if \"yes\" how can I solve this problem?\r\n### .I need to know this subject as soon as possible .\r\n### thanks to all for your attention to my request\r\n### best"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TRIQS/dft_tools/issues/comments/416184712","html_url":"https://github.com/TRIQS/dft_tools/issues/102#issuecomment-416184712","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/TRIQS/dft_tools/issues/102","id":416184712,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxNjE4NDcxMg==","user":{"login":"Reyhanehe","id":32782014,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMyNzgyMDE0","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/32782014?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe","html_url":"https://github.com/Reyhanehe","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Reyhanehe/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-08-27T10:30:26Z","updated_at":"2018-08-27T10:30:26Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"\r\n### Dear Alex. thanks for your comment. I had not another error in my calculation.but these lines are ### repeated in each itration:\r\n\"Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\n Move set Insert two operators: 0.0111467\r\n Move Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0109014\r\n Move Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0109503\r\n Move Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0110411\r\n Move Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0113811\r\n Move Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0111705\r\n Move Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0114359\r\n Move set Remove two operators: 0.0111465\r\n Move Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0109043\r\n Move Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0109496\r\n Move Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0110389\r\n Move Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0113763\r\n Move Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0111686\r\n Move Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0114414\r\n Move Shift one operator: 0.170339\"\r\n### I use the below \"case.py\" for my calculation:\r\n\"import pytriqs.utility.mpi as mpi\r\nfrom pytriqs.operators.util import *\r\nfrom pytriqs.archive import HDFArchive\r\nfrom pytriqs.applications.impurity_solvers.cthyb import *\r\nfrom pytriqs.gf.local import *\r\nfrom pytriqs.applications.dft.sumk_dft import *\r\nfrom pytriqs.applications.dft.converters.wien2k_converter import *\r\n\r\ndft_filename='5'\r\nU = 9.6\r\nJ = 0.8\r\nbeta = 40\r\nloops = 400                      # Number of DMFT sc-loops\r\nsigma_mix = 1.0                  # Mixing factor of Sigma after solution of the AIM\r\ndelta_mix = 1.0                  # Mixing factor of Delta as input for the AIM\r\ndc_type = 0                      # DC type: 0 FLL, 1 Held, 2 AMF\r\nuse_blocks = True                # use bloc structure from DFT input\r\nprec_mu = 0.0001\r\nh_field = 0.0\r\n\r\n# Solver parameters\r\np = {}\r\np[\"max_time\"] = -1\r\np[\"random_seed\"] = 123 * mpi.rank + 567\r\np[\"length_cycle\"] = 200\r\np[\"n_warmup_cycles\"] = 100000\r\np[\"n_cycles\"] = 1000000\r\np[\"perform_tail_fit\"] = True\r\np[\"fit_max_moment\"] = 4\r\np[\"fit_min_n\"] = 30\r\np[\"fit_max_n\"] = 60\r\n\r\nConverter = Wien2kConverter(filename=dft_filename, repacking=True)\r\nConverter.convert_dft_input()\r\nmpi.barrier()\r\n\r\nprevious_runs = 0\r\nprevious_present = False\r\nif mpi.is_master_node():\r\n    f = HDFArchive(dft_filename+'.h5','a')\r\n    if 'dmft_output' in f:\r\n        ar = f['dmft_output']\r\n        if 'iterations' in ar:\r\n            previous_present = True\r\n            previous_runs = ar['iterations']\r\n    else:\r\n        f.create_group('dmft_output')\r\n    del f\r\nprevious_runs    = mpi.bcast(previous_runs)\r\nprevious_present = mpi.bcast(previous_present)\r\n\r\nSK=SumkDFT(hdf_file=dft_filename+'.h5',use_dft_blocks=use_blocks,h_field=h_field)\r\n\r\nn_orb = SK.corr_shells[0]['dim']\r\nl = SK.corr_shells[0]['l']\r\nspin_names = [\"up\",\"down\"]\r\norb_names = [i for i in range(n_orb)]\r\n\r\n# Use GF structure determined by DFT blocks\r\ngf_struct = SK.gf_struct_solver[0] \r\n# Construct U matrix for density-density calculations\r\nUmat, Upmat = U_matrix_kanamori(n_orb=n_orb, U_int=U, J_hund=J)\r\n# Construct Hamiltonian and solver\r\nh_int = h_int_density(spin_names, orb_names, map_operator_structure=SK.sumk_to_solver[0], U=Umat, Uprime=Upmat, H_dump=\"H.txt\")\r\nS = Solver(beta=beta, gf_struct=gf_struct)\r\n\r\nif previous_present:\r\n  chemical_potential = 0\r\n  dc_imp = 0\r\n  dc_energ = 0\r\n  if mpi.is_master_node():\r\n      S.Sigma_iw << HDFArchive(dft_filename+'.h5','a')['dmft_output']['Sigma_iw']\r\n      chemical_potential,dc_imp,dc_energ = SK.load(['chemical_potential','dc_imp','dc_energ'])\r\n  S.Sigma_iw << mpi.bcast(S.Sigma_iw)\r\n  chemical_potential = mpi.bcast(chemical_potential)\r\n  dc_imp = mpi.bcast(dc_imp)\r\n  dc_energ = mpi.bcast(dc_energ)\r\n  SK.set_mu(chemical_potential)\r\n  SK.set_dc(dc_imp,dc_energ)\r\n\r\nfor iteration_number in range(1,loops+1):\r\n    if mpi.is_master_node(): print \"Iteration = \", iteration_number\r\n\r\n    SK.symm_deg_gf(S.Sigma_iw,orb=0)                        # symmetrise Sigma\r\n    SK.set_Sigma([ S.Sigma_iw ])                            # set Sigma into the SumK class\r\n    chemical_potential = SK.calc_mu( precision = prec_mu )  # find the chemical potential for given density\r\n    S.G_iw << SK.extract_G_loc()[0]                         # calc the local Green function\r\n    mpi.report(\"Total charge of Gloc : %.6f\"%S.G_iw.total_density())\r\n\r\n    # Init the DC term and the real part of Sigma, if no previous runs found:\r\n    if (iteration_number==1 and previous_present==False):\r\n        dm = S.G_iw.density()\r\n        SK.calc_dc(dm, U_interact = U, J_hund = J, orb = 0, use_dc_formula = dc_type)\r\n        S.Sigma_iw << SK.dc_imp[0]['up'][0,0]\r\n\r\n    # Calculate new G0_iw to input into the solver:\r\n    if mpi.is_master_node():\r\n        # We can do a mixing of Delta in order to stabilize the DMFT iterations:\r\n        S.G0_iw << S.Sigma_iw + inverse(S.G_iw)\r\n        ar = HDFArchive(dft_filename+'.h5','a')['dmft_output']\r\n        if (iteration_number>1 or previous_present):\r\n            mpi.report(\"Mixing input Delta with factor %s\"%delta_mix)\r\n            Delta = (delta_mix * delta(S.G0_iw)) + (1.0-delta_mix) * ar['Delta_iw']\r\n            S.G0_iw << S.G0_iw + delta(S.G0_iw) - Delta\r\n        ar['Delta_iw'] = delta(S.G0_iw)\r\n        S.G0_iw << inverse(S.G0_iw)\r\n        del ar\r\n\r\n    S.G0_iw << mpi.bcast(S.G0_iw)\r\n\r\n    # Solve the impurity problem:\r\n    S.solve(h_int=h_int, **p)\r\n\r\n    # Solved. Now do post-processing:\r\n    mpi.report(\"Total charge of impurity problem : %.6f\"%S.G_iw.total_density())\r\n\r\n    # Now mix Sigma and G with factor sigma_mix, if wanted:\r\n    if (iteration_number>1 or previous_present):\r\n        if mpi.is_master_node():\r\n            ar = HDFArchive(dft_filename+'.h5','a')['dmft_output']\r\n            mpi.report(\"Mixing Sigma and G with factor %s\"%sigma_mix)\r\n            S.Sigma_iw << sigma_mix * S.Sigma_iw + (1.0-sigma_mix) * ar['Sigma_iw']\r\n            S.G_iw << sigma_mix * S.G_iw + (1.0-sigma_mix) * ar['G_iw']\r\n            del ar\r\n        S.G_iw << mpi.bcast(S.G_iw)\r\n        S.Sigma_iw << mpi.bcast(S.Sigma_iw)\r\n\r\n    # Write the final Sigma and G to the hdf5 archive:\r\n    if mpi.is_master_node():\r\n        ar = HDFArchive(dft_filename+'.h5','a')['dmft_output']\r\n        if previous_runs: iteration_number += previous_runs\r\n        ar['iterations'] = iteration_number\r\n        ar['G_tau'] = S.G_tau\r\n        ar['G_iw'] = S.G_iw\r\n        ar['Sigma_iw'] = S.Sigma_iw\r\n        ar['G0-%s'%(iteration_number)] = S.G0_iw\r\n        ar['G-%s'%(iteration_number)] = S.G_iw\r\n        ar['Sigma-%s'%(iteration_number)] = S.Sigma_iw\r\n        del ar\r\n\r\n    # Set the new double counting:\r\n    dm = S.G_iw.density() # compute the density matrix of the impurity problem\r\n    SK.calc_dc(dm, U_interact = U, J_hund = J, orb = 0, use_dc_formula = dc_type)\r\n\r\n    # Save stuff into the dft_output group of hdf5 archive in case of rerun:\r\n    SK.save(['chemical_potential','dc_imp','dc_energ'])\r\n\r\nif mpi.is_master_node():\r\n    ar = HDFArchive(\"dftdmft.h5\",'w')\r\n    ar[\"G_tau\"] = S.G_tau\r\n    ar[\"G_iw\"] = S.G_iw\r\n    ar[\"Sigma_iw\"] = S.Sigma_iw\r\n\"\r\n### and after running it , the results of my calculation for 21 itrations  are:\r\n\"Starting on 1 Nodes at : 2018-08-26 12:09:13.269087\r\nReading input from 5.ctqmcout...\r\nReading input from 5.symqmc...\r\nReading input from 5.oubwin...\r\nReading input from 5.struct...\r\nReading input from 5.outputs...\r\nIteration =  1\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.500000  \r\n    Total Density = 12.328482\r\n    0.000000 < Chemical Potential < -0.500000\r\n    13.158315 < Total Density < 12.328482\r\n    0.000000 < Chemical Potential < -0.039600\r\n    13.158315 < Total Density < 13.052260\r\n    -0.024540 < Chemical Potential < -0.039600\r\n    13.093337 < Total Density < 13.052260\r\n    -0.024540 < Chemical Potential < -0.024813\r\n    13.093337 < Total Density < 13.092589\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 4 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092589;Chemical Potential = -0.024813\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.140228\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 6.090100\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 6.090100\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.963549945341\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.39341*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.39341*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.39341*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.39341*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.39341*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.39341*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; Insert error : recovering ... \r\n7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0130775\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0130632\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.013071\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0130685\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.013062\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0130857\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0131148\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0130772\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0130666\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0130703\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0130653\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0130567\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0130832\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0131211\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.291877\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 4800 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.188300\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 6.532356\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 6.532356\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 1.26693880701\r\nIteration =  2\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.524813  \r\n    Total Density = 12.969095\r\n    -0.024813 < Chemical Potential < -0.524813\r\n    13.419197 < Total Density < 12.969095\r\n    -0.024813 < Chemical Potential < -0.387624\r\n    13.419197 < Total Density < 13.074584\r\n    -0.024813 < Chemical Potential < -0.368664\r\n    13.419197 < Total Density < 13.090595\r\n    -0.024813 < Chemical Potential < -0.366575\r\n    13.419197 < Total Density < 13.092382\r\n    -0.024813 < Chemical Potential < -0.366355\r\n    13.419197 < Total Density < 13.092570\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 5 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092570;Chemical Potential = -0.366355\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.114400\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.49412*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.49412*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.49412*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.49412*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.49412*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.49412*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0122488\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0122253\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0122341\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0121171\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0123314\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0123454\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0122396\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0122487\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0122287\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0122335\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0121142\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0123264\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0123432\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0122461\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.22799\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 3895 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.156437\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 6.239220\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 6.239220\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 1.06347082497\r\nIteration =  3\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.133645  \r\n    Total Density = 13.252744\r\n    -0.366355 < Chemical Potential < 0.133645\r\n    12.952715 < Total Density < 13.252744\r\n    -0.133248 < Chemical Potential < 0.133645\r\n    13.074995 < Total Density < 13.252744\r\n    -0.106826 < Chemical Potential < 0.133645\r\n    13.090737 < Total Density < 13.252744\r\n    -0.104072 < Chemical Potential < 0.133645\r\n    13.092400 < Total Density < 13.252744\r\n    -0.103788 < Chemical Potential < 0.133645\r\n    13.092573 < Total Density < 13.252744\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 5 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092573;Chemical Potential = -0.103788\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.101801\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.46355*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.46355*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.46355*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.46355*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.46355*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.46355*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0117447\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.011601\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0116709\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0117808\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.011737\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0118238\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.011855\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0117444\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0116036\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0116702\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0117778\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0117322\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0118219\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0118607\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.19752\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 3564 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.132791\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 6.021678\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 6.021678\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.918511050657\r\nIteration =  4\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.396212  \r\n    Total Density = 13.292204\r\n    -0.103788 < Chemical Potential < 0.396212\r\n    13.047279 < Total Density < 13.292204\r\n    -0.011282 < Chemical Potential < 0.396212\r\n    13.084536 < Total Density < 13.292204\r\n    0.004525 < Chemical Potential < 0.396212\r\n    13.091236 < Total Density < 13.292204\r\n    0.007170 < Chemical Potential < 0.396212\r\n    13.092366 < Total Density < 13.292204\r\n    0.007610 < Chemical Potential < 0.396212\r\n    13.092555 < Total Density < 13.292204\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 5 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092555;Chemical Potential = 0.007610\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.099088\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.35741*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.35741*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.35741*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.35741*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.35741*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.35741*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; Insert error : recovering ... \r\n61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0112577\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0112262\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0113392\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0110511\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0112778\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0114474\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0112047\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0112574\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0112287\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0113387\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0110487\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0112728\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0114455\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0112099\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.175687\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 2900 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: -1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.100669\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 5.726156\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 5.726156\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.729829716833\r\nIteration =  5\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.507610  \r\n    Total Density = 13.252924\r\n    0.007610 < Chemical Potential < 0.507610\r\n    13.059124 < Total Density < 13.252924\r\n    0.093957 < Chemical Potential < 0.507610\r\n    13.088435 < Total Density < 13.252924\r\n    0.104412 < Chemical Potential < 0.507610\r\n    13.092086 < Total Density < 13.252924\r\n    0.105682 < Chemical Potential < 0.507610\r\n    13.092531 < Total Density < 13.252924\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 4 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092531;Chemical Potential = 0.105682\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.090465\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.15996*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.15996*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.15996*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.15996*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.15996*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.15996*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.010982\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0109147\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0108353\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0110854\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0107423\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0111642\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0111501\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0109819\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0109179\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0108349\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0110831\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0107378\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0111627\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0111552\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.164705\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 2897 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.092963\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 5.655263\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 5.655263\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.685978536929\r\nIteration =  6\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.394318  \r\n    Total Density = 13.149359\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.894318  \r\n    Total Density = 12.989935\r\n    0.105682 < Chemical Potential < -0.894318\r\n    13.344924 < Total Density < 12.989935\r\n    0.105682 < Chemical Potential < -0.605134\r\n    13.344924 < Total Density < 13.078143\r\n    0.105682 < Chemical Potential < -0.566635\r\n    13.344924 < Total Density < 13.090694\r\n    0.105682 < Chemical Potential < -0.561614\r\n    13.344924 < Total Density < 13.092345\r\n    0.105682 < Chemical Potential < -0.560961\r\n    13.344924 < Total Density < 13.092560\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 6 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092560;Chemical Potential = -0.560961\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.091311\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-4.42242*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -4.42242*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -4.42242*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -4.42242*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -4.42242*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -4.42242*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; Insert error : recovering ... \r\n61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0108917\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0112737\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0114066\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.011266\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0107405\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.00993039\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0107334\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0108917\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0112771\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.011406\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0112632\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0107362\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0099293\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0107388\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.161572\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 3102 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.085711\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 5.588543\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 5.588543\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.645207366997\r\nIteration =  7\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.060961  \r\n    Total Density = 12.180859\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.439039  \r\n    Total Density = 12.242264\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.939039  \r\n    Total Density = 12.686299\r\n    Chemical Potential = 1.439039  \r\n    Total Density = 13.543698\r\n    -0.560961 < Chemical Potential < 1.439039\r\n    12.163809 < Total Density < 13.543698\r\n    0.785210 < Chemical Potential < 1.439039\r\n    12.501937 < Total Density < 13.543698\r\n    1.155917 < Chemical Potential < 1.439039\r\n    13.031227 < Total Density < 13.543698\r\n    1.189819 < Chemical Potential < 1.439039\r\n    13.091265 < Total Density < 13.543698\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < 1.439039\r\n    13.092553 < Total Density < 13.543698\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 8 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092553;Chemical Potential = 1.190550\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.052514\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-6.10721*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -6.10721*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -6.10721*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -6.10721*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -6.10721*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -6.10721*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0139129\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0138999\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0139099\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0139122\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0138823\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0139493\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.013924\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0139126\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0139034\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0139095\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0139091\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0138769\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0139464\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0139301\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.31565\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 4937 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.255573\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 7.151274\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 7.151274\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 1.72721304919\r\nIteration =  8\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.690550  \r\n    Total Density = 14.645871\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.190550  \r\n    Total Density = 13.699400\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.309450  \r\n    Total Density = 13.128400\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.809450  \r\n    Total Density = 12.764979\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.809450\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 12.764979\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.580149\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 12.909961\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.460929\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 12.999032\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.402032\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 13.046293\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.373410\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 13.070551\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.359902\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 13.082342\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.353645\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 13.087881\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.350774\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 13.090438\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.349463\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 13.091610\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.348865\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 13.092145\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.348593\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 13.092389\r\n    1.190550 < Chemical Potential < -0.348469\r\n    15.622475 < Total Density < 13.092500\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 15 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092500;Chemical Potential = -0.348469\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.120673\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-6.13092*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -6.13092*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -6.13092*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -6.13092*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -6.13092*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -6.13092*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0129194\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0129113\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0128791\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0128502\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0129902\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0129268\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0129588\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0129191\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0129148\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0128783\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0128473\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0129853\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0129243\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0129643\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.258887\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 4059 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.193002\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 6.575622\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 6.575622\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 1.29776087544\r\nIteration =  9\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.151531  \r\n    Total Density = 13.143302\r\n    -0.348469 < Chemical Potential < 0.151531\r\n    12.837974 < Total Density < 13.143302\r\n    0.068489 < Chemical Potential < 0.151531\r\n    13.080515 < Total Density < 13.143302\r\n    0.084463 < Chemical Potential < 0.151531\r\n    13.092188 < Total Density < 13.143302\r\n    0.084994 < Chemical Potential < 0.151531\r\n    13.092579 < Total Density < 13.143302\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 4 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092579;Chemical Potential = 0.084994\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.101194\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.98873*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.98873*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.98873*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.98873*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.98873*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.98873*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; Insert error : recovering ... \r\n61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0125569\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0125777\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0125712\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0125821\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0124828\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0125862\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0125413\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0125567\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0125811\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0125708\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0125793\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0124781\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0125834\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0125474\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.23156\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 4059 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.182029\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 6.474669\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 6.474669\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 1.22615995019\r\nIteration =  10\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.584994  \r\n    Total Density = 13.489667\r\n    0.084994 < Chemical Potential < 0.584994\r\n    13.081270 < Total Density < 13.489667\r\n    0.098856 < Chemical Potential < 0.584994\r\n    13.090168 < Total Density < 13.489667\r\n    0.101807 < Chemical Potential < 0.584994\r\n    13.092078 < Total Density < 13.489667\r\n    0.102432 < Chemical Potential < 0.584994\r\n    13.092483 < Total Density < 13.489667\r\n    0.102564 < Chemical Potential < 0.584994\r\n    13.092569 < Total Density < 13.489667\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 5 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092569;Chemical Potential = 0.102564\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.101195\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.90535*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.90535*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.90535*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.90535*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.90535*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.90535*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0122236\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0123092\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.012261\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0121916\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0122336\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0122173\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0121288\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0122235\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0123123\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0122606\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0121894\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0122289\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.012215\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0121345\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.215487\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 3539 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.149488\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 6.175289\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 6.175289\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 1.02033632506\r\nIteration =  11\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.602564  \r\n    Total Density = 13.309616\r\n    0.102564 < Chemical Potential < 0.602564\r\n    13.005989 < Total Density < 13.309616\r\n    0.245178 < Chemical Potential < 0.602564\r\n    13.076909 < Total Density < 13.309616\r\n    0.269265 < Chemical Potential < 0.602564\r\n    13.090051 < Total Density < 13.309616\r\n    0.273123 < Chemical Potential < 0.602564\r\n    13.092188 < Total Density < 13.309616\r\n    0.273735 < Chemical Potential < 0.602564\r\n    13.092528 < Total Density < 13.309616\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 5 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092528;Chemical Potential = 0.273735\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.096217\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.77714*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.77714*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.77714*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.77714*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.77714*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.77714*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0118584\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0116871\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0116919\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0117547\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0119716\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0119733\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0120717\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.011858\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0116898\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0116909\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0117521\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.011967\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0119709\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0120773\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.197719\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 3589 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.127111\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 5.969422\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 5.969422\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.884456655601\r\nIteration =  12\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.773735  \r\n    Total Density = 13.316917\r\n    0.273735 < Chemical Potential < 0.773735\r\n    13.037300 < Total Density < 13.316917\r\n    0.372607 < Chemical Potential < 0.773735\r\n    13.081615 < Total Density < 13.316917\r\n    0.391321 < Chemical Potential < 0.773735\r\n    13.090552 < Total Density < 13.316917\r\n    0.394768 < Chemical Potential < 0.773735\r\n    13.092218 < Total Density < 13.316917\r\n    0.395399 < Chemical Potential < 0.773735\r\n    13.092524 < Total Density < 13.316917\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 5 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092524;Chemical Potential = 0.395399\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.093163\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.69294*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.69294*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.69294*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.69294*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.69294*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.69294*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; Insert error : recovering ... \r\n7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0115607\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0113379\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0112816\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0112916\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0117994\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0118566\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0117967\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0115605\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0113408\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0112808\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0112891\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0117948\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0118545\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0118028\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.184656\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 3275 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.130579\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 6.001324\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 6.001324\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.905211660411\r\nIteration =  13\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.104601  \r\n    Total Density = 12.945631\r\n    0.395399 < Chemical Potential < -0.104601\r\n    13.123070 < Total Density < 12.945631\r\n    0.395399 < Chemical Potential < 0.309516\r\n    13.123070 < Total Density < 13.086368\r\n    0.395399 < Chemical Potential < 0.324081\r\n    13.123070 < Total Density < 13.092370\r\n    0.395399 < Chemical Potential < 0.324599\r\n    13.123070 < Total Density < 13.092584\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 4 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092584;Chemical Potential = 0.324599\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.097113\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.65404*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.65404*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.65404*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.65404*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.65404*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.65404*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0113184\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0109556\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0111212\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0112986\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0113079\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0116008\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0116265\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0113181\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0109578\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0111202\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0112962\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.011303\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.011599\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0116323\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.174827\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 2868 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.099997\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 5.719974\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 5.719974\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.725984056746\r\nIteration =  14\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.824599  \r\n    Total Density = 13.251336\r\n    0.324599 < Chemical Potential < 0.824599\r\n    13.051545 < Total Density < 13.251336\r\n    0.427324 < Chemical Potential < 0.824599\r\n    13.087071 < Total Density < 13.251336\r\n    0.440679 < Chemical Potential < 0.824599\r\n    13.091862 < Total Density < 13.251336\r\n    0.442436 < Chemical Potential < 0.824599\r\n    13.092496 < Total Density < 13.251336\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 4 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092496;Chemical Potential = 0.442436\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.088431\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.49053*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.49053*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.49053*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.49053*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.49053*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.49053*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; Insert error : recovering ... \r\n81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0110555\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0115231\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0113278\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0113392\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0109791\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0105499\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0106139\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0110555\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0115268\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0113269\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0113368\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0109747\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0105483\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0106198\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.165324\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 2330 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.090859\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 5.635902\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 5.635902\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.674097300446\r\nIteration =  15\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.057564  \r\n    Total Density = 13.024462\r\n    0.442436 < Chemical Potential < -0.057564\r\n    13.207276 < Total Density < 13.024462\r\n    0.442436 < Chemical Potential < 0.128775\r\n    13.207276 < Total Density < 13.087493\r\n    0.442436 < Chemical Potential < 0.142128\r\n    13.207276 < Total Density < 13.092229\r\n    0.442436 < Chemical Potential < 0.143076\r\n    13.207276 < Total Density < 13.092567\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 4 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092567;Chemical Potential = 0.143076\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.090844\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-5.1071*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -5.1071*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -5.1071*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -5.1071*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -5.1071*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -5.1071*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; Insert error : recovering ... \r\n61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.0110142\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.01148\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0114497\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0114073\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0108721\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.00999196\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0108843\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0110141\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.0114832\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0114486\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0114043\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.010868\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.00999074\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0108897\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.163313\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 3029 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.105939\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 5.774634\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 5.774634\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 0.760130574623\r\nIteration =  16\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.643076  \r\n    Total Density = 12.581582\r\n    Chemical Potential = 1.143076  \r\n    Total Density = 13.373597\r\n    0.143076 < Chemical Potential < 1.143076\r\n    12.229385 < Total Density < 13.373597\r\n    0.897488 < Chemical Potential < 1.143076\r\n    12.935916 < Total Density < 13.373597\r\n    0.985400 < Chemical Potential < 1.143076\r\n    13.087777 < Total Density < 13.373597\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < 1.143076\r\n    13.092565 < Total Density < 13.373597\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 5 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092565;Chemical Potential = 0.988057\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.065640\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-6.09081*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -6.09081*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -6.09081*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -6.09081*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -6.09081*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -6.09081*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(up_1,0)\r\nUsing autopartition algorithm to partition the local Hilbert space\r\nFound 64 subspaces.\r\n\r\nWarming up ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\nAccumulating ...\r\n1%; 2%; 3%; 4%; 5%; 6%; 7%; 8%; 9%; 10%; 11%; 12%; 13%; 14%; 15%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%; 20%; 21%; 22%; 23%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 28%; 29%; 30%; 31%; 32%; 33%; 34%; 35%; 36%; 37%; 38%; 39%; 40%; 41%; 42%; 43%; 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; 48%; 49%; 50%; 51%; 52%; 53%; 54%; 55%; 56%; 57%; 58%; 59%; 60%; 61%; 62%; 63%; 64%; 65%; 66%; 67%; 68%; 69%; 70%; 71%; 72%; 73%; 74%; 75%; 76%; 77%; 78%; 79%; 80%; 81%; 82%; 83%; 84%; 85%; 86%; 87%; 88%; 89%; 90%; 91%; 92%; 93%; 94%; 95%; 96%; 97%; 98%; 99%; 100%; \r\n\r\n[Node 0] Acceptance rate for all moves:\r\nMove set Insert two operators: 0.013847\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_0: 0.0138475\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_1: 0.0138899\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_down_2: 0.0138318\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_0: 0.0138379\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_1: 0.0138294\r\n  Move  Insert Delta_up_2: 0.0138455\r\nMove set Remove two operators: 0.0138468\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_0: 0.013852\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_1: 0.0138896\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_down_2: 0.0138286\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_0: 0.0138323\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_1: 0.0138264\r\n  Move  Remove Delta_up_2: 0.0138519\r\nMove  Shift one operator: 0.311111\r\n[Node 0] Simulation lasted: 4225 seconds\r\n[Node 0] Number of measures: 1000000\r\nTotal number of measures: 1000000\r\nAverage sign: 1\r\nTotal charge of impurity problem : 1.251325\r\nMixing Sigma and G with factor 1.0\r\nDC for shell 0 and block up = 7.112191\r\nDC for shell 0 and block down = 7.112191\r\nDC energy for shell 0 = 1.69691599688\r\nIteration =  17\r\nDichotomy adjustment of Chemical Potential to obtain Total Density = 13.092592 +/- 0.000100\r\n    Chemical Potential = 0.488057  \r\n    Total Density = 14.188735\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.011943  \r\n    Total Density = 13.436116\r\n    Chemical Potential = -0.511943  \r\n    Total Density = 12.965913\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.511943\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 12.965913\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.428859\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.029613\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.388723\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.062400\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.369747\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.078507\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.360952\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.086115\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.356919\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.089634\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.355080\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.091245\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.354243\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.091980\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.353863\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.092314\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.353690\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.092466\r\n    0.988057 < Chemical Potential < -0.353611\r\n    15.252982 < Total Density < 13.092535\r\n    Chemical Potential found in 13 iterations : \r\n    Total Density = 13.092535;Chemical Potential = -0.353611\r\nTotal charge of Gloc : 1.120890\r\nMixing input Delta with factor 1.0\r\nThe local Hamiltonian of the problem:\r\n-6.0867*C^+(down_0,0)C(down_0,0) + -6.0867*C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0) + -6.0867*C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0) + -6.0867*C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0) + -6.0867*C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0) + -6.0867*C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_1,0)C(down_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_0,0) + 8*C^+(down_0,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(down_2,0)C(down_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_1,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_1,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_1,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_0,0)C(up_0,0)C(down_2,0) + 8*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(down_2,0) + 9.6*C^+(down_2,0)C^+(up_2,0)C(up_2,0)C(down_2,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C^+(up_1,0)C(up_1,0)C(up_0,0) + 7.2*C^+(up_0,0)C\"\r\n### I want to know that my calculation is true or not? and if it is not correct how can I solve it?\r\nthe best.Reyhaneh"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Reyhanehe"}}