{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/249","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/249/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/249/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/249/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/249","id":355641342,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNTU2NDEzNDI=","number":249,"title":"Bitcoin ABC version v0.18.1.0-5e02f75  doesn't accept block 530560  ( 00000000000000000195edc6e094ae1db6a274f1188127390a74a727db9a2717 )","user":{"login":"avl42","id":5255346,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjUyNTUzNDY=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/5255346?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42","html_url":"https://github.com/avl42","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2018-08-30T15:36:21Z","updated_at":"2018-09-08T07:38:38Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"I had been running an out-of-date version of BitcoinUnlimited before.  That gut stuck at #530561 on a minority fork.\r\n\r\nSo I got master from this repo  ( v0.18.1.0-5e02f75 )  and it still got stuck at that height.\r\n\r\nI then compared blockhashes with a public block-explorer (yes, an BCH one) and noticed that #530360 was first \"wrong\" one.  I did invalidateblock on the wrong block-hash, now getblockcount returns 530359 but no matter how often I call bitcoin-cli reconsiderblock 00000000000000000195edc6e094ae1db6a274f1188127390a74a727db9a2717, it just doesn't like it, and despite debug=1 it doesn't tell me why it doesn't like it.\r\n\r\n### Expected behaviour\r\nit should accept this block https://explorer.bitcoin.com/bch/block/00000000000000000195edc6e094ae1db6a274f1188127390a74a727db9a2717\r\n(shouldn't it?)\r\n\r\n### Actual behaviour\r\nit ignores all attempts to \"reconsiderblock\" it.\r\n\r\n### What version of bitcoin-abc are you using?\r\nv0.18.1.0-5e02f75\r\n\r\n### Machine specs:\r\n- OS: Linux\r\n- CPU: intel i7\r\n- RAM: 8GB\r\n- Disk size:  ~500GB left on relevant device. \r\n- Disk Type (HD/SDD): HD\r\n\r\n### Any extra information that might be useful in the debugging process.\r\n$ bitcoin-cli getblockheader 00000000000000000195edc6e094ae1db6a274f1188127390a74a727db9a2717 \r\n{\r\n  \"hash\": \"00000000000000000195edc6e094ae1db6a274f1188127390a74a727db9a2717\",\r\n  \"confirmations\": -1,\r\n  \"height\": 530360,\r\n  \"version\": 536870912,\r\n  \"versionHex\": \"20000000\",\r\n  \"merkleroot\": \"d722081321a8350df85b4661779f3cac7777c87a31fa5b70fcf89a02a5f29512\",\r\n  \"time\": 1526410326,\r\n  \"mediantime\": 1526406711,\r\n  \"nonce\": 3919073716,\r\n  \"bits\": \"1801c29f\",\r\n  \"difficulty\": 624628286707.5839,\r\n  \"chainwork\": \"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000009c98be9d8c7f3fe555222a\",\r\n  \"previousblockhash\": \"0000000000000000011ada8bd08f46074f44a8f155396f43e38acf9501c49103\"\r\n}\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/comments/419620624","html_url":"https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/249#issuecomment-419620624","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/249","id":419620624,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxOTYyMDYyNA==","user":{"login":"avl42","id":5255346,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjUyNTUzNDY=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/5255346?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42","html_url":"https://github.com/avl42","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/avl42/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-09-08T07:38:38Z","updated_at":"2018-09-08T07:38:38Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"Is there any **other** such mechanism of flagging than the one of\ninvalidateblock and reconsiderblock, that I've kept mentioning throughout\nthis issue so far?\n\n\n\ndeadalnix <notifications@github.com> schrieb am Fr., 7. Sep. 2018, 17:50:\n\n> Also, in any case, when facing this kind of issue, it's likely that a\n> previous version of the software flagged the block in some manner. In that\n> case, running the client with reindex should fix it.\n>\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"avl42"}}