{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound/issues/50","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound/issues/50/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound/issues/50/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound/issues/50/events","html_url":"https://github.com/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound/issues/50","id":302460183,"number":50,"title":"Potential divide and conquer strategy?","user":{"login":"km-git-acc","id":35831522,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/35831522?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc","html_url":"https://github.com/km-git-acc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/km-git-acc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":491,"created_at":"2018-03-05T20:58:43Z","updated_at":"2018-04-24T12:48:48Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"@rudolph-git-acc and @mariotrevi\r\n\r\nFew days back, I had noticed in the fourth thread at Prof. Tao's blog you were focused on the Ceff term, and improving Ht precision at smaller values of x, while I have been working more on the medium values of x.\r\n\r\nThis could be a good divide and conquer strategy in light of the fifth thread. Do let me know if there are any thoughts on this, and if we can help each other more."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound/issues/comments/383917739","html_url":"https://github.com/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound/issues/50#issuecomment-383917739","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/km-git-acc/dbn_upper_bound/issues/50","id":383917739,"user":{"login":"rudolph-git-acc","id":36714969,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/36714969?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc","html_url":"https://github.com/rudolph-git-acc","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rudolph-git-acc/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-04-24T12:48:48Z","updated_at":"2018-04-24T12:48:48Z","author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"@km-git-acc @p15-git-acc \r\n\r\nAh. Nope, I did mean the area from the end of the barrier at X+1 to some point N_x where analytics take over and numerical verification is no longer required. So, what about that area? Is checking a line sufficient?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"rudolph-git-acc"}}