{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/glinscott/leela-chess/issues/288","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/glinscott/leela-chess","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/glinscott/leela-chess/issues/288/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/glinscott/leela-chess/issues/288/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/glinscott/leela-chess/issues/288/events","html_url":"https://github.com/glinscott/leela-chess/pull/288","id":313219620,"number":288,"title":"Add tuning support for FPU reduction","user":{"login":"jkiliani","id":33714573,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/33714573?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani","html_url":"https://github.com/jkiliani","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":6,"created_at":"2018-04-11T08:21:38Z","updated_at":"2018-04-16T13:02:48Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/glinscott/leela-chess/pulls/288","html_url":"https://github.com/glinscott/leela-chess/pull/288","diff_url":"https://github.com/glinscott/leela-chess/pull/288.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/glinscott/leela-chess/pull/288.patch"},"body":"Change match default setting from --noise to --tempdecay 10"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/glinscott/leela-chess/issues/comments/381591444","html_url":"https://github.com/glinscott/leela-chess/pull/288#issuecomment-381591444","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/glinscott/leela-chess/issues/288","id":381591444,"user":{"login":"jkiliani","id":33714573,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/33714573?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani","html_url":"https://github.com/jkiliani","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/jkiliani/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-04-16T13:02:48Z","updated_at":"2018-04-16T13:02:48Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"@killerducky OK I think I made a version of get_eval that only deactivated virtual losses. Some sample control output for the first move looks like this:\r\n```\r\nDynamic node eval with VL:  0.52418 without VL:  0.52418\r\nDynamic node eval with VL:  0.41716 without VL:  0.51342\r\nDynamic node eval with VL:  0.33822 without VL:  0.50734\r\nDynamic node eval with VL:  0.50370 without VL:  0.50370\r\nDynamic node eval with VL:  0.32326 without VL:  0.51722\r\nDynamic node eval with VL:  0.49538 without VL:  0.49538\r\nDynamic node eval with VL:  0.50178 without VL:  0.50178\r\n```\r\nI scrolled though a number of node evals, and it seems the fix always returns stable evals around 0.5, while the previous dynamic eval is identical in most cases and significantly reduced in some, but never higher. This looks to me as if it works, but I can't guarantee it, feel free to review and test yourself."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jkiliani"}}