{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zerodhatech/dotnetkiteconnect/issues/8","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zerodhatech/dotnetkiteconnect","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zerodhatech/dotnetkiteconnect/issues/8/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zerodhatech/dotnetkiteconnect/issues/8/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zerodhatech/dotnetkiteconnect/issues/8/events","html_url":"https://github.com/zerodhatech/dotnetkiteconnect/issues/8","id":387370257,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzODczNzAyNTc=","number":8,"title":"Static Class Mapping","user":{"login":"sarthak-k","id":4685553,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjQ2ODU1NTM=","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/4685553?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k","html_url":"https://github.com/sarthak-k","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sarthak-k/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2018-12-04T16:27:15Z","updated_at":"2018-12-17T05:18:51Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"Hi,\r\n\r\nI was just wondering the  reason behind not having static class mapping over dynamic responses, which is far more error prone than classes. Also, the library can have API links as constant pushed to somewhere in other class and utilized RestSharp like libraries for making the calls..."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zerodhatech/dotnetkiteconnect/issues/comments/447725573","html_url":"https://github.com/zerodhatech/dotnetkiteconnect/issues/8#issuecomment-447725573","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/zerodhatech/dotnetkiteconnect/issues/8","id":447725573,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NzcyNTU3Mw==","user":{"login":"ajinasokan","id":10473719,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjEwNDczNzE5","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/10473719?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan","html_url":"https://github.com/ajinasokan","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ajinasokan/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-12-17T05:18:51Z","updated_at":"2018-12-17T05:18:51Z","author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"I was planning to write a port for .Net core. But like you said .Net Standard 2.0 will be a better target since it can work with both .Net framework and .Net core. \r\n\r\nAlso, I will check out the \"Flutent\" system for the API. Will consider both of them for the next major release."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ajinasokan"}}