{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exhuma/puresnmp/issues/47","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exhuma/puresnmp","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exhuma/puresnmp/issues/47/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exhuma/puresnmp/issues/47/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exhuma/puresnmp/issues/47/events","html_url":"https://github.com/exhuma/puresnmp/issues/47","id":332917668,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMzI5MTc2Njg=","number":47,"title":"fact finding for asyncio support","user":{"login":"acspike","id":114363,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjExNDM2Mw==","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/114363?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike","html_url":"https://github.com/acspike","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/acspike/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2018-06-15T21:21:44Z","updated_at":"2018-06-16T16:37:12Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"I'm interested in learning what it would take to bring asyncio support to puresnmp. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exhuma/puresnmp/issues/comments/397824229","html_url":"https://github.com/exhuma/puresnmp/issues/47#issuecomment-397824229","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exhuma/puresnmp/issues/47","id":397824229,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NzgyNDIyOQ==","user":{"login":"etingof","id":17447359,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE3NDQ3MzU5","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/17447359?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof","html_url":"https://github.com/etingof","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/etingof/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-06-16T16:37:12Z","updated_at":"2018-06-16T16:37:12Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"> I was hoping that I could find some gains by using pysnmp's asyncio support but the newer versions of pysnmp are significantly slower than the older versions in my tests. \r\n\r\nThis is a tad bit surprising as recent pyasn1 (which is the basis of pysnmp message serialization) is actually faster. You may consider raising an issue with pysnmp, along with a reproducer, to help pinpointing and hopefully fixing the slow piece.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"etingof"}}