{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties/issues/752","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties/issues/752/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties/issues/752/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties/issues/752/events","html_url":"https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/752","id":328853042,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMjg4NTMwNDI=","number":752,"title":"How \"fair\" is the current Trust metric system: Analyzing its effectiveness","user":{"login":"David405","id":16638973,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE2NjM4OTcz","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/16638973?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405","html_url":"https://github.com/David405","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/David405/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":938943846,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5Mzg5NDM4NDY=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties/labels/Discussion","name":"Discussion","color":"a54ed8","default":false},{"id":851028817,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw4NTEwMjg4MTc=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties/labels/Voting","name":"Voting","color":"fef2c0","default":false},{"id":843460404,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw4NDM0NjA0MDQ=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties/labels/bounty-contract","name":"bounty-contract","color":"9d59d1","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"Valentine-Mario","id":30703567,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMwNzAzNTY3","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/30703567?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario","html_url":"https://github.com/Valentine-Mario","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"assignees":[{"login":"Valentine-Mario","id":30703567,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMwNzAzNTY3","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/30703567?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario","html_url":"https://github.com/Valentine-Mario","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Valentine-Mario/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false}],"milestone":null,"comments":48,"created_at":"2018-06-03T19:00:50Z","updated_at":"2018-06-06T19:19:21Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"In 201805 pay period, the trust rating was put into place to be used for voting on budgets and rewards. Out of about 109 issues that have received votes for May pay period, about 80% of the rewards goes to \r\npersons with trust ratings. \r\n\r\nOn issues where people with trust ratings and those without it collaborated, those with trust ratings usually have far higher percentages than the others (which is okay because voters will always seek to protect their rewards first before others).\r\n\r\nOn issues where none of the participants have trust ratings and they have to solicit for votes from people certified by the trust rating, there seems to be a lot of unfairness because the rewards votes are not fairly distributed among the participants as the voters did not partake in the task/project and so do not know who did the most work and who did a minimal job.\r\n\r\nI understand that the Trust metric system is put in place to prevent fraud and encourage fairness but it's current state cannot accomplish this for some obvious reasons:\r\n\r\n- Humans tend to protect their interest first before any other and this is natural, so most times, during voting on collaborative projects, members with trust rating will naturally vote for themselves before any other. _(This can be seen in democratic and cooperative societies)_\r\n\r\n- On issues where none of the collaborators have the trust rating, it is difficult for an external voter to give a right judgement as to who gets what percentage of the reward simply because the external voter do not have an idea on the individual contributions.\r\n\r\n- Members without trust rating have to solicit for reward votes from members whose votes carry weight, sometimes these voters with trust rating take days _(weeks in some cases while some never reply)_ before responding to their messages and then they end up voting based on their judgement and from an informed objective point of view.\r\n\r\n**Possible Amendments**\r\n\r\n- I believe every member of the coop should have a right to protect his/her interest in rewards and voting. There may be people whose votes carry more weight but at least a member should be given the right to vote for himself/herself on a project he/she participated in. \r\n\r\n- Guides should be able to give suggestions as to how much budget an issue is worth.\r\n\r\n- Another possible amendment(_I don't support this due to the stress involved but it can also be considered_) Voters with trust rating should be tasked with voting for others without the trust rating.\r\n\r\n**This should be added to the agenda of 20180606 member meeting**\r\n\r\n_Estimated Budget of Participation:_ **$[400]**\r\n_How will we measure completion?_ **[Amendment to Trust metric system]**\r\n\r\ncc: @dckc @lapin7 @jimscarver @kitblake @ian-bloom @pmoorman @allancto and everyone\r\n\r\n### Legal\r\n\r\n_Task Submitter shall not submit Tasks that will involve RHOC being transacted in any manner that (i) jeopardizes RHOC’s status as a software access token or other relevant and applicable description of the RHOC as an “asset”—not a security— or (2) violates, in any manner, applicable U.S. Securities laws._\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties/issues/comments/395183444","html_url":"https://github.com/rchain/bounties/issues/752#issuecomment-395183444","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/rchain/bounties/issues/752","id":395183444,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NTE4MzQ0NA==","user":{"login":"Pionelle","id":36760393,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjM2NzYwMzkz","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/36760393?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle","html_url":"https://github.com/Pionelle","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Pionelle/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-06-06T19:19:21Z","updated_at":"2018-06-06T19:19:21Z","author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"@pmoorman You could be correct.\r\nAnd you maybe a little bit incorrect. Because of in doing the work, we subjected the pre-published work to inspection from other equally good workers. \r\n**And if in the conclusion, that opening up our works to scrutiny, and whatever the result of that was, is wrong.** Then the whole process may have been easier if we had avoided any standards and went ahead to claim rewards. Which is wrong.\r\nWhatever the outcome was, doing the right things comes first. Lastly, I do not support having a punishment feel in the work place, and extending such inhumane treatment to a member's other work. "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Pionelle"}}