{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/190","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/190/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/190/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/190/events","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/190","id":332146543,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMzIxNDY1NDM=","number":190,"title":"CFMIP-GCSS case: Output clear-sky radiative fluxes for cloud_feedback cases (Trac #190)","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":963997231,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTcyMzE=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/Migrated%20from%20Trac","name":"Migrated from Trac","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":963997516,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTc1MTY=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/clubb_src","name":"clubb_src","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":963997043,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTcwNDM=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"a2eeef","default":true},{"id":963998767,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTg3Njc=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/meyern@uwm.edu","name":"meyern@uwm.edu","color":"FFFFFF","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestones/2","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestone/2","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestones/2/labels","id":3423153,"node_id":"MDk6TWlsZXN0b25lMzQyMzE1Mw==","number":2,"title":"Set up CLUBB for the CFMIP/GCSS cloud feedback intercomparison","description":null,"creator":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":10,"closed_issues":7,"state":"open","created_at":"2018-06-13T20:00:55Z","updated_at":"2018-06-14T06:45:20Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":27,"created_at":"2018-06-13T20:14:02Z","updated_at":"2018-06-14T09:45:48Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"On 14 Aug 2009, Minghua wrote\n\"Looking at the cloud water change between the control and perturbed simulations, your model has a large positive cloud feedback at s11 and s12. But the data files do not contain the clear-sky radiative fluxes (fsntc and flntc) for me to do a calculation. Do you happen to have them? If not, will it be convenient to add them to the simulations? This is a quantity we use to do benchmark comparisons with the GCMs.\"\n\nLet's see if fsntc and flntc are available from BUGSrad.  We'd need to locate the corresponding variables in the BUGSrad code and then feed them out to stats.  (Of course, we'd want to give them more descriptive variable names in our stats.)\n\nAttachments:\n\n[cloud_feedback_s6_flnsc_verify.pdf](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/cloud_feedback_s6_flnsc_verify.pdf)\n[cloud_feedback_s6_flns_verify.pdf](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/cloud_feedback_s6_flns_verify.pdf)\n[cloud_feedback_s6_flntc_verify.pdf](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/cloud_feedback_s6_flntc_verify.pdf)\n[cloud_feedback_s6_flnt_verify.pdf](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/cloud_feedback_s6_flnt_verify.pdf)\n[cloud_feedback_s6_fsnsc_verify.pdf](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/cloud_feedback_s6_fsnsc_verify.pdf)\n[cloud_feedback_s6_fsns_verify.pdf](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/cloud_feedback_s6_fsns_verify.pdf)\n[cloud_feedback_s6_fsntc_verify.2.pdf](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/cloud_feedback_s6_fsntc_verify.2.pdf)\n[cloud_feedback_s6_fsnt_verify.pdf](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/clubb/cloud_feedback_s6_fsnt_verify.pdf)\n\nMigrated from http://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/ticket/190\n```json\n{\n    \"status\": \"closed\", \n    \"changetime\": \"2010-10-11T20:24:58\", \n    \"description\": \"On 14 Aug 2009, Minghua wrote\\n\\\"Looking at the cloud water change between the control and perturbed simulations, your model has a large positive cloud feedback at s11 and s12. But the data files do not contain the clear-sky radiative fluxes (fsntc and flntc) for me to do a calculation. Do you happen to have them? If not, will it be convenient to add them to the simulations? This is a quantity we use to do benchmark comparisons with the GCMs.\\\"\\n\\nLet's see if fsntc and flntc are available from BUGSrad.  We'd need to locate the corresponding variables in the BUGSrad code and then feed them out to stats.  (Of course, we'd want to give them more descriptive variable names in our stats.)\", \n    \"reporter\": \"vlarson@uwm.edu\", \n    \"cc\": \"\", \n    \"resolution\": \"Verified by V. Larson\", \n    \"_ts\": \"1286828698000000\", \n    \"component\": \"clubb_src\", \n    \"summary\": \"CFMIP-GCSS case: Output clear-sky radiative fluxes for cloud_feedback cases\", \n    \"priority\": \"major\", \n    \"keywords\": \"\", \n    \"time\": \"2009-08-14T21:07:54\", \n    \"milestone\": \"Set up CLUBB for the CFMIP/GCSS cloud feedback intercomparison\", \n    \"owner\": \"meyern@uwm.edu\", \n    \"type\": \"enhancement\"\n}\n```\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/comments/397237037","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/190#issuecomment-397237037","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/190","id":397237037,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NzIzNzAzNw==","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-06-14T09:45:48Z","updated_at":"2018-06-14T09:45:48Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"**Trac update on 2010/08/18 at 21:57**\n\n* **vlarson@uwm.edu commented:**\n\nCan we check whether these radiative fields are being output from the top of the rad_zt file (>30 km), rather than the top of the _zt file (~6 km)?  \n\n\n* vlarson@uwm.edu changed resolution from \"Verified by V. Larson\" to \"\"\n* vlarson@uwm.edu changed status from \"closed\" to \"reopened\""}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"StrikeNP"}}