{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/polyswarm/contracts/issues/95","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/polyswarm/contracts","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/polyswarm/contracts/issues/95/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/polyswarm/contracts/issues/95/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/polyswarm/contracts/issues/95/events","html_url":"https://github.com/polyswarm/contracts/issues/95","id":382444080,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzODI0NDQwODA=","number":95,"title":"Sometimes CI fails revealing assertions during CI unit test run","user":{"login":"ceseale","id":7860694,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjc4NjA2OTQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/7860694?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale","html_url":"https://github.com/ceseale","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-11-20T00:06:52Z","updated_at":"2018-11-21T23:43:00Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"MEMBER","body":"**Describe the bug**\r\nCI unit tester unexpectedly fails while running BountyRegistry unit test `arbiters: should allow removing and adding arbiters` \r\n\r\n**To Reproduce**\r\nIt's a tricky one to reproduce. I haven't seen it locally and it only occasionally happens during CI runs.\r\nHere's a couple failed ones:\r\nhttps://gitlab.polyswarm.io/externalci/contracts/-/jobs/7855\r\nhttps://gitlab.polyswarm.io/externalci/contracts/-/jobs/7836\r\n \r\n**Expected behavior**\r\nAll tests should pass if appropriate.\r\n\r\n**Additional context**\r\nThe tests pass when you click `Retry` button in gitlab to restart job.\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/polyswarm/contracts/issues/comments/440851597","html_url":"https://github.com/polyswarm/contracts/issues/95#issuecomment-440851597","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/polyswarm/contracts/issues/95","id":440851597,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MDg1MTU5Nw==","user":{"login":"ceseale","id":7860694,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjc4NjA2OTQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/7860694?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale","html_url":"https://github.com/ceseale","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ceseale/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-11-21T23:43:00Z","updated_at":"2018-11-21T23:43:00Z","author_association":"MEMBER","body":"Current theory on this is the commitment hash is falling victim to JS not having enough precision and is slightly off. I'm not sure why it's happening only during CI runs."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ceseale"}}