{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/taps-api/drafts/issues/258","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/taps-api/drafts","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/taps-api/drafts/issues/258/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/taps-api/drafts/issues/258/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/taps-api/drafts/issues/258/events","html_url":"https://github.com/taps-api/drafts/issues/258","id":386161392,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzODYxNjEzOTI=","number":258,"title":"Do we need a terminology section in arch","user":{"login":"mirjak","id":8420764,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjg0MjA3NjQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/8420764?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak","html_url":"https://github.com/mirjak","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mirjak/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-11-30T12:07:15Z","updated_at":"2018-11-30T12:07:15Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"I think we should move some of the terms definied in \"Transport System Implementation Concepts\" to a terminilogy section at the beginning of the doc, such as \"Path\", \"Connection Group\", \"Protocol Instance\" and \"Protocol Stack\", because these terms seems rather basic and not implementation internals. Further these terms have already been defined in other docs, so it would just be fine to say there that we are using these terms from these other docs at the beginning.\r\n\r\nAlternatively or additionally, I'm wondering if it would be possible to integrate the term \"Path\" somewhere in the first diagram (\"Concepts and Relationships in the Transport Services Architecture\")."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"mirjak"}}