{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/248","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/248/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/248/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/248/events","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/248","id":332148048,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMzIxNDgwNDg=","number":248,"title":"Add SAM support for inputfields (Trac #248)","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":963997231,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTcyMzE=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/Migrated%20from%20Trac","name":"Migrated from Trac","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":963997516,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTc1MTY=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/clubb_src","name":"clubb_src","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":964011129,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjQwMTExMjk=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/connork@uwm.edu","name":"connork@uwm.edu","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":963997043,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NjM5OTcwNDM=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"a2eeef","default":true}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":39,"created_at":"2018-06-13T20:18:10Z","updated_at":"2018-06-14T12:44:12Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"Currently, inputfields can feed in data from both GrADS and netCDF files, but only for COAMPS LES data.  The variable names are different in SAM (e.g. U instead of um), and inputfields isn't general enough to handle the different names.\n\nOne possible solution is to construct inputfields namelists that are analogous to the tuner namelists, e.g., error_bomex.in.  That namelist specifies the names of the variables that we want to match (e.g. \"um\").  The user could then specify the SAM variables names (e.g. U), and we'd have generality.\n\nAttachments:\n\n\nMigrated from http://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/ticket/248\n```json\n{\n    \"status\": \"closed\", \n    \"changetime\": \"2017-10-22T21:20:58\", \n    \"description\": \"Currently, inputfields can feed in data from both GrADS and netCDF files, but only for COAMPS LES data.  The variable names are different in SAM (e.g. U instead of um), and inputfields isn't general enough to handle the different names.\\n\\nOne possible solution is to construct inputfields namelists that are analogous to the tuner namelists, e.g., error_bomex.in.  That namelist specifies the names of the variables that we want to match (e.g. \\\"um\\\").  The user could then specify the SAM variables names (e.g. U), and we'd have generality.\", \n    \"reporter\": \"vlarson@uwm.edu\", \n    \"cc\": \"dschanen@uwm.edu, roehl@uwm.edu\", \n    \"resolution\": \"wontfix\", \n    \"_ts\": \"1508707258440137\", \n    \"component\": \"clubb_src\", \n    \"summary\": \"Add SAM support for inputfields\", \n    \"priority\": \"minor\", \n    \"keywords\": \"\", \n    \"time\": \"2009-10-22T18:00:53\", \n    \"milestone\": \"\", \n    \"owner\": \"connork@uwm.edu\", \n    \"type\": \"enhancement\"\n}\n```\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/comments/397280746","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/248#issuecomment-397280746","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/248","id":397280746,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NzI4MDc0Ng==","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-06-14T12:44:12Z","updated_at":"2018-06-14T12:44:12Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"**Trac update on 2012/02/14 at 19:23**\n**vlarson@uwm.edu commented:**\n\nReplying to [comment:39 connork@…]:\n> Replying to [comment:38 vlarson@…]:\n> > The red LES line should be fed into CLUBB at the beginning of a timestep by inputfields.  We should check this.  You could print out values at the beginning of a timestep and compare with SAM.  Or you could try to run CLUBB with a 1-s timestep and create a plotgen plot; the profiles of wprtp and wpthlp shouldn't change much over 1 s.  \n>\n> \n> I ran arm_97 at a 1 s timestep and got the following results: http://www.larson-group.com/connork/protected/clubb-248-1s.maff. I then decided to run all of the cases again at the normal timesteps and got the following results: http://www.larson-group.com/connork/protected/clubb-248-9.maff. wpthlp now looks much better than it did before. I'm not sure why this is, because I didn't change any of the code since I last ran it. How do these plots look?\n\nwpthlp looks good, but wprtp and many other fields look poor.  Which fields were input from SAM into CLUBB?  Just wpthlp?  Or other fields as well?  \n\nIf we feed in all the fields from SAM, then do all CLUBB fields look good?\n\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"StrikeNP"}}