{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/752","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/752/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/752/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/752/events","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/752","id":334664185,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMzQ2NjQxODU=","number":752,"title":"Evaluation and improvement of the new SILHS sampling scheme (Trac #752)","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":971577014,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NzE1NzcwMTQ=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/Migrated%20from%20Trac","name":"Migrated from Trac","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":971577274,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NzE1NzcyNzQ=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/clubb_src","name":"clubb_src","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":971576851,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NzE1NzY4NTE=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/enhancement","name":"enhancement","color":"a2eeef","default":true},{"id":971649570,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NzE2NDk1NzA=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/raut@uwm.edu","name":"raut@uwm.edu","color":"FFFFFF","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestones/8","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestone/8","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestones/8/labels","id":3442840,"node_id":"MDk6TWlsZXN0b25lMzQ0Mjg0MA==","number":8,"title":"Improve SILHS","description":null,"creator":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":24,"closed_issues":57,"state":"open","created_at":"2018-06-21T18:03:51Z","updated_at":"2018-06-24T06:17:38Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":28,"created_at":"2018-06-21T21:27:00Z","updated_at":"2018-06-24T06:18:38Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"**Introduction**\n\nIn ticket:736, we implemented a new importance sampling scheme in SILHS that allowed a flexible number of points to be placed in each category. Through various unit tests and assertion checks, I am somewhat confident that the new code is working.\n\nI started a new ticket here dedicated to evaluating and/or improving the new scheme.\n\n(Note: some discussion on this is in ticket:736.)\n\n**Important Tasks**\n\n1. How do profiles look in the new scheme vs. the old scheme? Compare plots for both single timesteps and time-averaged output.\n\n2. How do interactive runs look when using the new scheme vs. the old scheme? Time series such as liquid water path are of particular interest to me.\n\n3. How do other cases and microphysics schemes look with the new scheme vs. the old scheme? So far, my analysis has been limited to RICO with KK microphysics.\n\nAttachments:\n\n[plot_explicit_ta_configs.maff](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/trac_test/822/plot_explicit_ta_configs.maff)\n[plot_new_pdf_config_1_plot_2.maff](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/trac_test/822/plot_new_pdf_config_1_plot_2.maff)\n[plot_combo_pdf_run_3.maff](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/trac_test/822/plot_combo_pdf_run_3.maff)\n[plot_input_fields_rtp3_thlp3_1.maff](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/trac_test/822/plot_input_fields_rtp3_thlp3_1.maff)\n[plot_new_pdf_20180522_test_1.maff](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/trac_test/822/plot_new_pdf_20180522_test_1.maff)\n[plot_attempts_8_10.maff](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/trac_test/822/plot_attempts_8_10.maff)\n[plot_attempt_8_only.maff](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/trac_test/822/plot_attempt_8_only.maff)\n[plot_beta_1p3.maff](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/trac_test/822/plot_beta_1p3.maff)\n[plot_beta_1p3_all.maff](https://github.com/larson-group/trac_attachment_archive/blob/master/trac_test/822/plot_beta_1p3_all.maff)\n\nMigrated from http://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/ticket/752\n```json\n{\n    \"status\": \"closed\", \n    \"changetime\": \"2016-07-27T19:46:08\", \n    \"description\": \"'''Introduction'''\\n\\nIn ticket:736, we implemented a new importance sampling scheme in SILHS that allowed a flexible number of points to be placed in each category. Through various unit tests and assertion checks, I am somewhat confident that the new code is working.\\n\\nI started a new ticket here dedicated to evaluating and/or improving the new scheme.\\n\\n(Note: some discussion on this is in ticket:736.)\\n\\n'''Important Tasks'''\\n\\n1. How do profiles look in the new scheme vs. the old scheme? Compare plots for both single timesteps and time-averaged output.\\n\\n2. How do interactive runs look when using the new scheme vs. the old scheme? Time series such as liquid water path are of particular interest to me.\\n\\n3. How do other cases and microphysics schemes look with the new scheme vs. the old scheme? So far, my analysis has been limited to RICO with KK microphysics.\", \n    \"reporter\": \"raut@uwm.edu\", \n    \"cc\": \"vlarson@uwm.edu\", \n    \"resolution\": \"fixed\", \n    \"_ts\": \"1469648768420580\", \n    \"component\": \"clubb_src\", \n    \"summary\": \"Evaluation and improvement of the new SILHS sampling scheme\", \n    \"priority\": \"major\", \n    \"keywords\": \"SILHS flexible sampling\", \n    \"time\": \"2014-10-31T00:43:30\", \n    \"milestone\": \"Improve SILHS\", \n    \"owner\": \"raut@uwm.edu\", \n    \"type\": \"enhancement\"\n}\n```\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/comments/399732663","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/752#issuecomment-399732663","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/752","id":399732663,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5OTczMjY2Mw==","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-06-24T06:18:38Z","updated_at":"2018-06-24T06:18:38Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"**Trac update on 2014/12/08 at 20:23**\n**vlarson@uwm.edu commented:**\n\nReplying to [comment:17 raut@…]:\n> Replying to [comment:16 vlarson@…]:\n> > > Now, I may wish to compare the old probability method with the new one with the new `k_lh_start` method.\n>\n>>\n> > \n>\n> > This is a plot that we'll need for the paper.\n> \n> attachment:cldk_maxoverlap_old_vs_new.maff shows a comparson of the two sampling methods when basing `k_lh_start` off of cloud fraction.\n> \n> The new sampling method looks better for some fields.\n\nA puzzling aspect is why accretion and autoconversion don't improve with the new method.  It seems like they should.\n\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"StrikeNP"}}