{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/558","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/558/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/558/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/558/events","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/558","id":330449007,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMzA0NDkwMDc=","number":558,"title":"SILHS RICO case does not converge as of 26 Mar 2013 (Trac #558)","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":958019852,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NTgwMTk4NTI=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/Migrated%20from%20Trac","name":"Migrated from Trac","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":958042830,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NTgwNDI4MzA=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/clubb_src","name":"clubb_src","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":958019855,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NTgwMTk4NTU=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/defect","name":"defect","color":"FFFFFF","default":false},{"id":958114258,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw5NTgxMTQyNTg=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/labels/raut@uwm.edu","name":"raut@uwm.edu","color":"FFFFFF","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestones/8","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestone/8","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/milestones/8/labels","id":3408876,"node_id":"MDk6TWlsZXN0b25lMzQwODg3Ng==","number":8,"title":"Improve SILHS","description":null,"creator":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"open_issues":43,"closed_issues":38,"state":"open","created_at":"2018-06-07T19:59:06Z","updated_at":"2018-06-09T10:35:38Z","due_on":null,"closed_at":null},"comments":2,"created_at":"2018-06-07T21:52:18Z","updated_at":"2018-06-09T10:40:49Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"\nKenny Chowdhary at Sandia would like to compare SILHS vs. their Gaussian-Legendre integration method.\n\nSILHS no longer converges to KK for the RICO case. It converged as of 3 Jul 2012 (ticket:506), but it no longer converges.  Partly this is probably just an issue of configuration.  E.g., in the nightly tests, rico and rico_lh have different timesteps, different PDFs for Nc, and sedimentation of the mean vs. sedimentation variability.  \n\nBrian, could you please note on this ticket, in order to achieve an apples-to-apples comparison, what lines of code need to be commented out and what flag needs to be set for a lognormal Nc.\n\nOnce we restore convergence, we should devise a nightly test that will make it obvious if convergence breaks in the future.  We already plot both rico and rico_LH in the nightly tests.  Perhaps we could simply overplot the two cases?  Or perhaps we could develop text-based output that checks whether the profiles agree to within some tolerance?\n\nAttachments:\n\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rico_before.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rico_after.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rico_adjusted.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rico_and_LH_difference.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rico_noninteractive.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6217_conv.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6219.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6219_newfields_conv.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6219_conv.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rico_r6187.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rico_r5867.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r4895.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rico_r5867.2.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r5867_4.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6187_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6187_2.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6353_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6353_2.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6353_3.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6353_4.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6353_3.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6194_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6195_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6357_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6357_3.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6357_3.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rrainm_src_adj.png\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rrainm_cond_adj.png\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6364_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6364_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6366_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6369_2.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6369_2.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6382_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6366_6.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6388_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6404_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6404_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6404_2.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6404_2.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6411_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6411_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6422_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6422_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6423_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6432_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6437_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6437_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6437_2.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6437_2.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/rico_noninter_256_1024_10240.case\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/mod_comp_orig.txt\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/mod_comp_mod.txt\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6440.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/mod_comp_orig2.txt\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/mod_comp_mod2.txt\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6441_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6441_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/LH_KK_conv_r6444_256_1024.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/mod_comp_orig3.txt\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/mod_comp_mod3.txt\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/LH_KK_conv_r6455_256_1024.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6457_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6457_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6470_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6474_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6474_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6474_2.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6474_2.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6476_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6476_2.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6476_2.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6541_3.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6541_3.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6541_4.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6541_4.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6541_5_3.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6541_5_3.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6542_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6542_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6543_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6543_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6544_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6544_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6580_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6580_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6589_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6589_1.maff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6594_1.diff\nhttp://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/attachment/ticket/558/r6594_1.maff\n\nMigrated from http://carson.math.uwm.edu/trac/clubb/ticket/558\n```json\n{\n    \"status\": \"closed\", \n    \"changetime\": \"2014-07-10T22:03:35\", \n    \"description\": \"\\nKenny Chowdhary at Sandia would like to compare SILHS vs. their Gaussian-Legendre integration method.\\n\\nSILHS no longer converges to KK for the RICO case. It converged as of 3 Jul 2012 (ticket:506), but it no longer converges.  Partly this is probably just an issue of configuration.  E.g., in the nightly tests, rico and rico_lh have different timesteps, different PDFs for Nc, and sedimentation of the mean vs. sedimentation variability.  \\n\\nBrian, could you please note on this ticket, in order to achieve an apples-to-apples comparison, what lines of code need to be commented out and what flag needs to be set for a lognormal Nc.\\n\\nOnce we restore convergence, we should devise a nightly test that will make it obvious if convergence breaks in the future.  We already plot both rico and rico_LH in the nightly tests.  Perhaps we could simply overplot the two cases?  Or perhaps we could develop text-based output that checks whether the profiles agree to within some tolerance?\", \n    \"reporter\": \"vlarson@uwm.edu\", \n    \"cc\": \"vlarson@uwm.edu, dschanen@uwm.edu, charlass@uwm.edu, katec@ucar.edu, janhft@uwm.edu\", \n    \"resolution\": \"worksforme\", \n    \"_ts\": \"1405029815654410\", \n    \"component\": \"clubb_src\", \n    \"summary\": \"SILHS RICO case does not converge as of 26 Mar 2013\", \n    \"priority\": \"major\", \n    \"keywords\": \"\", \n    \"time\": \"2013-03-26T20:35:57\", \n    \"milestone\": \"Improve SILHS\", \n    \"owner\": \"raut@uwm.edu\", \n    \"type\": \"defect\"\n}\n```\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/comments/395959034","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/558#issuecomment-395959034","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/StrikeNP/trac_test/issues/558","id":395959034,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NTk1OTAzNA==","user":{"login":"StrikeNP","id":2577059,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI1NzcwNTk=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2577059?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP","html_url":"https://github.com/StrikeNP","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/StrikeNP/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-06-09T10:40:49Z","updated_at":"2018-06-09T10:40:49Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"Trac update at 2013/03/26 at 23:42\n\nbmg2@uwm.edu commented:\n\nFor a log-normal N_c, simply set l_const_Nc_in_cloud to .false.  This is actually done by default in the CLUBB code, however, l_const_Nc_in_cloud is a microphysics namelist variable.  In the appropriate model.in file, find the ```&microphysics_setting``` namelist.  Either remove l_const_Nc_in_cloud from the namelist, or set it to .false.  It is currently set to .true. in the namelists for DYCOMS-II RF02 DO and RICO only.\n\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"StrikeNP"}}