{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmruntimes/ci.docker/issues/45","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmruntimes/ci.docker","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmruntimes/ci.docker/issues/45/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmruntimes/ci.docker/issues/45/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ibmruntimes/ci.docker/issues/45/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ibmruntimes/ci.docker/issues/45","id":361130157,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNjExMzAxNTc=","number":45,"title":"support of UseContainerSupport flag in the s390 architecture","user":{"login":"lgrateau","id":24404215,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI0NDA0MjE1","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/24404215?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau","html_url":"https://github.com/lgrateau","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/lgrateau/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2018-09-18T04:21:07Z","updated_at":"2018-09-26T15:15:23Z","closed_at":"2018-09-26T15:15:23Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"It's seems the flag -XX:+UseContainerSupport is not taken into account for the s390x/ibmjava architecture.\r\nThis leads to OOM exceptions that kill the container. The other architecture amd64 and ppa64le work correctly.\r\nMy investigation is that the memory computation inside the jre ibm docker image for S390x is not correct. (Same behavior that we have previously without this flag set in the ibm jre docker \r\nimage).\r\n\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"dinogun"}}