{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IAmPicard/StarTrekTimelinesSpreadsheet/issues/195","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IAmPicard/StarTrekTimelinesSpreadsheet","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IAmPicard/StarTrekTimelinesSpreadsheet/issues/195/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IAmPicard/StarTrekTimelinesSpreadsheet/issues/195/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IAmPicard/StarTrekTimelinesSpreadsheet/issues/195/events","html_url":"https://github.com/IAmPicard/StarTrekTimelinesSpreadsheet/issues/195","id":368473533,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNjg0NzM1MzM=","number":195,"title":"Option for voyage recommendation calculations to be balanced or weighted","user":{"login":"SodPen1","id":43949922,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjQzOTQ5OTIy","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/43949922?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1","html_url":"https://github.com/SodPen1","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/SodPen1/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2018-10-10T02:52:37Z","updated_at":"2018-10-11T16:10:23Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**\r\nNot related to a problem.  \r\n\r\n**Describe the solution you'd like**\r\nDepending on the intent and goal of individual voyages, sometimes it's better to go with a balanced approach and sometimes it's better to go with a weighted approach when deciding upon crew composition.  \r\n\r\nIdeally, what I'd like to see in the application is a checkbox option included alongside the \"include active crew\" option for \"calculate weighted.\"  When left unchecked, the application would calculate the best crew and recommend exactly as it does now, which is the balanced approach (all six disciplines given equal weight).  When checked, the application would calculate the balanced recommendations, then determine the weakest of the four non-priority disciplines, then sacrifice the crew in those two slots, replacing them with the two crew that would bolster the primary discipline, then recommend a 12-crew compliment based on that composition.  For extra tweaking, subset weighted options for bolstering primary discipline, secondary discipline, or both could be included. \r\n\r\n**Describe alternatives you've considered**\r\nAt present, when I want to run a weighted voyage, I have to take the balanced recommendation and then manually drop and replace the crew from the weakest discipline and launch the voyage manually within the game.  I've considered continuing to do that, and decided that it's a quality of life feature that I'd really like to see in the application natively.\r\n\r\n**Additional context**\r\nN/A\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IAmPicard/StarTrekTimelinesSpreadsheet/issues/comments/429016746","html_url":"https://github.com/IAmPicard/StarTrekTimelinesSpreadsheet/issues/195#issuecomment-429016746","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/IAmPicard/StarTrekTimelinesSpreadsheet/issues/195","id":429016746,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyOTAxNjc0Ng==","user":{"login":"Gryphonsdream","id":37913328,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjM3OTEzMzI4","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/37913328?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream","html_url":"https://github.com/Gryphonsdream","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/Gryphonsdream/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-10-11T16:10:23Z","updated_at":"2018-10-11T16:10:23Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"i have to concure with @paulbilnoski with one minor alternate\r\nthat might cover the trick thoe teknicaly all ready covered sort of\r\n* calculate to a set number of hours adding in refills as needed with expected Dil cost calculated and giving way a to over run. \r\n* perhaps a switch to keep your top shuttle crews out of the calculation.\r\n          ** i should note that as you dont know what your shuttles will need untill you open them this gets tricky and can sevearly limit your use list leaving crew just sitting while you are waiting for every hing to finish. example\r\n          ** \"sure Mirror Picard just sit around for the next 12 hours because i thought you might be needed for a shuttle. oops my bad, i guess you were not needed after all\"\r\n          ** not  very likely senario but i think you get my point.\r\npresently when i see a crew pop up in my voyage list i realy dont want to use, i just add their name to the DoNotUse list and recalculate, ussualy with little change in time calculation (my worst loss was 40 minutes), but other wise i have found it more than amicable.\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"Gryphonsdream"}}