{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/issues/6","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SAP/jenkins-pipelines","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/issues/6/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/issues/6/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/issues/6/events","html_url":"https://github.com/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/pull/6","id":282457025,"number":6,"title":"Add support for new configuration framework wrt neoDeploy","user":{"login":"marcusholl","id":1853183,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/1853183?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl","html_url":"https://github.com/marcusholl","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":722910182,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/labels/question","name":"question","color":"cc317c","default":true}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2017-12-15T15:11:36Z","updated_at":"2018-02-14T14:30:52Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/pulls/6","html_url":"https://github.com/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/pull/6","diff_url":"https://github.com/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/pull/6.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/pull/6.patch"},"body":"This change is supposed to be backward compatible."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/issues/comments/365624058","html_url":"https://github.com/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/pull/6#issuecomment-365624058","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/SAP/jenkins-pipelines/issues/6","id":365624058,"user":{"login":"marcusholl","id":1853183,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/1853183?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl","html_url":"https://github.com/marcusholl","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/marcusholl/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-02-14T14:30:52Z","updated_at":"2018-02-14T14:30:52Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"@1084565 @alejandraferreirovidal : We know about issue with validation e.g. what happens if\r\n* parts of the pipeline runs inside docker images\r\n* parts of the pipeline runs on nodes instead on Jenkins master\r\n* parts of the pipeline are somehow switched off.\r\n\r\nNow we move our code so that it is able to use also the new configuration framework (for the sake of backward compatibility we take the old one still into account). But with this we have also to update the early parts of our pipeline so that the new config framework is taken into account also here.\r\n\r\n@1084565 The question is now - in the light of the issues mentioned above - how do we deal with the validation at all? Is it important to keep it - despite the the issues we know. Or should we remove it? Some guidance - maybe based on customer feedback - is appreciated."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"marcusholl"}}