{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/etcd-io/etcd/issues/10291","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/etcd-io/etcd","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/etcd-io/etcd/issues/10291/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/etcd-io/etcd/issues/10291/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/etcd-io/etcd/issues/10291/events","html_url":"https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/issues/10291","id":386090818,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzODYwOTA4MTg=","number":10291,"title":"leaseId keepalive but key lost without case","user":{"login":"leadDirec","id":26377266,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI2Mzc3MjY2","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/26377266?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec","html_url":"https://github.com/leadDirec","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/leadDirec/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-11-30T08:46:29Z","updated_at":"2018-11-30T08:46:29Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"In a production environment, it is found that using a different key to perform a keepAlive on the same leaseId will cause a key to be lost without cause. What is the reason?"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"leadDirec"}}