{"push_id":2894036177,"size":1,"distinct_size":1,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"bcdb2f20a701bb9f3a16aba2b34b954ebb8755e2","before":"604f30e319ea66d97d632a1191684a0540b69afe","commits":[{"sha":"bcdb2f20a701bb9f3a16aba2b34b954ebb8755e2","author":{"name":"jraghuvir","email":"54c18caaa57837006abd16b1a1e933aa6f9a3d36@users.noreply.github.com"},"message":"removed na.rm during aggregation\n\nI had earlier used na.rm when doing aggregation by day. This means that the day on which there was no observation became 0 instead of NA. This brought my median and mean down and it is not correct as no observation days should be simply ignored, not replaced by 0. (note: This is not to be confused with imput which is done later in the code.)","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/jraghuvir/RepData_PeerAssessment1/commits/bcdb2f20a701bb9f3a16aba2b34b954ebb8755e2"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"jraghuvir"}}