{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/mnx/issues/97","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/mnx","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/mnx/issues/97/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/mnx/issues/97/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/w3c/mnx/issues/97/events","html_url":"https://github.com/w3c/mnx/issues/97","id":313125575,"number":97,"title":"Mapping parts to staves","user":{"login":"clnoel","id":6453511,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/6453511?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel","html_url":"https://github.com/clnoel","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/clnoel/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-04-10T23:40:17Z","updated_at":"2018-04-10T23:40:17Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"I mentioned this in #57, but I think it needs its own issue, so we can talk about it separately.\r\n\r\nIn many pieces, the mapping of parts to stavesis very straight forward. One staff (or geand staff) = One part.\r\n\r\nHowever, there are cases when this is not true. Usually, the goal was probably to save paper, but in some cases I'm sure it actually improves readability. In particular, I recall a number of instances from my past in a SATB choir where my alto part was sometimes written in unison with sopranos, written as a chord with the soprano part, written downstem against the sopranos' upstem part, or written on its own staff. Sometimes all four modes would be used in the same piece. \r\n\r\nConceptually, I would consider my alto part to be a `<part>` and its location on the staves to be a layout decision, but I'm not sure how we would represent that. It's also possible that we need to get further on #57 before we can take up this issue!\r\n\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"clnoel"}}