{"push_id":2510736340,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"c00ef6ac023057b01075c28d1cc0c1f067decc4e","before":"03739aae87f333dbf9c047e554da8477cbfc8a16","commits":[{"sha":"75e6a5360b054d072cc7f697251a378458679d28","author":{"name":"Christian Grobmeier","email":"bb0b6647e93b6fb3593e649f301d6c4b49990a8a@grobmeier.de"},"message":"classes with only static methods should have a private constructor\n\nStill, the question is why all the static is needed. It's usually a better idea to make this class non-static. However, if there are reasons, please add a private constructor so accidents are avoided.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/wildbit/postmark-java/commits/75e6a5360b054d072cc7f697251a378458679d28"},{"sha":"c00ef6ac023057b01075c28d1cc0c1f067decc4e","author":{"name":"Igor Balos","email":"8db7e97e0065cd58ccf3e14c4c815a45d14fbb34@gmail.com"},"message":"Merge pull request #5 from grobmeier/patch-1\n\nclasses with only static methods should have a private constructor","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/wildbit/postmark-java/commits/c00ef6ac023057b01075c28d1cc0c1f067decc4e"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ibalosh"}}