{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UniversalDependencies/UD_French-Sequoia/issues/4","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UniversalDependencies/UD_French-Sequoia","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UniversalDependencies/UD_French-Sequoia/issues/4/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UniversalDependencies/UD_French-Sequoia/issues/4/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/UniversalDependencies/UD_French-Sequoia/issues/4/events","html_url":"https://github.com/UniversalDependencies/UD_French-Sequoia/issues/4","id":343396228,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNDMzOTYyMjg=","number":4,"title":"Indirect object","user":{"login":"rafael75012","id":24861889,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI0ODYxODg5","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/24861889?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012","html_url":"https://github.com/rafael75012","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rafael75012/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-07-22T10:51:54Z","updated_at":"2018-07-22T10:51:54Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"The UD guide defines indirect object as \"a nominal which corresponds to a dative object\", I don't understand why these two examples are analyzed with **iobj** in Sequoia UD : \r\n > où <--**iobj**--ils se trouvent\r\n> n'y<--**iobj**--résidaient pas\r\n\r\nShouldn't it be **obl:arg**? Or the definition should be modified...\r\n\r\nThe UD guide also stipulates \"In general, if there is just one object, it should be labeled **obj** regardless of the morphological case or semantic role\", but we can find examples like :  \r\n> rien ne lui <--**iobj**--échappe\r\n> il vous <--**iobj**--sera administré\r\n\r\nin which no other object is present, but the object is still analyzed **iobj**.\r\n\r\nThere is also this analysis with **iobj** that is problematic : \r\n> escargots qu'elle préparait --**iobj**-->elle-même\r\n\r\nIsn't it a typical **dislocated**?\r\n\r\n\r\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"rafael75012"}}