{"push_id":2708579966,"size":2,"distinct_size":2,"ref":"refs/heads/master","head":"b61f8ea91bb724e0f87df252487c44cf08f54ac0","before":"bd06e7cbb565dd00e505b7bea443db92519a3342","commits":[{"sha":"cf2f02299f1524a064ddd31878c46902a2c0d291","author":{"name":"Justin Mcgowen","email":"e38ded97e9afb9a378cb58b3fb389eaac14ab874@gmail.com"},"message":"Think new azimuth noise is now incorporated into non-stripmap outputs. Also documented an error I ran into.\n\nSame could probably apply to stripmaps, though I don't think the additional data points would help much. Don't have a stripmap with azimuth noise. Hopefully there's only ever one vector in azimuth noise, not sure how things would work otherwise. Also don't know how to verify this noise is better, if it even is - might be easier to just keep the old version.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/justmcgowen/sarpy/commits/cf2f02299f1524a064ddd31878c46902a2c0d291"},{"sha":"b61f8ea91bb724e0f87df252487c44cf08f54ac0","author":{"name":"Justin Mcgowen","email":"e38ded97e9afb9a378cb58b3fb389eaac14ab874@gmail.com"},"message":"Reverted azimuth noise fitting because the function is small and apparently cycloid shaped, which is hard to fit.","distinct":true,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/justmcgowen/sarpy/commits/b61f8ea91bb724e0f87df252487c44cf08f54ac0"}]}
{"actor":{"display_login":"justmcgowen"}}