{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/325","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/325/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/325/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/325/events","html_url":"https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/325","id":294155271,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUyOTQxNTUyNzE=","number":325,"title":"ROCm RX VEGA hash rates for Cryptonight (linux vs windows)","user":{"login":"rhlug","id":32407315,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjMyNDA3MzE1","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/32407315?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug","html_url":"https://github.com/rhlug","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rhlug/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":639438449,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw2Mzk0Mzg0NDk=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/labels/Bug_Performance_issue","name":"Bug_Performance_issue","color":"d93f0b","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":120,"created_at":"2018-02-03T23:44:51Z","updated_at":"2018-06-12T08:48:09Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"Going to start a new issue in hopes to find a solution to the performance of cryptonight mining on linux under ROCm, as we continue to lag behind the windows aug 23rd blockchain drivers by 35%.\r\n\r\n### \r\n\r\nGPUs - RX Vega 64\r\n\r\nRunning Aug 23 blockchain drivers on windows, I see 1900h cryptonight, and 39Mh ethash.\r\nRunning ROCm 1.7 on ubuntu, I see 1250h cryptonight, and 39Mh ethash.\r\n\r\nSo the fact that I can get like rates on ethash means the opencl stack is just as good as windows.\r\n\r\nI gave windows 64GB of virtual memory and ubuntu 64GB of swap. Tested amdkfd.noretry 1 and 0.\r\n\r\nAny other recommendations on things to try?\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/comments/396514825","html_url":"https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/325#issuecomment-396514825","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/325","id":396514825,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NjUxNDgyNQ==","user":{"login":"uentity","id":71352,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjcxMzUy","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/71352?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity","html_url":"https://github.com/uentity","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/uentity/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-06-12T08:48:09Z","updated_at":"2018-06-12T08:48:09Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"Do somebody have any success in launching `xmr-stak` with `cryptonight7` algo on top of ROCm stack? Despite that my Vega 64 is now successfully detected (thanks to weakened PCIe atomics requirement in 1.8) miner is actually not mining anything (no single valid result).\r\n\r\nThere are no errors, OpenCL code compiles fine, but it's resulting size is less than 300 Kb and it produces no useful work. For comparison, size of \"valid\" compiled OpenCL binary is ~ 3 Mb (compiled using amdgpu-pro stack and working fine)."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"uentity"}}