{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmar/cppcheck/issues/1318","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmar/cppcheck","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmar/cppcheck/issues/1318/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmar/cppcheck/issues/1318/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmar/cppcheck/issues/1318/events","html_url":"https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/pull/1318","id":342594814,"node_id":"MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjAyNDU2Nzk4","number":1318,"title":"Add isSameExpression to valueflow analysis","user":{"login":"pfultz2","id":1306044,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjEzMDYwNDQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/1306044?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2","html_url":"https://github.com/pfultz2","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/pfultz2/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":4,"created_at":"2018-07-19T06:27:50Z","updated_at":"2018-07-22T15:41:11Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmar/cppcheck/pulls/1318","html_url":"https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/pull/1318","diff_url":"https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/pull/1318.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/pull/1318.patch"},"body":"Check for same expressions in valueflow analysis."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmar/cppcheck/issues/comments/406875924","html_url":"https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/pull/1318#issuecomment-406875924","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/danmar/cppcheck/issues/1318","id":406875924,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNjg3NTkyNA==","user":{"login":"danmar","id":60195,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjYwMTk1","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/60195?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar","html_url":"https://github.com/danmar","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danmar/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-07-22T15:41:11Z","updated_at":"2018-07-22T15:41:11Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"> Ah sorry, so we dont do messages for same expression if the value is known, instead we rely on the condition is always true/false check.\r\n\r\nThe warning message should say that the expressions are the same. in my opinion, I don't think the alwaysTrueFalse check should be used for this."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"danmar"}}