{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stsp/dosemu2/issues/571","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stsp/dosemu2","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stsp/dosemu2/issues/571/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stsp/dosemu2/issues/571/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stsp/dosemu2/issues/571/events","html_url":"https://github.com/stsp/dosemu2/pull/571","id":300456270,"number":571,"title":"Dpmi kvm streamline","user":{"login":"bartoldeman","id":10634630,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/10634630?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman","html_url":"https://github.com/bartoldeman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":5,"created_at":"2018-02-27T01:08:29Z","updated_at":"2018-03-02T21:18:28Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stsp/dosemu2/pulls/571","html_url":"https://github.com/stsp/dosemu2/pull/571","diff_url":"https://github.com/stsp/dosemu2/pull/571.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/stsp/dosemu2/pull/571.patch"},"body":"I managed to make DPMI+KVM behave more similar to native DPMI with respect to control flow.\r\nThis way dpmi_thr() is used in both cases, only signals are not used.\r\n\r\nI assumed that it's ok to simply keep the FPU state inside KVM all the time with no explicit save and restore; as far as I can see DOSEMU does not attempt to keep a per-client FPU state. Let me know if I understood that wrongly."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stsp/dosemu2/issues/comments/370055242","html_url":"https://github.com/stsp/dosemu2/pull/571#issuecomment-370055242","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/stsp/dosemu2/issues/571","id":370055242,"user":{"login":"bartoldeman","id":10634630,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/10634630?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman","html_url":"https://github.com/bartoldeman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/bartoldeman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-03-02T21:18:28Z","updated_at":"2018-03-02T21:18:28Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"Please check kvm.c: return value of dpmi_fault is important. I will push a new set with more smaller patches."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"bartoldeman"}}