{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools/issues/55","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools/issues/55/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools/issues/55/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools/issues/55/events","html_url":"https://github.com/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools/issues/55","id":304873546,"number":55,"title":"Add capability to recalculate JEC's for both MC and data in post-processor","user":{"login":"scooperstein","id":1993967,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/1993967?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein","html_url":"https://github.com/scooperstein","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/scooperstein/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":15,"created_at":"2018-03-13T17:58:24Z","updated_at":"2018-05-17T13:48:29Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"It would be very useful if for example in python/postprocessing/modules/jme/jetmetUncertainties.py there was an option to recalculate the JEC's.  That way if the JEC's are updated one could just rerun the post-processor instead of reproducing NanoAOD. This module would have to run on both MC and data, for data there would need to be some option such that only the nominal value is calculated and it does not attempt to add uncertainties."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools/issues/comments/389872426","html_url":"https://github.com/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools/issues/55#issuecomment-389872426","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/cms-nanoAOD/nanoAOD-tools/issues/55","id":389872426,"user":{"login":"arizzi","id":5022358,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/5022358?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi","html_url":"https://github.com/arizzi","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/arizzi/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-05-17T13:48:29Z","updated_at":"2018-05-17T13:48:29Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"#58 implemented it"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"arizzi"}}