{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Azure/azure-storage-net/issues/629","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Azure/azure-storage-net","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Azure/azure-storage-net/issues/629/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Azure/azure-storage-net/issues/629/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Azure/azure-storage-net/issues/629/events","html_url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-storage-net/issues/629","id":295697744,"number":629,"title":"\"Use RequestResult.ErrorCode instead\"","user":{"login":"IlyaGrebnov","id":773346,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/773346?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov","html_url":"https://github.com/IlyaGrebnov","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/IlyaGrebnov/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2018-02-08T23:05:49Z","updated_at":"2018-02-10T18:05:47Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"MEMBER","body":"Why ErrorCode was marked as obsolete? Why introduce breaking change for such minor detail?\r\n\r\nI am working on a library which depends on Azure storage library and today consumers of my library are free to choose any version 6.x to 8.x version to link (with assembly redirect). Now I would need to use new property making it impossible for consumer of my library to use any version < 9.0\r\n\r\nStorage team, why introduce breaking change for such minor detail? Is any functional issue with it? Looks like pretty unnecessary cosmetic change. \r\n\r\nStorage team I urge you to correct this nonsense with 9.0.1 release:\r\n1. Remote Absolute attribute.\r\n2. Keep the ErrorCode property on RequestResult but let it be a proxy for (RequestInformation.ErrorCode)\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Azure/azure-storage-net/issues/comments/364676923","html_url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-storage-net/issues/629#issuecomment-364676923","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/Azure/azure-storage-net/issues/629","id":364676923,"user":{"login":"erezvani1529","id":7978554,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/7978554?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529","html_url":"https://github.com/erezvani1529","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/erezvani1529/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-02-10T18:05:46Z","updated_at":"2018-02-10T18:05:46Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"Apologies if I was not clear enough. I meant the regression(bug) you reported is specific to table service and we have decided to remove the \"obsolete\" tag for now with a release next week.\r\n\r\nAlso for clarification, the ErrorCode is added to the RequestResult mainly due to requests by many users who complained about the discoverability of it. (cc: @seguler )\r\n\r\nHope this clears the confusion.\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\nElham"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"erezvani1529"}}