{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/5269","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/5269/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/5269/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/5269/events","html_url":"https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/5269","id":330212793,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMzAyMTI3OTM=","number":5269,"title":"Feature: Standard electrode position computation","user":{"login":"sappelhoff","id":9084751,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjkwODQ3NTE=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/9084751?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff","html_url":"https://github.com/sappelhoff","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sappelhoff/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":25,"created_at":"2018-06-07T10:31:26Z","updated_at":"2018-06-18T11:44:31Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"I have recently finished a little pet project of mine, in which I compute all 345 standard EEG electrode positions of the 10-05 (5%) system. Although that's nothing new per se and the data are available e.g., from [Robert Oostenveld](http://robertoostenveld.nl/electrode/), I thought that it would be nice for MNE to have the actual computations, which then yield the data to be used as part of the code. Currently, there are only a bunch of data files in [`mne/channels/data`](https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/tree/master/mne/channels/data) which is not as transparent as the code would be.\r\n\r\n... as I started to hint at on [gitter](https://gitter.im/mne-tools/mne-python) yesterday, this also relates to the issues about montages, layouts, and digitization, see #5190 #3987\r\n\r\nWhat do you think?\r\n\r\nThis is the [repository](https://github.com/sappelhoff/eeg_positions) containing the computations I am talking about.\r\n\r\nHere is a [short notebook](https://gist.github.com/sappelhoff/d6eba442088c0b3528345e53dad278b1) showing an initial integration with MNE.\r\n\r\nAnd a plot:\r\n![screenshot from 2018-06-07 12-23-45](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9084751/41094203-c0bb02da-6a4d-11e8-856e-ba1e86c8c03e.png)\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/comments/398027273","html_url":"https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/5269#issuecomment-398027273","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/mne-tools/mne-python/issues/5269","id":398027273,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5ODAyNzI3Mw==","user":{"login":"cbrnr","id":4377312,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjQzNzczMTI=","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/4377312?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr","html_url":"https://github.com/cbrnr","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/cbrnr/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-06-18T11:44:30Z","updated_at":"2018-06-18T11:44:30Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"PS: Just to make sure, you do know that `read_raw_xxx(fname, montage=\"standard_1005\")` already works, right? The argument needs to be an existing montage file name."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"cbrnr"}}