{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/julianhyde/sqlline/issues/163","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/julianhyde/sqlline","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/julianhyde/sqlline/issues/163/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/julianhyde/sqlline/issues/163/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/julianhyde/sqlline/issues/163/events","html_url":"https://github.com/julianhyde/sqlline/issues/163","id":367370967,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNjczNzA5Njc=","number":163,"title":"Upgrade checkstyle to being able to work with java 8 syntax","user":{"login":"snuyanzin","id":403174,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjQwMzE3NA==","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/403174?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin","html_url":"https://github.com/snuyanzin","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/snuyanzin/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-10-05T21:14:59Z","updated_at":"2018-10-05T21:14:59Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"Looks like current maven-checkstyle-plugin and checkstyle do not support method references.\r\nI found the similar issues in Calcite https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2139 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1963\r\nTo have it supported need to upgrade to 3.0.0 checkstyle plugin and 6.18+ checkstyle\r\n\r\nAfter such upgrade reformat is required (Currently I see 300+ warnings).\r\n\r\nTo be on the same page what is better with such number of warnings? Rules changing or reformat existing code?\r\n\r\nAs I see Calcite approach the code fix should be right way"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"snuyanzin"}}