{"action":"closed","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/onboarding-meta/issues/21","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/onboarding-meta","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/onboarding-meta/issues/21/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/onboarding-meta/issues/21/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/onboarding-meta/issues/21/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ropensci/onboarding-meta/issues/21","id":262157712,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUyNjIxNTc3MTI=","number":21,"title":"Submitters not using reviews","user":{"login":"sckott","id":577668,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjU3NzY2OA==","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/577668?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott","html_url":"https://github.com/sckott","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sckott/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":829959110,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWw4Mjk5NTkxMTA=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ropensci/onboarding-meta/labels/process","name":"process","color":"4a50ba","default":false}],"state":"closed","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":7,"created_at":"2017-10-02T17:16:26Z","updated_at":"2018-06-27T06:08:31Z","closed_at":"2018-06-27T06:08:31Z","author_association":"MEMBER","body":"What do we do if submitters don't want to make changes that reviewers/editors suggest?  \r\n\r\nI think we have to be firm about this.  If submitter gives good reasons for not making changes reviewers/editors suggest that's fine (and it should be item by item response too), but if there's a blanket statement that they just don't want to make the changes, I think we need to reject the submission. \r\n\r\nI think this scenario could arise from a submitter simply wanting to be under rOpenSci but not wanting to do the work. "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"maelle"}}