{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dplyr/issues/3484","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dplyr","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dplyr/issues/3484/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dplyr/issues/3484/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dplyr/issues/3484/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr/issues/3484","id":311804374,"number":3484,"title":"Add option for NOLOCK against MS SQL Server","user":{"login":"mkirzon","id":5666220,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/5666220?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon","html_url":"https://github.com/mkirzon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mkirzon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":213548409,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dplyr/labels/database","name":"database","color":"eeeeee","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-04-05T23:38:21Z","updated_at":"2018-04-06T15:42:48Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"When using dplyr directly against databases, it'd be helpful to have a NOLOCK options when configuring table connections. \r\n\r\nThis is a common practice in MSSQL to ensure complex queries don't lock the database for other read/writes. The tradeoff is that the read may be uncommited so this should be a toggleable option. "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dplyr/issues/comments/379293382","html_url":"https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr/issues/3484#issuecomment-379293382","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tidyverse/dplyr/issues/3484","id":379293382,"user":{"login":"edgararuiz","id":7875923,"avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/7875923?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz","html_url":"https://github.com/edgararuiz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/edgararuiz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-04-06T15:42:48Z","updated_at":"2018-04-06T15:42:48Z","author_association":"NONE","body":"@mkirzon - Good point\r\n@batpigandme - Would you mind adding the `feature` tag as well.  Thanks!"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"edgararuiz"}}