{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nkdAgility/vsts-sync-migration/issues/116","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nkdAgility/vsts-sync-migration","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nkdAgility/vsts-sync-migration/issues/116/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nkdAgility/vsts-sync-migration/issues/116/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nkdAgility/vsts-sync-migration/issues/116/events","html_url":"https://github.com/nkdAgility/vsts-sync-migration/issues/116","id":310847637,"number":116,"title":"ReflectedWorkitemID Not Getting Populated on Source with 7.5.31 (Seems broken since 7.5.26)","user":{"login":"klc126","id":30442341,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/30442341?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126","html_url":"https://github.com/klc126","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/klc126/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":9,"created_at":"2018-04-03T13:56:13Z","updated_at":"2018-04-05T23:34:01Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"I updated a few weeks ago to version 7.5.29 and since I have upgraded, the ReflectedWorkItemID source field is not being populated. I haven't changed any of my JSON files (have been running them without errors for months).  The target ReflectedWorkItemID does get populated, but the source does not.  \r\n\r\nAnyone else experiencing the same issue?\r\n\r\nMy JSON files are pretty simple - take a look below:\r\n\r\n{\r\n    \"TelemetryEnableTrace\": true,\r\n    \"Source\": {\r\n        \"Collection\": \"http://xxxxxxxx/tfs/xxxxxxxxxxxx/\",\r\n        \"Name\": \"Financial Inventory Management\"\r\n    },\r\n    \"Target\": {\r\n        \"Collection\": \"http://xxxxxxxxxx/tfs/xxxxxxxxxxxxx/\",\r\n        \"Name\": \"DW Inventory Management\"\r\n  },\r\n  \"ReflectedWorkItemIDFieldName\": \"TfsMigrationTool.ReflectedWorkItemId\",\r\n  \"WorkItemTypeDefinition\": {\r\n    \"Bug\": \"Bug\",\r\n    \"Epic\": \"Epic\",\r\n    \"Feature\": \"Feature\",\r\n    \"Product Backlog Item\": \"Product Backlog Item\",\r\n    \"Shared Parameter\": \"Shared Parameter\",\r\n    \"Shared Steps\": \"Shared Steps\",\r\n    \"Task\": \"Task\",\r\n    \"Test Case\": \"Test Case\",\r\n    \"Test Plan\": \"Test Plan\",\r\n    \"Test Suite\": \"Test Suite\",\r\n     \"Code Review Request\": \"Code Review Request\",\r\n     \"Code Review Response\": \"Code Review Response\",\r\n      \"Feedback Request\": \"Feedback Request\",\r\n      \"Feedback Response\": \"Feedback Response\",\r\n      \"Impediment\": \"Impediment\"\r\n  },\r\n  \r\n    \"Processors\": \r\n    [\r\n        {\r\n      \"ObjectType\": \"VstsSyncMigrator.Engine.Configuration.Processing.NodeStructuresMigrationConfig\",\r\n      \"Enabled\": true,\r\n      \"PrefixProjectToNodes\": false\r\n    },\r\n    {\r\n      \"ObjectType\": \"VstsSyncMigrator.Engine.Configuration.Processing.WorkItemRevisionReplayMigrationConfig\",\r\n      \"Enabled\": true,\r\n      \"UpdateCreatedDate\": true,\r\n      \"UpdateCreatedBy\": true,\r\n      \"UpdateSoureReflectedId\": true,\r\n      \"PrefixProjectToNodes\" : false,\r\n\t   \"QueryBit\": \"AND [TfsMigrationTool.ReflectedWorkItemId] = '' AND [System.WorkItemType] IN ('Feature', 'Bug', 'Product Backlog Item', 'Epic', 'Task', 'Shared Parameter', 'Shared Steps', 'Test Case', 'Test Plan', 'Test Suite', 'Code Review Request', 'Code Review Response', 'Feedback Request', 'Feedback Response', 'Impediment') AND [System.Tags] CONTAINS 'FIM'\"\r\n\t},\r\n\t{\r\n\t   \"ObjectType\": \"VstsSyncMigrator.Engine.Configuration.Processing.LinkMigrationConfig\",\r\n\t\t\"Enabled\": true,\r\n\t\t\"QueryBit\": \"AND [System.Tags] CONTAINS 'FIM' AND ([System.ExternalLinkCount] > 0 OR [System.RelatedLinkCount] > 0)\"\r\n\t},\r\n\t{\r\n\t\t\"ObjectType\": \"VstsSyncMigrator.Engine.Configuration.Processing.AttachementExportMigrationConfig\",\r\n\t\t\"Enabled\": true,\r\n\t\t\"QueryBit\": \"AND [System.Tags] CONTAINS 'FIM' AND [System.AttachedFileCount] > 0\"\r\n\t},\r\n\t{\r\n\t\t\"ObjectType\": \"VstsSyncMigrator.Engine.Configuration.Processing.AttachementImportMigrationConfig\",\r\n\t\t\"Enabled\": true,\r\n\t    \"QueryBit\": \"AND [System.Tags] CONTAINS 'FIM'\"\r\n        }\r\n    ]\r\n}"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nkdAgility/vsts-sync-migration/issues/comments/379107009","html_url":"https://github.com/nkdAgility/vsts-sync-migration/issues/116#issuecomment-379107009","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/nkdAgility/vsts-sync-migration/issues/116","id":379107009,"user":{"login":"sinairv","id":1077764,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/1077764?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv","html_url":"https://github.com/sinairv","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/sinairv/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-04-05T23:34:01Z","updated_at":"2018-04-05T23:34:01Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"@klc126 Can you please verify if you add `SourceReflectedWorkItemIdFieldName` and give it the exact same value as the value for `ReflectedWorkItemIDFieldName` will it work? \r\nThe reason I introduced this field was to support for different process names in source and destination environments. Probably I should have defaulted it to `ReflectedWorkItemIDFieldName` if it doesn't exist."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"sinairv"}}