{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/c/issues/239","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/c","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/c/issues/239/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/c/issues/239/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/c/issues/239/events","html_url":"https://github.com/exercism/c/issues/239","id":271227825,"number":239,"title":"Static analysis","user":{"login":"wolf99","id":281700,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/281700?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99","html_url":"https://github.com/wolf99","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":132353742,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/c/labels/help%20wanted","name":"help wanted","color":"159818","default":true},{"id":577006879,"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/c/labels/pinned","name":"pinned","color":"bfd4f2","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":10,"created_at":"2017-11-04T21:28:30Z","updated_at":"2018-02-14T16:07:06Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"Should we add static analysis to the CI tasks to analyse each implementation?\r\n\r\nAs it is all the exercise implementations work just fine -- according to the tests that have been written. Static analysis would add a second layer of \"correctness\" checking, for the current exercises and also for any exercises added into the future. So far I don't think there is any specific _need_ for this it just occurred to me that it might be a nice-to-have thing. Downsides might be potentially increased maintenance in the case of any major change to the track structure.\r\n\r\nThoughts?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/c/issues/comments/365655359","html_url":"https://github.com/exercism/c/issues/239#issuecomment-365655359","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/exercism/c/issues/239","id":365655359,"user":{"login":"wolf99","id":281700,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/281700?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99","html_url":"https://github.com/wolf99","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/wolf99/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-02-14T16:07:06Z","updated_at":"2018-02-14T16:07:06Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"I've recently started a new job and not had as much time to look at this as I'd like. It may be some time but I would still like to play with this and get it working at some stage. If anyone else is interested feel free to contribute suggestions or PRs!"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"wolf99"}}