{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/e2nIEE/pandapower/issues/146","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/e2nIEE/pandapower","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/e2nIEE/pandapower/issues/146/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/e2nIEE/pandapower/issues/146/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/e2nIEE/pandapower/issues/146/events","html_url":"https://github.com/e2nIEE/pandapower/issues/146","id":352423737,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNTI0MjM3Mzc=","number":146,"title":"STATCOM, UPFC and capacitor banks in pp","user":{"login":"thomaswolgast","id":41008623,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjQxMDA4NjIz","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/41008623?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast","html_url":"https://github.com/thomaswolgast","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/thomaswolgast/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"friederikemeier","id":11868107,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjExODY4MTA3","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/11868107?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier","html_url":"https://github.com/friederikemeier","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"assignees":[{"login":"friederikemeier","id":11868107,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjExODY4MTA3","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/11868107?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier","html_url":"https://github.com/friederikemeier","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false}],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2018-08-21T07:50:47Z","updated_at":"2018-09-10T15:10:19Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"For a voltage control algorithm, I want to implement Static Synchronous Compensators (STATCOM), Unified-Power-Flow-Controller (UPFC) and capacitor banks in a pandapower network. My general question is: what are the best solutions to implement these three elements?\r\n\r\nCapacitor banks seem to be the easiest ones, because of the \"create_shunt_as_capacitor()\" method. But it appears that it is not possible to define a fixed \"vm_pu\". Instead the reactive power \"q_kvar\" is defined and the voltage is a result after power flow calculation. Is it possible to turn this around? To define a fixed \"vm_pu\" and get the \"q_kvar\" as a result? Or would it be the best to use just a Generator with a fixed active power of 0? \r\n\r\nFor the other two I didn't find any prefabricated elements in pp. But again I think that for the STATCOM a simple Generator could be the easiest solution. But maybe these problems occured before and someone did already implement these elements in pandapower? Are there any experiences with this case?\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/e2nIEE/pandapower/issues/comments/419948330","html_url":"https://github.com/e2nIEE/pandapower/issues/146#issuecomment-419948330","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/e2nIEE/pandapower/issues/146","id":419948330,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxOTk0ODMzMA==","user":{"login":"friederikemeier","id":11868107,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjExODY4MTA3","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/11868107?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier","html_url":"https://github.com/friederikemeier","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/friederikemeier/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-09-10T15:10:19Z","updated_at":"2018-09-10T15:10:19Z","author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"Hi, sorry for the late response.\r\nSo, yes, It is in per unit. For one entry of the matrix it is power in per unit divided by voltage in per unit. The unit value for power is 1 MVA by default and can be changed by using the parameter net.sn_kva.\r\nIf you do not change it, you can as well work with it like it was power in MW divided by voltage in per unit. "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"friederikemeier"}}