{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/133","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-class-fields","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/133/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/133/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/133/events","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/133","id":364192448,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNjQxOTI0NDg=","number":133,"title":"Does the FAQ really justify the syntax and its limitations?","user":{"login":"rdking","id":2289634,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjIyODk2MzQ=","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/2289634?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking","html_url":"https://github.com/rdking","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/rdking/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":19,"created_at":"2018-09-26T20:15:52Z","updated_at":"2018-09-28T16:05:39Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"First, don't join in on this conversation unless you've read\r\n\r\n**[The FAQ](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/blob/master/PRIVATE_SYNTAX_FAQ.md)**\r\n\r\nThis thread is to be a discussion on how the considerations of the FAQ affect not only the usability of the language should this proposal become standard, but also how it affects the future extensibility of the language. If you have issues with this proposal that come about because of the FAQ, and you can support that with reasonable examples and use cases, or if you have counter-arguments in support of the FAQ, also with reasonable examples and use cases, **please join in**."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/comments/425484812","html_url":"https://github.com/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/133#issuecomment-425484812","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/tc39/proposal-class-fields/issues/133","id":425484812,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNTQ4NDgxMg==","user":{"login":"ljharb","id":45469,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjQ1NDY5","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/45469?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb","html_url":"https://github.com/ljharb","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ljharb/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-09-28T16:05:39Z","updated_at":"2018-09-28T16:05:39Z","author_association":"MEMBER","body":"Forcing bracket access to a normal property from inside the class is also unacceptable, and would violate almost every common styleguide."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"ljharb"}}