{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/2factorauth/twofactorauth/issues/3162","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/2factorauth/twofactorauth","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/2factorauth/twofactorauth/issues/3162/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/2factorauth/twofactorauth/issues/3162/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/2factorauth/twofactorauth/issues/3162/events","html_url":"https://github.com/2factorauth/twofactorauth/issues/3162","id":318204399,"number":3162,"title":"Question: Marking complex setups or non-standard 2FA methods","user":{"login":"MovGP0","id":83339,"avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/83339?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0","html_url":"https://github.com/MovGP0","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/MovGP0/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":2,"created_at":"2018-04-26T21:32:17Z","updated_at":"2018-05-25T17:57:57Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"It should be possible to mark websites as having implemented 2FA, but have a very complex method of setting it up, or requiring proprietary hardware or software, rather than a standardized method. \r\n\r\nWhat would be the best way to do so? "},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/2factorauth/twofactorauth/issues/comments/392134834","html_url":"https://github.com/2factorauth/twofactorauth/issues/3162#issuecomment-392134834","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/2factorauth/twofactorauth/issues/3162","id":392134834,"user":{"login":"mxxcon","id":847140,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/847140?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon","html_url":"https://github.com/mxxcon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mxxcon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-05-25T17:57:57Z","updated_at":"2018-05-25T17:57:57Z","author_association":"MEMBER","body":"@mporcheron Separate notes page IS the right solution for situations where sites do not provide easy instructions on how to enable 2fa.\r\nWe previously listed all kinds of site-specific 2fa implementations but specifically decided to switch to broad generic categories for the simplicity of contribution, maintainability and readability.\r\nIt sounds like this is a limitations of 1pass where it can not handle use-cases where 2fa is enabled but not integrated into 1pass. They should have a setting where you can tell it that 2fa is enabled but used externally from 1pass."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"mxxcon"}}