{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/doxygen/doxygen/issues/4802","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/doxygen/doxygen","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/doxygen/doxygen/issues/4802/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/doxygen/doxygen/issues/4802/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/doxygen/doxygen/issues/4802/events","html_url":"https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/issues/4802","id":337402603,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzMzc0MDI2MDM=","number":4802,"title":"Java packages that don't directly contain classes are sometimes treated differently (Origin: bugzilla #679991)","user":{"login":"doxygen","id":1300762,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjEzMDA3NjI=","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/1300762?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen","html_url":"https://github.com/doxygen","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/doxygen/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-07-02T07:39:27Z","updated_at":"2018-07-02T07:39:27Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"status RESOLVED severity *normal* in component *general* for *---*\nReported in version *1.7.6.1* on platform *Other*\nAssigned to: Dimitri van Heesch\n\nOn 2012-07-16 08:39:34 +0000, Daniel Kullmann wrote:\n\n> We have a large Java project with many packages that only contain other packages, but no classes. In the package list, some of these packages are written as some::java::package, instead of some.java.package. They are also\n> called \"namespace\" instead of \"package\". I couldn't find a reason for the\n> difference in treatment.\n\nOn 2012-07-16 08:51:16 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:\n\n> Hi Daniel,\n> \n> Can you check if the problem is gone with version 1.8.1.2 (as I recently made some changes in this area). If not, please attach a self-contained example (source+config file in a tar or zip) that shows at least one wrong occurrence.\n\nOn 2012-11-16 21:29:07 +0000, Tobias Mueller wrote:\n\n> Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.\n> Thanks!\n\n"}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"doxygen"}}