{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RasaHQ/rasa_core/issues/211","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RasaHQ/rasa_core","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RasaHQ/rasa_core/issues/211/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RasaHQ/rasa_core/issues/211/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/RasaHQ/rasa_core/issues/211/events","html_url":"https://github.com/RasaHQ/rasa_core/issues/211","id":294557799,"number":211,"title":"increasing max_history vs. epochs ?","user":{"login":"znat","id":3694634,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/3694634?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat","html_url":"https://github.com/znat","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/znat/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-02-05T22:01:19Z","updated_at":"2018-02-05T22:01:19Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"I noticed that as the dialog flow deepens/widens (more branches, more turns), increasing `max_history` or `epochs` both increase accuracy.\r\n\r\nI am trying to understand the implication of both.\r\n\r\nMy understanding, for now, is that increasing `max_history` enriches the model by letting it learn from a longer sequence of dialogue turns (provided examples are long enough), whereas increasing `epochs` improves the memorization of the training and overfits. \r\n\r\nIs that correct? "}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"znat"}}