{"action":"opened","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ESCOMP/ctsm/issues/284","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ESCOMP/ctsm","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ESCOMP/ctsm/issues/284/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ESCOMP/ctsm/issues/284/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/ESCOMP/ctsm/issues/284/events","html_url":"https://github.com/ESCOMP/ctsm/issues/284","id":296912188,"number":284,"title":"Rework handling of negative runoff: make MOSART / RTM responsible for doing this limiting","user":{"login":"billsacks","id":6266741,"avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/6266741?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks","html_url":"https://github.com/billsacks","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/billsacks/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-02-13T22:40:30Z","updated_at":"2018-02-13T22:40:30Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"OWNER","body":"**I'm moving this from a 2015-11-17 comment. I'm not sure if it's still relevant.**\r\n\r\n@swensosc is adding some logic regarding the handling of negative runoff: If this would put VOLR below some spatially-variable threshold, then runoff is being routed directly to the ocean, rather than through the rivers. He is putting this limiter in CLM because it needs a temporal accumulator, which CLM has but RTM / MOSART do not.\r\n\r\nWe (CLM-CMT & Sean) agreed that, long-term, it would be better to make RTM & MOSART responsible for doing this limiting / routing of negative runoff themselves, rather than relying on CLM to figure it out on behalf of the river model."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"billsacks"}}