{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/issues/86","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/issues/86/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/issues/86/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/issues/86/events","html_url":"https://github.com/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/pull/86","id":309763072,"number":86,"title":"Redefine Getter with constraints - otherwise it doesn't compose well.","user":{"login":"LiamGoodacre","id":1189645,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/1189645?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre","html_url":"https://github.com/LiamGoodacre","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":1,"created_at":"2018-03-29T13:51:55Z","updated_at":"2018-03-29T14:04:44Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","pull_request":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/pulls/86","html_url":"https://github.com/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/pull/86","diff_url":"https://github.com/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/pull/86.diff","patch_url":"https://github.com/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/pull/86.patch"},"body":"For https://github.com/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/issues/85"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/issues/comments/377245784","html_url":"https://github.com/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/pull/86#issuecomment-377245784","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/purescript-contrib/purescript-profunctor-lenses/issues/86","id":377245784,"user":{"login":"LiamGoodacre","id":1189645,"avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/1189645?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre","html_url":"https://github.com/LiamGoodacre","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/LiamGoodacre/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-03-29T14:04:44Z","updated_at":"2018-03-29T14:04:44Z","author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"Oh wait, that works with the original `Getter` too.\r\nLooks like the issue is with the synonym being to specific about the index to `Forget`."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"LiamGoodacre"}}