{"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yongman/tidis/issues/34","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yongman/tidis","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yongman/tidis/issues/34/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yongman/tidis/issues/34/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yongman/tidis/issues/34/events","html_url":"https://github.com/yongman/tidis/issues/34","id":358580726,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzNTg1ODA3MjY=","number":34,"title":"Idea/question: would it possible to port some Redis protocol layer code directly","user":{"login":"syang","id":188004,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE4ODAwNA==","avatar_url":"https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/188004?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang","html_url":"https://github.com/syang","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/syang/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":0,"created_at":"2018-09-10T11:26:28Z","updated_at":"2018-09-10T11:40:49Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"NONE","body":"Problem to solve: make sure 100% Redis API supported\r\n\r\nIdea: instead to re-write different API supports, can we port the protocol layer code directly and then use TiKV client code to write the requests to TiKV?"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yongman/tidis/issues/comments/419883759","html_url":"https://github.com/yongman/tidis/issues/34#issuecomment-419883759","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/yongman/tidis/issues/34","id":419883759,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxOTg4Mzc1OQ==","user":{"login":"yongman","id":3875656,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjM4NzU2NTY=","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/3875656?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman","html_url":"https://github.com/yongman","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/yongman/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2018-09-10T11:40:49Z","updated_at":"2018-09-10T11:40:49Z","author_association":"OWNER","body":"Some api will be inefficient according the storage features compare to memory access. eg random commands `RANDOMKEY`.\r\n \r\nAddition, because of the encoding of the user key, different types will have entire keyspace, such as `set key value` and `lpush key value` have the same key name with different type, so we add `delete` for string, and `ldelete` for list.\r\n\r\nAny ideas will be welcomed."}}
{"actor":{"display_login":"yongman"}}